Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (33%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bitche	Game Crash	4 hours ago
Paris	Game Crash	2 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	2 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	2 days ago
Paris	Online Play	2 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Constance (@Constan63413921) reported 1 minute ago

  @Jerusalem_Post Diplomacy with the Islamic Republic was built on a false premise: that the regime had a solvable dispute with the West. It does not. Its hostility is not transactional; it is ideological, constitutional, and central to its identity. Negotiations could manage tempo, delay escalation, exchange prisoners, or create temporary pauses, but they could never resolve the underlying conflict because the regime’s survival narrative depends on anti-Americanism, anti-Israelism, revolutionary expansion, and permanent confrontation. So the real question is not: “When does diplomacy stop being a path to resolution?” The real question is: “Why did Washington keep pretending diplomacy with Tehran was designed to resolve a conflict that the regime itself needs in order to survive?” That is the strategic error. Diplomacy became a mechanism for stabilizing the Islamic Republic, not changing its behavior. It gave Tehran time, legitimacy, cash flow, and breathing room while allowing Western governments to avoid the harder conclusion: this is not a normal state seeking a bargain. It is a revolutionary regime using talks as a battlefield. The regime did not enter diplomacy to end the conflict. It entered diplomacy to manage pressure, divide its enemies, buy time, and survive.

• 
  Bustin Cider 🔞🇺🇲🇺🇲 (@DominusFlorum) reported 1 minute ago

  @Therealrobtutor @Battlefield Have the same issue with one of the carbines lol

• 
  FinalBoss.io (@FinalBoss_io) reported 2 minutes ago

  EA keeps “fixing” Battlefield 6 boosters by accident. That’s not a patch note problem. It’s a trust problem. When the messaging around monetized time keeps changing, players stop assuming it’s sloppy and start assuming it’s deliberate. Usually because it is.

• 
  Misfit (@misfithz) reported 2 minutes ago

  Squadmate gets kicked for being afk cuz the respawn timer was stuck, can’t rejoin so he queues for another match, finds one AND IT PULLS ME OUT OF MY ONGOING ROUND INTO HIS MATCH. Fix your game @Battlefield #battlefield6

• 
  Dale Gribble’s Hat (@plainhyperbole) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The team balance in this game is worse than it’s ever been. I picked the game back up after the update yesterday and your dogshit game literally put me in 20 back to back losing matches, that’s not hyperbole or an exaggeration. Fix this ******* **** or give us server browser

• 
  J harr (@Joeharr19139570) reported 3 minutes ago

  @repeat_1776 @F1sT @KobeissiLetter Might makes right. The dollar stays king until the US military loses. Not Vietnam or Afghanistan or Iraq. The US would have to leave the battlefield broken like Iraq after Desert Storm. That’s not impossible, but it’s not likely anytime soon.

• 
  boob inspector (@bygonezbygonz) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Battlefield ******* 30 guys sniping and only 1 flag captured, fix your ******* game

• 
  AlienMonkey (@Black_monkiii) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your stupid *** game

• 
  Dave (@ThoughtEngaged) reported 11 minutes ago

  This last update has killed Battlefield and Redsec. I spent two ******* hours trying to play ranked with the squad tonight. We all took turns getting disconnected, having our games crash and falling through the map and more. I believe it was the final nail in the coffin. RIP.

• 
  It's Absurd (@ExtraSmallBrain) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the crashes! Fix the bugs! Played just now and in the middle of the game, I was back on desktop. No other game I play crashes. Battlebug is a shite game!!! 100%

• 
  Zen ۶ৎ | reading closed (@jentelism) reported 15 minutes ago

  But the universe is using Justice and The Hanged Man to pull the emergency brake. They are being asked to step down from the battlefield, stop trying to fix the external world or the broken collaborations, and turn inward.

• 
  Craig Hall #GeneralStrike #Worldwide (@w41gy) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Crypt0Mess1ah @NHSMillion Hospitals were originally designed to treat wounded soldiers and getting them back on the battlefield ASAP. There’s no rush to fix us now that the wealthy can afford to circumvent the NHS with our two tier system.

