Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bordeaux	Matchmaking	3 days ago
Bron	Online Play	3 days ago
Madrid	Online Play	3 days ago
La Trinité	Game Crash	8 days ago
Lyon	Online Play	9 days ago
Persan	Sign in	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ryan (@Hoskins1st) reported 8 seconds ago

  @EndersFPS BF6 wasn’t even supposed to come out until this year. So give it time. The game was released a year early. Also pretty much every Battlefield was trash for the first year or two and everyone seems to have forgotten that, but they fixed them in time. So let’s hope they fix it.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 1 minute ago

  Fighting Right With Wrong Weapons Key Passage: 2 Corinthians 10:3 “For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh:” 2 Corinthians 10:3 There are few things more dangerous than a man who is right about the issue and wrong about the way he fights it. Error is easy enough to identify when it comes carrying a false Bible, a crooked doctrine, a pagan philosophy, or some religious costume stitched together in Rome, Alexandria, Salt Lake City, Brooklyn, or the imagination of a modern apostate. The harder thing to recognize is the flesh wearing the uniform of truth. A Christian can believe the right Book, preach the right gospel, stand on the right doctrine, expose the right error, and still conduct the battle with weapons God never issued. Paul says, “For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh.” That little distinction is where many good causes have been wrecked. The doctrine was right, but pride drove the wagon. The argument was biblical, but hatred held the reins. The preacher had the Sword of the Spirit in one hand and a fleshly club in the other, and by the time the smoke cleared nobody could tell whether he had been defending truth or defending himself. Being right about the battle does not give you permission to be wrong about the weapons. Paul knew something about fighting. The man was ******, beaten, jailed, mocked, opposed by Jews, opposed by Gentiles, opposed by false brethren, opposed by false apostles, and criticized by people whose greatest spiritual accomplishment was apparently having an opinion about Paul. Yet when he comes to 2 Corinthians 10, he draws a deliberate line between living in a human body and allowing human flesh to govern the warfare. “Though we walk in the flesh,” he says. He does not pretend to be some floating spiritual mist immune to irritation, weariness, insult, or human emotion. Paul had flesh, and so do you. But then comes the restriction: “we do not war after the flesh.” He will defend his apostleship. He will expose false apostles as “deceitful workers.” He will answer foolish charges. He will rebuke sin. He will name names when necessary. But he refuses to admit that because the enemy fights *****, the servant of God may therefore crawl into the same sewer and call the smell discernment. That issue has become even more important in a generation where everybody carries a printing press in his pocket. A man once had to own a newspaper to broadcast slander; now he needs two thumbs and an internet connection. A believer can become angry at ten o’clock, publish at ten-oh-one, gather applause from people already angry at ten-oh-two, and convince himself by ten-oh-five that the Holy Ghost must have inspired the whole operation because somebody clicked “like.” But Scripture has not changed because communication got faster. “The wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God” (James 1:20). That verse still stands after the thread goes viral. We are told to “earnestly contend for the faith” (Jude 3), but the same Bible still condemns lying, malice, railing, bitterness, envy, strife, and evil speaking. The cause does not sanctify the carnality. You can carry the right banner into battle and still disgrace it by the way you swing the sword. 1. A Right Cause Does Not Sanctify Wrong Conduct The first thing that needs to be nailed down is simple: truth does not make sin righteous simply because the sin was committed while defending truth. If you lie about a false teacher, you have not improved the truth; you have added another falsehood to the battlefield. If you intentionally misrepresent somebody’s position because the real position is harder to answer, you have not defended Scripture; you have demonstrated that you do not trust Scripture enough to meet the real argument. Paul says in 2 Corinthians 4:2 that he had “renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully.” There is your standard. He did

• 
  McMfog (@McMfog) reported 6 minutes ago

  @mamamurlox @Aurora_verdit The fandom of this show drives me insane, there’s never any accountability for what the women are doing. Daemon the wife slayer literally unleashed caraxes on two children. We all saw it in 4k. sir Rodrick Dustin kills a kid that’s sitting down. Ormund keeps the kids on the front lines. You are god damn right I’m turning on all of them into ash. The children are dead because they kept them on the battlefield. In a show where everyone is a piece of ****, some broken abused addict is somehow the villain. I s2g man

• 
  🌹 The Infamous E.G.🌹 (@TheInfamousEG) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MrBattlefield0 @BattleNonSense @Battlefield The problems are rooted from BC1

• 
  caro1 (@fr0gwad) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm why wasn't this posted as an appendix to the initial post abt matchmaking? why did you just leave everyone to speculate and assume the absolute worst for a week? is it that hard to update a live service games community in two tweets?

