Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint-Malo	Online Play	21 hours ago
Buenos Aires	Sign in	3 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	3 days ago
Perpignan	Sign in	3 days ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	5 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Psycho Fella (@Psycho_Fella) reported 1 minute ago

  THE TANK ERA IN UKRAINE IS OVER. JUST NOT THE WAY COUCH EXPERTS, ADVISORS, AND CONSULTANTS UNDERSTAND IT By Rimas Armaitis, Armed Forces of Ukraine (ZSU) veteran—Lithuanian, sapper, instructor The New York Times reports that about half of the tank battalion soldiers from Ukraine’s 33rd Mechanized Brigade have already retrained as drone operators. Some recruits are no longer being trained to operate tanks at all. Leopard 2A4s are still maintained, repaired, and used for training, but they are rarely sent on combat missions—mostly during bad weather when drone activity decreases. This does not mean that all tanks will be scrapped tomorrow. It means something much more unpleasant for tank enthusiasts: the tank has lost its status as the primary strike platform. The platform remains, but its role, frequency of use, and cost-to-risk ratio have fundamentally changed. A tank costing millions cannot operate freely on the battlefield because it is under constant surveillance by reconnaissance drones. Once detected, a tank doesn’t even need to be destroyed in a single strike. The first FPV drone might damage a track or optics, the second hits the engine, and the third attacks the crew or the evacuation vehicle. Later, the job is finished off by a heavy bomber drone, artillery, or aerial mining. Even if the tank remains repairable, the combat mission is already ruined, the crew’s lives are at risk, and another expensive machine must be sent to evacuate the vehicle. This is where the economics of war begin—something our couch generals for some reason stubbornly refuse to understand. The key issue isn't whether a tank can theoretically be protected. What matters is how much its protection, logistics, repairs, and trained crew cost compared to how little it costs the enemy to detect, disable, and finish it off. When a chain of drones costing a few hundred or a few thousand euros disables a platform worth millions, we are not facing an emotional debate of "tanks vs. drones," but a catastrophically unfavorable cost-to-result ratio. Of course, some advisor-consultant will now pop up and solemnly declare: "But a drone doesn't hold ground!" Thank you for the breakthrough. An artillery shell doesn't hold ground either. A landmine doesn't control an intersection, and a fighter jet doesn't sit in a trench. Different tools perform different functions. The logic of modern assault is as follows: reconnaissance drones spot positions and movement; FPVs and bomber drones destroy or suppress targets; ground-based robotic systems transport explosives, lay mines, scout, provoke the enemy into revealing firing points, and provide fire support. Only then do the infantry clear, capture, and consolidate the territory—performing what is called "zakrep" on the front lines. Unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) are already being deployed with machine-gun modules, grenade launchers, shaped charges, and fragmentation charges. They handle logistics, evacuation, engineering, and specific assault tasks. They haven't replaced all light armored vehicles yet, but they are already taking over functions where it is better to lose a machine than to lose a machine along with its driver, crew, and squad. Infantry aren't going anywhere. However, a pure infantry assault without aerial reconnaissance, electronic warfare, drones, combat engineering preparation, and fire support is nowadays more simply referred to as a "meat assault." The neat phrase "an infantryman will still have to clear the trench" does not justify the idiotically wasteful decision to send him into that trench first. The role of artillery is also evolving. It remains essential for mass firepower, suppression, area targets, and operating under conditions where drones are restricted. However, single targets have long been handled by FPVs, heavy bomber drones, and mid-strike drones. Deep-strike systems and cheaper cruise missile analogs operate further behind enemy lines. So, drones haven't "replaced everything." They have taken over a huge share of reconnaissance, spotter adjustment, precision destruction, mining, logistics, and even assault roles. As a result, tanks, armored vehicles, artillery, and aviation are used less frequently, more cautiously, and only when their impact justifies the cost and risk. Another argument from the couch experts: "Just turn on electronic warfare and the drones won't fly." Right, of course. Strange that the Ukrainians themselves haven't thought of pressing the magic "turn off drones" button over more than four years of war. Electronic warfare (EW) is essential, but it is not an invisible dome. We now have frequency hopping, relays, elements of autonomous control, machine vision systems, and fiber-optic-guided FPVs. Every line of defense triggers a countermeasure, and technological cycles at the front line sometimes change within weeks. While our consultant spends six months coordinating the final version of a PowerPoint presentation, his "latest" conclusion is already outdated twice over. We are not anti-tank. We are against using tanks according to the doctrine of yesterday's war. For a tank to make a proper comeback to the battlefield, it needs more than just a metal cage welded onto the roof. It requires a complete protection ecosystem: drone detection, electronic warfare, active and passive defense, interceptor drones, dedicated reconnaissance drones, reduced physical and electromagnetic visibility, and integration into a unified intelligence and fire-control network. The tank of the future will likely be unmanned or optionally manned. Because the issue isn't just armor thickness. The issue is sending human beings, along with the tank, into a zone under constant surveillance and targeted fire. This is what we have been talking about for years now. Except our conclusions weren't drawn from watching YouTube or dragging blue and red rectangles across a screen. They emerged from the trenches of the current war. We have seen how the kill zone is shifting, how drones evolved from an auxiliary tool into a primary means of destruction, and how outdated procedures began costing human lives. Yet in Lithuania, a strange qualification system still prevails: if you were at the front yourself, you are "too emotional." If you fought on Facebook for four years, you qualify as a military expert. If you saw the doctrine fail, you are a radical. If you rewrote it three times in PowerPoint, you are an advisor or consultant. So let me repeat this as simply as possible: Tanks haven't disappeared. What has disappeared is the ability to use them the way it was planned ten or twenty years ago. Aerial and ground robotic systems have already taken over a portion of the roles previously held by light armor, artillery, aviation, and infantry. Anyone who fails to grasp this isn't "defending classic warfare"—they are simply preparing for yesterday's war using tomorrow's budget. And if, after all these arguments, someone still only hears "veterans want to get rid of tanks," it's not an additional explanation they need. They lack the ability to read a text longer than the headline of a tank procurement contract.

