Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (38%)
• Online Play (31%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Sign in	1 day ago
Mérignac	Online Play	4 days ago
Cergy	Sign in	4 days ago
Casablanca	Game Crash	4 days ago
Courcelles-lès-Lens	Glitches	4 days ago
Aix-en-Provence	Game Crash	4 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Bambi (@Cheeki_Bambi) reported 1 minute ago

  Why do I have issues with specifically @AMD drivers crashing my pc when I try to play @Battlefield every few weeks. At this point I'm uninstalling the virus of a game because holy ****

• 
  Ramazan Daş (@ramazandash) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix this ******* game already! I’m shooting at the guy but he won’t die; the bullets aren't registering on the enemy at all. The weapon aiming is total crap—I’m sick of this game. I’m quitting immediately; there is no game as disgraceful as this one.

• 
  Mr Battlefield (@MrBattlefield0) reported 4 minutes ago

  @JulianWinters9 @BattlefieldComm That was most likely a server issue at the time. Few of my friends had issues for a minute and eventually resolved itself for the course of an hour or less.

• 
  GoGitUrFuknShineBox (@ItsQagain) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your spawn system im tired of getting killed by your professional cheaters and getting spawned directly in front of them. I don’t want to feel like I’m playing against seal team six or delta force..Understand?

• 
  ok then 🐡 (@AScribbledEagle) reported 10 minutes ago

  O'Reilly for James with Spence swapping sides maybe? James and Rice both look half fit. I don't know how you solve the problem of taking Rice off with Anderson on a booking though. Maybe Stones to centre mid because it's a battlefield there anyway

• 
  Ajay Kimble (@kimbleajay1) reported 12 minutes ago

  @cloudhead69 @Mesmeratize_ The issue is that it looks more like battlefield than cod

• 
  Andrew Bentz (@AndrewBentz9) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Another update, no Strikepoint fix. You guys are hot dogshit and deserve the decline you created for yourselves

• 
  𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔻𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠𝕣 (Chp16 Spoilers) (@id_oblitus) reported 14 minutes ago

  "Ros... montis." Him? After everything he's done? All the blood on his hands? All the broken dreams that lied shattered beneath the cruelty of his tactics and command? Him? Dad? A father doesn't send his children out to the battlefield.

• 
  Ermin Hamidovic (@ermin_h) reported 16 minutes ago

  @nuhre_ Depends whether that's an earnest ponderance or whether you're taking the time to delineate between people blindly supporting a corporation, or taking an abstractive step deeper and determining that physical media itself is not intrinsically emblematic of any form of meaningful ownership vis-a-vis software. The disc is the carrier mechanism. The software itself is the same whether downloaded and manually backed up, or shipped on a disc (which itself is perishable and has a set shelf life, if that's of any consequence to you). A notable example of the irrelevancy of the entire argument is Diablo 3. I bought it on release, 14 years ago. It came shipped in a box. Had a disc in it with the game data. Wonderful. Didn't mean anything. It still required an always active internet connection to play. The battlefield regarding ownership and perpetual license largely happened (and was lost by the gamer) back then. The current argument is simply a byproduct of psychological reactance ie. 'I didn't give a **** about the blue ball until the other toddler took it from me and now it's all I care about'. The actual substrate of the issue was settled a generation ago. This is just people whining about the theatrics.

• 
  Elena 🇺🇸 (@LanieASassyVet) reported 19 minutes ago

  Wednesday's Motivational Message: Your grand ambitions mean absolutely nothing on the battlefield of reality. Adversity does not test your highest ideals; it ruthlessly searches for your uncorrected flaws and applies pressure until you break. Identify your structural cracks and fix them now.

• 
  3 (@Majmunspiuni3) reported 21 minutes ago

  @IndoZEnjoyer @JoeWestNaCl @failure1991 No. It’s not they can. They will. Rather easily in the grand scheme of things. Damages accumulate overtime until they don’t. It doesn’t go both ways. Because the issue remains how ready is 404 to see the battlefield move from choke points to scorched earth.

• 
  Chris Cook (@LetChrisCook) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm No mention of the flare bug or any other air fixes. Kind of crazy for a map with tons of air vehicles yall just ignore all the issues with air. The biggest being missiles just going through flares.

