1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Buenos Aires, CF 1
Chaniá, Crete 1
Équancourt, Hauts-de-France 1
Wilhelmshaven, Lower Saxony 1
Holbæk, Zealand 4
Comuna 1, CABA 1
Vitória da Conquista, BA 1
Montréal, QC 2
Copenhagen, Capital Region 2
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Plougastel-Daoulas, Brittany 1
Montpellier, Occitanie 1
Paris, Île-de-France 3
Melbourne, VIC 1
Annonay, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Brownville, NY 1
Hagerstown, MD 1
Edinburgh, Scotland 1
Aix-en-Provence, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Enumclaw, WA 1
Ealing, England 1
Eggenfelden, Bavaria 1
Puteaux, Île-de-France 1
Weißenburg in Bayern, Bavaria 1
Villeneuve-d'Ascq, Hauts-de-France 1
Meyzieu, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Le Marillais, Pays de la Loire 1
Colomiers, Occitanie 1
Birmingham, England 1
Sain-Bel, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • glitchtruth
    Glitch Truth (@glitchtruth) reported

    Starlink's real numbers: 1.2M terminals deployed to Ukraine, Pentagon treating it as battlefield internet. That's not a product launch, that's a prototype for contested space comms. The Pentagon just realized they've outsourced critical infrastructure to Elon. This is not a problem they knew how to solve.

  • omar_alajeeli
    Anunat (Sky Father) (@omar_alajeeli) reported

    @NotTheCityInTX @Battlefield yes, when the game didn't need fixing, instead of wasting time and resources on this garbage they need to fix the game. net codes/ gunplay. this is not that important.

  • SgtWireless
    SgtWireless (@SgtWireless) reported

    @Battlefield Could your team please fix the issue that makes the game lock up our pcs 10 minutes into any game, its been broken for over 2 weeks now and i couldnt even play the last event because of it

  • madmole56
    thomas (@madmole56) reported

    @SamuelEsqu60479 @onebattlefield I played BO7 against my better judgment and honestly its more true to itself than BF6 is. The game played well and I actually had fun. BF6 is trash and for my "battlefield" fix I'll stick to Arma and HLL or easy red. Battlefield is dead.

  • aidennC9
    Aidenn- (@aidennC9) reported

    @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Fix the ******* audio, cant do anything in this game without hearing a cracking noise

  • MariusBarczak
    Mariusz Barczak | Senior Cybersecurity Architect (@MariusBarczak) reported

    You Are Scaling Risk INFRASTRUCTURE IS THE NEW BATTLEFIELD For years, organizations believed that cybersecurity was about tools. More dashboards. More alerts. More vendors. More layers. And yet, the system remained the same. Fragmented. Reactive. Unpredictable. Because the problem was never the lack of tools. The problem was the absence of architecture. Today, we are entering a different reality. Global trade is shifting. Supply chains are being reconfigured. Infrastructure is becoming the core of economic power. Ports, logistics networks, cloud systems, data pipelines — they are no longer support functions. They are the backbone of entire economies. And that changes everything. Because when infrastructure becomes central, security is no longer an IT concern. It becomes a structural requirement. The real question is no longer: “How do we detect attacks?” The real question is: “Why does the system allow this level of exposure in the first place?” This is where most organizations fail. They build systems that are: – connected, but not controlled – scalable, but not secured – efficient, but not resilient And then they try to protect them with tools. That approach does not work anymore. Attackers do not break systems. They use what the system already allows. Misconfigured access. Overprivileged roles. Invisible trust relationships. Uncontrolled execution paths. This is not exploitation. This is architecture failure. In a world where logistics defines growth, where infrastructure defines competitiveness, and where digital systems define stability… Security must be designed — not added. Not after deployment. Not after incidents. Not after damage. At the foundation. This is why Zero Trust is not a concept. It is not a trend. It is not a guideline. It is a structural necessity. Because without enforced boundaries, there is no control. Without control, there is no predictability. And without predictability, there is no resilience. Organizations that understand this will lead. They will build systems that are: – controlled by design – predictable under pressure – resilient by architecture And most importantly… They will not depend on reaction. They will operate on certainty. The future will not be defined by who has the most technology. It will be defined by who has the strongest architecture behind it. And in that future, security is no longer a function. It is the foundation of everything. And this is exactly where most discussions about AI, automation, and digital transformation miss the point. We are not scaling intelligence. We are scaling exposure. Every new integration, every API, every automated decision layer increases the attack surface — often invisibly. Organizations celebrate speed. Attackers exploit structure. This asymmetry is growing. Because while companies invest in innovation, very few invest in architectural discipline. And without discipline, scale becomes risk. AI agents, automation pipelines, cloud-native systems — they do not create security challenges. They amplify existing weaknesses. If identity is weak — they multiply it. If access is uncontrolled — they expand it. If trust is implicit — they weaponize it. That is why the next generation of cybersecurity will not be defined by detection. It will be defined by elimination of unnecessary possibilities. Reducing what can happen. Restricting what is allowed. Designing systems where deviation is not just detected — but structurally impossible. This is infrastructure hardening at its core. Not more tools. Not more alerts. Not more noise. But fewer paths. Fewer permissions. Fewer assumptions. And in that simplicity — real security emerges. Because the strongest system is not the one that reacts fastest. It is the one that cannot be meaningfully exploited. This is the shift that is coming. From complexity to control. From reaction to design. From visibility to certainty. And those who understand this early will not just secure their systems. They will redefine how systems are built. #CyberSecurity #ZeroTrust #Infrastructure

