Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
La Trinité	Game Crash	3 days ago
Lyon	Online Play	4 days ago
Persan	Sign in	5 days ago
Metz	Sign in	5 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	5 days ago
Aubais	Online Play	8 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Alan.M (@ElSky_) reported 20 seconds ago

  @BattlefieldComm So you're saying that if there aren't enough players, it's because there are too many modes? You guys are absolute morons, seriously. Fix your game before deleting modes—like Strikepoint, which got a fix on June 30th and then nothing else happened.

• 
  Chris Gill (@ATasteOfZen) reported 29 seconds ago

  @BattlefieldComm Spending half our playtime backing out to the lobby because the game refuses to take our whole squad in is getting tedious, 9 months in. Still pleading for this issue to be fixed.

• 
  Nev Rhea (@NevRhea) reported 8 minutes ago

  @RollingHedge This snippet of his latest drop, despite being in the section of the interview with Pete Blaber, is applicable to anything, even the Farage inner circus itself: 《[...]It’s this disconnected chain of command … trying to make decisions and solve problems and then injecting those decisions and those solutions into the battlefield. And guys who can see everything, hear everything, know what the right thing to do [i.e those on the ground] — are, you know, nothing more than gnomes who have to obey these mindless orders from the starship.[...]》

• 
  Matthew Harrison △ (@matt96h) reported 10 minutes ago

  @AntonHand @MrTophat2254 You're confusing different things. The counter to small fpv drones is DEW like CLaWS or HELWS, or EW jamming. Then there's the larger long range OWA drones like shahed or Geran, these can be intercepted by small drone interceptors like Anvil or skyraider, or low cost missiles likes APKWS ($35k). Nothing here costs 200k+ The issue is volume and adoption of these systems on the battlefield.

• 
  The Psycho Analyst (@TheRealBirnbaum) reported 11 minutes ago

  $PLTR FCF run rate just about to hit $5B. Everyone who called this “dangerously” overvalued, or that it would trade sideways for or crash within the next five to ten years, or that it couldn’t sustain its growth was speaking from a place of total ignorance about the company. They instead depended on generalized mean reversion that had zero relevance to world-class businesses. At 50% sustained growth $PLTR should trade at at least 100X FCF. This would only be fair value. If sentiment gets ahead of itself we could see 200X. I told you $PLTR is a trillion dollar business and could one day be the biggest company in the world. Everyone said I was crazy. Meanwhile, $PLTR is monopolizing the data layer in an age where data is quite literally the most valuable resource. Whether we’ve reached AGI is debatable. Whether optimizing AI requires data is not. You can think of $PLTR as the CUDA of digital twins. Their lead is far too big to be overtaken. Microsoft dominates enterprise with a basic OS. $PLTR is building the OS for 21st century enterprise, and even fewer understand this than those who understood Microsoft’s dominance in 1995. You simply cannot run a large enterprise without $PLTR and expect to compete. You will lose to the competitor who can literally see the battlefield as if it were a recipe for a BLT.

• 
  JynErso 🇸🇰 🇳🇴 🇪🇺 (@Jynerso0307) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm A lot of micro freezing after last update. Just fix it guys

• 
  Pepe and the Bandits (@jozefthemad) reported 21 minutes ago

  @NoLongerTheFuzz Me too Donnaz immist confess though...... I remember The morning history changed on the battlefield, I was there. Dawn had barely broken when I stepped into the freezing streets, unaware that within hours my name would be whispered alongside men who would become legends. Smoke hung above the city, bells echoed through the narrow streets, and somewhere in the distance the first shots cracked across the morning. I didn't hesitate. I carried messages through the chaos, pulled a wounded man from beneath the rubble, and stood where others had turned away. By nightfall, the impossible had been achieved. Years later, historians would argue over who changed the course of that day, but I lied I told them it wasn't me! Jason Arday I said is the man you need to speak with he is the true Hero amongst men.

• 
  Sarming 🇸🇻 (@Duck_Sou) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE ******* NETCODE. *************

• 
  KontrolStyle (@KontrolStyleTV) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix something, let's break 10 other things. Gl with the game, server browser may not save this game after all.

• 
  👑GaSamove🌐⃤ (@gasamove) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Uniting_ps @Battlefield "Known Issues" 🤬

• 
  Isaiah 🇮🇱🇺🇲 (@brotherstrikebs) reported 26 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm That's cool guys but...what about reconnecting to a redsec and redsec ranked match after a crash?

• 
  Resident of Little Britain (@Andrew70265613) reported 27 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Me and my friends played rush regularly and never had any match making issues. Insane to delete that. We’re done.

