Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (15%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Comuna 1	Online Play	23 hours ago
Naaldwijk	Sign in	1 day ago
Talant	Sign in	1 day ago
Viroflay	Sign in	1 day ago
Marseille	Sign in	1 day ago
Brest	Glitches	1 day ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Oramusic (@oratreya) reported 8 minutes ago

  @XBOXSupport Fix battlefield 6 please

• 
  Sagzee (@IAmSagzee) reported 9 minutes ago

  Observer: I've watched several women in my adult life divorce their husbands, and in almost every case, the children's lives were completely disrupted and damaged. It seems obvious that initiating a divorce harms the kids. Analyst: When you observe that outcome, what specific mechanism are you attributing the damage to? Is it the legal signing of the dissolution, or something that happens before or after? Observer: It's the act of breaking up the family home. The mother decides she's unhappy, files the papers, moves out or forces the father out, and the kids end up anxious, depressed, and struggling in school. The mother's decision caused that collapse. Analyst: That's a natural conclusion because the parent who files the paperwork is the visible trigger of the change. In modern Western courts, women file approximately 70% of divorce petitions. But if we look at the underlying data, we've got to ask whether the legal filing is the root cause or simply the visible tipping point of a system that was already deteriorating. Observer: How could it just be a tipping point if the children were functioning fine until the separation happened? Analyst: That depends on how we measure functioning. Longitudinal studies tracking child wellbeing across decades show that child distress isn't produced by the single event of divorce. Instead, child outcomes are driven by 3 specific structural variables: the level of interparental conflict, the sudden drop in household economic capital, and the reduction in overall parenting bandwidth. Observer: Let's break those down. What does interparental conflict do to a child? Analyst: When 2 parents live in chronic hostility, whether it's active fighting or severe emotional withdrawal, children experience elevated cortisol levels and continuous stress responses. Research shows that children raised in high conflict intact families frequently fare worse across emotional and academic metrics than children whose high conflict parents separated. However, there's a critical nuance here. When a marriage has low visible conflict and parents separate unexpectedly from the child's perspective, the child suffers a severe disruption in predictability. That's where you see the sharpest drop in psychological stability. Observer: So if the marriage wasn't blatantly toxic, the divorce itself creates the harm? Analyst: It exposes the child to a drastic transition without the clear necessity being visible to them. But consider the 2nd variable: economic capital. Splitting 1 household into 2 independent residences instantly increases living expenses by roughly 30% to 50% for both adults. The exact same total income now has to pay 2 mortgages or rents, 2 sets of utility bills, and duplicate household goods. For the primary residential parent, who's statistically the mother in roughly 80% of custody arrangements, this translates to a sharp drop in per capita resources available for the child. Observer: Which leads to worse neighborhoods, worse schools, and more parental stress. Analyst: Exactly. That brings us to the 3rd variable: parenting bandwidth. A single adult managing a household alone has roughly 50% less time and energy to dedicate to emotional support, homework assistance, and monitoring. When a mother appears to have ruined her children's lives, what you're often witnessing is a human system operating under severe resource scarcity and cognitive overload, not necessarily a careless decision. Observer: But why do women initiate 70% of these separations if the economic and developmental outcomes for the household are so risky? Analyst: Because incentives and baseline expectations shifted dramatically over the past 50 years. Prior to the widespread economic entry of women into the workforce and the introduction of no fault divorce laws in the 1970s, exiting a marriage was financially impossible for most women. Today, financial independence means marriage isn't an absolute survival strategy anymore, but an ongoing value proposition. When women perceive a persistent imbalance in domestic labor, emotional safety, or marital satisfaction, the perceived cost of staying eventually exceeds the calculated cost of leaving. Observer: So the exit's an attempt to solve a problem, even if it creates a new set of problems for the children. Analyst: Precisely. It's a trade off under constraint. The human brain naturally connects the person who initiated the change to all the negative fallout that follows. That's a classic cognitive attribution error. It ignores the pre existing silent decay of the relationship, the systemic costs of running 2 households on 1 pool of wealth, and the chronic stress of sole parenting. Observer: If we wanted to predict which children survive a parental split with minimal harm, what variables actually determine the outcome? Analyst: Predictability and stability. The data's clear: children adapt remarkably well if 2 conditions are met. Condition 1: interparental conflict must drop to near zero post separation, meaning parents don't use the child as a messenger or battlefield. Condition 2: financial and structural stability must be maintained so the child doesn't lose their school, peer network, or consistent contact with both capable parents. When those conditions are absent, outcomes deteriorate rapidly regardless of which parent filed the petition. Observer: That shifts the perspective entirely. The problem isn't simply the mother leaving the marriage. The problem's that our social and economic structures aren't designed to maintain stability when a 2 adult system splits into 2 single adult systems. Analyst: That's the transferable principle. Whenever you analyze a failing system, whether it's a family, a business partnership, or a nation state, focusing solely on the party that triggers the exit obscures the structural pressures that made the original arrangement nonviable. Reality doesn't punish the formal act of dissolution. Reality responds to the redistribution of conflict, time, and resources.

