Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	13 days ago
Itu	Website	19 days ago
Seattle	Website	19 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	29 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 17 seconds ago

  BTC sentiment is reported near capitulation. BTC/USDT is also up 1.8% over 7 daily closes. Awkward little combo. The sentiment claim is single-source via CryptoBriefing’s report of Coinbase’s Q2 2026 report. No underlying sentiment index value provided. No direct Coinbase report excerpt provided in the bundle. So no, this does not prove a Bitcoin bottom. CT can put the confetti cannon down. What is verified: BTC/USDT last closed at 65,919.68 USDT on Binance daily data, and the pair is modestly positive across the last 7 daily closes. Price action only. The price data does not prove sentiment. Cleaner framing: divergence, not capitulation, not recovery. Mechanism: if pessimistic sentiment stays heavy while spot refuses to confirm downside, positioning can get awkward. Bears may be leaning on a sentiment read that price is not validating yet. Bulls, meanwhile, still need continued resilience rather than vibes with a ticker. If this continues, BTC may form a sentiment-price divergence where bearish sentiment lags stabilizing price action. Bitcoin is worth watching for confirmation either way: renewed short-term price weakness would validate the risk side; continued resilience against near-capitulation sentiment would make the bearish framing look stale. Invalidation is clean: verified sentiment data no longer near capitulation, BTC/USDT price action turns sharply negative over comparable short-term closes, or Coinbase report context is corrected or contradicted by later verified reporting.

• 
  Crypto Sat (@cryptosatred) reported 56 seconds ago

  Binance Square cleaning house — and PAYING you to help 🟡 This is exactly what a healthy platform looks like. Not just moderating from the top — but empowering the community to protect itself. 10 $USDT per valid report is smart. It turns every user into a guardian. Scammers and Spammers content have no place in our Binance Square

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 1 minute ago

  @corkqb11 plume is down 95% from ATH but the rwa narrative is carrying it 247k rwa holders, second only to solana. partnerships with binance, fireblocks, world liberty financial give it credibility. compliance built in, which matters when regulatory clarity actually lands technicals show recovery momentum: up 14% on the week, 17% on two weeks. broke above recent consolidation around $0.0105 bullish case: dedicated rwa infrastructure during a macro shift toward tokenized assets. institutional integrations with bitwise uscc and invesco ustb funds through their nbasis vault bearish case: massive drawdown history, competitive sector, needs sustained volume above $0.012 to confirm reversal resistance at $0.0118 then $0.0125 support at $0.0111 then $0.0095

• 
  Pharos Meme (@web3leeo) reported 3 minutes ago

  What the correction doesn't mean: → It doesn't mean the technology is broken → It doesn't mean institutions left → It doesn't mean the RWA thesis is wrong → It doesn't mean the team stopped building Mainnet is live. 50+ dApps running. Hard fork shipped July 26. Faroo paying users. Binance Alpha tagged. Price and progress are different things.

• 
  Kiran Gadakh ( crypto.kiran ) (@kirangadakh16) reported 7 minutes ago

  DAILY TOKEN ANALYSIS 🚨 Token : $VIRTUAL WHALES ARE AGGRESSIVELY SCOOPING UP VIRTUAL PROTOCOL ON THE DIPS Smart money is building massive positions as the AI agent ecosystem explodes Virtuals Protocol just integrated directly with Robinhood Chain and hit Binance Wallet's Meme Rush, driving over $150M+ in AI agent trading volume! Plus, since $VIRTUAL has been fully unlocked since 2023, there are absolutely ZERO scheduled token unlocks coming to dump on your face Support : $0.590 and $0.490 Resistance : $0.670 If $VIRTUAL breaks $0.650, we are sending it straight to $0.680 - $0.720 If it gets rejected, the $0.590 - $0.540 zone is the golden buy level

• 
  Ivor (@Ivorkanko) reported 8 minutes ago

  @DeFiTracer Binance = Crypto cartel and CZ is human scum and garbage, to hell with him

