Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  nAtEdAwG (@natedawgg46) reported 0 seconds ago

  @Rapha_828 @MrProWestie No one will care if it does, the trust is already severely broken with the community and way past the chance of being repaired by the Devs. Players won't buy the next battlefield. I think I'm headed down that path too.

• 
  Archangel Michael (@LaughsInCrusade) reported 29 seconds ago

  Every @EA_DICE dev deserves to be publicly flogged for their broken *** game

• 
  Cass 💜🔞 (@perfectcrimes_) reported 3 minutes ago

  @WolfBeils He's never been bad, people just had a skill issue. I remember being forced to only him in a challenge run (until everyone else was reclassed appropriatly) and he was a savior at every turn. Will never diss my King of the Battlefield!

• 
  Aisha Mehta (@AishaMehtabn) reported 4 minutes ago

  If you want inbound leads without posting every day, learn to systematize brand building. We used to think brand building required daily effort. Then we realized the world rewards predictable systems. Sadly, most founders don’t have the leverage. Here’s the brand-building framework that’s helped our clients generate $2M+ in pipeline: Contrary to popular belief, brand building isn’t about going viral. It’s about consistency, not luck. Done right, every post compounds and the decision to reach out becomes their idea, not yours. The AUTOMATE framework helps you do that in five steps: 1. Account Architecture Most founders start posting without a strategy (when they shouldn’t). Real strategy means mapping your ICP, competitors, and hooks upfront. It means starting with questions like: - Who do we want reading this? - What pain do they wake up with? - What authority gaps exist in their space? Your only job here is to understand the battlefield before you fight. 2. Understand Patterns Now analyze what already works. “We found your top-performing content is when you talk about X and Y. Is that right?” When they say “Yes, exactly”, you just earned their trust. They’ve seen the pattern in their own words. The system should come after you’ve confirmed the signal, not before. 3. Test Engineering This is where you experiment fast. Assume other approaches have already been tried. So do things like: - Have you A/B tested hooks? - What formats got the most replies? - Why do you think engagement dropped? Your goal is to find the winning angle AND surface why past efforts stalled. This sets up the next step. 4. Automate Execution Volume beats perfection - but only when the system is proven. Use the winning patterns you just discovered to build a content engine that runs on its own: “We had a client with the same problem. Posted sporadically, felt stuck. Then we implemented one system that doubled their inbound leads in 30 days.” Stories let them picture themselves in the solution. 5. Track & Optimize Lastly, frame continuous improvement as the missing piece: “Your goal is 10 inbound leads/week. The problem is you have no system. You’ve tried posting manually. The missing piece is [our engine]. Here’s how we’ll do it in [timeframe].” Then finish up with “Does that sound like what you need?” This makes you a partner in their growth. To them, you’re not selling - you’re solving. Ultimately, brand building isn’t about being loud. It’s about being systematic. Let systems do the heavy lifting. And don’t forget the money is in the inbound.

• 
  Resident of Little Britain (@Andrew70265613) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Me and my friends played rush regularly and never had any match making issues. Insane to delete that. We’re done.

• 
  The Cummins Accountability Project 🌎 (@tcumminsap) reported 10 minutes ago

  "They seem to have assumed that bringing in a barrister, defeating the claim and obtaining a favourable judgment would neutralise you. But you don’t treat the tribunal as the only battlefield. You absorbed the loss, studied the record, built TCAP and turned their expensive legal victory into an open-ended reputational problem. They mistook winning the proceeding for ending the dispute. Given they already knew you could execute a sustained strategy, that was a spectacular gamble." So let's rolllllll the dice. One last time, take a chance on lovveeee again tonightttttttt

• 
  Pedro49er (@Pedro49er) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm FIX THE AUDIO AND TTK **** IS GETTING OLD.

• 
  GodIsAble (@nova_nyla) reported 19 minutes ago

  Candace Owens currently holds structural leverage over Andrew Wilson in this debate negotiation, and she has earned it. Debating Wilson does almost nothing for her platform or status. Debating her does a great deal for his. That asymmetry is the foundation of everything that followed. She has spent years building to this altitude through constant high-stakes combat. He is the one who needs the collision more. That is why she can dictate terms and still look like the reasonable party. Look at what she actually did with the format. Wilson’s preferred structure (equal claims from the jump + formal cross-examination blocks + automatic default loss on ad hominem) would have put her on extended defense, spending large stretches of the debate justifying every alternative theory while he controlled tempo. That is a classic competitive-debate posture designed to grind the other side. She detected it immediately and killed it. She forced the sequence to begin with the strong public claim he has made — that the evidence against Tyler Robinson is “overwhelming” and “crystal clear.” Only after that does the floor open to her theories. That single move inverted the burden and denied him the defensive siege he was trying to create. On top of that she locked in: •$300k just for showing up •her studio •no time limit •short timeline while seven months pregnant Easy money for her. Significant elevation opportunity for him. Both sides get something, but the power dynamic is not equal. Wilson is a serious, trained debater. He prepares, he does not fold easily, and he has a real record. Respect is due. But this is a different matchup. Candace has been living inside the Kirk case for months — the footage, the texts, the medical examiner issues, the timeline around Erika, the chain of custody questions. It is second nature to her at this point, and it is personal. She has also spent years surviving the highest-pressure media environments and long hostile sessions without crumbling. That combination of subject-matter depth, emotional investment, media-hardened composure, and proven ability to stay standing under fire is rare. She already won the pre-fight by refusing the framing that would have put her on permanent defense. The person who controls the battlefield usually controls the perception of the outcome. This is going to be a long session, and it will be significantly harder for Wilson than a standard debate-circuit contest. Objectively: she is a tough cookie for a reason. Whether you like her or not, the track record and the current positioning are clear. Wilson’s preferred structure is classic competitive debate architecture: put both sides’ claims on equal footing from the opening, grant him formal cross-examination blocks, and force Candace to spend large stretches defending every alternative theory she has floated. That format turns the event into a long defensive siege for her. It is the same dynamic that has worn down many people in extended Piers Morgan-style or Fuentes-style sessions — you spend the majority of the time reacting, clarifying, and protecting secondary claims while the aggressor controls the tempo and the burden of proof. Candace detected it immediately and killed it. She forced the sequence to be: 1. First, test the strong claim Wilson has repeatedly made in public (the evidence against Tyler Robinson is “overwhelming” and “crystal clear”). 2. Only after that does the floor open to her alternative theories. This is not a minor procedural preference. It is a strategic inversion. She is refusing to start on the back foot. By making his strongest public assertion the opening battleground, she puts him in the position of having to carry the affirmative burden first. If he cannot overwhelm the room with the official case, every alternative theory she then introduces gains automatic legitimacy. That is the opposite of the dynamic he was trying to create. @RealCandaceO @paleochristcon

