1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Telêmaco Borba, PR 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 6
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Madrid, Madrid 5
La Trinité, Martinique 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 10
Persan, Île-de-France 1
Metz, ACAL 3
Aubais, Occitanie 1
Toulouse, Occitanie 5
Seysses, Occitanie 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Colmar, ACAL 1
Les Sables-d'Olonne, Pays de la Loire 1
Chantonnay, Pays de la Loire 2
Paris, Île-de-France 38
Pringy, Île-de-France 1
Santiago de Querétaro, QUE 1
Duque de Caxias, RJ 1
Parmilieu, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Amiens, Hauts-de-France 2
Rouen, Normandy 1
Vienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Pontoise, Île-de-France 2
Asnières-sur-Seine, Île-de-France 1
Arrondissement de Charleroi, Wallonia 1
Santa Cruz de la Palma, Canary Islands 1
Rennes, Brittany 2
Caxias do Sul, RS 1
Saint-Lubin-des-Joncherets, Centre 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • PatternNotes
    SR (@PatternNotes) reported

    The Wrath of Khan Moment — Why CB-011 Is Still $CRBU’s Torpedo The Enterprise is damaged!!! Caribou does not currently have enough capital to comfortably fund the entire program through completion while simultaneously advancing CB-011. Management knows this. Shareholders know this. The market knows this. And that creates the trap: Management already used the ATM heavily around $2. It raised cash. It reduced spending. It extended the runway. It preserved the CB-011 H2 2026 catalyst. In other words: Management bought firing distance. But buying firing distance is not the same thing as winning. Something still has to change the battlefield. CB-011 is that shot That dataset matters for reasons much bigger than another response-rate update. There are actually two warheads on this torpedo Warhead #1: Valuation Suppose CB-011 expansion reproduces something close to the original signal. Suddenly the market has to reassess whether Caribou owns: another experimental allogeneic CAR-T or a genuinely competitive off-the-shelf multiple-myeloma asset with unusually deep responses. If CRBU re-rates from $1.50 toward $3, $4 or higher, the entire financing problem changes. A $60M raise at $1.50 requires: 40M shares. At $3: 20M shares. At $4: 15M shares. Strong CB-011 data therefore do not eliminate dilution. They make dilution cheaper. And that means existing shareholders surrender less ownership of both CB-011 and vispa-cel to fund the next stage of development. CB-011 can help finance vispa-cel before CB-011 itself ever reaches approval. That is the first warhead. Warhead #2: Regulatory path This is potentially even bigger. Vispa-cel is headed toward a large randomized pivotal trial. The question is whether CB-011 ultimately has to follow the same capital-intensive playbook. Maybe it does. RMAT does not guarantee otherwise. But CB-011 has several things working in its favor: heavily pretreated multiple myeloma deep early responses RMAT access and now deliberate enrollment of patients previously treated with BCMA-directed therapies That last population may be crucial. If CB-011 repeatedly produces deep responses after prior BCMA therapy has already failed, the regulatory question becomes different. It is no longer simply: “Can this compete broadly against existing BCMA CAR-T products?” It becomes: “What registration pathway is appropriate for an off-the-shelf therapy showing meaningful activity in patients who have already exhausted BCMA-directed treatment?” That is a potentially much more favorable question. Imagine three outcomes. Outcome one: Strong data, conventional regulatory path CB-011 looks excellent. CRBU re-rates. Management raises at a much better valuation. That alone can still save shareholders enormous dilution. The torpedo worked. Maybe not perfectly—but enough. Outcome two: Strong data + shortened registration path Now things become much more interesting. CB-011 gains value. CRBU re-rates. Financing gets cheaper. And Caribou potentially discovers that its second major asset can reach commercialization with substantially less capital than vispa-cel requires. Outcome three: Good data, no regulatory shortcut, no major re-rating This may be the most frustrating outcome. CB-011 works. But not enough to force the market to change its valuation. FDA still wants a large expensive development program. This is the actual Wrath of Khan moment The Enterprise does not need another routine weapon. It needs the weapon capable of changing the geometry of the fight. That is what CB-011 represents. Management has already done the maneuvering. They used the ATM. They conserved capital. They bought time. They preserved the catalyst. Now comes the shot. Because that is the moment we find out whether CB-011 really is different from vispa-cel— or whether Caribou has simply loaded another expensive weapon it cannot afford to fire. My personal notes. Not financial advice

