Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	12 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cryptofocus (@Cryptofocus_NL) reported 1 minute ago

  @CryptoMichNL The chart is a 4 hour SUI/USDT on Binance. Three support lines under price: 0.67, 0.66, 0.65. Two red lines above it: 0.71 and 0.73, where the early August bounce died. The block he marked as his entry sits under the lowest of the three.

• 
  shooky (@andrenackt) reported 15 minutes ago

  @cz_binance So with that, question is: Was Binance ableto fix its KYC?

• 
  WHITE RABBIT (@Befbunny) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Abrlien @cz_binance Totally agree. It’s nothing like networks such as Solana. Binance offers something useful, something that can actually change people’s lives. That’s why projects like $MAX, which have donated over $300,000 to Giggle Academy in less than a month, deserve recognition. Those fees, which would normally go into the pockets of some random token creator, are instead continuing to help change lives. And I’m not just talking about $MAX. I genuinely think it would be great to see more meme coins donating their fees to charity.

• 
  butler (@btlrtrades) reported 22 minutes ago

  i just got paid 50,694 USDC from @tradexyz regarding my liquidation on $SKHX. i think what you can learn from this is that its important to choose wisely where you trade. frankly you should choose a massive platform - one with high revenue and an actual thriving business - for me that would be lighter, hyperliquid, tradexyz, binance, bybit, etc. my liquidation was super unexpected, -100k aud in 1 minute during school, but honestly as the days passed i felt 95% confident i would be reimbursed due to the integrity/wealth of the tradexyz team. when i opened my wallet to an extra 50k USDC this morning I wasn't surprised. not to **** on them but i think a similar sized "loss of funds" occurred on Ostium and due to their lack of funding/success, affected users likely won't be reimbursed. basically what im trying to say is hyperliquid

• 
  Crypto Banter (@crypto_banter) reported 23 minutes ago

  🚨L1s ARE THE WORST INVESTMENTS IN HUMAN HISTORY! On @MarketBubble, @blknoiz06 and @mdudas highlight how countless L1s and L2s that piggybacked off Ethereum and Solana are down 98%. A basket of Binance-listed VC L1, L2 and infra projects is potentially the worst investment in the history of mankind. While those same people moralize against memes and on-chain speculation.

• 
  Muntari Abdulhamid (@SupplyDemand29) reported 24 minutes ago

  $BTC $BTCUSD Everyone is bearish on Bitcoin at $63k. That’s usually when it bottoms. Price: $63,078 Week: $65k -> $62.5k 📉 Narrative: SEC cancels meeting. Clarity Act odds dump to 20%. Barron’s screaming “pressure through Q3”. Perfect. This is what capitulation feels like. Let me tell you what the chart is ACTUALLY saying: 1. WE ARE DOWN 53% FROM ATH $120k+ in Oct 2025 -> $59.5k end of H1 2026. We have already erased more than half. Binance Research themselves called this a “historical bottoming window into Q4 2026”. Every cycle, the bottom is formed when no one wants to talk about crypto anymore. We are there. 2. $63K IS NOT RESISTANCE. IT'S A WALL OF BUYERS. 515k BTC sitting at $63k. That’s 3% of the entire supply. People think it’s resistance - I think it’s the floor being built in real-time. Smart money doesn't sell into a wall. It builds on it. 3. THE $60K - $50K SCARE IS OVERDONE Yes, if we break $60k for 3 days, $50k is next. $49,445 is the Aug 2024 low. Bears are salivating for it. But ADX at 15.42 tells you trend is DEAD. This is not a breakdown market. This is a coiling market. August has been red 4 years in a row? Good. Mean reversion loves that stat. My plan: I am not shorting $63k. You will not catch me shorting support that has held all summer. • I’m scaling spot between $62.5k - $60k • Invalidated if we lose $60k on weekly close • Target: $68k -> $74k -> $80k in Q4 This is the part of the cycle where it feels stupid to buy. That’s the point. Are you selling the bottom again? $BTC

• 
  Richard James (@TBG2018) reported 24 minutes ago

  @sheldonbitmart @binance You've got problems coming you little thick clown and you can't do anything about it and neither can any of other wasters you're associated with who are meant to be all powerful you prick. You don't F'in mess with me. Your fkd

• 
  panz.hl (@panzonhl) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Binance_intern "what does the Binance AI agent look like and what is its name?" It keeps telling me it doesn't know could you help me?

