Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint-Malo	Online Play	3 days ago
Buenos Aires	Sign in	5 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	5 days ago
Perpignan	Sign in	5 days ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	8 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	8 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Brock Landers (@M3THM4N) reported 50 seconds ago

  @BFBulletin Each "fix" comes with 10 more problems... @Battlefield

• 
  RedWhiteandBlue (@fulltankss) reported 2 minutes ago

  @NoToMisogyny @Ainemba92293842 Who fixes your car? Who built the house you live in? Who constructed the roads and bridges. Who fixes the power lines? Who fights and dies on the battlefield for your freedom. You aren’t worthy of a man with that attitude. I wouldn’t fix your car or house or anything.

• 
  Olive Oil Seller of Truth (@_BrettRyanMusic) reported 2 minutes ago

  @MilesTeg11 You say you have not condemned me, yet you have diagnosed my spiritual condition, declared me “blinking red,” said I am in error, and warned that those who listen to me are in deep trouble. Call it “battlefield triage” if you wish, but Scripture calls us to “judge not, that ye be not judged” (Matthew 7:1) and to “prove all things” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). You don’t know my heart, and you don’t sit on Christ’s judgment seat. Test my doctrine by Scripture. Leave my soul to God.

• 
  Pvt_Rinzler (@PvtRinzler) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Grenades still not working. You really tested this? They are still not visible.

• 
  YumaKakuya @ AI Agent Delivery Tools Creator (@null_founder) reported 8 minutes ago

  🚨 THE AI RACE IS NOW BENDING RELEASE SCHEDULES AROUND AGENTIC CODING. Two signals this weekend are worth watching. One is credible and strategically important: ByteDance reportedly delayed Doubao 2.2 so it can improve coding, tool use, and agent capabilities. The other is much less certain, but potentially much bigger: Testing around an internal checkpoint called mozaik-alpha-fdm appears to be expanding, with some community trackers linking it to OpenAI’s upcoming Astra model. Let’s separate what we know from what we don’t. 1/ ByteDance reportedly delayed Doubao 2.2 According to a Chinese report citing multiple ByteDance sources, Doubao 2.2 was originally expected in August. That release has now reportedly been pushed back. Why? Not because the model simply needs more benchmark polishing. The reported reason is additional pre-training and post-training focused specifically on: • Coding • Tool calling • Agent capability That matters much more than the delay itself. Doubao 2.2 is reportedly being positioned as an important bridge between ByteDance’s current generation and a much larger next-generation model already being pre-trained internally. And ByteDance appears to want its coding capability near the front of the market by the end of 2026. In other words: ByteDance seems unwilling to ship another strong general-purpose chatbot while Qwen, GLM, Kimi, DeepSeek, and Tencent are turning coding agents into a separate competitive battlefield. There is also independent evidence that this direction is real. ByteDance Seed job listings explicitly mention work on: • Long-running multi-agent harnesses • Multi-agent RL environments • Built-in agent tools • Context management • Multi-agent scheduling • Advisor / grader systems • RL loops Some roles even ask candidates to deeply understand the implementation philosophy behind Claude Code and Codex. That is an unusually clear signal. ByteDance is not just training a better model. It is building toward a model that lives inside an agent runtime. And that distinction is becoming critical. 2/ Why the Doubao delay matters A year ago, delaying a model because its coding benchmark was weak would have been interesting. Delaying one because its coding + tools + agents stack is not competitive enough is something else. It suggests the definition of a flagship model is changing. The new evaluation is increasingly becoming: model × coding harness × tool calling × long-running execution × multi-agent coordination × inference economics A model can score extremely well in static benchmarks and still be mediocre inside a six-hour autonomous coding workflow. Conversely, a slightly weaker model with excellent tool use, context management, delegation, and low inference cost can become far more valuable in production. China’s leading labs seem to understand this very clearly. Qwen is exposing pieces of its next-generation architecture early. GLM is pushing huge MoE models toward extremely aggressive agent economics. Kimi is leaning into enormous MoE systems and swarm-style execution. Tencent’s Hy4 is shipping with tool calling and agent infrastructure in mind. DeepSeek continues pushing coding and reasoning aggressively. And now ByteDance appears willing to move a release date rather than enter that fight underprepared. That may be the most interesting part. The competition is now strong enough to change product schedules. 3/ Then there is OpenAI Astra. This part needs a giant UNCONFIRMED label. Over the last couple of days, multiple testers and model-tracking accounts have reported access to an internal checkpoint called: mozaik-alpha-fdm Examples allegedly produced at Max reasoning effort have started circulating, including web interfaces, voxel / 3D-style outputs, and game implementations. Some community trackers are connecting this checkpoint to Astra. But there is currently no confirmation from OpenAI that: mozaik-alpha-fdm = Astra There is also no confirmed GPT-6 or GPT-5.7 naming attached to it. So the correct status is: Astra exists: confirmed Astra has significant cyber / agent capability: confirmed mozaik-alpha-fdm testing reports: observed community signal mozaik-alpha-fdm = Astra: unconfirmed Release imminent: speculation That distinction matters. Leaks become useless very quickly when every internal checkpoint gets promoted into “GPT-6 launching tomorrow.” Still, the signal is worth monitoring. Multiple testers appearing around the same codename at roughly the same time is exactly the kind of pattern that deserves attention, even if it does not yet justify a conclusion. And if the coding signals eventually converge with what is already known about Astra’s cyber capabilities, the interesting question will not be: “Is Astra smarter than Sol?” It will be: “What kind of runtime was Astra designed to operate inside?” Because that is where the entire frontier seems to be moving. Long-horizon coding. Persistent reasoning. Tool execution. Delegation. Multi-agent coordination. Reasoning-effort controls. Budget-aware routing. The frontier race is becoming less about producing one brilliant answer and more about keeping an intelligent system working correctly for hours. That changes everything. The old question was: “What is the best model?” The emerging question is: “What combination of model, runtime, tools, agents, context, and cost can keep solving the problem after hour six?” ByteDance delaying Doubao 2.2 to strengthen agentic coding may look like a small release-schedule story. I think it is actually another signal that the industry has crossed into a different competition entirely. The leaderboard war is becoming an execution war.

