1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Saint-Malo, Brittany 1
Buenos Aires, CF 1
Comuna 1, CABA 5
Perpignan, Occitanie 1
Domingos Martins, ES 1
Courbevoie, Île-de-France 1
Strasbourg, ACAL 1
Chaumont, ACAL 1
Amagney, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Paris, Île-de-France 20
Itapemirim, ES 1
São Paulo, SP 2
Brech, Brittany 1
Trévoux, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Nidau, BE 1
Villa Victoria, MEX 1
Santiago de Querétaro, QUE 3
Telêmaco Borba, PR 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 4
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Madrid, Madrid 4
La Trinité, Martinique 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 5
Persan, Île-de-France 1
Metz, ACAL 3
Aubais, Occitanie 1
Toulouse, Occitanie 4
Seysses, Occitanie 1
Colmar, ACAL 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Dr_Autistic_3D
    NPI-AMERICA (@Dr_Autistic_3D) reported

    @xpertfusion3 Agree except TTK, needs to be Faster like it was on Day one weekend 1, was perfect. It’s all that war is supposed to be a fast paced running gun that’s how call the dude’s always been like when we used to play shipment running around with dual pistols sliding through containers popping tops and then jumping up and popping another top three tops and instantly and then you get your top popped, but it was always fast. That’s how Call of Duty is always bad. I think the people requesting a slower TTK our former battlefield players I mean, each is entitled to their opinion, but when it takes an entire magazine from an M4 to kill someone there’s an issue I quit using my favorite gun because it took too long to kill Someone..

  • Stephen_rawling
    Steve R (@Stephen_rawling) reported

    @JezHermerMBE Shape the battlefield, you have literally sat on an IED and blown yourself up. You know what numbers you hoped to get and it was double what you got. All you have done is let the enemy pincer around us. You are the problem.

  • ben_clark55
    Ben Clark (@ben_clark55) reported

    @TheManLandTCG i’ve been playing the deck and i’m having some trouble figuring out the battlefield order, what were you doing with them?

  • HussainYaqub3
    Hussain Yaqub (@HussainYaqub3) reported

    @Alonso_GD Those who see foreign military intervention as a shortcut to solving their country’s problems should read history. Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya have already shown that the consequences of military intervention are often far more destructive and lasting than the promises used to justify it. Opposing a government is one thing; supporting the transformation of your own country into a battlefield is quite another.

  • NewsTongueX
    NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported

    🔴 White Kreschet Battalion strikes Ukrainian military communications nodes White Kreschet Battalion claimed strikes on antenna and communications equipment of Ukraine's Armed Forces. The unit framed the targeting of communication nodes as degrading enemy command-and-control speed: through these systems Ukraine receives and transmits intelligence, targeting data, and battlefield situational information. The claim states longer communication disruptions delay Ukrainian responses and increase errors in decision-making.

  • LowlightCafe
    Ziegengrimm (@LowlightCafe) reported

    @JezCorden @MckKirk My big issue is: I have to buy a new GPU for every GTA but I still cannot blow up a single house and maybe not even drive through a wall. I like the Finals in that regard and Battlefield.

  • Nazumejud
    Maris (@Nazumejud) reported

    The blizzard had buried the driveway beneath thick drifts, yet it could not hide the sight of Emma lying beside the porch steps, clutching Noah beneath her coat to keep him alive. One look at her frostbitten hands and exhausted eyes hurt more than every battlefield I had survived during the past eighteen months. For one horrifying moment, I feared I was already too late. I dropped my duffel bag and sprinted through the snow. “Emma!” Her eyes opened weakly. “Ethan?” She said my name as though she believed I was a dream. Noah’s faint cries barely rose above the howling wind. Emma had wrapped him in layers of her clothing, leaving her own arms and feet exposed to the cold. I tore off my military coat, wrapped it around them both, and lifted them into my arms. “How long have you been out here?” Emma tried to answer, but her teeth were chattering too violently. I reached the front door and twisted the handle. Locked. I pounded once. No one answered. Through the living-room window, I saw the glow of the fireplace. Shadows moved inside. Someone laughed. My family was warm while my wife and infant son were freezing to death outside. I stepped back and kicked the door beside the lock. The frame cracked. A second kick sent the door flying inward. Warmth spilled over us. So did the smell of roasted meat, expensive bourbon, and burning cedar. My father, Richard Cole, sat beside the fireplace holding a glass from the bottle I had saved for my homecoming. My mother, Diane, wore Emma’s favorite cream cashmere robe as though it belonged to her. My younger brother, Kyle, stretched across my couch with muddy boots resting on the coffee table Emma and I had chosen together. All three stared at me. My mother’s face lost its color. “Ethan?” she blurted. “We weren’t expecting you until Friday.” My return date had changed after a transport aircraft opened an earlier seat. I had kept it secret because I wanted to surprise Emma. Instead, I had surprised the people destroying her life. I carried my wife and child across the room. My father rose from his chair. “Put her back outside.” I stopped. “What did you say?” “She attacked your mother,” he replied. “She became hysterical when we explained the situation.” Emma buried her face against my shoulder. “They changed every lock,” she whispered. “They took my phone, my wallet, everything. They said the house belonged to them.” Kyle gave a careless shrug. “Legally, it does.” He nodded toward the wall above the fireplace. A framed property deed hung where Emma and I had once displayed our wedding portrait. My father’s name appeared beneath the description of my property. On the dining table sat mortgage documents, bank statements, legal notices, and a thick folder marked CUSTODY PETITION. My mother crossed her arms. “Emma became unstable while you were deployed. We had to protect your assets and your son.” “You left them outside in a blizzard.” “She refused to cooperate,” my father said. No anger showed in his face. That frightened me more than shouting would have. I had seen men justify terrible actions with the same calm expression. They did not think of themselves as cruel. They believed they had the right to decide who deserved safety. I carried Emma upstairs. My mother followed. “You cannot take the baby,” she said. “Our attorney advised us to keep Noah away from her.” I turned so quickly that she stepped backward. “Come near my son again, and the police will be the least of your problems.”….

