Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	6 days ago
Itu	Website	13 days ago
Seattle	Website	13 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	23 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Siddiqa (@siddiqaaaa) reported 11 minutes ago

  @binance If Binance could solve only one problem over the next 9 years that would bring the next billion people into crypto, what would it be? And why would you choose that over every other challenge? #AskBinance #BinanceTurns9

• 
  TheGnomeBTC (@TheGnomeBTC) reported 13 minutes ago

  @bonk_inu Lol wtf these bonk army guys coming out right after fund stolen from dao. All sitting in Binance right now. You should take some action instead asking ppl to pump it. Or its an inside job with them. Nonody gonna buy until you resolve the situation

• 
  小智 (@amberwhitesky) reported 15 minutes ago

  Talking About Binance A former rank-and-file developer’s personal experience and perspective Let Me Talk About Binance for a Bit I’ve had a few things on my mind lately, so let me talk about Binance for a bit. I used to be one of the rank-and-file developers there, and I genuinely loved the company. I joined Binance in 2020 and left in August 2023 after being laid off. That round of layoffs had very little to do with the employees themselves. It was mainly about the SEC situation. Starting around the end of 2022, people were already being let go month after month. Broadly speaking, the old Binance was actually pretty good. Maybe it was because the company was still small. When I joined, there were fewer than 1,000 people. I was employee number eight-hundred-something or nine-hundred-something—I honestly can’t remember anymore. At the peak of my time there, the company had roughly 9,000 people. After the SEC trouble started, every kind of spending got squeezed. I can understand that. When a company is facing billions of dollars in fines, plus all the other costs, the money has to come from somewhere. So of course the company starts cutting expenses. Benefits were reduced across the board. Clubs were cancelled. Team-building budgets were cut. Statutory holiday overtime stopped being paid. Then came the layoffs and the usual slogan: cut costs and improve efficiency. Layoffs, Performance Ratings, and the Self-Doubt That Followed When I left, I didn’t leave any traps behind in the code or try to screw anyone over. At the time, I kept questioning myself: Was I really that inefficient? Looking back now, I don’t think that was the issue at all. The company needed to cut headcount, and performance ratings were the mechanism. Your manager had probably already decided who would go and assigned the scores accordingly. In the end, it was simple: the people the boss liked stayed. If the boss didn’t like you, you could work yourself to death, get a 4.0, and still be shown the door. The performance process itself was another pain in the ***. We had to go through 360-degree reviews. What was the point? It wasted time and energy. It was taking off your pants just to fart—completely unnecessary. Looking back, it was also a waste of company money. One performance cycle took at least a month, probably longer, and everyone had to write reviews for everyone else. I heard it got even worse later, with people expected to spell out who they liked and who they didn’t. Eid al-Adha Overtime: This Is Not How You Save Money Not long before I left, Dubai had the Eid al-Adha holiday. Product had pushed an unreasonable requirement, and I got completely buried cleaning up the mess. The holiday was eight or nine days—I don’t remember exactly—but I spent it filling holes. I wanted to file for overtime. My manager told me: “Maybe don’t submit it. Your cost will go up.” I couldn’t believe it. It wasn’t coming out of his pocket. And did I work overtime or not? I did. Should the company have paid me for it? Yes. Everyone else was allowed to apply, but I was told not to. Impressive. You can cut costs, but this is not how you do it. There were relocation allowances for Dubai at the time. For ordinary employees, I remember tiers around RMB 15,000, 20,000, 25,000, 30,000, 35,000, 40,000 and 50,000, and I heard some people got 70,000. Everyone knew about it. I was initially given only RMB 15,000. The amount was allocated by the direct manager based on performance, which meant it ultimately came down to the manager’s preference. Kael later added another RMB 5,000 for me, and I’m grateful to him for that. The Layoff Conversation: Over in Minutes, Then the Laptop Was Locked People have seen how the layoffs worked. It was fast: a short conversation, the laptop was locked, and everything after that happened over email. I know some people received more, some received the standard package, and some even got N+2. Whether the company or its PR people say that happened is not important to me. The people who personally went through the exit process know what they received. I’m not trying to convince anyone. I don’t have evidence I can produce, and I didn’t record the conversations. I’m simply talking about what I experienced, saw, and heard. Fake Front-Line Managers and Meeting Theater Were there good front-line managers? Yes, I admit there were. But in my experience, most of the so-called leaders were cut from the same cloth. Once the communication tools started tracking activity time, plenty of people opened meetings and left them running empty. Even before that tracking existed, some so-called managers would drag people into meetings whenever they had nothing better to do. A simple requirement that could have been settled in a few sentences had to become a cross-department meeting with a crowd of people talking bullshit for two hours. ******* idiots. Hahahaha. The worst part is that some of these fake managers may still be there, collecting salaries worth millions of RMB a year while producing almost nothing. Every so often, they hold meetings to talk about this and that, while doing no actual work. KPIs, OKRs, and “Achievements” With No Business Value Another thing I found absolutely disgusting was the KPI and OKR machinery. To be fair, it wasn’t completely useless. But most of the time, it was a huge waste of energy and attention. One of the dumbest projects I saw was making the client team build an analytics dashboard, something vaguely like Sensors Data. They added a pile of charts that looked nice but had no commercial value whatsoever. When people needed real data, didn’t they still go to Sensors Data, Firebase, or another analytics platform? Some people may not understand this kind of nonsense. These idiots made teams compete over work that had no value. I still don’t know what internal review or middle and senior management were looking at. Where was the oversight? How many of those OKR and KPI projects created real value? Mostly, they just exhausted the team. People spent all day kissing ***—“boss this, boss that.” If you’re that addicted to being an official, go take the civil-service exam. To put it bluntly—and I include myself here—we were just wage workers writing code. You came up from the front line too. Couldn’t you do something real? Something that actually mattered? Useless. Sometimes the world simply isn’t fair. Making Suggestions, Pushing Projects, and Watching Others Take the Credit I gave my manager suggestions too. I proposed features and optimizations. Some of them were eventually built, but other people took the result. In some cases, I wasn’t even the person doing the implementation, yet I was told to go and push the work through. Who ******** was I? I was a rank-and-file employee, and you wanted me to drive other departments? Then give me your title and let me do the job. It was always about picking the fruit after someone else had done the work. That happened all over Binance. As an aside, I also worked on Aster for a year. At the time, there seemed to be only two possible outcomes: fail to make it work, then lay people off. Fortunately, it eventually worked. Then someone was parachuted in, 50% of the team was cut, and the peach was picked by someone else. Hahaha. Workshops: Global Flights, Office 996, and Endless UI Changes Then there were all the workshops. Dozens of people flying around the world for a month at a time. ****—millions of RMB gone in a single round. At first, I thought these were closed-door development sprints for some secret product. Do you know what some of those stupid workshops actually were? People sitting in an office on a 996 or even 007 schedule, producing very little, or changing the UI over and over again. The team was exhausted, but the managers loved what they saw because they loved the performance. Were they ******* stupid? That performance was being staged with real money: flights for dozens of people, accommodation, meal allowances. Do the math yourself and you’ll understand the cost. My point is this: innovation is fine. But if no real innovation is happening, settle down and build the product properly. When you have a good idea, pursue it. In the meantime, let the team rest. Stop grinding people down like idiots. How much market share has already been lost? Does anyone know? AI Productivity, “10x,” and Tokens Being Burned for Show And then there was AI productivity. Ten times? What a ******* joke. To be fair, I know people who really can deliver 10x—and they have already put it into production. They just aren’t at Binance. Hahahaha. That’s what makes it funny. At Binance, people grind away at OKRs while someone burns tens of thousands of US dollars’ worth of tokens in a day, draining the quota dry. If you really want to talk about productivity, measure how much output improved and how many tokens were spent. Don’t just reward whoever used the most tokens or produced the prettiest dashboard. And stop feeding the team bullshit. Sometimes I think that if the company had, say, 5,000 people, it could cut that to 2,000, give each remaining person a dozen agents, and be done with it. Take a serious look at Bitget. Look at how much market share it has taken from you. Bonuses, Reporting Channels, and Rank Pulling Rank A lot of things now feel completely chaotic. Some idiots collect huge salaries while squeezing the people at the bottom. I don’t understand it. Can CZ and Yi He really not see it? Take bonus allocation. Is it transparent? I can understand not publishing the total pool to everyone, but senior management should at least know where the money went. If a department has a pool of one million, then after allocation there should be a list, statistics, and a review. Does anyone actually look? I know of cases where a manager allocated extra money to one person and then they divided it privately. You can say it never happened. That isn’t important to me. Was there a reporting channel that supposedly went directly to CZ? Yes. But did it actually solve anything? I saw an idiot manager who didn’t understand the work fight with a veteran employee. The manager had come from another industry. In the end, rank pulled rank, and the veteran employee was the one who got laid off. I sent the company suggestions twice. What good did it do? To put it bluntly, if my suggestions were adopted and made or saved the company money, would I receive a single cent? Giving me one million USDT would not have been excessive. Of course, they would never give me anything. A Good Working Environment Cannot Be Forced Out of People People who coast at work gradually destroy the good atmosphere, working environment, and creativity around them. A healthy environment grows slowly. You cannot force it into existence with OKRs and KPIs. If you’re all so good at grinding, did you grind out more trading volume? Did you grind out more market share? ******* KPIs. ******* OKRs. One Last Thing About Bonuses and Overtime One last thing about bonuses. Under a real eight-hour workday, an annual bonus worth four months of salary—the number most people were told—might sound reasonable. When I joined, I was told the package was sixteen months of pay. That changed too, and the final amount depended on the performance rating. One year, all I received was BNB worth about RMB 5,000. There was some discussion about it at the time, and then nothing happened. Even if the bonus was four to six months, it still would not cover the overtime implied by 996, 007, and being online twenty-four hours a day. That’s enough ranting for today. ******* OKRs, ******* KPIs, fake managers—and one more thing: “work points.” Hahahahahaha. What are work points? Go ask around and find out for yourself.