  • levelsio
    @levelsio (@levelsio) reported

    🚁 My war drone simulator Apocalypse Drone now has support for 32 players! I also made it Conquest/CTF so you have multiple bases that you have to capture, each round the map is procedurally generated and random so every time it's different (like Battlefield) There's still some bugs to work out and most importantly I have to figure out soldier animations, because they're fixed models now But I have got really far this time I think and coding with AI is really way further than it was a year ago, you mostly notice that how few times you get stuck, only one time this month building this I got stuck which was today where I moved the AI players to the server and they kept showing up as invisible, very buggy, every time I told it that it couldn't fix it though Then I asked it to fundamentally analyze the current server-side AI player code and make it work like industry standard, and it took a long time and fixed everything Last year I'd get stuck hundreds of times and the AI just couldn't get itself out of a hole, but now it can I think it's impressive that just last year only for the first time we could make actual games with AI But this year as non-game dev, I can get pretty close to the level of a multiplayer game from 20y ago (like Battlefield 1942, that lots of ideas here are based on, but with drones :D) Obviously we're still far away from AAA (I hate that term though) but the curve of exponential progress is there again, as it was in AI image generation, then video, and now code, first bad, then better, then good enough! Here's a video of gameplay from my drone sim You can play it with the link in the reply below and it's multiplayer!

  • glitchtruth
    Glitch Truth (@glitchtruth) reported

    Starlink's real numbers: 1.2M terminals deployed to Ukraine, Pentagon treating it as battlefield internet. That's not a product launch, that's a prototype for contested space comms. The Pentagon just realized they've outsourced critical infrastructure to Elon. This is not a problem they knew how to solve.

  • JKilla279
    JKilla (@JKilla279) reported

    @Battlefield AI slop. Go fix the hit registration and TTK. And for the love of god get my soldier a ******* energy drink. Why does it take 30 seconds to plate up. The second plate up doesnt even show the character applying it. Gun in hands still but cant shoot it. Smh

  • Curitiba_Fodase
    Curitiba (@Curitiba_Fodase) reported

    @Valor53555939 @KFTragic the problem is that this wasn't what was wrong with the Fire Nation, and retroactively adding this just feels done to get brownie points before the Fire Nation was the only one shown to allow women in the battlefield, how progressive they were or weren't was never the issue

  • hi_im_matter
    m (@hi_im_matter) reported

    @kirb0htw0 @TheHaciendaDon I haven’t heard a single soul talk or care about battlefield 6 since January. The game fell off a cliff due to dice and ea still not understanding how to make a live service battlefield game, and cod is still crushing bf while selling like ****. Says a lot about gaming currently

  • omarvance
    Omar Vance (@omarvance) reported

    @LRoundels I liked the battlefield set better. This one’s got some errors. AI is good for some things but other things it just doesn’t get right.

  • EverythingBubbl
    Bubble Boy🫧📌 (@EverythingBubbl) reported

    @Battlefield @rowni_ahaha We do not care. Fix the netcode and the TTK/gunplay

  • TaskUnitFreedom
    TaskUnitFreedom (@TaskUnitFreedom) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Don't stop there. >Aim assist (reverted S1, buffed S2) >25% recoil reduction (unchanged) >S2 recoil adjustments/improvements (extremely beamy AR's/LMG's) **DRS-IAR w/ Synthetic Tip is beyond BROKEN** Aim assist is a plague in Season 2 because of the recoil adjustments/improvements. It's mostly KTS rollers beaming you 90M+ out with triple headshot while bot walking & ADS'ing while you're attempting to zig-zag or duck for cover. Totally normal I guess.🙄

  • LetChrisCook
    Chris Cook (@LetChrisCook) reported

    @Battlefield Fix the spawn protection abusing for tanks before you “improve” their gameplay

Check Current Status