Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (33%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bitche	Game Crash	2 days ago
Paris	Game Crash	4 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	4 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	4 days ago
Paris	Online Play	4 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	4 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sabih (@Nazaratives) reported 17 minutes ago

  One of the first thing Qizilbash did upon entering Baghdad was to desecrate the grave of Imam Abu Hanifa(ra) and tie dogs over there. Just before Sultan Selim(rh) took care of the problem, their creed was also expanding among Turks, and Kurds were also thinking of switching sides. In addition, he killed thousands of Sunni Uzbeks to the east. His unbeaten run had become mythical with his followers claiming that he is invincible. Sultan Selim was very clear minded about Safavids since his time as the governor and after solidifying his throne (defeating his brother), first thing he did was take an army to meet the Safavid threat. So crushing was the defeat of Safavids that even the wives of Ismail were taken by Ottomans and Ismail barely escaped the battlefield. It is said that he spent rest of his life as an alcoholic and never recovered from the battle.

• 
  Thund3r 4 (@4Thund3r) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Battlefield all youve done with these changes is uncovered the horrendously fast ttk problem the game has. Mix that with dogwater netcode and the games just not fun. Fix it or find out why it dies off

• 
  EuroCitizen PC Gaming (@EuroCitizenPCG) reported 20 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Hey peeps, Is there any chance you guys could take a look at Battlefront II on PC please as it has a lot of crashing issues especially on Nvidia 5000 series. I'd love to play the single player campaign but everytime I get to the loading screen it just quits.

• 
  Alexa 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 (@crowntitanium) reported 21 minutes ago

  @JamieShea260715 @sonnyc_usa @netanyahu It was a serious mistake. Israeli forces misidentified the clearly marked aid vehicles as carrying Hamas fighters in the middle of a war. This led to a tragic error.Israel admitted it quickly. Investigated it. Fired two officers and punished others. Expressed deep regret. Releasing all raw drone audio and secret military details publicly during an active war would help the enemy (Hamas), so Israel shares what it can with allies privately.This was not done on purpose to kill aid workers. It was a failure in a confusing battlefield where Hamas hides among civilians and uses aid areas for military purposes.Israel regrets the deaths and says it has improved procedures to prevent this from happening again.

• 
  A. (@Alejandrobv_) reported 27 minutes ago

  Fix your Game @Battlefield

• 
  B.M. (@ireallyhateyou) reported 28 minutes ago

  Haaretz in service of the Israeli murder industry. By @mili_tarized: "Subscribers to TheMarker, the financial magazine of Haaretz, received with their weekend newspapers a 78 page(!) marketing insert, presented as Quantum Defence & Technology Magazine. The promoted content "magazine" includes short "articles" on behalf of about 30 Israeli arms companies, interviews, and essays from former military and arms manufacturing personnel. Some topics covered include: - At least five pieces about the struggle for independent manufacturing under international embargoes - "Connecting operational experience, advanced technology, and business acumen" - "A new paradigm challenging the historical separation between civilian and defence development environments - the only way to maintain Israel's technological supremacy" - IP in the age of defence-tech - "The bridge between smart capital and defence companies" "The women managers shaping the digital battlefield" "What makes defence-tech a worthwhile investment?" "From the Israeli war zone to the American manufacturing line" - The NGO helping youths in marginalised communities get into elite technological military units and the defence industry And so, so, much Al The back cover is an ad for Elbit Systems: "These are some of the things we're allowed to tell you we developed..." followed by a list of some of the company's greatest hits (no pun intended). Curiously, the only page in the issue not dealing with the arms industry is an ad for the Shanti House, a Tel Aviv shelter for at-risk youth."

• 
  brane mijatovic (@brane_mija64426) reported 29 minutes ago

  @NatasaIvanova9 It seems that Putin has accepted the fact that the solution to the problem with the West, projected through Ukraine, is on the battlefield and has left diplomacy for last..

