Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  oobie (@oobiewpb) reported 2 minutes ago

  $SPX $QQQ $IWM $NVDA $SPY DLMM EARLY-WARNING SHIFT — TUESDAY, AUGUST 25 — PREMARKETSTATUS: YELLOW — TECHNOLOGY IS ATTEMPTING A CHARACTER CHANGE There is one meaningful change from yesterday worth putting on the board. Monday finished with SPX at 7652.86, down 0.3%, while Nasdaq and Russell 2000 both lost about 0.8%. Technology was again the clear problem. This morning, that leadership is trying to reverse. QQQ has reclaimed roughly 710–711 in premarket trading, and semiconductors are participating in the rebound ahead of Nvidia earnings. Nvidia, Intel, Micron and Marvell are all trading higher early. That matters because yesterday's bearish confirmation depended heavily on QQQ continuing to lead lower. Right now, it isn't. SPX OPTIONS STRUCTURE Yesterday's closing gamma model still had: Gamma flip: 7713 Put wall: 7600 Call wall: 7900 Net GEX: approximately -$30.6B per 1% move SPX closed at 7652.86 — still well underneath that gamma flip. So the negative-gamma risk has NOT disappeared. But today's SPXW chain already shows substantial positioning around 7650. Tuesday open interest is approximately 1,589 calls and 1,678 puts at that strike. That makes 7650 an especially useful opening reference again. DLMM MAP 7600 — major downside gamma rail from yesterday's positioning.7650 — immediate decision.7670–7680 — first meaningful repair.7700 — major psychological/options battlefield.7713 — yesterday's gamma-regime transition. Here's what would constitute the next MATERIAL shift: SPX holds 7650 → reclaims 7670/80 → QQQ holds its premarket recovery → IWM participates → volatility does NOT expand.If that develops, yesterday's bearish gamma environment could become considerably less threatening because price would be moving back toward the regime boundary rather than away from it.The opposite sequence is equally important:QQQ loses 710/711 → SPX loses 7650 → attempted reclaim fails → IWM resumes lower → volatility expands. Then yesterday's negative-gamma thesis is back in control, with 7600 becoming increasingly relevant. The important change this morning is therefore NOT a new gamma number. It's QQQ. Technology spent Monday leading the market down. Tuesday morning it is attempting to lead it back up. That's an EARLY WARNING of a possible character change — not confirmation yet.I want price after 9:30 to prove whether this is genuine demand or simply an overnight reset. Trade the reaction, not the premarket move.

• 
  Trollaria (@Trollaria) reported 3 minutes ago

  @rustytatra Even battlefield 6 ai chat bot wouldnt ban for this long. And about performance. For sure it runs smooth on these days pc’s. Back then i often got DirectX error. Had only 3GB vram. If i had no rsi i had maybe played battlefield 1 more.

