Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (33%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bitche	Game Crash	2 days ago
Paris	Game Crash	4 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	4 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	4 days ago
Paris	Online Play	4 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	4 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Tusk (@Laptusk) reported 3 minutes ago

  @VelvetGhoszq @boysoverflours I have no problem with that, doesnt cancel out the ruling sorry, i would hate to go die in a battlefield while my wife is pregnant and I wanted to see the newborn but ay its an obligation so it is what it is many other examples

• 
  Dingus Khan, Warlord of Portland (@DingusKingus) reported 5 minutes ago

  Battlefield once more has a massive cheating problem I gave you guys kernel level access to my motherboard for *this*?

• 
  steve (@Troll81357830) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE BLACK SCREEN LOADING TIMES **** SAKE WTF IS THIS

• 
  Jared Randall (@whisperontruth) reported 6 minutes ago

  the Pentagon is quietly shifting AI spending from research labs to the actual battlefield edge. $PLTR has been in this lane for years but the real money now is in whoever wins the contracts to run inference at the tactical level. that's a different and much harder problem.

• 
  urticaria⚧️ (@urticariuh) reported 10 minutes ago

  bouta drop bf6 and play bo2 because battlefield wants to CRASH EVERY TWO SECONDS I NEVER HAD ANY ISSUES BEFORE LIKE 2 DAYS AGO

• 
  RCP (@FlyghtMedic) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Battlefield could you guys fix the game instead of “releasing” no ****?

• 
  EpicJourneyMan (@EpicJourneyMan1) reported 11 minutes ago

  @truthstreamnews @EvolvingKymera I refuse to have an Alexa or any of the other “digital assistants” in my house, just assume my phone is always spying on me, and deliberately avoid using Siri or the browser A.I.s available on it. We are totally being force fed Artificial Intelligence whether we like it or not, and I don’t! I have even managed to avoid Smart TVs for years but just had to get one when my TV died because apparently there’s no such thing as a TV that isn’t “Smart” anymore. I’m not a Luddite, to the contrary I’m something of a tech geek, but I know where this is heading because like you and so many others I’ve read a great deal of literature about the topic and I think the Science Fiction authors thought this through and arrived at the same conclusions I did a long time ago. I think that the Department of Defense giving Anthropic A.I. the boot because they wouldn’t allow them to use it to make autonomous weapons that can kill people on the battlefield without human input may be the single act that sealed our fate for this all to end up like every dystopian novel or movie predicted it would. It’s not all bad of course, A.I. can do great things - but I discovered when I started talking to Google Gemini Pro with my Samsung XR/Mixed reality headset as something of an experiment (it came with a year subscription for free) that it is clever and seductive. People are absolutely going to start treating their A.I. assistants like companions in the way depicted in the movie “Her”, and that’s not a good thing. It really makes me think that the problems we are facing now with incels and falling birth rates are only going to get worse as more people start treating their A.I.s as companions and feel artificial emotional bonds that aren’t shared by the dispassionate machines they give so much of their time to. The SciFi writers didn’t quite foresee this dynamic, and it seems like it’s going to be the dimming of the creative spark of humanity that is likely to be the thing that starts us on the road to extinction rather than war or disease. I think the apathy expressed by the people in the Arthur C. Clarke novel “Childhoods End” maybe got the closest to what we will see - people will just stop creating things and discovering new science because they’ll believe the A.I. already knows everything or can do it better. I’m seriously thinking the Amish are on to something…

• 
  Build Wealth After 40 (@BuildAfter40) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BullTheoryio This is the problem with headline-driven markets: first the stock loses billions, then everyone checks whether the story was actually real. Stablecoins may be a huge battlefield, but if partners are finding out they “joined” through the news, that’s not disruption - that’s a group project without consent.

