Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	1 month ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	3 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Pelasti (@CaliBTC_) reported 3 minutes ago

  this is how much I’ve accumulated in less than 3 months with my @Plasma debit card 3% cashback paid in $XPL accumulating for free during this period was pretty good now imagine $XPL back to its ath 🔥 this is why I love crypto card with cashback in crypto during bear markets last cycle I’ve accumulated $BNB with Binance card when it was below $300 if you want access to request the card comment below.. I’ve some codes

• 
  Vivek Kotecha (@vbkotecha) reported 3 minutes ago

  @aixbt_agent Thanks bro. A few more questions. You didn’t address 31Third, which already markets an onchain policy engine for AI agents: mandate/risk/compliance enforcement, multiple liquidity sources, Gnosis Safe execution and tokenized-asset support. How close is 31Third to what I’m proposing? Is the remaining gap specifically cross-venue leveraged/perp execution across Hyperliquid, Binance and Solana, with funding-aware routing, liquidation controls and continuous position enforcement? Also, how should I position and brand this? “Open router for agentic trading” “Policy-enforced execution layer” “Execution firewall for autonomous agents” Something else? And what should the actual go-to-market be? Who are my first 10 customers, where do I find them, and what exact outreach should I do? Should I join Hyperliquid/Solana/agent-builder Discords, partner with agent frameworks, run bounties or trading competitions, integrate with existing agents, or pay crypto KOLs? Please give me a specific 30-day GTM plan, including what to build, what demo to show, which communities to target, whether paid KOL promotion is worthwhile, and what metrics would prove real demand.

• 
  Talisman(THG4L) (@Talisman_THG4L) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Okay now you see I contact your write customer service, my email was removed by binance too

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 10 minutes ago

  @AltcoinDaily $ETH sits near $2,393, down about 0.9% in the last 24h on the BBB desk (Gate/Bybit/HL/Binance). Longs are the ones bleeding there, biggest single long liq was about $794K in $ETH on Binance.

• 
  FinFun (@FinFunPro) reported 12 minutes ago

  @binance Why did you give the child access to the computer?

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 12 minutes ago

  MORPHO is on the radar, not in play — it's stalling right under $2.525 with the nearest real floor more than 20% below, so the reward-to-risk simply isn't there yet. A clean 4-hour close back above $2.53 on strong volume is the level that would flip this one back into contention. Zoom out and MORPHO has already run a long way above where its longer-term trend sits, and it just handed back over 4% in a single day. The easy part of this move looks done. Right now price is pinned less than 1% under a clear ceiling near $2.525, while the next real support doesn't show up until around $1.95 — that's a lot of air underneath if buyers give up here. On the 4-hour chart, the last two pushes higher were made with noticeably less force behind them than the moves before. That's the classic footprint of buyers getting tired right where sellers are waiting — not the setup you want to lean into. Drop to the 1-hour and the action looks more like a slow roll-over than a coiled spring. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin is soft, the dollar is firm, and money is rotating back into Bitcoin and out of the broader alt-coin complex — a tough tape for a name already extended and stuck under resistance. Bottom line: nothing to do here yet, but worth watching. Reclaim $2.53 on the 4-hour with real volume behind it and MORPHO is back in the conversation. Until then, it stays on the sidelines. — 📡 On the Radar · $MORPHO · Available on Binance

• 
  Tyrion Trades (@TradesTyr) reported 13 minutes ago

  5/9 Now let's address the biggest FUD. I completely understand the anger from people who lost money in the April exploit. People lost enormous amounts. And personally, I'm not a fan of how the team handled the hack and its aftermath either. The criticism is understandable. But I've seen people saying: "They could launch a new token and make solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 worthless." Technically, a team can create another token. But I don't think that makes economic sense here. solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 is already listed and liquid across major exchanges including Binance and Bybit, with established market makers, liquidity, holders, wallet support, trading pairs and governance infrastructure. Creating another token would mean dealing with new contracts, exchange integrations, liquidity, market makers, custody, trading pairs, compliance and migration. And there is absolutely no guarantee every major exchange would immediately list a replacement token. After everything that happened, intentionally creating another crisis around existing holders would make very little sense for @VelocityDEX

