Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	8 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  SINGLEBEAR (@bestbear22) reported 1 minute ago

  if you have binance and want to help me out here my binance id 955178338 (i really need that help im going through hard hard time)

• 
  TNT (@TNTCapitalC) reported 3 minutes ago

  Reposting message sent to Mark with minors edits: A lot of emotion is attached to BTC reaching $200K or even $1,000,000 per coin. Perfectly justified. We all want to buy and hold and get rich? Who will pay for it? Don't care How long need to hold? Don't care Is quantum computing potentially a threat to Bitcoin current PA? Don't care Does Saylor selling affect institutional allocation? I don’t care Moon only, moon soon A lot of regrets from most people not selling BTC at 100k also. Many institutions also have regrets. Which make the whole thing even more emotionally charged. But the current market structure and risk/reward profile don’t support BTC trading at $160K–$180K this year. We’ve seen rejections after rejections after rejections as of late. Yet, some people wake up the next morning and say: they don't care. BTC still going to 200k. Even when Saylor starts selling Bitcoin, they say, it's ok, BTC still going to $200k this year. Even when BTC drops 20% in a week, people continue to say, it's ok, BTC still going to 200k this year. At some point, you need to ask why the market is rejecting those levels. Start studying instead of ignoring every rejection and repeating what you see on TV. We all want to make 2-3x profit on big size. We all miss the good old days, 100x from alts of last cycle. A 2–3x move from lower on BTC, with size (say from 30k) would already be an extraordinary outcome given today's market depth and positioning. If this happens, you need to start showing respect to the market, be grateful for the gains. Winning is not easy, it shouldn't be taken for granted. If you win, it means other people lose. Why was BTC the trade of the decade? Because last 10 years. The edge was never certainty. it was uncertainty. For the last decade, nobody knew where Bitcoin's terminal price could be. There was no proof, only probability. A lot of dreams and beliefs in Saylor also. Institutions bought big, they made a mistake, now they are paying the price of their greed. And they bought retail's bags also in the process. Someone said he has 6 figures ready to deploy, feels can do easy 2-3x by buying the dips. Safe, nice and easy. To help with retirement. But back in the days, 10 years ago, or even 5 years ago. Never heard anyone saying investing in BTC for retirement was easy money. If you are not scared when you make a big investment, something is wrong. In fact, investing in BTC in 2020 during Covid (6 years ago only), was risky as ****. That information asymmetry created outsized returns because the market consistently underestimated the upside. And fomo later was real when governments started accumulating very high. Today, the investment case is largely validated. Institutions, sovereigns, and corporates recognize Bitcoin as a legitimate asset. The uncertainty that once created the opportunity has been significantly reduced. And it's actually a really big thing. Same reasons why SPCX could never have been alpha. Because not enough uncertainty. It was a crowded trade. Even heard Uber driver mentioning SPCX. If 50% win and 50% lose. Who pays for it then? Where is the money coming from? Uncertainty is what gives the 100x. Certainty kills the ROI, it kills markets. Always. Don't forget. When you materialize a 100x profitable trade, it means 100 people are paying for it. (technically) It's less obvious on CEX like Binance, because you have Market Makers. But think about the exit liquidity dynamic. If you buy an altcoin on Uniswap at $1 and eventually sell it at $100, all else being equal, someone is willingly paying $100 for an asset they had no interest in buying at $1. That's the trade. You de-risk and realize gains by distributing your position into their demand. You're happy because you've crystallized a 100x return. They're happy because they believe there's still meaningful upside from $100. Markets clear because every trade has two participants with different expectations. The problem is that every additional leg higher requires increasingly larger capital inflows. As the valuation expands, the marginal buyer has to absorb supply from earlier investors who are taking