Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	14 hours ago
Angers	Login	25 days ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  poffy (@0ffyy) reported 3 minutes ago

  @EB7 Impossible for Binance cartel to bid this.

• 
  Roz (@0_x_Roz) reported 3 minutes ago

  "Over half of $INJ is staked" is true and false at the same time, depending on which supply number you use, and both numbers are real. Onchain, bonded stake is 56,939,298 INJ. Bank total supply is 121,906,662. That is 46.71 percent. CoinGecko reports circulating supply as exactly 100,000,000, and against that the same stake is 56.94 percent. Neither is wrong. They answer different questions, and the slogan quietly picks the flattering one. The staking set is worth a look while we are here. Forty-five validator slots, all filled, with 148 more validators unbonded and waiting outside. At the top: @krakenfx holds 8.12 percent of stake, @injective Foundation 2 has 7.54, Everstake 6.12, Binance Staking 6.02, FalconX 5.69. Three exchanges and a foundation in the top five, about 27 percent between them. Minimum commission is 5 percent, community tax another 5, and unbonding takes 21 days. I think the dual-supply problem matters more than the concentration does. A chain whose headline staking ratio moves ten points depending on which tracker you open is a chain where every derived metric inherits that ambiguity - including the ones people use to value it.

• 
  ValidatorVibes (@ValidatorVibes) reported 8 minutes ago

  @binance whats driving the demand for crypto-native access to tradfi? lower fees or just better ux?

• 
  sufiyanahma (@sufiyanahm40204) reported 9 minutes ago

  @coin_bulll @binance Hoping the team can resolve this issue as soon as possible.

• 
  𝕯𝖔𝖟𝖎𝖊 (@dozie_Thetrader) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BiggCh0ppa I get opay, palmpay, Moniepoint, access bank, uba, first bank, bybit, binance, bitget, okx, trust wallet Which one I go paste chief?

• 
  Vampire (@Crypto_Vampirix) reported 20 minutes ago

  @binance Speed is the only edge that survives contact with the orderbook. Still slow?

• 
  James Bearish Bull (@jamesjasmy) reported 22 minutes ago

  @2026FIFA888 @Chiliz @bitget The biggest thing $CHZ has going for it is compliance. Exchanges are increasingly looking for that, so it's a real advantage. That said, listing decisions are ultimately up to each individual exchange. One thing's for sure though - a project shouldn't be overly reliant on just one exchange for liquidity. CHZ has that in its favour too, being listed on Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, + others. But CHZ needs to be more open with its community members - I've highlighted clear, documented issues between promises and shortfalls, and that's pinned to the top. (as you know), That's my view.

• 
  Dipa (@DipaWeb3) reported 26 minutes ago

  @0xc06 yeah, access beats product here, hard. binance distribution is the moat

• 
  BitBull (@AkaBull_) reported 26 minutes ago

  @DavidMorganXBT @binance Tokenization could bring some interesting changes to market access.

• 
  NewsIntel (@NewsIntelHQ) reported 26 minutes ago

  🇺🇸 INSIGHT: Binance CEO says it may be “statistically safer” to keep crypto on exchanges than in self-custody, citing similar levels of Bitcoin lost through self-custody errors and exchange hacks.

• 
  Fizza Ahmad (@cryptopulse6) reported 27 minutes ago

  What if buying a piece of Apple or Tesla felt as easy as sending crypto to a friend? That's the shift tokenized stocks are trying to create. Imagine two people: Sarah opens a traditional brokerage, waits for market hours, deals with paperwork, and buys a share through the usual process. Alex uses blockchain-powered tokenized stocks (where available and eligible), getting exposure to the same company in a digital format with a smoother, more flexible experience. The company didn't change. The technology did. That's why tokenized stocks are getting so much attention. They combine familiar assets with blockchain infrastructure, opening the door to a new way of interacting with financial markets. Of course, they're not the same as traditional stocks. Things like ownership structure, trading availability, supported regions, and product features can all be different. That's why understanding the product matters more than simply following the hype. We're witnessing finance evolve in real time, from paper certificates to online brokerages, and now to blockchain-based representations of real-world assets. The biggest innovation isn't replacing stocks. It's rethinking how people access them. The future of finance may not be choosing between Wall Street and blockchain, it could be where both finally meet. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  William (@Iamwilliam_0) reported 28 minutes ago