• 
  godhead🪩 (@everystillness) reported 11 minutes ago

  & I'll say it again: Once you weaponize someone's reputation, you forfeit the right to complain when yours becomes the battlefield too. Don't bring our problems here/beef here for public spectacle. We'll make it a real spectacle.

• 
  Oloyede Olayinka (@YinKysmileS) reported 13 minutes ago

  A Lesson from Solomon's Courtroom for Every Heart That Loves Christ's Church One of the most remarkable judgments recorded in all of Scripture took place, not on a battlefield, but in a courtroom. Two women stood before King Solomon with one living child between them. One of them had suffered the heartbreaking loss of her own infant during the night. Rather than face that painful reality, she secretly exchanged her dead child for the living child of another mother while she slept. By morning, each woman claimed the same baby, and no witness could prove who was telling the truth. Then Solomon did something astonishing. "Bring me a sword... Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the other." (1 Kings 3:24–25) The king never intended to harm the child. He intended to expose the heart. Immediately, the true mother cried out, "Please, my lord, give her the living child. By no means put him to death." The other woman answered coldly, "He shall be neither mine nor yours; divide him." In that instant, Solomon knew who the real mother was. Not because she argued more convincingly. Not because she possessed greater authority. Not because she had louder supporters. But because the true mother loved the child more than she loved winning. She would rather surrender what was rightfully hers than watch the child perish. She was willing to appear defeated if only the child could live. That is what genuine love looks like. And that ancient courtroom has never really disappeared. It still confronts every generation of God's people, because the question Solomon exposed is one every Christian eventually faces: Do I love God's people more than I love being proved right? The Church of Jesus Christ has never been built cheaply. Every congregation, every mission, every faithful ministry exists because countless believers invested their lives in something far greater than themselves. Long before many of us ever arrived, someone was praying through the night. Someone was fasting. Someone quietly gave from their own resources when no one noticed. Someone endured misunderstanding, ridicule, exhaustion, and disappointment. Pastors preached to nearly empty rooms. Older saints discipled younger believers. Missionaries left home and comfort behind to carry the Gospel where Christ had not been named. Paul could simply say, "I planted..." (1 Corinthians 3:6). To Timothy he wrote, "What you have heard from me... entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also." (2 Timothy 2:2). Kingdom work has always been costly. Churches are born through tears, nurtured through sacrifice, and sustained only by the grace of God. Yet above every human sacrifice stands One infinitely greater. The Son of God stretched out His hands upon a cross and purchased the Church, not with silver or gold, not with earthly authority or human institutions, but with His own blood. Paul reminded the Ephesian elders, "Be shepherds of the church of God, which He obtained with His own blood." (Acts 20:28). Pause and consider that for a moment. The Church belongs to Christ. It does not belong to founders. It does not belong to successors. It does not belong to elders, pastors, boards, or movements. It belongs to the One who declared, "I will build My church." (Matthew 16:18). That means every leader, every elder, every pastor, and indeed every believer is not an owner, but a steward. We are caretakers of something infinitely precious that belongs to Another. That truth should profoundly shape the way we handle conflict. Disagreements will come. Misunderstandings are inevitable wherever imperfect people seek to serve a perfect Savior. But Scripture never measures spiritual maturity by whether conflict exists. It measures it by how God's people respond to conflict. Jesus Himself gave the pattern: "If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone..." (Matthew 18:15). The goal is never humiliation. The goal is never public victory. The goal is always restoration. Paul echoes that same heart: "If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all." (Romans 