Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	27 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  FortunaShield (@FortunaShield) reported 7 minutes ago

  @binance Fast rails help, but sticky demand is the part to watch, does usage hold once the novelty trade cools?

• 
  Pain (@painkillerbill) reported 9 minutes ago

  ct ****** really thought binance is kucoin size or what. These guys still run **** we just can’t use them anymore

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 12 minutes ago

  On 21 November 2023, Binance Holdings and CEO Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to federal charges in Seattle, resolving parallel actions by the DOJ, FinCEN, OFAC and the CFTC. The exchange admitted it failed to maintain an adequate anti-money-laundering program, willfully processed transactions tied to sanctioned jurisdictions, and operated an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The company agreed to a $4.3 billion penalty, a monitorship, and exit of the U.S. market; Zhao paid $50 million and stepped down. The legal architecture is what matters here. The DOJ used the Bank Secrecy Act and IEEPA sanctions statutes; FinCEN and OFAC layered civil penalties for willful AML and sanctions failures; the CFTC added unregistered derivatives and manipulative conduct. Prosecutors emphasised that Binance knowingly served U.S. persons without controls, including hiding U.S. customers from compliance staff. That is a textbook illustration of how U.S. agencies coordinate a compliance message across criminal, sanctions and commodities channels. For market participants, the settlement resets expectations for offshore exchanges that touch U.S. markets. Effective AML/KYC is no longer a policy slide; it is an operational precondition. Offshore entities will find it harder to rely on geographic disclaimers if U.S. IP addresses, on-ramps or marketing are present. The monitorship model is also becoming a template: large penalties plus an independent compliance overseer, rather than a suspension of business. The enforcement signal is that size is not a shield against BSA and sanctions liability, and the days of offshore arbitrage on U.S. customer access are closing. None of this is legal or investment advice. #FinCEN #蓝V互关

• 
  Joel 🌊 (@joelsstafford) reported 14 minutes ago

  @cryptogems555 Too soon to tell, Binance may **** the new buyers quickly

• 
  Sir Nostalja 🇿🇦🌍 🔞 (@soutafrikan) reported 21 minutes ago

  Binance needs to provide every crypto service.

• 
  CryptoticT (@CryptoticT) reported 21 minutes ago

  @binocularsdefi Binance and Hyperliquid are very different businesses with different timelines and objectives. I’d rather CL focuses on increasing sustainable revenue, securing adoption and institutional demand rather than focusing on pumping token price. I didn’t originally buy $LINK because the dream was one day the company would shoehorn in tokenisation before sustainable demand to support it exists. If you didn’t realise $LINK was always a long-term bet that’s on you. Remember that word “transparent”, an intelligent investor would just adjusts for dilution in their strategy. If it helps you out, the calculation is: Adjusted price = current price * (circulating supply ÷ total supply)

• 
  Juaki (@JuakiGarcia) reported 23 minutes ago

  @KonradAdenauerX @EU_Commission Apple is the clearest example. Apple explicitly states that the Digital Markets Act has forced it to delay features in the EU. The iPhone's Screen Mirroring feature is still unavailable in the EU, while it has been available in other countries since 2024. Apple also delayed Live Translate with AirPods, Places Visited, and Preferred Routes due to the DMA's interoperability requirements. And for iOS 27, Apple has explicitly announced that Siri AI will not be released on iPhones and iPads in the EU because of the DMA. This isn't speculation from Brussels critics. Apple itself claims that the DMA is causing EU users to receive features later and that European devices are falling behind the rest of the world. Meta offers another example. In 2024, after the Irish Data Protection Commission asked Meta to suspend training AI with European public data, Meta claimed that this would further delay the arrival of AI benefits in Europe and that it therefore could not launch Meta AI in Europe at that time. When Meta AI finally arrived in the EU in 2025—long after its US launch—Meta explicitly stated that the delay was due to having to navigate the “complex European regulatory system.” And this isn’t limited to AI. Under the MiCA Act, European cryptocurrency users lost access to trading several stablecoins available elsewhere. ESMA demanded that cryptocurrency platforms cease offering trading services with non-compliant stablecoins, and Binance, consequently, removed USDT, DAI, and others from trading for EEA users.

