Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (37%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (13%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Americana	Glitches	10 hours ago
Rennes	Game Crash	2 days ago
Nantes	Glitches	6 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	6 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	7 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  XpertFusion (AKA MovieFusion) (@xpertfusion3) reported 5 seconds ago

  The number one thing Call of Duty needs to look into fixing is preventing players from leaving lobbies... This has been a big issue in a lot of CODs, but feels like a bigger issue in BO7, probably because of reduced SBMM and the higher skill gap. But obviously I don't want their solution to be to bring back strict SBMM, reduce the skill gap, or nerf the scorestreaks (all these solutions would suck) They need to find other ways to keep players in the match. I'll offer a few ideas here... • Reward Incentives Black Ops 3 did this, where you would receive more crypto-keys for staying in the full match than you would if you left the game early. This got many players to stay through the whole match, even if the other team was winning. I would love a new COD game to add an in-game currency that's earnable for free so they could do this, but perhaps they can setup some kind of system to where you have a chance at earning a random item from a random bundle as a "Post-Match Bonus" • Punishments I feel like people wouldn't like this solution, but I wouldn't be against small punishments (like locking you out of playing for 30 minutes) if you leave too many matches in a row. It would obviously give you a warning if you are close to that. • Make the game fun, even when you are doing bad... This is something Call of Duty has always struggled with. COD is not really that fun when you are doing bad. Maps being more interactive, more visually interesting, more dynamic, I think helps with this. Games like Battlefield can still be fun when you are doing bad, probably because of how cinematic the battles can be. Crazy map events help with that. COD should do more of that. • Rewards for Winning Games Even just rewarding players for winning games could help. People tend to leave lobbies when they are dying a lot, not necessarily when they are losing by a lot (happens in both situations though). Maybe give HUGE rewards for underdog wins, or making a huge comeback. • Persistent Lobby Bonuses Of course, this only works when lobbies are persistent, which should stay in every game going forward. But you should be given XP bonuses or other rewards for staying in the same lobby for multiple games in a row. This would significantly help with the social aspect of the game. • Harder to Earn Scorestreaks As I said, Streaks should NOT be nerfed, but I do think they are slightly too easy to get in BO7 (probably because of all the ways to get additional score). Scorestreaks should stay, and they SHOULD be loopable, but they should just cost a bit more to get, or there should be a few less ways to get additional score (or at least those ways shouldn't give you as much score) Just please, do anything EXCEPT for bringing back strict SBMM, nerfing streaks, or lowering the skill gap!! @InfinityWard @Treyarch @CallofDutyCM

• 
  Ben Kraize (@JointheKraize) reported 2 minutes ago

  @ShadowMakarov I think that’d be fine. I don’t think the issue was Nicki Minaj on the battlefield, I think it was just how jarringly out of place that skin looked out there.

• 
  Fallen_Soul / Maxwell (Name Of The Muse) (@SimeonePrime) reported 2 minutes ago

  @NanashiSukii *While She Tries To Make A Run For It, She Doesn't Get Far. As Maxwell's Wing Wraps Around Her.* Jeez, Calm Down Sukii. Running Away From Your Problems {and the battlefield} Isn't Exactly The Best Idea.

• 
  The Last Pict 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⚔️ (@Pict1sh) reported 8 minutes ago

  Lost estimated 12k RP in redsec ranked because of the no spawn glitch - Even had a 5th place when 4 teams have been glitched Then another 30+ games ruined from the visual glitch It’s disturbing how ruined @Battlefield is and each attempt to fix it makes it worse Been 1 month

• 
  Sayber_31 (@Sayber_31) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @CAMIKAZE78 That cryo barrel better be expensive when it comes to mod cost or the laser accurate guns are going to be an even bigger issue.

• 
  Dani😎 (@Dani1Official) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Tves500 @im_Kolins One historical detail most of you morons often overlooked is that although Asaba was ethnically Igbo and closely linked to nearby Onitsha, it was not part of Biafra. It was located on the western bank of the Niger in the Mid-West, and that complicated position played a major role in the events leading to the massacre. The issue isn’t that people died in a war; combatants on both sides unfortunately did. The Asaba Massacre is remembered because hundreds of unarmed civilians, including teenagers and community leaders, were reportedly separated from women and children and killed after federal forces entered the town. Even if some individuals from Asaba had fought for Biafra, that does not justify the execution of civilians or collective punishment of an entire community. In any conflict, there’s a difference between fighting enemy soldiers on a battlefield and killing unarmed civilians. That’s why Asaba remains a significant and painful chapter in Nigeria’s history.

