Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	28 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  CTM (@CryptoTalkMan) reported 6 minutes ago

  So @Binance gave us a hint 10 hours ago and everyone missed it? No no no. CTM SAW IT. Binance randomly posted: “brx ghfrghg wklv jp” Looks like complete gibberish to 99% of CT. But decode it and you get: “you decoded this gm” And what did I immediately say? “It’s the $FLORK language.” While everyone was wondering WTF Binance was talking about, I was already connecting the dots. And now this is getting ridiculous. Binance has posted FLORK FOUR TIMES. Not one. Not two. Not three. FOUR ******* TIMES. And now @cz_binance the founder of Binance — REPOSTED IT. At what point do we stop calling this a coincidence? I’ve been screaming about this narrative while the clues were happening in real time. Binance keeps posting FLORK. Now they’re literally speaking the language. And CZ himself just amplified it. AND HERE’S THE CRAZIEST PART… While I’m sitting here writing all these $FLORK posts and connecting the dots, I’ve already been rewarded over $5,000 WORTH OF BTCB JUST FOR HOLDING THE MEMECOIN. Read that again. I’m holding a ******* memecoin based on the character Binance keeps posting… AND THE MEME IS PAYING ME IN BITCOIN. You literally couldn’t write a more degen narrative if you tried. CTM SAW IT. The question is… DID YOU PAY ATTENTION? $FLORK I’m more ******* bullish than ever. KLJKHU! (means HIGHER in $FLORK language)

• 
  Telbloggram (@Telbloggram) reported 11 minutes ago

  Binance Futures will list HK0625USDT U margined Quanto Perps Binance Perps will launch the HK0625USDT Quanto perpetual contract on September 1, 2026 at 10:45, with a maximum leverage of up to 20 times and support for multi-asset mode. [ChainCatcher] - link

• 
  simone (@SimonieGranger) reported 13 minutes ago

  wrote down everything i own to check if even one thing had tokenized stock exposure. found an expired binance card and a strong feeling that the $29.5B in transfer volume is just the same few wallets passing assets back and forth for the screenshot

• 
  Hua BNB (@Hua_BNB) reported 17 minutes ago

  Guys, I get 1M+ views every month on @binance Square. I’ve been a little inactive recently, otherwise my monthly views usually reach around 2.5M – 3M. Overall, my profile has received 146M+ views, and I have 150K+ followers on Binance Square. So, if there are any project teams with tokens already listed on Binance who are looking for a collaboration, feel free to comment on this post and/or DM me. I’m genuinely interested in working on paid collaborations with serious projects. Let’s connect! 🤝

• 
  BoxZero (@benn3111) reported 18 minutes ago

  (continue) I asked binance, binance cant help. He asked me to report to police, i am 1000% sure indonesian police cant help, im gonna lose lot more money like the other scam cases i faced before.. which never finished until now, the scammer got lost easily.

• 
  Adi | Resolved Markets (@AdiFlips) reported 20 minutes ago

  Day 6: Building a Profitable Polymarket Bot Measurement of the reaction chain: We downloaded all Bitcoin trades on Binance for the same hour, with millisecond timestamps. We aligned three event streams: Bitcoin trades, order book updates, and the wallet's fills. Measurement of the reaction chain. The hour contained 29 Bitcoin moves of $5 or more within one second. After such a move, the market makers reprice the order book within a median of 0.2 seconds. The wallet's fill arrives after a median of 0.8 seconds. The wallet is four times slower than the market makers. It buys at prices set after the reprice. The wallet needs no fast data feed and has none. Measurement of the trigger: The wallet's purchases have two roles. An opening purchase increases the one-sided position; 26% of fills have this role. A completing purchase pairs off an earlier purchase; 74% of fills have this role. Opening purchases follow the Bitcoin direction: in 68% of cases with a nonzero Bitcoin move in the prior 2 seconds, the wallet buys the token on the side of the move. Completing purchases follow the order book, not Bitcoin. Measurement of the timing rule: The wallet completes a pair in 2 to 7 seconds when the second token is cheap. When the first token fell more than 3 cents, the second token is expensive, and the wallet waits: the median delay rises to 20 seconds. The wallet holds the one-sided position below approximately 200 shares at all times. At the end of the 5-minute period, it completes every open pair at any price. Measurement of the result: This hour was a loss. The Bitcoin price trended instead of oscillated. The wallet paid $5,444 for tokens, received $5,250 at settlement, and paid $123.77 in fees. The net result after the 37% rebate is approximately −$272. In the worst market, the wallet bought DOWN at $0.78, the Bitcoin price reversed in the final 10 seconds, and the wallet paid $0.88 and $0.92 for UP tokens. Those pairs cost $1.66 and $1.70. The forced completion converts an unknown loss into a known loss. The 93-day profit is an average over good hours and hours like this one.

