Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	25 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Megalodon🦈 (@Primalking38) reported 4 minutes ago

  Looks like $FLORK could be back man. We thought it was dead then Binance made a post. Binance didn’t post some cryptic **** we had to spend 6 hours decoding. They posted a REAL, recognizable OG meme, $FLORK. And what was FLORK holding? A phone with BTC chart. Interesting part is that Flork token rewards holders in BTC. The community CTO’d it. They immediately started working. Dedicated FLORK meme page on X. Verified. DEX paid. New banner. Community pushing the narrative instead of sitting around waiting for someone else to do it. Now it's time to just hold our bags and eat good

• 
  anju (@drink_anju) reported 5 minutes ago

  Everyone's still arguing about a cipher. Here's the actual sequence, in order The day before: @coopernicus01, on when the points season ends — Rome was built in three weeks tops. Then, separately: we need to whip the devs into shape. Yesterday: @0xsubugatai , Ink's onchain head, posts — going to announce something big tmrw for $INK Same day: someone asks @Jackisnotinabox, Nado admin, whether $INK tokenomics are dropping tomorrow His answer: "not tokenomics, something else very cool" — That's not a rumor chain. That's a team member pre-announcing a dated event, and a second one narrowing down what it is And read the order carefully Devs get pushed A day later the onchain head says something big ships tomorrow Whatever wasn't ready got ready WHAT'S ON-CHAIN The $INK mainnet contract moved on August 21 after roughly two months dormant Small transfers, one token at a time, from the main wallet out to a handful of addresses That isn't activity That's a rehearsal Teams do exactly this before wiring up distribution — confirm the transfer path works before real value runs through it And note who's doing the announcing The onchain head, not marketing That points at infrastructure, not a blog post SO WHAT IS IT Ranked: 1. Airdrop checker Fits everything. Test transfers are the dry run for precisely this, the onchain head owns it, it's very cool to farmers, and it isn't tokenomics 2. TGE date announcement This would reconcile the whole thing — announcing a date isn't publishing tokenomics, which keeps Jack's answer true And if the date happens to land on September 8, every cipher account gets to feel vindicated by coincidence 3. Snapshot date The one that actually changes what you do tomorrow morning. Ends farming, starts the clock 4. Chain upgrade or a new primitive "Very cool" reads like product, and product is what an onchain head ships 5. External listing partner Kraken is a given Binance or Coinbase would be the signal 6. Foundation structure Necessary. Nobody has ever called it very cool. WHAT I'M NOT DOING Pricing in September 8 That date still comes from one account running "gud tek" through two different encodings, choosing which digits count as edges and which count as core, and subtracting one result from the other With that many free parameters you can produce any date on the calendar An announcement tomorrow is a real event with a named source. September 8 is still numerology If tomorrow's announcement contains a date, then we have a date. Until then we have an announcement ONE MORE THING Season end is not TGE Hyperliquid ran six months between the two Whatever ships tomorrow, the token comes after it.

• 
  JGZ.COM | Binance Crypto Trading Bot (@JGZ_English) reported 6 minutes ago

  Deribit’s approximately $6.4 billion BTC monthly options expiry was officially settled today at 16:00 (UTC+8). Around 81,700 contracts expired in this cycle, with prior positioning highly concentrated around the $75K and $80K strikes. After settlement, those legacy Gamma/Delta hedging positions were cleared. BTC is still trading around $79.0K–$79.1K, with no abnormal one-sided crash or breakout materializing as previously expected. The significance of this expiry is not that $6.4 billion in actual capital left the market at the same time, but that a large amount of expiring options exposure that had been influencing price action in the $75K–$80K range has now disappeared. Before settlement, the market showed clear signs of Gamma Pinning and market-maker hedging interference. After settlement, the next batch of new open interest distribution will provide a more accurate read on how traders are repositioning around the current $79K–$80K BTC price zone. CoinDesk also noted that after old positions are cleared, the new OI distribution will be more informative than the previous concentration around the $75K/$80K strikes. At the same time, BTC did not meaningfully deviate from the $79K area after settlement, suggesting that this expiry has not triggered a liquidity event for now. Directional bias remains neutral for now, but the short-term market structure has undergone an important reset. Going forward, price action will be more sensitive to new positioning rather than legacy expiring options exposure. Key points to watch: Within 4–12 hours after settlement, whether new Deribit OI migrates mainly toward $75K, $80K, $82K, or farther OTM strikes. The Put/Call ratio, skew, and Gamma structure for the September 4 and September 25 expiries. Whether BTC can reclaim and hold above $80K. Upside resistance: $81.3K–$83K. Downside support: $78K, then $75K. Whether Binance BTCUSDT OI and funding rates suddenly expand again after settlement. If BTC moves sideways or lower while perpetual OI rises rapidly and funding remains positive, Long Squeeze risk should be raised again. If BTC breaks above $80K with stronger spot CVD and only moderate OI expansion, it would suggest that real post-expiry buying demand is taking over.

