Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (37%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (13%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Americana	Glitches	2 days ago
Rennes	Game Crash	3 days ago
Nantes	Glitches	7 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	8 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	8 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Renaissancetrack:3 (@BeyonceStan44) reported 2 minutes ago

  @muixyui Yall do know majority of service members don’t go to the battlefield unless it’s real war And the military has very good benefits

• 
  𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐬 (@MarcusClash117) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Please fix the ping problem in Golmud

• 
  UniQue 🇳🇱 (@ThePollus) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Can we get some proper factions back? It’s a giant mess. Some Pax look like NATO, some NATO look like Pax. What a giant mess you’ve created with this abomination of a customization system. Please fix this. It isn’t too late.

• 
  The ****** (@Garlicoyal) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ProjectedBeing @grok @Jijith_NR Vedic Sanskrit is ONE direct descendant of Indo-European. German, Spanish, Latin, and Greek are also direct descendants There's no evidence that it came from Northwest India and if it did, Northwest India at the time was occupied by European type people...the IE people As to the archaeological evidence...battles leave very little evidence. The dead are stripped of everything of value and if the bodies are left there, they'll be gone in a year. The lack of "Mass graves" is another point made by Hindus. Mass graves happen under 2 conditions: When an invading army loses (and the Aryans didn't lose) and after mass executions. A victorious invading army will leave the bodies in the battlefield and move on. These arguments are nothing burgers The IE people were derived 95% from Eastern European and Caucus hunter gatherers. This is now a closed a issue. The DNA proves it, and those Euro type people came to India. This is a fact There was no IE DNA in India in 2000 bc. There was lots of it in India 1000 years later, highest in Brahmins and declining with lower castes. That's why upper caste Indians often look very Euro

• 
  VanQish (@VanQish7) reported 11 minutes ago

  The signal is not “Thunes is growing.” The signal is that the global payments industry is openly documenting the exact problems that $XRP, $RLUSD, stablecoins, tokenization, and interoperable settlement networks are designed to solve. The Most Important Takeaway The report repeatedly uses the word interoperability as the defining challenge of the next generation financial system. Their conclusion: The world now has too many payment systems. The problem is no longer creating payment rails. The problem is making all rails communicate with each other. Winners will be the networks that bridge traditional and emerging payment rails. That should immediately make XRP holders pay attention because Ripple has been saying exactly this for years. Stablecoins Are Not Replacing Banks This is probably the most important section for crypto investors. Thunes specifically states that stablecoins are emerging as a middle-leg settlement layer for cross-border payments. Translation: They are not talking about replacing banks. They are talking about: Customer → Bank/Wallet → Stablecoin Settlement Layer → Bank/Wallet → Customer The report says stablecoins have: Near-instant settlement Negligible on-chain cost Massive efficiency benefits BUT… The biggest problem remains: On/Off ramps. Converting stablecoins into local bank accounts, wallets, cards, and cash remains difficult. This is exactly where Ripple, RLUSD, XRP, and similar liquidity networks become relevant. XRP Investors Should Notice One Sentence The report states: Stablecoins are unlikely to displace existing systems and will instead operate as a settlement layer embedded within traditional money transfer operators. That is enormous. Many crypto investors still believe: “Crypto replaces banks.” The actual institutional thesis is: “Crypto upgrades bank infrastructure.” Those are two very different outcomes. Mobile Wallets Just Passed Banks Another huge finding: Consumers now prefer: Mobile wallets Payment apps Digital experiences over traditional bank interfaces for initiating cross-border payments. Banks are becoming: Funding sources Settlement providers Back-end infrastructure while wallets become the front-end experience. This fits directly with: RLUSD Ripple Payments Stablecoin settlement Open banking Tokenized deposits Speed Matters More Than Fees This surprised me. 50% of users ranked instant transfers as the most important feature. Only 13% ranked low fees first. Institutional takeaway: People would rather: Pay slightly more Receive money instantly than: Save a little money Wait several days This favors: Real-time settlement XRP liquidity Stablecoin settlement Tokenized payment networks The Report Quietly Attacks Correspondent Banking Read between the lines. They identify: Legacy systems Multiple intermediaries Lack of interoperability Delayed settlement Hidden fees as major causes of friction. Then they describe blockchain settlement as: Instant Lower cost Reduced dependency on correspondent banking relationships. That is effectively the same value proposition Ripple has been selling to banks for over a decade. Why This Matters To XRP Specifically The report never says: “Use XRP.” But it does describe the exact future state XRP was built for: Layer 1 Banks Layer 2 Wallets Layer 3 Stablecoins Layer 4 Interoperability Network Layer 5 Cross-border Liquidity The missing piece is the neutral bridge asset/liquidity engine. That is where XRP competes. The Real Institutional Narrative Most retail investors are still asking: “Will banks use XRP?” The better question now is: “How will thousands of payment systems, wallets, stablecoins, CBDCs, banks, fintechs, and tokenized assets interoperate?” This report says interoperability is becoming the defining challenge of global finance. That is exactly the battlefield Ripple has positioned itself for. @ThunesPayments

• 
  Kaiser🇵🇸🇳🇱 (@TheLichtReich) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the ping and region servers for **** sakes I can’t play

• 
  Adrock (@Adrock318) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Battlefield the game is literally unplayable with this TTK. This isn't a milsim. I should not be dying in two frames. This game has been broken since launch and once again I am uninstalling. @tiggr_ @DRUNKKZ3

• 
  Zachary Davidson (@Ryangofett_2490) reported 14 minutes ago

  @stevedeleeuw @Battlefield Is this a Battle Royale issue?

• 
  x (@taylo65687) reported 16 minutes ago

  @sadieshinigami @Battlefield This game is so ******* broken. Just revert it to the ******* BETA. Everyone is walking away from this game and they don't even ******* care because they've already been paid.

• 
  Chikhi Cato (@KatoHus56872326) reported 21 minutes ago

  Here is the uncomfortable arithmetic of a human life. You have, if you are lucky, perhaps thirty thousand days. You have already spent a significant portion of them. On some of those days, you encountered information that required a response from you. Information about what was being done in your name, with your money, with your tacit consent, to people who had no voice in the matter. On those days, you had a choice. The choice was not dramatic. It was not a battlefield moment. It was small and daily and private. Do I let this change me? Do I let this cost me something? Do I accept that knowing requires responding, that understanding requires acting, that a person who sees and does nothing has made a decision just as much as a person who sees and does something? Or do I file it away, under complicated, under what can I do, under I have my own problems, and return to the life that the information, fully absorbed, would have made impossible to live the same way? Every day you make that choice. You are making it right now. The days are not coming back.

• 
  Adu Fitla (@spilmaher) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Absolute trash of a game, farming simulator is better since lunch u can't fix ping, every ******* update more bugs, and u charged us 80€ ******* scam

• 
  // SCO // ORANGE-ANGRIFF #HellLetLoose (@KampenRandy) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The most important question is missing: will ribbons, service stars, medals make a return to the game?

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Trios need to be added before solos. This dev team is updating this game like chickens with heads cut off. There is no direction. Features that should be in game or modified, priorities are ******. Remove portal or leave out server browser. Hire a graphic designer to fix menus

• 
  JABM (@BarrileroMunoz) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the brigness error....

• 
  NoLimitToSavagery (@KillaRoy22) reported 27 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Fix the damn lighting issue!!!! Legit about to stop playing this ****!

• 
  Flapjack (@TheHolyFlapjack) reported 31 minutes ago

  @sig_serg This could indicate an issue with your power supply. I had this same issue when battlefield 6 released. Had pretty much the same symptoms and thought my gpu died. Turns out the power supply failed and didn't have enough power to boot the GPU. I would check that if it keeps up.

• 
  Philosopher-King Miron 👑 (@eihtbeezy) reported 32 minutes ago

  @MrFirstOnIt @Marqy_Marqs I’m not saying it ain’t profitable. But it’s a secondary issue. For military agencies, the battlefield is the goal. If you don’t win there, there will be no markets or profits.

• 
  Cow007 #🟦☦️ (@cow007) reported 33 minutes ago

  @ArchmagosKiran @HavryshkoMarta Because the other problem with this is there’s no way to win a ground war with an information war. You can’t meme your way out of an inferior structural position on the battlefield. So this reads a lot more like jacking off in front of people for social approval than it does actually doing anything. I know that metaphor reads as a little bit coarse, but how is this any different from what people do on only fans? (other than the fact that it doesn’t generate any revenue.) Has it occurred to you that if you are this emphatic about this position that your time might be better spent on the front lines?

• 
  Adam Spangler (@Adam_M_Spangler) reported 33 minutes ago

  your game ******* blows donkey **** @EA_DICE - id ask you to fix it but we all have a better chance of seeing God

• 
  Slumber Season (@Slumber_Season) reported 34 minutes ago

  @RepLuna 2/ Weaponizing fake outrage to deflect from the actual issue is peak drama. You’re acting like you survived a battlefield when you really just survived a tough CONVERSATION.

• 
  MeAn_BeAn (@Dean280410) reported 34 minutes ago

  @MrJokujo We need this cod is stale as **** and battlefield is broken as **** and full of cheaters and makes gaming horrible for us true genuine gamers

• 
  Dani😎 (@Dani1Official) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Tves500 @im_Kolins One historical detail most of you morons often overlooked is that although Asaba was ethnically Igbo and closely linked to nearby Onitsha, it was not part of Biafra. It was located on the western bank of the Niger in the Mid-West, and that complicated position played a major role in the events leading to the massacre. The issue isn’t that people died in a war; combatants on both sides unfortunately did. The Asaba Massacre is remembered because hundreds of unarmed civilians, including teenagers and community leaders, were reportedly separated from women and children and killed after federal forces entered the town. Even if some individuals from Asaba had fought for Biafra, that does not justify the execution of civilians or collective punishment of an entire community. In any conflict, there’s a difference between fighting enemy soldiers on a battlefield and killing unarmed civilians. That’s why Asaba remains a significant and painful chapter in Nigeria’s history.

• 
  Stanislav Gryshyn (@stas_gryshyn) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Osint613 @ItayBlumental from the production side, protecting command elements is becoming as much an air defense problem as a battlefield one

• 
  Mr. Margheritiiii (@GetCheatz) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Battlefield a bunch of amateurs can't add server browser and region selection to the game, which was in every Battlefield since its release except BF 2042 🤡 Since the beta they haven't fix the netcode and they fcked up recoil 🤡

• 
  Trollofduty007 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏳️‍🌈 (@trollofduty007) reported 47 minutes ago

  @SirSnipeyy I need a Star Wars hero shooter where Chopper causes a Star Destroyer to crash onto the battlefield and wipe everyone out

• 
  Blank paper Ⓥ (@BlankpaperV) reported 47 minutes ago

  @pinkfilesss @nayana317668 @NawItsMaestro Lmao you won’t even view the ones on the battlefield the same as ice anyway lol so what’s your point the soldiers who fix the plane that bombs children are also culpable obviously the soldiers who provide logistics for the murder are obviously directly culpable

• 
  Swaguley (@swaguley) reported 51 minutes ago

  @miztifying Sure, I'd much rather deal with that if that meant removing sliding altogether, yes. Isn't it a strange coincidence that the the slide has been in Battlefield for 10 years now and that coincides precisely with the worst Battlefield games in the series? Battlefield V did have pretty solid, underrated gameplay in my opinion, apart from its other issues. I was on console up until 2042, so there wasn't really a problem with air strafing generally on the BF4 console version. One could argue controllers couldn't really air strafe fully because you can't set your stick speed both high enough to both be able have a usable sensitivity while being able to hit 180s like mouse users did. I would argue that console players actually experienced the base movement design of the game, even if air strafing was personally added by Sirland himself. The most I can say I saw was jump peeks, which doesn't bother me, I can't remember a single instance nor can my friends of encountering someone air strafing on console. Did some guys do it? Maybe, but it surely wasn't prevalent on console, but it sounds more common on PC, so I'd be curious to see how you would balance it so it doesn't overwhelmingly favor mouse users

