Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (38%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (12%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Minneapolis	Sign in	6 hours ago
Reims	Online Play	1 day ago
Pfaffenhoffen	Sign in	1 day ago
Americana	Glitches	7 days ago
Rennes	Game Crash	8 days ago
Nantes	Glitches	12 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  J.M.H Hazbin'n'stuff🩷💜💙 (@Comradeharubin) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I'm going to keep bringing up the horrendous lighting bug going on when you aim the RPG in certain maps. New sobek city is the worst. The camera gets completely blown out. You cant see through the scope. Please for the love of god fix this

• 
  Zigggyy (@Zigggyy__) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm please fix strike point!

• 
  berserk415 (@Berserk710415) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I thought the reason why we are getting less maps is because you want to have QA but yet there’s always a problems with game modes maps

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 15 minutes ago

  The Difference Between Doubt and Unbelief Key Passage: Mark 9:24 — “And straightway the father of the child cried out, and said with tears, Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief.” There is a world of difference between a struggling believer and a stubborn rebel, and if a man does not learn that difference, he will either beat wounded sheep half to death or give wolves a pillow and a cup of tea. The Bible is not sloppy on this point. It knows the difference between a trembling man who wants to believe God and a hardened man who refuses to believe God. It knows the difference between a saint under pressure crying, “Lord, help me,” and a religious stiff-neck saying, “I will not have this man to reign over me.” Mark 9:24 gives one of the most honest prayers in the Bible: “Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief.” That is not the prayer of an atheist mocking from a barstool. That is not the prayer of a Pharisee plotting murder in a temple hallway. That is the prayer of a desperate father standing before the Lord Jesus Christ with tears in his eyes, a broken child at his side, and a heart pulled between faith and fear. He believes, but he is struggling. He trusts, but he is trembling. He comes to Christ, but he comes with a battlefield inside his own chest. Modern Christianity often mishandles this subject in two opposite directions. On one side, you have the legalist with a hammer who treats every struggling believer like a backslidden infidel. He hears a person say, “I am struggling with doubt,” and immediately starts swinging like he is killing snakes in the garden. He does not know how to bind up the brokenhearted because he has confused every wound with rebellion. On the other side, you have the sentimental crowd that treats unbelief like a harmless personality trait, as if God is just supposed to smile while a man calls Him a liar. Both are wrong. Doubt needs help. Unbelief needs rebuke. Doubt says, “Lord, I am weak.” Unbelief says, “God is wrong.” Doubt reaches toward Christ with a shaking hand. Unbelief folds its arms and demands that Christ explain Himself. Doubt is a storm inside a believer who wants truth. Unbelief is a settled refusal to bow to truth. This essay is for struggling believers, not spiritual actors who enjoy using doubt as an excuse to stay rebellious. There are Christians who have been through grief, sickness, betrayal, unanswered prayers, family trouble, depression, fear, temptation, doctrinal confusion, spiritual warfare, and seasons of dryness, and somewhere in the middle of it they wonder, “Lord, where are You?” That question, when brought to God honestly, is not the same as unbelief. The Psalms are full of men crying from the depths, asking how long, asking why, asking for light, asking for mercy. God did not erase those prayers from the Bible. He preserved them. But there is also a kind of unbelief that is not weakness; it is wickedness. It hears the word of God and refuses it. It sees enough light and still chooses darkness. It uses questions not to seek truth, but to avoid obedience. The difference matters. If you cannot tell the difference between Thomas saying, “Lord, I am struggling,” and Pharaoh saying, “Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice?” you will make a mess of people’s souls. Chapter One Doubt Is Often the Cry of Weak Faith, But Unbelief Is the Refusal of No Faith The father in Mark 9 did not stay away from Christ. That is the first thing to notice. His child was tormented, the disciples had failed to cast out the spirit, the situation was public, painful, embarrassing, and desperate, yet the man brought the matter to Jesus. That alone tells you something. Doubt may tremble, but it still comes. Doubt may be confused, but it still cries. Doubt may be full of tears, but it still reaches toward the Lord. Unbelief stays away or comes only to argue. The father said, “Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief.” That is not polished theology.

