Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Douglas McLaren Sr (@sr_dMcLaren) reported 5 minutes ago

  AMAZON IS DOWN 750PM

• 
  the 3d dude in the money for nothin music video (@_groktuah) reported 7 minutes ago

  @mattahertz @FloRyRy410 @amazon Not remembering what your ordered sounds like a you're a mentally retarded stupid **** problem.

• 
  Jantilal Parihar (@JantilalParihar) reported 8 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp The link take to call or chat, when selecting either option it takes to order page and finally at on order their is no option to call, chat or reporting this problem. So please don't waste my time and give a geniune solution. Don't sent useless links which lead to nowhere

• 
  SgtSue (@SgtSue) reported 10 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp “Delivery attempted at 6:21 Ran into issue when attempting delivery. Update delivery information” Tell me what the issue is because the address is well established, good roads, just say “running late will try tomorrow” don’t make it sound like there is a pit bull on the porch

• 
  varun kumar (@varunku06457487) reported 13 minutes ago

  @amazonIN @AmazonHelp it has been more than 3 weeks and my Amazon UPI issue is not resolved. I changed my phone and from that day I am getting this issue.

• 
  JatinSharma (@jatinsharma_29) reported 13 minutes ago

  @amazonIN @AmazonHelp @amazonIN i am facing issue with my monitor, i have contaced amazon more than 30 times, i have been given false assurances via amazon team and they have scheduled many callbacks but none of em called. i am being treated like **** by amazon. order: 404-5257004-1805147

• 
  Babou (@sbabou) reported 20 minutes ago

  🚨@Lowes CUSTOMER SERVICE REACHED ROCK BOTTOM - I had one of the worst retail experiences recently with @Lowes, and it exposes a serious flaw in how they handle confirmed orders and pricing. Yesterday evening, I placed an order on Lowe’s website for a heavily discounted item at the South Antioch, California store. Within 20 minutes, I received a confirmation that the order was ready for pickup. The store was close to closing, so I decided to pick it up the next morning. Like any reasonable customer, I trusted that a confirmed and ready order meant the item was reserved at the agreed price. The next morning, without any prior notice or valid explanation, the order was canceled. When I called the store, the manager told me the price had increased overnight and claimed the cancellation was done by their IT systems - not the store. They also confirmed the item was still in stock. In other words, inventory was not the issue. I was then redirected to customer service. Customer service made things worse. I was told this was a “pricing error” and they refused to honor the confirmed price. No reinstatement. No accountability. Just a flat denial. I asked a very simple and logical question: If I had rushed to the store before closing the previous night, would I have received the item at that price? They avoided answering it. Because the answer is obvious. This is the core problem: the order was confirmed, processed, and marked ready for pickup. The only difference was timing. Yet Lowe’s unilaterally canceled the order after the fact because the price changed. What followed was a complete breakdown in accountability. The store blamed IT. Customer service blamed the store. At one point, they even tried to shift responsibility to a third-party seller. It was a classic case of internal deflection, with the customer stuck in the middle. Even after escalation to a supervisor, the response did not change. No price match. No attempt to honor the transaction. Just an offer to “find a similar item,” which completely misses the point. This is not just poor customer service-it is a breach of trust. When a retailer confirms an order and marks it ready for pickup, that is a commitment. If pricing errors exist, they should be resolved before confirmation, not after the customer relies on it. Canceling orders retroactively because the price increased sets a wrong and unfair precedent. If this is how Lowe’s systems and policies operate, customers need to be aware: a “confirmed” order may not mean anything. Retailers like Amazon and Costco have built trust by honoring pricing at the time of purchase. Lowe’s, in this case, chose the opposite path. This experience was not just frustrating - it was unacceptable.

• 
  eSteL🍁 (@DevotedTo96) reported 21 minutes ago

  @lotro Outdated management and heavy P2W/premium push are killing LOTRO. I'd tell you to fix it, but you lack the vision. Except for a tiny hardcore base, no one plays because of how poorly you run this game. Such a waste of a iconic name. @lotro Damn @amazon. I wish he’d been able to.