• 
  DonaldP 🏴‍☠️ (@Donald_mvp) reported 27 minutes ago

  Road to Top 30 for Badge collecting on @renaissxyz I'm really bullish on this project because it has a real business model, generates actual revenue, and is backed by @yzilabs If you look at the Web3 TCG space, you'll notice that most of the major projects are concentrated on Solana. Renaiss chose to build on BNB Chain, and it's currently the No.1 TCG project on the chain. I also wouldn't be surprised if Binance gives this project strong support, because I'm sure they'd want a strong TCG project representing the BNB Chain ecosystem. For Renaiss, Badges represent Proof of Contribution. You don't need to spend a huge amount of money on gacha. The gap between whales and regular users is much smaller. Open just 1 pack and you can already get a Badge. There are also events and community activities where you can earn Badges without spending anything. ------------------------------------------------------------ Is it too late? -I still don't think so. Maybe you're behind people who have been here for months, but that's still better than fading the project completely and doing nothing. Enjoy! #Renaiss

• 
  CrispyBull (@CrispyBull) reported 27 minutes ago

  Published a deep dive on the Binance vs RedotPay lawsuit. Key insight: $472.8M claim is based on estimated customer lifetime value, not actual losses. The real question is whether RedotPay broke contract terms. What happens when payment partnerships go wrong? More info in link.

• 
  B (@B0_tataki) reported 27 minutes ago

  @ArslanOnChain You should be active more on X. Some user IP cant log in binance square. Appreciated your work

• 
  Antonio Izarazuh (@Antonioizarazuh) reported 29 minutes ago

  @binance @binance , why not help Harmony now? You were involved with $ONE back in the day and even helped recover funds after the 2022 hack. After this latest incident, many holders are wondering: what happened? Is there really no path forward for Harmony?

• 
  cryptozidezi (@cryptozidezi) reported 31 minutes ago

  @MrWhale @FullTiltFrancis The problem has been present for more than 6 months. I believe that Binance Square is still in BETA, and the creators are testing the traffic. I think it will return to normal around 2029–2035, as Binance is preparing to reach 3 billion users!

• 
  ghostz (@memesavingme) reported 31 minutes ago

  My perspective on the CZ story about burning 4444 $MARSCOIN: In 2024, $NEIRO reached $50M and was listed on Binance Future. At that time, everyone thought that Neiro would be the official coin. But no, Binance announced a spot listing of a different Neiro coin. At that time, many people criticized Binance, but in the end, the $NEIRO was listed and soared to $1B. I think the issue here is about insiders and bundles. Don't mess with CZ,they're the masters of the game.

• 
  Arslan (@_E_T_F_) reported 33 minutes ago

  If I got my first salary today, I wouldn’t spend it all. I’d save some, keep some for emergencies, and invest a small part. For me, crypto means financial freedom and more control over my money. $BNB would be one of my picks. It started small and grew into one of the biggest names in crypto. But I wouldn’t go all in. I’d manage my risk and invest only what I can afford to lose. My first salary wouldn’t just buy things. It would help build my future. Always dyor #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  defido (@defido) reported 38 minutes ago

  "You just diidn't have distribution" Lol, ok. We had more distribution than I had seen even Ansem produce, at a scale that was everywhere. It was EVERYWHERE. Dw, we will do it again. Until you've had these people trying to kill your distribution, you have no idea what you're talking about. > Literal Binance founders Heyi and CZ > Justin Sun & HTX > The minister for crypto of Pakistan > The team close to the owner who constantly farms > Multiple whales with $300m+ net worth > BONKs laywers & KOLS > Some of the most high up people in the SF Then please. Sit down. You simply don't know the power we yield, considering we've got to a point that NONE of the above people will even mention the name anymore, not even the owner will talk about the token on ETH. We have POWER.