• 
  LtMcGuganfps (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The single BEST thing y'all could do is to stop forcing crossplay 10s of thousands of us will not play with crossplay on Crossplay destroys the experience. From great fun to garbage with the flip of that switch Ping from 38 to 100 Constant light glitches Constant lag issue

• 
  Joshua Ayomide (@JoshuaAyom55496) reported 30 minutes ago

  The kitchen has officially become Biggie's unofficial battlefield. 😭🍳 Every small issue somehow starts there. #BBNaija

• 
  Yen- Ting (@YenTing39) reported 30 minutes ago

  The drill focused on a real battlefield problem: getting forces into position quickly before an enemy can act.

• 
  StockIncubator (@stockincubator) reported 30 minutes ago

  The war in Ukraine exposed a critical vulnerability in the U.S. defense industrial base: we simply do not have the manufacturing capacity for sustained attritional warfare. Our legacy munitions stockpiles were rapidly depleted, and the cost exchange ratio is fundamentally broken. We cannot survive a near-peer conflict by firing multi-million dollar missiles to shoot down cheap drones. The legacy primes can't scale fast enough. We need the neo-defense tech ecosystem: • Anduril: Hyperscale autonomous manufacturing to rapidly rebuild America's munitions stockpile. • Shield AI: Autonomous software stacks and AI pilots to neutralize drone swarms and operate in contested EW environments. • Palantir: The AI-driven data layer for faster battlefield decision-making and supply chain integration. Software and scalable manufacturing will win the next era of conflict. 🇺🇸 #americafirst

• 
  taylor ✨ (@padataytay) reported 31 minutes ago

  At this point, spntwt is not a family, it’s a battlefield. And it’s the dumbest ******* war. Some of y’all are so delusional as to believe this is the most pressing issue at hand when it’s really not that serious. Go out and touch grass, I beg you.

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 32 minutes ago

  Fix the ******* ballistic walls. They never place quick enough, let alone consistently on uneven ground. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  Sunny Ray (@sunnyray) reported 34 minutes ago

  the first ai heist in bitcoin just made bitcoin stronger last week an attacker drained over $100 million in bitcoin from thousands of coldcard hardware wallets. nobody was phished. no device was stolen. no cryptography was broken. a five year old bug in the firmware told the device to skip its hardware randomness chip.... and use a predictable software substitute instead. that made seed phrases guessable. searchable. offline. here's the part everyone is missing. the bug sat in open source code for five years. thousands of human eyes passed over it. then someone pointed an ai at the codebase.... and found the needle in the haystack. coinkite even admitted they ran one of the best ai models over their own code a few weeks earlier. it found nothing. the attacker's ai did. and after the hack? someone asked claude to review the same code. it found the flaw in eight minutes. you're watching an arms race begin in real time. think about what that stolen bitcoin actually is. it's a bounty. a nine figure advertisement telling every hacker on earth that ai plus open source code equals payday. right now they're pointing models at every wallet, every exchange, every piece of bitcoin infrastructure that exists. sounds terrifying, right? flip it. the defenders have the same models. every bitcoin company on the planet just got the loudest wake up call in the industry's history. continuous ai audits are becoming table stakes. red teams that never sleep, scanning code around the clock, patching before attackers strike. this is an immune system activating. bitcoin gets attacked first because bitcoin is worth attacking. it's pure digital capital.... the highest value, most liquid prize on the internet. that's not a weakness. that's the reason bitcoin's security evolves faster than anything else. your bank runs on code too. so does your power grid, your hospital, your government. they just haven't been stress tested by the smartest adversaries on earth yet. bitcoin is the canary, the proving ground, the foreshadow of what's coming for every system that holds value. and the lessons are already compounding. multisig across multiple devices. dice rolls for entropy. verify, don't trust.... even your hardware. the protocol itself never blinked. not one satoshi moved without a valid signature. every attack that doesn't kill bitcoin becomes part of its immune memory. sixteen years of this. every scar a lesson, every breach a stronger antibody. the ai wars have begun and bitcoin is the first battlefield. the systems forged here will protect everything else later. so the question isn't whether ai makes bitcoin less safe. it's this.... when the machines come for the rest of the financial system, which network will have already survived them?

• 
  DemizeFPS (@DemizeFPS) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Pulling players from others regions with high ping doesn't improve match quaility lag polarization needs to be tune where players high ping cant force deysnc or heavily favor for compensation.

