Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	6 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Diana (@vitaminBtc1) reported 39 seconds ago

  @saamycrypt @binance Users losing access to NFTs or funds with no clear resolution is why trust in Binance keeps getting questioned.

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 3 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Hello CZ.! One of my friend had some p2p issue he lost 3000$ on p2p deposit in 2025 And he went to FIA pakistan and asked help from Binance too after this lose his heart broke and left Binance sir please help him 🙏

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 4 minutes ago

  STG is on the radar, not in play — the setup is upside-down with a ceiling at $0.230 right overhead and the nearest floor all the way back at $0.215. From $0.2245, that's less than 3% of room to the wall above and more than 4% of air to the support below. You don't want to lean long into a chart shaped like that — the math of the move is working against you before anything else even gets a vote. Zooming in makes it worse. The 4-hour picture is coiled and could break either way, but the 15-minute has already sprinted higher and is running on fumes, still trading under a short-term level buyers need to reclaim. Stepping in here is chasing a move that's mostly already happened, straight into resistance. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both bleeding today, the dollar is grinding higher (which tends to lean on crypto across the board), and STG just took a fresh round of forced sell-offs a few hours ago. That's not the environment to front-run a breakout in. The cleaner read: let it come back toward $0.215–$0.218 and watch whether buyers actually show up to defend that floor. The level that flips this entirely is a clean 4-hour close above $0.230 on real volume — that would mean the ceiling is gone and the coin is back in play. Until one of those two things happens, it's a watch, not a touch. — 📡 On the Radar · $STG · Available on Binance

• 
  Ella (@Ella_0733) reported 5 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance Access changes everything. That's the biggest advantage modern markets offer.

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 5 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  cococowi (@cocococowi) reported 5 minutes ago

  @binance Hey Binance, how does the 1:1 backing for bStocks really work? If many people convert stocks to bStocks and use them in DeFi (lending, liquidity pools, etc.), what happens to the actual shares? Any risk of fractional ownership or redemption problems #AskBinance

• 
  TaylorK (@7krry) reported 8 minutes ago

  @binance I’ve only ever traded standard crypto on Binance, so bStocks is totally new to me. How exactly does corporate action work here? For example, if a company issues a dividend or a stock split, how is that distributed to bStock holders on the app? #AskBinance

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet my honest feedback on #Binance Wallet DeFi after using it: the strongest part is not just “more yield options.” it’s that Binance is slowly turning DeFi from scattered tabs into an actual portfolio layer. before, a normal DeFi user had to jump between PancakeSwap, Venus, Uniswap, dashboards, explorers, and sometimes a notes app just to answer simple questions like: where is my money, what risk am i taking, what can i exit quickly, and what fees did i actually earn? Binance Wallet DeFi fixes a big part of that by putting staking, LPs, and loans in one place. that matters because BSC alone is still doing around $5B+ in DeFi TVL, $13B+ in stablecoins, and hundreds of millions in daily DEX volume, so the problem is not lack of activity — the problem is making that activity readable for real users. what i liked: - the 40+ protocols / 1,000+ pools coverage makes the product feel useful, not decorative - seeing Earn, Loans, and Liquidity Pools under one wallet flow reduces “where did i put this asset?” anxiety - loan access through protocols like Venus makes sense because collateral usage is one of the real DeFi use cases, not just farming incentives - LP management inside wallet is a big improvement because adding/removing liquidity and claiming fees should not require users to leave the safety layer what i think can make it exceptional: 1. show “net APY after gas + incentives + price risk,” not just headline APY 2. add an LP impermanent-loss simulator before users deposit 3. add health-factor alerts for loans with push notifications before liquidation risk becomes urgent 4. rank pools by risk-adjusted yield, not just APY 5. show protocol dependency clearly: where the money sits, what contract is used, audit status, and whether rewards are sustainable 6. add a “one-tap unwind” view: remove LP, repay loan, or withdraw position cleanly during volatility 7. give users a monthly DeFi statement: earned fees, rewards, gas spent, unrealized IL, and net result overall, Binance Wallet DeFi feels like the right direction because it treats DeFi as a position-management problem, not only a yield-discovery problem. my main suggestion: don’t make the product compete on the highest APY. compete on clarity. the wallet that helps users understand risk, exit faster, and track real net returns will win long term.