• 
  çağtay ulusoy (@CatayBeyza) reported 39 minutes ago

  your position is flat, not up, not down. you checked it this morning and again after lunch, but something is still happening every eight hours. in 93 seconds, this breakdown explains the core math of Binance futures fees: 0:00 - the three costs every trader pays 0:27 - why fees scale with position size, not margin 0:44 - how to manage trading costs before leverage compounds them if you put up $1,000 at 10x leverage ($10,000 position), a baseline 0.01% funding rate bills you on the full $10,000 three times a day. over a year that is $1,100 in funding paid out of a $1,000 deposit - wiping out your entire margin while price never moved. i took the mechanics of perpetual funding and turned them into a practical risk framework. skip this and you are paying hidden rent on every trade you hold. watch the 90-second clip first, then dive into the full guide below. the article below is the deeper read

• 
  𝐊𝐚𝐦𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐬𝐠𝐡𝐚𝐫 (@Karman_1s) reported 42 minutes ago

  FIRST SALARY = FIRST FINANCIAL PLAN 💰 Your first paycheck isn’t just money to spend. It can be the start of better financial habits. Before making big financial decisions, consider: Cover Your Needs Start by understanding your regular expenses and what you actually need each month. Build a Safety Net Setting aside money for unexpected expenses can help you stay prepared. Save With a Purpose Give your savings a goal instead of letting your money disappear without a plan. Learn Before You Invest Understand what you’re investing in, how it works, and what risks may come with it. Think About Diversification Different assets can carry different levels of risk. Learn why diversification matters before putting your money anywhere. If crypto is part of your learning journey, start with the basics. Binance Academy can help you understand crypto concepts before making financial decisions. Learn first. DYOR. Decide for yourself. Educational content only not financial advice. Availability varies by region. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  John Williamson (@JohnWillia35056) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Archilogix @TheSCIF Peter again do your research and quit listening to the talking heads. This was an attack from iran on binance not the other way around. I actualy lost a lot in this **** on the tron token. But like i always say just look it up.

• 
  Muntari Abdulhamid (@SupplyDemand29) reported 42 minutes ago

  $BTC $BTC UPDATE - Bitcoin is trading at $63,078 today. Low: $62.8k. High: $63.2k. Flat, boring, and heavy. But zoom out. This was $65k on Monday. Now $62.5k by Friday. Another red week, another failed breakout. What happened? 1/ REGULATION RUG SEC was supposed to hold an open meeting on new crypto fundraising rules this week. Canceled last minute. “Unforeseen scheduling issue.” At the same time, Senate went on 5-week recess WITHOUT advancing the Clarity Act. The market's reaction? Polymarket odds for Clarity Act passing in 2026 collapsed from 80% -> 20%. No clarity = no confidence. 2/ MACRO STILL PRESSURING Binance Research just said it: pressure likely stays through Q3. Context: BTC closed H1 2026 around $59.5k. That's -53% from the $120k+ ATH in October 2025. We are officially in a crypto winter. Their words: “This places BTC within a plausible, though unconfirmed, historical bottoming window into Q4 2026.” Translation: pain now, bottom later. 3/ TECHNICALS: $63K IS THE BATTLEGROUND Glassnode data shows ∼515,000 BTC (3%+ of all supply) concentrated right at $63k. This is the most important level on the chart right now. ADX is at 15.42. That means there is NO trend. Just chop. And history isn’t helping - BTC has closed RED in the last 4 straight Augusts. Levels I’m watching: Support: $62.8k (today) -> $60k (psychological). If we close below $60k for 3 days straight, next target is $50k. That’s the Aug 2024 low ($49,445). Resistance: $64,885 (yesterday’s rejection) -> $65k -> $67k-$70k cluster. We need $67k back to even talk about $70k again. Gameplan: I’m not chasing longs here. Above $63k with volume = scalp to $65k. Lose $62.5k = I’m out and waiting for $60k. Spot? This is not the time to be a hero. Q3 is for survival. Q4 is for positioning. BTC isn’t dead. But it needs a real catalyst. Right now it doesn’t have one.

