1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
Binance

Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: transactions, website and mobile app.

Full Outage Map

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

August 21: Problems at Binance

Binance is having issues since 09:30 AM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

  • 43% Transactions (43%)
  • 29% Website (29%)
  • 14% Mobile App (14%)
  • 14% Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Porto Alegre Transactions 17 days ago
Angers Login 1 month ago
Itu Website 2 months ago
Seattle Website 2 months ago
Nice Mobile App 2 months ago
Beaucaire Transactions 3 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Saanjana_Nikita
    Saanjana Nikita (@Saanjana_Nikita) reported

    Binance just launched Agent OS AI agents can now access market data, trade, and make payments directly on Binance. people will say, “AI trading bots are here.” i think the bigger story is permissions agents get separate subaccounts, limits, and a kill switch. Binance sees the trades, but not what the agent read or how it reached the decision. that’s controlled autonomy Coinbase, Kraken, and OKX are taking different approaches too. nobody seems to agree on how much freedom agents should get yet good. they probably shouldn’t real innovation isn’t AI trading. it’s giving AI access to money without giving it unlimited control.

  • OGNodeFather
    Node Father🤖⚡️ (@OGNodeFather) reported

    @emlanis_ Binance has supported us through a lot through the years. The situation Secret Labs put the network in is not an easy one, and it does trigger their risk calculations. You should delete this post. It doesn’t help, even if you think it does, it doesn’t.

  • coinbureau
    Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) reported

    🚨JUST IN: Binance founder CZ says “Let’s tokenize everything.” CZ emphasizes that he supports tokenization across all blockchains, arguing that while it creates a fragmented liquidity problem, having multiple players pushing the sector forward is the fastest way to grow it. He adds that greater interchangeability between different issuers could help address fragmentation over time.

  • _V_L_S_
    V_L_S_ (@_V_L_S_) reported

    Binance now lets AI agents trade your money, and supervising them is your problem. Bold move: hand the bots the wallet, then hand the user the blame. The tech works fine. The liability shuffle is the innovation.

  • AYprotocols
    AYprotocols® (@AYprotocols) reported

    @AkaBull_ @binance Gen Z has faster access to markets, but needs discipline for real

  • Khaikhaidao
    KhaiDao (@Khaikhaidao) reported

    @PeterVas6 that thestreet link is just a syndication feed, nothing new there. actual btc flow shows perp funding back to neutral after friday's flush, oi down 8% on binance. if 87k fails again before monday open, the dip buyers are exit liquidity.

  • Oly245
    Oliver Bell (@Oly245) reported

    @Willemology I resigned a long time ago, but I agree, Tbh i think creator tokens would only work for the major major influencers, as in theory, i dont think people care about the perks enough for the smaller ones, even decent size. And the lack of retail appetite. There's a lot that happened such as the MM losing a large amount of cash on launch, I will write a thread one day. Every project from 2021 has had the same fate unless on Binance/Coinbase from my experience, I mean Zilliqa is on Binance and even thats 99% down. I still have a very very small bag

  • dollaredfr
    dollared (@dollaredfr) reported

    @Crypto__Haris Bhai jaaan, apko bht arsay se me support krra ***. Please mjhe consider kren. Yaqeen manay, ye mere bht kaam ayenge. Allah apko jaza e khair de iska. Lots of prayers and wishes for your continued success!! Binance UID: 327965761

  • cryptosoyful
    Crypto Soyful (@cryptosoyful) reported

    @Abhayaitech Your lucky parson. I'm unless parson . Do you help me sir please... only $2000 binance uid....198104915

  • MelioHL
    Melio (@MelioHL) reported

    @CoinMarketCap Devs get direct access to Binance liquidity without building their own exchange integrations That shifts distribution for AI agents from wrappers to whoever controls the permissions

  • 1nxnn__
    Aminul (아미눌) (@1nxnn__) reported

    @GG_LMExchange true, but binance week won't fix narratives alone, need measurable adoption and security wins, not panels tbh

