Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	8 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cryptoradar (@Cryptoradar_hub) reported 4 minutes ago

  The crypto market has undergone another major "shakeout" over the past 24 hours. According to CoinGlass, approximately $165 million in positions were liquidated, affecting over 74,000 traders. Binance saw the highest volume of liquidations, totaling around $82.9 million. Interestingly, long and short positions were nearly balanced: Longs — ~$81.8 million Shorts — ~$83.5 million The single largest liquidation was an ETHUSDT position on Binance worth approximately $3.23 million. It seems the market is once again reminding us that high leverage can be painful. Do you think another wave of liquidations lies ahead, or is the market already starting to settle down?

• 
  Heisenberg (@cryptochad215) reported 6 minutes ago

  In the past month we have seen 4 chains attract massive volume while macro has barely moved. Robinhood - Cashcat run to 200 mill, drop down to 40 mill, then run back to 160 mill. With CashCat NFTs sitting at 0.32eth floor, 1.5 mill volume, on a 10k collection. - Stonkbrokers cook straight up for a month straight, currently at 75 mill. With an Stonkbroker NFTs sitting at 12eth floor, 5 mill volume, on a 4.4k collection. - Pipedog run up to 70 mill, currently sitting at 40 mill - Pons run to 66 mill, drop down to 16 mill, then run back to 56 mill - Tendies run up to 32 mill, drop down to 7 mill, currently slow cooking at 20 mill back to aths - Serveral other 7-8 figure runners Ethereum - FWA run to 37 mill, drop down to 4 mill, then run back to 36 mill Solana - Ansem consolidating around 200 mill (about 100 mill circulating) - Jimothy run up to 45 mill, currently sitting at 10 mill - Plumber run up 5 mill, currently sitting at 1.5 mill - Serveral other 7 figure runners Binance - Marscoin run to 75 mill with hardly any breaks - Serveral other 7-8 figure runners

• 
  Mark yu (@Markymarco34) reported 12 minutes ago

  You may think your answers were right, but I came away with a different impression. You told us the data showed that Koreans were the ones selling STX. But I think there is an important market-structure explanation for that. In the samples we previously reviewed, Upbit’s STX spot volume was at times roughly 4x Binance and 6x Coinbase. And even now, the latest snapshot shows: Upbit: ~8.68M STX traded in 24h Binance spot: ~3.93M STX traded in 24h So Upbit is still handling roughly 2.2x Binance’s spot volume right now. When one market represents such a large share of visible STX spot trading, it is naturally going to show a large share of both the buying and the selling. So seeing more selling activity in Korea does not automatically prove that “Koreans are the problem” or that Korean holders are uniquely bearish. It may simply reflect where most of the liquidity and turnover are concentrated. That is why I interpreted the same data differently. I’m not saying my interpretation has to be right. I’m saying the market structure deserves to be considered before drawing conclusions about who is selling and why. @muneeb

• 
  Lynh.cmc (@EAFBreal) reported 12 minutes ago

  LSK +25% to $0.0962 in 24h, clearly outperforming the flat market. Main driver: Explosive derivatives and liquidity surge. Spot volume up 1,510% to $28M. Top gainer on Binance Futures with volume +514% — strong speculative buying, possible short squeeze. Technical breakout above key MAs. RSI 7-day at 79.3 (overbought). Mild rotation into Layer-2 tokens. Short-term: Hold above $0.0893 support → possible retest of $0.1036 high. Break below → momentum weakens. Volume staying above $20M is key. This is a liquidity-driven move with no clear fundamentals. Not financial advice. High risk of reversal. Only risk what you can afford to lose. DYOR. #LSK ethereum:0x6033f7f88332b8db6ad452b7c6d5bb643990ae3f