• 
  P-HADR USA (@p_hadr) reported 14 minutes ago

  @thinkdefence @TomSharpe134 @CISACyber 10. JORDAN / AQABA LOGISTICS ASSESSMENT Current Position PORT: Operational. SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE: Operational. PORT CALLS: Continuing. STANDARD / IN-GAUGE CARGO: Accepted. OUT-OF-GAUGE (OOG): Suspended. CUSTOMS: Operating normally. ROAD LINKS: Open. AIR FREIGHT: Operational. PRIMARY EXTERNAL RISK: Escalation in Bab el-Mandeb. 11. SHIPPING / CARRIER ACCEPTANCE CONFIRMED REPORTING Aqaba remains within active carrier networks. The principal current restriction remains suspension of all OOG cargo bookings. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT For Jordanian defence and dual-use exports: Containerised cargo: comparatively resilient. Heavy completed platforms: significantly more constrained. 12. CUSTOMS / FREE ZONE CONFIRMED REPORTING No interruption has been identified affecting: Jordanian customs; Aqaba Special Economic Zone; industrial operations around Aqaba. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT Current constraints are external logistics issues rather than failures within Jordanian port administration. 13. INSURANCE CONFIRMED REPORTING War-risk insurance remains significantly restricted across the Red Sea, Gulf of Oman and Persian Gulf. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT Insurance remains one of the principal limiting factors affecting heavy defence exports from Jordan. 14. AIR FREIGHT CONFIRMED POSITION No national Jordanian airfreight disruption has been identified. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT Air freight remains viable for: electronics; communications equipment; sensors; urgent spares. It is not a realistic replacement for heavy vehicle exports. 15. ROAD LINKS CONFIRMED POSITION No significant disruption has been identified affecting Jordan's principal overland routes. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT Road transport provides resilience but does not eliminate dependence on specialist maritime lift for heavy exports. 16. JORDANIAN DEFENCE / DUAL-USE INDUSTRY CONFIRMED POSITION No verified widespread disruption has been identified affecting Jordan's defence or dual-use industrial sector. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT The principal risk remains logistics-driven: Production to Export Delays to Inventory Growth to Working Capital Pressure to Delivery Slippage to Eventual Production Adjustment There is no current evidence that this final stage has been reached. 17. JORDANIAN ECONOMIC / DOMESTIC STABILITY CONFIRMED POSITION No evidence currently supports: economic collapse; widespread shortages; Aqaba operational failure; widespread unrest; loss of government control. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT The credible medium-term pathway remains: Persistent Red Sea insecurity to Higher logistics costs to Reduced export competitiveness to Fiscal and employment pressure to Increased domestic dissatisfaction. Assessment: Acute Economic Failure: Medium-Rising. Prolonged Economic Attrition: MODERATE. Economic Collapse: LOW-PROBABILITY / HIGH-IMPACT scenario. 18. SYRIA BORDER / PROXY SPILLOVER CONFIRMED POSITION No evidence currently indicates deterioration along Jordan's northern border directly linked to Aqaba logistics. ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT The scenario remains conditional: Long-term economic pressure to Greater demands on security resources to Reduced reserve capacity to Increased opportunity for trafficking and militant activity. Potential exploiters include: narcotics trafficking networks; weapons smugglers; ISIS-linked cells; (Important to watch) Iran-aligned covert networks. These remain analytical scenarios rather than confirmed developments. FORWARD ASSESSMENT — NEXT 12–24 HOURS Priority indicators: 1. Further attacks on Gulf commercial shipping. 2. UAE, Saudi or USA responses to today's vessel attacks. 3. Updated Hormuz vessel traffic. 4. Additional USA blockade enforcement. 5. Iranian naval activity. 6. Further Houthi commercial-shipping attacks. 7. Yemen battlefield developments. 8. Changes to carrier operations affecting Aqaba.