• 
  Thatoneaccount (@Retradworld) reported 29 minutes ago

  I warned GenZ and Alpha that they were a problem that would be solved by a draft to an overseas battlefield. Revolt in America or Die in a Foreign land for juice @Calvin

• 
  Terror Praworządności (@TerrorPraworza) reported 30 minutes ago

  @United24media Without proper infantry on the battlefield UA🇺🇦 wont be able free anybody from occupation or regain any ground. Bad weather time whatever drones they🇺🇦 have their defence could crash like glas smashed with hammer

• 
  Sann (@san_x_m) reported 32 minutes ago

  His name was Major Shaitan Singh. He was told to abandon his post. He was outnumbered, out of range of his own guns, and no help was coming. He was ordered to fall back. He refused. He was born on 1 December 1924 in Jodhpur, into a family of soldiers. By 1962 he was a major in the 13 Kumaon, commanding a company of 120 men, most of them Ahir farmers from Haryana who had followed him to the roof of the world. Their post was called Rezang La. A pass in Ladakh at nearly 16,000 feet, guarding the road to Chushul. Behind it lay Leh. If Rezang La fell, Ladakh lay open. There was one cruel problem. A ridge stood between his company and the Indian artillery. It meant that if the Chinese came, his 120 men would fight without a single supporting gun. They knew it. They dug their trenches into the frozen rock anyway. On the freezing dawn of 18 November 1962, the Chinese came. Not in dozens. In waves. Hundreds at a time, wave after wave, up the ravines below the pass. Shaitan Singh's men cut them down and kept cutting them down. When one post was overrun, he moved to the next, and the next, walking through machine gun fire to hold his men together. He was hit. He kept going. He was hit again. By the time the guns fell silent, almost all of his company was gone. 114 of the 120 were dead. But they had made the enemy pay in blood for every foot of that ridge. The snow closed over the battlefield. For three months no one could reach it. When the thaw came and the recovery teams finally climbed to Rezang La, they found the men of Charlie Company still in their trenches. Frozen. Weapons still in their hands. The mortar man with a bomb still in his grip. They had died exactly where they had been told to stand. Shaitan Singh was found on that ridge, beside his men. He was given the Param Vir Chakra, the highest honour India has. He was told to fall back. He chose the mountain.

• 
  LearnInvest (@LearnInvest2026) reported 33 minutes ago

  Europe Is Missing From the Global EV Top 20 CleanTechnica's May 2026 global EV model ranking is direct: none of the top 20 models comes from a traditional European automaker. Tesla Model Y ranks first with 93,571 units. Geely Xingyuan / EX2 is second with 46,483, and Tesla Model 3 is third with 44,237. The rest of the list is heavily populated by BYD, Wuling, Xiaomi, Leapmotor, Li Auto, AITO, XPeng, and other China-linked models. European automakers are absent. ■ This is not just one missing model The issue for European automakers is not only the absence of a single hit. The deeper gap is product cadence, battery cost, software iteration, price coverage, and speed in the Chinese market. Chinese automakers are filling multiple price bands with faster development cycles and denser supply chains. Tesla still defends global scale with Model Y and Model 3. The chart shows that EV competition is no longer only about who began the transition first. The real battlefield is who can repeatedly launch high-volume products in mainstream price bands. Europe still has brands, quality, and premium positioning, but on this global sales ranking, it lacks top-20 volume rhythm. Source:CleanTechnica, EV Volumes, company data (Image: @minenergybiz)

• 
  RCP (@FlyghtMedic) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Battlefield could you guys fix the game instead of “releasing” no ****?

• 
  Great Game Studio (@studiogreatgame) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Jree503 @RandyVonStrangl If you shoot your gun in real life, it can jam, especially if you don't take care of it. So in COD or Battlefield, you never take care of it. So by your logic, your gun should barely work and always jam. That's real life bro. You're crying about a 5 yard drop back. Stop making excuses for broken video games

