Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (33%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bitche	Game Crash	1 day ago
Paris	Game Crash	3 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	3 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	3 days ago
Paris	Online Play	4 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	4 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sabih (@Nazaratives) reported 9 seconds ago

  One of the first thing Qizilbash did upon entering Baghdad was to desecrate the grave of Imam Abu Hanifa(ra) and tie dogs over there. Just before Sultan Selim(rh) took care of the problem, their creed was also expanding among Turks, and Kurds were also thinking of switching sides. In addition, he killed thousands of Sunni Uzbeks to the east. His unbeaten run had become mythical with his followers claiming that he is invincible. Sultan Selim was very clear minded about Safavids since his time as the governor and after solidifying his throne (defeating his brother), first thing he did was take an army to meet the Safavid threat. So crushing was the defeat of Safavids that even the wives of Ismail were taken by Ottomans and Ismail barely escaped the battlefield. It is said that he spent rest of his life as an alcoholic and never recovered from the battle.

• 
  Lincoln Parker (@LincolnParker5) reported 20 seconds ago

  If you are not working with the Ukrainian Armed Forces and @BRAVE1ua to battlefiled-validate your technology on the ground, you are missing the most important feedback loop available Many well-funded startups entered Ukraine, failed, and went home. I understand that. Ukraine is hard. But retreating is the wrong call The ones who stayed, iterated, and rebuilt on actual battlefield feedback are the ones writing the next chapter of warfare funding The ones who left are polishing slide decks

• 
  BEN (@BiGBENNGTR) reported 2 minutes ago

  @ZagazOlaMakama Let’s talk about this with the little experience I have. First, the landing could have resulted in a crash. You only make a landing like that during an emergency, especially when you already know the helicopter will no longer be of any use. Second, why were they all facing the same direction without anyone watching their 9 and 3 o’clock positions? After the rescue, again, nobody was watching their 6 o’clock. There was no overwatch either. Now I understand how the bandits and Boko Haram get their information from, because how do you leave a teammate on the battlefield without cover?

• 
  WillMoraes (@entabike_mtb) reported 7 minutes ago

  @OlenaRohoza 35% of Ukraine's territory conquered, and you talk about not achieving victories on the battlefield? What is your problem?

• 
  eugenio8a8 (@eugenio8a8) reported 12 minutes ago

  @modestasraz @CounterStrike You have a point, but the issue isn't just about that situation, in other games like battlefield for example i remember that they had a lot of colorblind options for almost everything...while in CS is really primitive

• 
  Xiǎobǎihé (@Suhyeem) reported 14 minutes ago

  That morning, the moment I entered the conference room, I realized the nature of the anomaly had changed. The anomalies up until now had been "branching." Reality split into multiple parts. But today was different. It wasn't branching; the existing branches themselves were being "rearranged." A battlefield map was displayed on the wall screen. But it wasn't just one map. More than thirty battlefield layers were superimposed on the same coordinates. Each possessed an independent military reality, each claiming to be the legitimate one. In one layer, F-35s were fully operational. In another layer, all aircraft had been lost. And yet another layer, the F-35s weren't even present in that battlefield. I took a deep breath and said, "This is no longer electronic warfare." Before someone could answer, another analyst interrupted. "Electronic warfare is a physical layer issue. This is a cognitive layer issue." Cognitive layer. The fact that this term was being used as if it were formal military jargon made me feel slightly dizzy. On another screen, the engagement log of an Apache helicopter was displayed. But it was the same here. "Shot down" "Returned" "Never even sortied" Three realities existed simultaneously on the battlefield. I pointed to one of them. "Where does this 'shot down' layer come from?" The analyst couldn't answer immediately. After a few seconds, he finally said: "Multiple civilian surveillance data and social media analysis." I understood immediately. Civilian data was generating "military reality." It was reversed. Normally, the military defines reality, and civilians track it. But now, civilian observations were forming part of the military log, and that was being fed back into the military's assessment. At that moment, another alert sounded. "Reference System Reverse Flow Detected" I stared at the screen. Reference system reverse flow. It wasn't just a confusion of information. It meant that the "order in which reality is defined" was reversed. Someone whispered softly. "Interpretation determines the battlefield before the actual situation." No one corrected those words. In fact, everyone was beginning to accept it as fact. I slowly operated my terminal and switched all layers to integrated display. For a moment, the screen flickered with noise. And what appeared wasn't a battle situation. 《Reference Conflict: Critical》 Seeing those words, I felt a chill run down my spine. A war of references. It wasn't weapons fighting. It was the very concept of "what we call reality" that was fighting. And in that war, the concept of a conclusion didn't yet exist.

