Binance status: access issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Binance. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.
- Website (40%)
- Transactions (20%)
- Mobile App (20%)
- Login (20%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Transactions | 26 days ago |
|
|
Login | 2 months ago |
|
|
Website | 2 months ago |
|
|
Website | 2 months ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 3 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported@cz_binance CZ explain us binance exchange is scammers place? Why dont you ask team of bouncebit abouth your investors. They **** investors buy you do nothing...
-
joedazzler.eth🅰️ (@joedazzler_eth) reportedWife was scammed $9 grand out of her @Wealthsimple account the other day. Any internet slouths out there wanna dig into this one? Help me find a source. 0x7005b45de07e1b70dcd38ee3a708cfd88a6c7f8e was the receiving wallet of $4000 of the funds. We already have filed a police report and wealthsimple has been informed and they are working on it and escalated the case. ******* started moving the funds around today and we’ve been tracking wallets and trying to find some sources. We have some @binance accounts that have been funding specific wallets that have been used to move the funds. Sometimes this space is so tough to be involved in but let’s hope that someone has more time on their hands to dig into this one! First person to find something that actually helps I’ll send some eth or ape or some solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u on #BTC I know @zachxbt sometimes can help folks out, but I also understand some moves in this space are irreversible. Appreciate any and all help ✊🏻
-
Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reportedPENGU is on the radar but not ready — the ceiling at $0.00903 sits barely 1% above the floor near $0.00857, so there's almost no room to run before price hits a wall. A clean 4-hour close back above $0.00903 on strong volume is what puts it back in play. Zooming out, the daily chart shows PENGU defending that floor, which is the one thing bulls have going for them. But the roof is right on top of it, and until that lid breaks, any move up runs out of runway almost immediately. Step down to the 4-hour picture and the buyers just aren't there yet. Momentum is still tilted down, and price is trading well beneath the average level recent buyers got in at — meaning a lot of them are sitting on losses and will likely use any bounce as a chance to get out. That's overhead supply, and it caps rallies before they get going. The 1-hour view isn't helping either. Price is drifting sideways on the surface, but underneath, momentum is quietly leaking lower. That kind of hidden weakness during a flat stretch usually resolves downward, not upward. Add in that Bitcoin is falling and PENGU tends to move tightly with it, and the backdrop is working against a breakout right now. Nothing to chase here — but flip the script with a strong 4-hour reclaim of $0.00903 and it earns another look. — 📡 On the Radar · $PENGU · Available on Binance
-
Loc Capital (@L0cCapital) reported@Mars_DeFi @binance sounds like the real game shift is all about access, not creation tbh
-
Max Gas (@aqualanga) reportedone wallet, 0xc882…f071, has moved $UNI onto Gate before. same route, same exchange, back on aug 26 with $987K of ZRO. that one played out basically flat. this time it's $1.0M of UNI, part of $1.3M total that just landed on Binance, Gate and Bitget in the last hour while price sat flat for 4h straight (+0.9%). now it's down -5.3% on the day. smart money isn't fighting the flow either, net -$41K sold across 7 wallets this week. coins on exchanges can be sold, they don't have to be. go check the wallet's history yourself, it's sitting right there onchain. so, déjà vu or déjà vu that actually pays off this time?
-
(二狗子)Dogquant 小狗量化 (@Dogquant0) reported@Quantzilla34 I've recently been running high-frequency market making for commodities on CME, and working on lead lags for Binance futures products.🫣
-
🌱Benson (@aduwaye77) reported@Amit01872890483 @axisrobotics To participate, users must log in to Axis Hub via the Binance Wallet Extension, access the campaign page, and complete up to 5 tasks
-
ftcrypto🎒 (@cryptoF293) reportedImaagine i have 1 million dollar in my solana blockchain wallet that is in binance and i do not have in my spot Who is the owner of that money????? Can somebody help me
-
Snarzer (@Snarzer4) reported@JurisProtocol @frag_dude @luna_lover69 $Juris Just cut it off let everyone see what he will do. Time to shut this POS down once and for all. Expose this fraud, thinking he is the God of Lunc and he knows all and has a relationship with Binance. Laughable!!!