• 
  Kaiser🇵🇸🇳🇱 (@TheLichtReich) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the ping and region servers for **** sakes I can’t play

• 
  Flamecycle (@flamecycle) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Brick_Suit Exactly. I own a home, so it's just assumed that I'm going to do what needs to be done to upkeep it. I can stay on top of it and make small repairs, or I can neglect it and have to do battlefield maintenance. By the same token, the government already owns this. It's been neglected, so the government just did battlefield maintenance to fix it right.

• 
  Alexander The Greatॐ (@baeckmannisboss) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Would be nice if you guys can fix the under the map / automatic win exploit for redsec

• 
  SpacersGuild (@Spacers_Guild) reported 25 minutes ago

  @ReforgeGaming Get tf outta here with your lies you wanna know how you can refute all of this??? BATTLEFIELD 6 if BATTLEFIELD 6 ran so smooth all because of the series S then its not the series S thats the issue its the devs who can't optimize for the hardware

• 
  M.D. (@KeepYoHeadUppp) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your stupid ******* game!

• 
  Jeremiah Knight (@iamrjknight) reported 28 minutes ago

  Apologetics is not the heart of our message. The gospel is. We do not defend the faith merely to win arguments, expose errors, or appear sharper than others. We give an answer so that Christ may be seen clearly, sin may be exposed truthfully, and sinners may be called to repentance and faith. “Sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you” (1 Peter 3:15). The danger is that apologetics can become a battlefield for pride if it is separated from the cross. A man may answer objections, defeat false arguments, quote history, and still fail to preach Christ. That is not faithfulness. That is noise with religious vocabulary. Paul did not build his ministry on cleverness. He said, “For I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2). So yes, we contend. Yes, we answer. Yes, we tear down arguments raised against the knowledge of God. But we do it as servants of the gospel, not as performers in debate. “We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God” (2 Corinthians 10:5). Apologetics is a tool. The gospel is the treasure. If our defense of the truth does not lead people to the glory of Christ, the guilt of sin, the necessity of the cross, and the call to bow before the risen Lord, then we have defended the wall while forgetting the King inside.

• 
  Steve in a Truck (@stevedeleeuw) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Still no fix to downtown, mustard yellow buildings, ketchup red? Venom black? Happens to PS5 players more then anyone else. It’s been months. Empty crates being dropped still not fixed? Maybe you should not have fired everyone

• 
  NoLimitToSavagery (@KillaRoy22) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Fix the damn lighting issue!!!! Legit about to stop playing this ****!

• 
  Bryan Schulz (@ChumThumb) reported 33 minutes ago

  @glennbeck The problem is Glenn we CANNOT beat them on the battlefield. We do not have the troops, we have no way of delivering them or equipment there, and no way of effectively resupplying them. Air campaigns do not win wars, especially when the other side has ballistic missiles.

• 
  Robbie K (@OSINToffenders) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Battlefield You need to fix the cheaters and give everyone a console only option in redsec

• 
  xSAHALx (@xSAHALx) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Is there any news about server desync and net-code issues ?

• 
  JARR3D💥 (@_JARR3D) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I thought apex BR was a hot mess, but someone how this is worse than that. You guys have a BR in s3 that is some how in a terrible state. The amount of problems I run into just trying to play a few games is insane.

