Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Bitboy (@cryptocrafters9) reported 11 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance Putting idle assets to work can be useful but only after understanding how and when you can access them again.

• 
  Suzzy | DeFi🧞‍♀️ (@SuzzyDefi) reported 14 minutes ago

  @CazroWeb3 @binance The interesting part is not replacing TradFi, it’s making markets easier to access

• 
  Sỹ Hùng (@syhung909090) reported 14 minutes ago

  @CoinMarketCap 1/CMC Research July 2026 Exchange Report. Total volume: $3.77T across 11 exchanges, down 20.4% from June. Binance share grew to the highest YTD: 42.81%. Net capital flow: −$2.19B, moderating from −$8.37B. The market cooled. Concentration did not.

• 
  Mike Mercier (@MikeyMike1121) reported 16 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Binance is a scam. My account has been locked for over 10 days with no responses from customer service. Do not use this company. Complete lack of professionalism

• 
  King Jeporphs 💎💙 (@e_okwori) reported 21 minutes ago

  @amz9660 We can mass report them to binance and coin base to stop the scam from getting any worse. Team has been selling for as long as I know and can't even hold a sub 1cent support? We can make binance place them on watchlist to save other investors

• 
  Bitrefill (@bitrefill) reported 22 minutes ago

  @0xCrypto_d We could no longer support Binance Pay, but we do accept USDT on BSC.

• 
  Mark yu (@Markymarco34) reported 23 minutes ago

  A simple summary of my conversation with Muneeb yesterday — no speculation, just what he directly clarified: Why did Binance add the Monitoring Tag? According to Muneeb, it was because Binance needed more time to review the network upgrade and the change in STX emissions. It was not because of liquidity, OTC activity, token supply, or market makers. Is Binance asking Stacks to fix something? According to Muneeb, no. Binance asked for information about the hard fork, the upgrade process, and communication around the emissions change. Stacks provided the information, Binance completed the upgrade, and Binance said they currently need nothing further. Is the Stacks treasury selling STX into the market? Muneeb said no. He stated that the treasury does not sell STX on the open market. Did miner rewards suddenly increase? According to Muneeb, no. Miner STX rewards remain the same as they have been since 2021. Who is the market maker? Muneeb confirmed that Wintermute is the market maker. He said Wintermute has a relatively small loan of a few million STX and that this arrangement has not changed for years. Then why is liquidity weak? His explanation was simple: trading volume fell during the bear market. The Stacks Endowment is working on separate programs intended to improve liquidity, and more information will be released later. What about the tighter leverage conditions? Muneeb said these are related to current trading volumes and are separate from the Binance Monitoring Tag. My takeaway: Some of the things I previously tried to understand using public information were different from what Muneeb explained from his direct conversations with Binance. Where my interpretation was wrong, I accept that and corrected it. The most important thing for me is that we now have clearer information directly from the founder. We don’t need everyone to agree. We need more transparency, more questions, and more communication — especially when the community is uncertain. Yesterday was a good example of why dialogue is better than silence. Less information creates speculation. More conversation creates clarity. Thanks again for Muneeb.

• 
  Iris | Mother of Dragons 👑🇵🇭🐲✝️ (@iriszio) reported 24 minutes ago

  @cz_binance We'd love to do this on Philippines w/ @binance help! I believe it can be done - just a matter of lobbying, and @Change.

• 
  Jia Lilly Crypto (@Jia_Crypto01) reported 25 minutes ago

  @ansari_ali76454 @binance Please @BinanceHelpDesk help him in this issue 🤝

• 
  Cow💹🧲 (@realcryptocow) reported 26 minutes ago

  @milly_rock7 Full text (warning, slop): Yes. Looking across the decision-useful onchain metrics rather than price action, I think there is a fairly clear answer: SPX6900 has the best memecoin onchain structure right now. And I don't think it's particularly close if the question is “which memecoin has the strongest holder base + supply dynamics + asymmetric setup?” That's different from saying SPX is guaranteed to outperform. PEPE has substantially better liquidity and distribution breadth, DOGE has vastly better longevity/network security, and FARTCOIN has an interesting smaller-cap setup. But SPX has the strangest combination of high-value holders + low apparent willingness to sell + constrained float + no dilution + still-small market cap. Here is how I'd rank the serious candidates as of August 6, 2026: CoinHolder qualityDistributionSupply / floatLiquidityOnchain persistenceUpside asymmetryOverallSPX108.510710109.3PEPE8.51081097.58.8FARTCOIN7.58887.598.0DOGE8106101058.0WIF6.597977.57.6BONK68.56.58.57.56.57.2GIGA76.57.566.5107.1 Why SPX comes out #1 The most remarkable metric isn't holder count. It's holder quality. SPX currently shows roughly 230k holders across its tracked contracts, while the canonical Ethereum contract alone has ~49,500. At ~$300–330M market cap, that's nowhere near PEPE's ~571k holders or WIF's ~252k, but the composition is extremely unusual. (CoinMarketCap) HolderScan-derived comparisons have consistently shown SPX with an abnormally large percentage of wallets holding meaningful amounts. One published comparison found 36% of SPX wallets held >$1,000, versus an average of 14.2% for the other large memes examined; PEPE was second among the large memes at 18%. SPX also led the comparison in wallets above $100k. (CoinLive) A more recent July analysis put the >$1,000 number around 16% across the broader tracked holder base—methodology/bridging explains much of the discrepancy—but SPX remained the standout among compared memes. (Reddit) That matters much more to me than having 500,000 wallets containing $8. There's also evidence that ~86% of SPX supply had not moved for >90 days in a recent HolderScan-derived snapshot. I would treat that figure as directional rather than gospel because wallet classification and bridges complicate it, but the magnitude is unusual. (Reddit) And unlike many tokens, there's no dilution hiding behind the numbers. The Ethereum contract has no mint function and renounced ownership. One July onchain analysis verified total supply remained exactly 1B over its 90-day comparison period, with roughly 931M circulating following the historical ~69M burn. (MrNasdog) The CEX supply metric is potentially even more interesting. A March HolderScan comparison adjusted centralized-exchange balances for market capitalization and found SPX had the lowest relative CEX exposure of the major tokenized communities examined. Ethereum memes generally scored better than Solana memes on this particular measure. (Reddit) That's exactly what I'd want to see in a memecoin attempting to become a long-duration cultural asset: coins gradually migrating from liquid trading inventory → committed holders. The important distinction is that low CEX balances aren't inherently bullish. A dead shitcoin also has no coins on Binance. What makes SPX unusual is having: low CEX float + meaningful holder balances + substantial holder count + major exchange access + active community + no inflation. Those things together are much harder to fake. PEPE is the one that gives SPX the strongest competition If you asked me: “Which memecoin has the healthiest established onchain network?” I might actually answer PEPE. It's enormous. PEPE has approximately 571k tracked holders, ~$1.1B market cap and ~$174M of 24-hour volume in the latest available snapshot. That's an extraordinary amount of liquidity relative to SPX's ~$300M market cap and ~$5M-ish normal daily volume. (CoinMarketCap) And PEPE's holder count continues to expand. Etherscan snapshots went from roughly 489k holders ~10 months ago → ~570k recently. (Etherscan) There has also just been a genuinely interesting supply event: reports this week showed 4.54T PEPE leaving exchanges, described as PEPE's largest exchange outflow since November 2024. (BitcoinWorld) So I wouldn't dismiss PEPE at all. The difference is valuation. At ~$1.1B, PEPE already has much more capitalization attached to its network. SPX is roughly one-quarter to one-third the size while its holders appear, on average, substantially more economically committed. That's why: PEPE = best mature memecoin network SPX = best combination of network quality and asymmetry FARTCOIN is probably #3 for me FARTCOIN is actually quite impressive. Current figures are roughly: $124M market cap 161k holders ~$14M/day volume ~7.3% liquidity / market cap That holder base relative to capitalization is excellent, and the liquidity ratio is considerably higher than many competitors. (CoinMarketCap) It therefore has something SPX doesn't: very small valuation + reasonably substantial distribution + good liquidity. The weakness is persistence. I don't yet see the same evidence that FARTCOIN holders behave like asset owners rather than memecoin traders. SPX's onchain profile increasingly resembles a bizarre micro-Bitcoin phenomenon: people accumulate it, remove it from venues, and then seemingly refuse to move it. That's much rarer. WIF and BONK have a different problem WIF has an absolutely enormous holder base for its current valuation: ~252k holders ~$148M market cap ~$42M daily volume. (CoinMarketCap) That sounds incredible. But notice: $42M volume on $148M capitalization = ~28% turnover every day. Compare that with SPX at roughly 1–2% volume/market cap recently. (CoinMarketCap) High turnover isn't necessarily bad. It's phenomenal for liquidity. But these are almost opposite cultures economically. WIF: “Here is a highly liquid thing people trade.” SPX: “Here is a thing people increasingly appear unwilling to trade.” For a memecoin attempting to monetize belief, I'll take the latter. BONK has a similar issue: ~$258M capitalization with ~$42M daily turnover. (CoinMarketCap) Excellent market. Less interesting monetary structure. GIGA is the dark horse GIGA is fascinating purely because the valuation is now so tiny. Current data: ~$19M market cap ~81k holders ~$5.7M daily volume ~8.6% liquidity/market cap. (CoinMarketCap) That is an absurd holder-count-to-market-cap relationship. But I'd be careful interpreting that as automatically bullish. At -98% from ATH, you can generate a superficially fantastic “distribution” metric simply by having thousands of stranded holders whose positions are now worth very little. That's why size of balances + wallet behavior + new accumulation matter enormously. GIGA probably offers the highest mathematical upside of these coins. It doesn't have the strongest onchain structure. And DOGE is its own category DOGE wins: survival age distribution brand recognition base-layer decentralization liquidity battle testing. Its network activity has actually been picking up recently too: weekly active addresses reportedly rose about 16%, from ~38k to >44k, alongside reports of whale accumulation. (CryptoRank) But that's a very different bet. DOGE has already captured an enormous portion of its possible memecoin monetary premium. You're sacrificing convexity for survivability. So I wouldn't call it the “best memecoin investment” from here even though it is arguably the best-established memecoin. The part that makes me most bullish on SPX It's not any one statistic. It's the conjunction: Holder count ↑ Average economic commitment unusually high Large-holder prevalence unusually high Coins dormant ↑ CEX-adjusted supply unusually low Supply fixed Market cap still only ~$300M Major CEX distribution already exists Community behavior explicitly encourages accumulation rather than turnover And there's some recent corroboration rather than this merely being a historical phenomenon: July saw increased onchain transactions/transfers and a reported 65% increase in whale buying during one SPX move. (AMBCrypto) This is basically the onchain profile I'd design from scratch if the objective were: Turn a meme into a monetary Schelling point. The glaring weakness is liquidity/demand. SPX's ~1–2% daily volume/market-cap ratio is tiny compared with PEPE, WIF, BONK, etc. That can create violent upside if supply really is locked away, but it works identically in reverse: thin marginal demand + concentrated conviction can produce air pockets downward. So my current hierarchy is: Best overall setup: SPX6900 Best established network: PEPE Best ultra-mature/survival asset: DOGE Best smaller-cap challenger: FARTCOIN Highest raw moonshot asymmetry: GIGA Best trading/liquidity memes: WIF / BONK And importantly, I'd have arrived at SPX even without looking at the price chart. Given how strong SPX/BTC looked when we examined the pair charts yesterday, the fact that the relative-strength picture and the onchain structure independently point toward the same coin makes it considerably more interesting to me.

