Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ambrigalist 🇩🇪 (@ambrigalist) reported 4 minutes ago

  @VeryBadSCAVR Played Rainbow six, Halo, Destiny, CoD, overwatch and Battlefield all had bigger hit boxes and some kind of aim assist. They should just give people a option to search for lobbys that accept aim assist aka "Arcade" games, and Advanced where tou actually need to aim. Aim assist Hardware has been getting out of hand and even softaim software and hardware can't be traced anymore. But aim assist should be disabled to not follow players enemys behind and trough smokes. I don't think aim assist is bad for shooters. SBMM after playing rounds I noticed, that I no longer play against people who use Hardware and software external game seetings to see in the dark and less lag switch users and ping abusers in lobbys.

• 
  kirito _4kirigaya (@K4kirigaya) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix sniping cuz bullet drop is broken. Make the bullet bigger so we can see where we are shooting. Firestorm is the worst map to shoot long range for this very reason. Make the range finder work as intended and not have it hold our hand by zeroing in for us.

• 
  Faded Joke (@FadedJoke) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Sweet, now fix the bipods. Plenty of obvious locations im the open to mount on that you just cant.

• 
  EcstasyDesignz (@EcstasyDegen) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Coachie01 I knew someone was going to question Ivar. His intelligence is more strategic than the others. Put them in a battlefield situation rather than a heist or prison, and suddenly Ivar becomes a very serious problem.

• 
  Onyx Novha (@ItzNovhaTV) reported 10 minutes ago

  Call of duty is meant to be a fast paced game, I’m sorry to those who like this slower ttk but this doesn’t feel like call of duty” it feels like battlefield and it’s honestly to a point that it may push me away from wanting to play it, I would love to release novelist 2 montage on this game, but this is a major red flag to me, pros feedback should only be for ranked play, lot those of us who are known for being pub players should be the ones to provide you the feedback problem with past three call of duty games is you’re trying to make pubs like ranked without the rewards, which is return makes pubs feel like cod champs, I like to snipe and pub stomp, if i wanted to play ranked on cod i would play ranked play, when I play cod I want to have fun but I also want to provide content on all my platforms, can you please take this advice into consideration @InfinityWard @CallofDuty @CallofDutyCM

