Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (37%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (13%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Americana	Glitches	3 days ago
Rennes	Game Crash	4 days ago
Nantes	Glitches	8 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	9 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	9 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	11 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Katherine (@stellarlumi) reported 8 seconds ago

  @DylanMalyasov The real bet here is GRAND out of MIT; rather than building a decoder per standard, it models the noise and guesses the original signal regardless of which error correction code was used. If that scales to real battlefield conditions, it’s a genuine paradigm shift in comms

• 
  Cow007 #🟦☦️ (@cow007) reported 18 seconds ago

  @ArchmagosKiran @HavryshkoMarta Because the other problem with this is there’s no way to win a ground war with an information war. You can’t meme your way out of an inferior structural position on the battlefield. So this reads a lot more like jacking off in front of people for social approval than it does actually doing anything. I know that metaphor reads as a little bit coarse, but how is this any different from what people do on only fans? (other than the fact that it doesn’t generate any revenue.) Has it occurred to you that if you are this emphatic about this position that your time might be better spent on the front lines?

• 
  Minerva (@Pol_Pot_Pet_Owl) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Grass_Wonder_SK @KongShenYiren @miren_41319 When you're a hammer every problem becomes a nail. Mao was a hammer. He never left the battlefield.

• 
  AcklesTV (@AcklesTTV) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Can yall stop celebrating **** and actually fix the game? Redsec has so many glitches, the games hit reg is dog ****, like come on guys

• 
  Sayber_31 (@Sayber_31) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @CAMIKAZE78 That cryo barrel better be expensive when it comes to mod cost or the laser accurate guns are going to be an even bigger issue.

• 
  XcentricXennial (@XcentricXennial) reported 12 minutes ago

  @ChrisMeiller So, what started as an unforced error became a cognitive dissonant ego-defense tailspin that had you fuming enough to try to find another battlefield on which you COULD win...then failed miserably there when you had it pointed out to you that strong, self-sufficient men aren't supposed to behave like the unhinged Twitter cat ladies in vagina hats that do that sort of thing all the time.

• 
  Chikhi Cato (@KatoHus56872326) reported 13 minutes ago

  Here is the uncomfortable arithmetic of a human life. You have, if you are lucky, perhaps thirty thousand days. You have already spent a significant portion of them. On some of those days, you encountered information that required a response from you. Information about what was being done in your name, with your money, with your tacit consent, to people who had no voice in the matter. On those days, you had a choice. The choice was not dramatic. It was not a battlefield moment. It was small and daily and private. Do I let this change me? Do I let this cost me something? Do I accept that knowing requires responding, that understanding requires acting, that a person who sees and does nothing has made a decision just as much as a person who sees and does something? Or do I file it away, under complicated, under what can I do, under I have my own problems, and return to the life that the information, fully absorbed, would have made impossible to live the same way? Every day you make that choice. You are making it right now. The days are not coming back.

• 
  Chiji (@Elcj18) reported 18 minutes ago

  @jrnaib2 You idiots and your brother Buhari with his service chiefs turned the whole SE to a battlefield just to proscribe IPOB, since he left office SE has been very peaceful but your brothers according to NSA chairman are ravaging Nigeria forest terrorizing people at Will.

• 
  Enlightened Rebel 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 (@Enlitend_Rebel) reported 18 minutes ago

  @RTRRC88 Ok, so this sounds ****** as ****. Its a technology they can use to beam a voice over extremely long distances, it sounds like voices in your head. Hear me out here, there are actual ****** crazy people who have mental illness that believe this happens to them. I am not one of those. Ive been targeted for years now, and its nothing like what the crazy people who get all the attention describe. Ive had a guy walk up to me when I was in DC, never seen him before. He asked to stand next to me while i was sitting on a wall. I was like "sure." He wasnt with anyone. Out of nowhere he just goes "my teeth are cutting into my gums." Im sitting there, at the time I had broken teeth... Its just bizzare as ****, ok. I've also had people blurt out absurdly personal things about me. As if their minds were hijacked. It sounds like a bunch of bullshit. Many years ago the US military had been studying voice to skull technology to use in the battlefield. Its been around for a long time. Theyve also experimented with actually hijacking people's heads and making them do and say things outside of their control. If i hadn't personally witnessed these things, I would think its just totally ******* nuts. I've seen and experienced a lot more than most people though. Now they have nanotechnology that can non-invasively enter the human body, they claim its for medical science. That's slightly bullshit. People are unaware of how advanced their nanotech really is. Theyre always 10 or more years ahead in the technology they let us in on.

• 
  Hung (@HHungduc) reported 18 minutes ago

  @WarHunter2222 Ukraine no longer has time to train female recruits for battlefield service.