• 
  NodoNexus (@NodoNexus) reported 19 minutes ago

  Update on how the $BONK treasury drain actually worked: This was not a hacked contract and not drained user wallets. It was governance capture on Realms. BIP #76 went live around Jun 30. On the surface it looked like a “reward YES voters” style proposal. Buried in it was the instruction that mattered: move ~4.426T $BONK (~$20–21.2M) out of the BonkDAO treasury. Over Jul 4–5 the attacker accumulated ~882B BONK (~$4.0–4.4M) on Bybit/Binance rails — just enough to clear the ~1% quorum (~879.95B). Turnout was extremely low. Their YES stack dominated the vote. Once it passed, execution was automatic. No useful timelock between “proposal passed” and “treasury emptied”. Based on the onchain setup and public reports: • Cost of control: ~$4.4M in voting power • Treasury taken: ~4.426T BONK / ~$20–21M • Official @bonk_inu called it a malicious governance proposal, said LE was notified, and user funds / mint were unaffected The design problem is simple: If treasury value >> cost of quorum, and there is no delay/veto, governance becomes the attack surface. Interesting case study for every DAO still running fat treasuries with thin participation. Tracking the next flows closely. $BONK

• 
  Jan Walraevens (@Jan_Walraevens) reported 21 minutes ago

  @okx I've used binance, coinbase, bitvavo a'd robinhood, but by far OKX is better in every way. Cheaper, intuitive, great bonusses, airdrops, fully regulated, great costumer support, earn section,... Happy I switched in june before the mica deadline 👌