• 
  Psycho Fella (@Psycho_Fella) reported 11 minutes ago

  THE TANK ERA IN UKRAINE IS OVER. JUST NOT THE WAY COUCH EXPERTS, ADVISORS, AND CONSULTANTS UNDERSTAND IT By Rimas Armaitis, Armed Forces of Ukraine (ZSU) veteran—Lithuanian, sapper, instructor The New York Times reports that about half of the tank battalion soldiers from Ukraine’s 33rd Mechanized Brigade have already retrained as drone operators. Some recruits are no longer being trained to operate tanks at all. Leopard 2A4s are still maintained, repaired, and used for training, but they are rarely sent on combat missions—mostly during bad weather when drone activity decreases. This does not mean that all tanks will be scrapped tomorrow. It means something much more unpleasant for tank enthusiasts: the tank has lost its status as the primary strike platform. The platform remains, but its role, frequency of use, and cost-to-risk ratio have fundamentally changed. A tank costing millions cannot operate freely on the battlefield because it is under constant surveillance by reconnaissance drones. Once detected, a tank doesn’t even need to be destroyed in a single strike. The first FPV drone might damage a track or optics, the second hits the engine, and the third attacks the crew or the evacuation vehicle. Later, the job is finished off by a heavy bomber drone, artillery, or aerial mining. Even if the tank remains repairable, the combat mission is already ruined, the crew’s lives are at risk, and another expensive machine must be sent to evacuate the vehicle. This is where the economics of war begin—something our couch generals for some reason stubbornly refuse to understand. The key issue isn't whether a tank can theoretically be protected. What matters is how much its protection, logistics, repairs, and trained crew cost compared to how little it costs the enemy to detect, disable, and finish it off. When a chain of drones costing a few hundred or a few thousand euros disables a platform worth millions, we are not facing an emotional debate of "tanks vs. drones," but a catastrophically unfavorable cost-to-result ratio. Of course, some advisor-consultant will now pop up and solemnly declare: "But a drone doesn't hold ground!" Thank you for the breakthrough. An artillery shell doesn't hold ground either. A landmine doesn't control an intersection, and a fighter jet doesn't sit in a trench. Different tools perform different functions. The logic of modern assault is as follows: reconnaissance drones spot positions and movement; FPVs and bomber drones destroy or suppress targets; ground-based robotic systems transport explosives, lay mines, scout, provoke the enemy into revealing firing points, and provide fire support. Only then do the infantry clear, capture, and consolidate the territory—performing what is called "zakrep" on the front lines. Unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) are already being deployed with machine-gun modules, grenade launchers, shaped charges, and fragmentation charges. They handle logistics, evacuation, engineering, and specific assault tasks. They haven't replaced all light armored vehicles yet, but they are already taking over functions where it is better to lose a machine than to lose a machine along with its driver, crew, and squad. Infantry aren't going anywhere. However, a pure infantry assault without aerial reconnaissance, electronic warfare, drones, combat engineering preparation, and fire support is nowadays more simply referred to as a "meat assault." The neat phrase "an infantryman will still have to clear the trench" does not justify the idiotically wasteful decision to send him into that trench first. The role of artillery is also evolving. It remains essential for mass firepower, suppression, area targets, and operating under conditions where drones are restricted. However, single targets have long been handled by FPVs, heavy bomber drones, and mid-strike drones. Deep-strike systems and cheaper cruise missile analogs operate further behind enemy lines. So, drones haven't "replaced everything." They have taken over a huge share of reconnaissance, spotter adjustment, precision destruction, mining, logistics, and even assault roles. As a result, tanks, armored vehicles, artillery, and aviation are used less frequently, more cautiously, and only when their impact justifies the cost and risk. Another argument from the couch experts: "Just turn on electronic warfare and the drones won't fly." Right, of course. Strange that the Ukrainians themselves haven't thought of pressing the magic "turn off drones" button over more than four years of war. Electronic warfare (EW) is essential, but it is not an invisible dome. We now have frequency hopping, relays, elements of autonomous control, machine vision systems, and fiber-optic-guided FPVs. Every line of defense triggers a countermeasure, and technological cycles at the front line sometimes change within weeks. While our consultant spends six months coordinating the final version of a PowerPoint presentation, his "latest" conclusion is already outdated twice over. We are not anti-tank. We are against using tanks according to the doctrine of yesterday's war. For a tank to make a proper comeback to the battlefield, it needs more than just a metal cage welded onto the roof. It requires a complete protection ecosystem: drone detection, electronic warfare, active and passive defense, interceptor drones, dedicated reconnaissance drones, reduced physical and electromagnetic visibility, and integration into a unified intelligence and fire-control network. The tank of the future will likely be unmanned or optionally manned. Because the issue isn't just armor thickness. The issue is sending human beings, along with the tank, into a zone under constant surveillance and targeted fire. This is what we have been talking about for years now. Except our conclusions weren't drawn from watching YouTube or dragging blue and red rectangles across a screen. They emerged from the trenches of the current war. We have seen how the kill zone is shifting, how drones evolved from an auxiliary tool into a primary means of destruction, and how outdated procedures began costing human lives. Yet in Lithuania, a strange qualification system still prevails: if you were at the front yourself, you are "too emotional." If you fought on Facebook for four years, you qualify as a military expert. If you saw the doctrine fail, you are a radical. If you rewrote it three times in PowerPoint, you are an advisor or consultant. So let me repeat this as simply as possible: Tanks haven't disappeared. What has disappeared is the ability to use them the way it was planned ten or twenty years ago. Aerial and ground robotic systems have already taken over a portion of the roles previously held by light armor, artillery, aviation, and infantry. Anyone who fails to grasp this isn't "defending classic warfare"—they are simply preparing for yesterday's war using tomorrow's budget. And if, after all these arguments, someone still only hears "veterans want to get rid of tanks," it's not an additional explanation they need. They lack the ability to read a text longer than the headline of a tank procurement contract.

