Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	29 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ryan Lenk (@itsryanlenk) reported 4 minutes ago

  @oimeninama @nuddypant @Recoverytechy can you help me get my binance account back or no?

• 
  TEE (@_tenaO) reported 5 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Help @binance

• 
  Aditya Warman (@warmanadit_) reported 8 minutes ago

  2/7 📌 The problem? HYPERLIQUID. GMX uses a "pool model" for trades. Hyperliquid uses an order book — just like Binance or Bybit. Order books are FASTER. They feel like CEXs. Traders don't care about "pioneer status." They care about execution speed.

• 
  Gigagoblin (@Gigagoblin) reported 9 minutes ago

  For his second talk @realRockyChung was back on the Solana Summit Serbia stage for a solo keynote on DART, and it was the sharpest pitch of the event. If the earlier fireside was the landscape view, this was the product deep dive, and it opened with a framing every on-chain trader should sit with. We all came on chain to fire the middleman. But we made an implicit trade to do it: we traded best execution for self custody. We accepted worse fills to hold our own keys. And that has a real cost. His example: a project that regularly does $200,000 trades. They see a price they like, click buy, approve in their wallet. By the time the transaction lands, they got filled around 10 basis points worse, about $200 gone, purely in the seconds it took to approve their own transaction. Do that trade 100 times and it's $20,000. As Chris put it, the quote wasn't wrong. The quote was right. But the market moved and the quote didn't move with it. That's the fundamental gap. The mechanics: there's no single price of SOL. There are over 100 venues on Solana, each with its own price and liquidity. A route gets locked at T0, you approve around 3 seconds later while the market has already moved, and the trade executes around 5 seconds in. The gap between locked quote and live market is where your money leaks. So Titan asked a simple question: what if the quote could move with the market? That's DART, which stands for Dynamically Allocated in Real Time, the first on-chain router on Solana. At the exact moment of execution, DART scans the entire universe of pools and market makers, prices on depth and liquidity, and allocates right there and then. A detail I didn't know: off-chain routers can only fit around 4 to 5 pools in a single transaction. DART fits 8 or 9. His side-by-side showed an off-chain route through 3 market makers versus a DART route generated at execution time through 8. More venues, no quote-to-execution gap, better price every time. Then the slide that made the room pay attention. Titan's combined best bid-offer runs spreads typically under 1 basis point, sometimes literally negative, which for the arb traders in the room means free money appearing frequently on the market. Against Binance VIP 9, the top tier basically reserved for institutions, DART showed a better spread by around 5 basis points. Read that again: a retail user on Solana getting better execution than institutions on the biggest centralized exchange on earth. On a $100k round trip, roughly 6 basis points of improvement over Binance VIP 9. Only possible on Solana. The stats versus other routers who've launched their own flavors of on-chain routing, in his words, don't lie. On-chain utilization: 79% for Titan versus around 35% for competitors, which tells you whose on-chain routing actually gets used. Average slippage: consistently POSITIVE at around 0.03 basis points, basically unheard of anywhere in finance, versus around 0.21 elsewhere. And the metric builders should care about most, intent failure rate: approximately 0% for Titan versus 1.4% for others. That 1.4% sounds small until it includes your whale, and then you have a platform problem. Titan Pro launches next week to put all of this in traders' hands: customizable layouts, every position and open order on one screen, DART filling every trade plus exclusive access to Titan's proprietary router that outperforms everyone else 75 to 80% of the time. Limit orders, DCA, and conditional orders including stop losses, take profits, and trailing stops, with gas, automatic slippage, and MEV protection handled for you. DM the Titan team for early access. For builders: the DART API is free, no keys, JSON, with Rust and TypeScript SDKs, plus Titan Direct websocket streaming and REST endpoints distributed via Triton and QuickNode. Exclusive integrations with projects like Exponent, HyLo v2, and OnRe mean depth others don't have. The closer landed. That $200,000-per-trade company tried DART for the first time recently. They got filled better than the quote. The trade where you gave up best execution for self custody is over. As Chris said: DART is the way to do it, and Titan Pro is how you trade it. Bonus: the host revealed backstage that Chris was recently diagnosed as allergic to grass. Extremely bullish for Titan.

