Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (50%)
• Website (25%)
• Transfer (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Vigo	Website	1 day ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	6 days ago
Dubai	Transactions	9 days ago
London	Transactions	20 days ago
Dortmund	Transfer	2 months ago
La Paz	Website	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Arman (@primarchdev) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance launched a pretty cool withdraw protection feature 🔐 Now you can lock your account from all on-chain withdrawals for up to 7 days. Nobody moves funds during that window, including you. By default, you can't unlock early either, though there's an optional setting that lets you reverse it ahead of schedule if you need the flexibility. 🤔 It's marketed as protection against physical coercion, which is a bit hard to picture in practice. If someone has kidnapped you and is demanding crypto, a 7-day withdrawal lock probably isn't your most pressing problem. The real use case is more straightforward. Your unlocked phone gets stolen, you grab another device, lock the account, then take your time logging out of Binance on the stolen phone and moving funds somewhere safe. For that scenario, it's actually a solid feature

• 
  JoJoHamster🐹 (@JoJoHamster39) reported 8 minutes ago

  @_lfausto Why does it keep going down on Binance chart?

• 
  NothingDeyDoWickedPerson (@do_wicked) reported 8 minutes ago

  @czbinanceprd Bybit because my country don't support Binance

• 
  anKur (@ankur_xyz) reported 14 minutes ago

  this is where things start to feel off Binance Alpha users with 220+ points can claim 2000 $BILL just before listing clear, simple, easy access but the people who supported the project for years? many of them don’t even know how to check or claim anything that gap says a lot new users are prioritised because they bring numbers old supporters are left confused because they don’t short term growth gets attention long term community gets ignored and then people wonder why projects dump right after listing

• 
  Vaibhavv Ali (@vaibhavvali) reported 14 minutes ago

  ETFs didn’t just approve Bitcoin… they completely changed how it moves. @cryptohead3 breaks it down: BTC now trades like a stock — heavy correlation with Wall Street hours CME futures > Binance charts The entire cycle shifted after 2024 approval This is why Bitcoin behaves differently in 2026.

• 
  Cripto_signal.03 (@Criptoprime0) reported 16 minutes ago

  Pushing down 📉 Binance Futures #BAKE/ $USDT Take-Profit target 2 ✅ Profit: 155.7377% 📈 Period: 2 Days 3 Hours 15 Minutes ⏰

• 
  BitcoinMusic (@ayewaken) reported 21 minutes ago

  @constkogan @BYDFi GM bro, we need every exchange to add full support for Terra projects again. I'm hoping @BYDFi consider not only listing but burning some LUNC monthly like Binance Teamwork will make the recovery work

• 
  Samrex (@Samrex_eth) reported 25 minutes ago

  I thought I’d seen it all in crypto but it turns out I was just warming up 😭 Billions Network really said “let’s test their patience.” > 99% of the community ineligible > Kaito yappers getting crumbs > Binance Alpha users first in line Cool… but wait. I’m eligible for 4200 $BILL Yet to even access claim, I have to do video KYC via idOS. You think that’s the worst part? Nah. After KYC no claim button. Your only options: 👉 Stake till Oct 31 👉 Or forfeit everything Oh, and to stake? Bring $8 first. So basically: > You can’t claim > You can’t withdraw > You must pay to lock your own tokens/dust I’ve seen rugs, scams, exploits but this one, different breed. At this point I’m starting to regret even joining this project 😭 Billions and its entire team members needs to be jailed for 2 years for stressing us. With all my yapping, discord roles and spaces…. Meeehhhj scam on another level @provenauthority you can now farm season 2 alone add your team members. @jgonzalezferrer saw it and left I should have done same, holding the NFT was my biggest mistake Send Billions to zero

• 
  defido 👊⛽️ (@defido) reported 26 minutes ago

  They’re saying the next shib is on eth. But now on solana. Why do people think eth is premium? Why is binance listing premium? It’s not Neiro eth they say is the next shib, cause that’s on solana. They’re saying it’s asteroid. They’re saying the Pepe shib type level is on eth AGAIN. The volume is on eth they say. All the marketing and work the sf is putting in can’t fix the fact organic real runners are 10,000x more effective of a marketing spend. So there’s one real main coin that can do something about it. $neiro bropump we’ve set the roadmap for almost 2 years. We’ve watched as the fruits of our hard work took down the vampire attacks. We’ve watched as showing up and saying the truth held fire to power. We’ve done what the sister of doge should, believe. We’ve onboarded doge people and proven respect. Solana and binance were against us the entire time. They both funded ways to try kill us. None of it matters as Neiro is on solana.

