Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (35%)
• Online Play (35%)
• Glitches (12%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (1%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Sign in	8 hours ago
Lyon	Sign in	2 days ago
Châteaubriant	Online Play	2 days ago
Cesson	Sign in	2 days ago
Rillieux-la-Pape	Online Play	2 days ago
Brest	Sign in	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  X (@o_oZeppelin) reported 2 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield How about you fix red dot optics and general optic illumination. Why do all the sights look like terrible dark red sharpie

• 
  Gabriel K (@EGabrielK) reported 4 minutes ago

  @GokTurk_01001 @Emrulla48879475 @hermes_z You are talking about technical issues for a plane under development produced by an industry that hasn't produced anything similar and compare it against an airplane from a superpower that based its battlefield dominance in air power and has fought in hign intensity conflicts. 🤡

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 5 minutes ago

  What Does It Mean To Be “Complete In Christ”? To be “complete in Christ” is one of the greatest, cleanest, strongest, most liberating truths in the Christian life, and yet it is one of the doctrines religion hates the most. Colossians 2:10 says, “And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power.” That verse is not a suggestion, not a feeling, not a goal, not a future possibility, and not a reward for elite saints who reach some higher plane of spirituality. It is a present-tense statement of what God says about the believer’s standing in the Lord Jesus Christ. “Ye are complete in him.” Not complete in a church system. Not complete in a priesthood. Not complete in sacraments. Not complete in philosophy. Not complete in self-improvement. Not complete in mystical experiences. Not complete in Hebrew roots. Not complete in religious traditions. Not complete in your performance. Complete in Him. The book of Colossians is a direct assault on religious substitutes for Christ. Paul warns about philosophy and vain deceit, traditions of men, rudiments of the world, voluntary humility, worshipping of angels, fleshly ordinances, and a false spirituality that looks deep but leaves a man puffed up in his fleshly mind. Right in the middle of that battlefield, the Holy Ghost drops the hammer: “For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead ******. And ye are complete in him” (Colossians 2:9-10). That means the believer does not need something outside Christ to finish what God has already made complete in Christ. The fullness is in Him. The believer’s completeness is in Him. Religious systems always say, “Christ plus this.” The Bible says, “Christ is enough.” The flesh wants to add something so it can boast. The cross removes boasting and leaves the believer standing in Christ alone. This truth does not mean a Christian is mature in practice the moment he is saved. It does not mean he knows everything, has victory over every habit, understands every doctrine, feels strong every day, or has no need for growth, correction, discipline, prayer, preaching, fellowship, service, and sanctification. That is not what “complete in Christ” means. It means that as to spiritual standing, acceptance, salvation, justification, identity, and position before God, the believer lacks nothing because he is in the Lord Jesus Christ. Growth is still needed in the walk, but nothing needs to be added to Christ to make the believer accepted before God. The Christian grows from completeness, not toward completeness. He serves from acceptance, not for acceptance. He walks because he is in Christ, not to earn his way into Christ. That distinction will either free a man from religious bondage or expose how much bondage he still loves. Chapter One: Complete In Christ Means Christ Is Enough For Salvation The first thing it means to be complete in Christ is that Christ is enough for salvation. That sounds simple, but it is the line where most religion goes wrong. Every false gospel eventually says Christ is necessary, but not sufficient. Rome says Christ plus sacraments, priesthood, confession, penance, mass, purgatory, and church authority. The cults say Christ plus their organization, their prophet, their restored gospel, their temple, their works, or their membership. Legalists say Christ plus law-keeping. Mystics say Christ plus experiences. Modern self-help religion says Christ plus your inner greatness. But the Bible says, “In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins” (Colossians 1:14). Redemption is in Christ, through His blood, not through man’s religious machinery. The gospel that saves today is not complicated. Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose again the third day according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:1-4). The sinner is saved by grace through faith, “and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9). If

• 
  Lord Dundee (@DundeeLord) reported 6 minutes ago

  @NoGGiNTheNoG8 @deadlyweapns Not necessarily, but all it takes is a little bit of dirt on the wrong hydraulic piston and this whole thing goes out of service. Btw, the entire battlefield is covered in dirt. Drones don’t even need to touch it to break this thing.