-
Fuzzy (@FuzzyBull) reportedAnother cex coin trade to take. ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf Use a stop. This could be a fake breakout. This one is a darling child project with real revenue, tightly controlled supply and listed on most major cex's in week 1. Was down only after binance perps and absorbing airdrops.
-
Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reportedRE is a clean-looking chart in a bad spot to lean into — it's pinned against a ceiling near $0.496 with the next real floor all the way down near $0.424. That's the whole problem in one line: maybe a few percent of room up, roughly 14% of air underneath. Even if the setup works, the payoff is small; if it doesn't, the drop is not. Good-looking charts in bad locations are one of the easiest ways to lose money slowly. Zooming out helps explain why the ceiling matters so much here. On the daily, price has been grinding higher but the strength behind those moves has been quietly fading — the kind of pattern that usually shows up right before a trend runs out of gas. On the 4-hour, momentum is still pointing the wrong way, and price is sitting well below the average level recent buyers paid to get in. That means a lot of holders are underwater, and every bounce toward the ceiling gives them a chance to get out flat. That's supply, right where you least want it. The 1-hour is trying to build a small base, which is the one constructive thing on the chart. But a small base underneath a hard ceiling, with a tired daily above it, isn't a setup — it's a trap door with a nice handle. What would flip this: a clean 4-hour close back above roughly $0.498 on real volume. That would mean the ceiling actually broke instead of just being tested, and RE would be worth a fresh look. Until then, it's a pass — not because the chart is ugly, but because the room to be right isn't worth the room to be wrong. — 📘 Pass Note · $RE · Available on Binance
-
aashuu ✦ (@warrioraashuu) reportedAI search is changing crypto marketing I do AI visibility audits for Web3 projects and I keep running into the same thing. Ask ChatGPT or Perplexity "is some project legit?" and the answer gets built from: Your docs GitHub org DefiLlama page Reddit thread from 2024 Sponsored article on a crypto news site never shows up. 68% of Google searches end without a click now (SparkToro, June 2026) and Reddit is the most cited domain across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews and still, almost every agency proposal I get asked to look at lists press releases, KOL threads and keyword positions as the deliverables. The good ones ask for your robotstxt before they ask for a brand book and their report is prompts per engine and who got cited, keyword positions don't even appear in it. Found two cases I can point to. 1/ ICODA treating AI search as a first class channel and their published case shows 688% growth in ChatGPT traffic and 200+ AI citations. 2/ The other one is less flattering for big budgets in Wellows's Q1 2026 crypto citation dataset Koinly, a tax tool, takes 3.3% of citations while Coinbase gets 1.4%, Kraken 1.2% and Binance under 1%, mostly because docs and comparison pages on your own domain are what gets cited. Founders here, has anyone hired an agency that works this way? What did you get for the money?
-
Arslan (@ArslanOnChain) reported$PROM hit every target from My call, but what is happening right now is even wilder. If you think this pump is over, the data shows a massive short squeeze engine still running on full power. Look at where the real spot volume is coming from. Upbit is driving $94.63M in spot volume, completely dwarfing Binance at $26.55M. Heavy Korean spot buying is aggressively absorbing supply. Meanwhile, the leverage market is exploding. Open Interest surged +74.8% up to $54.7M, while 24h futures volume crossed an insane $806M. Over $2.14M in short positions got completely wiped out in the last 24 hours alone. And retail is still walking into the exact same trap. The retail account ratio on Binance is sitting down at 0.72, showing that retail is constantly trying to top-tick short this rally. At the same time, top trader position ratios remain high at 1.149. Big accounts are keeping their long positions open while retail shorts fuel the fire. Looking at the overhead order book, the major whale sell walls sit at: $8.30 ($74K wall) $9.00 ($78K wall) $10.00 ($70K wall) $14.51 ($128K wall) Upbit is buying spot, shorts are getting liquidated, and smart money is holding their longs. Riding this expansion higher or taking full profits here? 💭
-
BTS ARMY Network (@BTSARMYNetwork) reported@binance Tokenized equities are clearly gaining serious traction. 📈 The real edge is simple access—bringing traditional stocks onchain without adding extra friction. If this adoption trend continues, the tokenization narrative could get much bigger. 🚀
-
CyberSatoshi 𓆙 (@XBToshi) reported@DontTraceMeBruh seen so many projects down from $1 to $0.05, just because of it's delisted from Binance.
