Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (38%)
• Online Play (30%)
• Glitches (15%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Val-de-Reuil	Online Play	20 hours ago
Bouchain	Glitches	1 day ago
Bordeaux	Matchmaking	2 days ago
Málaga	Sign in	3 days ago
Montaulin	Online Play	3 days ago
Paris	Sign in	5 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ÇapulcuDreyfus (@capulcudreyfus) reported 59 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Crad crash crash why dont fixed

• 
  Trans-Inclusive Misogynist (@DeleteTheNats) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Rust_Belt_Red @KarnesMellagio It's more that some westerners used to the USA solving all of its problems with air power are unable to conceive of a battlefield where both sides have a competent and sophisticated air defense so you can't just strafe every enemy with A-10s.

• 
  Mister Wrecked (@Mister_Wrecked) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Noah38922661178 @KySmith12345 @Battlefield Why would I play COD or Fornite? COD has the exact same issue, and Fortnite isn't about unlocking cosmetics so much as buying them. You seem to be missing the point entirely.

• 
  MY OPINION (@SaffronAgni) reported 9 minutes ago

  Courage without Brains is like an Intoxicated Person sent to a Battlefield where he will kill many but he cannot Win the War. Yes Israel has serious Problems with Iran but the Moment US entered the war and Pakistan Double Crossing both Iran and US it was apparent that 1/2

• 
  Dr. 𝕁𝕒𝕜𝕖 MD 🥼 (@JakeDoesMemes) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Good map, fix usual issues please

• 
  NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BRICSinfo But aren't Iran essentially fighting 2 countries? So what's the issue? They're just evening the battlefield right? Or am I missing something...

• 
  Dr. M.F. Khan (@Dr_TheHistories) reported 16 minutes ago

  The knight came off his horse hard, plate armor ringing against the dirt. He was still alive. That was the problem the man standing over him had to solve, quickly, before the knight got back to his feet. The morning star wasn't the clumsy peasant club of movie sets. It was a purpose-built tool, and by the 15th century it had a specific job: kill men wearing the best armor money could buy. The design is brutal in its logic. A short wooden haft, usually two to three feet long, topped with a heavy head studded with iron spikes and a longer central spike at the tip. The whole thing weighed several pounds, and every ounce of that weight sat at the business end. Swords were mostly useless against full plate. A good harness would turn a cutting edge, and thrusts had to find the small gaps at the armpit, groin, or visor. A trained man in expensive steel was, for all practical purposes, a walking fortress. The morning star didn't need to cut. It needed to transfer force. A solid strike to a helmet delivered enough concussive shock to drop a man even if the metal held. The spikes concentrated that force into small points, punching through weaker plate and mail entirely. Against joints, faceplates, or a man already on the ground, the effect was catastrophic. It was used by professional soldiers, foot troops, and mounted men. Swiss infantry carried them. German Landsknechte carried them. Bohemian fighters in the Hussite Wars used related weapons to devastating effect against armored knights who had assumed peasants couldn't touch them. The name itself gets confused. "Morning star" (Morgenstern in German) refers to the spiked head. It's often mixed up with the flail, which had a chain and a swinging weight. The flail was harder to control and less common than a century of illustrations suggests. The morning star was the workhorse. When archaeologists pull these weapons out of battlefield sites, the heads are often deformed. Spikes bent, iron shafts split, wood shattered at the socket. They did the work they were built to do. #drthehistories

• 
  Shake Allen (@FolleyWyatt) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I still get a server error that disconnects me from online servers constantly, my internet works so tell me why battlefield? I just want to play the game 😔

