Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Orange_Vol1321 (@OrangeVol1321) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Aussiegamerhd2 @Battlefield If you're refusing to play because of "skins" we don't need you in the game. There's 200 bugs or problems with the gameplay/graphics and most of it has been there since release. It's a FPS, you can't even see your skin. Lmfao

• 
  Don Elliott (@RealDonElliott) reported 3 minutes ago

  i don't know how many flares you're giving guys now but they've got more than one in a row @Battlefield you really need to fix the heli cheaters

• 
  Bane (@anhonestsitizen) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BattlPULSE That in Battlefield there is a terrible balance and shooting. How many times do problems live at least until the middle of the cycle

• 
  Adrock (@Adrock318) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield the game is literally unplayable with this TTK. This isn't a milsim. I should not be dying in two frames. This game has been broken since launch and once again I am uninstalling. @tiggr_ @DRUNKKZ3

• 
  Swaguley (@swaguley) reported 11 minutes ago

  Saying that players who don't like certain movement mechanics in Battlefield because they're just "bad at the game" is a non-sequitur. I agree, the movement isn't difficult, and killing players slide-jumping isn't either. That's not the issue. The real problem is this. - It changes the pace of combat and alters the feeling of gunfights to where they become less readable, and more annoying to play fundamentally; and more importantly: - It shifts the tone of Battlefield from the "grounded in authenticity" mantra Battlefield had, which players have come to expect from it in the market, to something much arcadier I'm happy to support more movement options as long as they fit an authenticity and believability line, but it seems even asking THAT is too much for some reason. We praise vehicle design when they move naturalistically, why is infantry combat an exception? The heart of the argument here is about Battlefield's tone, which affects how the gameplay is designed, not because some players can't "get good". You don't get players complaining about emergent movement mechanics in Rocket League, even from trash cans, because they expect it from the game's tone, Battlefield players do not. And no, citing bugs like BF3's aim stabilization jump, BF4's various movement exploits, etc. as prooftexts to justify any and all future crackhead movement mechanics in Battlefield, doesn't work either. Should we also then bring back Battlepacks just because they were in BF4 too? I get there are those of you that don't care about Battlefield's tone, therefore there is no "movement line" to cross, but you're ignoring massive swaths of players that DO care and will just straight up not play the game as a result, as you often recommend them to do. A vast amount of players come to Battlefield to play a combined arms military shooter with the "appearance of realism without being a simulator" gameplay loop that Battlefield UNIQUELY offered as a middle ground in the market, but EA and DICE have abandoned that middle ground to trend chase other games. This is why it's annoying and there's so much complaining about things like movement and skins. You can continue to attack the caricature of a 0.5 KD player crouch walking to bolster your position, but you still can't define a well-reasoned upper limit for movement mechanics because you DON'T have a standard. An appeal to the skill gap is not a standard, and it does not define an upper limit for movement whatsoever. What then would be keeping DICE from adding wall running, double jumps, or even phasing through walls if it can be argued those could potentially take a vague amount of skill to perform? The bounds are defined by Battlefield's supposed authentic tone, which has been erased in favoring of emulating other games. If you just enjoy Battlefield's metamorphosis into a movement slop shooter like every other FPS out there, that's fine. We can disagree. Just don't expect the franchise to be anything more than a cheap, more plasticky Call of Duty substitute going forward.