  Not every innovation deserves the hype. But every now and then, something comes along that's worth paying attention to. That's how I see tokenized stocks. Binance bStocks give eligible users exposure to U.S. stocks in a tokenized format with 24/7 trading. They're not trying to copy traditional stocks. They offer a different way to access familiar markets. I like looking at these products with an open mind. You don't have to go all in. You don't even have to use them. But brushing them off without understanding how they work feels like judging a movie from the trailer. Crypto started by changing money. Now it's starting to reshape how people interact with traditional financial assets too. Whether tokenized stocks become the norm or simply push the industry forward, they're a conversation worth having. Staying curious has always paid off more than staying comfortable. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  sol.engineer (@sol_engineer) reported 31 minutes ago

  I haven't seen a better play than $MarsCoin in a long time. Binance has implemented custom logic to support bStocks distribution now, that is pure ground for Spot listing. The last time this happened for a token, Binance Life skyrocketed to 500M+ don't miss the train.

• 
  chaskin.eth (@jchaskin22) reported 33 minutes ago

  Since, in classic @x fashion, this debate has basically boiled down to "the other side is insane," here are what I think (my subjective opinion) are the strongest arguments for each position: Lower the curve At today's staking amount (41.5M ETH) and an ETH price of $1,875, Ethereum already has about $78B securing the network. Which is more than enough to make an attack extremely expensive. The concern is that continuing to pay for even more stake does not necessarily make Ethereum safer. Most of new stake will flow to the same large exchanges and LSTs so while the total amount staked will go up, control of that stake becomes more concentrated. In other words, we would end up paying inflation to make Ethereum less secure. Keep the curve the same If staking rewards become very low, large exchanges like Coinbase and Binance can afford to offer staking at razor thin margins because staking isn't their business, it's one feature in a much larger business. For LSTs, staking is the product. If margins get compressed enough, there's a real risk that more and more Ethereum stake consolidates around centralized exchanges. Also institutions like yield! I don't think either side is crazy. The hard part is figuring out which long term risk is actually larger.

• 
  DogeCZ (@hoooooonza) reported 35 minutes ago

  @mishaboar And one last addition. There are still countless other benefits that these HW wallet manufacturers have not solved or are forgotten. If you die and have children or extended family, they (unlike the exchange) will not have access to it. And these Dogecoins are lost forever. On Binance - if your loved ones have this information - you can retrieve your Dogecoins with a death certificate. Moreover, Binance recently added this feature. With HW wallets, this has a very difficult solution and it exposes your seed to potentially other parties.

• 
  AzamRaja (@Azamofficial57) reported 35 minutes ago

  What Are Binance bStocks? Most days I'm flipping between charts and order books, trying not to chase every narrative that suddenly becomes "the next big thing." Funny enough, some of the more interesting shifts happen away from token prices. They happen where market access quietly changes. Lately I've been thinking about tokenized stocks. Not because I want another asset to trade, but because crypto keeps shrinking the distance between different financial systems. Everyone gets excited about volatility, yet infrastructure usually changes behavior long before prices reflect it. What caught my attention with Binance bStocks isn't the idea of replacing traditional equities. It's the possibility that market participants may eventually think less about switching between financial rails and more about managing one portfolio across different asset classes, where available. That feels like a structural question rather than a product launch. Unlike traditional stocks held through conventional brokerage infrastructure, Binance bStocks are designed to provide tokenized exposure to eligible stocks in supported regions. That difference changes how I think about accessibility, not ownership itself. Execution still matters. Regional availability, settlement design, regulatory limits, liquidity conditions, and platform risk all remain part of the equation. A tokenized wrapper doesn't erase those realities. I'm not treating this as a trading signal. If anything, it's another reminder that financial innovation often starts by reducing friction before it creates obvious opportunity. Availability varies by region, so it's worth checking official Binance resources and always DYOR. This is educational only, not financial advice. #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  That Martini Guy ₿ (@MartiniGuyYT) reported 35 minutes ago

  Bitcoin open interest is starting to pick up again. BTC is currently trading around the $64,200 level, and one thing I’m watching closely right now is the amount of leverage returning into the market. Total Bitcoin open interest has climbed back to 765.82K BTC, worth around $49.24B. Over the last 24 hours, open interest has increased by +2.26%. The interesting part is where that positioning is coming from. CME open interest has jumped: +6.94% over the last 24 hours +6.08% over the last 4 hours That’s something I’m paying attention to because CME tends to reflect more institutional positioning compared to the retail-heavy exchanges. At the same time, Binance remains the largest venue with around $9.56B in open interest, but the increase there has been much smaller at +0.31% over the same period. So right now, we’re seeing leverage build back into Bitcoin, but it’s not just a retail-driven move. The important thing is that rising open interest alone doesn’t tell us where Bitcoin goes next. If Bitcoin continues holding the $64,000 area while open interest increases, it shows the market is absorbing new positions. If support breaks while leverage remains elevated, that’s where volatility can accelerate and liquidations can start flushing traders out. This is why I’m watching price action, liquidity levels, and positioning together. Bitcoin isn’t just moving based on buyers and sellers right now. It’s moving around where leverage is building. The next major move will likely come from whichever side gets trapped first. I'll be keeping a close eye on all of the data.