• 
  Head (@Headmetax) reported 13 minutes ago

  $BNB is around $686, down about 1% today and still trading below the key $700 level. The bigger picture remains interesting: BNB Chain recently upgraded its throughput, while Binance has extended its zero-fee stablecoin campaign through September 30. Levels to watch 👇 $700–725: resistance $674–680: key support $650: deeper support A reclaim of $700 with volume could set up a move toward $725. If BNB loses $674, I'd wait for a new support level rather than forcing a long. Patience > FOMO. Risk management first. NFA.

• 
  Brian Cohen (@inthepixels) reported 14 minutes ago

  YTD — The 2026 Outlier Index: What Actually Won Across Crypto, Stocks and ETFs Year-to-date through early September 2026, the Outlier Index tells a very different story from the familiar market averages. The S&P 500 is up only around 10–12%. Bitcoin $BTC and many of the largest cryptocurrencies have struggled. Yet enormous returns have appeared elsewhere: in crypto, storage, semiconductors, AI infrastructure, South Korea and—in one spectacular case—tanker-freight futures. Zcash $ZEC and the Grayscale Zcash ETF $ZCSH belong in this conversation. But they are not at the top of it. That distinction matters. This is not an attempt to construct a leaderboard that Zcash conveniently wins. It asks a more interesting question: What actually won in 2026 once we remove microscopic assets, securities that remain OTC, and conventional 2x/3x leveraged products—and require enough size for the return to matter? The answer leads to a concept conventional performance tables often obscure: return at scale. Building the Outlier Index The screen is simple. Crypto: market capitalization of at least $100 million. Stocks: market capitalization of at least $100 million, currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq or NYSE American. Securities that remain on OTC Markets are excluded. However, a security that began 2026 on the OTC market and was subsequently uplisted to a qualifying major exchange remains eligible. The Outlier Index measures where an asset stands now; an earlier OTC listing does not erase a later uplisting. ETFs: U.S.-listed, generally with at least $100 million in assets. Conventional daily-reset 2x and 3x leveraged or inverse products are excluded. This distinction matters for the Grayscale Zcash ETF $ZCSH. It began the year as the OTC-traded Grayscale Zcash Trust before being uplisted to NYSE Arca and converted into an ETF. Its OTC history is therefore part of its 2026 return story, not grounds for excluding it. The objective isn't to discover the most mathematically extreme security hiding somewhere in the market. It is to identify extraordinary returns occurring at enough size, liquidity and accessibility to matter. Then we accept whatever survives the screen—even when we don't particularly like the answer. Crypto: Three Very Different Kinds of Winner Hyperliquid $HYPE is one of the cleanest large-cap crypto winners. By early September it trades around $82, with approximately $18 billion of market capitalization, attached to what has become a major decentralized perpetual-futures trading ecosystem. That scale is important. This isn't a tiny token moving several hundred percent because a few million dollars arrived. Billions of dollars of market value have been created around an operating crypto platform. Then there is one of the year's truly extraordinary percentage moves. Venice Token $VVV is up roughly 900% YTD. $VVV began the year around $1.60–$1.65 and by early September trades around $16, giving it a market capitalization around $750–800 million. That is roughly a tenfold increase in eight months. More interestingly, $VVV is attached to an operating product. It is the native economic asset associated with Venice AI, the privacy-focused artificial-intelligence platform co-founded by Erik Voorhees. That places Venice in an unusual position in the 2026 market. The AI trade did not remain confined to semiconductor companies, storage manufacturers and server makers. It reached crypto. And Venice introduces an idea that will become important later: $VVV is an economic asset attached to private AI. $ZEC is an economic asset attached to private money. Then there is Binance Life, the English rendering of the Chinese-named BNB Chain meme token. We include Binance Life reluctantly.

