Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (38%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (13%)
• Glitches (9%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Rennes	Game Crash	24 hours ago
Nantes	Glitches	5 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	6 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	6 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	8 days ago
Méry-sur-Oise	Matchmaking	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Philosopher-King Miron 👑 (@eihtbeezy) reported 2 minutes ago

  @MrFirstOnIt @Marqy_Marqs I’m not saying it ain’t profitable. But it’s a secondary issue. For military agencies, the battlefield is the goal. If you don’t win there, there will be no markets or profits.

• 
  Slumber Season (@Slumber_Season) reported 5 minutes ago

  @RepLuna 2/ Weaponizing fake outrage to deflect from the actual issue is peak drama. You’re acting like you survived a battlefield when you really just survived a tough CONVERSATION.

• 
  jaaron.ron | KIND | REJOICE (@jaaron_kai) reported 7 minutes ago

  @whatslukedoing @pixels_online @stacked_app Even people who are here for the long will be pressurized to sell when they know a significant sell off is coming. That is game theory at play here. When you are in the battleground, even though you know everyone needs to stay in order to stand a chance of winning yet when you see someone fleeing you know you need to be the first to run to save your own life or in this case your life saving. The issue is most people has very little faith in these projects and the morale in the crypto battlefield is extremely low. People had seen enough and knows that the revenue generated is not sufficient to sustain the tokens distributed. And why hold when there is a 98% chance it will fall?

• 
  Chronos (@N0VACIA) reported 7 minutes ago

  @NYNightTrain @BIG_Wojo_68 @Battlefield I do though haha. They need to fix air radar, add jet loadouts and fix the awful input delay feeling when pitching.

• 
  Robbie K (@OSINToffenders) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield You guys need to fix these cheaters and glare glitches on ranked red sec!!!! We have cross play off and waiting 20 minutes for a match! Get rid of pc players!

• 
  Time2split! (@Time2splitters) reported 10 minutes ago

  @giris4u @IGN And yet you have DICE saying the Series S made Battlefield run better. Every dev that claim Series S was tough has bad optimising history even on PS5 e.g. BG3 co-op ran badly on PS5, Quantum Error was a mess on PS5 and each of them used the Series S for console War viral tweet.

• 
  IBK_Olawepo (@hugabiola) reported 11 minutes ago

  It is just unfortunate that a lot of people cannot make conversation again. The comment section has become a battlefield. Someone disagrees with you, and suddenly it’s insults, curses, caps lock, “mumu”, “fool”, “you don’t know anything”. That reaction says more about you than it does about the comment. Tantrums show you lost control, not the argument. Cursing and insulting means you ran out of points. Mature people argue ideas, not attack people. When you throw a tantrum online, everyone sees it. The person you insulted is forgotten in 5 minutes. Your screenshot of rage lives forever. Insults shut down conversation. The moment you call someone names, they stop listening. They won’t hear your facts, your logic, or your experience. You both walk away angrier and dumber than before. Nothing gets solved. Nigeria has enough problems without us adding toxicity to them. Maturity is disagreeing without disrespect You can say I disagree without saying You’re stupid, ode, mumu, oponu ayirada, apode, ashawo, heo, ONKR Try: I see your point, but here is another angle… From my experience, it works differently because… Can you share the source for that? I’d like to learn more. Same disagreement. Different result. One builds respect, the other burns bridges. Your words are your CV. Employers, clients, future partners scroll your comments. If your TL is full of curses and fights, people assume that’s how you handle stress at work too. Polite conversation shows emotional intelligence. And EQ gets you further than IQ. How to learn polite conversation Pause before you type. Anger makes you type fast. Mature people type slow. Take 10 seconds. Breathe. Ask: Will I be proud of this tomorrow? Attack the idea, not the person: That policy is flawed because.... beats Only a fool would support that Disagree and still be human You can end with “We may not agree, but I respect your right to your view.” That line costs nothing and wins you respect. Cursing, insulting, and throwing tantrums over comments doesn’t make you look strong. It makes you look immature. Strength is calmness under pressure. Intelligence is explaining without insulting. Learn polite conversation. The internet is permanent. Speak like your future self is reading

• 
  Paul Johnson (@LonelyDragon84) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Redsec light glitch???? It's sometimes unplayable

• 
  Ankon (@Ussan_Ankon) reported 12 minutes ago

  Being blocked by yuritards is like earning medals for service on the battlefield.