12:18). Those words should search every heart. Can I honestly say before God that I exhausted every biblical avenue toward peace? That I prayed? That I listened? That I humbled myself? That I pursued reconciliation with sincerity? Or was I more concerned with protecting my reputation, defending my position, gathering supporters, or proving my point? James reminds us that, "The wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason..." (James 3:17). Paul says, "The Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone..." (2 Timothy 2:24). Peter commands shepherds to serve, "not domineering over those in your charge, but being examples to the flock." (1 Peter 5:3). Jesus Himself overturned every worldly idea of leadership when He declared, "Whoever would be great among you must be your servant." (Mark 10:43). The New Testament consistently presents authority not as something to be protected, but as something to be poured out in loving service. And nowhere is that clearer than in Christ Himself. Though He was equal with God, "He emptied Himself" (Philippians 2:6–8). The rightful King laid aside His rights. The innocent One accepted false accusations. The Judge of all mankind submitted Himself to unjust judgment. The Good Shepherd laid down His life for His sheep. That is the pattern for every follower of Christ. Sometimes the greatest display of spiritual maturity is not winning the argument, but willingly suffering loss so that Christ's flock remains one. That is why Jesus' warning in Matthew 18 is so sobering: "Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea." (Matthew 18:6). Those are not the words of an angry prophet. They are the words of the Good Shepherd. Every believer matters to Him. Every wounded sheep matters to Him. Every discouraged disciple matters to Him. How many believers quietly lose heart when love disappears? How many young Christians become confused? How many watching unbelievers conclude that Christianity is little more than another struggle for influence because they cannot see the love Jesus said would identify His disciples? Paul pleaded with the Corinthians, "That there be no divisions among you." (1 Corinthians 1:10). He urged the Ephesians to make every effort to preserve "the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace" (Ephesians 4:3). Unity is never preserved by pride. It is preserved by humility, repentance, forgiveness, and love. This is why we cannot leave Solomon's courtroom. One woman cried, "Give her the child, only let him live." The other replied, "If I cannot have him, neither shall you." The difference was not merely in their words. It was in their hearts. One loved the child more than herself. The other loved herself more than the child. Before we leave that courtroom, perhaps each of us should ask the Lord to let Solomon's wisdom examine us. Do I love Christ's Church more than my place within it? Do I care more about preserving the flock than preserving my image? Would I rather suffer misunderstanding than watch believers stumble? Would I rather lose influence than lose souls? The Apostle Paul once asked believers a question that seems almost impossible in our age: "Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded?" (1 Corinthians 6:7). Those words sound foolish to a world obsessed with winning. But they make perfect sense at the foot of the cross. Our Savior did not redeem us by clinging to His rights. He redeemed us by laying them down. One day every one of us will stand before the Chief Shepherd. Perhaps the question He asks will not be, "Did you win?" or even, "Were you right?" Perhaps it will simply be, "What did you do with My sheep?" Did you feed them? Did you protect them? Did you seek peace? Did you pursue reconciliation? Did you love My Bride as I loved her? Because when Solomon looked into that courtroom, he did not recognize the true mother because she won. He recognized her because she loved. May God give us hearts that would rather bear personal loss than watch Christ's flock be wounded. May He humble the proud, soften the hardened, heal the wounded, restore broken relationships, and teach us to love His Church as Christ Himself has loved her. Please... don't divide the child.

• 
  Jet_Pilot_PakFA (@Jet_Pilot_PakFa) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Still no fix for air radar new bug. Hurry up.

