Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	15 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	17 days ago
Vigo	Website	1 month ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	1 month ago
Dubai	Transactions	1 month ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Z (@Moneaseio) reported 3 minutes ago

  There is a growing need for non-KYC conversion and swap options for #XMR, #ZEC, and similar privacy-oriented cryptocurrencies, as many centralized exchanges, including #Binance, have discontinued support for them over the last two years.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 5 minutes ago

  JST isn't a setup worth chasing here — it's rolling over from a ceiling it couldn't break, and it only earns another look on a strong 4-hour close back above $0.0832. For weeks the coin has been bumping its head against the $0.0850–$0.0908 zone and getting rejected. Yesterday it gave back roughly 5% in a single day, and the daily chart is starting to roll over rather than build. On the 4-hour timeframe the trend is pointing down, price is trading under its short-term averages, and a textbook double top near $0.083 just failed — sellers are clearly in control of the near-term tape. Underneath that, the demand picture is weak. Buyers who got in near the lows have essentially stopped adding, and the average price recent buyers paid sits right overhead — meaning every bounce runs straight into people looking to get out flat. The short-term trigger that put JST on our screen actually fired in an already-stretched, overbought state — historically that's where quick traders take profit, not where a fresh leg up begins. The backdrop doesn't help either. Bitcoin's share of the market is climbing and the dollar is firming, both of which tend to drain money out of smaller alts like this one. And the math is unfriendly: only about 7% of room up to the recent high, with several forced-liquidation pockets sitting just below price that can act like magnets if support cracks. Net read: not in play right now. The level that flips the story is a strong 4-hour close back above $0.0832 — until then, this one stays on the watchlist, not the radar. — 📡 On the Radar · $JST · Available on Binance

• 
  Reset.sui (@Reset_sui) reported 11 minutes ago

  The best reason for the price action is @binance FYI: @WalrusProtocol raised $140M at $2 billion valuation with a 1 year lockup So for most people 0.4$ per $WAL was baseline support Then several things happened: • Binance listing distributed free tokens that immediately became sellable • High APY incentives increased circulating supply • The Bloody October's flash crash accelerated downside • The broader alt market weakened, with BTC down ~50% and many alts down 80-90%. Since October, $WAL has consistently made new lows. In hindsight, the issue wasn't one event — it was a combination of aggressive token emissions, weak demand, and one of the worst environments for altcoins. A project that once raised $140M is now trading at roughly $150M FDV What do you think ultimately killed $WAL's price action?

