Binance Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Binance users affected:
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Porto Alegre, RS | 1 |
| Angers, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Itu, SP | 1 |
| Seattle, WA | 1 |
| Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Paul Hersey (@Paul_Herseyy) reportedThe timing was the problem. MiCA's transition deadline was approaching on July 1. Binance had to find another regulatory route while the clock was already running. OKX didn't have that same problem. It had secured its European license more than a year earlier.
-
Rado | τsc (@RadoTsc) reportedA live chain split just happened on Bitcoin. I spent 4 hours studying BIP-110 It changed how I see this network after 10+ years of holding. Long post. Worth it. 👇 My position first: Bitcoin is a monetary network. I hate spam. Ordinals and arbitrary data have no business in blocks. I still don't think this is a winnable fight, and I don't think the people promoting it are honest about who pays for it. THE PROBLEM IS REAL Core nodes permit arbitrary data in transactions. JPEGs, inscriptions, non-monetary payloads. Fake outputs used as storage sit in the UTXO set permanently. Every node holds that in memory forever. Higher hardware requirements mean fewer people running nodes, which means centralization. That concern is legitimate. WHAT HAPPENED AT BLOCK 961,632 BIP-110 nodes began rejecting any block that doesn't signal version bit 4. Not the contents. The vote flag. The actual data limits don't activate until block 965,664. The first non-signaling block arrived. They rejected it. Split. WHY THIS IS UGLY 2.6% of hashpower signals bit 4. So BIP-110 nodes now reject roughly 97% of blocks produced. They're building on a chain backed by 2.6% of hashpower. 10 minutes ÷ 0.026 = one block every ~6.5 hours. That chain doesn't merge back. Every block hashes its parent, so once the histories diverge they stay diverged. WHO ACTUALLY PAYS A miner signaling bit 4 still earns 3.125 BTC per block. On a chain no exchange lists. They cannot send it to Binance. They cannot convert it to dollars. The power bill arrives anyway. The loudest advocates run nodes. If this fails they change one config line and resync. Cost: an afternoon. The people with nothing at stake set the deadline. The people with power bills absorb it. THE PART THAT CHANGED MY MIND Retail node count was never leverage. 20,000 basement nodes carry less weight than one Binance node, because Binance is where BTC becomes dollars. 2017 worked because the exchanges themselves refused SegWit2x. Miners faced unsellable coins and folded in days. In 2026 every major exchange runs Core. The threat has no financial edge. WHAT I NOW BELIEVE Hashpower follows dollars. Dollars flow through exchanges. Exchanges run Core. So the nodes that actually set Bitcoin's rules are a handful of exchange nodes, not the thousands of us running one at home. Not a conspiracy. Just where the money is. I wanted node sovereignty to be real leverage. After 10 years I don't think it is. More on this as to how it ties to Bittensor $TAO maybe tomorrow 1/2 Happy to be proven wrong. @mattkratter @LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin $BTC
-
CryptoPulse (@CryptoPulseGLBL) reported🔔#Today's Headlines 1. The Bitcoin BIP-110 proposal has triggered a node fork; supporters have split from the mainnet and are currently 20 blocks behind the main chain. 2. Fractal will burn over 4.1 million FB tokens during its first halving and move forward with proposals such as FIP-102. 3. Berkshire Hathaway’s second-quarter net profit surged, while cash reserves declined slightly 4. The EU plans to revise the MiCA framework, focusing on access rules for non-EU stablecoin issuers 5. @circle confirmed the renewal of its USDC partnership agreement with Coinbase and ruled out a quarterly dividend plan 6. AI fund Situational Awareness has informed investors that it is not accepting new capital for the time being 7. @Bitwise CIO: Institutions May Inject Trillions of Dollars into Bitcoin Over the Next Decade 8. A suspected Bitcoin miner has deposited 2,802 Bitcoin into Binance over the past two days, worth $182 million 9. A whale shorting $102 million worth of Bitcoin was partially liquidated; the liquidation price for the remaining position is approximately $65,300 10. Robinhood Wallet has lowered the minimum amount for gas sponsorship from $5 to $0.50
-
Md Habibur Rahman (@ariyan98dvm) reported@AlphaByMalik **** Binance... I have 244 points bt missing claim😡
