Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (41%)
• Online Play (29%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Matchmaking (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nantes	Matchmaking	13 hours ago
Gramat	Matchmaking	18 hours ago
Amsterdam	Matchmaking	2 days ago
Fontarèches	Matchmaking	2 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	2 days ago
Le Mont-sur-Lausanne	Matchmaking	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  brand new durango (@DrangoNew) reported 2 minutes ago

  @R0gue75 @BattlefieldComm Is there any other way to fix it besides restarting?

• 
  David (@RightByTheSea) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Lasers don’t line up with the sight fix that morons

• 
  KoMiNt (@_KoMiNt_) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Games are too long. Too many players. Not enough vehicles. Your broken system better know when someone leaves a match that is in progress that they get matchmade in to that is losing. Players just camp vehicle spawn and with 32 players it is an annoying feature. "Top 5%" lol

• 
  RJ owen (@RJowen56) reported 16 minutes ago

  @robert_lyman I suspect this is being deliberately misrepresented. No government would be that stupid to grant a blanket immunity for battlefield actions. However, immunity from post service prosecution as is occurring now in the UK over actions in N Ireland & the Troubles makes more sense

• 
  Mind of the Motherland (@UncolonisedMind) reported 18 minutes ago

  One thing I genuinely don’t understand is how some people can acknowledge that colonialism obstructed Africa’s development, yet somehow refuse to recognise that neocolonialism continues to do the same thing, in some cases even worse. Is the difference simply that the white man is no longer physically there to administer it? There is no meaningful difference between the colonial master and the local agent who administers the same system on his behalf. Your mistake is thinking these people are your people simply because they look like you. Physical appearance does not change the interests they serve, the system they uphold, or the consequences of their actions. Neocolonialism does not require the continued physical presence of the colonial master. It works precisely by reproducing the interests and structures of the former colonial order through local institutions, elites and agents. There is no “post-colonial era”. There is the pre-colonial era, the colonial era, and the neocolonial era. The system continues. The administrator changed. The structure of ********** did not. Replacing one agent with another is not the same as destroying the system entirely. And this is why understanding what we are fighting matters. If you do not understand the battlefield, you can defeat a local agent and still fail to defeat the system that produced and empowered that agent. You may mistake a few concessions and reforms for sovereignty, only to find yourself reproducing the same system under a different administration. And eventually, you either become another agent of that system or you are removed and replaced by one. When people tell you about neocolonialism, they are not denying the actions of its local agents. They are trying to give you a fuller understanding of what you are actually fighting. Because if you think the local agent is the entire problem, you will celebrate replacing the agent while leaving the system intact. The system is not failing. It has not failed. It is working as designed.

• 
  Nate Ellis (@StruckEllis3227) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Can you fix hit reg on PlayStation holy **** it’s horrific

• 
  Dajovi (@Dajovi2) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Enough with rotating modes out of nowhere. I'm tired of checking if my favorite mode is up every single day. Just kill Portal, it’s garbage. Keep the core modes -including Rush- and fix them so they work properly. Completely useless.

• 
  zenStrategist 🇬🇧🇮🇱⚔️🌸 (@zenstrategist) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Lindstar24 Imagine you've shot been shot to pieces on a battlefield. They send for a medic. They send private Burnham. He stands there and tells you that he wants to fix everything, but clearly hasn't got a clue how to do anything. And you wonder why everyone suddenly gets nervous?

• 
  AkramRock (@chemliakram) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix redsec

• 
  Chapo117 (@JoseA93559) reported 22 minutes ago

  @IdleSloth84_ Battlefield 6 is not working

• 
  Iain Rae Lennox (@iainsnotes) reported 25 minutes ago

  @dhh I’d love to see this. I absolutely love Battlefield 6, but it’s one of the few things keeping Windows around for me. The game itself isn’t really the problem, it’s EA Javelin AntiCheat and its Windows kernel/security requirements. Proton can’t solve that from the Linux side. If some of those behind-the-scenes conversations eventually persuade EA to support Javelin on Linux/Proton, that would be huge. BF6 running properly on Omarchy would remove one of the biggest reasons I still need Windows.

