Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bron	Online Play	8 hours ago
Madrid	Online Play	13 hours ago
La Trinité	Game Crash	5 days ago
Lyon	Online Play	6 days ago
Persan	Sign in	7 days ago
Metz	Sign in	7 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  King Resilience (@kingwizzi_tweet) reported 32 seconds ago

  @kenkenlewu The issue isn’t the ₦6 million; it’s the secrecy and the trust that was broken. Marriage without financial transparency can easily turn into a battlefield.

• 
  QuaZaR (@QuaZaR_2) reported 1 minute ago

  Don’t see anyone talking about it but vehicle disabling in battlefield is such a dogshit mechanic, get to low health in a heli or jet and 99% of the time it’s a forced crash because you literally cannot control it anymore, actual state mandated deaths dumb as ****

• 
  Conor (SWCentral) (@SWBFCentral) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MrProWestie This has consistently been a problem for every new Battlefield title in recent memory either with bad, late or no attempt at implementation at all. Now to the entire detriment of the game... There's clearly an old guard that vehemently oppose player agency and they need to go.

• 
  Matt (@MattGoesHigher) reported 7 minutes ago

  @pantera0581 @BattlefieldComm Sounds like a you problem dude. Buy an OLED monitor and move to the US, problem solved

• 
  Brylan (@metalboybrylan) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Wolf6120 @doctordieyoung @FrenlyOfficer ?? what does this even mean dumbass??? he easily could of had a knife on him, but first and foremost you don't get on a battlefield and expect to live after trolling the enemy do you?? then you came up with a retarded strawman that no one on earth has a problem killing

• 
  🖕🏻 (@Charlie_Mike01) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The entire game is full of broken mechanics and bugs, and you ******* MORONS are taking away game modes instead of fixing the ******* game play. It’s like you’re trying to bleed players as fast as possible. Incredible stupidity.

• 
  Larry Roe (@RoeR68678) reported 14 minutes ago

  @sentdefender You throw enough money at any problem and fix it. It isn’t a matter of accelerating the production, it’s a matter of meeting the needs of the future battlefield, and not wasting millions on a one shot solution.

• 
  NorkDorf Entertainment (@NorkDorf) reported 14 minutes ago

  @PsyPheRHQ @Battlefield @CallofDuty This isn’t just about bugs—it's about a lack of accountability. Developers can’t keep pushing out updates without addressing core issues first. The community is tired of being the beta testers.

• 
  Gaurav Tomar (@talkwithgt) reported 19 minutes ago

  After a decade dominating the corporate battlefield, the cold truth slammed into me. Out of every 100 people, 60 are dead weight. They’re not working. They’re not grinding. They’re just floating, doing the bare minimum while collecting a paycheck. And those same mediocre 60? They’re the ones softly programming the other 40 who are actually putting in the blood and hours, telling them to “keep going,” “stay loyal,” “be patient,” and that success will somehow magically arrive if they just keep sacrificing. They need the hard workers to keep believing that lie. Because if the 40 ever woke up, the 60 would have nowhere left to hide.

• 
  Make Germany Great Again (@Great_GER_Again) reported 21 minutes ago

  critical battlefield, with Iranian-aligned Shiite militias deeply embedded in the country’s security system. If those three networks were substantially weakened, Iran’s regional position would be dramatically worse. But here is the problem for Washington: This alliance does

• 
  🏳️‍🌈DedSec Official🏳️‍⚧️ (@DedSecOfficial3) reported 24 minutes ago

  @RappyGrinder @Pirat_Nation Are you forgetting about Battlefield 6? The game did amazing at still the devs got laid off just so the CEO could get a bonus. The problem is the devs or the story, it's the corporate greed.

• 
  Antonio Falconieri (@AULaw24) reported 27 minutes ago

  @NajjiiMalik You do realize that these larger American drones, in addition to being persistent over designated airspace are specifically designated as pretty much expendable resources. The more contested the airspace gets the more expendable they become, but the United States doesn’t stop using them merely because they’re going to lose them quite frankly, even though they’re more expensive than they should be, as is everything the United States buys, they are relative bargain. But the current most commonly used model models are completely obsolete and I don’t think losing them as any great tragedy. America has a lot of weapons acquisition and retention policies that are clearly coming to light right now and creating massive problems for the US military, but this really isn’t one of them. The United States, despite being accused of being so far behind in modern battlefield drone warfare (which it is) pretty much invented the concept. 20 years ago the word “drone“ or “drone strike“ with synonymous with American military power and reconnaissance.