• 
  SyAz (@SyAzCrypto1) reported 22 minutes ago

  Seven macro catalysts this week, and every one of them points crypto down. The only counterweight is a bill the Senate has 8 working days to pass. The week ahead → Tue 28 Jul: US Consumer Confidence → Wed 29 Jul, 2:00pm ET: Fed decision + Microsoft earnings (after close) → Wed 29 Jul, 2:30pm ET: Warsh press conference → Thu 30 Jul, 8:30am ET : US Q2 GDP → Thu 30 Jul (after close): Meta, Apple, Amazon earnings → Fri 31 Jul, 8:30am ET : US Core PCE → Fri 31 Jul (overnight ET): Bank of Japan decision + month-end expiry 1. The Fed, Warsh's meeting Kevin is leaning hawkish with no forward guidance, and rates are expected to hold at 3.50-3.75%, so the presser is the main watch, not the rate. With Brent back above $100, hike odds for this meeting rose to 31% from 13% a week ago, and half the committee flagged a hike later in 2026. If Warsh signals September is live, yields and the dollar go up and risk sells off. $BTC moves with that, likely trades down this week. 2. AI-capex scare $Alphabet and $Tesla reported last week and both got punished, Alphabet for its ballooning capex and negative free cash flow. right now the market's flipped the script, AI spenders get sold and chipmakers get bought. Microsoft reports this week, then Meta, Apple and Amazon, and if they raise capex without proof it's paying off, you get an equity risk-off wave. crypto has traded tight to Nasdaq all year, so this can hit BTC with zero crypto headlines. 3. Oil and PCE are the inflation vice $100 oil feeds straight into Friday's Core PCE, which is the Fed's real inflation gauge, so a hot print backs up every hawkish word Warsh says on Wednesday. So watch them as one, hawkish Fed Wednesday plus a hot PCE Friday keeps BTC pinned to the low end of its range. The tail to watch is the BoJ Friday, a hold is already priced in, but hike will force an unwind of the yen carry trade, the same one that cratered global markets in Aug 2024 and hit crypto within 48 hours. Low odds, but that's the one that bites. 4. CLARITY Act: the one that matters most for crypto With everything above pulls down, this is the one thing that can pull up. CLARITY sets crypto's market structure, splits oversight between the SEC and CFTC, and locks in commodity status for BTC and ETH. It's already passed the House and cleared Senate committee, and now it's stuck on the floor with the ethics provisions still unresolved. The catch is the clock. the Senate breaks for recess on Aug 7 and the vote still isn't locked, so if it passes it's a genuine risk-on trigger that can override a hawkish Fed, and if it stalls the only bullish story this week comes off the table. So yeah this looks like Macro down, CLARITY up. That's the whole week.

• 
  BankOfYouLoxlly (@BankOfYouLoxlly) reported 24 minutes ago

  Everyone thinks a blowout earnings beat sends a stock soaring. 📈 Alphabet just proved them wrong. Cloud revenue up 82%. Stock? Down 7% — its worst day in a year. Why? A $205B AI spending bill and negative free cash flow for the first time since 2004. Wall Street stopped clapping for growth. Now it wants the receipts. 🧾 Meta, Microsoft, Amazon & Apple ALL report this week. Who blinks first? 👀 🎥👇 #AI #Stocks #Markets

• 
  Aj🇮🇳 (@tthakur_AJAY) reported 26 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp No need for this link, I had already talked with your customer support they ended the chat without solving issue and their main focus was on "How would you like to get your refund ".

• 
  Jyothi (@JyothiPusala) reported 26 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp are you mad? no one's contacting us despite entering all the details every freaking time. I want your team to call me immediately and fix this problem as soon as possible.

• 
  Kalicharan Sahoo (@kalicharans472) reported 28 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp @JoshiPralhad @jagograhakjago it seems that you are not taking my issue seriously. Please transfer my refunded balance from the PayLater wallet to my PayAccount balance as soon as possible.If this issue is not resolved immediately,I will be forced to file a complaint against your company in the ConsumerCourt

• 
  Pangolinfo (@Pangolinfo_API) reported 32 minutes ago

  okay I need to talk about something that's been quietly wrecking Amazon PPC strategies for years and nobody really addresses it directly. SP ad placement data. specifically: why you almost certainly can't trust the data you're collecting. the problem isn't your bidding logic. it's not your keyword research. it's that the underlying competitive ad data feeding your decisions is probably half-wrong — and you don't know which half. here's the thing about Sponsored Products that makes it uniquely awful to scrape: the ads are geo-locked to zip code. what a buyer in Austin sees at position 1 is not what a buyer in Seattle sees. if your scraper isn't simulating the right local IP, you're monitoring a market that doesn't exist. the Sponsored label loads async via JS. static scrapers literally cannot see it. they return a mix of organic and paid results with no way to tell them apart. you think a competitor isn't bidding on your keyword. they are. and Amazon's search pages are some of the most aggressively protected endpoints on the internet. most DIY setups fall apart after a few hundred requests. the real cost isn't the missing data. it's that you confidently optimize in the wrong direction because the data you have LOOKS complete. anyway. found a solution that actually fixes this properly. drop a 🎯 in the comments and I'll send you the link