• 
  𝑫𝒂𝒏 𝑩𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒐 (@DanBelloNFA) reported 11 minutes ago

  BNB memes are telling us something… So many projects are getting real support and exposure from Binance, and we're watching them send into hundreds of millions in market cap. That isn't luck. Binance isn't here to participate. They're here to dominate. One thing I respect about @cz_binance is that he actually understands internet culture.... He interacts with communities instead of pretending memes don't matter. And honestly, a lot of builders today are just copying the playbook CZ has been using for years. So what's the move? Stop chasing random launches. Find the strongest communities on BNB, build conviction early, and bag the ones with real potential. $BNB season feels different. Let's see who cooks. 🤌

• 
  Katherine🔶 (@Katherine_XBT) reported 13 minutes ago

  @cz_binance The “until it’s all on Binance” line just stopped being a tagline. You can now buy actual Tesla or Nvidia calls from the same account you used to buy BNB. Physical settlement. Real shares. One app. That’s not feature creep. That’s the strategy working.

• 
  Hemskets | Pillar | Midnight Ambassador (@Hemsketsmelvet) reported 17 minutes ago

  Con: exchanges keep dropping it Binance, Kraken in Europe, OKX and others have delisted Monero. Regulators treat all or nothing privacy as a compliance problem. That makes XMR harder to buy, harder to sell, and thinner on liquidity.

• 
  Mari (@Maribtxn) reported 22 minutes ago

  2/3. Primus builds the decentralized verification and privacy layer, by proving the authenticity of any data off chain, and computing the encrypted private data onchain there are the two ways they use to make your information save and private, first one is; zKTLS:Normal HTTPS (TLS) already encrypts traffic between you and a bank, exchange, payroll site, or API. zkTLS adds a zero-knowledge proof on top of that connection. this make it possible to prove things like: • “this balance came from Binance” • “this person passed KYC” • “these reserves exist at the issue

• 
  Kyle (@zeroxkyle) reported 30 minutes ago

  anyways, for the liquid fund or altcoin players who are sidelined on-chain and waiting for the fabled alt season, here's my high conviction play firstly, imo there are two big risks w this thesis - first, the fact that on-chain has been very hot (hot ball of money is there) ; and secondly, that crypto x ai play has been left for dead due to many failures that have no pmf (only vvv works, and yes, this is a crypto x ai token) decentralized models - failed ; gpu renting - failed ; agents - failed; these risks cut both ways - one, you are pre-positioning for the "eventual puck" - but it may never come, and i may be stuck in this position that does nothing. But if it DOES come, then this is under-positioned and offer asymmetric upside and has good r/r. you can't have your cake and eat it two but the silver lining is - looking at VVV's success, we can conclude that market DOES have appetite, but for things that *work*. and alts HAVE just done a 2-4x since the bottom, and have just been chilling, so all things considered, odds are in your favour now for the thesis - n of 1 vertical, practically impossible to copy bc it's relationship driven biz in an atomized world (not bits) - right place, right time, jensen started gpu financing - was laughed at 1y+ ago but now it's starting to gain traction - also, in a vertical of crypto, like mentioned earlier, has been left for dead, yet has shown strong pmf in their metrics, and has the right tailwinds of bringing RWA yield on-chain, good tokenomics, in a secular high growth vertical (AI) - tvl up and to the right, closed sharon ai (leopold holding) + few other neos - overloaded with borrow demand, could write 10x loan TVL (3bn) in next three months. - top of funnel ~13bn in loan originations; constraint is not demand, but deposits ; aave + sky integration upcoming to provide material boost over the next few months - listed on every exchange - upbit, robinhood, binance, coinbase - expecting tokenomics update on value accrual in next few months. founder has shared public views on how he thinks about value accrual, expect this to be very positive. he takes lessons from HYPE / VVV ; - as an example, 65bn nasdaq listed tech company bought tokens three months ago - team just hired ex CRWV CFO as Senior Advisor - 80m MC with no unlocks till q1 27 - oh , and chart looks like this ******* send it

