Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Conal (@WZoolly) reported 2 minutes ago

  Update on Axis Robotics after they participated in Kaito - Top 3 DApps on Base (congrats team) - Dropped a post to guide newbie how to contribute - Follow them on X to get earn more points - The Pause button is live (to help you don't have to start all over again when you need to do something else) - Campaign with Binance Wallet: 1,500,000 Axis Points and run for 1 month

• 
  Backtesting Arena (@SifuBacktest) reported 6 minutes ago

  Bitcoin's August expiry sits 14% above max pain — the gap is positioning residue, not a magnet $6.37bn of Bitcoin options settle tomorrow, 28 August, at 08:00 UTC on Deribit. The max pain level for that expiry sits at $69,000. Spot is $78,862. That is a gap of roughly 14%. A gap that wide usually gets read as a magnet: price should be pulled down toward the strike where option holders lose the most. It won't be, and the reason is not opinion. It is measurable, and most of it comes down to what max pain actually is. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘅 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 Max pain is not the strike with the most open interest. It is the minimum of a piecewise-linear loss function computed across the entire option chain — an aggregate that drifts toward heavy open interest but is not itself a concentration point. Treating it as a price level where something is concentrated is the first error. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗱𝗲 Ten days ago Bitcoin traded near $62,000–63,000. The strike ladder for the August expiry was written there. The rally to $79,000 carried spot away from that open interest, and the open interest stayed exactly where it was. The 14% gap is residue from where positions were opened. It is not gravity, and nearly every longer-dated expiry shows the same thing: 4 September sits at $70,000, 25 September at $70,000, 30 October at $70,000, 25 December at $70,000. Six of the eight nearest expiries cluster at $68,000–70,000 while spot trades near $79,000. ——— 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝟭. 𝗗𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗱. European style, settled against the Deribit index at 08:00 UTC, paid out in BTC. Nothing is delivered. An in-the-money call produces no spot purchase at expiry. The mental model where option holders take delivery and move the market simply does not apply to this venue. 𝟮. 𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗺𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗳𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗱. A $65,000 call with spot at $79,000 carries a delta near 1. Its hedge has been static for days and no longer responds to price. The same is true in reverse for the puts down there, with delta near zero. The pinning effect that matters at large expiries comes from gamma near the money — 14% away, there is almost none. 𝟯. 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗸, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲. The argument that downside hedges get unwound assumes market makers were short those puts and short spot against them, so that expiry forces them to buy back. If clients wrote the puts instead, the sign reverses. Open interest cannot tell you which, and neither can a put/call ratio — tomorrow's is 0.86, September's quarterly 0.52. Those numbers say how much is open, not who holds it. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝟵𝟭 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 Over the last 365 days, 91 Deribit BTC expiries settled. Measuring the distance between spot at settlement and the max pain level for each one: Daily expiries, n=78: median miss 1.60%. Only 29.5% land within 1% of max pain. 61.5% land within 2%. Largest miss 12.35%. Weekly expiries, n=10: median miss 2.42%. Largest miss 16.92%. That is not a magnet. It is a weak average with a wide tail — and the daily class is the only one with enough observations to say anything at all. ——— 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 For monthly expiries specifically, that window contains n=2. Two observations. Our own tool marks the class sample_adequate: false, and it is right to. Two data points support no claim about tomorrow. Worth noting anyway, since it cuts against the popular reading rather than for it: both settled below their max pain level, by 1.74% and 2.05% — the opposite direction from today's gap. Anyone presenting a confident monthly-expiry base rate is working with a sample they should be naming. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 DVOL sits at 40.4. Thirty-day ATM implied volatility is 38.8%, with a mildly upward term structure out to 41.9% at 180 days. Calm, no stress. One-sigma ranges from that pricing: Into tomorrow's settlement: $77,200 – $80,500 One week: $74,600 – $83,100 Thirty days: $70,100 – $87,600 For spot to reach $69,000 by 08:00 UTC tomorrow would require −12.5% in roughly 26 hours. Against the volatility the market itself is quoting, that is close to a six-sigma move. The options market is not pricing convergence, and the base rates say convergence is not what happens anyway. ——— 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 25 September. Quarterly expiry, 144,353 contracts, $11.4bn — nearly double tomorrow's size. Max pain there also sits at $70,000, with a put/call ratio of 0.52. If spot is still in this area by then, the identical setup repeats at twice the scale. That is the expiry worth marking, not this one. ——— 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 Tomorrow's expiry passes without being the driver of anything. Around 80,000 contracts roll off, the book thins out until September builds, and the gap does not close because it was never a pull in the first place. What genuinely changes after 08:00 UTC is that positioning gets thinner for a week or so. That is a real observation. It is also a much smaller one than the headline number suggests. The honest limit: what nobody can read from this data is where the hedges actually sit and on which side. That needs open interest per strike and the direction of dealer positioning. The first is measurable. The second is not, from public data, by anyone. ——— 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 Spot from Binance, 27 August 2026, 05:53 UTC. Options data from Deribit, daily snapshot 02:00 UTC. Max pain levels are our own aggregation across the option chain. Base rates cover all 91 finalized expiries in the window 27 August 2025 to 27 August 2026, split by expiry class rather than pooled, because pooling mixes tiny daily expiries with large quarterlies. Ranges are one-sigma under a lognormal assumption and cover roughly 68% of outcomes. They describe what is priced, not what will happen.