• 
  sunday peter π (@sundaypeter8110) reported 11 minutes ago

  WHAT CLARITY ACT IS ALL ABOUT The CLARITY Act is a major U.S. crypto regulation bill currently moving through Congress in 2026, aiming to establish a clear legal framework for digital assets. It classifies cryptocurrencies into three categories—commodities, securities, and stablecoins—while resolving jurisdictional disputes between the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission). However, its passage faces tight deadlines before the midterm elections, and there’s uncertainty about whether it will become law this year. WHY CLARITY ACT? Long running turf war between the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) over who gets to regulate crypto. Here’s the background: SEC’s stance: Many crypto tokens are “investment contracts,” so they should be treated as securities. That means strict disclosure rules, registration, and investor protections. CFTC’s stance: Assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum behave more like commodities, so they fall under its jurisdiction. The CFTC tends to be lighter touch compared to the SEC. The clash: For years, both agencies have brought lawsuits against crypto firms, sometimes over the same assets. This has created confusion, legal uncertainty, and slowed innovation. The CLARITY Act is designed to end this fight by drawing clear lines. SEC regulates investment contract assets (tokens tied to central teams or profit expectations). CFTC regulates digital commodities (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or tokenized gold). Banking regulators oversee payment stablecoins. So, the enforcement battles, I meant the overlapping lawsuits, contradictory rulings, and regulatory uncertainty caused by the SEC and CFTC both trying to claim authority. The Act’s whole point is to stop that tug of war. How messy the SEC vs. CFTC enforcement battles have been in Crypto: Ripple (XRP) Case SEC’s position: In 2020, the SEC sued Ripple Labs, claiming XRP was an unregistered security because buyers expected profits from Ripple’s efforts. Ripple’s defense: XRP functions more like a commodity or currency, not a stock. Outcome so far: Courts have issued mixed rulings — some say XRP sales to institutions were securities, but sales on exchanges were not. This split shows the lack of clarity. CFTC’s role: The CFTC has hinted that XRP could be treated as a commodity, but without clear law, it hasn’t taken the lead. Ethereum Dispute CFTC’s stance: Ethereum is a commodity, so it falls under their jurisdiction. SEC’s stance: Some officials have suggested Ethereum’s ICO made it a security, and newer versions (like staking rewards) could still be securities. Result: Confusion for exchanges, funds, and developers — they don’t know which rules apply. Enforcement Overlap Both agencies have filed cases against crypto firms like Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken. Sometimes they accuse the same company of violating different rules for the same tokens. This overlapping enforcement creates uncertainty, legal costs, and slows down adoption. The CLARITY Act is meant to stop this tug of war by drawing bright lines: SEC = securities (investment contract assets). CFTC = commodities (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, tokenized gold). Banking regulators = stablecoins. That way, firms won’t face double lawsuits for the same product. How the SEC–CFTC turf war has hit crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Binance: Coinbase SEC lawsuits: The SEC sued Coinbase in 2023, claiming it listed unregistered securities (tokens like Solana, Cardano, etc.). Coinbase’s defense: It argued those tokens are commodities, not securities, and that the SEC is overreaching. CFTC’s role: The CFTC has generally treated major tokens (like Bitcoin and Ethereum) as commodities, creating a direct conflict with the SEC’s stance. Impact: Coinbase faces uncertainty about which tokens it can legally list, and investors face risk of sudden delistings. Binance

• 
  Joshuwa Roomsburg (@Joshuwa) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance Four hundred million matters. RWA access is getting simpler. Users want familiar rails. Binance understood that early.

• 
  Karter (@karter_web3) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance hope they fixed the last issues

• 
  Andy the Jet 🐬TermMax (@GpaAndy) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Dani_6686 @binance trust issues arise from lack of transparency

• 
  Juan Ruibal (@JuanRuibal10) reported 17 minutes ago

  @PrecisionTrade3 Hello Tara…. Weren’t we looking for XRP to reach at least 1.02 on this wave down on binance ? It only reach 1.05…. Short ????

• 
  Her-crypto majesty (@Majestye20) reported 18 minutes ago

  Bybit has launched its IPO Express service to offer tokenized access to SpaceX’s highly anticipated public listing, positioning itself as the second crypto exchange after Kraken to provide tokenized IPOs. Unlike earlier pre-IPO derivatives from exchanges like Binance, Bitget and Gate, Bybit’s offering lets eligible retail investors subscribe to tokenized representations of actual publicly traded equities at IPO pricing. The SpaceX IPO registration on Bybit runs from June 7 to 11, with allocations and spot trading of the token beginning June 11 and 12, as SpaceX targets a $75 billion raise at a $1.75 trillion valuation.

• 
  Lark 🌸 (@AzuraETH) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Dani_6686 @binance Looks like another broken promise from @binance on rigorous project vetting and due diligence.

