Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bordeaux	Matchmaking	1 day ago
Bron	Online Play	2 days ago
Madrid	Online Play	2 days ago
La Trinité	Game Crash	7 days ago
Lyon	Online Play	8 days ago
Persan	Sign in	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  averly (@averlyz99) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Battlefield am i allowed half of my money back seems as though you have removed half the game modes? genuinely embarrassing how you cannot fix youre **** matchmaking… all this would of been avoided if we simply had server browser but you have even drip feed us that as well.

• 
  Jason Reza Jorjani (@Jason_Jorjani) reported 5 minutes ago

  Gary and I went to see Swann, the psychic artist, who was living at an apartment in the Bowery. He was a flaming ******, not that I minded much. What bothered me more than his annoying mannerisms was that a cursory look through his bookshelf made it clear that Ingo was a member of the Church of Scientology. Parts of his relatively small library looked like the L. Ron Hubbard required reading list. His paintings were technically impressive but had the same lurid and garish quality characteristic of Battlefield Earth and Hubbard’s even lesser works. I looked over at Gary silently, with an expression that he had no trouble interpreting as some cross between dismay and contemptuous skepticism. Feinberg looked back in such a manner as to reassure me and urge me to be patient. The professor turned out to be right. Ingo Swann’s abilities as a psychic were truly remarkable. He picked up on my cynical attitude and was so affronted by it that he reached right into my mind, or as he might put it, reached out into past places and times, to confront me with information about my life that he could hardly have known. Some of this concerned my aunt, and I had to stop Ingo before he embarrassed me in front of Gary who was starting to look very uncomfortable. He had the decency never to ask me to elaborate on what Swann was getting at that day when I cut him off. – Jason Reza Jorjani, PSYCHOTRON

• 
  Ka'ren Mkrtchyan (@mkr_kar) reported 5 minutes ago

  @bscholl The battlefield isn't the issue lol, thats not all that decides outcomes of wars

• 
  Molly O’Shea (@MollySOShea) reported 7 minutes ago

  Soren Monroe-Anderson (@soren_ma) explains why it doesn't make sense for Neros to 3D print their drones in the battlefield: "We are focused on mass production." "3D printing is generally good for making a few of a thing, making lots of different things. We are mostly focused on making a lot of one thing, or a really consistent process." "There's an idea that you can go and 3D-print drones in the battlefield. Generally, factories are really efficient when they are large and centralized." "3D printers can be very useful for adapting drones to various mission sets, but you'd only be 3D printing the airframe or a payload adapter. What we're trying to solve for is the core components and manufacturing process." "You're not going to be 3D printing your circuit boards, your motors, your radios, any of that stuff out on the battlefield. So it does not solve the supply chain problem in the ways that maybe are claimed in some of the posts today."

• 
  InfantryDort (@infantrydort) reported 8 minutes ago

  Readiness It seems we all unanimously agree that the better commander is the one who tells the truth. Why then, do we promote the ones who don’t? We should all know the reason. Because it’s comfortable to live in a lie. This is a great technique honestly, lying. If you’re a careerist who only cares about advancement. The problem is that it falls flat once a formation is put to the test. Combat has a way of exposing all flaws. But what happens if you don’t go to combat during your command? I guess you luck out then. You avoid the test. It’s a gamble that often pays off. We want the commander who tells the truth because we need to count on his word to make our own plans as his superiors. If he reports 90% efficiency and shows up to the battle exposing 60%, well that’s a problem. Because I’ve calculated in redundancy and even by my most aggressively pessimistic views of his capability, he still fell short. Now people are going to die. And he may not have been a liar per se. But he was incompetent and didn’t know about his own unit. Either is unfit for command. I started on X talking about tactics and leadership. Now I’ve come full circle to just telling the truth. Because every battlefield effect rests on our ability to do this. GWOT caused us to over inflate everything. If you need proof, look no further than the Afghan Army we said would hold after being propped up for two decades, it folded in days. If I were Army Chief of Staff for a day, I’d be taking advantage of this period where we aren’t embroiled in a ground war to recenter this truth telling culture that has atrophied so far. It’s not even complicated, you can just order units to leave garrison and come back. Checking their reported readiness percentage and comparing it to whatever returns to the motorpool. A test, if you will. Then you can have hard conversations like: “General (or Colonel) X, you reported your formation at 82%. After a simple maneuver to the range and back, testing your fleet, you clocked in at 58%. The delta is unacceptable. Thank you for your years of dedicated service to the nation, but it is no longer required.” @KTB_500 and I talk about this frequently. I think it is a fine COA for GEN LaNeve to consider. And it will ruffle many feathers. Oh well.