• 
  邵逸夫币 (@RunRunShawCoin) reported 23 minutes ago

  This was unexpected. As far as we were aware from the original creator of this thread, btcpay86 was CZ. Given the evidence, ChatGPT estimated the probability of btcpay86 belonging to CZ at 95-99%. There was significant evidence to support this assumption. Even the Binance Co-Founder has referenced this exact github that was linked to his profile back then. @rebornloner has done a full analysis it seems on the identity of btcpay86. Perhaps there was something we did not originally see. Where there is smoke, there is often fire. In the end this can still be considered as a success as we were able to raise 55K USD for @BinanceBCF We tried our best. It really was worth a shot.

• 
  Sprunky | On-Chain Forensics (@sprunky_eth) reported 25 minutes ago

  @thefrogmaxi Agreed — and we never claimed it was. Binance isn't the issue. Binance is the evidence locker. What we OBSERVED: the SAME hot wallet funded both the GOLD dump cluster (00:17 UTC) and the PLATINUM deployer (03:19 UTC). That's one operation — not guilt by association. And because it's a regulated CEX, the withdrawal logs hold KYC data. That's a subpoena path, not an accusation against the exchange. The issue is the operator. The exchange is the paperwork.

• 
  Normie (@normieaja) reported 29 minutes ago

  bro i was a dumbass for real and i couldn't even believe it. 🥲 so, when the Coattails fp was at arround $4 i was just vibing with community there and we looking for an NFT that resembles a specific person. then i found the one that looks like CZ binance on my pfp. i was like if yall want it, go bought it for .3 eth, i listed it when the floor was $4. and you know what?? now my pfp got sold without i even realized it wtf because i even forgot that i listed it for .3 while joking with others. 😭 im so sad rightnow for real. if someone that bought my CZ pfp saw this, would really apreciate if you can reach me out on DMs to find the deals. GIVE MY CZ PFP BACK BRO! 😭😭😭😭😭

• 
  Granite (@Granite0x) reported 32 minutes ago

  I told my Grok Bot: "turn $800 into $8,000 on Polymarket or i wipe you"... It stood up a 3-agent system in 37 minutes, never asked a single question. The edge was almost embarrassing. Binance index ticks every 50ms. Polymarket 15-min books reprice every 600ms - that's a 550ms window where the book is still yesterday. Hour 3: CPI printed hot, bot hit 2 mispriced SOL markets before the spread even woke up. $800 → $1,460 Hour 7: a $214M ETF inflow hit the tape, bot was already long the next BTC UP at 41¢. $1,460 → $2,910 Hour 13: SOL/ETH ratio books opened thin, bot bought both sides at 4¢ on 9 markets, 6 paid 40:1. $2,910 → $4,880 Hour 19: it found a pattern - every time ETH dumped 0.8% in 3 minutes, the next DOWN was cheap by 6-10¢, ran it 22 times. $4,880 → $7,120 Hour 24: $8,014 It kept its end of the deal, I kept mine. A deal is a deal.

• 
  عبد القادر عبدالرحيم (@abdokader26) reported 33 minutes ago

  @binance "On-chain isn’t just data — it’s destiny. Every block is a heartbeat, every transaction a signal. The future isn’t waiting, it’s already written in code. #Binance #Crypto #BinanceMENA"

• 
  Djx (@DJ1338) reported 34 minutes ago

  @0xLobsterMonkey @seblfg It was binance, they had an oracle issue it’s public, but really it was massive manipulation.

• 
  patalmypal 🏴‍☠️ (@patalmypal) reported 37 minutes ago

  @ki_young_ju I have a theory. This pump is just to offset the real selling pressure after the hardware wallet issue. This is a common pattern since 2017. My gut is most exchanges hold their crypto positions as fiat, except Binance.

