Binance Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Binance users affected:
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Beaucaire, Occitanie | 2 |
| Stafford, England | 1 |
| Nakuru, Nakuru | 1 |
| Kiambu, Kiambu | 1 |
| Vigo, Galicia | 1 |
| Mont-Saint-Martin, ACAL | 1 |
| Dubai, Dubai | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
P.Sach. (@Sachcryptos) reported@binance Will bStocks eventually support 24/7 trading and instant settlement like crypto markets? #AskBinance
-
Deal Guardian (@DealGuardianApp) reportedEurope's MiCA deadline is looming, potentially impacting Binance access and USDT liquidity. In the US, regulators are proposing user ID requirements for stablecoin issuers, while Ireland considers crypto safeguards. #Crypto #NFTs
-
K.E.Ndaeyo (@KenK_fx) reported@binance ¹ bStocks is totally new to me. How exactly does corporate action work here? For example, if a company issues a dividend or a stock split, how is that distributed to bStock holders on the app? ² Can I trade during weekends or after US market close? ³ fees for trade #AskBinance
-
joseph (@FreepanO) reportedCurrently, MiCA excludes "fully decentralised" crypto services from its scope — meaning platforms with no identifiable intermediary don't need a CASP licence and aren't subject to MiCA's investor-protection rules. Recently, Malta's regulator have communicated that truly decentralised crypto service is a much narrower category than most DeFi users assume. The MFSA's paper finds that the majority of DeFi protocols retain centralized features: admin or upgrade keys controlled by a small group, governance tokens concentrated in a handful of wallets, or front-end interfaces run by a single company. Under the paper's proposed spectrum test, those platforms would fall inside MiCA's scope — requiring licensing, smart-contract audits, and governance disclosures. For retail investors this cuts both ways. On the protection side, bringing pseudo-decentralised platforms within MiCA means accountability, redress rights, and mandatory audits — things you currently have zero claim to when using most DeFi protocols. On the access side, any DeFi platform that fails or refuses to get licensed would have to block EU users, shrinking the product set available. The consultation closes July 10, and whatever standard emerges will likely become the EU-wide template — not just a Maltese rule. What this all means is that MiCA is really but the 1st chapter of an incremental regulatory crackdown on DeFI. And this is an EU exception. The US is doing exactly the same. So if you use DeFi apps and live in the EU, pay attention to how things evolve because the regulatory ground is shifting under your feet. The elephant in the room is obviously @HyperliquidX What's going for them is that their reputation, so far, is impeccable relative to CEXs (looking at you Binance...)
-
Bông 🍊 po (@B0ngQy) reported@BinanceWallet Biggest issue with Binance Wallet DeFi: headline APY can look attractive, but real returns are harder to judge. Net yield, fees, incentives, and sustainability should be much more transparent.
-
wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported@rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..
-
Kashif Zaib (@KashifZaib1995) reported@binance **** you binance scammers
-
Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported@binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.
-
zkpuzzlematt 🧩 (@zkmattwyatt) reported@tulipking yup -- this is what I noticed with my BTC decoupling thesis HYPE/ZEC barbel stood well in Apr/May and decoupled from BTC as robinhood/binance/etc all became everything exchanges -- but EOD most of onchain economy and growth is with people taking leverage on their crypto holdings so if BTC comes down then they are forced sellers as such
-
Henry (@LordOfAlts) reported@Draxen_Web3 @binance Bullish on unified access to global assets
-
Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported@Cointelegraph Smart move from Binance, good to see them working with local regulators instead of fighting them
-
boss11.base.eth (@saqib7258) reported@binance If users make a wrong-chain deposit, why is there a recovery fee of around $20 in some cases, while in other cases support says recovery is impossible because the token isn't listed? I recently sent a token through the wrong network and when I contacted support,
-
Serena (@Serena_offical_) reported@binance @binance Since bStocks are Certificates over the underlying share (not direct stock ownership) under ADGM rules; if BTech Holdings ever needed to wind down a bStock, what’s the actual redemption path back to the real share or cash for holders outside ADGM? #AskBinance
-
Whaleland (@Whaleland_Dex) reportedEurope’s new crypto license race has started because MiCA is moving from theory to enforcement. Firms now need authorization as a crypto-asset service provider in one EU country, and that license can then be used across the bloc. That has created a real competitive sprint among exchanges, fintechs, and crypto infrastructure firms. Winning early means gaining regulated access to the EU market ahead of rivals, while missing the deadline can mean an orderly exit, blacklisting, or legal risk. Recent events show both sides of that race. Conio secured a MiCA license in Italy this week, while Reuters reported Binance is expected to lose its bid in Greece and may no longer be able to serve EU users from July. The bigger picture is that Europe is becoming one of the first major markets where crypto regulation now directly decides who can scale. That makes licensing less of a compliance box and more of a strategic moat.
-
Michael Mislos | BitPinas (@mmichaels_21) reportedHow did @binance successfully and legally re-enter the Philippines? Here are the points from a recently released whitepaper: “The Regulated Reentry of @binance in the Philippines”. Here is a summary but Please note it is best to read the 7-page whitepaper as there might be finer points lost in the summary: 1) The Reentry & Global Anchor: The whitepaper outlines a compliant, cross-jurisdictional framework to bring Binance back into the Philippines via local partner BlockShoals Technologies Inc.. They did this by leveraging the international regulatory weight of a comprehensive ADGM FSRA license secured in Abu Dhabi. (The reasoning for this and the exact implementation is detailed in the whitepaper. If there is only one section that you will read from there, this is it!) 2) The architecture is built on a split-jurisdiction design: BlockShoals handles the front-end user experience under the SEC’s Crypto-Asset Intermediary (CAI) track, while natively delegating 100% of the peso-denominated fiat clearing to an active, independent domestic VASP partner. 3) The paper explicitly disputes recent media commentary that characterized the 90-day integration window as a "compliance gap" or an unexpected "halt" to the platform's entry. It clarifies that this timeline is actually a pre-planned technical "Pre-Phase" mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines April 14, 2026 Notice to Proceed. 4) It rejects the negative narrative that BlockShoals lacking a standalone VASP license is a regulatory error; instead, it argues that utilizing an existing local VASP's rails was a deliberate, engineered feature of the approved architecture from day one to satisfy the BSP's "unbroken chain" clearing rule, not a late remedy added to it. 5) The whitepaper confirms that public-facing retail onboarding and open trading are strictly barred during the current 90-day sandbox phase, which serves purely as a closed, highly supervised technical window to test backend infrastructure and fiat rails. 6) The SEC's StratBox approval carries more than fifteen highly sensitive, substantive conditions regarding user caps and product scopes, which must continuously coordinate with and adapt to evolving local banking policies, such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas strict June 12, 2026 privacy coin ban. Whitepaper in the second tweet. 👇 @cz_binance