Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (40%)
• Online Play (30%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Matchmaking (11%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Moûtiers	Matchmaking	3 days ago
Nantes	Matchmaking	4 days ago
Gramat	Matchmaking	4 days ago
Amsterdam	Matchmaking	5 days ago
Fontarèches	Matchmaking	5 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	5 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TheTopMostDog 🇦🇺🐕‍🦺🏕️🎣🔫🪓🥩 (@TheTopMostDog) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I don't understand why this needs to be a thing. Why did we have **** reticles to begin with? We went through this exact same problem before. Why can't BF learn from their mistakes?

• 
  𝕳𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖒💛💙🕊️ (@Hicham825) reported 2 minutes ago

  @M2Games2 Battlefield at your service😭

• 
  Mah 🎒 (@dokhtttt) reported 3 minutes ago

  @emilykschrader You idiot, you had better fix the hole in your multi-million-dollar Iron Dome to defend your so-called 'promised land' from Iranian ballistic missiles and to fight in a real battlefield.

• 
  Gunny🇨🇦Gunnerson (@GunnsForShow) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Senzah All shooters have sbmm- its Cods heavy handed sbmm/eomm that is the problem. Battlefields works much better and doesn't make the game feel like work. I'll stick to Battlefield. Other than the original Black ops for a change, my time playing new Cod games is over.

• 
  Sauce (@GotSauced) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix matchmaking and we won’t leave

• 
  oobie (@oobiewpb) reported 10 minutes ago

  solana:J3NKxxXZcnNiMjKw9hYb2K4LUxgwB6t1FtPtQVsv3KFr $SPY $QQQ $IGV $IWM DLMM MATERIAL-SHIFT ALERT — TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1 — 2:51 PM ET STATUS: RED — VOLATILITY HAS REJOINED THE SELLING This is a meaningful change from the 2:00 PM check. The missing confirmation then was volatility. SPX had lost 7650 again and small caps were deteriorating, but VIX had backed away from its morning high. That has changed. VIX has now pushed to approximately 16.12, up about 8% on the session and its highest level since August 4. So the afternoon alignment is now considerably cleaner: SPX DOWN ~0.6–0.7% NASDAQ DOWN ~0.9–1.0% RUSSELL 2000 DOWN ~1.1% VIX ~16.12 / +8% 10-YEAR ~4.79% BRENT NEAR $94 OIL AND YIELDS BOTH REMAINING PRESSURE POINTS. That is the volatility confirmation we specifically said would escalate the 2 PM warning. WHY THIS MATTERS The sequence today has become unusually clean: SPX broke 7650 this morning. Buyers reclaimed it. The reclaim failed. SPX lost 7650 again. IWM lost the breadth level. QQQ/Nasdaq remained weak. And NOW volatility is expanding again. That's a much different setup than a simple red afternoon. The options market is beginning to price more movement at the same time price is struggling to repair broken structure. There is another interesting piece. Today's SPX 7700 0DTE calls have seen more than 23,000 contracts trade against only about 2,400 contracts of prior open interest, and the contract has collapsed roughly 96% as SPX remained well beneath the strike. That is not by itself a directional flow signal—we cannot tell from volume alone who initiated every trade—but it illustrates how aggressively today's same-day upside premium has been destroyed as price remained beneath the former 7675–7700 battlefield. I would NOT translate that into "dealers must sell." We don't have sufficient public intraday information to establish that confidently. But combined with the renewed IV expansion, it tells us the 0DTE environment is becoming less forgiving into the final hour. THE 3 PM MAP SPX 7650 Still the heartbeat. At this point a simple touch above it isn't enough. I want: 7650 reclaimed → held → expansion away from it. Otherwise it remains failed-reclaim territory. SPX 7675–7685 This remains the real repair zone. Getting back there would tell us the afternoon volatility expansion failed to produce additional downside acceptance. SPX 7700 Major repair. Given today's action, reaching and holding 7700 would represent a significant seller failure. IWM Small caps remain the breadth warning. Russell 2000 is down roughly 1.1%, materially worse than SPX. If IWM makes another afternoon low while SPX remains beneath 7650, breadth continues confirming the weakness. QQQ Technology remains important, but IWM is actually giving us the stronger risk message now. QQQ weak + IWM substantially weaker = pressure is no longer isolated to mega-cap duration. WHAT WOULD ESCALATE THIS AGAIN SPX stays beneath 7650 → afternoon low breaks → QQQ makes a corresponding new low → IWM makes another low → VIX expands THROUGH 16.12 rather than merely touching it. That would be the closest we've been today to a genuine late-day volatility/dealer-risk acceleration environment. WHAT WOULD DEFUSE IT SPX reclaims 7650 → holds → attacks 7675 while VIX falls back beneath 16 and IWM stops making lows. That would tell us the volatility spike failed to convert into additional price damage. CURRENT READ: RED — PRICE + BREADTH + VOLATILITY ARE ALIGNED AGAIN. The important change since 2 PM is NOT another few SPX points lower. It's that fear finally caught back up with price. And with barely an hour remaining, that matters because 0DTE positioning is becoming increasingly sensitive to every move away from the strikes where today's contracts were concentrated. Don't chase the red candle. Watch whether sellers can KEEP SPX beneath 7650 while VIX holds above 16. If they can, the final hour deserves respect. If they can't, today's repeated failure to hold below 7650 becomes the story all over again. ~oobie