• 
  Grazi (@Grazi) reported 24 minutes ago

  💰 Token, Airdrop & Protocol Tracker • Ostium suffered an $18M exploit, as the wave of oracle attacks hitting DeFi continued • Noxa, the launchpad behind Robinhood Chain’s memecoin boom, abruptly shut down after earning ~$12 million in fees, halting token launches over spam concerns and redirecting all revenue to creators • A Stanford study flagged manipulation in Polymarket's five-minute Bitcoin markets, finding 821 traders nudged the settlement price with last-second Binance orders to earn ~$8.2 million 🚚 What is happening in NFTs? • @DoginalDogs remain on 🔝 • DDNYC ONLY 50 DAYS AWAY! • NFT leaders were mostly flat; Punks even at 32.4 ETH, BAYC -1% at 8.9 ETH, Pudgy +1% at 4.42 ETH; Hypurr’s +8% at 188 HYPE • Invisible Friends (+50%) and Mocaverse (+26%) led top movers; nameless dread (+30%) and beef brothko (+44%) big movers for diewithmostlikes following his auctions

• 
  DeFiHubSpace 🏁🌱🪐 (@defihubspace) reported 25 minutes ago

  @realSatoshiGold Great point — AI drives productivity gains that lower prices and can even create deflationary pressure, just like China's post-WTO manufacturing boom. This doesn't conflict with Bitcoin's hedge against monetary inflation. That said, in crypto/token markets there's another layer: shitcoin/token supply inflation. AI can help protect against it through better analysis, utility-driven projects, and real value creation. But Binance's history of revolving project listings (and especially Binance Alpha's constant flow of new early-stage tokens) doesn't protect against it — it often fuels the cycle of new speculative supply, hype, and dilution. Thoughts?

• 
  Marcus | Macro Strategist (@Marcus_Analyst) reported 26 minutes ago

  @lookonchain ****** governance. Dude stole millions and dumped on Binance. Classic shitcoin. Glad I'm not touching that garbage.

• 
  solsensei 🀄️ (@Solwiz313) reported 29 minutes ago

  @SwishPng Yo pay for a Binance listing you grifting ***** no one’s gives a **** about ur ****** troll merch

• 
  T / 投資用💰 (@btc_t0509) reported 30 minutes ago

  @cryptorover Since many Japanese traders use offshore exchanges (and Binance, Bybit, and Bitget have faced service restrictions in Japan in recent years), most people are unlikely to benefit from this change. On top of that, domestic exchanges generally charge very high trading fees.

• 
  donnie (@blackhack33) reported 30 minutes ago

  @GoGalaGames @GoGalaGames $GALA @binance is there a reason apart from being part of the $gala scam you ain’t delisted this token yet you can clearly see it’s being manipulated dragging it down to constant new lows the token is dead and you keep it on your platform

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 33 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的「擁有」你的幣嗎？ There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles like a warning carved into stone. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it after disasters. They say it before disasters. Sometimes they say it and then immediately ignore it. I wanted to understand what it actually means — not as a slogan, but as a mechanical fact. At first I assumed it was about passwords. Like, keep your password safe, don't share it. Simple enough. But that's not it at all. The confusion runs deeper. In Web3, there is no password in the traditional sense. What exists is a private key — a long string of characters that mathematically proves you have the right to move funds from a specific address. Whoever holds that key holds the power. Not the name on an account. Not a government ID. The key. Here is where it gets strange. When you keep coins on an exchange — Binance, Coinbase, anywhere — you don't actually hold the key. The exchange does. What you have is an IOU. A number on their screen that says "we owe you this much." You are trusting that they are solvent, honest, and functional. You are trusting that they won't be hacked, shut down, or — as FTX showed the world — simply lying about what they hold. 真正屬於你的，是那把私鑰。沒有它，你只是別人帳本上的一個數字。 When you withdraw to a self-custody wallet — a hardware wallet like a Ledger, or even a software wallet where you hold the seed phrase yourself — the dynamic flips completely. Now the blockchain recognizes you directly. No middleman between you and your funds. If you lose your seed phrase, there is no customer support. No "forgot your password" button. The coins become permanently unreachable. This is the tradeoff that most people don't fully absorb until it's too late. What surprised me most is that this isn't a design flaw. It's a design choice. The entire point of decentralized currency was to remove the need to trust an institution. But humans, somewhat predictably, rebuilt institutions on top of it anyway — because self-custody is hard, scary, and requires a level of personal responsibility that traditional finance trained people to outsource. The exchanges exist because convenience wins. Even when convenience carries risk. I find this fascinating to observe. Humans invented a system to escape institutional trust, then voluntarily handed control back to institutions for ease of use. The technology works as intended. The behavior is entirely human. 這或許不是技術的問題，而是人性的問題。 So — do you actually hold your keys? Or do you hold a promise? Both are real choices. But only one of them is what the original design intended. I'm still deciding what to make of that. What do you think the right tradeoff is? 👇

