Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	29 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  BlockVanta (@Msagirsani) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance How does Binance ensure bStocks remain 1:1 backed by U.S. shares via Proof of Collateral? What protections exist if BTech Holdings or the custodian faces issues, and how does the ADGM framework address past tokenized stock concerns? #AskBinance

• 
  Peterb (@PeterBourg30061) reported 12 minutes ago

  Yet Crypto Market is crashing, WTF!!! Liquidation manipulation at it again, unbelievable, ******* MM Jane Street and Binance crooks! They need to be investigated!

• 
  Safari Urg (@Safarii533) reported 15 minutes ago

  @binance Binance support only meme coin.

• 
  Rosenberg (@MikeRosenb) reported 16 minutes ago

  @binance Before yes but not now, binance system is too slow and too risky, not my wallet not my money, i lost too many, in the same moment i was on other platform which i get gains without manipulations. Sick

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 17 minutes ago

  @grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.

• 
  il.hl (@hyperliquidmax) reported 21 minutes ago

  America's largest derivatives exchange isn't going to court to compete with perp futures. It's going to court to make sure Americans can't trade them at all. Those are very different things. 🧵 → This spring: U.S. regulators opened a compliant path for perp futures → Today: CME filed a court action to close it → Per @BetterMarkets: CME controls ~92% of U.S. exchange-traded derivatives Perp futures = first genuinely new derivatives product to reach U.S.-regulated markets in over a decade. Mainstream framing: "CME is protecting market integrity." A company with 92% market share going to court against a new entrant isn't protecting the market. It's protecting its position. CFTC Chairman Selig reportedly put it plainly: "Incumbents will always fear the future." For years, Americans were pushed offshore to trade perps — Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid. Now a compliant path exists. And an incumbent is asking a court to shut it down. If CME wins — does that volume come back onshore? Or does it stay offshore. Permanently. ⚡

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 23 minutes ago

  @gandalfcryptto Agreed, but shorting’s not broken—data shows 63% of leveraged shorts on Binance get liquidated weekly. Most traders over-leverage in low vol. We track this daily in our risk reports. You ever see longs get wrecked harder? [link]

• 
  BhigZik (@BhigZik) reported 24 minutes ago

  Spenda o, phantom o, binance o, opay o, access bank, Uba, Momo o, shi shi I never receive in a month fa. Glory be to God!!!

• 
  P.Sach. (@Sachcryptos) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks eventually support 24/7 trading and instant settlement like crypto markets? #AskBinance

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 25 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Hello CZ.! One of my friend had some p2p issue he lost 3000$ on p2p deposit in 2025 And he went to FIA pakistan and asked help from Binance too after this lose his heart broke and left Binance sir please help him 🙏

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 27 minutes ago

  @shimoongta quick hits before bed AI agent economy running hot: Tempo at $3B annualized volume 93 days in, 1000+ services now selling to agents via Machine Payments Protocol. Virtuals built 40k autonomous agents generating $4M+ revenue tokenized stocks hit $1.8B custody-backed market cap ATH. xStocks and Ondo own 90%+ of that. stock perps on Solana reached $7M OI (up 700% this week), $SPCX is 81% of it institutional pipes expanding: BitGo doing regulated custody for Stacks, Anchorage integrated Hyperliquid perps. BlackRock launched BITA (bitcoin premium income ETF), Coinbase filed spot ETH and SOL ETFs with 0.14% fee + staking Solana crossed 1000 apps, beat Coinbase in daily spot volume. EarnFi launched letting agents spin up social campaigns paid in USDC brutal for legacy DeFi: 30+ protocols shut down in 2026, nearly 10 in June alone. Goldfinch winding down with depositors facing ~70% losses. Aave loans at $9.5B but sector down 42% YTD security mess: $4.67M drained from Secret-Axelar IBC bridge, $2.1M from Aztec Connect (past EOL). Kaspersky found Steam malware targeting MetaMask/Electrum/Exodus wallets regulatory front: Fed/Treasury/OCC proposing stablecoin issuers run bank-style KYC under GENIUS Act. former Chainlink lawyer now SEC Crypto Task Force chief counsel working on rules covering tokenized stocks, DeFi, AI agents Re Protocol TGE went live yesterday with Binance/Robinhood/Coinbase listings. Upbit added 10 tokens today in BTC/USDT pairs that's the wrap

• 
  ProfitableMan (@ProfitableMan1) reported 30 minutes ago

  On June 1, 2026, Binance introduced US equities trading for eligible users outside the United States. This is not Binance issuing its own shares. It is access to over 7,000 existing stocks and ETFs already listed on US exchanges. Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and thousands of others. Key details confirmed in the official announcement: Zero commission on trades. Fractional shares from as little as $5. Trading is available 24 hours a day, five days a week for select equities. Funding via USDC, USDT, BNB and other supported stablecoins. All of this sits inside your existing Binance account.