  • fr0gwad
    caro1 (@fr0gwad) reported

    @BattlefieldComm why wasn't this posted as an appendix to the initial post abt matchmaking? why did you just leave everyone to speculate and assume the absolute worst for a week? is it that hard to update a live service games community in two tweets?

  • King0fKingsRKP
    KingofKingsRKP (@King0fKingsRKP) reported

    @Battlefield Will you fix the F'in Igla challenge already!!!!!!!

  • RandomAhmad7
    🇵🇸 (@RandomAhmad7) reported

    @BattlefieldComm you guys focus on problems that no one cares about the most, while leaving the game breaking bugs still in the game FOR MONTHS, why are you guys trying to kill the game so bad?

  • MnKSpdi
    EXE spdiii (@MnKSpdi) reported

    Battlefield 6 newest update nerfs movement again?! BUT STILL NO BLACK SCREEN FIX ! I don’t understand why the movement is getting punished again, since in My eyes it’s already balanced, but besides that the new update looks promising! We will see what I will cook with this !

  • ClutchyyyyF
    Clutchy (@ClutchyyyyF) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Another useless update which doesnt fix any of the 3526363 bugs in redsec

  • amsferdam
    Day1 (@amsferdam) reported

    @DylanMalyasov @BRAVE1ua Since it's a war context, it's important that issues for the defenders on the battlefield, problems they face but cannot solve themselves with the means at hand, reach the umfeld were people can approach those same problems from a different context and/or perspectives and ->

  • rowell_96
    God Emperor (@rowell_96) reported

    @DavidRa53789847 @TrndSetrr @BattlefieldComm Because microtransactions fuel the live service model you insufferable ****. If they paywalled content on a premium membership like they used to do we wouldn’t be stuck in a loop of 2 maps a season vs the 4 and mounds of content in a Premium paid service model

  • JR98726272
    Lionidas (@JR98726272) reported

    @CelticAshes If he didn't get his AIDS in the battlefield, then it's not our problem.

  • bnarbnar1997
    bnarr1997 (@bnarbnar1997) reported

    @Battlefield Fix your ******* audio and broken hit reg you ********, stop this with this stupid things.

  • Hal0tara
    Tara (@Hal0tara) reported

    @BattlefieldComm How about instead of making everything shitier, you use your time to make what everyone as been asking from THE VERY BEGINNING like idk the server browser that would surely help with the problem

  • AllOnMalone
    REDACTED (@AllOnMalone) reported

    @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Stupid decision. I’ve played nothing but ********** since the game came out with zero problems with matchmaking. Stupid excuse instead of admitting they f**ked up their ui creating the so called issues in the first place

  • killjoy77k
    Roccie Apollo (@killjoy77k) reported

    @ka1nfso1 @BattlefieldComm PS5 and maybe that’s my problem..

  • TheRobbieBlair
    LtMcGuganfps (@TheRobbieBlair) reported

    @BF6Updates We only worried that the Moe Ron brass @EA_DICE fix the ballistic system Everything else is quite stout and good If you watch, bullets exit rifle-barrels @25degrees If you listen to new players, its a constant: "Wtf, how did that miss?!" Bf6 has the worst gunplay of any fps

  • HSandwich47
    Ham_Sandwich47 🇨🇦 (@HSandwich47) reported

    @CTVNews Absolutely not. HIV is a highly infectious, incurable disease. And military service includes a lot of bloodletting. Not just on the battlefield, but in every day service. Getting blisters treated, constant cuts and bruises, combined with living in extremely close quarters.

Check Current Status