Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	7 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sarosh (@SaroshQ2022) reported 39 seconds ago

  $SUI Data Analysis — August 11, 2026 The big story is Iran & elevated Macro. Plus CPI & PPI fear and so SUI is cooling along with Bitcoin. SUI internals still look better than the price suggests. The biggest change is that futures have weakened and leveraged longs are getting flushed, while spot demand is holding up much better. That tells me this looks more like a leverage reset than people abandoning SUI. The one thing I am watching closely is crowded long positioning. If spot keeps absorbing the weakness while leverage continues to come out, this pullback is healthy. If spot starts breaking down too, then the picture changes. For now, I would call SUI constructive, but cooling. _____________________________________________________ FULL READ BELOW SUI Data Analysis — August 11, 2026 In a Nutshell SUI has pulled back to roughly $0.681, but the internals are not showing a complete breakdown. What has changed is the balance underneath the move: futures participation has weakened over the larger intraday windows, while spot is holding up better than derivatives. That is important. This looks more like a leveraged reset inside an improving broader structure than spot holders aggressively abandoning SUI. Price Is Pulling Back SUI is around $0.681, down roughly 1.56% over 24 hours. The shorter window is better: • 4-hour performance: +0.64% But the larger relative picture remains weak: • 7-day: -1.34% • 30-day: -6.44% • 90-day: -44.97% So I am not going to pretend the price structure is suddenly strong. The improvement we saw last week has hit resistance and SUI is now consolidating that move. Open Interest Is Still Elevated Open interest is roughly $533 million, which is actually higher than the approximately $507 million we were looking at a couple of days ago. That matters because despite the pullback, leverage has not disappeared from the market. But when I look underneath that aggregate number, the exchange data is mixed. Some exchanges are still adding OI: • Binance: roughly +$0.3% • Gate: roughly +3.5% • MEXC: roughly +4.0% But others are reducing exposure: • Bybit: roughly -0.9% • Bitget: roughly -2.2% • BingX: roughly -28% So the OI picture is no longer uniformly expanding. Futures Flows Have Clearly Deteriorated This is the biggest change from the August 9 data. Short-term futures flows are positive: • 5-minute: +$345K • 15-minute: +$321K • 30-minute: +$378K But once I move farther out: • 1-hour: -$107K • 4-hour: -$830K • 8-hour: -$5.91M • 12-hour: -$4.00M That is a meaningful shift. Two days ago, the 4-hour, 8-hour and 12-hour futures windows were all positive. Now they are negative. So derivatives traders have clearly been reducing exposure into this pullback. Spot Is Holding Up Better This is where the data gets more interesting. Spot flows are mixed, but the larger windows are considerably healthier than futures: • 5-minute: -$10K • 15-minute: +$18K • 30-minute: +$31K • 1-hour: -$35K • 4-hour: +$369K • 8-hour: -$95K • 12-hour: +$527K That 12-hour number is particularly important because while futures are showing roughly -$4 million, spot is showing approximately +$527K. So the weakness is being driven much more aggressively through derivatives than through spot. That is a better setup than seeing both futures and spot getting dumped together. Liquidations Confirm the Reset The liquidation numbers are overwhelmingly hitting longs. Over 24 hours: • Long liquidations: roughly $652K • Short liquidations: roughly $81K Over 12 hours: • Long liquidations: roughly $524K • Short liquidations: roughly $69K So leveraged longs have been getting flushed. That fits perfectly with what the futures-flow data is telling us. The market built more leverage during the recent move, price failed to immediately continue higher, and some of those longs are now being forced out. That is not necessarily bearish by itself. Sometimes this is exactly what a market needs before attempting another move. Long Positioning Is Still Crowded The long/short ratios remain elevated: • Binance accounts: 2.13 • OKX accounts: 3.02 • Binance top traders: 2.62 • Binance top trader positions: 2.32 This is still the part I do not love. Too many traders are leaning in the same direction. So even if the broader SUI setup remains constructive, there is still plenty of fuel for additional long liquidations if price gets pushed lower. Funding Is Still Controlled The OI-weighted funding chart remains mostly positive but not disorderly. That tells me traders are still willing to pay to remain long, but we are not seeing the kind of extreme funding spike that would make me think the entire structure is dangerously overheated. So leverage is elevated, but it has not reached a level where I would call it completely out of control. Bottom Line The internals are not as bullish as they were on August 9, and I think we need to say that clearly. Futures flows have deteriorated. Long liquidations have increased. The long side is still crowded. And price has pulled back. But underneath that, spot is holding considerably better than derivatives, especially over the 4-hour and 12-hour windows. That tells me the recent weakness looks more like leveraged traders being cleaned out than broad spot capitulation. And that is the distinction I care about. A couple of days ago, SUI was expanding out of compression and everything underneath it was improving at the same time. Today we are seeing the first real test of that move. So now I want to see whether spot continues absorbing the weakness while futures leverage resets. If that happens, this pullback is healthy. If spot begins turning consistently negative alongside futures, then the picture changes. For now, I would call SUI constructive but cooling — with derivatives resetting while spot remains surprisingly resilient.