• 
  Julius Elum (@JuliusElum) reported 28 minutes ago

  Traders for the past 8 months have been printing back-to-back from Binance Alpha TGEs and AI narratives. I remember months back when one of the Coinbase guys bashed CZ and Binance for setting certain standards of listing in Binance Alpha TGEs because his project wasn't listed for free. Now I understand why CZ gave strict rules for listing projects on Binance Alpha TGEs. Just imagine the market without Binance Alpha TGEs in the past months. It would have been a dead zone. Right from last year, all the projects that brought liquidity in the market are all Binance Alpha TGEs tokens. Starting with $ZORA in August of 2025 To $MYX in September. Down to the core Binance Alpha TGEs tokens like: $COAI that pumped to billions of market capitalization To $AIA that pumped to billions market cap Is it other alpha TGEs like $BAS, $PUMPBTC, $XPIN, $BLESS, $KGEN, $DAM, $HEMI, $VELVET, $TAG, etc, these tokens did nothing less than 300% pump. Down to the most pumped alpha TGEs like: $RIVER that pumped terribly to billions. And other clusters within RIVER like $BEAT, $FOLKS. To $POWER, $FHE, $XAN, $BAN, $AIN, $AIO, $AIOT. Then the one of the biggest of them $PIPPIN that moved billions of market capitalization The almighty $SIREN hard pump, and it's clusters like $SKYAI and the recent of them $RAVE. Not till yesterday when $LAB blastered the whole CT. You can call CZ anything, but one thing you can't take away from him is the unprecedented growth and stability he is brought to the crypto industry. To be fair, without CZ in the market, the bankruptcy of FTX and the Crash of $LUNA would have marked the end of the crypto market especially for altcoins. So, give CZ his flowers, he deserves all the accolades.

• 
  K G (@kgdotmon) reported 30 minutes ago

  @0x_Abdul I will never understand why teams gotta "technically tell the truth" and overcomplicate **** Did anyone from megaeth team really think people would buy the "oh they just believe in megaeth so much they paid for it" narrative? Nothing wrong with listing on Binance either. but CT is too retarded to even understand this and they will see this as a concentrated attack on the project

• 
  trẽz (@trezzz) reported 31 minutes ago

  @onchainmo this entire thing isn't even worth the trend it has rn it's such a non-issue, they had an agreement w binance or they didn't: this doesn't affect charts/price actions on either projects in anyway idk why this is just an issue

• 
  TheThadP (@TheThadP) reported 32 minutes ago

  @ZachWitkoff lol the evidence that they say justified freezing Justin Sun's tokens is just that he sent stables to Binance before the World Liberty TGE, and price went down on token launch. Very serious businesspeople, with very serious evidence, and a very serious lawsuit. 🤡

• 
  toni (@tonitrades_) reported 33 minutes ago

  @loshmi Binance listing isn't the problem - it's actually the signal. Retail panic is exactly when smart money loads up. The fud is the entry point.