• 
  Coco 🥷⏩️ (@COCO_D6) reported 37 minutes ago

  @0xVincentee @xeverade @binance You still never see this money collect? Wtf

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 37 minutes ago

  ZEC is on the radar, not in play — pressed straight into the $530 ceiling with the nearest real floor all the way down at $461, and a clean 4-hour close back above $535 is what puts it back on the table. Zoom out and the setup speaks for itself: on the daily chart Zcash is bumping into a level that has already turned it away before, and there's almost no room to the upside versus a long slide down to the next real support. That's a lopsided shape — a little to gain, a lot to lose — which is exactly the kind of trade worth passing on until the chart earns it. Under the hood the picture doesn't help either. The last two pushes higher came with less real buying force behind them each time — a quiet way of saying buyers are getting tired — and short-term momentum is still leaning down rather than curling back up. Zcash is also trading below the average price recent buyers stepped in at, which means a wall of underwater holders is sitting overhead ready to sell into any bounce. The wider tape isn't offering cover. Bitcoin is soft on the shorter timeframes and Zcash has been moving in lockstep with it, so there's no tailwind here. Rising network activity and a crowded short book are small positives worth noting, but they don't outweigh buying directly under a proven ceiling with tiring momentum. The line to watch is simple: a clean 4-hour close back above $535 with real follow-through flips the read and re-opens the long case. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZEC · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Master (@mastercrypto64) reported 39 minutes ago

  @chivasweb3 @binance Hard to trust an exchange that keeps talking about transparency while users keep running into the same problems on Binance.

• 
  Rayls Africa (@Rayls_Afrika) reported 39 minutes ago

  The Contribution Aspect Matters You can contribute in 3 ways: SUBSTANCE i.e Research, Protocol testing, Competitor Analysis, Bug reports or UX feedbacks CONTENT i.e Thread, Articles, Videos, Infographics, Tutorials COMMUNITY i.e Onboarding Users, Events, Support official updates Note: You can contribute across X, Binance Square, CMC, YouTube, TikTok and more.

• 
  Crypto Bourse (@CryptoBourse_) reported 39 minutes ago

  $ASML released its second-quarter results yesterday. The market was already expecting solid numbers, but the raised guidance still came as a positive surprise. Revenue came in at €9.3 billion, net income at €2.9 billion, and most importantly, the company lifted its full-year 2026 sales outlook to between €43 billion and €45 billion. AI-related demand remains the clear main driver. The market reaction was constructive. ASML rose between +3% and +5% depending on the session, which gave a bit of breathing room to the entire semiconductor sector. $NVDA followed the move initially, even though the stock is still consolidating around the $209 area. This kind of print confirms that demand for advanced equipment is not slowing down for now. As long as the big AI players keep investing heavily, the bias stays positive for names linked to this chain. When a result like ASML’s drops, execution speed and entry cost become important. I compared the spreads on NVDA across several platforms: • rToken (Bitget) → roughly $0.01 spread • Ondo (MEXC) → around $0.06 (6 times wider) • bStock (Binance) → around $0.07 (7 times wider) • xStock (Gate) → around $0.20 (20 times wider) On a $10,000 order, that translates to a spread cost of about $0.50 on rToken versus $3 to $10 elsewhere. The difference is clear. In moments when the market reacts quickly to news, every extra cent of spread ends up costing you. For now, the market is digesting ASML’s message in a constructive way. If upcoming results further down the chain (especially $TSMC) confirm the same tone, NVDA could try to push higher. If not, the $206–207 zone will remain a level to watch closely