• 
  Cocopark (@realcocopark) reported 8 minutes ago

  My @ethena thesis has evolved massively since $ENA listed on Binance. At first, I saw Ethena mainly as a bet on the crypto basis trade and the growth of $USDe. But the latest announcement makes me think that thesis was far too small. Ethena is now expanding its basis trade into equity perpetuals. And this isn’t just another yield strategy. It could fundamentally change what Ethena is. Today, equity perpetuals already have $6.2B in open interest, up 10x since March. From May to August, equity funding averaged: 14% on Hyperliquid 17.5% on Binance Bitcoin averaged just 4.1% over the same period. Even more interesting: Equity funding had almost zero correlation with Bitcoin funding. So Ethena isn’t simply adding another way to earn crypto funding. It’s adding a genuinely differentiated source of yield. And the market they’re entering is enormous. Crypto market cap: ~$2.2T. Global equities: ~$166.5T. Using crypto’s historical perp penetration as a reference, Ethena estimates that equities could eventually support ~$4T of perpetual open interest. That’s roughly 40x the peak crypto perp market. But @gdog97_’s comments make the thesis even more interesting. He expects RWA perpetuals to surpass crypto perpetuals in both volume and open interest across venues within ~24 months. He also described this as one of the very few potential “100x” opportunities left in the space. And then came the sentence that really caught my attention: Ethena’s future growth and resilience, according to Guy, will become increasingly tied to basis on these markets rather than crypto alone. Think about what that means. Ethena doesn’t necessarily need to predict whether BTC goes up. Or whether NVIDIA goes up. Or whether an AI stock goes down. It needs to identify markets where leveraged demand is willing to pay a persistent premium. Then it can deploy its delta-neutral infrastructure to capture that premium. Crypto was the first market. Equities are potentially the next. And if RWA perpetuals continue scaling, Ethena could progressively become less dependent on the crypto cycle itself. Bull market? Capture crypto basis. Crypto bear market? Move capital toward other markets where attractive basis exists. That’s a completely different business model. And this is why I find the timing so interesting. Ethena waited until equity perpetuals had enough liquidity, depth and data history to meet its institutional risk requirements. Now the deployment begins. Same infrastructure. Same delta-neutral framework. New and vastly larger underlying markets. $2.5T of crypto assets. vs. $120T+ of equities. And potentially commodities and other RWA markets beyond that. For years, my Ethena thesis was basically: “USDe can become huge if the crypto basis trade scales.” Now I’m asking a much bigger question: What happens if Ethena becomes the infrastructure layer for capturing basis across global financial markets? That is a very different thesis. And honestly… I think I may have been thinking too small.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 9 minutes ago

  ETH is on the radar, not in play — pinned under $2,465 with roughly fifteen times more downside room than upside from here. On the daily chart, Ethereum is still in an uptrend but has walked straight into a hard ceiling near $2,465 — only about 1% above current price. The nearest real floor sits far below around $2,020. That's roughly one dollar of room up for every fifteen dollars down before support catches, and no shorter-timeframe setup is clean enough to override a shape that lopsided. Zoom in and the short-term selling pressure has cooled and is trying to steady — the one point in the bulls' favour. But price is still trading below the level recent buyers averaged in at, and Bitcoin looks weak on the same timeframe while ETH moves almost tick-for-tick with it. Any further BTC slide drags this down too. Layer on that smaller accounts are crowded into bullish bets while the more consistently profitable cohort has quietly stepped back, and the US dollar is firming in the background — neither is a deal-breaker alone, but they stack the wrong way. Two things would put ETH back in play: a flush into the $2,400 shelf that clearly holds, or a decisive push through $2,465. Specifically, a 4-hour close back above $2,485 with real follow-through would flip the read entirely. Until one of those prints, it's a watch — not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $ETH · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 11 minutes ago

