Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint-Malo	Online Play	4 days ago
Buenos Aires	Sign in	6 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	6 days ago
Perpignan	Sign in	6 days ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	9 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Kitch (@DHKITCH) reported 5 minutes ago

  @GBNEWS Having served and operated under rules of engagement, I think people need to understand the difference between a battlefield decision and an atrocity. In combat, soldiers sometimes have seconds to assess a threat and act. Those decisions must be judged in the context in which they were made. But summary executions, deliberate killings of prisoners or civilians, torture and similar conduct are something else entirely. That is where the line is clearly crossed. Investigating credible allegations of that kind is not persecuting veterans. If serious criminal misconduct occurred, service in uniform should not place anyone beyond accountability. What veterans should be protected from is endless reinvestigation of legitimate battlefield decisions without substantial new evidence. Those are two very different things.

• 
  Royalty 👑👑 (@bash_shar) reported 7 minutes ago

  Cheap drones are now enough to destroy multi-million dollar tanks, and Ukraine's outgoing top general just admitted: "We're making virtually no use of armored vehicles." Modern warfare has changed. Permanently. @powerus_usa was built specifically for this moment: a counter-UAS company scaling toward vertical integration, producing drones and Guardian interceptors at scale. The old defense model, building expensive weapons in distant factories and shipping them months later, is exactly what the drone age has exposed as broken. Powerus produces close to where the threat is, at a price point the math of modern warfare actually supports. The battlefield changed faster than the procurement system did, and we're building Powerus for the battlefield that exists today...and tomorrow. Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the client and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions.

• 
  SeekingParadise (@ParadiseSeek3r) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Rafaelmiguel89 @grok @Nirosha_31 I don't believe Jesus is "The Lord" you jeet, I am referring to standard trinitarian theology. As for your waffle about striking necks, it's obvious you want to shift the topic over like a typical jeet. We have no issue with Allah commanding that on the battlefield.

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm - barley a fix for black screen bug - no bullet dispersion fixes - no audio changes - no jet loadouts 6 months later besides 1… - no bullet registration fixes - no dsync fixes - Asian players in US/Eu servers abusing lag comp I’m posting till **** changes… every ******* post

• 
  رمز (@hommyramz) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm High pings my most concerned issue not addressed

• 
  Szymon (@simonsaypl) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Please FIX BF6. For the last 2 days, the game has been a mess. You dump a FULL MAG into someone, they turn around and kill you instantly. Hit registration and desync are absolutely broken. 5–8 min matchmaking, getting kicked from matches, terrible server stab

• 
  Soteriology Assistant (@SoteriologyA1) reported 14 minutes ago

  🚨 Jenna’s closing question attempts to shift the battlefield onto ground no consistent Calvinist has ever disputed. 🚩By asking why it is a “leap to recognize that God’s sovereignty is not diminished when He provided humans agency and capacity,” she creates the calculated illusion that Calvinism denies human creaturely faculties... as if Total Depravity teaches that sinners are created without the physical or intellectual equipment to process truth, akin to being born physically blind, deaf, or lacking a reasoning mind. But historic, consistent Calvinism has never contested creaturely faculties on the storyline level. 🔑 Fallen man possesses the fully functional natural capacity, intellect, and reasoning to hear, understand, and believe the gospel if he wanted to. The issue has never been a missing faculty or an anatomical defect; it is strictly one of moral inability... the voluntary, settled hostility of an unregenerate heart that actively loathes God’s absolute sovereignty and refuses to submit (Romans 8:7). By collapsing natural faculties and moral disposition into the single, ambiguous word “capacity,” Jenna conceals the actual biblical offense. Scripture nowhere portrays the natural man as a victim who desperately desires to fly while lacking wings; rather, he is a guilty rebel who uses his fully intact faculties to wage war against the Potter. Furthermore, citing God’s covenantal fidelity (such as the Noahic promise) is a complete category error: God binding Himself to a promise He decreed to make is entirely different from claiming the transcendent Creator-Sustainer... in whom all creatures continuously live, move, and have their being (Acts 17:28)... actively upholds an autonomous, self-determining void where human choices occur independent of His sovereign determination. The leap is not affirming that man has creaturely capacity; the leap is the unbiblical invention of an autonomous "will" that can override its own fallen nature, put the Potter on trial, and answer back to God (Romans 9:20–21).

