Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Asta (@Deku_85) reported 3 minutes ago

  @last_aka @COTInetwork So we stopped the treasury, node rewards, Coti Earn etc etc but we have Kucoin with 18%, Binance 26%…. Is this a joke? Given the fact that u working for @COTInetwork , can u ask them why they had 54m $Coti in the treasury? Robbing community’s rewards!

• 
  MetaShark (@themetashark) reported 6 minutes ago

  @CryptosR_Us 🔥 MOMENTUM: Altcoins are waking up. From Aug. 19–22, roughly $215 BILLION poured back into the altcoin market, pushing TOTAL2 above $1 TRILLION again. But the stat I’m watching even closer: 56% of Binance altcoins are now trading ABOVE their 200-day moving average. Not long ago, roughly 80%–85% were BELOW it. That is a MASSIVE shift in market breadth. Now, I’m not calling full altseason yet. Bitcoin dominance is still elevated and the Altcoin Season Index is only around 49 — well below the 75 level generally associated with a confirmed altseason. But this is how rotations START. BTC moves first. Then majors. Then capital starts hunting higher-beta opportunities further down the market. We’re finally seeing signs that money is beginning to spread out. Altseason isn’t confirmed yet. But the engine is starting to turn over.

• 
  3Ms (@MaxMoneyMakers) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance Crypto is garbage also the scam of stocks is not working the CEX a running out of lies to sell? LOL

• 
  Geoff B (@MarketCapGuy) reported 8 minutes ago

  @LeonidasNFT @binance Why charge for dreams? Isn’t free access the true currency of innovation?

• 
  🌱Benson (@aduwaye77) reported 9 minutes ago

  @0xCryptoPirates Binance bStocks allows users to access publicly listed companies' stocks on blockchain, bypassing traditional paperwork and trading hours

• 
  Shizu_静 (@Shizu86s) reported 9 minutes ago

  Binance Lite Loan Crypto backed borrowing, simply explained Need liquidity without immediately selling eligible crypto assets? Crypto backed borrowing is a concept where eligible digital assets can be used as collateral to borrow supported assets under specific loan terms. With Binance Lite Loan, users may be able to borrow against eligible collateral while that collateral may continue earning yield where applicable, depending on the product and asset. How does it work? 1. Eligible crypto is provided as collateral. 2. Supported assets can be borrowed according to the applicable terms. 3. The collateral remains subject to the loan conditions until the borrowing is repaid or otherwise settled. Why might users consider it? • It can provide access to liquidity without immediately selling collateral. • Where applicable, eligible collateral may continue generating yield. • It introduces another way to manage digital asset liquidity. What are the risks? Borrowing against crypto is not risk-free. Collateral values can fluctuate, and loan terms, collateral requirements, interest or other costs may apply. Users should understand the possibility of additional collateral requirements or liquidation according to the applicable terms. Product features and availability can vary by region and may change over time. Always review the latest information, terms, eligibility requirements, and risks through official Binance sources before using any product. Educational content only. This is not financial advice. Always verify information through official sources, and remember that product availability may vary by region. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  ✰𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕠𝕗𝕫𝕖𝕤𝕥💎💎 (@the1reallfash) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance @grok @bot break it down to lame man understanding

• 
  Aminul (아미눌) (@1nxnn__) reported 13 minutes ago

  @AbdulRehma77317 @binance @BinancePk Borrowing against crypto can help, but liquidation risk matters.

• 
  Ria (@CryptoWeb3girl) reported 14 minutes ago

  Stocks meeting blockchain sounds like a strange combination until you actually understand what's going on. Let's break down Binance bStocks properly. At the core, bStocks are tokenized U.S. stock products, meaning they represent exposure to real, publicly listed companies but in a digital format built on blockchain. One of the more notable things about them is that eligible users can trade them 24/7, unlike traditional stock markets which run on fixed hours. Now, tokenized stocks aren't identical to traditional stocks just wearing a digital costume. Things like trading availability, ownership structure, and specific product features can differ quite a bit depending on how the product is built and regulated. This is exactly why it's worth slowing down before assuming you understand something just because it sounds familiar. Any financial product deserves a proper look, how it actually works, what risk comes attached, and whether you're even eligible to access it based on your region. Right now, Binance bStocks are limited to supported jurisdictions and eligible users specifically, so this isn't something available everywhere yet. It's a genuinely interesting example of where traditional finance and blockchain are starting to overlap, and understanding that intersection properly is more useful than jumping straight to conclusions about it. Educational only, not financial advice. Always do your own research and check official sources. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Seph (@Jehoseph) reported 17 minutes ago

