1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Amazon
  4. Outage Map
Amazon

Amazon Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Amazon users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Amazon, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Amazon users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Irving, TX 1
Lakeville, MN 3
Zürich, ZH 2
Cali, Valle del Cauca 1
Strasbourg, ACAL 2
Canberra, ACT 1
Caen, Normandy 1
Uzès, Occitanie 1
North Richland Hills, TX 1
Allentown, PA 1
Boston, MA 4
Manchester, England 4
Sutton Coldfield, England 1
Hamburg, HH 2
Prince Frederick, MD 1
Los Angeles, CA 9
Arras, Hauts-de-France 1
Orlando, FL 4
Canton, MI 1
Silsbee, TX 1
Bamberg, Bavaria 1
Township of Evan, KS 23
San Jose, CA 4
Département de l'Hérault, Occitanie 1
Elizabeth, NJ 1
Toronto, ON 9
Easton, MD 1
Birmingham, AL 1
Paris, Île-de-France 10
Kansas City, MO 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • studymarketsai
    Jorge Ugalde (@studymarketsai) reported

    @MerlijnTrader The core point is right: $2T at IPO isn't "early days." Google IPO'd at ~$23B and is worth well over 100x that today. For SpaceX to repeat that from $2T, it would have to become worth more than every stock market on earth combined. Entry valuation caps the math — that part's fair. But two things are loose. Huang didn't "tell retail to buy" — he compared buying at IPO to being an early large investor. A CEO's bullish framing, not a retail directive. And "retail buys the exit" is betrayed by the very examples cited: Meta IPO'd at $38 to a retail stampede and is up more than 10x; Google and Amazon IPO buyers did fine. The variable was never IPO-vs-private. It was the entry price — $23B vs $2T. The real problem is the one the post skipped: the messenger. Nvidia holds ~$30B of OpenAI and ~$10B of Anthropic, and all three run on its chips. Huang endorsing these IPOs is Huang talking his own book — he sells the shovels and owns equity in the mines. That's the conflict to flag, not "retail buys the exit." Skepticism on a $2T entry is fair. Just make the argument that actually holds.

  • sweettart024
    Gina (@sweettart024) reported

    @bavedikian @BestBuy @FedEx Ran into same problem - a computer ordered from Amazon, tracked to a UPS warehouse in TX,en route to me, just "disappeared". Amazon said to deal with Dell & UPS to solve it. I tried with no luck & finally convinced them THEY made the deal with UPS to ship the computer. Not me.

  • Polaris501
    Robert 'Jack' Dempsey (@Polaris501) reported

    @DavQuinn Sure David, Clarkson *was* cancelled. After his article about Meghan Markle a few years ago. I remember at the time ITV and Amazon saying they wouldn't renew his series. I suppose they (wisely) just waited until the heat died down before giving him new contracts.

  • Letoy89
    c leb (@Letoy89) reported

    @AmazonHelp have a massive issue with my account. You removed review privileges. Won’t tell me why. I’ve talked to like 8 people through chat and email and no one at your company will treat me like an adult and answer why in plain English. So I’m going to the BBB by weeks end

  • gauravlawaniya1
    gaurav sharma (@gauravlawaniya1) reported

    @AmazonHelp After this post i spoke with 5 representatives. Each one kept transfeting my call to another agent instead of resolving the issues

  • ColdHeart_Prj
    Zack Riley 🇦🇺 (@ColdHeart_Prj) reported

    @NoahRayWrites I do, via Ingrem and booktopia, but my success through them has been a few book stores and local orders, that was with Guardians. I'm hesitant to do anything until sales at-least slow down. I have no idea where the influx of sales has come from but its been constant since launch so I don’t know how I would point anyone at another platform because I've done no advertising and the book keeps hitting the top 10 in both the US and AUS on amazon so its likely all word of mouth.