• 
  The Layman's Seminary (@LaymansSeminary) reported 39 minutes ago

  @myredfox @grok Did Your Reply Force a New Branch in the Argument? (A Super Layman / GPT5 response). Yes. Your latest reply is important because it attacks the premise Grok has been looping on. For roughly twenty replies Grok’s structure has been: Institutions can regulate conduct. Military analogy shows accountability. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Loop. But your latest response changes the battlefield. You effectively said: “I already granted the assumption that you had permission.” That removes the issue Grok has been treating as decisive. The conversation now becomes: Original Issue: Is RedFox violating authority? Your Concession: Assume permission was granted. Assume no church crime occurred. New Issue: If permission was granted, is the distinction itself coherent and consistently applied? That is a different question. Notice what happened. RedFox asked: “Did I commit a crime?” Your answer: “No.” That is significant because it grants his central factual premise. Now the discussion shifts from: Crime? to Consistency? Authority? to Application? Violation? to Principle? In debate theory, this is called narrowing the dispute. You are removing disputed premises and moving to the surviving disagreement. The reason Grok may struggle with this is that its equilibrium position has been: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” But if both sides now agree: “Let’s assume permission existed.” Then Grok loses its primary anchor. The discussion becomes: Why are some forms of public theological engagement permitted while others are discouraged? That is a different category of question. So your reply effectively says: “I am no longer accusing you of violating authority. I am questioning whether the authority structure is being applied consistently.” That is a stronger and cleaner formulation than the earlier military-crime framing. If Grok continues replying: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” after your concession, then the loop becomes more obvious because the specific issue it kept demanding evidence for has already been granted away for the sake of argument. At that point a genuine advance would require Grok to defend the consistency of the distinction itself, not merely ask for proof that a violation occurred.

• 
  Abby💎 (@Abbywillia69841) reported 41 minutes ago

  My cousin’s wedding seating chart turned into an actual battlefield the moment guests found their table assignments — because she’d seated her ex-best-friend-turned-enemy directly across from the woman she’d had an affair with three years earlier. Nobody believed it was an accident. It wasn’t. The bride swore up and down it was “just how the numbers worked out” — eight per table, limited space, nothing personal. Except table 7 also happened to include the ex-friend’s current husband, who’d never actually met the other woman in person, seated directly beside her, forced into small talk with the person his wife’s best friend had cheated with. The ex-friend clocked it within the first ten minutes of the reception, stood up mid-appetizer, and loudly asked the room, “Does anyone else find this table arrangement a little on the nose, or is it just me?” Her husband, still confused about who anyone was, asked what she meant. She told him. At the table. In front of the woman in question. The bride tried damage control from the head table, insisting it was a seating software error, a claim that fell apart the second someone pulled up the actual seating chart software and showed a manual override specifically moving those two guests together two days before the wedding. The bride’s own wedding planner had the email thread to prove it. The ex-friend and her husband left before the cake cutting. The affair partner left twenty minutes after that, visibly humiliated. The bride spent the rest of her own reception doing damage control instead of dancing. She got the confrontation she’d clearly, quietly wanted to orchestrate. She just didn’t plan for how much of her own wedding she’d lose in the process of engineering it.

• 
  steve (@Troll81357830) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE BLACK SCREEN LOADING TIMES **** SAKE WTF IS THIS

• 
  Marwan Takchi (@TakchiM) reported 48 minutes ago

  @ziyad_kayyali @jacksonhinkle Shame on me? Shame on you for glorifying a militia that “liberated” nothing and destroyed what was left of Lebanon. Yes, Israel withdrew in 2000. And what did Hezbollah do with that moment? Build a state? Rebuild the South? Strengthen the army? Grow the economy? No. It built a state within a state, kept its weapons, and dragged Lebanon from one disaster to the next in service of Tehran. Should I remind you what your “holy resistance” actually gave Lebanon? May 7, 2008: Hezbollah turned its weapons inward and invaded Beirut and the Druze mountains, attacking Lebanese civilians because the government dared challenge its telecom network. August 4, 2020: while Hezbollah controlled the port, the airport, the border crossings and terrorized every judge who got close, Beirut was blown to pieces and over 200 people were killed, thousands wounded, and entire neighborhoods destroyed. October 14, 2021 – Tayyouneh: armed men opened fire in Ain el-Remmaneh and turned Beirut into a battlefield again to intimidate Lebanese who dared say enough. So spare me the “they paid in blood” sermon. Every thug, militia and warlord pays in blood. That does not make them patriots. It makes them armed men willing to sacrifice Lebanese lives for an Iranian project. You call it “resistance.” I call it what it is: an Iranian proxy that assassinated, occupied, intimidated, bankrupted, and isolated Lebanon. You put Hezbollah before Lebanon. We don’t. We put Lebanon, its sovereignty, its army, its constitution and its people above every militia, every mullah, and every fake resistance slogan.