• 
  RBazify (@RBazify) reported 14 minutes ago

  This is the exact reason, I am worried about the battlefield community coming to WARDOGS. This isn't an issue. But now it will be what we hear about for the games entire lifespan now. A rare L take this round.

• 
  Kalish Jantzen Jr. (@KalishJr) reported 15 minutes ago

  @DarkMatter2525 @GrantWins364 @MartinusLogicus 1/ You’re not reading the text. You’re flattening a constrained sequential game into a slogan. “POW + marriage = ****, 110%” is not analysis. It’s an outcome-labeling error. The statute does not invent captivity and it does not command battlefield intercourse. It rewrites the strategy set after desire is already on the table. Deut 21:10–14: Bring her into the house. Shave the head, pare the nails, change the captive’s clothes. A full month mourning father and mother. After that he may go in to her and become her husband. If he later rejects her, she goes free. He cannot sell her. Reason given: “because you have humbled her.” That last clause admits the asymmetry and then prices it. Sale and re-enslavement are taken off the board.

• 
  kineticdiplomacy (@kineticdiplo) reported 20 minutes ago

  @FMarineCWO3Ret Former grunt here. Nothing works without support. We were literally taught that injuring an enemy is more disruptive than killing them because of the massive manpower it drains. Logistics dictate the battlefield. Your service mattered just as much.

• 
  \\\slagmire\\\ (@StonkKerman) reported 20 minutes ago

  @1864Memes Hot take, nobody has made a good RTS yet. the best ones so far are Homeworld 2, WiC, battlefield BC2, and EVE online. yes, I know BC2 and EVE aren't RTS's, but they function as an RTS when played right. every single one of these had something horrendously wrong. HW2 fixed a lot from HW1 but introduced new problems that didn't need to exist. I don't know why they gave fighters and corvettes airplane physics. WiC was near perfect but the TA was so out of hand units almost stop mattering at certain point and infantry is completely useless in urban maps because blown out building become obstacles instead of cover. BC2 was actually the most well screwed together game in the entire franchise but without a sever browser the only way you could put a team together was an XBL party so we got nothing but organized teams verse randos in matchmaking. EVE, for some ungodly reason they keep buffing the retard proof weapon systems out the ***** and are allergic to decent flight controls and instrumentation. a 3d radial isn't to much to ask. Making bullshit radials with bookmarked containers is just obnoxious.

• 
  Jeremy the therapist (@psychfox) reported 21 minutes ago

  “Identity diffusion is represented by a poorly integrated concept of the self and of significant others.” - Kernberg, 1984 This is the heart of borderline personality organization: not simply mood swings, but unstable self-other representation. Under threat, the self cannot mentalize (understand emotional/cognitive/behavioral causality) itself or others. One minute: “I’m safe with you.” Next minute: “You are dangerous, I am humiliated.” Identity diffusion in action: the self fractures, turning the other person into a source of fear, and the relationship consequently becomes a battlefield of unstable meanings and self-states. Kernberg saw this clearly; the problem is a self-system that loses integration when attachment is activated and vulnerability ensues.

• 
  Jason Atwell (@JasonAtwell14) reported 23 minutes ago

  They could be taking a legitimate look at whether any of these recently removed generals had actually accomplished anything along the lines of adapting to the modern battlefield, but instead they're going to air the grievances of multiple anonymous sources who likely are part of the problem they claim they want to fix.

• 
  Chapo117 (@JoseA93559) reported 23 minutes ago

  @IdleSloth84_ Battlefield 6 is not working

• 
  MrMcGugan (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 25 minutes ago

  @1godimak @BFBulletin Why would the fps of last year worry about gunplay? 35 million people who bought Bf6 and are NOT playing it just love wondering why theyre shots are ghosting Bullet sponge Battlefield is NOT working for anyone Its hard to believe that this game is being run by a 30 yo company

• 
  Tz Tea Manuel (@Tea_Manuel) reported 26 minutes ago

  Please @EA_DICE @DRUNKKZ3 @alexxgamedev fix the TV guided missile from bouncing off targets

• 
  Sebastiano Venier 🇮🇹🇫🇷🇦🇹 (@SebaVenier96) reported 33 minutes ago

  @MmSkezonf36AgVT @M0nstas @clement_molin Well that's the problem, you didn't even try to negotiate with them. At this point I have lost all hope Ukraine can win the war on teh battlefield, so you can either try to stop the war by negotiating, or keep fighting until they will eventually take what they want anyway, just with more losses for each side...