• 
  Tommy McDevitt (@TMLKMCD) reported 9 minutes ago

  3. Are you competing on a sensible battlefield? If your offer sounds like everyone else's, you're forcing buyers to compare you on price, convenience...or maybe just "vibes". Specificity helps the right people realise: "This is for me". Get incredibly specific on: - your service area - your target audience - customers you are NOT for - the specific problem you solve Shrink the battlefield. Own your area.

• 
  Sabin (@mastersabin) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your ******* game, we don't care about maps where we will not see ****

• 
  Alexander (@AlexfromBabylon) reported 11 minutes ago

  @StockChaser_ The problem with LADOS is that is has zero battlefield experience. Contracts are signed today for C2/C4 not in 5 years.

• 
  Lumbricus Terrestris (@Wormwarone) reported 16 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Tried downloading and the update is stuck. Anyone else have this issue?

• 
  TheSmokingDuck (@KadofanHypnos) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Slorpler My main problem with Jetpack Cat’s lore is the fact that Brigitte made a Jetpack with machine guns for a cat which as far as she knows has the intelligence of an average cat, then sent it out into a battlefield with 0 concern whatsoever.

• 
  Libertad_24 (@FlacoG_2023) reported 18 minutes ago

  @GrimBF6 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm "Buddy," how many more months do they need to fix this? Are they waiting for MW4 to come out and there will only be 2000 people left...? "We are working." Game from 2025...

• 
  Bud (@ImaBudtender) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the portal server search. Shows people playing but all servers say 0/64

• 
  Robbie Blair (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 21 minutes ago

  @OhmanEU @BattlefieldComm I play RedSec too, when I need a good laugh But I'm on SeriesX with fiber optic internet and hard-lined with a CAT8 ethernet cable I usually have crossplay off, but you cant get a match Putting crossplay on brings many bugs/glitches/issues that don't exist without crossplay

• 
  apt install soul (@nshttpd) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Thee_John_Brown @BFBulletin That's just the horrible net code. They'll never fix that. VPN and get a ping of around 80ms and you'll rule the Battlefield. (Pun intended)

• 
  BillsmafiaMFKA He/Bro/Daddy (@Emanuel56353090) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX STRIKE POINT AND PUT IT BACK TO HOW IT WAS ********

• 
  whyohdeeay (@whyohdeeay) reported 26 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Lobbies haven't filled in months. Lighting isn't the issue

• 
  Arminius Secundus (@Arminius214) reported 31 minutes ago

  Where’s the fudd from yesterday who was splerging about ARs not working on the battlefield bEcAuSe oF ThE mUd.

• 
  Draeko Silver 🔞 (@DraekoSilver) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Lathrix The problem is they are only good when paired with a lot of phobos units and you really only want MAYBE two 5 man squads in any army list. They make more phobos units to forfill all battlefield roles (melee guys, anti tank, etc) rather than just objective monkeys.

• 
  Nick Calandra (@nickjcal) reported 34 minutes ago

  Look no further than the Battlefield franchise for a great example of how spending more and more didn't lead to better games. It led to rushed out unfinished games that took years and more money to fix, and then to get the franchise back on track even more money to do it "right".

