Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (41%)
• Online Play (29%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Matchmaking (9%)
• Game Crash (8%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Gramat	Matchmaking	1 hour ago
Amsterdam	Matchmaking	22 hours ago
Fontarèches	Matchmaking	22 hours ago
Paris	Matchmaking	23 hours ago
Le Mont-sur-Lausanne	Matchmaking	23 hours ago
Jauldes	Matchmaking	23 hours ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  V (@catslashmouse) reported 4 minutes ago

  This game is a ******* travesty. Way down there with BF2042. And don't you ******* dare tell me BF2042 is better than this ****, there's a laundry list of issues that remained unresolved in that game from launch to the end of support, one being 128 players, but I digress

• 
  Zach (@prozck) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Sure we can stay on target all we want, doesn’t mean the bullets are going there. Fix your trash *** game.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 8 minutes ago

  remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. The scene is not the present Church Age in normal doctrinal terms. It is the Tribulation environment, where Israel, commandments, witnesses, remnant, dragon, Beast, and wrath all come together. When Satan’s access is curtailed above, his fury intensifies below. That is not the Church’s blessed hope; that is the world’s nightmare after rejecting truth. The Body of Christ is not appointed to that hour. First Thessalonians 5:9 says, “For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ.” Revelation 3:10 speaks of being kept from the hour of temptation which shall come upon all the world. The Church is caught up before the Beast system reaches its full prophetic authority, before the mark becomes the dividing line of life and death, before the Dragon’s last campaign against Israel’s remnant, and before the vials of wrath pour out upon the earth. Christians may suffer now. They may be persecuted. They may be imprisoned. They may be killed. But that is not the same as being placed under the prophetic hour of Satanic rage and divine judgment described in Revelation. The devil would love the Church to think she belongs in that hour. Fear is one of his favourite religions. If he can make believers believe they must face his final dominion, he can rob them of comfort, joy, expectancy, and clean focus. Suddenly they stop looking for Christ and start looking for Satan’s last chess move. That is how the blessed hope gets replaced with the Beast’s calendar. But the Church is looking for the Saviour from Heaven. The rapture removes the Body before Satan’s last fury against Israel and the Tribulation saints unfolds. The Bride is not scheduled for the Dragon’s last tantrum; she is scheduled for the Bridegroom’s call. 5. Satan’s Dominion Over the Church Is Already Legally Broken The rapture ends Satan’s practical dominion over the Church’s earthly journey, but Calvary already broke his legal claim. Hebrews 2:14 says that through death Christ destroyed him that had the power of death, that is, the devil. Colossians 2 says Christ spoiled principalities and powers, making a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it. First John 3:8 says, “For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.” The devil is not waiting to find out whether Calvary worked. It worked. The blood was accepted. The tomb is empty. The Lord is seated. The victory is legal, historical, doctrinal, and eternal. That is why Satan fights like a condemned criminal, not like a legitimate king. He knows his sentence. He knows the Seed of the woman has bruised his head. He knows the lake of fire is in the Book. He knows Christ is risen. His strategy now is sabotage, not ultimate victory. He wants to blind the lost, corrupt doctrine, counterfeit religion, accuse saints, divide churches, pervert Scripture, exalt man, erase Israel, enthrone Rome, build Babylon, and make the Church ineffective. He cannot undo redemption, so he attacks revelation, assurance, fellowship, holiness, and hope. A defeated devil is still dangerous, but he is dangerous like a cornered serpent, not like the rightful heir. The believer must live from the victory already accomplished. We do not fight for justification; we fight from it. We do not wrestle to become accepted; we wrestle because we are accepted in the beloved and the enemy hates it. We do not put on the whole armour of God to help Christ win Calvary. Calvary is finished. We put on the armour because the defeated enemy still shoots fiery darts at saints walking through enemy territory. The rapture is when the campaign ends for the Church. The troops are called home. The enemy loses access. The battlefield is left below for God’s prophetic dealings. Calvary broke Satan’s title deed over the believer; the rapture removes the believer from Satan’s neighbourhood.