• 
  KaKa_Defi (@BlesdAbroad) reported 18 minutes ago

  BTC and ETH remain stuck in a decision zone. BTC is trading around $64K to $65K after failing to hold above $65K, while ETH has slipped below $1,900 and is hovering near $1,870 to $1,920. The near-term pressure is clear. U.S. spot ETFs recorded roughly $144.67M in BTC outflows and $14.59M in ETH outflows on August 10. USDT dominance is also holding above the 8.27% support area, which could signal more caution if it breaks higher. But the bigger picture is not entirely bearish. Bitcoin wallets holding at least 10,000 BTC reportedly reached a six month high of 90. Smaller and mid-sized holders have added around $1.5B worth of BTC since July 29. On the Ethereum side, approximately 90,000 ETH was reportedly withdrawn from Binance, with about 40,000 ETH moved into staking. That creates a clear conflict: ETF demand and price momentum are weakening, while larger holders appear to be positioning for the longer term. For now, patience matters more than prediction. BTC needs to reclaim $65K with volume, while ETH needs to recover and hold above $1,900. Until then, expect more chop and avoid chasing sudden moves.

• 
  0xMoon (@0xMo0n) reported 19 minutes ago

  @lndnd1110 expect the impossible when you're talking about binance

• 
  King of bnb memes (@abiel720s) reported 19 minutes ago

  Binance didn’t list $BIBI on Alpha, and I don’t think they’ll ever list $bstocks there either. It seems Binance is intentionally avoiding meme tokens that use the names of its own products or services, most likely because of potential legal issues.

• 
  ayaan🐂🍷 (@ayaanfqi) reported 20 minutes ago

  @cz_binance absolutely agree once i was depositing usdc but had some issuues but the customer service of binance was so great number 1 exchange for a reason

• 
  Moin (@Moin447491) reported 25 minutes ago

  @binance Binance and CoinMarketCap try to push down $Qrl Quantum Resistant Ledger, they have taken away the placement of Qrl on CoinMarketCap. They try not to let $Qrl come up, but $Qrl will complete its light and will replace Bitcoin in a few years, when Quantumcoputers will Break $Btc.

• 
  AllGreenCandles (@AllGreenCandles) reported 26 minutes ago

  @FvctCrvpto its funny. crypto has seemingly collectively admitted that pmf is basically speculation, and coinbase's sole mistake was for some reason changing the vehcile of speculation from the **** we were already speculating on to creator coins. as for binance, never been a fan of their UIs or UX, but maybe they can pull of a legit competitor late-mover advantage and all (an actual thing)

• 
  Doshky (@Doshky39) reported 27 minutes ago

  OKX wasn’t a perfect company. In the United States, OKX faced serious legal problems and in 2025 agreed to pay roughly $500 million in penalties and forfeiture. So nobody should read this as “OKX is good and Binance is bad.”

• 
  Ulexander Gaseff 🌕🌊 (@UlexanderGaseff) reported 29 minutes ago

  Bizarre development. Both $MOVR and $GLMR received a monitoring tag from @binance. All the loyal holders are panicking and waiting for a plan from the teams @MoonbeamNetwork @MoonriverNW. And they are ignoring it and now posting about AI Agents giving eachother a *******. WTF

• 
  Scope360 (@Scope360Journal) reported 30 minutes ago

  @binance Screenshots of errors are important so you can always go back to them and tell yourself, “I won’t make that same stupid mistake again”. And you can store them in the Scope360 automated trading journal

• 
  Eyioluwase Olatunji (@eyioluwase64683) reported 34 minutes ago

  @okx The takeaway is simple: Plan early. OKX secured its EU authorization ahead of the deadline, while Binance was still working through its application. Timing and preparation matter. @OKX

• 
  TCC (@TCryptochicks) reported 37 minutes ago

  I’ve seen so many nonsense rumors and FUD circulating over the past few days, so I want to make this clear again. I support visions I believe in. I don’t do paid partnerships. That way I remain free to speak my mind and keep my timeline organic, which will always be my #1 priority. Interactions within Binance/BSC happen randomly. There’s nothing coordinated behind them. Don’t overthink every interaction, build theories around it, or invest based on rumors. Always DYOR.

