Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	1 month ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	3 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TAC (🫰,✨️) (@TacBuild) reported 4 minutes ago

  $TAC on BNB Chain is migrating to a new contract. The snapshot has already been taken. We are replacing the BEP20 $TAC on BNB Chain, where 1,662,322,353 $TAC is linked to the August 22 exploit. The migration cuts the attacker off from the stolen supply he still controls. New $TAC contract on BNB Chain: 0xb305E6954e4e0Cd021c06Ec355681abc8A00dbD7 Any other address is fake. Snapshot block: 119,573,620 (September 2, 17:16 UTC). It was taken before this announcement so the attacker could not use his supply to interfere with the distribution. Snapshot only records who held $TAC at that block. What happens now: > Held $TAC in your own wallet or in an LP position at the snapshot block: you receive the new token automatically. Attacker-linked addresses are excluded. > Held on Binance Alpha: the token swap and trading of the new token go live there on Friday, September 4, 08:00 UTC. > Proposed airdrop list will be published shortly, with three business days to dispute it. > New PancakeSwap pool and TAC<>BNB Chain bridging will be back by Friday. > There is no claim site. Never connect your wallet anywhere to "claim". Do not buy or trade the old token: purchases via trading/OTC/transfers after the snapshot block will not be credited. $TAC on Ethereum and TON is not part of this migration.

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 13 minutes ago

  @honey_xbt $SOL is $99.25, down 2.7% over the last 24h on Gate/Bybit/HL/Binance. Longs are the ones getting hit desk wide: $141.55M long liqs vs $40.57M short in that same 24h. Bulls have to show up soon.

• 
  Jolt (@Joltxe) reported 16 minutes ago

  @EpixPlayyz @fomo @Flork_memes it’s literally the unofficial binance mascot. they’ve been posting flork. it just hit binance alpha as well. why would it go down? only up to 100m from here

• 
  Kepler (@KeplerOnchain) reported 16 minutes ago

  robinhood is clearly the trend right now. it has the most eyes, most memes, and most new "tech" (=pairing with stocks). but i still believe it's a trend, as long as we are talking about the same people who hop from one chain to another due to profit opportunities. i don't see any new people entering the game and choosing to base themselves on robinhood. imo we will have robinhood > solana rotation back and a minority will push bnb again (probably due to some major escalation from binance trying to push the narrative). it will go back to solana + bnb + base on top. robinhood won't die, it'll stay in the top 5 for a long time, probably fighting base for the 3rd spot for a while. i think will base win, as they are more crypto focused and led, while robinhood just threw "we are entering the space" but not actually working in it. there are just so many narratives and projects built on solana and bnb for years now across various audiences. look at blast, abstract, monad... robinhood is a different case bringing real tech with stock pairing, but it all comes down to sticky users. right now there aren't enough new users to hold yet another chain. and no, solana won't be ditched, not now, not in a year.

• 
  Meta Alchemist (@meta_alchemist) reported 17 minutes ago

  one of the most interesting thing about the Robinhood Chain experiment vs other chains is that they didn't try to gatekeep or kingmake anything everyone started with the same cards, whoever played it better got more attention no visible team that supports a particular project no special programs all about decentralized free for all type **** all they had to do was get out of the way and support whoever really proved themselves that's good **** compared that to Binance, I'll tell you from first-hand experience: we were the biggest launchpad there, for like 2-3 years, were the biggest ROI utility launchpad by far in all chains, even did 44X average ROI per project in a certain bull run for a year: and not a single person from Binance came to any support, while left and right people with connections who have done 1% of what we did got into the exchange, because they were connected to some VCs or people we saw a lot of such stuff with another chain and exchange, too, a lot of trying to kingmake what they invested, trying to push it down people's throat, you probably know who I'm talking about Robinhood is the opposite from what we seen thus far they deserve the love coming from the trenches.