• 
  V (@catslashmouse) reported 27 minutes ago

  This game is a ******* travesty. Way down there with BF2042. And don't you ******* dare tell me BF2042 is better than this ****, there's a laundry list of issues that remained unresolved in that game from launch to the end of support, one being 128 players, but I digress

• 
  oobie (@oobiewpb) reported 27 minutes ago

  solana:J3NKxxXZcnNiMjKw9hYb2K4LUxgwB6t1FtPtQVsv3KFr $SPY $QQQ $IGV $IWM DLMM MATERIAL-SHIFT ALERT — TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1 — 2:51 PM ET STATUS: RED — VOLATILITY HAS REJOINED THE SELLING This is a meaningful change from the 2:00 PM check. The missing confirmation then was volatility. SPX had lost 7650 again and small caps were deteriorating, but VIX had backed away from its morning high. That has changed. VIX has now pushed to approximately 16.12, up about 8% on the session and its highest level since August 4. So the afternoon alignment is now considerably cleaner: SPX DOWN ~0.6–0.7% NASDAQ DOWN ~0.9–1.0% RUSSELL 2000 DOWN ~1.1% VIX ~16.12 / +8% 10-YEAR ~4.79% BRENT NEAR $94 OIL AND YIELDS BOTH REMAINING PRESSURE POINTS. That is the volatility confirmation we specifically said would escalate the 2 PM warning. WHY THIS MATTERS The sequence today has become unusually clean: SPX broke 7650 this morning. Buyers reclaimed it. The reclaim failed. SPX lost 7650 again. IWM lost the breadth level. QQQ/Nasdaq remained weak. And NOW volatility is expanding again. That's a much different setup than a simple red afternoon. The options market is beginning to price more movement at the same time price is struggling to repair broken structure. There is another interesting piece. Today's SPX 7700 0DTE calls have seen more than 23,000 contracts trade against only about 2,400 contracts of prior open interest, and the contract has collapsed roughly 96% as SPX remained well beneath the strike. That is not by itself a directional flow signal—we cannot tell from volume alone who initiated every trade—but it illustrates how aggressively today's same-day upside premium has been destroyed as price remained beneath the former 7675–7700 battlefield. I would NOT translate that into "dealers must sell." We don't have sufficient public intraday information to establish that confidently. But combined with the renewed IV expansion, it tells us the 0DTE environment is becoming less forgiving into the final hour. THE 3 PM MAP SPX 7650 Still the heartbeat. At this point a simple touch above it isn't enough. I want: 7650 reclaimed → held → expansion away from it. Otherwise it remains failed-reclaim territory. SPX 7675–7685 This remains the real repair zone. Getting back there would tell us the afternoon volatility expansion failed to produce additional downside acceptance. SPX 7700 Major repair. Given today's action, reaching and holding 7700 would represent a significant seller failure. IWM Small caps remain the breadth warning. Russell 2000 is down roughly 1.1%, materially worse than SPX. If IWM makes another afternoon low while SPX remains beneath 7650, breadth continues confirming the weakness. QQQ Technology remains important, but IWM is actually giving us the stronger risk message now. QQQ weak + IWM substantially weaker = pressure is no longer isolated to mega-cap duration. WHAT WOULD ESCALATE THIS AGAIN SPX stays beneath 7650 → afternoon low breaks → QQQ makes a corresponding new low → IWM makes another low → VIX expands THROUGH 16.12 rather than merely touching it. That would be the closest we've been today to a genuine late-day volatility/dealer-risk acceleration environment. WHAT WOULD DEFUSE IT SPX reclaims 7650 → holds → attacks 7675 while VIX falls back beneath 16 and IWM stops making lows. That would tell us the volatility spike failed to convert into additional price damage. CURRENT READ: RED — PRICE + BREADTH + VOLATILITY ARE ALIGNED AGAIN. The important change since 2 PM is NOT another few SPX points lower. It's that fear finally caught back up with price. And with barely an hour remaining, that matters because 0DTE positioning is becoming increasingly sensitive to every move away from the strikes where today's contracts were concentrated. Don't chase the red candle. Watch whether sellers can KEEP SPX beneath 7650 while VIX holds above 16. If they can, the final hour deserves respect. If they can't, today's repeated failure to hold below 7650 becomes the story all over again. ~oobie

• 
  Linki (@Linkinitouille) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Dude_Largepants Battlefield 4 works for you? Thought it was not working due to it being a very early Xbox One game.

• 
  Howard Roark (@J_Galt_I_Am) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Can you fix the hit reg on the tv missile on the F18. It will phase through moving targets or bounce off.

• 
  Doug L (@douglas_le21933) reported 33 minutes ago

  @noahkaufmanmd This is a great, and very important question. Staffing changes are the first priority. 🎯 Allow me to illustrate. A woman rushed into my clinic one evening, right before I closed, yelling "I'm having a heart attack! I'm having a heart attack!" I made her sit down and I grabbed my phone to call 911. She grabbed my arm. "No! I am NOT going to the hospital!" I looked at her in disbelief. She yelled in my face, "I've had a heart attack before and I don't want to go through that again!" Again, I was dumbfounded. I wanted to help her, but I didn't want to misrepresent the medicine I practice (acupuncture, herbology, etc.). Like all healthcare professionals, my skillset is limited. I explained to her as calmly as I could, "I want to help you, but if you die right here in my clinic I'm screwed." (I was scared; cut me some slack) She said, "If you call 911 I'm leaving." I couldn't allow that. I proposed that I quickly do what I was taught ("emergency" type points), that she relax and breathe deeply, and stop talking (and yelling), and that if we didn't see immediate improvements in her condition within 180 seconds that she allow me to call. She agreed. I did what I was taught. Her condition improved. She calmed down. Her racing pulse normalized. She stated that her chest pain had stopped. With phone in hand, I sat with her and we breathed slowly together. Mind you, I was pretty friggin' terrified that I might fry for this. We sat together for about an hour. By "old school" standards, she was doing much better. Pulse: good. Breathing: good. Muscle tension: relaxed. Facial expression and tongue color: good. I urged and pleaded with her to go to the hospital to at least get some data, and possibly save her life in case she was not truly "out of the woods" yet. I thought, "Now I'm really in trouble if she dies because I treated her withought secretely calling 911!" I offered to drive her to the ER. She refused. I was not okay with that, but my America is a free country. I did not charge her $5000, not $1500, not $500. I charged her $75 (my fee at the time). I stayed in touch with her. No recurring issues for the approximately 10 years that we were in touch. THE POINT 🎯: My colleagues and I belong in the ER, or should at least be informing the process. Acupuncture became "famous" in China millennia ago as "battlefield medicine", not merely chronic pain or prevention medicine. Likewise with herbology (i.e., Yunnan Pai Yao). I am willing to have SERIOUS discussions with mainstream health professionals such as yourself. I've been available to you all for decades, as have been my colleagues. We've been waiting in the wings. But I won't do it for $500 per hour. Our knowledge and education is worth far more than that. For $5000 per hour, and 40 hours minimum, I'll teach you, and a group of other ER professionals, how to make radical, revolutionary, and positive changes in emergency medicine. We can't do it in an X post, or over a weekend. You can afford it. Put a group together and pitch in. Or were you not in integrity when you asked your question? (By the way, she may have just been in the throes of an anxiety attack, despite having a "heart history", but the point remains the same. $75 (at the time)... Do the math.

• 
  Masten Thrust (@eagles7251) reported 35 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm So no fix for invisible weapon after revive? No netcode improvements between console and PC crossplay?

• 
  Cameron England (@iamcamengland) reported 35 minutes ago

  Past $50k/mo the only skill that matters is diagnosing constraints. That is my entire job now. I zoom out on the business, look at the battlefield, and work out where every team lead is running and what's hitting them. There are hundreds of problems in every business that could be solved. Only one of them, if solved, would let you 2x, 5x, 10x. Find that and ignore the rest.