• 
  trix (@brane_trix) reported 22 minutes ago

  The Last Stablecoin Ep. 2 It always comes back to questioning: why do we need decentralized stablecoins? The main frame is, we need a safer and more transparent way to have credit and currencies in the world economy. The economy is the world economy. Local economies are so powerful and meaningful, but at this point the world is connected, and outside of catastrophe it's likely to stay connected. As the powers of the world continually compete for more power, there's always gonna be a new battlefield. And that battlefield, or a weapon on the battlefield, should no longer be money. Because money, the ability to trade, the ability to exchange, the ability to have different time preferences and plan finances around your life, is something that everybody needs to have. Not just control over, but predictability and stability within. Otherwise you have people that aren't even allowed to truly build a life for themselves, because corrupt systems and individuals continually filter from them. As the more transparent, decentralized, and persistent monies scale, hopefully more pressure due to competition is put on any currencies backed by democracies to make changes to their financial system. To make things more transparent. For example, to make taxes traceable. As a citizen, I should know what my tax money goes to, and I should know that it's gonna benefit me, mostly our country. But due to cash, and honestly the true benefits of cash, things won't always be able to be fully transparent for any old world financial systems. So they'll never truly be able to compete with the digital currency systems. They can't just migrate, it isn't that easy. And that's why the digital systems need to have full censorship resistance, full corruption protections, full sovereignty, because otherwise you get totalitarian and authoritarian rules built into these systems. On the cash standpoint: there's always gonna be somebody with $100,000 stuck under the bed, you know? So that's always gonna come back to bite a fully cash system trying to migrate. But if it comes down to digitize or the money dies, then they're gonna do something similar to the executive order, I think it's 6102, that took gold from every citizen to transfer into US dollars. Probably gonna do the same thing: take cash from all citizens and transfer it into digital money. Which is just CBDCs. We don't really want that. But it might happen if there's too much competitive pressure on the currencies. Realistically, there needs to be competition that reduces the reach of these currencies. Not hindered, but forced to be more responsible with their spending. Because if a business with $4 billion in the bank spends $2 billion of those dollars on party yachts, the business is going down. If our country does that, nothing bad happens for like a hundred years. That's why there needs to be quicker consequences for bad spending. Otherwise you run into the principal-agent problem, where the person making the decisions no longer has any risk, and the risk all gets pushed out to other generations. So then we're kind of just ******, and nobody's incentivized to make good decisions anymore. In that sense, our stablecoins bring competition where necessary, and we hope this competition creates better fiat currencies as well. But at the end of the day, a decentralized currency that can scale will do more for the world than a fiat currency built well.

• 
  EV-AT (@martin55347292) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Just got back in after months, i enjoy it so far, still miss levolution, changing weather or night day cycle, some dynamic features for the "wow effect", crashing after every match is annoying, needs fix asap, but so far its gotten better since release, !!!MORE MAPS PLS!!!

