1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Brasília, DF 1
Arlon, Wallonia 1
Coyoacán, CDMX 1
Saint-Malo, Brittany 1
Buenos Aires, CF 1
Comuna 1, CABA 5
Perpignan, Occitanie 1
Domingos Martins, ES 1
Courbevoie, Île-de-France 1
Strasbourg, ACAL 1
Chaumont, ACAL 1
Amagney, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 2
Paris, Île-de-France 17
Itapemirim, ES 1
São Paulo, SP 2
Brech, Brittany 1
Trévoux, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Nidau, BE 1
Villa Victoria, MEX 1
Santiago de Querétaro, QUE 3
Telêmaco Borba, PR 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 4
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Madrid, Madrid 4
La Trinité, Martinique 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 5
Persan, Île-de-France 1
Metz, ACAL 3
Aubais, Occitanie 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • M3THM4N
    Brock Landers (@M3THM4N) reported

    @BFBulletin Each "fix" comes with 10 more problems... @Battlefield

  • SwiftyLunatic
    Alex Devine (@SwiftyLunatic) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Let's hope you actually fix the issues you listed! Most of the time, you just write words and never fix the issues!

  • yungkikori
    Kiko (@yungkikori) reported

    Everybody booing OP but I know exactly what she means 😭 The problem is she’s never fought in any of the movies, & now all of a sudden she’s on the battlefield. It would take 20 seconds for her to say “This is a hard fight, and I want to be by your side while you fight it” 😭

  • andrewlydiard
    Andrew Lydiard (@andrewlydiard) reported

    @BattlefieldComm In RedSec, there are still some glaring issues like the Recon drone being unable to ping, which is kind of the entire point of it. The SVD still being overly oppressive, sniping being all but useless. These are CORE game issues you have to address sooner rather than later.

  • DHKITCH
    Kitch (@DHKITCH) reported

    @GBNEWS Having served and operated under rules of engagement, I think people need to understand the difference between a battlefield decision and an atrocity. In combat, soldiers sometimes have seconds to assess a threat and act. Those decisions must be judged in the context in which they were made. But summary executions, deliberate killings of prisoners or civilians, torture and similar conduct are something else entirely. That is where the line is clearly crossed. Investigating credible allegations of that kind is not persecuting veterans. If serious criminal misconduct occurred, service in uniform should not place anyone beyond accountability. What veterans should be protected from is endless reinvestigation of legitimate battlefield decisions without substantial new evidence. Those are two very different things.

  • Aimlocker2
    Aimlocker (@Aimlocker2) reported

    @Battlefield FIX THE “EVERYONE IS MEDIC” BUG

  • chemliakram
    AkramRock (@chemliakram) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Fix redsec

  • UncolonisedMind
    Mind of the Motherland (@UncolonisedMind) reported

    One thing I genuinely don’t understand is how some people can acknowledge that colonialism obstructed Africa’s development, yet somehow refuse to recognise that neocolonialism continues to do the same thing, in some cases even worse. Is the difference simply that the white man is no longer physically there to administer it? There is no meaningful difference between the colonial master and the local agent who administers the same system on his behalf. Your mistake is thinking these people are your people simply because they look like you. Physical appearance does not change the interests they serve, the system they uphold, or the consequences of their actions. Neocolonialism does not require the continued physical presence of the colonial master. It works precisely by reproducing the interests and structures of the former colonial order through local institutions, elites and agents. There is no “post-colonial era”. There is the pre-colonial era, the colonial era, and the neocolonial era. The system continues. The administrator changed. The structure of ********** did not. Replacing one agent with another is not the same as destroying the system entirely. And this is why understanding what we are fighting matters. If you do not understand the battlefield, you can defeat a local agent and still fail to defeat the system that produced and empowered that agent. You may mistake a few concessions and reforms for sovereignty, only to find yourself reproducing the same system under a different administration. And eventually, you either become another agent of that system or you are removed and replaced by one. When people tell you about neocolonialism, they are not denying the actions of its local agents. They are trying to give you a fuller understanding of what you are actually fighting. Because if you think the local agent is the entire problem, you will celebrate replacing the agent while leaving the system intact. The system is not failing. It has not failed. It is working as designed.

