Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Remove ranked. Give every squad size for red sec. Casual better be whatever squad size we want. You removed working initiation for graphic lighting glitchfest in redsec you cant even patch a fix. Great job giving recon even more bullshit for redsec. Infantry conquest, not oblit

• 
  Nikita Kabardin (@nkabardin) reported 4 minutes ago

  @langfuse It looked like a standard UI problem. How hard can it be? I've built filter UIs before (TV schedules, internal tools, a Battlefield server browser...), all with a fixed set of parameters.

• 
  KaseMond (@kasemoond) reported 6 minutes ago

  He lost his right arm and broke his left one being thrown out from the explosion on the battlefield. However, his service hasn't stopped there yet: Kurt wants to switch to gebirgsjäger, as he finds mountains close to his spirit. He is learning to use rifle with one hand and legs

• 
  ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ฏ (@voidsrus4) reported 7 minutes ago

  the problem with battlefield 6 being a live service game is all the cosmetics are designed for children. there are cosmetics i would probably buy, they won't sell them. and the game despite their best efforts is still too hard for children

• 
  Grim (@GrimBF6) reported 9 minutes ago

  @FlacoG_2023 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm All he said was there’s nothing mentioned about netcode, when there is. Netcode is frustrating, and they’ve been working on it for a decade+ of titles. It’ll always be an issue atp.

• 
  Kelly Detonated (@KellyDetonated) reported 10 minutes ago

  We can blame eachother for this but truth be told the whole Doha Deal was a disaster, and is still problematic today. Now, it can be something accept for what it is, learn and get better now, or we can pretend it isn’t there. I’ve accepted it, and hope we address that money is still going to the Taliban. Qatar is exceptionally clever when it comes to laundering money, while slapping on a bow and smiling saying it’s something else. We don’t operate this way, but they do, no matter how many shiny gifts and “peace” deals it brokers. It seems Soviet inspired, so maybe they learned from the best. Idk. It would be wise to have a completely neutral mediators, moving forward, that nobody involved has any conflicts of interest and a proven track record of success. We must use the icky stuff as a point of reference no matter how bad it stings to do so. My thoughts are that this is a clear case for strategic, long-game warfare that isn’t necessarily fought on a battlefield. We also need to admit that our reward system is very different than the middle eastern countries. We want everything done now. They are ideology driven. We’re built different. So this would require any agreements to include some language requiring enforceability that can’t be broken until it’s complete.

• 
  DanteTakashi (@DanteTakashiX) reported 10 minutes ago

  @EpicNNG heres the problem with boarderlands in general THEY HAVE COOL CHARACTERS BUT WE CANT SEE THEM IN GAMEPLAY!!!!!!!! if this was COD Or BATTLEFIELD WHo gives a **** but DUDE 3rd person

• 
  SkullsCard (@Skullscard) reported 14 minutes ago

  @_collinthewhite @Battlefield Cant talk, but cheaters can stream the broken game

• 
  Alexander (@AlexfromBabylon) reported 16 minutes ago

  @StockChaser_ The problem with LADOS is that is has zero battlefield experience. Contracts are signed today for C2/C4 not in 5 years.

• 
  Swipy (@Sleepy4PF) reported 16 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Just fix that damn netcode im tired of ghost bullets and inconsistent shots

• 
  Woke Smeed (@mrburgerboy) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Viscountpost Okay then whoever your preferred moderate is should have no problem easily defeating her on the battlefield of ideas or whatever what are you even bitching about at this point

• 
  Stevo3854 (@stevo3854420) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Your entire game is broken. From black loading screens, graphical glitches, bullet registration, ridiculous ranked squad rules that you can't squad with lower ranked friends then they immediately squad you with complete noobs. Let's not even mention the insane amount of hackers!

• 
  Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported 25 minutes ago

  @mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.

• 
  Kris Nair (@krisnair) reported 29 minutes ago

  The battlefield is not a geometry problem. It never was.

• 
  Ducky (@Duckey141) reported 33 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Most out of touch clueless devs currently out there, genuine monkeys, just adding things and fixing **** all while we still have beta bugs rampaging in season 3 with no fix in sight