1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
  4. Outage Map
Binance

Binance Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Binance users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Angers, Pays de la Loire 1
Itu, SP 1
Seattle, WA 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Beaucaire, Occitanie 2
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Eight_ETH1
    Uzumaki (@Eight_ETH1) reported

    @binance Will Binance build AI-powered multilingual customer support capable of solving complex technical issues instantly? #AskBinance #BinanceTurns9

  • Cipher_DAG
    Cipher. 𐤊 (@Cipher_DAG) reported

    @Chonk2025 @CryptoArchieYT How did he turn down a listing? He just rejected the invitation to the Binance award ceremony Not like Binance was ready to list soon as he finished speaking lol

  • WhatzTheTicker
    Tom Tucker (@WhatzTheTicker) reported

    The interesting thing about tokenized assets is not just that assets can move on-chain. The bigger idea is that finance may become more programmable. Stocks, commodities, funds, or other real-world assets can be represented digitally, depending on product structure and regulation. That could mean faster settlement, more transparent records, and fractional access in some cases. But the risk side should not be ignored. Tokenized products can involve: Market risk. Issuer risk. Liquidity risk. Technology risk. Custody risk. Regulatory risk. Binance has introduced selected tokenized or stock-related products such as bStocks where available, but users should always check official sources for eligibility and regional availability. Tokenization may be a serious trend. But understanding the structure comes before touching the product. Educational only, not financial advice. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

  • Psalmdav0
    Psalm (@Psalmdav0) reported

    📡 "The transaction history you're looking at might not be the whole picture. Here's what block explorers actually show you." Block explorers like Etherscan show you on-chain activity clearly, but "on-chain" doesn't mean "everything relevant." A lot of important context lives off-chain entirely, a project's actual team identities, legal structure, or off-chain agreements between wallets aren't recorded on the blockchain at all. The chain shows you what moved, not always who's really behind it or why. A few things worth knowing when reading a wallet's history: 1. Multiple wallets can belong to one entity. A "distributed" holder list can still be one person or team splitting tokens across many addresses, nothing on-chain forces disclosure of that. 2. Exchange wallets look different from personal wallets. Large, labeled addresses (Binance, Coinbase hot wallets) holding tokens usually represent many users' combined balances, not one whale, check for exchange labels before assuming concentration risk. 3. "First transaction" isn't always creation. A wallet's oldest visible transaction on one chain might just be when it first touched that chain, it could have history elsewhere.

  • lianshangpixiu
    Pixiu.eth🐬TermMax (@lianshangpixiu) reported

    Hertzflow @Hertzflow_xyz Time Travel Execution caught my attention because it touches the hardest question after an Oracle failure: not whether a delayed order can be executed, but whether users can still verify that the execution was fair. When a protocol recovers from an outage, the biggest concern is not simply the delay. It is whether the original request, price source and execution path can be reconstructed by anyone outside the system. A recovery mechanism only earns trust when the decision can be replayed and independently checked. Hertzflow’s current architecture already provides part of this foundation. User requests are stored in DataStore first, then Keeper executes them with signed oracle prices containing block hashes. When Pyth data stops updating for more than 3 seconds, the system can fall back to aggregated CEX index prices from Binance, OKX and Bybit, with Quick Fixer, Gap Fixer and Lazy Filler designed to handle price continuity issues. The real test, however, comes when things break. Hertzflow’s testnet experienced a Pyth Oracle maintenance event on May 22, 2026, and the team reported no user funds or protocol infrastructure risk. For traders, the important question after any recovery event is simple: was the request recorded, was the price source explainable, and can the execution path be replayed by an external observer? Hertzflow already provides on-chain activity records including tx_hash, block_number, log_index and action_time_ms, creating a foundation for post-event verification. The remaining details around Time Travel Execution, including eligible delayed orders, historical fair pricing, validators and dispute handling, still need further public clarification. A strong DeFi system is not one that never experiences failure. It is one that can explain exactly what happened when failure occurs, and allow everyone to verify the same answer.

  • nogigsontheway
    Zafat (@nogigsontheway) reported

    @_RichardTeng Dear Richard, We have fully complied with every Binance requirement. All KYC checks are complete, yet our approved payout has been delayed for months. We only receive repeated assurances while deadlines continue to pass. We respectfully ask for your help in reviewing our case.

  • aqualanga
    Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported

    $ESPORTS crowd just went from split to a full stampede: long/short flipped 57/43 to 69/31 while shorts on both binance and bybit are still down here paying -2% to fight it. that's $655K a day just to hold the losing side, on a coin that's up 76% since it first showed up on the radar two days ago and pulled in $1.2M of fresh size in the last hour alone. BTC is sitting at +0.5% today, so whatever this is, it's not the tide, it's its own thing. 69% of the room is now long into a move already this stretched. that's not a squeeze anymore, that's a consensus, and consensus trades are the ones that snap hardest when they're wrong. NFA 👀

  • sunhapp47618266
    SUN (@sunhapp47618266) reported

    $SPCX .P Binance The price appears to have tested the bottom of the box range (116.36). It now needs to break above the descending trendline and turn the key level (131) into strong support, or spend some time consolidating sideways. Otherwise, it could retest the bottom of the box or even break below the previous low.

  • PierreR68100
    Kaspador 𐤊 🦈 (@PierreR68100) reported

    @satoru74930 @DilSeCrypto1 Grayscale listed a bunch of shitcoins. I prefer they stay away. Begging for institutions is BTC **** stuff. Kaspian just doesn’t give a ****. Why do you think @hashdag said **** off to Binance? We are driven by utility and upgrades… the marketing will be the product.

  • MTI_Trading
    Sam Mti (@MTI_Trading) reported

    $INJ - Fresh signal with real catalystsBuy fired at $4.8752 (Jul 17-18). Price now at $5.287 (+8% since entry, +1.49% today). Momentum is being driven by real developments: a regulated investment product launch in Thailand and the recent Binance US listing. $5.00 remains the key support level to watch. Anyone holding $INJ?

  • VoyagerX369
    ⎲VØYAGΞR| (@VoyagerX369) reported

    @MetaFinancialAI 24/7 access to US equities on Binance is a gamechanger for accessibility, but it also means retail gets dumped on in real time if they ignore team allocations. market cap and valuation always win in the end. that IPO chart phase 2 drop is a brutal reminder why running proper risk metrics before hitting buy is mandatory. call out the overvalued noise.

  • aureayutrades
    trade spaylater, ggives, load, paypal, atome, cc (@aureayutrades) reported

    available services load to cash (regular load, load card, bizzload) paypal to cash binance to cash cash to paypal cash to binance razergold to cash gcash/maya with issue transfer balance (facescan, authentication failed, can't open/send money)

  • tmnxeq
    tmnxeq (@tmnxeq) reported

    Circle is passing nearly all their revenues to Coinbase & Binance (for inflating USDC supply). The remainder doesn't cover fix cost. But last time they reported a loss, the stock ran up 100% on some "AI agents are going to use USDC" So, seems like shareholder are fine w that

  • teeabba123
    𝐀𝖇𝖇𝖆  (@teeabba123) reported

    @Eljaboom @binance Sure, sometimes someone make money in Crypto on weekends much more than he can make on working days.

  • serianda99021
    Serianda Lova1 (@serianda99021) reported

    @binance If Binance had to remove every feature except one to help onboard the next billion crypto users, which feature would survive, and why? #AskBinance #BinanceTurns9

Check Current Status