• 
  Giona Strazzacappa (@Pano_077) reported 1 minute ago

  @AgentW23 @Battlefield u prob. play 3 hours a week maybe, the more u play and more u understand that this game is broken top to bottom, plsu they will never adress netcode and all the VPN abuser in the lobby, sry if im salty but thats the reality and im tired of it

• 
  DaanktreezXVIII (@DaanktreezXviii) reported 2 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm AND ITS RANKED PLAY I CANT FOCUS WITH BACKGROUND NOISE FROM PLAYSTATION MICS! And it’s like nobody wants to LISTEN TO YOUR FAMILY PROBLEMS IN RANKED PLAY BUT I CANT MUTE PLAYSTATION ANYMORE AFTER CARRIER STRIKE UPDATE

• 
  so사rceeee. (@sourceeeezz) reported 6 minutes ago

  -battlefield 6 has dead content support, and fundamental issues still havent been fixed. -arc raiders is the same, but even worse, cuz they decided to remove wipes. (3/?)

• 
  JTCrawford (@JtCrawford) reported 7 minutes ago

  FBI seized Chinese botnet tools used against NASA, DOE, and Senate networks. When adversaries penetrate critical infrastructure with impunity, it's not just an IT problem—it's proof we're not treating cyberspace like the battlefield it is. #Cybersecurity #CriticalInfrastructure

• 
  Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) reported 7 minutes ago

  🇺🇸🇮🇷 U.S. officials claim they’ve cleared much of the main shipping lane, restored roughly half of pre-war oil traffic and are steadily building a protected corridor through the Strait. If true, that changes the war considerably. But the problem is simpler: how can we still trust Washington enough to believe it? Even genuine battlefield progress becomes difficult to recognize when previous declarations of victory keep colliding with reality. @WeTheBrandon

• 
  Mazzphysics (@fredrik_fdev) reported 8 minutes ago

  @dhh @dhh The main problem I have with any Linux is I can't play battlefield 6 on it. Is this something omarchy could fix? Or are we doomed to use windows? I'd switch without hesitation if all my games worked on a Linux environment.

• 
  Michal Ngo (@PathFinder_CZ) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why dont you fix the carrier camping?

• 
  Joe (@josiiiah) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm How about fix the black screen that causes you to need to restart after leaving a match.

• 
  Strategic FaultLine (@StratFaultLine) reported 16 minutes ago

  @thetect0nic This is where escalation becomes genuinely dangerous. The most consequential words here may be « unknown sources. » A threat against facilities on British soil combined with built-in plausible deniability moves the confrontation into the grey zone between sabotage, cyberwarfare and open military action. And that grey zone creates a terrible problem: how does NATO respond to a serious attack when attribution itself becomes part of the battlefield? Europe should be paying very close attention.

