Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Protocall (@ProtoCallAsia) reported 3 minutes ago

  BNB Chain just completed its 36th quarterly token burn, the third of 2026. The Auto-Burn mechanism adjusts each quarter based on $BNB price and BSC block count. Burns go straight to the dead address, fully auditable and independent of Binance.

• 
  Aped in Crypto (@apedintocrypto) reported 4 minutes ago

  Based on Btc's liquidation heatmaps on Binance (2w/1m/3m/6m), next steps are very clear. In near term, 65-67k could get hit, but sooner or later 60k will be tested, and broken to reach 57k, 52-53k, and even 48-50k in next leg down. Expect a spike up to 82k+ after this bigger long liquidation cascade happened (we need to see something like in February, as June flush was too small).

• 
  Francis Mutatiina (@Mut55919Francis) reported 4 minutes ago

  @binance I lost control of my firmer email and phone number by which I opened my old account. I request you allow me to access it by a new phone number and new email, Thank you.

• 
  Elja (@Eljaboom) reported 5 minutes ago

  @binance Those recovery numbers show why good support matters just as much as good products 🫶

• 
  CapitalFronts (@capitalfronts) reported 7 minutes ago

  Is the Fed about to crash $BTC and $ETH — or send them flying? That's the question everyone's stuck on. Do they hike and drag the market down, or do they cut? Has $ETH bottomed, or does it break lower? And here's the spicier one: is there actually a chain BETTER than Ethereum right now? We think there is — and it's Robinhood. You're going to say we're crazy. Robinhood Chain is literally built on top of Ethereum, so how can it be "better" than ETH? Look at the income flow of Robinhood Chain and it clicks. Robinhood Chain keeps ~89% of the gross revenue from trading fees and everything else. Arbitrum takes ~10%. And $ETH? It gets about 0.15% — for providing the actual security via proof of stake. Read that again. The chain doing the least glamorous, most critical job — securing the network — earns almost nothing. Arbitrum is a Layer 2 on ETH, and Robinhood sits on TOP of Arbitrum, basically a "Layer 3." The higher up the stack you go, the more of the money you keep. Rewind 3 years. The whole market argued about the "best chain." ETH was crowned most useful for smart contracts. Then Solana posed the killer question: what if Ethereum is just the settlement layer — too slow and too expensive to actually transact on? Remember the gas-fee era? People reported paying over $200 just to mint one NFT. So Layer 2s like Arbitrum showed up to make it cheap. Great for users — but brutal for ETH, because ETH provides the security while the value gets captured above it. Do you see the trap ETH is in? So where does that leave ETH price? Most of the market is calling for $1450 — the 2018 high and the April 2025 major bottom (see chart). But here's our contrarian instinct: when the whole market agrees on a level, it usually doesn't play out that way. What if ETH already bottomed ABOVE 1450 because everyone was staring at 1450? Right now the crucial zones are the yellow and red lines on our chart (yellow being an extreme line drawn on the very bottom candles). ETH is printing 3 green candles — the 3rd not closed yet — and it looks healthy. If it closes the monthly above the red line, that's real strength. The key level is around 1750. Close a weekly above 1890/1900 AND the monthly above it, and we think ETH is heading toward the 2800 area. Are you positioned for that, or waiting for a 1450 that may never print? Now back to Robinhood, because this is the bigger picture. It's going to grow BIGGER because of its US dominance. It brings a flood of new money into crypto through its STOCK traders — and it's roughly twice the size of Coinbase. Binance and OKX aren't even listed in the US. Think about what that means. In a few short years, we think Robinhood becomes the Meta/Google/Microsoft of the crypto world. And why is the market up right now? Because we called that the Fed isn't hiking. The market has now priced only a ~12.3% chance of a hike at the July 29 meeting. Who told you that early? CapitalFronts. The data backs it. CPI cooled to 3.5% nominal — but the CORE number came in much lower than expected, which is the real good news. Why did it drop? June oil prices tanked, and the July print should still reflect that. We firmly believe the Fed doesn't hike — because a hike would bomb their Treasury bonds, and then everything unravels (we covered this in an earlier post). But here's the nuance most people miss — cutting isn't clean either. If they cut, do the Treasury bonds hold their integrity protecting the dollar? Our read: a cut means the Fed and businesses make more, tax revenue rises, less gets spent on entitlements — that's the outcome we WANT. A hike? Stocks tank, tax revenue falls, and they're stuck paying more on interest AND entitlements. So which lever do you honestly think they pull? So — is the Fed about to crash crypto, or light the fuse on the next leg up? And is ETH quietly the worst-positioned blue chip in the room? 👇 That's today's breakdown. Platform members get this 24 HOURS before socials. Launching soon. NFA.

• 
  chuckie ray (@HandsCovered) reported 7 minutes ago

  @CROWNFIELD01 @binance i called for help twice

• 
  RedVine🐵 (@cccby8888) reported 9 minutes ago

  Trade Review | SNDK | #003 Today’s market didn’t have a clear directional bias and was mostly range-bound, so I avoided predicting the move premarket and waited for the US open to confirm direction. SNDK had already rallied significantly during premarket. In an overall bearish environment, I saw this as a negative rather than a positive—it created more room for a downside move. After the open, capital flowed into the market, but price remained stuck in a range instead of trending higher. I stayed bearish because price failed to hold above VWAP and the key moving averages. At the same time, KDJ rolled over from a short-term high. My interpretation was that buyers were unwilling to absorb supply around the 1800 level. I opened my first short around 1800, with 1830 as my thesis invalidation level. The stop wasn’t chosen randomly. If price had broken above 1830, it would have suggested either an upside breakout or a higher consolidation range. In that scenario, the original short thesis would no longer be valid. As price moved lower, I continuously tightened my trailing stop to protect profits: 1830 → 1805 → 1785 (I preferred 1805 over 1810 because it fit the structure better.) One mistake I made was adding to my position around 1772 because of FOMO. That worsened my average entry and increased overall risk. To manage that mistake, I kept the added position on a much tighter stop at 1780, limiting the additional risk. After closing the first trade, I still believed the selling pressure in SNDK hadn’t been fully exhausted. The market conditions weren’t strong enough to support a sustainable move above 1800, so I waited patiently for a second setup instead of forcing another entry. As the market continued consolidating, capital inflows weakened noticeably. Combined with confirmation from KDJ and MACD, I entered a second short around 1774. (In hindsight, 1780 would have been a better entry. I was slightly impatient.) As heavy selling entered the market, I kept trailing my stop lower to lock in profits. Eventually my stop was triggered around 1740, ending the trade. Looking back, when price bounced near 1735, I already felt the rebound was different. However, my execution was too slow, and I was a little overconfident, which delayed my decision to tighten the stop further. ⸻ A few days ago I made a rule for myself: Don’t immediately open a second trade after closing one, whether it’s a win or a loss. Today I intentionally didn’t follow that rule mechanically. Because I realized the real problem isn’t taking a second trade. The real problem is taking a second trade driven by emotion. After closing the first position, I wasn’t excited and I wasn’t chasing profits. I re-evaluated the market. The second trade had: a new thesis, a new market structure, and a new stop-loss plan. That made it an independent trade rather than an emotional continuation of the first one. After closing the second trade, I immediately closed Binance. I had already made what I believed the market was willing to give me today. Beyond that point, my edge was getting smaller. So I ended the trading day.

• 
  tradt 🔺 (@wsf4l) reported 11 minutes ago

  Some deep-pocketed Binance genius loaded BTC from 20:30–21:30 UTC with most obvious TWAP known to man then ran stops above $65K at 22:15 UTC. Nobody chased it higher so he started puking it out around 00:00 UTC. No idea if he got paid but I did. Please do that stupid **** again.

