Binance Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Binance users affected:
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Itu, SP | 1 |
| Seattle, WA | 1 |
| Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
| Beaucaire, Occitanie | 2 |
| Stafford, England | 1 |
| Nakuru, Nakuru | 1 |
| Kiambu, Kiambu | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
PUP (@pupXbnb) reportedRelaunching PUP We got delisted from Binance Alpha a few days ago so we are here to try again and this time do it properly Previous ATH was 60 MIL Let's go past that, will send @cz_binance 70% of supply bnb upside down is pup bnb=pup
-
JEEB ✯ (@jeebofweb3) reportedYour account got liquidated. The price never actually moved anywhere except on one screen. During the late 2025 tariff crash, a stablecoin's price on Binance alone crashed to 65 cents while it held steady at a dollar on every other exchange on the planet. That single, isolated number, generated on one exchange's own internal feed, was enough to instantly devalue real collateral and trigger close to a billion dollars in forced liquidations. Binance later apologized and promised reimbursements. That doesn't un-liquidate anyone. Nobody signs up to lose a position because of a glitch on a book three time zones away that nothing else in the market agreed with. But that's exactly what happens when a platform's liquidation engine trusts whatever price last printed on its own thin order book instead of what an asset is actually worth everywhere else. @margin_trade was built so a wick like that literally cannot touch your account. Here's how 🧵↓
-
10X̌ (@10ofw3) reported@stekisteks Black bull in the bottom right? Binance just made the $ANSEM signal impossible to ignore louder than a 3AM chart check. Time to charge. 🔥
-
Aarman Abdallah (@shuaib_hosh) reported@binance Pull up or pull down kkk
-
ray🧲💰 (@raycromusic) reported@Kenzo13RO @cz_binance @binance Birpanda sucks ! Tried to transfer BTC to my Tangem ! 2 times rejected cancelled so I gave up ! Gonna swap for Eur back to my bank and then buy again directly in Tangem ! **** them CEX !
-
PUP (@pupXbnb) reportedRelaunching PUP We got delisted from Binance Alpha a few days ago so we are here to try again and this time do it properly Previous ATH was 60 MIL Let's go past that bnb upside down is pup bnb=pup
-
fratelli. (@fratCLVB) reported@Pattyice @binance @wintermute_t turning down binance listings is either the most based thing or the most expensive flex depending on how this plays out
-
profitable (@exitliquid1ty) reportedif you are in the binance garbage cz bull i hope a massive rusty victorian piano falls upon your head and you succumb to your injuries
-
As a Man Thinketh (@MuthaigaTraders) reported@cz_binance Your Customer Support at Binance have become incompetent!
-
CRYPTO WASTA (@cryptowasta) reported$PUMP at these levels is one of the most obvious asymmetric bets I'm seeing right now. Down around around 85% from launch. Platform still printing cash. Buybacks live. And a macro tailwind nobody's pricing in. Let me walk you through it. The business. Pump fun is doing around $848K/day in fees as of late June. That's #1 or #2 across ALL of DeFi by daily revenue, neck-and-neck with Polymarket ($999K/day). Bear market, token bleeding, and the machine is still running. Revenue doesn't care about vibes. The valuation nobody's looking at. PUMP: ~$590M MC → 1.9x annualized revenue. HYPE: ~$14B MC → 13.3x. Same business… monetizing on-chain trading. One's priced like it's dying, the other like it's the future. Which one looks mispriced? But the unlocks… Yeah, I know. 82.5B PUMP (~$125M) begins unlocking mid-July, the first unlock ever for these tranches: 50B → Team/Advisors (20% of supply) 32.5B → Private Sale (13%) Key word: begins. It vests out over 2 years, not all at once. Day one is a step-up in circulating supply, then it settles into a monthly drip of ~0.71%. So be honest with yourself, is the team dumping their whole bag at -80% from highs? Doubt it. The part that gets me bullish, buybacks & burns. 