Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  CagedandDenied (@CagedandDextu) reported 1 minute ago

  @house_chastity Some cheap crap from Amazon my Goddess ordered. Not terrible. It helped with sizing at least. First real one was Locked in Lust Vice Standard. Nice cage but moved to metal as we like it better.

• 
  TXKen (@ken_tx4598) reported 2 minutes ago

  @ThrillaRilla369 Amazon. Why should I get in the car, drive for 30 minutes, and stroll through 20 shops HOPING to find what I want, when I can sit down at my computer, do a quick Amazon search, and order EXACTLY what I want, and have it delivered the next day?

• 
  Catherine Hepp (@CatherineHepp) reported 9 minutes ago

  Map just showed Amazon van driving by my place. I think they are hoping that I will meet them downstairs and make a scene and that will somehow save their job. I'm not going to meet them down there. They are going to end up fired.

• 
  Vince (@VincedubU) reported 10 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp It wants me to make a report. Which I have done many times. My issue is well known. I just want a resolution for a serious issue, that’s been reported.

• 
  Ashwin Viswanath (@AshwinV800) reported 10 minutes ago

  @HedgieMarkets Wouldn’t this mean great news for Amazon, Google, and Microsoft, and terrible news for Anthropic and OpenAI? The more the open source models are used, the more compute usage on these cloud platforms will be. They get more money, while the customer reduces their costs of training.

• 
  Flyn II (@MissionSpartav2) reported 11 minutes ago

  Any reason whenever something is shipped to you vi @USPS you know you canust add 3-4 days to what they tell you the delivery rate is? Just close it down already....to incompetent to keep funding this trash. #USPS #Amazon

• 
  Janet Feast (@feast9848) reported 12 minutes ago

  @cdnrefugee @amazonca Husband had a car issue this week. Shop quoted almost $400 for the part. Or, they said, order thru Amazon for about $40. It arrived in a couple of days.

• 
  Kamil Kwapisz (@kamilkwapiszpl) reported 16 minutes ago

  OpenAI wants to be judged on more than model quality now. This week's Jalapeño benchmark release is the clearest signal of that yet. > 1.5x to 1.9x more throughput per watt across GPT-OSS 120B, DeepSeek R1, and Kimi K2.5. > End-to-end latency down 1.7x to 3.6x. > up to 4.1x faster than the Nvidia Blackwell system they benchmarked against (wow) Most coverage frames this as OpenAI versus Nvidia. The bigger picture is who else already built this. Google has run its own TPUs since 2015 and now handles roughly a quarter of the world's AI compute outside Nvidia entirely. Amazon has shipped over a million Trainium chips. Microsoft has Maia. Meta has MTIA. OpenAI is actually late to custom silicon among the big labs, not early. For Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, building their own chips was a cloud margin play from the start, since they sell compute to everyone else too. For OpenAI, this reads more like survival math. Compute is their single biggest cost line, and every dollar spent on Nvidia GPUs is a dollar not going toward their own margin. OpenAI increasingly frames this as compute scarcity, not model quality, being the real ceiling on their growth. OpenAI isn't walking away from Nvidia, and it's not trying to become the next Nvidia either. They're still buying enormous volumes of Nvidia GPUs. Jalapeño isn't even for sale. OpenAI says internal demand is so high it can't imagine selling the chip to anyone else. The competition with Nvidia here is about needing to buy less from them. This is the conversation I keep having with SaaS companies I work with. The AI competition everyone watches is model versus model, OpenAI versus Anthropic versus Google. The competition that actually decides who's still standing in three years is who controls their own compute economics.

• 
  ƬΣΣ ❣️ (@tiachante_) reported 19 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp The link is sending me back to the chat I had previously, where the supervisor associate told me that there’s nothing that can be done from their end to fix my issue. Thank you but I don’t know if this will be of any help and I don’t have another hour to try and figure it out

• 
  𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 (@OopsGuess) reported 20 minutes ago

  @ChrisRMcGuire You know what Microsoft, Amazon and Google care about? Revenue. Can your anti-China tantrum generate cloud usage? Can it sell inference? Can it attract developers? Can it grow enterprise demand? No? Then sit down. Kimi can make them money. You can only make noise.