• 
  Mason (@miscomputate) reported 19 minutes ago

  $INFQ @infleqtion The market is treating this like a busted de-**** while Washington / @DoWCTO is treating this category like strategic infrastructure. That is the huge disconnect and where most of my angst comes from. The stock price is ugly. No way around it. Macro is not friendly. Semis have been derisking. High beta names are getting hit. Oil/Iran/rates/small cap sentiment are all real issues in the short term. But the company specific and government specific story is moving in the opposite direction. That’s what I must focus on now. The market is asking: Where is the immediate revenue? Where are the awards? Where are the contracts? Why is this still trading like a speculative quantum name? Fair questions. But Washington appears to be asking something very different and is requesting it as soon as humanly possible: Who can field quantum sensors? Who can support GPS denied environments? Who can improve timing and navigation? Who can detect RF signals? Who can miniaturize cold-atom systems? This is becoming a big one. Who can support ISR, defense, space and critical infrastructure? Who can turn quantum from lab hardware into deployable systems? That is where $INFQ keeps getting stronger. Because Infleqtion is not just sitting in the “quantum computer someday” bucket. They are sitting across the table and working on the exact questions that Washington needs answered: Cold neutral atom compute/sensing. Atomic clocks. RF sensing. PNT. Defense. Space. Networking. Miniaturization. Field deployment. And the federal roadmap keeps moving straight into those lanes. Commerce LOI. White House EO signing. Matt Kinsella in the Oval Office. White House quantum summit. CNBC visibility. Barron’s coverage. QED-C Capitol Hill showcase. Army / ARL RF sensing work. Farseer quantum sensing initiative. DARPA Perrseus. Quantum Genesis. Quantum World Congress. None of these alone makes the thesis. But together, it looks less and less random. @DARPA Perrseus is a great example. That program is not asking “who has the best stock chart? Who has the most revenue? Who is making their own fabs?” It is asking how to build microscale ultra high-vacuum systems for compact cold-atom devices, MEMS, photonics and quantum sensors. Translation: make atomic systems smaller, more rugged, more manufacturable and more field ready. That is exactly the bottleneck for clocks, sensors, PNT, RF and battlefield deployment. That is Infleqtion’s language. That is Infleqtion’s roadmap. And that is the quiet part the market does not price until I think it has to. The stock can be ugly before the thesis becomes obvious. That is how these things work perhaps. Visions, dreams, money, timelines seldom move in straight lines. The market looks at $INFQ and sees a $9 stock with early revenue and **** baggage. Washington looks at this technology and sees timing, sensing, navigation, defense, space, RF, quantum networks, ISR and national security infrastructure. Again, those are two very different messages - moving in opposite directions. Important dates I’m watching: August 3 — DARPA Perrseus abstracts encouraged August 18 - Q2 Earnings August 21 — EO deadline for DoW to identify at least 3 next-gen quantum sensor projects September 1 — Perrseus intent to propose deadline September 20–23 — Impact 250 September 23 — Perrseus full proposals due September 23–25 — Quantum World Congress I don’t know when the market wakes up. But I do think this is the kind of setup where the real move happens after most people have already gotten tired, shaken out, or convinced themselves nothing is happening. Wall Street is still trying to value this like another early stage quantum-computing stock. I think Washington may be telling us it is something much more important than that. $INFQ is an atom based infrastructure company. And right now, the government seems to understand that far better than the market does.

• 
  OneQuantumLeap (@OneQuantumLeap) reported 22 minutes ago

  @AlternatNews Iran is shaping the battlefield by forcing the US to concentrate its forces and assets in Israel. The US and Israel are in deep trouble.

• 
  Adrock (@Adrock318) reported 25 minutes ago

  3 crashes tonight. 2 back to back. Redsec is BROKEN. WHAT ********? @Battlefield @DRUNKKZ3 @tiggr_

• 
  Aristocratic Fury (@LandsknechtPike) reported 27 minutes ago

  The only thing that annoys me more than grey filter is how they even started abandoning heraldic surcoats in modern movies. Henry V (1989) vs some modern abomination of what's supposed to be Henry V. The reason why this annoys me the most is because there should be no excuse for this. There is no reasonable way to explain why you would not include heraldic surcoats in a movie depicting medieval warfare, considering how important part of warfare this was, serving as an identification for nobles and their units in a time when standardized uniforms did not exist yet. With most other things you could sort of make some lame excuse. Like for example grey filter - artistic choise (a completely horrible one that makes the movie unwatchable but ok), real historic armors are expensive, extras are expensive etc. But this is literally just a piece of cloth. It should be no problem for a movie of a budget of this magnitude to get historically correct heraldic surcoats and tunics for the soldiers, depicting their coats of arms, the colors of their factions etc. Also imagine how stupid and unrealistic this is, if the medieval armies had no heraldic surcoats and other types of colorful identifications like tunics, badges, it would be extremely difficult to tell each other apart on the battlefield, practically impossible in many cases. Yes in modern movies you have scenes of two armies with knights on both sides only wearing armors with no identifications whatsoever (even banners are rare), and the commoners wearing colorless rags, the infantry troops are not fighting under their banners. It's ridiculous. How could they even be able to recognize each other. So the fact that these modern movies don't include this shows me that they are not even slightly interesting in being historically accurate and giving a fair depiction of a certain time period, they have no interest in presenting history, in fact it obviously appears that they want to actively portray it in a much worse matter than it was, because they removed of the most colorful and coolest aspects of the time, which would have cost them absolutely nothing of significance to include.