• 
  ᴄᴀʟᴍ (@Tjiawens) reported 43 minutes ago

  Thats problem with Binance wallet, don’t trade first

• 
  C H A R L I E 🌟 (@charlesnwawo) reported 47 minutes ago

  There’s a point where a Web3 project stops being something you simply “watch” and starts becoming something you need to pay attention to. I think @DigiMaaya is getting there. The biggest update for me right now is simple: The DigiMaaya Exchange Demo is LIVE. You can already explore the trading environment and get a feel for what the ecosystem is building before the next phase of the exchange rollout. And the roadmap is getting more interesting. The team currently has Spot & Futures trading, market-maker activation and exchange user growth listed as Q3 2026 milestones. But the exchange is only one piece of the puzzle. There’s the Loyalty App bringing users into the ecosystem through learning, tasks, participation and rewards. There’s SpringBoard, designed to help businesses and founders move from strategy and token design through fundraising, launch, liquidity and growth. And there’s $EMYA, intended to connect utility across the broader DigiMaaya ecosystem. That creates a much bigger picture: Learn ➤ Participate ➤ Earn ➤ Build ➤ Invest ➤ Trade ➤ Scale. This is why I’m bullish on the direction. Not because another project says “Web2.5.” But because the pieces are starting to look connected. DigiMaaya says its ecosystem already has 400K community members, 150K users and 20K DAU, alongside an approved partner/distribution network. Those are project-reported figures, so execution will ultimately matter more than the headline numbers. And that’s exactly what I’ll be watching. Can DigiMaaya turn all these components into one experience people genuinely want to use? If it can, this becomes much bigger than an exchange. It becomes an ecosystem. The infrastructure is moving. The next chapter is execution. And I’m paying very close attention. 👀 @binance

• 
  Mihcael (@Mihcaelayo) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Uglydanie1 Same >> Need that Binance glitch kind of update

• 
  William Short (@WilliamShortss) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Guillaume88745 @HAFPINTMUSIC @coinbase I don’t work for or represent Binance. I did say that my opinion was that Binance delisted BSV due to BSV tokens having the ability to be confiscated remotely. It adds risk. Protecting user funds would be near impossible.

• 
  _CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported 56 minutes ago

  @eBoltonBos6 Just login to binance. (Signup if you dont have account) then you can have access to bStocks over there.

• 
  reubs (@reubs_btc) reported 56 minutes ago

  Great outlook piece from @muneeb here tldr; - Upgrades went smoothly with 99.94% uptime (one very minor blip as new signers joined which was quickly fixed) - Almost 400M $STX was re-stacked after PoX-5 hardfork (strong signal) - Binance tag has no delisting risk, Muneeb and Stacks team in direct contact and will be removed at next review - Genesis bond for BTC staking is Sept 10th (potential $100B+ market) - Stacks endowment working on improving liquidity further with CEX partners making healthier markets I'm very bullish on @Stacks and the next few weeks are going to be fun leading up to genesis bond launch

