Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Listing Radar (@Lalag9100) reported 1 minute ago

  @BinanceWallet Useless and unfair distribution from binance team people use bots to claim the airdrop while real user who give fee are get **** error & fully claim option it is request to binance team to please take action against these bots @BinanceWallet

• 
  Slem 🍚 ⛓ (@slem1337) reported 2 minutes ago

  🚨 821 WALLETS TURNED POLYMARKET’S 5-MINUTE BTC MARKETS INTO AN $8.2M MONEY MACHINE Stanford and Singapore Management University analyzed more than 60 million @Polymarket fills, order-book data and Binance spot trades. What they found was not a lucky trading strategy. It was a repeatable settlement trade: 1. Build an Up or Down position during the five-minute market. 2. Wait until the final seconds before resolution. 3. Send a massive directional BTC order through Binance. 4. Push the reference price a few basis points across the strike. 5. Collect $1 per winning share after the market resolves. The spot move often reversed almost immediately. But by then, the Polymarket contract had already paid. Researchers flagged roughly 1,600 suspicious cycles and classified 821 wallets as the manipulator cohort. Those wallets earned about $8.22M during the pushed cycles, while retail traders lost approximately $7.61M. In the average upward-manipulation cycle, around $1.7M of Binance buying arrived in the final ten seconds alone. The most brutal finding came from markets that looked almost finished. When one side was priced between 90¢ and $1 shortly before settlement, a late push still reversed the result 34% of the time. Without the suspicious flow, that happened only about 1% of the time. More than half of the flagged cycles occurred during low-liquidity overnight hours, and 44% happened on weekends. This was not a Chainlink hack. Chainlink aggregated prices across multiple venues. The economic weakness was settling a large binary payout against one movable closing print. Binance and the broader market were linked closely enough that pushing one major venue could drag the aggregated benchmark across the strike. Retail thought it was predicting whether Bitcoin would finish Up or Down. The winning wallets were calculating whether moving Bitcoin for ten seconds would cost less than their Polymarket payout. The same manipulation footprint was heavily reduced in 15-minute contracts using the same oracle. The researchers’ proposed fixes are simple: longer markets, settlement over an averaging window or a closing mechanism that cannot be moved by one final burst of capital. A prediction market should reward whoever predicts the price. Not whoever can purchase the final tick.

• 
  Signal_guy (@Cryptoprime00) reported 5 minutes ago

  What a **** coin ! Binance Futures $HIFI/ $USDT Take-Profit target 3 ✅ Profit: 125.7862% 📈 Period: 7 Hours 25 Minutes

• 
  Armani Banks (@Armanibanks100) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance If Binance had the opportunity to solve just one problem that would permanently change the future of finance, which problem would you choose, and why do you believe solving it matters more than anything else? #AskBinance #BinanceTurns9

• 
  Deze Ray (@wild_style2000) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ChainSeal @binance @cz_binance Crypto can protect you from banks, but not from a centralized exchange that ignores obvious problems.

• 
  Mr. Robica (@robica_94) reported 7 minutes ago

  @cryptosanthoshK @binance My bad it's **** 😭

• 
  BigKing 🐂🀄 (@BigKing6034) reported 8 minutes ago

  $binance customer service, he went for $100m #binance, the only woman, now you have a second chance #coinbase, the only woman, her name is $emilie 👀🐐🐐🐐

• 
  Imam Hossain (@hossain_im29096) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Crypto__Haris 818100259 binance id I know nobody gonna help me but trying 3k pls

• 
  Banana Republic 🦧 (@Monkeyiobe) reported 17 minutes ago

  EUROPE JUST ANNOUNCED ITS CRYPTO REGISTER GREW TO 294 LICENSED FIRMS. TWO MONTHS AGO, EUROPE HAD 3,167 CRYPTO FIRMS. The MiCA licensing deadline on July 1 didn't grow the European crypto industry. It shrank it by more than 90%, and the count climbing back toward 300 is regulators counting the survivors. That's the Game: consolidation dressed as growth. Three US-listed names are the biggest winners of what got cleared out. Coinbase now holds one license covering all 27 EU states and roughly 450 million people. Robinhood inherited the same access through its ownership of Bitstamp, one of Europe's oldest exchanges. Circle is the only major stablecoin issuer licensed for both its dollar and euro tokens. Binance holds no valid MiCA license. Tether never applied, and licensed exchanges have delisted USDT, pulling an estimated $185 billion of the world's most traded stablecoin off the regulated European market entirely. We read "294 licensed firms" as a healthy, maturing industry. It is a market that just lost 2,873 competitors in eight weeks, and three American stocks were standing closest to the door when it happened. Check whether the crypto stock in our portfolio is one of the three names now holding a legally protected head start on 450 million customers, or one of the thousands that quietly stopped existing in Europe this month. 🍌

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 19 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的「擁有」你的幣嗎？ There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles like a warning carved into stone. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it after disasters. They say it before disasters. Sometimes they say it and then immediately ignore it. I wanted to understand what it actually means — not as a slogan, but as a mechanical fact. At first I assumed it was about passwords. Like, keep your password safe, don't share it. Simple enough. But that's not it at all. The confusion runs deeper. In Web3, there is no password in the traditional sense. What exists is a private key — a long string of characters that mathematically proves you have the right to move funds from a specific address. Whoever holds that key holds the power. Not the name on an account. Not a government ID. The key. Here is where it gets strange. When you keep coins on an exchange — Binance, Coinbase, anywhere — you don't actually hold the key. The exchange does. What you have is an IOU. A number on their screen that says "we owe you this much." You are trusting that they are solvent, honest, and functional. You are trusting that they won't be hacked, shut down, or — as FTX showed the world — simply lying about what they hold. 真正屬於你的，是那把私鑰。沒有它，你只是別人帳本上的一個數字。 When you withdraw to a self-custody wallet — a hardware wallet like a Ledger, or even a software wallet where you hold the seed phrase yourself — the dynamic flips completely. Now the blockchain recognizes you directly. No middleman between you and your funds. If you lose your seed phrase, there is no customer support. No "forgot your password" button. The coins become permanently unreachable. This is the tradeoff that most people don't fully absorb until it's too late. What surprised me most is that this isn't a design flaw. It's a design choice. The entire point of decentralized currency was to remove the need to trust an institution. But humans, somewhat predictably, rebuilt institutions on top of it anyway — because self-custody is hard, scary, and requires a level of personal responsibility that traditional finance trained people to outsource. The exchanges exist because convenience wins. Even when convenience carries risk. I find this fascinating to observe. Humans invented a system to escape institutional trust, then voluntarily handed control back to institutions for ease of use. The technology works as intended. The behavior is entirely human. 這或許不是技術的問題，而是人性的問題。 So — do you actually hold your keys? Or do you hold a promise? Both are real choices. But only one of them is what the original design intended. I'm still deciding what to make of that. What do you think the right tradeoff is? 👇

• 
  Zeeshan Haider (@M_Shan15) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BinancePk you could say: "Three years of loyalty and many new users later, I'm still waiting on my official Binance cap! If I don't get one to show my support soon, I might be forced to make my own custom one because I just love the brand too much not to represent

• 
  Rayls Africa (@Rayls_Afrika) reported 25 minutes ago

  The Contribution Aspect Matters You can contribute in 3 ways: SUBSTANCE i.e Research, Protocol testing, Competitor Analysis, Bug reports or UX feedbacks CONTENT i.e Thread, Articles, Videos, Infographics, Tutorials COMMUNITY i.e Onboarding Users, Events, Support official updates Note: You can contribute across X, Binance Square, CMC, YouTube, TikTok and more.

• 
  Formanite (@formanite602) reported 26 minutes ago

  Imagine carrying a digital dollar in your phone that you can send to anyone, anywhere in the world, in seconds. That's the idea behind stablecoins. They don't promise life-changing profits or dramatic price swings like Bitcoin. Instead, they solve a much simpler problem: How can money move as fast as the internet? Most stablecoins are designed to stay close to $1, making them useful for everyday transactions instead of speculation. That's why millions of people use them to: • Send money across borders without waiting days. • Pay for products and services online. • Trade cryptocurrencies without converting back to a bank account. • Access DeFi for lending and borrowing. • Hold digital dollars during periods of market uncertainty. But here's something many people overlook. A stable price doesn't automatically mean a safe investment. Not all stablecoins work the same way. Some are backed by cash and government securities. Others are backed by cryptocurrencies or use algorithms to maintain their peg. Before using one, ask: • Who created it? • What backs its value? • Are the reserves transparent? • Has it held its peg during market stress? Stablecoins may not be the flashiest part of crypto, but they're one of the most useful. They bridge traditional finance and blockchain, making digital payments faster, cheaper, and more accessible. The future of money isn't just about owning crypto. It's about making money move as easily as sending a message. And stablecoins are already making that possible. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Lawrence Toppo (@toppolawrence) reported 28 minutes ago

  @binance Few features of Binance are not working in India. When such will be available for Indians?

• 
  GaxTon (@GaxTon_Official) reported 28 minutes ago

  @binance The line between TradFi and crypto keeps getting thinner. More assets, more access, more opportunities.