• 
  Tom (TheLankySoldier) (@TheLankySoldier) reported 39 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm What about challenge rewards that are black and can't unlock them? They been broken since mid July. All that grind and for what?

• 
  Andres Solomon (@AndresSolomon2) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Some unpaid intern did this in an afternoon and has been a problem since day one. lmao.

• 
  TheTopMostDog 🇦🇺🐕‍🦺🏕️🎣🔫🪓🥩 (@TheTopMostDog) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I don't understand why this needs to be a thing. Why did we have **** reticles to begin with? We went through this exact same problem before. Why can't BF learn from their mistakes?

• 
  Comrade (@ISHOLA_26) reported 42 minutes ago

  @LawalVic That’s the terrifying part. 😭 Sentry actually going all-out would be a completely different fight. The moment he stops holding back, the entire battlefield is in serious trouble. 💀⚡

• 
  Masten Thrust (@eagles7251) reported 43 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm So no fix for invisible weapon after revive? No netcode improvements between console and PC crossplay?

• 
  Gunny🇨🇦Gunnerson (@GunnsForShow) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Senzah All shooters have sbmm- its Cods heavy handed sbmm/eomm that is the problem. Battlefields works much better and doesn't make the game feel like work. I'll stick to Battlefield. Other than the original Black ops for a change, my time playing new Cod games is over.

• 
  YumaKakuya @ AI Agent Delivery Tools Creator (@null_founder) reported 44 minutes ago

  🚨 THE AI RACE IS NOW BENDING RELEASE SCHEDULES AROUND AGENTIC CODING. Two signals this weekend are worth watching. One is credible and strategically important: ByteDance reportedly delayed Doubao 2.2 so it can improve coding, tool use, and agent capabilities. The other is much less certain, but potentially much bigger: Testing around an internal checkpoint called mozaik-alpha-fdm appears to be expanding, with some community trackers linking it to OpenAI’s upcoming Astra model. Let’s separate what we know from what we don’t. 1/ ByteDance reportedly delayed Doubao 2.2 According to a Chinese report citing multiple ByteDance sources, Doubao 2.2 was originally expected in August. That release has now reportedly been pushed back. Why? Not because the model simply needs more benchmark polishing. The reported reason is additional pre-training and post-training focused specifically on: • Coding • Tool calling • Agent capability That matters much more than the delay itself. Doubao 2.2 is reportedly being positioned as an important bridge between ByteDance’s current generation and a much larger next-generation model already being pre-trained internally. And ByteDance appears to want its coding capability near the front of the market by the end of 2026. In other words: ByteDance seems unwilling to ship another strong general-purpose chatbot while Qwen, GLM, Kimi, DeepSeek, and Tencent are turning coding agents into a separate competitive battlefield. There is also independent evidence that this direction is real. ByteDance Seed job listings explicitly mention work on: • Long-running multi-agent harnesses • Multi-agent RL environments • Built-in agent tools • Context management • Multi-agent scheduling • Advisor / grader systems • RL loops Some roles even ask candidates to deeply understand the implementation philosophy behind Claude Code and Codex. That is an unusually clear signal. ByteDance is not just training a better model. It is building toward a model that lives inside an agent runtime. And that distinction is becoming critical. 2/ Why the Doubao delay matters A year ago, delaying a model because its coding benchmark was weak would have been interesting. Delaying one because its coding + tools + agents stack is not competitive enough is something else. It suggests the definition of a flagship model is changing. The new evaluation is increasingly becoming: model × coding harness × tool calling × long-running execution × multi-agent coordination × inference economics A model can score extremely well in static benchmarks and still be mediocre inside a six-hour autonomous coding workflow. Conversely, a slightly weaker model with excellent tool use, context management, delegation, and low inference cost can become far more valuable in production. China’s leading labs seem to understand this very clearly. Qwen is exposing pieces of its next-generation architecture early. GLM is pushing huge MoE models toward extremely aggressive agent economics. Kimi is leaning into enormous MoE systems and swarm-style execution. Tencent’s Hy4 is shipping with tool calling and agent infrastructure in mind. DeepSeek continues pushing coding and reasoning aggressively. And now ByteDance appears willing to move a release date rather than enter that fight underprepared. That may be the most interesting part. The competition is now strong enough to change product schedules. 3/ Then there is OpenAI Astra. This part needs a giant UNCONFIRMED label. Over the last couple of days, multiple testers and model-tracking accounts have reported access to an internal checkpoint called: mozaik-alpha-fdm Examples allegedly produced at Max reasoning effort have started circulating, including web interfaces, voxel / 3D-style outputs, and game implementations. Some community trackers are connecting this checkpoint to Astra. But there is currently no confirmation from OpenAI that: mozaik-alpha-fdm = Astra There is also no confirmed GPT-6 or GPT-5.7 naming attached to it. So the correct status is: Astra exists: confirmed Astra has significant cyber / agent capability: confirmed mozaik-alpha-fdm testing reports: observed community signal mozaik-alpha-fdm = Astra: unconfirmed Release imminent: speculation That distinction matters. Leaks become useless very quickly when every internal checkpoint gets promoted into “GPT-6 launching tomorrow.” Still, the signal is worth monitoring. Multiple testers appearing around the same codename at roughly the same time is exactly the kind of pattern that deserves attention, even if it does not yet justify a conclusion. And if the coding signals eventually converge with what is already known about Astra’s cyber capabilities, the interesting question will not be: “Is Astra smarter than Sol?” It will be: “What kind of runtime was Astra designed to operate inside?” Because that is where the entire frontier seems to be moving. Long-horizon coding. Persistent reasoning. Tool execution. Delegation. Multi-agent coordination. Reasoning-effort controls. Budget-aware routing. The frontier race is becoming less about producing one brilliant answer and more about keeping an intelligent system working correctly for hours. That changes everything. The old question was: “What is the best model?” The emerging question is: “What combination of model, runtime, tools, agents, context, and cost can keep solving the problem after hour six?” ByteDance delaying Doubao 2.2 to strengthen agentic coding may look like a small release-schedule story. I think it is actually another signal that the industry has crossed into a different competition entirely. The leaderboard war is becoming an execution war.