• 
  Tim Kubit (@KravMagaRoc) reported 16 minutes ago

  @PsalmWarfare Those of you who think Twitter is the battlefield, you’re making a category error. You’re either failing to distinguish, or conflating categories.

• 
  Vit (@DLVittorio) reported 16 minutes ago

  @BattleNonSense @Battlefield The problem is 99% of the current player base never experienced a classic Battlefield match, and they have literally no idea what your discussion means. They’re so used to this chaos and garbage mechanics that think this is what Battlefield means

• 
  mohammed ed (@huy_ght59070) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I wish I could play it, but there are problems preventing me from playing it again, including packet loss high.

• 
  James Portis III | JPenumbra (@JPenumbra) reported 18 minutes ago

  @ItsSpyno Them not doing it is the problem. And her not being on the battlefield is a continued example of netease exhibiting anti black behavior

• 
  MetalSlug (@metalslug0390) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Blizzy63 @BattlefieldComm Pretty sure the black screen bug has been around since December… actually insane they haven’t fixed this yet. Too many game breaking issues in BF6, no desire to play it anymore.

• 
  Alex Devine (@SwiftyLunatic) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Nice, still no fixes for the hardcore++ ttk, sound issues, nade warning when a nade lands in your toes. Waste of an update.

• 
  Josue Almeida (@JosueCriticism) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm They really sleep at work hahaha damn, no a single fix in the real problems of gameplay and bugs in the game. GGs

• 
  Retrosport Gaming (@Tom2kvals) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Every first games since weeks . Happily i never have problem in my second game . Such a pleasure to wait in the worst lobby ever for no reason . Oh if you could open maps when they are 50 people waiting could be a good idea

• 
  Himanshu Bhandari (@Bhandari_112) reported 26 minutes ago

  Normal people play football, legends step on a battlefield. When you step up, there is a decent possibility of you coming back with something broken for sure, could be a broken knee, tore off ACL, ankle twist, dislocated shoulder, etc. Choose wisely and play anyway 🗿

• 
  Gaming Amigos (@gamingamigos24) reported 30 minutes ago

  A Battlefield 6 player with hundreds of hours played has reportedly received a full $110 refund from Steam after several game modes were removed from quick-play matchmaking. 🎮 The player said Squad Deathmatch and King of the Hill were initially removed from quick play. 🚨 Their final issue came after Rush, a long-running Battlefield mode, was also removed.

• 
  Battle(non)sense | Chris (@BattleNonSense) reported 31 minutes ago

  @DLVittorio @Battlefield That does apply to quite many. However they are clearly those who do see the problems, but they are unable to take the next step and understand why those problems showed up and accept what needs to change to improve the situation and fix the issues they complain about.

• 
  PLATTiNUM ⭐️ FiSH (@plattuhsus) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Cool now as someone who usually has a very limited amount of time to play can we fix the map rotation because I usually end up still playing the original maps 98% of the time

• 
  Rowan Hart (@NewEnglandLass) reported 33 minutes ago

  Kissing my husband on the porch of General Lee’s battlefield headquarters, at sunset in Gettysburg, PA would fix me.