• 
  ustonymc (@ustonymc) reported 41 minutes ago

  Slaughter COLD HARBOR Civil War June 1-7 1864 Cold Harbor was neither chilly nor a port but a crossroads taking its name from a tavern that served only cold food. It was near the 1862 battlefield called the Seven Days. Fighting on June 1 and 2 hadn't been fierce. On the first the Yankees didn't launch their assault until 6 pm and made some gains in the beginning but by then the Johnny Reb defenses stiffened and both Union corps entrenched in their advanced position. On the second Grant had scheduled his attack for early morning, but after constant delays and the approaching rain he called off the attack. These first two days Lee wasn't his usual aggressive self and Grant concluded that Lee was beaten. Accordingly, he scheduled an all-out assault for June 3. Lee was far from being beaten and was very confident. The fact that he had 60,000 against Grant's 110,000 didn't daunt him and he had given no sign of offensive operations because of Cold Harbor's natural defensive features and was content to remain there. Without the imposing fortifications of Spotsylvania and North Anna, Lee believed he could beguile Grant into believing that he confronted a vulnerable foe. Actually, there was seven miles of Butternut front integrated, linked and joined with overlapping fields of fire. Neither Grant or Meade had reconnoitered Lee's front, unpardonable oversight in both. The Yankee's were deceived. The soldiers in the Union army had a sense of foreboding. The night of the second, they were writing their names and addresses on slips of paper and pinning them to their tunics so their bodies could be identified and their fate made known to their families. The next morning the bluebellies advanced shouting, "Hurrah! Hurrah!" and in that seemingly silent landscape ahead of them erupted with flame and smoke and a scything rain of lead struck them. "It seemed more like a volcanic blast than a battle," one survivor recalled, "and it was just about as destructive." Grant was attacking all along the line rather than massing at a single point, even at this late date in the war, he still failed to grasp of the new and awesome superiority of the defense, like Lee at Gettysbug. Charge after charge was broken up, some in less than a quarter hour. Taken in their flank by Reb fire, some Union formations collapsed one upon another like falling dominoes. Across the entire front all the Bluebellies could see was the black hats of the Rebels and their muzzle flashes piercing the smoke. Whenever that withering fire seemed to ease off, the pinned down Yankees started scratching out a depression in the earth with their bayonets and gradually sank out of sight and when couriers came crawling out to them with orders to renew the assault they refused to go forward. And with good reason, in less than an hour Grant had lost 7,000 men against 1,500 for Lee, and he finally called off the assault. It was a shocking defeat, the cries of, "Water, water, for God's sake water!" from the wounded in his army outside the Confederate lines couldn't be retrieved because of the Reb sharpshooters. Lee was anxious to compel Grant to admit defeat and refused to call them off. Finally, after bickering back and forth for four days, on the 7th, Lee and Grant agreed upon a truce but by then it was too late, almost all of the Federal wounded were dead. Grant's refusal to ask for a truce wasn't calloused indifference to the suffering of his troops, but rather his unwillingness that a white flag be misconstrued as an admission of defeat that would encourage the northern peace movement and discourage Lincoln supporters. The real tragedy of Cold Harbor was that gallant young men in Blue were sent into battle without plan or preparation, and it was one of those apprehensive soldiers who wrote the night before that awful carnage. The last entry in his blood stained diary read: "June3. Cold Harbor. I was killed today." Many years later Grant would finally admit: "I have always regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made." Image 1: Yankee's charging. 2. Union attack, 3rd day. 3. Lee and Grant. 4. Union burial details.

• 
  VanQish (@VanQish7) reported 41 minutes ago

  The signal is not “Thunes is growing.” The signal is that the global payments industry is openly documenting the exact problems that $XRP, $RLUSD, stablecoins, tokenization, and interoperable settlement networks are designed to solve. The Most Important Takeaway The report repeatedly uses the word interoperability as the defining challenge of the next generation financial system. Their conclusion: The world now has too many payment systems. The problem is no longer creating payment rails. The problem is making all rails communicate with each other. Winners will be the networks that bridge traditional and emerging payment rails. That should immediately make XRP holders pay attention because Ripple has been saying exactly this for years. Stablecoins Are Not Replacing Banks This is probably the most important section for crypto investors. Thunes specifically states that stablecoins are emerging as a middle-leg settlement layer for cross-border payments. Translation: They are not talking about replacing banks. They are talking about: Customer → Bank/Wallet → Stablecoin Settlement Layer → Bank/Wallet → Customer The report says stablecoins have: Near-instant settlement Negligible on-chain cost Massive efficiency benefits BUT… The biggest problem remains: On/Off ramps. Converting stablecoins into local bank accounts, wallets, cards, and cash remains difficult. This is exactly where Ripple, RLUSD, XRP, and similar liquidity networks become relevant. XRP Investors Should Notice One Sentence The report states: Stablecoins are unlikely to displace existing systems and will instead operate as a settlement layer embedded within traditional money transfer operators. That is enormous. Many crypto investors still believe: “Crypto replaces banks.” The actual institutional thesis is: “Crypto upgrades bank infrastructure.” Those are two very different outcomes. Mobile Wallets Just Passed Banks Another huge finding: Consumers now prefer: Mobile wallets Payment apps Digital experiences over traditional bank interfaces for initiating cross-border payments. Banks are becoming: Funding sources Settlement providers Back-end infrastructure while wallets become the front-end experience. This fits directly with: RLUSD Ripple Payments Stablecoin settlement Open banking Tokenized deposits Speed Matters More Than Fees This surprised me. 50% of users ranked instant transfers as the most important feature. Only 13% ranked low fees first. Institutional takeaway: People would rather: Pay slightly more Receive money instantly than: Save a little money Wait several days This favors: Real-time settlement XRP liquidity Stablecoin settlement Tokenized payment networks The Report Quietly Attacks Correspondent Banking Read between the lines. They identify: Legacy systems Multiple intermediaries Lack of interoperability Delayed settlement Hidden fees as major causes of friction. Then they describe blockchain settlement as: Instant Lower cost Reduced dependency on correspondent banking relationships. That is effectively the same value proposition Ripple has been selling to banks for over a decade. Why This Matters To XRP Specifically The report never says: “Use XRP.” But it does describe the exact future state XRP was built for: Layer 1 Banks Layer 2 Wallets Layer 3 Stablecoins Layer 4 Interoperability Network Layer 5 Cross-border Liquidity The missing piece is the neutral bridge asset/liquidity engine. That is where XRP competes. The Real Institutional Narrative Most retail investors are still asking: “Will banks use XRP?” The better question now is: “How will thousands of payment systems, wallets, stablecoins, CBDCs, banks, fintechs, and tokenized assets interoperate?” This report says interoperability is becoming the defining challenge of global finance. That is exactly the battlefield Ripple has positioned itself for. @ThunesPayments

