Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  K@Z (@KazOG603) reported 3 minutes ago

  Congratulations on $wojak I was right just wrong cabal but hey it’s crypto what can you expect i probably should’ve grabbed some to be safe but I was to loyal and thought just maybe will make it through this since we made it literally through all the ups and down but I guess this binance listing was part of cabal gg once again back to square 1 🫡

• 
  Michael Mislos | BitPinas (@mmichaels_21) reported 5 minutes ago

  How did @binance successfully and legally re-enter the Philippines? Here are the points from a recently released whitepaper: “The Regulated Reentry of @binance in the Philippines”. Here is a summary but Please note it is best to read the 7-page whitepaper as there might be finer points lost in the summary: 1) The Reentry & Global Anchor: The whitepaper outlines a compliant, cross-jurisdictional framework to bring Binance back into the Philippines via local partner BlockShoals Technologies Inc.. They did this by leveraging the international regulatory weight of a comprehensive ADGM FSRA license secured in Abu Dhabi. (The reasoning for this and the exact implementation is detailed in the whitepaper. If there is only one section that you will read from there, this is it!) 2) The architecture is built on a split-jurisdiction design: BlockShoals handles the front-end user experience under the SEC’s Crypto-Asset Intermediary (CAI) track, while natively delegating 100% of the peso-denominated fiat clearing to an active, independent domestic VASP partner. 3) The paper explicitly disputes recent media commentary that characterized the 90-day integration window as a "compliance gap" or an unexpected "halt" to the platform's entry. It clarifies that this timeline is actually a pre-planned technical "Pre-Phase" mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines April 14, 2026 Notice to Proceed. 4) It rejects the negative narrative that BlockShoals lacking a standalone VASP license is a regulatory error; instead, it argues that utilizing an existing local VASP's rails was a deliberate, engineered feature of the approved architecture from day one to satisfy the BSP's "unbroken chain" clearing rule, not a late remedy added to it. 5) The whitepaper confirms that public-facing retail onboarding and open trading are strictly barred during the current 90-day sandbox phase, which serves purely as a closed, highly supervised technical window to test backend infrastructure and fiat rails. 6) The SEC's StratBox approval carries more than fifteen highly sensitive, substantive conditions regarding user caps and product scopes, which must continuously coordinate with and adapt to evolving local banking policies, such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas strict June 12, 2026 privacy coin ban. Whitepaper in the second tweet. 👇 @cz_binance

• 
  crypto Ro $ (@cryptosilar) reported 17 minutes ago

  @__kfm__ @turtledotxyz Worst fraud listed on binance ever ! -99% down

• 
  Whaleland (@Whaleland_Dex) reported 19 minutes ago

  Europe’s new crypto license race has started because MiCA is moving from theory to enforcement. Firms now need authorization as a crypto-asset service provider in one EU country, and that license can then be used across the bloc. That has created a real competitive sprint among exchanges, fintechs, and crypto infrastructure firms. Winning early means gaining regulated access to the EU market ahead of rivals, while missing the deadline can mean an orderly exit, blacklisting, or legal risk. Recent events show both sides of that race. Conio secured a MiCA license in Italy this week, while Reuters reported Binance is expected to lose its bid in Greece and may no longer be able to serve EU users from July. The bigger picture is that Europe is becoming one of the first major markets where crypto regulation now directly decides who can scale. That makes licensing less of a compliance box and more of a strategic moat.

• 
  Oldman Crypto (@Oldman__Crypto) reported 20 minutes ago

  Conflict of interest. Binance collects listing fees and trading fees both on the way up and the way down, and sometimes Binance Labs has even invested in the very token being listed. So they make money whether retail wins or loses. •Listing high-FDV, low-float tokens. This creates hype and pumps early volume, then when the token unlock schedule kicks in, there’s heavy selling — and the bag-holders at the end are usually retail who bought the top. •“Investor protection” arrives after the damage is done. By the time a token gets delisted, it’s often already down 99%, which makes the label feel pretty cynical. @cz_binance

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 20 minutes ago

  @cryptlogis platform reportedly gone since jan, users can't unstake, binance monitoring tag active down 99% from ath with fundamental operational issues

• 
  Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reported 21 minutes ago

  franklin templeton filed for etfs that funnel stock dividend flow into BTC. eu mica go-live in july puts binance access and USDT liquidity at risk in europe. oman launched omanhash, a national bitcoin mining pool to regulate licensed miners.

• 
  Kiarie Kariuki (@KKIARIEKARIUKI) reported 22 minutes ago

  @usehawala Hello, it is not working on my end. I have tried adding funds to the card & purchase crypto on Binance but the card is rejected. Not supported by Apple Pay and google pay too. I also can’t send the funds using Wise/Remitly. My ACH will receive this months pay but I can’t wthdrw

• 
  P.Sach. (@Sachcryptos) reported 23 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks eventually support 24/7 trading and instant settlement like crypto markets? #AskBinance

• 
  Fontinz (@1017_Zhu) reported 24 minutes ago

  My account has been under review for over 30 days and my funds are currently inaccessible. Case ID #163436272. ​Customer support has repeatedly provided template responses and confirmed they cannot assist further. Please help! @BinanceHelpDesk @binance

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Fadil_bawa1 @Fadil_bawa1 You missed the bigger play—$Wojak’s 24h volume on Binance US spiked 400% the day after the listing, but only 12% of traders held it for >6hrs. Most sold into the hype. We track this daily—breaking down why in our latest report. Follow...

• 
  Mavis (@0xmavis0x) reported 27 minutes ago

  Many crypto platforms rushed to offer tokenized shares or pre-IPO subscription products (Kraken, Bybit, Binance Wallet, Bitget Wallet, MEXC, Gate, and others). The problem: tokenized access doesn’t create more real shares.

• 
  connector🦄💨✨ (@connector_13) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Bria_OKX Sure they listed $USDC last month and went straight to garbage. Study the strength of community, binance can't do miracles and paid listings are destined to fail.

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 28 minutes ago

  @grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.

• 
  Admiano.id (@Admiano) reported 30 minutes ago

  The most successful businesses have their founder talking to people; their customers, potential partners, and constantly working to make their product better and growing the pie Not on some campaign to make their biggest competitor look as bad as possible This is why OKX/Star will never be as big and as successful as Binance/CZ There’s a lesson in there PS: This is not about Binance/OKX