Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (37%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (12%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Americana	Glitches	4 days ago
Rennes	Game Crash	5 days ago
Nantes	Glitches	9 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	10 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	11 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	12 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  **** Ferguson (@DrTurdFerguson_) reported 3 minutes ago

  @powers_Gar @ForcesNews 6.8* Not to mention there are serious QC issues. I think the 6.8 has a place on the battlefield but not as a standard issue rifle. And the issues need to be fixed. Apparently the handguard is so poor that any lights, PEQ units do not hold zero and the barrel harmonics are trash

• 
  FLEM (@tato2429) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Why did you make it so hard to kill tanks/vics? Mines and RPGs do **** all now. Also are we ever going to fix matchmaking so we’re not so we’re not losing full lobbies after every round? Don’t get why we can’t have map rotations.

• 
  MikeyMadCrypto (@MikeyMadGems) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the oce servers why does it take so long for solos

• 
  AcklesTV (@AcklesTTV) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Please just fix RedSec lol.

• 
  SlimKop (@KopSlim) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your game after update it's implayable ping goes up and doN to whooping 500ms for no reason i have good internet

• 
  SrHayami (@SrHayami) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Let's fix the reconnaissance drone; it can't destroy a device from 8 meters away—you practically have to fly it right over the device. It makes maps like Bazaar cluttered with beacons everywhere.

• 
  HEX Famous (@Hex_Famous) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix ur blinding light glitch u sorry pieces of ****

• 
  burstangels_thedoomslayer (@AUTBurstangels) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm server ping is suck fix pls

• 
  ムハンマド (@m_iiz1) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Can you fix middle east servers its lagging also high ping i play on 87 sometimes on 101 or 120

• 
  eA sxns1ble (@sxns1ble) reported 24 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Another issue that seems to be in the majority of my lobbies (eu) is force filling lobbies with AI instead of real players, it seems they would rather you play a lobby of AI than have fun against real players, this is my opinion so far, I will keep playing and update youse

• 
  ムハンマド (@m_iiz1) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm We need servers in middle east We have ping problem 87 - 90 sometimes more than 120

