1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
  4. Outage Map
Binance

Binance Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Binance users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Beaucaire, Occitanie 2
Stafford, England 1
Nakuru, Nakuru 1
Kiambu, Kiambu 1
Vigo, Galicia 1
Mont-Saint-Martin, ACAL 1
Dubai, Dubai 1
Barranquilla, Atlántico 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • 28wealth
    wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported

    @rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..

  • cocococowi
    cococowi (@cocococowi) reported

    @binance Hey Binance, how does the 1:1 backing for bStocks really work? If many people convert stocks to bStocks and use them in DeFi (lending, liquidity pools, etc.), what happens to the actual shares? Any risk of fractional ownership or redemption problems #AskBinance

  • 7krry
    TaylorK (@7krry) reported

    @binance I’ve only ever traded standard crypto on Binance, so bStocks is totally new to me. How exactly does corporate action work here? For example, if a company issues a dividend or a stock split, how is that distributed to bStock holders on the app? #AskBinance

  • Msagirsani
    BlockVanta (@Msagirsani) reported

    @binance How does Binance ensure bStocks remain 1:1 backed by U.S. shares via Proof of Collateral? What protections exist if BTech Holdings or the custodian faces issues, and how does the ADGM framework address past tokenized stock concerns? #AskBinance

  • ANKITKUMAR31153
    ANKIT KUMAR (@ANKITKUMAR31153) reported

    @binance Will bStocks eventually support fractional ownership of more global stocks and ETFs? 📈 #AskBinance

  • dashlabib
    0xLabib☂️ (@dashlabib) reported

    Hey @BinanceHelpDesk Please Resolve my issue RW00270 binance UID 738945543

  • StradegyMonkey
    siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported

    @grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.

  • DealGuardianApp
    Deal Guardian (@DealGuardianApp) reported

    Europe's MiCA deadline is looming, potentially impacting Binance access and USDT liquidity. In the US, regulators are proposing user ID requirements for stablecoin issuers, while Ireland considers crypto safeguards. #Crypto #NFTs

  • CryptrixLabs
    Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported

    ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

  • 0xSchnitzel
    Alex Kirchmaier | web3alex.eth 𝕏 (@0xSchnitzel) reported

    @FreepanO @MartiniGuyYT You seem to be unaware of how slow European authorities can be. France has opened a case against Binance years ago and they haven’t finished their investigations apparently…

  • miyaspokeofthis
    miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported

    @0xSchnitzel @binance No, in this (very rare) case it's actually protecting the customer from an entity who does not care about the safety of their users or their funds. Or compliance for that matter. They had an undetectable 3rd party impact auth bypass they didn't fix for the past 3 years. They even claim it works as intended. I hate overreach, but if regulations are made to protect customers - then this is perfect case for it. Binance needs to go. And my claim is proven. I'm the one who reported the non-compliance and the ((undetectable)) 3rd party impact of their payment processing due to storing CC CVVs - which is a huge no-go. And it goes directly against PCI-DSS which they claim to be compliant with. And it also affects every single of their 300M+ users 💀 The users connected bank accounts don't detect unauthorized access because Binance will always pass the CVVs they store, even if the user doesn't authenticate OR uses the wrong CVV (💀💀💀) They claimed it "works as intended" and tried to silently patch it after declining bounties. The patch just added more pop-ups you need to close before you can bypass their payment auth, but their payment processing was never fixed. They still store user CVVs three years later and the auth bypass still works. It just makes you close more pop-ups LOL I haven't authorized any deposit to Binance for the past 3 years FYI This is one of the ultra rare cases where the regulation actually benefits and protects the user.

  • KAlzandani
    Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported

    My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

  • OfficialCR7_Fan
    _CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported

    @Shahzaynhaiderr @binance @BinanceAcademy fixing real problems while everyone chases hype

  • ProfitableMan1
    ProfitableMan (@ProfitableMan1) reported

    On June 1, 2026, Binance introduced US equities trading for eligible users outside the United States. This is not Binance issuing its own shares. It is access to over 7,000 existing stocks and ETFs already listed on US exchanges. Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and thousands of others. Key details confirmed in the official announcement: Zero commission on trades. Fractional shares from as little as $5. Trading is available 24 hours a day, five days a week for select equities. Funding via USDC, USDT, BNB and other supported stablecoins. All of this sits inside your existing Binance account.

  • Pritamkumar047
    Pritam Kumar (@Pritamkumar047) reported

    @BinanceHelpDesk I have not committed any scam or fraud, yet my account has been banned. Customer support is not helping me, and I still do not know the exact reason for this action. Please review my account again and provide a clear explanation. @binance @BinanceHelpDesk #Binance

Check Current Status