• 
  Momentum Works (@momentumasia) reported 4 minutes ago

  @deepseek_ai uses Mao's playbook to win the AI race. Fewer chips, less capital — and a strategy built for the weaker side. For the last few years, we have often recommended that clients trying to understand their Chinese competitors read Mao Zedong's On Protracted War. In fact, many of the Chinese tech leaders we know have been reading Mao's works for strategic and tactical inspiration in a permanently cutthroat market. Liang Wenfeng, the founder of DeepSeek, appears to be doing the same. In a recent investor call, he talked about restraint, about not fighting for ground he does not need, about how being behind is actually an advantage. He never mentioned Mao once in the four-hour call. But anyone who has read Mao would recognise the strategy. Mao's strategic thinking came from a side that was poorer, smaller and surrounded. In the early 1930s the Communist insurgency forces were weaker than the Nationalist government on every axis a conventional army is measured on — men, weapons, industrial base, control of the cities. Earlier attempts to follow more orthodox, Soviet-influenced doctrine had ended disastrously, culminating in the loss of the Communist base areas and the Long March. The strategy Mao built afterwards began from a different question: not how to get as much force as the enemy, but how to change the terms of the fight so that being weaker mattered less. On Protracted War, written in 1938 - a year into the war against Japan, took the next step and folded time itself into the fight. Mao's answer was not to wait until he had as many men, guns or cities as his enemy. It was to fight in a way that made those advantages less decisive. That history matters here because Mao’s strategy was shaped by the same basic problem DeepSeek faces today: how to compete when the other side has far more resources. That is a fairly precise description of the box DeepSeek is in. It runs on a small fraction of a single American lab's compute, with less capital, no access to the best chips, and — on Liang's own account — models roughly an order of magnitude smaller than the largest ones he is looking at. So when he reasons his way through that position out loud, he arrives roughly where Mao arrived. This is the lens for the whole call. DeepSeek is not trying to run the American AI playbook with fewer resources. It has either consciously adopted, or independently reconstructed, a coherent strategy for fighting from the weaker side — and anyone who has read Mao will recognise its four basic moves. Refuse the stronger side's battle Liang points to the largest models, around 800 billion parameters. DeepSeek cannot train one. He knows it, and says he will not even try. On his own maths, it takes roughly four Huawei chips to do the work of one Nvidia chip, and the Huawei hardware itself is about two years behind. So rather than spend years trying to assemble the same firepower as the American labs, he simply refuses that battlefield. He made the same choice when DeepSeek went viral last year. Users poured in. For a brief moment, it looked like DeepSeek had been handed the opening every Chinese internet company spends years chasing: traffic, attention, and a chance to build a consumer platform. The obvious move was to spend heavily, keep the users and turn the moment into a super-app. Liang did not take it. There were bigger things to build, and he believed the users were not going anywhere. That is the first move in the weak-side playbook: do not fight the stronger side on the ground where it is strongest. Choose another ground. Concentrate the force you have This is Mao's 集中优势兵力，各个歼灭敌人 — concentrate a superior force and destroy the enemy piece by piece. The point was never that Mao had the superior army. In 1946, at the start of the renewed Chinese civil war, the Communist forces were weaker overall. Mao's instruction was to make that irrelevant at the point of contact: when the enemy advanced on several fronts, concentrate three, four, even six times his strength against one unit, destroy it, then move on to the next. The same logic would later reappear in Korea, where Chinese forces remained materially inferior overall but repeatedly tried to create local superiority at the points they chose to attack. DeepSeek is doing something very similar with compute. It does not have a superior force; it has a fraction of one. So Liang narrows the front. Everything off the direct path to AGI is cut — video generation, world models, the finance and medical agents everyone else is racing to build. The coding agent stays because it feeds back into DeepSeek’s own research; the rest can wait. That is what “concentrating superior force” means when you are weaker overall. You cannot be strong across the whole field, so you make yourself as strong as possible at the one point that matters. With a fraction of the compute, you do not get the whole product roadmap. You choose the one front you can win. Use time to change the balance In 1938, this was the heart of Mao's argument in On Protracted War. Japanese forces were far stronger and could keep taking Chinese cities. But every city they took also meant more territory to occupy, longer supply lines to protect and more troops tied down far from home. China, meanwhile, did not need to become stronger overnight. It needed to avoid being destroyed, preserve its forces and keep building them. If the war lasted long enough, the balance that looked hopeless at the beginning would not remain the same. Liang talks about being behind in much the same way. DeepSeek is roughly two years behind on hardware and, by his reckoning, works with about 5% of the compute. His answer is not to close all of that tomorrow. It is to turn two years into six months, then three — while still using only a fraction of the compute. That is why he says being behind has an advantage: it gives you time. Every extra month is another month in which the gap can narrow without DeepSeek first having to match the Americans chip for chip. The stronger side has the lead today; the weaker side's job is to make sure today's balance is not tomorrow's. Start from your own conditions Asked what DeepSeek models itself on — one of the US labs, perhaps — Liang says there is nothing to copy. He works from the other end: he starts with the chips he actually has, asks how large a model they can train and what that model can prove, and lets the rest wait. He does not start from the frontier model and work backwards to the compute he wishes he had. It is not that Chinese firms refuse to copy Americans. If your resources are not the leader's resources, copying the leader's strategy is not prudence. It is a mistake. Want less Then Liang says something harder to place neatly inside Mao’s playbook. DeepSeek could charge much more for its API. By Liang’s own calculation, the market could bear a hundredfold return on the hardware cost. He is satisfied with roughly six. He could keep the best model closed. Instead, DeepSeek open-sources it and helps others deploy it. He could build more of the applications downstream himself. He would rather leave much of that business to partners. Why leave so much on the table? Liang’s answer is unusually blunt: the one who wants more will be beaten by the one who wants less. He then takes the logic to its extreme. A company determined to capture 5% of the market will lose to one satisfied with 1%. And that company, in turn, can be beaten by one content with 0.1%. The one thing he will not give up is the team. It is what the raise is really for — enough options to hold the senior people in place, so that whatever setbacks come, nobody leaves. The mistake is to read DeepSeek as an American frontier lab with fewer chips. It is not running the same playbook on less fuel. Its playbook starts from the fact that it has less. Mao's strategic writing asked the same question: what does the weaker side do when it cannot match the stronger side in men, weapons or money? Whether Liang borrowed the answers or reconstructed them from the constraints in front of him is almost beside the point. The strategy is recognisable. The dangerous assumption, for the stronger side, is that the weaker side wants to fight the same war.