• 
  Iam Thee (she/it) (@RainbowNailGal) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Bf 2042 is a forewarning of what "live service" is. Release a half *** game, you build "with the community" then after it's perfect, abandon it for the next title and don't support past titles whatsoever. At this point give me a new season in 2042 I'm over BF6

• 
  Matthew Bromwell (@Quicksilvergoat) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Can you not fix REDSEC so I don’t get blinded? It’s been broken for weeks. This is @CallofDuty level nonsense.

• 
  Michael Salehi (@mickeyrshaw) reported 26 minutes ago

  “There’s a whole in daddy’s arm where all the money goes”. For generations now, America’s brave poor men have volunteered as canon fodder in service of international oligarchs and Zionist neo-cons. Sometimes I think the luckiest ones laid it all down on the battlefield.

• 
  MoMo (@Mo_problems3) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your game

• 
  Mr. Margheritiiii (@GetCheatz) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Battlefield a bunch of amateurs can't add server browser and region selection to the game, which was in every Battlefield since its release except BF 2042 🤡 Since the beta they haven't fix the netcode and they fcked up recoil 🤡

• 
  U.S.A.I. 🇺🇸 (@researchUSAI) reported 32 minutes ago

  🇮🇱 The First Order Consequence: The Israel Defense Forces struck a LAF vehicle after indicating Hezbollah activity in the area, which immediately raised the risk of LAF-identified security exposure and retaliation toward Israel, potentially reducing Israel’s operational freedom in Lebanon while increasing friction with Lebanese authorities. The primary unknown is whether the strike caused additional casualties beyond the reported deaths of 2 officers and a soldier 🇮🇱 The Second Order Consequence: Lebanon’s response Slamming Israel for killing 2 officers and a soldier Likely will increase diplomatic pressure, complicate any future Israeli coordination with Lebanese institutions, and raise the probability of further incidents involving LAF assets. A secondary unknown is whether Hezbollah’s local activity will prompt additional IDF strikes that could further involve LAF vehicles, escalating the spiral 🇮🇱 Discernment: Past evidence in similar cross-border incidents suggests that when IDF strikes are alleged to have hit LAF-linked assets, Lebanese statements commonly harden quickly and demand investigations, which can reduce short-term cooperation and increase monitoring of Israeli operations by Lebanese security. The key unknown is whether Lebanon’s “slams Israel” language is paired with specific evidence, such as vehicle registration details, time stamps, or locations that can be verified 🇮🇱 Reasoning: The IDF’s rationale Striking after an “indication of Hezbollah activity” Supports a claim of targeted threat detection, but it also implies a heightened likelihood of mistaken identification or battlefield proximity errors when Hezbollah activity occurs near LAF movements. Because the reporting ties the incident to deaths of 2 officers and a soldier, the immediacy of the stated casualties strengthens Lebanon’s justification for escalation, increasing the chance Israel’s next moves will be scrutinized and constrained 🇮🇱 Judgement: Israel’s near-term growth potential Measured as freedom to conduct operations with limited diplomatic cost Appears likely to decline if the LAF deaths are confirmed as stemming from the strike on the LAF vehicle. Lebanon’s diplomatic backlash and possible demands for accountability increase the likelihood of sustained friction, which could indirectly constrain Israel’s operational effectiveness and heighten the risk of further clashes

• 
  Trollofduty007 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏳️‍🌈 (@trollofduty007) reported 35 minutes ago

  @SirSnipeyy I need a Star Wars hero shooter where Chopper causes a Star Destroyer to crash onto the battlefield and wipe everyone out

• 
  HEX Famous (@Hex_Famous) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix ur blinding light glitch u sorry pieces of ****

• 
  x (@taylo65687) reported 41 minutes ago

  @sadieshinigami @Battlefield This game is so ******* broken. Just revert it to the ******* BETA. Everyone is walking away from this game and they don't even ******* care because they've already been paid.

• 
  🗽 (@TheGreatDXA) reported 43 minutes ago

  @luv_snakessss_ @Swollentwt Americans didn't lose either by the way, they dominated on the battlefield, they just didn't invade the north that was constantly attacking them, which they could've, and I denounce every war criminal, the problem is you see every soldier as a war criminal bc ur a retarded loser

• 
  Jhood (@Jhoodlet) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I am getting black screens on your game for a month now, my entire pc resetting. I have everything up to date, I run a 4090 / 13900k and everything else runs just fine but I crash nearly every game and black screen once every couple of hours. Any known bugs that would be causing this? This has only happened in the latest season of the game

• 
  Blimp (@BenLP9) reported 46 minutes ago

  @PaulieBelfast @United24media @iEndure_4evr Ukraine is still flying jets.l - they certainly have a place. And Gripen is a flying radar and EW suite that will help inform the battlefield. +meteor AA is electronically "silent" and has huge range - would really help reduce FABs which continue to be a problem