• 
  D (@upnorth321) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your game. It keeps crashing.

• 
  General Warmonger (@GeneralWarmong) reported 22 minutes ago

  I see a big problem with America right now. It's unwillingness to sacrifice soldiers on the battlefield. This makes the strongest army completely useless. The world elites are not amused... So, they will make America Great Fighter Again, by making it Communist. After failing to defend Hormuz.

• 
  Libertad_24 (@FlacoG_2023) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Stop releasing content, because technically the game runs like ****. Desync with console players, advantages for console players, desync with players having very low or high latency (-10ms/+60ms)—fix the game!

• 
  Jason Reza Jorjani (@Jason_Jorjani) reported 31 minutes ago

  Gary and I went to see Swann, the psychic artist, who was living at an apartment in the Bowery. He was a flaming ******, not that I minded much. What bothered me more than his annoying mannerisms was that a cursory look through his bookshelf made it clear that Ingo was a member of the Church of Scientology. Parts of his relatively small library looked like the L. Ron Hubbard required reading list. His paintings were technically impressive but had the same lurid and garish quality characteristic of Battlefield Earth and Hubbard’s even lesser works. I looked over at Gary silently, with an expression that he had no trouble interpreting as some cross between dismay and contemptuous skepticism. Feinberg looked back in such a manner as to reassure me and urge me to be patient. The professor turned out to be right. Ingo Swann’s abilities as a psychic were truly remarkable. He picked up on my cynical attitude and was so affronted by it that he reached right into my mind, or as he might put it, reached out into past places and times, to confront me with information about my life that he could hardly have known. Some of this concerned my aunt, and I had to stop Ingo before he embarrassed me in front of Gary who was starting to look very uncomfortable. He had the decency never to ask me to elaborate on what Swann was getting at that day when I cut him off. – Jason Reza Jorjani, PSYCHOTRON

• 
  Rajan (@Rajan24312) reported 32 minutes ago

  @LifeMathMoney Bruh. If they're made to do military service, we'll lose to China. If you're a soldier,you need someone who is strong enough to help you out. Women are a liability in a battlefield.

• 
  pala hanmi reddy | Beyond The Hype KTR (@hanmireddy) reported 35 minutes ago

  Here is the complete list of “The 36 Rules of Social Media” If all you do is respond to complaints, that’s all people will send you. Stop & Ask: Would an actual person talk that way? Everyone says they don’t want to be marketed to. Really, they just don’t want to be talked down to. The consumer is out for himself, not for you. As monetization attempts go up, consumer experience goes down. Don’t try to be clever, be clever. Social is 24/7. Not a one-time stunt. Always write back. Have an ROI. Have an ROI. Have an ROI. People would rather talk to Comcast Melissa than Comcast. Solve problems for people who talk about you, even if they don’t address you. Not everything will work, and that’s fine. Embrace negative content about your brand. Everyone’s an influencer. If fans distribute your content without your permission, offer to help. It’s okay to drive people to your site instead of Facebook’s. Update your page or delete it. Don’t make people do X, Y, then Z. Stick with X. Last year: Pump out content. This year: Optimize content. Become BFFs with your Facebook Reps. Social media doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Make traditional media and social work together. Desktop is conquered territory. Mobile is the battlefield. If you don’t see financial results, you wasted your money. People fight for their privacy. The only way to scale word of mouth: Paid Advertising. Have a crisis plan. Don’t use ads to prop up boring content. Use ads to accelerate successful content. Forget individuals. You’re creating content that encourages groups to form. People don’t want to shop where they socialize. Contests and sweepstakes are fine… if you want to encourage short relationships. People care what you had for breakfast… if you’re a food brand. Pinterest works. Your fans own your brand. If you’re bored by social media, it’s because you’re trying to get more value than you create. Think past vanity metrics like followers. It’s an organism, not a process.

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 35 minutes ago

  Fix the ******* ballistic walls. They never place quick enough, let alone consistently on uneven ground. @EA_DICE @Battlefield