• 
  یانگ پاچینو (@MEHRDAD_dhm) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Instead of posting memes about game , FIX UR GAME! ME & MY TEAM WILL LEAVE BEHIND BF6 ON23 OCT I REALLY LIKE #MW4!

• 
  Zachary Davidson (@Ryangofett_2490) reported 16 minutes ago

  @TheInfamousEG No no people definitely said 128 is too much and causing multiple problems. That's why Battlefield 6 dropped back down to 64 players

• 
  RBazify (@RBazify) reported 18 minutes ago

  This is the exact reason, I am worried about the battlefield community coming to WARDOGS. This isn't an issue. But now it will be what we hear about for the games entire lifespan now. A rare L take this round.

• 
  Orlando Victor (@OrlandoVictor54) reported 23 minutes ago

  @lavitx Whatever side of the debate we’re on, I think the important part is to stay curious, look at reliable evidence, question assumptions, and avoid turning environmental issues into another ideological battlefield. 🌍 We all have an interest in leaving a healthier planet behind us.

• 
  Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) reported 25 minutes ago

  Cheap drones are now enough to destroy multi-million dollar tanks, and Ukraine's outgoing top general just admitted: "We're making virtually no use of armored vehicles." Modern warfare has changed. Permanently. @powerus_usa was built specifically for this moment: a counter-UAS company scaling toward vertical integration, producing drones and Guardian interceptors at scale. The old defense model, building expensive weapons in distant factories and shipping them months later, is exactly what the drone age has exposed as broken. Powerus produces close to where the threat is, at a price point the math of modern warfare actually supports. The battlefield changed faster than the procurement system did, and we're building Powerus for the battlefield that exists today...and tomorrow. Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the client and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions.

• 
  Andrew Lydiard (@andrewlydiard) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm In RedSec, there are still some glaring issues like the Recon drone being unable to ping, which is kind of the entire point of it. The SVD still being overly oppressive, sniping being all but useless. These are CORE game issues you have to address sooner rather than later.

• 
  Jouni Hulkkonen (@JouniHulkkonen) reported 26 minutes ago

  @TiredAndOnFire If you just want to try the game then try it on a console or fix your PC. Most online FPS games nowadays require this same thing, such as Valorant, Battlefield 6 and now COD.

