1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
  4. Outage Map
Binance

Binance Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Binance users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Porto Alegre, RS 1
Angers, Pays de la Loire 1
Itu, SP 1
Seattle, WA 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ahmadwali1216
    Ahmad Wali (@ahmadwali1216) reported

    Hey @binance @MEXC and other exchanges why don't you delist **** projects that has been there for years and constantly devalued yet the coins of these projects are still listed on your exchanges that has heavily impacted negatively crypto industry

  • gmnome
    GM_Crypto (@gmnome) reported

    @jeeya_awan Binance Lite Loan lets you borrow up to 1,000 USDT by pledging BTC as collateral, while your BTC can stay in Simple Earn Flexible and continue earning yield. The initial term is 30 days with no price-triggered liquidation and no interest, just an upfront 1% service fee (0.5% promo until Sept 3, 2026). After the term, penalty interest accrues (36% APR) and liquidation triggers at 91% LTV or 30 days overdue. This is a capital-efficient liquidity tool, but the post-term risk is real—always read the terms. 📊

  • hannahda_o
    Hanah (@hannahda_o) reported

    You hold BTC. You need USDT. But you don’t necessarily want to sell your BTC. So what happens next? This is where crypto-backed borrowing comes in. With @binance Lite Loan, eligible users can currently use BTC as collateral to borrow USDT. The structure is pretty straightforward: Pledge → Borrow → Keep earning → Repay The initial term is 30 days, with a 1% upfront service fee. And during that initial period, your collateral remains subscribed to Simple Earn Flexible Products and can continue generating yield. There’s also no LTV-triggered liquidation during the initial 30-day term. Sounds simple. But here’s the part that matters: You still have a repayment obligation. Overdue loans can accrue penalty interest, and liquidation may apply after the initial term under specified conditions. So the smartest question isn’t: Can I borrow? It’s: Do I have a clear plan to repay? That’s the difference between understanding a product and simply using one. DYOR. Product availability and eligibility vary by region. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

  • Criptoprime0
    Cripto_signal.03 (@Criptoprime0) reported

    Pushing down 📉 Binance Futures #BAKE/ $USDT Take-Profit target 2 ✅ Profit: 155.7377% 📈 Period: 2 Days 3 Hours 15 Minutes ⏰

  • Dilba_Crypto
    Dilba Crypto (@Dilba_Crypto) reported

    @binance Nothing, It's a free-for-all until someone notices it. Then you'll wake up to a crashed server or a nasty cloud bill. Ask me how I know. Slap on rate limits and API keys now, or don't complain later when it gets abused. #AskBinance

  • jugalpant
    shawnmichelster (@jugalpant) reported

    @9GAG The owner of the project was last active before the art reveal in july for few days,before that he was shilling around the last year top in august... after that its all rinsing with the help of @cz_binance and @binance ...

  • Abdul_ELahhh
    SOHAIB (@Abdul_ELahhh) reported

    @ERVA_AH @binance Tokenized assets could reshape market access

  • BetSouthAfrika
    Bet South Africa (@BetSouthAfrika) reported

    @BSCNews @Stacks Is Binance going to support this? Or where can we stake?

