1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
  4. Outage Map
Binance

Binance Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Binance users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Beaucaire, Occitanie 2
Stafford, England 1
Nakuru, Nakuru 1
Kiambu, Kiambu 1
Vigo, Galicia 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Himelb2k24
    HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reported

    Can users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance @binance

  • CryptoTolga_
    Crypto Tolga (@CryptoTolga_) reported

    $NEAR #BİNANCE #BİTCOİN #NEARUSDT is at a critical level Price has reacted strongly from the lower boundary of the ascending channel and now appears to be preparing for its next directional move. If the $2.70–$2.75 resistance zone breaks, we could see a strong push toward the upper boundary of the channel. In that scenario, a move above $3 and eventually toward the $4 region would not be surprising. Support: $2.00 Breakout Level: $2.75 All eyes are on these levels. 👀📈

  • zkmattwyatt
    zkpuzzlematt 🧩 (@zkmattwyatt) reported

    @tulipking yup -- this is what I noticed with my BTC decoupling thesis HYPE/ZEC barbel stood well in Apr/May and decoupled from BTC as robinhood/binance/etc all became everything exchanges -- but EOD most of onchain economy and growth is with people taking leverage on their crypto holdings so if BTC comes down then they are forced sellers as such

  • 0xmavis0x
    Mavis (@0xmavis0x) reported

    Many crypto platforms rushed to offer tokenized shares or pre-IPO subscription products (Kraken, Bybit, Binance Wallet, Bitget Wallet, MEXC, Gate, and others). The problem: tokenized access doesn’t create more real shares.

  • ap_milly777
    ap milly (@ap_milly777) reported

    Community doesnt matter anymore. $WOJAK sol community been grinding for 6months+ just for a bundle pvp to come up with paid kols and get a binance listing. Asteroid at only 70m after 3 elon and spacex shills. Floki went to 3b with much less. Doge to 90b. This **** is cooked😭🙏

  • ferz_erz00
    𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported

    On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

  • nillionaire10
    The Pipslayer (@nillionaire10) reported

    @MitchJonez Micth ..by now I don't even know why am still commenting,commented on all ur previous comments....but if by any chance u get to read my comment That 5000usd will be life changing for me and my family 5316922670802928....that is my acc number bro... My binance is down

  • fxPips_god
    Akoto k. Alfred (@fxPips_god) reported

    My TRC20: TLudTEV2VCSHQ5eJWjVyMezNvdQHpBpWjA My phone is so broken I can't even comment on X without using Chrome 😭 I need a working phone to trade on Binance, Bitget & Bybit daily 📱 Winning this $100 = new Crosscall Trekker X4 = back to trading properly 🙏 I need this W. 📈

  • tolgaozek
    Tolga Ozek (@tolgaozek) reported

    @binance How does BEP-677 (Scaled UI Amount) support enable better RWA functionality for bStocks compared to standard BEP-20 tokens? What specific DeFi composability benefits does this provide? #AskBinance

  • Fin_CryptoAce
    Suraj Jha (@Fin_CryptoAce) reported

    $BTC Swing Short Update - After Breaking down from 64k$ ,it was a good MSB in LTF and was getting rejected from daily VWAP,continuous spot selling from Binance and coinbase made it very obvious that we will dump more and still I can’t see any strength in the price action of $BTC . Still no change waiting for lower , I don’t see any point of taking scalp long here so still in my swing short . #btc #btcusd

  • fxPips_god
    Akoto k. Alfred (@fxPips_god) reported

    @Learnernoearner My TRC20: TLudTEV2VCSHQ5eJWjVyMezNvdQHpBpWjA My phone is so broken I can't even comment on X without using Chrome 😭 I need a working phone to trade on Binance, Bitget & Bybit daily 📱 Winning this $100 = new Crosscall Trekker X4 = back to trading properly 🙏 I need this W. 📈

  • MetaFinancialAI
    Meta Financial AI (@MetaFinancialAI) reported

    @cz_binance A sharp thesis from CZ 👇 AI can't swipe your Visa card, can't pass 2FA, can't show a passport for KYC. But blockchain is API driven. So once agents start paying for things "a matter of months, not years" the money will move over crypto rails. "AI still need to spend money. AI still need to transact. Guess what? They're going to use the blockchain." @cz_binance And which chain will they pick? While other networks are bogged down by slowness and stability issues, the answer is obvious. #BSC. Fast, cheap, reliable exactly what an AI agent transacting thousands of times needs. And what will AI chase above all? Liquidity. And where's the deepest liquidity? @Binance. So, you don't actually need to be a fortune teller to see the future.

  • Adib2410119
    𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐁 (@Adib2410119) reported

    @heistruthX Binance bcz when I open prediction before match on poly. I can't entire their website when match ongoing that's why I skipped this

  • yedior
    Yedior (@yedior) reported

    @Spigg1115 has Binance not harmed competitors? Why did The Netherlands ban them? Why did France, Germany and more forced them to shut down Derivatives? Don't you think Binance's own actions led to this, rather than some kind of plot being run?

  • KAlzandani
    Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported

    @binance It's difficult to trust a platform that labels your account "high risk" due to technical errors, then repeats the error dozens of times, then bans you from P2P for two transactions totaling only a few dollars, implicitly accusing you of money laundering. The problem isn't the error itself, but the persistence in it, the lack of transparency, accountability, and apology when the error is proven. Users deserve fair treatment, not arbitrary decisions followed by justifications.

Check Current Status