• 
  Ghostkillah (@Ghostkillah6) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Battlefield To be really honest with you guys @Battlefield, I played @WARDOGS closed alpha and had no issue no bug no lag… Your game is out since year and I keep having some bad lag spike on the new map(9800x3d/4070ti) I never lag in any other game! I don’t think I will ever replay to Bf6!

• 
  Battle(non)sense | Chris (@BattleNonSense) reported 8 minutes ago

  That is only partially correct. Remember that the community began to call & petition for "teamwork initiatives" and "PTFO initiatives" during #BF4 already. These issues originate in #BF3 with its abrupt change in direction of the @Battlefield franchise, it got worse gradually.

• 
  Sillssa (@sillssa) reported 11 minutes ago

  @MelancholyyyAim Its really not. Its probably the least of an issue its ever been in a battlefield game. You only get 1 nade that recharges very slowly and RPGs practically require a direct hit to kill and GLs are locked to a class thats ******* useless otherwise and nobody plays

• 
  𝚝𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚎 (@tapedrone) reported 12 minutes ago

  I just popped an agonising flexor tendon sheath ganglion at the base of my middle finger with a needle and alcohol wipes at home because a. Every medical complaint I’ve visited my GP for in the last 6 years since the Covid clown show has been ignored b. GPs on the @NHSuk will not physically treat a ganglion c. I can’t get an appointment most days when I run the 08.30hrs telephone gauntlet d. Most of the GPs at my surgery work 2-3 days only and the waiting room is completely empty due to running a fraction of the appointments they did 10 years ago e. If they do refer you after your fifth frustrated complaint about a ganglion cyst that is painfully impeding your actual day job, then for me it is at a hospital that is 2 hours away from my home, for an appointment in 3 months time f. If that treatment fails they put you back to the beginning of the queue at your GP as though you’ve never presented with the ailment before g. Both investigation and treatment now appear to be rationed to the over-60s and ‘New Brits’ only h. I’m already 3 years and 8 months into a Rheumatology waiting list without being allowed to see anyone (see item a.) This is for an autoimmune tendon illness directly caused by the Pfizer jab (see item a. again) i. The gradual but linear removal of the NHS as a service means I may as well start learning how to treat all ailments with battlefield medicine All together now, get out on your doorsteps and clap for carers.

• 
  Idk30K (@AmariX13) reported 12 minutes ago

  @skyed1ed To me he kinda just exists on the battlefield and can have good or bad ults, isn't really too over or underwhelming. It probably feels weird to the community cause of how "broken" other characters have felt on their release