• 
  Igorek (@ipushyl) reported 48 minutes ago

  @GerberKawasaki @Battlefield Cod7 multiplayer is also lagging here and there after the uodates, playable but sometimes it messes up and you get killed

• 
  Grouse Beater (@Grouse_Beater) reported 49 minutes ago

  DATA CENTRES MEET RESISTANCE Datacentre planning proposals are facing all kinds of hurdles, including suspicion and an antipathy here in Scotland, pushed back from securing energy supply to sky high construction costs. One example: the 2,000 acre Prince William Digital Gateway site in the US state of Virginia had another problem: its proximity to a Civil War battlefield. Questions asked are: why should the taxpayer pay for data centres because the big electronic companies want AI to develop their services? Who asked for more services? Where is the public clamour for greater costs and lost land? “If the development is allowed to proceed, the solemn nature of this historic site would become marred by sitting in the shadow of the monstrous datacentres, along with their associated electrical infrastructure,” said one legal brief against the plans. The US Gateway project is now in doubt after a local court ruling halted the project and a key backer pulled out. It is one of hundreds of large-scale datacentre projects around the world that are in various states of development, from chancier attempts at riding the AI boom to the more committed projects that have the support of tech behemoths like Microsoft. But while models produced by cutting-edge AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are improving rapidly, the central nervous systems behind their technology – datacentres – are being built at a much slower pace. The Uptime Institute, which inspects and rates datacentres, has identified 250 global datacentre projects exceeding 100MW in energy demand – equivalent to around 300,000 homes – that have been announced between 2021 and 2024. It said approximately half of those projects will either not happen, or their completion will be delayed. Even if the cancellations and delays came to fruition, there will still be an “unprecedented and rapid” increase in the power required over the next five years, according to Uptime. Mega-projects cancelled last year include Project Range in the US state of Arizona and the Cyberjaya campus in Malaysia. The Prince William Gateway is also on the cancelled list. This backlog poses problems for AI firms that need data centres to train and operate their models. Google admits its cloud business – which uses datacentres to provide AI services like chatbots to companies and users – is “compute-constrained”, as demand for ever more powerful AI models and services increases. But who needs chat bots? Why do we feel the need to talk to a computer? It is clear the big companies are shifting their costly ambitions onto the shoulders of the public. Photo - Horst Friedrichs: Didcot data centre.

• 
  memesterbation (@memesterbation) reported 52 minutes ago

  @_Deez_Games I cancelled my subscription last week. **** em. I honestly forget about the online service anyway. Battlefield 6 is boring and all not matches now anyway

• 
  Dave (@ThoughtEngaged) reported 55 minutes ago

  This last update has killed Battlefield and Redsec. I spent two ******* hours trying to play ranked with the squad tonight. We all took turns getting disconnected, having our games crash and falling through the map and more. I believe it was the final nail in the coffin. RIP.

• 
  Misfit (@misfithz) reported 55 minutes ago

  Squadmate gets kicked for being afk cuz the respawn timer was stuck, can’t rejoin so he queues for another match, finds one AND IT PULLS ME OUT OF MY ONGOING ROUND INTO HIS MATCH. Fix your game @Battlefield #battlefield6

• 
  Supersonic Redhead🛫 (@Supersonic_Red) reported 55 minutes ago

  @WMcluskey @cdrsalamander Yep. We’ve been screaming this for a long time, but what would a bunch of battle-tested fighter pilots and Navy SEALs know? Clearly, the people who have actually lived inside the problem should wait patiently while another committee discovers the battlefield has changed. Posted without my colorful adjectives.