• 
  Kołdrian (@ten_na_chmurce) reported 34 minutes ago

  Mistfall Hunter is, first and foremost, an extraction RPG. Yes, it borrows some soulslike flavor: slower combat, dodges, limited resources, danger around every corner and dark fantasy presentation. But after around two hours with the demo, I would not call it a proper soulslike. It is more of a PvPvE extraction game with fantasy loot runs and a few soulslike ideas stitched into the combat. And honestly, that concept is not bad. The loop of entering a zone, looting everything you can, wondering if another player is nearby, and trying to escape with your stuff does create tension. Even solo, you can feel the pressure. I played as a sorcerer, and PvP was actually easier than I expected. I fought mostly rogue-style players, probably Shadowstrix, and using AoE skills, monsters, and positioning against them worked pretty well. I did not lose a PvP fight, but I also did not feel like the combat was especially deep. The combat has some interesting limits. You cannot just spam attacks forever because your energy or mana has to regenerate. Dodging also works through a limited dash system, with three dashes that recover over time. On paper, that gives the fights some rhythm. In practice, I often felt like I missed not because my aim was bad, but because the game decided the hit did not count. Sometimes the visual effect of a spell looked bigger than its actual hitbox. Maybe that is just a demo issue, but in an extraction game where every mistake can cost you loot, this matters a lot. Technically, though, I have to give the game credit. I played on mobile 5G internet and still had around 30–50 ms most of the time, which is genuinely good in my case. I only had one short moment where the game felt like it had not fully loaded the server or had a sudden FPS/ping issue, but outside of that it was very smooth. No serious lag, no constant stuttering, no big technical disaster. That is a strong point. Visually, Mistfall Hunter is fine, but not amazing. It has that Unreal Engine look, with some decent views, but also some rough character movement, sliding animations, strange hair and clothing rendering, and places where I could look under assets or textures. As someone who also builds maps, that kind of thing always bothers me. I know why developers hide objects behind other objects, but I really do not want the player to see the trick. The atmosphere is harder for me to praise. It feels like a mix of Slavic and Nordic dark fantasy filtered through a more Asian fantasy style, but I did not really feel the weight of dark fantasy here. It is *****, full of monsters, ruins and loot, but more “designed to look dark” than actually heavy or oppressive. I skipped most of the dialogue because nothing really pulled me in. The world is okay. The mood is okay. But “okay” is basically the problem. Character creation is actually in a good spot. You choose from several classes, including Mercenary, Sorcerer, Blackarrow, Shadowstrix, Seer and Withered Knight, then pick from multiple male and female looks and customize things like hair, eyes, makeup, scars, tattoos, voice and skin tone. I like character creators that let me feel like I made my own hero without trapping me for an hour before the game even starts. This one is enough. And yes, of course the breast physics are already there in the character selection screen. Classic. Weirdly, that might be one of the smoother animations in the demo. The bigger issue for me is progression. You loot a lot. Really a lot. The inventory fills up quickly, and after two hours I still was not sure which items were actually useful and which were just there to be stockpiled. You can send companions on expeditions, craft better items, and some crafting takes 12 hours, which may be a balancing choice for this type of game. I do not have enough experience with extraction games to judge that fully, but it felt slow. Maybe there is base development later, maybe not, but I got tired of returning to the same battlefield and doing quests before I reached the point where the system truly opened up. So where does that leave me? Mistfall Hunter has a good concept. A dark fantasy extraction RPG with some soulslike flavor sounds interesting. The solo experience has tension, and I can imagine it being much more intense in a trio, where every fight, escape and ambush probably feels more alive. But after around two hours and a few expeditions, I felt more curiosity than excitement. I do not think I will come back to it. It is not really my type of game. Still, I would not completely dismiss it. If you enjoy extraction games, PvPvE tension, fantasy loot runs and slower combat built around limited resources, it might be worth watching. For me, based on the demo: 5.5/10. Not bad. Not pointless. Just not convincing enough yet.

• 
  CAMIKAZE78 (@CAMIKAZE78) reported 39 minutes ago

  "This is what PEAK Battlefield gameplay looks like". This mode was literally you clicking prompts on an iPad, or on your PC like a cookie clicker game... This couldn't be further from "peak gameplay" in the context of an FPS game and when we consider the actual, important issues with BF6, any time spent on this feature would be wasted dev time imo.

• 
  Helles Sachsen (@HellesSachsen) reported 44 minutes ago

  @LReborn11 @MerelHazebroeck @JayinKyiv Exactly, on the battlefield it offers them hardly any advantage over large conventional bombs, but the number of their problems multiplies. They don't even know if they'll actually work anymore; in the end, they'll just embarrass themselves.

