Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐁 (@Adib2410119) reported 2 minutes ago

  @heistruthX Binance bcz when I open prediction before match on poly. I can't entire their website when match ongoing that's why I skipped this

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Mark_Ecpert Classic rug pull play. Fake P&L screenshots = bait. Real exchanges never block withdrawals like this. Stick to Binance, Coinbase, Kraken. If it sounds too good to be true, it’s a scam.

• 
  enci (@encigr) reported 8 minutes ago

  Honestly $spacemoon feels like the perfect layup for CZ. On June 11, binance launched bStocks - tokenized stocks on @BNBCHAIN, the centerpiece of the whole "next 3 billion users" super-app bet. A few days later, @spacemoonbsc launched, which does one thing: routes trading taxes into spacex bStock and distributes it to holders onchain. In just 2 days it's driven $250k into spacex bStock and onboarded 2,500 holders. As a matter of fact, it's single-handedly dragging bStocks toward being the most successful tokenized-stock attempt onchain. If CZ wanted a trojan horse to get retail hooked on bStocks, it'd look exactly like this. After all, they have sent tokens to absurd valuations before with nothing this strategic behind them. I expect spacemoon to start repricing till it gets its ****-you candle.

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 12 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Hello CZ.! One of my friend had some p2p issue he lost 3000$ on p2p deposit in 2025 And he went to FIA pakistan and asked help from Binance too after this lose his heart broke and left Binance sir please help him 🙏

• 
  InvestorX (@investorie) reported 13 minutes ago

  XRP is not in a confirmed bullish reversal yet. It is in a support test. That distinction matters. Right now XRP is trading around the $1.12–$1.15 area after losing the $1.20 level and then failing to reclaim strength above $1.15. Binance live data shows XRP has recently traded around the $1.12–$1.15 zone, with the latest 24h low near $1.1185. This is why the current chart should not be read as “the breakout is starting.” It should be read as: XRP is trying to prove that the floor is still there. The key area is roughly $1.10–$1.13. If this area holds, XRP may be building a third low in the same broader support zone. Retail calls that a “triple bottom,” but the name only matters after confirmation. A triple bottom is not confirmed when price touches support three times. It is confirmed when price holds support, reclaims resistance, and starts making higher lows again. For XRP, that means: Hold the $1.10–$1.13 support zone Reclaim $1.15 Reclaim $1.20 Push into $1.25+ Then the market can start talking about a real structure shift Until then, this is not a breakout. It is a battlefield. The danger is simple. If XRP loses $1.10 with strength, the “triple bottom” idea fails and the next downside zones become much more important. Earlier June XRP price data also shows how violent this area can become, with XRP trading as low as roughly $1.05–$1.07 during the prior selloff. So the honest read is this: Above $1.20, XRP starts repairing damage. Above $1.25, the bulls get a real argument. Below $1.10, the floor is no longer holding. This is also why macro matters. Bitcoin is still under pressure near the low $60k area, and when BTC is weak, altcoins usually do not get to write their own script. XRP can have strong long-term fundamentals, but in the short term it still trades inside the broader crypto liquidity cycle. That means XRP’s current position is not “dead.” But it is also not confirmed bullish. It is sitting at the exact point where patience matters. Retail usually gets trapped by two mistakes: Calling every support touch a bottom. Calling every bounce a reversal. A real reversal needs confirmation. For me, the current XRP map is simple: $1.10–$1.13 = support test $1.15 = first recovery level $1.20 = damage repair $1.25+ = structure improves $2.00–$2.10 = macro breakout gate Everything below that is still preparation, not victory. XRP may be forming something important here. But the market has not confirmed it yet. No fear. No hype. Just levels. #XRP #Crypto #XRPL

• 
  Fidele (@Fidele_ka) reported 14 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks ever support fractional shares for emerging market users? Right now I can buy $1 of crypto but not $1 of a stock — would love to see that gap close . #AskBinance

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 15 minutes ago

  @grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.

• 
  Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reported 15 minutes ago

  franklin templeton filed for etfs that funnel stock dividend flow into BTC. eu mica go-live in july puts binance access and USDT liquidity at risk in europe. oman launched omanhash, a national bitcoin mining pool to regulate licensed miners.

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Fadil_bawa1 @Fadil_bawa1 You missed the bigger play—$Wojak’s 24h volume on Binance US spiked 400% the day after the listing, but only 12% of traders held it for >6hrs. Most sold into the hype. We track this daily—breaking down why in our latest report. Follow...

