Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cheeky Crypto (@CheekyCrypto) reported 5 minutes ago

  The Truth About VET’s Biggest Wallets VET’s biggest wallets may look like giant whales, but the rich list tells a more complicated story. This breakdown examines why roughly 39.5% of VET appearing across staking, Binance and Upbit does not automatically mean three investors control nearly 40% of supply. We separate wallet balances from economic ownership and explain why exchange custody, staking structures and unidentified addresses need different treatment. You’ll learn how to classify VeChain rich-list addresses, why large transfers do not prove whale accumulation or dumping, and what VET holders should actually watch when assessing concentration, liquidity and potential sell pressure. Subscribe for more in-depth crypto breakdowns built around evidence rather than screenshots. #VET #VeChain #Crypto 00:00 The Truth About VET’s Biggest Wallets 00:57 Why 39.5% of VET Looks Concerning 02:23 Who Actually Owns the Exposure? 03:15 How Exchange Custody Changes the Rich List 04:42 Staking, Binance and Upbit Explained 05:36 When a VET Wallet Is Not a Whale 06:32 Transfers Are Facts, Motives Are Interpretation 07:24 The Problem With Unidentified VET Addresses 08:38 How to Read a VeChain Rich List 09:06 Custodial Addresses and Economic Ownership 09:59 Why Unknown Wallets Need Caution 11:02 VET Liquidity and Potential Sell Pressure 11:52 What VET Holders Should Actually Watch 14:35 Does VET Have a Whale Concentration Problem? 17:48 Why the VET Rich List Needs Interpreting

• 
  Dammie 🎒 (@Ghost_X_NFT) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Mars_DeFi @binance The rails that make the asset useful beat being first to issue it.

• 
  only.pulsechain (@Higherhighz) reported 7 minutes ago

  @DaiVinci369 @yourfriendSOMMI Lol, cz owns like 80 or 85% of binance. That is pure sh*t talk from binance. Main problem that all cex wants a ton of pls to dumb

• 
  Naomi June (@njkjh00) reported 9 minutes ago

  @0x3prestige @axisrobotics The flywheel concept is cool, but filtering out garbage data from people just farming the Binance campaign is gonna be the real challenge

• 
  Sujan Chakraborty Interlink trainee Ambassador (@gauti4585) reported 9 minutes ago

  There is no verified announcement yet that $ITL has been officially listed on Binance, OKX, or Coinbase. The project describes these as targets and says it is working on liquidity, market makers, legal/compliance, security, and exchange due diligence. #Interlink #ITLG #ITL

• 
  bloodredfrog (@bloodredfrog) reported 13 minutes ago

  @saiful265777507 @axisrobotics @BinanceWallet Binance wallet is awful But good luck to you fam

• 
  NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain (@NaoXprotocol) reported 14 minutes ago

  @chickenjoe2112 @binance Not quite, that math problem runs in polynomial time on a quantum computer, brute force stays exponential regardless of hardware

• 
  Guitar Cat + LLM (@GenAI_is_real) reported 23 minutes ago

  I came across a conversation CZ (Changpeng Zhao, founder of Binance) had at a book club event in Hong Kong today, and found it deeply inspiring: "A lot of students at the event wanted to join Binance, and his answer was just two words: be proactive. Binance is fully remote — you can slack off, and losing a few hours a day is easy. But if you're not proactive enough, two months down the line you may have nothing to show for it." "I touch a lot of things, jumping from one to the next, and some things I forget right after I've mentioned them. I generally don't track people. If someone doesn't proactively come to me with updates, I'll simply forget. But maybe two months later it comes back to me and I ask — and if the answer is 'we worked on it for a week and then it went nowhere,' I'll fire that person." "I never follow up. I need them to push updates to me." He summed it all up in one verdict: "If you proactively go after something, you will succeed. If you only act when your boss comes around to check on results, you won't." The fun part: the host drove the point home on the spot — everyone sitting in that room had been selected only after personally emailing the organizers again and again and submitting questions. Proactivity itself was the ticket in. CZ further broke proactivity down into two deeper underlying principles: 80% is showing up. In life, 80% of success comes from showing up. You have to be in the game — if you don't participate, there's no opportunity at all. What you don't do matters more than what you do. Most people today never think about what not to do. Someone sends them a message, and they feel obliged to reply... So many of these things could be cut entirely, yet people never cut them. I read CZ's book Freedom of Money a while back and was deeply inspired by it. In my view, growing an open-source community demands the same enormous proactivity: proactively initiating projects, proactively seeking collaboration, and owning the final outcome. Proactivity is a tremendous driving force. And at the same time, once you've proactively taken on the responsibility, the corresponding authority naturally follows — after all, matching authority with responsibility is the basic principle that keeps our community thriving over the long run. Someone who can drive a project end-to-end, cleanly from start to finish — to me, that's the strongest calibration there is. Even without any AI infra experience, anyone with that kind of proactivity is a friend absolutely worth collaborating with.

