Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  HARSHA $N$ (@harshasns) reported 5 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp @amazonIN @AmazonHelp I reported this issue with your customer care multiple times, they are simple saying sorry we cant do anything as order status already updated as cancelled , we will escalate this issue internally

• 
  Jon Stoddard (@JonMStoddard) reported 5 minutes ago

  The Anatomy of a 2.6x Entry Multiple (Why We Dropped $1.4M in Vanity Volume) Most acquisition searchers panic when they see a business with declining top-line revenue. We saw it as a goldmine. We are currently under a signed LOI to acquire a 42-year-old regional leader in the consumer/retail space. On paper, the top-line dropped from $3.8M to $2.4M over the last three years. A generic broker would say the business is dying. Our underwriting engine showed the exact opposite. The legacy owner spent two years running an aggressive "Amazon marketplace experiment". They bloated the top line, but got absolutely eaten alive by platform taxes—referral fees, mandatory ad spend, and brutal logistics overhead. So, they systematically pulled the plug on Amazon to refocus on their high-margin channels (Retail, Wholesale, and proprietary Web). The mathematical result? * Top-line revenue dropped 38%. * Gross margins expanded from 27% to 43%. * Net Income skyrocketed 82% to $456,000. Because the raw revenue baseline normalized, we locked this asset down under LOI at a 2.6x multiple. Even better? The transaction footprint includes $500,000 of multi-parcel commercial real estate fully baked into the purchase price. We’ve already secured and signed a senior debt term sheet for 76% of the deal with a tier-1 bank. We are currently running hard through final due diligence toward an August closing. If you are an operator, independent sponsor, or credit investor who loves "boring," highly defensive cash-flow engines with massive real estate cushions, let's connect. Drop a comment below or DM me to connect shop.

• 
  Podcast Alpha (@PodcastAlphaX) reported 6 minutes ago

  This is the chart Deutsche Bank buried, and it is the one the operators cannot stop talking about. The five big US hyperscalers now spend more on capex than their combined operating cash flow. Free cash flow is forecast to turn negative by the end of 2026. Ed Zitron @edzitron's teardown of OpenAI: $13 billion of revenue against $34 billion of costs, a $21 billion operating loss, with $150 billion more needed within a year. The rebuttal is just as hard. Jordi Visser @jvisserlabs points to $1.3 trillion of contracted cloud backlog Amazon, Google, and Microsoft cannot yet deliver. Both are true. Real demand, financed by burning more cash than the industry makes. That is not a valuation problem. It is a cash-flow problem.

