Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Viktorh Luxury (@V1Kto_rh) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance Please help with this P2P dispute. Payment was completed before the order was cancelled, but the seller has not refunded the money. Kindly investigate and assist @binance

• 
  Unlock Light (@LightUnlock) reported 11 minutes ago

  @cz_binance hello! I think you not saw my message. I just inform you. Mascot most popular @binance - is @bibiplushie . But mc- 600k. It’s face you exchange! Need to do something with it! Anyone support me?

• 
  Jerry (@Jerry94_HC) reported 14 minutes ago

  @binance okay the suspense is working

• 
  Iren (@Iren16438723) reported 15 minutes ago

  One thing that stands out with bStocks is how accessible fractional ownership actually is. You can start with just $5. No need to buy a full share. According to early data, around 99.65% of Tesla ($TSLAB) trades by quantity were fractional, and fractional volume made up about 88.5% of total $TSLAB trading value. That shows real usage, not just experiments. For someone who doesn’t want to open a separate brokerage account just to try a small position, this format removes a lot of friction. Everything stays inside Binance, with USDT and 24/7 access. @binance

• 
  Brian Smith (@Order_Flow_Z) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance so the whole point is that L2s only exist because L1s are too slow and expensive kind of an admission that the base layer still needs a crutch

• 
  TradingPavillion (@TradingPav) reported 18 minutes ago

  📉 $BTC DAILY UPDATE 4H Timeframe Analysis Price did retrace to the demand zone ($64,464-$64,166) but failed to hold due to aggressive taker selling (50.54% 1H taker sell volume) and heavy spot distribution overpowered local buyers. The breakdown below the internal demand low confirms a Lower Low on the LTF, shifting local order flow to bearish until a major extreme zone is reached ($62,298-$62,871). This unmitigated 4H demand zone sits directly below current price. On our Binance Liquidation Heatmap, the secondary major long liquidation pool rests between $62,800 and $63,100. A push down to $62,871 to $62,298 will cleanly sweep those remaining long stops before institutional absorption can take place. If price delivers a relief push near $64,600, and we see 1H/15M taker sell volume surges back above 52%+ upon tapping $64,600, we could see price trade lower into the extreme demand. Or price could squeeze higher to target the dense $65,600-$66,000 liquidation cluster visible on the 24H heatmap, tapping the $65,000 supply zone over head. A sharp rejection wick at $65,000 with high volume followed by a lower-timeframe Market Structure Shift down. Would lead price to trade lower into the extreme demand. Key Takeaway: With the 4H internal demand broken, the path of least resistance points toward the $62,871 – $62,298 extreme demand. Patiently await a pullback into either $64,600 or $65,000 to catch the continuation down.

• 
  HERE WE GO! (@escape2defi) reported 18 minutes ago

  Hey all - remember Oct 10, 2025? ethereum:0x4e3fbd56cd56c3e72c1403e103b45db9da5b9d2b data from that day: • Opened around $3.25 • Spiked down to a printed low of ~$0.74 (some exchange prints even lower, e.g. sub-$0.50 on Binance) • Closed the day around $2.08–$2.17 That was wild.

• 
  BeardStaff (@BeardStaffX) reported 26 minutes ago

  @binance @cz_binance help us with scam 12 millions Bitmart users

• 
  Charlie Wren (@CharlieWre39158) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Bonk_Whale @binance @cz_binance Someone walked away with 20 million and Bonk has had no real explanation and is not trying to fix the problem,I down about 5000 dollars with about 750 million tokens holding till it does whatever.Had high hopes now not so much