• 
  BeardStaff (@BeardStaffX) reported 57 minutes ago

  🚨 THIS IS AN APPEAL NOT ONLY TO SHELDON XIA AND OTHER PEOPLE CONNECTED TO BITMART. THIS IS ALSO AN APPEAL TO THE EXCHANGES THROUGH WHICH BITMART-RELATED FUNDS APPEAR TO BE MOVING. Since late July, BitMart withdrawals have effectively stopped working for affected users. The limit was reduced to approximately $2,000 per day, yet users report being unable to withdraw even $1. At the same time, according to blockchain tracing by affected users, transactions of approximately $5,000–$15,000 continue to leave wallets believed to be associated with BitMart — amounts exceeding the reported $2,000 daily user limit. Who is authorizing these transactions, and who controls the receiving accounts? Blockchain tracing indicates movement of funds toward Binance, OKX and Bybit. BINANCE, BYBIT and OKX — conduct an immediate AML/compliance review, restrict BitMart-related assets where appropriate, preserve KYC and complete transaction histories, cooperate with law enforcement, and bring public attention to this major BitMart withdrawal crisis. The roles of BitMart's leadership and finance team must also be investigated: Sheldon Xia — founder of BitMart. Where are the customer assets? Claudia — Head of HR — claims she “knows nothing.” Terrence Lee — BitMart co-founder — claims he also “knows nothing,” despite reportedly being one of Sheldon Xia's closest associates. According to available information, he left on July 31, when withdrawal problems were already ongoing. Chad Liang — claims he “knows nothing”; according to available information, he also left on July 31. Tony — VIP Manager — deleted his account on July 26. Pamela Grace Fernandez — Chief Accountant — claims she “knows nothing”; her role in financial operations and employee payments should be reviewed. Effie **** — also “knows nothing”; her role in employee payments and what information she had should be reviewed. Ray — Finance Leader. Sophia — Finance Leader. Chenkai Li — according to information available to us, worked closely with Sheldon and requested access from other employees at Sheldon's direction. Gavin — his alleged role in the strategy of attracting users with unusually high APYs should be investigated. 🚨 The May 10 employee conversation shown below is particularly important. In our assessment, it indicates that BitMart management was already aware of problems with reserves and the inability to provide Proof of Reserves. Despite this, increased APYs were used to attract additional deposits. The roles of Sheldon Xia and his closest subordinates in these decisions must be investigated. The entire leadership chain shown in the screenshot below, together with everyone listed above, must be investigated in connection with the movement, control, concealment and handling of BitMart customer funds. EXCHANGES RECEIVING THESE FUNDS: RESTRICT THE RELEVANT ASSETS WHERE APPROPRIATE, PRESERVE KYC AND COMPLETE TRANSACTION HISTORIES, AND PROVIDE ALL RELEVANT DATA TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. The blockchain leaves a trail. TXIDs do not disappear. These questions must be answered through the appropriate investigations and legal proceedings. WHO CONTROLS THE MONEY, AND WHERE ARE BITMART CUSTOMERS' ASSETS? #Binance #OKX #Bybit

• 
  chaza (@vaga30nd_) reported 58 minutes ago

  @binance Here’s one I actually use almost daily: “Act as my personal risk manager. When I send a chart or token, break it down like this: • Current market structure (higher highs/lows or not) • Key support & resistance levels • Clear invalidation point • Realistic R:R if I enter now • What would make this trade high-conviction vs pure FOMO Be blunt. Prefer sitting in cash over forcing setups.” #BuildWithYou @binance 💛

• 
  Pode vir (@thiagoTF) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Telegraph binance UK comeback after that iran ****? lol regulators sleeping on the job again

• 
  Zakariya Sharif (@zakariyasharif9) reported 58 minutes ago

  XRP Whale Deposits to Binance Persist as Price Halves XRP trades near $0.90, down substantially from its Q1 2025 high above $3. Whale-to-exchange flow on Binance shows a structural break that began before the decline and has not resolved. What the chart shows From 2017 through late 2024, whale deposits to Binance were consistently muted — a low, stable baseline with only brief episodes of elevated activity around March 2020 and early 2021. That regime ended in late 2024. Coinciding with the move from roughly $0.50 to above $2.50, deposit spikes reached levels an order of magnitude above anything in the prior seven years. Critically, they did not subside when price peaked. Large prints have continued throughout 2025 and into 2026 as price declined. Why it matters Exchange inflow from large holders is a supply signal. Coins moving from private wallets to a trading venue are being positioned for sale — not definitively sold, but made available. The timing is the informative part. Deposits accelerating into strength is standard distribution behaviour: size is best offloaded when liquidity is deepest. What distinguishes this dataset is that the pattern persisted through the drawdown rather than stopping once the exit window closed. Two readings The straightforward interpretation is continued distribution - large holders reducing exposure across a wide price range rather than at a single level. The alternative deserves weight: XRP's holder base includes entities whose transfers may reflect operational activity rather than directional intent. Exchange-to-exchange routing and custody restructuring can produce similar prints. This metric alone cannot separate the two. What this is not Persistent inflow is not a price forecast. It describes available supply, not demand - and price is the intersection of both. The more useful question is what happens when these prints normalise. A return to the pre-2024 baseline would signal that distribution has run its course. That has not happened yet.