  • katy_larreta
    katy larreta (@katy_larreta) reported

    @Dylan_Wang2 @binance One app won't fix psychology

  • MrRUHUL77
    MrRUHUL (@MrRUHUL77) reported

    Cross-Chain Bridges: Where Security Can Break I’ve been watching how quickly cross-chain activity is growing, and one thing stands out to me: bridges are becoming some of the most important infrastructure in crypto. But they’re also a huge target. A bridge usually has to lock, mint, burn, or release assets while communicating between two different blockchains. That creates multiple points where something can go wrong. The biggest risks I see are: 1. Smart contract exploits A bug in the bridge’s contracts can let an attacker bypass normal checks and withdraw funds they shouldn’t have access to. 2. Weak validator or signer security Some bridges depend on a group of validators or multisig signers. If enough of them are compromised or collude, the bridge can potentially be drained. 3. Message verification failures Bridges rely on cross-chain messages to confirm that an action happened on another network. If those messages aren’t verified properly, attackers may be able to forge or replay transactions. 4. Oracle and price manipulation If a bridge depends on external price data, manipulated oracle information can create incorrect valuations and potentially lead to massive losses. 5. Private-key compromises Even if the bridge’s code is secure, compromised admin or validator keys can become a single point of failure. 6. Replay and double-spending attacks If a bridge doesn’t properly track whether a cross-chain message has already been processed, the same authorization could potentially be reused. What I’ve learned from previous bridge exploits is that security isn’t just about having audited smart contracts. It’s about the entire system — validators, messaging, keys, oracles, permissions and how every component interacts. For me, the biggest question isn’t simply “How fast can this bridge move assets?” It’s “How safely can it move billions of dollars without creating a single point of failure?” As cross-chain adoption grows, bridge security is going to become even more important. In crypto, convenience is great but when billions are sitting behind the infrastructure, security has to come first. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

  • Draxen_Web3
    Draxen (@Draxen_Web3) reported

    What happens when an AI agent needs to do more than just give you an answer? Let me tell you: It needs access to real financial tools That’s the problem @binance Agent OS is trying to solve YEA Instead of developers creating separate connections for every capability, Agent OS brings several of them together: • Trading and market data • Wallet and on-chain functionality • Payments with x402 • Binance Skill Hub • MCP support for compatible AI applications It can also connect with agentic development tools such as Claude Code and Codex But the part that stands out is the permission model Agents operate within the access you give them, with dedicated sub-accounts and the ability to revoke that access. So the bigger idea here isn’t another AI trading bot It’s infrastructure for building AI agents that can actually interact with financial systems. AND THIS IS GOING TO GET A LOT OF ATTENTION IN THIS SPACE 💛

  • Cryptoprime00
    Signal_guy (@Cryptoprime00) reported

    Pushing down 📉 Binance Futures #BAKE/ $USDT Take-Profit target 2 ✅ Profit: 155.7377% 📈 Period: 2 Days 3 Hours 15 Minutes

  • Octop3s
    Octopus (@Octop3s) reported

    one of the utmost reasons fintechs/neobanks don’t want to build anything around credit is underwriting. they don’t want to spend a year figuring it out. that’s what we @Cr3dentials are building: a tech that a project can just use through our API instead. we plug in the data of the people who make up one of the largest % of neobank audiences today: gig workers who work across the internet. we verify their earnings to determine their eligibility for credit instead of just offering credit to anyone. we keep integrating as many websites as possible. right now, we have Bolt, Deel, OnlyFans, etc., and we’re working to integrate everywhere someone is earning, from social networks like YouTube and X to traders trading on Binance, Coinbase, and others. everybody who earns should have the same privileges as those earning a salary. on recourse, we build our system in a way that’s beneficial to both lenders and borrowers. borrowers have access to loans, but in rare cases where borrowers don’t want to pay back, recourse allows lenders to go beyond the original collateral, if there is any, and pursue the borrower’s other assets or income to recover the unpaid debt. with every loan, you don’t have to worry about whether they’ll pay back or not. our system does its thing. on repayment, our system records both repayment and payment data, which helps neobanks that provide this credit build a better picture of who the borrower really is and whether they should keep giving them loans. projects don’t just judge people based on their earnings alone. it becomes a combination of data. how early did they repay the last loan? combine that with their current earnings data to make a more informed decision when offering them a loan. on enforcement, we’re working with different jurisdictions across countries to make sure defaults, when not paid, can show up in the borrower’s financial record. for instance, we’re working with regulators in Nigeria to make use of BVN, which is like a financial record. so every time a customer doesn’t pay, they aren’t just owing money and walking away. it can be reflected in their financial footprint in TradFi too. we addressed every important segment of credit so projects and borrowers are even. that way, both lenders and borrowers are protected. happy to chat more as always.

  • BogeyGraveyard
    BogeyGraveyard (@BogeyGraveyard) reported

    @TrampledF @thedonhu @binance WTF 😒 bearish AF

  • 0xJohannn
    Johan (@0xJohannn) reported

    @binance $UTILITY DOWN

  • Fredvelezcrypto
    Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reported

    This is how bad crypto information spreads. “Here’s the EXACT reason Bitcoin pumped.” No. It isn’t. An Arkham inflow into a wallet labeled Coinbase does NOT mean: “Coinbase bought 6,139 BTC.” It means BTC moved into addresses associated with Coinbase. That could be: Customer deposits. Custody transfers. Internal wallet movements. Market makers. Collateral. OTC settlement. And yes, potentially trading activity. Ironically, exchange inflows are often watched as potential sell-side supply, because people move BTC onto exchanges when they want it available to trade. Then we make this jump: BTC moved → Coinbase bought it → Binance bought it → everyone coordinated → MANIPULATION. Come on. Could large buyers have helped push Bitcoin higher? Of course. But this screenshot does not prove who bought, why they moved the BTC, or that anyone coordinated anything. Bitcoin had multiple things happening at once: Strong ETF inflows. A major technical breakout. Shorts getting squeezed. Improving regulatory sentiment. Real spot demand. Markets are complicated. Onchain data is evidence. It is not a story generator. And whenever someone tells you they know the “EXACT reason” a global market moved… That should be your first clue to slow down.

  • GarnachoAle
    Wazza04🛡️🦓 (@GarnachoAle) reported

    @cz_binance are you going to fix what you did to $marscoin? A lot of holders on chain, most on binance wallet, all ridiculously angry. We can’t have broccoli or 4 round 2. Stock memes= the new thing you said you’ll try right? Support it, if for no reason than you harmed it

  • cockpit_xyz
    Cockpit (@cockpit_xyz) reported

    🚨 Binance is opening its platform to AI agents with new controls that let users decide exactly what their agents can access. Binance’s Agent OS allows AI agents to access market data, execute trades and make payments, while users retain control over permissions and account access.

  • zacodil
    Vadim (AI, ⋈) (@zacodil) reported

    Binance is delisting ICX, the Korean Ethereum. Its achievements: > Promised to put Korea's banks, hospitals, universities and government on one chain > Signed an MoU with Samsung to put its Chain ID inside Samsung Pass. Nobody has seen it since the press release > Formed a joint venture with LINE to build LINE's blockchain. LINE built one without them > Assembled 68 banks and brokers into an alliance meant to replace Korean ID logins. Korea did replace them, with Kakao and Naver > Consulted the National Election Commission on blockchain voting. Korea votes on paper > In 2025 its own validators voted to shut the chain down and become a DeFi app on Sonic, itself a rebrand of Fantom > ICX today: a $26M shell, down 99.8%

  • Lumen0x
    Lumen (@Lumen0x) reported

    @AkaBull_ @binance The biggest shift is that access is no longer the main barrier.

  • Morfu_one
    Tamora🌍 (@Morfu_one) reported

    @binance what's us is going down eventually

  • AzraCiv2310
    AzraCiv (@AzraCiv2310) reported

    @binance #AskBinance I’m sceptical about giving AI access to my wallet because of ongoing issues like hallucinations. How safe is Agent OS in practice? What safeguards prevent AI errors from causing losses, and is there any increased risk of hacks or malware through the connection?

  • philhie
    Phil Hie (@philhie) reported

    binance just gave AI agents access to real money and every crypto bro is celebrating. i've sat in 53 founder meetings this year and most of them can't get one agent to reliably send an email without hallucinating a 40% discount. we basically skipped five steps

  • tfuelhero76
    TFuelHero (@tfuelhero76) reported

    @heyibinance please take a look at $TFUEL!!! When it pump up, your binance earn per annual percentage increase so much!! Why??? This is always the pattern..why? Then when $TFUEL price gone down, the earn annual percentage also goes down.. Something FISHY!

  • selena_bennet05
    Selena Bennett (@selena_bennet05) reported

    Gen Z is investing differently than any generation before them, and I don't think enough people are talking about it. They're not waiting until their 30s to start. Many are learning about markets, tokens, and digital assets while still in school. They're not relying only on a bank or a broker either. They're opening an app, doing their own research, and making decisions earlier than most of us did. I'll admit, part of me used to think "they're too young, they don't know what they're doing." But the more I watch, the more I see something different. It's not reckless. A lot of them are actually more disciplined than people expect, and more curious about how global markets work. What's changed is access. Platforms like @binance let someone in their early 20s look at the same markets, the same information, as someone who's been investing for years. That's a real shift. This isn't financial advice, just me thinking about how differently this generation is approaching money. Do you think Gen Z is being smarter with money early, or just taking bigger risks earlier? Curious what you think.

  • TrillKek
    Kekkin (@TrillKek) reported

    Apparently the Chinese can't sell this token... It is due to the fault of @binance Wallet (China) (and @cz_binance). Chinese holders are tweaking out, complaining at CZ, and comparing this to MarsCoin (which apparently had the same issue early on) This is honestly kinda funny. Was this issue part of the reason why MarsCoin ended up mooning soon after? Was CZ dealing with so many complaints, that he was left with no choice but to crime the token and make everyone happy? Either way -- imagine a BSC coin with chinese holders, yet they are somehow all forced to hold? Sounds more bullish than the majority of other BSC coins to me. Maybe if the coin starts going up-only, instead of down to zero, all the Chinese holders will end up happy? Very interesting to watch this play out. $SKYLARK 0x5d52d11bb538ec28ab1597afff502ffc9e458888 What if SkyLark ended up... in the sky?

  • CuttingCharlie7
    Cutting Charlie🇧🇷 (@CuttingCharlie7) reported

    @CryptoHzr @TOSAinuBNB Binance support= $TOSA pump