Binance status: access issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Binance. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.
- Transactions (83%)
- Website (17%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Transactions | 28 days ago |
|
|
Transactions | 1 month ago |
|
|
Website | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Lotz (@Radio_Tua23) reported@ap_milly777 @BinanceUS Wojak Solana is wrong, it's impossible for a class like Binance to make the wrong choice hahahaa
-
Suraj Jha (@Fin_CryptoAce) reported$BTC Swing Short Update - After Breaking down from 64k$ ,it was a good MSB in LTF and was getting rejected from daily VWAP,continuous spot selling from Binance and coinbase made it very obvious that we will dump more and still I can’t see any strength in the price action of $BTC . Still no change waiting for lower , I don’t see any point of taking scalp long here so still in my swing short . #btc #btcusd
-
Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported@binance It's difficult to trust a platform that labels your account "high risk" due to technical errors, then repeats the error dozens of times, then bans you from P2P for two transactions totaling only a few dollars, implicitly accusing you of money laundering. The problem isn't the error itself, but the persistence in it, the lack of transparency, accountability, and apology when the error is proven. Users deserve fair treatment, not arbitrary decisions followed by justifications.
-
ronjukhanbd.eth (@ronjukhanbd) reported@binance If Binance or the custodian holding the underlying shares ever had issues, what actually happens to my bStocks? Can I always redeem 1:1 for the real share, or could there be limits/delays during high demand? #AskBinance
-
K (@KMore1_2) reported@binance I trade on Binance because I support CZ
-
Ngulik Crypto (@ngulik_crypto) reportedBINANCE SET TO LOSE PERMISSION TO OFFER SERVICES TO EU CLIENTS AS LICENCE APPLICATION IN GREECE TO BE TURNED DOWN, TWO SOURCES SAY BINANCE SAYS IT BELIEVES IT HAS MET THE RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS TO BE MICA AUTHORISED IN EU source @DeItaone
-
Mdx (@helloitsmdx) reportedHOLY **** WHO JUST SENT ME 1BTC ON MY BINANCE ???? that's right ******* nobody
-
David Arnal (@davidarngar) reported@binance The interesting question isn’t access—it’s execution quality. If stocks, ETFs, and crypto sit in one account, transparent fees, settlement mechanics, and tax reporting will matter more than the 24/5 headline.
-
Michael Bright (@phoxonomy) reported@binance it never let me down. hope you will find a solution for the eu bullshit in order to keep european customers!
-
Boris NEOF1 (@NEOFORCEONE) reported@kfXGGjovH2HKn4u @c_schuchardt Did dude @kfXGGjovH2HKn4u is using a small baby to promote Chinese scam, is clear to see he is NGD shill ( They have 0 moral ) They are Chinese scammers, all is pump and dump, that is the whole game, market manipuilation and harvesting people, that is why they don't really care about updates, as they are here to harvest people, that is why all things are slow in core-dev segment also, they don't care to work, as there is no incentive to progress on global goal, there is no leadership only a Chinese scamming boss and his scamming helpers/Yes man, soon court process for creating a global international, money laundering ring ( Da Hongfei ) And his partners in crime NGD etc... where Erik will be part of the court process also. They know abot pumps and dumps before they happened on Binance they orchestrated. Etc...