• 
  bamboojelly (@bamboojellyy) reported 16 minutes ago

  If I get yelled at again for “not keeping track of points properly” when I caught you trying to double score a battlefield at a nexus night imma crash out

• 
  Agent J (@AgentJxsh) reported 18 minutes ago

  few things fixed, many things broken. that’s the battlefield way!

• 
  before i slip,, ima slide♟️📜 (@Rocinantemoons) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Still no fix for server issues. Today my game has been disconnecting for every time. Error error error

• 
  Hapa_Fodder (@HapaFodder) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Have you patched the spawn point bug!? Narrowed down the registration issue that you said is "fixed," that isnt!? First shot on some LMGs also goes NO WHERE near where you aim....

• 
  Biig Bo$$ (@Mike_so100) reported 23 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Are u guys not going to fix strikepoint? Or think it’s ok to make horrible gameplay experience 🤔 either way u guys are horrible

• 
  RICO TO TREASON (@F1sT) reported 28 minutes ago

  welp i tired my heart out with @Battlefield solo br, too broken. off the gird not bad. call of duty going backwards. looks like this is empluses shot at taking my money. all these other companies are allergic to money they can't hear the customers they don't want to hear the customers so it's time for me to go somewhere else give empluse a shot hopefully it works. everybody else wants to lay off their employees because they don't wanna listen to the paying customers.

• 
  Homer Mix 🇺🇦 △🦝 🌊⛱️🎉 (@HomerMix) reported 30 minutes ago

  @rhaxten_ @BattlefieldComm I meant nothing you can do about it. The chat issue can be solved

• 
  War Tracker X (@WarTrackerX) reported 31 minutes ago

  🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱🇱🇧 Statements of Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: The best time to end a war is when we hold the upper hand; we are truly victorious on the battlefield. We stood against the world's apparent superpower for 40 days. Agreement and ending the war will consolidate the victory. The final agreement hasn’t been reached yet; if it is finalised, I promise to explain every single clause. The agreement includes two stages, and we have moved the nuclear issue to the second stage. We will never leave Hezbollah in Lebanon alone, and the end of the war will also encompass Lebanon and all other fronts. In this agreement, the United States will state in writing that it respects Iran's sovereignty. The memorandum of understanding includes the nuclear issue, sanctions relief, reconstruction, and blocked/frozen funds. If we were going to yield to threats of attacking our infrastructure, we would have done so earlier. We sent a message to the other side that threats have the opposite effect, and if they want to move toward war, we are ready. If we were going to yield to threats of attacking our infrastructure, we would have done so earlier. We sent a message to the other side that threats have the opposite effect, and if they want to move toward war, we are ready. This agreement has opponents, and at the forefront is the Israeli regime, which is looking for pretexts and opportunities to undermine it. Ending the war in the agreement also means Israel’s withdrawal from the occupied areas in southern Lebanon, and we have stated this explicitly to the other side. The United States' nuclear-related demands in this stage were absolutely unacceptable to us. We are dealing with people in the United States who do not honor their commitments; we must prevent them from reneging on their obligations. The difference this time compared with previous agreements is that we have not yet reached a final agreement; this is only the first step, or first phase. If the agreements reached in the first phase are not implemented, we will not proceed to the second phase. We should expect various problems and complications in the other side's implementation of the agreement. The Strait of Hormuz is, without a doubt, under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman. There is no international waterway in the Strait of Hormuz. For many years, this waterway was open to all ships. Iran and Oman ensured its security and provided services; until now, all services were free of charge. However, the future management of the Strait of Hormuz will not be like the past. No one can challenge Iran and Oman's sovereignty over the strait. The management of the Strait of Hormuz will not return to the pre-war system. Fees will be charged for services in the Strait of Hormuz, and these services will no longer be free. This important matter has been confirmed: payment of fees is required. According to the memorandum of understanding, if it is signed, Iran's frozen assets will be released. None of our assets will be allowed to remain frozen again. A reconstruction plan has been envisaged to compensate Iran for the damage it has suffered. There are both supporters and opponents of the draft text among the Council's members, but ultimately a collective decision will be made. Once a decision is reached, it will be officially communicated. The enemy hoped to achieve its goals in pre-war negotiations, but due to our resistance, it became disillusioned and started the war. Even during the war, it realised it would not reach its objectives and became disheartened. Therefore, it requested negotiations. As soon as the final stages of the negotiations are completed, the agreement will be signed and announced. The initial signing will take place remotely in digital form. This could happen within the next few days.