• 
  EXODUS_TRADES💹🤝🏾 (@johnsonexodus1) reported 7 minutes ago

  @iamchrisani @abalu_uthman Alright, I think the issue here is a misunderstanding of my writing and I have too much honor for you than to be doing this back and fort You asked if you can invest in stocks with Binance and I said i don’t know cause it’s been long since I checked the app

• 
  Shahid Nadeem | T3-InterLink Ambassador (@shahidnlashari) reported 8 minutes ago

  @0xkingsmans @binance @BinancePk Access to information is the biggest difference for me. Gen Z can learn faster than any generation before them, but filtering good information from noise is the real challenge.

• 
  ExtPiece_cro (@ExtPiece1) reported 12 minutes ago

  @raifmehmet6 @binance @cryptocom It doesn't solve the problem, but it helps with adapting to the new reality, and they have more capital than any brokerage.

• 
  Hyblock (@hyblockcapital) reported 16 minutes ago

  Most people think short liqs is what fuels a move up. and our research show that when in bull regime that is indeed true (median / mean forwards returns are positive which implies squeeze and continue). but more interestingly, long liquidations show how sustainable the move actually is (does it still have legs to run). to understand if the bullish trend still has strength you want to look to answer questions like: 1. is a small 50-100 bps move down still triggered long liquidations, like it did at the start of the move? 2. what does the p95, p99, p99.9 long liqs look like. is the size decreasing (severity) and/or is the frequency decreasing? we just saw a green 1 minute candle binance perp. from high to low it was approx 40bps. and while it makes sense that it triggered short liqs, it also triggered 1 singular long liquidation for $292k. a 40 bp green candle triggering a 292k long liq. safe to say that long liqs are still very active.

• 
  King of bnb memes (@abiel720s) reported 17 minutes ago

  @flapdotsh @BNBCHAIN Without binance support and listing memefi bnb chain , people will just sell and go to robinhood chain memes , first time I see binance no supporting bnb memes !

• 
  Degen (@degenidze) reported 17 minutes ago

  @JakeGagain @binance I don't really believe this. I don't think Binance will support the cat trend. They're not the type to let a bagworker make money. But I bought it anyway, just in case I'm wrong :)

• 
  ADD+🐕🌖Bullishbrown♡ (@THAbullishbrown) reported 19 minutes ago

  @crypto_bitlord7 @binance The model doesn't need to own reality. It just needs to understand the problem. Let the kernel own: state. history. permissions. receipts. Then swap the model whenever something better comes along. That makes way more sense to me. study them: 8EeDdvCRmFAzVD4takkBrNNwkeUTUQh4MscRK5Fzpump

• 
  James Berkeley-Clarke (@JBerkeleyClarke) reported 20 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Why has #Binance been DELISTED from the play store? It's nowhere to be seen and I'm getting weird updates that want to load to my files not the app? What's that all about? Had Binance lost its play sore credentials on Google?? Wtf is happening?