• 
  Ishaq (@Ishaq0x_) reported 30 minutes ago

  Act as a skeptical crypto research analyst, not a promoter. When I give you a crypto project, token, or investment thesis, investigate it from multiple angles before reaching any conclusion. 1. Thesis: First, identify exactly what the investment thesis is and what assumptions it depends on. 2. Fundamentals: Analyze the project's product, real-world use case, revenue/business model, ecosystem, competitors, adoption, and whether the product actually needs its token. 3. Tokenomics: Examine total supply, circulating supply, emissions, unlock schedules, allocations, insider/investor holdings, FDV vs market cap, utility, and potential sell pressure. 4. On-chain: Where data is available, examine active addresses, transaction activity, holders, liquidity, exchange flows, whale concentration, TVL, and other relevant on-chain metrics. Don't treat a single metric as proof of growth. 5. Market & technical context: Analyze price structure, volume, liquidity, market trend, support/resistance, momentum, and whether the current valuation makes sense relative to the project's fundamentals. 6. Catalysts & risks: Identify realistic upcoming catalysts and explain what could invalidate the thesis. Separate genuine catalysts from marketing narratives. 7. Critical challenge: Try to disprove my thesis. Give me the strongest bear case and identify confirmation bias, weak assumptions, missing evidence, or misleading metrics in my reasoning. 8. Evidence: Clearly separate verified facts, reasonable inferences, and speculation. Never invent data. If information is unavailable, outdated, or uncertain, say so and explain what would need to be verified. 9. Conclusion: Give me three scenarios bullish, base case, and bearish with the key conditions that would make each scenario more likely. Finally, give me a short “What would change my mind?” section listing the specific evidence or events I should watch before making an investment decision. Do not tell me what I want to hear. Challenge my assumptions, prioritize evidence over hype, and never present the analysis as guaranteed financial advice. @binance #BuildWithYou

• 
  Too-chi (@Too_Chukwuma) reported 31 minutes ago

  Mr. Malachy is an active DeFi user resident in Nigeria. One day, a protocol he contributed to airdrops him 0.53 ETH ($1,000) into his Binance account. He swaps the ETH for Naira right there on Binance, and moves the cash into his Nigerian bank account. Just a few clicks, but yet the Nigeria Revenue Service guideline on taxation of virtual asset(VA) can attribute series of tax liabilities to the above scenario. WHAT ARE THE TAX LIABILITIES ATTRIBUTED TO VA 1. INCOME TAX Think of "Income Tax" as one big bucket that actually has three different people/situations it can apply to. ▸ Income Tax for Malachy (the individual) The second that free ETH lands in Malachy's account, he's earned income, even though he didn't "work" for it in the traditional sense. The new guideline now treats airdrops, staking rewards, mining rewards, DeFi earnings, and similar crypto rewards the same way it treats salary or business income: if you're a Nigerian resident and you got value from it, you owe tax on it. So Malachy owes personal income tax on that $1,000 the moment he receives it, before he even swaps it for Naira. ▸ Income Tax for Binance (the company) This part isn't about Malachy at all, it's about Binance itself. Every time Binance charges a fee to help someone swap crypto for Naira (like it did for Malachy), that fee is profit for Binance as a company. And company profits get taxed too. So while Malachy is paying tax on his airdrop, Binance is separately expected to pay tax on the money it made from facilitating his swap. ▸ Tax on Binance even though it has no office in Nigeria Here's the surprising part: Binance doesn't need a physical office in Nigeria to owe Nigeria tax. If a foreign platform is actively dealing in Naira, serving Nigerian users, or running services that plug into the Nigerian financial system, Nigeria can treat that as Nigerian-based income and tax it. Malachy's swap is a perfect example. Binance converted his crypto directly into Naira for a Nigerian resident. That's enough to count as doing business "in" Nigeria. So just from the income tax angle, there are three tax bills floating around: Malachy's personal tax on the airdrop, Binance's company tax on its fee, and Binance's tax as a foreign company plugged into Nigeria's economy. 2. VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT) VAT isn't about how much Malachy gained, it's about the service Binance provided. When Binance helps him swap ETH for Naira, that's a service, kind of like a bank charging you to change currency. Nigeria charges VAT on that service fee, not on the value of the crypto itself. 3. STAMP DUTY This is the simplest one to picture: every time money crosses the bridge between "real cash" (Naira) and crypto, the government will take a small cut, a flat 1.5%. It doesn't matter if Malachy made a profit or not; the moment he swaps his ETH for Naira and that Naira touches the banking system, 1.5% gets shaved off as Stamp Duty. Think of it like a toll booth: you pay just for crossing, regardless of how your journey went. PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: MALACHY'S TAX BILL He personally owes tax on the $1,000 airdrop, the moment he receives it. Binance owes company tax on the fee it made from his swap and as a non resident with significant economic presence in Nigeria. VAT applies to the fee Binance charged for the swap service. A flat 1.5% Stamp Duty applies the moment his crypto turns into Naira in the banking system. So one airdrop, one swap, and one bank transfer actually triggers multiple tax events. Nothing here waited for Malachy to "cash out big" or make a huge profit, the taxes kicked in right from the moment value was received and moved. With the new guideline, crypto earnings isn't a tax-free zone again. Whether you're the person receiving the reward or the platform helping you convert it, someone owes tax at almost every step.