• 
  Baris (@Barisaktass35) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance **** you ************* scammers

• 
  Paul Timofeev (@ptimfv) reported 44 minutes ago

  The @circle business model is at a crossroads. Q2 reserve income was 95% of its total revenue but: - Supply is down QoQ - The reserve return rate fell 66 bps YoY The float business model has worked well till now but its inputs are deteriorating. Circle can only influence supply via distribution so much; Fed rates are out of its control, which explains why Circle has been laying the groundwork for a volume-based business model that charges per-transaction, much more similar to that of Visa or Mastercard, who collect a fee on each payment they clear, which is a much more sound business model whose growth is tied closer to its industry (consider that Visa grew FY25 net revenue 11% on 8% payments volume growth while rates were coming down). Lower rates also means less incentive to sit on cash, which means money is more likely to move around. A stablecoin volume-based business model is built around stablecoin velocity. Usually measured as stablecoin transfer volume/circulating supply, velocity tells us how actively a stablecoin is being exchanged between different owners for various goods + services. The higher the stablecoin's velocity the more it is being transacted with. For reference, USDC velocity held near ~200 in Q2 ($14.8T volume / 73.3B circulating supply). To monetize USDC accordingly, Circle is building its new business model around its upcoming native L1 @arc - Gas fees on all transactions are paid in USDC, then converted to the native L1 token ARC at the protocol level: validators keep a commission, the rest passes to stakers proportional to stake, and a portion is burned against 2-3% initial issuance - Circle holds 25% of the initial 10B ARC supply and runs validators, so it earns on both sides of that flow - None of this is reserve income, so none of it falls under the Coinbase revenue share that takes 100% of on-platform reserve income plus 50% of the residual reserve income. Velocity matters particularly for agentic commerce because behaviorally agents are more likely to spend money for resources they need rather than hold the money idle as is common in emerging markets using stables like USDT as savings accounts. This behavior is already visible in data; comparing USDC (pink line) and USDT (orange) velocity below, we see the two track each other for six years and separate sharply from mid-2025 (when x402 launched) with USDC breaking above 50x while USDT remained flat around 12x. ~99% of x402 agent-payment volume settles in USDC, and Circle's Agent Stack now supports 900+ paid services, but that activity runs on public chains today. USDC settles transactions while those chains capture the gas fees, meaning Circle currently earns nothing per-transaction itself. Conversely on Arc, value generated in the payment loop will accrue to Circle. x402 has cleared 165M+ transactions across ~69,000 active agents in its first year. If even a portion of that migrates to Arc, each transaction converts USDC gas into ARC, split between validator commission, staker rewards, and a burn against supply Circle owns a quarter of. Transaction count (which has been consistently growing for USDC QoQ) becomes more important than payment size. Needless to say, how this all plays out depends on the success of Arc, whose mainnet is currently scheduled in a little over a month from now. Founding validators include BlackRock, DTCC, ICE, Mastercard, Visa, Standard Chartered, Galaxy, Global Payments, MoneyGram, SBI and Sumitomo; BlackRock is expected to deploy BUIDL on the network; DTCC will enable tokenization of DTC-custodied assets. Circle is also shipping a product suite for Arc including configurable privacy, AI-powered tooling for building apps and smart contracts, and native support for RWAs, while Binance Wallet, Chainlink, Fireblocks, Kraken, Ledger, MetaMask, Uniswap Labs and Upbit have already confirmed day-one USDC distribution on Arc. Realistically won't see the velocity model show up in Circle's numbers till Q1-Q2'27, but monetizing USDC's velocity is Circle's clearest differentiator in an increasingly crowded multi-layered stablecoin landscape.

• 
  Vydamo (@vydamo_) reported 47 minutes ago

  I don't know what this is, but get me 5 minutes with some binance execs and I will hardpill them on a meme which has the chance to unite western and Chinese consumers and why it's extremely beneficial for them to support a meme that even westerners can relate to They already have the Chinese market, they need to bridge the two worlds, and I've got just the cat to do it

• 
  HERE WE GO! (@escape2defi) reported 47 minutes ago

  Hey all - remember Oct 10, 2025? ethereum:0x4e3fbd56cd56c3e72c1403e103b45db9da5b9d2b data from that day: • Opened around $3.25 • Spiked down to a printed low of ~$0.74 (some exchange prints even lower, e.g. sub-$0.50 on Binance) • Closed the day around $2.08–$2.17 That was wild.

