Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  AshleyNicole0416 (@ANicole0416) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Hello, my amazon account was hacked and the email and password was changed without my authorization and I now no longer have access. I’ve tried multiple calls and emails to customer service and have not gotten this issue resolved. Could you please help, thx

• 
  CCostis (@c_costis) reported 14 minutes ago

  The conversations around here:: corporations who are manipulating Americans lives so they get a good return on investment. Consider the fake food business which was sold to investors as the next big thing. No buyers so they try to ruin the natural foods industries or Hedge funds and governments collaborating (remember during covid) to shut down small businesses and funnel customers to Walmart and Amazon who are now charging customers what they believe the customers will pay based on DATA RETRIEVAL, of detailed information they are gathering on citizens and storing in data banks. This concern crosses party lines and these tentacles are infesting every part of our lives.

• 
  wizard (@Wizardgames15) reported 14 minutes ago

  OneWeb will go down as one of the craziest blunders of all time. Perfect timing Actual ability to execute Spectrum Competitive pricing One has to imagine where this company would be if it didn’t get bought by Europeans. Maybe dead? Maybe it would be the first shell of Amazon?

• 
  JACQUELINE 💜ᴾʳᵒᵒᶠ!! 💜💜 ∞ (@ImThirstaekim2) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Cy_La_Ng In Stanford we waited 7 hrs in the sun and went to the Amazon tent for merch Others waited for the black merch tent and when we finally got up to where both tents were the army's at the black tents were livid bc all their card readers were down People were passing out it was cray

• 
  Debayan Roy (Gadgetsdata) (@Gadgetsdata) reported 15 minutes ago

  @AnshuTechblog @Pmkphotoworks If they ensure that the device is not pre-activated just after receiving and get the invoice (which they'll get) then there shouldn't be any issue... Also, a tip : check the ratings of the seller before purchasing the Nothing Phone 3 from Amazon

• 
  Wyfeknave🌹 (@wifeknave) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Iwritestuff404 @moon187415 Ranchers are literally tearing down the Amazon and displacing indigenous tribes

• 
  Milk Road AI (@MilkRoadAI) reported 18 minutes ago

  The most dangerous thing a company can do right now is rent intelligence from the same place as its competitors (Save this). You cannot rent intelligence from the same place that rents it to your competitor as @chamath points out. If every company in an industry is feeding their workflows into the same frontier model, they are all converging on the same outputs, the same decisions, the same product improvements. The model becomes the equalizer and everyone pays a premium to become more mediocre. This is happening exactly as Chamath predicted, and the evidence is now concrete. Anthropic and OpenAI have established what analysts are now openly calling an emerging model layer duopoly. Anthropic crossed $45 billion ARR in may 2026, more than tripling from $9 billion at the end of 2025, OpenAI was at roughly $24 to $33 billion ARR at the same time. Together, the two companies combined could hit $160 to $240 billion ARR by end of 2026 and Anthropic and OpenAI now control 88% of enterprise LLM spend. That concentration is the structural problem Chamath is pointing at. And Anthropic isn't just winning on merit because it's actively lobbying for regulatory outcomes that would make that duopoly permanent. Dario Amodei has explicitly framed open source models as unsafe, pushing a safety agenda that, if enshrined in regulation, would effectively make it illegal for enterprises to use the cheaper, private, sovereign alternatives locking them into a closed model dependency by government decree rather than by choice. So you have market forces producing a duopoly, and potential regulatory capture moving to enforce it from the top down. This is exactly why the Nvidia Palantir partnership is not just a product announcement but rather a strategic counter to that duopoly. The logic is straightforward from both sides because If you're Palantir, sitting at the application layer, the last thing you want is to be permanently beholden to Anthropic or OpenAI for the intelligence that powers your product. You want competitive model options, sovereignty and be able to tell enterprise customers they can run AI on their own infrastructure with their own data without any of it touching a frontier lab's servers. If you're Nvidia, sitting at the chip layer, an Anthropic-OpenAI duopoly is an existential concentration risk. Right now, Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and dozens of other companies buy Nvidia's hardware. If the model layer consolidates into two players, both of which are building their own chips Nvidia faces a monopsony where its best customers are building the tools to displace it. A healthy open source ecosystem where thousands of enterprises train, fine tune, and deploy their own models is Nvidia's ideal market structure. More buyers, more diversity, more demand, less pricing leverage from any single customer.