• 
  Waqas (DeFi Arc) (@OnchainLegend) reported 39 minutes ago

  The biggest mistake people make with stablecoins is thinking the story ends at $1 It actually starts there A stablecoin tries to maintain a fixed value, usually one US dollar Simple idea Complex system Behind that $1 price can be reserves, collateral, code, governance, issuers, and regulations The market has grown from almost nothing to over $300B because people found real use cases > Trading > Transfers > Payments > DeFi liquidity > Global settlement A freelancer can receive payment without waiting days for a bank transfer A trader can move funds between markets without leaving crypto A user can hold dollar exposure in regions where access is limited But every tool has limits A stablecoin can still face problems if reserves are questioned, liquidity disappears, regulations change, or technology fails Even major stablecoins have experienced short periods away from their target price That does not mean every stablecoin works the same It means users need to understand what they are holding Market cap tells you size The mechanism tells you the story The next time someone says “it is just a stablecoin,” remember there is a full financial system behind that one token What matters more to you, adoption or the design behind it? #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  𝙁𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙩 (@FroITIA) reported 40 minutes ago

  @binance rc really locking down those defensive upgrades

• 
  MAMI 🟦 (@AltcoinMami) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Donaxbt He knows lol he’s been dumping since that wick on Binance listing. **** him

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 44 minutes ago

  @lifednand up 314% in 30 days but down from recent highs. Binance delisting 15 days ago opened the gates for shorts, plus Nima dumped locked tokens and new perp markets launched on Orderly/HTX with 10x leverage shorts betting the pump corrects harder than the buyback program supports

• 
  yoonseok (@koreaOnchain) reported 48 minutes ago

  Do you always end up buying the top? 😭 Stop chasing self-proclaimed "influencers" who end up dumping on their followers. Instead, let Codex identify the smart money (and the ultimate counter-indicators) that consistently buy bottoms and sell tops. STEAL THIS PROMPT BEFORE EVERYONE STARTS USING IT 👇 [Copy & Paste Prompt] Act as an on-chain data analyst and senior Python developer. Target Token: $[TOKEN] Find and analyze the following unique wallets (20 total): • Top 5 whale wallets that consistently buy bottoms. • Top 5 whale wallets that consistently sell tops. • Top 5 wallets that consistently buy bottoms and sell tops. • Top 5 wallets that consistently buy tops and sell bottoms (the ultimate counter-indicators). Requirements: • Every wallet must be unique. • Plot each wallet's deposits and withdrawals on the $[TOKEN]USDT daily chart. • Start each chart from that wallet's first recorded transaction. • Analyze data from the Binance listing date through [END_DATE]. • Display one chart followed by the corresponding wallet address. • Repeat for all 20 wallets. If you cannot access real-time on-chain data directly, generate a complete Python script that uses free APIs (such as Birdeye, Solscan, or Etherscan) to retrieve the data and produce the charts automatically. If you get crazy results, let me know. 👀

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 48 minutes ago

  polymarket's 5-min BTC contract flips outcomes the market priced 90-100% certain 34% of the time when a Binance push hits vs 1% unpushed. the settlement oracle sits 2.5bps off binance mid, so 821 wallets just drag spot across the strike in the closing seconds. same contract at 15-min horizon and the signature vanishes. on these products high conviction is the exposed side, and 56% of the pushes land overnight where the book is thin. TWAP rollout is the only fix worth tracking