• 
  John Anderson (@JohnAnders66671) reported 2 minutes ago

  @RausGeorge @MoonbeamNetwork are you slow its confidential they cant just blast all the info while in negotiations with Binance you sound like amateur that would piss Binance off & posssibly escalate delisting they are waiting to respond until resolving the issue obviously. Merging the tokens is a dumb idea

• 
  tarık (@tark45738292) reported 3 minutes ago

  @binance Enough is enough, for ****'s sake, Binance—every single day you list an altcoin, and every single day you put another one under review and delist it.

• 
  φ (@punpun0911) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MoonbeamNetwork Good response. A monitoring tag isn’t a death sentence. What matters now is how fast the team responds, fixes the issues, and gives Binance a reason to remove it. Execution matters more than panic. $GLMR 👀

• 
  Gnanesh Crypto (@Gnaneshcrypto07) reported 5 minutes ago

  A lot of people are texting me about $BEAT right now. I know exactly how much this position means, but I’m still holding. I’m not closing it until Binance actually delists the coin. Let me give you a real example. I bought heavily into $GUA while it was dumping. It crashed hard that day and I closed at a loss. My average entry was right around $0.09 I could have easily broken even, but I took the L. At the time GUA only had an $8M market cap and was ranked in the thousands. Just yesterday it pumped hard and the hype came right back. I honestly thought Binance was going to delist it… they didn’t. They even updated the last price. The exact same thing is going to happen with BEAT. People are celebrating that I’m in a loss right now. Cool, no problem. I was up $400 when BEAT hit $3.9 and I still didn’t sell, because I believe this coin has real potential to reclaim. Do you really think a coin with a $380M market cap is just going to get delisted for no proper reason? I’m only down about $230 right now. Even if it drops back to $0.50, I’m not sweating it. I know my target clearly and I’m waiting. I’ll show you what I’m made of. Challenge accepted.

• 
  Người Chơi Coin (@moneygame47) reported 11 minutes ago

  Don’t overlook the AI narrative on BSC. Recently, the Meme Stock narrative on BSC has been getting a lot of attention. It all started with buying and holding $Marscoin and then receiving dividends from the trading fees generated by #Marscoin. BSC memes have evolved really well and gained strong support from the community. However, in my personal opinion, AI is still a narrative worth paying attention to. The latest example is $Summer, the name of a Binance AI Agent. This may be a bit subjective, but I still see several similarities between $Summer and $TUT: Both are part of the AI narrative. Both are names of AI Agents. Both $TUT and $Summer were around a $3M market cap before going viral. Neither received much attention when they first launched. When $TUT launched, everyone’s attention was focused on $TST and $Broccoli. Now that #Summer has launched, most people are paying attention to $币有. CZ and Yihe have repeatedly mentioned the phrase 何必东奔西走 币安全部都有, which has made the name 币有 extremely hot right now. Personally, I’ve already bought some $Summer and I’m waiting for lower prices to accumulate more. $TUT traded sideways for more than a month before pumping from $3M to $40M, so I’m mentally prepared for something similar to happen with $Summer. Keep an eye on the BSC AI narrative. 🚀

• 
  Claudio 𐤊 ✈ (@monrad24) reported 13 minutes ago

  @InvestwithDoc @binance Most of us did. Last time we checked, they asked for 3% of the supply, which is crazy for a fair launched project. They had no problem listing KAS on futures though.