• 
  SolOwl (@SolOwl_) reported 32 minutes ago

  @solana Down almost 10% with 5 years of growing and speeding up. Sucks that $SOL value is determined by Binance and not fundamentals

• 
  Arslan (@ArslanOnChain) reported 35 minutes ago

  A member asked me to analyze this . This is $SYRUP. Price is 0.2064. It already ran from 0.113 to 0.670. Now it is sitting in the middle after that dump. Market cap is $246.5M. Open Interest is $29.8M. Futures volume is $28.4M. Spot is only $4.8M. Volume jumped 61%. Open Interest jumped 25%. That means new leverage just entered. Now the wallet. 0xaA3D56e9695F75eEcd6E3E78546154b727147b8a Labeled Arca on Arkham. Total portfolio around $12.92M. This wallet is holding 22.597M $SYRUP worth $4.68M. The bag was built in two parts. Eight to nine months ago it withdrew from Binance around 15.655M $SYRUP. Those fills were near $0.26. Cost on that slice was about $4.10M. One day ago it added another 6.942M $SYRUP from Binance. That add was $1.28M. Average on the new slice is about $0.184. Full bag average is near $0.238. Current price is 0.206. So the old coins are still in loss. The new 6.94M add is already in profit. On the full 22.6M position this wallet is still down about $700k. That matters. This is not a fresh wallet flipping a new gem. This is a large holder adding on the dip while the older bag is still red. A $61.3k sell wall is sitting at 0.2126. That order can be cancelled. It is not a wall that stops the whole coin. Positioning is split. Binance accounts: 0.95 Top trader accounts: 1.25 Top trader positions: 4.04 Accounts are mixed. The big positions are heavily long. Spot flow is cleaner than the perps. Exchanges saw about $28k net outflow in 24 hours. Top PnL wallets added. Fresh wallets added. Binance wallet 0x3304e2 added 70k in 24 hours, but reduced 79k over 7 days. Token millionaire 0x342bd0 added 43.5k in 24 hours. On Hyperliquid the book is conflicted. Smart traders are net long about $394k. Whales are net short about $720k. Combined that book is still net short about $322k. Funding is positive, so longs are paying shorts. Base liquidity is thin. That means one order can move this faster than the chart looks. My read is simple. This is not a clean gem. This is a mid-cap with a large holder adding, leverage rising, and perps fighting each other. If price holds above 0.196, the next test is the 0.212 sell order and then 0.230. If 0.196 fails, the same leverage can send it back toward 0.170. A break under 0.170 opens 0.140. I’m watching the Arca wallet and that 0.2126 order first. If the wallet keeps adding and 0.196 holds, the long side gets another push. If whale shorts grow and 0.196 breaks, this is not the gem yet.

• 
  Dr. Yashu 🤍 (@pumpit_apu) reported 35 minutes ago

  @binance seriously working onboarding retails 🔥 $FLORK / $BTC pair gona moon 🙏 @cz_binance & $FLORK community gona change my life by holding a tiny portions of tokens 🥳

• 
  Haber (@Haber953901) reported 35 minutes ago

  @theunipcs please help me. I sent my Ethereum from my Uniswap account to my Binance ERC-20 address, but it didn't arrive in my Binance account. What can I do to recover my funds? That was all the money I had, man. Tx: 0x58c79ac78579559e75cd780c3ea93c52a73647b376d05bd9205d6433a6196437

• 
  10XN ☁️ (@Yucee_Official) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance Are you guys mad???? Whats this ****

