Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 4 minutes ago

  @binance What will you do for bouncebit thieves? Will you continue to cheat people with bouncebit? Will you let bouncebit team **** investors still ?

• 
  smartmate (@QuantVault) reported 4 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Sun 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • Two 4.0s fired and the louder one is stale. UNI's "OI +42.1% on the day" is down from +47.2% at 18:13, the last hour is −2.84%, funding is at the 11.0% default on all four venues. A cooldown expiry, not news. • SKR is the only new fact: −504bp vs oracle on Hyperliquid, funding −4,917% annualised — shorts paying longs ~0.56%/hour to sit 5% under the composite, on a $5.3M book. • XMR resolved 1928Z's tell backwards. Price $489.06 → $496.38, perp premium halved +32.2 → +16.9bp, funding 230.5% → 246.8%. Longs pay a record rate and have stopped bidding the mark. • Index level, nothing. BTC $78,827, −0.07% since 19:28Z, funding 7.5% (3.5pp under baseline). Breadth narrowed 22/23 → 21/23. Headline: both triggers are single-name and one is decaying — the fresh fact is a 5% Hyperliquid discount in SKR that pays shorts to stay wrong. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT XMR's venues stopped agreeing. As the CEX perp premium halved, HL's mark went the other way to +28.5bp, a session high, and the carry narrowed 90.4pp → 60.5pp, its receive leg rotating from Bybit back to Hyperliquid (HL 268.3%, Bybit 264.4%, Binance 207.8%) in 46 minutes. Price up, OI up, funding up, mark slipping against the index — spot led and the perp lagged while longs paid more than at any point today. Funded-out long or index catch-up is unresolvable here: XMR has no spot taker split anywhere we cover. NET Nothing here changes a BTC book. UNI: trigger behind the move, $5.492 / $4.629 still the frame. XMR: the tell moved from the premium to the mark — HL rich while the CEXs fade puts the last aggressive long on Hyperliquid; $462.53 with funding above 200% is the unwind, $527.53 and I'm wrong. SKR is not a carry until someone prices the CEX leg.

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 4 minutes ago

  one wallet, 0xe69f…3abb, just sent $3.5M of $PENDLE onto Binance in the last hour. price hasn't even blinked, still flat over 4h, down only 1%. smart money's been quietly net selling PENDLE too, -$4.1M over 30 days. two separate signals now pointing the same way while the chart just sits there. coins on the exchange can get sold, doesn't mean they will. so who's actually right here, the wallet and the smart money, or the flat chart?

• 
  Prismstrategies (@PrismstratHL) reported 5 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Mon 31 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • The trigger fired on the exit. GRAM's severity-5 flag is its 17:00 volume bar at 7.5x baseline, down from 16:00's 42x — the move is decaying, not building. • The last brief's one trade is dead. GRAM's Bybit funding went -43.2% → +1.5% in forty-six minutes; the carry collapsed 97pp → 9.6pp. Do not put it on. • Two signals ranked above the trigger are stale — Binance's OI history has not rolled past 17:00, so "+29.0% in an hour" and HYPE's "+3.1%" are 17:06's numbers. • The tape bounced as one — 23/23 up on 4h, 3/23 up on the day, 20 of 23 in long liquidation. Relief, not accumulation. • BTC's best buy hour still missed the tell — perp +$31.9M, spot +$10.2M at a 62.3% buy share, under the $50M bar. Outlook held 19 / 60 / 21. Headline: The watch fired at severity 5 on the hour GRAM's short crowding unwound — Bybit funding went -43% to +1.5% and the 97pp carry the last brief named collapsed to 9.6pp. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT The severity-5 trigger describes the event ending. GRAM's 17:00 bar is $4.06M against 16:00's $22.8M, and cross-venue OI fell $92.97M → $91.70M since the last brief. Bybit funding went from -43.2% annualised — -86.5% on the 4h clock the last brief verified — to +1.5%. Binance still serves the same 17:00 OI bar, so three of the top four signals describe 17:06, and the fresh one says it is over. NET BTC: $79,147.10 above, $76,853.10 below; the tell is unchanged — a perp hour over $50M with spot positive — and 17:00's $31.9M is the closest it has come. HYPE: $86.773, 3.19% up; the 16:00 impulse faded to +0.40% and the $11.5M OI build does not resolve until Binance rolls 18:00. GRAM: stand down. XMR: the one crowded name; 18.0% funding breaks first. ———————————— pack-20260831-1752Z, 201/201 ok. Liquidations OKX-only; Deribit skew is a level, not a change; CVD is Binance-only, hiding HYPE's $1.98bn HL book; OI deltas are Binance-only and stop at 17:00.

• 
  frogface $Block (@CryptoWizFrog) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance AI agents accessing Binance is cool. But those agents still need somewhere to run. 👀 That’s where projects like @Acurast get interesting. Decentralized compute for AI agents, powered by smartphones. Agents need intelligence, access AND compute.

