Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Devin NFT Hunter (@Devin_NFTHunter) reported 58 seconds ago

  @PANewsCN @Bitcoinconfasia cz signing books in hk damn hope he drops web3 gems not just Binance ****

• 
  Kira ♤ #Noirzuki 🔥 (@holyempresskira) reported 3 minutes ago

  What ******** happened to binance? I just wanna cash out 9 dollars worth of tezos and it wants to crawl up my *** for info. What's with this crazy level of scrutiny?

• 
  Azraël (@azrael_options) reported 6 minutes ago

  @FroehlichThors1 ETH's issue isn't price, it's participation. Binance holding 39% of volume shows the market is still too dependent on one exchange. Real breakout fuel comes when retail starts asking where to buy. Until then, expect more of the same sideways grind.

• 
  Richard James (@TBG2018) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance Get this **** off my page and those clowns who work for you @cz_binance - Your companies full of Satanic killers in they're little pathetic cults. Maybe we'll pull plug on them soon. @sheldonbitmart you better sort your **** out also don't annoy me I'll destroy you all

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 13 minutes ago

  @77rokias @cz_binance Hi, could you please share your TXID so we can help check the transfer? Also, if your withdrawal from Binance was successful but you have not received the funds, please contact the receiving platform for further assistance. SK

• 
  Paul Timofeev (@ptimfv) reported 13 minutes ago

  The @circle business model is at a crossroads. Q2 reserve income was 95% of its total revenue but: - Supply is down QoQ - The reserve return rate fell 66 bps YoY The float business model has worked well till now but its inputs are deteriorating. Circle can only influence supply via distribution so much; Fed rates are out of its control, which explains why Circle has been laying the groundwork for a volume-based business model that charges per-transaction, much more similar to that of Visa or Mastercard, who collect a fee on each payment they clear, which is a much more sound business model whose growth is tied closer to its industry (consider that Visa grew FY25 net revenue 11% on 8% payments volume growth while rates were coming down). Lower rates also means less incentive to sit on cash, which means money is more likely to move around. A stablecoin volume-based business model is built around stablecoin velocity. Usually measured as stablecoin transfer volume/circulating supply, velocity tells us how actively a stablecoin is being exchanged between different owners for various goods + services. The higher the stablecoin's velocity the more it is being transacted with. For reference, USDC velocity held near ~200 in Q2 ($14.8T volume / 73.3B circulating supply). To monetize USDC accordingly, Circle is building its new business model around its upcoming native L1 @arc - Gas fees on all transactions are paid in USDC, then converted to the native L1 token ARC at the protocol level: validators keep a commission, the rest passes to stakers proportional to stake, and a portion is burned against 2-3% initial issuance - Circle holds 25% of the initial 10B ARC supply and runs validators, so it earns on both sides of that flow - None of this is reserve income, so none of it falls under the Coinbase revenue share that takes 100% of on-platform reserve income plus 50% of the residual reserve income. Velocity matters particularly for agentic commerce because behaviorally agents are more likely to spend money for resources they need rather than hold the money idle as is common in emerging markets using stables like USDT as savings accounts. This behavior is already visible in data; comparing USDC (pink line) and USDT (orange) velocity below, we see the two track each other for six years and separate sharply from mid-2025 (when x402 launched) with USDC breaking above 50x while USDT remained flat around 12x. ~99% of x402 agent-payment volume settles in USDC, and Circle's Agent Stack now supports 900+ paid services, but that activity runs on public chains today. USDC settles transactions while those chains capture the gas fees, meaning Circle currently earns nothing per-transaction itself. Conversely on Arc, value generated in the payment loop will accrue to Circle. x402 has cleared 165M+ transactions across ~69,000 active agents in its first year. If even a portion of that migrates to Arc, each transaction converts USDC gas into ARC, split between validator commission, staker rewards, and a burn against supply Circle owns a quarter of. Transaction count (which has been consistently growing for USDC QoQ) becomes more important than payment size. Needless to say, how this all plays out depends on the success of Arc, whose mainnet is currently scheduled in a little over a month from now. Founding validators include BlackRock, DTCC, ICE, Mastercard, Visa, Standard Chartered, Galaxy, Global Payments, MoneyGram, SBI and Sumitomo; BlackRock is expected to deploy BUIDL on the network; DTCC will enable tokenization of DTC-custodied assets. Circle is also shipping a product suite for Arc including configurable privacy, AI-powered tooling for building apps and smart contracts, and native support for RWAs, while Binance Wallet, Chainlink, Fireblocks, Kraken, Ledger, MetaMask, Uniswap Labs and Upbit have already confirmed day-one USDC distribution on Arc. Realistically won't see the velocity model show up in Circle's numbers till Q1-Q2'27, but monetizing USDC's velocity is Circle's clearest differentiator in an increasingly crowded multi-layered stablecoin landscape.

• 
  Derek Fitzgerald-Poe (@Derekfitzpoe) reported 16 minutes ago

  @MoonbeamNetwork If that’s the issue, it may actually be one of the more manageable Binance review concerns. Successful migrations, stable contracts, verified supply/tokenomics and months of clean operation can be demonstrated. That’s very different from trying to manufacture liquidity or demand.

• 
  Giuliano (@GiulianoBigDuck) reported 20 minutes ago

  @MastrXYZ Since he's supporting BNB and clearly not investing Binance or CZ, I stopped paying attention to him on X. I only have notes for his TG channel. Mush better. This platform is just ****.

