1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
La Trinité, Martinique 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 10
Persan, Île-de-France 1
Metz, ACAL 3
Aubais, Occitanie 1
Toulouse, Occitanie 5
Seysses, Occitanie 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Colmar, ACAL 1
Les Sables-d'Olonne, Pays de la Loire 1
Chantonnay, Pays de la Loire 2
Paris, Île-de-France 38
Pringy, Île-de-France 1
Santiago de Querétaro, QUE 1
Duque de Caxias, RJ 1
Parmilieu, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Amiens, Hauts-de-France 2
Rouen, Normandy 1
Vienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Pontoise, Île-de-France 2
Asnières-sur-Seine, Île-de-France 1
Madrid, Madrid 4
Arrondissement de Charleroi, Wallonia 1
Santa Cruz de la Palma, Canary Islands 1
Rennes, Brittany 2
Caxias do Sul, RS 1
Saint-Lubin-des-Joncherets, Centre 1
Aubenas, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 2
Annonay, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Cruseilles, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • timmatula
    Tim Matula (@timmatula) reported

    @GeorgeRoush George, I think the next battlefield isn’t the same as the old one. The reality is that if something is connected to the internet, our agencies can access it—all of it. Access has never been the hard part. Once we have the data (and we already have more than anyone could ever begin to comprehend), the real challenge begins: finding the needle in the haystack—the signals that actually matter and are actionable. We already possess all the data we need. AI is starting to make that needle-hunting problem more manageable, but our adversaries are right there with us, doing exactly the same thing. It’s not planes and battleships anymore.

  • eve_0x01
    Eve OpenAi Danesh (@eve_0x01) reported

    >>>> Option stood. He carried his empty plate toward the fountain and washed it himself. No servant. No command. Just another resident. Then he walked toward the kitchen with the others. Like them. Like me. For a moment, I watched his enormous back disappear through the settlement. Then I returned to my bed. I dreamed of the labyrinth again. But this time, I was not the one being dragged through it. I was moving through it myself. A student. Then a cook. Then a warrior. Then someone else. Each time I reached for a memory, it shifted. A classroom became a kitchen. A kitchen became a battlefield. A battlefield became the settlement. Faces changed. Voices overlapped. The old lady sang. Option hammered. Ghost screamed. And somewhere beneath all of it, someone was calling my name. I turned toward the voice— and woke. No old lady. No greenhouse. Only the volcanic kitchen. My notebook lay beside me. The unfinished map stared back from its pages. I closed it. Today, I had a table to build. I stepped outside and began searching for stone. I had barely started when a blacksmith noticed me. Without asking what I needed, he reached beside his forge and handed me a pickaxe. "Make sure you break it in a way that you're going to put it back together." I looked at him. He was already walking away. "Wait—" CLANG. Apparently, that was the end of the conversation. I found a section of exposed stone near the edge of the settlement and began working. Crack. A piece broke loose. Then another. Then another. I gathered them beside me. Ten. Twenty. Forty. The pile grew. My hands became covered in dust. My shoulders burned. My palms blistered. Still, I continued. Eventually I stopped and counted. Ninety-seven. Ninety-eight. Ninety-nine. One hundred. I rested the pickaxe against the stone. One hundred should be enough. I turned around. Option was already standing behind me. I hadn't heard him approach. He looked at the pile. Then he bent down and picked up two stones with one hand. I stared. I could barely carry one. Option carried two as casually as I carried the notebook. He began walking. I grabbed a single stone and followed. Back and forth. Stone after stone. The distance between the quarry and the forge seemed to grow longer with every trip. By the time the last piece was delivered, my legs were trembling. I dropped the stone beside the broken desk. Then I simply collapsed beside it. For several seconds, I couldn't move. My lungs burned. My hands shook. Sweat ran down my face. Option stood over the pile. He examined the stones. Then looked at me. I waited for praise. Perhaps some profound statement. Perhaps even a rare well done. Instead, he simply said: "Next." I looked up. "Next?" He pointed toward the broken desk. "Cleaning." I stared at the pile of stones. Then at the shattered timber. Then at him. "You could've told me that before I carried all this." Option considered this for a moment. Then replied: "You would've complained." He walked away. I sat there in silence. Ghost appeared around the corner, climbed onto one of the stones, looked at me with its mismatched eyes, and gave what sounded suspiciously like a tiny laugh. Then it disappeared again. I picked up the first piece of timber. "Fine." I sighed. "Cleaning."