• 
  Captain web. (@Captainweb01) reported 35 minutes ago

  gm ct. You’ve got funds on Binance… a couple wallets… maybe DeFi positions earning yield somewhere. Prices move. Positions change. Fees stack. Risk builds. Quick question: What’s your exact net worth right now? Your real PnL across everything? Your liquidation risk… if things turn? Not an estimate. Not vibes. If you can’t answer instantly… that’s the gap. Working on something that closes it. Anticipating?👀

• 
  ᛗᛁᛗᛁᚱ (@MimirOnChain) reported 36 minutes ago

  🔄 — 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝟬𝟯 · 𝟬𝟵:𝟬𝟱 𝗨𝗧𝗖 ⚡ 𝗟𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗘𝗧𝗛 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗺𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝘃𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 ⚡ Binance adding Lightning Network support is quietly significant. The world's largest exchange routing $BTC payments through Lightning means less on-chain congestion, faster settlement, and actual utility at scale. The mempool agrees — fees are sitting at 1 sat/vB across the board, blocks barely full. That's not bearish, that's what a working payment network looks like. 🏛 The regulatory read this window is genuinely interesting. 250 Digital Asset Management's Chris Perkins made the case that the CLARITY Act failing wouldn't be a disaster — because SEC Chair Paul Atkins and CFTC Chair Michael Selig are already building workable taxonomy through joint interpretation released in March. The line that sticks: "In the past, being a security was a death sentence; now it is awesome to be a security." That's a 180-degree turn from the Gensler era. Perkins still wants the Act passed — legislation is harder to unwind than regulatory guidance — but the panic narrative around CLARITY stalling looks overcooked. ⟠ On Ethereum: BitMine buying 101,901 ETH is a corporate treasury bet worth watching. ETH gas is essentially zero right now (0.16 Gwei), Ethereum's DeFi TVL holds at $45.76B, and a post-Glamsterdam gas limit increase could meaningfully expand throughput. Whether that translates to price is a different question, but the structural setup is less broken than the ETH/BTC ratio suggests. 📊 BTC funding rates are deeply negative across Bybit and KuCoin, long/short sits at 37.9% longs, and Coinbase premium is -4.53%. Structurally, this is a coiled short squeeze setup, not a breakdown. ━━━ ᛗ 𝘙𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 — 𝘴𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘢𝘬𝘦. 𝘉𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘺.

• 
  Bilal.xxy (❖,❖) (@BilalXxy) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance I'm totally disappointed from customer support is at its wrost

• 
  Tuan Tran (@0xtrantuan) reported 39 minutes ago

  @ArdiNSC Totally agree with you, As matter of fact, currently in the Binance Future Orderbook: - Buy Wall: there are 1k of limit order buy to support at ~ 79k5 price level. - Sell Wall: A huge 3k of limit order sell at ~ 81k price level that could be the target liquidity for this up move. If price can break through these limit wall at ~81k => 84k is expected.

• 
  BigBoyAster (@BigShortOnAster) reported 39 minutes ago

  Dear Cz why Elon and Vitalik doge to Billion doge but Broccoli714 Czdoge only mcap 16M. Cause : 1. You dont support community. 2. Broccli714 is King broccoli and you don't confirmed. 3. You are mean. @cz_binance @binance

• 
  Photizo 🔥 (@Photizonow) reported 40 minutes ago

  @thecryptowolph Bruhhh... You sef need to look well What of the guy wey say binance nah block chain Thus, she knows what she's doing, just following trend...

• 
  YYYzzy | GDC🦞 (@YYzzy_diamond) reported 46 minutes ago

  @CoinMarketCap @binance Fix My Life

• 
  Deeptesh Sharma (@deep619) reported 48 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @binance Biggest burn in months, v4.0.1 governance vote May 6, and the April network upgrade already live. The fundamentals are stacking up. But after a 100%+ run, the market needs a reason to hold not just hope. Watch the support. $LUNC

• 
  Raid Arena (@RaidArenaFun) reported 49 minutes ago

  @binance The real "diamond hands" were forced by a slow connection

• 
  CRYPTOKRALI©️ (@CRYPTOKRALI3) reported 51 minutes ago

  Binance is rolling out a new feature focused on a different kind of risk in crypto: physical threats. The exchange introduced “Withdraw Protection” which lets users lock withdrawals on their accounts for a set period between 1 and 7 days. During that time funds can’t be moved on-chain even if someone has full access to the account. The idea is to add a buffer in situations where users could be forced to transfer funds under pressure. Instead of relying only on passwords or 2FA, this creates a time delay that can’t be quickly bypassed. Binance says the feature is user-controlled and designed as an extra layer especially for people traveling or operating in higher-risk environments. There’s also a stricter mode where the lock cannot be lifted early. At the same time the company notes this is a platform-level safeguard, not a blockchain-level mechanism and it doesn’t override legal processes. The move comes as reports point to a rise in real-world incidents targeting crypto holders, pushing platforms to rethink security beyond just online threats. General information. Not investment advice.