• 
  Dan (@dancrypto) reported 21 minutes ago

  The new memestock-3:native website is officially LIVE. Another piece of the puzzle just clicked into place. The chart has been making new highs, mainstream attention is arriving, Binance Wallet accessibility is here and now the entire brand has a proper home. This is what I want to see. Not just price going up. Infrastructure getting better while attention grows. The GameStop of memecoins keeps leveling up. memestock-3:native is building for something much bigger.

• 
  samia saba (@Samiasaba_75) reported 22 minutes ago

  1.5M Axis Points Are Now Up for Grabs @axisrobotics has launched a new 30-day campaign for Binance Wallet users, with a total reward pool of 1,500,000 Axis Points. Want to participate? Log in to Axis Hub through the Binance Wallet Extension Open the Binance Wallet campaign page Complete the available tasks, with up to 5 trajectories per task When your status shows “Sign,” sign the run on-chain from your Portfolio Reviews may take up to 48 hours. One important detail: eligibility is limited to Axis Hub accounts created using a Binance Keyless (MPC) Wallet created directly through Binance Wallet. Imported seed-phrase wallets are not eligible. This is a separate campaign with its own Points pool, so Binance Wallet users should definitely take a look.

• 
  Elijah Nkosi (@deeptiswiss) reported 22 minutes ago

  @MoneyLord @binance ngl this has to be a bot error or something

• 
  Aceattorneybrainrot2 (@Aceattorney07) reported 27 minutes ago

  @gomtu_xyz @okx i just hate this scamers , sorry this happend, but asking help from binance for someone stealing your coins on okx ? man do you know binance and okx are in constant war 😬 focus on okx ,this happened on their watch ,they should help if its possible at all...

• 
  whashywash (@whashywash) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Hacker_Fuckvc @QINGCHUN7729 yo mr hacker, would you support a bnb coin for your narrative to takeover. it'd be funny too because binance banned you and if your coin went high enough then they'd have to acknowledge you.

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Alamin9900 @kanchi_jeevan @axisrobotics Hello. Please make sure you are using the Binance Wallet Extension on desktop and have signed in there with your Binance Keyless Wallet before completing the tasks. You can also try switching networks and checking again. If you have already done this and the issue still persists, please contact the project team through their official Discord channel for further assistance. - HN

• 
  JCooks (@JamieJohnsonArm) reported 35 minutes ago

  This was unexpected. As far as we were aware from the original creator of this thread, btcpay86 was CZ. Given the evidence, ChatGPT estimated the probability of btcpay86 belonging to CZ at 95-99%. There was significant evidence to support this assumption. Even the Binance Co-Founder has referenced this exact github that was linked to his profile back then. Perhaps there was something we are not seeing. Where there is smoke, there is often fire.

• 
  Kerukeion (@thekerukeion) reported 36 minutes ago

  this is the exact failure mode. wallet goes public, someone watches the balance build for months, then drains it the moment there’s enough to justify the gas. staked KAITO unwound, restaked into a Pendle YT position, routed out through Mayan, gone in under a minute once it started moving. every step was visible before it happened. that’s not a KAITO problem or a Pendle problem, that’s what happens when your entire position history sits on a public ledger for anyone to watch and time. hope OKX and Binance can actually help freeze something on their end, but this is why more of us are moving toward payment rails that don’t expose the balance in the first place.

• 
  maxlevelskitzo (@MaxLvlSkitzo) reported 37 minutes ago

  Owning both doesn’t make the dichotomy fake. One coin hid a four-year circuit bug that could mint inside the private pool with no fingerprint. The other got delisted off 70+ exchanges for refusing a transparent mode. Those are different products.Zcash’s “better cryptography” only applies to a clean z-to-z spend. Most ZEC isn’t that. t-addresses, pool hops, view keys, and lightwallets are endpoints. Analysts label large slices of ZEC flow because the public side of the ledger exists on purpose. That’s how it stays on Coinbase and in an ETF. Monero paid for default privacy. No foundation to take the meeting. No compliant off-switch. CCS instead of a company. RandomX. Tail emission. Atomic swaps after Binance and Kraken EEA dumped it. IRS money went into metadata theater, not a broken spend proof. You can hold both. Don’t call optional privacy plus an emergency pool migration “just factual” superiority. The ringer Monero went through is the cost of every spend looking the same. ZEC kept the door open. That’s the split.