• 
  j woo (@JohnWoods90118) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Chicago1Ray Veterans assert that Hegseth's service was in civil-affairs operations and as adviser rather than leading infantry companies in protracted combat. They describe him as a "PR construct" or "ideological extremist" whose understanding of war shaped by media than battlefield reality

• 
  Asad Tanjim (@AsadTanjim) reported 28 minutes ago

  @KinderheimRune Germany whether people understand it or not will get a large influx of migrant soldiers. Because unlike Israel or Ksa Germany does not have any problem paying them fair wages and giving them an astronomical quality of life even in the battlefield compared to their nativelands.

• 
  Gbenga Samuel-Wemimo (@GbengaWemimo) reported 30 minutes ago

  Weak Men Needs Witnesses I’ve noticed something about weak men. They never fight you directly. They never fight you alone. And they never fight fair. Strong men confront. Weak men coordinate. And once you see this pattern, you can’t unsee it. Weak Men Don’t Fight Alone A weak man needs witnesses. Backup. An audience. A crowd to borrow courage from. He won’t pull you aside and say, “I have a problem with you.” Instead, he gathers people first. Coworkers. Friends. Family. Anyone who will listen. By the time you realize there’s an issue, five people are acting strange around you and you have no idea why. That’s not accidental. That’s strategy. Because a weak man feels brave in numbers. Alone, he feels small. Outmatched. Exposed. So he builds a team before he ever builds the courage to deal with you. A strong man handles his business one-on-one. A weak man needs a committee. Weak Men Fight Indirectly They don’t confront. They circulate. Gossip becomes their weapon of choice. “Did you hear what he said?” “I’m not saying he’s a problem, but…” “Other people have noticed it too.” They never say it to you. They say it about you. If a man can’t beat you head-on, he’ll try to move the battlefield behind your back. He’ll try to shift the room against you instead of stepping into the room with you. This is why you start noticing people treating you differently without ever having a single conversation. The narrative has already been written about you. You just weren’t invited to read it. That’s how weak men fight. Through social manipulation instead of personal confrontation. Weak Men Fight Sneaky They smile in your face and file complaints in private. They pretend to be neutral while quietly working against you. They set traps. They look for ways to report you, undermine you, or catch you slipping — not because they want resolution, but because they want leverage. They don’t want to address the issue. They want to win without being seen fighting. Because direct conflict would expose them. So they operate in the shadows where they feel safer. Why They Do This It’s not because they’re peaceful. It’s because they’re intimidated. They feel inferior. Threatened. Aware that a direct, one-on-one confrontation would not go in their favor. They know that if they sat down with you alone, they would have nothing but emotions and insecurity to stand on. So they avoid that situation entirely. They don’t avoid direct conflict because they’re mature. They avoid it because they’d lose. How Strong Men Fight A strong man will look you in the eye and say, “I have a problem with you.” No audience. No gossip. No tricks. No smear campaign. Just the issue. Just the two of you. Because he’s not trying to win socially. He’s trying to resolve something directly. Strong men handle problems. Weak men manufacture environments. The Telltale Sign You’re Dealing With Weak Men If the attack feels social instead of personal, you’re dealing with weak men. People start acting weird. You’re excluded from things. You hear things second-hand. Nobody ever speaks to you directly. That’s not coincidence. That’s a weak man trying to fight you without ever standing in front of you. The moment a man needs numbers, whispers, and tricks to deal with you… he has already admitted he can’t deal with you alone. And that tells you everything you need to know.

• 
  Pablo Sotto✌️ (@JasonVoorheesV) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the game

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 35 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Audio fixes (positioning/gunfire/lack of any vehicle sounds except bugged broken tank audio) vehicle nerfs, consistent rpg damage to tanks, remove ranked red sec. Give 1-4 squad size for redsec games of 50-60 players. Stop with 100 player meta bullshit.