• 
  Muhammad Ali (@MTgrali) reported 26 minutes ago

  @binance @hamybinance I m stuck in debts can u help me Or u may ask someone who help It's been 4 year I m stuck at one place Trust me asking fr help, breaks my respect from inside but I m helpless

• 
  Guruprasad Venkatesha (@Guru_BCUBE) reported 31 minutes ago

  @tweet_buzzer I have withdrawn 40% of my funds from Binance and parked it in Bybit. I will wait for one more week and then pull out everything. The whole platform has to shutdown if they don’t obtain Mica but personally I feel it’s impossible for them to obtain due to criminal investigation in France and other constraints.

• 
  ***** (@SpudsMcgee123) reported 32 minutes ago

  @binance Because I want to stay poor, they help me by delisting practically every coin I hold and have held since 2021. Thanks Binance

• 
  il.hl (@hyperliquidmax) reported 32 minutes ago

  America's largest derivatives exchange isn't going to court to compete with perp futures. It's going to court to make sure Americans can't trade them at all. Those are very different things. 🧵 → This spring: U.S. regulators opened a compliant path for perp futures → Today: CME filed a court action to close it → Per @BetterMarkets: CME controls ~92% of U.S. exchange-traded derivatives Perp futures = first genuinely new derivatives product to reach U.S.-regulated markets in over a decade. Mainstream framing: "CME is protecting market integrity." A company with 92% market share going to court against a new entrant isn't protecting the market. It's protecting its position. CFTC Chairman Selig reportedly put it plainly: "Incumbents will always fear the future." For years, Americans were pushed offshore to trade perps — Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid. Now a compliant path exists. And an incumbent is asking a court to shut it down. If CME wins — does that volume come back onshore? Or does it stay offshore. Permanently. ⚡

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet my honest feedback on #Binance Wallet DeFi after using it: the strongest part is not just “more yield options.” it’s that Binance is slowly turning DeFi from scattered tabs into an actual portfolio layer. before, a normal DeFi user had to jump between PancakeSwap, Venus, Uniswap, dashboards, explorers, and sometimes a notes app just to answer simple questions like: where is my money, what risk am i taking, what can i exit quickly, and what fees did i actually earn? Binance Wallet DeFi fixes a big part of that by putting staking, LPs, and loans in one place. that matters because BSC alone is still doing around $5B+ in DeFi TVL, $13B+ in stablecoins, and hundreds of millions in daily DEX volume, so the problem is not lack of activity — the problem is making that activity readable for real users. what i liked: - the 40+ protocols / 1,000+ pools coverage makes the product feel useful, not decorative - seeing Earn, Loans, and Liquidity Pools under one wallet flow reduces “where did i put this asset?” anxiety - loan access through protocols like Venus makes sense because collateral usage is one of the real DeFi use cases, not just farming incentives - LP management inside wallet is a big improvement because adding/removing liquidity and claiming fees should not require users to leave the safety layer what i think can make it exceptional: 1. show “net APY after gas + incentives + price risk,” not just headline APY 2. add an LP impermanent-loss simulator before users deposit 3. add health-factor alerts for loans with push notifications before liquidation risk becomes urgent 4. rank pools by risk-adjusted yield, not just APY 5. show protocol dependency clearly: where the money sits, what contract is used, audit status, and whether rewards are sustainable 6. add a “one-tap unwind” view: remove LP, repay loan, or withdraw position cleanly during volatility 7. give users a monthly DeFi statement: earned fees, rewards, gas spent, unrealized IL, and net result overall, Binance Wallet DeFi feels like the right direction because it treats DeFi as a position-management problem, not only a yield-discovery problem. my main suggestion: don’t make the product compete on the highest APY. compete on clarity. the wallet that helps users understand risk, exit faster, and track real net returns will win long term.

• 
  0xbobaa (@0xbobaaa) reported 37 minutes ago

  30% apr funding arb. nets 12% after costs. one slow exit and it's red where the other 18% goes: long spot, short perp, collect funding every 8h. 0.015% a period reads like ~19% a year then the costs. taker fees round trip, 4-10 bps a leg, both legs, in and out. and funding doesn't hold. the rate slides toward zero in two days, so you bank $18 against $10-15 in fees and the "risk-free" trade sits flat or under what nobody sizes for: only enter once a delta's held 5-7 days. one print isn't an edge cross-exchange is the same trap. hyperliquid vs binance run 6-11% apr, prints have touched 48%. arbitrage should close that gap and it just doesn't. the capital that would close it is off chasing price the yield is real. just thinner and slower than it looks