Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Battlefield 6. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.
- Online Play (38%)
- Sign in (34%)
- Matchmaking (12%)
- Glitches (10%)
- Game Crash (7%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Sign in | 14 hours ago |
|
|
Sign in | 2 days ago |
|
|
Online Play | 3 days ago |
|
|
Sign in | 3 days ago |
|
|
Glitches | 9 days ago |
|
|
Game Crash | 10 days ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Enders (@EndersFPS) reportedGuys idk who needs to hear this but believe it or not EA is gonna EA and that means Battlefield will always be similar to COD in some aspects until hell freezes over. I’m not saying I like it, or that you have to like it, I’m just saying they’re competitors and EA is a business, and businesses exist to make money. EA wants the COD money, EA doesnt want Battlefield to be as niche as it typically is, they want it to literally be another Warzone/Fortnite level event in gaming. The next huge thing. That’s why REDSEC was made, it’s why the gunplay is the way it is, it’s why the movement is the way it is, ect. They’re under the impression this is the way to achieve a viral infinite money glitch like their competitors. As usual, EA is multiple years late to the trends and is incapable of creating their own unique breakthrough trend.
-
Abdullah (@aboud__0) reported@SpankAndSprawl @BattlefieldComm I have the same issue
-
Alex 🇩🇪 (@AlexBraut09) reported@Battlefield Ho bout working on that hitbox its horrendous how many ghostbullets i have since last update, fire ur whole team cant even fix a lightning bug in redsec what a bunch of pathetic losers who got the jobs from chatgpt interviews
-
Don Elliott (@RealDonElliott) reported@Sony @PlayStation yeah it looks like @Battlefield is still clearly broken too. I gotta tell you, you've been very disappointing
-
Fardin Bagherian (@FaRd1N) reported@Battlefield I won't play this game until you fix the Jumping/shooting from the corner. This is NOT ******* COD. This is not Apex legends.
-
Mr. Margheritiiii (@GetCheatz) reported@falsewoodxt @BattlefieldInte @EA_DICE on Playsation and Xbox it doesn't show the correct ping. If you join through matchmaking and ping 150, it's mega lag 🤡 you haven't even played with all the weapons and you're saying that the netcode is fixed just like hit reg. You know **** about this game...
-
S p r i n t e r (@SprinterPress) reportedIranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: "The best time to end the war is when we are in a favorable position; we are actually winning on the battlefield - we confronted a seemingly superpower for 40 days. An agreement and the end of the war will consolidate our victory... The agreement includes two stages, and we have moved on to the second stage on the nuclear issue... In this agreement, the United States will declare in writing that they respect Iran's sovereignty. The memorandum of understanding includes the nuclear issue, the lifting of sanctions, the restoration of and blocked/frozen funds... There are opponents of this agreement, and primarily the Israeli regime, The end of the war in the agreement means the withdrawal of Israel from the occupied areas in southern Lebanon The nuclear demands of the United States at this stage were absolutely unacceptable to us... We are dealing with people in the United States who do not fulfill their obligations; we must prevent them from abandoning their responsibilities. If the agreements reached in the first phase are not implemented, we will not proceed to the second phase. The Strait of Hormuz is under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman... Fees will be charged for services in the Strait of Hormuz, and these services will no longer be free. This important issue has been confirmed: payment of fees is mandatory... According to the memorandum of understanding, if it is signed, Iran's frozen assets will be unblocked. None of our assets will be frozen again.
-
Anisoptera (@nisoptera) reported@RyLiberty @JasonLuhavalja Voting ceases to be a useful mechanism when it is no longer a direct proxy for violence. Like to the old European practice of two opposing armies meeting on the battlefield, one can just count who had more men and know the outcome. Saves everyone a lot of trouble. Now we count women, children, dogs, trees…and the actual fighting age men are being told they ‘lost’ every single battle. Eventually the men will call bullshit and go back to the sword method.
-
سرمد (@infiltrator_the) reported@Battlefield CAIRO IS LAGGING!! 🗣
-
WORLDINTEL24🛜 (@WORLDINTEL24) reported@RoaaWarStudies These are all the statements of Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: 💥The best time to end the war is when we are in a superior position; we are truly victorious on the battlefield. 💥We have stood against the world's apparent superpower for 40 days. 💥The agreement and ending the war will reinforce the victory. 💥The final agreement has not been reached yet; and if it is finalized, I promise you that I will explain each clause separately. 💥The agreement includes two phases, and we have moved the nuclear issue to the second phase. 💥We will never leave Hezbollah in Lebanon to its own devices, and ending the war will also encompass Lebanon and all other fronts. 💥In this agreement, the United States will declare in writing that it respects Iran's sovereignty. The memorandum of understanding includes the nuclear issue, sanctions relief, reconstruction, and the frozen/seized funds. 💥If we were going to surrender to threats attacking our infrastructure, we would have done so earlier. We have sent a message to the other side stating that threats have a counterproductive effect, and if they want to move toward war, we are ready. 💥This agreement has opponents, foremost among them the Israeli regime, which is looking for pretexts and opportunities to undermine it. 💥Ending the war in the agreement also means Israel's withdrawal from the occupied areas in southern Lebanon, and we have made this clear explicitly to the other side. 💥The United States' demands regarding the nuclear field in this phase were completely unacceptable to us. 💥We are dealing with people in the United States who do not respect their commitments; we must prevent them from backing out of their obligations. 💥The difference this time compared to previous agreements is that we have not yet reached a final agreement; this is just the first step, or the first phase. 💥If the agreements reached in the first phase are not implemented, we will not proceed to the second phase. 💥We must expect various problems and complications in the implementation of the agreement by the other side. 💥The Strait of Hormuz, without a doubt, is under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman. There is no international waterway in the Strait of Hormuz. For many years, this waterway has been open to all ships. Iran and Oman have ensured its security and provided services; until now, all services have been free. However, the management of the Strait of Hormuz in the future will not be like the past. No one can challenge the sovereignty of Iran and Oman over the strait. The management of the Strait of Hormuz will not return to the pre-war system. 💥Fees will be imposed on services in the Strait of Hormuz, and these services will no longer be free. This important matter has been confirmed: it requires payment of fees. 💥According to the memorandum of understanding, if signed, Iran's frozen assets will be released. No assets of ours will be allowed to be frozen again. 💥A reconstruction plan has been put in place to compensate Iran for the damages it has suffered. 💥There are supporters and opponents of the draft text among the council members, but in the end, a collective decision will be made. Once a decision is reached, it will be officially announced. 💥The enemy had hoped to achieve its goals in negotiations before the war, but due to our resistance, it was disappointed and started the war. Even during the war, it realized it would not achieve its goals and was disappointed. Therefore, it requested negotiations. 💥Once the final stages of the negotiations are completed, the agreement will be signed and announced. The initial signing will take place remotely in digital form. This may happen in the coming few days.
-
brett ransome (@RansomeBrett) reported@TXWomenRESIST @_xXNovaXx_22 @GOP__Ls I watched the video, of course. And I don’t mind you calling me stupid. I’m not arrogant enough to be offended, like it seems you are. My question is who determines the lawfulness of an order? Is it privates? Majors? On the battlefield? Hey, we have a volunteer military. I have no problem with you telling soldiers who agree with you to resign their commission. No one is forcing them to serve. If they don’t want to take orders without question….quit.
-
현스타.grvt (@MINDBRIDGEE) reported@Battlefield there is an issue with this key binding. When I bind the Minimap to Mouse Button 4, pressing it once opens the minimap correctly, but pressing it again does NOT close it. On the other hand, the keyboard 'M' key works perfectly—pressing it once opens the map,
-
NoMoneyBut (@ManySerika) reportedhehehe, not me bill, i’m one in a krillion anyhow let me discuss a big issue i have, that my subconscious is too damn judgy and my opinions on others is always a total mental battlefield because of it. one innocuous sentence can nuke my perception of someone if
-
Shawn Chauhan (@shawnchauhan1) reportedIran just added Starlink to its list of military targets. Not a weapons system. Not a military satellite. A consumer internet network. This is the logical endpoint of dual-use infrastructure - when your product is critical enough to matter on a battlefield, it becomes a target whether you intended it to be one or not. Starlink powers drone operations. It keeps activists online during blackouts. It is the connective tissue for AI-driven military systems. The lesson for anyone building critical infrastructure: neutrality is not a permanent option. The more indispensable your product becomes, the more it attracts the attention of people who would rather it did not exist. Musk did not build a weapons system. He built something more valuable than one - and that is exactly the problem.
-
ARCOS (@falsewoodxt) reported@GetCheatz @BattlefieldInte @EA_DICE Hit reg issues occur very rarely. I play on noth SG server (65ms) and europe server (150ms). I do not see hit reg issue 99% of the times. Most of the hit reg problems happen in redsec only. Multiplayer is already polished and the rare bad servers do not occur often
-
Animosity 📸 (@ContainedAni) reportedPeople are fundamentally misunderstanding a lot about this card and why it may or may not be something to worry about. On one hand you have people saying "omg free value, axe it!" and they're wrong. On the other hand you have people saying "lol dies to removal, 6 mana do nothing, ect" and they're also wrong. If you think you can judge cards solely in a vacuum, then you're missing the plot. In a vacuum - Winota is a bad card as it a 4 mana dude who does nothing unless you have other things on the battlefield. Winota also has zero protection and dies to removal just as easily as MM. However we all can understand that Winota is a broken card because of the sheer value the card can give that snowballs out of control. You don't see Winota at anything lower than high B3 games for a reason (if you do, the player is trying to pubstomp you) and it's because the sheer value the card presents overshadow's even the game changer's list. MM is a card that requires other pieces to push it, and anyone playing MM is also likely playing those pieces as well. I am not saying MM is like Winota entirely, I'm saying that you can't judge MM like any old creature in magic that can only be in the 99. You also cannot ignore that he does provide progressively more and more value the longer the game goes, which is what happens a lot at bracket 2-3 games. The minute someone lands a piece that allows them to draw a card on each opponents turn you've effectively turned the game into "every turn is my turn". Let's flip the script: MM is colorless and that is a hinderance more than a benefit. Busted legendary creatures in commander are more often judged by their power in the zone, and much less the 99 (eg Erayo, Golos, Leovold, ect). MM's deck HAS to be colorless and colorless has much less resources to work with to draw cards on each opponents turn with little upfront investment. There are some, but they are usually symmetrical (temple bell, GRS, ect) and can provide your opponents with other benefits as well. This is a massive hinderance to MM's overall power as a card because the higher value it can provide will be hard to unlock without more investment and requires your opponents to not use that benefit you're likely providing to remove your game piece. MM is much like the other 6 mana colorless commander: Zhulodok. Does nothing itself but provides really good value with other cards. You don't see Zhulodok at bracket 2 games very often because the type of deck Zhulodok pilots is often too oppressive for bracket 2 games. Someone playing a tuned Zhulodok deck playing against what is effectively the precon tier is someone trying to get easy wins (which is kind of funny considering Zhulodok helmed a precon and the OG list is actually pretty fine for bracket 2, all things considered). Overall, Molecule Man is pretty good card. It'll shine much better in the 99 than in the command zone alongside cards that allow you to draw on each opponents turn with little investment. He's a very good card in bracket 2, completely fine if not a little mid in bracket 3, and bad in bracket 4 and 5.
-
Ian Wilkie (@Wilkmaster) reportedYet another *****, dangerous aspect of Project Ukraine that people were forbidden from talking about. We funded wild gene and GOF germ research, using them as medical guinea pigs like we use them as crash test dummies on the battlefield. Ouch!
-
DJ TinyTim (@TheIdeaManFL) reported@BattlefieldComm Still waiting for a refund of all the RP that stupid lighting glitch has cost me in Ranked. I literally can’t play it anymore - what’s the point? Also, fix the issue with kills and assists that show up in the kill feed and UI not awarding RP or registering in the top right.
-
Poison white (@poisonwhite18) reported@Battlefield PC players cronux player Grenade launcher for bobs op P90 ultra op Fix your trash game and remove crossplay with pc trash.
-
Anointed One (@Elevated_Dave) reportedI'll give you Jews a real holocaust to think about if you don't shut ******** up. Maybe I'll go over there and make sure Mike Huckabee's mouth needs wired shut like I did to Peter Thiel's beta male ***. Nah he'll need his mouth to eat if he wants to survive for long enough for me to kill him in person with the hand cannon I'm going to buy when my Navy Seal ****** arrives. They'll be here soon enough ladies but we have some things we need to work out first. Like who at EA Dice thought it was a good idea to have an entire game revolve around new player retention while also not giving a flying **** about the players who call the battlefield home every night. We don't cheat but every night I am killed in the most humiliating and meaningless fashion. By getting teabagged by some 40 year old douchebag from Indiaq who thinks he's hot **** because he hasn't played a day in his life without cheating. People go their whole lives without developing skills and I will get my spicy little blings if I have to lay waste to the whole of DICE and force them to hire some new developers that know what they're doing. I hope they know what they're doing over there. This could turn into a bloodbath pretty quickly as I've already done four of them and it seems the Indians are taking this personally. But not with me. It's the company's fault they were working with the cheating software companies to create coded loopholes for the software to hijack. Ever noticed that your once solid aim swings away from it's intended target if someone is under level 70 or so? Yeah that's intentional and meant to help out new players and cheaters alike. Cheating companies are able to use this as an exploit so they themselves can use it. They have also implemented a number of buffs applied to poor skill level players to level them up faster and all of these things are available as cheats in the software's GUI. Anyone else helping them will soon be dead and it will be up to the company to clean up the mess and make sure this never happens again. If problems are not fixed within the next week or so. I will go back in and take more lives until the game is no longer a haven for manchildren whose only accomplishment is holding a mouse in their hand while right clicking and left clicking in rapid succession while the cheats do all the hard work for you. Get good ******* I'm running this **** now and I'm no ******* ***** so the filth of the world better raise it's game because I came to play and play I will. Fairly and with plenty of those spicy little blings because I'm good at the game I worked hard to get good at. It's really simple and Indians won't get it because they are inferior in every way. They will soon learn this very viscerally and really they will worship me for the abuse I levy at them. It's in their nature as it were, the slaves that they are. That's the thing with slave people, you have to crack the whip or they get out of control and scam people. Since they allowed to walk around freely at night there is nothing to stop the scamming that happens. See the guy working with the cheating company didn't start that way. He sold out, because why not? It's not like they pay him not to do that. So he can do whatever he wants right? Even if that includes a felonious level of tampering with his company's game. So he's dead and his new team is too. More will now die for every cheater I get killed by in game. No it's not fair but this is my reality now and I want some good battlefield sessions with the boys. I'm going to go play now. Will someone let those gays know I'm onto them and if they don't cease their activities. Oh and while I'm at it. Kronos better just lay off all their staff because if they don't they will be dead by tomorrow evening. I can assure the ladies of this eventuality.