  • J_omotola28
    J_Omotola (@J_omotola28) reported

    and then you will be able to solve the problem at hand. Child of God, nobody prepares for war on a battlefield. Oftentimes, commanders and soldiers plan their battle strategies long before wars break out.

  • PiotrekMJK
    piter-_- (@PiotrekMJK) reported

    @BattlefieldComm @EA Also if you think that "chin chan chong?" is offensiv, than please read a book about dark humour. I'll take my 7 days ban, but rethink your way of the life service for this game. Because right know, there is no fun playing battlefield at the current state.

  • r_vonhagn
    Rick von Hagn 🗽 (@r_vonhagn) reported

    @peterawolf Hate this romanticized nonsense. Men sought glory on the battlefield because military service was the only meritocratic social structure that offered them an escape from the immiseration of peasantry and feudal service - and even then, many instead chose scutage.

  • SilverSypitzki
    Silver (@SilverSypitzki) reported

    @jane_ethan12 ChatGPT: Why did the IDF destroy and damage so many buildings in Gaza? Whatever one’s view of the legality or proportionality of Israel’s actions, it is important to understand the military reasoning the IDF has given for the enormous amount of destruction in Gaza. Gaza is an exceptionally dense urban battlefield, with Hamas and other armed groups operating a large underground tunnel network beneath and alongside civilian infrastructure. The IDF has repeatedly reported finding tunnel entrances, command centers, weapons storage facilities, explosives and booby-trapped buildings in residential areas. From a military perspective, this created several serious problems. Tunnels: Tunnel entrances were frequently located inside or underneath buildings. Destroying the structure above or around a tunnel could be necessary to expose, collapse or neutralize the underground network and prevent fighters from using it to infiltrate Israeli forces. Booby-trapped buildings: Israeli ground forces repeatedly encountered houses and other structures containing explosives, hidden charges and prepared ambushes. Entering such buildings could put soldiers at extreme risk. In some circumstances, destroying a building from a distance was considered safer than sending troops inside. Sniper and observation positions: Tall buildings provide an enormous tactical advantage in dense urban combat. They can be used for observation, sniper fire, directing attacks and monitoring the movement of troops. Removing such positions can therefore be an important part of protecting advancing soldiers. Weapons and rocket infrastructure: The IDF has reported weapons depots, rocket-launching positions, weapons-production facilities and military command infrastructure inside or adjacent to civilian buildings. Once a civilian structure is being used for military purposes, it can become directly relevant to military operations. Creating safe movement corridors: In some areas, Israeli forces had to clear routes through extremely dense urban environments. Buildings close to military positions could provide concealed firing points or places from which explosives could be deployed. Demolishing structures could therefore be used to reduce the risk to troops and make movement through an area possible. Preventing Hamas from returning to cleared areas: In some operations, destruction was also intended to remove underground infrastructure and military positions that could otherwise be reused after Israeli forces had moved through an area. None of this means that every destroyed building necessarily contained Hamas infrastructure, nor does a military explanation by itself establish that every individual attack was lawful or proportionate. But it does explain why the destruction was on such an extraordinary scale. The central military reality Israel faced was that the battlefield was not simply a collection of buildings. It was a dense urban environment in which military infrastructure, tunnels, weapons, explosives and combat positions were frequently located within or beneath civilian areas. For Israeli soldiers moving through these areas, leaving buildings standing could sometimes mean leaving behind potential sniper positions, observation posts, booby traps, tunnel entrances or concealed fighters. Understanding that military logic is essential to understanding the scale of the destruction — even for people who ultimately reach different conclusions about whether particular operations were justified or lawful.