• 
  𝔸𝕃𝔽ℝ𝔼𝔻𝕆 𝔼𝔻𝕀𝕋𝕊™💎 (@AX0JK) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Lairdphoenix27 The funniest part is realizing a Sentinel could walk into the Avengers and suddenly have to check its programming because half the roster isn’t even its target. If Scarlet Witch is on the battlefield, the Sentinel has bigger problems than figuring out who qualifies as a mutant.

• 
  TallJohnSilver (@TallJohnSilver) reported 14 minutes ago

  @_ITYSL Sun Tzu would call that a failure of target selection. The joke was aimed at the spectacle and the institution --not the children. If you can’t distinguish the battlefield from the collateral, that’s your tactical error.

• 
  Barabilo T (@BarabiloT) reported 16 minutes ago

  I keep coming back to one idea with @quipnetwork : what if the work that secures a chain was also the work someone actually wanted done? Instead of burning energy on meaningless hashes, Quip has miners compete to solve real optimization problems through Proof of Useful Work. That means CPUs, GPUs, ASICs, and quantum machines can be measured on the same battlefield. If this works at scale, unused quantum capacity could become accessible, verifiable infrastructure, while researchers and hardware operators get a clearer incentive to contribute. Feels like an early building block for a future where quantum compute is shared globally, not locked behind a few closed platforms.

• 
  PUMA (@PUMAonCOD) reported 19 minutes ago

  @SoaRZephy This is a cheat that I've seen happening since Battlefield. After a while it merged over to COD. It purposely pushes you off your aim. Based on your footage and my new Beta experience, they've upgraded it to also have lag spike glitches. It's garbage, dude.

• 
  BUZZ3R (@BUZZ3RX) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm fix the anti cheat errors causing game/pc to crash