• 
  Jorge (@ghosy01) reported 18 minutes ago

  @AndreiBtvt They just keep slapping explosive bricks on the t90 . I don’t think anything can fix that tank it just doesn’t work on a modern battlefield

• 
  BUZZ3R (@BUZZ3RX) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Guys FIX THE DAMN CRASH ERROR 0XC0000005

• 
  Eddie McNade (@EddieMcNade) reported 20 minutes ago

  Why do i have to relaunch BF6 like 3 Times before i get a Server thats not 100+ Ping? Top Scores full of 200 Ping players. Half of the Lobby Console Players.... Your Matchmaking sucks. Your Lag Com sucks. The Balance Sucks. Yes the Gunplay is better now. And its way more fun. But actually getting on a Server is pain! Why is it taking you ages to give access to persistent Servers... they ARE in the game! Stop gatekeeping stuff like this for future Roadmaps! I just want to pick a Server and play for hours! Why is this not fixed. DICE PLEASE! Give us Mouse Only Persitent Servers for people that actually want to compete against other Mouseplayers too! Or may i reming you that you promised me a great PORTAL mode, wich actually still does not even have all maps and modes in it! I really love the Patch, but its such a hard sell at this point! I love Battlefield, but its just so frustrating what you did to this great game!

• 
  Bugenhagen (@OtisDri14185268) reported 21 minutes ago

  @CAMIKAZE78 I really hate the state of battlefield ever since the very first update, so much so that I went back to call of duty warzone. Battlefield isn't battlefield at this point, they are trying for a cod/bf hybrid and its just not working (for me). I feel the game will never recover 😒

• 
  KansasArchaeologist (@KSArchaeologist) reported 23 minutes ago

  Two days after the battle a group of soldiers found Comanche near the battlefield. He was badly wounded and he was taken back to Fort Abraham Lincoln and ultimately survived the ordeal. In April 1878 he was retired from service at 21 years old. He was kept at Fort Meade near Sturgis, South Dakota from 1879-1887 when he was returned to Fort Riley in Kansas where he was given the honorary title of “Second Commanding Officer” of the 7th Cavalry. He died on November 7th, 1889 from colic, and is one of only 4 horses in US military history to have a military funeral with full military honors. But he was not buried. Comanche was taken to Professor Lewis Dyche at the University of Kansas in Lawrence and taxidermied to be displayed. In 1893 he was shown at the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago at the Kansas Pavilion with Professor Dyche’s panorama of North American Mammals.

• 
  JEGULILY SPREADER|🍉 (@JegulilyFluff) reported 27 minutes ago

  He was sick and could make him sick, Lily solved the problem by sacrificing herself to be in bed all day with a regulus lost between sleep and consciousness, the bed Looked like a battlefield, sheets just changed To keep regulus clean and comfortable

• 
  EuroCitizen PC Gaming (@EuroCitizenPCG) reported 31 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Hey peeps, Is there any chance you guys could take a look at Battlefront II on PC please as it has a lot of crashing issues especially on Nvidia 5000 series. I'd love to play the single player campaign but everytime I get to the loading screen it just quits.

• 
  N8D (@USN8D) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm BF6 is just a placeholder FPS till something better drops. Game is dead, broken and riddled with third party software in anything competitive. EA/Dice should just hang it up. The last decent thing created was BF3 and 4.

• 
  Dave (@ThoughtEngaged) reported 32 minutes ago

  This last update has killed Battlefield and Redsec. I spent two ******* hours trying to play ranked with the squad tonight. We all took turns getting disconnected, having our games crash and falling through the map and more. I believe it was the final nail in the coffin. RIP.

• 
  Boyishdude (@DisposedZero) reported 33 minutes ago

  @AzraelSch @FreeTalkLive IP isn't protecting DICE from losing money they deserve for their work, it's protecting them from competition. It's allowing them to ship out consistently bad, broken products and still make money off of them because nobody else is allowed to make Battlefield games.

• 
  LewdHub (@LewdLab760) reported 34 minutes ago

  Myrtle | Arknights "Hehe~ Seems like you really like my special service, Doctor~ Then please take care of adjusting my position later~ I want somewhere more relaxing~" "Your only job is generating DP… how much lazier do you wanna be?I didn’t even put you on the battlefield."