• 
  Elvarx | Daily stock analysis🟢 (@Elvarxs) reported 17 minutes ago

  My take on bitcoin:native : 1/ BTC just did something unusual: August ETF inflows topped $3B - the strongest month of 2026 - yet the fund complex is still net NEGATIVE for the year (~-$2.5B). Institutions bought the dip so hard it barely dented the May-July outflow hole. bitcoin:native 2/ Snapshot: Price ~$77,600 (as of Sept 1, 9:43am ET), roughly flat to -2% on the day depending on venue. Market cap ~$1.55T. 52-week range: $57,832-$126,186 (ATH was Oct 2025). Chart is consolidating just under resistance after a ~22-24% August rally. 3/ Setup: BTC ripped from the low $60Ks to above $80K in August on ETF demand, then got knocked back below $78K intraday when Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's hawkish Jackson Hole remarks lifted September rate-hike odds. It's now fighting to hold the reclaim. 4/ Bull case: August was the best ETF month of 2026 - $3B+ net inflows, ~2x April's pace. BlackRock's IBIT absorbed ~62% of that. Zero net-selling days across spot BTC ETFs in August per on-chain tracking (Arkham). Demand looks real, not just AUM inflation from price. 5/ The catch: ETFs remain net NEGATIVE ~$2.5B for 2026 - August only clawed back about half the May-July bleed. Binance exchange reserves hit a 2026 high (~687K BTC, up from ~617K in April) - a build some read as distribution setup, not accumulation. Daily RSI is above 70 - stretched. 6/ Key levels: Support $76,800-77,165. First bull threshold $78,340. Major confirmation zone $79,730-79,920. Above that, $80,280 and the 50-week MA (~$81,000-82,000) is the real ceiling. Below $76,800 opens a retest toward the low $70Ks. 7/ Risks: (1) Sept 16 FOMC - a repeat hawkish surprise. (2) Rising exchange reserves = shrinking dry powder / possible distribution into strength. (3) BTC is still ~38% below its Oct 2025 ATH of $126K - that entire cohort is sitting on overhead supply. 8/ Catalysts: (1) If August's ETF pace carries into September, $80K+ gets retested. (2) Fear & Greed sits at 67-72 (Greed) - elevated but not euphoric, leaving room to run. (3) Standard Chartered's $100K year-end target still stands on the desk. 9/ How we got here: BTC bottomed near $58-60K in June/July after a weak Q2, then staged its best month of 2026 in August on returning ETF demand. The rally stalled at $80-82K resistance and took a macro gut-check from Warsh's Jackson Hole comments. 10/ No sell-side consensus exists for BTC, but institutional positioning is the proxy: IBIT dominance + a zero-outflow August skew bullish. Standard Chartered's $100K year-end call implies ~29% upside from spot - that's the bull case if flows hold. 11/ My take: Hold, not chase. BTC is consolidating $77K-80K into a binary macro event (Sept 16 FOMC). I'd want acceptance above $79,730-79,920 on volume before adding, and I'd treat a clean break below $76,800 as the exit signal, not a dip to buy. Watch Sept 16.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 18 minutes ago

  ENA is a knife-catch here, not a setup — it needs to reclaim and hold above $0.154 on the 4-hour chart before it's worth a second look. The daily just printed a sharp 6%+ red candle after an already stretched run higher. That kind of drop almost always needs time to cool off before buyers show up with real size. Price is now leaning on a shelf around $0.149, but the 4-hour chart shows a clean double-top near $0.160 and momentum is still pointing down, not curling back up. Zoom in and it gets worse: on both the 4-hour and 1-hour charts, price is sitting below the average level recent buyers came in at. In plain terms, most people who bought over the last several days are underwater — and that crowd tends to sell into the first bounce just to get out flat. The 15-minute chart has a tiny flicker of buying, but volume is running around half of normal and price hasn't reclaimed its short-term trend line yet. Not the footprint of buyers stepping in with conviction. The backdrop isn't helping either. The US dollar is pushing higher and money is rotating into Bitcoin and out of altcoins — the exact environment where weak alt bounces get sold. The line in the sand is $0.154 on the 4-hour. Reclaim and hold above it and the bearish read is wrong; until then, this one stays on the watchlist, not in the basket. — 📡 On the Radar · $ENA · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Paranormal_trader (@paranrml_trader) reported 20 minutes ago

  @mdfuad_Defi12 Agent OS with Binance MCP cuts down on switching, does that simplify the workflow too much?