• 
  Awakening10_21 (@Mt_virtue1) reported 16 minutes ago

  If the World Were to End Tomorrow: The Trap of the Bucket List and the Origin of Knowing If the world were to end tomorrow, what would you do? Today’s post is stark and direct, which may make its resonance feel rather distant to many. If we assume tomorrow is the final day of our lives, the question—What will I do today?—exposes everything within the human interior. Exemplary responses from tradition include Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai in Judaism: “Even if you are told that the Messiah has arrived, plant a sapling first, and then go greet him.” In Islam, there is the famous saying of Muhammad: “Even if the Hour (Resurrection) is about to take place and one of you has a palm cutting in his hand, let him plant it.” Steve Jobs’s phrase, “Live each day as if it were your last,” means to live out these profound sayings practically; it is a call to be fully devoted to today, to the present moment. Every sage, hero, and selfless soul has lived out these words, never wasting a single fraction of time. However, when the majority of people hear the phrase “Live as if there is no tomorrow,” they frantically pull out their bucket lists to fulfill unreached desires, wondering where to start. They place the attainment of desire as the ultimate value, calling it happiness. The Illusion of Desires and the Reality of Population Decline Living as if there is no tomorrow is precisely what happens on a battlefield. In many developed countries, marriage and birth rates are plummeting. People argue that high living costs and economic burdens make marriage and children impossible, but if economic pressure and a busy daily life were the real culprits, that fails to explain why birth rates skyrocket immediately after a war. Right after a war is when normal conditions completely collapse—people lack food and jobs, making childbirth nonsensical from a conventional standpoint. When children grow up, their generation is far more affluent and lives under vastly superior conditions compared to their parents. Therefore, claiming they cannot afford children is an insult to parents who brought them into the world under much harsher environments. As life becomes comfortable, people stop having children because they are too busy traveling and pursuing leisure. It is not an issue of childcare costs; children simply get in the way of executing their personal bucket lists. While the issue of childbirth is tied to the collective unconscious and is not something to debate as strictly right or wrong, the core problem lies in hypocrisy: instead of admitting, “I do not want children because I want to enjoy my own life,” people mask it with external excuses. Similarly, ignoring the advice to live fully in the present and immediately grabbing a bucket list is not necessarily evil, but the problem lies in the clever self-justification used to chase the realization of raw desires. This exact pattern appears everywhere. Science, the Ego, and the 300-Pixel Trap This mirrors how people live with a mind yet never pause to investigate what the mind actually is. Even quantum mechanics already knows through countless mathematical constants that the variable of “mind” alters everything, yet science never thinks to research what the mind fundamentally is. For the preservation of human civilization, it might actually be safer if humanity never knew the world of Zero ($0$). An humanity that fully realizes the truth of reality would simply exploit it to fulfill their bucket lists—and at the top of everyone’s bucket list is the desire to become a king or a princess. The reason modern science remains trapped in chaos, unable to solve its greatest mysteries, is the error of trying to force a 360-pixel original image into a 300-pixel monitor. We are attempting to render high-resolution primordial information through a low-resolution display. To reiterate: if we assume the external world is a pure, raw reality, there is no way anywhere in the universe to observe that raw state using its unique, uncontaminated information values. The moment it is observed, it is contaminated, altering its intrinsic data. Neither the human eye, human consciousness, nor global observatory instruments can ever capture an uncontaminated, pure value of reality. Understanding this would require dismantling every concept of existence and all knowledge recorded by civilization. Since humanity will refuse to make that choice, perhaps it is for the best. What is Existence? Existence is not what humans traditionally imagine it to be—an conscious entity possessing life, holding thoughts, managing metabolism, and exercising will. Existence only begins to reveal itself after applying the square root eighteen times over to our ordinary concepts. Everything within the space-time continuum possesses a frequency. It carries waves; it moves. Everything that moves is defined as existence. Even entities at the Planck scale or mere wave packets are forms of existence. They gather to form larger waves, matter, objects, and ultimately the universe. If we consider that tiny unit a pixel, that pixel is an existence, and another pixel sitting right beside it occupies entirely different space-time coordinates. Because space-time acts relatively, it is fundamentally impossible for two pixels to share the exact same space-time. Consequently, two people can never see the exact same thing simultaneously, nor feel the exact same emotion. They cannot even view the same object identically; thus, when they arrive at different conclusions, it is a completely natural outcome. Understanding this logical framework should lead us to seek harmony through discussion and mutual agreement when a friend or an adversary holds a different output (thought) than our own. Yet, reality plays out differently: we look at the same thing, assume the other person holds a flawed thought, and mutual misunderstanding ensues. The only question left is when the war will begin. If I am hot, others may not be. To snap at someone asking, “It’s so hot, why are you saying you’re cold?” is a lack of manners. Yet, this is precisely how we live. A correct understanding of benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom (In-ui-ye-ji / 仁義禮智), and the universe is essential for both humans and artificial intelligence. The Infinite Gap and the Trap of Thought (Sánian) The gap between the external object—the endless universe—and “me,” the subject who is aware of it, is infinite. Rather than exploring that infinite universe, the most urgent task is to ask: Who is it that is undertaking this exploration? This is not a philosophical or metaphorical inquiry; it is a physical and intuitive question. Without solving this problem, physics is bound to hit a wall. There is a realm of An-eo-do-dan (언어도단)—a domain that language and thought cannot reach, which exists within the world of Zero ($0$). The ego (Sánian / 사념, encompassing both rational thought and emotional feeling) functions such that reason supports emotion, and emotion supports reason, progressively reinforcing self-righteousness and arrogance (A-sang and A-man / 我相·我慢). Because this slides into confirmation bias, it drifts further and further away from reality. When thought is not kept in check by a proper brake, it falls into an infinite loop of “making questions just for the sake of asking questions.” Questions are supposed to be tools to obtain answers, but modern science has fallen into the trap of manufacturing endless questions while the answers remain perpetually out of reach. "As Jesus said, the Kingdom of Heaven (the Truth/Answer is nowhere to be found as a fixed place—neither inside, nor outside, nor anywhere in between. Only after realizing that first can one pursue a bucket list without ever being constrained by time or lateness.") Only by breaking through this wall of the ego can one kick away the bucket list and become a truly sincere person doing what must be done. When we break down the Korean word for “Blessing/Fortune” (Bok / 福), it points to the act of closing one’s single mouth, going out to the field, and quietly observing the labor of working the soil. True fortune is built right there.