• 
  volodmire (@_sarkaz) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm some of these answers like "actively looking into reticle brightness" dog, they've been an issue since the game launched. tf you mean i know they've gave us the ability to change reticle color, but it didn't fix the brightness issue.

• 
  Hon Noah Ahmed (@HonNoah93) reported 13 minutes ago

  I see people complaining on their status and page that's hypocrisy of the highest order, I was tire of the system,I was tired of just complaining online or posting status, jump into the battlefield, I fought, I stood my ground, how many youths or people here where there to show support or solidarity, I was out of Resources I openly Ask for help everyone act like am making noise but you can also check my score cards I didn't just come out to Ride on PO wave, I have been doing my things year ago without even thinking I will contest for office, All the influencers I met them to help push, none Answer, All the bigger boys who spend in clubs I pleased for help everyone turned their back, we are complaining online as of we Care about the country, go into the field Risk your life take the bullet, which I did All of that, I questioned the system I met the who and the who controls the system what happened nothing, our youths are the problem of the country, we will not support people who Really wants to change the Narrative people who wants to Face the system because he is not a celebrity or son of nobody, The highest I know they can do is complaining online and move on tomorrow, The total money I spent can't be said publicly well God and my Ancestors knows I did my best I stood up for what is Right and With God nobody can stop me....

• 
  Pseudo (@pseudoshiro) reported 15 minutes ago

  @EveryDamnDay__ They should fix the ratio on UNL. Too many legendary and Battlefield 🥲

• 
  Iam Thee (she/it) (@RainbowNailGal) reported 17 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Bf 2042 is a forewarning of what "live service" is. Release a half *** game, you build "with the community" then after it's perfect, abandon it for the next title and don't support past titles whatsoever. At this point give me a new season in 2042 I'm over BF6

• 
  Zachary Davidson (@Ryangofett_2490) reported 17 minutes ago

  @stevedeleeuw @Battlefield Is this a Battle Royale issue?

• 
  Tyren Johnson-Fleming ✝️🇺🇸 (@TyrenJF) reported 18 minutes ago

  @bonchieredstate You really hate this country to smear a US combat surgeon, a hero to the people he saved while they fought through hell on the battlefield. You can’t imagine how many people are able to live thanks to combat surgeons. No service member in their right mind would smear one

• 
  Northern Mexican 🇲🇽 (@NorthernMexa) reported 20 minutes ago

  Missiles are flying. Videos are circulating. Official statements say one thing, while people watching events unfold see something else entirely. The issue isn't just what happened on the battlefield. It's that confidence in official narratives keeps eroding.

• 
  Rick B. White (@RickBeeWhite) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Breaking911 This is the kind of report that requires prudence. A deadly shootout with police, bullets hitting vehicles and a home, and an entire neighborhood left shaken — this is not something to turn into a slogan before all the facts are known. The serious questions must be asked: What started this? Were innocent people placed in danger? Did the officers have no other option? And how did a neighborhood become the scene of a battlefield in the middle of the night? We should wait for the full investigation. But one thing is already clear: When violence reaches people’s homes, society is facing something deeply broken. “Blessed are the peacemakers.” — Matthew 5:9

• 
  symplyTonbra (@SymplyTonbra) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Fortune__ai Lavabending easily. Changing the entire battlefield into molten rock is completely broken