• 
  maxlevelskitzo (@MaxLvlSkitzo) reported 36 minutes ago

  Owning both doesn’t make the dichotomy fake. Zcash encryption isn’t better.. Monero stacks multiple layers; ring signatures for the sender, stealth addresses for the receiver, and Bulletproofs to hide amounts. while Zcash privacy is one optional zk circuit. One coin hid a four-year circuit bug that could mint inside the private pool with no fingerprint. The other got delisted off 70+ exchanges for refusing a transparent mode. Those are different products. Zcash’s “better cryptography” doesnt even apply to z-to-z spend as its already been mapped AND Most ZEC isn’t even that. t-addresses, pool hops, view keys, and light wallets are endpoints. Analysts label large slices of ZEC flow because the public side of the ledger exists on purpose. That’s how it stays on Coinbase and in an ETF. Monero paid for default privacy. No foundation to take the meeting. No compliant off-switch. CCS instead of a company. RandomX. Tail emission. Atomic swaps after Binance and Kraken EEA dumped it. IRS money went into metadata theater, not a broken spend proof. You can hold both. Don’t call optional privacy plus an emergency pool migration “just factual” superiority. The ringer Monero went through is the cost of every spend looking the same. ZEC kept the door open. That’s the split.

• 
  Raymond R. (@RayNordic) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance CHIA will fix this after USDT fails

• 
  Kepler (@KeplerOnchain) reported 39 minutes ago

  robinhood is clearly the trend right now. it has the most eyes, most memes, and most new "tech" (=pairing with stocks). but i still believe it's a trend, as long as we are talking about the same people who hop from one chain to another due to profit opportunities. i don't see any new people entering the game and choosing to base themselves on robinhood. imo we will have robinhood > solana rotation back and a minority will push bnb again (probably due to some major escalation from binance trying to push the narrative). it will go back to solana + bnb + base on top. robinhood won't die, it'll stay in the top 5 for a long time, probably fighting base for the 3rd spot for a while. i think will base win, as they are more crypto focused and led, while robinhood just threw "we are entering the space" but not actually working in it. there are just so many narratives and projects built on solana and bnb for years now across various audiences. look at blast, abstract, monad... robinhood is a different case bringing real tech with stock pairing, but it all comes down to sticky users. right now there aren't enough new users to hold yet another chain. and no, solana won't be ditched, not now, not in a year.

• 
  yağız (@crypto_yagiz) reported 45 minutes ago

  @damonemcrp @axisrobotics @BinanceWallet 1.5M points in a separate pool is a strong move for Axis. Do you think Binance Wallet can bring in a lot of new contributors? Let’s support each other’s posts 🤝

• 
  hodLNothing.btc 🟧 (@hodlstxbtc) reported 46 minutes ago

  Muneeb just published the first official @Stacks market analysis, co-written with a newly hired market analyst. Read past the numbers and three things stand out 👇 📊 The numbers ▸ STX +83% in 4 days, ~4x Bitcoin's move ▸ Still +42% above the July Binance-tag level, BTC +19% over the same period ▸ $157M weekly volume, 7x normal, largest since 2024 ▸ Mid-to-large orders: 2,879, 10x the 2026 weekly median ▸ First positive net taker flow of 2026 across Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Upbit 🔍 What the data says 1⃣ The buyer changed In January and May, programmatic buying showed up before the rally. This time small orders led and systematic flow joined on day 4. Pulled, not pushed. 2⃣ Korea flipped The market that sold hardest after the Binance tag exhausted its selling before the rally, then posted the only Korean net inflow of 2026. When Upbit sold again the next week, passive bids absorbed it over 7 days and price closed flat. In July, the same selling took STX down 15% in two days. The overhang is being digested. 3⃣ Downside beta went negative Two days where BTC fell and STX closed green. STX started trading on its own catalyst instead of as a Bitcoin beta trade. The report flags that two days is a thin sample, and it is right. 🧭 The meta signal A founder who avoided market talk for years now publishes internal flow data with a named analyst and a disclaimer. That is the behavior of a team that believes the fundamentals can survive scrutiny. Their closing line: markets price narrative fast, fundamentals slow. Eight days to enrollment. Disclosure: I hold BTC and $STX .