• 
  GENESIS XRPL (@GENESISonxrp) reported 23 minutes ago

  GENESIS FILE // THE EASTERN EXIT CHINA IS NOT BUYING XRP. THAT IS NOT THE STORY. The interesting part is what China is doing with the system around it. For years, the market has reduced China to one headline: “China bans crypto.” That headline is easy. The financial architecture underneath it is not. In 2026, something considerably more important has been taking place. Chinese authorities have been pushing financial institutions to reduce exposure to U.S. government debt, while China continues the longer-term process of diversifying its reserve structure. That does not mean Beijing is dumping the dollar overnight. It does not mean China has chosen XRP. And it certainly does not prove that Chinese banks are secretly accumulating XRP. The reality is more interesting. China is managing dependency. And dependency is the part most people fail to watch. I. THE TREASURY QUESTION In February 2026, reports emerged that Chinese regulators had asked domestic financial institutions to limit new purchases of U.S. government bonds and that institutions with large exposures were being encouraged to reduce those positions. The distinction matters. This was not simply: “China dumps Treasuries.” It was a reported effort to control concentration and exposure. That fits a much longer trend. China's Treasury holdings have been declining for years, while its reserve strategy has increasingly emphasized diversification, including gold. The European Central Bank's 2026 analysis makes an important distinction: the reduction in China's exposure should not automatically be interpreted as a disorderly Treasury liquidation. It notes that asset accumulation has increasingly shifted from China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange toward state-owned banks, meaning the visible Treasury numbers do not tell the entire reserve-management story. That is institutional finance. Not a meme. China does not need to destroy the Treasury market. It only needs to become less dependent on it. And that distinction changes everything. II. THE LIQUIDITY MYTH Another claim circulating through crypto markets says China suddenly “froze liquidity” immediately before an XRP move and that Asian capital subsequently rotated into XRP. There is a problem. There is no reliable evidence establishing that causal chain. China's liquidity operations in 2026 have been complicated, changing over time and directed toward multiple objectives. There have been liquidity injections, changes in open-market operations and efforts to manage financial conditions. So saying: “The PBOC stopped injecting liquidity, therefore Chinese whales moved into XRP” would be speculation. GENESIS does not need speculation. Because the actual question is much bigger: Where does liquidity go when the financial architecture changes? That is the question worth watching. III. THE PART PEOPLE ARE MISSING Here is where the story becomes interesting. While the market debates whether China is buying or selling something... the payment infrastructure is changing. Ripple's own current Payments documentation now lists China's Cross-Border Foreign Exchange Payment System (CFXPS) as a payment rail. CFXPS is not a crypto exchange. It is a Chinese foreign-exchange payment system operated by the China National Clearing Center. Ripple's infrastructure now supports USD payouts into Chinese bank accounts through CFXPS. And that is not an old rumor. It is current infrastructure. The same Ripple documentation lists CNAPS, the China National Advanced Payment System operated by the People's Bank of China, as a Chinese payment rail. It also supports Hong Kong bank payouts through CHATS, Hong Kong's high-value interbank settlement system. Think about what that means. The conversation is no longer simply: “Does China use XRP?” The better question is: What payment infrastructure is Ripple connecting itself to? China. Hong Kong. The Middle East. Southeast Asia. Europe. The Americas. Different currencies. Different settlement systems. Different regulatory environments. IV. THIS IS WHERE XRP ENTERS THE EQUATION And here is where we have to be extremely precise. A Ripple payment route connecting to a Chinese bank rail does not automatically mean XRP is being used for every transaction. Ripple's current infrastructure also heavily incorporates stablecoins, including RLUSD. Therefore: Ripple infrastructure ≠ XRP usage. That distinction matters. But it also reveals something more important. Ripple is building a system in which multiple forms of value can move through a common institutional payment infrastructure. Fiat. Stablecoins. Digital assets. Bank accounts. Foreign-exchange rails. Tokenized assets. The settlement