Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Tech Tales (@TechTalesUnfold) reported 28 seconds ago

  Microsoft's stock is down 18% this year — while its AI capex climbs to $262 billion next year. Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and Amazon all report earnings within 48 hours starting Wednesday. Two years of "spend more, win the AI race" logic gets tested this week. Azure needs to clear 36% growth just to avoid a selloff. That's the number that actually matters — not the capex headline. Clears 36% growth, or cracks — which one?

• 
  Chico del apartamento 512 ..🤴🏻 (@Tito_arriaga) reported 41 seconds ago

  @amazon Terrible service and follow-up. I made a $130 USD purchase and it was delivered incomplete, less than 50%. It's a scam and makes me distrustful of making purchases through their platform without support. 👎 Awful

• 
  Gary **** (@GaryWang28384) reported 1 minute ago

  @sorukumar @scmallaby @The_AI_Investor infrastructure concentration is less of an issue. Google, Amazon, Meta, and now OpenAI all have their own chips, Google's TPUs are the biggest competitor to Nvidia.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 3 minutes ago

  🔴 Google search ad share falls below 50% as AI and Amazon reshape referral economy Google's U.S. search advertising share will drop below 50% in 2026 for the first time since roughly 2004, according to eMarketer projections. Amazon, whose sponsored product searches count as search advertising, is growing three times as fast as Google. AI summaries are collapsing traditional click-through: Pew Research found users click results only 8% of the time when Google shows an AI summary, down from 15% with no summary.

• 
  Spook Show (@Sp0okSh0w) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Martyupnorth I had a close friend buy one it worked fantastic. I believe the only issue he had was charging ..I believe he had to buy an adapter that was an Amazon 10 buck piece.. but that was the only issue I believe

• 
  Jen LM (@jenmeilm) reported 3 minutes ago

  @AnthropicAI "We've never advocated for a ban on open-weights models." Great. Then why was Anthropic the ONLY major AI lab that refused to sign Jensen's open-weights letter — even after OpenAI, Google, Amazon and your own $5B compute partner AMD all signed? Here's the problem: you built your company on open research (transformers, RLHF, open datasets), then released ZERO open-weight models yourself, and now advocate for "testing" frameworks that you'd get to define. Classic regulatory capture — safety as a moat. The irony peak: in June 2026, when the US govt restricted Fable 5, you called it "disproportionate" because the capabilities were "widely available from other models." Now that Chinese open-weight models make the same argument, suddenly it's a safety crisis. You can't have it both ways. The open ecosystem didn't hold back AI progress — it accelerated it. The real risk isn't that open weights spread capability; it's that a few API-gatekeeping companies get to decide who builds the future.

• 
  CRAIG (@craigbessette) reported 4 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Yes i have access, just placed a order and it got cancelled. No error message, or email. I either want my product i ordered or my money back

• 
  Andrew Wilkinson (@StartupsILike) reported 6 minutes ago

  In 1999, 94% of Americans lived within a 5 minute drive of a RadioShack. 8,000 locations. $5 billion in sales. 15 years later it was bankrupt, and by the 2020s the brand was being used to sell a crypto token. And the strangest part is that the thing that saved RadioShack is the same thing that killed it. Some history first. By 1963 RadioShack was a struggling Boston chain selling radio parts to ham hobbyists, drowning in 40,000 different products. Charles Tandy bought it and cut the catalog down to 2,500 items aimed at one customer: the person who fixes their own electronics. That customer was everywhere. Depression raised adults repaired everything they owned, electronics were big and modular, and the rising car culture made a quick parts run easy. Through the 70s and 80s, RadioShack was the place for your TV antenna, answering machine, VCR cables, and batteries, and in 1977 their TRS-80 beat most of the world to the personal computer. Then the ground shifted three ways at once. Electronics became cheap and disposable. A stereo repair that cost $1,000 in parts made no sense when a brand new unit cost $200, and Gen X threw things away without a second thought. Walmart and Target doubled their store sizes and started selling cheap Chinese LCD TVs at or below cost on Black Friday. Best Buy grew to 800 stores averaging 20,000 square feet against RadioShack's 2,500. Then Amazon came specifically for RadioShack's best business, which was never the devices, it was the $30 HDMI cable that cost $2 from China. Amazon sold the same cable for 3 bucks. By the early 2000s the chain probably should have died. Instead, cell phones arrived and carriers desperate for market share paid huge bounties for every new signup. RadioShack's thousands of convenient locations became cell phone sales counters, and by the early 2000s nearly 45% of revenue came from phones. That's the paradox. The phone paying RadioShack's bills was a device that swallowed a category of their inventory every year. The PDA, the answering machine, the camera, the radio, the GPS, all absorbed into the thing in your pocket. And the bounty gravy train had an expiration date too. Once everyone had a phone, new signups dried up, and carriers built thousands of their own branded stores to keep the best customers, leaving RadioShack the scraps. The chain made its last profit in 2011. Bankruptcy came in 2015, again in 2017, and in 2020 an investor group led by internet personality Tai Lopez bought the brand, promising an e-commerce rebirth that never materialized but did produce a crypto token during the boom. An American icon, reduced to a ticker symbol joke. A lifeline that erodes your core business isn't a rescue, it's a slower sinking, and the time it buys you only matters if you use it to change. RadioShack had a decade of cell phone money to become iFixit or Best Buy, and spent it being a phone kiosk instead. What do you remember buying at RadioShack?