  • TheInfamousEG
    🌹 The Infamous E.G.🌹 (@TheInfamousEG) reported

    If im wrong about the frostbite engine being the reason it takes them so long to fix bugs that LITERALLY get unfixed the next patch later in Battlefield How come non Battlefield games had SIMILAR problems including SINGLE PLAYER games

  • Blizzy63
    D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported

    @BattlefieldComm - barley a fix for black screen bug - no bullet dispersion fixes - no audio changes - no jet loadouts 6 months later besides 1… - no bullet registration fixes - no dsync fixes - Asian players in US/Eu servers abusing lag comp I’m posting till **** changes… every ******* post

  • TheTopMostDog
    TheTopMostDog 🇦🇺🐕‍🦺🏕️🎣🔫🪓🥩 (@TheTopMostDog) reported

    @Battlefield I don't understand why this needs to be a thing. Why did we have **** reticles to begin with? We went through this exact same problem before. Why can't BF learn from their mistakes?

  • GeraKerla
    Gera (@GeraKerla) reported

    @stefayylmao1 I do not understand why we keep putting in snipers in moba shooters when they create so many issues and are extremely unfun to play against at the level that the majority of every playerbase operates on. At least in battlefield you have more meaningful ways to work around them.

  • bash_shar
    Royalty 👑👑 (@bash_shar) reported

    Cheap drones are now enough to destroy multi-million dollar tanks, and Ukraine's outgoing top general just admitted: "We're making virtually no use of armored vehicles." Modern warfare has changed. Permanently. @powerus_usa was built specifically for this moment: a counter-UAS company scaling toward vertical integration, producing drones and Guardian interceptors at scale. The old defense model, building expensive weapons in distant factories and shipping them months later, is exactly what the drone age has exposed as broken. Powerus produces close to where the threat is, at a price point the math of modern warfare actually supports. The battlefield changed faster than the procurement system did, and we're building Powerus for the battlefield that exists today...and tomorrow. Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the client and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions.

  • azrael_options
    Azraël (@azrael_options) reported

    0DTE scalpers: nobody has ever blown up an account taking one trade per day on $SPX. Six trades before lunch is where accounts go to die. Overtrading is negative expectancy you volunteer for, five to eight times a day, and the industry sells it as work ethic. Why do smart traders defend the habit? → More trades feels like more control. In practice it is more crossings of the spread. → Survivorship bias runs the feed: one guy posts 8 green scalps while 400 silent accounts provided his exit liquidity. → Flat feels like losing, so you manufacture setups. Every red scalp demands revenge, every green one demands proof it was skill. → By trade 5 the desk is a casino and you are the revenue stream. Now hear the same day from the other side of the book. → Dealers classify retail market orders as the cleanest flow in the book. Every scalp hands them the spread on both sides. → 0DTE theta bleeds hardest mid-session, exactly when scalper activity peaks. You pay hourly rent on an asset built to expire worthless. → They fade the opening wick, pin price between expected move boundaries, and let the churn cook you into tilt. The real move prints after the overtraded accounts are flat and done. The fix is fewer decisions, not more discipline. → Premarket: pull VIX, compute the expected move, mark the upper and lower boundaries. That is the entire battlefield for the day. → Let the first 20 minutes play out. That window is dealer inventory reload, not opportunity. → One trade per day, taken only at an expected move boundary where dealer hedging flows actually turn. → Hard 1R cap on every position. Structure breaks, the day is over. No revenge trade, no second attempt. → Demand asymmetry: target the far boundary or the next structural shelf so the reward is multiple R against a fixed 1R. One asymmetric trade with a fixed 1R cap beats eight frantic scalps on every risk-adjusted metric that matters. That single rule carries the entire challenge I am documenting. Boring scales. Frantic bleeds. I put the entire system, the 4 trade archetypes, the Excel workstation engine, and the 20 minute opening rule into an ebook. Comment "MATRIX" and I'll DM it to you.

  • simonsaypl
    Szymon (@simonsaypl) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Please FIX BF6. For the last 2 days, the game has been a mess. You dump a FULL MAG into someone, they turn around and kill you instantly. Hit registration and desync are absolutely broken. 5–8 min matchmaking, getting kicked from matches, terrible server stab

Check Current Status