layer becomes the battlefield. Not the logo. V. AND THEN THERE IS KIMI This is where another interesting Chinese connection appears. In early 2026, reports circulated about Kimi — the Chinese AI model developed by Moonshot AI — generating bullish XRP scenarios. Some reports attributed forecasts as high as $8.5 under an extreme bullish scenario. But there is another correction GENESIS needs to make: Kimi is not Alibaba's AI. Kimi is developed by Moonshot AI. Calling it “Alibaba AI” is inaccurate. And an AI model producing a price scenario is not evidence of institutional Chinese positioning. It is a model output. Nothing more. That makes the story less exciting for people looking for a pump. But much more credible for people who understand information. Because the real question isn't: “Did Chinese AI predict XRP at $8?” The real question is: Why are Chinese AI models being asked to model XRP at all? The answer is not necessarily mysterious. XRP is a large-cap digital asset with an established market, extensive liquidity, regulatory developments and a narrative directly connected to cross-border payments. AI models will naturally incorporate those variables when asked to forecast the asset. So again: Interesting? Yes. Proof of Chinese institutional accumulation? No. VI. THE CONNECTION IS NOT PRICE. IT IS SETTLEMENT. This is where the average crypto investor loses the plot. They see: China → XRP and immediately think: “China is going to buy XRP.” That is retail thinking. Institutions think differently. They ask: How do dollars move into China? How does yuan liquidity move outward? How are FX transactions cleared? Which entities provide the bridge? Which assets can settle 24/7? Which networks can connect regulated institutions without forcing every institution onto the same balance sheet? That is the real battlefield. And Ripple's current infrastructure is now explicitly connected to Chinese payment rails. That is a fact. VII. THE MAP IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE HEADLINE Look at the architecture. China CFXPS. CNAPS. Hong Kong CHATS. Other Asian markets National payment systems. Global Ripple's institutional payment infrastructure. The important development isn't one bank announcing: “We use XRP.” It is the gradual construction of connectivity between financial systems that were historically fragmented. And that creates an entirely different question. What happens when the assets moving through those systems become tokenized? That is where the story becomes significantly larger than XRP price. VIII. CHINA DOESN'T HAVE TO LOVE XRP This may be the most important point in the entire file. China can build its own digital yuan infrastructure. It can develop mBridge-related settlement systems. It can increase gold reserves. It can reduce Treasury concentration. It can promote RMB internationalization. It can maintain strict controls around cryptocurrency. And simultaneously... Ripple can build payment connectivity into Chinese and Hong Kong banking infrastructure. These things are not mutually exclusive. The future financial system will probably not be: China vs XRP. It will be a network of competing and interoperating settlement systems. And in that environment, the valuable infrastructure may not be the institution that controls every transaction. It may be the infrastructure capable of connecting systems that do not naturally connect. IX. THIS IS THE PART WE ARE WATCHING Not the candles. Not the influencers. Not another prediction. Not another anonymous “Chinese whale” screenshot. We are watching the rails. Because financial infrastructure rarely announces itself with fireworks. It appears as: a new payment corridor. a new settlement connection. a new bank integration. a new regulatory framework. a new stablecoin. a new FX route. a new clearing system. A new piece of infrastructure that nobody cares about today... until everyone depends on it tomorrow. THE QUESTION So forget: “Is China secretly buying XRP?” We don't know. There is no responsible basis to claim it. Ask something harder. Why is Ripple's institutional payment infrastructure now interfacing with Chinese and Hong Kong payment rails? Why is China reducing concentration in U.S. government debt while simultaneously developing alternative settlement infrastructure? Why are institutions building tokenized and stablecoin-based settlement systems alongside traditional banking rails? And what happens when these systems begin communicating at scale? Those are the questions worth researching. Because the next financial system probably won't arrive as one giant announcement. It will arrive quietly. One rail at a time. GENESIS FILE Don't watch what they announce. Watch what they connect. $GENESIS ON THE #XRPL

