Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  I dont pick sides (@engineeredguy29) reported 6 minutes ago

  @QueenAnticommie There's a girl i work with at Amazon,when I see her I try to keep a distance, I'm always wondering if she doesn't realize she absolutely stinks,I think its much more than a deodorant issue though,but definitely part of it

• 
  It's me.. (@connect_shank) reported 8 minutes ago

  I personally feel @ICICIBank_Care @ICICIBank does not show interest on checking on the critical data leak issue. Not taking any action as well. So it's high time to surrender my ICICI Amazon card. What is the procedure to surrender it? Pls advise. Thank god i dont have account.

• 
  S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) (@CsTominaga) reported 10 minutes ago

  @KenEbert3 Amazon is the obvious example, since apparently this needs to be said slowly. Amazon fell about 95% from December 1999 to October 2001. It was not merely “down a bit.” It was treated by many as a dot-com casualty. Yet it later became one of the most important companies in the world. That example is not folklore; it is discussed in Morgan Stanley research on drawdowns and recoveries, and reported again in market coverage of that research. So the statement “if something loses 98% of its value, it is complete crap” is just wrong. Large drawdowns do not automatically prove permanent worthlessness. They prove that price collapsed. That is all. Research by Mauboussin and Callahan looked at more than 6,500 US stocks from 1985 to 2024 and found severe drawdowns were common. The median peak-to-trough decline was about 85%, and major long-term winners such as Amazon, Apple, and NVIDIA also suffered enormous falls before later recovering and exceeding prior highs. That does not mean every collapse recovers. Most do not. That is the point a competent person would make. But your claim was categorical: “when something loses 98% of its value, it’s complete crap.” Amazon alone destroys that argument. You are confusing a price collapse with an ontological statement about utility, survivability, and future value. That is not economics. That is a slogan pretending to be thought.

• 
  Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported 15 minutes ago

  @pravinsingh1101 @pravinsingh1101 Please copy and paste the link into a different web browser clearing cookies/cache and enabling desktop mode or try to access the link via desktop/laptop to connect with our team. Copy the link > paste the link in any browse > search the link > login to your Amazon account and once logged in, it will display 2 options, one is "continue previous chat" and other is "start a new chat". Click on start a new chat option, and it will connect to our team. Kindly connect with our team via order related account for our team to check and help you accordingly. Please end active chat, and follow the steps here to get connected with our team. Please be informed that it starts as a usual customer support chat except the agent introduces themselves as from the our team. -Fasi

• 
  Tom in Hawaii (@TomTayon) reported 17 minutes ago

  @DicksTrash @amazon A 3d printer could fix that in a jiffy!

• 
  Shriram Ponnengala (@Shriram_26) reported 19 minutes ago

  @amazonIN I ordered 2 Samsung S23 back covers but received only 1 case. I raised a replacement request... the replacement ALSO arrived with just 1 item. Now the delivery agent refuses my return saying "there should be 2". Please fix this issue ASAP #amazon

• 
  MoldyRobot (@MoldyRobot) reported 25 minutes ago

  @RedPandaKoala You must not have gotten it from Amazon since it doesn't look like it's been dragged down the street.

• 
  Matthew (@DavidWrigh51263) reported 27 minutes ago

  Day off=Get Amazon return sorted as Evri Machine not working so walk to post office, pick up Prescriptions hope it doesn't rain

• 
  Dr Maureen Rhoden (@rmau_r) reported 30 minutes ago

  @AmazonNewsUK Why is it impossible to phone Amazon if I have a problem I need to discuss with someone and your FAQs doesn’t have the answer?

• 
  Louis Mosley (@louismosley) reported 31 minutes ago

  @davidrichards There’s a lot I’d take exception to here, but I’ll highlight two: (1) the misinformation Palantir does not own NHS data. We cannot use it, sell it, or move it. It stays inside each NHS trust, under NHS control, and the contract is the NHS’s to end whenever it likes. You may be right about NHS data being a goldmine, but it is not one Palantir can monetise, or would want to. (1) the double standard Your chief concern seems to be that Palantir’s contract with NHS is akin to letting “a foreign, state-adjacent company into critical national infrastructure.” You should apply this concern consistently then. Yesterday, NHS England announced that 505,000 staff will get Microsoft 365 Copilot. The NHS also runs on Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google. All are US firms. All have the same “deep roots in US defence and immigration enforcement” you mention with regards to Palantir. If US ownership, and having certain US government clients, are disqualifying tests, then surely these should apply equally to every such company? Either US technology in the NHS is a sovereignty problem (in which case maybe the relevant news today is the 505,000-seat deal signed with Microsoft). Or it isn’t, in which case perhaps singling out Palantir isn’t really about sovereignty at all?