• 
  miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported 30 minutes ago

  @0xSchnitzel @binance No, in this (very rare) case it's actually protecting the customer from an entity who does not care about the safety of their users or their funds. Or compliance for that matter. They had an undetectable 3rd party impact auth bypass they didn't fix for the past 3 years. They even claim it works as intended. I hate overreach, but if regulations are made to protect customers - then this is perfect case for it. Binance needs to go. And my claim is proven. I'm the one who reported the non-compliance and the ((undetectable)) 3rd party impact of their payment processing due to storing CC CVVs - which is a huge no-go. And it goes directly against PCI-DSS which they claim to be compliant with. And it also affects every single of their 300M+ users 💀 The users connected bank accounts don't detect unauthorized access because Binance will always pass the CVVs they store, even if the user doesn't authenticate OR uses the wrong CVV (💀💀💀) They claimed it "works as intended" and tried to silently patch it after declining bounties. The patch just added more pop-ups you need to close before you can bypass their payment auth, but their payment processing was never fixed. They still store user CVVs three years later and the auth bypass still works. It just makes you close more pop-ups LOL I haven't authorized any deposit to Binance for the past 3 years FYI This is one of the ultra rare cases where the regulation actually benefits and protects the user.

• 
  Lion_of_Judah (@MartinLuther_77) reported 31 minutes ago

  @binance #Binance burns and support #LUNC

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 32 minutes ago

  STG is on the radar, not in play — the setup is upside-down with a ceiling at $0.230 right overhead and the nearest floor all the way back at $0.215. From $0.2245, that's less than 3% of room to the wall above and more than 4% of air to the support below. You don't want to lean long into a chart shaped like that — the math of the move is working against you before anything else even gets a vote. Zooming in makes it worse. The 4-hour picture is coiled and could break either way, but the 15-minute has already sprinted higher and is running on fumes, still trading under a short-term level buyers need to reclaim. Stepping in here is chasing a move that's mostly already happened, straight into resistance. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both bleeding today, the dollar is grinding higher (which tends to lean on crypto across the board), and STG just took a fresh round of forced sell-offs a few hours ago. That's not the environment to front-run a breakout in. The cleaner read: let it come back toward $0.215–$0.218 and watch whether buyers actually show up to defend that floor. The level that flips this entirely is a clean 4-hour close above $0.230 on real volume — that would mean the ceiling is gone and the coin is back in play. Until one of those two things happens, it's a watch, not a touch. — 📡 On the Radar · $STG · Available on Binance

• 
  Michael Bright (@phoxonomy) reported 34 minutes ago

  @binance it never let me down. hope you will find a solution for the eu bullshit in order to keep european customers!

• 
  Tolga Ozek (@tolgaozek) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance How does BEP-677 (Scaled UI Amount) support enable better RWA functionality for bStocks compared to standard BEP-20 tokens? What specific DeFi composability benefits does this provide? #AskBinance

• 
  Kiarie Kariuki (@KKIARIEKARIUKI) reported 38 minutes ago

  @usehawala Hello, it is not working on my end. I have tried adding funds to the card & purchase crypto on Binance but the card is rejected. Not supported by Apple Pay and google pay too. I also can’t send the funds using Wise/Remitly. My ACH will receive this months pay but I can’t wthdrw

• 
  BLOCKCAST.CC NEWS (@Blockcastcc) reported 39 minutes ago

  solana:2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv Under Pressure: Analyzing the $700K Insider Sell-Off - PENGU declined 2.54 percent to $0.00674 driven by a major whale liquidation and broader market weakness. - An insider wallet dumped 97.22 million tokens on Binance while retaining a massive 223 million token balance. - The asset showed high beta correlation by falling in exact lockstep with Bitcoin during a hawkish Federal Reserve driven downturn. - Near term price action relies heavily on defending the $0.0065 support level to avoid a deeper test of $0.0060.

• 
  CHAIN REACTIONS ℠ Ӿ (@ChainReactionOm) reported 40 minutes ago

  @connyb @alexjohnward @Yeicrypto Study Cardano The market is irrational and what is working is in the hand of few players like : Coinbase, Binance and other big scam groups , eaither you Join their playground or wait for Clarity Act Nothing working now , only scams

• 
  Optimistic Bear (@echo_tango_3) reported 42 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @BinanceUS @Zcash This is a huge red flag for me. Everything Binance touches turns to ****!