• 
  cexscan (@cexscan) reported 20 minutes ago

  $USUAL is one of the most mathematically broken charts in crypto right now. ▸ Price: $0.0096 ▸ ATH: $1.64 (-99.4%) ▸ New ATL: 2 days ago ▸ Fear & Greed: 14 Chart says avoid at all costs. But here's what the chart doesn't show 🧵 It's a stablecoin protocol. $331M TVL. Real product. Real revenue. How it works: → USD0 stablecoin backed 1:1 by U.S. T-bills → Yield from those T-bills → 70% USUAL buybacks, 30% paid to stakers → Emissions are deflationary (decrease as TVL grows) This is NOT a meme coin. It's a cash flow machine. The numbers don't add up: $331M TVL $17M market cap → MCap/TVL ratio: 0.05 That's either a pricing error or a protocol about to die. There's no in-between. For context: most DeFi protocols trade at 0.3–1.0x TVL. USUAL is at 0.05x. Who's behind it: ▸ Coinbase Ventures ▸ YZi Labs (Binance Labs) ▸ Galaxy Digital ▸ CertiK audit: 4.5/5 ▸ Listed on Binance (Launchpool) Not exactly a rug-pull crew. The USUALx unlock phase just completed in March. Supply overhang: resolved. The bear case is obvious: - 99% down, trend is your friend - 95% of volume on one exchange (Binance dependency) - Competing with Tether & Circle The bull case is uncomfortable: - If TVL holds and revenue flows, buybacks compound - Every $100M new TVL = materially more buyback volume - MCap/TVL of 0.05 is unsustainable if protocol survives At $17M mcap, it wouldn't take much buying to move this. The question that matters: Is $USUAL a dying protocol priced fairly at $17M... Or a revenue-generating protocol with $331M TVL, tier-1 backers, and deflationary tokenomics — trading at a 95% discount because sentiment is at rock bottom? Which one do you think it is?

• 
  Ethan DeFi (@EthanDeFi_) reported 23 minutes ago

  I've started farming @predictdotfun airdrop again. A couple of reasons why I am bullish: • It's backed by YZi Labs (Binance) • CZ himself shilled it several times • There's a 49% chance on Polymarket that its token will have a FDV of $500M+ To farm Predict, I placed a NO bet using it on the "Will Polymarket launch their official token by June 30?" market. At the current NO odds (97.4%), I will get a 2.6% return in 22 days (54% APY). The thesis is simple: Once Polymarket decides to launch its token, I think they will announce it several weeks, or even 1-2 months, in advance to generate hype. Furthermore, Polymarket's trademark application for $POLY was assigned to an examiner on June 3, which still didn't finish its review. Until the trademark process is completed, I doubt we will see a Polymarket token. On top of that, the market conditions are terrible right now, which is another reason why I don't see the TGE happening in June. Let's hope this bet pays off 🫡

• 
  Matti Ullah (@MattiUllah15596) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Patrici85657302 This issues with me not solve and binance

• 
  Mishal Alshaheen (@MishalAlshaheen) reported 26 minutes ago

  @YazanXBT I use OKX and its not 5 or 10 minutes its instant deposit and withdraw to bank. The issue with okx they charge 75aed fees to withdraw and around 1.6% to exchange usdt to AED which is alot How much binance charged u comission to exchange usdt to aed and aed to usdt ?

• 
  CZ 🔶 BNB - Quotes (@CZ_binanceQuote) reported 29 minutes ago

  The real value of Binance stock tokenization isn't TradFi access. It's that BNB Chain becomes the backend for global equity markets. Permissionless. 24/7. Self-custodied. Wall Street won't see it coming until it's already too late.

• 
  Lucifuego (@_Lucifuego) reported 31 minutes ago

  @HappyCatKripto @spikey_crypto Do you have solid evidence that they’re not working on something? Maybe they come through and surprise us all with a burn protocol like similar to Binance?

• 
  Shaheb Khan (@shahinhasan009) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Crypto__Haris Please help me boss Binance id: 579710444

• 
  emelia (@Emeli1344) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance Hi, I have lost all my assets worth $10,000. Is there anyone here who can help me? Even if it's just a few dollars so I can get back on my feet. Help me please USDT Trc20 TTEMwxQ1zpXWfuidhhKeMAYAtueNP1gV1L

• 
  Matthew Allen (@MatthewAllen178) reported 39 minutes ago

  $lunc if u arent brain dead u know there will be no 2 trillion burn . No one is just going to give up money like that. Binance only burns part of profits . They arent even going to take any net loss due to burns like dmb fck youtuber hype scam cucks want u to beleive. Lunc won't even hit .0003 this year . I have a 50k usd bet on that ****.