• 
  War Detective (@seekersomething) reported 17 minutes ago

  @JosephJakeKlein All these were presented in the media as starvation victims in the summer 2025, but every single one had pre-existing conditions: 1. Mohammed Al-Mutawaq: He has cerebral palsy, proven by the medical report signed by Dr Saeed Mohammed Al Nassan on 20th May 2025, also confirmed by NY Times later and by the Anti-Israel site Drop Site News. The death of his father was also used as a framing for this story, claiming that: "Mohammed's father was killed last year when he went to seek food". But footage and reports from that day and location showed that he was most likely killed on the battlefield, as a Hamas soldier. 2. Youssef Matar: Toddler with cerebral palsy. He was initially meant to be used by NY Times as the cover photo, but they agreed to not do it when they found out that he had the pre-existing illness. So NY Times then changed the image to Mohammed, that later turned out to have the very same condition as him. 3. Osama Al-Raqab: He has been in Italy receiving treatment since 12th June 2025. This was confirmed in September 2025 by the hospital in Verona, by the doctor there, where he was treated for leaky SCID. 4. Karam Khaled Al-Jamal: He was 27 years old but on the images he was so skinny that he was presented like a child in the media. On 31 July 2025 he was reported dead by malnutrition. According to the IDF he had a lifelong muscular dystrophy and partial paralysis, confirmed by both Palestinian media and Turkish media: "Karam, who had suffered from muscular atrophy and hemiplegia since childhood". 5. Abdullah Abu Zarqa: Has a genetic disease causing deficiencies, osteoporosis, and bone thinning. 4 months before the outbreak of the war, he traveled with his mother to receive medical treatment in East Jerusalem. 6. Atef Abu Khater: Was severely burned on his foot and hand in a soup kitchen. This led to a form of psychological distress by which he stopped eating and drinking. 7. Mosab al-Debs: He sustained a critical injury that resulted in a portion of his skull being removed and severe brain hemorrhaging, leaving him completely paralyzed. 8. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: Suffered from a long-term condition that causes vomiting and requires specially prepared food for her to digest properly. 9. Hamza Mishmish: Living with disabilities since birth and was confirmed by Drop Site News to suffer from cerebral palsy. 10. Maryam Dawas: Suspected of having a serious undiagnosed stomach illness, causing diarrhoea, intestinal malabsorption and unspecified severe protein-energy malnutrition. Her mother and her brother can be seen looking healthy in the images from that location. Her illness is proven by the medical file from Al-Rantisi Children’s Hospital. 11. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: She had esophageal stenosis. This was later confirmed by Drop Site News, in an interview with her mother: "Before the war started, we had taken her to the hospital, and she was diagnosed with esophageal stenosis. Her condition had not yet worsened, and a surgery was scheduled for December 4, 2023". 12. Jana Ayad: This story was first presented as being from 2025, but already in June 2024 she was seen in a hospital showing these conditions and then reported for the same thing still in September 2025. So if the conditions were ongoing during such a long time, is it likely that they came from the lack of food? Well Jana's sister Joury died of kidney problems in July 2025 and her father had left the Gaza Strip for medical treatment before the war.

• 
  Onyx Novha (@ItzNovhaTV) reported 18 minutes ago

  Call of duty is meant to be a fast paced game, I’m sorry to those who like this slower ttk but this doesn’t feel like call of duty” it feels like battlefield and it’s honestly to a point that it may push me away from wanting to play it, I would love to release novelist 2 montage on this game, but this is a major red flag to me, pros feedback should only be for ranked play, lot those of us who are known for being pub players should be the ones to provide you the feedback problem with past three call of duty games is you’re trying to make pubs like ranked without the rewards, which is return makes pubs feel like cod champs, I like to snipe and pub stomp, if i wanted to play ranked on cod i would play ranked play, when I play cod I want to have fun but I also want to provide content on all my platforms, can you please take this advice into consideration @InfinityWard @CallofDuty @CallofDutyCM

• 
  Bootstrap Bill (@WillDaBeast_69) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the ******* black screen bug. Fix the ******* grenades. Fix the ******* new sniper being a total meme gun. Thx

• 
  Old Sapper (@OldSapper94713) reported 22 minutes ago

  @RoadknightThe It dosent matter where they come from, our government takes a hero and alters the law to charge this man with murder on the battlefield, but allow this class of murders scum and crims to exist at all. What service do they serve for this privilege 🤔

• 
  Winfield Scott (@LtGenScott) reported 24 minutes ago

  @AHC1776 June 17, 1876 If I'm not mistaken, I think Crook had his own problems with Indians just a week before, and just south of the site of the Little Big Horn. I believe his battle was called The Battle of the Rosebud. It was a spirited affair, and while by no means a massacre, it nevertheless caused Crook to retreat south from the battlefield. The reason he was there (Northern Wyoming/Southeast Montana) at all was part of the grand strategy. To apply pressure to the Indians on several fronts at once. Well, Crook's retreat did two things: It gave the Indians a surge of confidence that they would use later on the 7th Cavalry, and it removed one of the army's pressure points. From Custer's point of view, it may have changed the entire complexion of the battle he went into 8 days later.

• 
  —𝘿𝙄𝙎𝘾𝙊𝙍𝘿— (@Person_lity00) reported 24 minutes ago

  @VADER1711 @EmiliaRxse I got 3-5 shots to kill one person. I think this is more about server issues, where how many bullets you shot vs how many bullets your enemy received, Battlefield 6 did that and honestly way easier on how many shots I missed.