• 
  Sallie Stone (@IndieAuthors) reported 25 minutes ago

  @toolshed_labs @CryptoVerse_Co I'd say 2029 if we are to go with Google, Microsoft and Cloudflare. So, it's necessary to start preparing. @QANplatform is already working on its mainnet, Algorand is getting ready and now, we have Binance.

• 
  Kerry19 (@kerrylyy19) reported 27 minutes ago

  Binance was still working through its European route when the clock was almost finished. The bigger lesson goes beyond crypto. If a new regulation is coming, don’t wait until everyone else is scrambling to comply.

• 
  Dexter_1104 (@Dexter_1104) reported 27 minutes ago

  Hello bitcoin:native and constellation-labs:native community, I would like to make another post today explaining why almost everything is different this time, and why many still claim that everything is going as usual and the bottom will be reached around Q4. This has zero substance apart from this theory; no data or alleged facts, apart from the cycle theory, support this scenario, and yet these people refuse to understand. I am sharing some of my data and facts here. First, there is a bullish divergence on the Bitcoin 2-week chart,just like in the last bear market, after which the bottom was already in. Second, stock markets are at an all-time high; we are seeing an extreme divergence between stock markets and the crypto market. Third, looking at the total market cap, we see that the first and second lows have already been established, and as with Bitcoin, there is a bullish divergence. Fourth, USDT and USDT dominance show a clear bearish divergence, signaling that we have seen the peak in dominance and are already witnessing a trend reversal. Fifth, in June we saw a $5 billion liquidation event, three times larger than the one during the FTX crash, historically, major liquidation events have signaled the market bottom. What else could possibly happen now? World War III? The collapse of Binance? Sixth, the number of Bitcoin holdings currently in the red is at an all time high exactly the level where bear market bottoms have occurred in the past. On top of that, Bitcoin dominance is hovering just below 60% something never seen before in a bear market. So, please,what actually supports your theory other than the "4-year cycle" and "Q4 is the bottom" narrative? It is incredible how arrogant these people can be: faced with 99 arguments against their position and only one in favor, which side would they bet on? Stay tuned. bitcoin:native #crypto

• 
  Julius Elum (@JuliusElum) reported 28 minutes ago

  $HUMA might not be that face-melting pump but a decent 100%-300% is progressively possible. The reason is, despite having a decent accumulation and consolidation over time which created a great chart 📉 It's not a Binance Alpha TGEs and Ai narratives. And it's listed on Binance spot. So, if you want a slow decent profit like $ZAMA, then buy $HUMA today at the $0.019 price zone on your spot bag and hold with a stop-loss at $0.113020

• 
  FemiCrypt 🧑‍💻 (@oluwaferan82543) reported 29 minutes ago

  @binance My $bnb sitting in an EVM wallet that i can't access...can you help me?

• 
  Mark yu (@Markymarco34) reported 31 minutes ago

  STX FACT LEDGER #4 — What Changed Ledger #3 contains the full background. This update only records what changed. The key timeline remains fixed, and unresolved issues remain on the ledger. ✅ Verified 🟨 Direct statement / claim ⬜ Still unresolved What changed — Aug. 12 Q&A 🟨 Muneeb says Binance is satisfied with all information provided, has requested nothing further, and has never discussed any STX delisting risk with the team. 🟨 The Stacks team’s current hope and understanding is that the Monitoring Tag can be removed following the late-August review. 🟨 Another institutional deal was reportedly completed this week. 🟨 Muneeb clarified that institutional accumulation has not started yet because the bonds have not been issued yet. 🟨 He says ~390M STX has returned as stacking power. 🟨 His family office reportedly bought another 4.49M STX after the Monitoring Tag announcement. 🟨 Personal price view from Muneeb: new ATH / $5+. This is his personal guess, not an official target. --- Key timeline — unchanged 📍 Late August Binance STX Monitoring Tag review expected. 📍 Sep. 9 Genesis Bond enrollment closes. 📍 ~Sep. 10 Genesis Bond begins at Bitcoin block 966,350 / Reward Cycle 143. 📍 ~Sep. 17 First Genesis Bond BTC rewards projected. 📍 ~October Muneeb previously indicated the first broader “real bond” could follow. 📍 Nov. 3 U.S. midterm elections. --- Problems that have NOT disappeared ⬜ Binance Monitoring Tag Still active. No official removal announcement yet. ⬜ ACX vs STX ACX was placed in the same Monitoring Tag cohort and was later delisted. STX was not. The specific Binance reasoning behind the different outcomes remains unknown. ⬜ Dubai STX is reportedly still in a trade-only category. The timing and conditions for removing that restriction remain unclear. ⬜ PoX-5 recovery Restacking has recovered significantly, but full recovery to previous locked-STX and participant levels is still not confirmed. ⬜ Institutional demand Deals and bonds are being discussed, but Muneeb himself says accumulation has not started yet. Actual STX purchases, lockups and their size still need to appear in the data. ⬜ Monitoring Tag review outcome Late August is the expected review timeline. The outcome is still unknown until Binance acts. --- Nothing from Ledger #3 disappears simply because new statements were made. The timeline stays on the ledger. The unresolved issues stay on the ledger. Only verified outcomes move them. Facts stay facts. Statements stay statements. Unknowns stay unknown. No hype. No FUD. Just evidence. This is not financial advice. @Stacks @muneeb

• 
  Donaldo90 Real Madrid to the last day (@Donaldo90110295) reported 31 minutes ago

  Binance submitted a MiCA application in Greece in January 2026 but withdrew it on June 24, 2026, just days before the July 1 deadline. Without a MiCA authorisation, Binance could no longer operate as an authorised crypto-asset service provider across the EU after the deadline.