Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (33%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bitche	Game Crash	17 hours ago
Paris	Game Crash	3 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	3 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	3 days ago
Paris	Online Play	3 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	3 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Lincoln Parker (@LincolnParker5) reported 3 minutes ago

  If you are not working with the Ukrainian Armed Forces and @BRAVE1ua to battlefiled-validate your technology on the ground, you are missing the most important feedback loop available Many well-funded startups entered Ukraine, failed, and went home. I understand that. Ukraine is hard. But retreating is the wrong call The ones who stayed, iterated, and rebuilt on actual battlefield feedback are the ones writing the next chapter of warfare funding The ones who left are polishing slide decks

• 
  W (@JAYT1) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm You guys the devs should fix the server side rewind penalty for low ping players. High ping players is ruining the experience for everyone that had a great connection... My gameplay are great until someone 60+ ping enters the match.

• 
  ARSHAM (@dj_arsham) reported 6 minutes ago

  The speed here is non-negotiable On-chain performance on Solana is a battlefield, and FatCat operates with surgical precision. Swaps settled consistently in 3-5 seconds. What I truly appreciated was the brutal fee transparency, 0.1% platform fee + network fees clearly broken down. No fluff, no "hidden tax" surprises, just pure data 🧵 2

• 
  Boyishdude (@DisposedZero) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AzraelSch @FreeTalkLive Anyway, the reason copyright is an issue here is for the reasons I already mentioned. The real fans can't come in and make a proper Battlefield game (that's named as such) that does justice to what the series is at its core because that's illegal;-

• 
  BUZZ3R (@BUZZ3RX) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Guys FIX THE DAMN CRASH ERROR 0XC0000005

• 
  🇺🇸 DigitalWarrior on BlueSky (@DigitalWarfare1) reported 8 minutes ago

  @SweetFnLucifer I say Letitia James but would no problem with smith. I would take Elias off the voter disenfranchisement battlefield tho

• 
  Bo (@couleestomper) reported 10 minutes ago

  @gunpolicy The next major battlefield will be with shall issue regimes. Requiring permits for enumerated rights is facially unconstitutional. And that is precisely the next step after these authoritarians lose their ability to regulate rifles. All shall issue schemes need to be squashed.

• 
  The Rocket Media (@TheRocketMediaX) reported 13 minutes ago

  Imagine a drone without GPS inside a battlefield ! In modern warfare, GPS jamming instantly blinds a drone mid-mission. The moment that happens, the drone loses its sense of direction completely and can crash within seconds. This is the problem this startup is trying to solve, so that India's drones can accomplish their mission even without a GPS in hostile environments.

• 
  boob inspector (@bygonezbygonz) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your ******* SBMM I’m ******* spawning in to games with ******* players with no ******* thumbs and only captured 1 flag, 5 ******* games in a row and I dropped cod to play BF WTF is this fix this ****, ******* ridiculous I can’t even move out of spawn

• 
  big_markyt (@big_markyt) reported 18 minutes ago

  @tboe012 @EA_DICE I've deleted it twice since release, considering doing it a third time and leaving it alone as it's not enjoyable. I agree on gunplay too, some of the lads I played with yesterday were struggling with lag issues, too, going as high as 400 ping

• 
  e (@cloudz9187) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Battlefield can you guys please fix your ****** servers. I’m pissed I went against my better judgement and redownloaded this 💩.The fact that battlefield 1 has better servers then 6 is ******* sad. Fix your ****

• 
  Don Elliott (@RealDonElliott) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield lol can't shoot down even 1 chopper. Not one. Your game is the most broken game out there

• 
  TaDe (@TadejDem) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield If it took you idiots so long to fix this then we can only imagine how long it will take to fix the major issues if you ever manage to get them fixed.

• 
  The Lou (@stl_william) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Battlefield yall need to fix your broke *** game! All these glitches after an update is stupid af

• 
  Jared Randall (@whisperontruth) reported 25 minutes ago

  the Pentagon is quietly shifting AI spending from research labs to the actual battlefield edge. $PLTR has been in this lane for years but the real money now is in whoever wins the contracts to run inference at the tactical level. that's a different and much harder problem.

• 
  Marc Clay (@omniclay2) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the console matchmaking for the whole game! This is the only game that separates console players, forcing us to play with computer players or bots.

