Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Grant Ellison (@secondorderfx) reported 4 minutes ago

  @ash18191244512 @plzbepatient That doesn't mean that there isn't money in the system to pay a small number of people well. But overall, it's a terrible business due to the razor thin margins, as evidenced by Amazon trying it and quitting.

• 
  No try = no fail (Sean Stromsten) (@StillTr05207382) reported 4 minutes ago

  @neilturkewitz @mysteriouskat It strikes me like a lot of big company behavior: not obviously illegal, but still callous, with painful side effects. Amazon doesn't steal from anyone, but it puts a lot of retailers out of business, and that's not nothing. Maybe "reading" a book to train your model is fair use, under some interpretation of current IP law, but putting programmers and artists out of business is still a terrible effect.

• 
  Whowontessme (@ForeignRoller_) reported 6 minutes ago

  @tantehenia I know ****** that work at Amazon was online saying they dm her when she got out the car shaking *** on that video. Some of them are slow as hell. She still look better than most at her age. Fell off equals decline and there is for sure a visible change in that.

• 
  Joey (@joeypraete) reported 11 minutes ago

  3. Brand source Broad, not narrow. Here's where many people make an easy mistake. They brand source just like they reverse source. Tight ridgid filters excluding most products in a search. Brand sourcing should be very broad. It should be tight enough to exclude obvious losing products like wholesale/pl products, or really slow/tanking products. However it SHOULD NOT remove some more advanced product research opportunities, because this is where some real cash can be made. Here's my filter stack: Max BSR: 250k New Price from: $7 Amazon OOS: Yes New offer Count from: 3 Is one of Brand: (whatever brand) That's it. Simple, broad, and targeted.

• 
  Singh Dhakad (@SinghDhaka84845) reported 14 minutes ago

  @voidcodead I thought it's my phone problem only but it amazon problem

• 
  Dumb Hunter | Try Maven (@DumbMoneyHunter) reported 14 minutes ago

  elon knew. that's why he launched so early.- spacex was valued above amazon while making a tenth of what amazon makes- made no sense. we were short it the whole way down- launch fast, bolt xai on, xai buys cursor on the spike- now cursor's building the thing that saves the whole stackhe had to beat everyone before the collapse. that's the play.

• 
  Alex Bulkin (@ABulkin) reported 15 minutes ago

  Amazon is taking another run at nuclear co-location—this time in Texas. The deal is enormous: up to 1.2 GW of data-center load located behind the meter at Vistra’s 2.4 GW Comanche Peak nuclear plant. A 20-year PPA. Roughly $5 billion of development. Full buildout targeted for 2032. But the most interesting part isn’t the size. It’s how Amazon proposes to handle grid emergencies. Two years ago, FERC rejected the interconnection amendment needed to expand Amazon’s co-located load at Pennsylvania’s Susquehanna nuclear plant from 300 MW to 480 MW. Texas now has an express approval process for these arrangements under SB 6—but the early precedent has been demanding. In prior co-location proceedings, ERCOT required the data-center load to shut down within 30 minutes when called and barred it from participating in paid demand-response programs. Amazon appears to have designed around that problem. Under its proposal, ERCOT could call Comanche Peak’s full capacity back to the grid on 30 minutes’ notice. But instead of shutting down, the data center would transfer to on-site backup generation sized to carry its entire load. The application says the campus may never draw power from the grid at all. That makes PUCT Docket 59399 the co-location case to watch. The question is no longer simply whether Texas will allow 1.2 GW of nuclear generation to move behind the meter. It’s whether full-load backup is enough to make that arrangement acceptable to ERCOT without additional conditions. The Texas rule may ultimately be pretty simple: You can take the generation behind the meter—but only if you can give every megawatt back when the grid needs it. ERCOT’s study is expected in October. A decision is due around December 12.

• 
  Hop (@OldManHop) reported 16 minutes ago

  @DAKKADAKKA1 It's every major company. For example: Amazon. Remember this next time AWS goes down (again)

• 
  soar (@mfSoared) reported 17 minutes ago

  The thing about Jimothy most people don’t understand is that Jimothy isn’t really catalyst based, people buying up are catalyst enough we already have a Pepe whale whose bull posting it’s only time until more whales see the vision and buy causing others to look into Jimothy and fomo in And the most important thing about Jimothy is that no one owns it, with Pepe furie owed it with punch the zoo was in charge/ owned it meaning the world couldn’t adopt the narrative, like the companies like Google meta Amazon couldn’t post it or use it as there could be trademark/legal issues But with Jimothy no one owns it it’s a public wild animal meaning companies don’t need permission to add it to their platforms as Easter eggs or even games don’t need permission to add it to their games meaning people can mass adopt it Now another thing is as it’s a wild animal anything can happen to it which is even more bullish long term $Jimothy

• 
  Kuldeep Pisda (@kdpisda) reported 18 minutes ago

  A doctor's handwritten note can override a printed checkbox and change a patient's entire care plan. Most AI systems miss that. Guardoc Health says it processes 1M+ clinical documents daily using Amazon Nova models on Bedrock. Its pipeline sends only the hardest pages, like handwriting, stamps, signatures, and overridden checkboxes, to the more powerful Nova Pro model, keeping costs low. The company reports 46% fewer documentation errors, 70% fewer audit fines, and $400K+ annual ROI per facility. One important caveat: these results are vendor-reported and haven't been independently verified.

• 
  R. M Jr (@Muekara_) reported 20 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp @amazon The link is not working

• 
  Jake (@T8Jake) reported 23 minutes ago

  @jeff_of_norwich Amazon have been excellent in resolving issues I have had quickly. It's a good business strategy on their side. It means I don't have to think twice when making a purchase with them.