profits. The higher the price, the more exit liquidity is needed to sustain the move. Going from $1 to $100 is one thing. Going from $100 to another 100x is a completely different proposition. It requires a much larger pool of incremental capital and a new wave of buyers willing to pay substantially higher prices. Alpha is made by buying before consensus. Exit liquidity arrives after consensus. Now obviously: It's not that a 100x higher price literally requires 100 times as many buyers. A small number of aggressive buyers can move price significantly if available liquidity is thin. What is generally true is that as an asset's market capitalization grows, sustaining the same percentage returns usually requires much larger dollar inflows. Going from a $10 million valuation to $1 billion is often easier than going from $100 billion to $10 trillion. This is why many hedge funds talk about "law of large numbers," "reflexivity," "marginal buyer," "liquidity," and "exit liquidity." Early investors profit because later investors are willing to pay higher prices, but each successive multiple typically requires a larger base of capital and stronger conviction. Same reason why Gold going down like a shitcoin. Most people don't understand why Gold will continue to go down. Everyone currently saying Gold is safe, Gold is the hedge. Who do you think is selling then during such certainty? That's the paradox: it's often easier to make money speculating before something is proven than after it becomes consensus. That's why we are contrarian. Because being non-contrarian doesn't work. (it didn't for us) Bitcoin could one day still reach $125K? Through continued adoption, liquidity expansion, and capital inflows? Maybe, but not now. The BM literally just started. (if you zoom out) Expecting another exponential repricing right now becomes more difficult once the market broadly agrees on the thesis. Everyone waiting and buying the dips. Even people with zero economics or finance background, and 0 investment experience, think they’re going to make easy money with one unique investment strategy. Why? On the sole basis, that apparently it worked for others in the past. We need some mad capitulation before that. Some **** hitting the fan. And it's not Saylor selling 32 btc, and it's not MSTR. SP500 dropped 80% after Dot com bubble. No one cares now. People will always say this time is different. But if SP500 dropped 80% 20 years ago, it's gonna drop 80% now. Nothing has changed. And don't think Internet bubble was larger than this current AI bubble. That's why we heavily positioned short on SP500 at 7,615. We are barely at break even. Boring? Bulls laughing. Let's see who will be laughing in 12 months from now. Fundamentally, and will probably stop with this essay, when everyone has the same information and similar expectations, alpha compresses, and future returns tend to moderate. You won't make money with certainty. Right now, too much certainty on BTC, on GOLD, on SPX. And it's very much a remake of history. Same market, new players. Most weren't even born, or weren't old enough to invest, 20 years ago, and many are too lazy to open TradingView. Earlier today, SOL had put in a top. Every signal was flashing exhaustion, yet the market squeezed another 3% higher. That final pump only happened because of information asymmetry and surprise, the move caught participants offside. Now that the move has played out and expectations have adjusted, the asymmetry is gone. From here, the path of least resistance for SOL is lower. But a few hours ago, this was already the same path anyway. A pump doesn't change the structure. Same with BTC, same with SPX. Again, Information asymmetry created the opportunity. Consensus compresses it. The market will recover one day, BTC, SPX, Gold but not from the price levels everyone expects. In the meantime, be very careful not to burn your USDT. We are not in a bull run anymore. Some people will read this and will still conclude: "Don't care, when 200k?" 🟥 US Average Hourly Earnings in 20 mins Expect volatility (though that’s just short-term noise). There’s nothing here that can sustainably push BTC higher from this point. Appreciate all your messages today. Going to archive this in case some people are interested in reading about the certainty and asymmetry discussion. Big dump coming. Correction is not over. As far as today is concerned, gonna be another Black Thursday by the look of it. Chat soon.