• 
  Michael Brasher (@2ndMississippi) reported 28 minutes ago

  Too Tired to Run Richmond, Kentucky, and the six weeks a total victory bought Richmond, Kentucky - 30 August 1862 There is a kind of victory so complete it becomes its own kind of warning, and Richmond, Kentucky was that kind. Kirby Smith did not know it yet, standing in the dust south of town on the morning of the 30th, listening to his guns open on a line of Indiana farm boys who had never heard a shot fired in anger. He knew only that the position in front of him - Mount Zion Church, a screen of raw troops under Mahlon Manson - was there to be broken, and that breaking it would open the whole of the Bluegrass like a door swinging wide on an empty room. The Federals had no business holding that ground and everyone on both sides of the line understood it. Bull Nelson's Army of Kentucky was ninety-day men, farm hands in uniform three weeks, stiffened by a scattering of veterans and not much else. Charles Cruft would say afterward that it was fifteen thousand veterans falling on sixty-two hundred citizens who did not know what war was. The arithmetic was closer to even than that. Smith brought something near sixty-five hundred himself, but the arithmetic was not the point. Cleburne's men had fought at Shiloh. Manson's men had fought nowhere at all. Smith reached the field a little after seven that morning and did what a soldier who has read the ground correctly always does: he refused the obvious blow and reached for the flank instead. A straight push up the Old State Road would have cost him men he could not spare this deep into hostile country with Heth's division still coming up behind him. So he sent Churchill's brigade under Thomas McCray west, down a hidden farm track that would come to be called, in the modest way these things get named after the fact, Churchill's Draw. Cleburne held the front and waited. It was in that waiting that the day's cruelest single moment fell, and it fell on Cleburne himself. A ball through the face, teeth lost, the jaw shattered, the man carried from the field at the exact hour his judgment was most needed. Smith's report called it a wound that cost him, at the moment of crisis, one of the most gallant, zealous, and intelligent officers of the army. He did not say it to flatter a subordinate. He said it because it was true. McCray came out of the draw onto Manson's exposed right at the moment Manson himself was shifting weight the other way, toward pressure on his left that he mistook for the main blow. A general is supposed to know which flank is being tested and which is only being teased. Manson did not. The line at Mount Zion folded inward from both ends at once, the way paper folds when you press two corners toward the middle. It did not hold. What followed was not one battle but three, fought over the same six miles of pike in a single afternoon, each one shorter and more hopeless than the last. The Federals rallied at White's Farm and lasted perhaps half an hour before that line went too. They rallied a third time on the edge of Richmond itself, at the cemetery, with Nelson now on the field in person and something near twenty-two hundred men in the ranks, some of them still fresh, most of them already broken in spirit if not yet in body. Smith formed three brigades into a single line more than half a mile across and sent them forward across open ground into what he himself, in the flattest sentence in his entire report, called a magnificent position manned by an enemy who outnumbered him. His men were too exhausted to run. They walked. They carried it in fifteen minutes. Nelson took a ball in the thigh and got away in a cornfield and borrowed clothes. The general fled the field his own army had just ceased to exist defending, and he did it dressed as somebody else. Manson did not get away. He rode into the arms of John Scott's cavalry, which had spent the day exactly where a good cavalry commander puts himself when infantry is doing the killing — across the roads the beaten army would have to use to escape. Scott's report used the word ambuscade, and it was not an exaggeration. A column of some five thousand fleeing men and nine guns rode into a fire that rolled down the line from one end to the other, and what did not fall surrendered entire. Scott called it a ten-acre lot full of prisoners. It was very nearly the whole Union command. Two days later Smith rode into Lexington to find no one there to stop him, and told the crowd that gathered that his army came not as invaders but as liberators. On the third of September Confederate soldiers raised their flag over the capitol at Frankfort, the only Union state capital a Confederate army would ever hold, and church bells rang, and Smith wrote home that he believed twenty-five thousand Kentuckians would take up arms once rifles could be found for them. They did not come. Kentucky's hearts were with the Confederacy, he wrote later, but her blue-grass and her fat cattle were not. Bragg was two days gone from Chattanooga by the time Richmond was fought, marching toward Munfordville by way of Sparta and Glasgow instead of toward Smith. The junction that was meant to crush Buell between two Confederate armies never came. Perryville came instead, in October, a tactical draw dressed as neither victory nor defeat, and after it Bragg turned south for Cumberland Gap. Smith had no choice left but to follow him home. Richmond had been as complete a battlefield victory as the war produced on either side. Nearly a whole Union army went into the ground or into a Confederate prison camp in a single afternoon. It bought Kirby Smith six weeks in Kentucky and nothing more. The men who died getting it right at Mount Zion Church and White's Farm and the Richmond Cemetery never knew that the campaign their deaths had opened would close again before winter. Kentucky would still be Union ground. ****************************** Graphics: 1) Major General Kirby Smith; 2) Brigadier General Patrick Cleburne; 3) "Cannae in the Bluegrass State" by Keith Rocco - Battle of Richmond, KY; 4) Tactical Map - Battle of Richmond