• 
  Peter Pru Prusinowski (@onlypeterpru) reported 14 minutes ago

  The Fed meets tomorrow. Four Magnificent 7 stocks report this week. Oil just plunged 9%. And the best trade you make might be the one you don't. Most traders lose money in weeks like this not because they can't read a chart. Because they can't sit still. The checklist beats the hunch. Every time. Quality check. Earnings flag. RSI screen. Delta discipline. Position sizing. Assignment plan. ROC calculation. Seven steps. No exceptions. Not when the premium looks fat. Not when the headline looks scary. Not when you are bored and want to feel alive. The earnings calendar is a minefield this week. Meta Wednesday. Microsoft Wednesday. Amazon Thursday. Apple Thursday. One earnings surprise and your put is deep in the money. The 30% extra premium is not worth the 300% extra risk. Cash is a position. Not a problem. The traders who survive this week will not be the ones who predicted the Fed correctly. They will be the ones who followed their process when everyone else abandoned theirs. Discipline is the only edge that compounds.

• 
  Captain Autismo 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@lyeuhm) reported 14 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Yeah. Can even modify my accounts settings, but whenever I click My Orders it puts me into a login loop and keeps trying to use a passkey that doesn't exist -- can change my account details, but can't view my orders lol

• 
  Shhhhhhhhh You Know Who? (@gatesisavirus) reported 16 minutes ago

  @zoeunashamed Oh,well i can tell you in my honest fashion,i worked for Amazon delivering parcels 3 years ago,from day one,we was told to be careful in parts of Seaham,i expect this comment from the manager was mainly about theft,im not trying to worry you,but im a person that always reads the bottom line.Seaham was a mining town thats never recovered from the pit closures,hardly anybody has a job,like most of the North East,but it a cheaper place to live and if you fit in in you fit in Not hitting on you or nothing either,but maybe when i get back down South maybe i can meet up with you and disclose further? Im always happy to meet up with like minded people,so yes,you recognise we have a migrant problem across Europe.....Our lives are getting tougher,mainly financially because of immigrants,theres no escaping the truth of that It amazes me how some unelected bureaucrats got away with this? Afterall, theyre meant to be a UNION not a GOVERNMENT They knew all them years ago,that it could go wrong My question is,where was plan 'B' to reverse it?

• 
  Zach Alt (@ZachAltmyer) reported 17 minutes ago

  @chadthereseller It really does. Not only did my water heater go down but also had a pipe leak in the basement lol It’s so much less stressful when you have the eBay/Amazon funds to cover it

• 
  The Crash Profit Blueprint (@xinnora) reported 24 minutes ago

  The AI Boom: Are We Funding the Future, or Repeating 1999? If you were investing in 1999, would you have known you were living through a bubble, or would you have been certain — absolutely certain — that "this time it's different"? That's the question almost nobody wants to answer honestly, because in hindsight the dot-com bubble looks obvious, but at the time, it felt like the most rational bet in the world. The internet was real. It really did change everything. The companies just weren't worth what the market said they were worth, until suddenly the market agreed and re-priced almost everything down by 70-80%. Here's the uncomfortable parallel nobody in AI-hype content wants to draw: artificial intelligence is almost certainly going to change the world in profound ways, the same way the internet did. That doesn't mean current valuations are correct. Those are two completely separate claims that keep getting merged into one, and that merger is exactly how bubbles get built — by treating "this technology is transformative" and "therefore any price is justified" as the same idea. Right now we're watching a wave of enormous AI-adjacent IPOs approach public markets — Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX among them, representing a combined $3.85 trillion in valuation. That is not a small, gradual trickle of new supply into the market. It's a historic surge, and historic surges of IPO capital have a track record of arriving near market tops, not market bottoms, because private investors and insiders generally aren't in a rush to sell cheap. Most content online treats AI stocks as a binary: either you're a believer riding the rocket, or a skeptic missing out. That framing is lazy, and it's also extremely profitable for content creators, because certainty gets more clicks than nuance. What almost nobody is saying clearly is the more useful, more boring truth: a technology can be genuinely revolutionary and its associated stocks can still be dangerously overvalued at the same time. Those aren't contradictions. Amazon was a real, world-changing company in 2000, and its stock still fell over 90% before recovering years later. Being right about the technology and being right about the timing are two entirely different skills, and conflating them is how otherwise smart, careful people lose serious money. So here's the harder question underneath all of this: if you owned pure AI-exposure names right now, would you be able to tell the difference between conviction and denial? Would you know if you were holding because the fundamentals genuinely justify it, or holding because admitting the position is overextended feels like admitting you were wrong, and nobody enjoys that feeling? This isn't a call to abandon AI as a theme, or to declare the sky is falling. It's a call to separate the story from the price, something almost no mainstream financial content is built to do, because nuance doesn't trend. If you want a framework for thinking about exposure during a period that has genuine echoes of past speculative peaks — without the hype and without the panic — that's precisely the gap Crash Profit Blueprint's research was built to fill. The free quiz is a starting point to see where your own portfolio sits relative to that risk, not a verdict on AI itself.

• 
  Tmos Monstrocity (@TmosMonstrocity) reported 27 minutes ago

  @SpooksH @lukepbeasley Yea, a big failure that is. Lies all around, let us print money and it will prickle down in the form of saving to you. Then you get corporations like Amazon and Walmart having employees on welfare to make ends meet. The social contract null and voided by big corporations. Yet still receiving printed cash to keep their doors open. That's some pure capitalism right there.

• 
  Michael Shourd (@MichaelShourd) reported 28 minutes ago

  @GEATSzilla Amazon servers went down. No one is hacking these companies so they'll sell physical games