• 
  🌹 The Infamous E.G.🌹 (@TheInfamousEG) reported 11 minutes ago

  If im wrong about the frostbite engine being the reason it takes them so long to fix bugs that LITERALLY get unfixed the next patch later in Battlefield How come non Battlefield games had SIMILAR problems including SINGLE PLAYER games

• 
  Andrew Lydiard (@andrewlydiard) reported 12 minutes ago

  @grvmpss @Tremourx47 @BattlefieldComm It's been that way for months. It's not like we didn't use it for that time. It's not a **** you, it was a free item that wasn't terribly difficult to obtain. You didn't purchase anything. This is better for the health of the game (albeit lightly so given other issues).

• 
  Voice for the truth (@voiceofztruth) reported 14 minutes ago

  @benshapiro @benshapiro forget about the Hareidim. Do you believe it’s ok to force people to fight on the battlefield or be conscripted to service against their will? It’s hard for me to digest.

• 
  Jeremy the therapist (@psychfox) reported 15 minutes ago

  “Identity diffusion is represented by a poorly integrated concept of the self and of significant others.” - Kernberg, 1984 This is the heart of borderline personality organization: not simply mood swings, but unstable self-other representation. Under threat, the self cannot mentalize (understand emotional/cognitive/behavioral causality) itself or others. One minute: “I’m safe with you.” Next minute: “You are dangerous, I am humiliated.” Identity diffusion in action: the self fractures, turning the other person into a source of fear, and the relationship consequently becomes a battlefield of unstable meanings and self-states. Kernberg saw this clearly; the problem is a self-system that loses integration when attachment is activated and vulnerability ensues.

• 
  Lets negotiate (@EliteKingDarth) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Parasite Why dont they make the change like all previous cods bro? Simple fix we dont want alot of settings like battlefield

• 
  TheSuperRebel (@TheSuperRebel1) reported 20 minutes ago

  I like how battlefield 6 makes sure they have new store options and skin options but can’t fix the bugs

• 
  Jason Atwell (@JasonAtwell14) reported 20 minutes ago

  They could be taking a legitimate look at whether any of these recently removed generals had actually accomplished anything along the lines of adapting to the modern battlefield, but instead they're going to air the grievances of multiple anonymous sources who likely are part of the problem they claim they want to fix.

• 
  AkramRock (@chemliakram) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix redsec

• 
  Not A ****** (@BIG_PARMENIDES) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield But make the damn red dots less thicc. Most of them have way too big of a dot at least for me on MnK. I doubt roller players have that issue but the dots lose effectiveness past really short ranges because they obscure the target too much.

• 
  John Ruth (@Lfrankbaum1939) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Smil3yAngel I understand your anger…people don’t really care what the u.s. says….now all that aside, as a doctor, I am..I would never judge her integrity by her weight; however whatever the cause, she needs to address the issue…also if she was in combat, unless her only job was to be a sniper…she can’t be allowed on the battlefield….nothing stops her from flying drones, developing strategies…etc

• 
  Kurt Ambrose (@LtCmdrAmbrose) reported 34 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE FIX YOUR ******* GAME YOU USELESS *****

• 
  ziad elkhalil 🇱🇧 (@ZiadElkhalil) reported 36 minutes ago

  𝐇𝐞𝐳𝐛𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡 𝐢𝐬 “𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠.” 🙄 Truck after truck. Coffin after coffin. Lives sacrificed, not in defence of #Lebanon, but in service of #Iran and its mullahs. #Tehran gives the orders. Lebanon supplies the battlefield, the destruction, the funerals and the dead. And then Hezbollah calls the catastrophe a “divine victory.” 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲. 𝐈𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐇𝐞𝐳𝐛𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐫𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧.