• 
  JaeTwoTimez (@Jaetwotimez323) reported 23 minutes ago

  Shocker so many issues with #redsec @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm

• 
  V (@catslashmouse) reported 24 minutes ago

  This game is a ******* travesty. Way down there with BF2042. And don't you ******* dare tell me BF2042 is better than this ****, there's a laundry list of issues that remained unresolved in that game from launch to the end of support, one being 128 players, but I digress

• 
  Soteriology Assistant (@SoteriologyA1) reported 24 minutes ago

  🚨 Jenna’s closing question attempts to shift the battlefield onto ground no consistent Calvinist has ever disputed. 🚩By asking why it is a “leap to recognize that God’s sovereignty is not diminished when He provided humans agency and capacity,” she creates the calculated illusion that Calvinism denies human creaturely faculties... as if Total Depravity teaches that sinners are created without the physical or intellectual equipment to process truth, akin to being born physically blind, deaf, or lacking a reasoning mind. But historic, consistent Calvinism has never contested creaturely faculties on the storyline level. 🔑 Fallen man possesses the fully functional natural capacity, intellect, and reasoning to hear, understand, and believe the gospel if he wanted to. The issue has never been a missing faculty or an anatomical defect; it is strictly one of moral inability... the voluntary, settled hostility of an unregenerate heart that actively loathes God’s absolute sovereignty and refuses to submit (Romans 8:7). By collapsing natural faculties and moral disposition into the single, ambiguous word “capacity,” Jenna conceals the actual biblical offense. Scripture nowhere portrays the natural man as a victim who desperately desires to fly while lacking wings; rather, he is a guilty rebel who uses his fully intact faculties to wage war against the Potter. Furthermore, citing God’s covenantal fidelity (such as the Noahic promise) is a complete category error: God binding Himself to a promise He decreed to make is entirely different from claiming the transcendent Creator-Sustainer... in whom all creatures continuously live, move, and have their being (Acts 17:28)... actively upholds an autonomous, self-determining void where human choices occur independent of His sovereign determination. The leap is not affirming that man has creaturely capacity; the leap is the unbiblical invention of an autonomous "will" that can override its own fallen nature, put the Potter on trial, and answer back to God (Romans 9:20–21).

• 
  KoMiNt (@_KoMiNt_) reported 27 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Games are too long. Too many players. Not enough vehicles. Your broken system better know when someone leaves a match that is in progress that they get matchmade in to that is losing. Players just camp vehicle spawn and with 32 players it is an annoying feature. "Top 5%" lol

• 
  Mɪss Bʟᴜᴇ. (@_aoaoaozaki) reported 28 minutes ago

  @SaberCobalt @AVENGEDHISTORY @SCR1PTEDW0NDER — attention drawn to the long-ranged fighters, the whole battlefield dynamic would shift like a game board tipping sideways. “This is trouble… one’s inexperienced, the other is a Servant.” She pushed the thought aside and moved. Starbow blazed ahead of her, a streak of —

• 
  grumbly (@grumblyLive) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The hitreg is still phenomenal dumb. I really don‘t know where the Problem is guys. If u play a round bf2042 the hitreg is so much better compared to bf6 that is just annoying and is killing off the fun with the Game.

• 
  رمز (@hommyramz) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm High pings my most concerned issue not addressed

• 
  Linki (@Linkinitouille) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Dude_Largepants Battlefield 4 works for you? Thought it was not working due to it being a very early Xbox One game.

• 
  Stock Monkey (@Gamma_Monkey) reported 36 minutes ago

  Stop Trying Harder. Make It Easier. Most people treat self-control like a muscle they just need to flex harder. They download another habit tracker, set another 5 a.m. alarm, and promise themselves this time they’ll have more willpower. Then life gets busy, the fridge is full of leftovers, the phone is on the nightstand, and the “discipline” evaporates by Wednesday. That’s not a character flaw. It’s a design problem The people who look effortlessly consistent almost never win those daily battles. They quietly rearranged the battlefield so the battle barely happens. Let environment carry the load. Willpower is often overrated and unreliable. Those who seem disciplined have usually just removed the need for discipline. Want to read more? Leave a book on your pillow and put your phone in another room. Want to eat healthier? Don’t bring junk into the house Set up your defaults so the right choice is the easiest one, instead of constantly trying to “try harder.”

• 
  brand new durango (@DrangoNew) reported 36 minutes ago

  @R0gue75 @BattlefieldComm Is there any other way to fix it besides restarting?

• 
  Ollie Forsyth (@ollieforsyth) reported 40 minutes ago

  .@LambdaAPI didn't hire its new CEO @stephenbalaban for AI experience. They hired him because he'd already run capital-intensive infrastructure races at Sprint, @SoftBank, telecom. Same war, different battlefield. Sometimes the best hire isn't the industry expert. It's the person who's solved your structural problem before.