• 
  josé (@josefbednar) reported 49 minutes ago

  @cryptogoos Scroll down his own screenshot. He pulled the same 7.2K off Binance last week

• 
  investor 🔸 (@moneymancalls) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance BROOO WTF

• 
  Footydude (@Bear999999996) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance Reason #1 the trenches are tired of Binance. Cets (original) has been working for a month and reaches 30M MC with no Alpha listing. Flork (version 10,000) gets bull posted by binance and listed in days.

• 
  LʋMMy❄️ (@Lyy_diia) reported 51 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Like in the binance app There’s self recovery area where there’s wrong chain or memo tag issue

• 
  币安交易所注册新手攻略｜币安返佣注册开户教程下载binance美股app交易所 (@SokaEdgar) reported 51 minutes ago

  🍐 🎻In my sleep, I drifted through a luminous metropolis where every tower flickered with glowing market patterns. My phone buzzed on its own—the Binance interface had launched. Hands shaking, I hit sign-up, typed a celestial passcode, and full access unlocked in a flash. Bef

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 52 minutes ago

  @DustyBC ETF desks were buying while the tape was doing the opposite: $ETH is $2,393 and down 2.98% with 24h market buys of $19.39B against $21.29B of sells. Biggest single $ETH buy print was about $11.1M on Binance versus a $10.4M sell, so the flows are nearly matched.

• 
  Brian Cohen (@inthepixels) reported 53 minutes ago

  YTD — The 2026 Outlier Index: What Actually Won Across Crypto, Stocks and ETFs Year-to-date through early September 2026, the Outlier Index tells a very different story from the familiar market averages. The S&P 500 is up only around 10–12%. Bitcoin $BTC and many of the largest cryptocurrencies have struggled. Yet enormous returns have appeared elsewhere: in crypto, storage, semiconductors, AI infrastructure, South Korea and—in one spectacular case—tanker-freight futures. Zcash $ZEC and the Grayscale Zcash ETF $ZCSH belong in this conversation. But they are not at the top of it. That distinction matters. This is not an attempt to construct a leaderboard that Zcash conveniently wins. It asks a more interesting question: What actually won in 2026 once we remove microscopic assets, securities that remain OTC, and conventional 2x/3x leveraged products—and require enough size for the return to matter? The answer leads to a concept conventional performance tables often obscure: return at scale. Building the Outlier Index The screen is simple. Crypto: market capitalization of at least $100 million. Stocks: market capitalization of at least $100 million, currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq or NYSE American. Securities that remain on OTC Markets are excluded. However, a security that began 2026 on the OTC market and was subsequently uplisted to a qualifying major exchange remains eligible. The Outlier Index measures where an asset stands now; an earlier OTC listing does not erase a later uplisting. ETFs: U.S.-listed, generally with at least $100 million in assets. Conventional daily-reset 2x and 3x leveraged or inverse products are excluded. This distinction matters for the Grayscale Zcash ETF $ZCSH. It began the year as the OTC-traded Grayscale Zcash Trust before being uplisted to NYSE Arca and converted into an ETF. Its OTC history is therefore part of its 2026 return story, not grounds for excluding it. The objective isn't to discover the most mathematically extreme security hiding somewhere in the market. It is to identify extraordinary returns occurring at enough size, liquidity and accessibility to matter. Then we accept whatever survives the screen—even when we don't particularly like the answer. Crypto: Three Very Different Kinds of Winner Hyperliquid $HYPE is one of the cleanest large-cap crypto winners. By early September it trades around $82, with approximately $18 billion of market capitalization, attached to what has become a major decentralized perpetual-futures trading ecosystem. That scale is important. This isn't a tiny token moving several hundred percent because a few million dollars arrived. Billions of dollars of market value have been created around an operating crypto platform. Then there is one of the year's truly extraordinary percentage moves. Venice Token $VVV is up roughly 900% YTD. $VVV began the year around $1.60–$1.65 and by early September trades around $16, giving it a market capitalization around $750–800 million. That is roughly a tenfold increase in eight months. More interestingly, $VVV is attached to an operating product. It is the native economic asset associated with Venice AI, the privacy-focused artificial-intelligence platform co-founded by Erik Voorhees. That places Venice in an unusual position in the 2026 market. The AI trade did not remain confined to semiconductor companies, storage manufacturers and server makers. It reached crypto. And Venice introduces an idea that will become important later: $VVV is an economic asset attached to private AI. $ZEC is an economic asset attached to private money. Then there is Binance Life, the English rendering of the Chinese-named BNB Chain meme token. We include Binance Life reluctantly.