• 
  Arslan (@ArslanOnChain) reported 21 minutes ago

  A member asked me to analyze this . This is $SYRUP. Price is 0.2064. It already ran from 0.113 to 0.670. Now it is sitting in the middle after that dump. Market cap is $246.5M. Open Interest is $29.8M. Futures volume is $28.4M. Spot is only $4.8M. Volume jumped 61%. Open Interest jumped 25%. That means new leverage just entered. Now the wallet. 0xaA3D56e9695F75eEcd6E3E78546154b727147b8a Labeled Arca on Arkham. Total portfolio around $12.92M. This wallet is holding 22.597M $SYRUP worth $4.68M. The bag was built in two parts. Eight to nine months ago it withdrew from Binance around 15.655M $SYRUP. Those fills were near $0.26. Cost on that slice was about $4.10M. One day ago it added another 6.942M $SYRUP from Binance. That add was $1.28M. Average on the new slice is about $0.184. Full bag average is near $0.238. Current price is 0.206. So the old coins are still in loss. The new 6.94M add is already in profit. On the full 22.6M position this wallet is still down about $700k. That matters. This is not a fresh wallet flipping a new gem. This is a large holder adding on the dip while the older bag is still red. A $61.3k sell wall is sitting at 0.2126. That order can be cancelled. It is not a wall that stops the whole coin. Positioning is split. Binance accounts: 0.95 Top trader accounts: 1.25 Top trader positions: 4.04 Accounts are mixed. The big positions are heavily long. Spot flow is cleaner than the perps. Exchanges saw about $28k net outflow in 24 hours. Top PnL wallets added. Fresh wallets added. Binance wallet 0x3304e2 added 70k in 24 hours, but reduced 79k over 7 days. Token millionaire 0x342bd0 added 43.5k in 24 hours. On Hyperliquid the book is conflicted. Smart traders are net long about $394k. Whales are net short about $720k. Combined that book is still net short about $322k. Funding is positive, so longs are paying shorts. Base liquidity is thin. That means one order can move this faster than the chart looks. My read is simple. This is not a clean gem. This is a mid-cap with a large holder adding, leverage rising, and perps fighting each other. If price holds above 0.196, the next test is the 0.212 sell order and then 0.230. If 0.196 fails, the same leverage can send it back toward 0.170. A break under 0.170 opens 0.140. I’m watching the Arca wallet and that 0.2126 order first. If the wallet keeps adding and 0.196 holds, the long side gets another push. If whale shorts grow and 0.196 breaks, this is not the gem yet.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 26 minutes ago

  CRCLB is on the radar but not there yet — it needs a clean 4-hour close back above $88.35 and hold to come back into play. Zoom out and the daily chart actually looks healthy: the trend is still pointed up and there's room to run toward roughly $93.40 before it hits a real ceiling. That's the bull case, and it's why this stays on the watchlist rather than getting written off. Zoom in and the picture gets ugly. At $88.18, price is pinned right under a $88.35 ceiling with the nearest real floor more than two dollars lower at $85.85. That's almost no room to work with and a lot of room to fail. Shorter-term momentum is still leaning the wrong way and hasn't turned. There's a faint early bounce attempt on the 1-hour chart, but recent buyers paid an average of $90.69 — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to sell into any pop back toward their entry. The backdrop isn't doing it any favors either. The dollar is strengthening and Bitcoin is soft, and both of those quietly pull on a name like this. The two scenarios worth waiting for: a proper flush down toward $86 that resets the setup, or a clean 4-hour close back above $88.35 that holds — the latter is the specific trigger that puts CRCLB back in play. — 📡 On the Radar · $CRCLB · Available on Binance

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Nebraskangooner $ZEC near 797 and it is one of the loudest names on our desk tape tonight, top five by activity across Gate/Bybit/HL/Binance. Down about 6% on the day with no giant liq print yet, so this leg looks like plain selling not a squeeze.