• 
  Superpositionbigbang (@Quantumvacuume) reported 23 minutes ago

  @gerb_sam @spaceandtech_ Ok I just want to point out this is something they already know is bound to happen yet they keep pushing foward. Math puts the event of a cascading effect at 3-5 years just on math alone. After 10 years with hundreds of thousands of satellites its certain past 100% chance of collision due to the math. My point is why spend so much energy on something that is for sure comming down on all of us. There was a close call just last week so it could literally happen any day. Even without the nuclear stuff the rest is comming down reguardless. The serious point is this is stupid and dangerous beyond belief like its all just gonna work out. If it is stopped now there is a chance. However if they keep going which they will its all eventually going to come crashing down on all of us globally. The Orbital Chain Reaction: The Ring of DeathBecause space is a continuous loop, the debris doesn't fly away into deep space; it stays trapped in Earth's gravity well, spread out over the exact same orbital pathway. Spreading the Grid: Within just a few hours of an initial crash, the resulting cloud of 10,000+ shards stretches out into a giant, lethal ring encompassing the entire planet. The Next Layer Drops: As this ring sweeps around the Earth every 90 minutes, it intersects with other satellite networks. Like a runaway lawnmower, it slices through the next fleet of satellites, creating more debris rings. Within days, the clean orbital lanes are completely choked out, transforming an orderly highway into a self-perpetuating mechanical meat-grinder that destroys anything human-made left in the sky The Physics of Hypervelocity: Kinetic Bombs At orbital heights, objects are not floating they are falling around the Earth at a minimum of 17,500 miles per hour (28,000 km/h) . When two objects in different orbits cross paths, their relative impact speed can easily exceed 35,000 miles per hour (56,000 km/h) Trillion-Dollar Industry Death: The global space economy worth over half a trillion dollars would entirely collapse. Satellite companies, launch providers, and aerospace manufacturers would go bankrupt overnight, causing massive layoffs. The Age of Isolation: Trapped on Earth The "Space Prison" Effect: The worst consequence of Kessler Syndrome is that the debris cloud stays in orbit for centuries. A thick layer of millions of hypervelocity projectiles would form a lethal, impenetrable shield around Earth. No Future Exploration: Humanity would be entirely trapped. We could no longer launch missions to the Moon, send rovers to Mars, or put up deep-space telescopes like James Webb. Space exploration would be entirely dead for generations. The 2028–2030 window is widely viewed by satellite tracking experts as the absolute crunch point. While the runaway chain reaction (where debris multiplies itself without any new launches) takes decades to mature, the initial breakdown event—the sudden operational failure that triggers Kessler Syndrome—is mathematically expected to happen right in that 2028–2030 pocket. The specific math explains why 2028–2030 is the true "danger zone." The 2028–2030 Mass Inbound Filing WaveTo understand why the window hits precisely between 2028 and 2030, look at international spectrum rules. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) operates on a "Use it or Lose it" regulatory clock. When a company or nation files plans for a megaconstellation, the ITU gives them a strict 7-year deadline to launch a major percentage of their fleet. If they miss the deadline, they lose their highly valuable rights to use those space radio frequencies. The 2021–2023 Boom: Dozens of global mega-networks filed their paperwork during the tech boom of 2021 to 2023. The 2028–2030 Tipping Point: Their 7-year regulatory deadlines expire between 2028 and 2030. As a result, companies like Amazon (Project Kuiper), European initiatives, and major Chinese state networks (like the Qianfan and GW constellations) are mathematically forced to cram tens of thousands of satellites into the sky at the exact same time. The Math Behind the 2028–2030 Danger HorizonThe mathematical collision probability formula relies on a metric called Spatial Density (ρ), which is the number of objects divided by the volume of space they sit in. 2019 Base Line: ~2,000 active satellites. Spatial density was low, meaning paths crossed rarely. 2026 (Right Now): ~14,500 active satellites. Starlink satellites alone are collectively making over 355,000 emergency swerves a year—meaning a satellite has to dodge space debris or a passing craft almost weekly. 2028–2030 Projection: ~50,000 to 60,000 active satellites. When you plug 60,000 satellites into the mathematical collision equation (N × (N-1)), the number of possible intersecting paths increases not by 4 times, but by nearly 20 times compared to current levels. At that density, the background mathematics indicate that satellites will be intersecting with passing space junk or other networks multiple times a day.

• 
  Wes Roth (@WesRoth) reported 28 minutes ago

  One of the world’s largest credit-rating agencies just issued its strongest AI warning yet. Fitch says an AI market correction is becoming a major global credit risk. Not just a technology-stock risk. A credit risk. The S&P 500’s valuation is approaching levels seen during the dot-com boom. U.S. corporate bond issuance increased 26% during the first half of 2026. Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia, Meta, Oracle and SpaceX issued a combined $182 billion in investment-grade bonds. Meanwhile, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are expected to spend $700 billion this year. More than 75% above last year. That spending is already supporting the economy. Fitch estimates that information-technology investment added 1.4 percentage points to first-quarter U.S. GDP growth. Rising AI stocks also make investors feel wealthier which encourages more spending. But this creates a feedback loop. Companies borrow money to build AI infrastructure. Chipmakers and data-center operators grow because of that spending. Higher AI revenues and stock prices create more confidence. That confidence finances the next expansion. The system works as long as demand keeps growing. But what happens if the revenue does not arrive quickly enough? Technology companies reduce spending, data-center projects slow down, chip orders fall, suppliers lose revenue, bond investors become more cautious, and the same loop begins operating in reverse.

• 
  Rinku K (@RinkuK10) reported 32 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp I know u guys r not going to help me i raised complaint on 4th june today month is about to complete but u guys didn't solve my problem. If can solve my issue in 24 hours else I will think I have given money to begger that's it.