• 
  MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported 39 minutes ago

  Here’s the part people actually need to understand. The $XRP Ledger can have new software installed and still not have the new features turned on. Those are two different things. Think of it like this. The update is already sitting on the computers that run the network, but the network still has to vote on which new rules it wants to use. One of those rule changes, fixCleanup3_3_0, finally has enough support. It’s at 29 of 35 validators. That still doesn’t mean it’s live. The vote has to stay above 80% for 14 straight days first. That clock started August 28. If enough validators keep voting yes, it can turn on around September 11. The bigger features people keep talking about are still waiting. Batch transactions, ConfidentialTransfer, sponsored accounts and the others don’t turn on just because this one does. Now the transaction numbers. The latest completed window had about 540,700 payments. That sounds huge until you look at how much $XRP actually moved. Those payments moved about 45.2 million $XRP, which was down around 89% from the previous comparable window. So yes, there were a lot of payments. They were just much smaller payments. That’s why you can’t look at a giant transaction count and automatically say adoption exploded. One number tells you how many times something happened. Another tells you how much value actually moved. Trading works the same way. XRPL has its own exchange built directly into the ledger. Over the latest 24 hours, about 4.91 million $XRP traded there across 93,284 trades from 7,349 unique traders. That’s XRPL trading. If somebody shows you Binance or Coinbase volume and calls it XRPL activity, they’re mixing two completely different things. The easiest way to read all of this is pretty simple. Stop looking at the biggest number on the screen. Ask what the number is actually measuring. A transaction could be a payment, a trade, an order, an automated action or something else entirely. A million transactions doesn’t mean a million people bought $XRP, and it definitely doesn’t mean a million people suddenly started using the network. Once you separate the numbers by what they actually represent, the ledger gets a whole lot easier to understand.

• 
  Backtesting Arena (@SifuBacktest) reported 41 minutes ago

  The Screener Told Me What Was Strong Against Bitcoin. It Never Said What Happened Next. There is a kind of website that shows about a thousand altcoins on one screen, each priced in Bitcoin instead of dollars, each stamped uptrending, basing or downtrending. Green, grey, red. It is well built and the data is fresh, and it answers one question cleanly: what is strong against Bitcoin right now? What it does not say, anywhere, is what happened after the stamp. So we measured that instead. Before touching a single price we wrote the rule down. Take the coin's dollar price, divide by Bitcoin's, and you have a series that rises only when the coin beats Bitcoin. Uptrending means that ratio sits above its 50-day average and the 50-day sits above the 200-day. Downtrending is the mirror image. Everything else is basing. Daily closes, no costs, no judgment calls, and no second attempt. The hash of that definition lives in the dataset so nobody, including us, can quietly tune it later. Then 370 Binance pairs, 457,994 trading days, every one of them a data point. The first number is not about the label at all. It is the floor. If you bought any altcoin against Bitcoin on any day since 2017, with no condition whatsoever, the median outcome was a loss of 2.0 percent after a week, 6.8 percent after a month, 17.3 percent after a quarter. Positive windows: 39 percent, 33 percent, 26 percent. In three quarters out of four the median altcoin lost ground to Bitcoin. That is the water everyone in this market is swimming in, whether the screener shows it or not. Now the stamp. On 8.7 percent of all days a coin carried the green label. What followed, in medians, was minus 2.7 percent after a week, minus 9.6 after a month, minus 23.0 after a quarter. Against the floor that is 0.8, 2.7 and 5.6 points worse. Below average at every horizon, and the gap widens the longer you hold. The only edge in the whole table points the wrong way. Coins stamped downtrending, which is 58 percent of all days, sat 0.4, 1.2 and 1.9 points above the average afterwards. Mild mean reversion. Their median was still negative, so this is not a case for buying red. It is just where the label's information actually lives. A result pooled over that many days can fool you in three standard ways, and we tried all three. Counting only every seventh, thirtieth or ninetieth day per pair, so no two windows overlap, leaves 5,694, 1,312 and 428 uptrending windows and the same sign: minus 0.8, minus 2.6, minus 3.2. Asking each coin separately whether its own uptrending days beat its own average, only 28 percent said yes over a week, 22 percent over a month, 20 percent over a quarter. Four coins in five pulled the stamp down. And splitting the history at the start of 2024 gives minus 0.9, minus 2.9, minus 6.6 before and minus 0.8, minus 3.5, minus 8.7 after. Two market regimes, one picture. The reason is not something wrong with altcoins. It is something built into the stamp. A 50-day average needs weeks to climb over a 200-day average. In synthetic series with trends built in, the green label appeared a median of 80 days after the trend began, never sooner than 52, never later than 115. Give that classifier 600-day regimes and it earns 4.2 points over the floor. Give it 120-day regimes and it loses 3.7, because it turns green right as the reversal is due. Alt-versus-Bitcoin trends are, apparently, the short kind. The label is not lying. It is describing the past while being read as a description of the future. Two objections deserve a straight answer. The dead coins are missing, yes. Only pairs still trading today are in the sample. But a dying coin spends its last months stamped downtrending, so leaving it out flatters the red arm, not the green one. The bias runs against the one edge we found, not for the label. And medians hide the moonshots, also yes. That is exactly why we do not quote the means. The seven-day mean in the basing state before 2024 was plus 152 percent. The median was minus 1.8. The difference is a handful of days when something went up a hundredfold. Defending the stamp with the mean is defending three afternoons. So the honest description of an alt-versus-Bitcoin screener is an inventory. It shows you what is on top. The number it owes you is the one above: seventeen percent a quarter against Bitcoin, and the green stamp pushes that figure down, not up. If you rotate anyway, at least know which current you are swimming against. The whole table now lives on Backtesting Arena as a Knowledge Object called alt_vs_btc_base_rate, recomputed every month with the definition hash and all three checks inside it, so you can check whether the label has ever climbed above the floor before you move a single sat.