• 
  GENESIS XRPL (@GENESISonxrp) reported 38 minutes ago

  GENESIS FILE // THE EASTERN EXIT CHINA IS NOT BUYING XRP. THAT IS NOT THE STORY. The interesting part is what China is doing with the system around it. For years, the market has reduced China to one headline: “China bans crypto.” That headline is easy. The financial architecture underneath it is not. In 2026, something considerably more important has been taking place. Chinese authorities have been pushing financial institutions to reduce exposure to U.S. government debt, while China continues the longer-term process of diversifying its reserve structure. That does not mean Beijing is dumping the dollar overnight. It does not mean China has chosen XRP. And it certainly does not prove that Chinese banks are secretly accumulating XRP. The reality is more interesting. China is managing dependency. And dependency is the part most people fail to watch. I. THE TREASURY QUESTION In February 2026, reports emerged that Chinese regulators had asked domestic financial institutions to limit new purchases of U.S. government bonds and that institutions with large exposures were being encouraged to reduce those positions. The distinction matters. This was not simply: “China dumps Treasuries.” It was a reported effort to control concentration and exposure. That fits a much longer trend. China's Treasury holdings have been declining for years, while its reserve strategy has increasingly emphasized diversification, including gold. The European Central Bank's 2026 analysis makes an important distinction: the reduction in China's exposure should not automatically be interpreted as a disorderly Treasury liquidation. It notes that asset accumulation has increasingly shifted from China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange toward state-owned banks, meaning the visible Treasury numbers do not tell the entire reserve-management story. That is institutional finance. Not a meme. China does not need to destroy the Treasury market. It only needs to become less dependent on it. And that distinction changes everything. II. THE LIQUIDITY MYTH Another claim circulating through crypto markets says China suddenly “froze liquidity” immediately before an XRP move and that Asian capital subsequently rotated into XRP. There is a problem. There is no reliable evidence establishing that causal chain. China's liquidity operations in 2026 have been complicated, changing over time and directed toward multiple objectives. There have been liquidity injections, changes in open-market operations and efforts to manage financial conditions. So saying: “The PBOC stopped injecting liquidity, therefore Chinese whales moved into XRP” would be speculation. GENESIS does not need speculation. Because the actual question is much bigger: Where does liquidity go when the financial architecture changes? That is the question worth watching. III. THE PART PEOPLE ARE MISSING Here is where the story becomes interesting. While the market debates whether China is buying or selling something... the payment infrastructure is changing. Ripple's own current Payments documentation now lists China's Cross-Border Foreign Exchange Payment System (CFXPS) as a payment rail. CFXPS is not a crypto exchange. It is a Chinese foreign-exchange payment system operated by the China National Clearing Center. Ripple's infrastructure now supports USD payouts into Chinese bank accounts through CFXPS. And that is not an old rumor. It is current infrastructure. The same Ripple documentation lists CNAPS, the China National Advanced Payment System operated by the People's Bank of China, as a Chinese payment rail. It also supports Hong Kong bank payouts through CHATS, Hong Kong's high-value interbank settlement system. Think about what that means. The conversation is no longer simply: “Does China use XRP?” The better question is: What payment infrastructure is Ripple connecting itself to? China. Hong Kong. The Middle East. Southeast Asia. Europe. The Americas. Different currencies. Different settlement systems. Different regulatory environments. IV. THIS IS WHERE XRP ENTERS THE EQUATION And here is where we have to be extremely precise. A Ripple payment route connecting to a Chinese bank rail does not automatically mean XRP is being used for every transaction. Ripple's current infrastructure also heavily incorporates stablecoins, including RLUSD. Therefore: Ripple infrastructure ≠ XRP usage. That distinction matters. But it also reveals something more important. Ripple is building a system in which multiple forms of value can move through a common institutional payment infrastructure. Fiat. Stablecoins. Digital assets. Bank accounts. Foreign-exchange rails. Tokenized assets. The settlement