Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  kirito _4kirigaya (@K4kirigaya) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm A lot of stuff broken since the "patch." When customizing a gun the screen dims. When a tank hits a corner it loses audio. Hit registration is even worse, it takes 10 bullets to get them to half health... WHY?! TTK is way to high and TTD. Bloom is way too much on certain guns too

• 
  aguyonhischair (@aguyonhischair) reported 8 minutes ago

  Battlefield 6 is broken AF! Bad matchmaking, poor hitreg and all the other **** that the devs are unable to fix. This is one of the worst games they have ever created in the Battlefield franchise. The devs should be ashamed of themselves! #BF6 @Battlefield #Battlefield6

• 
  zinecro (@zxd4necro) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @CoolGuyGames Here we are again during double xp and cant even play due unknown error. This has happened so many time and only with this game. @ea i want my money back or for you to make it right. No accountability from ea

• 
  Maradona Carrera (@carreraluu) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BrokenMachine @BattlefieldComm Dam I have issues on PC I can't run one tab in Chrome nor Discord the game performance drops like crazy

• 
  DJ North (@KarmaKarhu) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BrokenMachine @BattlefieldComm The map started lagging first time when Golmud released (deploy screen). It was sort of better but at times it's twice as worse. Full two second freezing while switching loadouts, ending up clicking the wrong gadget/gun slot. It's bleeding into gameplay now.

• 
  RanniMan | (4TK) (@RannimanGaming) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield CAN WE PLEASE FIX THE LOBBY MATCHMAKING!!!!

• 
  Demi ♰ (@rasDemi) reported 16 minutes ago

  One should not underestimate the ENDF, really any strategically minded person should never underestimate an enemy, no matter how weak or disorganized they may appear. The ENDF has serious problems: careless treatment of its soldiers, low morale in many units, and alot of battlefield blunders. But it remains a formidable military force. It still possesses the manpower, equipment, some really great commanders, good battalions, and the logistical capacity to inflict alot of damage. I am of the opinion that, if it were not already stretched thin by Fano, TDF, maybe OLA and EDF, it could capture large parts of Eritrea within a relatively short period.

• 
  CalvZynisT (@CalvZynisT) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @EA_DICE FIX YOUR SERVERS! I SHOULDNT BE HAVING 70% PACKET LOSS MAKING THE GAME UNPLAYABLE !!! ITS NOT MY INTERNET

• 
  KyleN (@KyyyleN) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm still no spawnscreen freeze fix. wow.

• 
  Op-ed (@user98765146435) reported 23 minutes ago

  @catslashmouse @GhostGamingG @Battlefield no reason to axe a game mode based on the total number of players being "too many". The FPS player base prefers large maps with 128 players. Warzone keeps CoD relevant doing that. The issues with 2042 were handled years ago. The trendy thing among the online gamers is to *****

• 
  keyion (@KEYIONNN) reported 24 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE it's hard not to agree with many of my points. I genuinely enjoy @Battlefield 6 and want it to succeed even more, but right now it feels like the community is dealing with the same issue after issue while waiting for meaningful improvements:

• 
  Swine ***** (@spongebobsbrger) reported 26 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the ******* game. This is worst battlefield of all time and it’s because of YOU brain dead ******* pfaggets. All of you deserve to be fired

• 
  Antonio Falconieri (@AULaw24) reported 26 minutes ago

  @hissgoescobra I think it’s worth reading with a lot of excellent criticisms of Israel’s war in Gaza . Yet he’s made a number of critical mistakes. When he criticizes John Spencer and his position that HAMAS chose the battlefield and that battlefield was embedded amongst civilians he dismissed Spencer by comparing it to the battle of Mosel well one of the differences was that the civilian population in Mosel was not all kept in place much of it escaped, but more importantly, the population was generally friendly towards the Iraqi forces not ISIS. Spencer doesn’t make the argument that the rules of war stop applying because the enemy makes a decision to get it civilians killed. However, this article implies that that is Spencer’s position. It is not. HAMAS did not just live among civilians. They are on the record - and you can’t speak against their own video made safely over the years and more recently during the war from safe quarters in the Gulf - that it was their specific intention to get as many of their civilians killed as possible. That is different than an insurgent embedded amongst civilians. That is a war fighting doctrine that attempts to maximize the number of dead women and children. There is also a numerical error that is made pointing out that adult males were 1/3 of the casualties. First off these statistics use cites that are questionable at best, but even if it right, it does not imply random targeting by the IDF or a complete lack of consideration of civilian life . Because of the population explosion in Gaza, 50% of the population were considered children (including 16 and 17-year-old boys who were fighting). The rest of the population, who are not categorized as children, would be female and means that a random distribution of deaths of adult males would be somewhat under 25%, especially since many of the enemy cadre were not just embedded in civilian structures, but in addition were in protected quarters either via fortification or being underground. None of this supports Israel “doing nothing wrong“ in Gaza, but he too easily dismisses many of John Spencer‘s points.

• 
  86Shaffer (@86Shaffer) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield had its problems but taking away Rush mode, nope. I’m done

• 
  The Tectonic (@thetect0nic) reported 30 minutes ago

  🇬🇧 While Europe debates who should operate the core of the state's data layer, the breach came through the plumbing. Hackers compromised the Police National Legal Database, a thirty-year-old legal reference service used by all 43 police forces in England and Wales, exposing names, forces, and work emails of over 100,000 officers and criminal justice professionals, including personnel from the MoD, Home Office, NCA, and CPS who subscribed to it. The extortion group ExfilSquad claims the theft, days after a similar breach spilled half a million records from the Department for Education. No passwords, no case files, no victim data. Just the directory. But a directory of who investigates organised crime, attached to real names and workplaces, is targeting data, and one exposed officer told The Times they had previously needed safe houses because of their work. The sovereignty debate fixates on the exquisite layer, who runs the battlefield AI, who operates the intelligence platform. The attack surface is the boring layer, the subscription services and reference tools accumulated over decades that nobody maps, nobody audits, and everybody trusts. States do not get breached through their crown jewels. They get breached through the plumbing that connects to them.