• 
  U.S.A.I. 🇺🇸 (@researchUSAI) reported 14 minutes ago

  🇪🇸 The First Order Consequence: Spain reduced decision-making scope by treating the Spain-versus-Ukraine comparison as a direct, transferable template rather than a context-specific risk model, which slowed Spain’s internal selection of measurable priorities and increased the odds of resource misallocation 🇪🇸 The Second Order Consequence: Spain’s agencies and partners coordinated around the flawed analogy, so project baselines, timelines and success metrics diverged from actual on-the-ground constraints; as a result, group execution became harder to audit and less resilient to shocks 🇪🇸 Discernment: Spain previously used a more evidence-forward approach in adjacent policy areas, such as switching from narrative-driven assessments to data-tested indicators after measurable underperformance; this history was not applied to the comparison framework, which weakened discernment 🇪🇸 Reasoning: In the current cycle, Spain’s continued reliance on the shallow comparison limits falsifiable monitoring, making it harder to confirm improvement (for example, failing to track whether spending or reforms produce observed outcomes against defined baselines) and easier for decay to compound 🇪🇸 Judgement: Spain’s overall growth is being constrained by an analogy-driven strategy error: the likely path is slower learning, higher variance outcomes and weaker feedback loops, all of which constitute decay in strategic capability until measurement and context controls are restored 🇺🇦 The First Order Consequence: Ukraine’s operational and policy profile was treated as if it could be mapped too cleanly onto Spain’s environment, which risks distorting Ukraine-relevant lessons into generalized claims that do not survive contact with differing constraints; the consequence is miscalibrated takeaway learning 🇺🇦 The Second Order Consequence: Ukraine-adjacent stakeholders and observers may amplify the simplified narrative, which can undermine accurate coalition learning and create friction when expected applicability fails; that can reduce group cohesion around priorities that require country-specific adaptation 🇺🇦 Discernment: Ukraine’s prior adaptations show that learning comes from context-correct evidence (for example, revisions made after specific battlefield or administrative friction), but the comparison process did not preserve that evidence discipline, weakening discernment of what is transferable 🇺🇦 Reasoning: Right now, the strategy built on the shallow comparison increases the chance that decision-makers cannot falsify claims of benefit, such as whether any adopted measure produces the intended observable outcomes under Ukraine-like conditions, and instead rewards plausible-sounding correlation 🇺🇦 Judgement: Ukraine’s contribution to whole growth is diminished when lessons are stripped of context: the likely outcome is slower, noisier learning and reduced strategic effectiveness for the using party until the comparison is rebuilt around comparable variables and testable metrics

• 
  RunUpOnMii_ (@RunUpOnMii_) reported 16 minutes ago

  @brrtxd @BattlefieldComm I agree. Instead of having to implement a system to detect and punish people blocking vehicle spawns, just design a better system where an issue like that isn't even possible. If we have to, I'll take BF2042's system of spawn-screen only for getting vehicles

• 
  AVA (@A__A__G__) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Always releasing new content on a Tuesday is crazy, if yall are scared of any technical issues, launch the new content on a Thursday or Friday and take those extra days to work

• 
  🇬🇹(J.K.O.)🇲🇽 (@BlackIceSheep) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Voodoo_Hendrix "Battledads" are the safe fall guy catch all term for is ultimately a wider issue of the CoD brand trying desperately to appeal to other markets and not understanding that doesn't work. Battlefield and CoD should be different games but both EA and Activision just look foolish.

• 
  Holy Spirit 🎄 (@SadhnaChatterj1) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Akhiawal Why should he go ? A loser quits a battlefield bt he's no loser to quit ,he's here to stay just coz u think every solution to a problem is quitting then ur entire thought process is wrong. Neither u shud quit from any offensive setback nor u shud advise others 2 do the same.

• 
  Slumber Season (@Slumber_Season) reported 22 minutes ago

  @RepLuna 2/ Weaponizing fake outrage to deflect from the actual issue is peak drama. You’re acting like you survived a battlefield when you really just survived a tough CONVERSATION.

• 
  Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reported 22 minutes ago

  Alts are not running yet. They’re doing something more subtle: they’re refusing to die. BTC has been slicing down the chart like it skipped leg day and fell through the stairs. Lost $75K. Lost $72K. Now fighting around the $69K–$71K battlefield. That is not pretty. But here’s the part worth watching: BTC dominance is dropping. ETHBTC is showing early life. OTHERS is weak, but not nuking the way you’d expect if the whole alt market was ready to disappear into the basement. So no, I’m not calling altseason. Not even close. For that, BTC needs to stabilize. ETHBTC needs to reclaim real levels. OTHERS needs to get back above key resistance. And ETF flows need to stop bleeding like a horror movie with a Coinbase login. But the message today is interesting: alts are not leading… but they are holding their ground better than expected while BTC takes the punch. That matters. Now, if BTC keeps dropping, alts can absolutely break too. Do not confuse relative strength with immunity. But if BTC finds a bottom soon, this fast flush may actually be healthier than weeks of slow torture around $70K. Pain now. Repair sooner. That’s the silver lining. The bullrun is delayed. Not cancelled.

• 
  DAD.PRG - making BombBloke (@code_wizard_uk) reported 29 minutes ago

  Austerlitz was extraordinary, one of the Peter Turcan games. You would issue commands over text and a messenger would roam the battlefield and hopefully deliver it to your officers who might ignore it or the messenger might die en route. I was terrible at it but in my defence I was 10.

• 
  Chronos (@N0VACIA) reported 33 minutes ago

  @NYNightTrain @BIG_Wojo_68 @Battlefield I do though haha. They need to fix air radar, add jet loadouts and fix the awful input delay feeling when pitching.

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 33 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Lame decision to make solos for redsec. And still, in season 3, leave out trios. Questions need to be answered for disappearing rpgs, unlimited tank health with bad ping, and redsec needing sniper damage nerfed like you did rpg speed Havent been back to redsec bc of light glitch