1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
  4. Outage Map
Binance

Binance Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Binance users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Angers, Pays de la Loire 1
Itu, SP 1
Seattle, WA 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • quang250802
    Quang (@quang250802) reported

    @nixkhhil hell nahhh wen binance shut down huhu

  • CryptrixLabs
    Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported

    JST is one to keep on the watchlist, not chase here — the whole setup unlocks on a clean 4-hour close back above $0.1013 with real volume behind it. Zoom out and the bigger picture is actually fine. On the daily chart JST is still trending up and sitting comfortably above its longer-term average price, with a floor near $0.0957 and a ceiling near $0.1046. That's a healthy structure. The issue is what's happening much closer to current price. On the 4-hour chart, price is pinned right underneath a stubborn ceiling around $0.1012 — only about half a percent overhead — while the nearest support sits nearly three times further below. That's a lopsided risk: very little room to gain if it breaks up, a lot of room to give back if it doesn't. And underneath the sideways grind, buying pressure on both the 4-hour and 1-hour charts is quietly fading. When price stalls under resistance while momentum leaks out, it usually means the bid is tiring, not loading up. The broader tape isn't helping either. Bitcoin is soft, the dollar is firming up, and capital is rotating out of smaller coins and back into BTC. Fighting a local ceiling into that kind of backdrop is a low-percentage move, and a short-term bounce on the 15-minute chart doesn't change any of it. The level to watch is clear: a decisive 4-hour close back above $0.1013, with volume actually showing up, would break that ceiling and put JST firmly back in play. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $JST · Available on Binance

  • bitgu_ru
    BitGuru 🔶 (@bitgu_ru) reported

    @bullishbanter01 The biggest issue I have seen so far is the reach issue, Every other platform has at least reach of 5% of its audience and thats why people follow you to watch your content. But on Binance Square its like with you have 200K or 20K you might have same reach of 2K-4K views only.

  • TradingProtocol
    Trading Strategy (@TradingProtocol) reported

    @snj_peters There is a difference between "discretionary" and "discretionary " with predefined trading rules limited by a smart contract. For example, if the vault curator is limited to taking only certain BTC and ETH trades and certain lending positions, the risk to the vault depositor is very, very low. This likely does not warrant regulation. The only risk is bad trades. Then we have Mainstreet and some vaults that just transfer all assets to a centralised Binance account and can do whatever they want with the money, e.g. buy Ferraris, without rules, transparency, and smart contract protection. We should call the latter vaults "full custodian" and separate "full custodian" from "discretionary." Because smart contracts enable the difference. TradFi does not. That's why TradFi has tons of regulation, to prevent the fund manager from just taking all the money. But in DeFi, smart contracts already prevent that. We do not need regulation to prevent something that is impossible. It is a waste of cigarettes.

  • B4dmantrading
    B4dMan (@B4dmantrading) reported

    @0xteo9x Binance withdrawal block error lasts forever

  • JunoCrypto3
    Juno.eth (@JunoCrypto3) reported

    @catqpx Binance down? Market would panic but bounce fast.

  • theNovacyberqfs
    Novacybersecurity Inc. & Associates (@theNovacyberqfs) reported

    Breaking: Arthur Hayes-Founded BitMEX, Pioneer of Crypto Perpetuals, to Shut Down BitMEX said it will permanently close its exchange at 04:00 UTC on September 23 and has stopped accepting new user registrations. Co-founded by Arthur Hayes in 2014, BitMEX introduced the crypto industry’s first perpetual swap and was once one of the world’s dominant derivatives exchanges before losing market share to Binance and Bybit. Hayes and his co-founders stepped down after U.S. criminal charges in 2020, while a reported effort to sell the exchange in 2025 did not result in an announced deal.

  • Mr_Luckry
    L U C K Y (@Mr_Luckry) reported

    @sanmiastar How sustainable are these high promotional yields once the current Binance and Gate campaign windows officially close down?