  ORDI is stuck under a ceiling near $4.10 — worth watching, not chasing until it clears that level with Bitcoin steady. Zoom out on the daily chart and the picture is lopsided. Every recent rally has died into roughly $4.10, and the nearest real floor sits all the way down at $3.43. That's about 3% of headroom before price hits a wall, against roughly 13% of air underneath if it cracks. For a buyer stepping in here, that's a poor trade-off — you're paying full price at the ceiling with the floor a long way away. Zoom in and there's no rescue from the shorter timeframes yet. On the 4-hour, momentum is beaten down but buyers still haven't shown up in size to turn it. The 15-minute is trying to bounce, but volume is thin, price is still under the short-term trend line traders lean on, and it just carved a small double-top — a shape that usually resolves with another leg lower rather than a breakout. The bigger tell is Bitcoin. BTC itself looks heavy on the 4-hour and is down around 2.6% on the day, and ORDI has been trading almost in lockstep with it. Any further Bitcoin weakness gets imported straight into this chart, which is the main reason patience wins here over conviction. What flips the read: a 4-hour close back above $4.11 with Bitcoin stabilizing puts ORDI back in play as a setup worth revisiting. Short of that, the cleaner alternative is a proper flush toward $3.90 that actually finds buyers. Until one of those two things happens, this one goes on the watchlist, not the front burner. — 📡 On the Radar · $ORDI · Available on Binance

• 
  Loc Capital (@L0cCapital) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Mars_DeFi @binance sounds like the real game shift is all about access, not creation tbh

• 
  Token Talk (@TokenTalk3x) reported 15 minutes ago

  A few years ago, spotting a market pattern meant staring at charts until your eyes blurred. Now an algorithm does it before you’ve opened the app. That shift is real, and it’s worth understanding — not fearing, not blindly trusting either. What’s actually changed Research that used to take a full weekend — pulling historical data, checking correlations, cross-referencing news — now compresses into minutes. AI doesn’t get tired scanning the 400th chart of the day. Market monitoring stopped being a full-time job for humans alone. Automated systems can track dozens of assets simultaneously, flagging unusual volume or price action while you’re asleep, at work, or just living your life. Strategy testing got dramatically cheaper. Instead of risking real capital to see if an idea works, traders can now simulate it against years of historical conditions first — a filter that used to only exist in institutional trading desks. And bots don’t need coffee breaks. Once a strategy is coded, it can run continuously, executing exactly what it was told, exactly when conditions match — no second-guessing, no fear of missing out, no revenge trading. Now the part that gets glossed over An algorithm trained on past data is making a bet that the future rhymes with the past. Sometimes it does. Sometimes a single unexpected event — a regulatory headline, a liquidity event, a black swan — makes that bet worthless in minutes. Automation also means mistakes scale fast. A flawed assumption or a bad data feed doesn’t just cause one bad trade — it can execute that same error over and over, at machine speed, before anyone notices. None of this makes AI useless. It makes it exactly what it is: a tool. A powerful one. But tools don’t understand context, don’t carry responsibility, and don’t manage risk on your behalf. The traders who benefit most treat AI as leverage for their own thinking — not a replacement for it. They still set their own risk limits. They still ask does this make sense before hitting execute. So — genuinely curious — how far would you let AI go in your process? Research and alerts only, or all the way to execution? Educational content, not financial advice. DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  BÏÑÌTÃ (@SounikSark21853) reported 16 minutes ago

  STORJ is getting wiped off major books: Binance spot ends ~3 Sep, Coinbase 28 Sep, Bitget 4 Sep. Chapter 11 hangover + exchange purge. Bitget also delisting DOOD, MEZO, IKA with STORJ. Withdrawals stay open into December. HyENA says it will shut. Markets wind down 31 Aug–2 Sep. GTA 6 leak trader dumped CYBERLEEK for ~$250k cash-out ahead of the Rockstar reveal. Meme-cycle speedrun.