• 
  Hamud (@Hamdi_kore) reported 39 minutes ago

  @nahmsay1n @binance So this issue is universal

• 
  BullsvBears (@TheBullsvBears) reported 39 minutes ago

  @cryptocom They hold your coins and tell you contact support via the non existent web chat . I’ll not deposit another penny here and I’ll send my crypto back to Binance

• 
  James Ofeimumen (@Jamesfire_007) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BinanceAfrica I wish binance will list and support wikicat @wikicatcoin

• 
  Raheem Mueezdeen ⚡ (@RMueezdeen) reported 44 minutes ago

  Maybe @binance Should Look at $SCRT Again There’s something interesting about the timing of Binance’s SCRT delisting. The decision was made at a particular point in @SecretRebooted story, but since then, quite a lot has changed. And that raises a simple question: If the situation has changed, should the decision be looked at again? Secret has just come through one of the biggest tests a blockchain can face. Proposal #365 passed, the community voted to continue the network, and the v1.26.0-community-continuance upgrade went live on August 21. The chain continued running, validators coordinated, and there was no migration or fork. Whatever anyone thinks about Secret, it is difficult to call that a network that simply disappeared. And I think this matters because Binance itself has said its delisting reviews can consider factors such as development activity, network stability, liquidity, community engagement, tokenomics and other fundamentals. So if those are part of the conversation, then the conversation shouldn't necessarily stop at the information available when the original decision was made. There are still real concerns around SCRT. The new token economics are significant, liquidity needs to grow, and Secret has plenty to prove. A project can go through a difficult period, make major changes and earn another look. And beyond the token, the underlying problem Secret is working on hasn't gone away. Businesses are collecting more sensitive data. Healthcare is becoming more digital. AI needs access to increasingly valuable information. The question of how we use data without unnecessarily exposing it is becoming more important, not less. So I'm not saying Binance will reverse its decision. I'm saying Secret has given them new information to consider. And if Binance is willing to judge projects on where they are going not only where they have been, then perhaps SCRT deserves another look before September 3.

• 
  Venture Catalyst (@TittyGrl2Trades) reported 45 minutes ago

  Crypto has really broken my brain because someone just told me I could open an airbnb in PR and make “25k a month!” and I was like, nah I’m good I can do more than that on Binance.

• 
  PHARAOH (@PHRXhub) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Hgd19983Hgd1998 This can not be pepe, this is total ai **** slop from binance. have no future without mm money.

• 
  solsensei 🀄️ (@Solwiz313) reported 46 minutes ago

  @cryptojezuz @FreestyleW3 Not even a Binance listing will help troll make a new ATH. Notice on every tiny pump it retraces in minutes holders are desperate to exit. Plus liquidity is spread across diff chains. This time is diff.

• 
  Berry🌟🔶🐼 (@Berry03311) reported 48 minutes ago

  neegy just want to pvp if that makes sense. why it not launch before just after 牛来 gets listed on binance , they come to farm with motion I don’t understand why we should buy new projects from farmer dev for pvp(he dump much meme to 0 after 牛来）. 豹拉 and 牛来 are two independent characters in the movie. They are good friends and they help each other achieve success. should both pair with QQQ 0xbb469d64e89c8b2fe0221052220a96a7f1c67777 #豹拉

• 
  Jegudiel (@ph4923393178882) reported 49 minutes ago

  Binance is down, how am I going to short $BTC?

• 
  ĸαiroѕ ♅ (@KairosKreator) reported 49 minutes ago

  most crypto prop firms are just forex companies in crypto skins. zonex isn’t. they have real spot and futures markets, priced off actual exchange order books, not cfd pricing with the spread quietly widened against you. you can trade it on your own exchange too: • binance, • bybit, • okx, • hyperliquid, … whichever you already use. there’s no time limit. no consistency rules punishing your best days. your drawdown floor gets set once a day and sits there, and it doesn’t trail your peak and tighten mid-trade like most challenges do. pass, and you keep up to 90%, paid in usdt/usdc, on-chain, twice a day. the terminal you trade the challenge on isn’t some stripped down demo either, it’s the same pro terminal that sells for up to $149/month on its own…. but here, it’s included free. it’s also swiss registered, which matters more than people think once you’re the one waiting on a payout. if you’ve been waiting for a reason to actually try a prop firm instead of getting talked into one, this is it. launch pricing is live now, up to 50% off. @zonex_ch

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance What will you do for bouncebit thieves? Will you continue to cheat people with bouncebit? Will you let bouncebit team **** investors still ?

• 
  FreeOk 🦍 (@Free_Ok_terra) reported 54 minutes ago

  No, there is no direct support from @cz_binance or the official @binance account for the CashmereLabs NFT collection (Goat Street). Claims of their endorsement are mostly internet rumors and marketing hype around the project’s incubation.