• 
  Leah Hoopes (@hoopes_leah) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Joeoltmann Joe, government yoursel accordingly You just publicly stated that you “don’t really care” what I did or did not do, and then, without missing a beat, declared that I “was not the woman that did the work.” You cannot claim ignorance of the record and simultaneously appoint yourself the authority on it. Pick one. You don't know what I did because you weren't there. You didn't conduct our investigations. You didn't participate in my communications. You didn't recruit the witnesses. You didn't do my leg work. You didn't prepare my court filings. You didn't sit beside me while evidence was being developed. You didn't give my testimony. You weren't involved in the relationships I established with attorneys, investigators and organizations. You weren't there for the work that preceded the people you now defend. So you are in absolutely no position to tell the public who “did the work.” And calling me a “nasty woman” and an “entitled queen” doesn't cure those facts. Those are insults from a man who just admitted he doesn't know the underlying facts. I challenged your position with facts. You answered by attacking my character. That tells me everything I need to know. I never claimed to be the only whistleblower, the only investigator, or the only person who contributed evidence. In fact, my entire argument is that every person who actually developed evidence matters because the truth requires an accurate chronology. You and others are the one trying to erase people from that chronology while admitting you don't care enough to learn it. That is precisely the problem I have been talking about. This isn't about me needing recognition from you or anyone, Joe. I couldn't care less about your approval. It is about protecting evidence, witnesses, investigations, court records and the people who can authenticate what actually happened. You want to disagree with me? Fine. Bring documents. Bring dates. Bring testimony. Bring court filings. Bring the complete chronology and put it against mine. But don't walk onto a battlefield you weren't standing on, announce that you don't care what happened there, and then start issuing orders about who did the work. You don't have the factual foundation for the authority you're pretending to exercise. Facts will always win and they matter. 6 years of contemporaneous documentation, because I knew this day would come. Preserve your communications buddy.

• 
  Kaoukabi Jaouad (@JaouadKaoukabi) reported 38 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the servers, i think the dynamic allocation of servers and the netcode, makes the game servers being always on scarcity hence the very bad netcode, the worst ever i played in an FPS game, the servers allocated are always full and don't have the compute power is insufficient.

• 
  Denise (@dnsrpld1989) reported 38 minutes ago

  @okrika25 But why is the black’s fault when he went after her and she refused to go back with him and he never told Daemon that his wife was there or anyone in the battlefield 😒 I’m tired of this always blaming someone else about their on errors

• 
  King Emmanuel (@Obanuell) reported 41 minutes ago

  @7evenReels Yeah, the battlefield was never his real problem, the moment he broke that promise he basically signed his own invitation to the Red Wedding. Feelings are expensive in Westeros apparently.

• 
  Nikola Tesla (@teslawarehouse) reported 41 minutes ago

  @EricLDaugh Within the margin of error, this shows Ohio is going to be a real battlefield this fall. Turnout is going to dictate everything in this race.

• 
  Chuma the EPL Champion😎🏆 (@Bizzle025) reported 48 minutes ago

  @GetSteven3D97 @Mark13prepper @GhostRecon Lol you know what is funny? First person is actually the most generic one among the 2. Apart from Ghost recon, which other tps military games are out there? If you are asking to be optional, then no problem. But COD and Battlefield etc should have a TPS option for campaign too

• 
  Clutchy (@ClutchyyyyF) reported 50 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Another useless update which doesnt fix any of the 3526363 bugs in redsec

• 
  ALEX (@Ay_See1003) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I can't stand today's gaming. These seasons and limited time events are what made me stop playing so many beloved franchises that went the completely live service route. Goddamnit

• 
  Greg Gustilo (@GustiloGreg) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Chemisorptive @ElofsonJess @HealthRanger There is no possibility a woman could get grown men to do a job designed for men. Makes no logical sense, unless you wish to destroy the morale of the men in service. How does a woman, who has no ability to be as good as men on the battlefield get to command a US boat.

• 
  Michael Raymond (@Michael65775190) reported 56 minutes ago

  @HFI_Research Well, first off, oil on water has been a big battlefield between independent analysts and Wall Street because of double counting. Second, as a consequence of point one, I suppose you can't undo the "super glut" theory of 2025 when counting total oil inventories so the number is likely overstated. Third, outside of the United States, visibility on oil inventories is poor and comes with a lag. I stopped listening to Wall Street a while ago. About the person only person with any credibility is Helima Croft. Where's Mike Rothman on all of this?

• 
  D-niska (@FINAL1DY) reported 57 minutes ago

  Main problem of Battlefield 6 Matchmaking is that they kill full server and start to search for new 64/48 Players. Lmao… Dice kill’s themselves full lobbies and forces people to search again just to get in a bot lobby. Genius!!!!!