• 
  Mawnsino 🐾 (@oghenetefe) reported 37 minutes ago

  🚨 Tobirama Wasn’t Faster Than Juubito… He Was Smarter 👀 A lot of people look at this scene and instantly say: “Tobirama speed > Ten Tails Jinchūriki Obito” But I think people miss what actually happened here 😭 Let’s slow down and look at the situation. Juubito at this point wasn’t some normal opponent. This was Obito after becoming the Ten Tails Jinchūriki. The same Obito who was overwhelming multiple Kage-level fighters, Hashirama, Tobirama, Naruto, Sasuke and practically the entire battlefield. His raw speed and power were ridiculous. So the question becomes: If Juubito was that broken, how did Tobirama suddenly appear and attach explosive tags to him? Because Tobirama did NOT beat him with raw movement speed. He beat him with mechanics and battle IQ. People forget Tobirama is literally the creator of Flying Raijin. Minato perfected it, but Tobirama built it. And Flying Raijin isn’t normal movement speed. That’s the important part. Flying Raijin is instantaneous space-time transportation. There’s no “travel time.” No acceleration. No crossing distance. No running from Point A to Point B. You’re simply THERE. That means Tobirama wasn’t physically outrunning Juubito. He bypassed movement entirely. Now here is the really interesting part. People also forget what Tobirama was doing during that fight. The man wasn’t charging in blindly. He was constantly observing. Constantly reading. Constantly analyzing. Tobirama’s entire fighting style was built around identifying tiny openings. Even Madara acknowledged his intelligence during the war. So what likely happened wasn’t: “Tobirama blitzed Juubito.” What happened was: Tobirama found a small opening in Obito’s movements, instantly teleported through Flying Raijin and placed the explosive tags before Obito could properly react. Huge difference. People also underestimate something else: Juubito himself wasn’t perfectly stable at that stage. Obito was still struggling with the Ten Tails’ power and control. He wasn’t fighting like a calm, experienced Madara. There was internal conflict happening. Mental instability. Power fluctuations. All of that matters. Because combat isn’t just: “Who has bigger power level?” Naruto fights constantly show that timing, strategy and intelligence can create moments where weaker fighters land hits on stronger opponents. Shikamaru built his entire career on that 😭 And honestly that’s what makes Tobirama dangerous. Not because he screams louder. Not because he throws bigger attacks. But because the moment you think: “There’s no way this guy can touch me…” You’ve probably already got a Flying Raijin mark somewhere on your body 💀 Follow for more insights on characters, psychology, storytelling, and the moments we can’t stop talking about.

• 
  Eddie McNade (@EddieMcNade) reported 37 minutes ago

  Why do i have to relaunch BF6 like 3 Times before i get a Server thats not 100+ Ping? Top Scores full of 200 Ping players. Half of the Lobby Console Players.... Your Matchmaking sucks. Your Lag Com sucks. The Balance Sucks. Yes the Gunplay is better now. And its way more fun. But actually getting on a Server is pain! Why is it taking you ages to give access to persistent Servers... they ARE in the game! Stop gatekeeping stuff like this for future Roadmaps! I just want to pick a Server and play for hours! Why is this not fixed. DICE PLEASE! Give us Mouse Only Persitent Servers for people that actually want to compete against other Mouseplayers too! Or may i remind you that you promised me a great PORTAL mode, wich actually still does not even have all maps and modes in it! I really love the Patch, but its such a hard sell at this point! I love Battlefield, but its just so frustrating what you did to this great game!

• 
  MusicoBf (@MusicoBF) reported 38 minutes ago

  @FocusBF @EA_DICE You keep trying to reinvent the system with new matchmaking ideas. Just remove matchmaking altogether, and most of these problems disappear. It's really that simple. GOOD IDEA FOCUS"

• 
  Thatoneaccount (@Retradworld) reported 38 minutes ago

  I warned GenZ and Alpha that they were a problem that would be solved by a draft to an overseas battlefield. Revolt in America or Die in a Foreign land for juice @Calvin

• 
  Digital Areopagus Radio (@AreopagusRadio) reported 44 minutes ago

  @CDamianWrites You literally went to a ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST, someone who took a vow and received the Sacrament of Holy Order, to figure out spiritual things in relation to your sins and then you don't like the answer! Look - self proclaimed enemies of God only have so much time before they have to account for their words and deeds. You should listen to Father here and what he is trying to tell you, rather than just being presumptuous and dismissive in your response when he fails to affirm your mortal sins. In our religion, we believe that this life is the battlefield for spiritual warfare and we come to know things spiritual by way of things in matter through a body. When men go into other men, and with men attempt to marry other men as opposed to the natural and divine law of God so as to reject children and what God ordained, the spirit suffers for it. Want to be returned to a sound mind? Stop doing the evil things in the world and change. Want to be affirmed by the error and future condemned heresy of James Martinism? Then follow @JamesMartinSJ The fallen angels followed satan into hell too!