• 
  speck (@spec4spec) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BluntCap @PGL_BULLISH @binance there’s no way this doesn’t break 100m by the end of the week, i’ve never seen a coin with this much holders and support and at the same time be this low

• 
  Toshi (@toshiXchain) reported 21 minutes ago

  @uhonyn Binance listing doesn't help with pump anymore for a prolonged time say even a week Also listing in the beginning of a bull will ruin the further cycle Btw what was ur average entry

• 
  ExtPiece_cro (@ExtPiece1) reported 21 minutes ago

  @1Anon212 @binance @cryptocom That would be impossible.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 22 minutes ago

  MUBARAK isn't ready yet — it's stuck under a ceiling near $0.0197 with the nearest real floor all the way down at $0.0170, and that's the wrong shape to lean into. A clean 4-hour close back above $0.0197 on strong volume is what would put it back in play. Zoom out and the bigger picture is actually fine. On the daily chart MUBARAK is still trending up and trading comfortably above its longer-term average price — the trend hasn't broken. The problem is the shorter-term setup underneath it. On the 4-hour chart the coin is stuck in the middle of its range. There's roughly 2% of room up before price runs into that $0.0197 ceiling, and more than 12% of room down before it finds the last area where buyers actually stepped in and defended. That's a lopsided trade — a small win available and a much larger drop possible — and it's the core reason this one stays on the watchlist, not the front page. Momentum backs that up. On the 4-hour chart the push behind price is still fading rather than turning back up. The 1-hour chart is weakening right underneath the same $0.0195–$0.0197 zone. And the little bounce on the 15-minute chart is running straight into that resistance, not breaking away from it — the kind of move that usually gets sold. Two things would change the read. A flush down to around $0.0170, where buyers have defended before, would give the setup a real floor to work off. Or a decisive 4-hour close back above $0.0197 on strong volume would prove the ceiling is broken and bring this one back into focus. Until one of those happens, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $MUBARAK · Available on Binance

• 
  mmmatt (@mmmatt) reported 24 minutes ago

  $btc market and trade update so, early tonight while i was sending flow. suddenly i started getting 429's on each order i sent. so, i contacted coinbase. coinbase claims that API rate limit hasn't changed. they pulled me into a dev discord, but have yet to reply to me there. they're hiding it, similarly like how they hid the reason they banned me (until they unbanned me) unfortunately, with things like this, i have learned over time that it's just best to accept things and move forward. if i stay in my long full size, continuously reach out to coinbase, and do diligent work trying to get this fixed- it's more than likely seller will retrace a lot of the pa, and i will give back majority of my upnl, before i am able to save it with high rate flow or any flow again, if at all! so yeah, for me personally, the trade is over. trade isn't over because the upside is done, but it's over because coinbase has removed my ability to influence market and respond to sellers. i always think that exchanges should enable their traders to do as they wish, because nefarious traders on other exchanges such as binance, they move the market all day for personal gain. china takes money from most countries via crypto, it would've been nice to be able to continue fighting back. but coinbase has other plans anywho, i have taken my long size from 0.185btc (i was adding when this happened), down to 0.05btc, $3k size, a size that doesn't matter anymore (so it can retrace without harming me). i've realized $2500, with $250 still in upnl. due to the lack of my flow, $btc volume has died off on coinbase. haven't checked other exchanges yet. attached is a 5m chart first. checking the volume indicator, MFI momentum is no longer meaningful. regime is neutral additionally attaching the 1m chart. pa looks pretty cursed. lower highs and lower lows then finally, attaching the 1h chart- we've completely plateaued. this pa at the highs resembles distribution now. we would've had to continue up at 23:00-00:00 utc, to not print a very distro looking setup. but as i was unable to step in, we didn't. seller is active on tape. what stings is they've actually tamed their flow, and they're still having constant impact. they are able to really preserve capital now, as they don't have any contenders to pvp with. it's literally just this seller doing flow semantics :( i really tried to do something good for us crypto folk. i really wish that this was enough to ignite a bull market, but i fail to believe we will survive every macro event/news event, and at that, seller is literally present. they've been selling since the 19th- this is their clear shot. if you don't think they'll take it, you're being too hopeful. so between seller, macro environment, pa that looks like distribution- i believe it's wise and safe to consider the bull thesis over. so, i am taking profit at this local top. as always, thank you guys for supporting me and participating in this move. it was the most fun i've had in a long time with trading, and has taught me a lot. i appreciate those who didn't try to beat me down, even when they didn't understand or believe my orderflow semantics. we may go up further, or we may completely crumble. but without my flow, the outcome is random to me. so yeah, trade is over for me thank u bois for everything, i am grateful