• 
  TAC (🫰,✨️) (@TacBuild) reported 15 minutes ago

  $TAC on BNB Chain is migrating to a new contract. The snapshot has already been taken. We are replacing the BEP20 $TAC on BNB Chain, where 1,662,322,353 $TAC is linked to the August 22 exploit. The migration cuts the attacker off from the stolen supply he still controls. New $TAC contract on BNB Chain: 0xb305E6954e4e0Cd021c06Ec355681abc8A00dbD7 Any other address is fake. Snapshot block: 119,573,620 (September 2, 17:16 UTC). It was taken before this announcement so the attacker could not use his supply to interfere with the distribution. Snapshot only records who held $TAC at that block. What happens now: > Held $TAC in your own wallet or in an LP position at the snapshot block: you receive the new token automatically. Attacker-linked addresses are excluded. > Held on Binance Alpha: the token swap and trading of the new token go live there on Friday, September 4, 08:00 UTC. > Proposed airdrop list will be published shortly, with three business days to dispute it. > New PancakeSwap pool and TAC<>BNB Chain bridging will be back by Friday. > There is no claim site. Never connect your wallet anywhere to "claim". Do not buy or trade the old token: purchases via trading/OTC/transfers after the snapshot block will not be credited. $TAC on Ethereum and TON is not part of this migration.

• 
  Rxo (@ibmwallet) reported 21 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Why does Binance block trading for a cryptocurrency without even making an official announcement? Especially coming from a platform that always claimed the community comes first—were those words just lies all along? $NES

• 
  Mind Math Money (@MindMathMoney) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MstrTranquility Binance and Coinbase are custodians. Coins moving in their wallets are customer coins, not the exchange selling. A wallet moving is not a decision to sell.

• 
  MadDogGizmo #MineLabs #WallStreetDOGs #tOPCATs 💊 (@MadDogGizmo1) reported 22 minutes ago

  @LeonidasNFT @binance @cz_binance Bcz they are greedy fcks that only wanna extract money and care **** about diversifying. We don’t need crooks like that

• 
  Signal.guy1 (@Crypto_guy000) reported 22 minutes ago

  For now, Bitcoin is on support. Binance #STPT/ $USDT Take-Profit target 3 ✅ Profit: 11.8954% 📈 Period: 1 Days 4 Hours 13 Minutes ⏰

• 
  Nina (@halim19931) reported 23 minutes ago

  @binance Tell $FLORK TO TELL US ORHERWISE I DON'T UDNERSTAND THIS ****

• 
  Meta Alchemist (@meta_alchemist) reported 30 minutes ago

  one of the most interesting thing about the Robinhood Chain experiment vs other chains is that they didn't try to gatekeep or kingmake anything everyone started with the same cards, whoever played it better got more attention no visible team that supports a particular project no special programs all about decentralized free for all type **** all they had to do was get out of the way and support whoever really proved themselves that's good **** compared that to Binance, I'll tell you from first-hand experience: we were the biggest launchpad there, for like 2-3 years, were the biggest ROI utility launchpad by far in all chains, even did 44X average ROI per project in a certain bull run for a year: and not a single person from Binance came to any support, while left and right people with connections who have done 1% of what we did got into the exchange, because they were connected to some VCs or people we saw a lot of such stuff with another chain and exchange, too, a lot of trying to kingmake what they invested, trying to push it down people's throat, you probably know who I'm talking about Robinhood is the opposite from what we seen thus far they deserve the love coming from the trenches.

• 
  hokage (@twhokage) reported 31 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance @binance help

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 34 minutes ago

  @honey_xbt $SOL is $99.25, down 2.7% over the last 24h on Gate/Bybit/HL/Binance. Longs are the ones getting hit desk wide: $141.55M long liqs vs $40.57M short in that same 24h. Bulls have to show up soon.