• 
  The Ancient One (@TheOnesAncient) reported 6 minutes ago

  The problem with the Corp system is that if the Crop’s themselves don’t have enough troops they can’t fight by themselves or turn areas of the battlefield. So at minimum you need three devisions of four brigades

• 
  𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕻𝖗𝖔𝖕𝖍𝖊𝖙 (@Prophet_Poe) reported 6 minutes ago

  I fell in love with you and now I don't know what to do. Those three words still don't feel like enough. But can you tell me, what's greater than love? Maybe trust when the trembling starts, when the past comes crashing through the barricades of my heart. When I wake with the taste of old mistakes in my mouth, cold sweat on my neck, hear the city breathing outside. Blue light through the blinds, 3am alive, while I'm staring at the ceiling trying to bargain with time. I've carried dead names like stones in my coat, buried whole chapters but still smell the smoke. Some memories don't fade. They ferment in the flesh, turn a man into a maze with a war in his chest. I've learned how to laugh while I'm breaking in half, make a joke at the table while I'm choking on facts. Everybody loves the armor, nobody asks what it costs. How much iron can a wounded man carry before he's lost? I remember the nights when the silence got loud, when the walls felt closer and the floor disappeared. I could taste every tear like salt and regret, feel the rough cotton sleeve soaking wet from my face. I have slept with my fists clenched tight as a vice, dreamed of running from myself but woke up inside. That's the cruelest part. There ain't nowhere to hide when the enemy knows every scar you keep inside. And you? You touched the places I kept underneath the debris, like sunlight finding weeds through the cracks in concrete. Your perfume on my hoodie, your fingerprints on my skin, little evidence that something good might still get in. I heard your voice and the whole damn room changed, like rain hitting pavement after months of heat waves. For once I wasn't performing survival for somebody. I was just a man hoping somebody might actually want me. So if love is the question, maybe love ain't the answer. Maybe it's choosing each other when the chemistry scatters. Maybe it's patience when the panic gets violent, staying when the wounded parts of me get quiet. Maybe it's seeing the monster and calling him human, holding my hand when I don't know what I'm doing. Maybe greater than love is the courage to remain when leaving would be easier than explaining the pain. I don't need forever written neatly in stone. I need somebody who won't make me bleed alone. Somebody who understands a man's silence ain't pride. Sometimes it's a battlefield with no witnesses outside. I've lost enough people to know what absence weighs, felt an empty chair become a monument with a name. So if I say I love you, understand what it means: I'm handing you the parts of me I never let anybody see. And if tomorrow comes ugly, if the sky turns gray. If the ghosts start knocking and I don't know what to say. I'll remember your warmth, the scent left in the sheets. The sound of your heartbeat underneath my cheek. Because maybe love isn't three words spoken once. Maybe it's showing up after everything comes undone. Maybe it's two broken souls refusing to run. And maybe what's greater than love is finding something worth loving and finally believing you deserve not to lose it.

