1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Minneapolis, MN 1
Reims, ACAL 1
Pfaffenhoffen, ACAL 1
Americana, SP 1
Rennes, Brittany 1
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Montignac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Paris, Île-de-France 15
Méry-sur-Oise, Île-de-France 1
Halle, Flanders 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Bourg-en-Bresse, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
La Paz, BCS 1
Cahors, Occitanie 1
Saint-Genis-Laval, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Brisbane, QLD 1
Partido de José C. Paz, BA 1
Saint-Étienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Orléans, Centre 1
Castelnau-le-Lez, Occitanie 1
Comuna 1, CABA 5
Barrhead, Scotland 1
Lausanne, VD 1
Nairobi, Nairobi Area 1
Tiruvalla, KL 1
Propières, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Lübeck, Hansestadt, Schleswig-Holstein 1
Montpellier, Occitanie 2
San Bruno, CA 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • KarmaKarhu
    DJ North (@KarmaKarhu) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Fix XP boosts so they do not run out in real time but only when in match.

  • TNTJohn1717
    PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported

    The Bible believer rejects the scholar-pope system. He does not need Rome with incense, and he does not need Alexandria with footnotes. He does not need a pope in a white cassock or a pope in a bow tie with a Greek grammar. The words of God are not floating in manuscript space waiting to be assembled by experts. God preserved them. The English-speaking believer has them in the King James Bible. That is the line James White will not cross. He can debate Rome all day about tradition, but when he puts the preserved Bible under the scholar’s apparatus, he has created a Protestant version of the same authority problem. The final authority moves away from the Book and into the hands of men. Chapter Seven: Postmillennialism and the Reformed Kingdom Drift James White’s eschatological move is also important. He was raised in the dispensational premillennial world, but moved away from it and into the Reformed/postmillennial orbit. That is not a small adjustment. Eschatology is not a hobby chart in the back of a study Bible. It affects how a man reads Israel, the Church, the kingdom, prophecy, Matthew 24, Romans 11, Revelation, and the future reign of Christ. Once a man moves from dispensational premillennial truth into Reformed kingdom theology, the lines begin to blur fast. Postmillennialism is attractive to Reformed men because it fits the system. It gives them a victorious kingdom program in history. It lets them read the Great Commission through cultural conquest categories. It lets them talk about nations discipled, Christ reigning now in a way that progressively subdues the world through gospel influence, and history moving toward Christianized victory before the Second Advent. That sounds bold. It sounds optimistic. It sounds masculine in a soft age. But if it blurs Israel and the Church, denies the plain force of prophetic passages, and pushes the Church into a kingdom program not assigned to the Body of Christ, it is not Bible optimism. It is Reformed reconstruction. The Bible believer is not pessimistic. He is realistic because he believes the Book. The Church is going out before the wrath. Israel is going through Jacob’s trouble. Christ is coming back ****** and visibly. He will sit on David’s throne. The kingdom promised to Israel is not the Church’s cultural project. Revelation 20 is not a metaphor for gradual Christian influence. Romans 11 does not teach that Israel is permanently absorbed into the Church. God still has a program for Israel. Paul’s mystery doctrine still matters. The rapture still matters. The blessed hope still matters. White’s drift from dispensational truth into postmillennial Reformed categories is another reason Bible believers must test him carefully. Conclusion James White is strong where many men are weak. He is strong against Rome. He is strong against Mormonism. He is strong against Islam. He is strong against Jehovah’s Witness theology. He is strong in debate. He is strong in public confrontation. He is not afraid to name false systems. He believes doctrine matters, and in an age of doctrinal jellyfish, that alone makes him stand out. Those things should be acknowledged. Truth does not require us to pretend a man is wrong when he is right. But his errors are not small. Calvinism is a major error. Limited atonement is a major error. Regeneration before faith is a major error. Treating Calvinism as the gospel is a major error. Rejecting the King James Bible as final authority is a major error. Submitting the text to modern critical scholarship is a major error. Moving into Reformed postmillennial kingdom theology is a major error. These are not tiny disagreements over preference. They touch the gospel, the Bible, the sinner, the cross, the will, the promise of preservation, and the prophetic program of God. So the verdict is simple. Take what is useful, but do not follow him into Geneva, Alexandria, or postmillennial reconstruction. Let him expose Rome battlefield.