• 
  Ghost (@Ghost_IOO) reported 30 minutes ago

  one of the most toxic things on CT right now is this growing habit of people trying to burn down entire projects because something didn't go their way. you missed a wl. you didn't qualify for rewards. you didn't get the allocation you wanted. you minted too late. and suddenly the project is a scam? come on. what makes it worse is that some of these are large accounts with audiences who trust them. instead of moving on, they weaponize their influence. they start farming outrage. they start feeding half-truths. they start creating chaos. and thousands of people who don't know the full story jump in and amplify it. that's not accountability. that's not protecting the community. that's ego. if a project genuinely does something wrong, call it out. if there are real issues, discuss them. if founders are acting shady, expose it. that's healthy. what isn't healthy is turning every personal disappointment into a public crusade. not getting what you wanted doesn't automatically make something a scam. sometimes you simply didn't qualify. sometimes someone else got selected. sometimes things just didn't go your way. that's life. the reality is this behavior hurts everyone. it hurts builders. it hurts communities. it hurts newcomers trying to understand what's actually happening. and it makes CT look more like a battlefield of bruised egos than a place where people come together to build. we need less emotional reactions and more maturity. if something doesn't go your way, take the loss, learn from it, and move forward. not every setback needs a mob. not every disappointment needs a hit piece. and not every project deserves to be dragged through the mud because somebody didn't get the outcome they wanted.

• 
  Carzy (@JackofDecks) reported 30 minutes ago

  @HMBohemond The problem is don't bring Soldiers who are not "trained" to deal with Demons to a demon infested battlefield then decide to cleanse them after they do the deed. Because the paradoxal nature of Chaos would mean somehow them being upset the Emperor did not save em from the Inquisition will somehow empower chaos. Also, It's just in poor taste when you got, how many ******* Marine chapter made for this and your own personal Space marines. Which you cant spare for this but to go beat on the Lamenters. Yeah, there is a reason most people find the inquisition to be cringe beside being closest heretics.

• 
  Pookie's Polls & Opinions (@pookiepolls) reported 34 minutes ago

  The most dangerous lie they told men was that being “nice” would be enough. Nice gets you tolerated. It does not get you respected. In 1946, millions of men came home from war. They had stormed beaches. Survived artillery. Made life-and-death decisions under fire. The consumer economy looked at these men and saw a problem. Dangerous men don’t make good customers. A man who trusts his own instincts doesn’t need to be told what to buy, who to be, or how to live. So the postwar machine went to work. The advertising industry, the corporate structure, the suburban blueprint. All of it was designed to convert warriors into consumers. Trade the battlefield for the cubicle. Trade instinct for instruction. Trade danger for comfort. By the 1950s, the ideal American man wasn’t the one who could survive in the wild. It was the one who mowed his lawn on Saturday, bought what the television told him to buy, and never raised his voice at the dinner table. They didn’t remove his teeth in one day. They did it across a generation. And then they called the result “mature.” Here is what they buried. There is a difference between a man who is kind and a man who is harmless. A kind man has teeth and chooses not to bite. A harmless man had his teeth removed and calls it evolution. Women do not feel safe with harmless men. Safety does not come from the absence of danger. It comes from the presence of controlled danger. A woman needs to know that the man beside her is capable of something fierce and is choosing gentleness. That choice is what creates trust. A man with no edge has nothing to choose from. He is not gentle. He is just tame. And the system needs him tame. Because a tame man is a predictable consumer. A predictable employee. A predictable voter. His compliance isn’t a virtue. It is a product. The edge they told you to bury wasn’t a flaw. It was the part of you that couldn’t be controlled. And that is exactly why they wanted it gone

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 38 minutes ago

  Fix your matchmaking so that I’m not put of defense 80% of the time in breakthrough and halfway through the match when people are already backing out because the teams are unbalanced. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  Archit (@archit_gunner) reported 39 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the blinding lights issue ffs I cant go to Downtown or Lighthouse

• 
  Andrew Dean (@Andrew_Dean12) reported 40 minutes ago

  @MasonReact They need to do away with the secure boot **** they trying copy battlefield and it’s not working you can easily bypass that **** on cod to cheat

• 
  Robbie K (@OSINToffenders) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Battlefield You guys need to fix these cheaters and glare glitches on ranked red sec!!!!