• 
  Rish (@mrfundible) reported 33 minutes ago

  I lent a house flipper money I borrowed from a bank at 0% He paid me back at 50% I kept the spread and did nothing but wire the money Here’s exactly how it worked 🧵 Let me back up I had $200,000 in 0% business credit sitting across Chase and Amex Most people would have bought inventory or run ads with it I did something different I became the bank Here’s the problem most real estate flippers have that nobody talks about They find a great deal A house they can buy for $80,000, put $40,000 into, and sell for $200,000 The math is obvious The problem is they need the $40,000 for rehab THIS week Not in 6 months when an SBA loan closes Not after 90 days of mortgage underwriting This week Banks don’t move that fast Hard money lenders do And that’s exactly what I became I had a developer in my network Experienced flipper Multiple successful projects behind him Found a beat up house that needed a full rehab He had the deal, the contractor, the buyer lined up He just needed the gap capital to fund the rehab That’s where I came in The structure I liquidated $150,000 from my 0% business cards through @trykashu Cost me 6.5% to convert to cash $9,750 in fees Money landed in my account in 48 hours I loaned it to the flipper at 14% interest Secured by a recorded lien on the property If he didn’t pay I didn’t just lose money I got the house You can see the before in the photos That neglected property on the left 6 months later Project completed House sold Flipper paid me back principal plus 14% interest My $70,000 turned into $135,000 That’s a 25% cash on cash return in 6 months on bank money The bank gave me the capital at 0% I deployed it at 14% The spread was mine My cost: $9,750 in liquidation fees My return: $65,000 in profit Net after fees: approximately $55,000 On money that was never mine to begin with Here’s what most people miss about this play The downside is not losing money If the flipper defaults I don’t lose a dollar I foreclose and take the property A property I lent 70 cents on the dollar against The downside is I accidentally own a house worth more than my loan That’s not a downside That’s just a different kind of win And while all of this was happening I was sitting poolside at Crystal Bay Nusa Penida in Bali Villa booked with points Trip cost $0 Money working without me That’s not passive income That’s a system Here’s the full picture of what happened in 12 months Raised $250,000 in 0% business credit Liquidated $150,000 through @trykashu Deployed into fix and flip gap funding at 51% Collected $135,000 back in 6 months on $70,000 deployed Used returns to fund Amazon inventory acquisition Amazon business now does $65,000 a month Remaining credit still earning travel points on business spend Every dollar worked twice The bank’s money funded a flip The flip funded an Amazon business The Amazon business funded the lifestyle None of it was mine to start with This is what I mean when I say the goal isn’t to make more money It’s to understand how capital moves And position yourself at every point in the flow where it passes through your hands Comment “Lender” and I’ll show you exactly how we build the 0% capital stack and structure the hard money deployment so your money is always secured by real estate worth more than the loan

• 
  Tom😈Loves❤️Horror😱 (@ILoveHorror7) reported 33 minutes ago

  The Omen (2006) The primary driving force behind the 2006 remake was a calendar anomaly. 20th Century Fox fast-tracked the film specifically to capitalize on the ominous calendar date of June 6, 2006 (06/06/06), reflecting the biblical "Number of the Beast". In 1976, 20th Century Fox originally previewed the original movie nationwide on June 6, 1976 (06/06/76) to create word-of-mouth buzz around the "Number of the Beast." This early sneak peek campaign worked perfectly, creating huge anticipation for its official wide release later that month on June 25th. The studio launched an aggressive promotional campaign for the remake that cost double the budget of the original film. Massive billboard signs stating "You Have Been Warned" covered major cities. Fox even hired airplanes to fly warning banners over crowded beaches, causing enough panic that a military fighter jet was dispatched in one instance to ****** a banner plane down. The Omen (2006) was an undisputed financial success at the box office, fueled almost entirely by opening-day curiosity and event-driven marketing. To boost home video sales, Fox heavily pushed an "Unrated Extended Edition". This version included highly stylized, extended gore sequences—most notably an elongated, digital glass-shattering death for Father Brennan (Pete Postlethwaite). The film performed incredibly well in video rental stores and retail spaces, such as Walmart and Amazon. It became a standard fixture of horror movie marathons and physical media "Halloween sales" throughout the late 2000s. Today, horror fans and film critics view The Omen (2006) and The Omen (1976) through completely different lenses. While the 1976 original is revered as an untouchable masterpiece of psychological dread, the 2006 remake is looked back on as a hollow, glossy time capsule of mid-2000s studio trends. Modern audiences feel it traded genuine atmosphere for 2000s MTV-style editing, removing the psychological ambiguity entirely by making Damien obviously evil from the start.

• 
  Jack (@jackcoder0) reported 34 minutes ago

  The uncomfortable truth: The Amazon you see isn't the Amazon your sister sees. The "$17.49" laundry detergent isn't actually $17.49. It's $14.99 to someone and Amazon decided you'd pay more. You haven't done anything wrong. You haven't been targeted maliciously. You've just been profiled accurately. The algorithm correctly identified you as someone willing to absorb small price increases without noticing. The price you see is a mirror of how the system perceives you, your habits, your patience, your loyalty, your alternatives. The 7-step playbook above takes 5 minutes to learn and saves an average of 8-15% on every Amazon purchase going forward. It won't make you immune to dynamic pricing. Nothing will. But it forces Amazon's algorithm to work harder for the markup and often, when the algorithm can't be certain about your willingness to pay, it defaults to lower prices. Her friend's final words at dinner: "The customers who pay the most aren't the ones who shop the most. They're the ones who shop without thinking. The fix isn't to stop using Amazon. It's to stop being predictable."

• 
  Ætheric (@3TH3RIC) reported 37 minutes ago

  @GlobalBoxOffice Amazon doesn’t care about how this movie does at the box office, the movie has already been funded by the Amazon prime subscription that millions of retards still pay for. They don’t care about a flop, as long as they get to push their agenda and shove the woke ideology down everyone’s throats. Cancel all of your streaming services. You don’t need TV, snap out of it.

• 
  🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported 41 minutes ago

  Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.