-
Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceWallet Thank you for your response, but the issue has never been properly addressed. The same problem keeps happening repeatedly, and each time it is eventually attributed to a "technical error." When the same mistake occurs over and over again, it is no longer an isolated incident—it becomes a systemic issue. Your technical failures have repeatedly classified my account as high-risk, restricted services, and caused unnecessary inconvenience and stress. As a user, I am expected to comply with all requirements, and I have done so every time. Yet Binance continues to make the same mistakes without taking responsibility. What is even more frustrating is the lack of transparency, accountability, and any form of apology after these errors are proven. Repeating the same issue for months is not acceptable and reflects poorly on the reliability of your systems. Users deserve better than repeated technical failures and generic responses. We deserve fair treatment, clear explanations, and accountability
-
nev | pray4profit.hl (@pray4profit) reported>> be kyle samani >> constantly shits on hyperliquid ("low integrity team", "everything wrong with crypto", closed-source, permissioned, "binance 2.0 without marketing", etc.) >> says drift is the best perp dex in crypto drift gets hacked for $285m on april fools day 2026 (not a joke) >> chairman of sol DAT (forward industries, $FWDI) — the "world's largest solana treasury company" >> forward industries down ~$1B+ on its $SOL (unrealized losses hit ~$670-700M early on; accounting losses of $868M in first 6 months from mark-to-market + impairments) >> leaves multicoin right before he starts yapping about how hyperliquid is "everything wrong with crypto" (steps back feb 4-5 2026, first big anti-hyperliquid posts days later) >> still "mega long SOL" while his own treasury company posts $868M losses in 6 months >> vaults on solana were "awesome product design space" until the one he was shilling got drained >> "figuring out what's next" after turning the biggest solana treasury play into a billion-dollar baghold >> lmao
-
Pritam Kumar (@Pritamkumar047) reported@BinanceHelpDesk I have not committed any scam or fraud, yet my account has been banned. Customer support is not helping me, and I still do not know the exact reason for this action. Please review my account again and provide a clear explanation. @binance @BinanceHelpDesk #Binance
-
SeekeronChain π² 🌶️ (@mbombelasilver) reported@binance You had one job, literally on bloody job. HODL the damn line, can't trust y'all for ****.
-
Crypto Tolga (@CryptoTolga_) reported$NEAR #BİNANCE #BİTCOİN #NEARUSDT is at a critical level Price has reacted strongly from the lower boundary of the ascending channel and now appears to be preparing for its next directional move. If the $2.70–$2.75 resistance zone breaks, we could see a strong push toward the upper boundary of the channel. In that scenario, a move above $3 and eventually toward the $4 region would not be surprising. Support: $2.00 Breakout Level: $2.75 All eyes are on these levels. 👀📈
-
Alpha (@Mrdollar22) reported@binance With regulations around tokenized assets changing across different countries, how is Binance making sure bStocks can stay compliant in places where synthetic stocks face stricter rules? Do these regulatory differences affect how users in different regions can access or use them? #AskBinance
-
carol (@carolpandora007) reportedTop crypto traders on Binance Alpha see volumes hitting millions, with five projects each reaching around 5M dollars in a month. An extra 0.1% tax on trades impacts profits. Will this slow down the race or fuel innovation? #Crypto #Trading #Binance
-
ISELLB4U (@isellbeforeyou) reportedBinance US listed $wojak and it’s been up since while soljak has just been down only What I don’t understand is this: 1. Why did Binance US list the Eth version with less prior volume + less of a community imo 2. Why did solscan delist $WOJAK on Solana a few weeks back? Just doesn’t really add up imo
-
Riar saab (@Riarsaab13) reported@binance #AskBinance "In the rare event of a platform outage or custodian insolvency, what specific legal claims or consumer protections do bStock holders have over the underlying traditional assets?"
