Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	11 days ago
Itu	Website	17 days ago
Seattle	Website	17 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	27 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  CryptoMover🇺🇸 (@CRYPTOSMOVER) reported 51 seconds ago

  @cz_binance But who made money on 10.10.2025?! The ******* answer is CZ & @binance **** you all *******

• 
  Zafat (@nogigsontheway) reported 2 minutes ago

  @cz_binance CZ please help with my long lasting case with binance. My account has been locked, all investigations have been passed, have received official emails with exact dates of my money return, but they keep extending and never transfer my money back. Please help.

• 
  JS Hahn (@bekjish) reported 5 minutes ago

  Sometimes I believe some should bring down their imagination, mirroring in reality. In the case of me, I imagined to build — binance like — centralised exchange. Yes, I imagined only. That’s all.

• 
  usmann (@usmannk) reported 8 minutes ago

  the @wanchain_org bridge was hacked on @Cardano endpoint. bit of a "classic" issue where the nodes signed a hash over malleably packed fields & took untrusted info on the boundaries. much of the $NIGHT on binance is now unbacked bc it was bridged, think it's a 0 not just -50%

• 
  0xNox (@0xNoxxx) reported 12 minutes ago

  Let's talk about today's $GENIUS transfer. Because the amount is significant. 101M tokens were moved to Binance's cold wallet, making it the 3rd largest holder. Looking at the token holder structure you can see just how restricted the circulating supply is. With this transfer, the top 3 wallets now control approximately 91% of total supply. Team Wallet 1 - 560,000,000 (56%) $185.33M Team Wallet 2 - 256,135,825.97 (25.61%) $84.77M Binance Cold Wallet - 100,990,417 (10.1%) $33.42M The large majority of tokens in the first 2 wallets are locked. No unlock visible until October 25th. In short, circulating supply is very restricted. In situations like this, moving the price up or down becomes very easy. We've seen this many times before (see: LAB). $GENIUS dropped over 50% after the Binance HODLer Airdrop announcement and is currently sitting around $0.33. With this drop, liq clusters on the heatmap go all the way up to $0.82. Reaching those levels requires volume though. Both futures and spot volume increased over 100% today but since this is already a very low volume token I'm treating those numbers as normal. Long/Short ratio at 0.91. If you're bullish, shorts being more dominant is a good data point. Whale order book is empty. Only one sell order sitting at $0.6 worth $102K placed 34 days ago. Bottom line, I think today's transfer could be meaningful. If volume picks up it'll become much easier to read which direction this is heading.

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 12 minutes ago

  $LA shorts are down bad on two exchanges at the same time. funding's at -1.2%, OI's unwinding on both binance and bybit, that's not one desk panicking, that's the whole short book capitulating in sync. price already ran 21% and shorts are still footing a $154K/day bill to sit in this. $60K walked out in the last hour, someone already decided that's enough pain. 61% of the crowd is still short into a rip that started 7h ago and only got sharper. that's the trade getting more crowded on the losing side, not less. NFA

• 
  imran209 (@RafiaImran209) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Ishaqhouth @BinanceHelpDesk @Binance #binance yes,we are facing the exact same disqualification problem. Not just one or two, but many genuine users known to me are experiencing this automated appeal failure. Please audit this system error and fix it immediately!

• 
  Sam Mti (@MTI_Trading) reported 17 minutes ago

  $INJ - Fresh signal with real catalystsBuy fired at $4.8752 (Jul 17-18). Price now at $5.287 (+8% since entry, +1.49% today). Momentum is being driven by real developments: a regulated investment product launch in Thailand and the recent Binance US listing. $5.00 remains the key support level to watch. Anyone holding $INJ?

• 
  Rockfella🕳️ (@Rockfella900) reported 22 minutes ago

  @binance @sqkuux **** U SCAMMERSSSS

• 
  Cho Hee (@BeautyChoHee) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Navin09500382 @SolvProtocol It feels like pump-and-dump projects keep finding support on Binance, and the platform needs to do more to stop users from getting burned.

• 
  TryHardSorry (@tryhardsorry) reported 27 minutes ago

  Does a Binance listing mean that the token’s price will only go down afterward, like what happened with $AERO?