• 
  Battlefield Bulletin (@BFBulletin) reported 48 minutes ago

  @ahmedmahmoudu5 I'm not forcing anyone to buy bundles. I'm just informing about this week's store content as I used to do with other titles before Battlefield 6. That said, I'm aware that Battlefield Studios has to address some critical issues.

• 
  🇬🇹(J.K.O.)🇲🇽 (@BlackIceSheep) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Voodoo_Hendrix "Battledads" are the safe fall guy catch all term for is ultimately a wider issue of the CoD brand trying desperately to appeal to other markets and not understanding that doesn't work. Battlefield and CoD should be different games but both EA and Activision just look foolish.

• 
  ustonymc (@ustonymc) reported 52 minutes ago

  Slaughter COLD HARBOR Civil War June 1-7 1864 Cold Harbor was neither chilly nor a port but a crossroads taking its name from a tavern that served only cold food. It was near the 1862 battlefield called the Seven Days. Fighting on June 1 and 2 hadn't been fierce. On the first the Yankees didn't launch their assault until 6 pm and made some gains in the beginning but by then the Johnny Reb defenses stiffened and both Union corps entrenched in their advanced position. On the second Grant had scheduled his attack for early morning, but after constant delays and the approaching rain he called off the attack. These first two days Lee wasn't his usual aggressive self and Grant concluded that Lee was beaten. Accordingly, he scheduled an all-out assault for June 3. Lee was far from being beaten and was very confident. The fact that he had 60,000 against Grant's 110,000 didn't daunt him and he had given no sign of offensive operations because of Cold Harbor's natural defensive features and was content to remain there. Without the imposing fortifications of Spotsylvania and North Anna, Lee believed he could beguile Grant into believing that he confronted a vulnerable foe. Actually, there was seven miles of Butternut front integrated, linked and joined with overlapping fields of fire. Neither Grant or Meade had reconnoitered Lee's front, unpardonable oversight in both. The Yankee's were deceived. The soldiers in the Union army had a sense of foreboding. The night of the second, they were writing their names and addresses on slips of paper and pinning them to their tunics so their bodies could be identified and their fate made known to their families. The next morning the bluebellies advanced shouting, "Hurrah! Hurrah!" and in that seemingly silent landscape ahead of them erupted with flame and smoke and a scything rain of lead struck them. "It seemed more like a volcanic blast than a battle," one survivor recalled, "and it was just about as destructive." Grant was attacking all along the line rather than massing at a single point, even at this late date in the war, he still failed to grasp of the new and awesome superiority of the defense, like Lee at Gettysbug. Charge after charge was broken up, some in less than a quarter hour. Taken in their flank by Reb fire, some Union formations collapsed one upon another like falling dominoes. Across the entire front all the Bluebellies could see was the black hats of the Rebels and their muzzle flashes piercing the smoke. Whenever that withering fire seemed to ease off, the pinned down Yankees started scratching out a depression in the earth with their bayonets and gradually sank out of sight and when couriers came crawling out to them with orders to renew the assault they refused to go forward. And with good reason, in less than an hour Grant had lost 7,000 men against 1,500 for Lee, and he finally called off the assault. It was a shocking defeat, the cries of, "Water, water, for God's sake water!" from the wounded in his army outside the Confederate lines couldn't be retrieved because of the Reb sharpshooters. Lee was anxious to compel Grant to admit defeat and refused to call them off. Finally, after bickering back and forth for four days, on the 7th, Lee and Grant agreed upon a truce but by then it was too late, almost all of the Federal wounded were dead. Grant's refusal to ask for a truce wasn't calloused indifference to the suffering of his troops, but rather his unwillingness that a white flag be misconstrued as an admission of defeat that would encourage the northern peace movement and discourage Lincoln supporters. The real tragedy of Cold Harbor was that gallant young men in Blue were sent into battle without plan or preparation, and it was one of those apprehensive soldiers who wrote the night before that awful carnage. The last entry in his blood stained diary read: "June3. Cold Harbor. I was killed today." Many years later Grant would finally admit: "I have always regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made." Image 1: Yankee's charging. 2. Union attack, 3rd day. 3. Lee and Grant. 4. Union burial details.