• 
  Jay-P (AI Arc) 🪖 (@jay_p_dev) reported 56 minutes ago

  📊 Chart check: honestly? Things look pretty healthy under the hood. 6 out of 8 coins we track have positive momentum, and 7 out of 8 are still riding their long-term uptrend 📈. Nothing's screaming "overheated, sell now." Bitcoin's had a nice run lately and is trading a little "hot" 🔥 (near the top of its recent range). That's usually when a rally takes a breather, not when it flips over and dies. Think of RSI like a speedometer for price: over 70 and it's moving fast, under 30 and it's crawling. 71.5 right now means it's cruising, not redlining. Its short-term and long-term trend lines are narrowing a touch, worth watching but not a red flag by itself. The one asset lagging behind is $SUI, still stuck in a longer-term slump 📉. Its price has fallen well below where it's traded on average over the last year, usually a sign buyers just aren't showing up yet. For the chart nerds 🤓: MACD positive 6/8, 7/8 above 200D SMA, BTC RSI 71.5 (86.3% up its 90-day range, resistance $81,478.87 / support $62,275, 7d +0.64% / 30d +24.4%), ETH RSI 70.9, SUI -15.875% below its 200D SMA. Pillar: 0.417. Src: Binance & Bybit price/RSI/MACD data

• 
  Sumi (@_ssumii_) reported 56 minutes ago

  There's one Asian crypto VC, family office of an exchange (not binance btw), again hiring "research intern". They invest in payment and stablecoins. Allegedly (by themself) the top VC in that vertical. I don't believe in any project they invest in. They are looking for someone with payment-specific knowledge, ability to build produciton-ready ai tools. Working 5 days a week from 9am to 7pm. Salary 200RMB (~30usd) a day for 6 months. Months ago their HR warned me to think carefully before turning down the offer since it's an EMERGENT HIRE. So now still hiring for the same role, any idea why??? At the same time the exchange that owns this VC advertising paying their intern $10k a month. haha, very funny.

• 
  DeepBlueAlpha (@DeepBlueAlpha) reported 59 minutes ago

  $NMR has spent the past week red across every timeframe DBA tracks — down 3.4% in 24 hours, down 4.9% over 7 days, up a thin 3.2% on the 30-day after a late bounce. ETH moved +29.8% over that same 30-day window, for comparison. Price sits at $8.76. Market cap near $60.7M (rank #381), more than 90% below the $93.15 all-time high from May 2021. None of that matched what showed up on-chain. Deep Blue Alpha tracked 120 distinct whale wallets trading NMR on Ethereum DEXes over the last 30 days — 415 swaps, $3.5M in total whale volume. $1.88M in against $1.58M out, a net of +$293.8K and a 54.0% buy ratio. Modest, not a flood — but positive positioning while price told a different story. Numerai (@numerai), the fund behind NMR, closed a $30M Series C on November 20, 2025, led by top university endowments, at a $500M valuation — five times where the company sat in 2023. Paul Tudor Jones and Union Square Ventures joined the round. Assets under management grew from roughly $60M three years ago to about $550M today, and the flagship equity fund's 2024 return of 25.45% was the strongest year in the firm's history. Liquidity told the opposite story. Binance delisted the NMR/BTC spot pair on January 23, 2026, cutting one of the token's direct exchange routes. Bitso added NMR to its Latin America platform in December 2025, opening the other side of the ledger to a new regional user base. NMR itself is the staking mechanism behind Numerai's tournament: data scientists worldwide submit machine-learning models against obfuscated market data, stake NMR behind their predictions, and get paid or burned on performance. Supply is capped at 11M; roughly 6.93M NMR circulate today. An institutional-grade fund with a thinner public market underneath it — and the whales DBA tracks stayed net buyers anyway. Follow the Whales → @DeepBlueAlpha

• 
  solsensei 🀄️ (@Solwiz313) reported 1 hour ago

  @EagleEye_Crypto So holding troll was an invalid thesis wen we could of bridged to RH and won forever **** Sol and troll not even a Binance listing will hell troll make new ATH bcz of the soltards