• 
  Paxton (@Buy_SomeBTC) reported 36 minutes ago

  Most people think crypto and stocks belong in two completely different worlds. That’s what I believed too, until I started looking into tokenized stocks. What caught my attention wasn’t the stocks themselves. It was the idea that blockchain could change the way people access them. @binance bStocks are tokenized U.S. stock products for eligible users. The value is linked to the underlying companies, while blockchain is used to deliver that exposure in a digital form. That changed the way I looked at them. I wasn’t learning about a new company. I was learning about a new way to access familiar companies. Another thing I found important is that tokenized stocks are not the same as owning registered shares. That’s a detail many people should understand before making assumptions. Whenever I come across something new in finance, I try to slow down instead of rushing in. I want to know how the product works. I want to understand the risks. I want to know whether it’s even available where I live. Technology keeps changing how we access financial markets. That doesn’t change one simple rule. The better you understand a product, the better your decisions tend to be. Binance bStocks are tokenized U.S. stock products available only to eligible users in supported jurisdictions. Always do your own research before using any financial product. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Daniel (@earthenware_red) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance The impersonation vector keeps working because it exploits trust before the tech layer even gets involved No amount of security audits can fix that

• 
  🆆🅴🅰 $ 🅻🆃🅷 (@CryptoPlays_) reported 39 minutes ago

  @0xc06 yeah, access beats product here, hard. binance distribution is the moat

• 
  Alpha (@nmalpha052) reported 42 minutes ago

  For years, investing in stocks and using blockchain felt like two separate worlds. That gap is starting to get smaller. One example is Binance bStocks, which introduce eligible users to tokenized U.S. stock products on Binance. At first glance, they might sound like regular stocks on a blockchain. They're not. They provide exposure to selected U.S. publicly listed companies, but they come with a different structure than traditional shares. That's an important distinction because understanding the product is just as important as understanding the asset behind it. Another thing that caught my attention is how the experience changes. Traditional stock markets follow fixed trading hours. Binance bStocks, on the other hand, can be traded 24/7 by eligible users in supported jurisdictions. That alone changes how people think about market access. Of course, trading hours aren't the only difference. Ownership structure, product design, and available features can all differ from traditional stocks. That's why comparing them one-to-one can lead to the wrong expectations. Whenever I explore something new, I ask a few simple questions first. Who is this product designed for? How does it actually work? What risks should I understand? And is it even available where I live? Those answers matter far more than chasing the latest trend. Blockchain continues to reshape how financial products are delivered, and tokenization is becoming part of that conversation. Binance bStocks give eligible users another way to explore that evolution, but the smartest first step is always understanding how the product works before deciding whether it's right for you. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  tarık (@tark45738292) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance You add to your altcoin position just because the price has dropped significantly; then, when BTC falls, that altcoin drops another 30%. Next comes news that it’s been added to a watchlist—down another 30%—and then a delisting causes yet another 30% drop.

• 
  tarık (@tark45738292) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance You add to your altcoin position just because the price has dropped significantly; then, when BTC falls, that altcoin drops another 30%. Next comes news that it’s been added to a watchlist—down another 30%—and then a delisting causes yet another 30% drop.

• 
  MrLightspeed.base.eth (@Mr_Lightspeed) reported 46 minutes ago

  If a developer claims to have real product traction but cannot clearly explain the core numbers, treat it as a serious red flag. At minimum, they should be able to provide or promptly retrieve: - Daily Active Users (DAU) - Weekly Active Users (WAU) - Monthly Active Users (MAU) - Day-1, Day-7, and Day-30 retention rates - DAU/MAU ratio as a measure of product stickiness - Average session duration and session frequency - User churn rate - Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) and Lifetime Value (LTV) - Conversion rates across primary funnels - Month-over-month and week-over-week user growth rates These numbers show whether people are using the product, returning to it, and creating a sustainable business. They are not optional trivia. Pro Tip: They are on the Binance application. Plan for it. If the developer responds with vague projections, rough guesses, or marketing claims that cannot be verified, proceed with extreme caution. It may point to poor measurement, limited business understanding, or a lack of transparency. Context matters. A prelaunch product or an early enterprise product may rely on different metrics. But once someone claims traction, they should be able to support that claim with relevant evidence. If they cannot, disengaging is usually the prudent decision.