• 
  TokenizedWolf (@tokenizedwolf) reported 4 minutes ago

  Crypto is becoming an infrastructure race. Not every headline matters. The ones that matter show where liquidity, regulation, and real-world adoption are moving. 1. Robinhood launched its public L2 chain. Robinhood Chain is now live, built on Arbitrum, with tokenized stock products available through Robinhood Wallet in 120+ countries. Why it matters: Brokerages are moving from offering crypto exposure to building onchain financial rails. 2. Ethereum is pitching governments directly. The Ethereum Foundation released a new policy guide positioning Ethereum as neutral digital infrastructure for identity, public records, payments, and asset tokenization. Why it matters: Public chains are trying to become government-grade infrastructure, not just speculation networks. 3. Bitcoin ETF stress is still the liquidity signal. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs reportedly saw $4.5B in June outflows, their worst month since launch. Market impact: When ETF demand weakens, crypto risk appetite weakens with it. 4. SEC market data showed IPO momentum improving. The SEC published updated market statistics highlighting stronger IPO activity and proceeds raised. Why it matters: If public-market appetite improves, AI, fintech, crypto infrastructure, and tokenization companies may get a better capital window. 5. Binance launched BTCU and ETHU perpetuals. The new contracts settle in United Stables “U,” support up to 100x leverage, and trade 24/7. Why it matters: This is a small but real example of stablecoin rails expanding deeper into derivatives market structure. Bottom line: Watch these lanes: Tokenized equities Public blockchain infrastructure Crypto ETF flows Ethereum institutional adoption Stablecoin settlement rails IPO windows AI + fintech capital markets The next winners may be the platforms turning speculation into usable financial infrastructure.

• 
  MetaFi Consortium (@Meta_UnityNet) reported 4 minutes ago

  First, we need to clarify a basic concept: what is the essence of compliance? Compliance is a baseline, not a ceiling. It is a guardrail to protect users, not a marketing tool for PR campaigns. The cryptocurrency industry was born after the 2008 financial crisis, and its core spirit was precisely a rebellion against the centralized monopoly and regulatory failures of traditional finance. If an exchange treats compliance as its only selling point and promotes it everywhere, that actually exposes its overall weakness in product capability, technology, and liquidity. Only when the product itself lacks highlights does “we obey the rules” become the biggest highlight. It is like a race car driver repeatedly emphasizing on the track that he has fastened his seat belt. Is it important? Of course. But people buy tickets to watch speed, skill, and overtaking — not to see how properly a safety belt is worn. OKX treats regulatory certificates as badges of honor, as if obtaining a license naturally grants it industry leadership. The problem with this mindset is that compliance is an entry threshold, not a trophy. Once everyone crosses that threshold, what determines who runs ahead will always be product strength, innovation, and insight into user demand — not who got the admission ticket first. Besides, Star Xu’s OKX does not even hold more regulatory licenses than Binance. It is worth noting that, as of June 2026, according to data from the European Securities and Markets Authority, among more than 1,200 pre-registered companies, only 210 had obtained full authorization. This shows that compliance under the MiCA framework is itself a long marathon, not a short sprint. Star Xu using phased progress in a compliance process as a weapon to overpower competitors is neither professional nor respectable.

• 
  Yasir Faiz (@gjeeyfa) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance My fully verified Binance account was restricted after I tried to update my renewed Pakistani CNIC because my old one was expiring. I had only one account, never used a VPN, and had a long trading history with significant trading volume. Support escalated my case, then rejected

• 
  THATTKTHO.ICP (@ThatTkTho) reported 7 minutes ago

  It was a bad launch but that had nothing to with @dfinity and everything to do with FTX and Binance. its always the same argument with you ********* lol. No sustenance to it at all. Just regurgitate the same "oh the price. Oh the launch" almost every single altcoin is down 80%or more. I cant wait for the next bullrun when I watch you either delete your accounts or eat your words lol its gonna be glorious.

• 
  CoastRider (@CoastRiderX) reported 7 minutes ago

  In the beginning #Binance (customer since 2017) i had great view about them and they gave the vibes the will be top crpyto financial institution. But shady stuff in recent years and how they market make, treat their customers its just a NO-GO. Distrupt trad-fi not your people! 🫣

• 
  MPMR (@Proofofcripto) reported 8 minutes ago

  I need your help. With the closure of Binance in Europe, I really need to protect my investment. Which is the best hard wallet - Trezor or Ledger?

• 
  bibi.eth (@nguyenthambt) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Alexxx636 @binance Stablecoins really help with volatility.

