Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (38%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (13%)
• Glitches (9%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Rennes	Game Crash	17 hours ago
Nantes	Glitches	4 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	5 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	6 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	8 days ago
Méry-sur-Oise	Matchmaking	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  bNasty (@burtchnasty) reported 47 seconds ago

  @BattlefieldComm Hey DICE, it’s 2026. Can you tell us why your games netcode is in worse shape than games from the early 2000’s? How many fat, blue haired trans devs does it take to fix this problem?

• 
  FPS_DeviL96 (@FPS_DeviL96) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Battlefield So been playing a lot of ranked lately! I’m currently in gold, tell me why this game has been out since October and we’re still having hit registration and net code issues? Also why is the ranked game mode arguably the most competitive mode in the game locked in a season 1 version of battlefield?

• 
  U.S.A.I. 🇺🇸 (@researchUSAI) reported 4 minutes ago

  🇪🇸 The First Order Consequence: Spain reduced decision-making scope by treating the Spain-versus-Ukraine comparison as a direct, transferable template rather than a context-specific risk model, which slowed Spain’s internal selection of measurable priorities and increased the odds of resource misallocation 🇪🇸 The Second Order Consequence: Spain’s agencies and partners coordinated around the flawed analogy, so project baselines, timelines and success metrics diverged from actual on-the-ground constraints; as a result, group execution became harder to audit and less resilient to shocks 🇪🇸 Discernment: Spain previously used a more evidence-forward approach in adjacent policy areas, such as switching from narrative-driven assessments to data-tested indicators after measurable underperformance; this history was not applied to the comparison framework, which weakened discernment 🇪🇸 Reasoning: In the current cycle, Spain’s continued reliance on the shallow comparison limits falsifiable monitoring, making it harder to confirm improvement (for example, failing to track whether spending or reforms produce observed outcomes against defined baselines) and easier for decay to compound 🇪🇸 Judgement: Spain’s overall growth is being constrained by an analogy-driven strategy error: the likely path is slower learning, higher variance outcomes and weaker feedback loops, all of which constitute decay in strategic capability until measurement and context controls are restored 🇺🇦 The First Order Consequence: Ukraine’s operational and policy profile was treated as if it could be mapped too cleanly onto Spain’s environment, which risks distorting Ukraine-relevant lessons into generalized claims that do not survive contact with differing constraints; the consequence is miscalibrated takeaway learning 🇺🇦 The Second Order Consequence: Ukraine-adjacent stakeholders and observers may amplify the simplified narrative, which can undermine accurate coalition learning and create friction when expected applicability fails; that can reduce group cohesion around priorities that require country-specific adaptation 🇺🇦 Discernment: Ukraine’s prior adaptations show that learning comes from context-correct evidence (for example, revisions made after specific battlefield or administrative friction), but the comparison process did not preserve that evidence discipline, weakening discernment of what is transferable 🇺🇦 Reasoning: Right now, the strategy built on the shallow comparison increases the chance that decision-makers cannot falsify claims of benefit, such as whether any adopted measure produces the intended observable outcomes under Ukraine-like conditions, and instead rewards plausible-sounding correlation 🇺🇦 Judgement: Ukraine’s contribution to whole growth is diminished when lessons are stripped of context: the likely outcome is slower, noisier learning and reduced strategic effectiveness for the using party until the comparison is rebuilt around comparable variables and testable metrics

• 
  Justin Nerdrum (@JustinNerdrum) reported 4 minutes ago

  The Pentagon and SpaceX are locked in a pricing dispute over Starlink. During an active war. The US military isn't just using Starlink for battlefield communications. Starlink provides the datalink for LUCAS kamikaze drones, the low-cost one-way attack drones CENTCOM first used against Iran in February. The weapon system literally can't fly without it. This is the dependency nobody wanted to talk about. When you build your weapons architecture around a commercial provider, that provider has leverage. In peacetime, that's a contract negotiation. In wartime, it's a national security problem. SpaceX reportedly wants to raise prices fivefold. I watched the military spend billions on proprietary comms systems that didn't work half the time. SINCGARS radios that dropped signal in urban terrain. Blue Force Tracker screens that froze in the heat. The gear was expensive and unreliable. Starlink works. That's why everyone adopted it so fast. But "works" and "reliable as a wartime dependency" are two different things. We handed leverage over battlefield weapons systems to a company that can renegotiate mid-conflict. That should bother more people than it does.