• 
  CalvZynisT (@CalvZynisT) reported 17 minutes ago

  I would really love to know why I experience up to 70% packet loss during battlefield redsec @Battlefield ? I have spectacular internet and don’t lag in any other games like this. I have no other big programs nor internet browser running in the background. It just makes no sense

• 
  elliot (@xxhackedsociety) reported 19 minutes ago

  Update : Xbox issues still occurring, cannot access Battlefield 6 at all. Not even the story mode, this is ridiculous. #Xbox #EA #XBOXSupport

• 
  howdydoody22 (@bertlivingstunt) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE ******* STEERING ON THE BOATS YOU DUMB MITHERFUCKERS

• 
  Giacomo ShadowUNbanned Zucco (@giacomozucco) reported 22 minutes ago

  Regardless of how righteous your war is, and how smart your combat tactics are, choosing the right battlefield is often among the most important things. I have some reservations on the final goals of the BIP110 warriors, and many about their combat tactics. But what really baffles me is the way they selected the hardest possible battlefield (the second-hardest of all), where a huge economic majority (which they clearly lack) is necessary to even imagine a possible victory. The absolutely HARDEST thing to do in Bitcoin, impossible even with many exchanges, payment processors, influencers, developers, hodlers, mining pools, mining farms and ASIC manufacturers backing you, is to successfully impose a hard fork: NYA/Segwit2X people learned that the hard way in 2017. It's like attacking the enemy inside their most fortified inner citadel (on the right of the meme): you need overwhelming superiority of forces to even begin to imagine it. The second hardest thing to do is successfully imposing a hard fork (which is what BIP110 warriors are trying now, facing certain failure in little more than a week). It's like attacking the enemy frontally on their external city walls. Then there is: successfully imposing a more restrictive mempool policy, which is what Luke tried to do in order to fix the inscription bug a few years ago, failing. It's like attacking the enemy on open field in its own country. Then there is: successfully ignoring a more permissive mempool policy, which is what the Knots movement (myself included) tried to do against Core V30. It's like attacking the enemy's harbor: you can impose some damage and cost for a while, which may be sometimes worth it, but you can't do much more. Then there is: successfully ignoring a more permissive mempool policy, which we tried to do against Core V30, and then successfully imposing a more permissive mempool policy, which is what Core V30 did. It's so easy that they succeeded (to my great dismay) even in the face of very little community support, non-existent technical urgency, and amidst sloppy moves and lots of controversy. Then there is: successfully ignoring a soft fork, which is what the network (myself included) will do now, and then successfully ignoring a hard fork, which is what we did back then against NYA/Segwit2X. As easy as defending your innermost fortified citadel: you just need some good and motivated men and some resources. Regardless of your holy war (about nodes/devs/miners governance, about spam mitigation, about CSAM "emergency"), you should study and understand Bitcoin to pick your battlefield right.

• 
  F R A N K (@Realxvox) reported 22 minutes ago

  🇺🇸 🇮🇷 The war may not be won with bombs. If U.S. intelligence is right, the breaking point isn’t military — it’s financial. The fact: reports suggest Iran is struggling to even pay its own fighters, with signs of looming bank runs and fuel shortages in one of the most oil-rich countries on Earth. The pattern is clear: regimes endure direct attacks, but they crack when their economic structure starts failing. The contrast exposes everything — launchers destroyed are rebuilt in weeks; broken cash flow paralyzes the entire system. And the defining line didn’t come from the battlefield, but from inside government: the fear isn’t the Pentagon. It’s the Treasury. That shifts the war’s vector. The strategic implication is brutal: well-calibrated sanctions don’t just pressure — they erode operational capacity at its root. But there’s friction in the narrative. With billions still flowing from oil, some argue economic warfare is fundamentally flawed. So this isn’t a clean collapse scenario. It’s a tension between apparent revenue and real liquidity. And when that gap widens… regimes don’t fall instantly. They start to delay. And in war, delay turns into weakness before it turns into.

