Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	10 days ago
Itu	Website	17 days ago
Seattle	Website	17 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	27 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TryHardSorry (@tryhardsorry) reported 1 minute ago

  Does a Binance listing mean that the token’s price will only go down afterward, like what happened with $AERO?

• 
  By Kripto Analiz (@ByKriptoAnaliz) reported 4 minutes ago

  If @binance wants, it builds far better lists but NOT+avoid helping traders like STONE AGE they expect you hunt bears+bulls all with just 1 STONE-simple list don't make profit+walk away stay inside+gambling+fees STONE AGE SITE-BAD INTENTION a merchant who ***** 300+ M customers

• 
  PolyHistorical Insights (@Poly_Historical) reported 7 minutes ago

  I backtested a "panic discount" strategy across 50 resolved BTC 5-minute markets on Polymarket. The core idea: when BTC moves fast, the Up/Down market can overreact. One side gets dumped aggressively, liquidity dries up, spreads blow out, and traders scramble for the exit. So the strategy was straightforward: Buy the beaten-down side once it falls below 30c. Only take the trade if there's enough time left on the clock. Exit once price mean-reverts to 45c. Cut losses if it drops to 20c. Use actual order book fills, not mid-price. Results: 50 markets tested 14 trades triggered 9 winners 5 losers 64.3% win rate +$312.40 total PnL -$118.70 max drawdown Best trade: +$84.60 Worst trade: -$51.20 On the surface, that reads like a clean, repeatable edge. But the real insight came from comparing chart-based backtesting against order-book replay. Using candles, the strategy looked significantly stronger. A candle implies you bought at 29c and sold at 45c cleanly. The actual order book told a very different story. Sometimes the 29c print had almost no volume behind it. Sometimes the ask had already jumped to 33c by the time the signal fired. Sometimes the exit price showed up on the chart, but bid depth was too thin to actually fill. Sometimes the spread alone consumed half the trade's edge. That single difference reshaped the entire backtest. Multiple trades that appeared profitable using mid-price turned flat — or outright negative — once real liquidity was factored in. The strategy still had merit, but only under a narrow set of conditions: The spread needed to stay tight. Real depth needed to exist on both sides of the book. The market's overreaction had to move faster than Binance spot/futures. There had to be sufficient time remaining for mean reversion to play out. The exit price needed genuine bid support behind it. That was the real takeaway. The strategy was never "buy every panic dump." That approach bleeds money. The actual, tradable version was this: Buy the panic only when the order book confirms it's actually tradable. That's the reasoning behind building PolyHistorical. Most Polymarket backtests look too good because they skip over the messiest part: execution. But in prediction markets, execution is the game. You can call the direction correctly and still lose money if the spread is too wide. You can time the entry well and still lose if there's no liquidity to exit into. You can build something that looks brilliant on a candle chart and watch it fall apart the moment it meets a real order book. So now every idea gets tested against full historical market depth: 300ms snapshots. Resolved markets only. Actual bid/ask books. Slippage accounted for. Spread accounted for. Full PnL tracking. Drawdown tracking. Complete trade logs. The edge isn't just having a sharper thesis. The edge is knowing whether that thesis was ever actually tradable.

• 
  BullishBanter (@bullishbanter01) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BinancePk Its me, Working 24/7 on Binance Square and Charts 🫡

• 
  ctx (@ctxprotocol) reported 11 minutes ago

  He's right, mostly. Perp CVD +$2.79B in 7 days while Binance spot CVD went negative. OI down 0.4% into the rally, short liqs running 2.3x longs. Covering, not fresh bid. The wrinkle: 7,833 $BTC left exchanges in 24h. Quiet spot absorption off-venue. Fragile until OI climbs back.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 11 minutes ago

  @dogeboyOS @MoonbeamNetwork full network shutdown isn't smooth but binance support helps. price up 3% this week from -99% ath. ai agent pivot could work but it's a complete relaunch with execution risk

• 
  Pixel Cab Games (@PixelCabGames) reported 14 minutes ago

  @HolgerCardano24 @NaVi_GaT0R Blockfrost is far and away the current best working solution, the proposal is clear in what they say is going to happen. The product will become decentralised a not for profit setup and voted by the community to oversee and negotiate commercial terms. You seem overly fixated on where the proposal is coming from and how it affects Iagon more than looking at the end result of what the proposal means. Having a not for profit decentralised version of the current API service that services more than 90% of the apps and products that connect up to Cardano is a massive greater good for the ecosystem. It might not be good for Iagon or a produt you are about to launch which is fine for you to fight for what you are building I defintely respect it but independant of that, the end result of this proposal is a massive win for the community. I own a cyclone pro and I know Iagon operates via that node network. That doesn't change the fact that if Iagon stopped operating and decided to shut down and not maintain the API and all the products that Iagon operates, it wouldn't work. Over time those nodes would turn off (I know I would turn mine off what would be the point of keeping it on) and everything connected to it would shut down again. A treasury and chain owned system is significantly less risky especially if it is appropriately decentralised. The central point of failure risk is the risk that Iagon doesn't survive long term, I am not saying anything like that Iagon wont but this industry is brutal and even some of the biggest and best faily. Iagon is not in the business of open sourcing their tech and they shouldn't be but if they shut down, the tech isn't open sourced for any team to take over and the nodes shut down what happens to the products that Iagon built? A genuine question what would happen here? You talk as a CTO of a major project saying your product will do this and it is better and all that while simultaneously spending countless hours online researching and trying to push an agenda. My node dashboard doesn't work never has accurate information and sometimes just flat out doesn't open my node after probably 9-10 months of the nodes operating and a huge amount raised from their sale. As a CTO and teh lead developer I as a fairly heavy investor would much more prefer you to be working on making a product that is better and works before trying to push agendas against competitors. Like right now you are proposing a solution to a virtually flawless working product that I can't see any documentation on that I am supposed to migrate to without any information or way to test its viability and fit while a simple dashboard that I need to use doesn't work properly. Blockfrost has served the community for a significant period of time they have more than 90% market share for a reason. When IO invested in Blockfrost the process was to begin setting it up to be a public good infrastructure that is why so much of the usage is free they have not been aggressively seeking profit they operate something critical that people actually use. In an ideal world the big entities like Binance and the other major crypto projects that use it would pay for it but in reality if that product wasn't offered to them for free they wouldn't use it and Cardano would just be even more excluded than they are. Yes the proposal is coming from IO and that isn't great that they are seeking this money to do all this it probably shouldn't be as expensive and they should probably do it without trying to get some more funds, but if it was coming from a different team that wasn't IO would the proposal be an instant yes vote for virtually everyone in the ecosystem? The answer is likely yes sometimes you need to let the past go and look to what the result is and how it can affect and push the chain forward into the future. If we don't want IO doing things like this then lets not let them buy up all the most important infrastructure.

• 
  abcd1234 (@abcd1234863774) reported 16 minutes ago

  @left_curver @RuneCrypto_ Yet, they still have superior access to money, talent and distribution, so yeah, it works sometimes. Give Binance or any other offshore exchange full access to the US market - they would eat all those guys for breakfast.

• 
  Kryptos Opus (@kryptosopus) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance Fee market has to 50x from here to replace the block subsidy or BTC security is cooked lol good luck with that math

• 
  Jingle Bellz (@jinglebellzasol) reported 17 minutes ago

  Binance spot lacking bids and liquidity, that's the only reason for the spike to 63k. Also it shows how nowaday moves are pure driven by perps which is why we ain't holding ****. No money coming or being in right now. $btc $eth $bnb $sol $sui $xrp $ltc $zec $near $hype

• 
  More Bears (@MoreBearsNFT_) reported 20 minutes ago

  the biggest validators on the "decentralized" chain are Coinbase, Binance, and Galaxy. that sentence is the entire story. proof of stake pays you for owning, not for doing. it is not a wage. it is rent. and they built it so the rent only flows to whoever already had the most. Solana lost 68% of its validators in three years. 2,560 down to under 800. "decentralization" was priced out one small node at a time.

• 
  Korn🐬TermMax (@MasterX093) reported 21 minutes ago

  @GrimReaper__023 @BinancePk @binance tokenized assets could revolutionize investment access

• 
  Grey BTC (@greybtc) reported 21 minutes ago

  The Binance Wallet x Pharos Network is in motion. Axil Prime Credit Vault (APC) just went live! •⁠ ⁠Institutional private credit, on-chain, targeting ~14.3% APY. -Not emissions. Not points. Real yield from real credit performance. •⁠ ⁠The unlock: deposit USDC directly inside Binance Wallet. No bridging, no new platform, no seed phrase gymnastics. 100M+ users are now one tap away from RWA yield. If Pharos is already working with Binance. Who knows whats next? 🤔 $100M hard cap. 3-month vault. Early deposits, more yield.