• 
  Dmitry R (@DmitryR12) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I used to play a lot of portal modes like that, my biggest problem is that those portal servers had latency and connection issues much worse than normal servers. Did you fix that ? Makes no sense to try if it's still the same.

• 
  Stevo3854 (@stevo3854420) reported 47 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Your entire game is broken. From black loading screens, graphical glitches, bullet registration, ridiculous ranked squad rules that you can't squad with lower ranked friends then they immediately squad you with complete noobs. Let's not even mention the insane amount of hackers!

• 
  Shadow (@ASmoothTaurus) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Does anybody know why when console types this code it in doesn’t load it takes us to a blank screen with nothing showing? Is there a fix for this?

• 
  monster115 (@AMH_1151) reported 50 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm when Fix server middle east ?

• 
  Douglas MechArthur ☭⃠ (@Kicksbuttson) reported 50 minutes ago

  Way too many of your guys are seeing the Tier system of operators and assuming it's a simple good/better/best hierarchy. What it really represents is a distinction between different mission sets, or mission types. Tier One mission sets are high-stakes, and therefore very low margin or error. That's why the soldiers sent on those missions are so highly skilled, and belong to units that have the strictest gatekeeping measures possible. They also have the best logistics imaginable which lends them special insights prior to most of the missions. Those are things you won't have in a civilian defense scenario. Even if you were trained to their level (which you're not) all it's going to do is cause you to outkick your coverage. In a civilian defense scenario where soldiering skills are going to pay off (a scenario that is unlikely but many of us still prepare for) you're goin to find yourself on foot, weighed down, and fighting from a position of near absolute ignorance of the wider battlefield. You're not in Tier One territory. You're not in Tier 3 territory, which is technically not even an actual tier. We just call them conventional or regular forces, and you have less logistics than they do. Taking all your advice from super Delta SEALs just because they have credentials is going to lead to you running around the backwoods with a Geissele 11.5" AR15 with a Hydra mount equipped with an EoTech, quad nods, and a suppressor that looks like an Aztec death whistle. But you're going to get lost and run out of energy before you reach anything remotely resembling a target. Probably fall into a far ambush the moment you think cutting through a field will save you time, realize your rifle isn't optimized for this engagement, and run out of ammo because you only have 3 magazines across your front on a slick carrier. Those of us who've been there before and aren't taking every lead from Tier One types are going to have a 14.5" AR15 with a reliable LPVO and piggybacked red dot, PVS14s our wife bought us on our anniversary, and a ******* compass because we don't trust GPS. We'll get to the objective and lay the ambush that wins the fight because we've done it before and knew that 12 magazines was far more reasonable. We won't mind carrying that weight to the objective because we know the moment the shooting starts the weight is gonna drop quickly, and we still need ammo to get home. Now is your chance to tell me how wrong I am, and how some ex-Delta guy says competitive shooting is king, and tactical shooters are ruining your sport. Because comp shooting is just a sport whenever I'm at the competition with a tactical setup, but it's suddenly top tier tactical skills whenever you're in fantasy land pretending to do what some of us have done in real life.

• 
  Bonald Trosby (@BonaldTrosby) reported 57 minutes ago

  @rabbriansamuel This is a cogent and thoughtful response to the question of why. Others should try to spell it out similarly instead of acting like Israel is holding the gates against America’s fiercest enemy on the battlefield and if the bond is broken mullahs will rule in Cleveland tomorrow

• 
  ARCOS (@falsewoodxt) reported 57 minutes ago

  @GetCheatz @Millitings @BattlefieldComm How unemployed are you to be tagging me on random tweets like these bruh of course there are going to be a few people with hit reg issues. Are you 12 or something

• 
  RuaninhoBR - Hardware e Tecnologia (@gagaruano) reported 58 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix freezes on AMD Gpus in the Spawn Screen!

• 
  SkullsCard (@Skullscard) reported 59 minutes ago

  @_collinthewhite @Battlefield Cant talk, but cheaters can stream the broken game