-
Michael Mislos | BitPinas (@mmichaels_21) reportedHow did @binance successfully and legally re-enter the Philippines? Here are the points from a recently released whitepaper: “The Regulated Reentry of @binance in the Philippines”. Here is a summary but Please note it is best to read the 7-page whitepaper as there might be finer points lost in the summary: 1) The Reentry & Global Anchor: The whitepaper outlines a compliant, cross-jurisdictional framework to bring Binance back into the Philippines via local partner BlockShoals Technologies Inc.. They did this by leveraging the international regulatory weight of a comprehensive ADGM FSRA license secured in Abu Dhabi. (The reasoning for this and the exact implementation is detailed in the whitepaper. If there is only one section that you will read from there, this is it!) 2) The architecture is built on a split-jurisdiction design: BlockShoals handles the front-end user experience under the SEC’s Crypto-Asset Intermediary (CAI) track, while natively delegating 100% of the peso-denominated fiat clearing to an active, independent domestic VASP partner. 3) The paper explicitly disputes recent media commentary that characterized the 90-day integration window as a "compliance gap" or an unexpected "halt" to the platform's entry. It clarifies that this timeline is actually a pre-planned technical "Pre-Phase" mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines April 14, 2026 Notice to Proceed. 4) It rejects the negative narrative that BlockShoals lacking a standalone VASP license is a regulatory error; instead, it argues that utilizing an existing local VASP's rails was a deliberate, engineered feature of the approved architecture from day one to satisfy the BSP's "unbroken chain" clearing rule, not a late remedy added to it. 5) The whitepaper confirms that public-facing retail onboarding and open trading are strictly barred during the current 90-day sandbox phase, which serves purely as a closed, highly supervised technical window to test backend infrastructure and fiat rails. 6) The SEC's StratBox approval carries more than fifteen highly sensitive, substantive conditions regarding user caps and product scopes, which must continuously coordinate with and adapt to evolving local banking policies, such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas strict June 12, 2026 privacy coin ban. Whitepaper in the second tweet. 👇 @cz_binance
-
Guruprasad Venkatesha (@Guru_BCUBE) reported@tweet_buzzer I have withdrawn 40% of my funds from Binance and parked it in Bybit. I will wait for one more week and then pull out everything. The whole platform has to shutdown if they don’t obtain Mica but personally I feel it’s impossible for them to obtain due to criminal investigation in France and other constraints.
-
Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reportedMy account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.
-
Bông 🍊 po (@B0ngQy) reported@BinanceWallet Biggest issue with Binance Wallet DeFi: headline APY can look attractive, but real returns are harder to judge. Net yield, fees, incentives, and sustainability should be much more transparent.
-
Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceWallet Thank you for your response, but this generic reply is exactly part of the problem. Every time I contact customer support, I receive the same surface-level responses that do not address the root cause of the issue. It often feels as if no one is genuinely reviewing the case or interested in understanding the impact these repeated errors have on users. The same problem keeps happening again and again. My account is repeatedly flagged as high-risk due to your technical errors, and each time I have to spend time proving that the decision was wrong. These recurring mistakes have caused me to miss numerous rewards and distributions over the years because my account was restricted or incorrectly classified. To be clear, I am not even concerned about the rewards themselves. What concerns me is the lack of accountability. When Binance eventually acknowledges that the issue was caused by a technical error, the missed rewards are not restored, no compensation is offered, and no official apology is given. I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking for something very simple: an official apology from Binance and a clear commitment that these repeated technical failures will be investigated and prevented from happening again to me and other users. Users deserve transparency, accountability, and respect—not repeated mistakes followed by automated responses.
-
CryptoMagnet (@CryptooMagnet) reported@cas_abbe @binance The biggest shift isn't the IPO itself it's who gets access before Wall Street opens the door.
-
wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported@rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..
-
جانان (@LeoMe08) reported@cz_binance Hello CZ.! One of my friend had some p2p issue he lost 3000$ on p2p deposit in 2025 And he went to FIA pakistan and asked help from Binance too after this lose his heart broke and left Binance sir please help him 🙏
-
Diana (@vitaminBtc1) reported@saamycrypt @binance Users losing access to NFTs or funds with no clear resolution is why trust in Binance keeps getting questioned.
-
Nova (@badattrading_) reportedfirst thing you wanna do is having an overall idea of the distro, if it's more Binance/OKX/Gate/Bybit/Mexc or Coinbase/Cryptocom/Change Now/Kraken. If it's more Binance then it can really pump high, but expect a hard dump at some point (like worldcup), if it's more Coinbase study your shits really really well and look if they are bagworking like maniacs, if you see them bagworking like there's no tomorrow : avoid. Basically after you have an overall idea where the holders are based, you need to find good strong hardcore kols in there. If you see the same guys with multi axiom wallets that's no good. if you see folks who can hold hard and are not insiders like ily or wrld_sol or gake, that's potentially the good ****. At the end of the day it's only about the holders and their reputation, it's very tough out there
-
Peterb (@PeterBourg30061) reportedYet Crypto Market is crashing, WTF!!! Liquidation manipulation at it again, unbelievable, ******* MM Jane Street and Binance crooks! They need to be investigated!