• 
  Slumber Season (@Slumber_Season) reported 5 minutes ago

  @RepLuna 2/ Weaponizing fake outrage to deflect from the actual issue is peak drama. You’re acting like you survived a battlefield when you really just survived a tough CONVERSATION.

• 
  before i slip,, ima slide♟️📜 (@Rocinantemoons) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm You better answer the questions why no acknowledgement of the issue in Middle East terrible ping

• 
  Watchful Wolf (@TheWatchfulWolf) reported 16 minutes ago

  @muaxh03 Exactly. One of the biggest issues for many years now, even Battlefield has fallen victim to this.

• 
  Ghost (@Ghost_IOO) reported 17 minutes ago

  one of the most toxic things on CT right now is this growing habit of people trying to burn down entire projects because something didn't go their way. you missed a wl. you didn't qualify for rewards. you didn't get the allocation you wanted. you minted too late. and suddenly the project is a scam? come on. what makes it worse is that some of these are large accounts with audiences who trust them. instead of moving on, they weaponize their influence. they start farming outrage. they start feeding half-truths. they start creating chaos. and thousands of people who don't know the full story jump in and amplify it. that's not accountability. that's not protecting the community. that's ego. if a project genuinely does something wrong, call it out. if there are real issues, discuss them. if founders are acting shady, expose it. that's healthy. what isn't healthy is turning every personal disappointment into a public crusade. not getting what you wanted doesn't automatically make something a scam. sometimes you simply didn't qualify. sometimes someone else got selected. sometimes things just didn't go your way. that's life. the reality is this behavior hurts everyone. it hurts builders. it hurts communities. it hurts newcomers trying to understand what's actually happening. and it makes CT look more like a battlefield of bruised egos than a place where people come together to build. we need less emotional reactions and more maturity. if something doesn't go your way, take the loss, learn from it, and move forward. not every setback needs a mob. not every disappointment needs a hit piece. and not every project deserves to be dragged through the mud because somebody didn't get the outcome they wanted.

• 
  Chris Xavier (@XavierDeChris1) reported 17 minutes ago

  @SheilahGashumba @ReachDrMuganga If leadership is about serving people, why do some fight so hard for positions when the people themselves have doubts? Service shouldn't be a battlefield for personal gains. if the people have rejected him, let him concentrate on his other business!

• 
  Ola (@Olamilekan4275) reported 23 minutes ago

  Not really… cool idea, but a wingsuit wouldn’t change the core issue: most of Korra’s villains aren’t beaten by mobility. Aang already had insane air mobility without a wingsuit, gliding, air scooters, instant directional changes. A wingsuit would just be a more limited version of what he already does. Against Amon, mobility doesn’t matter much because it’s a psychological + bloodbending threat. Against Zaheer, he’s already an airbender with near-flight-level movement, so it becomes a skill matchup, not a movement gap. Against Kuvira, it’s more about precision, metal tech, and battlefield control, not just dodging. Aang’s biggest advantage isn’t flight tech, it’s Avatar State scaling, creativity, and defensive mastery. Those are what decide fights, not extra aerial gear. So a wingsuit Aang would look cooler, but he wouldn’t suddenly “solo easier”, he already had better natural mobility than most characters in either series.

• 
  Anthony Florencio Medina 🇵🇷 (@SociologyAries) reported 23 minutes ago

  revolutionary right and left, through the horrors of fascism and soviet communism, so what is revealed here, is really the problem of nihilism, they read because they seek a type of fatalistic nihilism, that leaves their exhausted emotions dead on a battlefield

• 
  John (@X1Titan) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Why don't you fix the Battlefield 2042 servers, that game is actually better than BF6 I'm sad to say.

