Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  RAHUL SHARMA 🇮🇳 (@KumarRahul65453) reported 2 minutes ago

  @unusual_whales "Iran's strategy in one sentence: survive the battlefield, win the bargaining table. The problem is when both sides think they're winning the same negotiation." 🤔

• 
  Magnetosphere (@watchindy) reported 3 minutes ago

  @ProfStanciu @ProfStanciu to be walking inside myself as a regular civilian and fighting with my blood cells as if my body is the battlefield of everyone's problems

• 
  Stevo3854 (@stevo3854420) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Your entire game is broken. From black loading screens, graphical glitches, bullet registration, ridiculous ranked squad rules that you can't squad with lower ranked friends then they immediately squad you with complete noobs. Let's not even mention the insane amount of hackers!

• 
  Ashish Bajpai (@AshishB60558222) reported 5 minutes ago

  BATTLEFIELD SITREP: THE 23,991 GAP-DOWN SHOCK Active Combat Feed (Friday, June 19, 2026) Commander, the Operator has just executed a violent, trend-shattering move. The tape is pre-opening at 23,991.20. This is a catastrophic ~177-point gap-down from yesterday's 24,168 close. This gap completely obliterates the entire bullish demand staircase we mapped yesterday (24,155, 24,121, 24,103). More importantly, it gapps the market back below the psychological 24,000 floor and slices straight through yesterday's absolute low of 24,036.95. The bullish structure is temporarily broken. Here are your condensed, trigger-ready playbooks for the open: 🔴 PLAYBOOK A: THE BREAKER BLOCK REJECTION (Short the Relief) The Logic: The gap-down is so severe that the entire 24,036 to 24,100 zone (yesterday's floor and demand voids) has instantly flipped into a massive overhead Bearish Breaker Block. The Operator allows a quick morning bounce to trap dip-buyers before resuming the FII distribution. The Trigger: Nifty opens at 23,991, rallies back up to test the 24,036 - 24,050 zone, and instantly prints a sharp Red Shooting Star on the 5-minute chart, violently rejecting the 24K level. The Action: Execute a Short (PE) scalp on the confirmed rejection. The Target: A flush back down through the 23,991 open, targeting the 23,950 macro support. ⚫ PLAYBOOK B: THE CASCADING WATERFALL (Trend Continuation) The Logic: The global panic is too severe. DIIs step aside completely, and the algorithms relentlessly hit the bids off the opening bell. The Trigger: Nifty drops immediately from 23,991. A 15-minute candle closes cleanly and fully below 23,950 with heavy volume displacement. The Action: Do not short the absolute bottom. Wait for a 3-minute micro-pullback (a tiny Bearish FVG) to execute a Short (PE) continuation. The Target: Price discovery into the 23,888 gap-fill vacuum. 🟢 PLAYBOOK C: THE EXTREME TURTLE SOUP (Buy the Reclaim) The Logic: The Operator engineered this massive gap-down purely to liquidate the late retail longs from yesterday's 3 PM squeeze. Once the panic stops are triggered below 24K, DIIs absorb the liquidity and initiate a violent V-shaped recovery. The Trigger: The tape flushes below 23,991 but instantly rejects the downside. It prints a massive Green Hammer on the 5-minute chart and aggressively reclaims and closes back above 24,040. The Action: Execute a strict, counter-trend Long (CE) scalp only on the successful reclaim of 24,040. The Target: A short-covering squeeze back toward 24,100. The Sniper's Rule: The 24,000 line is no longer your floor; it is your ceiling. If they bounce and fail at 24,036, the bears are in total control. Hold your fire until the structure confirms the trend!

