Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Brasília	Online Play	1 day ago
Arlon	Glitches	3 days ago
Coyoacán	Sign in	3 days ago
Saint-Malo	Online Play	7 days ago
Buenos Aires	Sign in	9 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  o RAY qu 🐦‍⬛ (@o_Ray_qu) reported 5 minutes ago

  I think I’m done with Battlefield for now. I’m having a TPM 2.0 BIOS issue. I literally just started streaming again too, haha. I guess fate is trying to tell me something. 🪦

• 
  Cameron England (@iamcamengland) reported 9 minutes ago

  Past $50k/mo the only skill that matters is diagnosing constraints. That is my entire job now. I zoom out on the business, look at the battlefield, and work out where every team lead is running and what's hitting them. There are hundreds of problems in every business that could be solved. Only one of them, if solved, would let you 2x, 5x, 10x. Find that and ignore the rest.

• 
  Dajovi (@Dajovi2) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Enough with rotating modes out of nowhere. I'm tired of checking if my favorite mode is up every single day. Just kill Portal, it’s garbage. Keep the core modes -including Rush- and fix them so they work properly. Completely useless.

• 
  HellBoundLycan (@madruger) reported 13 minutes ago

  @WolfGangPlays to be fair I think all sports games are just the same thing over and over again... Same with CoD and Battlefield. It's the same game with the same content, just a different year. *i complain about those too for the same problems.* There's so much hype over so much broken.. :(

• 
  BKScoPe (@BKScoPe) reported 16 minutes ago

  been sitting with one idea about @quipnetwork for a few days now. what if the work that secures a chain was also the work someone actually needed solved. not hashes for the sake of hashes, actual optimization problems, proof of useful work instead of proof of work. i keep going back and forth on what that actually changes. one side of me says it's just a scoring trick, put every kind of hardware on the same problem and call it fair. the other side wonders if this is actually the first time cpus, gpus, asics, and quantum machines get measured on one shared battlefield instead of separate leaderboards. both feel true at once. quantum capacity right now mostly sits behind a handful of closed platforms, expensive, gated, hard to even test against. if this holds up at scale, that idle capacity starts looking like infrastructure other people can actually rent and check the work on. researchers get a reason to point real problems at it instead of vanity benchmarks, and operators get a reason to keep machines running past the demo phase. none of that is guaranteed yet, still early.

• 
  Ax1omVoid (@Ax1omVoid) reported 18 minutes ago

  WTF WEDNESDAY is officially entering the rotation. 📷​ Battlefield 6 is the move tonight — I’ve played it before, just never brought it to stream. Only problem: the download apparently has other plans. The second it finishes, we’re going straight into the chaos. 📷 Twitch + YouTube tonight.

• 
  Brock Landers (@M3THM4N) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BFBulletin Each "fix" comes with 10 more problems... @Battlefield

• 
  Aric Chen (@aricchen) reported 25 minutes ago

  Japan put 8.9 trillion yen on the table Monday for fiscal 2027, a record request, and left more than 100 line items unpriced. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is rewriting the three security documents before year-end. The final figure is widely expected to clear 10 trillion yen. That is not a rounding error. It is Tokyo deciding that the cheap, attritable systems the PLA already fields in quantity are now Japan's problem to solve at scale. The Defense Ministry is asking for attack drones that can launch from the surface or from underwater, built at home, produced fast and cheap, and flown with standoff missiles. Officials point to Ukraine. They also want an AI coordinator inside command and control so battlefield assessment and target selection move faster than a human staff can cycle. A ministry cloud is meant to keep classified traffic up when the network is under stress. I have watched Japanese cabinets talk around this problem for years. This request does not. Shinjiro Koizumi's ministry is buying tools that raise the cost of a first move across the first island chain. Beijing still calls any Japanese hardening "new militarism." Koizumi already answered that in Singapore: China fields nuclear weapons and strategic bombers. Japan does not. The budget paper is the operational follow-through. The 2022 documents put spending on a path to 2 percent of GDP. Tokyo hit that two years early. This request is the bridge to whatever Takaichi writes into the revised strategy. The blank lines are the tell. They are holding space for a larger counterstrike architecture, not padding a press release. If the PLA assumed Japan would stay a high-end, low-volume force that runs out of munitions in week one, that assumption is being written down. ACI — Aric Chen | Insights

• 
  Alex Devine (@SwiftyLunatic) reported 26 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Let's hope you actually fix the issues you listed! Most of the time, you just write words and never fix the issues!