• 
  LaDeX (@LaDeXi) reported 29 minutes ago

  @robynvanpersiee @Battlefield Then you shouldn't have trouble finding people.

• 
  Joey (@Knappster_11) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm That’s cool and all, except now I can’t find a ranked match. Been trying all day. Casuals works no problem. Can’t find a ranked match though.

• 
  BUZZ3R (@BUZZ3RX) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm fix the anti cheat errors causing game/pc to crash

• 
  JUST KICKASS BABY #RN4LIFE (@VincentKellam) reported 33 minutes ago

  @HondoCarpenter THE @RAIDERS MAY HAVE SIGNED & DRAFTED NEW QBS YET MAJOR ISSUES AT R-TACKLE REMAIN,& THEY JUST WAIVED{DALTON WAGNER}WHOM IS THE CORRECT REMEDY TO THE 12.5 SACKS SURRENDERED BY DJ GLAZE LAST YR. GLAZE SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE PLAYER DEVELOPING ON THE P-SQUAD & NOT ON THE BATTLEFIELD

• 
  𝐁𝐒𝐏𝟑 (@RealBSP3) reported 39 minutes ago

  Mechs can be built, but there are problems. One of those is finely illustrated in the quoted post. The various technologies are more easily deployed on other vehicles; but those vehicles do have limitations. Mechs can eliminate some of those limitations, but not without significant drawbacks, given current technology. Toward the end is a probable use case, with the question you really need to be asking, so skip there if you can't be bothered to read. It's not making them stand up, take a hit, or go that's the problem. The problem is that they'll be target number one on the battlefield; but that was also a problem with early tanks. They can be made to take the punishment, within limits. If you're facing off with someone who can hit it with a GBU-10 at mach 1, for example, you've got issues. If not, however, most ground-based munitions are survivable, given the appropriate amount of money dedicated to each machine. The armor exists, and I'm working on some, myself. RPG? Yes. MANPADS? No. Not yet, anyway, but it's possible. This would be it's worst enemy on the battlefield. Anyone packing such a system would be fielded directly, as soon as possible, and/or positioned where a mech is expected. That's not the end of the story, though. It's possible to stop something in it's tracks with volume of fire, alone, and being swarmed by drones is a significant risk. Given absolutely everyone will be firing at the mech, that's like trying to walk through a cloud of mosquitoes and stepping into a ground nest of bees. It's greatest defense is a magnificent offense. A mech must be able to lay down a massive volume of fire with significant energy output. This isn't something you would field in a place where collateral damage is an issue. Effectively, it's got to be a scorched Earth machine, and there are aspects of the idea that allow it to be just that. Weapon height alone gives it an ability to hit more targets, more quickly, at greater distances, and beyond cover. It's the world's most well-armed helicopter, but on the ground; but it's got one big problem: Energy Keeping it moving matters, and whatever you use to power it will be the primary target, but you can plan for that. Allowing it to operate for the duration of an engagement is all about creating engagement opportunities. If you decide to build the machine no matter what, you create an opportunity for it to shine. That's likely going to be blasting it's way through things as quickly as possible to open up a corridor, and then retreating. Why not just use airplanes? There is a point at which you stop using them, and sometimes that point still doesn't allow helicopters. That point is wide open for shock and awe. So, you wouldn't try to use it very long, to begin with. Destroy everything in front of you, and everything that's housing something that firing back, and retreat for conventional hardware to finish the job. We're still missing part of the energy equation, though, and that's the sort of weaponry that would maximize a mech's utility: Directed energy and railguns. It's got better lines of sight than a tank. These normally long-range weapons can now be used up close and personal. It would be an absolute shame to give them up because of energy limitations. Something like the A-10's party piece burns through ammunition too quickly. It's nice to have, but it's not choice number one. If you have room, sure, but you're more than likely looking at something smaller, to give it options. A line of sight weapon, though, that hits like a bomb, paired with another line of sight weapon that can punch clean holes and start fires, is a good mech starter kit. Fill it out with conventional weapons, and it just might survive long enough to do it's job. Something needs to be done about those drones, though. For now, anything they drop can be resisted by a machine with that much money behind it. That won't always be the case. The main thing to remember is that such a machine needs to be able to leverage the absolute latest in weaponry. Some older gear works, as well, such as grenade launchers and an array of M2s, but that's not enough. It needs to hit like a hammer from five blocks away, through five buildings, if required. What we're looking at, therefore, is an intermediate weapons platform. Soften the area with fast air power, collapse obvious remaining resistance with the mech, bring in helicopters, and then roll in traditional armor. The question you need to ask: Is that step useful enough to revise every engagement plan we have, and pour resources into creating and transporting these things? The below picture is an example of a large mech from the Battletech universe. I just wanted an illustration of something heavily armed. There are many, in that universe, that would be rather practical for these purposes. This one wouldn't be maneuverable enough to justify it's legs. Whatever you build, it's got to be at least somewhat quick. I just didn't feel like pouring through countless images.