• 
  heAd3r (@wuuuif) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Atomiclizard88 @BattleNonSense @Battlefield I know and opinions will differ when it comes to the overall gameplay however i would argue that if we didnt have those pressing issues people would less likely roast the rest of the game.

• 
  翔（Justin ****） (@sb9717) reported 12 minutes ago

  Essentially, the machine was the product of taking a surviving test unit and subjecting it to a final round of practical modifications and battlefield refurbishment before sending it into service as a squad commander's machine.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 16 minutes ago

  Paid Backwards: When the More You Love, the Less You Are Loved Key Passage: 2 Corinthians 12:15 — “And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.” Introduction There are verses in the Bible that look good embroidered on a pillow, painted on a coffee mug, or printed beneath a picture of a sunrise. Second Corinthians 12:15 is not one of them. This verse comes into the room wearing work clothes, carrying scars, and smelling like the battlefield. Paul did not say, “The more I loved, the more everybody appreciated me.” He did not testify that every sacrifice brought applause, every sermon produced gratitude, and every soul he helped sent him a thank-you card. He said the exact opposite: “The more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.” That is one of the strangest paychecks ever handed to a servant of God. Paul gave more and received less. He loved more and was loved less. He poured himself out, and some of the very people drinking from the cup complained about the vessel. That verse cuts directly across the polished sales pitch of modern Christianity, where people are told that serving God will straighten every road, repair every relationship, silence every critic, and turn life into a well-landscaped stroll through a bed of roses. The truth is that the only bed of roses associated with faithful Christianity may be the one where somebody removed the flowers and left you the thorns. Many Christians are completely unprepared for this side of the Christian life. They get saved, begin reading the Bible, clean up their conduct, start witnessing, become faithful to church, and try to do something useful for God. They naturally imagine that the people around them will recognize the improvement and appreciate it. After all, the drunk has become sober, the liar is telling the truth, the selfish man is beginning to serve others, and the careless soul is now trying to live for eternity. What could anybody possibly object to? Plenty, according to the Bible. Family members begin to pull away. Old friends become uncomfortable. Coworkers start whispering. People question motives, twist words, and treat conviction like a contagious disease. A Christian who thought obedience would eliminate his problems discovers that obedience has introduced him to a whole new collection of them. He expected the devil to oppose wickedness and discovered that the devil generally sponsors wickedness. What the devil opposes is anything that threatens his territory. The moment a Christian becomes useful, dependable, prayerful, and spiritually awake, he has moved from being part of the scenery to being a target. This is where many believers become discouraged. They can endure work, but they cannot endure being misunderstood while doing it. They can make sacrifices, but they struggle when those sacrifices are treated as selfishness. They can love people, but they are wounded when that love is returned with coldness, suspicion, ridicule, or outright hatred. Some finally decide that serving God is not worth the pain. They withdraw, become bitter, sit down, and spend the rest of their Christian lives explaining why they used to care. But 2 Corinthians 12:15 was not written to teach us how to quit; it was written to show us what genuine ministry costs. The servant of God must learn that obedience is not measured by applause, truth is not determined by popularity, and love is not proven only when it is returned. There are times when the clearest proof of Christian love is that it continues after appreciation has disappeared. Paul was willing to spend and be spent because his account was kept in heaven. He was not working for the approval of Corinth, the acceptance of Jerusalem, or a favorable review from the local religious establishment. He served under the eyes of Jesus Christ, and that is the only way any Christian can remain faithful when the more abundantly he

• 
  nolawhereelsetogo (@angrynolasports) reported 21 minutes ago

  @freakofxeets Why fix what isnt broke? Madden. NBA. COD. Battlefield. Fallout. The money makers haven’t changed either. People Want pick up and play.