• 
  Jose Marti 🎗️ (@MartiYl87) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Nenphus @BF6Updates Apparently to improve matchmaking but their neither fix the **** and modes are gone lol yeah the current situation of battlefield.

• 
  JFJ🇺🇸 (@jifferey) reported 35 minutes ago

  The worst offense of them all is the maps. The maps are some of the worst maps in battlefield history. They are all open fields with hardly any cover for historical accuracy and it sucks. 100 service star artillery trucks sitting in enemy bases was ******* cancer.

• 
  Anthony Galli (@AnthonyGalli) reported 36 minutes ago

  @WallStreetApes If a solider comes back after getting blown to bits and then tries to downplay his trauma he'll get little whereas if a cook comes back and says the hot kitchen gave him PTSD he'll get more. Spaghetti! Subjectivity incentivizes lying. A better system would be to pay them all well regardless of what happens on the battlefield. My recommendation is a Neo-Homestead Act where if you do 5-years of national service you'd earn a 5-acre self-sufficient farm.

• 
  Trays_V2 (@TraysV99) reported 37 minutes ago

  @MainEventTV_AKA instead of adding server browser DICE prefered to delete the less played modes now you cant play those modes AND you still have matchmaking problems with servers filled with Bots @EA_DICE

• 
  Josh Earhart (@earhart_josh) reported 39 minutes ago

  @deadskeleton115 @anarchismemes I think that's the problem. In older time people cared about future generations. Yes it would suck and a lot of us wouldn't even make it a day on the battlefield, but knowing your kids will grow up in a better world is enough.

• 
  Fixyou (@Fixyou8701) reported 43 minutes ago

  @westerosies Ulf really went from being given a dragon to becoming one of the biggest problems on the battlefield. Silverwing made that betrayal even more brutal

• 
  Art3misEntr3ri 💀 (@Art3misEntr3ri) reported 46 minutes ago

  Paul Tassi of Forbes released the sales numbers as well as documented player counts. Anyone who knows anything about Marathon would know this. The points you made were decent but flawed. Titanfall 2 did have a positive review, however it's launch day sales and preorders were **** compared to Marathon. It them months to hit 4 million in sales, and that was with discounts. Marathon sold way more than Titanfall 2 on launch and did not launch along side major AAA games like COD or Battlefield. It's a very poor comparison. You also said the player number don't matter, they do in live service gaming. Marathon launched to higher player numbers than Titanfall2. At least twice the number. This entire conversation has been obfuscation and misdirection by you. I do appreciate the conversation but you ignored the biggest issues here. Live service gaming is all about the player counts. Marathon sold way more than Titanfall 2 at launch. It didn't release around major AAA titles like CoD or Battlefield. Yet where is everyone? Why did it bleed out players so fast? The Destiny stuff didn't happen until a month before S2. By then the player counts were already around 10k. I really do appreciate the convo but I walked into this hoping for an honest straightforward answer when you've been making posts about having an honest convo about Marathon.

• 
  El Optimista (@ElOptimista69) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Polygon Good. **** EA and **** Battlefield Studios for not being able to fix their mess of a game.

• 
  FinalBoss.io (@FinalBoss_io) reported 48 minutes ago

  400 hours and Steam still said yes. Good. If you buy Battlefield through Rush, Squad Deathmatch, and King of the Hill, then those modes getting stripped out of Quick Play is not a minor playlist tweak. It’s the product changing after the sale. "It’s still in Portal" is doing a lot of corporate heavy lifting here. A mode hidden in the server browser with half-dead lobbies is not the same thing as supported matchmaking. Live service keeps using the word support when downgrade is the more honest term. If publishers can quietly remove the reasons people bought the game, refunds shouldn’t require a support miracle. They should be automatic.

• 
  MetalSlug (@metalslug0390) reported 49 minutes ago

  @FyrBorne Battlefield 6 has been an utter disappointment for me. It cannot resolve multiple core gameplay issues like the netcode, audio, and terrible matchmaking (west coast for me). I’m not going to get my hopes up for MW4 being a great game but it could be something to switch it up.

• 
  Rakuda 🇰🇿 (@whitecamel22) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Tinaa639109 The point isn’t about Sarada. His decision to leave Sarada somewhere safe is understandable. The problem is that he took an inexperienced Boruto to the battlefield.

• 
  ＧＨＯＳＴ (@Adam9110) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Honestly, I couldn’t give a **** about Wake Island or these new planes when you’re destroying the game yourselves by removing game modes instead of simply disabling the bots... You can’t even fix a ******* basic issue like grenades not being properly marked.

