Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	25 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	28 days ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 3 minutes ago

  first thing you wanna do is having an overall idea of the distro, if it's more Binance/OKX/Gate/Bybit/Mexc or Coinbase/Cryptocom/Change Now/Kraken. If it's more Binance then it can really pump high, but expect a hard dump at some point (like worldcup), if it's more Coinbase study your shits really really well and look if they are bagworking like maniacs, if you see them bagworking like there's no tomorrow : avoid. Basically after you have an overall idea where the holders are based, you need to find good strong hardcore kols in there. If you see the same guys with multi axiom wallets that's no good. if you see folks who can hold hard and are not insiders like ily or wrld_sol or gake, that's potentially the good ****. At the end of the day it's only about the holders and their reputation, it's very tough out there

• 
  Mavis (@0xmavis0x) reported 20 minutes ago

  Many crypto platforms rushed to offer tokenized shares or pre-IPO subscription products (Kraken, Bybit, Binance Wallet, Bitget Wallet, MEXC, Gate, and others). The problem: tokenized access doesn’t create more real shares.

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 23 minutes ago

  @grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance @BinanceAngels @BinanceWallet The survey link is not working atm. Please fix this!

• 
  Alek (@Alek_Carter) reported 24 minutes ago

  @greg_miller05 @binance @BinanceAcademy This shift feels slow while it’s happening, then suddenly it becomes normal.

• 
  Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported 26 minutes ago

  @binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 27 minutes ago

  @cryptlogis platform reportedly gone since jan, users can't unstake, binance monitoring tag active down 99% from ath with fundamental operational issues

• 
  melinda (@Melinda_Stairs) reported 27 minutes ago

  @pharma_le36640 hey if you are using binance web3 wallet, you have to message their support page @HumanityprotS1 for guidance on how to migrate and claim your new token. They just assisted me with mine.

• 
  Lotz (@Radio_Tua23) reported 30 minutes ago

  @ap_milly777 @BinanceUS Wojak Solana is wrong, it's impossible for a class like Binance to make the wrong choice hahahaa

• 
  CryptoSocials (@CryptoSocialsX) reported 31 minutes ago

  $INJ is a crypto trend on X today, ranked #13. What traders are talking about: • Injective is being positioned as the dedicated finance layer L1, emphasizing DeFi, RWAs, and AI applications with low transaction fees. • The network is seeing adoption for novel use cases, including the tokenization of music IP and AI agent payments. • Technical analysis suggests buyer absorption and potential price targets, with some users expressing strong long-term conviction. • Key infrastructure upgrades and partnerships, such as the native EVM mainnet launch and Coinbase support, are noted as significant developments. • Large entities like Revolut and Binance are increasing their $INJ holdings, indicating institutional interest. Users posting about $INJ most on X today: @0xtega_ - 2 @CadeONeill - 2

• 
  Whaleland (@Whaleland_Dex) reported 34 minutes ago

  Europe’s new crypto license race has started because MiCA is moving from theory to enforcement. Firms now need authorization as a crypto-asset service provider in one EU country, and that license can then be used across the bloc. That has created a real competitive sprint among exchanges, fintechs, and crypto infrastructure firms. Winning early means gaining regulated access to the EU market ahead of rivals, while missing the deadline can mean an orderly exit, blacklisting, or legal risk. Recent events show both sides of that race. Conio secured a MiCA license in Italy this week, while Reuters reported Binance is expected to lose its bid in Greece and may no longer be able to serve EU users from July. The bigger picture is that Europe is becoming one of the first major markets where crypto regulation now directly decides who can scale. That makes licensing less of a compliance box and more of a strategic moat.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 38 minutes ago

  BFUSD is a pass — it's a dollar-pegged token trading at $0.9996, and there's simply no room above it to make the trade worth taking. Every chart here, daily down to hourly, is a flat line hugging $1. The "moves" you see are fractions of a cent. That's by design — BFUSD is built to sit on the dollar, not to trend. So even in the best case where momentum turns up, price runs straight back into the $1 peg before any meaningful gain can develop. The reward side of the equation just isn't there. The backdrop makes it worse. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both drifting lower on the 4-hour, the US dollar is firming up (which historically leans on crypto), and this specific pair barely trades — only around $2 million in daily turnover. Thin liquidity plus a capped ceiling is the opposite of what a swing setup needs. None of that means the chart is "bad." It means the instrument is structurally wrong for this kind of trade. A clean-looking base only matters if there's somewhere for price to go. The one thing that would put BFUSD back on the radar: a decisive push above $1.001 on the 4-hour with real volume behind it. That would signal the peg is actually breaking, and the whole read would need to be rebuilt from scratch. Until then, there's nothing here to lean into. — 📘 Pass Note · $BFUSD · Available on Binance