• 
  shinyufoguy2222 (@ollobrains) reported 26 minutes ago

  Jeremy Corbell threatens to release hundreds of UFO files if the next batch of government files don’t address reverse engineering and biologics. That is viral, but it accidentally weakens Corbell. “Threatens” makes him sound reckless, emotional, or legally exposed. Better: Jeremy Corbell warns that independent UAP archives may be released if the next government file drop continues to avoid the core allegations around reverse engineering, non-human craft, and biologics. Or: Corbell is using his archive as leverage against curated disclosure. Or best: Corbell is drawing a line: if the government keeps releasing peripheral UAP files while avoiding the Grusch core, independent evidence may move into the public record. That is sharper and more serious. 2. The core frame: “curated disclosure vs adversarial disclosure” This is the missing big idea. There are two kinds of disclosure: Curated disclosure: The government releases selected videos, historical files, low-risk documents, and unresolved cases under its own timetable. Adversarial disclosure: Journalists, whistleblowers, lawmakers, and outside custodians force the release of records the government did not choose to prioritize. Suggested line: The UAP fight is no longer simply “will the government release files?” It is who controls the disclosure sequence. That is the whole story. 3. Best hook options Use one of these: Corbell just put the government’s UAP disclosure process on notice. The next UAP file drop may decide whether disclosure stays curated — or becomes adversarial. Corbell is saying the quiet part out loud: videos are not enough if reverse engineering and biologics remain untouched. The government is releasing UAP files. Corbell is asking why the files avoid the hardest claims. This is no longer about more UFO clips. It is about whether the official archive will address the Grusch core. My favorite: The next UAP release is not being judged by volume. It is being judged by whether it touches the forbidden categories. 4. Define “the forbidden categories” Your post should make clear what Corbell is demanding. Not just “more UFO files.” The forbidden categories are: crash retrieval reverse engineering non-human craft biologics contractor custody program names witness lists lab records chain of custody SAP/CAP access records budget trails classification guides Suggested line: The real test is not whether the next drop contains more lights in the sky. The test is whether it addresses the categories government releases usually avoid: recovered material, reverse-engineering records, biological evidence, program ownership, contractor custody, and witnesses with direct knowledge. That is much stronger. 5. Add the “videos are not disclosure” line This is the best sentence to add: Videos are not disclosure if the government withholds the metadata, chain of custody, program records, witness testimony, and funding trail. Or shorter: A clip is not disclosure. A custody trail is disclosure. This matters because the PURSUE portal itself frames many records as unresolved due to insufficient data, which means the files may be interesting without resolving the deeper claims. 6. Be precise about Grusch Your draft says: David Grusch went up in front of Congress… and he told the truth. Stronger and safer: David Grusch testified under oath that he was informed, through official duties, of a multi-decade UAP crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program to which he was denied access. That is the official-record version. The House transcript records Grusch saying he was informed of a “multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program” and denied access when he requested additional read-ons. 7. Do not overstate “pilots” The quote says: “there were pilots, biologics…” Be careful here. In the hearing, Representative Mace asked whether the U.S. had “the bodies of the pilots who piloted this craft.” Grusch answered that “biologics came with some of these recoveries,” and when asked human or non-human, he said “nonhuman,” based on the assessment of people with direct knowledge. Better wording: Grusch did not publicly prove “pilots.” He testified that biologics came with some alleged recoveries and that people with direct knowledge assessed them as non-human. That is still explosive, but much more defensible. 8. Add the caveat that makes the post credible Use this: Grusch’s claims remain publicly unproven. AARO disputes the core reverse-engineering and extraterrestrial-technology narrative. That is exactly why the next release matters. AARO’s 2024 historical report says it found no empirical evidence that the U.S. government or private companies have been reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology, and it says AARO found no evidence that any U.S. company possessed off-world technology. This does not weaken the post. It strengthens it because it sets up the contradiction: AARO says no empirical evidence. Grusch says names, locations, witnesses, and protected disclosures exist. Corbell says outside file systems exist. The next logical step is evidence, not more vibes. 9. The best “contradiction” framing Use this: The public record now has two incompatible stories:AARO’s story: no empirical evidence of extraterrestrial reverse-engineering programs. Grusch’s story: officials with direct knowledge described crash retrievals, reverse engineering, exact locations, and non-human biologics. Corbell’s pressure point: if the government avoids those categories, independent archives may force the issue. That is the strongest structure. 10. Add “Sleeping Dog” context carefully The phrase “they saw in Sleeping Dog the file systems” needs context. Public listings describe Sleeping Dog as a 2026 documentary centered on Jeremy Corbell’s UAP work, rare access, and the risks of exposing what “was never meant to be seen.” SYFY’s interview with the director says the film drew from Corbell’s personal archive of “hundreds of hours of footage.” But unless you have a verified transcript of this exact Corbell quote, phrase it as: In the clip, Corbell appears to be referencing file systems shown or discussed in Sleeping Dog. Do not write: Sleeping Dog proves he has hundreds of UFO files. Better: The documentary’s framing is that Corbell’s archive is large, distributed, and treated by him as a form of protection. 