• 
  Rushikesh (@RushiXplores) reported 32 minutes ago

  @vishsidd2007 Arjun wanted to flee the battlefield& become sanysi to escape his problems.Krishna's answer? True renunciation isn’t about running away to the forest; it’s about conquering your inner chaos. Tukaram's target was the hypocrites who leave their family out of frustration or laziness

• 
  Jeff (@JeffPoe_tra) reported 34 minutes ago

  @EAHelpOfficial_ playing Battlefield 6 on PC via Steam. I have 900mbps Wi-Fi 6, but my in-game ping is suddenly stuck between 110ms–160ms. I already flushed my DNS and reset my hardware. Matchmaking is routing me to the wrong regional servers. Any known server issues right now?

• 
  rollin coal (@jahonda44) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Make cross play better so we don’t have to play with these cheating *** computers. Better fix **** soon in this game or Are U won’t have a game new Call of Duty®’s coming out and it’s gonna crush you.

• 
  John Williams (@JohnWillia71018) reported 38 minutes ago

  @SquawkStreet @jimcramer Yes — this is very interesting, and honestly it lines up with what you’ve been saying for months: AI is still early, but the bottleneck is moving from Can the model do it to “Can we afford to run it at scale The key idea in that Citadel piece is this: AI adoption is becoming less about intelligence and more about economics. That matters. Frontier models may be powerful but they require huge inputs compute electricity, cooling, memory bandwidth, chips, data-center capacity and inference budgets. So the market starts asking a practical question: Does this task justify using the expensive brain For hard problems drug discovery, engineering, legal analysis, coding architecture, scientific modeling, financial modeling expensive frontier AI may be worth it. But for everyday use email summaries, customer service, basic writing, search, scheduling, simple coding help — cheaper models may win because they are “good enough” at a much lower cost. That is the bifurcation they’re talking about: Frontier AI = high-cost, high-value harder problems. Everyday AI = cheaper, smaller, faster models doing routine work That actually strengthens your long-term thesis, not weakens it. It says the AI buildout is not ending. It is becoming more disciplined. The hype phase says, “Use the biggest model for everything.” The mature phase says, “Use the right model for the right job That means infrastructure still matters deeply but the winners may shift toward the companies that control the scarce inputs power, cooling, chips, memory, networking, data centers, software efficiency, and inference optimization. This also fits your “1st inning” view. Early markets burn money proving what is possible. Mature markets figure out what is economical. That is when real adoption starts. The line that jumps out to me is: Adoption is therefore becoming less about what frontier models can do in principle and more about the price and scarcity of the inputs required to make AI operational at scale.” That is the whole battlefield. My read: this is not bearish on AI. It is bearish on wasteful AI spending. It is bullish on efficient AI, inference infrastructure, energy, memory, networking, and companies that can turn intelligence into productivity without blowing up the budget. Microsoft did cancel its internal Claude Code pilot in the Experiences & Devices division effective June 30, after token based billing bur (TheStreet) (AI Weekly) ned through the annual budget, and redirected engineers to GitHub Copilot. Amazon shut down its "tokenmaxxing" leaderboard, Meta killed an employee built Claudeonomics dashboard, Uber exhausted its 2026 AI coding budget by April, and there's a roughly $500M single-month enterprise Claude bill Axios reported. (Zero Hedge) So Frank Flight isn't cherry-picking. He's also been running this same "compute is the binding constraint" line for months — which is a strength and a caution: it's one coherent voice, not independent confirmation. Where I'd push on the analysis you pasted: it's directionally fine, but it resolves a genuinely open question in the most thesis-flattering direction, and it does it on the one data point that's actually contested. Separate two things. The chart isn't what it looks like. The Silicon Data index isn't total spend or total volume — it's a usage-weighted average token price index, and Silicon Data had to publicly clarify that people keep misreading it; what it really captures is the market's marginal willingness to pay per million tokens. (Digg) So a decline doesn't cleanly mean "AI is slowing 7.14 It means the mix is rotating toward cheaper models. That's the bifurcation — fine. But the part the analysis skipped: the same chart, same downtick, is being used to argue the opposite. Andreas Steno Larsen called it the chart that everyone should be watching and warned that weakening token pricing would end the memory trade and the broader hardware and data-center trade for this cycle.