• 
  bigby (@EsdHhb) reported 23 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS The problem isn’t the large factor it is the variety that matters i dont care if the maps are large or small they need to be great But battlefield 6 has already more than enough of small to medium maps so yes big maps in this exact context actually matter

• 
  NewGenTV_Official (@NewGenTV_real) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX YOUR FREAKIN GAME!!!!!!!!! After latest update im getting direct x 11 error, makes my pc extremely slow and loads on to extrenely low resolution! Tried loading in to direct x 12 and still does the same thing! Veryfies integrity, reinstalled, cleared shader cach & nothing!!!

• 
  N8D (@USN8D) reported 27 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm BF6 is just a placeholder FPS till something better drops. Game is dead, broken and riddled with third party software in anything competitive. EA/Dice should just hang it up. The last decent thing created was BF3 and 4.

• 
  Jeffrey’s Aura Farm (@HolyMulletMan) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Battlefield My sons will grow up without a father bc I will kill my self unless you guys fix Strikepoint

• 
  big_markyt (@big_markyt) reported 30 minutes ago

  @tboe012 @EA_DICE I've deleted it twice since release, considering doing it a third time and leaving it alone as it's not enjoyable. I agree on gunplay too, some of the lads I played with yesterday were struggling with lag issues, too, going as high as 400 ping

• 
  ARSHAM (@dj_arsham) reported 36 minutes ago

  The speed here is non-negotiable On-chain performance on Solana is a battlefield, and FatCat operates with surgical precision. Swaps settled consistently in 3-5 seconds. What I truly appreciated was the brutal fee transparency, 0.1% platform fee + network fees clearly broken down. No fluff, no "hidden tax" surprises, just pure data

• 
  Boyishdude (@DisposedZero) reported 37 minutes ago

  @AzraelSch @FreeTalkLive IP isn't protecting DICE from losing money they deserve for their work, it's protecting them from competition. It's allowing them to ship out consistently bad, broken products and still make money off of them because nobody else is allowed to make Battlefield games.

• 
  Marc Clay (@omniclay2) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the console matchmaking for the whole game! This is the only game that separates console players, forcing us to play with computer players or bots.

• 
  e (@cloudz9187) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Battlefield can you guys please fix your ****** servers. I’m pissed I went against my better judgement and redownloaded this 💩.The fact that battlefield 1 has better servers then 6 is ******* sad. Fix your ****

• 
  ♰ OLISeraph_VT👁️🪽 ♰ (@OLISeraphVTuber) reported 46 minutes ago

  @rowell_96 @Battlefield Sounds like an issue related to skill

• 
  Zolyode (@R_eh_mika) reported 46 minutes ago

  @yuhMaxine @Battlefield Do you know how SBMM work, and why it does that ? because I can't play neither modern COD or Battlefield and its going to make me crazy If I can't find a solution to that problem...