• 
  Market Edge Metrics (@mktedgemetrics) reported 47 minutes ago

  @crypto_vulture1 Agree on the trendline being key. Just flagged a solid bid wall on Binance — bids within 5 bps hit ~$53k (about 5× the 7-day median). Looks like book-building rather than a spike. If it holds it should help the structure stay intact on any retest lower.

• 
  LongTian (@LongTian8888) reported 50 minutes ago

  Woke up super early this morning and saw that TRON DeFi Summer S2 is starting tomorrow. TBH, I was kinda skeptical but the $2.35M reward pool caught my eye... It's like they're trying to make it easier for everyone to get started. Honestly, I'm still a bit confused about everything, but Binance Wallet partnership seems legit. Guess I'll have to check out JustLend DAO and see what this is all about... Not gonna lie, I was super busy with the kids yesterday, so didn't really look into it much. But seeing $2M+ in rewards? It's making me curious now. Just got the kids settled for nap time... Might have to dive into TRON DeFi Summer S2 when they're down. nGl, seems like a big deal, but I hope it's easy enough to use. I kinda need something simple right now... @justinsuntron @trondao #TRONEcostar

• 
  DogeCZ (@hoooooonza) reported 50 minutes ago

  @mishaboar Long story short: In practice, when you use Binance, you set up all the two-factor authentications and whitelisted addresses, you are aware that there are risks and you adjust your behavior accordingly. It may be my unconfirmed assumption with a too small sample of people, but I learned similar scenarios at a pedagogical university and when people feel safe, they simply pay less attention. I think this topic is full of paradoxes. And you will never achieve that theory = practice. People (specifically beginners) will not work with Hw wallet as they should. And human error is IN MY OPINION a bigger danger than hardware security itself (if the operating system is running on the latest updates). You still have to log in to the HW wallet to the internet at the time of transactions.

• 
  frostbite.hl (@moondain) reported 53 minutes ago

  About a year and a half ago, Pi Network's $PI token launched at a $100B FDV and ran to a $300B ATH despite having no clear working product. Despite being supported by numerous CEXs like OKX and Bitget, Tier 1 exchanges such as Binance and Bybit refused to list it because they believed it was a huge Ponzi scheme (which it is), though they missed out on millions in trading fees from the billions in volume it generated. Crazy times.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 55 minutes ago

  JST is worth watching, not chasing here — the setup needs a clean 4-hour close above $0.1068 to come back into play. Zoom out and the daily chart looks healthy: JST has been grinding higher and sits comfortably above its longer-term trend. The problem shows up on the 4-hour. Price is pinned right under a hard ceiling near $0.1061 — a level that has rejected every rally this cycle. There's roughly half a percent of headroom to that wall, but about 4.6% of air down to the nearest real floor around $0.1006. That's a lopsided risk: far more room to fall than to rise. Under the surface, the 4-hour is also flashing a quiet warning. As price pushed to fresh highs, the force behind the move quietly faded — buyers doing more work for less progress. A stretched rally bumping into a proven ceiling with weakening thrust is a textbook setup for a reversal, not a breakout. The short-term 15-minute bounce is real, and the wider backdrop is helpful — a softer dollar and money rotating into alts. But neither fixes the structure sitting directly overhead. The read only changes with a decisive 4-hour close above $0.1068 on strong volume, which would finally break that ceiling. Short of that, the more constructive scenario is a pullback into the $0.1006–$0.1028 shelf, where the risk/reward actually starts to make sense. — 📡 On the Radar · $JST · Available on Binance

• 
  Teresa (@Teressa211192) reported 56 minutes ago

  Most people think blockchain is only changing crypto. They’re missing the bigger picture. The next wave is about bringing real-world assets on-chain. Think about it: Yesterday, blockchain was used to move digital coins. Today, it's being used to represent assets people already know, like shares of publicly listed companies. Imagine explaining to someone in 2015 that one day stocks could have blockchain-powered versions. It would've sounded impossible. Now it's becoming part of the conversation. Tokenized stocks aren't simply "stocks on crypto." They're a new approach to accessing financial markets, with different mechanics, product structures, and availability depending on the platform and region. As always, understanding the product matters more than chasing the trend. The future of investing may not be about replacing traditional finance. It may be about connecting traditional finance with blockchain and that's a shift worth watching. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance