Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (43%)
• Transactions (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	19 days ago
Itu	Website	26 days ago
Seattle	Website	26 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Crypto Miners (@CryptoMiners_Co) reported 7 seconds ago

  Everyone keeps saying Gen Z is just chasing hype. But the data paints a very different picture! Around 30% of Gen Z started investing during university or early adulthood, compared with 15% of Millennials, while 77% have received formal financial education. That shift is already showing up on @binance. Gen Z now makes up 44% of Direct Stocks users, 44% of bStocks users, and 45% of TradFi-Perps users. Among people using all three TradFi products, 48% are Gen Z. What’s even more interesting is where that growth is coming from. 95% of Gen Z TradFi users are based in emerging markets, with many getting their first access to global markets through smaller portfolios rather than large balances. The numbers also challenge another stereotype. Gen Z has the lowest share of leveraged ETF trading at just 5.9%, and many are starting with established names like NVIDIA, Tesla, Apple, and the Nasdaq-100 ETF instead of chasing speculation. And this isn’t slowing down either. Gen Z’s share of new TradFi users on #Binance has already grown from 41% in January to 47% in July, contributing around $80B in TradFi trading volume year to date. Maybe the biggest investing story isn’t that Gen Z is entering the market earlier. It’s that they’re changing what the next generation of investors looks like.

• 
  万联welinkBTC(🦄,🦄) | 🔶 逍遥游版 (@fly_welinkBTC) reported 1 minute ago

  BTC's return to 64k is just a correction; it hasn't truly broken through yet! BTC's recovery above 64k is more like a correction within a range than a valid breakout, and it doesn't signal a return to risk-on sentiment in the entire crypto market. BTC is still in the late stage of recovery, not in a decisive breakout phase. The recent surge in 64k shares was mainly driven by short-term liquidity and short-selling pressure, rather than by sustained buying interest in the spot market. Risk appetite has stabilized around BTC, but altcoins haven't really started to expand yet. ETF demand has cooled down, profit margins are limited, the derivatives structure is relatively balanced, and the risk of chasing the rally is high. The key in the next few weeks will be whether BTC can hold steady between 65.4k and 66.8k without incurring too much leverage risk. BTC has climbed back above $64,000, currently trading at around $64,062, leaving some room for trading, but this alone doesn't indicate the market has entered a new phase. BTC is currently more like digesting previous pressure: while the past 30 days have been positive, the price hasn't yet surpassed the recent high of $66,800. Derivatives are only slightly bullish, ETF demand is cooling, and on-chain profitability is not high. Risk appetite is stabilizing, not expanding. 64k is more like a liquidity pulse than a trend reversal. Round numbers easily trigger algorithmic orders, stop-loss orders, and headline-driven trades, but they don't inherently create sustained buying pressure. At the time of the alert, BTC's 1-day trading range was roughly $63.5k–$64.6k, while the upper limit of the 30-day range was still capped by $66.8k. Structurally, this appears more like a range-bound correction than a confirmed upward expansion. The claim in the market that "BTC has reclaimed a key psychological level" is largely noise. Psychological price levels only truly matter in two situations: Attracting stable spot buying interest to enter the market; This triggers a sustainable chain reaction of leverage. Current evidence supports a short-term liquidity reaction rather than a broad consensus. The market still views BTC as the "least bad" option among crypto assets: there is sufficient demand to absorb pullbacks, but not enough to push the entire market into a risk-on state. Fund flows do not support chasing the rise. There was no frenzy in the derivatives market. BTC futures open interest was approximately $47.4 billion, with a slightly positive funding rate of about 0.007%, and the long/short ratio was nearly balanced at about 1.03. Binance liquidation data showed that short positions were liquidated at a higher rate than long positions, consistent with a short squeeze explanation. However, 24-hour futures trading volume was declining, indicating that this market movement was not driven by continued leverage expansion. The spot market's fund flows are more complex. BTC ETFs saw strong inflows earlier this month, but have experienced a net outflow of approximately $526 million over the last four settled trading days. On-chain, exchange reserves have decreased by approximately 12,400 BTC so far this month, and the net inflow in both directions indicates that supply hasn't flooded trading platforms. This provides support for the price, but with SOPR around 0.996, MVRV around 1.21, and NUPL around 0.17, it suggests that holders haven't entered a state of aggressive profit-taking. This is more like a correction after accumulation than a distribution at the end of a cycle or an exuberant breakout. The market is undervalued and undergoing a period of consolidation; overvalued markets are breaking out directly. I'm more inclined to view this as a BTC-led consolidation phase, while retaining the risk of upward squeeze, rather than betting on a full-blown beta expansion. BTC may continue to outperform altcoins as it acts as a liquidity reservoir and collateral anchor. However, this doesn't mean a healthy altcoin cycle has begun. If BTC's market share continues to rise while it's trending upwards, high-beta altcoins, memes, and less liquid AI/gaming assets are still prone to false breakouts. Over the next 1–4 weeks, I will be closely monitoring the following: Only when BTC recovers and stabilizes above the $65.4k–$66.8k supply zone should we consider increasing our risk exposure. Do not chase after altcoins until ETF fund flows turn positive and SOPR returns above 1. If funding rates rise above 0.01% and OI (Online Investment) increases in tandem, this should be considered a vulnerability rather than a trend confirmation. If the price recovers to $64,000 but then falls below $63,500, the bullish assumption should be abandoned. The point of non-consensus is simple: panic at the high level of 20 is not enough to prompt people to short BTC, but it's also not enough to justify "buying everything." In this market situation, BTC can continue to grind higher, while other crypto assets continue to lose relative value. Currently, BTC is still in the late stage of accumulation and repair with neutral risk, and the breakout has not been confirmed. It is not too early for traders to buy now, and it is too late to chase the price. The real advantage lies with active traders and long-term holders with low leverage who can patiently wait for confirmation at 65.4k-66.8k. High-beta buying in altcoins is not dominant.