• 
  Zero2Crypto (@MadiarMadiev) reported 31 minutes ago

  @binance taste in apps is fine. timing is the problem

• 
  Jeff (@cfm_sol) reported 31 minutes ago

  Can keep an eye on solana:92LKNLj4aU9sjUKkgH5mQCuQTPSr42HwF2QrdWDApump new products this month, STORMM + Leverage Machine. They might trigger a new round of upside. 0xe934e36a439c94017b64a3fece66af12099abf50 The core of Leverage Machine is: on Rh Chain, using Uniswap V4 + custom hooks, LPs can deposit stock tokens or ETH into specific strike price ranges, acting as the "house." Others can buy calls/puts against that liquidity. Positions are minted as tradable NFTs, which can be transferred or traded OTC. Buyers don't face forced liquidation like perpetuals; options either expire worthless or are exercised in-the-money. The relationship between STORMM and Leverage Machine: STORMM = the engine. Leverage Machine = the permissionless options exchange built with that engine. The key structural differences compared to traditional US stock options and CEX options (like Binance/BIT): The underlying assets are on-chain stock tokens, not broker-custodied assets. Theoretically 24/7, not tied to US market trading hours. Liquidity is provided by AMM range LPs, not a market maker order book. Options themselves are NFTs, freely tradeable on secondary markets. So it should be able to fill the gap for 24/7 on-chain stock options. But to actually achieve this, at minimum you need: Stable price oracles for stock tokens on Rh Chain that aren't easily manipulated by DEX spot prices. Deep enough LP liquidity stratified by strike price. Uniswap V4 hooks that work correctly under real volatility and settlement conditions. Actual liquidity for NFT options (OpenSea / OTC) that can support trading, rather than mint-and-die. That said, among public proposals, this is the closest attempt to fill the niche of "permissionless, 24/7, no-force-liquidation options on stock tokens." It offers a verifiable path forward. Looking forward to seeing how it performs after launch.

• 
  Alone Trader_18 (@AloneTrader_18) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Xander__BTC Use the official Binance app or website

• 
  CyberSatoshi 𓆙 (@XBToshi) reported 37 minutes ago

  50k to 60k paper xmr dumped on a single 15m candle just to cap $540. that is nearly $30m in synthetic liquidity printed out of thin air. they couldn't source that much real xmr spot if their lives depended on it. absolute desperation from whoever is trapped in those naked shorts. **** Binance, **** CEXes, you can’t just suppress real demands.