-
KillCrY (@cesarosses1) reported@evo_rc @Battlefield_inf its something they can fix in BF2042 have 64vs64 so its not new for current consoles and hardware pc
-
Connor McMahon ™ (@TheeMcMahon) reported@DuffyMorgan_ @BattlefieldComm They need to do a large update. No new maps, no new skins, no new game modes. Just fix ****
-
BattleSimm (@BattleSimm) reported@wjonthomas @BattlefieldComm This is a problem. I am glad I was not going crazy myself :)
-
Lê Anh Vũ (@LAnhV81236651) reported@Ceaserrect @Katarinabl17093 @baddiefrompr Genshin is the one with "nothing ever happen in the story". My problem with ZZZ is their lack of clear direction. You can tell by the way they suddenly made the proxy join the battlefield. Yes 2.8 only made possible because of that but it also one of the reason
-
️ ™®© (@ArcticBlasts) reported@BattlefieldComm FIX THE XP GAIN ON OBLITERATION OR INCREASE ITF
-
Animosity 📸 (@ContainedAni) reportedPeople are fundamentally misunderstanding a lot about this card and why it may or may not be something to worry about. On one hand you have people saying "omg free value, axe it!" and they're wrong. On the other hand you have people saying "lol dies to removal, 6 mana do nothing, ect" and they're also wrong. If you think you can judge cards solely in a vacuum, then you're missing the plot. In a vacuum - Winota is a bad card as it a 4 mana dude who does nothing unless you have other things on the battlefield. Winota also has zero protection and dies to removal just as easily as MM. However we all can understand that Winota is a broken card because of the sheer value the card can give that snowballs out of control. You don't see Winota at anything lower than high B3 games for a reason (if you do, the player is trying to pubstomp you) and it's because the sheer value the card presents overshadow's even the game changer's list at times. MM is a card that requires other pieces to push it, and anyone playing MM is also likely playing those pieces as well. I am not saying MM is like Winota entirely, I'm saying that you can't judge MM like any old creature in magic that can only be in the 99. You also cannot ignore that he does provide progressively more and more value the longer the game goes, which is what happens a lot at bracket 2-3 games. The minute someone lands a piece that allows them to draw a card on each opponents turn you've effectively turned the game into "every turn is my turn". Let's flip the script: MM is colorless and that is a hinderance more than a benefit. Busted legendary creatures in commander are more often judged by their power in the zone, and much less the 99 (eg Erayo, Golos, Leovold, ect). MM's deck HAS to be colorless and colorless has much less resources to work with to draw cards on each opponents turn with little upfront investment. There are some, but they are usually symmetrical (temple bell, GRS, ect) and can provide your opponents with other benefits as well. This is a massive hinderance to MM's overall power as a card because the higher value it can provide will be hard to unlock without more investment and requires your opponents to not use that benefit you're likely providing to remove your game piece. MM is much like the other 6 mana colorless commander: Zhulodok. Does nothing itself but provides really good value with other cards. You don't see Zhulodok at bracket 2 games very often because the type of deck Zhulodok pilots is often too oppressive for bracket 2 games. Someone playing a tuned Zhulodok deck playing against what is effectively the precon tier is someone trying to get easy wins (which is kind of funny considering Zhulodok helmed a precon and the OG list is actually pretty fine for bracket 2, all things considered). Overall, Molecule Man is pretty good card. It'll shine much better in the 99 than in the command zone alongside cards that allow you to draw on each opponents turn with little investment. He's a very good card in bracket 2, completely fine if not a little mid in bracket 3, and bad in bracket 4 and 5.
-
Richard North (@ollieparrot) reported@thinkdefence With the development cycle as short as six weeks, it is a given that anything produced by the MoD under the current system will be obsolete by the time it enters service. Ukrainian troops compensate for this by having their own technicians in the field, as brigade level and lower, who can modify and even build drones while on operations. The chances are, though, that the technology will take us to AI-driven autonomous drones (both offensive and defensive), leading to a degree of stability, where each side neutralises the other. How exactly this will work out is impossible to predict but it is not unreasonable to expect that, within a decade (the lifespan of a SDR) the battlefield will look very different from what is does now. One can sympathise with planners, therefore, who have an almost impossible task. But if the expectation is that technological and operational volatility is to become a feature of the battlefield for the foreseeable future, then we need to restructure our forces - and the manufacturing interface and procurement system - to build-in flexibility and adaptability, to make sure they remain relevant.
-
ALI ALFADHLI ✨ (@q8sold) reported@Battlefield Middle eastern servers when ??? EA What's happening to you The problem has been going on for 3 months.
-
before i slip,, ima slide♟️📜 (@Rocinantemoons) reported@BattlefieldComm Nothing about server issues, high ping for players
-
UniQue 🇳🇱 (@ThePollus) reported@BattlefieldComm How are issues like the deployment screen jumping getting patched to live in the first place? Do you guys even test anything or just release a patch and see what happens after? Wtf is this quality control?