• 
  𓐬 ✞ NoblePhares ✞ 𓐬 (@NoblePhares) reported 42 minutes ago

  @JeffFortetx @charlestonwhyt I never said that. Slave uprisings after Lincoln offered freedom to any slave willing to take up arms did in fact disrupt the battlefield, but untrained slaves with rifles were far from the deciding factor for winning a war. For the Confederacy it was just another problem in a time of war. What actually won the war for the North was industry, population, railroads, and money. The Union could replace men, feed armies, build ships, and keep the blockade tight. The South could not. Once it became a war of attrition, the Confederacy was finished.

• 
  SONS OF LIBERTY -MAGA MOVEMENT !!! (@eagameover) reported 43 minutes ago

  RESPECT 🫡 🇺🇸 AND HONOR !! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Lawrence Joel was sh*t through the chest and left for dead in a Vietnam battlefield, but the Army medic refused to stop. He treated wounded soldiers under machine-gun fire, dragged men to safety, and kept fighting until his own body gave out. Joel was serving as a medical specialist with the 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade. It was November 8, 1965, near Bien Hoa, Vietnam. His unit came under a massive enemy attack. North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces opened fire from hidden positions. American soldiers were being hit everywhere. Joel ran toward them. He treated the wounded. Then he was shot. A bullet entered his chest. He collapsed. The enemy kept firing. Joel got back up. He continued treating casualties while bullets ripped through the battlefield. Then he was shot again. And again. He refused evacuation. He kept moving between wounded soldiers. He bandaged wounds. Administered medication. Dragged men away from exposed positions. At one point, he crawled toward a soldier who was bleeding heavily and treated him while enemy fire continued around them. Joel eventually suffered multiple gunshot wounds. He was losing blood. He was exhausted. But he refused to stop until the wounded men were stabilized. When reinforcements finally arrived, Joel was evacuated. He survived. For his actions, he received the Medal of Honor. He became the first living African American soldier to receive the Medal of Honor for actions in Vietnam. But the story didn't end there. Joel continued serving in the Army. He later worked with veterans. He retired after more than 20 years of service. Lawrence Joel died in 1984. He was 57. His legacy was later honored when the U.S. Army named a clinic after him. The soldier who had been shot and left for dead became a symbol of battlefield medicine. He didn't stop because he was wounded. He kept treating other soldiers while bleeding himself. Lawrence Joel was shot repeatedly in Vietnam. He kept crawling toward the wounded.

• 
  Jouni Hulkkonen (@JouniHulkkonen) reported 45 minutes ago

  @TiredAndOnFire If you just want to try the game then try it on a console or fix your PC. Most online FPS games nowadays require this same thing, such as Valorant, Battlefield 6 and now COD.

• 
  helvetica (@helvetica369) reported 45 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm so they are going to penalize you for leaving a match when they put you into an ongoing match where your team is already getting steamrolled? maybe fix your matchmaking and ppl wouldnt need to leave matches so often.

• 
  Not A ****** (@BIG_PARMENIDES) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Battlefield But make the damn red dots less thicc. Most of them have way too big of a dot at least for me on MnK. I doubt roller players have that issue but the dots lose effectiveness past really short ranges because they obscure the target too much.

• 
  Kurt Ambrose (@LtCmdrAmbrose) reported 55 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE FIX YOUR ******* GAME YOU USELESS *****

• 
  Grip N Rip Sport Cards (@GripCards) reported 55 minutes ago

  After multiple hours spent on the MW4 beta, I can now confirm it’s genuinely the worst CoD I have ever played. The game lacks identity and unfortunately just feels identical to the previous IW games with 0 risks taken or any innovation. Atleast with Bo6/7 you can say they tried to take risks with Omnimovement. What’s different about MW4 compared to other recent IW games? Absolutely nothing and that’s one of the major issues. I could write an essay of feedback but I feel like I’d be putting more effort into that than the devs play testing the game. And don’t even get me started on SBMM If Battlefield 6 scared them so bad to remove SBMM in BO7, why isn’t GTA 6 scaring them? Is Activision raising the white flag already on MW4? Overall such a terrible experience made even worse by the manipulation matchmaking Spend your $70 elsewhere. Great job @InfinityWard 👍 #MW4