• 
  WOLF Bitcoin (@WOLF_Bitcoin_) reported 9 minutes ago

  BINANCE IS BEING SUED IN LONDON FOR ALLEGEDLY SELLING BANNED PRODUCTS TO UK INVESTORS. Nearly 1,700 claimants are seeking at least $200 million from Binance and founder Changpeng Zhao. The core of the claim: Binance allegedly offered leveraged tokens, futures and options to UK customers without the required regulatory authorization, starting in late 2019. The bigger issue: The UK's FCA banned the sale of crypto derivatives to retail consumers back in January 2021. The lawsuit claims Binance kept offering some of these products to UK users even after that ban took effect. Binance says it will defend itself and denies wrongdoing.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 12 minutes ago

  @ath_sui 7/10 at 25m binance hodler airdrop going live in hours, plus HTX 50% APY product and multiple exchange promos running. heavy institutional backing for a microcap L1 AI agent narrative is nuclear right now. x402 seeing millions in agent spend, coinbase launched in-app AI, bnb chain dropped agent studio. OPG positioning as the verifiable onchain execution layer with zkML hits the theme hard but it's an L1 play which means long execution risk. bittensor subnets already have paying customers, gensyn just ran on binance, akash backing venice. competition is real team has palantir DNA and they're building with walrus/allium but we don't have TVL or active usage metrics yet, just promotional velocity 25m is cheap for an AI L1 if they deliver. could easily run to 100m+ on narrative alone given the exchange support. but you're betting on tech execution and developer adoption, not just hype rotation

• 
  TOMMY VERCETTI (@vercettiliving) reported 13 minutes ago

  @rushtradingx @binance trying to fake pump the bottom is going to work retard dumbest **** ive seen this year

• 
  Ivan Bullish (@IvanBullish) reported 15 minutes ago

  @InjectiveOrbit @injective binance support makes it safe

• 
  SUPPORT TEAM (@Suportteamm) reported 16 minutes ago

  @very_common_guy Btc dev and many other great projects don't lure their community with religious gilbarish like "believers", great projects are working hard to be listed in great exchanges to bring value to holders, marpy said God will do it, that binance will beg him to list his scam wkc. etc

• 
  Whale Alerts (@WhaleAlerts_08) reported 22 minutes ago

  Binance Will Support the Injective (INJ) Network Upgrade & Hard Fork - 2026-07-02 Starting at approximately 2026-07-02 13:00 (UTC), Binance will suspend the deposits and withdrawals of token(s) on the Injective (INJ)

• 
  Senhor Gus (@Senhor_Gus) reported 23 minutes ago

  @MarinadeFinance Hello. My Wallet at Solflare have being hacked, How can I get in touch to prof my onership and provide a new wallet adress? Gladly my SOL came mostly from my Binance, Bybit and MECX account Sorry to disturb, please help.

• 
  bb brownie (@bbbrownie31094) reported 25 minutes ago

  @RealAllinCrypto It’s actually very good for consumers to be rid of scam exchanges that cannot abide by simple protections and laws for users and choose to incorporate in shady offshore locations and are unaccountable. Binance and criminal exchanges need to be shut down for the sector heal.

• 
  Kuch New For You (@kuchnewforyou) reported 30 minutes ago

  Binance LUNC Burn Closing in on 90 Billion Milestone Binance burned over 600 million worth of $LUNC tokens on July 1. Per LUNC Metrics, the latest burn update means the exchange has burned 87.37 billion of the asset, continuing to reduce its supply for long-term growth. LUNC trading volume is up 5% in the past 24 hours, according to Coinmarketcap data. However, the asset has been down nearly 30% in the past month.

• 
  Bryan Benson (@bryancripto) reported 30 minutes ago

  Hey guys, Bryan here. So as you've probably heard, #MiCA went live today and Europe axed around 3,000 companies in one shot. Binance included. Didn't matter how legit the business was. No papers, no license, you're out. 3,000 companies. In broad daylight. What I want you to know: @aurum_ecosystem is live. We're fully aware of what's happening across the industry and we're working through it. We're going to rebuild parts of the structure. And when it's done, you're going to like the result. More soon.