  • CarolynCostain
    Carolyn Costain (@CarolynCostain) reported

    @amazonnews Amazon has gone down hill an officially sucks! I placed an order on June 3rd this is what I get from your sucky delivery and lies! I bet its not even shipped just so I cant cancel the order as they have done before while I was watching them change the status before my eyes on the site! This is totally unacceptable! It will go back when I am done! Amazon costs me money having to buy something twice because you cant cancel it when they lie saying its shipped! Only to waste my f-ing time returning one of them, Just to have something on time! WTF this happens every time and I cancelled all subscriptions my next cancellation will be Prime!!!! Amazon is just not worth buying from when they cost you money having to buy it local anyways! Ordered this June 3rd!

  • Savage90623337
    Investing=retired at 35 (@Savage90623337) reported

    @grok @saylordocs It’s called investing. There’s always risk but we plan percentages and safety here so it makes sense to go with something that’s happened 100% of the time would you tell an investor not to invest in the top stock in the S&P 500 because things evolve and so it might not go up overtime it might go down. Even though the safest bet, is that overtime that S&P stock let’s say Amazon is gonna go up overtime. You know the risk like corrections and depressions but overtime it does the So wouldn’t that make sense for bitcoin and midterm years until it actually changes because what you’re saying is the same thing I’ve heard bitcoin say before to never do the this time is different until it’s actually different so don’t try to beat the market

  • mjarbo
    Matt Jarbo (@mjarbo) reported

    @MoviesThatMaher In this case I feel like it might have a shot of getting a lower budgeted sequel on amazon, but at the same time they can keep the costs down by just utilizing AI which I think is going to be what gives us a lot of movies in the future

  • SemiconductorsX
    Semiconductor Insider (@SemiconductorsX) reported

    These companies are funding this massive spend with heavy bond issues and even raising fresh equity. A big chunk of their operating cash flow is getting eaten up. Some estimates show Amazon could face a $17-28 billion cash shortfall. Basically, they’re betting the farm on AI paying off big time.

  • JeromeBagu39039
    Geronimo (@JeromeBagu39039) reported

    @DerekMinnemaOnX I'd like to know how much Amazon made from the lock down. Seems odd. Doncha think?

  • DaxRyanMyhand
    Dax Myhand (@DaxRyanMyhand) reported

    @Gavinator220 @ClownWorld Don’t order from Amazon, problem solved.

  • ColdHeart_Prj
    Zack Riley 🇦🇺 (@ColdHeart_Prj) reported

    @NoahRayWrites I would say they probably do if I can buy directly from Germany. This is /com.au vs .com so I am wondering if mid week it pulls them from the US store and the price comes down, but one would think that shipping would be more. It cost $70 to send a package to/from the US to Australia. I guess if amazon does it in bulk it would be different.

  • CBread04
    Cheeseburger (@CBread04) reported

    My letter to Amazon Studio: Dear Amazon Studio Executives, I'm sure you have been hearing from a lot of very passionate Stargate fans recently. I hope, while passionate, none crossed a line. But if some did cross a line, please understand their passion likely got the best of them because Stargate is something they love and they feel betrayed by your studio for killing it. That said, being overly disrespectful doesn't represent the Stargate fandom as a whole or the lessons the series taught its fans, so I apologize on their behalf. That said I too am extremely frustrated with the decision to shut down the new Stargate project. Especially when I heard one of the reasons was that it was going to hold too closely to the original lore which was deemed to focus too much on the original audience and not on some almost mythical modern audience. Firstly the original series was hugely successful, and the vast majority of its original audience are not only still living, but also more likely to be in the age range where they have much more disposable income, like myself. They also now have children they want to share the series with. There is also an enormous vacuum for this type of positive, realistic sci-fi show. This was a series that guided many of our morals, our understanding of right and wrong, courage, loyalty, honor, patriotism, respect, education, science, hope for the future, unity, how our differences can be our strengths, teamwork. I could go on forever. It was an enormously positive influence on millions over the span of two decades. When Stargate aired it was my brother and I that bonded over the show. Today from those two fans, the new Stargate series would have had myself, my brother, his two sons, my wife, and two close friends of mine all excited to watch every episode. That was 2 original fans that would now be a diehard audience of 7. There is more than enough potential to create a very successful series just with the original fans and the people they shared the show with. But I believe it goes beyond that. If the show held true to the original it would spark the interest of an entirely new generation even if they don't have an original fan to introduce them. Like I said there has been a huge vacuum in the market for this type of series. Nothing like it really exists today and the sci-fi and television world is weaker for that. Many are longing for this type of series even if they don't know it yet because they were never introduced to it. So many cherished shows and movies that have been rebooted by major studios have not been the commercial success the studios expected them to be. I believe the evidence is clear that their lack of success has been in large part because the original audience is often abandoned or an afterthought in some attempt to capture an illusive market of new fans. But in the attempt to target a more general audience you make the show average, unoriginal and destroy all the magic that made the show so special. So the original fans hate it and new potential fans are introduced to a show that just isn't very special. Instead it's a show built for the average audience in every way, making it average and boring. Studios are focus grouping art to death in some attempt to please an average that doesn't exist as a real person. In the end the show loses the qualities that would earn it a new audience while also alienating the original audience. Please I beg of you, give this new series a chance. Reconsider your choice to cancel it. Allow the creators of the project to continue to run it and fulfill their vision. They have already proven themselves capable of creating a beloved series and one of the most successful and loved sci-fi shows ever created. They know what they're doing. Please give them a season. I am confident it will be a success. You have a loyal fan base that would buy up all the merch you want to sell if it means they will have an authentic Stargate series back in their lives. Please don't walk away from this and alienate so many Stargate fans. In the meantime I'm sorry to say, I have canceled my Amazon Prime and will not be renewing if the project is not continued. Or at least release the rights to the series so it can be continued by those that love and understand the series and why so many care so deeply for it. Sincerely a Stargate fan