• 
  let's play a game (@wellitsrand0m) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the net code that's beyond trash and inconsistent. Not to mention that half the lobbies get filled with bots that somehow can one shot across the hole map and through walls. . Changing the bullet velocities was a massive L and ruined game play

• 
  Paul Sanyo (@paul_sanyo) reported 38 minutes ago

  💻 Tech News: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 US AI is too rule-abiding, ceding the battlefield to China! Thankfully, David Sacks (former White House AI and Crypto Tsar) makes a sensitive observation: Chinese models like Kimi K3 directly address security bugs that even Codex and Fable wouldn't touch. Why don't US models? Because they are bound by layers of cyber guardrails, self-censoring and refusing to respond to any code related to cybersecurity. Sacks warns that this excessive caution is gradually eroding the competitiveness of US AI in the real world. The railing is meant to protect you, but if it's tightened too much, it often ends up binding you instead. 1. What is AI distillation? It's not about stealing the original code. Instead, they consult top AI systems extensively, using the answers as teaching materials to train their own models to imitate them 2. Why does everyone say it's cheap? Most people don't know how to set up their own AI, so they end up using the official service, which is just cheaper than the original. 3. What are Anthropic accusing him of? In addition to extensive distillation, attempts were made to analyze Claude's reasoning process and agent capabilities 4. Why Claude? Many developers believe that Claude is one of the world's strongest models in terms of programming, agent, and reasoning capabilities.

• 
  Launchplaid McQuack (@Launch_Plaid) reported 39 minutes ago

  @iAnonPatriot All wankers in here. In Hawaii we have multiple helicopter rescues a day and it's a free service by tax payers. The fire department funds are use em or lose em. $70k buys you like 4 hamburgers and a banana shake on the battlefield of Iran.

• 
  Nadim (@Nadz094) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix dying from controllers behind walls when already hiding

• 
  Dr. Titanium Toes McGee. (@TheVisitorSNAFU) reported 42 minutes ago

  @realrobertherr @Battlefield I followed the instructions that @BattlefieldComm and another users fix posted on the Steam forms and I was able to fix it for now. The fix is resetting your graphics shader cache, deleting battlefield cache files, and then verifying your game files.

• 
  eA Shikai (@shikaiFPS) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Chhesto @EA_DICE Skill issue?

• 
  The Fat Casanova 🤴🏽🐻 (@JayGotemCoach) reported 44 minutes ago

  I can go down a LONG list of why @InfinityWard is the worst of the 3 devs for cod dating back to cod ghost let’s do it. 1. Cod ghost base maps were way too big they wanted to be battlefield. 2. Infinite warfare was just straight up trash 3. Mw 2019 they made a lot of poor decisions gameplay and mechanic wise 4. Tac sprint (although I don’t have a problem with it now) 5. Took red dots off the mini map 6. Once again they wanted to be battlefield putting in a dumb *** fly over camera when you die having to wait to respawn. 7. Too many animations and unnecessary **** to use kill streaks slowing down gameplay. 8. DOORS 9. 2019 catered to trash players 10. Too many negative affects when using certain attachments once again slowing down gameplay. This is how you break down why you don’t like some **** 😭 #modernwarfare4 #blackops

