Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ (@shanaka86) reported 5 minutes ago

  A quarter to a third of all the Bitcoin that will ever exist, as many as 6.5 million coins including the 1.1 million believed to be Satoshi's, sits in addresses whose keys are already exposed on the open ledger. This year Google showed how to shrink the quantum machine that could crack them by about 20 times, and Bitcoin's own developers are now at war over a plan to freeze those coins before anyone builds it. Start with the mechanism, because the popular version is wrong. Quantum does not threaten Bitcoin mining. Attacking that would take something near the power output of a star. What it threatens is the signatures, the locks that prove who owns a coin. The moment you spend, or if your coins sit in one of the early address formats, your public key is written onto the chain forever. A quantum computer running Shor's algorithm could take that public key and run it backward to the private key that was never meant to be found. A Coinbase analyst put the exposed pile at 6.51 million coins, almost a third of all supply. Glassnode says 6.04 million. Hundreds of billions of dollars, held safe today only because the machine does not yet exist. And it does not, not close. In April 2026 the best result on real quantum hardware cracked a 15-bit key. Bitcoin's keys are 256 bits, a gap that is astronomical, not one more rung up a ladder. The quite credible timelines from NIST, IBM, Google and PsiQuantum still land between 2030 and 2035. This is not a next-week story ladies and gents! What changed is the direction of travel. Google's 2026 work cut the qubits needed to under 500,000. In the past month Microsoft, Google and Amazon each announced error-correction gains that turn a real machine from fantasy into a schedule. Governments moved too, ordering US agencies to file post-quantum migration plans by April. The clock, everyone now agrees, has started. Which is where Bitcoin turns strange. A bank swaps its encryption from the top, overnight. Bitcoin $BTC can only change by consensus, and consensus is the one thing it does not have. A quantum-safe address type, BIP-360, is already running on a test network, yet Bitcoin Core has not begun to build it in, and serious developers disagree on the path. A second proposal, BIP-361, goes further and colder: force every vulnerable coin to move, and freeze the ones that do not. That would seal Satoshi's 1.1 million and millions more in lost wallets forever, coins whose owners are gone and can never sign the transaction to save them. Protect the network by freezing the founder's fortune, or leave it in the open for the first quantum computer to take. Bitcoin now has to choose. For more than 15 years that fortune has rested untouched in plain sight, safe because the math was unbreakable. The math just got an expiry date, and the people who inherited Satoshi's network must now decide whether to bury his coins or let a machine come for them. Critical situation here!

• 
  Buried Headlines (@BuriedNewsBlog) reported 7 minutes ago

  @SenWhitehouse If CO2 caused climate change, why aren't the Amazon rain forests heavily protected? Why do we cut trees down with abandon? Why is Bill Gates wanting to cut trees down to combat so called man made climate change when the very thing we need to clean CO2 (which isn't the driver for climate change) is TREES which convert CO2 to Oxygen!?!

• 
  Aparna jha (@japarna11) reported 8 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp It's not working, still can you take pain to share the working link thr which I can add gift card money to my wallet

• 
  Gorefang (@TheHungerer) reported 9 minutes ago

  Project Hail Mary is streaming on Amazon. Spoiler Alert - It sucks. The general idea is that there are little alien dark cells that are killing every sun in the vicinity of our star system, the Solar System and this is an existential threat. For no good reason at all, the entire world needs the help of a douchebag middle school math teacher to solve the problem. No one else will do. It's a terrible movie from start to finish esp bc it's scifi that doesn't understand anything about science. These cells are made mostly of water, but can somehow travel en masse through space and eat the sun over a period of about 30 years without being destroyed by it. The math teacher becomes the only living person on the mission that survives the journey to a star 11.9 lightyears away, which is not 11.9 travel years away, it's 11.9 LIGHTYEARS which is such an incredible distance that he could not cross it in his lifetime, but somehow his ship can make that distance in just over 4 years, that's faster than light speed travel. Faster, even, than his communications back to Earth, which take approx 12 years to arrive. The movie thinks that the engine has to be firing for the ship to be moving and it will coast to a fairly abrupt stop if the accelerator isn't being held down, but this isn't a car. Cars stop when the accelerator isn't held down because Earth's gravity causes friction between the wheels of the car and the surface the car is traveling on. In space, no such friction exists so if you stop burning an engine, the craft will simply continue on at the same direction and speed unless acted on by another force. These kinds of simple mechanical errors are rife throughout the film, which at somepoint turns into a buddy comedy with a animate rock creature. I wish I was joking. This Math teacher and the rock are both intelligent scientists when the script calls for it and bumbling idiots in way over their heads when it doesn't. Gosling's acting, esp when he's pretending he can't remember how to speak properly after waking up from Cryosleep is some of the worst I've ever seen. I have no idea why people say this movie is good. It's not and to make matters worse, it's 2.5 hours long when it could have easily been 90 minutes. Terrible film. It's actually a little shocking to me that some idiot would make a scifi movie like this one without understanding the most basic things about space, space travel, orbital dynamics, gravity, or air pressure. If you don't understand any of that and you like cute little pet companions reminiscent of the animal companions each Disney Princess gets, then you might find something to enjoy in this film. If you don't like that or you understand even basic **** about space, you're going to see a lot of things that don't really make sense.