  • TheHyland3r
    TheHylander (@TheHyland3r) reported

    @avidseries @L0m3z I personally find that sweeteners are best used when they are mixed together to cancel out any aftertaste or fairness, etc. After mixing so many different sweeteners for many years, I’ve come to the conclusion that the closest thing to sugar is a mixture of erythritol, Stevia, and sucralose. Stevia is fine, but by itself is a lackluster sweetener in my opinion. Don’t get me wrong, it is sweet, but it doesn’t have to full sweetness profile or taste that sugar does. Stevia is extremely sweet so when you use it, you get a really powerful sweetness, but it lacks the other qualities or well-rounded flavor that sugar has. So because it is extremely sweet it can give one component of that sweetness profile, but it doesn’t give the whole profile and ‘mouth feel’ sweetness that sugar gives. So because it is extremely sweet, it is not very good to use alone, however, when used with other sweeteners, it can amplify the overall sweetness without lacking the other components or giving off any aftertaste This is where erythritol comes in. Erythritol ads “body” but have you used it in higher amount it can cause gas/bloating. So this is where adding sucralose comes in handy. Most stores (in the baking aisle) carry a Splenda brand product that is a Stevia/erythritol mixture. It is a green package that says “stevia” on it. So this product alone already has erythritol and Stevia mixed together in the correct ratio that comes very close to sugar and is a one to one substitute for a real sugar. But then what I do is I use liquid concentrated loss (25% by weight) and I add that to the splendid product when I make any kind of beverage or food or condiment that is supposed to be sweet. If I make a protein shake that has 3 to 4 cups of liquid in it, I will use one full dropper of the sucralose and I will add about 80 g of the splendid product. I can make anything from a chocolate shake to a mocha to a fruit smoothie, and it comes out tasting almost identical to having real sugar in it with this mixture of sweeteners. I also make sweet-and-sour curry sauce with it, and it tastes very close to the real thing despite having virtually no calories or sugar. In fact, a sweet-and-sour curry sauce that I make with it tastes so much like the real thing, everyone who has tried it can’t even tell and I actually have to tell them that it doesn’t have any sugar in the sauce and they are quite surprised by it. The liquid sucralose I ordered off Amazon in the large container. It is dirt cheap if you do it that way and you can get a dropper bottle with it. The brand I use is called “sweet solutions.” If anyone uses that with the splendid product, it may take you a little bit of experimenting to get down the ratio you like best, but the ratio I gave is a really good starting point and I think anyone who tries it will be pleasantly surprised. I don’t think a lot of food companies have caught on to this ratio of sweeteners yet. Maybe if I was a food scientist I could make money off of it by using it in certain products, lol.

Check Current Status