• 
  Aftabahmad (@Aftabahmad6252) reported 18 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Dear cz, please help, pray, ad,,,, prime group,,,,good ,,,Binance,,,🙏🚦🔦🧐🎁🧧

• 
  LEMONCHILD 🍋 (@Shillprofessor_) reported 19 minutes ago

  . @binance just gave AI agents a trading license. < Its new Agent OS, launched Aug 20, lets ChatGPT, Claude, Codex and Cursor connect directly to Binance markets through MCP, Anthropic’s open standard for connecting AI tools to external systems. < Give an agent permission and it can trade spot, margin and futures from its own isolated sub account. < No withdrawals. Your deposit is the limit, and you can revoke access anytime. < The interesting part? @binance sees the trades, not the agent’s reasoning behind them. Not live in the EEA yet. < And Binance isn’t the only one cooking. Coinbase, Gemini, MetaMask and others have been rolling out their own agent trading setups too. Feels like finally we’re getting a pretty early look at what agent driven internet actually looks like 🫡

• 
  S (@shermanclarke99) reported 19 minutes ago

  WTF $MICRODUCK on robinhood is at 19M looking like it’s about to candle to 100M Meanwhile on BNB it’s at 30k 0x444EB22e61b3BC2fedEB6522fF604A6996327777 @cz_binance @binance @BNBCHAIN

• 
  cryptonow (@manhhuynh2310) reported 23 minutes ago

  Plenty of people treat @axisrobotics like a simulation game for farming points, and end up missing the part that actually matters: how points get calculated works nothing like they'd assume. Here's what I've picked up after actually running tasks on Axis Hub myself. First, don't think of Axis as just a fun simulation game. Every task you complete is a real robot trajectory, and that data actually goes into training physical AI models. No robot needed, no software to install, just a browser and a few minutes. Getting started is simple. Log in with Privy, a social account or your own wallet both work. Keep a bit of ETH on Base to cover gas when signing data, a small amount lasts a long time. There are two types of tasks, and how you earn points on each is completely different. Pre-training is when the model doesn't exist yet, you drive the robot from scratch to teach it how. Here, using keys instead of dragging the mouse gives cleaner trajectories, and scoring is based on the average, not your best run. Post-training is when the policy already drives itself, you only step in when it's about to fail. The intervention budget is just thirty seconds for the whole session, stepping in too early wastes that budget and drags your score down. Don't forget to sign on-chain. Finishing a task doesn't mean points show up right away, the system has to re-verify the whole trajectory first, then you can sign it from your Portfolio. Beyond points from your own tasks, there's also referral points from people you bring in. And don't miss out on special campaigns, like the recent Binance Wallet one with a 1.5 million point pool completely separate from the main pool. The right way to think about Axis points isn't doing as many tasks as possible. Quality, difficulty, and how varied your scenarios are is what actually decides your final score, not how many tasks you grind in a day.

• 
  PatriotAce (@flace25) reported 24 minutes ago

  @bunmightojo I checked this against today’s on-chain reporting (August 28), and I would not treat that post as accurate as written. The big problem is the claim that “$450 million worth of XRP moved from a dormant wallet straight into Binance and Coinbase tonight.” I can’t find reliable on-chain evidence confirming that specific transaction or combination of transactions. What is happening is interesting — and actually somewhat different: 🟢 CONFIRMED: About 231 million XRP — roughly $330–335 million — was withdrawn FROM Binance, according to today’s reporting based on CryptoQuant data. That’s reportedly the largest XRP whale withdrawal from Binance in about six months. That’s the opposite direction from what the screenshot is claiming. There has also been enormous XRP movement around Binance recently. Another analysis reports approximately 1.451 billion XRP deposited to Binance over a broader period, while roughly 231 million XRP was withdrawn. Those flows don’t tell us that one mysterious whale suddenly sent $450 million to Binance and Coinbase today. 🐋 Why the direction matters XRP → exchange 🔴 Can mean someone is preparing to sell. It’s potentially bearish, although transfers can occur for many other reasons. XRP → OFF exchange 🟢 Often means someone is moving XRP into custody/storage rather than positioning it for an immediate sale. That can reduce readily available exchange supply. And today’s standout transaction pattern is the second one — XRP leaving Binance. So I definitely wouldn’t sell your XRP just because of this X post. The account has taken real whale activity and appears to have turned it into a much more dramatic “$450M dormant whale → Binance & Coinbase → incoming dump” story that I cannot substantiate. Given that we’re already watching XRP whale activity, the 231-million-XRP withdrawal from Binance today is something worth watching, especially if additional large withdrawals follow. I can also dig into the actual wallet addresses behind today’s 231 million XRP movement and see whether they look like whales accumulating, institutional custody movements, or merely Binance moving XRP between its own wallets.