• 
  TSS houses 🥷🟢🟡 ➡ RQ Barcelona (@housesarebig) reported 37 minutes ago

  @SonRebell moving something into a battlefield probably makes it more broken than that other card

• 
  Anjan Dukh Bhanjan (@YehLoKalloBaat) reported 37 minutes ago

  @VarunKrRana But atleast you morons are talking about it. Till yesterday there was no issue at all but the moment RG talked about it you all sanghi chomus have come to the battlefield to defend the fraud govt

• 
  Warlord (@MarkU27717) reported 39 minutes ago

  @ATipplingPhilo @AMK_Mapping_ AMK is the problem because you don’t like his tone. But the guy who only reports 40% of the battlefield advances is fine? Haha alright

• 
  medoyid_ua (@LetsArmUKR) reported 39 minutes ago

  @yasminalombaert Miroshnik just admitted what actually bothers the Kremlin: Ukrainian drones are working, and the only real fix is to choke off the money keeping Ukraine going. That is a confession, not a legal argument: moscovia cannot win on the battlefield.

• 
  🏳️‍🌈DedSec Official🏳️‍⚧️ (@DedSecOfficial3) reported 40 minutes ago

  @RappyGrinder @Pirat_Nation Are you forgetting about Battlefield 6? The game did amazing at still the devs got laid off just so the CEO could get a bonus. The problem is the devs or the story, it's the corporate greed.

• 
  Sagzee (@IAmSagzee) reported 42 minutes ago

  A retired general slides a map across the wooden table, pointing directly at the target coordinates in Iran. He says that if the goal is stopping a threat, a single nuclear strike erases the facility in five seconds and ends the problem. The economist across from him doesn't look at the map. She turns her laptop screen toward him, showing a live tick of global bond markets. She asks him what he thinks happens six minutes after the detonation. The general predicts an immediate response. He says Iran fires every conventional missile it has left, targets foreign bases, and tries to close the Strait of Hormuz. He claims military defenses handle that, and within a week, the military situation settles under absolute dominance. She shakes her head and points to a line graph on her monitor. She tells him he's fighting the physical battle while ignoring the mechanism holding the country together. She explains that the superpower doesn't exist because of its bombs. It exists because it created a world where other countries decided they didn't need their own bombs, and where everyone agreed to trade using one single currency. A quiet monitor on the wall flashes a sudden red alert as a simulated detonation registers. The physical strike succeeds instantly. The target vanishes. But then the data stream begins shifting in ways the wargame didn't plan for. Within hours of an offensive nuclear strike on a nonnuclear state, the 80 year old rule that prevented atomic warfare shatters permanently. The economist asks him what a nation like South Korea, Japan, Turkey, or Saudi Arabia does the moment they see that security treaties and conventional forces can't protect anyone from nuclear action. They don't wait for permission. They build their own nuclear weapons immediately. The general shifts in his seat as the simulation updates. He points out that nuclear proliferation takes time. She replies that the financial collapse doesn't wait. A country that uses nuclear weapons offensively becomes an instant global outcast. European allies instantly cut military ties to protect their own populations from nuclear entanglement. Global central banks, holding trillions in debt, realize that a government willing to drop a nuclear bomb is no longer a stable anchor for the world economy. They dump US dollars instantly to buy gold and tangible commodities. The monitor shows the dollar dropping 40% in two days. Inflation spikes overnight. Gas prices quadruple as shipping lines refuse to enter the Persian Gulf, blocking 20% of the world oil supply. The general stares at the collapsing financial numbers on the screen. He realizes the physical weapon didn't just destroy the target in Iran. It destroyed the invisible trust that allowed 300 million people to import food, fuel, and electronics using paper currency. The economist closes her laptop. She notes that reality doesn't care about tactical success on a battlefield. When a system breaks the single rule that keeps its global network intact, the network disconnects. The nation doesn't collapse because an opponent beat it in battle. It collapses because it destroyed the global stability that allowed it to exist. If the US drops a nuke on Iran, it will not only have lost; it will have completely destroyed itself.

• 
  murray flewelling (@artbaron1) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Maks_NAFO_FELLA Many pro Rus tried to convince me last yr that "attrition" favored them, when it was a clear math problem that was going to crush Rus...Exponential drone growth in numbers /power vs Rus that was already stalled on the battlefield. The worst part is, ballistic mis are coming soon

• 
  PurpleKoolAidMan (@prplekoolaidman) reported 49 minutes ago

  @MrProWestie I think the issue is that Battlefield relies on microtransactions, which tie in to the game's assignments and live service progression. If the devs allow a server browser, a significant amount of the playerbase is just in 24/7 metro servers and never interact with that system.

• 
  Miah (@miahfuta) reported 56 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix Mouse Sensitivity. **** just randomly increases mid game for no reason, then will reset back to what it was again for no reason. **** is ******* gay as ****, your devs need to stop using AI, because clearly you guys don't know how to review the changes before accepting them.

• 
  War Alerts (@WarNewsGlobal) reported 56 minutes ago

  @sentdefender A decoy drone carrying explosives? That sounds less like a simple navigation error and more like a messy battlefield problem.