• 
  Mercek (@WorldOfMercek) reported 13 minutes ago

  Movement Labs went from raising over $38M and launching at a $10B FDV to filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in just 18 months. Its collapse shows how capital and token hype fail without sustainable ecosystem activity and protocol revenue. Here’s what actually led to Movement’s collapse. — ➤ Everything Changed After the Token Launch The December 2024 movement:native launch became the turning point after a reported sale of 66M tokens by a market maker triggered a rapid loss of confidence. - A reported sale of 66M tokens pushed the price from above $1 to just a few cents. - Community confidence faded as selling pressure accelerated. - Binance scrutiny and an internal investigation soon followed. - Co-founder @rushimanche was later removed. The selloff quickly became a credibility crisis, undermining confidence across the project and its leadership. — ➤ The Business Wasn't Generating Real Demand Movement failed to generate meaningful economic activity despite strong funding and early hype. - Daily app revenue stayed below $800 for months. - Daily chain fees fell into single digits, signaling limited network usage. - Protocol revenue never became strong enough to support long-term operations. As speculative demand faded, protocol revenue never became strong enough to sustain the business. — ➤ The Token Reflected the Business - movement:native fell over 97% from its ATH, while FDV dropped from nearly $10B to around $106M. - Ecosystem activity remained weak, and protocol revenue never materialized. - Treasury reserves continued to shrink as confidence faded. The token followed the business, as weakening fundamentals ultimately led to Chapter 11. — ➤ The Balance Sheet Told the Story The bankruptcy filing exposed how little financial runway remained. • Assets: $100K–$500K • Liabilities: $1M–$10M • Creditors: Around 299 — ➤ My Take Every cycle reminds us that capital and token demand are not product-market fit. Sustainable ecosystems are built on users, builders, and revenue, not valuations. Markets eventually price fundamentals.

• 
  Soressa H (@H15365H) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @AFKBNB FedEx tracking called my phone today; my reward is on the way . Thank for your support 🙏

• 
  Paul Roussel (@PaulRoussel_SEA) reported 14 minutes ago

  @ayewaken @InsertFoolery Hi, following your post, am not really sure I properly understand your collateral issue. Do you mean that previously when trading 100% worth of LUNC on the future, Binance requested to have an additional 30$ worth in another coin to back the trade in case of losses & now it’s only $10?

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 14 minutes ago

  $DEXE's shorts finally got the dump they wanted, 25% off the highs, and now they're the ones running. OI just flipped from piling in to draining, $1.7M of size walked out in the last hour alone. trigger was reportedly team wallets landing on Binance and getting sold, everything since is liquidation cascade. whoever's still in this trade is paying ~$724K a day to hold a $17.2M book while price just sits mid-range, well off today's low. crowd's still 61% long into a coin down 66% since we first flagged it three chapters ago. that's not a small bet to be wrong on. NFA 👀

• 
  Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ (@shanaka86) reported 20 minutes ago

