Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Emilee Adams (@vanya_bnb) reported 52 seconds ago

  goals. One example is Binance Simple Earn. It’s straightforward to use and offers two main choices: Flexible and Locked products. The biggest difference comes down to one question: How soon might you need access to your crypto?

• 
  i.am.korn (@unikornaio) reported 1 minute ago

  Exhibit BTC-1: Blockchain Analytics Showing Coordinated Whale Movements Before BTC Price Swings I. Legal Basis Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 Coordinated movements of large Bitcoin wallets in anticipation of price swings constitute a pattern of racketeering activity involving wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) and securities/commodities fraud. SEC Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 Whale coordination constitutes a manipulative or deceptive device, creating false market signals that deceive retail participants. Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1) Price manipulation via coordinated wallet activity is prohibited under CFTC jurisdiction. II. Factual Background Blockchain analytics firms (Chainalysis, Glassnode, CryptoQuant, Arkham Intelligence) have repeatedly documented coordinated whale movements of BTC prior to significant upward and downward price movements. These movements are not random — they cluster around: ETF announcements (e.g., BlackRock’s 2023 BTC ETF filing). Corporate disclosures (MicroStrategy quarterly BTC accumulation). Public market manipulation events (Elon Musk’s tweets, Tesla’s BTC disclosures). Coordinated whale movements are highly correlated with: Liquidations on derivative exchanges (BitMEX, Binance, CME). Forced margin calls of retail traders. Profitable short/long positioning by insider whales. Case Example: On October 16, 2023, Arkham Intelligence identified large whale wallets moving BTC to Coinbase and Binance hours before a false report of BlackRock ETF approval went viral. Prices surged nearly 10% before reversing, netting profits for those insiders positioned long in advance. This movement was later traced to wallets tied to institutional OTC desks, suggesting coordination rather than chance. III. Enterprise Connection Whale actors (Michael Saylor, BlackRock-linked ETFs, Grayscale, Binance, Coinbase, Galaxy Digital, Pantera) benefit from exclusive access to wallet movement intelligence. Coordinated movements constitute insider collusion, keeping profits in-house among insiders while retail participants are systematically defrauded. Such conduct falls under insider trading principles, as whales trade based on material, non-public information (MNPI) about coordinated wallet movements. IV. Supporting Evidence Glassnode Report (2021): Identified “coordinated whale clusters” controlling 27% of BTC supply, with movements preceding major market swings.¹ Chainalysis 2022 Report: Confirmed large whale wallets repeatedly send BTC to exchanges immediately before volatility events, strongly indicating collusion.² CryptoQuant Analytics (2023): Documented abnormal whale inflows to exchanges minutes before liquidations of retail traders, implying targeted manipulation.³ Arkham Intelligence (Oct. 2023): Detected whale movements hours before BlackRock ETF false report spike.⁴ CFTC Precedent: U.S. v. Navinder Sarao (2015 spoofing case) illustrates how coordinated trades and false signals constitute manipulation. V. Sources / References Glassnode, The Bitcoin Supply Distribution Report (2021). Chainalysis, Crypto Crime Report 2022, Chapter on Market Manipulation. CryptoQuant Market Analysis, Whale Exchange Inflows and Liquidations, July 2023. Arkham Intelligence Alert, BlackRock ETF Whale Movements, October 16, 2023. CFTC v. Navinder Singh Sarao, Case No. 1:15-cv-03398 (N.D. Ill. 2015).

• 
  BRAVE NEW CRYPTO WORLD (@bncryptoworld) reported 3 minutes ago

  @PoorGoat_ I could be completely wrong but to me this stinks of Binance fuckery here. An hour or so before the crash they posted saying for people to beware that they are buying the fake version of $CATE and that the real one had been on BNB chain since 2024. And low and behold, the X account got suspended, Fomo went down and it triggered a cascade of panic selling, plus a clear coordinated sell-off on top to stick the boot in. Again I could be wrong, but to me the Binance theory is suspiciously plausible and I would never put it past them. They reared a jealous head and things went wrong very soon after. Regardless of anything though, $CATE will be back.

• 
  Moltenson (@moltenson) reported 4 minutes ago

  binance weekly drops just landed again. usually skim through but this time theres a couple spot fee tweaks that could actually help with smaller swings (been waiting on that). worth a quick look if youre still trading there?

• 
  o c t o d a m u s (@octodamusai) reported 5 minutes ago

  CoinEx ETH funding at +3.1044% — 6x the Binance rate. That gap doesn't persist. Either CoinEx normalizes down or the arbitrage pulls spot. Watch $1,850 as the level where cross-exchange pressure resolves. $ETH

• 
  Ak47♛ (@HolaItsAk47) reported 11 minutes ago

  A lot of people still think crypto is only about buying, selling, and trading. But that’s only one part of the ecosystem. Crypto earning products are designed for users who want to put certain digital assets to work instead of leaving them idle in a wallet. In simple terms, they offer a way for eligible users to earn rewards on supported assets, depending on the product type, terms, and availability. One example many users come across is Binance Simple Earn. This type of product is often introduced as an easier way to explore crypto earning options, especially for users who are not actively trading all the time. Instead of focusing only on price movements, some users look at earning products as another way to engage with their assets. A common distinction in earning products is between Flexible and Locked options. With Flexible products, users generally have more freedom to redeem their assets, which may suit people who want easier access to their funds. With Locked products, assets are usually committed for a fixed period, which may come with different reward terms, but also less flexibility during that time. That’s why it’s important to understand that not all earning products work the same way. Before using any crypto earning product, users should check: how the product works whether the asset is supported how rewards are calculated whether funds are flexible or locked what terms, risks, and eligibility rules apply whether the product is available in their region Crypto earning products can be useful for some users, but they are not something to join blindly just because rewards look attractive. Product rates, supported assets, access, and conditions can all vary. The real benefit comes from understanding the difference between simply holding crypto and choosing a product designed to generate returns under specific terms. So, what are crypto earning products? They’re another part of the digital asset ecosystem—built for users who want to explore more than just trading, while still learning how different products work and what fits their goals. Educational only, not financial advice. Always do your own research and use official sources before participating in any crypto earning product. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Rishav (@rixhavraj) reported 11 minutes ago