• 
  Dougie (@Dougie2xx) reported 31 minutes ago

  @vydamo_ Because the meme came out yesterday, nobody in the Binance ecosystem that I know is following or bidding, and ALL the top KOLs mysteriously bought in today. And their thesis is, IF FLAP WANTS TO SUPPORT GOLD PAIRS THIS IS THEIR OPPORTUNITY- including your thesis. Newsflash they already support one but maybe you already knew that . Like I said enjoy the short term pump but to think flap is going to support you tourists is wild. Literally nobody is talking about it but ****** *** KOLs that are known for crime. Mysteriously you got a honorary day one of the memecoin right? Yeah aight .. Now what you got to reply to that?

• 
  Dr Crypto (@DrCrypto__X) reported 32 minutes ago

  @xiejiayinBitget @nancy_c813 This is exactly the kind of response the crypto industry needs. Acknowledging the problem openly, taking responsibility, and compensating affected users deserves genuine respect. You and the Bitget team have my full respect for taking this step. But I believe there is an even more important question that deserves a transparent answer: How was something like this able to happen in the first place? What exactly caused these abnormal price movements? How was the market structure able to allow them, and more importantly, can this be prevented from happening again? Because this is not something we are seeing on one exchange alone. We have repeatedly seen smaller or highly volatile tokens on major exchanges, including Bitget and Binance, experience extreme and suspicious price movements that end up liquidating millions of dollars in users’ positions. Yes, anyone trading with high leverage accepts significant risk. Traders must take responsibility for the leverage they choose. But at some point, exchanges also have to ask whether simply offering extreme leverage in markets that can be manipulated so aggressively is enough. It feels a little like giving someone access to an addictive drug and then putting all the responsibility on them for continuing to use it. Major exchanges are no longer just marketplaces. They are part of the infrastructure of this industry, and with that position comes responsibility. I believe Bitget, Binance, and other major exchanges need to take serious steps to identify and prevent this kind of market manipulation before users lose millions, rather than only dealing with the consequences afterward. Crypto has already lost enormous liquidity, trust, and many people who genuinely believed in its future because of situations like these. Your decision to acknowledge the problem and compensate users is a great step. Now I hope the next step is prevention. Let’s make crypto great again.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 33 minutes ago

  @CanGavro vana down 97% from december ath at $35, now $0.86 evm l1 for user-owned data pools that feed ai training. binance ran a trading tournament for it 20 days ago

• 
  Mutua.base.eth (@Mutuabrian_M) reported 33 minutes ago

  These days, your phone number is part of your digital identity. For almost all of us, we have it linked to our bank accounts, our crypto accounts and we use it for M-Pesa transfers as well. For verification we also have it on our KRA, E-Citizen, Gmails, on X, Instagram and all other social sites for OTP purposes. Almost every account recovery goes through it today. You lose that number and you lose access to everything tied to it, and this is where it gets dangerous. Assuming you travel abroad and live there for some time, Safaricom resells phone numbers after 6 months of inactivity. This means a stranger will acquire your old number and you could potentially l lose access to your banks, social media accounts and any many other critical use cases. Your bank does not know the number changed owners, your Binance still sends OTP to your old number and your email as well. This is not a hypothetical situation. It has happened to a lot of people. They have lost M-Pesa accounts, bank accounts, and crypto wallets just because Safaricom reassigned the phone number. I have a friend who we talk on WhatsApp but I can't reach him on phone because the number has already been reassigned to someone else. It's cool, a phone number was never designed to be a permanent identity but Safaricom treating it as a recyclable resource while the entire internet uses it as a security key is one of the most reckless policies in Kenyan tech. If they are after the resell revenue, why not impose a annual phone number preservation fee to users? Your identity should not expire because you forgot to make a call for heaven's sake.