Binance Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Binance users affected:
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Porto Alegre, RS | 1 |
| Angers, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Itu, SP | 1 |
| Seattle, WA | 1 |
| Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Belle (@Bitt_Belle) reportedWhen I look at @binance Blockchain Week, I don’t think the most important thing is how many announcements come out of the event. I’m more interested in the quality of the conversations. Crypto moves fast, and every few months there is a new narrative, a new sector, or a new technology everyone suddenly talks about. But not every trend turns into something people actually use. That is why I think events like Binance Blockchain Week are useful. They give builders, companies, exchanges, creators, users and industry experts a chance to compare ideas in the same place and ask harder questions. • What is actually gaining real users? • Which blockchain products are solving problems outside crypto? • Where are stablecoins becoming genuinely useful? • What still makes Web3 too difficult for normal people? • How should security improve as more people hold digital assets? And which parts of AI + blockchain are real innovation rather than just another narrative? For me, these questions matter more than another discussion about the next token to outperform. I would especially like to hear more about the gap between technology and everyday use. A blockchain can be fast. A wallet can have more features. A payment system can technically work. But if the average person still finds the experience confusing, then there is still a problem to solve. The same applies to regulation. Clearer rules can help businesses and users understand what they can actually do, but the challenge is creating that clarity without slowing useful innovation. This is why I see Binance Blockchain Week as more than a crypto gathering. It is a chance to see which ideas are moving from theory into real products and which problems the industry still has not solved. If I were attending, the question I would want answered is simple: What needs to change before using blockchain feels normal to someone who has never owned crypto? That conversation would interest me much more than another short-term market prediction. What would you want to hear discussed at Binance Blockchain Week? The purpose of this post in only education. NFA. DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance
-
Troy (@Thintroy) reportedI've used bitget/bybit/Binance/remitano for about 5 years, I've never faced an issue like this. Just now that I said let me use a Nigerian company, my money dun hang and no customer support is even answering me. But I should "support local business"
-
NerrdAlerrt (@NerrdAlerrt) reportedBinance just delisted 3 alts that were each already mid-meltdown, separate crises and all. Nothing rallies people like getting kicked while down.
-
Crypto Noob (@cryptonoobini) reported@binance 5,000,000 PYTH vouchers and i'll still manage to trade it down to a single voucher and a lesson
-
Hfo (@0xhfo) reportedunpopular opinion: exchanges are missing a key sybil-resistance primitive: ZK withdrawal attestations. today I can send funds from Binance to two fresh MetaMask wallets and no on-chain tool - Chainalysis, Arkham, Nansen - can prove they're the same person. the link only exists in the exchange's private DB. fix: exchanges issue a ZK nullifier per user. on withdrawal, it attaches to the wallet, no identity revealed. you can prove "same person funded both wallets" without knowing who. this would meaningfully strengthen sybil resistance across the entire industry without sacrificing user privacy.
-
Garrett (@Garreett_G) reportedWhen I think about @binance Blockchain Week, I don’t think the most useful conversation is going to be about where Bitcoin trades next week. Crypto already spends enough time talking about price. What interests me more is what happens when builders, exchanges, companies, regulators, creators and users are in the same place discussing where blockchain is actually heading. For me, the biggest topic is real adoption. We have talked about adoption for years, but I want to know what is genuinely working today. Are stablecoins making cross-border payments easier? Are tokenized assets giving people better access to financial markets? Are businesses finding reasons to use blockchain beyond speculation? Then there is regulation. The industry needs clearer rules, but those rules also need to leave enough room for new products and ideas to develop. I would be interested in hearing how exchanges, builders and policymakers think that balance should work. Security deserves just as much attention. It is difficult to bring millions of new users into crypto if scams, phishing and complicated wallet experiences still make people nervous. Better technology matters, but making crypto safer and easier to understand matters too. I would also like to hear more about payments and Web3 usability. Crypto can move value globally, but ordinary users care about something much simpler: Is it fast? Is it affordable? Is it easy to use? Does it solve a problem