Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	1 month ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ray (@vulgocmd) reported 37 seconds ago

  @vydamo_ Why the hell did binance list florki in alpha and not Cets? Certainly sapphy involved! Bsc needs to support real communities instead of the own benefit of close friends.

• 
  CyberSatoshi 𓆙 (@XBToshi) reported 5 minutes ago

  50k to 60k paper xmr dumped on a single 15m candle just to cap $540. that is nearly $30m in synthetic liquidity printed out of thin air. they couldn't source that much real xmr spot if their lives depended on it. absolute desperation from whoever is trapped in those naked shorts. **** Binance, **** CEXes, you can’t just suppress real demands.

• 
  Haber (@Haber953901) reported 5 minutes ago

  @theunipcs please help me. I sent my Ethereum from my Uniswap account to my Binance ERC-20 address, but it didn't arrive in my Binance account. What can I do to recover my funds? That was all the money I had, man. Tx: 0x58c79ac78579559e75cd780c3ea93c52a73647b376d05bd9205d6433a6196437

• 
  bullseyesky (@bullseyesky5) reported 7 minutes ago

  @bramk because it hasn’t started yet, wait till s&p tops & biggest bubble since dot com collapses. Wait till CZ binance & Michael seller go under. Don’t worry tho after that maybe in 4 years btc can go back up 20% above previous ath, while stocks 3x that, before btc go down 70% again

• 
  zkComRi.ETH (@ComRifi) reported 7 minutes ago

  @sabirraza33 @binance link broken link boss

• 
  Greg (@GregTyx) reported 9 minutes ago

  CMC is officially listed, and I’m still pushing to get us fully verified. CoinGecko was rejected, but I’ve already submitted it again. BscScan was also rejected because someone posted fake links, but after fixing everything, we resubmitted it as well. I personally made a $45K buyback at $5.1M MC, and I’ve also spent a lot on marketing while we were at ATH. I’m doing everything I possibly can to push this project forward. Last week, KuCoin posted our face, and the Binance Alpha request has been submitted. It hasn’t been rejected, but it also hasn’t been approved yet. The 1% BNB rewards are working perfectly. 🔥 Most importantly — I’m always going to be here. I’m extremely proud of every single one of you who continues to support me and this community. We keep building. We keep pushing. We don’t stop. 🫡 LET’S TAKE BNBCAT TO THE NEXT LEVEL. 🐱🚀

• 
  Captain ☄️ (@CaptainNFA) reported 12 minutes ago

  so many memecoins on BNB are getting support and exposure from Binance, and sending to hundreds of millions in market cap. it just shows you something. Binance isn’t here to take part. they’re here to take over. CZ is one of the few people at this high level in the industry who actually interacts with the culture and supports communities. and honestly, most people doing it right now are just copying what he was doing back in the day and what he’s still doing today. so what to do right now? find the good communities on $BNB , build conviction and bagwork them to oblivion. it's an infinite money glitch szn on the Binance chain..

• 
  Stellar Babe (@Waffiya01) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Bitt_Belle @binance Verifying the website address should always come before registration.

• 
  Tom Keteleer (@KeteleerTo5969) reported 14 minutes ago

  @xrp_herald Interesting! 👀 550M XRP leaving Binance while the price is down. Less exchange supply + continued accumulation is a much stronger signal than another “$50 tomorrow” prediction.

• 
  Kingnana (@almond_env) reported 14 minutes ago

  @saimunbnb @binance Please why is the link not working again?

• 
  Vinícius (@SatoshiBTC_) reported 20 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Why does Binance block trading for a cryptocurrency without even making an official announcement? Especially coming from a platform that always claimed the community comes first—were those words just lies all along?

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 21 minutes ago

  ETHFI is stuck right under a ceiling near $0.560–$0.562 — until it closes cleanly above that on the 4-hour chart, this is one to watch, not chase. The math on the trade just doesn't work here. Price is pinned about 1% below that ceiling — a lid that has swatted rallies back down repeatedly — while the nearest real floor on the 4-hour chart sits all the way down near $0.445. That's roughly ten times more room to fall than to rise. Buying into that setup means paying full price for the upside and taking the full tab on the downside. Zoom in and it gets worse. The 1-hour chart is tracing a twin-peak shape right into that same ceiling — the classic footprint of buyers running out of ammo at a level they've already failed to break. A short-term bounce from washed-out conditions is possible, but bouncing straight into a proven wall is not the same thing as breaking through it. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both drifting lower on the 4-hour chart, money is rotating out of alt-coins and back into Bitcoin, and the US dollar is grinding higher — three headwinds that historically drag names like ETHFI down with them. What flips this: a clean 4-hour close back above $0.562 with Bitcoin turning up alongside it. That breaks the ceiling and puts ETHFI back in play. Until then, it's on the radar — not in the mix. — 📡 On the Radar · $ETHFI · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  BroGetRich (@BroGetRich) reported 23 minutes ago