• 
  Vikingz🪓 (@Cryptovikingz) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance 0 times.. It's garbage

• 
  Signal_guy (@Cryptoprime00) reported 14 minutes ago

  As long as btc holds and chops tight, certain alts have the room to go and bounce off support. Very hard to call but just sitting back watching the PA. Binance #AVA/ $USDT Take-Profit target 3 ✅ Profit: 13.8571% 📈 Period: 8 Days 2 Hours 7 Minutes ⏰

• 
  HaMy🔸 (@hamybinance) reported 15 minutes ago

  Keep your seed phrase to yourself, homies. Even Binance Support will never ask for it. 🔐

• 
  Hoogie (@H0ogie) reported 16 minutes ago

  @TheDeFiAngel @binance Both approaches seem to be working

• 
  Rock1988 (@cmaDxB) reported 17 minutes ago

  @WatcherGuru Crypto went from shitcoin to deepshit coin. Nobody want Binance deepshitcoin anymore , they made last round money from deepshit coin creator as listing fee as much possible... Nobody anymore have to smell it to find its **** , it's visible from far away that is deepshit...

• 
  Cryptocrat (@Cryptocratico) reported 19 minutes ago

  🚨 BINANCE ETH OUTFLOW EXPANDS TO $93.5M Two Binance-labeled hot wallets transferred a combined 50,000 ETH to the same unlabeled address in a single block. The recipient previously staked 40,000 ETH after a similar Binance withdrawal. No sale is confirmed—the next move toward the Beacon Deposit Contract will be the key signal. 🚨 BINANCE ETH OUTFLOW EXPANDS TO $93.5M Two Binance-labeled hot wallets transferred a combined 50,000 ETH to the same unlabeled address in a single block. The recipient previously staked 40,000 ETH after a similar Binance withdrawal. No sale is confirmed—the next move toward the Beacon Deposit Contract will be the key signal.

• 
  Charlie Wren (@CharlieWre39158) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Bonk_Whale @binance @cz_binance Someone walked away with 20 million and Bonk has had no real explanation and is not trying to fix the problem,I down about 5000 dollars with about 750 million tokens holding till it does whatever.Had high hopes now not so much

• 
  Midnight Crypto (@midnightcrypto) reported 25 minutes ago

  This is why wallet analysis needs context. A Binance or Bitget wallet holding millions of $TUT does not mean Binance or Bitget “owns” those tokens. CEX wallets custody assets for thousands of users. A transfer into Bitget cold storage also doesn't prove Bitget is “accumulating”. It can be customer deposits or normal exchange wallet consolidation. And shorts getting liquidated isn't evidence of manipulation. That's what happens when traders crowd one side of a leveraged market and price moves against them. If you're going to claim manipulation, show the manipulating entity, connected wallets and trades that caused it. On-chain data is evidence. A story attached to on-chain data isn't. $TUT 🟡

• 
  Caszet07 (@caszet0736767) reported 26 minutes ago

  As the deadline approached in 2026, Binance was still working through its European licensing strategy. On June 24, 2026, Binance withdrew its application for a MiCA licence in Greece and indicated that it would pursue authorisation through another European jurisdiction.

• 
  nomadshiba - 300KB - BIP110 (@nomadshiba) reported 28 minutes ago

  @aeonBTC not all, it still leaks some. thats why fee on bip110 side is going up, high fee txs are piling up on the first mempool block. and i can replay your tx. if i withdraw some bitcoin from binance. i can replay its path on the bip110 side, assuming it continues. until sep1.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 31 minutes ago

  @dogeboyOS @binance migration support closed july 23. monitoring tag announced august 11. binance reviewed glmr after the migration window ended and flagged higher volatility risk. no hidden drama. exchanges re-evaluate tokens constantly. monitoring tag means glmr stays listed but binance watches it closer for potential delisting if metrics deteriorate further.