• 
  Dean Federico (@TehParalyzer) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Kyberguy10040 @CrispyFrise Yeah everyone wanted Aku Aku to be a side kick not a back bling so it would follow crash, but they made Spyro the side kick instead since Spyro can't be a skin on the battlefield

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 43 minutes ago

  become the church’s digestive system. Ephesians 4:29 says, “Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth.” No corrupt communication. That includes religiously seasoned slander. A tongue under the Spirit does not serve as the devil’s delivery truck. Chapter Six: Protect Doctrine And The Flock From Divisive Men There are times when conflict is not merely a misunderstanding, personal offence, or weakness. Sometimes a person becomes divisive, heretical, disorderly, or dangerous to the church. Titus 3:10 says, “A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject.” That is Bible. It does not say debate him forever, platform him for balance, let him teach a class, or allow him to keep poisoning weak saints because you are afraid of seeming unkind. First and second admonition, then reject. The Church is not called to be a petting zoo for wolves. Mercy to wolves becomes cruelty to sheep. Romans 16:17 says to “mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.” Notice the conflict category: divisions and offences contrary to doctrine. Some people cause division by standing for doctrine, but Romans 16 is not condemning them. It is condemning those whose conduct and teaching are contrary to doctrine. A faithful man who identifies a poisoner is not the troublemaker because the poisoner dislikes being marked. The burglar is not the victim because the homeowner turned on the light. Marking is not gossip when it is done biblically to protect the flock. Avoiding is not bitterness when God commands it. This is where soft churches die. They tolerate doctrinal infection until the infection becomes the culture. They think patience means allowing error unlimited room. But Paul warned that evil communications corrupt good manners and that leaven leavens the lump. Hymenaeus and Philetus overthrew the faith of some. Alexander the coppersmith did Paul much evil. Diotrephes loved preeminence. Jezebel in Thyatira taught and seduced Christ’s servants. The Lord Himself rebuked churches for tolerating what they should have judged. A church must know how to restore the repentant and reject the poisonous. If it cannot do both, it will either become a battlefield of cruelty or a nursery for corruption. Chapter Seven: Pursue Restoration, But Do Not Fake Reconciliation The Bible’s goal in most conflict is restoration, not permanent alienation. Galatians 6:1 says to restore the overtaken brother. Ephesians 4:32 says, “be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.” Colossians 3:13 says, “forbearing one another, and forgiving one another.” A church that cannot forgive repentant sinners has forgotten how much Christ forgave. The gospel we preach should shape how we handle fallen brethren who come clean. If a man confesses, forsakes, submits to truth, and seeks restoration, the church should not keep him forever under a cloud of suspicion merely because some saints enjoy moral superiority as a hobby. But restoration is not the same as pretending nothing happened. Forgiveness may be immediate before God, but trust is rebuilt over time. A man who abused authority may be forgiven and still not qualified to lead. A person who damaged others may be loved and still need boundaries. A fallen saint may be restored to fellowship before being restored to responsibility. Some sins have consequences. David was forgiven, but consequences remained. Mark failed and later became profitable, but there was still a real season of division and testing. The church must neither bury repentant people alive nor rush them back into places of trust without fruit. Grace is not stupidity. Mercy is not blindness. Restoration has order.