• 
  William John G. Balderama (@WJGBalderama) reported 22 minutes ago

  @nothanksfrankie My guess is that the XM30 will ultimately win. It’s a little sad to see the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle being replaced, but there’s only so much you can do with upgrades before you eventually run out of space, weight capacity, electrical power, and room for additional systems. More importantly, today’s battlefield demands a level of protection that the original Bradley was never designed to provide—particularly against drones and loitering munitions. The Russo-Ukrainian War has made it painfully clear that counter-drone capability and survivability against persistent aerial threats have become essential requirements for any modern armored fighting vehicle. I’m particularly familiar with the software that went into the BFV system. I was actually hired by United Defense in 1999, a few years after my retirement, so I had some firsthand exposure to the technology and the evolution of the platform. That gives me a bit of a personal connection to the Bradley and makes seeing it eventually replaced somewhat bittersweet. I do see it being relegated for service with the reserves so we will still see it before it finally gets mothballed.

• 
  ExoticTurnip (@skogsdundret) reported 24 minutes ago

  @LordMazzar @TTVbbloxham322 @HeadNaughty And the Call Of Duty, Battlefield and Medal of Honor games were all based on real actual battles back in the day. I still don't see the issue. Are we no longer allowed to create games based on actual events? Or is that too "real" for the modern crowd?