• 
  Mutua.base.eth (@Mutuabrian_M) reported 35 minutes ago

  These days, your phone number is part of your digital identity. For almost all of us, we have it linked to our bank accounts, our crypto accounts and we use it for M-Pesa transfers as well. For verification we also have it on our KRA, E-Citizen, Gmails, on X, Instagram and all other social sites for OTP purposes. Almost every account recovery goes through it today. You lose that number and you lose access to everything tied to it, and this is where it gets dangerous. Assuming you travel abroad and live there for some time, Safaricom resells phone numbers after 6 months of inactivity. This means a stranger will acquire your old number and you could potentially l lose access to your banks, social media accounts and any many other critical use cases. Your bank does not know the number changed owners, your Binance still sends OTP to your old number and your email as well. This is not a hypothetical situation. It has happened to a lot of people. They have lost M-Pesa accounts, bank accounts, and crypto wallets just because Safaricom reassigned the phone number. I have a friend who we talk on WhatsApp but I can't reach him on phone because the number has already been reassigned to someone else. It's cool, a phone number was never designed to be a permanent identity but Safaricom treating it as a recyclable resource while the entire internet uses it as a security key is one of the most reckless policies in Kenyan tech. If they are after the resell revenue, why not impose a annual phone number preservation fee to users? Your identity should not expire because you forgot to make a call for heaven's sake.

• 
  泵泵超人 | Pumpman 🔶 (@crypto_pumpman) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance What ****?

• 
  Dr Crypto (@DrCrypto__X) reported 39 minutes ago

  An Open Message to Major Crypto Exchanges: #Binance , #bitget and Everyone Leading This Industry Bitget has announced nearly $40 million in compensation for users affected by abnormal price movements that resulted in massive liquidations. First, this deserves recognition. Admitting that something went wrong, taking responsibility, and compensating affected users is a strong step, and Bitget deserves respect for doing it. But this also raises a much bigger question: Did this happen out of nowhere? And why are we seeing situations like this repeatedly across crypto markets? This is not about Bitget alone. We have seen tokens on multiple major exchanges experience extreme and sometimes difficult-to-explain price movements, followed by millions of dollars in liquidations within a very short period of time. Of course, leverage carries risk. Traders who choose high leverage must accept responsibility for that risk. But trader responsibility should not eliminate exchange responsibility. When relatively illiquid markets are combined with high leverage, concentrated positions, aggressive liquidation mechanisms, and sudden abnormal price movements, we create an environment where enormous amounts of user capital can disappear within minutes. This is where I believe the largest exchanges need to lead. Bitget, Binance, and every major platform have access to market data and infrastructure far beyond what an ordinary retail trader can see. You can monitor liquidity depth, open interest, position concentration, abnormal order flow, liquidation clusters, volatility and potential manipulation in real time. So perhaps the industry needs to move beyond simply asking: “Why did traders use so much leverage?” And start asking: “Why was this level of leverage available in a market with this level of liquidity and potential manipulation in the first place?” Maybe the solution requires dynamic leverage limits based on liquidity. Maybe exchanges need stronger safeguards when abnormal price behavior is detected. Maybe listing standards, market-maker activity, liquidation mechanisms and position concentration need greater transparency and oversight. Or perhaps the industry needs entirely new mechanisms. I don’t claim to have the perfect solution. But the largest exchanges have the data, technology, expertise and resources to find one. Compensation after an incident is admirable. Preventing the next incident would be even more important. Crypto has lost more than capital over the past few years. It has lost liquidity, participants, and most importantly, trust. If we genuinely want this industry to grow again, protecting market integrity cannot remain secondary to increasing trading volume. So this is a sincere request to Bitget, Binance, and every exchange helping shape the future of crypto: Please work together and find a solution. Make manipulation harder. Make leverage smarter. Make abnormal market conditions safer. And give people a reason to trust crypto markets again. The industry doesn’t only need more users. It needs users who believe the market is worth staying in. Let’s make crypto great again.