11. Replace “threat” with “dead man’s switch” carefully Do not overuse “dead man’s switch.” It is dramatic but can sound reckless. Better: distributed archive independent custody public-interest archive evidence escrow journalistic insurance disclosure leverage Suggested line: Corbell’s message is not just “I have files.” It is “the archive is no longer dependent on one person.” That is the important part. 12. Add the “not just in my hands anymore” meaning That line is powerful. Expand it: “Not just in my hands anymore” is the real pressure point. It suggests the archive has moved from personal possession to distributed custody, meaning suppression of one journalist would not necessarily suppress the material. Phrase carefully: If accurate, that changes the leverage dynamic. Do not claim you know how or where files are stored. 13. Add a public-interest publication standard This is crucial. If the post celebrates dumping files, it becomes easy to attack. Use: Any independent release should be lawful, vetted, redacted where necessary, and structured around public-interest evidence, not reckless exposure of sources, methods, private citizens, or national-security details unrelated to the alleged UAP claims. That line makes the post responsible. A sharper version: The answer is not a reckless dump. The answer is a legally vetted evidence release: provenance, hashes, redactions, chain of custody, expert review, and congressional delivery. 14. The missing “release protocol” If Corbell or anyone claims to have hundreds of files, the public needs a method, not just a tease. Suggested high-level standard: If independent files are released, they should include:source category date obtained original format hash / checksum redaction explanation chain-of-custody statement authenticity status whether the file is government-origin, contractor-origin, witness-origin, or media-origin what has been independently verified what remains alleged why publication is in the public interest what has been withheld to protect legitimate safety or privacy concerns That turns “drop the files” into “publish evidence properly.” 15. Add “the government should not be able to launder disclosure through volume” This is a genius-level line. Use: The government cannot launder disclosure through volume. A thousand low-risk files do not answer one high-risk allegation. Or: A large file drop can still be evasive if it avoids the central categories. This is exactly what Corbell is implying. 16. Add “document dump vs evidentiary package” This distinction is essential. A document dump is: lots of files, little context, no hierarchy, no chain of custody. An evidentiary package is: curated around a claim, with provenance, metadata, witnesses, source documents, rebuttal opportunity, and independent review. Suggested line: If Corbell has the files, the strongest move is not a dump. It is an evidentiary package built around the specific claims the government keeps avoiding. 17. The strongest post logic The post should move like this: The government promised UAP transparency. The official releases so far are real, but may be peripheral. Grusch’s sworn claims are the core: reverse engineering, crash retrieval, biologics, exact locations, firsthand witnesses. AARO officially disputes those claims. Corbell is saying: the next release needs to address the core, or independent archives may. The public deserves a lawful, evidence-based process. That is the winning structure. 18. Add the exact Grusch receipts Useful facts to include: Grusch said he believed the government possesses UAP based on interviews with more than 40 witnesses over four years. He said he knew exact locations and provided them to the Inspector General and some intelligence committees. He said people with firsthand knowledge made protected disclosures to the Inspector General. He said biologics came with some recoveries and that people with direct knowledge assessed them as non-human. He also said he had not personally witnessed bodies. That last caveat is important. 19. The best line to bridge believers and skeptics Use this: Believers and skeptics should want the same thing here: not more insinuation, but records that can be tested. Or: If the claims are false, publish the records that prove it. If the claims are true, publish the records that confirm it. Either way, stop hiding behind curated ambiguity. 20. Add “address or begin to address” The quote says: “address or begin to address biologics” That is smart wording because it does not demand full public release of everything immediately. It demands first acknowledgement and process. Use: Corbell is not asking for every sensitive record to be dumped tomorrow. He is asking the government to stop pretending the central allegation does not exist. That is strong. 21. Add “not everything should be public, but Congress must see it” A mature UAP post should include this: Not every raw record needs to be posted on the internet. But Congress, inspectors general, and cleared independent reviewers should be able to see the unredacted materials, witness names, classification guides, lab records, and chain-of-custody logs. That is a serious oversight position. 22. Add “classification cannot be a one-way mirror” Use this line: Classification cannot become a one-way mirror where agencies can see everything and Congress only sees what agencies choose to show. Excellent. 23. Add “the next drop should be judged by categories, not file count” Very useful: The next batch should be judged by whether it includes:reverse-engineering references crash-retrieval references biologics references material analysis records contractor involvement program names or euphemisms witness channels classification guides chain-of-custody records Inspector General correspondence budget or appropriations traces Suggested line: If the next release is 500 more ambiguous sightings and zero records on the Grusch categories, the public will rightly ask whether this is transparency or controlled exhaust. 