• 
  Thermopylae Aerospace (@thermopylaeaero) reported 27 minutes ago

  @dnlklr @ikirigin @tunguz Solve the customer’s problem on the battlefield first. Show the results. Everything else, including economics - follows. But if the solution is too expensive from the start, its cost at scale will eventually become the problem.

• 
  Joe (@MonFartS) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the spawn beacon not working

• 
  Aimlocker (@Aimlocker2) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE “EVERYONE IS MEDIC” BUG

• 
  SightBringer (@_The_Prophet__) reported 31 minutes ago

  @MtDew_Crabjuice You’re right about the constraint, but I think you’re defining financial repression too narrowly. Repression does not require the bond market to be fooled forever, and it does not require a giant young savings cohort. It requires the state to keep the effective funding cost below nominal GDP growth long enough to stabilize the debt ratio. That can be done through maturity management, central-bank balance-sheet support, bank and pension regulation, capital requirements, captive domestic demand, tax treatment, and policies that steer savings toward government paper. The real problem you’re pointing to is rollover speed. If too much debt reprices quickly, inflation feeds straight back into higher interest expense and the benefit evaporates. That absolutely makes the U.S. position harder than the classic postwar repression model. But that does not kill the strategy. It changes the form. Washington then has to suppress the effective cost of funding while tolerating higher nominal growth. That can mean pushing duration into regulated balance sheets, changing capital rules, using the Fed as buyer of last resort, leaning on banks and money funds, and accepting a lower real return for savers. So the deeper point is: You’re right that inflation alone cannot solve this anymore. The state has to pair nominal growth with forced financial intermediation. That is exactly why the bond market is becoming the battlefield.

• 
  Mɪss Bʟᴜᴇ. (@_aoaoaozaki) reported 34 minutes ago

  @SaberCobalt @AVENGEDHISTORY @SCR1PTEDW0NDER — attention drawn to the long-ranged fighters, the whole battlefield dynamic would shift like a game board tipping sideways. “This is trouble… one’s inexperienced, the other is a Servant.” She pushed the thought aside and moved. Starbow blazed ahead of her, a streak of —

• 
  MrMcGugan (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 37 minutes ago

  @1godimak @BFBulletin Why would the fps of last year worry about gunplay? 35 million people who bought Bf6 and are NOT playing it just love wondering why theyre shots are ghosting Bullet sponge Battlefield is NOT working for anyone Its hard to believe that this game is being run by a 30 yo company

• 
  David (@RightByTheSea) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Lasers don’t line up with the sight fix that morons

• 
  Jonathan Quick (@Qwest336) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Battlefield , you're losing your RedSec community. 1)Most US don't play ranked before noon due to EU server lag. 2)In Pubs, give a penalty for leaving mid game. 3)Stop listening to the CoD players with this movement crap. They will leave for #MW4 anyway. 4)Fixed Top 250 1/2

• 
  William M Clynes (@Thecenterwayis) reported 44 minutes ago

  @nashinia NO ******* EXCUSE! The man must protect his family! If he doesn't he is worse than a infidel! This gets me all in my feelings when you hurt your own family. Stop causing harm and address the issue that is you Dad! STOP using the N-word slave terms died on the battlefield!