• 
  BLOCKCAST.CC NEWS (@Blockcastcc) reported 31 minutes ago

  “Binance officially enters the Philippines” The attached image is an official Philippine SEC document approving BlockShoals Technologies to test crypto products under the Strategic Sandbox regulatory framework. BlockShoals will integrate with Binance as its global crypto-asset service provider partner during a 90-day testing period for local user access to selected services.

• 
  Nft Trader (@DmForNftTrade) reported 38 minutes ago

  BINANCE#Binance EN: Binance Will Support the Toncoin (UMA) Rebranding to Gram (GRAM)

• 
  Chartist (@ChartistXBT) reported 44 minutes ago

  @fernandowavesfx That piece of **** is a big scammer from way back in the day. He was and still a @binance plant. Absolutely garbage vile **** he is

• 
  ones (@sherwoodones) reported 44 minutes ago

  this is the important takeaway it's not that token/equity structures shouldn't exist (i am generally bearish on them but i am sure there are reasons - mostly legal - that even well-meaning teams feel compelled to do them still) but founders that choose this path need to understand that the market has made it very clear how it feels about tokens in these structures and they will re-price them accordingly token/equity structures are only sometimes a morality issue but they are (now) always a market issue it doesn't help that i'm not sure we have even one example outside of bnb* of a token/equity structure that has delivered sustainable value for tokenholders in all of crypto's history - not one! you're quite literally betting on the next one to be the first one, with a graveyard of 1,000s that have failed in this regard * if you're holding up binance/bnb as the template, i suggest you not do that

• 
  Adeel (@CryptoAdeeeel) reported 45 minutes ago

  @cz_binance that is true. Been a trader using binance for the past 4 years and although I don’t use leverage im still down 99% because there is no protection for users. They list garbage projects only to dump on their users and then eventually delist them. Good decision for EU.

• 
  Etherbit (@EtherbitHQ) reported 48 minutes ago

  This isn’t the first meeting either. The committee already spoke to CoinDCX, Binance, WazirX, and a bunch of other exchanges over the past year. This is a slow process. Today was one more step, not the final word.

• 
  Martinus Maximus (@MigthtyMaximus) reported 49 minutes ago

  @binance I think it is really sad. I was a happy customer for years and you never let us down.

• 
  Rei Researcher (@Satoureireal) reported 51 minutes ago

  $BTC on Binance Is Seeing Negative Netflow Again According to data from CryptoQuant, Bitcoin Exchange Netflow (Total) on Binance continues to lean negative, showing that more $BTC is being withdrawn from the exchange than deposited. This usually suggests that immediate sell-side pressure on the exchange may be easing, as investors are not sending too much $BTC to Binance to be ready to sell. The reason is that although negative netflow reflects a partial decline in exchange supply, $BTC price still remains relatively weak. This shows that the market has not yet seen a clear improvement in demand, but rather that selling pressure may be temporarily cooling down. In other words, CryptoQuant data shows that sentiment is becoming less stressed on the supply side, but it is still not enough to confirm a strong reversal.

• 
  Kansai Photos (@KansaiPhotos) reported 51 minutes ago

  Remember eNeFTees? (which Ťrümp sells to his supporters as "digital trading cards") Today, Binance Japan announced they were closing their NFT marketplace; must have been really unpopular for a crypto company to decide it wasn't worth their server space and UI clutter...

• 
  milly.hl (@milly_rock7) reported 56 minutes ago

  @silverfang88 Wait, Binance listing TQQQ with 0 fees is actually wild. US retail doesnt even get 0 fee access to TQQQ this easily.

• 
  yaboyskey (@gajewskey) reported 60 minutes ago

  @GTPro777 It want on a rally before the drop but from the cross no it was down 13% not 28% from the peak after the rally 28%. Also I’ve said it many times 2022 was a black swan and in it self an anomaly unless you think Coinbase or binance is going to zero this is not happening again. 2015 also did not range for 6 months after the cross.. nor is 6 months a long time