24. The “controlled exhaust” phrase This is a great obscure concept. Controlled exhaust means the system releases enough material to look transparent while venting pressure away from the core. Use: The danger is controlled exhaust: release enough peripheral material to satisfy the headline, while keeping the actual disputed compartments untouched. That is very strong. 25. Add “metadata is the battlefield” For UFO/UAP files, the video itself is often less important than the surrounding data. Use: Metadata is the battlefield: date, platform, sensor, location, custody, classification authority, analyst notes, longer version, related reports, and who requested withholding. That makes the post much smarter. 26. Add “biologics require lab records” This is probably the strongest missing science point. Use: If biologics exist, there should be lab records. If craft exist, there should be custody records. If reverse engineering exists, there should be budgets, task orders, programs, and personnel. That is a killer sequence. More precise: “Non-human biologics” cannot remain an adjective. It requires tissue records, sample custody, DNA/protein/isotope analysis, contamination controls, lab chain of custody, and named custodians. 27. Add “reverse engineering requires infrastructure” Reverse engineering is not a magic phrase. It requires: facilities access lists contracts materials labs security logs test plans budgets compartment names engineering reports failed experiments storage records safety protocols program managers contractor deliverables Suggested line: A decades-long reverse-engineering program cannot exist as folklore. It either leaves an institutional footprint or it does not. That is one of the strongest lines. 28. Add “files are not enough without witnesses” Use: Files matter, but witnesses explain what the files mean. Or: A document with no witness is ambiguous. A witness with no document is vulnerable. The power is when both meet. Excellent. 29. Add the “publication should be staged by claim” Instead of “hundreds of files,” suggest: Release by claim category:reverse-engineering records biologics records crash-retrieval records contractor custody records witness protection / retaliation records disinformation or obfuscation records sensor/video provenance records This is more persuasive than a massive dump. 30. Add “Corbell’s leverage is credibility, so he must protect it” This is important. If he releases messy, unverifiable files, critics will focus on the weakest document. Suggested line: If Corbell releases files, the strongest release is not the biggest one. It is the cleanest one. Or: One airtight file is worth more than 300 ambiguous files. That is a very strong point. 31. Add the “weakest file problem” This is a media strategy insight. A mass dump lets critics pick the weakest file and use it to discredit the whole archive. Therefore: Release fewer, cleaner, better-documented files first. Suggested line: Do not let the weakest document become the headline. 32. Add “red-team before release” If an independent archive goes public, it should be challenged before publication. Use: Before publication, let skeptical experts attack the files: metadata analysts, image/video forensics specialists, archivists, former classification officials, aerospace engineers, biologists, materials scientists, and national-security lawyers. This is high-level and responsible. 33. Add “right of reply” A credible release should give named agencies/contractors an opportunity to respond. Use: A serious evidentiary release should give implicated agencies or contractors a chance to comment before publication. That is journalism 101 and makes the release harder to dismiss. 34. Add “do not ask for classified dumping” Important safety/legal point: The demand should not be “dump classified material recklessly.” The demand should be “use lawful channels, congressional oversight, declassification review, protected disclosures, and public-interest journalism to force the truth out without exposing unrelated sensitive sources or methods.” This keeps your post responsible. 35. Better version of your post Here is a much stronger rewrite: Jeremy Corbell just put the government’s UAP disclosure process on notice.His message is simple:If the next official file drop avoids the core allegations — reverse engineering, non-human craft, crash retrievals, and biologics — then independent UAP archives may begin forcing the issue.That matters because the government has promised transparency, but file count is not the same as disclosure.More videos of unresolved objects do not answer the Grusch core.Grusch testified under oath that he was informed of a multi-decade UAP crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program. He said he interviewed more than 40 witnesses, knew exact locations, and that people with firsthand knowledge made protected disclosures to the Inspector General.He also testified that biologics came with some alleged recoveries and that those biologics were assessed as non-human by people with direct knowledge still on the program.AARO disputes the core claim and says it has found no empirical evidence that the U.S. government or private companies have reverse-engineered extraterrestrial technology.Good.Then the next release should address the contradiction directly.If there are no reverse-engineering records, say so with specificity.If there are no biologics records, say so with specificity.If there are no crash-retrieval programs, publish the search terms, custodians, agencies, contractors, and classification guides reviewed.If the claims are false, prove it with records.If they are true, stop hiding the most important evidence behind curated disclosure.Videos make headlines.Chain of custody makes evidence. 