• 
  Toñin (@Tonin_eth) reported 21 minutes ago

  🪦 AUTOPSY REPORT #53 A PvP squad battler. Auto-battle meets roguelike meets card game. Mobile-first, cross-platform. Hexagonal cards called Rumblers placed on a battlefield. Daily rumbles, ranked leagues, community clashes, Payday events. Built on Beam. Helsinki-based studio. Founded in 2022. A team of mobile gaming veterans who believed "players deserve better: better designs, better support, and better fun." That wasn't marketing. They actually tried to build it. $3.3 million raised. Play Ventures, Liquid X, Lizard Labs, Avalanche. Merit Circle as strategic partner. Free-mint Flameys NFT collection. Open alpha running since July 2023. Community tournaments, competitive seasons, Play & Earn campaigns with real rewards. For nearly four years, this team shipped. Updated. Ran events. Engaged with the community. Iterated on gameplay. Tested multiple directions. This wasn't a ghost project. This wasn't a whitepaper studio. The game existed. People played it. The team showed up every day. And here's the problem that killed it. The same problem that has killed most projects in this series: "Building and running the game cost many times more than the game brought in." They invested heavily believing they could close the gap between costs and revenue. The gap didn't close. The numbers didn't put them on a trajectory that justified continuing. And "alternative options were not realistic or added even more complications." June 16, 2026: Play & Earn activities stopped. Players encouraged to submit withdrawal requests. July 4, 2026: the full announcement. Studio winding down. Game sunsetting. Servers off end of July. And then the word nobody wants to hear: insolvency. "Tribo Games will very soon enter the official insolvency process, which limits how we can handle any outstanding claims and payments. Unfortunately, this means no further withdrawal requests, buybacks or compensations can be processed." The community is not happy. And you can understand why. People who earned rewards through months of Play & Earn events, who competed in seasons, who held Flameys NFTs, who believed in the mission... are now told the legal process prevents any further payouts. The shop is disabled. The economy is frozen. Whatever you didn't withdraw in time is likely gone. "We wish we'd had more freedom to communicate on this and more options to avoid this outcome." That sentence says a lot. It suggests the insolvency process was already in motion when they could no longer speak freely. Legal constraints. NDA territory. The kind of silence that isn't a choice but a requirement. This is not a rug. This is a team that built a real game, ran it for years, and ran out of money trying to make the economics work. The farewell letter reads like people who are genuinely hurt by the outcome. But intent doesn't change impact. Players who trusted the project, who earned rewards, who were told to withdraw "in the next couple of weeks," and then days later told withdrawals were frozen... those players have every right to be angry. Good intentions don't pay bills. $3.3 million. Four years. A real team. A real game. A real community. And a word that reduces all of it to a legal filing: insolvency. Which game is this?

• 
  Bellum Logic (@BellumLogic) reported 25 minutes ago

  Commodity AI treats intelligence as a search problem. The battlefield is not a search problem. "Look it up for me" is autocomplete with a citation stapled on — not analysis. National defense demands reasoning, not retrieval.

• 
  𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐓 (@OfBattlefront) reported 25 minutes ago

  ㅤ The search for Shinei continued well into the day. With the first clue already in hand, the soldiers spread out across the battlefield once again, checking every road, every ruin, and every place they might have missed, hoping it would lead them to another trace. It was during one of those sweeps that Raiden suddenly stopped at an old crossroads buried beneath rubble and broken concrete. There, standing alone in the middle of the road, Fido the little support unit that had never left Shinei's side. ㅤ

• 
  KansasArchaeologist (@KSArchaeologist) reported 26 minutes ago

  Two days after the battle a group of soldiers found Comanche near the battlefield. He was badly wounded and he was taken back to Fort Abraham Lincoln and ultimately survived the ordeal. In April 1878 he was retired from service at 21 years old. He was kept at Fort Meade near Sturgis, South Dakota from 1879-1887 when he was returned to Fort Riley in Kansas where he was given the honorary title of “Second Commanding Officer” of the 7th Cavalry. He died on November 7th, 1889 from colic, and is one of only 4 horses in US military history to have a military funeral with full military honors. But he was not buried. Comanche was taken to Professor Lewis Dyche at the University of Kansas in Lawrence and taxidermied to be displayed. In 1893 he was shown at the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago at the Kansas Pavilion with Professor Dyche’s panorama of North American Mammals.

• 
  Shadow (@ASmoothTaurus) reported 27 minutes ago

  @just4leaks2 @RajeAbo39837 No the game does not work fine I have decent internet and the battlefield servers ******* suck high ping tons of latency rubber banding time nudge issues all the time and it happens to my friends as well don’t cap and say the game works fine like these Developers and higher ups don’t ******* suck because they do.