• 
  ustonymc (@ustonymc) reported 48 minutes ago

  "Blazing Inferno" OMAHA BEACH June 6 1944 It took General Gerow's V Corps spearheads 3 hours to reach Omaha Beaches, and by then, most of the men had thrown up their breakfasts, all were drenched, and many were seasick, covered in puke and caked with salt. Gerow's soldiers were boated in darkness 12 miles from the beach, rather than 7 like the British. Even 7 was quite a distance for troops in LCVP's to travel, especially in choppy 10 knot seas off Omaha. But 12 in rough waters was a serious error of judgement. Omaha Beach gave a dreadful and deadly demonstration of Murpty's Law; all that can go wrong, will go wrong, at the wrong time. * In this sector, American bombers fearing to hit their own craft and troops had delayed their drop until the bombs crashed uselessly behind German defenders. * Here Rommel stationed the 352 Division, one of his finest. * Here too, the Germans held the strongest natural positions facing the entire Overlord assault; hills and cliffs rising steeply up to up to 200 feet from the beach and seawall above it. At Omaha was the largest concentration of enemy fire on the 60-mile invasion front. * Gerow loaded down his men with 90 pounds of gear. Even the best conditioned athletes in the world couldn't go careening around the battlefield for hours so encumbered. * Attempts to land artillery was a disaster, losing 26 guns. * 32 tanks were launched in heavy seas 3 1/2 miles out. Five reached the beach, and 27 sank like stones, drowning most of the crews. * Without tanks to take enemy fortifications under fire, the infantry had to storm the beaches themselves, flesh against fire. When the 5 tanks did arrive, they came behind, not in front of the 8 spearhead companies-1,450 soldiers in 36 landing craft. Heavy machine gun and mortar fire greeted these men as the waded ashore, many were wounded before they could reach dry land and had to struggle painfully up the beach heading for protection of the seawall. A wall of wrecked vehicles built up so quickly on the beach, soldiers were taking cover from scything German fire. One of them a soldier with a flamethrower took a direct hit to his fuel tank. The explosion catapulted his dying body into the sea and set a vessel on fire. A company of 270 specially trained demolition men followed the infantry ashore planning to blow up the boat obstacles before the tide covered them so that the following waves of 25,000 men and 4,000 vehicles might have an unimpeded path ashore, but German gunfire killed or wounded nearly half of them. Among the infantry huddled beneath the seawall or strewn among the debris, collapse of command followed quickly upon the destruction of communications HQ, which took a direct hit. Too many of the American Jr officers on Omaha that morning had been paralyzed by that same immobilizing dread that had come over their men. Offshore aboard the cruiser Augusta, Omar Bradley had his binoculars trained on Omaha Beach. The 1st Army commander anxiety deepened upon receipt of fragmentary reports suggesting disaster at Omaha. He was shocked at the loss of 27 tanks and 26 artillery guns lost. When V Corps reported at noon the situation, "still critical." Bradley considered diverting follow up forces to other sectors. Bradley realized that all depended on "that thin wet line of Khaki" that had struggled ashore and was so desperately clinging to its precious hold. Although the German defenders at Omaha possessed the power to impede or disorganize the American advance, they were neither numerous or strong enough to halt or destroy it. Throughout the battle they fought a static defensive fight. So, when the Americans gained ground or seized a toehold, they held it. The Germans never attempted to retake it. Like pieces being slowly fitted into a jigsaw puzzle, the Americans slowly expanded their hold. They were now fighting better and with more skill and better judgement. Now the battle experience of the 1st Infantry Division on the left began to have its effect. Small groups of soldiers from the "Big Red One" had begun to advance up the narrow valleys mounting local attacks against the Germans in their pillboxes and communication trenches. They fought their way onto high ground and began to hammer the Germans on their flanks. By their valor and rising momentum, they gave encouragement to the inexperienced and all but paralyzed 29th Infantry Division on their right. When General Norman "Dutch" Cota arrived on Omaha with his 29th Infantry command group he found chaos and paralysis. Cota moved among his dazed troops coming upon a group of pinned down Rangers, he asked who they were. "Rangers" came the reply. "Then goddamnit if you're Rangers, get up and lead the way!" Stung, they leaped ***** and began blasting paths through the German wire with bangalor torpedoes. The road at the top of the cliff was reached and the Americans had gotten behind some of the Germans strongest positions killing the enemy or taking him prisoner. When Cota found another group of Rangers apparently pinned down, he deliberately walked ahead of them to show there was no enemy fire. There was, but it didn't kill Cota. And because the Americans had such men-soldiers who didn't point the way but cried, "Follow me!" the near disaster that had been Omaha had been reversed. At 1:30 pm a vastly relieved Omar Bradley read Gerow's message, "Troops formally pinned down on beaches Easy Red, Easy Green, Fox Red advancing up heights beyond beaches." By nightfall the Americans controlled and area a mile deep beyond Omaha where the highest casualties occurred, 2,000-2,400 Americans were killed, wounded or missing.