• 
  Joey Zhuo (@JoeyZhuo777) reported 10 minutes ago

  $MRVL Jensen says it's worth a trillion, the filings say growth to $4 billion Nvidia put $2 billion into Marvell and Jensen threw around trillion-dollar talk, so retail piled in and the stock tripled in two months before giving back a third of it. The question isn't whether the rally was real — it's whether what's left still makes sense at 57 times forward earnings. The bull case runs on three engines, and you need to separate them because they carry very different risk profiles. Engine one is the data center ramp that's already happening. Marvell did $2.42 billion in Q1, data center was 76% of that, and management lifted the full-year guide to $11.5 billion for fiscal 2027 and $16.5 billion the year after. That's 40% growth this year, 45% next year. The beats were tiny — revenue missed by half a percent, EPS by less — so the price move came entirely from guidance, not from the quarter itself. This piece is already in the price. The stock more than doubled because the street re-rated future growth, not because anything surprised in the last three months. If you're buying here, you're not buying a surprise, you're buying the assumption that those guide raises hold up. Engine two is the custom ASIC business, and this is where the real growth lever sits. Marvell pulled in $1.5 billion in ASIC revenue last fiscal year. Management sees that hitting north of $4 billion by fiscal 2028. The customer list is Amazon Trainium, Google Axion, Meta DPU programs, and one unnamed hyperscaler already locked in for 2028 volume. If that 3x in two years actually lands, the multiple starts to make sense. If any of those programs slip or one of the hyperscalers pulls back on custom silicon spending, the math breaks. The risk here isn't technical, it's commercial. Custom ASIC work carries lower gross margins than off-the-shelf merchant silicon, so even if revenue triples, the margin profile compresses unless Marvell has enough scale to offset it. Broadcom is in the same game with better scale and pricing power, so there's no guarantee Marvell holds share or pricing as this market grows. Engine three is the Nvidia partnership, which is the most talked-about and probably the least understood. Nvidia isn't handing Marvell $2 billion out of charity — they're integrating Marvell's custom accelerators and optical connectivity into the NVLink ecosystem. That's a validation of the tech, and it probably gives Marvell some moat in the interconnect layer as AI clusters scale out. But it also makes Marvell dependent on Nvidia's architecture roadmap and their willingness to keep Marvell inside the tent instead of doing it themselves or switching to Broadcom. The agentic AI angle is interesting but speculative. The idea is that when you ask an AI agent a question, it might query a model thousands of times across distributed infrastructure, and every one of those queries runs through Marvell's network interface cards, PCIe retimers, CXL links. The logic holds if agentic AI actually takes off at enterprise scale in the next two years. If it stays mostly experimental, that revenue stream doesn't show up on the timeline the valuation assumes. Marvell sold the automotive Ethernet business to Infineon for $2.5 billion cash, so they're clearly streamlining toward AI and dumping anything that doesn't fit the hyperscaler buildout story. That's the right move if you believe in the TAM, but it also means there's no fallback if data center spending moderates. The valuation math here depends entirely on where you land on fiscal 2028 earnings. The consensus range for that year runs from around $6.18 to over $7. If you take the high end at $7.13 and slap a 40x to 45x multiple on it because growth stays above 40% into 2029 and 2030, you get to around $300 a share, which is 30% above the current post-correction price of $231. That assumes no multiple compression, no margin squeeze from ASIC mix shift, no hyperscaler budget cuts, and no competitive share loss to Broadcom. If any of those assumptions crack, you're looking at a stock trading near 60 times earnings with decelerating growth, and that reprices fast. The trillion-dollar market cap talk is noise. Marvell is a $200 billion company today. To get to a trillion at current valuations, revenue would need to go to something like $20 billion and the market would need to pay 50 times sales, which isn't happening outside of a speculative mania. The real question is whether the path from $11.5 billion this year to $16.5 billion next year to maybe $20 billion-plus in 2029 is credible, and whether the margin structure holds up as the business mix shifts toward lower-margin custom work. I think the direction is right, but the margin for error is thin. If you have a three-to-five-year window and believe hyperscaler spend stays elevated and Nvidia keeps Marvell inside the NVLink stack, there's probably 25% to 35% upside from here over the next year or two. If data center budgets flatten or Broadcom takes more ASIC share, this thing re-rates down to 35x earnings in a hurry and you're sitting on a loss even if the business grows. The analyst consensus price target sits around 9% upside, so most of the street is less optimistic than the bull case laid out here. That spread tells you where the risk sits — it's not in the technology, it's in the execution and the spending environment. Marvell dumped 30% from the June highs because the whole AI semiconductor trade got hit by rotation, not because anything broke in the business. That gives you a better entry than two months ago, but it doesn't change the fact that you're paying a premium multiple for growth that's entirely dependent on a handful of hyperscale customers and one very large partner who could change their mind. If the fiscal 2028 guide holds and the ASIC ramp delivers, this works. If either one slips, the valuation has no cushion. Image source: Seeking Alpha / Danil Sereda

• 
  markie mark (@StartScratchup) reported 10 minutes ago

  @FrancesJatkfc @StockSavvyShay the wild part isn't that Amazon is spending another $100M+ on AI infrastructure. it's that they're doubling down on a product that's spent years raising questions about its economics. sometimes the value isn't in today's P&L. it's in staying in the race.

• 
  Bishal Kumar (@Bishalk612000) reported 11 minutes ago

  @amazonIN @AmazonHelp Please provide the email address or contact for your Escalation Team. Despite multiple calls, my delayed delivery issue remains unresolved. I would like to formally escalate this matter. Order ID: 406-2619838-0161153.

• 
  Insanity Incarnate (@superpsychomode) reported 13 minutes ago

  @nightmothz @pinksartdump This would be harassment as this is not Spindlehorse making the decision but Amazon. Technically fan merch is illegal as you are selling IP without permission. The level of enforcement of these laws depend on the companies and I guess Amazon has decided to crack down

• 
  Leo (@RealPeterLeo) reported 13 minutes ago

  @delcodave312 Also I've been choosing my "Amazon day" instead of next day and it seems to just cause more problems. You'd think giving them more time would reduce problems.

• 
  Katrina 💙 (@Climbkt) reported 15 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp I did try to access it again ( couple of times) and could not get it to work for either of the links. It could be phone signal issues or that the phone has got a bit hot

• 
  Wayne Pinger (@WaynePinger) reported 19 minutes ago

  So while Amazon is replacing a few big box stores with data centers, Elon Musk wants to put data centers in orbit powered by solar: who, besides Bernie and Lizzie, might have a problem with that?