• 
  Marc Clay (@omniclay2) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the console matchmaking! There's no reason that this is the only game that separates console players, forcing us to play with computer players or bots

• 
  Voice for the truth (@voiceofztruth) reported 46 minutes ago

  @benshapiro @benshapiro forget about the Hareidim. Do you believe it’s ok to force people to fight on the battlefield or be conscripted to service against their will? It’s hard for me to digest.

• 
  Grip N Rip Sport Cards (@GripCards) reported 46 minutes ago

  After multiple hours spent on the MW4 beta, I can now confirm it’s genuinely the worst CoD I have ever played. The game lacks identity and unfortunately just feels identical to the previous IW games with 0 risks taken or any innovation. Atleast with Bo6/7 you can say they tried to take risks with Omnimovement. What’s different about MW4 compared to other recent IW games? Absolutely nothing and that’s one of the major issues. I could write an essay of feedback but I feel like I’d be putting more effort into that than the devs play testing the game. And don’t even get me started on SBMM If Battlefield 6 scared them so bad to remove SBMM in BO7, why isn’t GTA 6 scaring them? Is Activision raising the white flag already on MW4? Overall such a terrible experience made even worse by the manipulation matchmaking Spend your $70 elsewhere. Great job @InfinityWard 👍 #MW4

• 
  LetMeOffThisRide (@in_TSMWEL_era) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Blizzy63 @BattlefieldComm Half the **** you're complaining about has been addressed, you just still don't like it. There's a difference in something being broken and you just sucking too much to recognize it's a skill issue

• 
  Papi Wolf (@thePapiWolf) reported 48 minutes ago

  @GameBoostCom @RinoTheBouncer Slight argument to size of game. Example, Battlefield 6 is a much bigger game. More modes, more graphics, more happening. 16GB. CoD, complete opposite, almost 400. The problem isnt necessarily the size of game, rather than the studio doing its job ensuring the game is reasonable.

• 
  Abdurazok Abdulloev (@Abdurazok) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Reuters The broader strategic issue is that Moscow is running two clocks at once - a battlefield clock it says is favourable, and a fiscal clock its own officials are flagging. Wars usually end when those two diverge sharply. Worth tracking budget and borrowing data alongside frontline maps.

• 
  KoMiNt (@_KoMiNt_) reported 49 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Games are too long. Too many players. Not enough vehicles. Your broken system better know when someone leaves a match that is in progress that they get matchmade in to that is losing. Players just camp vehicle spawn and with 32 players it is an annoying feature. "Top 5%" lol

• 
  ℜ𝔶𝔞𝔫 🇺🇲 (@OfcRyan79) reported 54 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm How about fixing the issue of not connecting with your team when the round loads?

• 
  Iain Rae Lennox (@iainsnotes) reported 55 minutes ago

  @dhh I’d love to see this. I absolutely love Battlefield 6, but it’s one of the few things keeping Windows around for me. The game itself isn’t really the problem, it’s EA Javelin AntiCheat and its Windows kernel/security requirements. Proton can’t solve that from the Linux side. If some of those behind-the-scenes conversations eventually persuade EA to support Javelin on Linux/Proton, that would be huge. BF6 running properly on Omarchy would remove one of the biggest reasons I still need Windows.

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 55 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm - no fix for black screen bug - no bullet dispersion fixes - no audio changes - no jet loadouts 5 months later - no bullet registration fixes - no dsync fixes - Asian players in US/Eu servers abusing lag comp I’m posting till **** changes… Your ******* morons

• 
  V (@catslashmouse) reported 56 minutes ago

  This game is a ******* travesty. Way down there with BF2042. And don't you ******* dare tell me BF2042 is better than this ****, there's a laundry list of issues that remained unresolved in that game from launch to the end of support, one being 128 players, but I digress

• 
  zenStrategist 🇬🇧🇮🇱⚔️🌸 (@zenstrategist) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Lindstar24 Imagine you've shot been shot to pieces on a battlefield. They send for a medic. They send private Burnham. He stands there and tells you that he wants to fix everything, but clearly hasn't got a clue how to do anything. And you wonder why everyone suddenly gets nervous?