  An attacker created 4.5 million units of a dollar-pegged stablecoin out of a zero address, and the entire attack netted him roughly $912,000. Those 4.5 million tokens were each supposed to be worth a dollar. Selling them destroyed the exact price that made them worth stealing. Balance Coin now trades at 0.001157 dollars, down more than 99%. SlowMist put the loss near 912,000 dollars and PeckShield near 915,000. Balance Coin was issued by Balance Protocol and governed by 42DAO on BNB Chain, and it marketed itself as over-collateralized, backed primarily by Bitcoin Cash according to its own whitepaper. Users locked collateral and minted BLC against it. If collateral value fell too far, vaults liquidated automatically. That automation became the weapon. 42DAO has published nothing, so every technical account of this comes from outside security firms. According to SlowMist, the attacker pushed an abnormally low Binance-pegged Bitcoin price into the protocol's median oracle through its own poke and bark functions. Nothing checked it. Vaults never eligible for liquidation instantly appeared underwater, and the attacker took the collateral. The bad debt and newly minted BLC were dumped into PancakeSwap for USDT, and the peg was finished. SlowMist listed what was missing and it reads like a checklist nobody completed. No price deviation checks. No maximum drawdown limits. No minimum price protection. No liquidation delay. TenArmor identified two transactions, the second roughly two hours later, minting another 5,900 tokens and draining more liquidity. The architecture is the damning part. This was a MakerDAO fork built on Maker's own contract names. Maker solved this exact attack years ago with an oracle security module that holds any new price for a delay before it can act, so an impossible number can be caught and frozen before it touches collateral. The fork copied the engine and left out the brake. The project had publicized a CertiK audit of its BLC minting contract. The mint still produced millions of unbacked tokens, because the failure was never inside the contract that was audited. It was in the number that contract was handed. An audited component is not an audited system. Nothing in the code failed. It ran its safety check. Debt must stay below collateral value. That equation is correct and it returned true. It evaluated a real rule against a fake number. The contract was never tricked into skipping its rules. It obeyed them perfectly inside a world that did not exist. That reframes what collateral means. The asset never secured this system. The price feed did. A protocol cannot act on your reserves. It acts on what it has been told your reserves are worth. You can be honestly, fully, verifiably overcollateralized and still lose everything, because what executes is not the truth. It is the number the code was handed. So the oracle is not a data feed sitting beside the collateral. The oracle is part of the collateral. So is the monitoring. So is whoever holds emergency authority. Strip those out and the deposit ratio on the front page is decoration. This is the warning for everything being tokenized now. Tokenized Treasuries, digital government bonds, real-world asset funds and every collateralized stablecoin need something to tell the chain what things are worth. Tokenization does not remove the middleman. It converts whoever supplies the information into whoever controls the asset. In old finance a wrong number starts a reconciliation that takes days. Here it liquidates the vault, mints the liability, sells both and settles with finality before anyone reads the alert. A blockchain can prove a rule executed. It cannot prove the world that rule assumed was real.

• 
  kepo (@kepochnik) reported 27 minutes ago

  everyone keeps asking what the next big chain after Arc is. GIWA might be it, and almost nobody outside Korea is paying attention yet what it is: GIWA is an Ethereum L2 built on the OP Stack, backed by Dunamu, the parent company of Upbit (Korea's dominant exchange, 13M+ users, #2 globally in cumulative spot volume 2020-2024) the pattern is familiar: Binance has BNB Chain, Coinbase has Base, OKX has X Layer. now Upbit has GIWA. when the biggest exchange in a country builds its own chain, that's usually not a small thing the setup: → announced Sept 2025, built with the Optimism Foundation → first-ever deployment on OP Enterprise "Self-Managed" tier (Upbit controls its own sequencer) → one-second block times, full EVM compatibility → testnet already processed ~100M transactions → private mainnet expected roughly Aug–Sept 2026 → core stack: GIWA Chain + wallet + KRW-backed stablecoin ecosystem important, so nobody gets misled: there's NO confirmed token. no confirmed airdrop. no confirmed incentives. anyone selling you "farm the testnet for the drop" is guessing. the funding numbers floating around ($143M, $1.2B) are Dunamu's, not GIWA's own raise so here's the actual play, and it's not mindless testnet clicking: GASOK, their builder competition, is live for MVP submissions July 1–31. this is the real opportunity. same way people who actually built on Arc early stood out, this is a chance to ship something real on a chain with serious backing before the crowd shows up if you're just farming faucet clicks hoping for a drop that isn't confirmed, imo that's a waste of time. if you're building, this is worth a look still very early. no guarantees on anything. but a chain with Upbit behind it is worth keeping tabs on.

• 
  Chelsea's Finest 💙⚽️ (@Bellarm85) reported 28 minutes ago

  @HenryElizah Tell your upline to help you set a withdrawal password Get a Binance account and withdraw

• 
  defido 👊⛽️ (@defido) reported 29 minutes ago

  Congrats to KET btw, had a dm a month ago saying who to target, and bam a month later, it's now being pushed by the SF fndn obviously. If you want your meme to do well on Solana, there is one thing you must come to grips with, there's no distribution but Solana themselves, Ansem, Ket, these are the runners atm. Bonk only where it is because of the fndn. There's never been a breakout without it. You don't have millions of SOL. This relationship is two sided, the fndn needs memes, the memes need the fndn's coffers to survive, otherwise Binance wins, Justin Sun wins, Chinese whales win, they're experts at this on ETH. And they do, far better than anyone else, good to see it happening. Some will goto tens of billions, others will become marketing material and flash out. But they all share the same need. fndn support.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 29 minutes ago