• 
  Michael Brasher (@2ndMississippi) reported 26 minutes ago

  Too Tired to Run Richmond, Kentucky, and the six weeks a total victory bought Richmond, Kentucky - 30 August 1862 There is a kind of victory so complete it becomes its own kind of warning, and Richmond, Kentucky was that kind. Kirby Smith did not know it yet, standing in the dust south of town on the morning of the 30th, listening to his guns open on a line of Indiana farm boys who had never heard a shot fired in anger. He knew only that the position in front of him - Mount Zion Church, a screen of raw troops under Mahlon Manson - was there to be broken, and that breaking it would open the whole of the Bluegrass like a door swinging wide on an empty room. The Federals had no business holding that ground and everyone on both sides of the line understood it. Bull Nelson's Army of Kentucky was ninety-day men, farm hands in uniform three weeks, stiffened by a scattering of veterans and not much else. Charles Cruft would say afterward that it was fifteen thousand veterans falling on sixty-two hundred citizens who did not know what war was. The arithmetic was closer to even than that. Smith brought something near sixty-five hundred himself, but the arithmetic was not the point. Cleburne's men had fought at Shiloh. Manson's men had fought nowhere at all. Smith reached the field a little after seven that morning and did what a soldier who has read the ground correctly always does: he refused the obvious blow and reached for the flank instead. A straight push up the Old State Road would have cost him men he could not spare this deep into hostile country with Heth's division still coming up behind him. So he sent Churchill's brigade under Thomas McCray west, down a hidden farm track that would come to be called, in the modest way these things get named after the fact, Churchill's Draw. Cleburne held the front and waited. It was in that waiting that the day's cruelest single moment fell, and it fell on Cleburne himself. A ball through the face, teeth lost, the jaw shattered, the man carried from the field at the exact hour his judgment was most needed. Smith's report called it a wound that cost him, at the moment of crisis, one of the most gallant, zealous, and intelligent officers of the army. He did not say it to flatter a subordinate. He said it because it was true. McCray came out of the draw onto Manson's exposed right at the moment Manson himself was shifting weight the other way, toward pressure on his left that he mistook for the main blow. A general is supposed to know which flank is being tested and which is only being teased. Manson did not. The line at Mount Zion folded inward from both ends at once, the way paper folds when you press two corners toward the middle. It did not hold. What followed was not one battle but three, fought over the same six miles of pike in a single afternoon, each one shorter and more hopeless than the last. The Federals rallied at White's Farm and lasted perhaps half an hour before that line went too. They rallied a third time on the edge of Richmond itself, at the cemetery, with Nelson now on the field in person and something near twenty-two hundred men in the ranks, some of them still fresh, most of them already broken in spirit if not yet in body. Smith formed three brigades into a single line more than half a mile across and sent them forward across open ground into what he himself, in the flattest sentence in his entire report, called a magnificent position manned by an enemy who outnumbered him. His men were too exhausted to run. They walked. They carried it in fifteen minutes. Nelson took a ball in the thigh and got away in a cornfield and borrowed clothes. The general fled the field his own army had just ceased to exist defending, and he did it dressed as somebody else. Manson did not get away. He rode into the arms of John Scott's cavalry, which had spent the day exactly where a good cavalry commander puts himself when infantry is doing the killing — across the roads the beaten army would have to use to escape. Scott's report used the word ambuscade, and it was not an exaggeration. A column of some five thousand fleeing men and nine guns rode into a fire that rolled down the line from one end to the other, and what did not fall surrendered entire. Scott called it a ten-acre lot full of prisoners. It was very nearly the whole Union command. Two days later Smith rode into Lexington to find no one there to stop him, and told the crowd that gathered that his army came not as invaders but as liberators. On the third of September Confederate soldiers raised their flag over the capitol at Frankfort, the only Union state capital a Confederate army would ever hold, and church bells rang, and Smith wrote home that he believed twenty-five thousand Kentuckians would take up arms once rifles could be found for them. They did not come. Kentucky's hearts were with the Confederacy, he wrote later, but her blue-grass and her fat cattle were not. Bragg was two days gone from Chattanooga by the time Richmond was fought, marching toward Munfordville by way of Sparta and Glasgow instead of toward Smith. The junction that was meant to crush Buell between two Confederate armies never came. Perryville came instead, in October, a tactical draw dressed as neither victory nor defeat, and after it Bragg turned south for Cumberland Gap. Smith had no choice left but to follow him home. Richmond had been as complete a battlefield victory as the war produced on either side. Nearly a whole Union army went into the ground or into a Confederate prison camp in a single afternoon. It bought Kirby Smith six weeks in Kentucky and nothing more. The men who died getting it right at Mount Zion Church and White's Farm and the Richmond Cemetery never knew that the campaign their deaths had opened would close again before winter. Kentucky would still be Union ground. ****************************** Graphics: 1) Major General Kirby Smith; 2) Brigadier General Patrick Cleburne; 3) "Cannae in the Bluegrass State" by Keith Rocco - Battle of Richmond, KY; 4) Tactical Map - Battle of Richmond

• 
  OSINTDesk (@INDOSINTDESK) reported 28 minutes ago

  War is back on. One-month lull broken. US hit IRGC launchers on Larak Island. Iran answered with ballistic missiles and drones on 2 US-hosted bases in Jordan. King Hussein and Muwaffaq Salti (Azraq). Jordan: 8 missiles intercepted. Squeeze Hormuz, and US bases become the battlefield. 🇮🇳🔥

• 
  Ryan (Prayer Garden) (@PrayerGarden) reported 29 minutes ago

  @4thOfJuly365 I personally think it's working fine. Considering how many people are part of it+ not farms..it's the town square of the world and I see both sides saying they are being censored. I believe that means they are right over target. People just tend to believe there content should get all the views. If everyone believes that then obviously some are gonna feel let down. I am here because I believe it's the battlefield of the digital world and I believe the Lord is allowing whatever I post to be seen by exactly who he wants to see it. While I do appreciate what you are doing and am a member...I just also believe X and what you are doing are 2 separate thing. I believe given enough time and growth (people) that you will see some of the issues and come to accept the way they(x) are working to fix them