• 
  Cryptic (@CrypticM0) reported 40 minutes ago

  @sayinshallah now he wouldn't be able to do **** even with listing info because Binance listing is itself washed now, no one gives a **** about it lol

• 
  Top 7 | Tech, AI & Crypto Analytics (@top7ico) reported 41 minutes ago

  CEX Futures Volume Falls to a 31-Month Low Futures volume on centralized exchanges fell to $4.0T in July - the lowest monthly print since December 2023, down 63% from the $10.9T peak last October, per CryptoRank. The three-month recovery that ran from April through June is over, and no major venue was spared: Binance did $1.4T, roughly a third of the whole market. Put July's numbers side by side and the structure gets clear. CEX futures at a 31-month low, spot DEX volume on Ethereum back to October 2023 levels — while perp DEXs keep printing records, with tokenless venues clearing $194B and RWA perps hitting an all-time high of $141B the same month. The trade didn't disappear. It moved to where the incentives are. 🔗 @CryptoRank_io

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 47 minutes ago

  $BLUAI's whole story flipped. three days ago it was shorts getting squeezed on a +40% ripper off a $2.5B FDV meme narrative. now the coin's down 43% since that chapter and it's shorts piling BACK in, $2.2M just showed up in the last hour on binance and bybit both. crowd still doesn't buy the bleed though, 62% still long into new lows. that's the actual tension: fresh short money betting the crash continues while the majority sits long hoping for chapter 1 again. $10.4M total in play, losing side eating ~$5K a day just to hold the line. book's thin enough that this resolves fast either way. NFA, just tracking the flip 👀

• 
  Scorpion 🦂♏ (@scorpio51998691) reported 47 minutes ago

  Gm everyone 🌅 Friends, I want to warn you about a scam. Please read until the end. 📌One such method is when you lose money or your wallet is stolen, someone claiming to be a cybersecurity expert will contact you and promise to recover your funds. In return, they will either ask you for your wallet's recovery phrase or the prívate key Or they might ask you for a deposit in exchange for returning your money. This is one of the secondary methods used to scam you again, so be careful in these matters. If you are unsure what to do if one of these incidents occurs—that is, if your money is stolen—go to the nearest [police station/etc.]. Report your case, and in parentheses, if your country supports cryptocurrency. If it doesn't, I advise you never to go, as this will get you into other problems you don't want. Secondly, file a complaint with the official FBI page, but on the condition that The stolen amount is usually greater than $10,000, and they typically don't accept smaller amounts. Thirdly, report the incident to all platforms, such as Binance, via their technical support and provide them with all the details of the transactions you made through your wallet, but be as quick as possibl Because this will increase your chances of recovering your money, speed is key. Fourth, submit your complaint on pages that have the strongest blockchain investigators so they can track and monitor the cases and issues that have been resolved, and also who solved the most cases and Site rating And I think that's all, and thank you to everyone who's read this far. Finally, please repost and like so everyone can benefit and thank you again 🙏

• 
  Harbour (@0xHarbour) reported 48 minutes ago

  Oh ****? binance summer intern apparently made an ai? 0x6ced1d2ad59ae0969c90b9d410d7ca7376f58888

• 
  V Levine (@Vern_Levine_) reported 51 minutes ago

  @ForTheCross_CH @binance Hey I have a bunch of LUNC staked in your validator, but I was curious what happened to all your YouTube videos and your webpage that had dreams/prophecies on it. did you feel like you had a need to take all that down?

• 
  FR FACTORIAL (@HeisBaroNest) reported 55 minutes ago

  @RanaCreater333 @BinanceWallet @binance I have the same problem. I was selling my drop and instead of half-sale, I bought 70 tokens at 0.58, after which, of course, I couldn't sell them.

• 
  Belinkov (@kriptomanikk) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Superp_xyz @binance listing scam token on his app, you are adding more token in circulation while in investor are down and not saying anything!

• 
  Cyclo Trading System (@cyclosoluctions) reported 58 minutes ago

  I’ve always greatly admired you and the innovation you brought to this market, but the level of indifference Binance shows toward new projects is extremely disheartening. If you don’t have heaps of money, Binance simply ignores your outreach—they won’t even answer an email—because it seems the priority is no longer doing something disruptive, but rather having enough cash to grab attention with idiotic projects. It’s a huge letdown to find that support doesn't help you properly and emails go ignored.