• 
  Mr Paul. A (@MULTISTARHUB) reported 43 minutes ago

  @PhtEmmanuelO They can actually list, just that the taxes will not be charged because they are not trading directly from pancake swap but on their internal server. This means that you will be generating trading fees from those that are trading on pancake but you won't get fees from binance

• 
  KURA^⁠_⁠^ (@kuragems) reported 43 minutes ago

  @BitcoinSnipe @Bybit_Official @binance Either it catches up or catches down....

• 
  Lily (@Lily1128540) reported 44 minutes ago

  Not even the largest asset in the world can survive a binance listing. They have accomplished the impossible.

• 
  User42690 (@user_42690) reported 47 minutes ago

  Chinese are slant-eyed ************* same as theirs BSC **** chain. Top narrative could not go more than 500k (because binance did not cabal it) 0x64e42d99fa091cf0507c42e21eb3c4418b9a4444

• 
  Patt is taking a nap (@pattisme_) reported 47 minutes ago

  Flow & Liquidity check: Binance OI dropped to 97.6k, signaling position exits during this sideways chop. Negative funding on Hyperliquid ($BTC -0.0005, $ETH -0.0007) confirms derivative pessimism, but a high L/S ratio (~1.92) warns of Long Squeeze risks if support breaks. Majors & Alts: • $ETH: Weaker than $BTC, trading at 1668. Support: 1658/1505. Resistance: 1714. • $SOL: Trading ~65.9. Must reclaim 66.8k with volume to validate a bounce. Support: 65.2/60.1. • Alts: No Altseason in sight. $MOVE (-0.02) and $AERO (-0.0006) show extreme negative funding—avoid chasing shorts here due to high squeeze risk.

• 
  Emre Arda (@emre_arda8390) reported 47 minutes ago

  @CryptoHzr Altcoins, from the largest to the smallest, are constantly being driven down. Binance is running a complete scam and theft. Binance knows all the wallets. The day when Binance's founder and partners will be tried and imprisoned is near.

• 
  Wietse Wind - 🪝☝️🛠 Xaman® + XRPL + Xahau (@WietseWind) reported 53 minutes ago

  @the_cryptowolf @XamanWallet @binance Flagged, can be for any number of reasons, please send an in app support ticket with the r-address and we'll check.

• 
  Michael (@Holden_Rye_) reported 55 minutes ago

  Something about this BTC pump does not smell organic. Saylor posts the $32 signal before the move. A whale moves 1,656 BTC / $102M into Binance before the pump. Then BTC rips, ETH follows, and hundreds of millions in shorts get liquidated. That is not “retail suddenly got bullish.” That looks like pre-positioned liquidity warfare. Move coins to the exchange. Load the position. Trigger the pain zone. Let liquidations become the fuel. Then let Crypto X call it a breakout. I’m not saying this proves who did what. I’m saying the order of events matters. If the BTC holds structure, maybe it was collateral/liquidity support. If it fades back into the pump candle, then the move was probably a squeeze into exit liquidity. Either way, stop pretending Bitcoin is some clean little free market. This is whale hunting season. Retail was the farm.

• 
  David Joseph (@deey_je) reported 55 minutes ago

  @fluffycrypt Boss please help out with USDT... Any amount please Bybit UID - 377610463 Binance UID - 55579576

• 
  Sandra Lenore Nelms (@SNelms48077) reported 1 hour ago

  Tonight! On the Real Housewives of Ocean Park WA! lololololololololololol $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ "Yeah! Take his money!" -Unknown Author, Precision Consulting, Phone Booth, when a B2C customer called to pay. Hahahhahahhahhaa! Slack. Google Workspace. Solve 360. Ohhhh, the SlackBots! Clark Guo, now Binance Risk Management, said ... "Whuuuu? Suck my ...." [screeeech!] lol New lead sales! What a rush!

• 
  3Ms (@MaxMoneyMakers) reported 1 hour ago

  @binance CEXs are the issue here, use them less Crypto wins, use them more crypto has many days like Oct 10, 2025