Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  UnkWerks (@UnkWerks) reported 38 seconds ago

  @VideoCardz Tech stated the card is passing functional tests idk what the user wants at this point, he stated the battlefield 6 started crashing on him, there’s no way to prove that that was the GPU burnt pins/cable vs other system issues or settings causing the crashing let alone the game’s spotty optimization… IIRC the cables are accessible without breaking a warranty on these models I probably would have tried a new cable first.

• 
  Tommy McDevitt (@TMLKMCD) reported 3 minutes ago

  3. Are you competing on a sensible battlefield? If your offer sounds like everyone else's, you're forcing buyers to compare you on price, convenience...or maybe just "vibes". Specificity helps the right people realise: "This is for me". Get incredibly specific on: - your service area - your target audience - customers you are NOT for - the specific problem you solve Shrink the battlefield. Own your area.

• 
  『Just an Ordinary Nikke』 (@Overzone_Nikke) reported 4 minutes ago

  @UrMaidAndSpy But you shouldn't *Have* to have band aids on them. Our body is...important. to not be allowed to cover how we want can lead to issues in a battlefield.

• 
  Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported 5 minutes ago

  @mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.

• 
  Woke Smeed (@mrburgerboy) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Viscountpost Okay then whoever your preferred moderate is should have no problem easily defeating her on the battlefield of ideas or whatever what are you even bitching about at this point

• 
  Marcel Spiewak (@marcelspiewak) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Can you guys look into the flickering light issue on light bulbs? When you a shoot a light bulb the electrical effect will emit like a green strobe. Looks jarring

• 
  ✯ R I L E Y ✯ (@RileyTX) reported 13 minutes ago

  @DylanBurns1776 @RisingActionRA @whoseurlefty We can’t even call Gaza/West Bank a battlefield because they have no standing army or functioning government in place. They are in an open-air concentration camp. Your pet issue has broad majority support in Congress. This is not in need of the same level of advocacy at all.

• 
  ناصر بن تركي (@nasserturki11) reported 16 minutes ago

  This is exactly the problem with Washington’s hardline Iran debate. It treats the Middle East as a battlefield for ideological theories, while the region itself has to live with the consequences. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Oman, and others did not push for de-escalation because they trust Tehran. They pushed for it because they understand geography, energy markets, shipping lanes, and the cost of a war that no one can fully control once it starts. Every time, outside hawks promise a clean outcome. Every time, the region is left dealing with the consequences. Israel may want permanent pressure on Iran. Some voices in Washington may want regime collapse. But regional states have a different responsibility: protect their economies, their societies, their infrastructure, and their long-term stability. That is not appeasement. That is sovereignty. The real question is not whether Iran should be trusted. It should not. The real question is whether endless escalation has ever produced the stable Middle East its advocates keep promising. It has not. The countries that chose diplomacy, deterrence, and regional balance were not being naive. They were being realistic. And this war proved their point.

• 
  Paul Eggs Nolan LFS6B (@paul_eggsNolan) reported 18 minutes ago

  Major James Capers Jr. earned the Medal of Honor for March 31–April 3, 1967 actions near Phu Loc, Vietnam. As a 2nd Lt leading 9-man Force Recon Team Broadminded, the patrol was ambushed. All were wounded. Despite severe wounds (abdomen ripped open, leg broken, heavy blood loss), he refused evacuation. He directed close supporting fires, led the defense, and twice stepped off the evac helo so others could leave first—ensuring every Marine got out safely. Trailblazer: first Black enlisted Marine to earn a battlefield commission and command a Recon company. True hero. 🇺🇸

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield nice job making the game go black screen with today's update. Guess you didnt fix it

• 
  Mr. Margheritiiii (@GetCheatz) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Millitings @BattlefieldComm @falsewoodxt look another person who, in your opinion, only has problems with Battlefield 6 🤡

• 
  BillsmafiaMFKA He/Bro/Daddy (@Emanuel56353090) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Battlefield hey douchebags fix strike point. you ruined it and took it away. it was the perfect game mode

• 
  ramyun (@Aztech1101) reported 27 minutes ago

  @EA why does @Battlefield 6 keep crashing with DEVICE_HUNG issue on my 5090. It’s been months and it hasn’t been fixed . Is there a solution ?

• 
  235Nuke (@nuke_235) reported 29 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm All these changes look good, but have questions about gunplay. If you are able to control recoil are multiple guns going to still have sub 200ms TTK? If so that still does fix the major issues with everyone’s feeling that the TTK/TTD is way too fast for BF.

• 
  X (@o_oZeppelin) reported 35 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield How about you fix red dot optics and general optic illumination. Why do all the sights look like terrible dark red sharpie