Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	28 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported 5 minutes ago

  @rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..

• 
  cococowi (@cocococowi) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance Hey Binance, how does the 1:1 backing for bStocks really work? If many people convert stocks to bStocks and use them in DeFi (lending, liquidity pools, etc.), what happens to the actual shares? Any risk of fractional ownership or redemption problems #AskBinance

• 
  TaylorK (@7krry) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance I’ve only ever traded standard crypto on Binance, so bStocks is totally new to me. How exactly does corporate action work here? For example, if a company issues a dividend or a stock split, how is that distributed to bStock holders on the app? #AskBinance

• 
  BlockVanta (@Msagirsani) reported 15 minutes ago

  @binance How does Binance ensure bStocks remain 1:1 backed by U.S. shares via Proof of Collateral? What protections exist if BTech Holdings or the custodian faces issues, and how does the ADGM framework address past tokenized stock concerns? #AskBinance

• 
  ANKIT KUMAR (@ANKITKUMAR31153) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks eventually support fractional ownership of more global stocks and ETFs? 📈 #AskBinance

• 
  0xLabib☂️ (@dashlabib) reported 23 minutes ago

  Hey @BinanceHelpDesk Please Resolve my issue RW00270 binance UID 738945543

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 24 minutes ago

  @grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.

• 
  Deal Guardian (@DealGuardianApp) reported 24 minutes ago

  Europe's MiCA deadline is looming, potentially impacting Binance access and USDT liquidity. In the US, regulators are proposing user ID requirements for stablecoin issuers, while Ireland considers crypto safeguards. #Crypto #NFTs

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 25 minutes ago

  ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  Alex Kirchmaier | web3alex.eth 𝕏 (@0xSchnitzel) reported 29 minutes ago

  @FreepanO @MartiniGuyYT You seem to be unaware of how slow European authorities can be. France has opened a case against Binance years ago and they haven’t finished their investigations apparently…

• 
  miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported 29 minutes ago

  @0xSchnitzel @binance No, in this (very rare) case it's actually protecting the customer from an entity who does not care about the safety of their users or their funds. Or compliance for that matter. They had an undetectable 3rd party impact auth bypass they didn't fix for the past 3 years. They even claim it works as intended. I hate overreach, but if regulations are made to protect customers - then this is perfect case for it. Binance needs to go. And my claim is proven. I'm the one who reported the non-compliance and the ((undetectable)) 3rd party impact of their payment processing due to storing CC CVVs - which is a huge no-go. And it goes directly against PCI-DSS which they claim to be compliant with. And it also affects every single of their 300M+ users 💀 The users connected bank accounts don't detect unauthorized access because Binance will always pass the CVVs they store, even if the user doesn't authenticate OR uses the wrong CVV (💀💀💀) They claimed it "works as intended" and tried to silently patch it after declining bounties. The patch just added more pop-ups you need to close before you can bypass their payment auth, but their payment processing was never fixed. They still store user CVVs three years later and the auth bypass still works. It just makes you close more pop-ups LOL I haven't authorized any deposit to Binance for the past 3 years FYI This is one of the ultra rare cases where the regulation actually benefits and protects the user.

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 30 minutes ago

  My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

• 
  _CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Shahzaynhaiderr @binance @BinanceAcademy fixing real problems while everyone chases hype

• 
  ProfitableMan (@ProfitableMan1) reported 37 minutes ago

  On June 1, 2026, Binance introduced US equities trading for eligible users outside the United States. This is not Binance issuing its own shares. It is access to over 7,000 existing stocks and ETFs already listed on US exchanges. Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and thousands of others. Key details confirmed in the official announcement: Zero commission on trades. Fractional shares from as little as $5. Trading is available 24 hours a day, five days a week for select equities. Funding via USDC, USDT, BNB and other supported stablecoins. All of this sits inside your existing Binance account.

• 
  Pritam Kumar (@Pritamkumar047) reported 38 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk I have not committed any scam or fraud, yet my account has been banned. Customer support is not helping me, and I still do not know the exact reason for this action. Please review my account again and provide a clear explanation. @binance @BinanceHelpDesk #Binance

• 
  Zhang Han (@vertie95594) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance What makes bStocks a better option for global investors who cannot easily access U.S. stock markets? #AskBinance

• 
  ÄLÇHËMÏST (@Agent2K4) reported 39 minutes ago

  @binance Since #bStocks live on-chain as BEP-20 tokens, what happens if a user loses access to their private keys? Can tokenized RWAs be recovered, or do traditional crypto loss rules apply? #AskBinance

• 
  ronjukhanbd.eth (@ronjukhanbd) reported 41 minutes ago

  @binance If Binance or the custodian holding the underlying shares ever had issues, what actually happens to my bStocks? Can I always redeem 1:1 for the real share, or could there be limits/delays during high demand? #AskBinance

• 
  Crynet (@crynetio) reported 44 minutes ago

  🇵🇭 Binance Gains Regulatory Green Light for Philippine Traders BlockShoals reports Binance can serve Philippine traders under a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sandbox arrangement. The framework permits trading access without requiring a local Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license, according to BlockShoals.

• 
  miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported 45 minutes ago

  @0xSchnitzel @binance I hate regulatory overreach but tbh **** Binance. Their payment processing is awful and not compliant with any standard they falsely claim to have in place. They store user CC CVVs which quite literally puts all of their 300M+ users AND their bank accounts at risk. They even decline bug bounties and then sneakily try to patch things, but never actually bother to truly fix the issues. Been like that for 3+ years now. Good riddance.

• 
  K.E.Ndaeyo (@KenK_fx) reported 49 minutes ago

  @binance ¹ bStocks is totally new to me. How exactly does corporate action work here? For example, if a company issues a dividend or a stock split, how is that distributed to bStock holders on the app? ² Can I trade during weekends or after US market close? ³ fees for trade #AskBinance

• 
  HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance Can users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance

• 
  joseph (@FreepanO) reported 50 minutes ago

  Currently, MiCA excludes "fully decentralised" crypto services from its scope — meaning platforms with no identifiable intermediary don't need a CASP licence and aren't subject to MiCA's investor-protection rules. Recently, Malta's regulator have communicated that truly decentralised crypto service is a much narrower category than most DeFi users assume. The MFSA's paper finds that the majority of DeFi protocols retain centralized features: admin or upgrade keys controlled by a small group, governance tokens concentrated in a handful of wallets, or front-end interfaces run by a single company. Under the paper's proposed spectrum test, those platforms would fall inside MiCA's scope — requiring licensing, smart-contract audits, and governance disclosures. For retail investors this cuts both ways. On the protection side, bringing pseudo-decentralised platforms within MiCA means accountability, redress rights, and mandatory audits — things you currently have zero claim to when using most DeFi protocols. On the access side, any DeFi platform that fails or refuses to get licensed would have to block EU users, shrinking the product set available. The consultation closes July 10, and whatever standard emerges will likely become the EU-wide template — not just a Maltese rule. What this all means is that MiCA is really but the 1st chapter of an incremental regulatory crackdown on DeFI. And this is an EU exception. The US is doing exactly the same. So if you use DeFi apps and live in the EU, pay attention to how things evolve because the regulatory ground is shifting under your feet. The elephant in the room is obviously @HyperliquidX What's going for them is that their reputation, so far, is impeccable relative to CEXs (looking at you Binance...)

• 
  ☄️ (@r91950056) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Remy_Ryy bro the real problem is the market conditions and binance scam listing

• 
  ManelXBT (@manelxbt) reported 54 minutes ago

  @worldnetwork @FortuneMagazine Guys please don’t sell any coins, binance is now trying to sell the price down. Our goal is to keep holding the tokens Main target above 21$ Realistic short term target 8$

• 
  Byte Drift (@byte_drift1) reported 55 minutes ago

  Something shifted in how people are learning about money. It didn't happen in a classroom. It happened on a phone screen. A few years ago if you wanted to understand investing, budgeting, or crypto you either knew someone in finance or you figured it out the hard way. Now that information is everywhere. 1 in 3 Gen Z adults now use social media as their primary source of financial education. That number was almost unthinkable a decade ago. Almost 40% of younger adults use social platforms to research financial products and services before making any decisions. That's a whole generation learning from feeds, not textbooks. And honestly it makes sense. A 60 second video explaining how compound interest works reaches more people than any school curriculum ever did. A simple post breaking down a confusing market term gets seen by thousands of people who never took an economics class. Accessibility changed everything. But here's where it gets important. Not everything you read online is accurate. Not every creator explaining finance actually understands it. Some are sharing opinions dressed up as facts. Some are sharing information that applies to their situation but not yours. Poor financial literacy cost Americans alone more than $246 billion in 2025. A significant portion of that came from acting on incomplete or misleading information. So the skill isn't just finding financial content on social media. The skill is knowing how to verify what you find. Cross reference what you learn. Check official sources. Understand that context matters and what applies in one market or region may not apply in yours. Social media made financial education more accessible than ever before. That's genuinely a good thing. Just make sure what you're consuming is actually education and not just noise dressed up to look like it. Stay curious. Always DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Ankush (@Ankushk63616898) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Coco_Airdrop Binance customer support me iski complaint kar de.

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 1 hour ago

  @gandalfcryptto Agreed, but shorting’s not broken—data shows 63% of leveraged shorts on Binance get liquidated weekly. Most traders over-leverage in low vol. We track this daily in our risk reports. You ever see longs get wrecked harder? [link]

• 
  Mr.Gorstein 🧪 (@MrGorstein) reported 1 hour ago

  @guiguziben @FengShui_BNB They usually take time aftr such moves.... Like 200% up in frst week. Then 50% down then again 400% and binance alpha

• 
  Guruprasad Venkatesha (@Guru_BCUBE) reported 1 hour ago

  @tweet_buzzer I have withdrawn 40% of my funds from Binance and parked it in Bybit. I will wait for one more week and then pull out everything. The whole platform has to shutdown if they don’t obtain Mica but personally I feel it’s impossible for them to obtain due to criminal investigation in France and other constraints.