• 
  Itsadiee_Fx (@Itsadiee1) reported 27 minutes ago

  XAUUSD . 🚨GOLD CRASH ALERT! THIS LEVEL COULD TRIGGER A MASSIVE SELLOFF! Throughout this entire week, Gold repeatedly attempted to close above $4087, but failed every single time. From Monday to Wednesday, we did witness several impulsive buying moves, yet every rally into the $4087 region was met with strong rejection. This clearly tells us that sellers are still in control around that level and that institutional buyers are not showing enough interest to support a sustained breakout. Because of that, I believe a very attractive selling opportunity is developing over the next few sessions. So make sure you read this analysis carefully, because it could help you lock in a high-probability trade with me. This week, the $4030-$4065 zone has become the main battlefield between buyers and sellers. So far, the market has failed to break below this range, but it has also failed to break above $4065. Price is simply consolidating while both sides continue fighting for control. The most important question now is, who will win this battle? Buyers or sellers? One thing you should always remember is that whenever the market spends a long time consolidating in one area, it means a large number of orders are building there. Once that consolidation finally breaks, the market usually delivers a very strong move in the direction of the breakout. I have been closely watching Gold over the past three days, and according to my analysis, if the bulls were truly strong, the market should have already closed above $4080. Instead, every time price approached that level, sellers stepped in aggressively and rejected the move. Even after several strong buying pushes from the lows, sellers continued to absorb all of that demand. To me, this is a clear sign that the sellers are currently stronger than the buyers. Another important observation comes from Tuesday's CPI move. If you look at the 4-hour candle that formed during the CPI release, its low has still not been broken. Instead, Gold has continued retracing higher and repeatedly attempted to move back into buying territory. After a strong impulsive move, many traders naturally assume the market is only retracing before continuing higher. As a result, they begin buying while treating the origin of that move as a strong support zone, placing their stop losses just below it. Keeping that psychology in mind, I believe the low of the CPI 4-hour candle, which is around $4014, has become an important liquidity zone. As long as Gold remains above this level, the market can continue attracting more buyers. However, the moment Gold breaks below $4010, I expect a highly aggressive selling move that could push the market directly toward $3977, $3944, $3920, $3908, and eventually $3890. The reason is simple. As you can clearly see, Gold has repeatedly found support around the $3950 region, meaning a significant amount of buy-side stop losses are likely resting below that area. On top of that, Monday's session managed to close above $4000, which encouraged many random retail traders to enter long positions. Most of those traders are still holding their buys with hope. Based on how Gold has behaved throughout this year, the market has consistently moved toward the side where the largest pool of liquidity was waiting. Looking at the structure formed over the past few weeks, I still consider the overall trend to be bearish. Most importantly, we have not yet received a valid higher-timeframe buying confirmation. Yes, buying pressure has appeared several times, but notice when those aggressive buying moves occurred. They mainly happened during high-impact news events. In my opinion, those spikes were strong enough to create FOMO and attract random buyers into the market, while the broader trend remained unchanged. For that reason, I have no interest in buying Gold unless we see a daily close above $4080. Until that happens, I will continue looking for selling opportunities and prefer holding positions for larger downside targets because I strongly believe that a major bearish move in Gold is approaching. I hope you found this psychological analysis logical and that it helped you understand the market from a different perspective. Wishing everyone the very best for Thursday. I hope you all have a profitable trading day. What is your current view on Gold? Do you think buyers will finally break above $4080, or are sellers about to take full control? Let me know your opinion in the comments.

• 
  The Good Time Rambler (@marvingardns) reported 32 minutes ago

  Horseshoe Bend, 1814 I saw this neat overflight view of Horseshoe Bend from one of them generic Alabama history pages. But there was zero context to the tactical problem, which was obviously against the Red Stick’s favor, but not completely. I had walked the battlefield myself so I decided to annotate it. Jackson had been at the end of his rope by the winter of 1813-1814. As attributed to Napoleon, an Army marches on its stomach. He was deep in the wild Coosa and of the 2,000 something soldiers and camp followers crossed the Ditto Ferry with him, less than three hundred remained. The supply of his army was appalling. Most of the U.S. Army’s logistical chain was focused on Canada. What Jackson’s army had left were state legislatures, local contractors and almost nothing to forage in the Coosa. Legend was he faced near mutiny with the mouth of his cannon. But he could not entice expiring militia enlistees to stay. Even David Crockett left the Army to tend to poor Polly back home in the Nickajack to see that she wintered and that he’d sow for the Spring. He’d left John Wesley, William and Margaret behind with her. But he’d return to Army for the summer campaign. But the memory of being so hungry that he’d eaten potatoes boiled in human fat was the most disturbing recollections of his normally wry memoirs. When early Spring returned, so too did more 90-day militia, and some who’d volunteered for the “duration of the present War.” Moreover he had a regiment of regulars of the U.S. Army, the 39th Infantry including a young Lieutenant named Sam Houston. Hopeful to his cause and all were also two cannons in blue carriages. He had probably around 1,500 infantry at most facing across a scrubby but open field of fire (I marked in blue NATO “X”). He placed his two guns on a wooded knoll (red rectangle) about 75 yards from the Creek barricade and shelled the native works for about two hours. But recent rains had soften the logs and made the ground spongy. The bombardment was ineffectual. But by then John Coffee, a close confidante of Jackson and his cavalry commander, had positioned his cavalry dismounts (green rectangle) south of the Tallapoosa Bend as Cherokee allies led by The Whale (and including Major Ridge) rowed a relay of warriors (yellow rectangle) across the River. The Red Stick village of Tohopeka (white circle) was now threatened with being overrun. As their Chief Menawa and other leaders sent some warriors back to contain the Cherokee beachhead, Jackson sent his infantry in. The first assault was probably no more than 350 men, but among the first over the barricade was Lt. Sam Houston who almost immediately took an arrow wound to the groin. It would not be the last wound of the day for him, but it would last the longest. Red Stick defenses quickly collapsed and mayhem, then bedlam ensued. Warriors who tried to escape west across the Tallapoosa were shot down by a screen of pickets along the bank - Tennessee dismounts, Cherokee, White Stick Creeks. It was all over by early afternoon with few captives taken but for a few women and children. Chief Menawa managed an escape. So too did Peter McQueen, who encouraged the Fort Mims massacre. But Jackson had crushed only the heart of the Red Creek resistance. It’s spirit lived on in a few die hard guerrillas like Peter McQueen, who sought refuge around Pensacola begging for firearms from the Spanish and awaiting the coming the British who had a new “Gulf Strategy” to win the War of 1812. There a motley collection of Creek, Seminole and Maroons would continue to resist the new American Gulf expansion, and especially the ever greedy Georgians… But all that is a story for another day.