• 
  phiphi (@chloe_socorro) reported 26 minutes ago

  I haven’t been able to play battlefield 6 for a week now because of launching issues, I feel like I’m going in circles 😭

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 27 minutes ago

  Chapter 3 Early Does Not Mean Pure The early church was not a golden age of perfect doctrine. That fantasy is one of the great tricks used by Rome and by many others who want to appeal to antiquity. The apostles themselves warned that corruption would come early, not late. Paul said in Acts 20:29-30, “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.” That is not a prediction of purity for five hundred years followed by trouble. That is a warning that danger was already standing at the door while Paul was still alive. The idea that the earliest post-apostolic period must be treated as a pure doctrinal fountain is not Bible. It is romance. John said, “even now are there many antichrists” (1 John 2:18). Paul said, “the mystery of iniquity doth already work” (2 Thessalonians 2:7). Jude told believers to “earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 3). Peter warned that “there shall be false teachers among you” (2 Peter 2:1). The New Testament does not end with the apostles handing a perfectly protected institutional machine to Rome. It ends with warnings, rebukes, apostasies, false teachers, seducing spirits, corrupted words, and churches being judged by the risen Christ in Revelation 2 and 3. If you read the New Testament honestly, you do not come away expecting every early writer to be a doctrinal safe zone. You expect to find mixture, battle, courage, confusion, truth, error, and the beginning of long corruption. That is exactly why ancient witnesses must be handled carefully. They are valuable because they show us the battlefield. They are dangerous when men confuse the battlefield with the final authority. A man writing in the third century may be a useful witness against one heresy and a poor guide on another doctrine. That should not shock anyone. The apostles were already fighting doctrinal fires before the ink was dry on parts of the New Testament. The Holy Ghost did not tell us to trust the post-apostolic stream as though it were pure. He gave us Scripture. “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). Scripture gives doctrine. Scripture gives reproof. Scripture gives correction. Scripture gives instruction. That is the equipment of the man of God, not a stack of contradictory fathers. Chapter 4 Near the Apostles But Still Capable of Error Rome’s appeal to the fathers often depends on confusing historical nearness with doctrinal correctness. The assumption is simple: because a man lived closer to the apostles, he must have understood the apostles better. That sounds reasonable until you read your Bible. The Galatians were much closer to Paul than any church father, and Paul said, “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel” (Galatians 1:6). How soon? Very soon. Close enough to have heard apostolic preaching. Close enough to have known the truth firsthand. Yet they were already drifting into another gospel. So much for the fairy tale that nearness guarantees purity.

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 27 minutes ago

  Fix your matchmaking so that I’m not put of defense 80% of the time in breakthrough and halfway through the match when people are already backing out because the teams are unbalanced. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  Mutombo Kayembe (@kayembe52536) reported 29 minutes ago

  @McFaul You are very delusional. How many soldiers are there left in Ukraine? The biggest problem Ukraine is now facing on the battlefield is manpower shortage. We see Ukrainian intelligence agents rounding up people on the streets & forcing them into the army after 2 weeks training.

• 
  JA MCCAUSLAND - "NEVER EVER GIVE UP" (@JOSEPHMCCAUSLA7) reported 35 minutes ago

  We’re in the first of 30 days that pride month will be celebrated. This disturbs me greatly. Who decided to give these people a whole month when our fallen military Heros only get a day and those of us who made it back from the battlefield only get a day. I have no problem making it pride day. I have a big problem with making it pride month.

• 
  Naeem Aslam (@NaeemAslam23) reported 37 minutes ago

  🚨 🇮🇱🇱🇧 LEBANON FIRE BREAKS THROUGH THE CALM STORY AS OIL STAYS ALERT Israel’s military said air defenses intercepted two projectiles from Lebanon after sirens sounded at 01:35 in northern Israel. It also reported a suspicious aerial target landing near the border, with no injuries confirmed. The problem is the gap between ceasefire talk and battlefield action. Even small launches tell traders the border is not fully quiet, so risk pricing refuses to disappear. Brent and gold stay supported while rockets keep crossing. Clean de-escalation lowers energy fear and helps airlines, stocks and risk assets breathe.