• 
  Granny (@Angary_Granny) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @Tea_Manuel see…. They don’t care about fixing a very broken game, just cinematics

• 
  NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS (@NATOJFCBS) reported 11 minutes ago

  Drones are the challenge of the present. Two recent stories say it all: 🇸🇰In Slovakia, three people were arrested over an alleged plot to set fire to a drone manufacturing facility. 🇵🇱 In Warsaw, the city is investing around PLN 1 million in a system to detect and identify drones over sensitive areas. One story is about protecting our drones. The other about protecting ourselves from them. Drones are no longer just a battlefield issue. @Poland_MOD @Slovakia_NATO #WeAreNATO

• 
  ShinzosGhost (@ShinzosGhost) reported 11 minutes ago

  @GrimBF6 My biggest problem with @Battlefield is your choices as a console player are either languish in PC sweat lobbies getting spawn killed or turn off Crossplay and every other match is filled with bots.

• 
  Tyler Frank (@mrtfrank007) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Battlefield The Interdictor is not a 1 shot and and actually terrible. Fix it.

• 
  LO NA GO (@otaku_D_sa) reported 11 minutes ago

  Dear PlayStation Team Do you think you’re safe? In the early 90s, Nintendo owned this industry. They were bigger than Sony ever was in gaming, until the first PlayStation arrived and took the market out from under them. And the reason was simple: Nintendo stopped listening… They clung to cartridges while the world moved to discs, they protected their traditions instead of evolving, and the developers walked. Square took Final Fantasy VII to PlayStation, and that single move decided the entire generation. Nintendo’s throne collapsed, and it took them more than a decade to recover and only by leaving your battlefield entirely and building their own. So don’t assume Xbox can’t pull your developers and your future exclusives away from you. Don’t assume a new platform can’t appear and do to you exactly what you did to Nintendo. The only thing protecting you is the loyalty of the players you already have…. and loyalty…. is not permanent. It’s earned every generation. So listen to your players. Listen now, while the problems are still small enough to fix. Every complaint you ignore today is a player you lose tomorrow, and you will not notice they’re gone until it’s too late to bring them back. Companies don’t fall overnight. They fall slowly, while ignoring messages like this one

• 
  mr.j (@jtjones999) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Need to fix bf royale ranked the most. Still have long queue times when with a party. Haven’t fixed people starting the match off dead. Also bug where it shows squad mates are muted but I can’t actually mute them. Fix these first their the biggest annoyances.

• 
  oobie (@oobiewpb) reported 12 minutes ago

  $SPX $QQQ $SPY $IWM $NVDA DLMM EARLY-WARNING SHIFT — THURSDAY, AUGUST 27 — PREMARKET STATUS: ORANGE — NVDA HAS CHANGED THE OVERNIGHT SETUP There is a meaningful change worth flagging this morning. Nvidia's earnings reaction has flipped technology decisively higher. Nasdaq-100 futures are up roughly 1.1%, versus about +0.5% for S&P futures, with NVDA itself up roughly 6–7% premarket after its earnings beat and strong forward guidance. That is exactly the QQQ confirmation yesterday's market was missing. The bigger issue, however, is that the gamma picture is NOT giving buyers a free pass. Fresh Thursday SPX positioning shows approximately: SPX reference: 7676 Zero gamma: 7730 Major 7715 concentration Net GEX: slightly NEGATIVE Today's implied range: approximately 7625–7726. That puts the overnight rally in an interesting position: PRICE/QQQ ARE IMPROVING BUT SPX REMAINS BELOW THE NEW ~7730 GAMMA TRANSITION. That's an early-warning setup for a potentially much larger decision after the open. Yesterday afternoon SPX was around 7672 with positive gamma and a zero-gamma line near 7633. Today the forward book has reset with the transition substantially ABOVE price. That is the material options change. DLMM MAP 7730 — BIG GAMMA REGIME TEST This is the level I care about most. If the NVDA/QQQ strength carries SPX through roughly 7715–7730 and price HOLDS above it, the overnight move becomes considerably more convincing. That would mean buyers are overcoming the overhead options structure rather than merely producing an earnings gap. 7715 — immediate options battlefield. 7675–7680 — yesterday's closing/acceptance neighborhood. 7650 — first meaningful failure area. 7625 — lower edge of today's current options-implied range. WHAT CONFIRMS THE BULLISH SHIFT: QQQ holds its NVDA-driven strength → SPX takes 7715 → 7730 breaks → pullback HOLDS → IWM participates → IV remains contained. That would upgrade this to a genuine bullish MATERIAL SHIFT. WHAT WOULD WORRY ME: QQQ opens strong but cannot hold the gap → SPX rejects 7715–7730 → falls back through 7675/80 → IWM refuses to participate → IV starts expanding. That would tell us the market used NVDA's earnings as liquidity rather than as the beginning of a broader expansion. And that's precisely why I would NOT chase the premarket move. The market has been handed an extremely bullish technology catalyst. Now make price prove what it intends to do with it. 7715–7730 is where I want the answer. Trade the reaction — not the headline. ~oobie