• 
  Douglas MechArthur ☭⃠ (@Kicksbuttson) reported 8 minutes ago

  Way too many of your guys are seeing the Tier system of operators and assuming it's a simple good/better/best hierarchy. What it really represents is a distinction between different mission sets, or mission types. Tier One mission sets are high-stakes, and therefore very low margin or error. That's why the soldiers sent on those missions are so highly skilled, and belong to units that have the strictest gatekeeping measures possible. They also have the best logistics imaginable which lends them special insights prior to most of the missions. Those are things you won't have in a civilian defense scenario. Even if you were trained to their level (which you're not) all it's going to do is cause you to outkick your coverage. In a civilian defense scenario where soldiering skills are going to pay off (a scenario that is unlikely but many of us still prepare for) you're goin to find yourself on foot, weighed down, and fighting from a position of near absolute ignorance of the wider battlefield. You're not in Tier One territory. You're not in Tier 3 territory, which is technically not even an actual tier. We just call them conventional or regular forces, and you have less logistics than they do. Taking all your advice from super Delta SEALs just because they have credentials is going to lead to you running around the backwoods with a Geissele 11.5" AR15 with a Hydra mount equipped with an EoTech, quad nods, and a suppressor that looks like an Aztec death whistle. But you're going to get lost and run out of energy before you reach anything remotely resembling a target. Probably fall into a far ambush the moment you think cutting through a field will save you time, realize your rifle isn't optimized for this engagement, and run out of ammo because you only have 3 magazines across your front on a slick carrier. Those of us who've been there before and aren't taking every lead from Tier One types are going to have a 14.5" AR15 with a reliable LPVO and piggybacked red dot, PVS14s our wife bought us on our anniversary, and a ******* compass because we don't trust GPS. We'll get to the objective and lay the ambush that wins the fight because we've done it before and knew that 12 magazines was far more reasonable. We won't mind carrying that weight to the objective because we know the moment the shooting starts the weight is gonna drop quickly, and we still need ammo to get home. Now is your chance to tell me how wrong I am, and how some ex-Delta guy says competitive shooting is king, and tactical shooters are ruining your sport. Because comp shooting is just a sport whenever I'm at the competition with a tactical setup, but it's suddenly top tier tactical skills whenever you're in fantasy land pretending to do what some of us have done in real life.

• 
  John (@DownHomeJohn) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm How about the bug where bots one shot me with a tank round from a smg and then the red outline of my killer is a tank, not the single infantryman I was attempting to gun battle? Is the game actually that broken? Is the game unraveling because of all the broken patches?

• 
  Blaccode (@IamBlaccode) reported 23 minutes ago

  @NigeriaStories Very mumu initiative, what would be the essence of journalists following the military to gun battlefield??? Would that fix the insecurity on ground??? If you insist I nominate VDM for this mission, he is a great content creator.

• 
  DJ TinyTim (@TheIdeaManFL) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fun…did you fix the optical glitch in BR? Have you returned the hundreds of RP we’ve lost dying in Ranked because your broken game is still broken?

• 
  Lumbricus Terrestris (@Wormwarone) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Tried downloading and the update is stuck. Anyone else have this issue?

• 
  TheSmokingDuck (@KadofanHypnos) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Slorpler My main problem with Jetpack Cat’s lore is the fact that Brigitte made a Jetpack with machine guns for a cat which as far as she knows has the intelligence of an average cat, then sent it out into a battlefield with 0 concern whatsoever.

• 
  Erick (@Erickschultz11) reported 27 minutes ago

  @mattvanswol We trust institutions to investigate wrongdoing fairly, yet repeated scandals have left many people questioning whether similar failures are treated the same way. Some see accountability being shaped by power, ideology, reputation, fear, or institutional self-protection. Others argue that different cases simply involve different facts, evidence, and constraints. The problem is not necessarily that institutions are acting in bad faith. They may genuinely believe they are applying consistent standards, weighing evidence carefully, protecting due process, avoiding prejudice, or balancing competing social concerns. The deeper issue is that much of this reasoning is often invisible to the public. When decisions are opaque or difficult to scrutinize, people cannot easily distinguish between responsible judgment and narrative management. As trust declines, disagreements spread beyond the events themselves. People begin disagreeing about which sources are credible, which facts matter, and which institutions can be trusted to evaluate the evidence. The result is a crisis of legitimacy. The question is no longer just whether accountability is being applied fairly. The question becomes who gets to decide what happened, how that decision was reached, and why everyone else should trust it. The way forward is not to choose one victim narrative over another. It is to make the process itself more transparent, more consistent, and more open to scrutiny. Every case should be examined through the same questions: who was harmed, who caused the harm, who enabled it, who ignored it, who benefited from silence, and what incentives may have protected the failure? But even that requires something more. We must be willing to apply the same standards of evidence and skepticism to our own preferred narratives that we apply to those we oppose. Without that, accountability becomes another battlefield for competing stories rather than a search for truth. The real challenge is not simply rebuilding trust in institutions. It is rebuilding trust in the processes by which institutions, evidence, and public judgments are evaluated in the first place.

• 
  NupeKeem 🫡 (@NupeKeem) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm you cant fix the notecode yet? I love getting shot behind a wall. Literally the best feeling there is. Imagine being on a streak and you dying behind a wall

• 
  JRB (@JRB___2) reported 29 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm FIX THE BOTS

• 
  vitor 🦅 (@DuffyMorgan_) reported 29 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm There's a lighting issue when we use the first person on vehicles, did you guys already fix that or no?

• 
  ARCOS (@falsewoodxt) reported 32 minutes ago

  @GetCheatz @Millitings @BattlefieldComm How unemployed are you to be tagging me on random tweets like these bruh of course there are going to be a few people with hit reg issues. Are you 12 or something