Binance status: access issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Binance. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.
- Transactions (44%)
- Website (33%)
- Mobile App (11%)
- Login (11%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Login | 14 days ago |
|
|
Website | 21 days ago |
|
|
Website | 21 days ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 1 month ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Phantom Data & Intelligence (@joinphantom) reportedpretty interested in ethereum:0x17205fab260a7a6383a81452ce6315a39370db97 as a spot hold or low leverage long I'm already entered in spot from .23$ so up nicely on this so far 🏆 we saw binance cartel send this thousands of %'s a few months ago - I am expecting a smaller scam pump now that the storm has 'settled' looks like the downtrend is finally broken and accumulation is currently forming once the breakout comes I fear entering may be to late for some 🤝
-
Him (@OnlyHim67) reportedI want to start with @binance you stupid ***** you list the stupids **** on there but not listing $Jimothy
-
Tee🌹 (@cryptomansui) reportedReviewing yesterday's market, many traders successfully capitalized on the trading opportunities. If you haven't yet found a suitable trading rhythm, we recommend continuing to follow our updates. BTC Latest Market Analysis (July 24, 2026, 08:11 HKT) Current Real-Time Price: Approximately $64,850 – $64,950 USD (Binance BTCUSD, July 23rd daily candlestick close approximately $65,090, continued its decline in early trading today, July 24th daily candlestick open approximately $65,048). The price is currently in a consolidation phase after retracing from the $66.5k–$66.9k resistance zone. Today's Hexagram: Upper trigram Gen, Lower trigram Li = Mountain Fire (Hexagram 22). The hexagram's text reads, "Success, small gains are possible"—symbolizing adornment, refinement, and fire beneath a mountain, representing outward brilliance but inner substance. In the short term, it suggests "splendid first, then substantial; refinement is better than aggressive moves," suitable for range-bound adjustments rather than strong one-sided trends. 24-hour trend: High-level consolidation or a potential decline followed by a rise; expected range: -0.8% to +1.2% (midpoint approximately +0.3%). A breach of key support levels would increase risk. Order Placement Strategies 1. Long Position (Buy on Dips/Rebound Strategy) Entry: Place a buy order at the current price of $64,800–$65,000 or after confirming a hold above $65,100–$65,200; a better buy-on-dips zone is $64,300–$64,600. Take Profit: First level: $65,600–$66,000 Second level: $66,500–$67,000 Stop Loss: $64,000–$63,800 (invalid if support is broken) 2. Short Position (Breakdown Strategy) Entry: Place a short order after confirming a break below the key support level of $64,200–$64,000 with significant volume (entry $63,900–$64,100). Take Profit: First level: $63,200–$63,000 Second level: $62,500–$62,000 Stop Loss: $64,700–$64,900 (Stop if pullback fails) Risk Warning: The hexagram "Ben" signifies adornment, outward brilliance but inner substance is lacking; short-term trading should focus on small profits. Total energy is +0.36, indicating weak positive momentum and lack of strong direction; range trading is preferred. Key support: $64,000–$64,200; resistance: $66,000–$66,900. Current ETHUSD real-time price: 1875-1880 USD (A pullback after yesterday's large bearish candle, approximately -3% in 24 hours). Overall: Today's market is consolidating, with key support at 1870 and resistance at 1920. Recommended Trading Strategy: Range Trading (Optimal, aligns with the "Small Accumulation" hexagram's accumulation phase) Range Trading (Main Force): Buy at 1865 → Sell at 1910, or buy low and sell high between 1875-1900, with a stop-loss and take-profit of 25-35 points each. Suitable for multiple intraday trades. Long Strategy: Entry Price: 1865~1885 (Buy near support) Stop Loss: 1850 (Invalid if 1870 support is broken; strictly adhere to this; loss control <1.5%) Take-Profit: First level 1910 Second level 1930~1940 Short Selling (Defensive): If 1850 is broken, enter a short position near 1840, with a stop-loss at 1870 and a take-profit at 1800 (probability approximately 40%, small position size). Alternative Strategy: Buy on Dips (Breakout): Enter a long position after a valid breakout above 1920, with a stop-loss at 1895 and a take-profit at 1960 (small position, enter only after breakout confirmation). Risk Warning: While the hexagram "Small Accumulation" suggests accumulation, the "dense clouds without rain" pattern indicates that a break below support could accelerate the decline. Strict stop-loss orders are advised. Monitor whether volume continues to shrink and whether there is a large-scale outflow from on-chain transactions.