• 
  Radagast The Brown (@pnwradagast) reported 29 minutes ago

  A) it's funny to me that the women's/trans issue and race war are sharing a "battlefield" and it's the WNBA B) Do you think the WNBA knows that they are promoting a race war and doesn't care because they're getting more views?

• 
  TarkovEngineer (@tjteabaggins) reported 31 minutes ago

  32.6 hours of @wardogs #wardogs #wardongs @bulkhead . I can say with 100% confidence that I will be playing this game when it comes out fully. If they add even more to this game then its GOTY 100 percent. I have more exciting casual excitement for an arena shooter that this... this is what battlefield was trying to replicate but failed. This is the excitment I had from ARMA 3 KOTH. Its not the same as ARMA 3 KOTH but it has the same moments that happen. Just had a match that was 85 100 85 with red coming back from the brink to suppress heavy artillery, mortars, tanks and kick the other teams out of the zone. I killed 2 tanks with a CIWS. I witnessed team mates going out into heavy arty and mortar fire to drag team mates to saftey so they could be revived. This is the first time in A LONG time that I saw this level of team work out side of ARMA. G ******* G @Brammflakes . Tell your investors to let you cook if they give you trouble.

• 
  jamielear (@Jamielear1) reported 33 minutes ago

  @CoolTipst32001 Yes too many basic battlefield errors at this point in the war.

• 
  Rabbit (@theblackorchard) reported 34 minutes ago

  Stubbornness EX Summoned as the hero and her cheat skill was STUBBORNNESS ranked EX and the system literally could not quantify it because every time it tried to measure her willpower the *metric* overflowed and crashed. The demon general Noctharis hit her with a spell that should have erased her from existence and she just stood there with her hair smoking going "no." "WHAT DO YOU MEAN NO." "I mean NO. I'm not being erased today. I have LAUNDRY." The technique bounced. The system error log filled with "CANNOT RESOLVE: TARGET REFUSES OUTCOME." The Noctharis sat down on the battlefield and put his face in his hands because you cannot fight someone whose response to oblivion is a chore list. - Tails from the Trashcan

• 
  John (@DownHomeJohn) reported 35 minutes ago

  @TheToyStoryClaw @INSTILLtv2 @WARDOGS I loved battlefield. Until 4. 1 & 5 I liked. I had high hopes for 6 but the hit regs/ net code issues drive me up a wall. The game is misery with brief moments of pure cinematic experience that’s just at the bare minimum to keep me playing.

• 
  Truth Setting U Free (@Dovakeen74313) reported 38 minutes ago

  @ExoGhost The streamers are by far the problem. Anybody remember a year ago when these same people the streamers was destroying battlefield 6 with the stupid movement and the dedicated players told them to fix this or it would kill the game. Well look where battlefield 6 is now.

• 
  Seb (@sebgreenwoodd) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Please explain what you are doing with the game modes, this is excessive and frankly getting irritating. EU servers had no issues with these.

• 
  IronDog of Écosse (@irondog55) reported 41 minutes ago

  @pcgamer No. Lag is a thing. Especially in competitive games with people who ratehack. A story as old as time. Can't hit what the netcode cant see...(Original MW2, Battlefield, Delta Force) Absolutely moronic take w/ @da

• 
  D (@upnorth321) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your game. It keeps crashing.

• 
  USAI Media (@USAI_Media) reported 48 minutes ago

  @tedlieu Calling Iran “second rate” misses the strategic lesson. The U.S. can hold overwhelming technological advantages, and still run into a munitions problem, if a prolonged conflict burns through interceptors, and precision weapons faster than industry can replace them. The Pentagon’s 21-day production directive is therefore less a verdict on Iran than a warning about the U.S. defense-industrial model. Modern war is increasingly an equation of inventory depth + expenditure rate + replenishment speed. If those numbers do not balance, even the superior force can lose strategic flexibility, before it loses battlefield dominance.