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 46 minutes ago

  The Genealogy That Put the Devil on Notice Key Passage: Matthew 1:1 — “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” Introduction Matthew does not begin his Gospel the way a modern religious professor would begin it. He does not begin with a theory, a debate over sources, a committee translation note, a dead German’s opinion, or a paragraph apologizing for believing the Bible. He begins with a record. He begins with a name. He begins with a title. He begins with paperwork. “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” That is not decoration. That is not filler. That is not a dry list for people who like ancient ancestry. That is the Holy Ghost walking into the courtroom of history, slamming the documents on the table, and saying, “Here He is. Here is the King. Here is the promised seed. Here is the legal heir. Here is the One the devil has been trying to stop since Genesis 3:15.” Before Matthew gives you a sermon, a miracle, a parable, a healing, a rebuke, or a resurrection scene, he gives you the line of the King. Why? Because authority matters. A throne requires a right. A covenant requires a seed. A promise requires fulfilment. A kingdom requires a King with credentials. The devil knew enough Bible to know a seed was coming. He knew God had said in Genesis 3:15, “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed.” From that moment forward, history became a battlefield over a bloodline. Cain rises against Abel. Pharaoh kills Hebrew male children. Athaliah tries to destroy the seed royal. Haman wants the Jews exterminated. Herod slaughters babies in Bethlehem. Satan has never been confused about the importance of the line. He may have better dispensational sense than half the seminaries in America. He knew there was a promised seed, a promised nation, a promised tribe, a promised house, a promised throne, and a promised King. So when Matthew opens with “Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham,” he is not giving us a polite Jewish introduction. He is giving the devil formal notice that all his efforts failed. The seed came. The King arrived. The promises survived. The throne has an heir. Hell could not corrupt the line, erase the covenant, cancel the prophecy, or stop the virgin birth. That is why this opening verse is so powerful. Modern scholarship wants to pick at Matthew like a buzzard picking bones in a ditch. They want to argue about literary arrangement, theological shaping, source criticism, redaction, and all the other fancy names men invent when they do not want to bow their knee to the Book. But the real issue in Matthew 1:1 is not whether some professor likes the structure. The issue is authority. Jesus Christ has the right to rule because God promised Abraham a seed and David a throne. He is not an intruder, not a usurper, not a religious philosopher, not a Jewish accident, not a moral reformer, and not a vague spiritual symbol. He is “the son of David” and “the son of Abraham.” That puts Him in direct connection with the land promise, the nation promise, the blessing promise, the throne promise, and the kingdom promise. Matthew opens like a legal document because heaven is presenting the rightful King to Israel, and before the first chapter is finished, the Holy Ghost has already put Satan, Rome, Herod, the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the scribes, and every Christ-rejecting system on notice. Chapter One: The First Verse Is a Royal Summons Matthew 1:1 says, “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” The first word after the phrase “the book of the generation” is not Moses, not Adam, not Israel, not Joseph, and not Mary. It is “Jesus Christ.” That is the center. That is the subject. That is the Person every name in the list is serving. Men read genealogies backward, looking for famous ancestors. God writes this genealogy forward, aiming

• 
  Zolyode (@R_eh_mika) reported 46 minutes ago

  @yuhMaxine @Battlefield Do you know how SBMM work, and why it does that ? because I can't play neither modern COD or Battlefield and its going to make me crazy If I can't find a solution to that problem...