  For our small network, unseen by most of Crypto X, but with branches stretching into a lot of quiet agreements made over many years. Monday open. Bitcoin is at $78,139, up 23% on the week. Ethereum is at $2,483, up 30.8%. Zcash is up 64.5%. One of the strongest risk-on weeks in a long time. ethereum:0xaeeaa594e7dc112d67b8547fe9767a02c15b5597 is up 7.5%. ethereum:0xff20817765cb7f73d4bde2e66e067e58d11095c2 is up 12.6%. The first thing people get backwards ANVL trades at $0.0008968. AMP trades at $0.0004214. ANVL sits at $79,006,750, ranked #311. AMP sits at $37,942,497, ranked #540. The market already values Anvil at more than double Flexa's collateral token, and ranks it 229 places higher. Whatever ANVL is, it is not the undiscovered one in this pair. It's the expensive one. The number that actually matters ANVL did $61,755 of volume in 24 hours. AMP did $3,054,053. AMP does roughly 50x the daily volume on half the market cap. As a share of market cap, AMP turns over about 8% a day. ANVL turns over 0.08%. A hundredfold difference in how much real money is voting. And it's thinner than that sounds. ANVL is priced across three exchanges and five markets, most of that volume in a single MEXC book. AMP is across 42 exchanges and 48 markets, with Binance the deepest venue. So when someone posts an ANVL chart, understand what they're charting. One order book on one mid-tier exchange. Look at the two 7-day sparklines above. AMP's is a smooth curve. ANVL's has a vertical gap down and a scramble back. That's what a thin book looks like when someone of ordinary size hits the bid. Which brings me to the thing our own chats need to hear. "We're up 10% today" is not a signal On $61,755 of daily volume, a 10% move can be a few thousand dollars of net buying. That isn't demand. That's an empty book. The same thinness that makes 30x math feel plausible is exactly what makes the exit brutal. Price targets are cheap when nobody has tried to sell into them. And here's the part almost nobody in either community says out loud: right now a major announcement from either side likely moves money sideways, not in. People holding both sell one to size up the other. AMP absorbs that. Anvil cannot. Somewhere between one and ten ordinary sellers is enough to take ANVL down 30% or more. Not a whale. Not an attack. Just people acting rationally on good news about the other asset. That holds until buyers who have never touched AMP find Anvil on their own. That takes listings, coverage, and depth we don't have yet. What the $79M is actually paying for Anvil currently charges zero protocol fees. No creation, no interest, no amendment, no withdrawal. Turning any on requires a governance vote. So, the valuation prices adoption that hasn't scaled, times fees that don't exist, times a future vote to create them, times those fees reaching holders. That's a legitimate thesis. It's also four conditionals deep. And when people reach for the UNI comparison, remember UNI is the textbook case of a governance token that captures no protocol revenue. Now, Anvil: The protocol is audited by OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits, runs two Immunefi bounty programs, and in June was accepted into the Ethereum Security Subsidy Program alongside the Ethereum Foundation, Nethermind, and Chainlink. It shipped its first institutional letter of credit product at Consensus in May. At Blockchain Futurist this month, six sponsors, EukaPay, Digital Spenders Club, Polymath, Stablecorp, APX Lending, MayFlower, secured their packages with on-chain LOCs instead of paying upfront. Small dollars, real counterparties, real usage. The honest counterweight: TVL sits near $10M today. It peaked at 36,000 ETH, about $109M, in July 2025. Usage went backwards while the market cap did not. And AMP: Flexa has been building since 2018. The token has been live since September 2020, launched with ConsenSys, backed by Pantera. Six years of price history and real settlement volume. This year Flexa retired SPEDN to focus on B2B rails and went live across 37 SEPA countries. Exchange reserves fell about 43% in 90 days earlier this year, supply moving into self custody. The counterweight there is just as blunt. AMP printed a fresh all time low this cycle. It is roughly 18% above it. That's an asset in a downtrend trying to build a base, and the burden of proof sits entirely with buyers. Levels, without inventing anything. $0.000356 is the line. Lose it on a weekly close and the base thesis is finished. Around $0.00050 is the first real reclaim. Near $0.00065 a trend change becomes arguable. A green Monday is not a signal. A weekly close over a prior swing high is. On ANVL I'll say the unpopular thing. At $62K a day across three venues, there isn't enough liquidity for TA to carry weight. You're fitting patterns to noise on one exchange. The structural fact is that it's about 90% off its $0.00929 high. Why both are in one post Anvil came out of the Acronym Foundation, originally the Ampera Foundation, created by one of Flexa's own founders. ANVL wasn't a launchpad token or a raise. It was distributed to addresses providing AMP collateral. Flexa is a named user of Anvil, alongside Bullish. Trace the whitepapers, the distribution, the conference stages, and you land on some of the same people who have been at this since 2018. If they execute, both work. If they don't, correlation goes to one and the thin book breaks first. Combined, both assets are worth about $117 million. Bitcoin traded $33.6 billion in the last day. Zcash traded $1.31 billion. Everything we're discussing is under a tenth of one day of Zcash volume. Against that, the market being described is not small. CoinDesk Research puts BNPL near $560 billion and global trade finance near $2.5 trillion, with letters of credit covering only about 12.5% of world trade today. That gap is either the opportunity or the tell. Honest people land on both sides. What isn't arguable is the shape of the risk. One asset has the deeper market, the longer record, and a fresh all time low to disprove. The other has the newer product, the institutional pilot, the security funding, and a book so thin a single motivated seller draws the candle you can see above. Not financial advice.