36. More aggressive version Corbell is done playing the government’s disclosure game.The message is clear:If the next UAP file drop is another pile of peripheral videos, old records, ambiguous sightings, and sanitized fragments — while avoiding reverse engineering, crash retrievals, non-human craft, and biologics — then independent archives may start doing what the official process refuses to do.That is the real pressure point.The government cannot launder transparency through volume.A thousand low-risk files do not answer one high-risk allegation.Grusch testified under oath that the U.S. has been hiding a multi-decade crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program. He said he gave exact locations to inspectors general and intelligence committees. He said firsthand witnesses made protected disclosures. He said biologics came with some recoveries and were assessed as non-human.AARO says there is no empirical evidence.Fine.Then release the records that prove it.Release the classification guides.Release the search methodology.Release the contractor certifications.Release the chain-of-custody denials.Release the lab-record denials.Release the program-name denials.Stop releasing shadows while avoiding the body of the allegation. 37. More careful/legal-safe version Jeremy Corbell’s warning should be understood as pressure for real disclosure, not a call for reckless leaks.The government has now begun rolling UAP file releases through PURSUE, but the central question remains whether those releases will address the most consequential allegations: crash retrievals, reverse engineering, non-human craft, biologics, contractor custody, and protected whistleblower testimony.David Grusch testified under oath that he was informed of a multi-decade UAP crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program and that people with direct knowledge assessed biologics from some alleged recoveries as non-human.Those claims remain publicly unproven. AARO disputes them and says it has found no empirical evidence of extraterrestrial reverse-engineering programs.That contradiction is exactly why the next release matters.The public does not need a reckless document dump.The public needs a lawful, evidence-based process: records with provenance, chain of custody, redactions where genuinely necessary, independent review, congressional access, and direct answers to the Grusch categories.Disclosure is not file volume.Disclosure is accountability. 38. Short X version Corbell just put the UAP disclosure process on notice.If the next government file drop avoids reverse engineering, non-human craft, crash retrievals, and biologics, independent archives may start forcing the issue.That matters because “more files” does not equal disclosure.Grusch testified under oath about a multi-decade crash-retrieval/reverse-engineering program, exact locations, firsthand witnesses, protected disclosures, and biologics assessed as non-human.AARO says no empirical evidence.Good.Then address the contradiction directly.Videos make headlines.Chain of custody makes evidence. 39. Best thread structure Post 1 Jeremy Corbell just put the government’s UAP transparency process on notice.His point: if the next official file drop avoids reverse engineering, non-human craft, crash retrievals, and biologics, independent archives may force the issue. Post 2 That is the real test.Not file count.Not more ambiguous videos.Not more old historical fragments.The test is whether the release touches the Grusch core. Post 3 Grusch testified under oath that he was informed of a multi-decade UAP crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program.He said he interviewed 40+ witnesses, knew exact locations, and that people with firsthand knowledge made protected disclosures. Post 4 The biologics claim is the explosive part.Asked whether biologics came with some recoveries, Grusch said yes.Asked whether human or non-human, he said non-human, based on assessments from people with direct knowledge still on the program. Post 5 Critical caveat:Grusch did not publicly show craft, bodies, lab reports, or chain-of-custody records.AARO says it found no empirical evidence for extraterrestrial reverse-engineering programs.That contradiction is the story. Post 6 The next release should answer:Were reverse-engineering records searched?Were biologics records searched?Were contractors queried?Were classification guides reviewed?Were IG disclosures checked?Were exact locations investigated? Post 7 A serious release needs:metadata chain of custody witness context program names contractor records lab records funding trails classification guides public-interest redactions congressional access Post 8 The government cannot launder transparency through volume.A thousand peripheral files do not answer one central allegation.If the claims are false, prove it with records.If they are true, stop hiding the evidence. 40. Add a “what the next drop should include” section This is a high-value addition: The next batch should include, or explicitly explain the absence of:• records mentioning recovered UAP material • records mentioning biological material or “biologics” • records mentioning reverse engineering or exploitation • records involving contractor custody • records involving special access programs or controlled access programs • Inspector General referrals or protected disclosures related to Grusch’s claims • classification guides for UAP-related recovered material terminology • lab or materials-analysis records • chain-of-custody logs • search methodology, agencies queried, and terms used That makes the post actionable. 41. Add “search terms matter” This is an obscure but very important point. Agencies may not use words like “UFO,” “alien,” or “biologics” in formal records. They may use euphemisms or compartment-specific terms. Suggested line: A serious search cannot just look for “UFO” or “alien.” It has to search program names, euphemisms, classification guides, contractor task orders, material-exploitation language, biological-sample language, and special-access terminology. Possible terms: anomalous aerospace vehicle recovered material materials exploitation foreign material exploitation non-human intelligence biological material unknown-origin material advanced aerospace threat special material controlled access program waived SAP unacknowledged SAP technology exploitation crash retrieval reverse engineering site exploitation biological sample non-terrestrial material exotic material