• 
  Military Observer (@TheMilObserverr) reported 41 minutes ago

  India is turning 2,400 ageing T-72 tanks into remotely operated battlefield platforms 🇮🇳 Instead of scrapping them, the Indian Army is converting them into unmanned systems for high risk missions. And the thinking behind this is smart. 👇 • Nearly 2,400 T-72s to be converted under iDEX ADITI 4.0 challenge • Extends operational life by 15 to 20 years at a fraction of replacement cost • Will breach minefields, conduct reconnaissance and act as decoys • Operate ahead of manned T-90s absorbing enemy fire and identifying positions • Real time data links feed directly into command networks • Bridges capability gap until Future Ready Combat Vehicle arrives from 2030 • T-72 has been in Indian Army service since 1979 Why risk a crew in a minefield when a remotely operated tank can do it instead. That is exactly the logic here. India is not scrapping its old tanks. It is giving them a second life on the modern battlefield. 🇮🇳

• 
  Some.BYU.Dude (@ByuSome) reported 41 minutes ago

  @nbot5000s Finn dying fighting the First Order to save the Resistance would've been amazing. Destroyed so Rose could be like, "Oh you dummy...love and stuff!" and defied physics to do so, and then apparently the First Order just let them run across the battlefield unscathed back to their friends. Again, TLJ has an incredible amount of terrible issues. Just a terrible film.

• 
  Facio (@FacioSol) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Crashing so many times I think my SSD is about to die. Please for the love of all things that are holy STOP adding shtuff to the in-game store and fix your buggy slop of a battlefield game.

• 
  PyrateQueen elsewhere (@Solarclaw) reported 47 minutes ago

  Lean more into this Science vs (paranormal) Magic lesgooooo Imagine q!Ash losing to q!Aldo & whether they're on the battlefield or during q!Multi experimenting a corpse, "Ghosty" appears (maybe even teamed up w/ Fatal Error) being all possessive over the glitch

• 
  Slumber Season (@Slumber_Season) reported 48 minutes ago

  @RepLuna 2/ Weaponizing fake outrage to deflect from the actual issue is peak drama. You’re acting like you survived a battlefield when you really just survived a tough CONVERSATION.

• 
  Marshal Zen (@DrZen555) reported 50 minutes ago

  The supreme leader of Iran told his people to issue a statement that the U.S. has “lost on the battlefield.” This clearly means Iran has reached its limits and is ready to agree to some kind of deal. Iranian style: “agree now, disregard later.”

• 
  Qusai (@QuSaYii) reported 52 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm When will the Middle East servers be working? We are currently experiencing issues with the European servers.

• 
  Chris Xavier (@XavierDeChris1) reported 56 minutes ago

  @SheilahGashumba @ReachDrMuganga If leadership is about serving people, why do some fight so hard for positions when the people themselves have doubts? Service shouldn't be a battlefield for personal gains. if the people have rejected him, let him concentrate on his other business!

• 
  𝓚𝓻𝔂𝓶𝓶𝓼 (@Krymms) reported 56 minutes ago

  @LowradishY @Marcodmeatball Yeah, I'd personally take gacha over whatever ******** western studios are doing with their live service games. Ideally we'd get away from live service though. At least for the games that don't benefit from it. (Looking at you Battlefield, bring back DLCs)

• 
  AVA (@A__A__G__) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Always releasing new content on a Tuesday is crazy, if yall are scared of any technical issues, launch the new content on a Thursday or Friday and take those extra days to work