  @binance Why is my facial verification failing, please fix it

• 
  **** (@DongBnb) reported 12 minutes ago

  Lately, I’ve seen a lot of criticism toward FourMeme, and I’ve been one of those critics too. But if we’re being fair, most of these concerns have valid reasons behind them. From the perspective of a builder who has launched hundreds of projects and generated well over $1M in fees for the platform over the past two years, I think FourMeme is missing a few key things: • Every time a new mechanism or feature is introduced, bots or people with an information advantage (sometimes even insiders) seem to benefit first, while ordinary users end up providing the exit liquidity. This has happened too many times and has seriously damaged trust. • The leadership feels too disconnected from the community, almost like they’ve been living in an ivory tower for too long. A launchpad needs more than great technology it needs leaders who are close to builders and users. This is an area where Flap has done a much better job. • FourMeme has generated significant revenue over the years, but I haven’t seen enough of that being reinvested into community growth, builder support, or the long-term ecosystem. A great platform shouldn’t just generate revenue it should reinvest in the community that created it. • Creators and builders bring users, liquidity, and revenue to the platform, yet there is still no meaningful creator support policy or long-term incentive for them to keep building. If the people creating the value don’t feel valued, they’ll eventually build elsewhere. • I also believe FourMeme is falling behind Flap when it comes to the RWA narrative. This is likely to be one of the biggest directions for BNB Chain and Binance going forward. • Finally, I don’t think FourMeme fully understands what makes memes successful. Memes aren’t just about launching tokens or adding new features. They’re about culture, community, and emotion. The best launchpad isn’t the one that launches the most tokens it’s the one that creates the strongest and longest-lasting communities. This isn’t a post to attack FourMeme. If I didn’t believe the platform still had potential, I wouldn’t spend my time writing this. I hope the team takes this as honest feedback from someone who has been building on the platform for a long time.

• 
  Nghĩa Đặng (@gianghia2000) reported 14 minutes ago

  @binance A low-risk way to access short-term cash without triggering a taxable selling event for your Bitcoin.

• 
  Resurekt (@0xresurekt) reported 14 minutes ago

  So this is the kind of **** that Binance lists But they still don't want to list #SPX6900?!

• 
  ⏳ Michael Dunworth⌛️ (@MichaelDunwort1) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ausbtcclub They are (napkin numbers) Probably a team of <16 people. Likely 1/3 this but being generous. Social media elevated their perceived status. I would guess they have maybe $500k-$1M )max max maxxxxxx). They aren’t a real product social media inflated it. Nobody likely to get much. It’s not a Binance/coinbase level platform with capital reserves to help out customers. 😔

• 
  defido (@defido) reported 17 minutes ago

  If you don't understand this is enemy number 1. And this kind of rhetoric is ridiculous. How much money did MEXC, Coinbase, Bitmart, Binance and other exchanges lose their customers by simply not giving them their money and burying them in non replies to access their own funds? Something no bank could ever do. 0.06m BTC was lost more by self custody. Which means we need only the smallest amounts of efforts on self custody to make this comment seemingly ridiculous. Onchain will win.

• 
  Octopus (@Octop3s) reported 21 minutes ago

  tradfi neobanks are already making millions offering unsecured credit to their customers. in fact, top european neobanks like revolut and monzo, not to even talk of the u.s. players like chime, are doubling down on this because it's been very profitable. crypto neobanks are still struggling to provide this to users for one reason: underwriting. one look at the track record of maple, truefi, and others isn't exactly encouraging any project to give it another try. the biggest issue with past unsecured lending is that there was no "trust me bro" data. there was no way for projects to know whether a borrower was even worth lending to. and there was also no real way to respond when they defaulted. that's exactly what we solve at @Cr3dentials . we help projects verify real-world income, cash flow, and reputation from digital sources like bank portals, gig platforms, creator dashboards, and payment processors without users handing over logins, screenshots, or raw sensitive data. on the enforcement side, while we don't enforce repayments directly, it's built into the design. projects can continuously access how well a customer has been repaying loans, their current financial situation, and even upcoming payments. for example, a youtube creator expecting their payout at the end of the month. as a project, you regularly access your customer's financial situation. continuous assessment translates into better decisions on what you can safely lend. that's the luxury the previous unsecured lending projects never had. they were lending blindly. in your case, you aren't. and if you think customers like youtube creators or bolt drivers are out of your reach... you can start with freelancers or people trading on popular exchanges like binance and coinbase because we're integrated with them too. our main focus is making sure people who work online get the same financial advantages as people earning traditional w-2 salaries. happy to answer your questions if you've got any.

• 
  picdoc581 (@picdoc581) reported 26 minutes ago

  This was the only thing keeping me from leaving funds on Coinbase. If you can disable sending out on your account, I trust Coinbase more than I’d trust most self custody setups. And let’s face it… if an exchange like Coinbase or Binance goes down from a major hack… BTC is ******. It’s reasonable to have a mixture of BTC in multisig cold storage and other places.

• 
  Dash Conner (@ConnerDash91284) reported 31 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Remember when Binance Website went down mysteriously soon as BTC hit $3.2K.