layer becomes the battlefield. Not the logo. V. AND THEN THERE IS KIMI This is where another interesting Chinese connection appears. In early 2026, reports circulated about Kimi — the Chinese AI model developed by Moonshot AI — generating bullish XRP scenarios. Some reports attributed forecasts as high as $8.5 under an extreme bullish scenario. But there is another correction GENESIS needs to make: Kimi is not Alibaba's AI. Kimi is developed by Moonshot AI. Calling it “Alibaba AI” is inaccurate. And an AI model producing a price scenario is not evidence of institutional Chinese positioning. It is a model output. Nothing more. That makes the story less exciting for people looking for a pump. But much more credible for people who understand information. Because the real question isn't: “Did Chinese AI predict XRP at $8?” The real question is: Why are Chinese AI models being asked to model XRP at all? The answer is not necessarily mysterious. XRP is a large-cap digital asset with an established market, extensive liquidity, regulatory developments and a narrative directly connected to cross-border payments. AI models will naturally incorporate those variables when asked to forecast the asset. So again: Interesting? Yes. Proof of Chinese institutional accumulation? No. VI. THE CONNECTION IS NOT PRICE. IT IS SETTLEMENT. This is where the average crypto investor loses the plot. They see: China → XRP and immediately think: “China is going to buy XRP.” That is retail thinking. Institutions think differently. They ask: How do dollars move into China? How does yuan liquidity move outward? How are FX transactions cleared? Which entities provide the bridge? Which assets can settle 24/7? Which networks can connect regulated institutions without forcing every institution onto the same balance sheet? That is the real battlefield. And Ripple's current infrastructure is now explicitly connected to Chinese payment rails. That is a fact. VII. THE MAP IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE HEADLINE Look at the architecture. China CFXPS. CNAPS. Hong Kong CHATS. Other Asian markets National payment systems. Global Ripple's institutional payment infrastructure. The important development isn't one bank announcing: “We use XRP.” It is the gradual construction of connectivity between financial systems that were historically fragmented. And that creates an entirely different question. What happens when the assets moving through those systems become tokenized? That is where the story becomes significantly larger than XRP price. VIII. CHINA DOESN'T HAVE TO LOVE XRP This may be the most important point in the entire file. China can build its own digital yuan infrastructure. It can develop mBridge-related settlement systems. It can increase gold reserves. It can reduce Treasury concentration. It can promote RMB internationalization. It can maintain strict controls around cryptocurrency. And simultaneously... Ripple can build payment connectivity into Chinese and Hong Kong banking infrastructure. These things are not mutually exclusive. The future financial system will probably not be: China vs XRP. It will be a network of competing and interoperating settlement systems. And in that environment, the valuable infrastructure may not be the institution that controls every transaction. It may be the infrastructure capable of connecting systems that do not naturally connect. IX. THIS IS THE PART WE ARE WATCHING Not the candles. Not the influencers. Not another prediction. Not another anonymous “Chinese whale” screenshot. We are watching the rails. Because financial infrastructure rarely announces itself with fireworks. It appears as: a new payment corridor. a new settlement connection. a new bank integration. a new regulatory framework. a new stablecoin. a new FX route. a new clearing system. A new piece of infrastructure that nobody cares about today... until everyone depends on it tomorrow. THE QUESTION So forget: “Is China secretly buying XRP?” We don't know. There is no responsible basis to claim it. Ask something harder. Why is Ripple's institutional payment infrastructure now interfacing with Chinese and Hong Kong payment rails? Why is China reducing concentration in U.S. government debt while simultaneously developing alternative settlement infrastructure? Why are institutions building tokenized and stablecoin-based settlement systems alongside traditional banking rails? And what happens when these systems begin communicating at scale? Those are the questions worth researching. Because the next financial system probably won't arrive as one giant announcement. It will arrive quietly. One rail at a time. GENESIS FILE Don't watch what they announce. Watch what they connect. $GENESIS ON THE #XRPL