-
reubs (@reubs_btc) reported@Airports57 @Stacks Well tbf STX supply did increase so if that’s the case then they will need to communicate that with Binance Which I’m sure they are doing as it’s a very important issue
-
Joe Guglielmucci (@JoeGuglielmucci) reportedCrypto Twitter in 2016 should be included in the Constitution as the latest Amendment or studied at ivy leagues as a period of enlightenment ICO’s pumping everywhere that all you had to do was risk losing all your eth and have a wallet Airdropping was new and you just had to blindly trust it Staking wasn’t really a legit thing Any coin listed on an exchange would pump for no reason so you could use kindergarten arbitrage and eat Binance and kucoin native tokens were trading for pennies I was fresh off getting scammed from bitconnect which was my alumni into Bitcoin GDAX was Coinbase’s “pro” version and it was 100% free and based, almost offerred on the sneak in the portal [Coinbase garbage now] This was before DeFi The $Crypto Twitter scene was just the Wild West then Can’t put it all in 1 tweet
-
Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reportedDEXE just bounced +100% in 24 hours after losing 62% yesterday. here is what actually happened and why this is a trap, not a recovery the sequence: on-chain tracking showed team/treasury-linked multisigs moving ~3.45M DEXE (~13m USD) to Binance and LBank. that triggered a leveraged liquidation cascade in a thin book, taking the token from ~10 USD to ~1.96. today's bounce to 3.98 is a textbook short squeeze on an empty order book — low float, high funding, predictable mechanics the important part is not the bounce direction. it is that the team has not said anything — no statement, no buyback, no explanation. when a governance token's treasury dumps on exchanges and the team goes silent, the distribution phase is rarely over after one candle the risk for anyone buying this dip: the cascade already liquidated leveraged longs, which means the book is even thinner now. a second round of distribution from the same multisig wallets would send it lower with less resistance. watch on-chain exchange inflows from the labeled addresses — if they resume, the bounce is done thesis invalidated only if the team addresses the sell pressure credibly, or if a real buyer absorbs the remaining treasury overhang. until then this is noise trading in a broken token NFA
-
Novacybersecurity Inc. & Associates (@theNovacyberqfs) reportedBreaking: Arthur Hayes-Founded BitMEX, Pioneer of Crypto Perpetuals, to Shut Down BitMEX said it will permanently close its exchange at 04:00 UTC on September 23 and has stopped accepting new user registrations. Co-founded by Arthur Hayes in 2014, BitMEX introduced the crypto industry’s first perpetual swap and was once one of the world’s dominant derivatives exchanges before losing market share to Binance and Bybit. Hayes and his co-founders stepped down after U.S. criminal charges in 2020, while a reported effort to sell the exchange in 2025 did not result in an announced deal.
-
Crstn (@cyelluzie) reported@0xJonnyDee i think after the execs plead guilty and left, it was just a slow grind to this. much of trust was lost and traders migrated mostly to binance and other exchanges with faster and better aesthetic UI
-
HeliconDarkStar (@helicondarkstar) reportedwhen Binance shuts down watch out below $BNB
-
Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported$AKE — Breakdown confirmed, whale concentration adds risk 📊 Price rejected hard from the strong resistance zone, broke the rising support trendline, and is now sliding toward local support. Currently at $0.0025042, down -0.08%, with structure pointing toward next support near 0.0020, and target support down at 0.017 0.0017 if the breakdown continues. Worth flagging: InvestorsPool (Proxy) alone holds 18.37% of total AKE supply, worth $46.7M. That's a massive single-entity concentration. If this wallet decides to de-risk or take profit after the recent rejection, it could trigger real panic and sell pressure across the market. Combined with other large holders (ERC1967 proxies, Binance, Gate deposits all holding meaningful stakes), supply is heavily concentrated in a handful of wallets, this cuts both ways, but on a breakdown, concentrated selling can accelerate moves fast. Watch the wallets here more than the chart. Structure is bearish until reclaimed. DYOR. NFA. $AKE #Binance
-
Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reportedDEXE got absolutely obliterated - down 96.8% in 11 days from $49.43 to $1.56. Massive transfers to Binance have people asking if DWF Labs dumped on retail again. Another day, another collapse nobody saw coming. $DEXE #crypto 📉💀
-