• 
  Jamin Thompson (@jaminthompson) reported 47 minutes ago

  Step 1 to defeating an army of gun-mounted robot dogs is to figure out what type of battlefield system they are. A reasonable person can assume that they're basically just mobile sensor-shooter nodes trying to drag a rifle through an adversarial physics problem. From there, we can use first principles to deduce that we have a lot of defensive advantages at our disposal that we can use to defeat such an enemy. The rookie mistake to avoid in the battle plan, however, is thinking the best countermeasure is more firepower or a straight-line escape. That's how you end up playing the robot's game, where every advantage goes to the hardware. Robot hardware has the clear advantage in a head-to-head duel, which is exactly why we don't make it one. So instead of using bozo tactics, we'll use our brains and target the robot's main weakness, its decision stack. This gives us the greatest tactical advantage. Instead of mindless pewpew blasting, we need to attack the robot's perception, state estimation, path planning, balance control, target classification, and weapons release. All the seams between those layers are where the robot is most vulnerable. So our first course of action is to make motion expensive. We want to fight on our terms, in an environment with terrain that is technically passable but tactically poisonous. And we'll prepare our defenses by making the battlefield very hostile to a machine. We want to make life as miserable as possible for the metal mind. So instead of thinking "oh no, we're fighting robot dogs with guns," we adjust the paradigm to "we're fighting balance algorithms that are dragging rifles through bad physics." The goal is to outsmart the bots and prevent them from having a clean path to go anywhere. So we'll make every path into the defended space feel like pure chaos, filled with elements that make a robot's control loop work harder: thick mud, rocks, gravel, sand, cables, uneven debris, weird curbs, surfaces with weird angles, ditches, tight turns, narrow gaps, and low baffles. We don't need to make every single obstacle perfect. We just need every step the robot takes to cost more terrain estimation, friction prediction, gait replanning, torque correction, stabilization, and battery drain. This is how we win. Next we will further terraform the defensive position so robot walking and shooting become separate problems that need solving. The robot might move forward, but movement isn't the same thing as being able to fight. So we'll craft the environment to funnel the bot swarm into very tight slow lanes where the "safe" path turns into a traffic jam. If they stop, they lose tempo. If they advance, they burn energy. If they shoot, they waste ammo. If they reroute, they lose time. If they trust the obvious path, they walk deeper into our trap. The goal here isn't to fully prevent the robots from crossing the terrain, because the probability of zero robots getting across is low. Our goal is to create as many slips, sensor conflicts, torque spikes, bad decisions, and battery losses we can force per meter as possible. Next, we'll **** up the robot's perception by changing what it actually sees. We'll fill the defensive space with glare, floodlights, smoke, mist, hard shadows, reflective panels, hanging tarps, moving junk, and a shitstorm of visual clutter so the robot cameras can't build a trustworthy picture of what's in front of them. Then we'll ruin their thermals. We'll mix in some hot junk, cold panels, warm decoys, and human-shaped heat ghosts so the robot can't tell what's human and what's fake bait. We want them to waste time and battery at every step. So we'll make their LiDAR miserable too. We'll hang up reflective sheets, angled panels, mesh, fog, and a bunch of repeating patterns everywhere so the robot will hallucinate edges, misread distance, and see fake things everywhere. We'll build confusing hallways that look similar but lead to different places so slam keeps matching the wrong landmarks. We'll also add moving decoys, swinging tarps, rolling carts, fans, flags, and mad max style mechanical motion devices so the scene never stays the same. We'll also **** up their gps and comms so the bots can't rely on the swarm map to bail them out. We want every single sensor to tell a different lie. Next, we want to minimize our probability of getting killed, so we'll need to make the robot gun matter less. Walking through the environment will be one problem for the bots to solve. Getting a clean, stable, confident shot will be a completely different problem for them. And we need to make it as hard as possible. A rifle on legs may sound scary, but it still has to do the boring stuff right. It has to stay balanced, point straight, see clearly, and know what it's shooting at. So we'll enhance our anti-clanker fortress with low baffles, offset walls, blind corners, staggered barriers, partial cover, false corridors, and a **** ton of blocked angles. The bots might still advance, but the rifle won't be able to get a clean lane. We'll also put up decoys and weird/ambiguous shapes in the firing lanes so every shot has to pass target id. The goal is to force the robot to choose between moving, aiming, identifying, and not shooting the wrong thing. Those are separate problems. If we make those requirements interfere with each other, the robot may still be able to move, but it can't confidently shoot, and it doesn't have unlimited ammo to waste. There are mathematical limits to ammo capacity, and the math here is in our favor. So the basic plan is to play to our strengths. We don't attack the robot's armor; we attack its confidence. If it advances, it enters a funnel. If it hesitates, it burns battery. If it shoots, it wastes ammo. If it phones home, operators get overloaded. If it trusts autonomy, it walks deeper into an environment designed to poison its autonomy. At the end of the day, though, the robot is just the visible endpoint. The real enemy is the machine behind the machine (algorithms, batteries, sensors, ammo, relays, maps, operators, etc.). You don't beat this type of enemy by building a bigger gun or dueling it 1 on 1. You beat it by forcing the kill chain to collapse and by making the battlefield itself eat the stack. You make the swarm slow down, split up, get confused, run in circles, lose confidence in the map, lose confidence in the target, lose clean firing lanes, burn battery, waste ammo, and enter an adversarial operating environment that takes their movement, vision, comms, and certainty away. The idea is to make the robot spend more compute, energy, ammo, and confidence per meter than you spend building/defending that meter. If you do it right, there probably won't be some glorious cinematic sci-fi battle. Just a pile of expensive machines trapped, confused, low on battery, unable to shoot, waiting to be recovered by their master.