-
Rexha 🐸 (@RexhaRexhaRexha) reportedRasmr breaks down the bull thesis for RWA memecoins "There is a smart thesis about stock memes. Everybody knows that the biggest stocks have memetic premiums already, speculative premiums. So if you just pull that out and make it a meme coin, it's kind of fun to trade. That's the first layer." "But also, there's a second layer, which is there's demand for it that is driving volume to RWAs. On Robinhood Chain, the number one and two stocks by volume are Nvidia and GME, right? Because of Artificial Inu and because of the GME meme. And on Binance, what is it? The number one is SpaceX." "So, when you're trying to push a product and the number one driver of the product's success is this thing, you're gonna wanna push that thing. That's just human, obvious psychology." "But also, there's another aspect, which is it's not easy to get stocks on-chain. People have to give up their stocks to tokenize them, right? People have to try to find this arbitrage on-chain." "And so, if there's volume being driven, that's increasing the price. We saw GME go to $200 on-chain, and then when people tokenized it, they tokenized their shares to close that arb. Then it goes from 200 all the way to 20, but there's more tokenized stocks on-chain still." "So it's bringing liquidity on-chain for tokenized stocks."
-
168Pi Shopping Mall (@168pishop) reported@BenX_HQ Binance and Coinbase have listed many low-quality coins, yet they still haven’t listed Pi Network. So it probably isn’t a legal issue. Who knows? We can only wait patiently for the answer to be revealed.
-
Ah Phu (@PhuAh3130) reportedHello BinanceTH. My account is under review for some days now. It is a verified account used for almost a year now. I tried Binance Support but can't contact any meaningful human support. Please help. @Binance_TH_
-
conFam 🐐 (@ConfamFred) reported@REDHOOD_1111 @fundingpips Contact binance support then
-
zaoc (@zaoc11) reported@binance About 60 percent of TradFi perpetual volume runs through Binance, showing crypto rails are swallowing market access. Gross that legacy finance still drags its feet. Will both systems finally connect? Share your take 😒
-
Robi (@robi44610) reported@binance **** your Binance since you became sell off
-
pedma (@pedma7) reportedglad i spent this last week digging into trade execution stuff. i was able to really push it down. i was spending unnecessarily too much on execution costs. binance so far the cheapest exchange, but lets give some grace to HL, because it has been my main exchange since is tarted this while thing and i was doing a lot of dumb stuff execution wise. binance only been active past few days. okx and kraken should continue to drop following the new changes.
-
moon shiesty (@moonshiesty) reportedthe L2 rollup model works all things equal aren't equal. its the L1 model that doesn't work: lighter provides: - zero-gas - low latency - colocation next to binance - MEV free trading the problem is L1 gas models don't work gas fees are a terrible proxy for economic value outside of MEV blockspace fees don't work for bitcoin and are the largest risk to bitcoin other than quantum. gas fees don't work for ethereum or solana either outside of capturing MEV rollups don't work for L1s because the entire crypto space still use derivatives of bitcoin's economic model from 2011 there's no reason except a lack of creativity solana or any L1s can't adopt better revenue sharing models for rollups
-
Steve (@azhou9531) reported@MARKOCHAIN_ Brother TUT has already paid attention to him. We should support him and ask Binance officials to support the developers
-
0xInvariant (@0xinvariant) reported@Beliukh_ @ZKSgu No, I think Binance is not a competitor of Hyperlqiuid. As CZ himself put it, Hyperliquid occupies a market niche that Binance simply cannot compete in. A CEX is a CEX — it will never truly become a DEX, at least not under the current regulatory and business constraints. Binance remains the clear No.1 platform for retail traders. Hyperliquid, on the other hand, has established itself as the leading venue for on-chain traders and institutional capital that prioritizes self-custody, transparency, and permissionless access. They serve different segments of the market. Treating them as direct competitors misses the structural distinction.
-
DCconcepts (@CconceptsD) reported@Eze_Wilberforce Which one is listing on Binance next on your call sir Please help with it, make we position @Eze_Wilberforce sir