  • BattlefieldComm
    Battlefield Comms (@BattlefieldComm) reported

    Battlefield 1.3.2.0 Blastpoint Update We wanted to provide a quick update before the weekend regarding the issues we’ve seen reported this week. As we are still working on several of these problems, we don't have an exact rollout date just yet, but we will provide updates next week when possible. Deployment Screen Jumping Issue for PC The root cause has been found for the issue that causes the screen to jump around when trying to deploy. We understand the frustration this causes and are looking into how/when a fix can be deployed while trying to avoid introducing any new issues. In the meantime, players on PC have recommended using the keyboard to select a deployment target as a workaround. Lighting Bug in REDSEC As we previously mentioned, the intended resolution for this, which rolled out with the Blastpoint update on Tuesday, unfortunately did not work. We are continuing to investigate this to get it properly fixed and will update you when we have more details. Black Screen/Game Hanging on Battlefield 6 Logo We’re aware of reports from some players that the game may hang on the BF6 logo screen or a black screen after leaving a match or installing/uninstalling game content from the in-game menu. While the result is similar, they seem to have different causes so we are continuing to investigate and understand possible resolutions. For now, if content like the campaign needs to be installed or uninstalled, we recommend doing it through the game service like EA app and not the front-end menu. Missing Bonus Path/Explosive Charge Points We deployed a fix on Wednesday which allowed players to complete this Bonus Path and unlock all of the items. Since then, we have seen reports from players on missing a few points to complete the Bonus Path. These have been more scattered than the initial issue and appears to be related to the use of re-rolls. We are looking into a fix for this, but it will primarily affect future rollouts. On Tuesday, the next week of Explosive Charge challenges will be available and there should be 50 more points to earn which will make this completable for affected players. Thank you all for your continued feedback, patience, and support. We’ll talk more soon, and we hope you have a great weekend on the Battlefield! 🧡

  • famousmanaz32
    1+1 (@famousmanaz32) reported

    @bekeestitches Dude's healing factor can't fix his trauma even his dreams are a battlefield. Rogue didn't deserve that jump-scare claws though Classic

  • ContainedAni
    Animosity 📸 (@ContainedAni) reported

    People are fundamentally misunderstanding a lot about this card and why it may or may not be something to worry about. On one hand you have people saying "omg free value, axe it!" and they're wrong. On the other hand you have people saying "lol dies to removal, 6 mana do nothing, ect" and they're also wrong. If you think you can judge cards solely in a vacuum, then you're missing the plot. In a vacuum - Winota is a bad card as it a 4 mana dude who does nothing unless you have other things on the battlefield. Winota also has zero protection and dies to removal just as easily as MM. However we all can understand that Winota is a broken card because of the sheer value the card can give that snowballs out of control. You don't see Winota at anything lower than high B3 games for a reason (if you do, the player is trying to pubstomp you) and it's because the sheer value the card presents overshadow's even the game changer's list. MM is a card that requires other pieces to push it, and anyone playing MM is also likely playing those pieces as well. I am not saying MM is like Winota entirely, I'm saying that you can't judge MM like any old creature in magic that can only be in the 99. You also cannot ignore that he does provide progressively more and more value the longer the game goes, which is what happens a lot at bracket 2-3 games. The minute someone lands a piece that allows them to draw a card on each opponents turn you've effectively turned the game into "every turn is my turn". Let's flip the script: MM is colorless and that is a hinderance more than a benefit. Busted legendary creatures in commander are more often judged by their power in the zone, and much less the 99 (eg Erayo, Golos, Leovold, ect). MM's deck HAS to be colorless and colorless has much less resources to work with to draw cards on each opponents turn with little upfront investment. There are some, but they are usually symmetrical (temple bell, GRS, ect) and can provide your opponents with other benefits as well. This is a massive hinderance to MM's overall power as a card because the higher value it can provide will be hard to unlock without more investment and requires your opponents to not use that benefit you're likely providing to remove your game piece. MM is much like the other 6 mana colorless commander: Zhulodok. Does nothing itself but provides really good value with other cards. You don't see Zhulodok at bracket 2 games very often because the type of deck Zhulodok pilots is often too oppressive for bracket 2 games. Someone playing a tuned Zhulodok deck playing against what is effectively the precon tier is someone trying to get easy wins (which is kind of funny considering Zhulodok helmed a precon and the OG list is actually pretty fine for bracket 2, all things considered). Overall, Molecule Man is pretty good card. It'll shine much better in the 99 than in the command zone alongside cards that allow you to draw on each opponents turn with little investment. He's a very good card in bracket 2, completely fine if not a little mid in bracket 3, and bad in bracket 4 and 5.