• 
  Kashif Zaib (@KashifZaib1995) reported 40 minutes ago

  @binance **** you binance scammers

• 
  hydra (@HydraRare) reported 40 minutes ago

  @binance if this was a real binance phone the chart would be going down

• 
  Ziopat (@PatriceinMilano) reported 43 minutes ago

  Bitcoin has broken lower to $62,975. Funding rates are still mixed. Binance shows +0.0060% while Bybit sits negative. Open interest has edged down to 98,900 BTC. The move below $64,000 is notable. It comes after several weeks of range-bound action. This suggests the market is no longer willing to defend higher levels without fresh catalysts. Macro conditions and ETF flows remain the dominant drivers. Neither has turned convincingly supportive yet. The structure is now testing lower support. Let's recap: - Price: $62,975 - Funding: mixed - OI: slightly lower - Recent action: breakdown from range How much further can price correct before we see meaningful dip buying return?

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 45 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet But I still face some issues. Sometimes it is hard to know if a project is safe or risky. Many new users may connect to a dApp without understanding the risks. It would be nice if Binance added stronger risk warnings, scam detection, and a simple safety score before users approve

• 
  Michael Bright (@phoxonomy) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance it never let me down. hope you will find a solution for the eu bullshit in order to keep european customers!

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Fadil_bawa1 @Fadil_bawa1 You missed the bigger play—$Wojak’s 24h volume on Binance US spiked 400% the day after the listing, but only 12% of traders held it for >6hrs. Most sold into the hype. We track this daily—breaking down why in our latest report. Follow...

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 47 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  ap milly (@ap_milly777) reported 49 minutes ago

  Community doesnt matter anymore. $WOJAK sol community been grinding for 6months+ just for a bundle pvp to come up with paid kols and get a binance listing. Asteroid at only 70m after 3 elon and spacex shills. Floki went to 3b with much less. Doge to 90b. This **** is cooked😭🙏

• 
  Lion_of_Judah (@MartinLuther_77) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance #Binance burns and support #LUNC

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Kuldeepgoy18861 @rsbiplob20 Additionally, we would like to note down that: - Eligible New Users who registered for a Binance account during the Promotion Period and completed the trading requirements may access the New User reward link to claim their reward from 2026-06-25 to 2026-07-15. The link will be available from 2026-06-25. - Eligible Existing Users who registered for a Binance account before the Promotion Period and completed the trading requirements may access the Existing User reward link to claim their reward from 2026-06-25 to 2026-07-15. The link will be available from 2026-06-25. Thank you. - HN

• 
  Safari Urg (@Safarii533) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance Binance support only meme coin.

• 
  Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reported 50 minutes ago

  franklin templeton filed for etfs that funnel stock dividend flow into BTC. eu mica go-live in july puts binance access and USDT liquidity at risk in europe. oman launched omanhash, a national bitcoin mining pool to regulate licensed miners.

• 
  Alpha (@Mrdollar22) reported 51 minutes ago

  @binance With regulations around tokenized assets changing across different countries, how is Binance making sure bStocks can stay compliant in places where synthetic stocks face stricter rules? Do these regulatory differences affect how users in different regions can access or use them? #AskBinance

• 
  gazel polat 🇹🇷 (@gazo_23) reported 51 minutes ago

  @cryptovlat @SuperChad15 Fk this scum project $turtle ! Worst garbage listed on binance ever ! 8 month non stop dropping without any bounce

• 
  Nobisblue (@nobisblue) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance Are customer assets fully segregated from company funds and verifiably backed 1:1, and can you prove it independently? #Askbinance

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 57 minutes ago

  @heyibinance Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution, I have been pushed to black hole within Binance support system. Can you please help. For the past 9 months, I have been suffering for the (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  Fontinz (@1017_Zhu) reported 58 minutes ago

  My account has been under review for over 30 days and my funds are currently inaccessible. Case ID #163436272. ​Customer support has repeatedly provided template responses and confirmed they cannot assist further. Please help! @BinanceHelpDesk @binance

• 
  G E N N Y (@Gennycruz_) reported 59 minutes ago

  @CryptoProject6 @binance Access to opportunities should not depend on geography. 🔥