• 
  Iskandre 𓂆 (@Iskandre3) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the game for fu$k

• 
  ichae (@imsupertoasted) reported 34 minutes ago

  @MsPrince1999 @BattlefieldComm They don’t have enough manpower to fix what they break. Give it a year maybe they’ll become competent enough to get it.

• 
  SoulReaver ™ (@The__SoulReaver) reported 36 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Audio! Fix the thing, Jesus.

• 
  tokr72 (@tokr72) reported 37 minutes ago

  @DesertTacSolAZ @squidgey2 @laralogan You will get both, but right now... Prosecuting low level election workers won't fix anything. Did Garland's prosecution of MAGA stop us? This is 5G warfare. Shape the battlefield. See the forest from the trees. Win the war, not a battle.

• 
  p.k (@Eddy199134) reported 37 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm joke post as usual. only thing you bother about is the reddit bots. and the vehicle shitters. like when we gonna get something playable for infantry only players that arent ******* meatgrinders? that **** is boring as ****. not to forget..fix stuff finally that is months broken

• 
  matt 🐻🙂‍↔️ (gobears.bsky) (@gobears99) reported 40 minutes ago

  @TechnoloJai @AGuyNamedNam Innocuous customer service AI >>>>>>>>>> dystopian military secret intelligence autonomous battlefield AI

• 
  Nexxy🎯 (@Next_Gen_Expert) reported 43 minutes ago

  @realgotchops Yeah this game has some serious netcode issues I've never had the issues i have in this battlefield game. Don't know how much more i can take with it because i love the game it's got so much potential.

• 
  Ramazan Daş (@ramazandash) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix this ******* game already! I’m shooting at the guy but he won’t die; the bullets aren't registering on the enemy at all. The weapon aiming is total crap—I’m sick of this game. I’m quitting immediately; there is no game as disgraceful as this one.

• 
  euri 🪼 (@eurihaline) reported 47 minutes ago

  well yea the only real reason i hate stables is bcs i cant do it yet and skill issue thingy and i havent learnt ttg sighs. dropping me into stables is like dropping a baby into a battlefield

• 
  iitzFever | YT @iitzfever (@iitzfever) reported 47 minutes ago

  All y'all were hype about how bf6 looked, yet now it's an issue if mw4 looks like battlefield. Y'all so corny it hurts 💔🥀

• 
  Trollaria (@Trollaria) reported 50 minutes ago

  @ForzaHorizon I mean. They always want life service games. But makes loot and grinds so huge thats only disappointing and instead of life service we quit. I am happy battlefield 6 got better. Now hopefully forza will chance to. DICE saw everyone quit. And now we finally got what we asked for.

• 
  Graphotto (@thegraphotto) reported 54 minutes ago

  @DipshikhaGhosh You’re naively and ideologically fighting a pointless war against men. The problem is, the men left the battlefield a long time ago.

• 
  Jesús (@DerStep) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the matchmaking. I'm tired of one sided matches even if I'm on the winning team is boring. 10 minutes matches in Conquest is insane because of this. Also, we need better map rotation, in like 4 matches I only see 2 maps.

• 
  lUFOlSHADOW (@Ibai_SB) reported 58 minutes ago

  @MrBattlefield0 @BattlefieldComm NOPE... its a glitch..i died there a few times..when the bridges is destroyed its to pass