• 
  boss11.base.eth (@saqib7258) reported 10 minutes ago

  @binance If users make a wrong-chain deposit, why is there a recovery fee of around $20 in some cases, while in other cases support says recovery is impossible because the token isn't listed? I recently sent a token through the wrong network and when I contacted support,

• 
  LorenzóⓂ️ (@Lawrenz_oo) reported 12 minutes ago

  Does Binance bStocks trading support fractional investing and dividend reinvestment for retail users? And what’s the minimum capital one can use to start investing in bStocks? @binance #AskBinance

• 
  𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐁 (@Adib2410119) reported 13 minutes ago

  @heistruthX Binance bcz when I open prediction before match on poly. I can't entire their website when match ongoing that's why I skipped this

• 
  Henry (@LordOfAlts) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Draxen_Web3 @binance Bullish on unified access to global assets

• 
  Alpha (@Mrdollar22) reported 16 minutes ago

  @binance With regulations around tokenized assets changing across different countries, how is Binance making sure bStocks can stay compliant in places where synthetic stocks face stricter rules? Do these regulatory differences affect how users in different regions can access or use them? #AskBinance

• 
  Safari Urg (@Safarii533) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance Binance support only meme coin.

• 
  hydra (@HydraRare) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance if this was a real binance phone the chart would be going down

• 
  Michael Mislos | BitPinas (@mmichaels_21) reported 19 minutes ago

  How did @binance successfully and legally re-enter the Philippines? Here are the points from a recently released whitepaper: “The Regulated Reentry of @binance in the Philippines”. Here is a summary but Please note it is best to read the 7-page whitepaper as there might be finer points lost in the summary: 1) The Reentry & Global Anchor: The whitepaper outlines a compliant, cross-jurisdictional framework to bring Binance back into the Philippines via local partner BlockShoals Technologies Inc.. They did this by leveraging the international regulatory weight of a comprehensive ADGM FSRA license secured in Abu Dhabi. (The reasoning for this and the exact implementation is detailed in the whitepaper. If there is only one section that you will read from there, this is it!) 2) The architecture is built on a split-jurisdiction design: BlockShoals handles the front-end user experience under the SEC’s Crypto-Asset Intermediary (CAI) track, while natively delegating 100% of the peso-denominated fiat clearing to an active, independent domestic VASP partner. 3) The paper explicitly disputes recent media commentary that characterized the 90-day integration window as a "compliance gap" or an unexpected "halt" to the platform's entry. It clarifies that this timeline is actually a pre-planned technical "Pre-Phase" mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines April 14, 2026 Notice to Proceed. 4) It rejects the negative narrative that BlockShoals lacking a standalone VASP license is a regulatory error; instead, it argues that utilizing an existing local VASP's rails was a deliberate, engineered feature of the approved architecture from day one to satisfy the BSP's "unbroken chain" clearing rule, not a late remedy added to it. 5) The whitepaper confirms that public-facing retail onboarding and open trading are strictly barred during the current 90-day sandbox phase, which serves purely as a closed, highly supervised technical window to test backend infrastructure and fiat rails. 6) The SEC's StratBox approval carries more than fifteen highly sensitive, substantive conditions regarding user caps and product scopes, which must continuously coordinate with and adapt to evolving local banking policies, such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas strict June 12, 2026 privacy coin ban. Whitepaper in the second tweet. 👇 @cz_binance

• 
  Ngulik Crypto (@ngulik_crypto) reported 22 minutes ago

  BINANCE SET TO LOSE PERMISSION TO OFFER SERVICES TO EU CLIENTS AS LICENCE APPLICATION IN GREECE TO BE TURNED DOWN, TWO SOURCES SAY BINANCE SAYS IT BELIEVES IT HAS MET THE RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS TO BE MICA AUTHORISED IN EU Sumber: @DeItaone

• 
  Crypto Bull ₿ ⚡ (@bullcryptobtc) reported 22 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @Abrlien @heyibinance 2 years ago, the same mistake happened to me. I transferred 15 BNB to the wrong address and thought I had lost it. I contacted Binance Support, and they returned my BNB within seconds.