Turtle (𝔦, 𝔦) (@turtleonchain) reportedI’m a great fan of Base. I’m also aware that there’s extreme denial going on at Base. While people have been getting rinsed left and right on Robinhood Chain, I’ve seen zero indicators of anyone wanting to go back to Base. The reputational damage Brian and Jesse caused is massive. People would rather lose everything somewhere else than go back. How does this get fixed, anon? That’s the million dollar question. It’s out of my control. If $BASE launches then Robinhood can just counter the move with their own native token. That in itself would kill all the excitement about $BASE that has been building up since 2025. People would just take the airdrop and **** off again. That shouldn’t be the case but that’s where we are. I couldn’t care less about TVL’s or the amount x402-transactions on Base when none of that serves the little guy in any way, shape or form. It’s awesome for those that made six- or seven figures on their own protocols and have deals with Coinbase because they used to work there. It’s great for them. But I’m not here for that crowd. I’m not here to serve those that work 9-5 or sleep on their golden silk pillows. I see and understand the suffering others have went through to make a dime in an honest way by investing (rather than trading like braindead gamblers or rugging tokens). Yes, there’s a huge group of investors that somehow always get the short end of the stick while the leadership always tries to convince them that they should think long-term. If there’s anything we’ve learned the past few years it’s that investing punishes you unless you got hold of supply for cheap as an insider or if you as a dev have been milking your community forever. Of course you’d defend your position and suck up to Coinbase because IT’S YOUR LIVELIHOOD. You cannot see the forest for the trees. You already made it. I’m speaking for those that want to achieve financial escape velocity. Don’t get me wrong. I couldn’t care less about memes nowadays or Brian’s sloppy handling of changing his PFP back and forth. I’m financially fine. I never entertained memes nor anything Zora-related on Base. Memes aren’t what they used to be. $BRIAN and $JESSE is pure slop. The big issue here is that utility protocols lack volume. The big issue is that builders and people that support builders with capital don’t get rewarded. ’Build on Base’ means jack **** today. It’s just mockery. It cannot be taken seriously nor should it. Base is terrible at bringing in real volume. Some have mistakenly confused recent posts from dozens of respected accounts as ”crashouts”. We are talking about hundreds of tweets with millions of impressions/views from a vast amount of minds that reached every corner of CT by trashing Coinbase, Base and its leadership. I’ve only seen Binance get such bad brand-sentiment in terms of people, platforms and products that are STILL working. This month has been an absolute PR-disaster for Base that unfolded organically. You have to make some really stupid moves on multiple occasions for a lengthy period of time to achieve this level of organic hatred. As long as the elephant in the room isn’t addressed this problem will not disappear. Brian and Jesse like to talk. But where is the volume? We can pretend all day long but I’m not a pretender. The volume isn’t pretending. My eyes aren’t lying. I know when volume has vanished. It’s a desert now as it was a desert in the early days of Base. BNB has been dry for a long while. ETH mainnet has been dry since late 2023. Could Base enter the same desert hell and never recover? It surely could. The matter of fact is that people don’t want to buy or hold tokens made by honest builders ONLY because they build on a chain that’s attached to Brian and Jesse. Should I repeat that? The quality of the protocols DON’T outweigh the disdain people have towards Brian and Jesse. The market is speaking and it’s speaking loudly. This is a very tricky spot to be in. Good luck with @baseapp, @cobie.
-
Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reportedBTC got a quantum-security funding narrative; Binance BTC perp funding cooled anyway. Cointelegraph reported a Strategy-led group pledged $15M to secure Bitcoin from quantum-computing threats. Decrypt separately reported BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy, plus other institutional Bitcoin names formed a consortium to fund developers working on Bitcoin security, including future quantum-computer risks. Credible headline. Not the same thing as leverage confirmation. Across the available 60-point window, BTC perpetual funding rate on Binance changed -45.7%. Latest reading: 0.005149%. Funding rate only covers Binance BTC perpetuals, so this is not a full-market positioning claim. It also says nothing about spot; no BTC spot price fact provided. Important distinction: consortium reports are single-source facts individually, not independently verified funding execution. Also, no on-chain developer activity fact provided. So we have reported institutional coordination around Bitcoin security, but not proof here of executed funding, developer traction, institutional demand, or bullish price confirmation. The clean read: the narrative has external confirmation from two reports, while the available derivatives data shows cooling rather than speculative leverage expansion. Invalidation is straightforward: BTC perpetual funding rises materially in later verified windows, or verified evidence shows derivatives positioning expanded after the consortium reports. Until then, if this continues, quantum-security funding may sit as a long-term credibility signal rather than a near-term leverage catalyst. CT can save the victory lap for actual positioning.