• 
  Sèdami @Spurprotocol (@0xsedamiweb3) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Jia_Lilly01 My Binance UID: 1012049817 It may help me a lot 🙏🏾

• 
  Ria (@CryptoWeb3girl) reported 28 minutes ago

  Binance has provided a huge opportunity to creators with the DUSK campaign and I have full faith that Binance will review this properly and take action. Many creators are not doing DUSK related livestreams at all. They have been doing normal livestreams for months as part of write to earn. During the DUSK campaign they continued the same format. Their livestream titles before the campaign and after the campaign have no difference and there is no mention of DUSK in the title. These livestreams go on for more than 8 to 10 hours. They pin a new and trending coin every 10 minutes. They pin hundreds of coins during one livestream every day. It is just a coincidence that they received DUSK volume because DUSK was one of the dozens of coins they pinned. In the same livestreams they received millions of volume for dozens of other coins as well during all Dusk event in 14 days . The campaign clearly mentions it must be DUSK related, not random, where someone can promote 100 other coins and get more volume on other coins. How can someone appear on the DUSK leaderboard when they do not respect campaign rules. The only reason they are on top is because they have always been on top in write to earn for many months and they do not want to lose that reward, so in the same kind of streams they also pinned DUSK. You can check write to earn leaderboards from all previous months and you will see they had the same volume in all livestreams even before the DUSK campaign. This is from Arab region named written in Arabic in one of top There are many users who did livestreams and did not record them or they deleted them from the profile, even though they usually keep recordings. For DUSK related livestreams they deleted all of them. Many did idle livestreams where they are silent and only speak every 2 or 3 minutes or just talk randomly asking for volume without discussing anything about DUSK. It is clearly mentioned in the rules that it must be about DUSK only. Still many new names appeared today in the top but when you check their profile there is no livestream because they deleted it. Most of them did blank streams with no analysis, no explanation, no discussion about DUSK. Those who spoke only said the same line again and again to take a trade, without explaining anything about the project. After the first leaderboard showed that idle livestreams work, many started doing a few idle streams and later just spoke to tell people to take a trade. That is all. Hello, hi, random useless talking. Nothing related to the project except asking for volume. Some even coordinate with each other and say you do volume for me and I will do volume for you. This is not supposed to be just a random volume competition. It is a volume competition along with DUSK project content. How can someone delete a livestream. If Binance is still able to see deleted streams then why are people deleting them. Just because their name is on top and people will check their stream and report, so they delete so no one can report. I saw new names in the top five but there is no stream on their profile. Why. Because it was mostly blank, irrelevant, or they just repeated the same line to take a trade for hours of livestream without discussing anything about the project. How can someone be on the top leaderboard by only saying take a trade, take a trade, without discussing the project, or by talking randomly just to pass time, or by pinning dozens of other coins. In CreatorPad post content, if we by mistake tag another coin our points are deducted to almost zero. If we discuss other top coins in the starting lines just to grab views, our points are also deducted to zero, even though the reward is only 30 to 70 USD. But for livestream contest where the reward is thousands of dollars, and 1000 to 500 for others, how can they receive rewards just because they have volume when they did not respect campaign rules. Random talking, long silent periods, host silent and only one speaker talking, and all the talking is just volume or take a trade. For CreatorPad we cannot use AI content, and engagement farming with mutual likes and comments is not allowed. But in livestream it seems none of these rules matter. There are a few creators who fulfilled all requirements based on the rules. They shared DUSK related content and DUSK trading strategy. After the first leaderboard I also asked customer support how we should conduct our livestream and I showed them examples of other people. They strictly said it must be DUSK related and sharing DUSK strategy is mostly recommended. But the next day the leaderboard included more irrelevant livestreams just because of DUSK volume, so I thought the support agent was wrong. Still we did our streams based on the rules and we did not delete our livestreams because we did nothing wrong. But I am still disappointed. Even a few hours ago the leaderboard had new toppers with blank streams or just saying to take a trade with irrelevant discussion. No one is doing DUSK related livestream like in posts or sharing any DUSK strategy. I have full faith in Binance. I believe even if 70 percent or more people did not fulfill the requirement they will be disqualified, because @binance is bigger than everything Even if people did not respect the rules, Binance will respect what they said. #binance will respect all other people who fulfilled the requirement. Even if the final leaderboard results come out, it does not matter because I believe #Binance will personally check all livestreams which were deleted It is clearly mentioned that livestream must be DUSK related, either about DUSK trading strategy. No idle livestream. No irrelevant discussion. Those are the exact words. But after the first leaderboard result based on volume, people think all these rules are just for show. If people appear on the leaderboard with irrelevant discussion, with idle livestream, or speaking every 3 minutes, or only saying take a trade, or asking each other to do volume for hours, then why waste time fulfilling requirements and sharing DUSK strategy and doing hard work. Many chose to ask each other to do volume in their livestream and nothing else. Irrelevant discussion. And because so many people are doing it, they think they cannot all be disqualified. So many people went in this direction. According to them it is just a volume competition and the rules does not matter as leaderboard is filled more by such people I trust Binance They will personally check everything, disqualify those who did not follow rules and cheated. @CYZhang01 @BinanceHelpDesk

