Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Boris NEOF1 (@NEOFORCEONE) reported 6 minutes ago

  @kfXGGjovH2HKn4u @c_schuchardt Did dude @kfXGGjovH2HKn4u is using a small baby to promote Chinese scam, is clear to see he is NGD shill ( They have 0 moral ) They are Chinese scammers, all is pump and dump, that is the whole game, market manipuilation and harvesting people, that is why they don't really care about updates, as they are here to harvest people, that is why all things are slow in core-dev segment also, they don't care to work, as there is no incentive to progress on global goal, there is no leadership only a Chinese scamming boss and his scamming helpers/Yes man, soon court process for creating a global international, money laundering ring ( Da Hongfei ) And his partners in crime NGD etc... where Erik will be part of the court process also. They know abot pumps and dumps before they happened on Binance they orchestrated. Etc...

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 6 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceWallet Thank you for your response, but the issue has never been properly addressed. The same problem keeps happening repeatedly, and each time it is eventually attributed to a "technical error." When the same mistake occurs over and over again, it is no longer an isolated incident—it becomes a systemic issue. Your technical failures have repeatedly classified my account as high-risk, restricted services, and caused unnecessary inconvenience and stress. As a user, I am expected to comply with all requirements, and I have done so every time. Yet Binance continues to make the same mistakes without taking responsibility. What is even more frustrating is the lack of transparency, accountability, and any form of apology after these errors are proven. Repeating the same issue for months is not acceptable and reflects poorly on the reliability of your systems. Users deserve better than repeated technical failures and generic responses. We deserve fair treatment, clear explanations, and accountability

• 
  Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported 8 minutes ago

  @binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.

• 
  chilombo (@Unfaithfulparis) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance clear the issue with the mica agreement if move or sell my bnb or others crypto it’s gonna be hard I have my account since the beginning. YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

• 
  miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported 10 minutes ago

  @0xSchnitzel @binance I hate regulatory overreach but tbh **** Binance. Their payment processing is awful and not compliant with any standard they falsely claim to have in place. They store user CC CVVs which quite literally puts all of their 300M+ users AND their bank accounts at risk. They even decline bug bounties and then sneakily try to patch things, but never actually bother to truly fix the issues. Been like that for 3+ years now. Good riddance.

• 
  Uzair | Web3 & Crypto (@ahmadbabar3590) reported 11 minutes ago

  After tokenizing the stocks, they will want to access the largest liquidity pool in the world. #BNB #Binance

• 
  CHAIN REACTIONS ℠ Ӿ (@ChainReactionOm) reported 14 minutes ago

  @connyb @alexjohnward @Yeicrypto Study Cardano The market is irrational and what is working is in the hand of few players like : Coinbase, Binance and other big scam groups , eaither you Join their playground or wait for Clarity Act Nothing working now , only scams

• 
  Crypto (@spiderman0647) reported 16 minutes ago

  We closed three accounts belonging to our family. We conducted two billion dollars worth of transactions in seven years. Damn that commission, may it go down your throats, die, you scoundrels! #Binance

• 
  Akoto k. Alfred (@fxPips_god) reported 18 minutes ago

  My TRC20: TLudTEV2VCSHQ5eJWjVyMezNvdQHpBpWjA My phone is so broken I can't even comment on X without using Chrome 😭 I need a working phone to trade on Binance, Bitget & Bybit daily 📱 Winning this $100 = new Crosscall Trekker X4 = back to trading properly 🙏 I need this W. 📈

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet After trying the Binance Wallet Extension, the feature that stood out most to me is not just the wallet itself, but the idea of putting decision support directly inside the browser. The Sports AI Assistant feels useful because it doesn’t force me to jump between tabs. I like that the widget stays beside the match page and gives probabilities, match context, market data, xG, likely scores, and impact factors in one place. That makes the experience feel more like “research while browsing” instead of “open wallet, open another site, open another tracker.” My main suggestion: add a “Why did this probability change?” timeline. For example: • 35’ — injury news added • 42’ — market odds moved • 58’ — current score changed • Win probability: 44% → 39% • Main reason: time remaining + defensive adjustment This would make the AI feel more trustworthy because users can see the logic behind the movement, not just the final number. For the Wallet Extension itself, I’d also like a clearer “session safety panel” before interacting with dApps: connected site, active wallet, current network, permissions, risk level, and last activity. Browser wallets are powerful, but users need quick context before signing anything. Overall, this feels like Binance is moving the wallet from a simple transaction tool into a real-time decision layer. The next step is explainability: show not only what the AI thinks, but why it changed its mind.

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 21 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng @_RichardTeng Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution since 9 months, within Binance complex & typical breuaratic support system. Can you please help here (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  K@Z (@KazOG603) reported 27 minutes ago

  Congratulations on $wojak I was right just wrong cabal but hey it’s crypto what can you expect i probably should’ve grabbed some to be safe but I was to loyal and thought just maybe will make it through this since we made it literally through all the ups and down but I guess this binance listing was part of cabal gg once again back to square 1 🫡

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 28 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  Michael Mislos | BitPinas (@mmichaels_21) reported 32 minutes ago

  How did @binance successfully and legally re-enter the Philippines? Here are the points from a recently released whitepaper: “The Regulated Reentry of @binance in the Philippines”. Here is a summary but Please note it is best to read the 7-page whitepaper as there might be finer points lost in the summary: 1) The Reentry & Global Anchor: The whitepaper outlines a compliant, cross-jurisdictional framework to bring Binance back into the Philippines via local partner BlockShoals Technologies Inc.. They did this by leveraging the international regulatory weight of a comprehensive ADGM FSRA license secured in Abu Dhabi. (The reasoning for this and the exact implementation is detailed in the whitepaper. If there is only one section that you will read from there, this is it!) 2) The architecture is built on a split-jurisdiction design: BlockShoals handles the front-end user experience under the SEC’s Crypto-Asset Intermediary (CAI) track, while natively delegating 100% of the peso-denominated fiat clearing to an active, independent domestic VASP partner. 3) The paper explicitly disputes recent media commentary that characterized the 90-day integration window as a "compliance gap" or an unexpected "halt" to the platform's entry. It clarifies that this timeline is actually a pre-planned technical "Pre-Phase" mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines April 14, 2026 Notice to Proceed. 4) It rejects the negative narrative that BlockShoals lacking a standalone VASP license is a regulatory error; instead, it argues that utilizing an existing local VASP's rails was a deliberate, engineered feature of the approved architecture from day one to satisfy the BSP's "unbroken chain" clearing rule, not a late remedy added to it. 5) The whitepaper confirms that public-facing retail onboarding and open trading are strictly barred during the current 90-day sandbox phase, which serves purely as a closed, highly supervised technical window to test backend infrastructure and fiat rails. 6) The SEC's StratBox approval carries more than fifteen highly sensitive, substantive conditions regarding user caps and product scopes, which must continuously coordinate with and adapt to evolving local banking policies, such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas strict June 12, 2026 privacy coin ban. Whitepaper in the second tweet. 👇 @cz_binance

• 
  Mr.Gorstein 🧪 (@MrGorstein) reported 35 minutes ago

  @guiguziben @FengShui_BNB They usually take time aftr such moves.... Like 200% up in frst week. Then 50% down then again 400% and binance alpha