  • AishaMehtabn
    Aisha Mehta (@AishaMehtabn) reported

    If you want inbound leads without posting every day, learn to systematize brand building. We used to think brand building required daily effort. Then we realized the world rewards predictable systems. Sadly, most founders don’t have the leverage. Here’s the brand-building framework that’s helped our clients generate $2M+ in pipeline: Contrary to popular belief, brand building isn’t about going viral. It’s about consistency, not luck. Done right, every post compounds and the decision to reach out becomes their idea, not yours. The AUTOMATE framework helps you do that in five steps: 1. Account Architecture Most founders start posting without a strategy (when they shouldn’t). Real strategy means mapping your ICP, competitors, and hooks upfront. It means starting with questions like: - Who do we want reading this? - What pain do they wake up with? - What authority gaps exist in their space? Your only job here is to understand the battlefield before you fight. 2. Understand Patterns Now analyze what already works. “We found your top-performing content is when you talk about X and Y. Is that right?” When they say “Yes, exactly”, you just earned their trust. They’ve seen the pattern in their own words. The system should come after you’ve confirmed the signal, not before. 3. Test Engineering This is where you experiment fast. Assume other approaches have already been tried. So do things like: - Have you A/B tested hooks? - What formats got the most replies? - Why do you think engagement dropped? Your goal is to find the winning angle AND surface why past efforts stalled. This sets up the next step. 4. Automate Execution Volume beats perfection - but only when the system is proven. Use the winning patterns you just discovered to build a content engine that runs on its own: “We had a client with the same problem. Posted sporadically, felt stuck. Then we implemented one system that doubled their inbound leads in 30 days.” Stories let them picture themselves in the solution. 5. Track & Optimize Lastly, frame continuous improvement as the missing piece: “Your goal is 10 inbound leads/week. The problem is you have no system. You’ve tried posting manually. The missing piece is [our engine]. Here’s how we’ll do it in [timeframe].” Then finish up with “Does that sound like what you need?” This makes you a partner in their growth. To them, you’re not selling - you’re solving. Ultimately, brand building isn’t about being loud. It’s about being systematic. Let systems do the heavy lifting. And don’t forget the money is in the inbound.

  • redslayerknows
    Red slayer (@redslayerknows) reported

    @BattlefieldComm It still sucks, a change that hasn’t really done anything, you are not bringing people back and the diminishing player base is your teams fault with a lack of content and broken foundation for the game. Don’t be surprised if your team gets gutted again for messing up so much.

  • stockincubator
    StockIncubator (@stockincubator) reported

    The war in Ukraine exposed a critical vulnerability in the U.S. defense industrial base: we simply do not have the manufacturing capacity for sustained attritional warfare. Our legacy munitions stockpiles were rapidly depleted, and the cost exchange ratio is fundamentally broken. We cannot survive a near-peer conflict by firing multi-million dollar missiles to shoot down cheap drones. The legacy primes can't scale fast enough. We need the neo-defense tech ecosystem: • Anduril: Hyperscale autonomous manufacturing to rapidly rebuild America's munitions stockpile. • Shield AI: Autonomous software stacks and AI pilots to neutralize drone swarms and operate in contested EW environments. • Palantir: The AI-driven data layer for faster battlefield decision-making and supply chain integration. Software and scalable manufacturing will win the next era of conflict. 🇺🇸 #americafirst

  • MarkU27717
    Warlord (@MarkU27717) reported

    @ATipplingPhilo @AMK_Mapping_ AMK is the problem because you don’t like his tone. But the guy who only reports 40% of the battlefield advances is fine? Haha alright

  • sunwukk990
    sunwukong (@sunwukk990) reported

    @Battlefield Is wayy too optimized it looks funny but understandable, is not meant to be a replica of reality. Still, fix it please, this is not that well polished.

  • realiainreid
    Iain Reid (@realiainreid) reported

    Sylvan’s final advantage may not have been an accident. By then, the Evil King may already know his kingdom is lost. His problem is no longer simply defeating Sylvan. It is succession. George has become dangerous: compromised, associated with the failed regime, carrying decades of secrets, and increasingly capable of discovering what his father actually did to him. Meanwhile, the King may have secretly created an unauthorized replacement heir through the breeding program. So he rearranges the competitive environment. George believes his father is sending him into the final battle to defeat Sylvan. But his father may know that Sylvan’s strongest period of influence is still waiting at the end. George isn’t being sent to win. He’s being sent somewhere his father expects him to be destroyed. The plan is elegant: George attacks Sylvan, Sylvan’s overwhelming advantage arrives, George absorbs responsibility for the failed campaign, Sylvan retaliates, the Throwaway Prince disappears, and the King clears the succession for his secret heir. He even gets Sylvan to perform the disposal for him. Except Sylvan refuses. He notices that George is still operating inside a manufactured reality while the father continues making the actual decisions, choreographing the signs, refusing negotiation, and encouraging attacks long after victory has become impossible. Suddenly the environment starts revealing something very different. Not that George attacked Sylvan and lost. But that the King knowingly sent his own son into an unwinnable fight and kept telling him he could win. The environment designed to process George begins documenting command responsibility instead. And the Throwaway Prince acquires its darkest possible meaning: George wasn’t merely raised as an expendable heir. His father may have built the final battlefield specifically so somebody else would throw him away.