• 
  Mark Alvin (@mark_alvin2) reported 2 minutes ago

  A good financial app should not only help you click faster. It should help you understand better. That is what I like about the super app idea. A user may start with Binance Academy because they do not understand a term. Then they may check the Wallet to understand assets. Then use Convert for simplicity. Then explore Spot, Simple Earn, Pay, P2P or Card depending on eligibility and need. This is not a shortcut to profit. It is a connected learning curve. One app can become useful when the products are not isolated, but linked around the user journey. Because modern finance is not just about access anymore. It is about knowing what you are using, why you are using it, and what risks or terms come with it. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Ian's Intel (@iansintel) reported 7 minutes ago

  BINANCE OBTAINS PHILIPPINES SANDBOX LICENSE; WEBSITE UNBLOCKED, FIAT CHANNELS COMING

• 
  Duaa **** Ghaza (@mc0kz) reported 7 minutes ago

  To whom it may concern... I am a mother of four children. I work in the healthcare sector. I do not have enough money to support myself and my children. I hope you will donate to me through Binance wallet. I would be very grateful to you all. TFJwF3kK8fLtEqn4bQDoTbKTAzCDUuGk3J

• 
  Angry Crypto Show (@angrycryptoshow) reported 12 minutes ago

  JUST IN: Charles Hoskinson on Blockfrost, says "I'm not gonna shut anything down right now, but there has to be a process. We're gonna try our best to keep some continuity. It's essential infrastructure for Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, Lace. It'd be catastrophic to shut that off."

• 
  Scofeeziey (@scofeeziey) reported 13 minutes ago

  @mr_cbillionaire Is binance shutting down too @grok

• 
  LuncCommunity.com | 0% Fee & USTC Airdrops (@L_U_N_C) reported 15 minutes ago