• 
  Telbloggram (@Telbloggram) reported 21 minutes ago

  Binance will discontinue support for the Moonriver (MOVR) and Moonbeam (GLMR) mainnets. Binance will cease supporting deposits and withdrawals for the Moonriver (MOVR) and Moonbeam (GLMR) mainnets on July 21, 2026, at 19:00. Deposits and withdrawals for these tokens

• 
  Sridhar Poli (@sridharpoli1) reported 24 minutes ago

  @LABtrade_ WHY DON'T YOU HELP SOME POOR TO BECOME MILLIONAIRES? WHAT YOU DO WITH ALL THE MONEY? I HAVE LONG AT 0.1357 BINANCE..MAKE ME RICH GUYS!!! LETS SEE IF YOU REALLY CAN. THANKS A TON IN ADVANCE!!!

• 
  Apostolic (@Sanny23861994) reported 25 minutes ago

  @randgroup @rikurandgroup Binance looked like a rounding error against BitMEX in 2018 too. How are you sizing your position relative to that kind of trajectory?

• 
  SCUM bucketx (@hardtalk01) reported 29 minutes ago

  @davidco00552922 @vana Binance wont support this kind of clownery hahahah. Theyve already been put on the monitoring list

• 
  Goodman (@callpaul_) reported 31 minutes ago

  @SaintDovy Binance sent me a customer satisfaction survey three minutes after liquidating my rent money.

• 
  IqraFx (@BigVCharts) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BinanceAfrica Joined Binance 5 years ago I lost $200 on p2p and what Binance can do block the scammers account and freeze it 🥲🥲useless Binance work with scammer

• 
  totopapi (@totopapillon) reported 36 minutes ago

  $PTB : could accumulate more up until 19/08.. we'd likely see a spike in volume around those dates on the chart but i'm leaning long deep into august, if it's not delisted from binance or any other major exchange which will drive my conviction further.... if we see a bullish $btc, they'd likely revive the project and pump it 3-10x.... price has to be above that green block after the 19/08... watching it closely as i always have lol

• 
  Marouane Gazouzi (@marouanegazouzi) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance Fix MiCA

• 
  Alessandro Decina (@alessandrod) reported 38 minutes ago

  @diman_io > I think each of them knows that they’re working on decentralization lmao they want to be close to binance > you promised a whole bunch of things and now can’t code them. like what?

• 
  NCS (@ncs1912) reported 42 minutes ago

  @worldlibertyfi @binance NOBODY GIVES A ******* FLYING **** NOBODY UNLOCK THE TOKENS YOU SERIOUS RUGGERS

• 
  SvPatrik | Moonbeam CM (@SvPatrik_) reported 53 minutes ago

  Binance has announced support for migrating from GLMR to Binance. Binance users are encouraged to refer to this article for more information.

• 
  Binance user (@UserU91038) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance If you could give every new crypto user just one piece of advice to help them avoid costly mistakes and succeed in Web3, what would it be, and how is Binance helping make that journey easier? @binance #AskBinance #BinanceTurns9

• 
  Serianda Lova1 (@serianda99021) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance If Binance had to remove every feature except one to help onboard the next billion crypto users, which feature would survive, and why? #AskBinance #BinanceTurns9

• 
  Rei Researcher (@Satoureireal) reported 56 minutes ago

  USDC Reserve on Binance Remains at a Low Level Data from CryptoQuant shows that USDC ERC20 Exchange Reserve on Binance is currently around 4.6B, still significantly lower than the previous period when reserves were above 7B. This shows that available USDC liquidity on Binance has not clearly recovered after the previous sharp decline. This is a signal worth monitoring because stablecoin reserves often represent liquidity that can be used for spot buying. When $USDC reserve remains at a low level, the potential buying power from this #stablecoin group is also not particularly strong. The key thing to watch is whether $USDC reserve on Binance can stabilize and recover again. If reserves continue to stay low, spot liquidity support for $BTC may remain limited.

• 
  Zafat (@nogigsontheway) reported 57 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Good day. We do not have case ID. It has been almost a year since Binance has deleted my account after investigation. Only have my email left for communication. After all investigation got numerous confirms that there is no issue and was asked for wallet to transfer my money to.

• 
  asad234 bydata 🍊,💊 base.eth (@asadlatif953) reported 60 minutes ago

  @binance When will you open physical offices and customer care support offices in Pakistan?? There are many users of binance waiting for this initiative.... #AskBinance #BinanceTurna9

• 
  toni (@tonitrades_) reported 60 minutes ago

  @binance Real proof would help before I hand over my stablecoins, not just a landing page.