• 
  Seph (@Jehoseph) reported 20 minutes ago

  For our small network, unseen by most of Crypto X, but with branches stretching into a lot of quiet agreements made over many years. Monday open. Bitcoin is at $78,139, up 23% on the week. Ethereum is at $2,483, up 30.8%. Zcash is up 64.5%. One of the strongest risk-on weeks in a long time. ethereum:0xaeeaa594e7dc112d67b8547fe9767a02c15b5597 is up 7.5%. ethereum:0xff20817765cb7f73d4bde2e66e067e58d11095c2 is up 12.6%. ANVL trades at $0.0008968. AMP trades at $0.0004214. ANVL sits at $79,006,750, ranked #311. AMP sits at $37,942,497, ranked #540. ANVL did $61,755 of volume in 24 hours. AMP did $3,054,053. AMP does roughly 50x the daily volume on half the market cap. As a share of market cap, AMP turns over about 8% a day. ANVL turns over 0.08%. A hundredfold difference in how much real money is voting. And it's thinner than that sounds. ANVL is priced across three exchanges and five markets, most of that volume in a single MEXC book. AMP is across 42 exchanges and 48 markets, with Binance the deepest venue. So when someone posts an ANVL chart, understand what they're charting. One order book on one mid-tier exchange. Look at the two 7-day sparklines above. AMP's is a smooth curve. ANVL's has a vertical gap down and a scramble back. That's what a thin book looks like when someone of ordinary size hits the bid. Which brings me to the thing our own chats need to hear. "We're up 10% today" is not a signal On $61,755 of daily volume, a 10% move can be a few thousand dollars of net buying. That isn't demand. That's an empty book. The same thinness that makes 30x math feel plausible is exactly what makes the exit brutal. Price targets are cheap when nobody has tried to sell into them. And here's the part almost nobody in either community says out loud: right now a major announcement from either side likely moves money sideways, not in. People holding both sell one to size up the other. AMP absorbs that. Anvil cannot. Somewhere between one and ten ordinary sellers is enough to take ANVL down 30% or more. Not a whale. Not an attack. Just people acting rationally on good news about the other asset. That holds until buyers who have never touched AMP find Anvil on their own. That takes listings, coverage, and depth we don't have yet. What the $79M is actually paying for Anvil currently charges zero protocol fees. No creation, no interest, no amendment, no withdrawal. Turning any on requires a governance vote. So, the valuation prices adoption that hasn't scaled, times fees that don't exist, times a future vote to create them, times those fees reaching holders. That's a legitimate thesis. It's also four conditionals deep. And when people reach for the UNI comparison, remember UNI is the textbook case of a governance token that captures no protocol revenue. Now, Anvil: The protocol is audited by OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits, runs two Immunefi bounty programs, and in June was accepted into the Ethereum Security Subsidy Program alongside the Ethereum Foundation, Nethermind, and Chainlink. It shipped its first institutional letter of credit product at Consensus in May. At Blockchain Futurist this month, six sponsors, EukaPay, Digital Spenders Club, Polymath, Stablecorp, APX Lending, MayFlower, secured their packages with on-chain LOCs instead of paying upfront. Small dollars, real counterparties, real usage. The honest counterweight: TVL sits near $10M today. It peaked at 36,000 ETH, about $109M, in July 2025. Usage went backwards while the market cap did not. And AMP: Flexa has been building since 2018. The token has been live since September 2020, launched with ConsenSys, backed by Pantera. Six years of price history and real settlement volume. This year Flexa retired SPEDN to focus on B2B rails and went live across 37 SEPA countries. Exchange reserves fell about 43% in 90 days earlier this year, supply moving into self custody. The counterweight there is just as blunt. AMP printed a fresh all time low this cycle. It is roughly 18% above it. That's an asset in a downtrend trying to build a base, and the burden of proof sits entirely with buyers. Levels, without inventing anything. $0.000356 is the line. Lose it on a weekly close and the base thesis is finished. Around $0.00050 is the first real reclaim. Near $0.00065 a trend change becomes arguable. A green Monday is not a signal. A weekly close over a prior swing high is. On ANVL I'll say the unpopular thing. At $62K a day across three venues, there isn't enough liquidity for TA to carry weight. You're fitting patterns to noise on one exchange. The structural fact is that it's about 90% off its $0.00929 high. Why both are in one post Anvil came out of the Acronym Foundation, originally the Ampera Foundation, created by one of Flexa's own founders. ANVL wasn't a launchpad token or a raise. It was distributed to addresses providing AMP collateral. Flexa is a named user of Anvil, alongside Bullish. Trace the whitepapers, the distribution, the conference stages, and you land on some of the same people who have been at this since 2018. If they execute, both work. If they don't, correlation goes to one and the thin book breaks first. Combined, both assets are worth about $117 million. Bitcoin traded $33.6 billion in the last day. Zcash traded $1.31 billion. Everything we're discussing is under a tenth of one day of Zcash volume. Against that, the market being described is not small. CoinDesk Research puts BNPL near $560 billion and global trade finance near $2.5 trillion, with letters of credit covering only about 12.5% of world trade today. That gap is either the opportunity or the tell. Honest people land on both sides. What isn't arguable is the shape of the risk. One asset has the deeper market, the longer record, and a fresh all time low to disprove. The other has the newer product, the institutional pilot, the security funding, and a book so thin a single motivated seller draws the candle you can see above. Not financial advice.

