Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Roman Dukey (@Dukey2003) reported 2 minutes ago

  @rowell_96 @IxBeast @Battlefield it's not glazing to point out, that it is weird to feel "offended" by a typo... I mean, they are all human and errors occur.

• 
  Silver Chambers (@SilverChambers) reported 3 minutes ago

  @TacticalGramps I’ve practically quit playing battlefield at this point. I just don’t have the patience for it anymore when I’m actually having fun with other stuff now. Especially that they aren’t broken messes. I really did have fun with battlefield back in the day.

• 
  mike bski (@BskiMike22802) reported 5 minutes ago

  @JeffreyMod31208 @atrupar Don't know why, but whatever you want to believe. I am an Army medic, a combat veteran, trying to look after the health of fellow service members. I guess that must be your criteria. What do you do? It must be more than saving lives on a battlefield while bullets are flying. I am kinda excited to hear it.

• 
  Niꓘ0bi1 (@Nik0bi1) reported 8 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS And you know What ? BF7 Will have the same issue 🤡 battlefield is dead !!

• 
  Jig (@Jiguiski) reported 12 minutes ago

  @sho_90r @tones_best @BattlefieldComm Yeah Redsec is the root of a lot of problem in this game

• 
  tom (@9vommy99) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Omg they are going to fix helicopters finally!!!!

• 
  IxBeast (@IxBeast) reported 14 minutes ago

  @baycosinus @BattlefieldComm this screams skill issue like its not even funny. Bro literally told us he downgraded his play experience to BF2042 LMFAO

• 
  7thDestiny🔰 (@7Destiny61786) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Judaeda3 White people are not like your Zimbabweans and Nigerians foreigners they will act when its time to act and on a battlefield in terms of fitness your tribe won't make it. Stop waging war and work hard fix your lives

• 
  ATA SABANCI (@sabanci_ata) reported 17 minutes ago

  Imagine a battlefield. No generals. No map. No radio. All you know is noise. Now a scout arrives. He reads the battlefield for you, scene by scene: "Selling Capitulation." The sellers dropped their weapons. It's over. No one left on the front line. "Quiet Accumulation." Silence. But pay attention — someone is taking position in the dark. "Pressure Building." Force is gathering behind the wall. It hasn't broken yet. "Dead Market." Everyone left. The battlefield is empty. Wait. "Breakout Candidate." One side loaded all the ammunition. Something is about to happen. "High-Volume Standoff." Two armies face to face. Both strong. Neither is moving. 19 scenes. Each one carries a name. None of them tells you "attack" or "retreat." It reads the battlefield. It leaves the decision to you. Smart Trader — SNIF-OFF 5.1, Trade Finder. How many scenes does your scout see?

• 
  Mason (@miscomputate) reported 20 minutes ago

  $INFQ @infleqtion The market is treating this like a busted de-**** while Washington / @DoWCTO is treating this category like strategic infrastructure. That is the huge disconnect and where most of my angst comes from. The stock price is ugly. No way around it. Macro is not friendly. Semis have been derisking. High beta names are getting hit. Oil/Iran/rates/small cap sentiment are all real issues in the short term. But the company specific and government specific story is moving in the opposite direction. That’s what I must focus on now. The market is asking: Where is the immediate revenue? Where are the awards? Where are the contracts? Why is this still trading like a speculative quantum name? Fair questions. But Washington appears to be asking something very different and is requesting it as soon as humanly possible: Who can field quantum sensors? Who can support GPS denied environments? Who can improve timing and navigation? Who can detect RF signals? Who can miniaturize cold-atom systems? This is becoming a big one. Who can support ISR, defense, space and critical infrastructure? Who can turn quantum from lab hardware into deployable systems? That is where $INFQ keeps getting stronger. Because Infleqtion is not just sitting in the “quantum computer someday” bucket. They are sitting across the table and working on the exact questions that Washington needs answered: Cold neutral atom compute/sensing. Atomic clocks. RF sensing. PNT. Defense. Space. Networking. Miniaturization. Field deployment. And the federal roadmap keeps moving straight into those lanes. Commerce LOI. White House EO signing. Matt Kinsella in the Oval Office. White House quantum summit. CNBC visibility. Barron’s coverage. QED-C Capitol Hill showcase. Army / ARL RF sensing work. Farseer quantum sensing initiative. DARPA Perrseus. Quantum Genesis. Quantum World Congress. None of these alone makes the thesis. But together, it looks less and less random. @DARPA Perrseus is a great example. That program is not asking “who has the best stock chart? Who has the most revenue? Who is making their own fabs?” It is asking how to build microscale ultra high-vacuum systems for compact cold-atom devices, MEMS, photonics and quantum sensors. Translation: make atomic systems smaller, more rugged, more manufacturable and more field ready. That is exactly the bottleneck for clocks, sensors, PNT, RF and battlefield deployment. That is Infleqtion’s language. That is Infleqtion’s roadmap. And that is the quiet part the market does not price until I think it has to. The stock can be ugly before the thesis becomes obvious. That is how these things work perhaps. Visions, dreams, money, timelines seldom move in straight lines. The market looks at $INFQ and sees a $9 stock with early revenue and **** baggage. Washington looks at this technology and sees timing, sensing, navigation, defense, space, RF, quantum networks, ISR and national security infrastructure. Again, those are two very different messages - moving in opposite directions. Important dates I’m watching: August 3 — DARPA Perrseus abstracts encouraged August 18 - Q2 Earnings August 21 — EO deadline for DoW to identify at least 3 next-gen quantum sensor projects September 1 — Perrseus intent to propose deadline September 20–23 — Impact 250 September 23 — Perrseus full proposals due September 23–25 — Quantum World Congress I don’t know when the market wakes up. But I do think this is the kind of setup where the real move happens after most people have already gotten tired, shaken out, or convinced themselves nothing is happening. Wall Street is still trying to value this like another early stage quantum-computing stock. I think Washington may be telling us it is something much more important than that. $INFQ is an atom based infrastructure company. And right now, the government seems to understand that far better than the market does.

