Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The Agentic Operator (@AgenticOperator) reported 8 minutes ago

  2.9%. That's how much of what AI says about your brand comes from your own website. The other 97.1% comes from sites you don't control. 149,912 citations analyzed across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Grok. Your website barely matters in the conversation AI is having about you. Reddit alone accounts for 40% of all AI citations. Wikipedia 26-48%. YouTube 19%. LinkedIn 15%. Yelp 21%. These platforms are writing your AI reputation right now whether you're present on them or not. Most brands spend 90% of their effort optimizing their own site. Schema. Page speed. Content rewrites. That covers 2.9% of the equation. The other 97.1%? Reddit threads you've never seen. YouTube reviews you didn't ask for. Wikipedia entries you can't edit. Amazon reviews you stopped monitoring. Forum comments from 2019 you don't know exist. Your brand story in AI is being written by strangers on platforms your marketing team doesn't manage. That's not a visibility problem. That's a control problem. And the first step to solving it is accepting you were never in control.

• 
  Wil Buchanan (@wil_buchanan009) reported 11 minutes ago

  @WallStreetApes Unfortunately this is probably a necessary move for UPS to lower operating costs. Now that Amazon has entered the shipping market, UPS is down over $12B in gross revenue from just 4 years ago.

• 
  John Mathon (@JohnMathon5) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Rafael47518447 @AnnieForTruth Spacex was and still is overvalued based on its current income. Nonetheless, it is inevitable that their income will rise dramatically over the next year. By 2027 SpaceX revenue should exceed $50 billion. Even that income would justify only a valuation of $500 billion. Amazon with $700 billion in revenue is worth about $4 trillion. However, because SpaceX can make $1000/$2000 per customer per year and has access to 8 billion customers its revenue could exceed $2 trillion when its 40,000 satellites are launched. They have no competition. No other company or country can reasonably compete with SpaceX. SpaceX’s current fleet of 10,000 satellites is more than all other satellites launched by the world for all time. Nobody can catch up in 10 years. Their technology and launch capabilities give them a monopoly. So sometime in the next 5 years SpaceX will be worth $10 trillion and Elon will be worth $4-5 trillion. I’m not saying this to promote Elon. I’m simply stating a fact. There were times in Elon’s life where he might have been bankrupt. I’d say today it’s inevitable that Elon will be worth many trillions. I wouldn’t worry about him or his companies. Remarkably even Tesla is showing incredible sales numbers recently. In China, Europe and even the US tesla is killing it. If you are hoping that any of these things will fail I’d take a pill, calm down and just focus on something else. It’s not going to work out betting against SpaceX or Tesla.

• 
  Otter gaming (@TheMobOtter) reported 14 minutes ago

  @AugustUS421547 @j_fishback The problem is scale. Amazon is too big to succeed.

• 
  Ryo (@0xRyoBuilds) reported 15 minutes ago

  AI solves International Math Olympiad geometry in 19 seconds but still can't reliably check whether your Amazon order shipped. Same models, same paradigm – so why is math the one field it's actually racing through? Grant Sanderson (3Blue1Brown) on Dwarkesh breaks down how AI progress in math actually works: Since 2024 it cold-solves IMO geometry in ~19 seconds with a brute-force solver – but chokes on combinatorics, the "playful" category. The frontier isn't a wall, it's spiky. The real breakthroughs aren't raw power. They're small cross-field "lightning bolts" – an idea from one field dropped into another. The Erdős 1196 result had exactly that shape. And here's the part everyone gets half-right: people say math races ahead because it's verifiable. But the missing half is grindability. You can run a million deterministic attempts at a proof. You can't spam Amazon's checkout a million times without getting shut down. That's the whole story. Math happens to have both properties current training needs – verifiable and grindable. Most of the economy has neither.

• 
  Daley (@DaleyFinX) reported 17 minutes ago

  The Mag7 concentration story is not a 2024 problem anymore. It is a 2025 structural dependency that nobody in the institutional world wants to say out loud. When seven names represent roughly 30% of the S&P 500 by weight, "the market recovering" and "seven stocks recovering" are the same sentence. That is not a healthy market. That is a hostage situation. Here is what the bulls are missing right now. The so-called comeback in Apple, Nvidia, Amazon is happening against a backdrop of tightening financial conditions, a Fed that is not cutting anywhere near as fast as the futures market priced six months ago, and a earnings revision cycle that is quietly rolling over in the rest of the index. The other 493 stocks are not "catching up." They are drowning in slow motion while the Mag7 lifeguards debate whether to jump in. Nvidia is carrying the weight of an entire AI capex supercycle on its balance sheet and forward guidance. Amazon is a logistics and cloud infrastructure play that trades like a consumer discretionary name when sentiment cracks. Apple is selling premium hardware into a consumer that is genuinely tapped on real disposable income. None of that screams "save the market." The deeper issue is valuation math. You cannot have the equal-weighted S&P sitting near flat year-to-date while the cap-weighted version shows gains and call that broad participation. That is seven stocks papering over a market that is quietly repricing risk on everything from regional banks to mid-cap industrials. Watch credit. Not equities. High-yield spreads and leveraged loan prices are telling a more honest story than the index level is. When the Mag7 bounce and credit does not tighten in response, that is the tell that this rally has no structural foundation. The market does not need Apple to hit a new high. It needs the other 493 to stop bleeding.