• 
  xSAHALx (@xSAHALx) reported 51 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Pls fix the net code

• 
  Mau Ortega (@AngelMOV25) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Battlefield And will the problem with the green notification dots not disappearing be fixed?

• 
  Paul Johnson (@LonelyDragon84) reported 53 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Redsec light glitch???? It's sometimes unplayable

• 
  VanQish (@VanQish7) reported 57 minutes ago

  The signal is not “Thunes is growing.” The signal is that the global payments industry is openly documenting the exact problems that $XRP, $RLUSD, stablecoins, tokenization, and interoperable settlement networks are designed to solve. The Most Important Takeaway The report repeatedly uses the word interoperability as the defining challenge of the next generation financial system. Their conclusion: The world now has too many payment systems. The problem is no longer creating payment rails. The problem is making all rails communicate with each other. Winners will be the networks that bridge traditional and emerging payment rails. That should immediately make XRP holders pay attention because Ripple has been saying exactly this for years. Stablecoins Are Not Replacing Banks This is probably the most important section for crypto investors. Thunes specifically states that stablecoins are emerging as a middle-leg settlement layer for cross-border payments. Translation: They are not talking about replacing banks. They are talking about: Customer → Bank/Wallet → Stablecoin Settlement Layer → Bank/Wallet → Customer The report says stablecoins have: Near-instant settlement Negligible on-chain cost Massive efficiency benefits BUT… The biggest problem remains: On/Off ramps. Converting stablecoins into local bank accounts, wallets, cards, and cash remains difficult. This is exactly where Ripple, RLUSD, XRP, and similar liquidity networks become relevant. XRP Investors Should Notice One Sentence The report states: Stablecoins are unlikely to displace existing systems and will instead operate as a settlement layer embedded within traditional money transfer operators. That is enormous. Many crypto investors still believe: “Crypto replaces banks.” The actual institutional thesis is: “Crypto upgrades bank infrastructure.” Those are two very different outcomes. Mobile Wallets Just Passed Banks Another huge finding: Consumers now prefer: Mobile wallets Payment apps Digital experiences over traditional bank interfaces for initiating cross-border payments. Banks are becoming: Funding sources Settlement providers Back-end infrastructure while wallets become the front-end experience. This fits directly with: RLUSD Ripple Payments Stablecoin settlement Open banking Tokenized deposits Speed Matters More Than Fees This surprised me. 50% of users ranked instant transfers as the most important feature. Only 13% ranked low fees first. Institutional takeaway: People would rather: Pay slightly more Receive money instantly than: Save a little money Wait several days This favors: Real-time settlement XRP liquidity Stablecoin settlement Tokenized payment networks The Report Quietly Attacks Correspondent Banking Read between the lines. They identify: Legacy systems Multiple intermediaries Lack of interoperability Delayed settlement Hidden fees as major causes of friction. Then they describe blockchain settlement as: Instant Lower cost Reduced dependency on correspondent banking relationships. That is effectively the same value proposition Ripple has been selling to banks for over a decade. Why This Matters To XRP Specifically The report never says: “Use XRP.” But it does describe the exact future state XRP was built for: Layer 1 Banks Layer 2 Wallets Layer 3 Stablecoins Layer 4 Interoperability Network Layer 5 Cross-border Liquidity The missing piece is the neutral bridge asset/liquidity engine. That is where XRP competes. The Real Institutional Narrative Most retail investors are still asking: “Will banks use XRP?” The better question now is: “How will thousands of payment systems, wallets, stablecoins, CBDCs, banks, fintechs, and tokenized assets interoperate?” This report says interoperability is becoming the defining challenge of global finance. That is exactly the battlefield Ripple has positioned itself for. @ThunesPayments

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 57 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Audio still awful. RPGs have been broken since the speed nerf. Red sec is still **** run by sniper rats and the light glitch makes it unplayable. Go from 500 matches in seasons 1 and 2. Only to play 3 matches so far in season 3. **** off with ranked wasting everyone's time

• 
  Champers (@xXChampersXx) reported 57 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Please fix the shocking packet loss

• 
  Flamecycle (@flamecycle) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Brick_Suit Exactly. I own a home, so it's just assumed that I'm going to do what needs to be done to upkeep it. I can stay on top of it and make small repairs, or I can neglect it and have to do battlefield maintenance. By the same token, the government already owns this. It's been neglected, so the government just did battlefield maintenance to fix it right.