• 
  boob inspector (@bygonezbygonz) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your ******* SBMM I’m ******* spawning in to games with ******* players with no ******* thumbs and only captured 1 flag, 5 ******* games in a row and I dropped cod to play BF WTF is this fix this ****, ******* ridiculous I can’t even move out of spawn

• 
  jscmanila (@jscmanila) reported 41 minutes ago

  “Pickett’s Charge” — July 3, 1863 This painting captures General Robert E. Lee’s most costly battlefield decision. Believing the Union center on Cemetery Ridge could be broken, Lee ordered a frontal assault across nearly a mile of open ground. The attack ended in disaster, with devastating Confederate losses. Gettysburg marked the turning point of the American Civil War, ending Lee’s invasion of the North and shifting the momentum decisively to the Union. Lee later accepted full responsibility, telling his men, “It is all my fault.”

• 
  Cooltaha ඞ 🔻💔 (@ohyeahmister2) reported 41 minutes ago

  @InsiderGeo The west is slow to respond and is failing to see the threat for now. The elites are too myopic and focused on internal alliance issues rather than facing the reality on the battlefield

• 
  Jameson Deezious (@JamesonDeezious) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Pseudonymous187 @Fifakill_ The issue is just as bad in any FPS title, grass is always greener till you get there and you're in a ****** swamp. Tried Apex, seemed alright for a few days, SBMM kicks in and that's it. Finals, Battlefield, Destiny, Marathon, CS, even Division ffs. It's all the same ****.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 44 minutes ago

  while still having a doctrinal home. Third John’s doctrinal home is Church Age local church life. It addresses how believers should walk in truth, love in truth, receive faithful brethren, support the Lord’s workers, and resist proud men who hinder the truth. This is why the book is so useful for pastors, teachers, Bible students, and ordinary believers sitting in the pews. Church trouble is not new. Proud men are not new. Slander is not new. Gatekeeping is not new. Casting out faithful people in the name of authority is not new. The Holy Ghost put 3 John in the canon because Church Age believers would need it. The local church is supposed to be a pillar and ground of the truth, according to 1 Timothy 3:15, but whenever truth is present, the devil looks for an entrance. Sometimes he attacks from outside. In 3 John, the trouble is inside the walls. Chapter Two: The Elder Stands Where the Battle Is John calls himself “the elder,” and that is significant because local church battlefields require tested spiritual oversight. The elder is not writing from a throne of religious vanity. He is not acting like a pope, prince, or owner of the saints. He is writing with aged discernment, apostolic truth, and pastoral care. That is the right kind of authority for a church battlefield. The wrong kind of authority wants preeminence. The right kind of authority serves truth. John’s authority strengthens Gaius and exposes Diotrephes. Diotrephes’ influence protects himself and harms the brethren. There is the difference between Bible authority and religious control. An elder who stands where the battle is must be able to identify the real issue. Many church conflicts are deliberately clouded by personalities, rumors, hurt feelings, side conversations, and religious language. Diotrephes could have claimed he was protecting the church. He could have said he was guarding local autonomy. He could have accused the brethren of being outsiders. He could have made Gaius look rebellious for receiving those whom he refused. But John sees through the fog. The real issue is preeminence, malicious words, refusal of faithful brethren, forbidding others, and casting people out. A faithful elder does not let the proud man define the battlefield. That is needed now. The Church Age is full of men who can manage meetings but cannot discern spirits, men who can run programs but cannot smell pride, men who can quote leadership books but cannot handle Diotrephes. John is not that kind of elder. He is not neutral between the faithful and the abusive. He is not confused between charity and compromise. He is not intimidated by the local church boss. When the battlefield appears, the elder stands in truth. That is what church leadership is supposed to do. It is not supposed to protect the institution at all costs. It is supposed to protect truth, brethren, testimony, and the honor of the Lord Jesus Christ. Chapter Three: Fellowship Is a Battlefield Third John shows that fellowship is not a harmless social category. Fellowship is a battlefield because whom you receive and whom you refuse says what truth you are standing with. Gaius receives faithful brethren. Diotrephes refuses them. John commands, “We therefore ought to receive such, that we might be fellowhelpers to the truth.” That word “such” is important. It does not mean receive everybody who owns a religious vocabulary. It means receive those who went forth for His name’s sake and took nothing of the Gentiles. Fellowship in 3 John is not blind hospitality. It is truth-governed charity. Second John and Third John must be read together if a man wants balance. Second John says not to receive the false teacher who brings not the doctrine of Christ. Third John says to receive the faithful brethren who go forth for His name. There is no contradiction. The same Bible that closes the door on heresy opens the door to faithful servants. The same truth that rejects antichrist doctrine