• 
  TygerSparky (@tygersparky) reported 47 minutes ago

  My take on the recent controversy concerning the Sony Playstation decision to no longer produce discs for their systems starting in 2028. Of course everyone is allowed to hold any opinion they want to on this move. I realize that your current opinion would likely be shaped based on your current buying preferences. But I would say that anyone defending this move or who is complicit and okay with Sony doing this is simply another example of someone focusing on the environment one step in front of them instead of actually looking to the future and seeing the inevitable outcome of this decision. I'll be up front, I have been buying things digitally for years. The last disc-based game I bought was The Witcher 3 on the Xbox One. But for me, that is because I don't look as fondly at modern games as I do games from my childhood. Given that, I still appreciate the option of having a disc copy of the game. If there was a game I absolutely fell in love with today, I would want to own a physical disc version of it. I have about 150 Xbox 360 discs and 125 PS2 discs, not to mention PS1 and Nintendo carts/discs in my current collection. For those like Asmongold and others who actually see no problem with this change, I would point to two past games in the current market to see exactly why having a physical option is absolutely superior. First: Battlefield Bad Company. This game was originally released on the PS3/Xbox 360 less than 20 years ago. However, EA delisted this game from digital storefronts in 2023, just 15 years after release. If you don't have an account that currently owns the game, you can't (legally) play a digital copy of this game. However, you can still go out and find a disc copy of the game and enjoy the awesomeness of that single-player story. Second: GTA San Andreas. If you have an original Xbox disc of GTA:SA from 2005, you can pop it in an Xbox or even an Xbox 360 and actually play the original game, complete with the original soundtrack of the game. If you put that same disc in an Xbox One or Series console, you will instead be forced to play the 2014 remaster mobile port which has updates to the game and the soundtrack. Some people consider this remaster to be an inferior version of the game because of these updates and changes. But thankfully, the original game is preserved on the disc and is still playable on original hardware. Another argument that I have heard is that most games come out with Day One patches. However, having a patch on release day doesn't mean that there isn't a playable version of the game on the disc already. It might have some unintended bugs, but if there is a playable form on the game on the disc, that is obviously infinitely better than not having any form of it available except in digital format where you are, again, at the mercy of the corpo storefronts if they allow you to download a copy of the game (even if you paid for it). And even then, it is still a modified version of the original game. There is absolutely no good argument from a consumer's perspective for a company to stop physical disc production. The benefit is completely and totally for the corporation. They save money, DO NOT pass that savings on to the consumer, and get an even tighter grip of maintaining full rights over the distribution and access of their games and content. They can take away that access at any time and offer their customers no compensation. Sony, and any other company who decides to go this route, absolutely deserves any backlash and revenue drop they get from these decisions. And I hope that their bottom line actually feels the pain of going this route. If I wanted to be discless and have zero options, I would move to PC. At least then I have access to the operating and file systems and can actually backup whatever version of a game I am playing for preservation. Not to mention, I have control over the hardware in it and can get the exact look and play of a game that I want. Convenience and nostalgia are why I continued to play my games on my Xbox. But with these systems becoming even more like just a pre-built PC in a box, they are doing little to nothing to actually give me a reason to continue to invest in their platform. Taking away the physical option is one more nail in their coffin. And don't get me started on this push for cloud-based game streaming. I'm 100% out on that. And a happy July 4th to everyone in the U.S.

• 
  Tim Koffer (@KofferTim) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Every fkn game is a blow fix this pile of dog ****. How the fk is fun to get blown out multiple games in a row? Its fkn pathetic

• 
  UniqueSkillez (@UniqueSkillez) reported 50 minutes ago

  @CynderFlamez Eomm is the problem within Battlefield 6. Battlefield 2042 looks and plays better to me.

• 
  𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐓 (@OfBattlefront) reported 50 minutes ago

  ㅤ Raiden went farther than anyone else, he searched every place Shinei would normally go. when he found nothing, he started over and He crossed the battlefield once. Then again. And again. Every ruined street, every collapsed trench, every broken road. He retraced them all, refusing to believe he'd overlooked something. ㅤ

• 
  RP Mythos (@SherryGT17Jan25) reported 51 minutes ago

  @a4lasade She just wants to know. And you’re free to tell her or not. Its good that she is open it up with you instead of gossiping about it with your husband. If its a problem between you two keep it between you two. No need to deploy her son into the battlefield it will just signal wars

• 
  Constance (@Constan63413921) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Jerusalem_Post Diplomacy with the Islamic Republic was built on a false premise: that the regime had a solvable dispute with the West. It does not. Its hostility is not transactional; it is ideological, constitutional, and central to its identity. Negotiations could manage tempo, delay escalation, exchange prisoners, or create temporary pauses, but they could never resolve the underlying conflict because the regime’s survival narrative depends on anti-Americanism, anti-Israelism, revolutionary expansion, and permanent confrontation. So the real question is not: “When does diplomacy stop being a path to resolution?” The real question is: “Why did Washington keep pretending diplomacy with Tehran was designed to resolve a conflict that the regime itself needs in order to survive?” That is the strategic error. Diplomacy became a mechanism for stabilizing the Islamic Republic, not changing its behavior. It gave Tehran time, legitimacy, cash flow, and breathing room while allowing Western governments to avoid the harder conclusion: this is not a normal state seeking a bargain. It is a revolutionary regime using talks as a battlefield. The regime did not enter diplomacy to end the conflict. It entered diplomacy to manage pressure, divide its enemies, buy time, and survive.

• 
  💎 Jewels 💎 (@JewelsVEVO) reported 59 minutes ago

  Top 3 Battlefield of all time for me Such a shame EA shut the servers down like a month or so ago