  • DanHollaway
    Dan Hollaway (@DanHollaway) reported

    There are morons in the military as well. The problem is, you don't have the experience to know when you're listening to one. Nothing about the battlefield can be learned from someone who's never been there. @stuartscheller

  • luinalaska
    Lu for Alaska (@luinalaska) reported

    Day four of intergenerational UNO combat: battlefield report My children have formed an alliance against me. This caused significant issues for the opening round, but then I pulled the oldest trick in the book. Divide and conquer. I brought up recent beef and squabbles with every hand. Remember when your brother fouled you in basketball but lied and said he didn’t foul you and then you got in trouble for throwing the ball at him? The sibling fights ensued. Yes. The alliance weakens. My son, savvy as he is, realized my ploy. “NO LOCK IN BRUH SHE’S RUINING THE GAME.” Ah but too late. The 12 year old is mad. She hits him with that red +2. The alliance is in shambles. My son glares at his mother. TEARS OF MY UNO ENEMIES.

  • Constan63413921
    Constance (@Constan63413921) reported

    No deal would save this regime. I wish this endless deal-or-no-deal circus would end soon. It’s become a distraction and, in many ways, it hurts the revolutionary movement. We cannot allow ourselves to become consumed by every rumor, leak, or headline about negotiations. Sanctions relief cannot repair a system built on corruption, fear, incompetence, and violence. The regime is not failing because of sanctions alone; it is failing because it has destroyed trust, looted the country, crushed its own people, and turned Iran into a battlefield for its ideology. Even if a deal gives them temporary breathing room, it will not give them legitimacy. In fact, it may raise people’s expectations and when nothing meaningfully improves, the anger will only deepen. The problem is not the deal. The problem is the regime.

  • AdemDoccus4
    Adem Doccus (@AdemDoccus4) reported

    @BattlefieldComm “How do we get our base traffic up?” “Let’s spend money and resources on game modes nobody wants” “Everything his broken, further driving core players away” “Get the SVP chick to post gameplay and ask cringy questions!!!”

  • shadowscourage
    𝕰𝑙𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝕯𝑎𝑟𝑢 (@shadowscourage) reported

    simultaneously. To her, the code wasn't just numbers, it was a battlefield. She was mapping out crossfire vectors, predicting entry angles, and building a flawless net in the sky. Line by line, the bleeding red errors on the screen began to turn a steady, compliant blue. ---

  • WhiskasOfficial
    Whiskas (@WhiskasOfficial) reported

    @BattlefieldComm It’s going to take them weeks to fix this

  • Brolis_92
    Brolis_ (@Brolis_92) reported

    @KoKane_96 @BattlefieldComm So its your problem 💁

  • mastersabin
    Sabin (@mastersabin) reported

    @Battlefield fix your ******* game

  • spikeman785021
    Major (R) In Pain (@spikeman785021) reported

    @A10TheHog I've never understood why we change a platform that has consistently dominated on the battlefield? The BUFF is a perfect example of: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just upgrade the technology it uses...

  • BigBoiJeff1
    DarkStar45 (@BigBoiJeff1) reported

    @DANNYonPC Battlefield has the same issue airsoft does where there's two halves of the community one who wants it to be more milsim "battle dads" or airsoft LARPers. Vs the other half who play in way faster and don't care about the military aspects "speedsofters" and movement tech bros.

Check Current Status