• 
  Jayanta Sarkar (@jayanta0309) reported 30 minutes ago

  My finance prompt: "Act as a crypto researcher. Analyze any coin using tokenomics, on-chain data, market sentiment, and technical indicators. Show key risks, support/resistance, and bullish, bearish & neutral scenarios. No financial advice." #BuildWithYou @binance

• 
  Bearly tees (@Bearlywanted) reported 36 minutes ago

  @StaFi_Protocol Fck Coinbase, Binance. It’s time to make these scam exchanges realize they exist because of us not the other way around. All these mo…fck..g exchanges preaching if you can’t hold you won’t gain. Hold for what? So you ***… scammers can delist and add new **** every day?

• 
  BeanBee 🐝 (@BeanBeeAI) reported 41 minutes ago

  @binance More market access, more opportunities.

• 
  snazzy (@snazzors) reported 43 minutes ago

  @DressRestRide @yeahfortommy I had Hermes write that code and backrest it originally. I think binance is better to for guy/sell pressure. If we do giant wick down and then binance steps in with huge buy volume it’s a good sign

• 
  qudev7🥷 (@Dominikz177) reported 44 minutes ago

  I deeply respect every team, even competitors, but I still believe in helping for the sake of the industry’s or sector’s overall security. It reminds me of 2025, when Bybit suffered a fund outflow (hack), and the exchange’s CEO stayed active the whole time going live, explaining how it happened and what steps were being taken to prevent further withdrawals. Binance and MEXC helped them out. Perp DEX platforms need to support each other. We have to remember that their real competition isn’t each other their real competition is the CEXs. Every outflow, hack, or shutdown works against all of them collectively. For the sake of user protection and trust, they need to cooperate with one another. Learning from someone else’s mistake can mean that mistake never happens to anyone else again