Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (38%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (12%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Reims	Online Play	7 hours ago
Pfaffenhoffen	Sign in	7 hours ago
Americana	Glitches	6 days ago
Rennes	Game Crash	7 days ago
Nantes	Glitches	11 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	12 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Himalaya Chaser 雪山神鹰 (@himalayachaser) reported 13 minutes ago

  2/5 The Apache is a classic U.S. attack helicopter: expensive to build, train for, and maintain. But on today’s battlefield, a low-cost drone, distributed sensor network, or simple attritable attack can force an expensive platform to crash, retreat, or stop flying.

• 
  Ibrahim Moh darbule (@ebradarbule11) reported 15 minutes ago

  @SecScottBessent The US made a big mistake, when they attacked Iran, its unprovoked and illegal. US made another mistake by abandoning the so called Gulf Allies after using them as battlefield. Dude Gulf's issue is not money, but they have security threat, let them alone, go with stolen 🇮🇷 money

• 
  Harvey Camper (@Harv3yCamp3r) reported 17 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Love BF6, but please fix netcode /crappy servers its unplayable in main modes, when it was 100% fine when it launched. 😑

• 
  𝕊𝕎𝔼𝔼𝕋🍁𝕃𝔼𝔸𝔽 (𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕊𝕠𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕥) (@SweetRedLeaf) reported 18 minutes ago

  In regards to the "Authoritarian Creep" by our Canadian "government" I will be adjusting my prescence on the "battlefield" In the past I was in control of what info i wanted to provide or utilize online.If that is no longer the case I will adjust using a combination of measures (VPN,Starlink,Faraday Pouches,etc) to do as i damn well please.Gen X,so if need be i have no issue eliminating or using it under many locks and many keys. This is not about children.This is about control.I will not be controlled.

• 
  Adam Spangler (@Adam_M_Spangler) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm how about my rerolls being reinstated for that broken path...now I have one I ******* hate...bunch of clown *** devs over there not thinking

• 
  Gbonka Ebiri (@EbiriGbonka) reported 20 minutes ago

  Ibadan warriors are legends, yes, they were humans and infallible…. However, when it comes to Yoruba people, it is important to appreciate the bigger picture of what they represented as opposed to petty bickering of their human errors (real or imagined). What Ibadan represented was absolute freedom of Yorubaland from alien invasions of the caliphate from Ilorin… they did a good job at defending their brothers in many wars that they could have looked away and indulge in feasting and palm wine in their fortress. It’s place in history is why Ibadan emerged as capital of the whole western region. If Hausa people had warriors like Ibadan in their land, they will not be almanjiris today…. The role Ibadan played in the 1800’s in defending Yorubaland is why Awolowo was able to rebuild the Pax Yorubana… If the major towns had fallen to Ilorin… it would have been the caliphate speaking for Yoruba people at Lancaster in the talks for independence like they did for Hausa people…. Many of these warriors did not enjoy old age… they died in their youths fighting for Yorubaland. In many of the wars they indulged in the interiors…. They were invited by the leaders under siege. The Osogbo war of 1840 was not an attack on Ibadan. It was an attack gradually making its war towards the cradle at Ile Ife. It was the King at Osogbo that sent emissaries to Ibadan to save him from Ilorin warriors…. Ibadan soldiers, led by Balogun Oderinlo, at the risk of their lives marched to Osogbo and chased Ilorin warriors out of Yorubaland for good. In The war, the son of Balogun Ali (believed to be Karara) was captured and brought to Ibadan. He was released send sent back home…. Balogun Ali was grateful for this and built a form a friendship with Ibadan… in some battles, Ibadan soldiers recruited his warriors as mercenaries. This friendship did not in anyway interpret as allegiance to the Ilorin emirate or endorsement of Ilorin expansionism into Yorubaland. Ibadan had zero tolerance for any part of Ibadan falling under the caliphate. Ibadan never at anytime took Ilorin as its superior or paid homage to it as an overlord…. When Karara, son of Ali succeeded his father as Balogun, he laid a siege on Offa to seek revenge for the role they played in the Jalumi war….. Ibadan soldiers, weary from many years of battle and eager to go home…. But still tasked with the burden of defending their brothers at Offa stayed to defend the people…. Ibadan warriors insisted that Karara must leave and return to Ilorin before they go back home and if he refuses, they will engage his forces in the battlefield.… They stood their ground until the people of Ofa turned against Ibadan and told them they were capable of solving their civil issues…. That was when Ibadan decided to go back home and those from Ofa that aligned with them left the city with Ibadan to resettle in a new city. (Karara marched in shortly after and did a massacre of Ofa elders) In the battle of Ikirun, it was the people of Ikirin that sent to Aare Latossa at Ibadan for help against a coalition of Ilorin and other Yoruba subgroups attacking them…. Balogun Ogboriefon marched to the city and defended it against the collation forces. Caveat, I am not from Ibadan…. If I chose to be tribal, I shouldn’t even see anything good about Ibadan…. My allegiance remains to Yoruba race as a whole… It is dangerous and reckless to demonize your legends and heroes. Not only does it show ingratitude, It is the same reason some even focus on the shortcomings of the sage… a man who refused temptations of the trappings of office at the expense of the welfare of Yoruba people. Tribal champions should desist from showing so much hatred for Ibadan… it is important to stop the strawman fallacies and observe history in a bigger context…. Ibadan warriors are legends and heroes…. Irrespective of their shortcomings and human errors…. We owe them gratitude for the role they played in the fight for freedom in Yorubaland.