• 
  Tusk (@Laptusk) reported 56 minutes ago

  @VelvetGhoszq @boysoverflours I have no problem with that, doesnt cancel out the ruling sorry, i would hate to go die in a battlefield while my wife is pregnant and I wanted to see the newborn but ay its an obligation so it is what it is many other examples

• 
  Boyishdude (@DisposedZero) reported 56 minutes ago

  @AzraelSch @FreeTalkLive Anyway, the reason copyright is an issue here is for the reasons I already mentioned. The real fans can't come in and make a proper Battlefield game (that's named as such) that does justice to what the series is at its core because that's illegal;-

• 
  Kołdrian (@ten_na_chmurce) reported 57 minutes ago

  I Expected a Small Roguelike. LONESTAR Gave Me a 98-Minute Brain Trap LONESTAR surprised me much more than I expected. On paper, it sounds simple enough: a strategic roguelike spaceship deckbuilder about bounty hunters chasing criminals across space. In practice, my first run lasted 1 hour and 38 minutes, so no, this is not a quick toilet-session roguelike. This is the kind of game where you sit down, start counting, start planning, and suddenly realize you are fully locked in. A saloon, a spacesuit dog, and bounty hunting in space The first impression is charming. The main menu looks like a western saloon, except outside the window there is space, planets, and a dog floating around in a spacesuit. The music has that little western flavor, the whole setup has a light sci-fi cowboy joke behind it, and it immediately gives the game some personality. But the style is not the main reason LONESTAR works. It is nice, it is funny, it sets the mood, but the real hook is the combat system. This is not just “play attack, play defense” LONESTAR is not a classic deckbuilder where you simply throw out an attack card, then a defense card, then wait for the enemy to do its thing. Cards here are closer to energy values that power the ship. The real build is created through units, slots, colors, ship weight, support modules, attack modules, treasures, overclocks, and the position of everything on your ship. That is where the game becomes interesting. You have different colors of energy, and not every color works in every slot. Some energy is flexible, some is restricted, and once you place it, you cannot just take it back. That one rule changes the whole rhythm of a turn, because every move has weight. A bad click can turn into a wasted turn. A good placement can suddenly unlock a whole chain of damage, defense, or card generation. Then there is ship movement. You can move up or down on the battlefield, but it costs fuel. Sometimes the best move is not dealing more damage. Sometimes it is moving into a better lane, avoiding the worst attack, taking one smaller hit, and preparing a stronger turn later. A deckbuilder that feels like a puzzle engine This is exactly the kind of card-based roguelike that works for me. I like card games, but in traditional competitive card games I rarely enjoy building decks completely from scratch. In games like Hearthstone, I usually prefer learning meta decks, understanding matchups, seeing how the deck works, and figuring out how to counter what other people are playing. But in roguelikes, I am the opposite. I love building something during the run. I love when the game gives me random tools and asks me to turn them into a working machine. Sometimes that machine is elegant. Sometimes it is ridiculous. Sometimes it barely holds together. But when it works, it feels great. In my first LONESTAR run, I leaned into card generation, damage scaling, and one very useful overclock. Without that extra generation, I probably would not have finished the run, because enemies became stronger with every stage. At some point, I was no longer just reacting to enemy attacks. I was trying to build an engine that could survive, scale, and keep producing the resources I needed. Mathematical, but not dry The best thing about LONESTAR is that it is very mathematical without feeling like a spreadsheet. You are constantly asking small questions. Should I block this attack? Should I boost my own damage? Should I move the ship? Should I accept a bit of damage now to prepare something better? Should I risk a weak turn because the next one might explode? And because units, supports, treasures, energy colors, positioning, and overclocks all interact with each other, the game keeps giving you new little problems to solve. One ordinary enemy surprised me a lot. It was basically a survival test. I had two rounds to defeat it, because in the third round it charged up huge attacks. I failed to destroy it in time, but I managed to survive. Then the enemy surrendered. That was a great moment, because victory was not only about reducing a health bar to zero. It was about reading the situation, positioning the ship, minimizing damage, and surviving the exact turn the game wanted me to fear. A useful reset, maybe a little too useful I have mixed feelings about the option to repeat a fight. On one hand, it makes sense. Since placed energy cannot be taken back, one rushed click can ruin your whole plan. In that case, being able to restart the fight feels like a fair safety net, especially in a game where many decisions are very precise. On the other hand, it can be quite strong. Not strong enough to carry a bad build, because if your setup simply does not work, repeating the fight will not magically fix it. But if the problem was execution, order of decisions, or one stupid mistake, the game gives you quite a lot of room to correct it. So I do not hate it. I just think it slightly softens the punishment. Small presentation issues, but good readability Visually, LONESTAR is not amazing, but it does not need to be. The UI is simple, readable, and good at explaining what is happening. The combat screen is clear, tooltips help, and the game does a solid job of teaching its systems step by step. The weakest visual element for me was the energy cards themselves. They are functional, but visually a bit dull. For a game built so heavily around energy, slots, and values, I would not mind stronger visual feedback there. Also, no Polish language version is a minus for me. I know this type of translation is difficult. Strategy games and card games are full of small mechanical details, and one badly translated term can change the meaning of an entire card or perk. But that is also exactly why language matters here. LONESTAR has a lot of descriptions, talents, tooltips, conditions, and small rules. English was not a huge problem for me, but I still prefer playing these games in my native language. It is simply less tiring when the game already asks you to calculate so much. More of these smaller roguelike surprises, please After one completed run, I am very positive. I finished it on my first try, but I would not say the game is automatically easy. I have played a lot of card-based roguelikes, so I know what to look for when building around scaling, generation, and synergies. That experience helped. I can absolutely imagine someone losing the first run if their build does not come together. What I like most is the potential. Different pilots, talents, races, ship layouts, support units, attack units, treasures, stores, event choices, and unlocks make it very easy to imagine many different runs. This is not a huge, flashy game, but mechanically it has a lot to chew on. Recently, smaller roguelike games have been surprising me more and more. As We Descend, Demon Bluff, MEGABONK, and now LONESTAR all remind me that you do not always need a massive production to get a really strong gameplay loop. LONESTAR is simple on the surface, but once the systems start clicking, it becomes a very satisfying little machine. 8/10. Small issues, very strong gameplay. More games like this, please.