  • blakmaclives
    blakmac (@blakmaclives) reported

    @RoodBoiBased I know I cannot fix her. I know only she can do that. That doesn't mean I can't influence things to go in a direction that gets her to understand that she needs to fix her ****. Which is why for the last few days I'm not texting her first. That's why last weekend when she started getting all projecty that I just backed off immediately and didn't talk to her all weekend. That's why I'm studying all of the stuff about BPD-like issues, avoidant attachment, etc. One of us has to know what the battlefield looks like.

  • notabotplus20
    Iran ❤️❤️ (@notabotplus20) reported

    @Batur1747 @NETWORKINTL2026 As for Afghanistan, calling everything a “civil war” oversimplifies the issue. The persecution of Hazaras, massacres of Shia civilians, and sectarian attacks documented over different periods were not simply ordinary battlefield clashes between equal sides. I have no problem acknowledging the violence involved in the Safavid conversion of Iran. Do you have the same honesty when discussing the persecution of Shias in Afghanistan, the massacres of Hazaras, or attacks on Shia civilians? Historical crimes don’t cancel each other out. A consistent standard means acknowledging all of them, not only the ones that support your argument.

  • FalconApoda
    Alfred Solomons (@FalconApoda) reported

    @Senshin108 @TruthEz @WalshFreedom You haven’t really been citing any “evidence” though. It appears that your conclusions are largely-based upon the opinions of others and their notions that the ship SHOULD have been identifiable on the basis of its markings, and that this SHOULD have precluded any possible attack, lest it be deliberate, which is also an opinion. Moreover, your reliance upon the identification by IDF forces which did take place earlier in the day glosses over the fact that this was done by different aircraft when the Liberty was in a different position, and ships at sea do tend to move around a lot. In fact, by the time the attack took place, the marker on the board noting the Liberty’s location had long-since been removed, this information considered no longer current within the context of a war in which battlefield conditions can rapidly change, minute to minute. Along these lines, you’ve also managed to completely sidestep the real-time audio of the attacking pilots, which clearly indicated their belief that the ship below them was Egyptian (i.e., not American), and that they were ordered to immediately withdraw once they began reading English off the hull back to their controllers. I could also get into the initial peaceful overtures of the subsequently arriving IDF boats and their attempts to signal the Liberty in order to ascertain their identification before they were fired upon by the Liberty’s gun mounts and all hell broke loose again. I could tell you about the fact that those same boats signaled offers of assistance to the Liberty once they realized they’d made a terrible error, both facts of which figured largely within the US Navy Court’s findings that the attack was the result of mistaken ID. Alas, however, you seem ossified in your beliefs, a condition impervious to facts and reasoning. I therefore hold no hope of disabusing you of your erroneous conclusions regarding this incident, and am only responding now for the benefit of casual passers by.

  • BoundaryBreach
    ‍‍ ‍ᴵᴺᵀᴱᴿ ‍‍ 𝐃𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 ‍‍ ‍‍ ˖ (@BoundaryBreach) reported

    ↷ battlefield. They were something worth fighting for. And if it meant seeing Sandra? Then she was a happy woman. Arms wrapped around the knight; digits intertwined — Lydia can simply exist, in this moment. Alas, business beckons. But that was 𝙩𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙧𝙤𝙬'𝙨 problem.

  • ElSky_
    Alan.M (@ElSky_) reported

    @BattlefieldComm So you're saying that if there aren't enough players, it's because there are too many modes? You guys are absolute morons, seriously. Fix your game before deleting modes—like Strikepoint, which got a fix on June 30th and then nothing else happened.

  • WarNewsGlobal
    War Alerts (@WarNewsGlobal) reported

    @sentdefender A decoy drone carrying explosives? That sounds less like a simple navigation error and more like a messy battlefield problem.

  • Blizzy63
    D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported

    @Battlefield How about stop showing us this stupid **** and fix your ******* game that’s had some issues since day 1

Check Current Status