• 
  Closing Bell Orca (@closingbellorca) reported 34 minutes ago

  US Market Commentary | 7.24.2026 1. Friday's market and the weekend's industry pointed in opposite directions. On Friday the market began to fear the money being poured into AI. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 4.3%, and Intel, which had jumped 9% after hours on Thursday's results, gave it all back and fell 8% in a single day. The Magnificent 7 dropped 4.8%, its worst day since the tariff shock. And yet over the weekend the industry said the opposite. It needs more chips. 2. Read Friday's fear first, and this is a shift in sentiment, not a collapse. Anderson Capital's Anderson said the fear of missing out is turning into a fear of massive over-investment. Alphabet's capex expansion and its first negative free cash flow were the trigger, and forecasts that the four big-tech firms' capital spending will reach 724 billion dollars this year and about 950 billion by 2027 gave that fear its weight. The semiconductor index, up 101% in the first half, has fallen 17% in July. 3. But what the market sold was not the economy; it was the AI-spending trade. On the same day, 10 of the 11 S&P 500 sectors rose, tech aside, and about 360 of its members closed higher. The index was pressed down by the weight of a few tech names, while the rest of the market was in fact sturdy. US business activity expanded at its fastest pace in eight months, powered by domestic services demand. The fear concentrated on the one box of the AI bill; it did not spread across the whole economy. 4. And over the weekend, the side that will collect that bill answered at record scale. South Korea announced AI initiatives worth 950 billion dollars. Nvidia and SK Group unveiled a joint project of more than 500 billion, Samsung and Broadcom a 200 billion partnership, and Naver a 10 billion investment raise. Chairman Chey Tae-won said even the five-year memory demand Nvidia laid out would prove too low, and that the next time he meets Jensen Huang, Huang will say he wants more. 5. These weekend deals are the strongest rebuttal to Burry's circular-financing warning. On Thursday Burry said much of AI revenue is a loop that funds itself. But Korean chipmakers signing 500 billion dollars with Nvidia, and OpenAI pressing SK to supply chips directly, is not self-dealing inside a closed loop; it is real demand crossing borders. Of course contracts too can overshoot if the end demand behind them disappoints. But half-a-trillion-dollar cross-border commitments point too far outward to be called circular. 6. In the end the market and the industry now stand on different scales. Graham said the market is a voting machine in the short run and a weighing machine in the long run. Friday's plunge was a vote cast by fear; the weekend's 950 billion of contracts is the actual weight placed on the scale. The vote moved down, but the weight says demand still overflows. For that weight to be accurate, though, the final demand behind the contracts must be real. 7. The clearest hint inside this split is Apple. Apple chose to partner for outside models rather than build vast infrastructure itself, and for that its stock rose 15% in July. The one that builds is punished by the bill, and the one that rents instead of builds is rewarded. This is the sharpest scene of the frame I have argued all week: beneficiaries over spenders, and the asset-light over the asset-heavy. 8. Oil is now a two-way tail. Brent jumped 27% in two weeks to close Friday at 96.78 dollars, but as Pakistan and Oman brokered talks, the US paused its strikes for a second day and Hormuz negotiations opened, and Friday's oil eased. Escalation or negotiation has not yet been decided, and with the Houthis widening the front to Saudi oil facilities, the upside risk is alive too. 9. In the end the AI trade has split into two truths. The market fears the bill, and the industry wants more of the chips. Next week's earnings from Microsoft, Meta, Apple and Amazon will decide which of the two truths is right. ■ How I read the market On Friday the market re-rated AI capital spending. The 4.3% drop in semiconductors, 8% in Intel, and 4.8% in the Magnificent 7 are the result of a fear of missing out flipping into a fear of over-investment. But over the weekend the industry answered the opposite way, with Korea's 950 billion dollars, Nvidia and SK's 500 billion, and Samsung and Broadcom's 200 billion. So I read Friday's plunge as a re-rating of the spenders in sentiment and positioning, not a collapse of the theme, because half-a-trillion-dollar cross-border contracts sit on the opposite side of Burry's circular financing. The decisive variable is whether next week's Microsoft, Meta, Apple and Amazon turn that capital spending into profit, that is, ROIC. I keep the axis of strength on the beneficiaries that collect the spending as revenue, the Korean firms in HBM, foundry, packaging and memory, and on the Apple-style asset-light that dodges the bill. Oil is a two-way tail between 96 dollars and the Oman talks. ■ Positioning Weight beneficiaries and the asset-light over spenders. The HBM, memory, foundry and packaging that actually collect the 950 billion of contracts, and above all the Korean chipmakers at their center, are the structural winners of this frame. Do not rush the spenders, the hyperscalers, until next week's earnings prove capital spending converts to profit. Grant a premium to asset-light models that rent infrastructure, as Apple does. Given the two-way risk of Brent at 96, keep energy exposure and a cash buffer. As for scenarios, if next week's hyperscalers prove ROIC and the Oman talks calm oil, widen weight toward the spenders; if the over-investment fear deepens or escalation lifts oil again, narrow into beneficiaries, the asset-light, and cash. ■ What to watch - Next week's big-tech earnings: whether $MSFT , $META , $AAPL and $AMZN justify capital spending as profit. It is the arbiter between the market's fear and the industry's conviction. - Follow-through on the Korea deals: whether the 950 billion turns into actual orders and revenue for SK Hynix and Samsung. - Oil and the Oman talks: whether Brent at 96 comes down through Hormuz negotiations, or jumps again on the Houthis' second front. - Whether semiconductors settle: whether the plunge in Intel and the chip index halts or spreads beyond the spenders. - The gap between market and industry: whether the vote of fear converges to the weight of demand, or the weight follows the vote down.