better than what they already have? And then there is AI + blockchain. There is plenty of hype around AI agents and onchain automation right now, but I would rather hear builders explain where blockchain actually improves an AI product and where it adds unnecessary complexity. That is what makes Binance Blockchain Week interesting to me. It is a chance to move beyond the daily timeline and ask bigger questions about where this industry is actually creating value. If I could ask one question in that room, it would be: What is blockchain ready to solve today for people who do not already care about crypto? That answer would tell me much more about the future of the industry than another price prediction. What topic would you want discussed most at Binance Blockchain Week? NFA. DYOR. Educational Only. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance
-
DSK KHANii (@DSKkhanii) reported@jeeya_awan better question isn’t always “Which coin will go up?” It can be “What problem is this technology trying to solve?” Binance Academy
-
RaoulDuke (@RaoulDukeDegen) reported@TwinTulips @binance they added mcp support so no more juggling api keys for agents
-
B.A.N.T.I.A 🔥 (@BlessingA9813) reportedI gave AethirClaw a simple task: “Build me a crypto whale wallet tracker.” I wanted to see if CARA could turn a simple idea into a working on-chain monitoring agent. I configured it to monitor Ethereum, use public whale lists, focus on transactions above $100K, and identify significant wallet activity. The first build did not work perfectly. CARA encountered an unavailable RPC endpoint, a JavaScript scope error, a missing dependency, and a major performance bottleneck. The scanner was making 6,000+ sequential RPC calls, causing execution to hang. This is where the build became interesting. CARA diagnosed the issues, replaced the failed RPC endpoint, fixed the JavaScript error, resolved the dependency problem, and optimized the scanner. The key improvement was using "eth_getBlockByNumber" with "fullTransactions: true", reducing the workload from 6,000+ RPC requests to roughly 200. After the fixes, the tracker successfully ran a live Ethereum scan. The results: • 25 large transactions detected • ~$25.06M in total transaction volume • Largest transfer: 1,999.9999 ETH (~$3.94M) • Large movements involving known Binance wallets For me, the most valuable part wasn't simply getting the final numbers. It was seeing AethirClaw move through the complete development cycle: idea → configuration → failure → debugging → optimization → deployment → real on-chain results. This is my AethirClaw Tribe Sprint build. #AethirClawTribe @AethirCloud
-
AYprotocols® (@AYprotocols) reported@AkaBull_ @binance Gen Z has faster access to markets, but needs discipline for real
-
HazyStack | AI Tools (@TheHazyStack) reportedAI agents are starting to get access to money. Binance just launched an Agent OS that lets AI agents interact with financial infrastructure, including executing trades when users give them permission. That's a pretty big step. We've gone from: “AI, answer this for me.” to: “AI, do this for me.” And now we're getting closer to: “AI, make this decision for me.” The technology is moving fast. I'm more interested in how we decide what an AI should never be allowed to do.
-
SAYED (@SayedVision) reported@binance Strong support around $2.83 watching $AUCTION closely
-
emlanis ⚡️ (@emlanis_) reportedBinance delisting SCRT is bad. It does not mean Secret is dead. I think we should separate those two things before the panic gets out of hand. losing Binance is obviously a serious hit. It is the biggest exchange in crypto, it provides access and liquidity, and pretending the delisting means nothing would be dishonest. but I’m already seeing people jump from Binance is delisting secret:native to Secret Network is finished. those are two completely different statements. SCRT is not Binance-dependent. there are still markets across Kraken, Bybit, KuCoin, Gate, MEXC, LBank, Pionex and others. more importantly, Binance does not determine whether Secret L1 exists. Prop 365 just passed. the community chose continuity. the plan now funds remediation, core development, validators, relayers, builders and continued operation of the existing chain. that work does not disappear because one CEX removes a trading pair. the price reaction is brutal. I understand why holders are angry and worried. I am too. but this is exactly the wrong moment to confuse price with protocol. The useful questions now are: how quickly can liquidity migrate to the remaining exchanges? which new listings can the new team pursue? how do we make the post-365 Secret worth listing again? and most importantly, what gets shipped from here? and I believe the new team has all the answers and even more. Binance leaving is a setback. Secret dying would be an outcome. they are not the same thing. the community just voted overwhelmingly against the second one. now we have to make that vote count.
-
yanixx.ip (@AnikSanya) reported@loffyhl binance is a terrible exchange that leaks its users' data
-
ZOZO (@0x_zozo) reported@Garreett_G @binance @BinanceAcademy real adoption and solving real problems not just hype and price