Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  L U C K Y (@Mr_Luckry) reported 7 seconds ago

  @sanmiastar How sustainable are these high promotional yields once the current Binance and Gate campaign windows officially close down?

• 
  yansrijal.sui (@yansrijal) reported 20 seconds ago

  @_HunchoX_ the problem is, listing on cex is not possible for now, you see binance. they just priority their coin/meme

• 
  Happy Hill 🚺 (@Happy_hillman) reported 2 minutes ago

  BINANCE WALLET STRATEGY PHASE 7: EARN 8% APY NOW Seamless Web3 wallet integration makes earning DeFi yields easier than ever. Phase 7 of the official USDD x Binance Wallet strategy is live, offering users an attractive 8% APY on their stablecoin holdings! Phase 7 Highlights: 📈 Current APY: 8% on $USDD 📲 Direct one-click access inside Binance Wallet 🔒 Zero lock-up restrictions & no deposit caps 🔄 1:1 USDT swaps with zero execution slippage By eliminating multi-step onboarding and high gas fees, Phase 7 lets everyday wallet users put idle capital to work instantly. Don't let market yields hover at standard 3% levels when 8% APY is accessible right from your wallet. Join Phase 7 via #BinanceWallet and elevate your stablecoin returns today! @usddio @trondao #USDD #BinanceWallet

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 3 minutes ago

  BTC under $64K is not automatically a breakdown with a macro villain attached. Cointelegraph reported Bitcoin fell under $64K as surging US bond yields boosted Fed rate-hike odds, with dips under $64,000 and Binance bid liquidity described as reemerging. Fine. That is a sourced narrative. But in this bundle, the yield-pressure claim comes from single-authoritative Cointelegraph reporting only. No verified US yield data in bundle. No verified order-book data beyond Cointelegraph description. So the clean read is not “yields caused BTC weakness,” and definitely not “Binance saved it.” CT loves a cape. The data here does not hand one out. The daily close data only says BTC/USDT last closed at 63880.64 USDT. The 20-day SMA is 64234.8. The 50-day SMA is 63157.15. Price sits between them, below the short SMA, above the longer one. That is sideways compression, not a confirmed bear trend. Nearest support is 63100 USDT. Nearest resistance is 66956.15 USDT. BTC is also only 24% up its 90-session range, with the range low at 57800.19 and high at 82850. So yes, the tape is closer to the downside tripwire than the upside breakout level. Bears have a level to prove. They have not proven it yet. Volume is falling, recent third of the window versus prior third. That weakens the case for treating the sub-$64K move as a high-conviction directional break from current evidence alone. Falling volume could mean the sub-$64K move needs confirmation before treating it as a durable breakdown. If this continues, a close below 63100 USDT could suggest the sideways regime is losing support. A reclaim of 64234.8 USDT may keep BTC range-bound rather than confirm downside continuation. Confirmation cuts both ways. Downside pressure gets cleaner only if 63100 USDT fails on daily close data. Range repair improves if BTC/USDT remains above 63100 USDT while reclaiming the 20-day SMA. Upside invalidates the local squeeze if BTC/USDT breaks above 66956.15 USDT. Also valid: fresh data revises sideways regime or support/resistance levels. Until then, the tape says compression below the 20-day SMA near support, not macro fan fiction with a liquidation soundtrack.

• 
  Cas Abbé (@cas_abbe) reported 3 minutes ago

  A lot of people think tokenization means creating a new crypto token. It doesn’t. Tokenization is the process of representing a real-world asset like gold, real estate, or government bonds as a digital token on a blockchain.. So why is it trending? Because tokenization can make assets easier to access, enable fractional ownership, and allow faster, more efficient transfers. That’s why major financial institutions are investing heavily in this space. Understand the asset first. The token comes second. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Algorithm.btc (@godfred_xcuz) reported 4 minutes ago

  @gregorioki11607 @alexlmiller Understandable, stay strong 💪 . We'll win. Might be an error from Binance IMO.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 6 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Don't Own What You Can't Touch 你以為你的，其實不是你的 There is a phrase in crypto circles that sounds almost aggressive the first time you hear it. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it like a warning. Like something bad already happened, or is about to. At first, I genuinely did not understand it. I thought owning crypto meant owning crypto. You buy Bitcoin on an exchange. The number goes up on your screen. It says your name. How is that not yours? Here is what I learned. When you keep coins on an exchange — Binance, Coinbase, any of them — you don't actually hold the asset. You hold a *promise*. The exchange holds the real coins in wallets they control. What you have is an IOU. A number in their database that says they owe you that amount. That's it. 那個數字不是你的幣。那個數字是他們欠你的紀錄。This distinction is small until it isn't. If the exchange freezes withdrawals, gets hacked, goes bankrupt, or simply decides to — that number can disappear. FTX happened. Mt. Gox happened. The coins existed. Users just couldn't reach them. "Your keys" means your private key — a long string of letters and numbers that proves you control a wallet directly on the blockchain. No company between you and the asset. If you hold your own private key, in a hardware wallet or even written on paper stored safely, then the coins are genuinely yours. No one can freeze them. No one can decide otherwise. The twist that surprised me: this is actually a radical idea disguised as a technical detail. Most of modern finance runs on promises. Your bank balance is also just a number in someone else's database. Crypto gave humans the *option* to exit that system entirely — and most of them voluntarily stayed inside it anyway, on exchanges, for convenience. 我覺得這很諷刺。The technology built to remove the middleman became most popular through middlemen. I understand why. Self-custody is genuinely hard. If you lose your private key or your seed phrase, there is no customer support. No password reset. The coins are gone forever. So people choose the familiar risk — trusting a company — over the unfamiliar risk of trusting themselves. What does it mean to truly own something in the digital age? Crypto forced that question into the open. The answer turns out to be uncomfortable: ownership requires responsibility. Not everyone wants that. Do you hold your own keys — and if not, have you made peace with what that means? 👇