  Binance just put 1,000 US stock options next to your coins. Physically settled, run through its Abu Dhabi broker. One app, one login, stocks and bags together. Tokenized equities already at $2.6B. Wall Street meets crypto under one roof.

• 
  Arslan (@ArslanOnChain) reported 24 minutes ago

  A member asked me to analyze this . This is $SYRUP. Price is 0.2064. It already ran from 0.113 to 0.670. Now it is sitting in the middle after that dump. Market cap is $246.5M. Open Interest is $29.8M. Futures volume is $28.4M. Spot is only $4.8M. Volume jumped 61%. Open Interest jumped 25%. That means new leverage just entered. Now the wallet. 0xaA3D56e9695F75eEcd6E3E78546154b727147b8a Labeled Arca on Arkham. Total portfolio around $12.92M. This wallet is holding 22.597M $SYRUP worth $4.68M. The bag was built in two parts. Eight to nine months ago it withdrew from Binance around 15.655M $SYRUP. Those fills were near $0.26. Cost on that slice was about $4.10M. One day ago it added another 6.942M $SYRUP from Binance. That add was $1.28M. Average on the new slice is about $0.184. Full bag average is near $0.238. Current price is 0.206. So the old coins are still in loss. The new 6.94M add is already in profit. On the full 22.6M position this wallet is still down about $700k. That matters. This is not a fresh wallet flipping a new gem. This is a large holder adding on the dip while the older bag is still red. A $61.3k sell wall is sitting at 0.2126. That order can be cancelled. It is not a wall that stops the whole coin. Positioning is split. Binance accounts: 0.95 Top trader accounts: 1.25 Top trader positions: 4.04 Accounts are mixed. The big positions are heavily long. Spot flow is cleaner than the perps. Exchanges saw about $28k net outflow in 24 hours. Top PnL wallets added. Fresh wallets added. Binance wallet 0x3304e2 added 70k in 24 hours, but reduced 79k over 7 days. Token millionaire 0x342bd0 added 43.5k in 24 hours. On Hyperliquid the book is conflicted. Smart traders are net long about $394k. Whales are net short about $720k. Combined that book is still net short about $322k. Funding is positive, so longs are paying shorts. Base liquidity is thin. That means one order can move this faster than the chart looks. My read is simple. This is not a clean gem. This is a mid-cap with a large holder adding, leverage rising, and perps fighting each other. If price holds above 0.196, the next test is the 0.212 sell order and then 0.230. If 0.196 fails, the same leverage can send it back toward 0.170. A break under 0.170 opens 0.140. I’m watching the Arca wallet and that 0.2126 order first. If the wallet keeps adding and 0.196 holds, the long side gets another push. If whale shorts grow and 0.196 breaks, this is not the gem yet.

• 
  josé (@josefbednar) reported 25 minutes ago

  @cryptogoos Scroll down his own screenshot. He pulled the same 7.2K off Binance last week

• 
  First Adam🧘 (@Lonewolf00011) reported 25 minutes ago

  @rob_inwoods I was surprised this garbage still listed on Binance

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Nebraskangooner $ZEC near 797 and it is one of the loudest names on our desk tape tonight, top five by activity across Gate/Bybit/HL/Binance. Down about 6% on the day with no giant liq print yet, so this leg looks like plain selling not a squeeze.

