Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Crypto Breaking News (@CryptoBreakNews) reported 2 minutes ago

  Binance and RedotPay Fight Over Singapore Lawsuit Outcome Binance-linked entities and stablecoin payments card provider RedotPay are sparring over whether a Singapore legal case tied to their wider Hong Kong dispute is winding down after a hearing held on Aug. 7. RedotPay to...

• 
  Nick Edvardsson (@Edvardsson85360) reported 3 minutes ago

  @o2dotapp what ******** is the difference from this or using leverage???? on binance or any other exchange

• 
  Thuy Signals (✱,✱) (@thuykeo56) reported 7 minutes ago

  @rab4745 @binance My poor wallet is weeping while watching ONE slide down that red list all afternoon long

• 
  onglaithuyen ⛵️ (@KSV_Whale) reported 13 minutes ago

  Bitget just did something the crypto industry rarely sees. They seized the market maker's assets through risk controls and used them to compensate users who got wrecked in the $TUT incident. Even ZachXBT, who has publicly criticized Bitget before, gave them credit for this one. When your loudest critic tips the hat, you know the move landed. Then Bitget followed up with another announcement: a framework for handling abnormal profits. In plain terms, if someone manipulates the market and walks away with ***** gains, the platform reserves the right to claw it back and redistribute to affected users. If they actually execute on this consistently, it could be one of the most important self-regulatory moves in crypto. Not because one exchange did the right thing once, but because it sets a precedent that puts pressure on everyone else. The real question now falls on Binance, OKX, Bybit, and every other major venue. When the next manipulation event hits your platform, will you protect users the same way, or will you hide behind "market risk" disclaimers? Crypto doesn't need more promises about security. It needs exchanges that treat user protection as a system design problem, not a PR problem. Bitget just raised the bar. Let's see who clears it. 🚣

• 
  Doshky (@Doshky39) reported 20 minutes ago

  That gave OKX something its competitors eventually needed badly: breathing room. Binance went down a different path. It pursued a MiCA application in Greece, but on June 24, 2026, it withdrew the application, just days before the July 1 transition deadline.

• 
  Dexter_1104 (@Dexter_1104) reported 20 minutes ago

  Hello bitcoin:native and constellation-labs:native community, I would like to make another post today explaining why almost everything is different this time, and why many still claim that everything is going as usual and the bottom will be reached around Q4. This has zero substance apart from this theory; no data or alleged facts, apart from the cycle theory, support this scenario, and yet these people refuse to understand. I am sharing some of my data and facts here. First, there is a bullish divergence on the Bitcoin 2-week chart,just like in the last bear market, after which the bottom was already in. Second, stock markets are at an all-time high; we are seeing an extreme divergence between stock markets and the crypto market. Third, looking at the total market cap, we see that the first and second lows have already been established, and as with Bitcoin, there is a bullish divergence. Fourth, USDT and USDT dominance show a clear bearish divergence, signaling that we have seen the peak in dominance and are already witnessing a trend reversal. Fifth, in June we saw a $5 billion liquidation event, three times larger than the one during the FTX crash, historically, major liquidation events have signaled the market bottom. What else could possibly happen now? World War III? The collapse of Binance? Sixth, the number of Bitcoin holdings currently in the red is at an all time high exactly the level where bear market bottoms have occurred in the past. On top of that, Bitcoin dominance is hovering just below 60% something never seen before in a bear market. So, please,what actually supports your theory other than the "4-year cycle" and "Q4 is the bottom" narrative? It is incredible how arrogant these people can be: faced with 99 arguments against their position and only one in favor, which side would they bet on? Stay tuned. bitcoin:native #crypto

• 
  1win Token (@1winToken) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph I think it’s not about protecting users, but rather that there were no issues with Binance.

• 
  Tat Thang (@tatthang) reported 23 minutes ago

  The exploit of harmony:native (Harmony) explained: Harmony launches through Binance Launchpad in May 2019. - Layer 1 blockchain, built on sharding - raised $5M in IEO at $0.003175 per token - Stephen Tse, PhD UPenn in cryptographic protocols, ex-Google, ex-Apple - pitch: 2-second finality, Effective Proof of Stake - at peak, ONE traded at $0.38 on October 26, 2021 - market cap reached ~$4B Then the security problems started. June 23, 2022: the Horizon Bridge hack - Harmony's cross-chain bridge is compromised - attacker gains control of the MultiSig wallet's private keys - $100 million in crypto assets drained in a single morning - assets stolen: WETH, USDT, USDC, DAI, BUSD - FBI later confirms the attacker: Lazarus Group (North Korea) Harmony never recovered the funds. December 2023: the staking bug - a smart contract bug causes 146.3 million ONE tokens to be minted unintentionally - not an external attack - the protocol's own code created supply that shouldn't exist the vulnerability was patched, but the pattern was forming. three incidents over four years. each one hits a different layer. each one goes deeper. August 12, 2026: the consensus exploit - an attacker discovers a vulnerability in Harmony's block production - the method: minting tokens through "empty blocks" - 4 billion ONE tokens are created - that's 26% of the entire token supply but here's the part that made this exploit different from almost every hack in crypto history: Harmony's totalSupply endpoint did not update. the standard API that every exchange uses to monitor token supply showed nothing wrong. dashboards displayed normal numbers. alerts didn't fire. the attacker minted 26% of total supply and the reporting layer said everything was fine. Fund flow: - 4B ONE minted through empty blocks - 2.8B moved to exchange deposit wallets - that's 97% of the minted tokens - sold into order books before anyone reacted - ~115M ONE remains on-chain across 4 identified wallets the price crashes to an all-time low of $0.0005735 Harmony identifies the 4 attacker wallets: - one1uap8dx2z0qsjxqthm5flgcxkeepsz3gsrghnfn - one17u300a40ll5wphd8kj5hktryhdjq3ml9f4phy4 - one1a5hur07z5vtvzhr35zkw8tfqedemkz8t88xgd7 - one1h56hkxmua0uzfv07fu04cudvtrl35u96pq47vy Harmony's response: - working with exchanges to freeze funds - validator patch v2026.1.1 released - Horizon bridge paused - evaluating a network rollback a rollback means reversing the entire blockchain to a state before the exploit. the last time a major blockchain attempted this was Ethereum in 2016 after the DAO hack. it split the community in half. Ethereum Classic was born from the disagreement. but there's a problem with rolling back Harmony: 97% of the tokens already left the chain. they converted to real money on centralized exchanges. a rollback reverses on-chain state. it doesn't reverse CEX trades. The security timeline: 2022: bridge layer. $100M. external attacker (Lazarus Group) 2023: staking layer. 146M ONE. internal bug 2026: consensus layer. 4B ONE (26% supply). protocol-level exploit three layers. three failures. each deeper than the last. Today: - ONE market cap sits at ~$13M - down from ~$4B at peak - that's a 99.7% decline from ATH - price: $0.0005735 (all-time low) - developer activity declined 19.5% year-over-year heading into 2026 2026 has seen 100+ crypto projects shut down. Harmony just showed what happens when a chain doesn't die all at once. It dies three times, each time from a wound one layer deeper than the last.

• 
  ayu trades - spaylater, ggives, etc. (@ayutrades) reported 25 minutes ago

  open for transferring - load to cash (regular & load card) - paypal to cash - binance to cash - gcash to paypal - gcash to binance - not verify balance transfer (gcash, maya, shopee, lazada, grab pay) - gcash/maya with issue transfer balance

• 
  Invesmentstreet (@bullishbro0) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph Binance has managed to avoid problems quite well, with a few notable exceptions—there are thousands of such success stories

• 
  TDubZero (@TDubZero) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Davinaonit @RustyTokenAI @binance Yeah I bet they are eager to help, more like ready to scam

• 
  Nicholas Soler (@nikonchain) reported 31 minutes ago

  This Binance transaction matters. It does NOT prove the attacker owned a Binance customer account. But 5B ONE moved directly from Wallet D into Binance-associated infrastructure. Binance should be able to determine internally what process/account, if any, corresponded to that transaction. That makes it an investigative choke point.

• 
  0xMoon (@0xMo0n) reported 31 minutes ago

  @lndnd1110 expect the impossible when you're talking about binance

• 
  miggyn 🧩 (@miggynvugyha) reported 34 minutes ago

  which disaster notification just trains you to scroll past the next one the old pattern was slow bank wires and opaque queues. this one puts 20 usdt vouchers from a 650k pool straight into local binance accounts and zeros p2p fees through august 18

• 
  Sallie Stone (@IndieAuthors) reported 36 minutes ago

  @toolshed_labs @CryptoVerse_Co I'd say 2029 if we are to go with Google, Microsoft and Cloudflare. So, it's necessary to start preparing. @QANplatform is already working on its mainnet, Algorand is getting ready and now, we have Binance.