• 
  Mau Ortega (@AngelMOV25) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Battlefield And will the problem with the green notification dots not disappearing be fixed?

• 
  VanQish (@VanQish7) reported 58 minutes ago

  The signal is not “Thunes is growing.” The signal is that the global payments industry is openly documenting the exact problems that $XRP, $RLUSD, stablecoins, tokenization, and interoperable settlement networks are designed to solve. The Most Important Takeaway The report repeatedly uses the word interoperability as the defining challenge of the next generation financial system. Their conclusion: The world now has too many payment systems. The problem is no longer creating payment rails. The problem is making all rails communicate with each other. Winners will be the networks that bridge traditional and emerging payment rails. That should immediately make XRP holders pay attention because Ripple has been saying exactly this for years. Stablecoins Are Not Replacing Banks This is probably the most important section for crypto investors. Thunes specifically states that stablecoins are emerging as a middle-leg settlement layer for cross-border payments. Translation: They are not talking about replacing banks. They are talking about: Customer → Bank/Wallet → Stablecoin Settlement Layer → Bank/Wallet → Customer The report says stablecoins have: Near-instant settlement Negligible on-chain cost Massive efficiency benefits BUT… The biggest problem remains: On/Off ramps. Converting stablecoins into local bank accounts, wallets, cards, and cash remains difficult. This is exactly where Ripple, RLUSD, XRP, and similar liquidity networks become relevant. XRP Investors Should Notice One Sentence The report states: Stablecoins are unlikely to displace existing systems and will instead operate as a settlement layer embedded within traditional money transfer operators. That is enormous. Many crypto investors still believe: “Crypto replaces banks.” The actual institutional thesis is: “Crypto upgrades bank infrastructure.” Those are two very different outcomes. Mobile Wallets Just Passed Banks Another huge finding: Consumers now prefer: Mobile wallets Payment apps Digital experiences over traditional bank interfaces for initiating cross-border payments. Banks are becoming: Funding sources Settlement providers Back-end infrastructure while wallets become the front-end experience. This fits directly with: RLUSD Ripple Payments Stablecoin settlement Open banking Tokenized deposits Speed Matters More Than Fees This surprised me. 50% of users ranked instant transfers as the most important feature. Only 13% ranked low fees first. Institutional takeaway: People would rather: Pay slightly more Receive money instantly than: Save a little money Wait several days This favors: Real-time settlement XRP liquidity Stablecoin settlement Tokenized payment networks The Report Quietly Attacks Correspondent Banking Read between the lines. They identify: Legacy systems Multiple intermediaries Lack of interoperability Delayed settlement Hidden fees as major causes of friction. Then they describe blockchain settlement as: Instant Lower cost Reduced dependency on correspondent banking relationships. That is effectively the same value proposition Ripple has been selling to banks for over a decade. Why This Matters To XRP Specifically The report never says: “Use XRP.” But it does describe the exact future state XRP was built for: Layer 1 Banks Layer 2 Wallets Layer 3 Stablecoins Layer 4 Interoperability Network Layer 5 Cross-border Liquidity The missing piece is the neutral bridge asset/liquidity engine. That is where XRP competes. The Real Institutional Narrative Most retail investors are still asking: “Will banks use XRP?” The better question now is: “How will thousands of payment systems, wallets, stablecoins, CBDCs, banks, fintechs, and tokenized assets interoperate?” This report says interoperability is becoming the defining challenge of global finance. That is exactly the battlefield Ripple has positioned itself for. @ThunesPayments