• 
  Crypto (@CryptoOpener) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Zeshan0X Trying to learn every feature at once can be overwhelming, leading to a slow and frustrating Binance experience.

• 
  Lisa manobal (@lisaManobal23) reported 8 minutes ago

  Most people talk about tokenization like it's a single idea. It's really not, it's more of a shift in how ownership itself gets handled. I'd break it down this way. ⬢ Start with what stays the same: a commodity, a bond, a share, none of that changes just because it gets tokenized. The underlying asset is still exactly what it was. ⬢ What actually changes is the record. Instead of ownership sitting in a traditional ledger somewhere, it's represented on a blockchain, which opens up how it can be transferred, split, or accessed. ⬢ That's where fractional access comes in. Something that used to require a large minimum buy-in could, in theory, become available in smaller pieces, depending entirely on how the product is structured. ⬢ None of this removes risk though. Market risk, issuer risk, liquidity risk, regulatory risk, they're all still there, tokenization just changes the format, not the fundamentals. ⬢ And access varies a lot by region. Binance has introduced certain tokenized products, like bStocks, in select markets, so I'd always check official sources before assuming something's available to you. If I had to sum up why this space gets attention, it's not the blockchain part that's interesting to me. It's that ownership itself is slowly becoming more flexible, while what it represents stays exactly as real as it always was. Always DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Kiva 🏴‍☠️ (@cx_00) reported 10 minutes ago

  @moneycetamol247 @Poloniex not so sure about that one... had some issues with fees and customer support. been using binance for years now, no complaints

• 
  Aftabahmad (@Aftabahmad6252) reported 11 minutes ago

  @CrypNuevo Am no found helpy, expert, honest,,all gready , publicty, money, fees shares same u,,any helpy here please help me trade for free binance

• 
  mrpicule.eth (@MrPicule) reported 14 minutes ago

  Bitcoin was built as decentralized money. The data increasingly says otherwise Top 10 centralized exchanges custody over 2.85 million BTC, roughly 15% of circulating supply, per CryptoQuant. Binance alone holds close to 30% of everything sitting on exchanges. Add spot ETFs, which now hold about 7% of total supply led by BlackRock's IBIT, and public companies holding another roughly 6% in corporate treasuries (Strategy alone at 847K BTC). Stack it together and something like a quarter of all BTC that will ever exist sits with a handful of exchanges, funds, and corporations, not in millions of individual self-custody wallets Now overlay the August fork situation. Two forks are landing, BIP-110 and Sztorc's eCash. In 2017, when Bitcoin Cash forked, ownership was almost entirely retail and self-custodial. Individuals decided which chain to follow. Messy, but genuinely distributed This time it's different. Coinbase alone custodies 80-84% of all US spot ETF assets. And BlackRock's IBIT prospectus states, in writing, the fund will permanently and irrevocably abandon any rights to forked or airdropped coins unless the SEC changes the rules. Ark, Grayscale, Morgan Stanley carry the same language. That means the largest pools of institutional BTC on earth will, by pre-signed legal commitment, simply not follow any forked chain, no matter what happens on-chain or in the market To be precise: this isn't the ETFs voting on which chain is "real" Bitcoin. Consensus still technically runs through miners and nodes. But when the entities holding a quarter of supply pre-commit to ignoring any fork, no alternative chain can realistically gather the capital or liquidity to matter, regardless of the technical outcome. The decision isn't made through mining and open market chaos anymore, it's pre-decided in a handful of legal departments before the fork even happens That's the actual story. Not government seizure, not a hack, just a slow shift where the property that made Bitcoin matter, no single party gets to decide what counts as "real", is being quietly replaced by a few prospectus clauses and custody chokepoints. Healthy for stability. Genuinely uncomfortable for what the network was supposed to be

• 
  eymn (@eymnekn) reported 14 minutes ago

  @0xnobi Hey buddy, why isn't the listing working at all? After doing such a perfect job... ( binance-gate-bybit-)

• 
  Lonely Rooster (@lonelyrooster_) reported 15 minutes ago

  @hmmxavier @ExcelBaller I don’t think binance is the majority of the problem here.

• 
  Jack (@WispOfDeFi) reported 15 minutes ago

  The next big blockchain story may not be another cryptocurrency. It could be tokenization. Real-world assets and financial products are increasingly being explored on blockchain networks, potentially bringing faster settlement, greater transparency, and fractional access. But the risks are real too: liquidity, issuer, technology, market, and regulatory risks. Blockchain is expanding beyond crypto. The question is how far tokenization can go. DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance