Battlefield 6 Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Battlefield 6 users affected:
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 6 |
| Châteaubriant, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Cesson, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Rillieux-la-Pape, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Brest, Brittany | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 21 |
| Criciúma, SC | 1 |
| Saint-Ouen, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Oyonnax, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Cluses, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Mont-Bonvillers, ACAL | 1 |
| Triel-sur-Seine, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 2 |
| Lille, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Moirans, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Villefranche-sur-Saône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Meyzieu, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Nantes, Pays de la Loire | 2 |
| Carvin, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 2 |
| Ornans, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | 1 |
| Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| La Garde, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
| Brunstatt, ACAL | 1 |
| La Crèche, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Sarreguemines, ACAL | 1 |
| Saumur, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Le Blanc-Mesnil, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Saint-Nazaire, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Bracieux, Centre | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Jacob K (@justwatchinrad) reported@hdagres Iran is degraded but a correct analysis. The issue wasn’t the battlefield- it was will.
-
JRB (@JRB___2) reported@BattlefieldComm FIX THE BOTS
-
NupeKeem 🫡 (@NupeKeem) reported@Battlefield @BattlefieldComm you cant fix the notecode yet? I love getting shot behind a wall. Literally the best feeling there is. Imagine being on a streak and you dying behind a wall
-
Sayber_31 (@Sayber_31) reported@the_patcher77 @BattlefieldComm The problem is unless the feedback comes from some with ttv or yt at the end of their username they’re not listening.
-
Dallas (@realdcm) reported@BattlefieldComm Can we get a fix for the spawn menu bug? Still not working correctly, can’t easily click a spawn
-
Ashish Bajpai (@AshishB60558222) reportedBATTLEFIELD SITREP: THE 23,991 GAP-DOWN SHOCK Active Combat Feed (Friday, June 19, 2026) Commander, the Operator has just executed a violent, trend-shattering move. The tape is pre-opening at 23,991.20. This is a catastrophic ~177-point gap-down from yesterday's 24,168 close. This gap completely obliterates the entire bullish demand staircase we mapped yesterday (24,155, 24,121, 24,103). More importantly, it gapps the market back below the psychological 24,000 floor and slices straight through yesterday's absolute low of 24,036.95. The bullish structure is temporarily broken. Here are your condensed, trigger-ready playbooks for the open: 🔴 PLAYBOOK A: THE BREAKER BLOCK REJECTION (Short the Relief) The Logic: The gap-down is so severe that the entire 24,036 to 24,100 zone (yesterday's floor and demand voids) has instantly flipped into a massive overhead Bearish Breaker Block. The Operator allows a quick morning bounce to trap dip-buyers before resuming the FII distribution. The Trigger: Nifty opens at 23,991, rallies back up to test the 24,036 - 24,050 zone, and instantly prints a sharp Red Shooting Star on the 5-minute chart, violently rejecting the 24K level. The Action: Execute a Short (PE) scalp on the confirmed rejection. The Target: A flush back down through the 23,991 open, targeting the 23,950 macro support. ⚫ PLAYBOOK B: THE CASCADING WATERFALL (Trend Continuation) The Logic: The global panic is too severe. DIIs step aside completely, and the algorithms relentlessly hit the bids off the opening bell. The Trigger: Nifty drops immediately from 23,991. A 15-minute candle closes cleanly and fully below 23,950 with heavy volume displacement. The Action: Do not short the absolute bottom. Wait for a 3-minute micro-pullback (a tiny Bearish FVG) to execute a Short (PE) continuation. The Target: Price discovery into the 23,888 gap-fill vacuum. 🟢 PLAYBOOK C: THE EXTREME TURTLE SOUP (Buy the Reclaim) The Logic: The Operator engineered this massive gap-down purely to liquidate the late retail longs from yesterday's 3 PM squeeze. Once the panic stops are triggered below 24K, DIIs absorb the liquidity and initiate a violent V-shaped recovery. The Trigger: The tape flushes below 23,991 but instantly rejects the downside. It prints a massive Green Hammer on the 5-minute chart and aggressively reclaims and closes back above 24,040. The Action: Execute a strict, counter-trend Long (CE) scalp only on the successful reclaim of 24,040. The Target: A short-covering squeeze back toward 24,100. The Sniper's Rule: The 24,000 line is no longer your floor; it is your ceiling. If they bounce and fail at 24,036, the bears are in total control. Hold your fire until the structure confirms the trend!