• 
  Tim Koffer (@KofferTim) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Every fkn game is a blow fix this pile of dog ****. How the fk is fun to get blown out multiple games in a row? Its fkn pathetic

• 
  McKeownPlayz (@MckeownPlayz) reported 49 minutes ago

  So @Battlefield apparently changed the gun fire but the damage is worse. •Still no fix for respawns •Still no answer to the god awful matchmaking. The only way to truly fix Battlefield and Ive thought this for years. You have to take DICE completely off the franchise.

• 
  d00k (@_hard_n00b_) reported 49 minutes ago

  @peymanr_farsi @m4h007 The problem is not the route but rather refueling and real-time battlefield maps of radar as sensed by US satellites

• 
  youngharold (@youngharold) reported 51 minutes ago

  @JonathanGuito @GrindeOptions And I don’t doubt millions of robotaxis will be on the road one day. It’s just not going to beat Optimus. The factory near Giga Texas will be complete at the end of 2027. They already have it going up. Optimus is a no-brainer for so many applications, from corporate, retail, personal, and most importantly, the battlefield. Companies will easily spend $ 50k-$100k on a robot to replace tasks humans currently perform. Even if it only replaces 1% of labor tasks, that’s trillions in revenue. Optimus revenue will make robotaxis become what Model Y made Model S look like—rounding error. The $400 stock price already includes robotaxi revenue; otherwise, the stock would trade around $75-$100 on the car business. You have to compare revenue with that of other companies like Nvidia, Facebook, and Google. Retail is not going to pump the price; only big money can. And right now they like printing money on the ups and downs. I like it. I’ve made way more selling options than on the stock itself. Tesla will be a $3,000 stock in the next decade, but not because of robotaxis.

• 
  The Rocket Media (@TheRocketMediaX) reported 54 minutes ago

  Recall the frustration we all feel when Google Maps malfunctions in an unkown city ! Now imagine a drone losing its access to GPS in a battlefield. Consequences can be huge. The problem? GPS communication happens over fixed frequencies that can be jammed with high-power electronic systems. Which is exactly why GPS-denied drone technology is becoming critical globally.

• 
  W (@JAYT1) reported 55 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm You guys the devs should fix the server side rewind penalty for low ping players. High ping players is ruining the experience for everyone that had a great connection... My gameplay are great until someone 60+ ping enters the match.