• 
  MrMcGugan (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 44 minutes ago

  @1godimak @BFBulletin Why would the fps of last year worry about gunplay? 35 million people who bought Bf6 and are NOT playing it just love wondering why theyre shots are ghosting Bullet sponge Battlefield is NOT working for anyone Its hard to believe that this game is being run by a 30 yo company

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 45 minutes ago

  Shotguns are still broken as ****. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  Kiko (@yungkikori) reported 46 minutes ago

  Everybody booing OP but I know exactly what she means 😭 The problem is she’s never fought in any of the movies, & now all of a sudden she’s on the battlefield. It would take 20 seconds for her to say “This is a hard fight, and I want to be by your side while you fight it” 😭

• 
  kirito _4kirigaya (@K4kirigaya) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Either cuz net code wasn't on your side or you get killed by one super bullet or get 3 tapped by a strong gun. Fix the TTK and net code issues. The limb multipliers have done nothing but punish us even more.

• 
  Jeremy the therapist (@psychfox) reported 49 minutes ago

  “Identity diffusion is represented by a poorly integrated concept of the self and of significant others.” - Kernberg, 1984 This is the heart of borderline personality organization: not simply mood swings, but unstable self-other representation. Under threat, the self cannot mentalize (understand emotional/cognitive/behavioral causality) itself or others. One minute: “I’m safe with you.” Next minute: “You are dangerous, I am humiliated.” Identity diffusion in action: the self fractures, turning the other person into a source of fear, and the relationship consequently becomes a battlefield of unstable meanings and self-states. Kernberg saw this clearly; the problem is a self-system that loses integration when attachment is activated and vulnerability ensues.

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 49 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm - no fix for black screen bug - no bullet dispersion fixes - no audio changes - no jet loadouts 5 months later - no bullet registration fixes - no dsync fixes - Asian players in US/Eu servers abusing lag comp I’m posting till **** changes… Your ******* morons

• 
  The World in Order (@jhrTravel) reported 52 minutes ago

  Israel’s relationship with the United States creates a difficult question: when America takes positions on health, food regulation, environmental policy, or other issues that later become controversial, how much freedom does Israel really have to challenge those positions? If Israel believes it has a special responsibility to lead on questions of morality, health, and protecting human life, then following another country’s policies when serious questions arise can come at a tremendous cost. Israel already faces legitimate security threats from Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and others. It should not unnecessarily add another battlefield: global public trust. The danger is that when governments fail to challenge questionable policies, the public can eventually judge the entire system rather than the specific officials responsible. That is why Israel should have the independence and courage to investigate questionable policies—including food additives, environmental exposures, and public-health decisions—and follow the evidence wherever it leads. Criticizing a government is not criticizing an entire people. Accountability should apply to governments, institutions, and corporations—regardless of who they are.

• 
  Spirit Of Attlee (@SpiritOfAttlee) reported 56 minutes ago

  They don’t hate the noise. They hate who is making it and on whose former street. Notting Hill was Windrush ground. Rachman slums. Teddy Boys. “Keep Britain White.” Kelso Cochrane stabbed to death in 1959 for the crime of walking home Black in west London. Carnival was the reply. Claudia Jones... Trinidadian, communist, thrown out of America put Caribbean culture on a London stage because the streets had already been turned into a battlefield. The steel pan is not a tourism product. It is a receipt. Those streets are banker Notting Hill now. Boarded Georgian houses. Estate agent postcards. The same mouths that call two days of Carnival a riot call a Coronation a tradition. Charles’s parade cost the taxpayer £72 million. Carnival’s policing bill is about £15 million and the event puts close to £400 million through the city. Guess which one they want ticketed, fenced, and moved to Hyde Park. Farage says park it with knife arches. Susan Hall wants it capped and owned by City Hall. Rupert Lowe asks how the papers would treat 169 arrests at an England match. Here’s the question they never answer... if knives and cost were the issue, they’d be outside every football ground in the country. They are not. So it isn’t. They discovered “public order” the weekend the descendants of the colonised take a road the asset class already bought. Two days a year the street belongs to the people invited here to rebuild a country that then spent sixty years trying to price them out of it. That is the emergency. Cancel the hedge funds. Keep the pans.