• 
  NextGemHunter (@Next_GemHunter) reported 13 minutes ago

  Tokenized assets sound complicated until you reduce them to one simple idea: representing real-world assets on a blockchain. That’s the starting point. Tokenization means creating a digital representation of an asset that can be recorded on a blockchain. The asset behind it can vary depending on the product. In some cases, people discuss tokenization around financial assets, commodities, or other real-world assets. So why is this getting attention? Because blockchain is being explored beyond cryptocurrencies. Instead of only asking “what coin is this?”, people are starting to ask how blockchain could be used for records, settlement, transparency, and access to certain types of financial products. But digital does not automatically mean simple. A tokenized asset can still come with important questions. Before exploring any tokenized product, it is worth checking: What asset does it represent? Who issues it? What rights does the token actually give? What risks apply? Is there market or liquidity risk? Are there technology or regulatory risks? Is it available and eligible in your region? Availability, eligibility, rights, risks, and regulations can vary by product and region. Binance has introduced certain tokenized or stock-related products in selected markets, where available. Always check official Binance sources for details, eligibility, and regional availability. Tokenization is one way people are exploring where traditional assets and blockchain infrastructure may intersect. But the trend matters less than the details. What would you check first in a tokenized asset: what it represents, who issues it, what rights it gives, or whether it is available in your region? Educational only. Not financial advice. DYOR. @Binance #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance 💛

• 
  enrico (@enricodefi) reported 21 minutes ago

  @yettisheep4 fair on both. imo binance having both discovery and volume doesn't tell us the volume is there because of discovery. binance also has ten years of head start and the deepest books in the world, that alone attracts flow. the cleaner comparison is between dexes, where nobody has that head start. and there the arrakis report shows it: lighter wins on discovery in 27 of 29 assets, but hyperliquid still has the volume. so discovery and volume look like two different prizes. on batching, agree it slows down the fastest informed traders. but that's the point of the design, not a flaw. the venue is built for everyone who doesn't want to lose to whoever has the fastest connection. it takes its reference prices from outside, it's not trying to be the place where btc's price gets made. also a good example is a pre-ipo perp, as it has no binance to copy from. whatever price forms there is the price. so "you need continuous time for real discovery" can be true for btc and irrelevant for the markets that don't exist anywhere else yet. that's the part i find really interesting.

• 
  Carly (@Carly_lanlan) reported 21 minutes ago

  This is the damn truth. Black Rock did a major sell off in October of 2025. This large sell off was coordinated with Binance. Once Binance had washed sold Bitcoin, they shorted Solana and put gains into BNB. All of this information was found on Arkham when it occurred. Bitcoin holders: The 4 year cycle is in tact. Black Rock and Binance are working together which is bullshit.

• 
  SpenzDigital (@SpenzDigital) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ansem @binance day 9 begging Binance to list $ANSEM. the trenches have officially become customer support.

• 
  Bart (@BartTradesX) reported 23 minutes ago

  In October 2025, similar thing happened in BNB chain when they introduced meme rush on binance which created huge sell off on all BNB memecoins, ruined the whole momentum & marked the top of BNB season. But this time it's different because in October 2025 BTC hit the cycle top of $126k & everything went risk off after that. This time it ruined the momentum yeah & is just going to slow things down but won't mark the top because majors are about to go risk on soon. In my opinion,this is a buying opportunity on your favourite memes.

• 
  Legva (@legva_eth) reported 26 minutes ago

  @binance @Bybit_Official restricted my access to funds since June 30 after an AML flag on an outgoing transaction. These are salary funds received via Bybit for over a year. 2+ weeks later: no updates, no document requests, only automated replies. Is this how Bybit treats customers?

• 
  Ibrahim (@cezormax) reported 26 minutes ago

  @yellowpantherx @binance Hoping I'm using exchange from long time but I don't have funds from last yesr so much down happening with me