• 
  TygerSparky (@tygersparky) reported 55 minutes ago

  My take on the recent controversy concerning the Sony Playstation decision to no longer produce discs for their systems starting in 2028. Of course everyone is allowed to hold any opinion they want to on this move. I realize that your current opinion would likely be shaped based on your current buying preferences. But I would say that anyone defending this move or who is complicit and okay with Sony doing this is simply another example of someone focusing on the environment one step in front of them instead of actually looking to the future and seeing the inevitable outcome of this decision. I'll be up front, I have been buying things digitally for years. The last disc-based game I bought was The Witcher 3 on the Xbox One. But for me, that is because I don't look as fondly at modern games as I do games from my childhood. Given that, I still appreciate the option of having a disc copy of the game. If there was a game I absolutely fell in love with today, I would want to own a physical disc version of it. I have about 150 Xbox 360 discs and 125 PS2 discs, not to mention PS1 and Nintendo carts/discs in my current collection. For those like Asmongold and others who actually see no problem with this change, I would point to two past games in the current market to see exactly why having a physical option is absolutely superior. First: Battlefield Bad Company. This game was originally released on the PS3/Xbox 360 less than 20 years ago. However, EA delisted this game from digital storefronts in 2023, just 15 years after release. If you don't have an account that currently owns the game, you can't (legally) play a digital copy of this game. However, you can still go out and find a disc copy of the game and enjoy the awesomeness of that single-player story. Second: GTA San Andreas. If you have an original Xbox disc of GTA:SA from 2005, you can pop it in an Xbox or even an Xbox 360 and actually play the original game, complete with the original soundtrack of the game. If you put that same disc in an Xbox One or Series console, you will instead be forced to play the 2014 remaster mobile port which has updates to the game and the soundtrack. Some people consider this remaster to be an inferior version of the game because of these updates and changes. But thankfully, the original game is preserved on the disc and is still playable on original hardware. Another argument that I have heard is that most games come out with Day One patches. However, having a patch on release day doesn't mean that there isn't a playable version of the game on the disc already. It might have some unintended bugs, but if there is a playable form on the game on the disc, that is obviously infinitely better than not having any form of it available except in digital format where you are, again, at the mercy of the corpo storefronts if they allow you to download a copy of the game (even if you paid for it). And even then, it is still a modified version of the original game. There is absolutely no good argument from a consumer's perspective for a company to stop physical disc production. The benefit is completely and totally for the corporation. They save money, DO NOT pass that savings on to the consumer, and get an even tighter grip of maintaining full rights over the distribution and access of their games and content. They can take away that access at any time and offer their customers no compensation. Sony, and any other company who decides to go this route, absolutely deserves any backlash and revenue drop they get from these decisions. And I hope that their bottom line actually feels the pain of going this route. If I wanted to be discless and have zero options, I would move to PC. At least then I have access to the operating and file systems and can actually backup whatever version of a game I am playing for preservation. Not to mention, I have control over the hardware in it and can get the exact look and play of a game that I want. Convenience and nostalgia are why I continued to play my games on my Xbox. But with these systems becoming even more like just a pre-built PC in a box, they are doing little to nothing to actually give me a reason to continue to invest in their platform. Taking away the physical option is one more nail in their coffin. And don't get me started on this push for cloud-based game streaming. I'm 100% out on that. And a happy July 4th to everyone in the U.S.

• 
  Toñin (@Tonin_eth) reported 58 minutes ago

  🪦 AUTOPSY REPORT #53 A PvP squad battler. Auto-battle meets roguelike meets card game. Mobile-first, cross-platform. Hexagonal cards called Rumblers placed on a battlefield. Daily rumbles, ranked leagues, community clashes, Payday events. Built on Beam. Helsinki-based studio. Founded in 2022. A team of mobile gaming veterans who believed "players deserve better: better designs, better support, and better fun." That wasn't marketing. They actually tried to build it. $3.3 million raised. Play Ventures, Liquid X, Lizard Labs, Avalanche. Merit Circle as strategic partner. Free-mint Flameys NFT collection. Open alpha running since July 2023. Community tournaments, competitive seasons, Play & Earn campaigns with real rewards. For nearly four years, this team shipped. Updated. Ran events. Engaged with the community. Iterated on gameplay. Tested multiple directions. This wasn't a ghost project. This wasn't a whitepaper studio. The game existed. People played it. The team showed up every day. And here's the problem that killed it. The same problem that has killed most projects in this series: "Building and running the game cost many times more than the game brought in." They invested heavily believing they could close the gap between costs and revenue. The gap didn't close. The numbers didn't put them on a trajectory that justified continuing. And "alternative options were not realistic or added even more complications." June 16, 2026: Play & Earn activities stopped. Players encouraged to submit withdrawal requests. July 4, 2026: the full announcement. Studio winding down. Game sunsetting. Servers off end of July. And then the word nobody wants to hear: insolvency. "Tribo Games will very soon enter the official insolvency process, which limits how we can handle any outstanding claims and payments. Unfortunately, this means no further withdrawal requests, buybacks or compensations can be processed." The community is not happy. And you can understand why. People who earned rewards through months of Play & Earn events, who competed in seasons, who held Flameys NFTs, who believed in the mission... are now told the legal process prevents any further payouts. The shop is disabled. The economy is frozen. Whatever you didn't withdraw in time is likely gone. "We wish we'd had more freedom to communicate on this and more options to avoid this outcome." That sentence says a lot. It suggests the insolvency process was already in motion when they could no longer speak freely. Legal constraints. NDA territory. The kind of silence that isn't a choice but a requirement. This is not a rug. This is a team that built a real game, ran it for years, and ran out of money trying to make the economics work. The farewell letter reads like people who are genuinely hurt by the outcome. But intent doesn't change impact. Players who trusted the project, who earned rewards, who were told to withdraw "in the next couple of weeks," and then days later told withdrawals were frozen... those players have every right to be angry. Good intentions don't pay bills. $3.3 million. Four years. A real team. A real game. A real community. And a word that reduces all of it to a legal filing: insolvency. Which game is this?