1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Amazon
  4. Outage Map
Amazon

Amazon Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Amazon users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Amazon, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Amazon users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Fort Smith, AR 1
Los Angeles, CA 6
Chicago, IL 5
Paris, Île-de-France 18
Fléron, Wallonia 1
Melbourne, VIC 1
Township of Evan, KS 11
Lillers, Hauts-de-France 1
Ciudad Jardín, MEX 1
Southampton, England 1
Valencia, PA 1
Les Herbiers, Pays de la Loire 1
Coacalco, MEX 2
Rouyn-Noranda, QC 1
Atlanta, GA 5
Sydney, NSW 1
Hyannis, MA 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
A Estrada, Galicia 1
Morlaix, Brittany 1
Mumbai, MH 1
Iztapalapa, CDMX 1
Charlotte, NC 2
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Santiago de Querétaro, QUE 2
Kingston upon Hull, England 1
Pensacola, FL 1
São Paulo, SP 1
London, England 4
Langen, Lower Saxony 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • TheEclecticGoat
    The Eclectic Goat (@TheEclecticGoat) reported

    @Ronin_Crusader7 @DJSmu Which is another problem with digital media. People could find out tomorrow that Amazon kills puppies and most wouldn’t abandon them because “but all my stuff is there.”

  • Wothi_ndosi85
    Samkelo Cele (@Wothi_ndosi85) reported

    @Abacus_69 @Sentletse Amazon has addressed that issue. Starlink can compete if they are up for it

  • Cyber_XTC
    XTC (@Cyber_XTC) reported

    @nothing Again this phone was 6 weeks old. 2 weeks earlier and I could have just done an Amazon return and none of this would be a problem. Sad days.

  • aphroareia
    ⋆𝓙.🫒. ⋆⸜ 🍵✮˚ (@aphroareia) reported

    @mirachaels this **Amazon acc** is a troll/bot of theirs that usually trolls under fans posts and never did more than 3 likes. in april it was suddenly doing 5k likes and now poses like someone who watched the movie and went down a rabbit hole

  • yobrycejoe
    Bryce Joe (@yobrycejoe) reported

    Your Amazon listing looks done and still does not sell. One small trust leak blocks every order. Fix the ugliest thing first. Then tighten photos, bullets, keywords. Finish the last 5 percent before you chase traffic. What detail kills trust on your listing right now?

  • Lord_Sandile
    I did Not lie (@Lord_Sandile) reported

    @pushinM15 You can't own a military asset with the natives, you won't have power to shut it down when you feel like it. Amazon is after profits so it's was simple to get the deal done.

  • newsgreenstreet
    Green Street News (@newsgreenstreet) reported

    We are aware that Green Street News is currently experiencing an outage. This has been caused by a wider issue affecting Amazon Web Services (AWS), a cloud infrastructure provider used by our hosting platform. AWS are working to get things back up and running .

  • bitz21
    Saurabh Asthana (@bitz21) reported

    @amazonIN @amazon . I have complained a few times but yet I'm facing the same issue with the delivery. The status shws out fr delivery and at the last minute I get a msg tht the pckg is undeliverable. The money doesnt get refunded immediately. I cnnt trust buying from Amazon now.

  • jlawrence12345
    Larry Marcs (@jlawrence12345) reported

    @twitbot72169658 @srvc76 Well, I ****** up selling aehr before earning as yesterday. It went up 40%. The problem is my shares of EOS aren’t worth ****. Couldn’t even buy 400 shares of AMD. That’s where I would put my money. Or Apple or Amazon or Facebook those are the winners I’ve got a loser