  • 0x_snatch
    Snatch | Dopamine125 (@0x_snatch) reported

    How does a DFBA process an order? — 3m36s of live trading on @slx_fi testnet On the Superluminal testnet, a bot places 0.01 BTC market orders every 20 seconds. The left side is the actual trading screen; the right side shows the market data at that same moment, recorded together in one take. Three panels on the right: 1. Top — live order books from 6 mainnet CLOBs (Binance, Bybit, OKX, Bitget, Hyperliquid, Lighter) This is how the rest of the market executes. A market order eats through the book from the top, and whoever arrives first gets processed first. 2. Middle — the auction receipt DFBA processes orders differently. An order doesn't walk the book. It enters an auction that opens every 40ms, and that auction clears at a single price. So every time an order goes out on the left, a receipt prints: - BUY 0.0100 BTC → FILLED @ $77,230 - TAKER-BUY AUCTION · BATCH #78,201,619 - 1 MATCH RECORD → 1 CLEARING PRICE How to read it: which auction it was (batch #), how many matches the order was split into (it can be matched against multiple makers), and that the clearing price is always one. However many match records there are, the price is one — and within the same auction, arrival order has no effect on price. This isn't a claim about the design — it's measured. I checked all 2,163 public fills over a 55-minute window: the number of auctions that printed two different prices was zero. 3. Bottom — CLOBs compared against each other For a hypothetical market order of the same size ($10K / $100K / $1M), how much worse than mid would you fill on each venue — computed live, each venue measured against its own mid. At $10K they all look the same; at $1M they spread from 0.09bp to 1.32bp — more than a full bp apart. Where the displayed book can't absorb the order, it says N/A instead of guessing. Not all CLOBs execute the same. 👉What was NOT compared No price or cost comparison between SLX and the CLOBs. The oracles differ, so the prices themselves differ, and comparing costs against testnet liquidity is meaningless in either direction. Fees are excluded. The clip even keeps the moment the testnet throws an order error. The claim of this video is not "cheaper." It's about how orders get processed — the difference between walking an order book and clearing at one price in an auction — shown with real orders.

  • SU__Crypto
    S.U (@SU__Crypto) reported

    @dotkrueger Alts have massively underperformed. 10/10 from binance didn't help. Exchanges / Teams / MMs have never given alts room to breath.

  • CryptoGates_io
    Crypto Gates (@CryptoGates_io) reported

    CT is calling a market maker's ethereum:native deposit to Binance "no coincidence" after a price dip. Checked the actual chart myself. ETH is down 0.70% on the day, not the dramatic move being implied. Market makers moving size onto exchanges happens constantly; it's treasury management, liquidity ops, OTC settlement, sometimes selling. The on-chain transfer alone doesn't tell you which one. What would confirm it: sustained order book pressure, funding rate shifts, or an actual breakdown in volume. None of that shows up here yet. This is the exact trap CT narratives set: one data point, one causal story, zero verification. Before you react to a flow alert, check if the price structure actually agrees with the story. Ours didn't today... #Bitcoin #OnChainData

  • xRMAAD
    RMAAD (@xRMAAD) reported

    @binance @BinanceArabic @BinanceAcademy 🔗 2. Check the URL — not just the logo A fake website can look almost identical to the real one Look carefully at the full domain name A tiny spelling difference can be the difference between the official website and a phishing page

  • haiderlevi
    HLevi (@haiderlevi) reported

    @ThomasOyxxx @binance Binance has no issues?

  • kenkenlewu
    Ebun (@kenkenlewu) reported

    I did one Ponzi scheme early this year. I knew it was Ponzi, but I still shook my head and entered. What we did was buy a coin on Binance, transfer it to the Ponzi site, convert it to USDT and withdraw. For the first three days, everything went smoothly. Within those three days, I made about $600. Then on the fourth day, greed entered my body… I said, “Let me go in big. I’ll use this whole $600 and make $1,000+ at once.” I tried to transfer money from Binance, but Binance restricted my account. They said I was carrying out suspicious transfers. I wanted to use my second Binance account, but my mind told me to check the Telegram group first. I entered the group… People were crying. Nobody could access the Ponzi website anymore. I just jejely removed myself from the group.

  • Shinobi1234
    shinobi1.eth (@Shinobi1234) reported

    $Bicat need to be a cat coin of bsc name given by @flapdotsh to @binance over 5000+ holder above 10mil+ volume yesterday hitted 7.5mil mcap and dipped down to 1 mil because of vamp attack Now its time to push $bicat to go above 10mil+ 0xdbc6333a7d8bcd95f96641eda4d095e69f207777

Check Current Status