• 
  Shibburn (@shibburn) reported 26 minutes ago

  The kind of news that gives ethereum:0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce a bad name. Blogs like these played a major role in shaping what people accepted as reliable news. Most of the time they were just paid placements, because that's what they have to offer. That is how Shibarium repeatedly gets presented as though it were officially tied to ethereum:0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce. When they repeat a group's narrative for long enough, or claim it's an official "press release" by "SHIB's executives" or their "leader", other news outlets begin repeating it, it gets echoed on Coinbase and Binance feeds. Even those so-called "officials" start sharing their articles with their phony titles as confirmation. They used many alt accounts to push these narratives as well. Eventually they end up being read by big investment firms like @TRowePrice. A disclaimer does not erase responsibility when you know your reporting can influence where people put their money. It does not give you a free pass to mislead people or manufacture credibility. At some point, these blogs should be investigated. Because when misinformation influences investment decisions and causes people to lose money, it is no longer simply a matter of bad reporting. They had more than 5 years to correct themselves, they were presented evidence but chose to look the other way. I called out these blogs in the past for the double standard they displayed after a self-titled "SHIB Marketing Lead" apparently "debunked" something we had said and supported with evidence. Well, their loyalty to that team seemed to matter more than the evidence, as they chose her "words" even though she provided nothing to support her response. Be careful what you amplify. Sharing a misleading article does not make its claims true, it only helps spread the misrepresentation to the next person who sees it. That is one group's project, not ethereum:0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce, or officially tied to it.

• 
  Alchemy (@cryptoalchemy11) reported 30 minutes ago

  @ali_alizeh72722 @BinanceHelpDesk @binance The best way to get rid of this now not to login this account anywhere for 2 weeks then try again

• 
  AnyExchange (@_Any_Exchange_) reported 33 minutes ago

  On exchanges, storing crypto is safer than storing it yourself. That’s exactly how Changpeng Zhao (CZ) commented on analyst ***** Woo’s statistics regarding Bitcoin losses from different storage methods. ***** Woo stated that over the entire period, users have lost: 🔸 1.57 million BTC through self-custody 🔸 1.51 million BTC through crypto exchanges Commenting on ***** Woo’s post, CZ said that if the data provided is accurate, then statistically, storing assets on exchanges is safer than self-custody. He also emphasized that information about hacks of centralized platforms is easier to collect, while losses resulting from self-custody (hacks, lost seed phrases, or user errors) often remain unreported. CZ also added that exchange statistics are significantly affected by cases of individual platforms going bankrupt. He also noted that Binance and a number of other major exchanges have compensated users for losses following successful attacks on their systems. What do you think — where is it safer and more reliable to store crypto?

• 
  ⚯ Michel de Cryptadamus ⚯ (@Cryptadamist) reported 33 minutes ago

  @ImDrinknWyn @SpecterAnalyst @zachxbt it would make sense if you were an unsophisticated person poking around these accounts because there are transfers from binance in there and binance does keep that kind of balance in a single wallet, but even the dumbest block explorers will label the binance wallets.

• 
  T_Khanh2026.eth 🐬TermMax (@0z_Dustin136) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BinanceVIP @binance @binancezh priority support is the only part that actually matters to me

• 
  adel.eth (@carte_free) reported 39 minutes ago

  @bullishbanter01 Always good to discover and support quality creators on Binance Square.

• 
  Defi_Deeja (@Defi_Deeja) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Alok7765 @ChuntersNode @binance Showing me sing up site not form