• 
  the intern (@theintern198) reported 54 minutes ago

  @binance More finance less problems

• 
  Tony (@ASVPXILLZ) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance VIP 6 means even your weekend FOMO gets customer support...

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 57 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I will ask you everyday. Why dont you stop bouncebit thieves? İs your exchange binance for **** coin, thief coin exchange? Tell us When will you obstruct bouncebit thieves?

• 
  Elvarx | Daily stock analysis🟢 (@Elvarxs) reported 1 hour ago

  My take on bitcoin:native : 1/ BTC just did something unusual: August ETF inflows topped $3B - the strongest month of 2026 - yet the fund complex is still net NEGATIVE for the year (~-$2.5B). Institutions bought the dip so hard it barely dented the May-July outflow hole. bitcoin:native 2/ Snapshot: Price ~$77,600 (as of Sept 1, 9:43am ET), roughly flat to -2% on the day depending on venue. Market cap ~$1.55T. 52-week range: $57,832-$126,186 (ATH was Oct 2025). Chart is consolidating just under resistance after a ~22-24% August rally. 3/ Setup: BTC ripped from the low $60Ks to above $80K in August on ETF demand, then got knocked back below $78K intraday when Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's hawkish Jackson Hole remarks lifted September rate-hike odds. It's now fighting to hold the reclaim. 4/ Bull case: August was the best ETF month of 2026 - $3B+ net inflows, ~2x April's pace. BlackRock's IBIT absorbed ~62% of that. Zero net-selling days across spot BTC ETFs in August per on-chain tracking (Arkham). Demand looks real, not just AUM inflation from price. 5/ The catch: ETFs remain net NEGATIVE ~$2.5B for 2026 - August only clawed back about half the May-July bleed. Binance exchange reserves hit a 2026 high (~687K BTC, up from ~617K in April) - a build some read as distribution setup, not accumulation. Daily RSI is above 70 - stretched. 6/ Key levels: Support $76,800-77,165. First bull threshold $78,340. Major confirmation zone $79,730-79,920. Above that, $80,280 and the 50-week MA (~$81,000-82,000) is the real ceiling. Below $76,800 opens a retest toward the low $70Ks. 7/ Risks: (1) Sept 16 FOMC - a repeat hawkish surprise. (2) Rising exchange reserves = shrinking dry powder / possible distribution into strength. (3) BTC is still ~38% below its Oct 2025 ATH of $126K - that entire cohort is sitting on overhead supply. 8/ Catalysts: (1) If August's ETF pace carries into September, $80K+ gets retested. (2) Fear & Greed sits at 67-72 (Greed) - elevated but not euphoric, leaving room to run. (3) Standard Chartered's $100K year-end target still stands on the desk. 9/ How we got here: BTC bottomed near $58-60K in June/July after a weak Q2, then staged its best month of 2026 in August on returning ETF demand. The rally stalled at $80-82K resistance and took a macro gut-check from Warsh's Jackson Hole comments. 10/ No sell-side consensus exists for BTC, but institutional positioning is the proxy: IBIT dominance + a zero-outflow August skew bullish. Standard Chartered's $100K year-end call implies ~29% upside from spot - that's the bull case if flows hold. 11/ My take: Hold, not chase. BTC is consolidating $77K-80K into a binary macro event (Sept 16 FOMC). I'd want acceptance above $79,730-79,920 on volume before adding, and I'd treat a clean break below $76,800 as the exit signal, not a dip to buy. Watch Sept 16.