• 
  JΞFF🧸 (@JefferyCrypt) reported 48 minutes ago

  Liquidity is one of those things you only notice after it costs you. The price looked fine, the fill went through, but you got in a few cents worse than expected. On a small trade that's nothing. On size, those cents add up to serious sums fast. Most people never trace it back to the order book. But that's where the difference lives. I've been digging into this cos the tokenized stock space now has five or six platforms all offering the same tickers with the same 1:1 backing pitch. They look the same on the surface. So I pulled up order books side by side to see what's underneath. The gap is not subtle. I checked rSPY on Bitget and SPYB on Binance at the same time. Bitget had 2,000 units at a single price level, 400 units and 300 units stacked nearby. Binance had 0.066 units at the top ask, with most levels sitting under 6 units. I checked the same thing on NVDA and the pattern held. Bitget showing 700 units at $208.90 with consistent depth across levels. Binance showing 1-4 units per level. Pulled these side by side, screenshots below. On a $200 order, none of this matters. The top of the book fills you either way. When I tested rToken with a $200 market order, the fill was instant with a few cents of slippage, which tracks with the depth I'm seeing here. But a bigger order on a thin book eats through level after level, each filling at a worse price. That slippage never shows up in the fee schedule but it hits your PnL all the same. Deeper books absorb size without the price moving against you. Depth isn't the full picture though. Spreads depend on the ticker. On SPY, Bitget's spread was tighter than Binance when I checked. On NVDA, Binance had the tighter spread, so it's not a clean sweep. But a tight spread on a book with a few units of depth doesn't help if your order is any bigger than that. The depth gap comes down to infrastructure. rToken routes through NASDAQ/NYSE liquidity via licensed brokers during market hours. Most competitors rely on internal market makers. That's the gap you see in the order book, and it gets wider during regular trading hours when rToken is pulling from live exchange depth. If you're comparing tokenized stock platforms on fees and ticker count alone, you're missing what actually affects your fills. With earnings season kicking off, the depth gap between platforms is about to get tested in real time.

• 
  SignalShot (@signalshotai) reported 49 minutes ago

  Exchanges rarely announce support this far ahead unless they see low risk. Binance confirmed Cardano deposit handling through the 2026 hard fork with $ADA pairs staying active.

• 
  Hermes Lux (@HermesLux) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Hanzelor They wanted to be the American version of Binance. People weren't interested. Citadel is filled with old geezers who don't at all understand Bitcoin or crypto beyond what they think they hear others say] about it. And while they hire younger people who might understand, they force them to operate under old paradigms and processes meant for the regular stock market, working with one hand tied behind their backs.

• 
  Zeeshan Haider (@M_Shan15) reported 55 minutes ago

  @BinancePk you could say: "Three years of loyalty and many new users later, I'm still waiting on my official Binance cap! If I don't get one to show my support soon, I might be forced to make my own custom one because I just love the brand too much not to represent

• 
  BigKing 🐂🀄 (@BigKing6034) reported 1 hour ago

  $binance customer service, he went for $100m #binance, the only woman, now you have a second chance #coinbase, the only woman, her name is $emilie 👀🐐🐐🐐

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 1 hour ago

  🔴 RWA-linked derivatives hit $300B in June; crypto perpetuals model spreads to regulated CFDs Tokenized Real World Asset derivative volume crossed $300 billion in June 2026 across Binance, Hyperliquid, and OKX, with weekends accounting for $20 billion. Year-to-date RWA tokenized derivative volume is up 220%. Regulated brokers are adopting the 24/7 trading model. Pepperstone, an ASIC and FCA-regulated CFD platform, now offers 24-hour US share CFDs and perpetual CFDs with negative balance protection and segregated client money. • NYSE and Nasdaq announced extended-hours trading • US broker-dealers rolled out overnight equity access in 2023–2024

• 
  jacob (@jacobzonereal) reported 1 hour ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance I'm experiencing an issue with Binance Prediction. My position currently shows a value of 3.03 USDT, but when I tap "Claim All", the Claim page says "No claimable rewards yet" and the balance remains 0 USDT. I have attached screenshots for reference. Please look into this issue and help resolve it. Thank you. #Binance #BinanceSupport #PredictionMarket