• 
  Kylos (@KylosWeb3) reported 50 minutes ago

  Craziest glitches in Pokemon history. In Pokemon Gold, Silver, and Crystal, there are two moves that seem somewhat harmless. Spike chips away at any Pokemon that is sent into battle, while Sandstorm slowly damages the Pokémon on the battlefield unless they're rock, ground or steel types every single turn, and on their own they do almost nothing dangerous. Nintendo never expected anyone to line them up in a very specific way, but if you faint your own team to them in a very specific order, the game quietly loses track of whether your Pokemon are even conscious, so here's what you do. You let one of your Pokemon faint to the sandstorm first, then you send in three more Pokemon back to back and let all three of them faint to the spikes. When that third Pokemon goes down, the game gets confused and leaves it standing at zero HP. So now you just run from the battle, and every Pokemon on your team stays in your party sitting at zero HP, without the game ever forcing you to black out. But that broken party is the exact setup the developers never planned for. They added a simple safety net for an empty party, but never expected a player to reach it with a team this broken, since your entire team is technically unusable. The game panics every time a new battle tries to start, and because it can't send out a single Pokemon, it cancels the fight instantly, and copies the result of your last real battle. If you won the previous battle, you'd just keep winning, which means you could walk into any trainer or wild encounter, and as soon as the screen fades, you have already won. Due to this glitch, people have beaten the Elite Four and the Champion without every making a single move against them.

• 
  El Optimista (@ElOptimista69) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Polygon Good. **** EA and **** Battlefield Studios for not being able to fix their mess of a game.

• 
  ClayInGames (@ClayInGames1) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Please Fix the console matchmaking for the whole game! This is the only game that separates console players, forcing us to play with computer players or bots.

• 
  BluCollar Guy (@BluCollar_Guy) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Cool. Now... Get to work on Frostbite and fix the broken lag compensation. That'd be REALLY cool. Otherwise it's a fun game. And recent maps have been freakin awesome!

• 
  Catch_u_reloadn (@Catch_u_reloadn) reported 53 minutes ago

  @GhostGamingG @WARDOGS Somebody said this was like armor reforger and Battlefield mixed. I did not like that first one I mentioned at all it was a waste of money. Anyway the problem I had with that was it was not optimized for console is war dogs?

• 
  Epithelial Atronach (@DaedalusIV) reported 53 minutes ago

  @ExoGhost It’s kind of always been this way though to some degree. With dolphin-diving in Battlefield, b-hopping in CS, slide-canceling in CoD. I’ve never had much of a problem with it - pattern recognition, adaptation, and satisfaction when their technique doesn’t work.

• 
  jaheim🇹🇿🥷 (@TZsfinestt) reported 54 minutes ago

  psyche is the battlefield. But general audiences expect the superhero formula: hero, villain, spectacle, massive third act. So when that gets replaced by psychological conflict, there’s a disconnect. They say it’s boring, there’s no punchy punchy.

• 
  早起鸟 (@bicc8eth) reported 55 minutes ago

  @dotkrueger The core controversy of BIP-110 is not essentially "whether spam should be cleared", but rather "who has the right to define the use of Bitcoin block space: Miners claim that 'the transaction fee market has the final say'" The node claims, "I have the right to refuse verification/execution." I think the next major battle might escalate from a "block size war" to a "block space usage war". The fate of BIP-110 will eventually fail, but it has brought the issue of "the use of Block Space" to the forefront, similar to an upgraded version of the debate over block size in the past. The main battlefield of the dispute over the use of block space is the storage of inscriptions/data in user transactions $NAT is precisely the inscription based on the Ordinals + TAP protocol - it is currently the only inscription incentive asset that miners are allocated to each block So in the future, $NAT might be: The benchmark token of the "incentive alignment layer" that naturally emerged among the market camp after the block space usage war In other words, $NAT could become a very good "soft landing point" for all stakeholders after this upgraded war: It not only retains the core proposition of miners that "transaction fees are determined", but also uses an inscription mechanism to directly return part of the data value to those maintaining the network, thereby partially alleviating the long-standing concern of nodes about incentive asymmetry without the need for consensus layer review. If this logic holds true, the next stage of the Bitcoin ecosystem debate might no longer be about "whether to allow inscriptions", but rather "how to make inscriptions better serve miners and network security". And $NAT, as the only inscription incentive asset currently that has achieved "automatic allocation to miners per block", is likely to be at the center of this new debate