• 
  Bryant Rockstar☆ (@rockstarbryant) reported 22 minutes ago

  @binance Sounds like a new operating system in town? I don't wanna trade or take high risks with grandma's savings, how's Agent OS gonna help me? #AskBinance

• 
  Crypto Eagles (@CryptoProject6) reported 23 minutes ago

  What If You Need Liquidity Without Selling Your Crypto? This is where Binance Lite Loan caught my attention. Instead of selling eligible crypto when you need funds, Lite Loan lets users borrow against supported collateral. The interesting part is that eligible collateral may continue earning yield while being used for the loan. For me, the main idea is simple: You keep exposure to your crypto, use it as collateral, and access liquidity without immediately selling it. But borrowing against crypto still comes with risks. Collateral values can change quickly, borrowing costs matter, and users should always understand repayment and liquidation conditions before taking a loan. I like seeing crypto products becoming easier to understand, especially for users who find traditional crypto lending complicated. Would you borrow against your crypto instead of selling it? Availability and terms vary by region. Educational only. Always DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Zolt₳n Ferenczfi © (@ZoltnFerenczfi) reported 23 minutes ago

  @burak_ee I woukd say: don’t panic. Binance does this always with hot coins. They offer crazy high APR just to get ppl have their coins transferred in. Afterwards the APR will go down big time. I remember 4 years ago the APR was 23.6% for a short period of time. Afterwards 0.1% for 4 years.

• 
  Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) reported 28 minutes ago

  Bitcoin Returns Above $80,000 After 113 Days, $179 Million in Futures Liquidated According to Binance market data, BTC has broken above the $80,000 level, reaching a nearly three-month high, and is currently trading at around $79,174. BTC last broke above $80,000 on May 4, 2026, marking a return to the level after 113 days. According to CoinGlass data, total crypto liquidations over the past four hours reached approximately $179.19 million, including $78.99 million in long positions and $100.20 million in short positions.