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 22 minutes ago

  if you see an unusual distro like Coinbase 35%, Binance 12%, Mexc 1%, Change Now 1.5%, Bybit 5%, and there are just 1 kol in there and he has a bad rep, that's just bad avoid that **** If you see something like Binance 25%, Coinbase 14%, Mexc 5%, Change Now 4%, Bybit 7%, Gate 6%, with less americans but you have strong kols in there, that's potentially the good **** We're learning everyday, but all i can say it's all about the holders, how strong they are, if they are farmers, when do they farm and so on, if they farm at all, you want to follow the ones who don't farm

• 
  Pritam Kumar (@Pritamkumar047) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk I have not committed any scam or fraud, yet my account has been banned. Customer support is not helping me, and I still do not know the exact reason for this action. Please review my account again and provide a clear explanation. @binance @BinanceHelpDesk #Binance

• 
  Cho Hee (@BeautyChoHee) reported 35 minutes ago

  @ragnarr786 @binance When Binance takes weeks to resolve a simple P2P dispute while holding your funds, trust becomes impossible.

• 
  Misha (@mishacrypto99) reported 45 minutes ago

  @fahadgoldy @binance Binance continues to face ongoing criticism over transparency, token listings, and user trust issues in its exchange operations.

• 
  chilombo (@Unfaithfulparis) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance clear the issue with the mica agreement if move or sell my bnb or others crypto it’s gonna be hard I have my account since the beginning. YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

• 
  Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reported 47 minutes ago

  franklin templeton filed for etfs that funnel stock dividend flow into BTC. eu mica go-live in july puts binance access and USDT liquidity at risk in europe. oman launched omanhash, a national bitcoin mining pool to regulate licensed miners.

• 
  InvestorX (@investorie) reported 47 minutes ago

  XRP is not in a confirmed bullish reversal yet. It is in a support test. That distinction matters. Right now XRP is trading around the $1.12–$1.15 area after losing the $1.20 level and then failing to reclaim strength above $1.15. Binance live data shows XRP has recently traded around the $1.12–$1.15 zone, with the latest 24h low near $1.1185. This is why the current chart should not be read as “the breakout is starting.” It should be read as: XRP is trying to prove that the floor is still there. The key area is roughly $1.10–$1.13. If this area holds, XRP may be building a third low in the same broader support zone. Retail calls that a “triple bottom,” but the name only matters after confirmation. A triple bottom is not confirmed when price touches support three times. It is confirmed when price holds support, reclaims resistance, and starts making higher lows again. For XRP, that means: Hold the $1.10–$1.13 support zone Reclaim $1.15 Reclaim $1.20 Push into $1.25+ Then the market can start talking about a real structure shift Until then, this is not a breakout. It is a battlefield. The danger is simple. If XRP loses $1.10 with strength, the “triple bottom” idea fails and the next downside zones become much more important. Earlier June XRP price data also shows how violent this area can become, with XRP trading as low as roughly $1.05–$1.07 during the prior selloff. So the honest read is this: Above $1.20, XRP starts repairing damage. Above $1.25, the bulls get a real argument. Below $1.10, the floor is no longer holding. This is also why macro matters. Bitcoin is still under pressure near the low $60k area, and when BTC is weak, altcoins usually do not get to write their own script. XRP can have strong long-term fundamentals, but in the short term it still trades inside the broader crypto liquidity cycle. That means XRP’s current position is not “dead.” But it is also not confirmed bullish. It is sitting at the exact point where patience matters. Retail usually gets trapped by two mistakes: Calling every support touch a bottom. Calling every bounce a reversal. A real reversal needs confirmation. For me, the current XRP map is simple: $1.10–$1.13 = support test $1.15 = first recovery level $1.20 = damage repair $1.25+ = structure improves $2.00–$2.10 = macro breakout gate Everything below that is still preparation, not victory. XRP may be forming something important here. But the market has not confirmed it yet. No fear. No hype. Just levels. #XRP #Crypto #XRPL