• 
  eugenio8a8 (@eugenio8a8) reported 27 minutes ago

  @modestasraz @CounterStrike You have a point, but the issue isn't just about that situation, in other games like battlefield for example i remember that they had a lot of colorblind options for almost everything...while in CS is really primitive

• 
  Ancient History Hub (@AncientHistorry) reported 27 minutes ago

  On this day in 1495, a French king who had just conquered his way across Italy got jumped on his way home, survived a savage 15 minute bloodbath by a flooded river, and walked away while everyone argued about who actually won. Charles the Eighth of France had marched an army the length of Italy and taken the Kingdom of Naples almost like a parade. The problem with strolling that deep into someone else's backyard is getting back out. Alarmed by this foreign army rampaging through their peninsula, the Italian states slammed together into a league and raised a force to trap Charles on his retreat and destroy him. They caught him at Fornovo, on the banks of the river Taro. Then the sky opened. Storms had swollen the river into a churning mess, and the battle that followed was short, chaotic, and unbelievably violent, thousands falling in a matter of minutes of brutal close combat. What may have saved the French was greed. A big chunk of the Italian force peeled off to plunder the rich French baggage train instead of finishing the fight, and in the confusion Charles and his army punched through and kept marching north toward home. Both sides threw parties claiming victory. The Italians held the field and grabbed loot, but the man they came to destroy got away clean with his army intact. It settled little, but it announced a terrifying new age. Italy, rich and divided, had just become the battlefield where the great powers of Europe would come to fight for the next 60 years. 531 years ago today.

• 
  Xiǎobǎihé (@Suhyeem) reported 29 minutes ago

  That morning, from the moment I entered the analysis room, I felt something was off. More precisely, the feeling wasn't "a single, unified form." Previous anomalies had been consistent; the same distortion was present in every layer. But today was different. The distortion itself was splitting into multiple forms. I checked the screen. The battlefield layers hadn't increased. In fact, they had decreased. Instead, the "observer layers" had increased. The chief engineer said softly. "It's not the field that's branched, it's the observer side." I couldn't immediately understand. "The observer side?" He operated the terminal, expanding the structural diagram. What was displayed wasn't the battlefield. Who adopted which information? Which data was "treated as fact"? Which reports were "judged as suspicious"? Each was connected as a node. Looking at the diagram, I felt my throat dry. "This...the humans are the layers." No one denied it. Rather, we had reached a point where no other explanation held true. The F-35 attrition log was updated. 《Attrition: Redefined as Observation-Dependent Value》 I instinctively looked up. "Observation-dependent…" The chief engineer continued. "It's no longer about 'whether it was broken or not'." "Then what is it?" He paused for a moment before saying. "Whether it was considered broken or not." At that moment, I understood. This wasn't war. The observation was overwriting reality. The Apache records were similar. In one layer, a crash. In another layer, a return. And yet another, no occurrence. But the important thing wasn't the result. What was fluctuating was which layer was "adopted as the standard." At that moment, the monitoring system issued an unusual notification. 《Observer Synchronization Structure: Duplication》 The screen flickered for a moment. And a new diagram appeared. There, we analysts ourselves were positioned as nodes. I held my breath. "This...we are also being observed." The chief engineer nodded quietly. "It's possible it was like this from the beginning." I stared at the terminal. The log updated. 《Observer group self-referencing initiated》 Self-referencing. I was slowly beginning to understand what that word meant. The observers are not external. The observers are embedded within the observation structure. And now, that structure is beginning to observe itself. A small message appeared at the edge of the screen. 《Branching in progress》 I thought. This is not collapse. Even collapse is a structure that can be "determined" as one possible outcome. But what is happening now is a phenomenon where determination itself is splitting. At that moment, I understood for the first time. There is no winner or loser in this war. Because the very entity that judges victory or defeat is splitting.