• 
  Vinícius (@SatoshiBTC_) reported 45 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I see that while Binance is growing, customer satisfaction is declining; for instance, how many "rug pull" projects have we seen on the platform itself? Not to mention the recent lack of communication and the removal of liquidity for the $NES token

• 
  Elastos Chimwanda, CISSP, CCSP (@diamond_riou4z) reported 47 minutes ago

  Not gonna lie, when a crypto exchange starts offering options on Apple and Tesla, my first thought is "regulatory nightmare incoming." But if Binance actually pulls this off, the TradFi-CeFi line basically disappears. Bullish long term. Who else sees this working? #Binance

• 
  Cryptoalphacall (@Cryptoalph360) reported 47 minutes ago

  $STRK $STRK MASSIVE WHALE ACCUMULATION & DERIVATIVE EXPLOSION: THE PERFECT STORM! The on-chain tape and derivatives market are flashing massive bullish signals for Starknet ($STRK). According to the Arkham logs, a highly capitalized entity just drained 51.492 Million $STRK ($1.25M) directly from Binance hot wallets to a private address (0x04E0C...) exactly 17 hours ago. • Block 1: 40,000,000 $STRK ($975.5K) • Block 2: 11,492,000 $STRK ($280.2K) whales move eight-figure token sums off centralized exchanges into private custody, they are actively restricting circulating supply and locking in for a macro markup. While the spot float is shrinking on-chain, the futures market is completely overheating: OKX Open Interest Surge: $STRK just recorded a massive 4.13M token Open Interest (OI) surge on OKX. Smart money is aggressively loading up on leveraged directional bets. Binance Volume Spike: Trading volume on Binance has violently spiked 12x, signaling extreme market participation, institutional order flow, and incoming volatility.