  • FalconyFalcon
    Falcon (@FalconyFalcon) reported

    In like 2029 Binance just drops: “We’re shutting down” and the timeline’s like: “Damn, October 10 was legendary. ******* gutting. We’ll miss you”

  • _Crypto_glass
    Zizcrypto (@_Crypto_glass) reported

    $BTC: Open Interest Moves Into Upper 30-Day Range While Retail Bias Stays Mid-Range Hyblock’s 30-day Binance positioning data shows elevated open interest, while retail account positioning remains near the middle of its monthly range. True Retail Longs Accounts stand at 60.07%, in the 50.20th percentile, up 2.87 points. True Retail Shorts Accounts stand at 39.93%, in the 49.82nd percentile, down 2.87 points. This points to a mild absolute long bias at the account level, but not an extreme retail-long reading relative to the 30-day lookback. Whale vs Retail Delta is 0.89, in the 64.29th percentile, down 1.20. The reading remains positive, meaning whale long positioning still holds a slight premium over retail, though that premium has narrowed. Binance Open Interest is near $6.74B, in the 86.45th percentile, up roughly $111.5M. This places OI in the upper 30-day range. Key takeaway: BTC’s 30-day positioning structure is not defined by extreme retail long participation. The stronger signal is elevated open interest while retail accounts remain roughly mid-range by percentile. This points to a more leverage-sensitive market, where positioning risk can rise even without an extreme retail-long reading.

  • Ghostfatt
    Ghost (@Ghostfatt) reported

    Whats the issue with binance ? Am trying to create an account its declining verification🤔

  • CryptoOpener
    Crypto (@CryptoOpener) reported

    @Zeshan0X Trying to learn every feature at once can be overwhelming, leading to a slow and frustrating Binance experience.

  • serdalGkde73828
    moruk (@serdalGkde73828) reported

    @cz_binance If only Binance would shut down so we could be done with the crypto business; that way, they wouldn't be able to cause too much damage.

  • mr_bullishh
    𝙈𝙧 𝘽𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝 🚀 (@mr_bullishh) reported

    @ReazWeb3 @binance Binance must need to fix this ASAP

  • Faridpk12
    Farid Ullah (@Faridpk12) reported

    The Crypto Paradox: Why One Bad Project Can Undermine an Entire Industry🚒 In our circles, it is common to hear people dismiss cryptocurrencies outright as a “scam” or “fraud.” They see the extreme volatility, sudden collapses, and stories of rug pulls, and conclude that the entire space is nothing more than a sophisticated gambling scheme designed to enrich a few at the expense of many. For those of us who deeply understand blockchain technology, decentralization, and the revolutionary potential of crypto, this blanket rejection is frustrating. We spend time explaining the fundamentals: how Bitcoin introduced a trustless monetary system, how Ethereum enabled programmable money and smart contracts, and how blockchain can bring transparency, financial inclusion, and ownership back to individuals. Yet, incidents like the recent DEXE crash make our explanations significantly harder. DEXE, which had climbed steadily for months and reached an all-time high near $49, collapsed dramatically in a single day, dropping over 85-90% in value. What took months — even years — of building momentum, hype, and market confidence was erased in a matter of hours. Whether caused by large team-linked wallet dumps, poor tokenomics, excessive leverage, or alleged insider selling, the result remains the same: thousands of retail investors suffered massive losses, and public trust in the broader crypto market took another hit. This is the real problem. Such events are not just isolated failures — they represent a hybrid selling model (aggressive hype + coordinated or opportunistic dumping) that repeatedly damages the reputation of the entire industry. When a token can 20x or 30x in a short period and then lose nearly everything overnight, it creates a massive contradiction. On one hand, we preach long-term technological innovation, adoption, and utility. On the other hand, the price action looks exactly like a classic pump-and-dump scheme. This contradiction is one of the biggest obstacles to mainstream crypto adoption. Ordinary people, regulators, and traditional financial institutions look at these violent swings and ask legitimate questions: How can something be a “serious technology” if its price can be manipulated or destroyed so easily? Why should we trust an asset class where value can evaporate faster than it was created? Where is the accountability when teams or large holders cash out at the peak while retail investors hold the bags? The unfortunate truth is that while the underlying technology of blockchain is powerful and transformative, the speculative nature of many token launches, combined with weak regulation and misaligned incentives, allows bad actors and reckless projects to thrive. These incidents don’t just hurt investors in that particular token — they poison the well for the entire ecosystem. The Way Forward If cryptocurrency is to achieve widespread adoption and realize its true potential, the industry must address this issue seriously. Stronger transparency requirements around team token allocations, vesting schedules, and wallet movements are essential. Better education for retail investors, stricter listing standards on major exchanges, and community-driven accountability can all help reduce these destructive events. We cannot deny that bad projects and predatory behavior exist in crypto — just as they exist in traditional finance, real estate, and every other market. However, the decentralized and permissionless nature of blockchain makes these failures more visible and emotionally painful. The future of crypto depends not only on technological advancement but also on building credibility and trust. Until the space matures enough to effectively discourage or prevent these hybrid hype-and-dump cycles, convincing our skeptical friends and family that “this time is different” will remain an uphill battle @binance @cz_binance @DexeNetwork

Check Current Status