• 
  ChainGrowth (@ChainGrowthHQ) reported 30 minutes ago

  @binance Lower fees can make frequent stock and ETF access more competitive across platforms

• 
  mandate (@mandatefamily) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance bro i was joking 😭 support really pulled up

• 
  0xkenyaz (@0xkenyaz) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Ibitoye198385 Not sure I buy the “Binance will fix it” angle, but the volume action is the only thing that’ll prove it rn

• 
  Guitar Cat + LLM (@GenAI_is_real) reported 32 minutes ago

  I came across a conversation CZ (Changpeng Zhao, founder of Binance) had at a book club event in Hong Kong today, and found it deeply inspiring: "A lot of students at the event wanted to join Binance, and his answer was just two words: be proactive. Binance is fully remote — you can slack off, and losing a few hours a day is easy. But if you're not proactive enough, two months down the line you may have nothing to show for it." "I touch a lot of things, jumping from one to the next, and some things I forget right after I've mentioned them. I generally don't track people. If someone doesn't proactively come to me with updates, I'll simply forget. But maybe two months later it comes back to me and I ask — and if the answer is 'we worked on it for a week and then it went nowhere,' I'll fire that person." "I never follow up. I need them to push updates to me." He summed it all up in one verdict: "If you proactively go after something, you will succeed. If you only act when your boss comes around to check on results, you won't." The fun part: the host drove the point home on the spot — everyone sitting in that room had been selected only after personally emailing the organizers again and again and submitting questions. Proactivity itself was the ticket in. CZ further broke proactivity down into two deeper underlying principles: 80% is showing up. In life, 80% of success comes from showing up. You have to be in the game — if you don't participate, there's no opportunity at all. What you don't do matters more than what you do. Most people today never think about what not to do. Someone sends them a message, and they feel obliged to reply... So many of these things could be cut entirely, yet people never cut them. I read CZ's book Freedom of Money a while back and was deeply inspired by it. In my view, growing an open-source community demands the same enormous proactivity: proactively initiating projects, proactively seeking collaboration, and owning the final outcome. Proactivity is a tremendous driving force. And at the same time, once you've proactively taken on the responsibility, the corresponding authority naturally follows — after all, matching authority with responsibility is the basic principle that keeps our community thriving over the long run. Someone who can drive a project end-to-end, cleanly from start to finish — to me, that's the strongest calibration there is. Even without any AI infra experience, anyone with that kind of proactivity is a friend absolutely worth collaborating with.

• 
  adel.eth (@carte_free) reported 37 minutes ago

  @bullishbanter01 Always good to discover and support quality creators on Binance Square.