• 
  Joa (@Sta50212) reported 18 minutes ago

  I am so curious what will happen to YouTube in the future, and the tax rules for creators I was listening to @StevenBartlett's Diary of a CEO podcast, the "Death of the Middle Class" episode with Daniel Priestley and Nick Hanauer. One idea stuck with me: companies like Amazon and Google do business in the UK but "pretend" to be in Luxembourg or Ireland, so they barely pay tax where the money is actually made. Priestley's fix @DanielPriestley talked about → tax companies based on where the audience is, not where the entity is registered. Almost like a broadcast license: you've got X views in this country, so this is what you owe. Now apply that to creators. Right now you can route a content business through a low-tax country while most of your views come from the UK, US, or Germany. If tax followed the audience instead of the company... the entire faceless/creator economy would have to rethink where its "revenue" actually lives. Would that kill the arbitrage — or just push AdSense to get taxed at the source? Just because everything is getting more expensive but the middle class is the suffering layer. For example an friend of mine opened an creative creation company, where it is impossible for him to hire people that are low cost high retention. Any thoughts?

• 
  Mohammad Smith 🇬🇧 (@Polythunks) reported 19 minutes ago

  @JohnHundeslit @amazon They cool slightly, but it's a con. The last thing you want when it's hot, is to pump moisture into the air. A dehumidifier will heat a room slightly, but it will allow you to cool down faster from evaporating sweat.

• 
  Tarnished Ghost (@Ghostyb40451588) reported 19 minutes ago

  @asmith4981 @ajassy Blame Amazon, I guess the OG cut was over 3 and a half hours long but suits think we are monkey brained and can’t sit down longer than 2 hours

• 
  Pulse and Profit (@pulseandprofit) reported 23 minutes ago

  $NVDA So why am I buying the dip? THE ACTUAL STORY: 🔥Last Q, they BEAT earnings by 6.5% while the entire market said they’d miss 🔥Growing 103% YoY. Name me another $4.8T company doing that 🔥Margins EXPANDING, not compressing. Data center TAM is growing, not shrinking 🔥New startup revenue-share program = unlocking a tier of customers who couldn’t afford H100 capacity THE BULL CASE NO ONE’S TALKING ABOUT: Nvidia isn’t growing GPU sales anymore. They’re monetizing the entire AI stack. Think bigger: → Hardware (H100/H200) → Software (CUDA, enterprise suites) → Financing (revenue shares with startups = recurring revenue model) → Custom silicon (inference plays, edge) Yeah, 103% growth at $4.8T feels rich. Until you remember: 🔥Hyperscale's still spending like drunken sailors on capex 🔥Meta, Amazon, and Google need Nvidia capacity 🔥Supply is constrained (TSMC can only make so much) This isn’t speculation. It’s just math. When shorts pile on + technicals look broken = usually when smart money loads. I’m patient. But when this chart's fixes (and it will) are in place, gap fills 236-245 fast. 🔥187-190 — if the breakdown accelerates, the next technical floor before serious support 🔥180s — if this turns into a real correction (unlikely but not impossible) Are you accumulating? $MSFT $IREN To me, this looks like a buying opportunity until we lose support.

• 
  Teksart (@TeksCreate) reported 25 minutes ago

  Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 is back online as of July 1 — 19 days after the US government imposed the first-ever export controls directly on an AI model. Here's what happened and why it matters more than the headlines suggest. The chain of events: - Amazon researchers found a way to prompt Fable 5 into identifying software vulnerabilities - Andy Jassy personally flagged it to Treasury - Commerce Secretary Lutnick signed an export control order — blocking foreign nationals from accessing the model - Anthropic couldn't verify user nationality in real time, so they killed access globally for 19 days The twist nobody's talking about: Anthropic tested the same technique on GPT-5.5, Kimi K2.7, Claude Opus 4.8, and a dozen other models. Every single one produced the same output. The "jailbreak" wasn't unique to Fable 5. Katie Moussouris (Luta Security) reviewed the actual research and called the flagged behavior "the most valuable thing an AI model can do for defensive security" — not a guardrail bypass at all. The new classifier blocks the specific technique in 99%+ of cases. But the real story isn't the fix — it's the precedent. Perplexity co-founder Andy Konwinski published an essay titled "Concentration of power in AI is a risk, not a solution" using this exact episode as exhibit A. His argument: when a handful of private labs decide what research is permissible, they're acting as unaccountable regulators. Yann LeCun replied directly calling it "medieval obscurantism akin to the Ottoman empire banning the printing press for 200 years." The uncomfortable truth: we now have a system where a single company's internal safety classifier can trigger a federal export control that shuts down a frontier model for 19 days. No legislation. No judicial review. No appeals process for the researchers who lost access. This isn't a Fable 5 story. It's a story about who controls the infrastructure that the next decade of software will be built on.