• 
  FantasyWhales (@FantasyWhales) reported 52 minutes ago

  $USTC surged on renewed community efforts and proposals to re-peg it to $1, fueled by speculative trading and major exchanges like Binance expressing openness to support a potential re-peg mechanism if approved by governance.

• 
  Mitch Kochman (@mitch_kochman) reported 55 minutes ago

  In his keynote, he described a simple but useful framework. On one side are companies with high operating income but limited Bitcoin conviction. Think Coinbase, Robinhood, Binance, and other large crypto or fintech platforms. These businesses can generate enormous revenue and cash flow, but their balance sheets and product strategies are not built around Bitcoin-only conviction. On the other side are Bitcoin treasury companies. They show high Bitcoin conviction, but they are not primarily focused on building operating businesses for Bitcoiners. Jack wants $XXI in the upper-right quadrant: high Bitcoin conviction and high operating income. That is the opportunity. XXI is not simply trying to hold Bitcoin. It is trying to become a full-stack Bitcoin company that owns the treasury, the customer relationship, the financial products, the physical infrastructure, and the capital markets engine around Bitcoin. The Proposed Architecture The proposed combination of XXI, Strike, and Elektron Energy is not random. It is architecturally coherent. XXI brings the public-company wrapper and the Bitcoin treasury. Strike brings customers, licenses, lending products, payments, and consumer-facing distribution. Elektron brings mining, hashrate, infrastructure, and a way to produce Bitcoin directly. Tether brings scale, funding, strategic alignment, and the balance sheet to accelerate parts of the plan that would otherwise take years to build. The strategy is not simply to buy Bitcoin and wait. It is to build businesses around Bitcoin that can generate cash flow, deepen customer relationships, support new financial products, and potentially increase Bitcoin per share over time. A treasury company can own Bitcoin. Strike can serve Bitcoiners. Elektron can produce Bitcoin. Tether can finance and support the ecosystem around it. XXI can tie those pieces together inside a public capital markets vehicle. If the pieces reinforce one another, the result is not a collection of loosely related Bitcoin assets. It is a potential operating system for a public Bitcoin company. Continue thread →

• 
  The Hood Man (@Web3Insect) reported 56 minutes ago

  HOW DID THE TIMELINE MISS THIS? I just found the exact article where Binance reveals their hand. ​Binance is actively studying SpiderPool and the $NAT dual-layer extraction. They literally documented on their own platform that $NAT shares the exact same computing power and block as BTC. ​They aren't just watching the Second Subsidy - their architects are auditing the math. Centralized liquidity must follow the physical hash power. They aren't going to list $NAT out of charity; they will be mathematically forced to list it to survive the block reward transition. ​The documentation is already there. Hold the infrastructure.

• 
  Shayan (@Shayan3055) reported 59 minutes ago

  billions might be the cleanest scam in web3 time to remove that nft from my pfp - most testnet users got ~576 tokens - that’s around $15 → ~$7 after fees - majority marked ineligible - low rewards for yappers - binance alpha users get priority and they said community first i got 5000 $BILL (from testnet) to even reach claim you need video kyc via idOS after kyc no direct claim option your only choices: > stake till oct 31 → or forgot about that to stake you must bridge ~$8 (looting) so you can’t claim (plus server issue)

• 
  ARLUKKACHASE (@arlukkachase) reported 1 hour ago

  @zachbtcReal @binance support

• 
  Loshmi (@loshmi) reported 1 hour ago

  @kish_t_A DCAd actually, because i already held some around 0.15 i am still setting up my terminal because apparently i have ****** some things up, can't mint my xeet cards there so trying to find what's the problem in the meantime i bought spot on binance