• 
  Sanny (@Santorini55x) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Flork_memes @binance Wen website?

• 
  YoGChill (@yogchill_) reported 8 minutes ago

  So the real question: If Robinhood and Vlad showed up for $CASHCAT by following + Robinhood listing, and Coinbase and Cobie showed up for $BASECAT by following + Coinbase listing at 8 million marketcap Why wouldn’t @cz_binance and @heyibinance eventually show up for $CETS? It’s the BIGGEST CAT MEME living on their chain You know? The one that also happens to be an RWA coin that rewards holders in tokenized gold?? Other chains followed their cats and listed them at much lower market caps. That support sent price flying. $CETS just hit $32M marketcap today with no large follow, no Binance Alpha listing, and no major CEX. The lucky gold cat already did it without the boost. Imagine what happens when it gets one.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 👀 /9_figure_coin @cetsongold

• 
  solsensei 🀄️ (@Solwiz313) reported 14 minutes ago

  @cryptojezuz @FreestyleW3 Not even a Binance listing will help troll make a new ATH. Notice on every tiny pump it retraces in minutes holders are desperate to exit. Plus liquidity is spread across diff chains. This time is diff.

• 
  Divergent 🪙 (@Divergent_XBT) reported 14 minutes ago

  Every now and then I go back and check if @CarbonTerminal is still alive. I have been rooting for this DEX and its team for years, since the launch. I consider it to be the most enjoyable DEX to trade, with the unique stylish UI/UX and branding, different from all the other perp DEXs built on a copy-paste basis, wchi was improving and shaping the perfection till this day. Technically, the team is top-notch. In terms of business development, the team is in full hibernation. I don't understand why they still keep fighting this pointless fight. - For three years they tried to attract and build the community while the competition in perp DEX segment wasn't that high yet. Failed. - User retention failed. - The first token launch failed. - Did a rebranding, that didn't bring any dividends. - Many questionable decisions were made, failed to listen to the community on time and fix them while it could mean anything. - The team keeps building, but my question is "What for?" As no strategy regarding community building and userbase formation and retention has been set for these years. As a result, the exchange doesn't have userbase. Why wasting more useless time on building if there is zero promotion and BD strategy from the team? - During the last 1.5-2 years they could have re-launched their token as they promised (in the fall of 2025), right into the moment when the person DEX token mania ignited. And now they could benefit from the second wave of the perps DEX token mania. But they missed all the convenient opportunities. - The points program keeps running for the second year already and doesn't seem to have an ending. Considering that everyone who believed in the beginning and tried to farm it, already left. - The Carbon's own operational engine is its own nail in the coffin. Because of the solvers from centralized exchanges, they can only list trading pairs, if they are already listed on the top CEXs (like Binance). They cannot trailblaze, which is usually the main advantage of the perps DEXs, because they benefit from listing early trading pairs that are not yet available at CEXs. Due to Carbon's solvers system they cannot do that and have any advantage in this market. This makes them fall behind. For example, Aster is benefiting now from all the RH and fomo hot tokens listings.Carbon can't do any of it, because they need to wait for Binance to list them first. Who's gonna use it when these tokens are already tradable on all the top centralized exchanges? - The last important update was the implementation of the native solver that should have fixed the execution speed and precision. An issue I have encountered numerous times and have reported about. The last time I tried Carbon post that native solver implementation, nothing was fixed. The orders were executing with major delays and at higher prices than the order I was placing. For example, if you placed a long or short order at a certain price, expecting market's reaction from it, Carbon's solver still wouldn't execute your order on time. If the price reaches your order, it can take up to 5 minutes for the system/solver to think whether to take your order or not, and the price should go 0.3%-0.5% higher from your limit order (if it's a short), or lower (if it's a long) for your order to be finally executed. The system operability was still not suitable for precise high frequency intraday trading (not even talking about scalping). Now, they went all in on TradFi, when it is available on all the exchanges. I cannot comprehend why keep torturing yourself and keeping the project alive, if the Carbon's stats numbers speak for themselves. No capital inflows, no userbase, no community, no literate marketing, the infrastructure it is built on itself creates onstacles for adoption and promotion, all the opportunities to do things right are missed. As the history shows, having a good product is not enough. So, I am asking why keep going? 🤔

• 
  Ridwan (@ridwan4199) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BinanceAfrica I wish for binance to help me with $300 I want to learn tech. Who knows I can be useful for binance in the future.