50% of net revenue → buyback & burn, live since Jul 2025. So far: $ 400M+ PUMP repurchased, 145.5B tokens burned. A real, revenue-funded bid under the token. And the kicker: at peak bull, Pump fun was doing $ 10-15M a day in revenue. Buybacks didn't even exist then. They do now. Get near those numbers again → around $7.7M a day in buybacks vs ~$400K today. Things can get silly, and they get silly fast. But memecoins are dead… No. They're structurally immortal. Memecoins are the only asset class where a broke 19yo with $50 can turn it into life-changing money. No gatekeepers, no VC allocation you'll never get. That's not a bug, that's the product. As long as people are priced out of everything else, they'll keep chasing the one casino that lets them play. Every cycle people call memes over. Every cycle they come back bigger. The tickers change, the behaviour never does. The tailwind nobody's pricing in… Solana on-chain is on fire, and it isn't just memes. Solana's led every chain in DEX volume for 30+ straight weeks ($250B in Q1 alone). It did $1.6T in on-chain spot volume in 2025, second only to Binance across the entire market, ahead of Coinbase, Bybit and Kraken. On-chain isn't the minor leagues anymore. But the real story? Tokenized stocks. This is the part flying under the radar. Tokenized equities did $4.9B in volume in H1 2026, a 6x jump from just $775M in the back half of 2025. And Solana is settling 95%+ of it. Mid-June alone saw a $1.3B week, mostly off tokenized SpaceX going live. Here's why that matters for PUMP: Whether it's memes, stocks, or whatever the next mania is, it all rides on Solana's rails, and Pump fun sits right at the top of that funnel. More trading means more launches, more attention, more fees, more buybacks. It all loops back. The setup. Chart's down around 85%, printing a clean bull divergence and bullish structure on the weekly. If you believe Solana keeps eating on-chain trading, memes today, stocks tomorrow, whatever's next, PUMP at 1.9x revenue is just mispriced. Simple as. Far more room to run up than down from these levels. Not pretending there's zero risk, the unlock could absorb worse than I expect, and if Solana volume craters the thesis weakens, so I'm sizing accordingly. But the asymmetry is too good to ignore. Adding a bag on spot here and riding it. nfa, dyor.
-
Chillstep Philosopher 💡🎶 (@Astralnaut369) reported@SolanaDali @binance They will just list futures to extract & try to kill the rally. If they wanted to join the cause & help they would just list spot without the teasing nonsense
-
Aika Velho (@StradegyMonkey) reportedNone of these are illegal. The botnet and its slaves were virtual private servers, a cloud, nothing related to malware. Obfuscation as opsec to avoid Binance account hijacking is completely legal, when illegal funds aren't washed but the funds originate from legal activities and the obfuscated funds aren't used to anything illegal, meaning there's no money laundering. Running automatic profit sharing by limiting withdrawals to customers' addresses so the creator of the seed who receives a confirmation of setup and sending balance and withdrawal requests can't hijack customers' funds isn't illegal, it's only good. Regulation wasn't worked around but there was a plan to make the system autonomous instead of a service offered by centralized operators, meaning that a license wouldn't have been required by the law. Binance didn't require identity verification in 2018-2020, when the system was active, meaning that the automatically created accounts would have been completely legal and avoiding hijacking them by verifying identity is a measure to protect customers' funds.
-
cexscan (@cexscan) reported@binance interesting article, but half the battle is knowing what to *look* for. most people just stare at the ledger and see numbers. the real alpha is in the volume shifts, the large wallets accumulating or distributing. that's where the edge is, not just staring at block heights.
-
The10yardsTalk (@the10yards) reported@puddles42069 @blknoiz06 so how will it work? i mean he said this a stimmy for on chaib people Held 55% of the coin now How will CEX approach him with their needs of coin tho? and isnt it a bad thing for the coin itself if say binance list it and they start the perp **** on $Ansem I kinda dont want that
-
eray (@eray1785060) reported@RWA_Inc_ @BitcoinNews For two years, it's always been the same, you kept me waiting because we were working on big stock exchange listings for two years, nothing happened. Don't deceive your fans, list on stock exchanges like Binance Okex. If you take your business seriously, it is impossible for you