• 
  Orlando Victor (@OrlandoVictor54) reported 25 minutes ago

  @lavitx Whatever side of the debate we’re on, I think the important part is to stay curious, look at reliable evidence, question assumptions, and avoid turning environmental issues into another ideological battlefield. 🌍 We all have an interest in leaving a healthier planet behind us.

• 
  helmsman (@StitchWeb3Joy) reported 28 minutes ago

  If you’re buying $BTC here because you’re afraid of missing $100K… you might be the exit liquidity. Everyone is bullish again. $100K predictions are back. “Buy every dip” is back. And somehow, after a massive vertical move, people suddenly think risk has disappeared. That’s exactly what worries me. My last call: ✅ Correct — The break above $70K triggered a violent short squeeze. ✅ Correct — $75K–$80K became the battlefield. ❌ Wrong — I underestimated how fast the squeeze would happen. Now forget the hype. I’m watching 3 levels: Above $80K + hold → $82K–$85K Rejected at $80K → late longs are in trouble Below $74K → this “new bull run” narrative gets seriously tested My 12H view: I’m not chasing this candle. And here’s the part Bitcoin bulls won’t like: A vertical pump caused by shorts getting destroyed is NOT the same thing as healthy spot demand. Maybe BTC goes straight to $100K. But buying AFTER the squeeze and calling it “conviction” looks a lot like FOMO to me. Bulls think I’m wrong. Good. Screenshot this. We’ll check again in 12 hours. $BTC

• 
  Farlans (@farlansangel) reported 33 minutes ago

  @IMJasonRhode fix the bugged sound. especially warzone. footsteps are just not there. sound effects way to loud even with turning down. it feels like i have wartapes from battlefield on. maybe this is battlecod?

• 
  Bill (@strokeyourself) reported 40 minutes ago

  @MeikoTesla I’m done with the lesser of two evils. Crash the system and let’s just sort things out on the battlefield.

• 
  John Lane (@JohnLan70186141) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Mr_Andrew_Fox Battlefield Ecology describes evolving technology and tactics. What works well gets used until changes make it work worse. Even then, old solutions sometimes address contemporary problems.

• 
  Legendary K9 (@MbwaLegend) reported 41 minutes ago

  @SyloveO Sometimes the problem isn’t what we’re saying, but how we’re communicating. Changing the format can change the entire conversation. Listen to understand, not to win. A good conversation should build a bridge, not another battlefield.

• 
  Jerry Razor Travone™️ (@JerryTravone) reported 42 minutes ago

  @hrplays7 Battlefield has major audio problems. A tank should make a ton of noise and the screen should shake not fly down the road at 50 mph and pull up behind you with no audio . That right there is why I quit battlefield.

• 
  Tyler Frank (@mrtfrank007) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Bring back the SCAR-SV. Fix the interdictor

• 
  Ben Clark (@ben_clark55) reported 47 minutes ago

  @TheManLandTCG i’ve been playing the deck and i’m having some trouble figuring out the battlefield order, what were you doing with them?

• 
  Daniel Faria Sampaio (@DanFSD) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Luuk__058 @BattlefieldComm First they need to fix matchmaking. Plenty of people playing Ranked on S. America but for some reason they throw us into N. America servers. When this happens, we're left we no choice but to enable such VPN tools in order to slightly improve latency, which benefits all parties

• 
  president of the nate/veen fan club (@PresidentVeen) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your ******* servers Jesus Christ

• 
  WorldMonitor (@1NightmareFuel) reported 57 minutes ago

  @hrplays7 Battlefield is better overall and cod is for children hence the slop skins and their downgrade in grit from world at war to airsoft looking maps, but battlefield also has issues.

• 
  Scott Sapinkopf (@Sctty569) reported 57 minutes ago

  mw4 feels like a game for overcompetitive cracked meta **** the movement speed is way to fast and the sbmm needs to be removed !!! it feels like your literally cracked up u cant have ur settings high becuz everyone is trying to lower settings to maximize less input lag i hate it , im forced to pkay bots becuz i dont wanna pkay sweaty losers every single game and the ppl cheating need to be banned !! tht is another frustrating thing !! also whatever engine they are using sucks the delta force graphics look better then cod graphics !!! and i dont even rlly play delta force anymore it is very upsetting to be a cod fan right now but atleast battlefield slowed pace of play and is still fun amd gta will come out soon !!!

• 
  Cannon (@_Cannon_Fire_) reported 58 minutes ago

  @KaptainKrunch97 What exactly is the issue? That it's shocking? The subject matter is shocking but that's ok when the appearance is sanitized and removed from the darkness of its inspiration like in COD or battlefield. ****** morality.