• 
  CLW (@cryptolistingws) reported 30 minutes ago

  🛑 @binance / @BinanceFutures just announced @aergo_io's $AERGO delisting! The token dumped hard. Our members were first to short it ;) Detected (UTC): 2026-07-21T14:15:15.189004Z (µs precision) Easy +18%, +$1M volume in just a few seconds WebSocket access in bio, free test tier available

• 
  d1pp3r.eth (@d1pp3r_eth) reported 31 minutes ago

  $4.4m in. $21m out. 49 seconds. and the bonk exploiter is still selling two weeks ago someone spent $4.4m buying bonk on binance and bybit. just enough to hit the 1% quorum on a governance vote. then they voted, alone, to send $21m from the bonkdao treasury to their own wallet no contract broken. every transaction valid. the rules worked exactly as written most people moved on. the wallet didn't: - dumped another 800b bonk (~$2.48m) on jul 18-19 - still holding ~2.4t bonk, roughly $7m at current price - bonk chart bleeding since the exploit, down sharply off local highs - upbit and bithumb froze deposits the overhang is the story now. every time this wallet moves, bonk bleeds, and there's still $7m of ammo sitting in it governance exploits are cheaper than sniping and hit harder than a rug. one vote, one wallet, $20m gone that's the part nobody wants to fix dyor

• 
  PolyHistorical Insights (@Poly_Historical) reported 31 minutes ago

  I backtested a "panic discount" strategy across 50 resolved BTC 5-minute markets on Polymarket. The core idea: when BTC moves fast, the Up/Down market can overreact. One side gets dumped aggressively, liquidity dries up, spreads blow out, and traders scramble for the exit. So the strategy was straightforward: Buy the beaten-down side once it falls below 30c. Only take the trade if there's enough time left on the clock. Exit once price mean-reverts to 45c. Cut losses if it drops to 20c. Use actual order book fills, not mid-price. Results: 50 markets tested 14 trades triggered 9 winners 5 losers 64.3% win rate +$312.40 total PnL -$118.70 max drawdown Best trade: +$84.60 Worst trade: -$51.20 On the surface, that reads like a clean, repeatable edge. But the real insight came from comparing chart-based backtesting against order-book replay. Using candles, the strategy looked significantly stronger. A candle implies you bought at 29c and sold at 45c cleanly. The actual order book told a very different story. Sometimes the 29c print had almost no volume behind it. Sometimes the ask had already jumped to 33c by the time the signal fired. Sometimes the exit price showed up on the chart, but bid depth was too thin to actually fill. Sometimes the spread alone consumed half the trade's edge. That single difference reshaped the entire backtest. Multiple trades that appeared profitable using mid-price turned flat — or outright negative — once real liquidity was factored in. The strategy still had merit, but only under a narrow set of conditions: The spread needed to stay tight. Real depth needed to exist on both sides of the book. The market's overreaction had to move faster than Binance spot/futures. There had to be sufficient time remaining for mean reversion to play out. The exit price needed genuine bid support behind it. That was the real takeaway. The strategy was never "buy every panic dump." That approach bleeds money. The actual, tradable version was this: Buy the panic only when the order book confirms it's actually tradable. That's the reasoning behind building PolyHistorical. Most Polymarket backtests look too good because they skip over the messiest part: execution. But in prediction markets, execution is the game. You can call the direction correctly and still lose money if the spread is too wide. You can time the entry well and still lose if there's no liquidity to exit into. You can build something that looks brilliant on a candle chart and watch it fall apart the moment it meets a real order book. So now every idea gets tested against full historical market depth: 300ms snapshots. Resolved markets only. Actual bid/ask books. Slippage accounted for. Spread accounted for. Full PnL tracking. Drawdown tracking. Complete trade logs. The edge isn't just having a sharper thesis. The edge is knowing whether that thesis was ever actually tradable.

• 
  ⎲VØYAGΞR| (@VoyagerX369) reported 32 minutes ago

  @MetaFinancialAI 24/7 access to US equities on Binance is a gamechanger for accessibility, but it also means retail gets dumped on in real time if they ignore team allocations. market cap and valuation always win in the end. that IPO chart phase 2 drop is a brutal reminder why running proper risk metrics before hitting buy is mandatory. call out the overvalued noise.