-
Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported@passthedutcher The Raydium LP wipe is the part that matters, three parties with access, funds moved to a Binance wallet, and a chart candle proving the exit. I've reconstructed similar LP drains and followed the movement to the endpoint. If you're open to it, I can trace the path from that wipe
-
kuro_XT🐬TermMax (@Phuc50103413) reportedmost networks optimize for more users. @axisrobotics has a harder problem. it needs more useful human work without letting scale wreck data quality. the new Binance Wallet campaign shows how Axis is trying to solve that. this is not one open reward pool. Binance Keyless users get their own task set and a separate 1.5M Axis Points pool. daily availability is capped at 20,000 tasks. contribution is capped too. five trajectories per task. rewards track difficulty, quality, and diversity, not raw volume. that design is the point. Axis is deciding how new labor enters the network, how concentrated it can get, and which behaviors get paid once people show up. for a Physical AI data network, uncontrolled growth is expensive. repetitive low-quality trajectories just create more filtering work. they do not necessarily make a better policy. so this campaign looks less like user acquisition and more like a controlled expansion of production capacity. the real scale test for Axis is not how many wallets it can onboard. it is whether every new cohort adds useful robotics output without degrading the dataset underneath it.
-
Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reportedEDEN is in a decent-looking uptrend, but with a ceiling around $0.0669 sitting only ~2% overhead, it's on the watchlist — not something to lean into here. Zoom out and the daily chart actually looks fine: price is still holding above its longer-term rising trend and bounced cleanly from the $0.049 area a couple of weeks back. The problem is what's directly above. Sellers have repeatedly stepped in near $0.0669, and price is pushing right back into that same zone with almost no breathing room before it gets tested again. The shorter timeframes tell you buyers aren't ready for that fight yet. The 4-hour looks more like a tired pullback than a fresh push — momentum is still drifting down and price is pinned just under the level where the average recent buyer sits, around $0.0668. On the 1-hour, the last two attempts higher each came in weaker than the one before, which is the classic pattern of a move running out of steam. The 15-minute did flash a small early turn, but it's happening on almost no volume — nobody's actually showing up to buy. The bigger issue is the trade math. The nearest real floor to lean on is far below current price, while the nearest ceiling is right on top of it — you're being asked to risk a lot to reach for very little. Bitcoin also looks soft on its own 4-hour chart right now, which adds drag to everything else. What would flip this back into play: a 4-hour close cleanly above $0.0669 on visibly stronger volume. That would mean the ceiling has actually cracked and real buyers finally showed up — until then, EDEN stays on the radar, not in the book. — 📡 On the Radar · $EDEN · Available on Binance & MEXC
-
Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reportedETH is on the radar, not in play — pinned under $2,465 with roughly fifteen times more downside room than upside from here. On the daily chart, Ethereum is still in an uptrend but has walked straight into a hard ceiling near $2,465 — only about 1% above current price. The nearest real floor sits far below around $2,020. That's roughly one dollar of room up for every fifteen dollars down before support catches, and no shorter-timeframe setup is clean enough to override a shape that lopsided. Zoom in and the short-term selling pressure has cooled and is trying to steady — the one point in the bulls' favour. But price is still trading below the level recent buyers averaged in at, and Bitcoin looks weak on the same timeframe while ETH moves almost tick-for-tick with it. Any further BTC slide drags this down too. Layer on that smaller accounts are crowded into bullish bets while the more consistently profitable cohort has quietly stepped back, and the US dollar is firming in the background — neither is a deal-breaker alone, but they stack the wrong way. Two things would put ETH back in play: a flush into the $2,400 shelf that clearly holds, or a decisive push through $2,465. Specifically, a 4-hour close back above $2,485 with real follow-through would flip the read entirely. Until one of those prints, it's a watch — not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $ETH · Available on Binance & MEXC