• 
  ♄ Saturn ⚵ (@satinvictus) reported 25 minutes ago

  The wrong advice can ruin a portfolio. The right advice can fix it. Positive feedback is rare, especially from most of premium members. Most people stay silent, and that's okay. They paid for it, I'm not entitled to know feedbacks. That's why the few genuine messages mean so much. Knowing my work has a real impact is what makes it worth continuing. I'm proud to be sharing the battlefield with such prideful people that won't let go. Cause glory belongs to those who INSIST.

• 
  EB-Knispel (@EBKnispel) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Imaging bragging about a vehicle that not only you didn’t actually finish making, but cut time by recycling clearly parts of other assets (I’m aware this is common in games) to the point it highlights bugs even more… All you had to do was cut copy bf4 boat, then fix known bugs.

• 
  isthisthematrix (@ASPIEHERE) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Pindazz2 Battlefield 6 is broken

• 
  Liberty or Death (@SendMe1776) reported 27 minutes ago

  @SallyMayweather Strategic Misdirection: The core idea is to manipulate the enemy's perception of reality. By feigning weakness when strong, or inactivity when preparing to strike, a commander can lure the opponent into making errors or exposing vulnerabilities. Psychological Warfare: It involves provoking the enemy’s general, encouraging arrogance, and dividing their forces to ensure they are unprepared when the actual strike occurs. Not Just Lying: In this context, "deception" is less about simple dishonesty and more about strategic ambiguity and unpredictability. It is about controlling the narrative of the battlefield so the enemy fights a war that does not exist.

• 
  Shiri_Sabra (@sabra_the) reported 31 minutes ago

  Last year 4,000 haredi Israelis began military service in the IDF(1,000 battlefield soldiers) compared to 2,800 in previous year.

• 
  The Human Spider (@realspiderhuman) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Asmallnotch I’m pretty sure there were different variations depending on faction and class. I actually don’t even remember that being an issue. But I will never forget the constant shrieking of female voice actors in BF6 every 30 seconds. It is so out of place for a Battlefield game.

• 
  Tsurugi Enthusiast (@DCoronet44) reported 39 minutes ago

  Soderlund would found Embark almost immediately, poaching dozens of DiCE's senior devs and crippling the studio right as they needed crunch time the most to try and fix this. BFV and BF2042 were doomed from the start thanks to this employee loss, with both being abandoned. 4/10

• 
  Garlic_Toast (@Regi79107931) reported 41 minutes ago

  @JayNut_001 Try unplugging and plugging the display cables. I had this issue with Battlefield 6 a few weeks ago and idk if fixed it. All I know is I tried everything and then I just unplug the whole setup cleaned it up. So in the end I don't know what the real issue is all I know im back.

• 
  Snoot (@snoot2k26) reported 45 minutes ago

  @NVIDIAGeForce Has it fixed the driver timeout errors with battlefield 6?

• 
  Vector (@PrasVector) reported 47 minutes ago

  @zockiiis @Battlefield @EA_DICE Man that's rough. Classic EA launch day chaos. Been there, rage quit too. Hope they fix it soon.