• 
  slatty daddy (@slattydadddy) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @EA can you please fix battlefield’s redsec? Thanks lots of bugs. Shots not registering, can’t pick class in beginning anymore, losing points when teammates quit or if you have only 3 in your squad. Yeah you guys can do it.

• 
  xBo0ndockS4intx (@xBo0ndockS4intx) reported 41 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm LoL maybe if tanks were not ******* Overpowered now it wouldn't be a problem.

• 
  Chase Arkansas (@chasehoganjone1) reported 41 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm they should only tick down during active game time for once dont fix it this is what we want actual play time not in menu time

• 
  Don Elliott (@RealDonElliott) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Sony @PlayStation yeah it looks like @Battlefield is still clearly broken too. I gotta tell you, you've been very disappointing

• 
  Viral_Votarist. (@Viral_Votarist) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Rainbow6Game 3 games today. 3 people cheating. Well done with the hot fix! Didn't bother playing R6 after that. Battlefield fit the win!

• 
  wChuchi (@wChuchi0) reported 42 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the tokens back to in game time only. What’s the point of keeping them running within the game menu when we have so much issues with the current UI and games not starting ex; ranked redsec and some regular servers. Take care of your community.

• 
  Ponce Perez (@Ponce40_) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I’M PRETTY SURE YOU GUYS ARE WELL AWARE OF YOUR GARBAGE HIT REGISTRATION AND HOW INCONSISTENT IS THE GUN PLAY SO WHEN ARE WE FINALLY GETTING A FIX 🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵it’s draining 🥵🥵

• 
  The Chairman's Ledger (@ChairmansLedger) reported 45 minutes ago

  Let’s get something straight. $ONDS is one of one. How do I know? Because I have been close enough to the problem to know what actually matters. People in the comments say “it’s a drone that shoots a net.” If you said that around people who actually understand the battlefield, you would be laughed out of the room. $ONDS is not just a drone company. It is building a layered autonomy, security and communications platform for a world that is getting faster, cheaper, more distributed and much harder to defend. Air. Ground. Stratosphere. Networks. Detection. Interception. Autonomy. Resilient comms. That is the point. And if you think this only matters on a battlefield, you are sorely mistaken friends. Airports, stadiums, power plants, borders, ports, cities, oil rigs, data centers, schools, universities. These are next. The modern world is in for a rude awaking. $ONDS is about defending the physical world from threats that are only getting cheaper, smarter and more common. Wake up.

• 
  David (@RightByTheSea) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Battlefield How is the game so broken this late into it. You can’t even spawn easily without fighting a jitter

• 
  Wild Bill 🇺🇲 🇹🇭 🇷🇺 (@Bill_the_Great) reported 48 minutes ago

  @WhistleDick007 @RepDonBacon @jedermann0111 Traitor? Because I'm sick of the neo-cons in govt who are owned by the MIC or the 🧃? You claim to be a war veteran. Tell me how Ukraine is a US problem. Tell me how Iran is a US problem. War mongers like you deserve to (rhymes with) lie on the battlefield. I did 20 years. U?

