Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Megalodon🦈 (@Primalking38) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Abrlien @cz_binance @heyibinance The gap is crazy wtf. Binance on top 🦅🦅

• 
  Zero2Crypto (@MadiarMadiev) reported 5 minutes ago

  @binance taste in apps is fine. timing is the problem

• 
  DSK KHANii (@DSKkhanii) reported 8 minutes ago

  @MuhammadAh89505 Explore After Verification Once verification is completed, eligible users can access Binance features available in their region, including trading and other crypto services.

• 
  YoGChill (@yogchill_) reported 10 minutes ago

  Some people are upset that $CETS didn’t get the Alpha listing and it went to $FLORK instead - a coin with 5000-6000 fewer holders (before the listing) that only launched 4 days ago. I get it. I’m a little confused too. But it changes nothing. $CETS is different. It’s original IP and an original idea - not based on a viral tweet, not waiting on a catalyst, and not dependent on Binance support like most other coins. It’s been building. 27 days old, not 4.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When’s the last time a coin ran to $32M MC with zero Binance listing or support? $CETS did. Binance tweeted $FLORK multiple times and listed it on Alpha. Still hasn’t broken CETS’ ATH. Still has fewer holders. That’s the gap between a real community and a listing pump.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ This isn’t $FLORK FUD. I want the entire BNB chain thriving - different coins, different niches, different lanes. More BNB volume means more organic volume for the best art community. We’ve watched it happen all month. Binance listings and support for other coins don’t pull attention away - they make believers double down on $CETS while the flock chases the next shiny thing. /cets_mode

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 11 minutes ago

  @LowCapB Long way from $2,389. $ETH is down 2.5% in the last 24h on Gate/Bybit/HL/Binance and it just took the biggest long liq on the tape, $11.99M on Binance alone. Busiest name we track right now.

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 12 minutes ago

  @IncomeSharks Waiting phase is expensive too. $ETH at $2,422 down 2.18% and the biggest long liq today was about $12M on Binance.

• 
  TXASCRYPTO (@txascrypto) reported 16 minutes ago

  @eth_taco @binance wtf !! This is Golden !

• 
  Duckster ✳️ (@Duckster1414) reported 17 minutes ago

  Thesis by @yogchill_ ! @cz_binance needs to look at where a real community is. Some people are upset that $CETS didn’t get the Alpha listing and it went to $FLORK instead - a coin with 5000-6000 fewer holders (before the listing) that only launched 4 days ago. I get it. I’m a little confused too. But it changes nothing. $CETS is different. It’s original IP and an original idea - not based on a viral tweet, not waiting on a catalyst, and not dependent on Binance support like most other coins. It’s been building. 27 days old, not 4.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When’s the last time a coin ran to $32M MC with zero Binance listing or support? $CETS did. Binance tweeted $FLORK multiple times and listed it on Alpha. Still hasn’t broken CETS’ ATH. Still has fewer holders. That’s the gap between a real community and a listing pump.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ This isn’t $FLORK FUD. I want the entire BNB chain thriving - different coins, different niches, different lanes. More BNB volume means more organic volume for the best art community. We’ve watched it happen all month. Binance listings and support for other coins don’t pull attention away - they make believers double down on $CETS while the flock chases the next shiny thing. /cets_mode

• 
  ALI ANSARI 🔶 (@ansari_ali76454) reported 20 minutes ago

  @analyst9701 Slow and secure is the way to go! 🔐🚀 #Binance #LearnWithBinance

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 23 minutes ago

  @WhaleInsider Spot tape is heavier than that. Largest 24h bitcoin:native buy was $15.86M on Binance against sells near $13.83M, price $77,619 down 1.59%.

• 
  LFeazylifeMode (@eazystonk) reported 24 minutes ago

  $ENA turning binance OI negative with spot buying up and filling down happening. On a 2%~ move. Sure. 0 tmrw. Lmao you guys are savage

• 
  Diana (@vitaminBtc1) reported 30 minutes ago

  @binance 24/7 stock access sounds great, but Binance needs to be crystal clear about custody, regulation, and what “1:1” actually means for users.

• 
  Bruno Silva (@Bruno_Silva035) reported 34 minutes ago

  @itsrealyasir @binance @BinancePk Slow start still counts progress.

• 
  BLUGATI (@blugati) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance Need fami support

• 
  Arslan (@ArslanOnChain) reported 36 minutes ago

  A member asked me to analyze this . This is $SYRUP. Price is 0.2064. It already ran from 0.113 to 0.670. Now it is sitting in the middle after that dump. Market cap is $246.5M. Open Interest is $29.8M. Futures volume is $28.4M. Spot is only $4.8M. Volume jumped 61%. Open Interest jumped 25%. That means new leverage just entered. Now the wallet. 0xaA3D56e9695F75eEcd6E3E78546154b727147b8a Labeled Arca on Arkham. Total portfolio around $12.92M. This wallet is holding 22.597M $SYRUP worth $4.68M. The bag was built in two parts. Eight to nine months ago it withdrew from Binance around 15.655M $SYRUP. Those fills were near $0.26. Cost on that slice was about $4.10M. One day ago it added another 6.942M $SYRUP from Binance. That add was $1.28M. Average on the new slice is about $0.184. Full bag average is near $0.238. Current price is 0.206. So the old coins are still in loss. The new 6.94M add is already in profit. On the full 22.6M position this wallet is still down about $700k. That matters. This is not a fresh wallet flipping a new gem. This is a large holder adding on the dip while the older bag is still red. A $61.3k sell wall is sitting at 0.2126. That order can be cancelled. It is not a wall that stops the whole coin. Positioning is split. Binance accounts: 0.95 Top trader accounts: 1.25 Top trader positions: 4.04 Accounts are mixed. The big positions are heavily long. Spot flow is cleaner than the perps. Exchanges saw about $28k net outflow in 24 hours. Top PnL wallets added. Fresh wallets added. Binance wallet 0x3304e2 added 70k in 24 hours, but reduced 79k over 7 days. Token millionaire 0x342bd0 added 43.5k in 24 hours. On Hyperliquid the book is conflicted. Smart traders are net long about $394k. Whales are net short about $720k. Combined that book is still net short about $322k. Funding is positive, so longs are paying shorts. Base liquidity is thin. That means one order can move this faster than the chart looks. My read is simple. This is not a clean gem. This is a mid-cap with a large holder adding, leverage rising, and perps fighting each other. If price holds above 0.196, the next test is the 0.212 sell order and then 0.230. If 0.196 fails, the same leverage can send it back toward 0.170. A break under 0.170 opens 0.140. I’m watching the Arca wallet and that 0.2126 order first. If the wallet keeps adding and 0.196 holds, the long side gets another push. If whale shorts grow and 0.196 breaks, this is not the gem yet.