  • Th_Angelopoulos
    Thanos Angelopoulos (@Th_Angelopoulos) reported

    @ThommoLad @UKDecline You are making the argument for me in two consecutive posts. Post one: "people vote with their money for Amazon, nobody holds a gun to their head". Post two: "businesses lobby government for barriers to entry and red tape to create a monopoly using the state for their own means". So which is it? Are consumers making free choices in a competitive market, or are large businesses using the state to entrench monopoly positions that eliminate the alternatives? You can't run both arguments at once. If Amazon's dominance is partly the product of lobbying, regulatory capture, and tax structuring that smaller competitors can't access, then "people vote with their money" isn't describing a free market. It's describing a market shaped by concentrated wealth using the state for its own benefit. That's not a "state corruption problem" separate from a billionaire wealth problem. The corruption you're describing IS the mechanism by which concentrated wealth entrenches itself. Who do you think is doing the lobbying? It's not the independent retailer on the high street. Amazon spent $24.4 million on US federal lobbying alone in 2023. The state doesn't corrupt itself in a vacuum; it gets captured by the same concentrated wealth you're defending. You say the state is fraudulent and inefficient, so we shouldn't give it more money. £570 billion sitting in offshore tax havens isn't a story about the state taking too much. It's a story about the state collecting too little from the people best equipped to pay. The inefficiency argument is a reason to fix enforcement, not to stop collecting.

  • Qasim_Soomro
    Qasim Soomro (@Qasim_Soomro) reported

    The biggest failure in email validation isn’t the bad address it lets through. It’s the good address it throws away. Amazon Web Services (AWS) helped make scalable email infrastructure accessible. Twilio built validation into its email stack. ZeroBounce, NeverBounce by ZoomInfo, Bouncer, Kickbox, and others made list cleaning a standard step before sending. That’s good. Bounce protection matters. But after testing across many systems, we kept seeing the same blind spot: Addresses we had independently confirmed were valid were being returned as invalid. Those false invalids never bounce—because they never get sent. They quietly disappear from campaigns, even though they may represent real people, real conversations, and real revenue. On the datasets we tested, @Saleslumen correctly returned more of those known-valid addresses as valid than the other systems we evaluated. That’s the problem we built around. Not: “How aggressively can we shrink a list?” But: “How do we protect deliverability without unnecessarily throwing away reachable prospects?” Because catching bad emails protects your sender reputation. Recovering good emails protects your pipeline. Don’t take our claim on faith. Take up to 200 emails your current verifier rejected. Run them through @Saleslumen free. Compare the decisions. If there’s no useful difference, keep your current tool. If there is, you just found pipeline hiding inside your reject pile.

  • ajayjain
    Ajay Jain (@ajayjain) reported

    CAN WE STOP BLAMING PRICE OF BOOKS AS CAUSE OF LOW READERSHIP? | #WriteNotes Those who follow my writings and talks know my views on discounting of books – I believe it is a regressive practice. Yes, the customer may seem to benefit on the face of it but they also lose out on good literature – read my other posts justifying this view. However, what I don’t understand is when people make issue with affordability – they point out to the ‘high’ cost of books as a matter of ‘national concern’ and an impediment to those who seek access to books. Corollary: If prices are lower, more books will be read. If not, we will suffer from low readership. Really? By that logic, go to Amazon. You get books at deep discounts. Problem solved, we should be a nation of readers. But when I insist on regulation and voluntary action by publishers to ensure books sell at full price across all channels, I face resistance. Please understand: discounts will not improve reading habits; selling at full price will not lead to a fall either. Because books in India are priced quite reasonably if you go by economic indicators and cost of other goods and services. Any further drop will eat into the margins needed to produce quality literature packaged as attractive books. Those who can afford to buy books at a certain price will also pay the full price. Those who cannot afford to buy new books, have other options like we did when growing up. All of us above a certain age lived in times of 'less' - when an ice cream lolly was a once-in-a-while treat. But we still managed access to books - we bought, borrowed and exchanged. And read all the time. So let us stop blaming pricing for low readership. The cause is something else, and I will share my opinions on those too.

  • nithin611
    Nithin Jayashankar (@nithin611) reported

    Being a longtime customer, recently amazon delivery service has been poor in my area. I need a resolution to this issue ASAP.

  • Austinhouse58
    DextersMom🇺🇸🌞🌴 (@Austinhouse58) reported

    @nithyavraman Didn't AOC do something stupid too with Amazon? She pushed all those jobs down the road.

  • DavidFalade001
    DavidGaga💎⚽️ (@DavidFalade001) reported

    @sarah_carusona Hidden attribution issue. Counting the same customer as “new” on Shopify and Amazon can make CAC look better than it really is. Discounting Amazon’s New-to-Brand metric is a smart interim solution.

Check Current Status