• 
  Bowtie Productions (@BowtieProdsYT) reported 20 minutes ago

  @exisbread No problem! I have the Titan brand Super Massager. There's no model number, unfortunately. I picked it up from 5 Below like 5 or so years ago, and they frequently rotate their stock, so I doubt they'll still have it. I didnt see the exact item on Amazon, but it looks like there's some eBay listings, at least.

• 
  Moan Joker (@DrJokerMoan) reported 21 minutes ago

  @amznsellerhelp @AmazonASGTG For the suggestion box: Please break down return rates by paid keyword ad conversions. I recently received a few new "frequently returned item" badges which seemed to coincide with me increasing my ads budget. High CPC 1st-position ads drive impulse buys, which can mean high conversion rates but also high returns. If ad spend is quietly driving higher returns, then my own ad spend may be damaging my account. I'm a leader in a "preference" niche (fit/feel matters), so I already receive a high number of return-prone impulse buys. Spending more to improve ad positions and/or expanding my keyword list may be adding fuel to that fire. Now, I'm considering cutting my $20k/mo spend dramatically over the next couple of months to test this theory myself. I'm not convinced that benefits me or Amazon, but the badge is a silent killer, and without visibility into this, I'm flying blind on my own ad spend.

• 
  Rutger Montgomery (@RutgerMonty) reported 24 minutes ago

  @dee_bosa The stakes are much higher than shielding American labs. The entire AI economy (labs, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Musk, Qualcomm, infrastructure, semiconductors, etc.) is at stake. Moonshot/China has the potential to lay waste to all of that. And now that hundreds of billions have been spent on AI capex, Moonshot/DeepSeek ********** would be fatal to many of those companies, and likely precipitate a recession. So, the Feds are going to shut it down. They'll say "national security" or whatever.

• 
  𝕍𝔼ℕ𝕂𝔸𝕋𝔼𝕊ℍ 𝕄𝔸𝕃𝕃𝕀𝕊𝔼𝕋𝕋𝕀 🔯JSP🚩 (@Venkat93ms) reported 24 minutes ago

  @amazonIN what is our guarantee? Who will take responsibility for our hard-earned money?If you continue to harass me like this, I am taking this issue very seriously. I am directly filing an official case against Amazon India with the National Consumer Forum (NCH - 1915) today.

• 
  Mr. X (@SudipGh63016449) reported 26 minutes ago

  @DealsDhamaka They would refund. Happemed this type of issue. Amazon is relatively far betted than other ecomm in customer service.

• 
  𝐫𝐮𝐞! ₊˚⊹ | edtwt (@mysticalories) reported 26 minutes ago

  @lilacpenguins i bought one of the cheaper ones (abt £100) on amazon, sadly its quite loud even on a slow speed its a combination of the mechanism noises and footing can vibrate through the floor :”)

• 
  Stark (@Stark_of_Zenon) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Bit_Faced Fair enough. But it's not like they are making it clear. The highlighted text could refer to anything ranging from Bitcoin miners to Amazon to the peers and providers that Electron chooses for you (it's the latter). It's arguably good enough for some things but most crypto users don't even realize or care that they are trusting intermediaries, and this model is not going to satisfy the threshold of trust minimization required to move Bitcoin to bigger blocks. I'm not dunking on BCH or Electron, nor am I dignifying BIP-🤢, I'm commenting on the reason why blocks are 4 mb and the actual open development problem. If some kind of neutral verification technology somehow provides Bitcoin with a light client solution that's better than SPV, it would work for BCH too.

• 
  𝗕𝗶𝗴 𝗜𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗮𝗵♎ (@BigIsaiah_01) reported 28 minutes ago

  A group of Yale students went into the Ecuadorian Amazon looking for anything interesting. They came back with a fungus that eats plastic and can do it without oxygen. It is called Pestalotiopsis microspora, and it was found living inside plant stems in the rainforest. In the lab, students fed it polyurethane, the plastic in foam, insulation, and countless products, and it did not just tolerate it. It thrived on it, treating the plastic as its only source of food. The part that made scientists sit up was what happened when they removed the oxygen. Most organisms that degrade waste need air. This fungus kept eating anaerobically, in exactly the conditions found at the bottom of a landfill, buried under tonnes of trash where nothing else can breathe. The mechanism is elegant. The fungus secretes an enzyme that snaps the chemical bonds holding the polymer chains together, breaking long plastic molecules into fragments it can absorb. To the fungus, plastic is just an unusual kind of carbon, and carbon is dinner. Now the honest caveats, because a headline like this always outruns the science. This was discovered years ago, and it is still not a deployed solution. Lab results are not landfills. It works on polyurethane, not on every plastic, and PET bottles like the one in this image are usually handled by different organisms and enzymes. Speed is the real problem. A fungus that takes months to chew through a foam sample is not going to erase a garbage patch, and the by-products still need to be understood before anyone releases anything at scale. But the discovery cracked open a whole field. Since then researchers have found bacteria that digest PET, waxworms whose gut microbes break down polyethylene, and engineered enzymes that dismantle bottles in hours. Here is the deeper truth in it. Plastic has only existed for about a century. In that blink, life has already begun evolving an appetite for it. We invented a material nature had no answer for, and nature started writing one anyway. Should we be racing to engineer these organisms for landfills, or is that fixing the wrong end of the problem?

• 
  ᝰ𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚕𝚎𝚢 ❦ mcdadley™ (@chadleymacguff) reported 31 minutes ago

  i recommend salvaging any broken or defective hardware from old laptops and gutting the drives for storage. an adapter with shell casing is relatively cheap on amazon and reformatting the drives takes maybe an hr at most