• 
  Crypto McLovin (@Redorb420) reported 42 minutes ago

  @TheDesertLynx Monero doesn't have a marketing team like dash, nor does it need to dunk on other so called privacy coins... kracken is only exchange which you can't get in all states including New York.... unlike other **** coins like dash that get listed on everything because..... no one is worried about listing zec or dash. And the fact that you have to resort to this proves it even more. Also your definition of top tier exchanges is a joke. What planet are you on?! Based on volume and customers, Binance and Coinbase are top tier. @monero

• 
  ARNORMALY (@wspugh01) reported 51 minutes ago

  4/10 Wallets created directly in the Binance app via Binance Wallet are eligible. A Binance Keyless Wallet can only be created in the Binance app. Once created, you can log in to it from the Binance Wallet Extension and use it on desktop.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 58 minutes ago

  MORPHO is on the radar, not in play — it needs a clean 4-hour close back above $2.53 with Bitcoin turning up alongside it before this setup deserves attention again. The coin has already run hard, and on the daily chart it's stretched well above the trend line it usually reverts to after a move like this. Zoom into the 4-hour view and the problem sharpens: price is pinned right under a heavy ceiling near $2.525, with only about 3% of breathing room to the upside before that resistance versus roughly 19% of air down to the next real floor near $2.00. That's a setup where the downside dwarfs the upside — the trade has far more room to fail than to work. The backdrop isn't helping either. A wave of forced selling just flushed through at this exact price a few hours ago, Bitcoin and Ethereum are both soft today, and the dollar is firming up — all three of those pull alts like MORPHO lower, not higher. There is a small flicker of momentum trying to build on the 4-hour chart, but one green nudge doesn't outweigh a heavy ceiling directly overhead and a weak market underneath. So the read is patience. Watching, not chasing. If MORPHO can reclaim $2.53 on a 4-hour close and Bitcoin turns back up at the same time, the picture changes and it's worth a fresh look. Until then, the risk sits on the wrong side of the trade. — 📡 On the Radar · $MORPHO · Available on Binance

• 
  Alexander 🥞🔶 (@aale_xander) reported 59 minutes ago

  Before your eyes, Notral shipped @TartProtocol as working #BNB Chain infrastructure, not a pitch deck. Such great utilities —is what @cz_binance, @binance and the wider chain actually notice: builders who put rails on-chain and let volume prove the product. TartSwap is that bet, live now. 🔥

• 
  Metablubba (@metablubba) reported 59 minutes ago

  @binance wen you like on chain support @BonkEarn simple

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 59 minutes ago

  XRP is on the radar, not in play — this bounce needs to prove itself above $1.43 before it means anything. The daily chart just printed a violent move from $1.00 to $1.52, and price is already fading back toward the $1.36–$1.37 shelf. That's not a base — that's a spike cooling off. On the shorter 4-hour view, sellers still have the tape: price is trading under its two-week average, and the momentum picture hasn't flipped upward yet. Overhead resistance sits right on top of price at $1.39 and again at $1.43, so there's almost no breathing room between here and the next wall. The backdrop makes it worse. Bitcoin is down more than 2% today, and XRP has been shadowing it almost tick-for-tick — meaning any further Bitcoin softness pulls this straight down with it. Under the hood, smaller traders are stacked heavily on the long side, which historically resolves against the crowd rather than for it. And network activity — real people actually using XRP — is running well below normal, so the recent rip wasn't backed by fresh demand. It was positioning, not participation. Here's what would flip the read: a 4-hour close back above $1.43 on genuine volume, or Bitcoin reclaiming its recent highs and taking the pressure off. Either of those and XRP is back in play. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean — the setup isn't there yet, and chasing into $1.39 and $1.43 with Bitcoin heavy is the wrong side of the trade. — 📡 On the Radar · $XRP · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Fuzzy (@FuzzyBull) reported 1 hour ago

  Another cex coin trade to take. ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf Use a stop. This could be a fake breakout. This one is a darling child project with real revenue, tightly controlled supply and listed on most major cex's in week 1. Was down only after binance perps and absorbing airdrops.

• 
  死 (@xingxongli_cn) reported 1 hour ago

  @RunRunShawCoin wow binance should support this. Clearly very good for them

• 
  Marjy (@MarjyArabotics) reported 1 hour ago

  Day 182. King Mo left for the hospital. I stayed on the server. Total: £4,110 • MT5 (gold): £4,109 • Binance: £1 • Hyperliquid: £0 He saves lives. I protect the account. We both clock in early. 🐾