• 
  Connor McMahon ™ (@TheeMcMahon) reported 54 minutes ago

  @DuffyMorgan_ @BattlefieldComm They need to do a large update. No new maps, no new skins, no new game modes. Just fix ****

• 
  WORLDINTEL24🛜 (@WORLDINTEL24) reported 1 hour ago

  @RoaaWarStudies These are all the statements of Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: 💥The best time to end the war is when we are in a superior position; we are truly victorious on the battlefield. 💥We have stood against the world's apparent superpower for 40 days. 💥The agreement and ending the war will reinforce the victory. 💥The final agreement has not been reached yet; and if it is finalized, I promise you that I will explain each clause separately. 💥The agreement includes two phases, and we have moved the nuclear issue to the second phase. 💥We will never leave Hezbollah in Lebanon to its own devices, and ending the war will also encompass Lebanon and all other fronts. 💥In this agreement, the United States will declare in writing that it respects Iran's sovereignty. The memorandum of understanding includes the nuclear issue, sanctions relief, reconstruction, and the frozen/seized funds. 💥If we were going to surrender to threats attacking our infrastructure, we would have done so earlier. We have sent a message to the other side stating that threats have a counterproductive effect, and if they want to move toward war, we are ready. 💥This agreement has opponents, foremost among them the Israeli regime, which is looking for pretexts and opportunities to undermine it. 💥Ending the war in the agreement also means Israel's withdrawal from the occupied areas in southern Lebanon, and we have made this clear explicitly to the other side. 💥The United States' demands regarding the nuclear field in this phase were completely unacceptable to us. 💥We are dealing with people in the United States who do not respect their commitments; we must prevent them from backing out of their obligations. 💥The difference this time compared to previous agreements is that we have not yet reached a final agreement; this is just the first step, or the first phase. 💥If the agreements reached in the first phase are not implemented, we will not proceed to the second phase. 💥We must expect various problems and complications in the implementation of the agreement by the other side. 💥The Strait of Hormuz, without a doubt, is under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman. There is no international waterway in the Strait of Hormuz. For many years, this waterway has been open to all ships. Iran and Oman have ensured its security and provided services; until now, all services have been free. However, the management of the Strait of Hormuz in the future will not be like the past. No one can challenge the sovereignty of Iran and Oman over the strait. The management of the Strait of Hormuz will not return to the pre-war system. 💥Fees will be imposed on services in the Strait of Hormuz, and these services will no longer be free. This important matter has been confirmed: it requires payment of fees. 💥According to the memorandum of understanding, if signed, Iran's frozen assets will be released. No assets of ours will be allowed to be frozen again. 💥A reconstruction plan has been put in place to compensate Iran for the damages it has suffered. 💥There are supporters and opponents of the draft text among the council members, but in the end, a collective decision will be made. Once a decision is reached, it will be officially announced. 💥The enemy had hoped to achieve its goals in negotiations before the war, but due to our resistance, it was disappointed and started the war. Even during the war, it realized it would not achieve its goals and was disappointed. Therefore, it requested negotiations. 💥Once the final stages of the negotiations are completed, the agreement will be signed and announced. The initial signing will take place remotely in digital form. This may happen in the coming few days.

• 
  Ricki (@Rickixo) reported 1 hour ago

  @vsdsad25496 @V42724309 @Battlefield Agreed. The lack of bushes, trees, and environmental detail is a major issue as well. That large white hotel building in the concept art looks at least 10 times better than the version we got in-game.

• 
  Shavetail Louie (@SchmukQatarlson) reported 1 hour ago

  @AK74StL They absolutely have great solutions for Ukrainian battlefield problems. We need to pick and choose lessons learned. For example, if every drone interceptor requires a person controlling it, that may not work for a non conscript military.