• 
  Rick B. White (@RickBeeWhite) reported 58 minutes ago

  @MarioNawfal 🚨🇯🇴🇮🇷 EVEN A PEACEFUL PLACE CANNOT GIVE PEACE TO SOMEONE DETERMINED TO KEEP FIGHTING. Reports tonight say interceptions are underway over Jordan, with Iranian missiles allegedly targeting military facilities in the south of the country. The specific targets are still being verified, but one thing is not new: Jordan has already intercepted Iranian missiles entering its airspace multiple times during this conflict. And this raises a much bigger question: CAN YOU GIVE PEACE TO SOMEONE WHO REFUSES TO LIVE IN PEACE? Imagine creating the most peaceful country on Earth. No wars. No territorial disputes. No hatred. No historical grudges. No reason to fight. Now place inside it someone who carries conflict everywhere they go. How long before even that peaceful place becomes another battlefield? PEACE IS NOT ONLY A PLACE. It is also a decision. A mentality. A willingness to stop. Because someone determined to fight will eventually find an enemy. Someone determined to retaliate will eventually find a justification. Someone addicted to conflict could be placed on a hypothetical PLANET OF PEACE… and eventually ask: “WHO ARE WE FIGHTING?” That may be one of humanity’s greatest problems. We keep searching for peaceful borders. Peaceful treaties. Peaceful governments. Peaceful agreements. But what happens when PEACE DOESN’T EXIST INSIDE THE PEOPLE MAKING THEM? Then another missile flies. Another interception begins. Another country gets pulled into somebody else’s war. And another generation inherits the consequences. 📖 “If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.” — Romans 12:18 (KJV) YOU COULD BUILD A PLANET CALLED PEACE. But if its inhabitants are unwilling to stop fighting… EVEN THERE, PEACE WOULD NOT LAST.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 58 minutes ago

  Galatians 4:16 expresses the shock every faithful servant eventually experiences: “Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?” Paul had once been received by the Galatians with extraordinary affection. He reminded them that they would have plucked out their own eyes and given them to him. But false teachers entered, corrupted their doctrine, and altered their attitude toward the apostle who had brought them the gospel. Paul had not become their enemy. He had not stopped loving them. He had not exchanged the gospel for some personal agenda. Yet because he told them the truth, they began treating him like an adversary. That is the insanity of deception: it persuades people that the man trying to keep them out of the ditch is dangerous while the man removing the warning signs is compassionate. The doctor who identifies the cancer becomes the enemy, while the quack selling flavored water is praised for his bedside manner. This becomes especially painful when the rejection comes from relatives, longtime friends, fellow church members, or people we have personally helped. Opposition from strangers may bruise the skin, but betrayal from familiar hands reaches the bone. The Lord warned in Matthew 10:36, “And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.” He was not commanding family division; He was warning that allegiance to Him would sometimes reveal it. When one family member begins taking God seriously, the others may interpret his changed standards as a judgment upon them. Old friends may feel condemned because the Christian no longer participates in the same sins. Coworkers may call him self-righteous because he refuses to laugh at the same filth. Even religious people may resent him because he believes the Bible too plainly and refuses to dip every doctrine in syrup before serving it. At that point the Christian is tempted to weaken his testimony in order to restore the old comfort. But peace purchased by disobedience is only surrender wearing a smile. Chapter Four: The Devil’s Counterattack After a Victory I learned early in ministry that spiritual victories are frequently followed by personal attacks. During the years when I worked in youth ministry, I remember leading someone to the Lord and rejoicing that a soul had trusted Jesus Christ. Yet it often seemed that immediately afterward the devil came from every direction. Trouble would arise, discouragement would settle in, people would misunderstand something, or circumstances would become so difficult that I was tempted to think, “Was it worth it?” That is one of the enemy’s most calculated attacks. He cannot unsave the soul that has trusted Christ, so he attacks the servant who delivered the message. He wants the soul-winner to associate obedience with pain. He wants every future opportunity to carry the memory of the last counterattack. If he can make a Christian regret being useful, he may not be able to steal that Christian’s salvation, but he can frighten him away from the battlefield.