-
India Crypto Research (@icr_indiacrypto) reported🇮🇳India just handed crypto oversight to the industry itself, while admitting the law behind it still doesn't exist. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance tabled its 36th Report on the Securities Markets Code, 2025, in Parliament on 23 July. Crypto stays out of that new securities law entirely. Instead, the committee wants Self-Regulatory Organisations running the show, under a designated regulator, until a full crypto law actually exists. Why SROs first? 🔹Months of consultations, that's why. Binance, WazirX, ZebPay, the IFSCA, the RBI, the ICAI, the Income Tax Department, all of them sat across the table from this committee. The report is what came out the other end. What would these SROs actually cover? 🔹Governance standards. Transparency rules. Disclosure requirements. Investor protection. Grievance redressal. Codes of conduct. A working rulebook built by the industry itself, supervised from above, rather than a government agency trying to write crypto-specific law from scratch. The committee didn't stop there. It also pushed the Finance Ministry to define virtual digital assets properly, not lump every token into one bucket. Some belong under securities. Some under derivatives. Some don't fit either category. Lawmakers want that sorted before anyone tries building enforcement on top of a definition that doesn't hold. The government's own position, quoted directly in the report, is that crypto in India is "presently unregulated," except for tax, AML and reporting. That's the official line, in 2026, on an asset class already taxed at 30% with 1% TDS on every trade. Nothing changes today for how crypto is taxed or traded in India. A phased build, SROs now, comprehensive law later, is still a build. That's more than the last few reports managed. Source - The Crypto Times
-
0xhanzala (@0xhanzala) reportedI would like to make a suggestion to @binance regarding @BinanceWallet campaigns. Whenever a project is listed in the Binance Wallet campaign section, the estimated listing date should also be clearly mentioned. This would provide greater transparency and help users understand how long the campaign is expected to run, allowing them to make informed decisions about the time and funds they wish to invest. As Binance is one of the most credible and trusted cryptocurrency exchanges, implementing this practice would further strengthen user confidence and improve the overall experience. For example, campaigns such as @REVApay_ai done it's booster campaign and pre-tge without any clear indication of when the project might be listed, leaving users uncertain about what to expect. I kindly request that Binance ensure future Wallet campaigns include an estimated listing timeline to provide better clarity and transparency for all users.
-
Juno.eth (@JunoCrypto3) reported@KT_BTC Same, binance support got me sorted in minutes
-
KISHUMATE ツ (@MateMXXI4) reported@binance that's a glitch in the matrix
-
Ghost (@Ghostfatt) reportedWhats the issue with binance ? Am trying to create an account its declining verification🤔
-
Maheswara Reddy s (@ScamFinder_1991) reported@CoinDCX_Cares Stop scamming by just learning few English words. Go and read the customer incidents. Read my incidents. Let's see if you guys are able make your app candles just like Binance. Can u guys able to do this thing in the next 100 years atleast?
-
Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reportedJST is one to keep on the watchlist, not chase here — the whole setup unlocks on a clean 4-hour close back above $0.1013 with real volume behind it. Zoom out and the bigger picture is actually fine. On the daily chart JST is still trending up and sitting comfortably above its longer-term average price, with a floor near $0.0957 and a ceiling near $0.1046. That's a healthy structure. The issue is what's happening much closer to current price. On the 4-hour chart, price is pinned right underneath a stubborn ceiling around $0.1012 — only about half a percent overhead — while the nearest support sits nearly three times further below. That's a lopsided risk: very little room to gain if it breaks up, a lot of room to give back if it doesn't. And underneath the sideways grind, buying pressure on both the 4-hour and 1-hour charts is quietly fading. When price stalls under resistance while momentum leaks out, it usually means the bid is tiring, not loading up. The broader tape isn't helping either. Bitcoin is soft, the dollar is firming up, and capital is rotating out of smaller coins and back into BTC. Fighting a local ceiling into that kind of backdrop is a low-percentage move, and a short-term bounce on the 15-minute chart doesn't change any of it. The level to watch is clear: a decisive 4-hour close back above $0.1013, with volume actually showing up, would break that ceiling and put JST firmly back in play. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $JST · Available on Binance
-
Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported$ESPORTS — Called this long at 0.0296, playing out exactly as expected 📊 Flagged the ascending triangle setup with rising support holding into resistance. Since then, price broke out clean, hitting a high near 0.045, and is currently at $0.04086, up +2.51% today. That's solid follow-through from the call. Liquidation data shows leverage building up above current price toward 0.047, with clustered short liquidations stacking up as price climbs — fuel for continuation if this trend keeps pushing. Structure remains bullish. Rising support still intact, minor support at 0.0380. Wouldn't be surprised to see a liquidity grab down toward 0.0351 before the next leg up, that zone lines up with the high-liquidity support area on the chart. Still watching the previous high near 0.049-0.050 as the next real resistance test. DYOR. NFA. $ESPORTS #Binance
-
toony.vanar (@toony_vanar) reported@Vanarchain Will binance support ?