• 
  Buried Headlines (@BuriedNewsBlog) reported 15 minutes ago

  If CO2 causes climate change, why aren't the Amazon rain forests heavily protected? Why do we cut trees down with abandon? Why is Bill Gates wanting to cut trees down to combat so called man made climate change when the very thing we need to clean CO2 (which isn't the driver for climate change) is TREES which convert CO2 to Oxygen!?! BECAUSE IT'S A LIE.

• 
  Krishna (@vegirajukrishna) reported 19 minutes ago

  We’ve had many companies but these 2 taught us pretty much what’s actually important. Company 1 Company established, all legal work done before we wrote down the plan by week 1 Spent first 2.5 months building an extremely clean, fully secured backend, picture perfect app. Indirect marketing, kind of the marketing that’s done by already established companies with no requirement of direct sales / results, just a brand image ( Amazon can sponsor NBA teams without expecting direct results/sales from that collaboration ) essentially burning through cash. Niche specific issue, we got into something which we’ve got absolute zero experience with. Meaning we had to go to people with experience in that niche and gather a lot of data, which we did but way less than we had to. Finally bad coordination, as the CEO no matter what happens I take full accountability. We were working on too many things and things slowed down and right now paused everything. Company 2 Started 1 month before company 1 No company, no specific bank account, till last week. Week 1 built the software, week 2 got our hardware manufactured from china, week 3 got to 500$ MRR Month 2 scaled with ads, influencer marketing etc ( spent about 2 hours a day max ) got to 1000$ MRR Month 3 same thing, refined ads more, got to 10.8x ROAS and hit the first 1000$ / day and 10,000$ MRR Now on month 4. Still no company, have a bank account from another company. Now what was the difference ? Was it the money spent ? Absolutely not, spent 15x more money on the first company. It was purely execution speed. We could’ve sped up company 1 by 10x if we just launched that ****** app by week 2 and did primary marketing to test if it will even work out, and if it didn’t we’d iterate and fix and move on. Company 2 simply worked on execution and speed and consistency.

• 
  Thomas (@t_morrowXrp) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph This is pointless. OUSD will be used internally. Like Mastercard you won't see the transaction. They will earn 7% on OUSD Many companies will issue stable coins. Like Amazon they will have stable coins but your not going to buy them but they will be in their system earning 7%. Maybe you will get free membership and other perks. Joe public will only know dollars...

• 
  LostChiDem (@LostChiDem) reported 20 minutes ago

  @famexbt Live with roommates or move to a lower cost area for your $20/hr Amazon or UPS job. There problem solved.

• 
  Timmy_Turnes (@Timmy_Turnes) reported 27 minutes ago

  Prediction markets don't have an intelligence agency Until now 2026: @Polysights launches to solve the biggest problem in prediction markets > billions flow through prediction markets > whales move odds before headlines > anonymous wallets shape global narratives > build Polysights > an institutional AI layer for prediction markets > designed to see what everyone else misses > cluster anonymous wallets > detect insider trading patterns > track whale movements in real time > generate AI trading signals > analyze liquidity across every major market > surface hidden onchain behavior > promise institutional-grade intelligence > transform raw betting data into actionable insights > become the "Arkham" of prediction markets > raise a $1.5M pre-seed > backed by YZi Labs + Maven 11 > receive grants from Amazon + Polymarket > early access opens > funds and high-volume traders get in first > retail watches from the sidelines > goal shifts beyond tracking markets > predict the traders before they move markets > identify smart money wallets > detect manipulation before news breaks > automate trades from onchain anomalies > data becomes the new edge > AI becomes the new analyst > prediction markets enter the intelligence era > if prediction markets keep growing > whoever owns the best data wins > Polysights wants to hold the map

• 
  🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Tim🇬🇧 (@TimboB055) reported 27 minutes ago

  @AndyRileyish @amazon He probably took it out of his/her van and forgot to put it back in and not dumped. How about relaxing instead of bursting a blood vessel. I'm sure Amazon will sort the issue out.

• 
  Andy Riley (@AndyRileyish) reported 33 minutes ago

  @ACABSTUDIOS @amazon My problem is not with the delivery driver; i know the pressures they work under. My problem is amazon printing rules on the litter they knowingly create saying we cant use that litter

• 
  #3.5% #IamEuropeanToo #FBPE #FBPA #FBPPR #💙 (@Veritas_Veritas) reported 36 minutes ago

  @andyburnham just place windfall tax of amazon & eBay ( flat rate on turnover not profit , as that is manipulated by inter holding company. Offshoring of profit and good sales to ensure UK tax take is low) for high street renewal and cutting business rates in run down cities

• 
  Rudra Maji (@RudraMaji3) reported 37 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp They couldn't resolve the issue and abruptly closed the chat!

• 
  @LynAldenContact (@mulekinhos1) reported 37 minutes ago

  This is basically what Amazon did with AWS, before the age of AI. They had all this server capacity and systems to run the largest retail website in the world, and then were like, “let’s scale it to run other businesses’ websites and applications, too.”

• 
  ☆ is talking to hong ?! (@HONGSMINGKI) reported 38 minutes ago

  we need to fix our digital game guys like focusing on purchasing the song digitally (on itunes, amazon etc), organizing mass purchase periods, funds for purchases….anything really. we are good on physicals and do better with every new cb but lets not abandon digital purchases