• 
  Kevin Chung (@k__chung) reported 20 minutes ago

  Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Meta (Facebook), OpenAI, Claude, ChatGPT, and Anthropic So are we going to book a meeting? Since all of you think this is AI. So you are telling me you are not working with IRA?

• 
  Master Of None (@dinquisitively) reported 21 minutes ago

  The ongoing friction between platform aggregators (like Uber, Eternal/Zomato, and Porter) and state governments in India, as highlighted by the platforms pulling out of the Karnataka Platform-Based Gig Workers Welfare Board underscores a crucial shift in the gig economy: the future of delivery-based gig work is becoming highly unpredictable. Criticizing gig work as inherently unstable or lacking traditional benefits is easy, but it overlooks a vital economic reality: for millions of workers, platform delivery serves as an indispensable shock absorber where formal, higher-paying jobs are scarce. When regulatory interventions push compliance mandates too aggressively without accounting for market dynamics, they risk creating severe, unintended consequences that harm the very people they aim to protect: Displacing Low-Barrier Employment: Platform work offers low entry barriers, immediate liquidity, and schedule flexibility for students, migrant labor, and workers between jobs. If regulatory levies (such as per-transaction fees) and compliance costs are pushed too aggressively onto thin-margin platforms, operating models become unviable. Platforms may react by restricting onboarding, capping active driver slots, or scaling down operations—ironically eliminating livelihood opportunities where alternative jobs do not exist. Higher Consumer Costs & Reduced Demand: Compliance burdens and transaction fees inevitably trickle down to consumers. Given the high price sensitivity in quick-commerce and food delivery, increased delivery charges depress order volumes. Lower customer demand directly shrinks trip availability and overall net earnings for delivery partners. Pushing Workers into Worse Informal Labor: Heavy-handed mandates do not automatically compel digital platforms to create formal, full-time jobs. Instead, if platforms cut back operations in heavily regulated regions, displaced gig workers are often pushed back into the unorganized, informal sector (such as manual daily-wage labor), where baseline earnings are lower and safety nets are non-existent. Legal Friction and Operational Uncertainty: With major platforms actively challenging state gig laws in High Courts over dual-compliance and central code conflicts, the sector faces prolonged regulatory ambiguity. This friction stalls platform capital investment and local expansion while simultaneously delaying the actual delivery of welfare benefits to workers. Key Context from the Karnataka Incident The Standoff: Platform aggregators including Uber, Eternal (Zomato), and Porter have withdrawn from Karnataka’s statutory welfare board while actively litigating the Karnataka Platform-Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Act, 2025 in the High Court. State Action: The state Labour Ministry ordered official notices against non-compliant platforms dodging welfare levies. Current Participation: Other entities like Delhivery, Namma Yatri, Yulu, and Amazon India remain associated or engaged, but overall coverage remains limited to a fraction of the broader gig ecosystem. Finding a balanced ecosystem, where basic social safety nets exist without crippling the low-margin business dynamics of platform work will determine whether the sector can continue to offer accessible employment moving forward.

• 
  Shep (@ShepherdsGlen) reported 21 minutes ago

  @dyhptg Ordered mine off of Amazon UK. They ship through Amazon to US bc Amazon. This is a non issue.

• 
  NeoX5 (@NeoX5) reported 21 minutes ago

  @KevinBarnicus @DopeFrags @MrR4ger_ I mean it spiked with the Tether partnership and then tanked not too long after that. I wouldn’t doubt it happens again. Time will tell. They’re venturing down a road of bigger losses before they ever see the payoff over the next 6 years. Their content platform and their B2B Cloud/AI are really two different business ventures they’re trying to roll into one. Neither benefits the other at this stage. It would be like Amazon rolling AWS under Twitch. On the note of Wallet, that was rushed through because of Tether. Northern Data, again, Tether.

• 
  Jay (@JayNCtoDC) reported 22 minutes ago

  The video quality for the Mystics game on Amazon Prime is like light years better than Monumental Network. Come on Ted you want me to pay $20 a month fix this ****.