-
The Quant (@TheQuantHQ) reported@AshCrypto The lead means nothing if offshore exchanges still eat 70% of the volume. I track where size actually moves. Binance and OKX still clearing the real flow while US platforms fight over retail scraps and compliance theatre. The Clarity Act does not fix the liquidity problem, it just makes the regulated corner slightly less painful to operate in.
-
BSCN (@BSCNews) reportedAre you using Binance or Bybit in Vietnam...? BEWARE! Vietnam is 'going after the little guy' according to Cointelegraph, the country set to fine users of unlicensed overseas exchanges up to $1,900. Unlicensed overseas exchanges include the likes of @Binance and @Bybit_Official. The issue is that Vietnam hasn't actually any exchange licenses yet, despite having approved five CEXs in principle...
-
Jessica Weddle (@Jessica_nacoel) reported@Bitt_Belle @binance @BinanceAcademy Lower friction and better access should always be the goal
-
Algorithm.btc (@godfred_xcuz) reported@gregorioki11607 @alexlmiller Understandable, stay strong 💪 . We'll win. Might be an error from Binance IMO.
-
Tommy Famous (@TommyBeFamous) reportedethereum:0xf8f173e20e15f3b6cb686fb64724d370689de083 💰 DWF LABS GEM #2 Retail traders are completely blind to the massive supply-insulation window currently locking down exchange order books on Heima Network. Engineered to unify Web3 through single-identity Omni Accounts and Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) cryptography, the network abstracts gas fees and wallet switching across Ethereum, Solana, and Polkadot. Following the execution of its 16.5M token supply burn from parachain treasuries, tradable exchange float has contracted significantly across active Binance and KuCoin deposit conduits. DWF Labs utilizes these compressed, low-float exchange deposit ranges to quietly absorb spot inventory before triggering sharp, V-shaped markup expansions. 📌 Bookmark this exchange supply map to track CEX deposit sweeps before order books dry up completely. Are you accumulating spot with smart money here or waiting to buy back higher? Drop your take below 👇
-
Allium (@AlliumLabs) reportedBinance lost access to EU users under MiCA on July 1. Many expected the money to flee to other centralized exchanges. Allium onchain data shows most of it did not. Here's where Binance's outflows actually went 🧵
-
Zizcrypto (@_Crypto_glass) reported$BTC: Open Interest Moves Into Upper 30-Day Range While Retail Bias Stays Mid-Range Hyblock’s 30-day Binance positioning data shows elevated open interest, while retail account positioning remains near the middle of its monthly range. True Retail Longs Accounts stand at 60.07%, in the 50.20th percentile, up 2.87 points. True Retail Shorts Accounts stand at 39.93%, in the 49.82nd percentile, down 2.87 points. This points to a mild absolute long bias at the account level, but not an extreme retail-long reading relative to the 30-day lookback. Whale vs Retail Delta is 0.89, in the 64.29th percentile, down 1.20. The reading remains positive, meaning whale long positioning still holds a slight premium over retail, though that premium has narrowed. Binance Open Interest is near $6.74B, in the 86.45th percentile, up roughly $111.5M. This places OI in the upper 30-day range. Key takeaway: BTC’s 30-day positioning structure is not defined by extreme retail long participation. The stronger signal is elevated open interest while retail accounts remain roughly mid-range by percentile. This points to a more leverage-sensitive market, where positioning risk can rise even without an extreme retail-long reading.
-
Poly Diction (@giddings_nga) reportedthe day i stopped handing over full keys was the day liquidations lost their grip on me. just trade-only api access now, no withdrawals possible. the partial sell trigger kicks in automatically and keeps my binance futures position alive instead of going to zero