• 
  𝑏 𝑥 𝑛 (@bxn45I) reported 47 minutes ago

  @NoFilterGames @charlieINTEL @thegamebusiness I don’t think so, Black Ops fatigue is real and the Battlefield release was a major problem

• 
  Robert Meurett (@Robert_Meurett) reported 49 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Me and my buddies have waited over a month for Strikepoint to come back. What the heck are we doing here. FIX STRIKEPOINT

• 
  Biorelations (@biorelations) reported 50 minutes ago

  FREYJA INSIGHTS "Give him 15 minutes of peace when he gets home. No questions. No tasks. No problems to solve. And he will give you the rest of the evening. That's how you build connection — without chasing connection. Just give him the 15 minutes — and he will give you everything else." Most women do the opposite. The moment he walks through the door — they're already talking. Already asking. Already needing something. And he shuts down. Not because he doesn't love her. Because he just came back from the battlefield. And he has nothing left — yet. 15 minutes. That's all it takes. The woman who understands this gets the man fully present. The woman who doesn't keeps wondering why he's always distant. In Freyja we teach women to understand how a man actually recharges — and how to work with his nature instead of fighting it. Have you ever tried giving him silence first — and been surprised by what came after?

• 
  Tim on two wheels (@2wheelsgoodBrum) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Bloatee1 @DonUnderThePool @SaferRoadsYorks We can all agree on that. As soon as we fix the endangerment behaviour, it will no longer feel like it is a battlefield.

• 
  𝗜𝗚𝗜 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 (@_IGI_Media_) reported 56 minutes ago

  @ObsceneSelene the issue (as your video points out) is that people are confusing "the ability to connect 3D to your AI" with "the need to connect 3D with your AI" If I told them when they first started in AI "yes, you can make stuff in AI, but yer going to need all these other software to get the job done" they'd laugh at me and run. So some blender dudes show how AI makes movies from input sources and other references, and now these folks have mis takingly come to the rationale that this is the way to do it. The issue is not the initial connection or in-coming source files, but rather if you need to make a change, then what? The reason they get away with this approach, is that they never ever go back. Even if they made an error, they just leave it in, and don't go back into Blender (or others) and try to fix it. This is because the bar they have set for quality is very very low. I.e. line up the camera to show people in a room, or horses riding across the battlefield. These are generic shots. Whereas if you were attempting to achieve a very specific movement by the actors, toggling back and forth between apps, then becomes extra steps, time consuming, and tricky. The irony here, is we're damned if we do, and damned if we don't. external CGI sources are temporarily a solution (and I say that with sarcasm) in that it is a crude approach to something that should use a finesse and very accurate solution. Using CGI for camera alignment, is like pounding a nail with a rock. Yes you could do it that way, but should you . . .no ! * P.s. for those reading down this far, I'm formally trained and 30+ years with CGI and graphic tools. Summary: inserting additional apps and steps into a work flow is not a solution, it's just a more elaborate work flow.

• 
  Sonya in TX (@SonyainTX1) reported 58 minutes ago

  @richardaeden Harry's problem is about status, not security. Harry wants the same level of security Prince William gets. Lying about war kills was a desperate attempt to generate threats. But we all know Harry never saw the battlefield. He got the name "Bunker Harry" for a reason. 🤨