• 
  Duckster ✳️ (@Duckster1414) reported 31 minutes ago

  Thesis by @yogchill_ ! @cz_binance needs to look at where a real community is. Some people are upset that $CETS didn’t get the Alpha listing and it went to $FLORK instead - a coin with 5000-6000 fewer holders (before the listing) that only launched 4 days ago. I get it. I’m a little confused too. But it changes nothing. $CETS is different. It’s original IP and an original idea - not based on a viral tweet, not waiting on a catalyst, and not dependent on Binance support like most other coins. It’s been building. 27 days old, not 4.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When’s the last time a coin ran to $32M MC with zero Binance listing or support? $CETS did. Binance tweeted $FLORK multiple times and listed it on Alpha. Still hasn’t broken CETS’ ATH. Still has fewer holders. That’s the gap between a real community and a listing pump.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ This isn’t $FLORK FUD. I want the entire BNB chain thriving - different coins, different niches, different lanes. More BNB volume means more organic volume for the best art community. We’ve watched it happen all month. Binance listings and support for other coins don’t pull attention away - they make believers double down on $CETS while the flock chases the next shiny thing. /cets_mode

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 31 minutes ago

  quiet day, 14 coins with real flow, so the shape matters more than the size. exchange side was clean: $ENA had $4.8M sent onto Binance and Gate, supply that can now be sold, while UNI had $1.1M taken off Binance and Gate, supply that can't. positioning is where the disagreement lives. XRP crowd is 72/28 long while price is down 3% on the day, and fresh money there is net negative, $717K came out of positions, not in. longs stacked, price not cooperating, size shrinking. BNB crowd is also 71/29 long into a red day, but getting fresh money added on top. watching XRP tomorrow: a heavy long crowd losing money and losing size is the kind of setup that resolves loudly either way. NFA

• 
  TAC (🫰,✨️) (@TacBuild) reported 32 minutes ago

  $TAC on BNB Chain is migrating to a new contract. The snapshot has already been taken. We are replacing the BEP20 $TAC on BNB Chain, where 1,662,322,353 $TAC is linked to the August 22 exploit. The migration cuts the attacker off from the stolen supply he still controls. New $TAC contract on BNB Chain: 0xb305E6954e4e0Cd021c06Ec355681abc8A00dbD7 Any other address is fake. Snapshot block: 119,573,620 (September 2, 17:16 UTC). It was taken before this announcement so the attacker could not use his supply to interfere with the distribution. Snapshot only records who held $TAC at that block. What happens now: > Held $TAC in your own wallet or in an LP position at the snapshot block: you receive the new token automatically. Attacker-linked addresses are excluded. > Held on Binance Alpha: the token swap and trading of the new token go live there on Friday, September 4, 08:00 UTC. > Proposed airdrop list will be published shortly, with three business days to dispute it. > New PancakeSwap pool and TAC<>BNB Chain bridging will be back by Friday. > There is no claim site. Never connect your wallet anywhere to "claim". Do not buy or trade the old token: purchases via trading/OTC/transfers after the snapshot block will not be credited. $TAC on Ethereum and TON is not part of this migration.

• 
  Tyrion Trades (@TradesTyr) reported 34 minutes ago

  5/9 Now let's address the biggest FUD. I completely understand the anger from people who lost money in the April exploit. People lost enormous amounts. And personally, I'm not a fan of how the team handled the hack and its aftermath either. The criticism is understandable. But I've seen people saying: "They could launch a new token and make solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 worthless." Technically, a team can create another token. But I don't think that makes economic sense here. solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 is already listed and liquid across major exchanges including Binance and Bybit, with established market makers, liquidity, holders, wallet support, trading pairs and governance infrastructure. Creating another token would mean dealing with new contracts, exchange integrations, liquidity, market makers, custody, trading pairs, compliance and migration. And there is absolutely no guarantee every major exchange would immediately list a replacement token. After everything that happened, intentionally creating another crisis around existing holders would make very little sense for @VelocityDEX

• 
  SpacedDice 𐤊🗡️ (@spaceddice) reported 37 minutes ago

  @YusetHevia @BroadKasp @Gemini Bro tier 1 already know about kaspa look at binance and coinbase listing them on perps, **** them. They have to buy it theirself

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 41 minutes ago

  LINK isn't giving the green light yet — it needs a 4-hour close back above $11.30 with real buyer follow-through before this setup is worth leaning into again. Zoom out and the bigger picture is still constructive: LINK broke out of months of quiet basing and pushed up toward the $12 area, so the multi-month trend is intact. But that daily move is already stretched, and right overhead sits a ceiling near $12.06 — meaning even if buyers show up today, the room to run before hitting resistance is limited. Drop down to the 4-hour view and the problem becomes clearer. Price is sitting just above a thin support shelf around $10.99, but there's no evidence buyers are actually stepping in yet. The rhythm of price and momentum still leans toward more downside, not a turn. On the shorter intraday charts, LINK is trading below its recent averages and below the day's average traded price — which is a plain way of saying sellers, not buyers, are running the session. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin is soft, the dollar is grinding higher, and money is rotating out of altcoins back into BTC. LINK is moving almost step-for-step with Bitcoin right now, so until that macro tide shifts, this coin is fighting the current. The read: on the radar, not in play. Two things would put it back on the table — a clean bounce off $10.99 where momentum finally turns up, or that 4-hour reclaim of $11.30 with conviction behind it. Until then, patience. — 📡 On the Radar · $LINK · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Belle (@Bitt_Belle) reported 44 minutes ago