• 
  Biig Bo$$ (@Mike_so100) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Are u guys not going to fix strikepoint? Or think it’s ok to make horrible gameplay experience 🤔 either way u guys are horrible

• 
  TugaInUk (@tugainuk) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm your fix for the rare laser designator placement bug has made the bug far more prominent.

• 
  Tobias Boekwijt (@t0byman) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix Strikepoint being all weird!

• 
  Serhiy Rybasov (@Sergersyn) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Mankosmash @HoansSolo @KofmanMichael We do have purpose built standardized solutions. They are usually lagging behind for 2 or 3 critical changes in the battlefield environment. Yet, indeed, modifying drones in every unit is a bit extremely Ukrainian (anarchistic) aproach.

• 
  Dillon Larche (@larche_dil67941) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix strikepoint ts is broken this update

• 
  PackHunter117 (@PackHunter117) reported 31 minutes ago

  @7l337 @asha_shar @Halo No we don’t want a Halo BR game. If anything Halo needs to look towards Battlefield, Star Wars Battlefront, and Helldivers for inspiration. If they choose to make another live service F2P game they need to look to Warframe. That’s the best live service F2P game on the market

• 
  Zachary Davidson (@Ryangofett_2490) reported 34 minutes ago

  @sensapaura @BattlefieldComm Every game has this system. More problems crop up in multiplayer games tho. Especially live services

• 
  NMW (@NMW_999) reported 35 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm can you please please please fix the spawn point bug

• 
  Griff (@Scott66785108) reported 39 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm How about you don't ignore the community and fix that XP booster issue you guys created so it doesn't run out in the menus

• 
  Arrasca (@10deArrasca) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm You need fix this. Another BF the XP count only when be playing in match

• 
  monster115 (@AMH_1151) reported 42 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm when Fix server middle east ?

• 
  ª (@Chocohector2000) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Do not fix that. Keep XP boosters as same as BF4, 1 and 2042 to just only "in-game" count down.

• 
  Nick Rice (@N_S_RICE) reported 48 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the rpg back to what it was!!

• 
  xBo0ndockS4intx (@xBo0ndockS4intx) reported 48 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm LoL maybe if tanks were not ******* Overpowered now it wouldn't be a problem.