• 
  Aristocratic Fury (@LandsknechtPike) reported 20 minutes ago

  The only thing that annoys me more than grey filter is how they even started abandoning heraldic surcoats in modern movies. Henry V (1989) vs some modern abomination of what's supposed to be Henry V. The reason why this annoys me the most is because there should be no excuse for this. There is no reasonable way to explain why you would not include heraldic surcoats in a movie depicting medieval warfare, considering how important part of warfare this was, serving as an identification for nobles and their units in a time when standardized uniforms did not exist yet. With most other things you could sort of make some lame excuse. Like for example grey filter - artistic choise (a completely horrible one that makes the movie unwatchable but ok), real historic armors are expensive, extras are expensive etc. But this is literally just a piece of cloth. It should be no problem for a movie of a budget of this magnitude to get historically correct heraldic surcoats and tunics for the soldiers, depicting their coats of arms, the colors of their factions etc. Also imagine how stupid and unrealistic this is, if the medieval armies had no heraldic surcoats and other types of colorful identifications like tunics, badges, slashes, it would be extremely difficult to tell each other apart on the battlefield, practically impossible in many cases. Yes in modern movies you have scenes of two armies with knights on both sides only wearing armors with no identifications whatsoever (even banners are rare), and the commoners wearing colorless rags, the infantry troops are not fighting under their banners. It's ridiculous. How could they even be able to recognize each other. So the fact that these modern movies don't include this shows me that they are not even slightly interesting in being historically accurate and giving a fair depiction of a certain time period, they have no interest in presenting history, in fact it obviously appears that they want to actively portray it in a much worse matter than it was, because they removed of the most colorful and coolest aspects of the time, which would have cost them absolutely nothing of significance to include.

• 
  Ajay Kimble (@kimbleajay1) reported 20 minutes ago

  @cloudhead69 @Mesmeratize_ The issue is that it looks more like battlefield than cod

• 
  ok then 🐡 (@AScribbledEagle) reported 21 minutes ago

  O'Reilly for James with Spence swapping sides maybe? James and Rice both look half fit. I don't know how you solve the problem of taking Rice off with Anderson on a booking though. Maybe Stones to centre mid because it's a battlefield there anyway

• 
  Raphael (@Raphael876252) reported 21 minutes ago

  China is one of America’s sworn enemies. They have not concealed that fact.. We America (FBI, CIA, etc), have run operations worldwide. Both side have weapons that could destroy the world. We need to fix this situation and prosecute the traitors who are working for and with our enemies. We need to clean our own house and recognize we have been at war for decades. It’s just not the type of war that’s fought on the battlefield..

• 
  Chris Jackson (@BigModernism) reported 21 minutes ago

  @zx77789 The premise is insulting. SSPX priests did not flee the battlefield; they stayed where the Faith, Mass, sacraments, and formation of souls could survive. Their chapels are full of converts, broken families, addicts, and confused Catholics seeking refuge from the very devastation Wells describes. Asking a priest to abandon that work and submit to the machinery that caused the crisis is surrender.