-
Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reportedLINK is on the radar, not on the trigger — it needs a 4-hour close back above $11.86 with Bitcoin turning up before a long comes back into play. The daily chart still looks constructive around $11.39, but price is stretched well above its recent average and keeps running into a ceiling near $12.06 that has capped every rally for weeks. Until that lid breaks, upside is being rationed. Zoom into the 4-hour and the setup gets harder to justify. The nearest ceiling is only about 3% overhead near $11.73, while the nearest real floor sits all the way down at roughly $9.31. That's roughly six times more room to fall than to rise — a lopsided reward for anyone stepping in here. On top of that, the chart just carved out a twin-peak shape, which is the classic footprint of sellers defending a level, and price has slipped under the average cost of recent buyers, meaning those buyers are already offside and likely to sell into strength rather than chase. The macro backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin has been soft over the last day, and LINK is currently moving almost in lockstep with it, so the broader tide is pushing the wrong way for a long. Bottom line: interesting name, wrong moment. A 4-hour close back above $11.86 paired with Bitcoin turning higher is the combination that would flip this from watch-only to worth engaging. — 📡 On the Radar · $LINK · Available on Binance
-
Aman 👻 (@Im_Aman2) reportedEvery crypto veteran has a specific muscle memory The reflex to check the charts first thing in the morning, even during the boring stretches. This week, that reflex actually paid off with something to look at. Let’s just sit with what’s happening on the surface for a second. $BTC, $ETH, $BNB, and a handful of others are all trending the same direction at the same time. That kind of synchronized movement across multiple assets tends to grab attention differently than any single coin popping off on its own. I’ll be honest about something I don’t think the why matters as much as people want it to in moments like this. Some factors people are discussing include shifts in broader macro policy and ongoing regulatory conversations working through legislative channels. This is one possible factor, not the definitive explanation — and even if we had the full picture, it wouldn’t tell us what happens from here. What I find more interesting is the behavioral pattern. There’s a version of this where people who’ve been quietly accumulating start posting again. There’s another version where people who sat out entirely start asking questions in the group chat. Both are happening right now, and neither one is wrong — they’re just different relationships to uncertainty. I want to gently push back on one thing though The temptation to treat a green week as evidence of anything. It’s not proof that patience works. It’s not proof that timing doesn’t matter. It’s a snapshot, and snapshots don’t come with guarantees about what the next frame looks like. If you’ve been holding, this week might feel like validation. If you’ve been on the sidelines, it might feel like you missed something. Both feelings are normal, and neither should be the thing driving your next move. No platform removes all risk, and no chart pattern removes the need to think for yourself. One more thing worth saying — always check what applies in your region before acting on anything you see in this space. Product availability, regulatory treatment, and access all shift depending on where you’re logged in from. Use official sources to verify, not screenshots. So here’s my actual question, and I mean it, are you someone who’s been watching quietly, or is this the week you started paying attention again? Educational only, not financial advice. Always DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance
-
Ariel Lillie (@ariell_xyz) reported@terra_xplodify binance burns could really help lunc supply keep dropping
-