• 
  UAP Reporting Center (@UAPReportingCnt) reported 29 minutes ago

  UPDATED- Human Trafficing the motive? “They Tried to Take Her Face”: What Really Happened in the Peruvian Amazon? There’s a village deep in the Peruvian Amazon that doesn’t sleep like it used to. In 2023, something started stalking the people of Alto Nanay. It didn’t walk; it floated. It didn’t speak, but it paralyzed. People fired shotguns and hit nothing. And at the center of it all: a 15-year-old girl who swears something tried to take her face. This is one of those stories that doesn’t go viral because it’s too strange. Too hard to explain. The kind that slips into a dark corner of the internet, where it’s dismissed as myth, or worse, ignored. But if you talk to the villagers, the fear is real. The wounds are real. And the silence from officials? That’s real too. The Attacks Begin It started in July 2023 in the district of Loreto, near the river. Locals began reporting tall, armored figures moving through the jungle at night. Not walking, floating. Seven feet tall, with glowing eyes and heads too large for a human. They glided silently, often on what people described as “hover discs.” One man said he shot one point-blank in the chest. No blood. No movement. Just gone. Another was slashed across the chest by what he called a “bladed light.” They named them “Los Pelacaras” (Face Peelers). Because whatever they were, they weren’t just attacking. They were taking things. The Girl in the Sky Then came the moment that turned everything. A teenage girl was walking outside one night when she was grabbed from behind; one of the beings covered her mouth, the other took her legs. She was lifted into the air, hovering above the ground. Frozen. Her family saw it happen. They say the entities injected something into her nose, smeared a cold cream across her jaw, and began cutting into her neck with a precise, scalpel-like tool. If her relatives hadn’t rushed at them with flashlights, she may not have come back. The beings dropped her and took off, straight up. She lived. But her wounds didn’t look like animal scratches or scrapes. They looked clinical. The Official Story Authorities eventually responded. The Peruvian Navy showed up. So did the police. Their explanation? Illegal gold miners using jetpacks to scare villagers away from the jungle. It’s a neat answer. But no one was arrested. No jetpacks were recovered. No one found any nearby mining camps. And who exactly has the budget; or the reason, to terrorize an entire village for weeks in the middle of the Amazon? The locals didn’t buy it. Neither did a few independent investigators who visited the region, including American researcher Timothy Alberino, who called the technology involved “otherworldly.” What Were They? This is where things get weird, and harder to dismiss. We’ve heard stories like this before. From Brazil. From parts of Africa. From the U.S. southwest. Reports of beings with advanced flight tech, immune to bullets, conducting strange biological procedures on people who live far from any media. In many of these cases, there are recurring themes: Floating craft Beings that don’t speak Precision wounds or memory loss Government disinterest, deflection, or silence This wasn’t a mass sighting of lights in the sky. It wasn’t a blurry photo. This was boots-on-the-ground fear. And to the people in Alto Nanay, it felt like an invasion. A Darker Agenda: The Trafficking Connection But what if we aren't just looking at a bizarre experiment? What if we're looking at an interrupted operation? There is a darker, deeply unsettling undercurrent in UAP lore that we rarely want to face: human trafficking. Recently, Marine Corps veteran and whistleblower Michael Herrera came forward with a harrowing account from his 2009 deployment in Indonesia. He described stumbling upon a massive, hovering craft operated by rogue, unmarked paramilitary forces. The implication of his testimony; and others who have spoken in the shadows, is terrifying: vulnerable people from impoverished or third-world regions are being loaded up and trafficked for nefarious, unknown purposes. Think about the logistics. The remote Amazon is the perfect hunting ground. No cameras, no cell service, no immediate authorities. When those beings grabbed that 15-year-old girl in Alto Nanay and lifted her into the air, they weren’t just studying her. If her family hadn't rushed them with flashlights, she wouldn't have just been left with clinical wounds. She would have been gone. Was Alto Nanay an attempted collection point? Are these advanced entities; or rogue black-ops groups wielding reversed-engineered tech, treating isolated populations as a resource pool? The terrifying reality is that this remote village may have successfully fought off a trafficking operation before it could finish the job. Why It Matters We’re quick to label these things: aliens, black ops, hysteria, hoax. But what if we’re too quick? What if these stories; these impossible stories, are the ones we should be paying the most attention to? If this was a test run, if some intelligence (human or not) is experimenting in the shadows, Alto Nanay might just be a data point. But if it’s real; if what happened there is what it felt like, then we have a much bigger problem. One that isn’t just flying over our heads anymore. It’s landing. They didn’t come to talk. They came to take something. And they knew exactly what they were looking for. Joe- UAP Reporting Center

• 
  Sumanyu Singh (@sumanyu_si19597) reported 29 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp my refund of ₹2,503 for the cancelled order was marked as "Refund Received", with an expected credit date of 5 July 2026, 11:00 PM, but it has still not been credited to my HDFC Bank Credit Card. Please look into this and resolve the issue at the earliest.

• 
  Afridi (@Afridi55287423) reported 35 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp I have read all the emails, I am asking why my problem has not been solved, till now I want to say that I have not got any result from your side.