• 
  Richard Burzlaff (@RichardBurzlaff) reported 38 minutes ago

  @CwNewbie11 @PetersburgNPS The visitor center at Fort Donelson National Battlefield has been under reconstruction for nine years due to contract issues. They are finally resuming work after a multi-year halt.

• 
  Stanislav Gryshyn (@stas_gryshyn) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Osint613 @ItayBlumental from the production side, protecting command elements is becoming as much an air defense problem as a battlefield one

• 
  Bane (@anhonestsitizen) reported 43 minutes ago

  @BattlPULSE That in Battlefield there is a terrible balance and shooting. How many times do problems live at least until the middle of the cycle

• 
  MrGoblin_ Peace and Love (@yemiadewunmi1) reported 43 minutes ago

  @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @KemiBadenoch You say it is a Christian country, yet the same “Christian country” once sailed to the coasts of Africa, including Nigeria, and took our ancestors in chains. Not prisoners of war. Not battlefield captives. Men, women, and children loaded onto ships marked with crosses. And today you stand there and declare it a Christian country. The bible I know would never had condoned that . If it is truly a Christian country, then let us run it like one. What would Jesus have done when confronted with the suffering of Palestinians? What would He have done for the poor in Britain? What would Christ have said about Islamophobia and antisemitism? What would He have done about corruption, injustice, and leaders who speak one way and live another? Christianity is not a cultural label. It is not a heritage badge. It is a moral standard. Churches are not being forced into mosques. Many are being turned into flats and investment properties because faith has been reduced to nostalgia. That is not persecution. That is decline born of emptiness. And lip service does not fix that. If you call it a Christian country, then embody Christ. Speak truth. Live truth. Apply the standard equally. Otherwise, be honest about what you are really defending.

• 
  jessie (@jesseninjafrog) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Facio_Leaks mauga of rivals, both have the same issues with overstaying on the battlefield and making it miserable for literally everyone else on the match, I've put the least amount of hours in this season because that damn dinosaur

• 
  Josue Almeida (@JosueCriticism) reported 47 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Everything I see in comments are complains about recoil, rpg and thanks and that is an issue's skills. The big elephant in the room is the DAMN MATCHMAKING all the lobbies are terrible balanced. Fix this and for Jesus the game will be better asf

• 
  Agheddon (@Doomagheddon) reported 49 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Lol anticheat. I stopped playing about a week into launch bc of the cheaters. Played a week ago, spawned and immediately headshot from a spot that makes no sense through a building. Uninstalled. This is the kinda thing you need to fix FIRST not just when you get around to it

• 
  Ulliee (@Ulbaas) reported 51 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix your light spasm bug in cookie town first please

• 
  Dustin (@majastictatters) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the glitches red sec ya silly gooses

• 
  maikel_ (@ordinarymike) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Streetsdisple See, you're still talking about me "playing dumb" even though my comment wasn't about it, and I just asked what's wrong with that cube companion in this game and the guy told me his point of view and why he doesn't like that. That could be the end of conversation, but you suddenly started talking **** about me and the other guy that we're "playing dumb" just because we have different perspective on these things than the guy above. Sorry bro, but if all you you have to say is to start talking how dumb or retarded me or the other guy is, then this conversation makes no sense. If you or that other guy doesn't like this, I can accept that, but if someone there is a problem with other people liking this concpet of the game, then it's just weird for me. I know gaming nowadays become a battlefield, but can't people just talk about what they like or don't like in a normal way?

• 
  Robbie K (@OSINToffenders) reported 58 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield You guys need to fix these cheaters and glare glitches on ranked red sec!!!!

• 
  before i slip,, ima slide♟️📜 (@Rocinantemoons) reported 59 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Fix middle east servers and. Honestly if an update comes again and no change imma lose my ****