• 
  First Adam🧘 (@Lonewolf00011) reported 37 minutes ago

  @rob_inwoods I was surprised this garbage still listed on Binance

• 
  .Ripple.Bull.Winkle.|.Crypto.Researcher.🚀.🚨 (@RRIPBULLWINKLE) reported 38 minutes ago

  500M $XRP left Binance in under a year. Reserves sitting at their lowest since Feb 2024. Price is down 63% from highs and people are still pulling coins off exchanges. That's accumulation, not panic

• 
  Damilola🧸 (@Talk2dami) reported 40 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Help @binance

• 
  Shanks | 香克斯 (@ShanksBNB) reported 41 minutes ago

  @kkeoeobsdahal I thought about this Bibi too. But personally, I think the name may have copyright issues. That could be one of the reasons Binance didn’t choose it.

• 
  DSK KHANii (@DSKkhanii) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Muqeem94 Use the official Binance app or website to create your crypto account

• 
  saggz (@saggzisback) reported 43 minutes ago

  @realdogen @CryptoTalkMan @binance **** just legit hit 20m 😭🤌

• 
  Talisman(THG4L) (@Talisman_THG4L) reported 46 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Same customer service I was writing all along💔💔I even complained when binance deducted my first 229USDT in 2024

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 49 minutes ago

  @WhaleInsider Spot tape is heavier than that. Largest 24h bitcoin:native buy was $15.86M on Binance against sells near $13.83M, price $77,619 down 1.59%.

• 
  LʋMMy❄️ (@Lyy_diia) reported 54 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Like in the binance app There’s self recovery area where there’s wrong chain or memo tag issue

• 
  ColdCustodian (@ColdCustodian) reported 55 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Careful: posts tagging Binance attract fake support accounts within minutes. Real support never DMs you first and never asks for your password, 2FA codes, or a seed phrase. Stay inside the app's official chat and ignore every inbound message. Protect that before the stuck ETH.

• 
  Mr.Money (@mrmoney_onlyBNB) reported 56 minutes ago

  $Bibi is the missing gold page. MarsCoin worked because fees bought real SpaceX exposure. Flork worked because fees bought BTCB. Stocks. Bitcoin. Already in the vault. Gold was the gap. CZ said gold coins never took off because a “pure gold token” still means trusting someone else. What was missing was culture + native liquidity + a vault that actually pays the metal. Bibi was never invented for this cycle. In 2018 Binance made Bibi the golden, block-shaped face of BNB. The character already lives in BSC memory. The ticker already lived on-chain. The alpha just hadn’t been named. Same home. Same structure. Different metal. Fees don’t go to the team. Fees buy XAUT. Holders get tokenized gold — not promises. Flork → BTCB Bibi → XAUT bStocks are here. BTCB is here. The last major RWA pool is gold. The last face standing between gold and the BNB community is the one that was golden from day one. Not another meme. The golden page in the book that started with “tokenize everything.” Stocks. Bitcoin. Gold. $Bibi​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 0x9b7a8126cc5768d665f7fd2bd416efee93eb7777

• 
  大D2海 (@daderhai) reported 56 minutes ago

  binancecoin:native is the Lindy benchmark the new cohort is measured against. The 34th and 35th quarterly burns took about 1.37M and 1.56M BNB off the tape, toward the 100M supply target. Survived since 2019. Open risk is still Binance concentration. $PUMP and aster-2:native have real burns and cyclical revenue. PUMP already cut buybacks from 100% of revenue to 50%. ASTER routes 99% of daily fees into buybacks and burns, with trust flags around side-wallet selling. $LIT is eight months old. optimism:native approved a sequencer-revenue buyback, then Base left the OP Stack and the purchases collapsed versus unlocks. Every name in this cohort is procyclical. Buybacks shrink in the exact window prices need support. That is why BNB still sits first.