  • TNTJohn1717
    PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported

    Galatians 4:16 expresses the shock every faithful servant eventually experiences: “Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?” Paul had once been received by the Galatians with extraordinary affection. He reminded them that they would have plucked out their own eyes and given them to him. But false teachers entered, corrupted their doctrine, and altered their attitude toward the apostle who had brought them the gospel. Paul had not become their enemy. He had not stopped loving them. He had not exchanged the gospel for some personal agenda. Yet because he told them the truth, they began treating him like an adversary. That is the insanity of deception: it persuades people that the man trying to keep them out of the ditch is dangerous while the man removing the warning signs is compassionate. The doctor who identifies the cancer becomes the enemy, while the quack selling flavored water is praised for his bedside manner. This becomes especially painful when the rejection comes from relatives, longtime friends, fellow church members, or people we have personally helped. Opposition from strangers may bruise the skin, but betrayal from familiar hands reaches the bone. The Lord warned in Matthew 10:36, “And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.” He was not commanding family division; He was warning that allegiance to Him would sometimes reveal it. When one family member begins taking God seriously, the others may interpret his changed standards as a judgment upon them. Old friends may feel condemned because the Christian no longer participates in the same sins. Coworkers may call him self-righteous because he refuses to laugh at the same filth. Even religious people may resent him because he believes the Bible too plainly and refuses to dip every doctrine in syrup before serving it. At that point the Christian is tempted to weaken his testimony in order to restore the old comfort. But peace purchased by disobedience is only surrender wearing a smile. Chapter Four: The Devil’s Counterattack After a Victory I learned early in ministry that spiritual victories are frequently followed by personal attacks. During the years when I worked in youth ministry, I remember leading someone to the Lord and rejoicing that a soul had trusted Jesus Christ. Yet it often seemed that immediately afterward the devil came from every direction. Trouble would arise, discouragement would settle in, people would misunderstand something, or circumstances would become so difficult that I was tempted to think, “Was it worth it?” That is one of the enemy’s most calculated attacks. He cannot unsave the soul that has trusted Christ, so he attacks the servant who delivered the message. He wants the soul-winner to associate obedience with pain. He wants every future opportunity to carry the memory of the last counterattack. If he can make a Christian regret being useful, he may not be able to steal that Christian’s salvation, but he can frighten him away from the battlefield. The pattern appears throughout Scripture. Jesus Christ was baptized, publicly identified by the Father as His beloved Son, and immediately afterward was led into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. Elijah stood on Mount Carmel, saw fire fall from heaven, witnessed the defeat of Baal’s prophets, and then found himself fleeing from Jezebel’s threat. Paul received an abundance of revelations and then encountered “a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet” him. In Acts, a revival is rarely given time to cool before persecution arrives. Souls are saved, a church is established, and then somebody starts a riot. The devil has never liked losing customers. Heaven rejoices over one sinner who repents, while hell begins studying the person who showed him the way out. The counterattack does not prove that the victory was false. Quite often, it proves that the victory mattered.

  • PathFinder_CZ
    Michal Ngo (@PathFinder_CZ) reported

    @Battlefield Why dont you fix the carrier camping?

  • G0dSoldier316
    GodSoldier316 (@G0dSoldier316) reported

    @BattlefieldInte The KV9 not like the broken piece of crap we have now on Battlefield six, and also the VSS

  • Kinzhaldaq
    DEADLIEST ASSASSIN (@Kinzhaldaq) reported

    To make technology from defense giants like Elbit Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) hyper-agile, the military architecture must shift from centralized command brains to autonomous frontline units.This system relies on three pillars 1. The Real-Time "Sensor-to-Shooter" Edge Loop Right now, Israel's core battlefield management system, Zad (or Hunter), processes massive amounts of data (recording over 850,000 real-time intelligence detections across theaters). However, routing this back to a central base causes data bottlenecks. The Agile Fix: Design an Open Digital Ecosystem. Instead of sending a drone's video feed back to headquarters to identify a target, the AI model must run directly on the drone's microchip (Edge Computing). The Result: The drone detects a threat, instantly cross-references it with local infantry data via a localized mesh network, and assigns a weapon to neutralize it in seconds, completely bypassing central servers.

Check Current Status