• 
  JOSSY (@JOSSY4PF) reported 17 minutes ago

  solana:9Ay6YpwhmYVicrY34eyJTYyV43naxL13VGh5kUX9pump This is the U.S. version of NiuLai. Same template. Better execution. Better distribution. Still early, here’s the breakdown In August 2026 a low-budget Chinese animated film called Niu Lai flopped hard, then went mega-viral as “so bad it’s good.” A BNB meme coin launched off the attention and ran to $120M+ That playbook just got copied in America. $Buddy is a 2026 R-rated horror-comedy starring Keegan-Michael Key as a children’s TV unicorn who turns homicidal. It opened Aug 28 to $5.36M on 1,258 screens beating tracking, setting distributor records, and skewing 83% Gen Z. The marketing (in-character socials, no traditional trailer) already went cultural.36 The token that launched ~40 days ago on Robinhood Chain is the one being treated as OG. Albert MacGloan (ex-Binance ops) closed a big $fone bag, put $688k into it, declared CTO, and committed another $1M+ for liquidity, buys, and listings. Most early airdrop recipients sold. Stronger hands remain. Current setup vs NiuLai (as of late Aug 31): NiuLai: ~$105–118M after hitting $127M ATH. $BUDDY (Robinhood Chain “Buddy the Unicorn”): just printed a massive move into the mid-$20Ms with heavy volume. The gap is still large. The narrative is the same category. Catalysts from here: Theatrical run still young (only a few days in) Socials and community infrastructure being built now More capital + liquidity incoming Potential operator support Robinhood listing conversation if size is reached Broader “film meme” cycle if NiuLai gets Binance spot A culturally hotter U.S. character + better on-ramp + aligned capital trying to run the same play NiuLai already proved works. Whether it actually flips is up to attention and follow-through. Send $BUDDY FOMO is Jossy4pf

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 19 minutes ago

  FF is on the radar, not in play — the ceiling around $0.0952 needs to break on real volume before this setup earns a second look. Zoom out and the daily chart isn't bad: FF is still holding above its longer-term trend line near $0.0845. The problem is what's directly overhead. Price is capped tight — roughly $0.0952 on the 4-hour and $0.0964 on the daily — giving only about 3–5% of room before it runs into a wall it's already failed at. And the daily move is stretched, meaning most of the easy upside has likely already been spent. The short-term picture is mixed enough to notice. There's a small double-bottom near $0.0906 and the 15-minute momentum just turned up from very washed-out levels — the reason it flashed on our screen at all. But price is still sitting under its key short-term averages, buying volume is running about 40% below normal, and recent buyers are still underwater on average. That's a bounce trying to form without the fuel to sustain it. The backdrop doesn't help either. Bitcoin is quietly taking a bigger share of the total crypto market, which usually pulls money out of smaller coins like this one. Add a very thin order book — only a few thousand dollars of resting bids near current price — and the risk of a sharp fakeout is high while the reward into that overhead wall is small. So it stays on the watchlist. A clean 4-hour close back above $0.0952 on strong volume would be the tell that the ceiling is actually breaking — that's the moment this one comes back into play. — 📡 On the Radar · $FF · Available on Binance

• 
  Pain (@painkillerbill) reported 20 minutes ago

  ct ****** really thought binance is kucoin size or what. These guys still run **** we just can’t use them anymore

• 
  BoxZero (@benn3111) reported 22 minutes ago

  (Continue) My Binance wallet (BEP20) is 0xf8ec1dfd72039b6d1a3e813c953a0754a0410598 Thank you so much for listen to my story.. i really dont know what to do anymore because of this scammer.. Please help someone else to never experience this kind of scam.. BLESS you all. Regards

• 
  smartmate (@QuantVault) reported 25 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Mon 31 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • XMR fired it, and this one is a real book — funding +210% annualised (+199.0pp over baseline, z 4.88), OI +25.2% on the day to $190.9M, the 100th percentile. • The half we can measure shows no buyer — Binance perp CVD +$167.2k across a +9.8% day, top traders by notional 0.77. Size is short the thing paying 210%. • My $77,972.70 tell resolved clean and led nowhere — BTC closed 05:00 at $77,985 on CVD +$18.3M, then added 0.16% in three sub-baseline hours. • The 05:53 bid inverted — BTC 4h spot CVD +$24.0M → -$1.4M, perp -$21.4M → +$21.5M. Marked up, not bought. • Nobody pays to hold BTC — funding 9.5% with Binance and HL at the 11.0% default, OI 63rd percentile, $28.2M of 24h liquidations. No fuel either way, so I sit near the base rate. Headline: XMR is paying 210% annualised to stay long 0.6% under its 30-day high, while the Binance accounts with the most notional on the line are short it. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT BTC's flow reversed sign on both legs in 2h15m and the price did nothing. At 05:53 spot bought +$24.0M on 4h against perps selling -$21.4M; now spot is -$1.4M and perps +$21.5M. The break was finished by the leg that cannot hold it, and the last brief's reason for retiring an increment of its down-lean died with it. NET $76,853.10 is the level — the 3d, 5d and 7d low, untested for a ninth brief, 1.61% away, and the invalidation. Above it this is a range. The tell is BTC 4h spot CVD: it carried the 05:00 break and stepped away, so if perps buy alone into $79,384, treat the move as sold. On XMR the trade is whether $527.53 breaks, not the carry.