Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (33%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nantes	Online Play	2 days ago
Bitche	Game Crash	4 days ago
Paris	Game Crash	6 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	6 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	6 days ago
Paris	Online Play	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  KingRamze (@DukeRamze) reported 1 minute ago

  Re-watching Battlefield Earth (2000) tonight. It's cartoonishly bad, but still has its charm. I almost wish they'd re-make it with a bigger budget and fix all the plot holes and mistakes.

• 
  Marc Clay (@omniclay2) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the console matchmaking for the whole game! This is the only game that separates console players, forcing us to play with computer players or bots.

• 
  UniqueSkillez (@UniqueSkillez) reported 12 minutes ago

  @CynderFlamez Eomm is the problem within Battlefield 6. Battlefield 2042 looks and plays better to me.

• 
  Jameson Deezious (@JamesonDeezious) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Pseudonymous187 @Fifakill_ The issue is just as bad in any FPS title, grass is always greener till you get there and you're in a ****** swamp. Tried Apex, seemed alright for a few days, SBMM kicks in and that's it. Finals, Battlefield, Destiny, Marathon, CS, even Division ffs. It's all the same ****.

• 
  SiPPY (@SiPPYtv) reported 14 minutes ago

  I’m going to put an 3 hour long video together of all the hitreg/netcode issues Ive experienced with Battlefield 6 and send it to @JakeSucky…and then pay him a million dollars (in Monopoly money) so he can expose how awful Dice is. Skill based hitreg needs to GO

• 
  Stoic Investor (@Stoic_investr) reported 14 minutes ago

  The MoU had very little chance of success and this became clear once the US forced Lebanese government to sign a separate deal with Israel and attempts to create a separate Oman coastline corridor was another example of how US tried to sabotage the MoU while paying lip service to it. Now Iranians have more than enough reasons to assume that any negotiations is essentially being conducted in bad faith and I don’t think they’ll show up for any more talks as now this issue will be resolved on the battlefield.

• 
  Boyishdude (@DisposedZero) reported 21 minutes ago

  @AzraelSch @FreeTalkLive IP isn't protecting DICE from losing money they deserve for their work, it's protecting them from competition. It's allowing them to ship out consistently bad, broken products and still make money off of them because nobody else is allowed to make Battlefield games.

• 
  Ramon (@ramondeveloper) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield This game is dead—it's full of bots. The menu looks like Netflix, and the live-service model doesn't fit the franchise at all. There's no server browser, they won't pay for weapon licensing, they don't even use real country names and have to rely on fictional ones.

• 
  Trays_V2 (@TraysV99) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix high value target challenges pls, i never got them again

• 
  Jamin Thompson (@jaminthompson) reported 30 minutes ago

  Step 1 to defeating an army of gun-mounted robot dogs is to figure out what type of battlefield system they are. A reasonable person can assume that they're basically just mobile sensor-shooter nodes trying to drag a rifle through an adversarial physics problem. From there, we can use first principles to deduce that we have a lot of defensive advantages at our disposal that we can use to defeat such an enemy. The rookie mistake to avoid in the battle plan, however, is thinking the best countermeasure is more firepower or a straight-line escape. That's how you end up playing the robot's game, where every advantage goes to the hardware. Robot hardware has the clear advantage in a head-to-head duel, which is exactly why we don't make it one. So instead of using bozo tactics, we'll use our brains and target the robot's main weakness, its decision stack. This gives us the greatest tactical advantage. Instead of mindless pewpew blasting, we need to attack the robot's perception, state estimation, path planning, balance control, target classification, and weapons release. All the seams between those layers are where the robot is most vulnerable. So our first course of action is to make motion expensive. We want to fight on our terms, in an environment with terrain that is technically passable but tactically poisonous. And we'll prepare our defenses by making the battlefield very hostile to a machine. We want to make life as miserable as possible for the metal mind. So instead of thinking "oh no, we're fighting robot dogs with guns," we adjust the paradigm to "we're fighting balance algorithms that are dragging rifles through bad physics." The goal is to outsmart the bots and prevent them from having a clean path to go anywhere. So we'll make every path into the defended space feel like pure chaos, filled with elements that make a robot's control loop work harder: thick mud, rocks, gravel, sand, cables, uneven debris, weird curbs, surfaces with weird angles, ditches, tight turns, narrow gaps, and low baffles. We don't need to make every single obstacle perfect. We just need every step the robot takes to cost more terrain estimation, friction prediction, gait replanning, torque correction, stabilization, and battery drain. This is how we win. Next we will further terraform the defensive position so robot walking and shooting become separate problems that need solving. The robot might move forward, but movement isn't the same thing as being able to fight. So we'll craft the environment to funnel the bot swarm into very tight slow lanes where the "safe" path turns into a traffic jam. If they stop, they lose tempo. If they advance, they burn energy. If they shoot, they waste ammo. If they reroute, they lose time. If they trust the obvious path, they walk deeper into our trap. The goal here isn't to fully prevent the robots from crossing the terrain, because the probability of zero robots getting across is low. Our goal is to create as many slips, sensor conflicts, torque spikes, bad decisions, and battery losses we can force per meter as possible. Next, we'll **** up the robot's perception by changing what it actually sees. We'll fill the defensive space with glare, floodlights, smoke, mist, hard shadows, reflective panels, hanging tarps, moving junk, and a shitstorm of visual clutter so the robot cameras can't build a trustworthy picture of what's in front of them. Then we'll ruin their thermals. We'll mix in some hot junk, cold panels, warm decoys, and human-shaped heat ghosts so the robot can't tell what's human and what's fake bait. We want them to waste time and battery at every step. So we'll make their LiDAR miserable too. We'll hang up reflective sheets, angled panels, mesh, fog, and a bunch of repeating patterns everywhere so the robot will hallucinate edges, misread distance, and see fake things everywhere. We'll build confusing hallways that look similar but lead to different places so slam keeps matching the wrong landmarks. We'll also add moving decoys, swinging tarps, rolling carts, fans, flags, and mad max style mechanical motion devices so the scene never stays the same. We'll also **** up their gps and comms so the bots can't rely on the swarm map to bail them out. We want every single sensor to tell a different lie. Next, we want to minimize our probability of getting killed, so we'll need to make the robot gun matter less. Walking through the environment will be one problem for the bots to solve. Getting a clean, stable, confident shot will be a completely different problem for them. And we need to make it as hard as possible. A rifle on legs may sound scary, but it still has to do the boring stuff right. It has to stay balanced, point straight, see clearly, and know what it's shooting at. So we'll enhance our anti-clanker fortress with low baffles, offset walls, blind corners, staggered barriers, partial cover, false corridors, and a **** ton of blocked angles. The bots might still advance, but the rifle won't be able to get a clean lane. We'll also put up decoys and weird/ambiguous shapes in the firing lanes so every shot has to pass target id. The goal is to force the robot to choose between moving, aiming, identifying, and not shooting the wrong thing. Those are separate problems. If we make those requirements interfere with each other, the robot may still be able to move, but it can't confidently shoot, and it doesn't have unlimited ammo to waste. There are mathematical limits to ammo capacity, and the math here is in our favor. So the basic plan is to play to our strengths. We don't attack the robot's armor; we attack its confidence. If it advances, it enters a funnel. If it hesitates, it burns battery. If it shoots, it wastes ammo. If it phones home, operators get overloaded. If it trusts autonomy, it walks deeper into an environment designed to poison its autonomy. At the end of the day, though, the robot is just the visible endpoint. The real enemy is the machine behind the machine (algorithms, batteries, sensors, ammo, relays, maps, operators, etc.). You don't beat this type of enemy by building a bigger gun or dueling it 1 on 1. You beat it by forcing the kill chain to collapse and by making the battlefield itself eat the stack. You make the swarm slow down, split up, get confused, run in circles, lose confidence in the map, lose confidence in the target, lose clean firing lanes, burn battery, waste ammo, and enter an adversarial operating environment that takes their movement, vision, comms, and certainty away. The idea is to make the robot spend more compute, energy, ammo, and confidence per meter than you spend building/defending that meter. If you do it right, there probably won't be some glorious cinematic sci-fi battle. Just a pile of expensive machines trapped, confused, low on battery, unable to shoot, waiting to be recovered by their master.

• 
  Hank Venture (@HankVenture5) reported 31 minutes ago

  "I need a weapon light" .... for a WEAPON. okay, well you've got a few choices, let's talk about what military and law enforcement uses... you've got your Surefire here, widely used by military and law enforcement. They're spendy, about $350. You've got Streamlight over here, also very good, very commonly used in law enforcement... about $180 or so. "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Well, I mean, those manufacturers test their products in literal battlefield conditions, use high quality LEDs and control boards, they are shock proof, waterproof, and they have a warranty with US based suppor..... "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Would it be a problem if the light were to go down at an inopportune time, like DURING COMBAT? "Yeah, absolutely unacceptable... now what do you have for $50?".

• 
  Gatzestreicheln (@FabianSchu96203) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldInte **** this game and **** @EA_DICE before ending new stuff to get in our pockets fix your ******* unplayable trash game Gunplay still sucks Sounds still sucks Maps are ******* horrible EA is right about fireing your useless worthless asses

• 
  ADIANKAIBANYY (@ADIANKAIBA22) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Baldnewsnetwork Because none of you are for the future did you know which you didn’t obviously but did you know that it cost Sony $780M to make and ship physical games to retailers and they save all that money we can actually get new IPs new games new stories to experience instead of Call of dukie bullshit for the 500th time or battlefield or Fortnite or any live service games that’s gettting $100M to $500M to make

• 
  The Rocket Media (@TheRocketMediaX) reported 35 minutes ago

  Imagine a drone without GPS inside a battlefield ! In modern warfare, GPS jamming instantly blinds a drone mid-mission. The moment that happens, the drone loses its sense of direction completely and can crash within seconds. This is the problem this startup is trying to solve, so that India's drones can accomplish their mission even without a GPS in hostile environments.

• 
  Cmaa726 (@cmaa726) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Dar31393Darr @TheXMatriarch Why would you want your woman on the battle field with men? Do you realize what the enemy will do to her if she gets caught? Or, she can end up disfigured from injuries. Or, in your absence she can sleep with other soldiers. When women work closely with men they bond with them and start to look to them for help with their problems, and then develop romantic feelings. The battlefield is no place for a woman. She should be home with your children, protecting them as best as she can.

• 
  RD (@Hoodiez_Up) reported 43 minutes ago

  You know what I can't stand about the FPS community? There is always something wrong with the game. Call of duty, battlefield ,etc it doesn't matter something is always "op" or the movement is wrong or the maps are no good. Here I am able to adapt and play them all with success and enjoy them for what they are. Ever think maybe the players are the problem?! "OPERATOR ERROR."

• 
  Don (@The_Don_07) reported 44 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE are you guys able to do anything about the performance on ps5. The game is practically unplayable for me with the amount of desync and lag I’m getting.

• 
  The Rocket Media (@TheRocketMediaX) reported 44 minutes ago

  Recall the frustration we all feel when Google Maps malfunctions in an unkown city ! Now imagine a drone losing its access to GPS in a battlefield. Consequences can be huge. The problem? GPS communication happens over fixed frequencies that can be jammed with high-power electronic systems. Which is exactly why GPS-denied drone technology is becoming critical globally.

• 
  Zarodnii 🍁 (@zarodnii) reported 48 minutes ago

  @TQ_110 @BattlefieldComm Any update on this problem? Been having the same problem since the update. Tried uninstalling and clearing the cache

• 
  steve (@Troll81357830) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THIS BLACK ******* SCREEN FUCKKK!!!!!

• 
  Operation Detachment Gaming (@ODGactual) reported 49 minutes ago

  @GhostGamingG That would be so dumb… this is one of CoDs biggest issues and honestly I don’t want a new game every year… having a game every 2 (and even that’s pushing it), or 3 years is better. I would invest more into that… I’m not buying @Battlefield every single year, period!

• 
  Brandon Parks (@Brandon73563391) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Battlefield ******* pathetic *** penny pinching clowns. Run some American servers at 6 am central not all European 200 ping lag trash

• 
  Mr.Nobody (@MrNobody1410) reported 49 minutes ago

  I usually post news and updates, but today I wanted to try something different. I tried writing a story for the first time. It's probably a little cliché, but I wanted to create something different from my usual posts. Read it and tell me how it made you feel. Here you go........ Alien invasion, but not the kind humanity had imagined. The aliens didn't come for our planet, our resources, or our technology. They came for our bodies. Somewhere in the universe, a deadly disease had plagued countless civilizations for centuries. Entire species were wiped out by it. But when an alien research vessel discovered Earth, they found something impossible. The human body. Human biology naturally resisted the disease. A human could live an entire lifetime without ever being infected. To the aliens, the human body was the closest thing to a cure ever discovered. But there was a problem. Humans were everywhere. Billions of them. And unlike many species the aliens had conquered before, humans were physically strong, unpredictable, and willing to fight back. A direct invasion would be costly. So they chose a different strategy. One night, a massive transparent dome appeared over a city. It stretched nearly 80 miles in every direction. Nothing could enter. Nothing could leave. Inside, the aliens began their harvest. Every day people disappeared. Every day fewer lights remained on. Every day hope became harder to find. Within a month, the population inside the dome had been reduced to a fraction of what it once was. But humanity refused to die quietly. A small group of survivors learned *********** the invaders. They stole alien weapons, studied their tactics, and formed a rebel force. Twenty fighters. One hundred civilians. That was all that remained. Among those twenty rebels was a young man who never wanted to be a hero. He wasn't fearless. He wasn't the strongest. Every battle terrified him. Whenever someone volunteered for dangerous missions, he stayed silent and hoped someone else would step forward. He survived because others were braver than he was. At least that's what he believed. One night the rebels discovered the truth about the dome. At its exact center stood the alien spacecraft that powered it. Destroy the ship, and the dome would collapse. The plan was simple. Ten rebels would ****** the hundred survivors toward the edge of the dome. The other ten would attack the spacecraft. If both teams succeeded, the civilians would finally be free. At dawn, they moved. And everything went wrong. The aliens were waiting. The ****** team was ambushed. The attack team was overwhelmed. When the battle ended, ten rebels were dead. Five more were critically wounded. Twenty civilians had been killed. The remaining survivors were trapped and surrounded. Only five rebels could still fight. Among them stood the man who had spent the entire month afraid. The man who always hoped someone else would make the sacrifice. For the first time, there was no one else. The wounded rebels looked at him. The civilians looked at him. Children who had lost their parents looked at him. And he finally understood something. Courage isn't the absence of fear. It's moving forward despite it. The spacecraft sat in the distance, protected by dozens of aliens. There was only enough explosive material left for one attack. A one-way attack. He picked up the detonator. "No." His friends tried to stop him. "You don't have to do this." He smiled. For the first time since the invasion began, he wasn't shaking. "Someone has to." Using stolen alien armor, he drove straight toward the spacecraft while the remaining rebels created a distraction. Alarms screamed. Alien soldiers flooded the battlefield. Blaster fire tore through the air. The vehicle was hit again and again. But it kept moving. Closer. Closer. Closer. Until it reached the base of the spacecraft. The young man looked back one final time.

• 
  VatsRohit (@KesariDhwaj) reported 50 minutes ago

  @DivyaHarikris Because the systems have been pushed post-haste into Ukraine, there have been issues with the UKR crew handling of the Western Systems. Plus, European systems come with their own logistical tail and requirement with respect to maintainance SOPs. Something which the Ukrainians are not always able to replicate for obvious reasons. Third, many European systems were pulled from storage/minimal usage and pushed into the battlefield w/o testing them first check their battle readiness.

• 
  Dolphins are Frauds (@iBrokeMyRouter) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @EA_DICE How about you fix the ******* game

• 
  Woo (@ffnwoo_) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Battlefield aye bro ain’t no way a mf helicopter should be able to bounce off the ground and kill people. Fix that if the game gon be realistic gang.

• 
  Abby💎 (@Abbywillia69841) reported 52 minutes ago

  My cousin’s wedding seating chart turned into an actual battlefield the moment guests found their table assignments — because she’d seated her ex-best-friend-turned-enemy directly across from the woman she’d had an affair with three years earlier. Nobody believed it was an accident. It wasn’t. The bride swore up and down it was “just how the numbers worked out” — eight per table, limited space, nothing personal. Except table 7 also happened to include the ex-friend’s current husband, who’d never actually met the other woman in person, seated directly beside her, forced into small talk with the person his wife’s best friend had cheated with. The ex-friend clocked it within the first ten minutes of the reception, stood up mid-appetizer, and loudly asked the room, “Does anyone else find this table arrangement a little on the nose, or is it just me?” Her husband, still confused about who anyone was, asked what she meant. She told him. At the table. In front of the woman in question. The bride tried damage control from the head table, insisting it was a seating software error, a claim that fell apart the second someone pulled up the actual seating chart software and showed a manual override specifically moving those two guests together two days before the wedding. The bride’s own wedding planner had the email thread to prove it. The ex-friend and her husband left before the cake cutting. The affair partner left twenty minutes after that, visibly humiliated. The bride spent the rest of her own reception doing damage control instead of dancing. She got the confrontation she’d clearly, quietly wanted to orchestrate. She just didn’t plan for how much of her own wedding she’d lose in the process of engineering it.

• 
  Atlas (@emilio_aguinaga) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Battlefield gonna need yall to fix this driver crash issue. It’s been since launch.. cmon now

• 
  Outsider (@AlbinSalkic) reported 54 minutes ago

  @WesOlesen @LauraLoomer @netanyahu Money is a huge problem, but even worse is American youth giving their lives on battlefield for Israel interests.

• 
  Andrew Lyerly ☦️ (@andrew_lyerly) reported 57 minutes ago

  @wokehammer Pariahs were absolute beasts on the battlefield though. Totally broken and could one-shot a Leman Russ if you rolled right. Could break a Custodes in half (if there were any) and do AOE damage to Psykers. The only thing that saved you was they couldn't regenerate and were slow.