• 
  BlackCat (@Mohave_Rain) reported 19 minutes ago

  @DuchessAlexis @OldVetvp You can get this on Amazon. I installed it on a new and cheap computer. I didn’t have to worry about losing anything when I had to override a bitlocker problem. No dual just Linux. I had to do three hard shutdowns to get past the bitlocker screen. Mint/cinnamon office libre is very similar to to MS office

• 
  ank (@ank1091040) reported 21 minutes ago

  @bezosjaff2 @amazonIN @AmazonHelp received a used laptop sold as new. Your support team confirmed in writing that the item is used, and I submitted all the required proof. the Leadership Team has refused to issue a refund. Please investigate and resolve my case ASAP

• 
  Lola la Chola (@KupoPewPew) reported 26 minutes ago

  @worldhuman_2026 @NYCShackleton @Bobbythirdway And a majority of the h1b scammers are paid less than 100k. My husband has been in the middle of this tech revolution for more than 25 years, worked for Microsoft Google amazon and others and he saw it first hand. I had a store down the steeet from Microsoft campus for 8 years and many of my customers where MS employees, and I got to see first hand many of them train and be replaced by these abusers and every single one that stayed had the same **** to talk about the surge of h1bs… low quality and lower wages, so don’t try and gaslight

• 
  Dileep Shukla (@dileepshukla202) reported 26 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp I have already contacted your customer support through e-mail, phone calls on this issue. Even after following up with them matter has not been resolved yet. Now it's your responsibility to take strict action against your team and arrange the delivery urgently.

• 
  CapitalFronts (@capitalfronts) reported 30 minutes ago

  Strategy just sold 3,588 $BTC to fund its digital credit dividends — and Michael Saylor isn't done. Reports point to him aiming for around $1.5B in total sales. Let that sink in. The man who spent years telling everyone to NEVER sell their Bitcoin… is selling Bitcoin. So is this the moment to panic? Our answer at CapitalFronts is the opposite — we think this is the moment to get IN. Here's why. He started selling near 74k, and between his pressure and the broader market, $BTC bled down to 58k. That drop already absorbed the MicroStrategy dumping. The proof? This latest sale of 3,588 BTC barely moved price — 62k to 61k. Compare that to the 74k → 58k slide earlier. The so-called "selling strength" is exhausted. They simply cant push it much lower anymore. And serious investors saw this coming. How did the market know roughly how much he'd need to sell? The $STRC chart. Strategy's Variable Rate Series Perpetual Stretch Preferred — the one paying ~13% — has to cover dividends. From Jun 26 it dumped from $92 to under $72, because the market realised he only had about 8 months of coverage left. To pay dividends he needs somewhere north of a billion a year, and he was sitting on roughly $500M in reserve — only about 7 months of runway. He needed to sell BTC just to keep more than 12 months of fiat on hand. By end of June, people were openly doubting whether he could even pay. Around $91 STRC he first sold ~$2.5M — a drop in the ocean — and we knew a much bigger sale was coming. STRC cratered to 72, then V-bounced back to 91. We think it pushes to $94 or higher. But here's the twist: he still hasn't sold that full billion. He's moved just $216M so far to fund the dividends, and claims $2.5B+ in fiat reserves. So the real question — if 95% of the market already knows he's going to sell more, who do you think is buying while retail panics? Whales. They're positioning between 55k and the low 60s, ready to catch the retail flush and ride it back up. The last time Saylor sold it was pure panic. This time? It's calm. That tells you everything. Our BTC view hasn't changed since our last post: one more fear-driven dip toward 55k, and then we go straight up. Now the macro. $SPX: if we close this week above 750, we're in a V-shape recovery targeting new all-time highs, maybe 2–3% above. We're also posting our Z-Score chart of the S&P CAPE ratio vs EPS. It measures how stretched the market is versus standard deviations — CAPE (the price/earnings side) in one line, EPS (actual earnings per share) in red. In the 2000 dot-com bubble, EPS was decent but CAPE was WAY higher — that gap is what signals a crash. Right now the gap is small, so the chart says "no bubble." But we don't fully buy that read. The 1929–early-40s depression also had CAPE sitting close to EPS, and it was the worst crash in history. The dot-com crash isnt even explained by this measure. Post-war through the late '60s, stocks were flat while CAPE and EPS hugged too. So it's not an honest standalone signal — it just tells us we're NOT in a dot-com setup. It doesn't tell us we're safe. And here's what worries us — our hyperscaler free cash flow chart. Since ~2012, when earnings rose, cash flow rose with it. Not this time. The red line has crashed. Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle, Google, Meta — total free cash flow is down hard. Why? They've poured it all into AI, semis, NVIDIA, SanDisk, Micron, energy. They used to hold ~$300B in cash flow and have now spent it — over $1.5 TRILLION in capex. So ask yourself: if the biggest names in the index are burning this much cash to invest, how sustainable is this earnings season really? Gold — same call as last time. We're watching for a third bottoming tail. We think $GOLD dips to around 3980 again, then bounces, maybe by Friday. If we get three bottoming tails, that's a strong signal for an upcoming uptrend. That's our read for today. One more thing — when our platform launches (mid-July), members get every one of these calls 24 hours BEFORE we post them publicly. So — are you panicking with retail, or positioning with the whales? NFA, just our analysis. Charts below 👇