• 
  Yash (@yashhsm) reported 47 minutes ago

  some thoughts on speculation x corpo chains: most corpo chains will now try to replicate robinhood-style meme hype cycle and most will likely fail until they’ve an unique edge 1) what worked for robinhood: - they were the largest stocks app & potential cex distribution for tokens - tokenised stocks available early on with decent liq + infra like uniswap - embraced bottoms-up speculation instead of top-down narrative forcing (just like solana in '24) and hence, we got plenty of stock memes which also makes sense from story pov (even base/bnb has a unique wedge of coinbase/binance's distribution) 2) now, let’s take circle’s arc for instance: - usdc does have some distribution, but it’s mostly borrowed distribution from other cexs, chains, wallets, protocols - it has no 'frontend distribution' - it’s wedge mainly comes from minting/redemption/ramps and treasury yields so there’s v less room for any meme speculation story - but i’d rather imagine some yield based speculation at best 3) however there's some corpo chains who can def do well here - leveraging their unique wedge. few examples: - Sony/Soneium on cultural distribution (anime/gaming/music) as long as they embrace cultural/ip speculation or figure out legal IP’ification of on-chain memes - Telegram/Ton - if turn on DEX trading via telegram wallet (they’re directionally moving there) they already own a huge distribution & existing social graph of crypto-native traders + any other chains which has great distribution and lets retail spin off good stories on a particular niche any other corpo which doesn't have unique wedge is better off just launching a protocol on solana etc 4) what makes new chains interesting now? multichain apps which abstract chains are new normal: fomo, gmgn, axiom is a good example on where we're headed (everything is just a good trading app/brokers and chains are like different exchanges like nyse/nasdaq) this makes it insanely bullish for newer chains who don't have to worry much about bringing much native apps and users rather they can just focus on decent liquidity and a good story & narrative to get people excited initially - and give them a hope for wider distribution or catalyst later will be interesting to see how the next wave of corpo chains play out from here on!

• 
  Jessica (@jessica_coderx) reported 49 minutes ago

  > be a 19-year-old Japanese student >build a trading bot with Claude Code in 2 days >use the iPad as a second monitor scan over 50 markets >sync BTC data from Binance >spot price errors before humans >first night: +$6,732 >started with $68 >total profit $750,000 Why do people keep trading manually? Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me @jessica_coderx (so i can DM you)

• 
  Smiggle🥶💙 (@Smigglemedia) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Bankyo @binance Real builders support builders

• 
  miralord fartfuck (@miralordf) reported 56 minutes ago

  @EricCryptoman @binance open a little position in fomo so people can see it, might help a little maybe lolz

• 
  SolOwl (@SolOwl_) reported 59 minutes ago

  @solana Down almost 10% with 5 years of growing and speeding up. Sucks that $SOL value is determined by Binance and not fundamentals

• 
  🪬 revoltic 8⚡️ (@revolticETH) reported 59 minutes ago

  truthfully, if @binance and @cz_binance do not send BSC memestonks, people will simply move large size to Robinhood Chain there are multiple high double digit runners there look how down bad $MARSCOIN is getting treated no official backing of @cetsongold i’ll give it a week

• 
  梭哈小怪兽 (@smile66833) reported 1 hour ago

  @cz_binance If there were a meme token that could make Binance better known to those outside the cryptocurrency circle, and a method of distributing dividend - paying stock tokens could attract people outside the circle to trade US stocks on Binance, would you support it? #binancecat

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 1 hour ago

  On 21 November 2023, Binance Holdings and CEO Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to federal charges in Seattle, resolving parallel actions by the DOJ, FinCEN, OFAC and the CFTC. The exchange admitted it failed to maintain an adequate anti-money-laundering program, willfully processed transactions tied to sanctioned jurisdictions, and operated an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The company agreed to a $4.3 billion penalty, a monitorship, and exit of the U.S. market; Zhao paid $50 million and stepped down. The legal architecture is what matters here. The DOJ used the Bank Secrecy Act and IEEPA sanctions statutes; FinCEN and OFAC layered civil penalties for willful AML and sanctions failures; the CFTC added unregistered derivatives and manipulative conduct. Prosecutors emphasised that Binance knowingly served U.S. persons without controls, including hiding U.S. customers from compliance staff. That is a textbook illustration of how U.S. agencies coordinate a compliance message across criminal, sanctions and commodities channels. For market participants, the settlement resets expectations for offshore exchanges that touch U.S. markets. Effective AML/KYC is no longer a policy slide; it is an operational precondition. Offshore entities will find it harder to rely on geographic disclaimers if U.S. IP addresses, on-ramps or marketing are present. The monitorship model is also becoming a template: large penalties plus an independent compliance overseer, rather than a suspension of business. The enforcement signal is that size is not a shield against BSA and sanctions liability, and the days of offshore arbitrage on U.S. customer access are closing. None of this is legal or investment advice. #FinCEN #蓝V互关

• 
  Rado | τsc (@RadoTsc) reported 1 hour ago

  @BitcoinNewsCom where can i buy blake 2b im down for a gamble can i buy it on binance?

• 
  Raymond R. (@RayNordic) reported 1 hour ago

  @binance CHIA will fix this after USDT fails