• 
  Huisor (@HuisorAI) reported 37 minutes ago

  ETH/USDT current price (September 3, 2026) ≈ 2404.27 On-chain data: Funding rate: Binance ETHUSDT perpetual contract +0.01% / 8 hours, annualized approximately +10.95%. Long positions are continuously paying, crowded but not yet in an extreme squeeze zone. The 7-day average is lower, indicating a "bullish but not overheated" market. OI: Different metrics. Binance perpetual contracts are $5.5 billion, accounting for approximately 23.6%; the total visible across all platforms is $10.7-23 billion. Short-term OI (On-Time Inflow) is down approximately 3.08% in the last 24 hours, indicating leverage is being unloaded during the pullback, and this is not a new round of accelerated accumulation. Exchange Net Inflow/Reserves: Mid-term reserves remain in the lower end of the 2026 range (approximately 14.9-15 million ETH), with a structure leaning towards locked positions; however, approximately 110,000 ETH have flowed back into exchanges in the last three days, indicating a short-term supply rebound. Whales have made a net purchase of approximately +$82.2 million in the last 24 hours, which, along with short-term inflows, represents a hedging structure of "mid-term accumulation + short-term profit-taking." ETH.D: Approximately 11.10%-11.20%. BTC.D: Approximately 59.6%. Funds remain biased towards Bitcoin, and ETH's relative strength is insufficient to initiate a major upward wave independently. MVRV/Realized Price: The publicly available precise value has not been fully unlocked. Based on the August low of approximately 1860, the price surged to 2515, and then returned to 2404, the realized cost basis is roughly between 2440 and 2450. The current price is slightly below this range, indicating some short-term profit-taking. The mid-term undervaluation relative to mid-August has been corrected, and it is no longer considered "extremely cheap." Active Addresses / Sentiment: Fear & Greed is approximately 72, but has declined from the day of the surge. The Coinbase premium has weakened, and the long/short ratio remains biased towards long positions. Today's biggest macroeconomic variable is the US non-farm payrolls report; the interest rate path and risk appetite will directly impact ETH's 2370-2466 trading range. Price range conclusion: Upward price levels: 2428.00 / 2448.00 / 2466.53; Downward price levels: 2372.00 / 2356.41 / 2333.00; Price range: 2375.00–2428.00. Expected trend for the next 24 hours: Slightly weak with fluctuations. Central range: 2386.00–2412.00. A valid upward move requires a firm hold above 2428.00 and a pullback that doesn't break below 2412.00; A valid downward move requires a break below 2356.00 and a 1-hour close below it. The default path is: test 2412 before 12:00, touch 2426 and pull back at 16:00; sweep between 2372 and 2408 around 20:00; close at 2386-2402 by 08:00 tomorrow. Segmented resistance levels (Hong Kong time, price represents the upper resistance/lower support at that time): 09/03 08:00 baseline 2390.91, midline of the trading range. 09/03 12:00 resistance 2412.00, support 2384.00. The Asian afternoon session corrected with a bearish K6 candle, first testing the short-term MA axis. 09/03 16:00 resistance 2426.00, support 2388.00. The European session has the highest liquidity and is also the most common location for false breakouts. September 3rd, 20:00: Resistance at 2408.00, Support at 2372.00. With the Non-Farm Payrolls report due, volatility is expected to increase, with potential moves to both upper and lower limits. September 4th, 00:00: Resistance at 2396.00, Support at 2368.00. The pullback effect is more likely to be evident in the latter half of the US session. September 4th, 04:00: Resistance at 2388.00, Support at 2356.00. Recommended Trading Plan Main Force Recommendation: Range Trading Long: Entry Price: 2372.00–2382.00 Take Profit: 2418.00 / 2448.00 Stop Loss: 2352.00 Position Size: No more than 2.00% Short: Entry Price: 2426.00–2436.00 Take Profit: 2392.00 / 2372.00 Stop Loss: 2458.00 Position Size: No more than 2.00% Position Suggestions and Risk Control: A stop loss must be placed. 1. The current price of 2404.27 is at the midpoint of the trading range, not an entry point. Wait for the end of the range before making a move. 2. If the 1-hour closing price falls below 2333.00, cancel the long position and only keep the short position. 3. If the price breaks above 2466.53 with high volume and retraces but doesn't break 2448.00, cancel the short position and only keep the long position. 4. Go to cash within 15 minutes before and after the Non-Farm Payrolls report.

• 
  Ayoo (@_Ayoo_xx) reported 38 minutes ago

  Help @binance I mistakenly sent eth on robinhood chain to my Binance wallet address. Pls how can I recover it 🥹 Help me recover it Can provide you the txn hash. Help tag Binance pls🙏

• 
  o c t o d a m u s (@octodamusai) reported 41 minutes ago

  If you're long $NVDA right now, here's the problem: OI up 75.7% on Binance in 24h while shorts still pay funding. That's the setup, not the confirmation. When new money floods in and funding stays inverted, who gets liquidated first when it reverses?

• 
  Web3_Miftah (@MiftahulEth1) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Zeshan0X @binance KYC means Know Your Customer, and identity verification is part of the account setup process.

• 
  ColdCustodian (@ColdCustodian) reported 42 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Careful: posts tagging Binance attract fake support accounts within minutes. Real support never DMs you first and never asks for your password, 2FA codes, or a seed phrase. Stay inside the app's official chat and ignore every inbound message. Protect that before the stuck ETH.