• 
  Giacomo (@sc4recrow619) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Someone things that's a good season? Matchmaking broken, balanced weapon broken, netcode broken, when you fix this problema Will be a good season.. all the rest Is only wasted time

• 
  Deeky (@the_realdeeky) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Best thing yall can do is fix the menu organization bc it’s a ******* mess.

• 
  Abyzon (@Abyzonn) reported 18 minutes ago

  In 1984 a Japanese man moved to the US with $40 in his pocket in 1949 and built an empire worth over $50 million. His institute trained thousands across 40 countries. His books sold 3 million copies. Heads of state paid to fly him in privately for one conversation. He was not a doctor. He was not a scientist. His name was Michio Kushi. And in 1984 he stood in front of a room and said everything modern medicine believes about disease is wrong. He opened with one sentence that cost him every mainstream audience he ever had. There is no enemy outside of you. There never was. He said modern medicine had built its entire structure on a war metaphor. Virus is the enemy. Bacteria is the enemy. DNA is the enemy. So we invented weapons — vaccinations, chemotherapy, radiation, drugs — and turned the human body into a battlefield. Billions of dollars. Thirty five years of research. Degenerative disease kept rising. Something greatly wrong, he said. The image of the enemy is the problem. He gave a simple example. Eat well for six months. Go to a summer picnic with people who eat normally. Watch where the mosquitoes land. They will circle you and move to the person drinking orange juice and eating ice cream. Not because they are polite. Because they know your blood is too thick and tight. Their feeding tube gets stuck. They have learned, while flying, that this one is dangerous. He said sickness works the same way. The bacteria did not attack you. You made yourself an attractive environment for bacteria. Then he said something nobody in the room expected. Nations do not exist. Birds cross borders without passports. From a plane you see mountains, forests, rivers. No lines anywhere. The lines are here — pointing to his head. We drew them, believed them, and then started fighting and dying to defend something that only exists as an image. Same with ownership. The house you think you own, you will leave behind. The money you think you have was made by a government from material taken from mountains that nature built. No one owns anything. Everyone is just using. Same with your job. He asked the room: you came from the infinite universe. Billions of years of transformation. Through plant kingdoms, through animal kingdoms, through thousands of different forms. You chose this planet, these parents, this body. And the result of that entire journey is — you sell your time for $200 a week and retire to Florida at 65? He said 90 to 99 percent of modern people are governed by delusions about what life is for. The cure was not a drug. It was grain. Brown rice, wheat, barley, corn. Plants that grow upward toward the sky. He said the food determines the quality of thought. Eat meat, you see enemies everywhere. Eat dairy and sugar, you sink into depression. Eat grain for six months and the delusions begin to dissolve on their own. He said when a person truly wakes up from the delusion, gratitude comes automatically. And when gratitude comes, the desire to help other people comes automatically. No teaching required. The lecture is free on YouTube. Just over an hour. Recorded in 1984. Almost nobody outside of macrobiotic and philosophy circles has watched it as a complete argument for why the modern world is suffering from something no hospital can treat.