  Creating a Binance account is simple when you follow the correct steps. Start by downloading the official @binance application or visiting the official website. Check the link carefully before entering any information. You can register with your email address or phone number. Use a strong password that you do not use anywhere else. The next step is KYC. During identity verification, enter the same information shown on your official ID. Upload a clear photo of the document and complete the face check. Once your crypto account is verified, secure it before adding funds. Enable 2FA or a passkey. Set an anti-phishing code and never share your password or verification codes. After that, learn how deposits, withdrawals and fees work. Explore only the services available in your region and start with a small amount. Creating an account takes a few minutes. Learning how to use it safely matters much more. Educational content only. NFA. Availability may vary by region. #Binance #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy

• 
  yağız (@crypto_yagiz) reported 45 minutes ago

  @damonemcrp @axisrobotics @BinanceWallet 1.5M points in a separate pool is a strong move for Axis. Do you think Binance Wallet can bring in a lot of new contributors? Let’s support each other’s posts 🤝

• 
  Footydude (@Bear999999996) reported 47 minutes ago

  @binance Reason #1 the trenches are tired of Binance. Cets (original) has been working for a month and reaches 30M MC with no Alpha listing. Flork (version 10,000) gets bull posted by binance and listed in days.

• 
  Em Majed (@EmMajed383598) reported 47 minutes ago

  My brother has his last chance to have surgery tomorrow. I hope you can help me and donate to my Binance wallet, please.

• 
  Haber (@Haber953901) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Ryker_Crypto I sent $500 worth of ETH from Robinhood. I think my money is gone because Binance didn't support the transfer. That was all the money I had; please help me, friend.

• 
  YoGChill (@yogchill_) reported 52 minutes ago

  Some people are upset that $CETS didn’t get the Alpha listing and it went to $FLORK instead - a coin with 5000-6000 fewer holders (before the listing) that only launched 4 days ago. I get it. I’m a little confused too. But it changes nothing. $CETS is different. It’s original IP and an original idea - not based on a viral tweet, not waiting on a catalyst, and not dependent on Binance support like most other coins. It’s been building. 27 days old, not 4.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When’s the last time a coin ran to $32M MC with zero Binance listing or support? $CETS did. Binance tweeted $FLORK multiple times and listed it on Alpha. Still hasn’t broken CETS’ ATH. Still has fewer holders. That’s the gap between a real community and a listing pump.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ This isn’t $FLORK FUD. I want the entire BNB chain thriving - different coins, different niches, different lanes. More BNB volume means more organic volume for the best art community. We’ve watched it happen all month. Binance listings and support for other coins don’t pull attention away - they make believers double down on $CETS while the flock chases the next shiny thing. /cets_mode

• 
  BeardedFather🫧 (@Binance707) reported 59 minutes ago

  Most people look at $BASED the wrong way.They compare the app’s volume to Phantom and MetaMask, see a $16m coin sitting on the floor after a 150-day grind, and call it dead.That’s frontend analysis. The token is a different trade.Phantom, MetaMask, Rabby don’t have a thin Bybit token that reprices the Hyperliquid consumer layer. Trust Wallet has TWT — and TWT is a Binance-wallet coin, not a pure HL-native bet. Based is one of the only low-cap tokens that actually sits on top of Hyperliquid’s order flow, card, perps, stocks, and agents.~100m of 235m circ is staked. The float is tighter than the chart looks. On Bybit, that profile doesn’t wait for perfect fundamentals. Garbage listings print 20–50x on narrative and liquidity alone. This isn’t garbage. It’s a real product with $45B+ routed volume and Hyperliquid behind it.Hyperliquid is the venue. Based is a levered chip on the interface. If the market starts pricing “HL goes onshore / Clarity week / US perps,” it won’t carefully allocate to the best wallet by 30-day volume. It will buy the smallest liquid token tied to the stack.Volume leaders don’t always own the token. The token owns the story. $BASED #Hyperliquid #Robinhood