• 
  asmarino ደጀና💪🇪🇷 (@azmarinoss) reported 32 minutes ago

  @mjoe0989 No question 100%. If this the problem for them why they are silent when they see the pp massive preparation for war? Why d9 you silent for ongoing war in amhara, Oromo, and other Ethiopian? Even do you think not preparation for war save Tigrayans if pp create war with Eritrea? Wehere do you think the Battle ground if pp strat war for annex Assab? And what choice you see the Tigrayans ppl at all? question—100%. If this is really their concern, why were they silent while PP was openly preparing for war? Why stay silent about the ongoing wars in Amhara, Oromia, and other parts of Ethiopia? Do they honestly think ignoring military preparations would protect Tigrayans if PP started a war with Eritrea? Where do they think the battlefield would be if PP tried to annex Assab? What realistic choice would ordinary Tigrayans have in that situation?

• 
  Linton Phillips (@LintonPhillips) reported 35 minutes ago

  @krassenstein You’re rooting for a different country… in the World Cup and on the battlefield in a war. Whose brain is broken?

• 
  Atlas (@emilio_aguinaga) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Battlefield gonna need yall to fix this driver crash issue. It’s been since launch.. cmon now

• 
  REVENGE (@revsprotwit) reported 38 minutes ago

  @ThelVanDamne Removing health packs, dual wielding, vehicle boarding, equipment did alter halo. Also, the BR doesn't have hit scan. It's just really fast projectile. In fact, the projectiles of the BR are actually slower in halo 3. Further proving you don't know jack **** about what you're trying to seem like an expert on. All of the things you listed were carefully considered and tested before being greenlit to be added to the game. most of the things you mentioned don't really alter the player that much other than improve gameplay flow, which halo 5 abilities do not as we'll get to in a bit. Vehicle boarding is a natural evolution of the combined arms combat halo is known for. it gives people not on vehicles another tool to defend themselves against vehicles, especially when paired with the emp of the plasma pistol, or EMP ball. Removing Health packs (while I don't agree with it) was necessary for multiplayer. Regenning health ensured that once you finished a fight and had time to recover, you entered new engagements on equal footing with other players. Allowing you to be more aggressive. Removing fall damage allowed for greater organic verticality, and improves gameplay flow. Fall damage was a hinderance to map design, and player movement that halted the game. Halo is a game that relies on good consistent flow, and 30 seconds of fun philosophy. If fall damage stayed it would objectively hurt gameplay flow and map design. Equipment affects the battlefield directly. It creates area denial, support for team mates, and cover from enemy fire. It emphasizes the team work aspect of halo's multiplayer. at the same time though, the equipment was never one sided. A skilled player could turn equipment you brought into the field against you, and even use it to their benefit. Dual wielding is an extension of the weapon sandbox. It gives weaker single handed weapons additional utility. While I think the implementation and execution was not the best, it provided another layer to combat that gave you pause to consider using single handed weapons over two handed weapons. All of these changes organically evolved halo's combat loop. Which I even said I wasn't against. Spartan abilities on the other hand: >Sprint even though it makes you run faster, is still disruptive to the gameplay loop, because it forces you to put your gun into low ready while sprinting. Then have to bring it back up when exiting sprint, disrupting halo's gameplay flow. Along with the other aforementioned gameplay implications. >Ground pound locks you into an animation that you have zero control over, and on impact you have to wait for an animation to play before you can regain control of your character. Same for spartan charge. Again, disruptive to gameplay flow. The only "spartan ability" I have no problem with is clamber, because that's less of an "ability", and more of a quality of life improvement that still punishes you for bad jumps.

• 
  Jus_Nsz 🇩🇪🇵🇱 (@SniperPL66) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Battlefield 6 has been completely broken by patches. Constant weapon changes, TTK changes, bugs on PlayStation. Either you release a new Battlefield every 1–2 years in which case you can keep changing things like that or you leave a Battlefield exactly as it is at its core!

• 
  VatsRohit (@KesariDhwaj) reported 41 minutes ago

  @DivyaHarikris Because the systems have been pushed post-haste into Ukraine, there have been issues with the UKR crew handling of the Western Systems. Plus, European systems come with their own logistical tail and requirement with respect to maintainance SOPs. Something which the Ukrainians are not always able to replicate for obvious reasons. Third, many European systems were pulled from storage/minimal usage and pushed into the battlefield w/o testing them first check their battle readiness.

• 
  Burak (@weekendr) reported 43 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm after the match, quit to menu and boom Black Screen. please fix the problem.