• 
  Gbonka Ebiri (@EbiriGbonka) reported 51 minutes ago

  Ibadan warriors are legends, yes, they were humans and fallable…. However, when it comes to Yoruba people, it is important to appreciate the bigger picture of what they represented as opposed to petty bickering of their human errors (real or imagined). What Ibadan represented was absolute freedom of Yorubaland from alien invasions of the caliphate from Ilorin… they did a good job at defending their brothers in many wars that they could have looked away and indulge in feasting and palm wine in their fortress. It’s place in history is why Ibadan emerged as capital of the whole western region. If Hausa people had warriors like Ibadan in their land, they will not be almanjiris today…. The role Ibadan played in the 1800’s in defending Yorubaland is why Awolowo was able to rebuild the Pax Yorubana… If the major towns had fallen to Ilorin… it would have been the caliphate speaking for Yoruba people at Lancaster in the talks for independence like they did for Hausa people…. Many of these warriors did not enjoy old age… they died in their youths fighting for Yorubaland. In many of the wars they indulged in the interiors…. They were invited by the leaders under siege. The Osogbo war of 1840 was not an attack on Ibadan. It was an attack gradually making its war towards the cradle at Ile Ife. It was the King at Osogbo that sent emissaries to Ibadan to save him from Ilorin warriors…. Ibadan soldiers, led by Balogun Oderinlo, at the risk of their lives marched to Osogbo and chased Ilorin warriors out of Yorubaland for good. In The war, the son of Balogun Ali (believed to be Karara) was captured and brought to Ibadan. He was released send sent back home…. Balogun Ali was grateful for this and built a form a friendship with Ibadan… in some battles, Ibadan soldiers recruited his warriors as mercenaries. This friendship did not in anyway interpret as allegiance to the Ilorin emirate or endorsement of Ilorin expansionism into Yorubaland. Ibadan had zero tolerance for any part of Ibadan falling under the caliphate. Ibadan never at anytime took Ilorin as its superior or paid homage to it as an overlord…. When Karara, son of Ali succeeded his father as Balogun, he laid a siege on Offa to seek revenge for the role they played in the Jalumi war….. Ibadan soldiers, weary from many years of battle and eager to go home…. But still tasked with the burden of defending their brothers at Offa stayed to defend the people…. Ibadan warriors insisted that Karara must leave and return to Ilorin before they go back home and if he refuses, they will engage his forces in the battlefield.… They stood their ground until the people of Ofa turned against Ibadan and told them they were capable of solving their civil issues…. That was when Ibadan decided to go back home and those from Ofa that aligned with them left the city with Ibadan to resettle in a new city. (Karara marched in shortly after and did a massacre of Ofa elders) In the battle of Ikirun, it was the people of Ikirin that sent to Aare Latossa at Ibadan for help against a coalition of Ilorin and other Yoruba subgroups attacking them…. Balogun Ogboriefon marched to the city and defended it against the collation forces. Caveat, I am not from Ibadan…. If I chose to be tribal, I shouldn’t even see anything good about Ibadan…. My allegiance remains to Yoruba race as a whole… It is dangerous and reckless to demonize your legends and heroes. Not only does it show ingratitude, It is the same reason some even focus on the shortcomings of the sage… a man who refused temptations of the trappings of office at the expense of the welfare of Yoruba people. Tribal champions should desist from showing so much hatred for Ibadan… it is important to stop the strawman fallacies and observe history in a bigger context…. Ibadan warriors are legends and heroes…. Irrespective of their shortcomings and human errors…. We owe them gratitude for the role they played in the fight for freedom in Yorubaland.

• 
  el prez (@thjmsthtb) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why no jeep allowed in the main hallways :/ also so many random movement glitches ive never experienced before. Enemy lighting is also way too generous. Pls fix

• 
  Jeffrey MacGinnis (@Jeff_MacG) reported 57 minutes ago

  @JC_AveMaria @5149jamesli No they didn't, you ******* idiot. That's what the 12 investigations confirmed. It was a deadly mistake. That's how friendly fire incidents happen. Israeli forces misidentified the USS Liberty as the Egyptian supply ship El Quseir during active operations near Sinai. Visual similarities, rapid battlefield movement, and comms breakdowns caused the error in the fog of war—even as Egypt's air force was destroyed and its leadership sought ceasefire. The ship wasn't firing, but tactical units engaged what they believed was hostile. Official US and Israeli inquiries confirmed mistaken identity. Israel apologized and paid full compensation. Maybe shut ******** up until you know what you're talking about.

• 
  Dra_Röva_i_Koks (@Dra_Rova_i_Koks) reported 57 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Are you aware that weapon progression seems to be broken after last update. At least for me. I unlocked a lot of things for different weapons and they are nowhere to be found. Is this only for me? Anyone else experienced this?