• 
  Dexter_1104 (@Dexter_1104) reported 48 minutes ago

  Hello bitcoin:native and constellation-labs:native community, I would like to make another post today explaining why almost everything is different this time, and why many still claim that everything is going as usual and the bottom will be reached around Q4. This has zero substance apart from this theory; no data or alleged facts, apart from the cycle theory, support this scenario, and yet these people refuse to understand. I am sharing some of my data and facts here. First, there is a bullish divergence on the Bitcoin 2-week chart,just like in the last bear market, after which the bottom was already in. Second, stock markets are at an all-time high; we are seeing an extreme divergence between stock markets and the crypto market. Third, looking at the total market cap, we see that the first and second lows have already been established, and as with Bitcoin, there is a bullish divergence. Fourth, USDT and USDT dominance show a clear bearish divergence, signaling that we have seen the peak in dominance and are already witnessing a trend reversal. Fifth, in June we saw a $5 billion liquidation event, three times larger than the one during the FTX crash, historically, major liquidation events have signaled the market bottom. What else could possibly happen now? World War III? The collapse of Binance? Sixth, the number of Bitcoin holdings currently in the red is at an all time high exactly the level where bear market bottoms have occurred in the past. On top of that, Bitcoin dominance is hovering just below 60% something never seen before in a bear market. So, please,what actually supports your theory other than the "4-year cycle" and "Q4 is the bottom" narrative? It is incredible how arrogant these people can be: faced with 99 arguments against their position and only one in favor, which side would they bet on? Stay tuned. bitcoin:native #crypto

• 
  its Karthik (@itsKarthik16) reported 55 minutes ago

  Unified Ecosystem Everything lives in one connected environment. Instead of switching between a CEX (like Binance) and a DEX (like Uniswap), users access both centralized and decentralized trading, liquidity, and tools from a single platform. @QuantaCore999 #nft #web3 #hybrid

• 
  Martin the Wanderer 🎻 (@martinwanderer) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance Nice gesture. At the same time you try to sue (for hundreds of millions) and ruin ReDotPay - on who's crypto debit cards many users in LATAM rely because you never offered us a working solution... Not so benevolent after all.

• 
  Doshky (@Doshky39) reported 55 minutes ago

  That gave OKX something its competitors eventually needed badly: breathing room. Binance went down a different path. It pursued a MiCA application in Greece, but on June 24, 2026, it withdrew the application, just days before the July 1 transition deadline.

• 
  AssetMarketCap (@AssetMarketCap) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance Trading just got a lot more flexible, access to the world’s markets is a good thing. Let’s keep exchanging ideas just as freely.

• 
  This Dorey | Trade Gold 24/7 on Vantage (@Stephcryptt) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance My long term plan is to build a reputable brand and promote projects solving real world problems, like @Weaver_Labs

• 
  UID (@uidabban) reported 56 minutes ago

  This thesis is right about trading. Binance already solved liquidity, security, and access there. But it stops short of the one everyday use case still living entirely outside the ecosystem: real-world commerce. Buying and selling physical goods still means leaving, bridging, trusting a random third party. That's the one sector still "outside the walls."

• 
  Janet24 (@Janet24446833) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Tmt246 @okx Compliance isn’t just about being clean — it’s about being early. OKX built its regulatory foundation ahead of time, while Binance waited and paid the price in lost market access. In crypto, timing can be as valuable as compliance itself.

• 
  Kira ♤ #Noirzuki 🔥 (@holyempresskira) reported 1 hour ago

  What ******** happened to binance? I just wanna cash out 9 dollars worth of tezos and it wants to crawl up my *** for info. What's with this crazy level of scrutiny?

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 1 hour ago

  $BTW is sitting at an interesting spot here 👀 Price is pushing into a clear lower-high resistance, while the bigger support structure around $0.20–$0.21 is still holding. In my opinion, this area decides the next move — rejection here could send it back toward support, but a clean breakout would change the setup completely. For now, I’m watching the reaction around $0.236–$0.24 closely. #BTW #Crypto #Binance

• 
  Sallie Stone (@IndieAuthors) reported 1 hour ago

  @toolshed_labs @CryptoVerse_Co I'd say 2029 if we are to go with Google, Microsoft and Cloudflare. So, it's necessary to start preparing. @QANplatform is already working on its mainnet, Algorand is getting ready and now, we have Binance.