• 
  Stoic Insider | Hard To Kill (@StoicInsider) reported 38 minutes ago

  @DeepPsycho_HQ The world is chaos. That's not a theory. That's what I see daily. But control isn't an illusion. It's a decision. You can't command the storm. But you can train to stay calm inside it. That's the only power that matters. Chaos is the battlefield. Discipline is the weapon. The system will always be broken. Your response to it doesn't have to be. What do you control when everything falls apart?

• 
  drugrankings (@RxRankings_com) reported 39 minutes ago

  @TheBluePen25 The reality is that women or female warriors cause more problems on the battlefield. 50:50 male:female army definitely loses to 100% male army

• 
  GoGitUrFuknShineBox (@ItsQagain) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Who tf cares?? You don’t fix the **** that needs to be fixed and I’m tired of you recycling the same three maps in multiplayer..You’re so in love with empire fck off

• 
  oobie (@oobiewpb) reported 45 minutes ago

  solana:J3NKxxXZcnNiMjKw9hYb2K4LUxgwB6t1FtPtQVsv3KFr $SPY $QQQ $IGV $IWM DLMM MATERIAL-SHIFT ALERT — TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1 — 2:51 PM ET STATUS: RED — VOLATILITY HAS REJOINED THE SELLING This is a meaningful change from the 2:00 PM check. The missing confirmation then was volatility. SPX had lost 7650 again and small caps were deteriorating, but VIX had backed away from its morning high. That has changed. VIX has now pushed to approximately 16.12, up about 8% on the session and its highest level since August 4. So the afternoon alignment is now considerably cleaner: SPX DOWN ~0.6–0.7% NASDAQ DOWN ~0.9–1.0% RUSSELL 2000 DOWN ~1.1% VIX ~16.12 / +8% 10-YEAR ~4.79% BRENT NEAR $94 OIL AND YIELDS BOTH REMAINING PRESSURE POINTS. That is the volatility confirmation we specifically said would escalate the 2 PM warning. WHY THIS MATTERS The sequence today has become unusually clean: SPX broke 7650 this morning. Buyers reclaimed it. The reclaim failed. SPX lost 7650 again. IWM lost the breadth level. QQQ/Nasdaq remained weak. And NOW volatility is expanding again. That's a much different setup than a simple red afternoon. The options market is beginning to price more movement at the same time price is struggling to repair broken structure. There is another interesting piece. Today's SPX 7700 0DTE calls have seen more than 23,000 contracts trade against only about 2,400 contracts of prior open interest, and the contract has collapsed roughly 96% as SPX remained well beneath the strike. That is not by itself a directional flow signal—we cannot tell from volume alone who initiated every trade—but it illustrates how aggressively today's same-day upside premium has been destroyed as price remained beneath the former 7675–7700 battlefield. I would NOT translate that into "dealers must sell." We don't have sufficient public intraday information to establish that confidently. But combined with the renewed IV expansion, it tells us the 0DTE environment is becoming less forgiving into the final hour. THE 3 PM MAP SPX 7650 Still the heartbeat. At this point a simple touch above it isn't enough. I want: 7650 reclaimed → held → expansion away from it. Otherwise it remains failed-reclaim territory. SPX 7675–7685 This remains the real repair zone. Getting back there would tell us the afternoon volatility expansion failed to produce additional downside acceptance. SPX 7700 Major repair. Given today's action, reaching and holding 7700 would represent a significant seller failure. IWM Small caps remain the breadth warning. Russell 2000 is down roughly 1.1%, materially worse than SPX. If IWM makes another afternoon low while SPX remains beneath 7650, breadth continues confirming the weakness. QQQ Technology remains important, but IWM is actually giving us the stronger risk message now. QQQ weak + IWM substantially weaker = pressure is no longer isolated to mega-cap duration. WHAT WOULD ESCALATE THIS AGAIN SPX stays beneath 7650 → afternoon low breaks → QQQ makes a corresponding new low → IWM makes another low → VIX expands THROUGH 16.12 rather than merely touching it. That would be the closest we've been today to a genuine late-day volatility/dealer-risk acceleration environment. WHAT WOULD DEFUSE IT SPX reclaims 7650 → holds → attacks 7675 while VIX falls back beneath 16 and IWM stops making lows. That would tell us the volatility spike failed to convert into additional price damage. CURRENT READ: RED — PRICE + BREADTH + VOLATILITY ARE ALIGNED AGAIN. The important change since 2 PM is NOT another few SPX points lower. It's that fear finally caught back up with price. And with barely an hour remaining, that matters because 0DTE positioning is becoming increasingly sensitive to every move away from the strikes where today's contracts were concentrated. Don't chase the red candle. Watch whether sellers can KEEP SPX beneath 7650 while VIX holds above 16. If they can, the final hour deserves respect. If they can't, today's repeated failure to hold below 7650 becomes the story all over again. ~oobie