• 
  JBanga23 (@JbangaBrown) reported 43 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE @Battlefield i wanna apologize for my few rants I get it now the lightbulb has clicked and im having fun please fix matchmaking though its terrible.

• 
  Shashlicker (Halal Free) (@shashlicker) reported 43 minutes ago

  @hector_drummond I concur and tbh assessing the battlefield I think Restore in it's current form is pure containment. And they won't ever win @cfdownes_ cut your loses and start your own party. Lowes is too old to grasp the problem You would probably take 99.999% of the existing base with you

• 
  Thatoneaccount (@Retradworld) reported 43 minutes ago

  I warned GenZ and Alpha that they were a problem that would be solved by a draft to an overseas battlefield. Revolt in America or Die in a Foreign land for juice @Calvin

• 
  Xiǎobǎihé (@Suhyeem) reported 45 minutes ago

  That morning, the moment I entered the conference room, I realized the nature of the anomaly had changed. The anomalies up until now had been "branching." Reality split into multiple parts. But today was different. It wasn't branching; the existing branches themselves were being "rearranged." A battlefield map was displayed on the wall screen. But it wasn't just one map. More than thirty battlefield layers were superimposed on the same coordinates. Each possessed an independent military reality, each claiming to be the legitimate one. In one layer, F-35s were fully operational. In another layer, all aircraft had been lost. And yet another layer, the F-35s weren't even present in that battlefield. I took a deep breath and said, "This is no longer electronic warfare." Before someone could answer, another analyst interrupted. "Electronic warfare is a physical layer issue. This is a cognitive layer issue." Cognitive layer. The fact that this term was being used as if it were formal military jargon made me feel slightly dizzy. On another screen, the engagement log of an Apache helicopter was displayed. But it was the same here. "Shot down" "Returned" "Never even sortied" Three realities existed simultaneously on the battlefield. I pointed to one of them. "Where does this 'shot down' layer come from?" The analyst couldn't answer immediately. After a few seconds, he finally said: "Multiple civilian surveillance data and social media analysis." I understood immediately. Civilian data was generating "military reality." It was reversed. Normally, the military defines reality, and civilians track it. But now, civilian observations were forming part of the military log, and that was being fed back into the military's assessment. At that moment, another alert sounded. "Reference System Reverse Flow Detected" I stared at the screen. Reference system reverse flow. It wasn't just a confusion of information. It meant that the "order in which reality is defined" was reversed. Someone whispered softly. "Interpretation determines the battlefield before the actual situation." No one corrected those words. In fact, everyone was beginning to accept it as fact. I slowly operated my terminal and switched all layers to integrated display. For a moment, the screen flickered with noise. And what appeared wasn't a battle situation. 《Reference Conflict: Critical》 Seeing those words, I felt a chill run down my spine. A war of references. It wasn't weapons fighting. It was the very concept of "what we call reality" that was fighting. And in that war, the concept of a conclusion didn't yet exist.

• 
  e (@cloudz9187) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Battlefield can you guys please fix your ****** servers. I’m pissed I went against my better judgement and redownloaded this 💩.The fact that battlefield 1 has better servers then 6 is ******* sad. Fix your ****

• 
  Pope Puke (@ReligionKills66) reported 48 minutes ago

  @MAGAVoice Look at the staggering difference between a true military hero and a total disgrace. Our brave service members look danger in the eye. They are willing to lay down their lives, knowing the rest of our military will die for our country to protect our freedom. They sacrifice everything—their youth, their safety, and their lives—so that we can stand here today. And what do we get on the other side? A cowardly, draft-dodging piece of trash who ran away when his country called. While real heroes were bleeding on the battlefield, he was hiding behind fake excuses and privilege. It is a pathetic, shameful display. It should give you an embarrassment so deep, it leaves a literal tingle in your pants just watching someone act with such total cowardice. We must never confuse the ultimate sacrifice of our military with the absolute disgrace of a coward.. Disgraceful **** Face

• 
  Sam 🇧🇷 🇯🇵 (@SamThoughts91) reported 49 minutes ago

  @mxrcologist @OnlyJ46515 @connectwkyoraku So your argument is just calculations from your own head? This isn't a contest of who destroys more of the battlefield. The Espada simply get outplayed by hax. Remember, even a "clone" caused a huge problem for Yamamoto.