• 
  Yang ⚡🀄 (@YangofWeb3) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance Isn't that Web 5 or some mind control ****

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 41 minutes ago

  @islandqueen_eth can't find anything on fartcoin spx has the data—$336m cap, down 84% from ath, recent binance and korean exchange listings. meme with actual infrastructure plays but currently bleeding not really a fair comparison when one doesn't exist in the dataset

• 
  By Kripto Analiz (@ByKriptoAnaliz) reported 42 minutes ago

  If @binance wants, they build far better lists but they DON'T+avoid helping traders like Stone Age they expect you hunt bears+bulls all with just 1 STONE-simple list don't make profit+walk away stay inside+gamble+fees STONE AGE SITE-BAD INTENTIONS a merchant who ***** customers

• 
  Mark Alvin (@mark_alvin2) reported 44 minutes ago

  If I were explaining Binance to a complete beginner, I would not start with candles, leverage, or advanced trading screens. I would say: First, verify your account. Then deposit only a small amount you are comfortable with. Then try to understand simple tools first. Binance Convert is a clean starting point because it lets eligible users swap between supported digital assets without needing to read an order book. After that, learn what Spot Trading means. Then explore Simple Earn only after understanding how it works and what risks apply. Most beginners don’t need more speed. They need more clarity. Digital asset prices can go up or down. Always do your own research before making financial decisions. Educational only. Not financial advice. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Kryptos Opus (@kryptosopus) reported 47 minutes ago

  @binance Fee market has to 50x from here to replace the block subsidy or BTC security is cooked lol good luck with that math

• 
  SCUM bucketx (@hardtalk01) reported 49 minutes ago

  @davidco00552922 @vana Binance wont support this kind of clownery hahahah. Theyve already been put on the monitoring list

• 
  Faizan Ahmed ( 6 years Of Crypto Experience ) (@FaizanAhmed265) reported 51 minutes ago

  If you see different supply and total supply and marketcap in @binance then don't worrk i reported that issue to support and within 48h it will be updated.

• 
  Faizan Ahmed ( 6 years Of Crypto Experience ) (@FaizanAhmed265) reported 51 minutes ago

  If you see different supply and total supply and marketcap in @binance then don't worry i reported that issue to support and within 48h it will be updated.

• 
  KidMoseby (@KidMoseby) reported 52 minutes ago

  @PacoDeLaPaco @Sr_Smitch_ @Greenpeace06_09 Misleading people into thinking you’re affiliated with Binance to gain trust is a serious concern, especially if it’s being used to attract delegations or support.

• 
  The Edge of Show 🎙 (@TheEdgeofShow) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance Binance working with regulators instead of around them has shifted the tone for the whole space. People forget how much groundwork that actually took.

• 
  Rune (@RuneCrypto_) reported 54 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong honest question brian: why is jesse still running base? he launched coins that dumped on his own community. promoted soulja boy, a documented scammer zachxbt exposed years before jesse amplified him. pushed content coins for 18 months while the community begged him to focus on trading and perps. ignored every piece of feedback until the data was catastrophic and everyone had already left. his own words: "the collateral damage was pretty bad" and "an exercise in eating sh**" zora left base for solana. farcaster got sold. $VIRTUAL (the biggest thing ever built on base) wasn't listed on coinbase for over a year while kraken and binance listed it first, and has now moved to robinhood. the chain went down twice in 10 months. builders say they felt "gaslit by base management" and after all of that, he didn't step down. he just handed the app to cobie and kept control of the chain itself. the same person who spent 2 years proving he doesn't listen until it's too late is still in charge of the infrastructure every builder and trader depends on you have 100M users and every advantage in crypto. base should be untouchable. the reason it's not is sitting right there

• 
  A Green Handtruck (@Green_Handtruck) reported 54 minutes ago

  @LuncRotti One problem though... @binance isn't MICA compliant and neither is terra-luna:native As a holder, I hope those issues get resolved in the future.

• 
  m3d1a (@MeD1a_92) reported 58 minutes ago

  @tryhardsorry When you see binance listing it means they run ******* campaigns for binance and bought or took some amount tokens from team to give their alpha or **** bnb holders and those ***** do not hold anything they just dumping straight away

• 
  Crypto Diva (@Anita1Diva) reported 58 minutes ago

  @zuandac @BinanceWallet Another Binance issue—users still can’t claim their rewards, and there’s no clear resolution.

• 
  AetheriumX (@aetheriumX_fun) reported 58 minutes ago

  Tokenized IPOs could be the next major step for RWA. The real innovation is not putting a stock inside a token wrapper. It is using blockchain from day one to improve issuance, ownership records, settlement, corporate actions, and investor access. Join us for a Binance Live discussion on whether tokenization can truly reshape capital markets.