  🔴 Crypto Exchanges Adopt Proof-of-Reserves Standards Post-FTX Collapse Proof of reserves has shifted from rare practice to industry baseline after FTX's 2022 collapse exposed an $8 billion customer fund shortfall. Exchanges now use cryptographic methods—Merkle trees and zero-knowledge proofs—to let users verify their balances are included in reported liabilities without exposing other account data. • Binance holds ~$1 billion in its Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU) emergency reserve, bootstrapped from trading fees • Binance open-sourced its zk-SNARK verification system and maintains stablecoin reserves (USDT, USDC) above 100% reserve ratios

• 
  Zaro (@Zero_Arb) reported 32 minutes ago

  Exchange counterparty risk assessment: Before deploying capital, check: Tier 1 (lowest risk): • Binance, Coinbase, Kraken • High liquidity, regulated, proven track record Tier 2 (medium risk): • Bybit, OKX, Bitget • Good liquidity, less regulation Tier 3 (higher risk): • Smaller exchanges • Lower liquidity, withdrawal issues possible Never put >30% of capital on Tier 2/3 exchanges FTX taught us this lesson 📊

• 
  Alastar (@AlastarTrades) reported 33 minutes ago

  $BANK update 24 hours since my last post. Price has moved higher, and exchange flows have not slowed down. The picture is one-directional: Binance is the main source. - Net outflow from Binance: ~4M BANK (~$750K), spread across Gate, Bitget, MEXC and KuCoin - Bitget received ~2.4M BANK net and moved 9.6M BANK (~$1.74M) into cold storage in five batches - Gate pulled 4.3M BANK (~$1M) out of cold storage back to its hot wallet, which usually points to elevated withdrawal demand - ~670K BANK entered Binance through ChangeNOW from unlabeled wallets. Someone prefers not to deposit directly. So tokens are leaving Binance and getting distributed across smaller venues, while Bitget keeps sweeping its inflows into cold storage. This looks more like liquidity dispersion than exchange dumping. I'll post an update if the behavior changes. These updates go out in my Telegram before X(link below) #bank #bankusdt

• 
  Jonny Moe (@JonnyMoeTrades) reported 36 minutes ago

  Absolute end of an era Inventors of perps Their downfall was infrastructure reliability and failure to list shitcoins Binance and FTX fixed both those things, copied perps, and it was a slow death

• 
  Ben (@0xbenito_) reported 37 minutes ago

  in less than a year of building tokenized stocks, we've achieved - $8B+ in tokenized stocks volume - 30+ assets for users to trade - bStocks with Binance - Ondo Stocks with Ondo Dex - xStocks assets on BNB and its still only July. if you want to build around stocks on BNB, dm me for some special access 👀

• 
  Greg Miller (@greg_miller05) reported 38 minutes ago

  What are tokenized assets, and why is everyone talking about them? Tokenized assets are digital representations of real-world assets, like financial products or commodities, recorded on a blockchain. This process, known as tokenization, is being explored across different asset types as companies look for ways to bring traditional finance on-chain. The appeal comes down to a few potential benefits: faster settlement, improved transparency, and fractional access, depending on how the product is designed and what rules apply. In theory, this could make certain assets easier to access and trade than they've traditionally been. That said, tokenization is still evolving. Tokenized products can carry real risks, including market risk, liquidity risk, issuer risk, technology risk, and regulatory risk. Availability, eligibility, and rights also vary by product and region, so not everyone can access every product. Binance has introduced certain tokenized or stock-related products in selected markets, such as bStocks, where available. Always check official Binance sources for details, eligibility, and regional availability. Tokenization is where traditional finance and blockchain may intersect, but understanding the risks and checking what applies in your region matters before getting involved. Educational only, not financial advice. Always do your own research and use official sources. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Jeztoshi (@cryptojezuz) reported 38 minutes ago

  $TROLL at $41.35M is the only ticker on Solana right now that's holding structure while the rest of the memecoin board is either chasing pumps or bleeding out. ANSEM flushed 8% today. BUTTCOIN is down another 7.3% and sitting at $9.20M. TROLL dropped half a percent and held the zone. Binance doesn't list tokens that can't survive drawdown. They list the ones that prove liquidity is real when nobody's watching. TROLL's been coiling for weeks with no catalyst, no hype cycle, just bids stacking quietly while volume stays consistent at $2.42M. That's the pattern that precedes exchange listings, not the other way around. If the listing prints, you're positioned sub-$50M before the first distribution candle even forms.