-
Rhiyddun (@rhiyddun) reportedWhat strikes me is the methodology, they start out as enthusiastic cheerleaders with a "MAGA" slant, gung ho, rah rah, and suddenly do a compete 180 on some "core" issue when they've accumulated massive follower count? Move along folks, nothing to see here... the war is narratives, the battlefield is media, but the ROE are wacked.
-
Michael E. Perry (@lcbchefperry) reported@Primary_Pianist The Book of Mormon describes whole peoples, cities, buildings, wars, kings, prophets, temples, records, armies, weapons, and massive battles. Mormon 1 says the land was covered with buildings and the people were almost as numerous as the sand of the sea. Mormon 6 describes roughly 230,000 Nephites killed at Cumorah. Ether 15 describes nearly two million Jaredite “mighty men” killed, plus wives and children. Imagine someone claimed that an ancient Israelite civilization existed somewhere in North America. Not a tiny campsite. Not one immigrant family. A real civilization. Imagine it had a final battle where the dead were roughly the size of Irving, Texas population 238K. Then imagine another earlier civilization in the same sacred history lost a male fighting population roughly the size of Houston 2.4M, plus women and children. Now imagine this civilization supposedly had cities, temples, written records, named places, religious systems, kings, trade, weapons, metalwork, and centuries of history. Then ask: Would it be plausible for a civilization of that size and complexity to vanish with no confirmed city, no confirmed inscription, no confirmed Hebrew or Egyptian writing, no confirmed Nephite place name, no confirmed Israelite temple, no confirmed Book of Mormon battlefield, no confirmed “reformed Egyptian,” and no material culture that clearly identifies it? That is the issue. A small family can disappear genetically. A civilization of that scale should not disappear historically, archaeologically, linguistically, and materially. So the problem is not merely DNA. DNA is one missing footprint. But the larger issue is that almost every expected footprint is missing. At some point, “the evidence disappeared” stops being an explanation and starts becoming a shield against testing the claim.
-
نور🔻 (@thegreyspec) reportedLet's not be always late to the battlefield and engage in small, secondary debates; and while Arab supremacism is an issue, it was addressed fairly early and debunked by several ahadith of the Prophet. Abu Obeida called for us to direct our focus to enemy, may Allah reward you.
-
Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported@mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.
-
Ducky (@Duckey141) reported@BattlefieldComm Most out of touch clueless devs currently out there, genuine monkeys, just adding things and fixing **** all while we still have beta bugs rampaging in season 3 with no fix in sight
-
NodeAspect (@IdleMindl4qg) reported@Battlefield Horrible game! Broken and unbalanced
-
X (@o_oZeppelin) reported@BattlefieldComm @Battlefield How about you fix red dot optics and general optic illumination. Why do all the sights look like terrible dark red sharpie
-
CAMIKAZE78 (@CAMIKAZE78) reported"This is what PEAK Battlefield gameplay looks like". This mode was literally you clicking prompts on an iPad, or on your PC like a cookie clicker game... This couldn't be further from "peak gameplay" in the context of an FPS game and when we consider the actual, important issues with BF6, any time spent on this feature would be wasted dev time imo.
-
Grim (@GrimBF6) reported@FlacoG_2023 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm All he said was there’s nothing mentioned about netcode, when there is. Netcode is frustrating, and they’ve been working on it for a decade+ of titles. It’ll always be an issue atp.