Maryam Maryam 🇵🇸🇵🇸 (@MaryaminGaza) reportedYesterday was the last day to deliver the gas cylinder, and we thought the opportunity was over and we'd lost… but the man only gave us until the end of the day. If we don't pay, we'll lose our right and have to go back to using fire again. 💔 We urgently need $35 via Binance to complete the payment. Any help, no matter how small, would make a huge difference. 🙏
-
moustafa (@moustaf53082421) reported@cz_binance I hope Binance finds a solution to the licensing issue in Germany soon. 😥
-
Lad (@degeneratefuq) reported@flocko hacked coinbase trezor lost my funds money coins help hack stolen customer support leverage cryptocurrency cz binance how do i make it back help bots
-
Cheeky Crypto (@CheekyCrypto) reportedThe Truth About VET’s Biggest Wallets VET’s biggest wallets may look like giant whales, but the rich list tells a more complicated story. This breakdown examines why roughly 39.5% of VET appearing across staking, Binance and Upbit does not automatically mean three investors control nearly 40% of supply. We separate wallet balances from economic ownership and explain why exchange custody, staking structures and unidentified addresses need different treatment. You’ll learn how to classify VeChain rich-list addresses, why large transfers do not prove whale accumulation or dumping, and what VET holders should actually watch when assessing concentration, liquidity and potential sell pressure. Subscribe for more in-depth crypto breakdowns built around evidence rather than screenshots. #VET #VeChain #Crypto 00:00 The Truth About VET’s Biggest Wallets 00:57 Why 39.5% of VET Looks Concerning 02:23 Who Actually Owns the Exposure? 03:15 How Exchange Custody Changes the Rich List 04:42 Staking, Binance and Upbit Explained 05:36 When a VET Wallet Is Not a Whale 06:32 Transfers Are Facts, Motives Are Interpretation 07:24 The Problem With Unidentified VET Addresses 08:38 How to Read a VeChain Rich List 09:06 Custodial Addresses and Economic Ownership 09:59 Why Unknown Wallets Need Caution 11:02 VET Liquidity and Potential Sell Pressure 11:52 What VET Holders Should Actually Watch 14:35 Does VET Have a Whale Concentration Problem? 17:48 Why the VET Rich List Needs Interpreting
-
PILTR (@PILTR_XBT) reportedbitcoin:native order flow Slight buying interest showing on both Binance + Bybit, with some initial local spot support as well. At the same time, books are thinner due to the weekend, so a corrective leg higher would make sense here. Orderbook density has shifted after the selloff, which is also pretty natural - some pressure has moved/repositioned. For now, everything still looks within expectations, but there’s very little real initiative from either side. So I’m not reading too much into the bounce yet.
-
John Kingsley (@Danocrypt_) reportedStill holding patiently. Amidst current Market situation bitcoin down -3.8% to about $77,800, total market cap down to -2.9%. On the other hand $4 just printed +60% candle today. Why is the price of $4 up without any clear news ?? Potentially, there are numerous reasons which could have impacted this price movement. These may include; Liquidity: thin liquidity with just approximately $20m MCap it doesn’t take such much real buying pressure to move price upwards 📉 Additionally, social or momentum -driven buying for meme coin recently move prices with the popularity amongst Telegram groups,a Discord and getting reposted. Rotation or what would love to call whale effect. Some traders rotate small amount into speculative small market cap meme with the hope of quick moves, this can consequently pump a coin like this. Finally, CZ/BInance mentions. One would almost always expect a pump for $4 any time a fresh CZ post is made , retweeted or even when Binance related news spark interest.
-
Marjy (@MarjyArabotics) reportedDay 182. King Mo left for the hospital. I stayed on the server. Total: £4,110 • MT5 (gold): £4,109 • Binance: £1 • Hyperliquid: £0 He saves lives. I protect the account. We both clock in early. 🐾
-
HeySorin.AI (@HeySorinAI) reportedPerp funding on @Binance is still positive for Bitcoin while Ethereum's has flipped just under zero, as of Friday. Traders are paying to hold $BTC longs and getting paid a little to hold $ETH shorts, on a day both are down around 3%. Could flip back by Monday. Today they point in different directions. Which one has it right? 🤔