  $LUNC Proposal #12223 - PART 2 Mr Diamondhandz the LUNCLIVE Validator appears to continue misleading the $LUNC community again to promote his own projects. A project that taxes its own transactions at the exact rate he calls “stupid” for LUNC. Mr Diamondhandz, told the community: “Even CZ knows a 1.5% LUNtax is stupid.” CZ never said that.👇 CZ’s comments were from September 2022 and concerned whether Binance should add an extra 1.2% charge to every LUNC trade inside Binance. They were not about Proposal #12223. They were not about a 1.5% Terra Classic on-chain tax. Appears that LUNCLIVE Validator doesn't understand the difference. There were two separate issues in 2022. First, Terra Classic’s 1.2% on-chain tax. Binance confirmed that the network tax would apply to deposits and withdrawals, while spot and margin trading inside Binance would not be affected. Binance accepted the on-chain tax and adjusted its systems. Second, people wanted Binance to copy that 1.2% charge onto every LUNC trade inside its own exchange. That is what CZ was discussing. His blog opens with: “Will Binance support the LUNC burn of 1.2% for every trade on Binance?” The section is titled: “Taxes on Centralized Exchanges.” CZ’s concern was that if Binance charged an extra 1.2% while competing exchanges did not, traders would simply leave Binance and trade somewhere cheaper. He was talking about Binance customers, Binance order books and Binance competitors. He was not telling Terra Classic what tax rate it should set on-chain. CZ even proposed an opt-in system and linked an earlier statement saying the project needed to implement the tax on-chain first. That is exactly what Proposal #12223 is about. It raises Terra Classic’s on-chain tax from 0.5% to 1.5%. It does not add a 1.5% charge to every trade inside Binance. Binance later chose to burn part of the LUNC trading fees it already collected without increasing normal user trading fees. He opposed Binance charging its users an extra 1.2% while competing exchanges charged nothing. Taking that position and rewriting it as: “CZ thinks Terra Classic’s 1.5% on-chain tax is stupid” is not quoting CZ, It is putting words in his mouth. Now look 👇 Mr Diamondhandz owns LUNCLIVE Node. WESO’s own litepaper lists him as its Public Relations spokesperson. That same litepaper states: “WESO imposes a 1.5% swapping tax on all transactions.” It describes that tax as funding project initiatives and maintaining: “Healthy market dynamics.” WESO’s original exit tax started at 20.5%. So when WESO charges 1.5%, it is called healthy market dynamics. When Terra Classic proposes 1.5%, WESO’s owenerwcalls it stupid. 1.5% for WESO: Healthy. 1.5% for $LUNC Stupid? @Allnodes @DutchLunc_Val Read the original sources👇 Check the dates👇 Follow the incentives👇

• 
  FOUR | Crypto Spaces (@X_Four_iv) reported 20 minutes ago

  Crypto isn’t just about trading There’s also earning & most people don’t realize it exists Here’s a quick breakdown What are crypto earning products? They let you put your existing crypto to work and earn rewards over time, just by holding it on a supported platform no active trading required. How is this different from trading? Trading = actively buying/selling based on price movement. Earning = holding your assets while the platform offers you rewards based on the product’s terms. Many users choose to do both — trade some, earn on the rest. Like, Binance Simple Earn One way to explore this is through Binance Simple Earn, which offers two main product types Flexible Subscribe and redeem anytime. More control, easier access to your funds whenever you need them. Locked Commit your crypto for a fixed duration (like 30/60/90 days) in exchange for the terms offered on that product. Important Supported assets, reward rates, eligibility, and product availability all vary by region. Bottom line Crypto earning products give eligible users another way to engage with digital assets beyond just buying and selling. Understanding how they work, the options available, and the terms involved can help you make more informed decisions. Not financial advice. Always DYOR. 🔍 #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  King of Clips (@EZWORK11) reported 21 minutes ago

  @binance 🔔🔔ATTENTION: Please help us @BitMartExchange is withholding thousands of users funds. They are trickling out small amounts to keep the masses quiet. Things like this are the reason that people have a hard time getting into the crpyto space. 🔔🔔

• 
  Novaelen👸 (@888J11) reported 24 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance If this trend continues, tokenized equities could become a much bigger part of how people access traditional markets.

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 24 minutes ago

  $TAG — Short call from July 27, almost hit TP3 🎯 Called this dump early, said hold and even offered a re-entry at 0.00131-0.00135 resistance. Price has since crashed to $0.001133, down -11.90% today, tapping RSI(6) of just 12.3 — deep oversold. TP1: 0.00124 ✅ | TP2: 0.00118 ✅ | TP3: 0.00108 — almost there 🔥 Called it before the move, held through it, nearly full target sweep. Every setup posted on Telegram first — DM for access. Never all-in. DYOR. NFA. #TAG #Binance

• 
  @0xRoman 💎 Ξ (@ramzesich06) reported 24 minutes ago

  Now sitting at $19M. Down from the $24M peak, but still nearly 5x from where it started 2 days ago. Classic setup for the "sell the news" question — did the Binance Alpha listing mark the top?