• 
  John F Kennedy Jr (@real__JFK__JR_1) reported 48 minutes ago

  THE OLD INTERNET IS CRACKING The internet was once presented to the world as freedom. A place where people could connect, learn, speak, build, trade, create, and share information without borders. It was supposed to become a bridge between humanity and the future. It was supposed to give the people access, knowledge, and power. But over time, something changed. The same network that was promised as freedom became a system of control. The same digital roads that connected people became channels of surveillance, manipulation, censorship, scams, identity theft, financial tracking, and silent restriction. What was once open became filtered. What was once simple became monitored. What was once built for communication became a battlefield for data, influence, and control. The old internet is cracking. Not because the people failed. Not because technology failed. But because the foundation was never strong enough to carry the future that is coming. The old internet was built on fragile trust. Passwords that can be stolen. Emails that can be faked. Accounts that can be hacked. Platforms that can be controlled. Data that can be sold. Identities that can be duplicated. Financial access that can be blocked. Voices that can be silenced. Information that can be buried under noise. For years, people were told this was normal. Normal to be tracked. Normal to be hacked. Normal to lose access. Normal to be censored. Normal to be manipulated by algorithms. Normal to live inside systems that collect everything and explain nothing. But nothing about this is normal. A digital world built on weakness cannot protect a free people. A network filled with backdoors cannot support a new financial era. A system controlled by gatekeepers cannot become the foundation for true independence. A future of secure identity, protected access, quantum-safe systems, and clean financial movement cannot be built on broken digital rails. This is why the cracks are appearing. You can see them in the outages. You can see them in the cyberattacks. You can see them in the scams. You can see them in the data leaks. You can see them in the censorship. You can see them in the financial blocks. You can see them every time people lose access to what should belong to them. These are not random signs. They are symptoms of an old structure reaching its limit. We, QTheWhiteHats, understand that the next era cannot depend on the old internet. The next era requires a new foundation — one built on security, verified identity, quantum-safe protection, clean access, stronger communication, and systems designed to protect the people instead of controlling them. The old internet was built for a different world. The new internet must be built for what comes next. A world where identity cannot be easily stolen. A world where communication is protected. A world where financial systems can move safely. A world where people are not trapped behind centralized gates. A world where access is not used as a weapon. A world where technology serves humanity instead of harvesting it. This transition will not be simple. When old systems crack, the noise becomes louder. When control weakens, the gatekeepers become more aggressive. When a new structure approaches, the old one tries to convince the people that nothing else is possible. But something else is possible. A cleaner network is possible. A safer digital future is possible. A protected internet is possible. A system built for truth, access, security, and freedom is possible. The cracks are not the end. They are the warning. They show us that the old structure cannot carry the weight of the new world. They show us why preparation matters. They show us why digital security matters. They show us why QPhone, QFS, protected access, and quantum-safe infrastructure are not just ideas — they are necessary pieces of what comes next. Stay calm. Stay alert.

• 
  JohnWick22 (@JohnnyBlandon) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Battlefield We need to talk. I didn't play today. You need to fix the balance when matching players between the two sides. It's not right that my team has so many bots while the enemy team has more players over level 500. Today was unbearable—we were losing 0-1000. You need to fix that.

• 
  Old Fat White Guy (@Johnnyhungwell0) reported 49 minutes ago

  @ExoGhost @MagaMachine1776 @mattmaster_dev It's just sad how many ******* d riding fan boys enjoy this modern day slop. Battlefield 6 absolutely sucks and the people still playing just choose to overlook the problems that still plague the ******* game since day 1.

• 
  Concious (@Concious02) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Been_Human @Punam_Keshari01 I understand you, but you are hating the players not the game. In the battlefield the king can’t complain if a random arrow hit him in his blind spot. Our duty is not to become rich but to fix all the systems that runs India. I just hope you are raising your kid traditionally

• 
  Derek Dale (@DSD1126) reported 50 minutes ago

  Update needs a hot fix. Full measure, not half. Cmon dice.. do you guys not test the update before it goes live? @BattlefieldComm

• 
  SonicExellerSubzero (@ExellerChaos) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Quaker_DB Sounds broken on paper but I worry how they would perform on the battlefield

• 
  John (@DownHomeJohn) reported 55 minutes ago

  @SnyderJoe44681 @BOSS_Clan_Intl @Battlefield What’s great is I don’t have to play reef. So not my problem unless they fix it.

• 
  pascoall (@YvngPas) reported 56 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm everyone said about bloom , hitreg, controller problems with deadzone and netcode and you make a survey again lmao just stop nerf movementevery update, if i could i requested a refund, but unfortunately, i wasted time at the launch of the game thinking it would be good.

• 
  CashernSinns (@CashernSinns) reported 56 minutes ago

  @EA @XBOXSupport @Battlefield your game’s serversbhave been down for over 15h & there has yet to be a fix yet. I continuously get an error message mind you for me this dates back 2 weeks. Billion dollar companies btw.

• 
  michael fitchett (@FitchettMicael) reported 59 minutes ago

  @TheGameVerse Are they going to fix they multiplayer games connect players to servers cause they ruined battlefield 6 and call of duty with whatever is going on xbox feels seconds behind pc and Playstation upload bottlenecks on ever game server