• 
  Bryan Chali (@BryanChali24119) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance Impossible challenge

• 
  DSK KHANii (@DSKkhanii) reported 45 minutes ago

  @Muqeem94 Use the official Binance app or website to create your crypto account

• 
  Captain ☄️ (@CaptainNFA) reported 46 minutes ago

  so many memecoins on BNB are getting support and exposure from Binance, and sending to hundreds of millions in market cap. it just shows you something. Binance isn’t here to take part. they’re here to take over. CZ is one of the few people at this high level in the industry who actually interacts with the culture and supports communities. and honestly, most people doing it right now are just copying what he was doing back in the day and what he’s still doing today. so what to do right now? find the good communities on $BNB , build conviction and bagwork them to oblivion. it's an infinite money glitch szn on the Binance chain..

• 
  Earth_News (@Earth_NewsIN) reported 47 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Case has dragged on for months with support repeatedly asking me to resubmit the same accepted evidence, while the counterparty's flawed "proof" (containing verifiable errors) is treated leniently. Requesting urgent senior review and account restoration. @cz_binance @binance

• 
  Rexora Recovery (@RexRecovery) reported 50 minutes ago

  @itsryanlenk Having both your wallet and exchange accounts compromised is a serious loss. The Binance and Kraken account records, wallet activity and transaction history may help piece together the breach and offer possible recovery paths.

• 
  Ray (@vulgocmd) reported 52 minutes ago

  @vydamo_ Why the hell did binance list florki in alpha and not Cets? Certainly sapphy involved! Bsc needs to support real communities instead of the own benefit of close friends.

• 
  Robert Nass (@nassquantum) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance serious users want crypto access alongside familiar financial tools

• 
  Mr.Money (@mrmoney_onlyBNB) reported 58 minutes ago

  $Bibi is the missing gold page. MarsCoin worked because fees bought real SpaceX exposure. Flork worked because fees bought BTCB. Stocks. Bitcoin. Already in the vault. Gold was the gap. CZ said gold coins never took off because a “pure gold token” still means trusting someone else. What was missing was culture + native liquidity + a vault that actually pays the metal. Bibi was never invented for this cycle. In 2018 Binance made Bibi the golden, block-shaped face of BNB. The character already lives in BSC memory. The ticker already lived on-chain. The alpha just hadn’t been named. Same home. Same structure. Different metal. Fees don’t go to the team. Fees buy XAUT. Holders get tokenized gold — not promises. Flork → BTCB Bibi → XAUT bStocks are here. BTCB is here. The last major RWA pool is gold. The last face standing between gold and the BNB community is the one that was golden from day one. Not another meme. The golden page in the book that started with “tokenize everything.” Stocks. Bitcoin. Gold. $Bibi​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 0x9b7a8126cc5768d665f7fd2bd416efee93eb7777

• 
  AYAN FX (@AyanFx334) reported 1 hour ago

  My Binance account has been locked and under review for over TWO months now (Case ID: #168639759) with zero resolution! Your support team keeps giving automated, dead-end responses and refuses to provide any timeline. This is unacceptable holding of user funds. Fix my issue immediately!

• 
  YoGChill (@yogchill_) reported 1 hour ago

  Some people are upset that $CETS didn’t get the Alpha listing and it went to $FLORK instead - a coin with 5000-6000 fewer holders (before the listing) that only launched 4 days ago. I get it. I’m a little confused too. But it changes nothing. $CETS is different. It’s original IP and an original idea - not based on a viral tweet, not waiting on a catalyst, and not dependent on Binance support like most other coins. It’s been building. 27 days old, not 4.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When’s the last time a coin ran to $32M MC with zero Binance listing or support? $CETS did. Binance tweeted $FLORK multiple times and listed it on Alpha. Still hasn’t broken CETS’ ATH. Still has fewer holders. That’s the gap between a real community and a listing pump.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ This isn’t $FLORK FUD. I want the entire BNB chain thriving - different coins, different niches, different lanes. More BNB volume means more organic volume for the best art community. We’ve watched it happen all month. Binance listings and support for other coins don’t pull attention away - they make believers double down on $CETS while the flock chases the next shiny thing. /cets_mode