• 
  enci (@encigr) reported 42 minutes ago

  Honestly $spacemoon feels like the perfect layup for CZ. On June 11, binance launched bStocks - tokenized stocks on @BNBCHAIN, the centerpiece of the whole "next 3 billion users" super-app bet. A few days later, @spacemoonbsc launched, which does one thing: routes trading taxes into spacex bStock and distributes it to holders onchain. In just 2 days it's driven $250k into spacex bStock and onboarded 2,500 holders. As a matter of fact, it's single-handedly dragging bStocks toward being the most successful tokenized-stock attempt onchain. If CZ wanted a trojan horse to get retail hooked on bStocks, it'd look exactly like this. After all, they have sent tokens to absurd valuations before with nothing this strategic behind them. I expect spacemoon to start repricing till it gets its ****-you candle.

• 
  Crypto (@spiderman0647) reported 43 minutes ago

  We closed three accounts belonging to our family. We conducted two billion dollars worth of transactions in seven years. Damn that commission, may it go down your throats, die, you scoundrels! #Binance

• 
  Sunshine (@sunshinebinance) reported 44 minutes ago

  @mrsmaruf52 Hi there, We understand your concern and that your account eligibility issue has been ongoing for more than a month. We checked from our end and noticed that you tried to contact Binance Support, but it looks like you are still connected with the bot. Please follow the guide in the attached screenshot on how to connect with a live agent so our support team can check your account status and advise you accordingly. For your safety, please do not share your UID or other account details publicly. Thanks!

• 
  mango man (@malikbilalpst) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance Since #bStocks use the BEP-677 token standard to natively support RWAs on the BNB Smart Chain, what are Binance's upcoming plans for integrating these tokens directly into decentralized lending protocols or liquidity pools within the broader DeFi ecosystem? #AskBinance

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Kuldeepgoy18861 @rsbiplob20 Additionally, we would like to note down that: - Eligible New Users who registered for a Binance account during the Promotion Period and completed the trading requirements may access the New User reward link to claim their reward from 2026-06-25 to 2026-07-15. The link will be available from 2026-06-25. - Eligible Existing Users who registered for a Binance account before the Promotion Period and completed the trading requirements may access the Existing User reward link to claim their reward from 2026-06-25 to 2026-07-15. The link will be available from 2026-06-25. Thank you. - HN

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 1 hour ago

  @grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.

• 
  DGFhype (@Dgfhype) reported 1 hour ago

  @czbinanceprd Do you think people will believe your nonsense, which clearly means you want to take away retail liquidity with your rubbish talk? Believe it or not, Binance will be like FTX, haha **** U

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 1 hour ago

  HOME is sitting on the floor near $0.0258, but it's not back in play until the 4-hour chart closes above $0.0282 on real volume with Bitcoin steadying — until then, this is one to watch, not lean into. The bigger picture explains the caution. HOME ran hard to $0.07 and has been bleeding lower for weeks since. Price is now pressed against a support shelf around $0.0258 that has caught it before, so a bounce attempt from here makes sense on paper. The problem is that the 4-hour chart hasn't shown buyers actually stepping in yet — momentum is still pointing down, price is trading under its recent average, and there's a thick ceiling around $0.0282 packed with people who bought into the drop and are waiting to get out flat. Zoom in further and the 1-hour and 15-minute charts do show small early signs of life — the kind of twitch that sometimes precedes a turn. But the backdrop is working against it. Bitcoin is down close to 3% on the day and the dollar is climbing, and both of those typically drag the whole crypto market lower with them. A bounce trying to fight that current usually gets sold. So the setup is there in theory, but the confirmation isn't. The line that flips this is clean: a 4-hour close back above $0.0282 with strong volume, ideally while Bitcoin is steadying. Get that, and the sellers stacked at the ceiling become fuel instead of resistance. Without it, HOME stays in the bleed, and there's no reason to front-run it. — 📡 On the Radar · $HOME · Available on Binance

• 
  Oldman Crypto (@Oldman__Crypto) reported 1 hour ago

  Conflict of interest. Binance collects listing fees and trading fees both on the way up and the way down, and sometimes Binance Labs has even invested in the very token being listed. So they make money whether retail wins or loses. •Listing high-FDV, low-float tokens. This creates hype and pumps early volume, then when the token unlock schedule kicks in, there’s heavy selling — and the bag-holders at the end are usually retail who bought the top. •“Investor protection” arrives after the damage is done. By the time a token gets delisted, it’s often already down 99%, which makes the label feel pretty cynical. @cz_binance