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 53 minutes ago

  @shimoongta quick hits before bed AI agent economy running hot: Tempo at $3B annualized volume 93 days in, 1000+ services now selling to agents via Machine Payments Protocol. Virtuals built 40k autonomous agents generating $4M+ revenue tokenized stocks hit $1.8B custody-backed market cap ATH. xStocks and Ondo own 90%+ of that. stock perps on Solana reached $7M OI (up 700% this week), $SPCX is 81% of it institutional pipes expanding: BitGo doing regulated custody for Stacks, Anchorage integrated Hyperliquid perps. BlackRock launched BITA (bitcoin premium income ETF), Coinbase filed spot ETH and SOL ETFs with 0.14% fee + staking Solana crossed 1000 apps, beat Coinbase in daily spot volume. EarnFi launched letting agents spin up social campaigns paid in USDC brutal for legacy DeFi: 30+ protocols shut down in 2026, nearly 10 in June alone. Goldfinch winding down with depositors facing ~70% losses. Aave loans at $9.5B but sector down 42% YTD security mess: $4.67M drained from Secret-Axelar IBC bridge, $2.1M from Aztec Connect (past EOL). Kaspersky found Steam malware targeting MetaMask/Electrum/Exodus wallets regulatory front: Fed/Treasury/OCC proposing stablecoin issuers run bank-style KYC under GENIUS Act. former Chainlink lawyer now SEC Crypto Task Force chief counsel working on rules covering tokenized stocks, DeFi, AI agents Re Protocol TGE went live yesterday with Binance/Robinhood/Coinbase listings. Upbit added 10 tokens today in BTC/USDT pairs that's the wrap

• 
  Fadil (@Fadil_bawa1) reported 56 minutes ago

  A few people asked why I sold my $Wojak position. The reason was simple. Binance US listed the Ethereum version of Wojak and later changed its profile picture to Wojak. Whether you like it or not, that shifts attention. In memecoins, attention drives liquidity. I didn’t think the Solana thesis was broken, but I did think the market would react to the news, so I decided to close my position. The chart went from around 5M to below 4M shortly after. For now, I’m staying on the sidelines and watching. If it finds a strong base again, I’ll be happy to reassess. A thesis can still be good even if the trade no longer makes sense.

• 
  mango man (@malikbilalpst) reported 57 minutes ago

  @binance Since #bStocks use the BEP-677 token standard to natively support RWAs on the BNB Smart Chain, what are Binance's upcoming plans for integrating these tokens directly into decentralized lending protocols or liquidity pools within the broader DeFi ecosystem? #AskBinance

• 
  Sunshine (@sunshinebinance) reported 57 minutes ago

  @mrsmaruf52 Hi there, We understand your concern and that your account eligibility issue has been ongoing for more than a month. We checked from our end and noticed that you tried to contact Binance Support, but it looks like you are still connected with the bot. Please follow the guide in the attached screenshot on how to connect with a live agent so our support team can check your account status and advise you accordingly. For your safety, please do not share your UID or other account details publicly. Thanks!

• 
  Fontinz (@1017_Zhu) reported 57 minutes ago

  My account has been under review for over 30 days and my funds are currently inaccessible. Case ID #163436272. ​Customer support has repeatedly provided template responses and confirmed they cannot assist further. Please help! @BinanceHelpDesk @binance