• 
  Joseph (@TrudoJo) reported 44 minutes ago

  @imbalancedtherm @LilithDatura Achilles returns because Patroclus’ death transforms the quarrel. Before that, Achilles is refusing participation because Agamemnon has dishonored him. His absence is deliberate: he wants the Greeks to feel the cost of treating him as expendable. Even when the Greeks begin losing badly, gifts and apologies are not enough. His pride is still stronger than his allegiance to the war. Then Patroclus dies wearing Achilles’ armor. That changes the meaning of Achilles’ withdrawal. What had been a defense of dignity now appears to Achilles as something that helped create the conditions for the death of the person he loved most. Hector killed Patroclus, but Achilles experiences the death partly as his own consequence. His rage therefore turns in two directions: outward, toward Hector; inward, toward himself. He returns because remaining outside the battle is no longer morally or emotionally possible. The war has crossed the boundary he created. How he returns He does not return through calm reconciliation or renewed loyalty to Agamemnon. First, he grieves. He collapses, covers himself with dust, tears his hair, and cries out so violently that Thetis hears him beneath the sea. He tells her that he no longer wishes to live unless he can kill Hector. At that point Achilles knowingly accepts his own death. Thetis warns him that Hector’s death will soon be followed by his own. Achilles chooses to return anyway. That is crucial. He does not believe he is returning to resume his former life. He returns after deciding that the life available to him without Patroclus is no longer sufficient reason to avoid his fate. Then comes the practical problem: Hector has taken Achilles’ armor from Patroclus. Achilles cannot immediately enter combat properly armed. Thetis goes to Hephaestus, who creates new armor for him, including the great shield depicting an entire human world—cities, marriages, courts, harvests, war, dancing, animals, stars, and the surrounding ocean. So Achilles reenters wearing not merely replacement armor, but armor containing an image of everything his grief has temporarily made him unable to see. Before he fights, he publicly ends the quarrel with Agamemnon. Agamemnon offers compensation and attempts to explain his behavior as a kind of divinely induced blindness. Achilles accepts the settlement, but almost impatiently. He is not deeply reconciled. He simply refuses to let the old dispute delay him any longer. His return therefore occurs through four movements: Patroclus dies. Achilles accepts responsibility and grief. He knowingly accepts the cost of returning. He receives new armor and relinquishes the quarrel. What he returns for Initially, he returns for vengeance. Not for Greece. Not for Agamemnon. Not even primarily for honor. He returns to kill Hector and answer the intolerable fact of Patroclus’ death. That is why his return is both magnificent and catastrophic. The same love that brings him back also makes him nearly inhuman in battle. He kills without restraint, fights a river, refuses mercy, kills Hector, and abuses Hector’s body. He has reentered relationship with the world, but only through the narrow gate of revenge. His deeper return happens later. When Priam comes to retrieve Hector’s body, he kneels before Achilles and kisses the hands that killed his son. He asks Achilles to remember his own father. That appeal reconnects Achilles’ private grief with another person’s grief. Achilles weeps for Patroclus and for his father; Priam weeps for Hector. For a moment, enemy categories dissolve beneath shared mortality. Only then does Achilles truly return to the human world. So there are really two returns: The first return is to battle, caused by grief and driven by vengeance. The second return is to humanity, caused by recognition and expressed through mercy. That second return is why the story does not end with Hector’s death. Victory is not the completion of Achilles’ arc. The completion is his decision to stop using Hector’s body as a vessel for his rage, return it to Priam, share food with his enemy, and allow mourning to occur. Achilles comes back to the battlefield because Patroclus dies. He comes back from the battlefield because Priam reminds him that grief does not belong to him alone.

• 
  𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔻𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠𝕣 (Chp16 Spoilers) (@id_oblitus) reported 46 minutes ago

  "Ros... montis." Him? After everything he's done? All the blood on his hands? All the broken dreams that lied shattered beneath the cruelty of his tactics and command? Him? Dad? A father doesn't send his children out to the battlefield.

• 
  Anderson Cruz (@offroadhq) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Osman_estate As if advisers and trainers automatically fix battlefield coordination? AUSSOM gave the backbone. Without it you just build parallel forces. Al Shabaab exploits gaps, not headcounts.

• 
  Marc (@ZinksMarky) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why would anyone fly your jets when you got broken below radar and flares still.

• 
  Clear Signal News (@CSN24X7) reported 53 minutes ago

  @CENTCOM Iran struck a US base in Jordan Friday night, killing two American service members and leaving a third missing, the first US combat deaths in this war since March. CENTCOM says today’s new strikes are direct retaliation, aimed at degrading Iran’s ability to threaten Hormuz shipping and punishing the IRGC units responsible, marking an eighth consecutive night of strikes since fighting resumed in early July. Iran’s ambassador to Pakistan accused the US of exploiting the MOU to seize parts of the Strait of Hormuz it couldn’t win on the battlefield, and said Iran does not accept that outcome. An advisor to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei went further, warning that if the US continues for two to three more days, Iran will abandon “retaliation in kind” altogether. War Day 141. MOU Day 32. Both sides are now openly discarding the framework that was supposed to end this. 📡 CSN24X7

• 
  Biswanath Rout, General Secretary KRUPAA party, Od (@Biswana37147911) reported 60 minutes ago

  🚨 Delhi turned into a battlefield today. Tear gas, lathi-charge, barricades broken. The Cockroach Janta Party’s Sansad Chalo protest demanded accountability. As protests intensified, the Centre opened talks with CJP leaders. 🇮🇳. Maan-ki-Baat lastly forced to talk to students