• 
  Budd Rolan Kronic (@BuddKronic313) reported 28 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Hopefully fixed the visual glitch in boutique district

• 
  ClkWrkTim (@Ajaw565) reported 29 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm This one's kinda rough guys. I crash out to a black screen maybe every 3rd match? The deployment screen is buggy as hell too...

• 
  Aditya Mahajan (@Aditya7Mahajan) reported 30 minutes ago

  II The problem is the fact that it massively evens out the battlefield whilst costing nothing to the adversary and being hard to counter. Two counters come to mind to fight this threat.

• 
  ColdAtTheTop (@ColdAtTheTop1) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm F*** the devs the light glitch in redsec is still present you incompetent pieces of trash

• 
  nyfak (@thisguyisalex) reported 34 minutes ago

  @MGhamdi97331 @Battlefield maybe you should fix your internet

• 
  Mr.Encouragement (@MrEncouragement) reported 36 minutes ago

  @CornCamdy @AlderNate Okay, in the meantime, every major archaeological and anthropological institution, including the Smithsonian Institution and the National Geographic Society, has explicitly stated they have found no archaeological evidence supporting the Book of Mormon narrative. The Smithsonian has issued official statements confirming they have never used the Book of Mormon as an archaeological guide. As I indicated previously, the Mormon church agrees. Here are some significant issues: - Horses were extinct in the Americas from approximately 10,000 BC until reintroduced by Spanish conquistadors in the 1500s AD. The Book of Mormon describes horses in regular use around 600 BC to 400 AD. - No pre-Columbian steel has ever been found in the Americas in the timeframe described. - No evidence of wheeled vehicles of any kind has been found in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica or North America in the relevant period. - No domesticated Old World grains have been found in pre-Columbian American archaeological sites in the Book of Mormon timeframe. - Mammoths and mastodons were extinct in the Americas thousands of years before the Book of Mormon period begins. - No mass burial sites, weapons caches, or battlefield archaeology consistent with the scale of warfare described has ever been found.

• 
  Ak (@toxicak7734) reported 37 minutes ago

  i am glad i was never scared to abandon the battlefield... i always thought of solutions and never counted the problems...

• 
  lilymae (@rationalgranny) reported 38 minutes ago

  Scott Pelley spent decades in air-conditioned studios lecturing America about truth, democracy, and sacrifice. Now the mask is off. A legacy media elite who thinks the network revolved around his ego, equates getting fired to spousal murder and battlefield service, then melts down on a national podcast.

• 
  monster115 (@AMH_1151) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm when Fix server middle east ?

• 
  Cliff (@CliftonBaconNY) reported 40 minutes ago

  @StuartHameroff Here’s a thought I can’t shake. What if the microtubule debate, the Tegmark fight, the coherence times, all of it, is fighting on the wrong battlefield? Orch-OR asks how the brain generates consciousness from quantum collapse inside itself. But suppose the brain isn’t the generator. Suppose consciousness is the thing acting on collapse, from outside the system being measured. Then microtubules stop being the seat of consciousness and become just the most exquisite antenna evolution ever built, not where it happens, but where it couples in. The testable consequence flips entirely. You’d stop looking inside the skull for coherence and start looking at whether an observer’s state changes decoherence in an external system it has no classical business touching. Same physics you’ve defended for decades, same seriousness about the measurement problem, just the arrow reversed. You’ve spent your career proving the brain is quantum enough to matter. What if you were right about the quantum and wrong about the direction?