• 
  Soteriology Assistant (@SoteriologyA1) reported 45 minutes ago

  🚨 Jenna’s closing question attempts to shift the battlefield onto ground no consistent Calvinist has ever disputed. 🚩By asking why it is a “leap to recognize that God’s sovereignty is not diminished when He provided humans agency and capacity,” she creates the calculated illusion that Calvinism denies human creaturely faculties... as if Total Depravity teaches that sinners are created without the physical or intellectual equipment to process truth, akin to being born physically blind, deaf, or lacking a reasoning mind. But historic, consistent Calvinism has never contested creaturely faculties on the storyline level. 🔑 Fallen man possesses the fully functional natural capacity, intellect, and reasoning to hear, understand, and believe the gospel if he wanted to. The issue has never been a missing faculty or an anatomical defect; it is strictly one of moral inability... the voluntary, settled hostility of an unregenerate heart that actively loathes God’s absolute sovereignty and refuses to submit (Romans 8:7). By collapsing natural faculties and moral disposition into the single, ambiguous word “capacity,” Jenna conceals the actual biblical offense. Scripture nowhere portrays the natural man as a victim who desperately desires to fly while lacking wings; rather, he is a guilty rebel who uses his fully intact faculties to wage war against the Potter. Furthermore, citing God’s covenantal fidelity (such as the Noahic promise) is a complete category error: God binding Himself to a promise He decreed to make is entirely different from claiming the transcendent Creator-Sustainer... in whom all creatures continuously live, move, and have their being (Acts 17:28)... actively upholds an autonomous, self-determining void where human choices occur independent of His sovereign determination. The leap is not affirming that man has creaturely capacity; the leap is the unbiblical invention of an autonomous "will" that can override its own fallen nature, put the Potter on trial, and answer back to God (Romans 9:20–21).

• 
  Jason Burns (@JasonBurns_CM) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Battlefield there's a major hardcrash issue on Xbox atm since the latest patch I've crashed constantly every 15m 6 times in 1 match

• 
  Ollie Forsyth (@ollieforsyth) reported 47 minutes ago

  .@LambdaAPI didn't hire its new CEO @stephenbalaban for AI experience. They hired him because he'd already run capital-intensive infrastructure races at Sprint, @SoftBank, telecom. Same war, different battlefield. Sometimes the best hire isn't the industry expert. It's the person who's solved your structural problem before.

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 50 minutes ago

  @in_TSMWEL_era @BattlefieldComm Yeah definitely a skill issue when everything I’ve listed has been a problem and most of those problem that have been addressed as you say didn’t solve anything…. But yeah my 3.24 K/D is a skill issue brother

• 
  MrNotSo (@MrNotSo_) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Baby steps. I really want this game to have a long life like bf4, you're headed in the right direction. But there are more pressing issues you might wanna lock down before anymore aesthetic updates.

• 
  Lorxel ×͜× (@lorxell) reported 56 minutes ago

  Can someone explain why everyone assumes the Avengers were the best team to fight Thanos? Because if the X-Men were there, Thanos might’ve had a completely different problem. Professor X or Jean Grey attacking his mind, Magneto controlling the metal around him, Storm controlling the entire battlefield, Wolverine constantly getting back up… The Avengers mostly had to punch this man until someone figured out a way to stop him. 💀 And that’s BEFORE Thanos got all six Stones. I think we all agree that the X-Men would’ve stopped him successfully in Avengers Infinity wars right?

• 
  Miguel Carones (@s3n0rac) reported 57 minutes ago

  @BUZZ3RX @BattlefieldComm lol dude while that would indeed be great, the game has a ton of different technical issues that it needs to solve before even starting considering such things

• 
  Your girl came over drunk, i said she was lagging! (@JiveTurkey600) reported 57 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Kicking AFK players but not giving us a Chance to Reconnect (in Redsec) if we disconnect is CRAZY!!! @DRUNKKZ3 @BattlefieldComm Sorry Florian lol

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 59 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm - barley a fix for black screen bug - no bullet dispersion fixes - no audio changes - no jet loadouts 6 months later besides 1… - no bullet registration fixes - no dsync fixes - Asian players in US/Eu servers abusing lag comp I’m posting till **** changes… every ******* post

• 
  SeekingParadise (@ParadiseSeek3r) reported 1 hour ago

  @Rafaelmiguel89 @grok @Nirosha_31 I don't believe Jesus is "The Lord" you jeet, I am referring to standard trinitarian theology. As for your waffle about striking necks, it's obvious you want to shift the topic over like a typical jeet. We have no issue with Allah commanding that on the battlefield.