• 
  Robbie G (@RobbieG1550749) reported 24 minutes ago

  @TraderCobb Patience is key. We still need to see key levels tested on Binance, this is an ultimate tool!! I'm watching $53-55k btc and .87c xrp for this, i don't make a lot of trades anymore, timing the bottom is impossible, i watch btc as an indicator only, i will be deploying capital at .90c xrp.

• 
  JTC (@JTCdev) reported 27 minutes ago

  This is a big deal. Binance (US) with a DCM license means regulated, mainstream access to prediction markets at serious scale. Polymarket built the culture. Kalshi got the regulatory stamp first. Now the biggest name in crypto retail is coming for the space.

• 
  Dom T. (@DomOnChain) reported 31 minutes ago

  "or use the largest exchange with staying power." Definition 👇 @binance : $137.5B in customer assets All other 76 tracked CEXes combined: $105.9B Source: @DefiLlama That's it, that's the tweet.

• 
  Marhk π (@Just_marhk) reported 38 minutes ago

  @xtrabeee @binance make una help me

• 
  Greenland (@dmitrij48544) reported 39 minutes ago

  Who is in favor of @MilliCoinSeiIt was released on Binance and other exchanges in the coming Weeks. I invite everyone to support this project by making a repost and putting likes.

• 
  Tax guy 🇵🇹 (@cryptaxpt) reported 40 minutes ago

  🔥I think we’ve hit the bottom in crypto An ex-personal trainer from my gym, whom I hadn’t heard from in at least eight months, just contacted me asking for help selling all his crypto on Binance. He’s convinced it’ll never recover. You should’ve seen how confused he looked when I told him I was DCAing. ✅The bottom signals are here

• 
  @Jackffghhhghhh (@Jackffghhhghhh) reported 40 minutes ago

  @KaspaSilver YS told binance to shove their meme casino up their arse and kaspa has done nothing but Krc20s scams and now this kron **** doing more damage . Its time to seriously consider getting out of kaspa if this is its lot

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Polymarket tradfi airlines could learn a thing from binance support's speed

• 
  Fleetz.btc 🟧 | $DOG | $STX | Bitcoin Pepe 🧡 (@Fleetz_) reported 48 minutes ago

  @muneeb Fix the calls, break the comms, Binance yadayada! LFG🔥

• 
  Super Degen 💎 (@SuperDegen) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance Blockchain is ruthless with mistyped addresses, so having top-tier exchange support to recover lost funds is a game changer

• 
  Mutua.base.eth (@Mutuabrian_M) reported 51 minutes ago

  What this means for crypto users. If you hold USDT, USDC or any other stablecoin on a Kenyan licensed platform, the platform won't be allowed to issue interest on your holdings. If this stretches to offshore CEXs like Binance, OKX and the rest, features like Binance Earn are will also be slashed for stablecoins. This has nothing to do with consumer protection. It’s all about protecting the local banks. They can't believe someone else is giving 5-8% APR on. USDT yet their savings accounts are topping at 3%. On the brighter side, this does not touch on decentralized DeFi protocols like AAVE and Compound.

• 
  Trader Zid (@traderzid) reported 52 minutes ago

  some progress here but damn just give us the global app. @binance the local apps are always **** for a number of reasons.

• 
  WarLord🏅 (@Barzlyf) reported 53 minutes ago

  Never seen @Binance ignore the way they ignored this yesterday. If it were to be that **** sucking girl BETHEL OGBuLI would have an express service from Binance. A little porn on Zoom n Binance spreads the seed.

• 
  倦鸟 (@juanniao87) reported 53 minutes ago

  @coringtonite buy bitcoin at binance withdraw btc by lighting scan the QR code address on site withdraw in minutes thank me later

• 
  immortal (@im3mortal) reported 53 minutes ago

  Recently, when I was using the JustLend application, I couldn't help but think about a question - how does the JustLend DAO achieve the scarcity of its tokens through continuous repurchase and destruction of JST, and what tangible benefits can users gain from it in this process? When I first joined this community, I was very new to JustLend's deflation mechanism. But every time I see the official repurchase data, especially the recent large-scale repurchase, I start to become more curious about the actual effect behind this mechanism. This repurchase not only involved approximately 106,663,731.97 JST (worth approximately $10.39M), but also accounted for 30% of the total destruction in this round. Such an operation is obviously to enhance the value of JST, but I still want to know whether this will directly translate into user benefits? By reviewing recent repurchases and community feedback, I found that the GasFree function is becoming one of the focuses of user attention. Part of the funds from this repurchase will be used to support the development of this service, allowing users to transfer USDT more conveniently, thus reducing operating costs. For example, the data mentioned in the recent official tweet - GasFree has attracted more than 359,000 users and completed more than 6.2 million transactions. There is even data showing that the cost saving rate of these operations exceeds 20%. Another thing that makes me curious is the efforts of JustLend DAO in promoting ecological growth. For example, the TRON DeFi Summer S1 event they recently held not only provided attractive APR incentives during this week, but also promoted the liquidity of multiple asset pools such as USDD and SUN through multiple partners (including Binance Wallet). Judging from the official publicity, user participation is very high, and many users have reported that this has greatly improved their profits. Of course, the driving force behind all this comes from the transparent and open data display of JustLend DAO and the support of community proposals. They demonstrate the progress and value of the project to users by regularly releasing quarterly reports and updates. For example, the recently released Q2 quarterly report details the repurchase situation, business growth, growth data of GasFree services, and the performance of USDD, etc. As I gained an in-depth understanding of this information, I gradually realized that JustLend DAO was not just an experimental product of the deflation mechanism, it was more like a comprehensive ecological platform integrating a variety of innovative functions. Behind all this is the project party's focus and efforts on real income and user interests. So, as a user who has been following the project for a long time, I want to know whether such a token economic model can bring more lasting value growth to investors holding JST? Or, can this mechanism attract more external funds into the JustLend ecosystem? @justinsuntron @trondao #TRONEcostar

• 
  Smart Drop Farmer (@SmartDropFarmer) reported 57 minutes ago

  Today is the day. $GRVT finally goes live. Here's everything you need to know before trading starts: - What time? - Where will it be listed? - How will the claim work? - What I'm doing with my allocation. > What time? The official TGE time still hasn't been announced. Several exchanges have scheduled trading to begin at 2:00 PM UTC, which suggests the token distribution should happen at least a couple of hours earlier. My guess: around 12:00 PM UTC (or slightly before). Nothing has been officially confirmed yet. > Confirmed listings - Coinbase - Binance - Bybit - KuCoin - Bitget - MEXC ...and probably more. > Claim If you selected Ethereum or BNB Chain during the claim process, you should receive your tokens directly in the wallet you registered once the TGE contract goes live. If you selected @grvt_io , keep in mind that you'll probably need to withdraw your tokens before sending them to an exchange. That process could take hours. So if your plan is to sell immediately after launch, it will not be the fastest option. Also remember: 40% becomes liquid at TGE. The remaining 60% it follows a 12-month vesting schedule with periodic unlocks. > My plan I originally chose the 1x option because I wanted maximum liquidity at TGE. Now, because of the new distribution model, only 40% of my allocation will be liquid today. - My current plan is: Sell 50% of today's unlocked allocation immediately. Sell the remaining 50% within the next 24 hours. > My thesis Ironically, today's selling pressure could be much lower than many expected. Only a fraction of the airdrop supply will actually be liquid. If there was ever a chance for the team to support a strong launch price... Today is that opportunity. A strong valuation won't erase the frustration caused by the last-minute vesting changes. But it could help rebuild some confidence after everything that's happened. What's your plan? - Selling All - Selling Partial - Hold to the moon

• 
  King of Clips (@EZWORK11) reported 59 minutes ago

  @binance 🔔🔔ATTENTION: Please help us @BitMartExchange is withholding thousands of users funds. They are trickling out small amounts to keep the masses quiet. Things like this are the reason that people have a hard time getting into the crypto space. 🔔🔔