• 
  Kartikeya (@Keyaswings) reported 39 minutes ago

  My take on @WARDOGS Seven years. Two finished games. Three cancelled ones. And at one point, a defence company's lawyers threatening to sue over the shape of a helmet. That's the price @BULKHEAD Studio paid to bring WARDOGS to Steam Early Access on 10th September and as a 40-year-old who's been looking for that “Boys Gaming Together” feeling since the LAN cafe days, I just want to say thank you. I already got my Boomer Squad locked for the beta on 3rd September and the launch on 10th Sept. Mind you, Bulkhead once had a deal on the table with Tencent. Tencent wanted them to "go bigger" basically publisher-speak for cutting the parts of the game nobody would notice missing until launch day, when it's too late to fix. Bulkhead walked away instead. No safety net, no guaranteed funding, just a bet on themselves and Team17 to do it properly. They didn't just build in a bunker and drop a trailer six weeks out. They opened the doors. Closed beta after closed beta, nearly 500,000 players stress-testing servers, breaking things on purpose, telling a small studio exactly what wasn't working. I played the last beta weekend and there were 100,000 people online at the same time, for a game that hadn't even launched. That's not a marketing beta. That's a studio actually listening. 20 years in Gaming. I’ve watch a lot of titles get pushed out of the door because a date on a roadmap looked good in a boardroom slide. Players feel that. They always do. So when a studio this size holds the line, refuses the "ship it now, patch it later" playbook, and tells us straight up not to expect it fully finished until they've earned that right over the next year or two that's rare enough to stop and clap for. If you've never heard of WARDOGS that's fair, most people haven't yet. It's a hundred-player tactical shooter, three teams fighting over a destructible battlefield in the ruins of an Eastern European industrial mountain range, built by people who clearly still love making games. Half a million players already tested it before a single copy sold. That should tell you more than any trailer could. Go look it up. See what a studio looks like when it says no to the suits. To everyone at Bulkhead and @Brammflakes league(team) of extrodinary gentleman. Thank you. (Posted the same on my linkedin :D )

• 
  Master2u (@Master2udarnit) reported 42 minutes ago

  @TimOnPoint I think it's biggest problem is that it appears to be slow moving. Anti flying drone weapons are more than likely going to be prolific on any future battlefield

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 43 minutes ago

  Y’all didn’t fix ****. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 43 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm - no fix for black screen bug - no bullet dispersion fixes - no audio changes - no jet loadouts 5 months later - no bullet registration fixes - no dsync fixes - Asian players in US/Eu servers abusing lag comp I’m posting till **** changes… Your ******* morons

• 
  PUMA (@PUMAonCOD) reported 44 minutes ago

  @SoaRZephy This is a cheat that I've seen happening since Battlefield. After a while it merged over to COD. It purposely pushes you off your aim. Based on your footage and my new Beta experience, they've upgraded it to also have lag spike glitches. It's garbage, dude.

• 
  Lets negotiate (@EliteKingDarth) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Parasite Why dont they make the change like all previous cods bro? Simple fix we dont want alot of settings like battlefield

• 
  Arc Dite (@ArcDite) reported 50 minutes ago

  @IdleSloth84_ Warning to anyone you may get trouble redeeming games such as Alien Isolation, Battlefield 4 etc. I keep getting either the game isn't supported or the disc is damaged (F.Y.I the discs are fine I play them enough to test them out for such things)

• 
  GauldForge (@GauldForge) reported 54 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm No mention of the request order button… how strange? ALSO WHEN WILL YOU FIX THE RPGS AND GRENADES SPLASH DAMAGE, ITS PATHETIC THAT A POINT BLANK RPG DOESNT KILL SOMEONE. Also, I rammed a tank yesterday in a buggy with 4 C4s attached, tell me why it only done 30 vehicle damage?

• 
  BKScoPe (@BKScoPe) reported 56 minutes ago

  been sitting with one idea about @quipnetwork for a few days now. what if the work that secures a chain was also the work someone actually needed solved. not hashes for the sake of hashes, actual optimization problems, proof of useful work instead of proof of work. i keep going back and forth on what that actually changes. one side of me says it's just a scoring trick, put every kind of hardware on the same problem and call it fair. the other side wonders if this is actually the first time cpus, gpus, asics, and quantum machines get measured on one shared battlefield instead of separate leaderboards. both feel true at once. quantum capacity right now mostly sits behind a handful of closed platforms, expensive, gated, hard to even test against. if this holds up at scale, that idle capacity starts looking like infrastructure other people can actually rent and check the work on. researchers get a reason to point real problems at it instead of vanity benchmarks, and operators get a reason to keep machines running past the demo phase. none of that is guaranteed yet, still early.

• 
  Marcin Wójcik (@marcinwojcik111) reported 58 minutes ago

  The real issue with Palantir is not the software itself. It is where the decision-making power begins to shift. When an external system integrates data, filters signals and shapes the battlefield picture seen by commanders, its provider becomes part of the state’s decision loop. The strategic question is simple: are we buying capability, or renting part of our sovereignty?

• 
  🇺🇸FABI🇺🇸x (@FVera39609037) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the game

• 
  Sonic Rose (@SonicRoseGaming) reported 60 minutes ago

  @Antektw @BattlefieldComm Bruh the jets are about to be unplayable again anyway with the laser designation fix so who cares lol