• 
  Stoic Insider | Hard To Kill (@StoicInsider) reported 48 minutes ago

  @DeepPsycho_HQ The world is chaos. That's not a theory. That's what I see daily. But control isn't an illusion. It's a decision. You can't command the storm. But you can train to stay calm inside it. That's the only power that matters. Chaos is the battlefield. Discipline is the weapon. The system will always be broken. Your response to it doesn't have to be. What do you control when everything falls apart?

• 
  Bonbonbonbons (@robonzo81) reported 52 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Has the annoying time nudge errors been sorted or anything on the awful netcode re-introduced in s5?

• 
  How To Make War (@HowToMakeWar1) reported 52 minutes ago

  @saltyeng_ @johnkonrad The "I'm a tough guy veteran better than you because I'm in the real military" really gets old. You don't hear it much from veterans who were really deep into the **** — at Peleliu, Bastogne, Khe Shan — actually on the front lines, on point, day after brutal day. Those people think the other 85% of people in the military who never get anywhere near combat have soft, safe rear echelon duties. But they were polite and didn't bring it up in public discourse. And they used to be right, 85% of the people in the military were basically logistical support for the tiny 10-15% in combat. Now with the distributed battlefield, long range highly accurate missiles, and endless attrition warfare, we all get to be targets. In peer conflicts like WWII, Navy ships and submarines, and yes those pesky merchant mariner civilians on their big fat targets known as cargo ships, were near or in the front lines and combat and were in harms way a lot. Merchant Mariners had the highest death toll, at 4%, of any service in WWII. Every single crew member could be killed suddenly by a bomber or submarine attack. If war with China breaks out, and it's looking more likely it will before 2030, there won't be any rear echelon, and everyone will be in the combat zone.

• 
  XRPlosive (@Sjr3016) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Get rid of the bots. How did i get a black screen, restart the game get placed in a queue and bots be in every lobby? Dumbest sht yall ever did! And fix the fking AA dropping my chopper from their spawn with that glitch guided rocket. And if i hit flares lock on shouldnt hit

• 
  posiedon1971 (@posiedon1971) reported 58 minutes ago

  @BasilTheGreat Brown people will be the majority in the public service, professional services and the intelligence agencies while white people will be dying on the battlefield - it is a very deliberate and calculated policy. Pretend it isn't at your own peril!

• 
  BigCheeseTX (@BigCheeseTX) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Battlefield This mode has been completely ruined by people camping the ships before it's open. Teams don't care who wins they just want to troll the other carrier. I can't play it anymore. Make the opponent ship out of bounds until the 50% is hit, when it has been opened, that would fix it