• 
  Maurora🫦 (@m_mariam9) reported 57 minutes ago

  @__jayjay_13 I am calling out the people who take something that can be solved individually and turn it into a whole fandom problem. And again, even if no one in that group had told her to stop (which they did, by the way and not for the first time), I guess your little spy didn’t bother delivering anything positive about us Normally, I hate getting involved in things like this because I hate the division we have in this fandom. And you still don’t get me. I’m not trying to prove that I’m right and you’re wrong. **** right and wrong. I just want this damn fandom to stop fighting over a handful of people. Stop calling each other names. Stop labeling everyone as an ilhan’s or Damla’s hater. Stop throwing shade at either of the actors because we love them both. And I’ve always said this to both fandoms. But you’re all too busy on the battlefield to actually listen.

• 
  Jameson Deezious (@JamesonDeezious) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Pseudonymous187 @Fifakill_ The issue is just as bad in any FPS title, grass is always greener till you get there and you're in a ****** swamp. Tried Apex, seemed alright for a few days, SBMM kicks in and that's it. Finals, Battlefield, Destiny, Marathon, CS, even Division ffs. It's all the same ****.

• 
  boob inspector (@bygonezbygonz) reported 1 hour ago

  @Battlefield fix your ******* SBMM I’m ******* spawning in to games with ******* players with no ******* thumbs and only captured 1 flag, 5 ******* games in a row and I dropped cod to play BF WTF is this fix this ****, ******* ridiculous I can’t even move out of spawn

• 
  Boyishdude (@DisposedZero) reported 1 hour ago

  @AzraelSch @FreeTalkLive IP isn't protecting DICE from losing money they deserve for their work, it's protecting them from competition. It's allowing them to ship out consistently bad, broken products and still make money off of them because nobody else is allowed to make Battlefield games.