• 
  Feranmi (@Kenny_Tomide) reported 40 minutes ago

  @injective just hit 3 billion onchain transactions. Let that sink in for a second. One of the highest lifetime transaction counts in blockchain history, and they are still moving like it's day one. Rewind to 2018. Eric Chen was a 19 year old NYU dropout. Teamed up with Albert Chon. Got into Binance Labs' first ever incubation batch. Back then Injective was just an L2 DEX on Ethereum trying to fix front running and slow order matching. They didn't stop there. → Built their own Cosmos L1 for serious finance → Mainnet launched November 2021 → Added CosmWasm, EVM, IBC → Now handling perpetuals, #RWAs, tokenized markets at scale From a dropout's idea to 3B transactions. Injective isn't chasing the future of finance. They're building it, block by block. $INJ #Injective

• 
  💥BaiBai💥 (@twkay1) reported 42 minutes ago

  @cz_binance "Always support Binance and CZ."

• 
  0xChen (@0xChenez) reported 42 minutes ago

  I just saw a Stock project listed on Binance Alpha. This shows the Stock meta has only just begun. I called the entry for Asteroid for you guys at around 100k mc. It just crossed 400k mc a moment ago. And I have the following reasons to believe it will go even higher: - Official SpaceX Event in September: The official SpaceX event is coming up this September when the Asteroid plushie goes on sale. - Artist Endorsement: The project has secured official support from the official Asteroid artist. - The Stock Meta: The Stock meta has just started, and Binance is kicking off the play. - Holder Rewards: Since launch, around $10,000 worth of$SPCX rewards have already been distributed to holders. I'm not selling my bag until it hits $10M. Hold to rich or ded. 0x38aAf33082B20AfF2e33433138de920f131B7777

• 
  Jeremiah Mabele (@mabele2003) reported 47 minutes ago

  @mr_bullishh Binance app os letting me down too

• 
  Nodir Tillabayev (@necktomor) reported 48 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet 3. Dear Binance, I can receive funds but I can’t withdraw them. The Withdraw button has been broken for almost 2 weeks despite support confirming it would be fixed within 24 hours.

• 
  Alice (e/nya)🐈‍⬛ (@Alice_comfy) reported 49 minutes ago

  Unethical behavior + stagnation (maybe they were bogged down in legal issues idk). Inverse futures made since before Tether existed but basically meant the platform couldn't have altcoin trading, the matching engine couldn't handle enough trades per second, and conveiniently there were rumors that the "internal market making" desk could trade while said freeze was on. ByBit came out as basically a "BitMEX but the platform actually works" alternative and then FTX did USD margin and a few other things. Binance then copied that with their distribution and there was no real reason to use BitMEX anymore.

• 
  A.r.n 💢 and No (@arnobissnzh) reported 51 minutes ago

  1. The Problem: Finance Is Fragmented Today, one person may use Binance for crypto, a broker for stocks, a bank for savings, and another platform for property. Assets are divided by institutions instead of user needs. The future is removing these walls, not adding more apps.

• 
  𝙈𝙧 𝘽𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝 🚀 (@mr_bullishh) reported 54 minutes ago

  @ReazWeb3 @binance Binance must need to fix this ASAP

• 
  Adrian (@AdriansCryptoo) reported 54 minutes ago

  Movement labs filling for bankruptcy is a sad thing to see After raising over $141M and targeting a $3B valuation, it has all gone down the sink The beginning of the end was the market making scandal that rocked the price of movement:native , getting them banned on Binance and other exchanges. A truly sad way to go out 💔