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 51 minutes ago

  Chapter 3 Early Does Not Mean Pure The early church was not a golden age of perfect doctrine. That fantasy is one of the great tricks used by Rome and by many others who want to appeal to antiquity. The apostles themselves warned that corruption would come early, not late. Paul said in Acts 20:29-30, “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.” That is not a prediction of purity for five hundred years followed by trouble. That is a warning that danger was already standing at the door while Paul was still alive. The idea that the earliest post-apostolic period must be treated as a pure doctrinal fountain is not Bible. It is romance. John said, “even now are there many antichrists” (1 John 2:18). Paul said, “the mystery of iniquity doth already work” (2 Thessalonians 2:7). Jude told believers to “earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 3). Peter warned that “there shall be false teachers among you” (2 Peter 2:1). The New Testament does not end with the apostles handing a perfectly protected institutional machine to Rome. It ends with warnings, rebukes, apostasies, false teachers, seducing spirits, corrupted words, and churches being judged by the risen Christ in Revelation 2 and 3. If you read the New Testament honestly, you do not come away expecting every early writer to be a doctrinal safe zone. You expect to find mixture, battle, courage, confusion, truth, error, and the beginning of long corruption. That is exactly why ancient witnesses must be handled carefully. They are valuable because they show us the battlefield. They are dangerous when men confuse the battlefield with the final authority. A man writing in the third century may be a useful witness against one heresy and a poor guide on another doctrine. That should not shock anyone. The apostles were already fighting doctrinal fires before the ink was dry on parts of the New Testament. The Holy Ghost did not tell us to trust the post-apostolic stream as though it were pure. He gave us Scripture. “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). Scripture gives doctrine. Scripture gives reproof. Scripture gives correction. Scripture gives instruction. That is the equipment of the man of God, not a stack of contradictory fathers. Chapter 4 Near the Apostles But Still Capable of Error Rome’s appeal to the fathers often depends on confusing historical nearness with doctrinal correctness. The assumption is simple: because a man lived closer to the apostles, he must have understood the apostles better. That sounds reasonable until you read your Bible. The Galatians were much closer to Paul than any church father, and Paul said, “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel” (Galatians 1:6). How soon? Very soon. Close enough to have heard apostolic preaching. Close enough to have known the truth firsthand. Yet they were already drifting into another gospel. So much for the fairy tale that nearness guarantees purity.

• 
  Minerva (@Pol_Pot_Pet_Owl) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Grass_Wonder_SK @KongShenYiren @miren_41319 When you're a hammer every problem becomes a nail. Mao was a hammer. He never left the battlefield.

• 
  Enlightened Rebel 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 (@Enlitend_Rebel) reported 55 minutes ago

  @RTRRC88 Ok, so this sounds ****** as ****. Its a technology they can use to beam a voice over extremely long distances, it sounds like voices in your head. Hear me out here, there are actual ****** crazy people who have mental illness that believe this happens to them. I am not one of those. Ive been targeted for years now, and its nothing like what the crazy people who get all the attention describe. Ive had a guy walk up to me when I was in DC, never seen him before. He asked to stand next to me while i was sitting on a wall. I was like "sure." He wasnt with anyone. Out of nowhere he just goes "my teeth are cutting into my gums." Im sitting there, at the time I had broken teeth... Its just bizzare as ****, ok. I've also had people blurt out absurdly personal things about me. As if their minds were hijacked. It sounds like a bunch of bullshit. Many years ago the US military had been studying voice to skull technology to use in the battlefield. Its been around for a long time. Theyve also experimented with actually hijacking people's heads and making them do and say things outside of their control. If i hadn't personally witnessed these things, I would think its just totally ******* nuts. I've seen and experienced a lot more than most people though. Now they have nanotechnology that can non-invasively enter the human body, they claim its for medical science. That's slightly bullshit. People are unaware of how advanced their nanotech really is. Theyre always 10 or more years ahead in the technology they let us in on.