• 
  Mawnsino 🐾 (@oghenetefe) reported 42 minutes ago

  People get this totally wrong. One of the biggest myths about the Uchiha Massacre is the idea that the clan was weak. But it’s way more complicated than that. It’s not that the Uchiha didn’t have any power. The truth is, people just don’t realize how absurdly strong Itachi and Obito were, and honestly, they overestimate how many Uchiha actually had the Mangekyō Sharingan. Let’s unpack it. The Mangekyō Sharingan wasn’t something every Uchiha had lying around. Far from it. By the time the massacre happened, Itachi and Obito were the only ones with confirmed Mangekyō. Fugaku’s Mangekyō appears in the anime, sure, but the manga never confirms it, so canonically, nobody knows for sure. Throughout Uchiha history, getting a Mangekyō wasn’t a rite of passage or something people trained for. It happened after insane trauma, something most Uchiha never went through. Just having the normal Sharingan didn’t mean you could awaken the Mangekyō. Most clan members probably only got as far as one or two tomoe, and some never unlocked the Sharingan at all. So, what actually happened during the massacre? People picture Itachi and Obito rampaging through the Uchiha district, facing off with the whole clan at once. That’s just not it. The operation was meticulously planned. The Uchiha didn’t get the chance to resist or rally together. Nobody saw it coming. No alarms. No battle formations. Nothing. It was all happening in the dead of night, house by house, family by family, and by the time anyone figured out they were under attack, it was already over for them. Obito changed the game. By then, he had Kamui, a broken power and honestly one of the most overpowered abilities in the series. He could go intangible, phase through attacks, and teleport people into another dimension. The average Uchiha had no way to deal with that. Let’s be real. Even years later, top-tier ninja struggled with Kamui, so expecting regular clan members to counter it is impossible. And then there’s Itachi. Even as a teenager, Itachi was on another level. He was already an ANBU Captain, trusted with crucial missions and considered a genius by pretty much everyone, Hiruzen, Danzo, you name it. He was the kind of prodigy who freaked out grown adults. His intelligence wasn’t just for show. It was lethal in itself. Some of the novels even suggest most Uchiha didn’t realize what was happening until it was too late to do anything about it. Don’t forget, a bunch of the strongest Uchiha weren’t even around or didn’t fight back. Shisui was already dead. Fugaku, whether his Mangekyō is canon or not, never resisted. He understood what Itachi was doing, saw the writing on the wall, and accepted the outcome. Many Uchiha were caught asleep, protecting their families, or just unable to make sense of the chaos quickly enough to organize a defense. This was never a fair fight or even a battlefield. It was an execution. Pure and simple. The psychological shock was outrageous. Imagine waking up and finding out that your clan’s pride and joy, Itachi, is murdering his own people alongside some masked Uchiha with mysterious powers. That confusion alone made it impossible to mount any kind of effective defense. So the massacre doesn’t mean the Uchiha were weak. If anything, it shows the opposite. Konoha’s leaders were so worried about the Uchiha that they saw the possibility of a coup as a potentially existential threat to the village. The massacre only worked because two of the most dangerous Uchiha in history carried it out under perfect circumstances against a clan that never expected a betrayal from within. The Uchiha weren’t powerless. They were up against Itachi and Obito. In the Naruto universe, that’s a whole different ballgame, and honestly, even the strongest clans would’ve been crushed. The massacre was less about weakness and more about getting blindsided by legendary power.

• 
  Vova42ne (@vova42ne) reported 42 minutes ago

  @DooM49 Bad. Game is unplayable anymore. Not because of in-game issues it's about retarted community who grow up on Fortnite and CoD. 90% matches in Breakthrough rushes in 5 mins, players completely ignore PTFO. @Battlefield need huge rework on PTFO and add SBMM.

• 
  Zzz (@Anthony03600627) reported 42 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Did you guys fix the glare issue in downtown in redsec?

• 
  J (@jabzz21_) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix redsec and add more content to that

• 
  SugaDante (@SugaDante) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Pottsy941 @BattlefieldComm Shader issue.. You running an Nvidia card by any chance?.

• 
  This Is Texas Freedom Force (@TexanLoyal) reported 52 minutes ago

  @StoneLanda2000 We don’t find it funny at all. It is more 😡 that they would claim this. The Alamo is sacred to us real Texans. Hell we (This Is Texas Freedom Force) stood armed in front of the Alamo to protect it from 5,000 rioters/looters who threatened it May 30, 2020. So for rug riders to come in and claim that it’s an Islamic building is offensive and we (along with many other Texans) will speak against this 💩 June 22nd. X has gone into the toilet. Shadow banning our post, deleting real patriots profiles. Plus too many keyboard patriot warriors that want to talk a big game online but never step foot on the battlefield. Thats not our style. Our org has been active since 2017 and we have driven this state to take action on Texas issues we believe in. Thats why we focus on our FB page & Mewe where we have 10k followers who are just like us, they walk the walk not just talk the talk.

• 
  DJ North (@KarmaKarhu) reported 53 minutes ago

  @BattleNonSense @Battlefield That's the problem indeed. We, the paying customers, are not upset enough. We keep buying microtransactions and preordering and not refunding unfinished products.

• 
  SkullsCard (@Skullscard) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Ppl with 200 ping have better experience imagine how unsync this game is, netcode or whatever they cant fix