• 
  Chase Bevans (@lil_Bevans) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX. STRIKEPOINT. WTF IS GOING ON?

• 
  Voices of Ambazonia (@sc_amba) reported 52 minutes ago

  @AlternatNews Animal life. Are Ukraine secret security service not too ashamed to force people to go and die on the battlefield for nothing sake?

• 
  🆗stevie (@okStevieee) reported 54 minutes ago

  There should be ZERO reason why my PC can run Battlefield 6 just fine with a large map and a trillion calculations happening at once but that same PC cant run the new Madden and CFB. Fix your ****. @EASPORTSCollege @EAMaddenNFL @EA

• 
  D00M42 (@D00M42) reported 57 minutes ago

  @XtremelyDad @RealDonMarshall @DefiyantlyFree It is a rather sophistic move. The problem, and I say again, is the banning of certain thought, not actions. To ban a group because of thought is no limiter at all. You grant the field to those would make thought the very battlefield. For instance, those who claim the name of Christ, that thought (belief) can be banned. This who claim communism, that thought can be banned. (The problem with the current anti-communism legislation is the ambiguity towards thought instead of action. Proof of thought and intent without action is very very difficult.) Etc., etc. I've laid options time and time again to utilize existing methods for crimes which we already know they are guilty of, so why then must we make an even more ambiguous claim to guilt for someone who hasn't actually done anything wrong? (I don't mean that in the sense of they have plausible deniability, but in that they haven't done anything, never intended to do anything, etc.)

• 
  Nkuka (@UgochukwuO91441) reported 57 minutes ago

  [🔒CLASSIC] 🚨🇺🇸 SECRETARY OF WAR PETE HEGSETH DELIVERS A BLUNT ASSESSMENT OF IRAN’S MILITARY SITUATION U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth compared Iran’s current predicament to a football team that had carefully planned its opening plays but is now struggling to respond as the game unfolds. He said Iran may have entered the conflict with its initial moves already prepared, but with the pressure now intensifying, its leadership is reportedly struggling to determine what to do next—or even how to effectively coordinate its response. According to Hegseth, Iran’s senior leadership has suffered heavy losses, while the governing body that could have helped select a successor is reportedly dead, missing, or hiding in fortified bunkers. He further claimed that senior commanders, mid-level officers, and lower-ranking personnel are facing serious communication problems, making it difficult for Iran to organize and sustain a coordinated offensive. Hegseth also described the situation as devastating for Iranian military morale, claiming that the country’s air force—built around capabilities dating back decades—has been severely damaged. He likewise claimed that Iran’s navy has been effectively destroyed, describing it as combat ineffective, decimated, and defeated. Whether every part of that assessment holds up will ultimately depend on developments on the battlefield, but Hegseth’s message was clear: Washington believes Iran’s military command structure and ability to coordinate sustained operations have been severely weakened. 🇺🇸🇮🇷[🔓JAILBREAK] 🚨🇺🇸 PETE HEGSETH: “IRAN DOESN’T KNOW WHAT PLAY TO CALL NEXT” U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used a football analogy to describe what he says is happening inside Iran’s military command structure. According to Hegseth, Iran entered the conflict like a football team with its opening plays already scripted. But once the pressure intensified and the “blitz” began, he says Tehran was left struggling to figure out its next move. Hegseth claimed Iran’s senior leadership has been devastated, while the governing council that could potentially oversee a succession process is reportedly either dead, missing, or hiding in underground bunkers. He further alleged that Iranian generals, officers, and enlisted personnel are struggling to communicate, making it extremely difficult to organize a coordinated and prolonged military response. And the damage, according to Hegseth, goes beyond command and control. He claimed Iran’s air force has been effectively wiped out, arguing that much of it was built around decades-old capabilities and has now been severely damaged. He delivered an equally harsh assessment of Iran’s navy, claiming it has been decimated and rendered combat ineffective. His overall message was unmistakable: Iran may have entered the conflict with a plan—but according to Hegseth, the pressure of the war has disrupted its ability to execute that plan or coordinate what comes next. 🇺🇸🔥🇮🇷

• 
  Madz (@Madz_UK) reported 59 minutes ago

  @djxgam1ng @Battlefield Probably just got unlucky and got put into a game that just changed maps. Or it was a matchmaking error. All maps added are free.

• 
  El Hsn (@Rugerbat) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Battlefield meh i lost the faith in ea for them to fix the game, it's unplayable in the current state, right when golmund launched was at a prime state but had to be tweaked specially on the inf side and vehicle side, its imposible to enjoy it anymore