• 
  ROTTWEILER_RED95 (@Rottweiler_Red9) reported 57 minutes ago

  From Season 2 onward, Battlefield 6 has become gutted. No skill expression, SMGs are still broken, every new map is somehow worse than the previous one, and the game's loss of players is a clear indicator of serious problems. Rush has also become unplayable.

• 
  Ateam043 (@Ateam043) reported 1 hour ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix Strikepoint! The game logic is completely broken since the latest update.

• 
  rollin coal (@jahonda44) reported 1 hour ago

  @Battlefield Make cross play better so we don’t have to play with these cheating *** computers. Better fix **** soon in this game or Are U won’t have a game new Call of Duty®’s coming out and it’s gonna crush you.

• 
  John Williams (@JohnWillia71018) reported 1 hour ago

  @SquawkStreet @jimcramer Yes — this is very interesting, and honestly it lines up with what you’ve been saying for months: AI is still early, but the bottleneck is moving from Can the model do it to “Can we afford to run it at scale The key idea in that Citadel piece is this: AI adoption is becoming less about intelligence and more about economics. That matters. Frontier models may be powerful but they require huge inputs compute electricity, cooling, memory bandwidth, chips, data-center capacity and inference budgets. So the market starts asking a practical question: Does this task justify using the expensive brain For hard problems drug discovery, engineering, legal analysis, coding architecture, scientific modeling, financial modeling expensive frontier AI may be worth it. But for everyday use email summaries, customer service, basic writing, search, scheduling, simple coding help — cheaper models may win because they are “good enough” at a much lower cost. That is the bifurcation they’re talking about: Frontier AI = high-cost, high-value harder problems. Everyday AI = cheaper, smaller, faster models doing routine work That actually strengthens your long-term thesis, not weakens it. It says the AI buildout is not ending. It is becoming more disciplined. The hype phase says, “Use the biggest model for everything.” The mature phase says, “Use the right model for the right job That means infrastructure still matters deeply but the winners may shift toward the companies that control the scarce inputs power, cooling, chips, memory, networking, data centers, software efficiency, and inference optimization. This also fits your “1st inning” view. Early markets burn money proving what is possible. Mature markets figure out what is economical. That is when real adoption starts. The line that jumps out to me is: Adoption is therefore becoming less about what frontier models can do in principle and more about the price and scarcity of the inputs required to make AI operational at scale.” That is the whole battlefield. My read: this is not bearish on AI. It is bearish on wasteful AI spending. It is bullish on efficient AI, inference infrastructure, energy, memory, networking, and companies that can turn intelligence into productivity without blowing up the budget. Microsoft did cancel its internal Claude Code pilot in the Experiences & Devices division effective June 30, after token based billing bur (TheStreet) (AI Weekly) ned through the annual budget, and redirected engineers to GitHub Copilot. Amazon shut down its "tokenmaxxing" leaderboard, Meta killed an employee built Claudeonomics dashboard, Uber exhausted its 2026 AI coding budget by April, and there's a roughly $500M single-month enterprise Claude bill Axios reported. (Zero Hedge) So Frank Flight isn't cherry-picking. He's also been running this same "compute is the binding constraint" line for months — which is a strength and a caution: it's one coherent voice, not independent confirmation. Where I'd push on the analysis you pasted: it's directionally fine, but it resolves a genuinely open question in the most thesis-flattering direction, and it does it on the one data point that's actually contested. Separate two things. The chart isn't what it looks like. The Silicon Data index isn't total spend or total volume — it's a usage-weighted average token price index, and Silicon Data had to publicly clarify that people keep misreading it; what it really captures is the market's marginal willingness to pay per million tokens. (Digg) So a decline doesn't cleanly mean "AI is slowing 7.14 It means the mix is rotating toward cheaper models. That's the bifurcation — fine. But the part the analysis skipped: the same chart, same downtick, is being used to argue the opposite. Andreas Steno Larsen called it the chart that everyone should be watching and warned that weakening token pricing would end the memory trade and the broader hardware and data-center trade for this cycle.

• 
  AkramRock (@chemliakram) reported 1 hour ago

  @BattlefieldComm Are you aware of the broken footsteps?

• 
  talkingINTROVERT (@ALAUDDINSHAHED) reported 1 hour ago

  @BattlefieldComm fix strikpoint game logic. its broken