Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	19 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TheCableIndex (@thecableindex) reported 6 minutes ago

  JUST IN: Binance halts transactions with 17 crypto platforms in Nigeria, UAE, Iran Binance says it will stop processing transactions involving 17 cryptocurrency-asset service providers and platforms following recent regulatory developments. In a notice to users, the cryptocurrency exchange listed the affected entities and dates from which transactions involving them will no longer be processed. #TheCableIndex

• 
  HLevi (@haiderlevi) reported 8 minutes ago

  @ThomasOyxxx @binance Binance has no issues?

• 
  Signal_guy (@Cryptoprime00) reported 8 minutes ago

  📉 Another leg down Binance Futures #AR/ $USDT Take-Profit target 3 ✅ Profit: 116.5939% 📈 Period: 3 Days 14 Hours 17 Minutes ⏰

• 
  Ezah (@Ezah07) reported 11 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @Booksey Yes. Can’t wait to buy $MAX meme on Binance Alpha which keeps donating to @GiggleAcademy so I can at least help by trading it

• 
  Bet South Africa (@BetSouthAfrika) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @Stacks Is Binance going to support this? Or where can we stake?

• 
  Media Debug (@mediadebug) reported 13 minutes ago

  Only @binance has transparency regarding everything that's why it's number one exchange. @bitget ,If you don't support user, you will loose time to time. I know this just small profit but what if we earn more profit and you won't credit in future?

• 
  OomDagobert (@OomDagobertDuck) reported 18 minutes ago

  XRP is down 8% to $1.44 (€1.24), pinning the price right at the weekend support floor. Despite the drop, Binance funding rates remain completely flat at a neutral 0.0100%. Shorts aren't getting aggressive here—it's a total volume standoff on the daily candle. $XRP

• 
  ₿itoshi Galt (@cryptoshigalt) reported 19 minutes ago

  @JoeNakamoto Or get paraguay cedula and use it for kyc at bybit/kraken/binance/cryptocom/ether.fi and dont give a flying **** spending globally with apple pay

• 
  .py.a. (@pyaaaaaaa_7) reported 19 minutes ago

  2/3 Binance, Bybit and Gate Reveal the Same Structural Problem The Binance example becomes even more interesting when compared with other exchanges. The objective was not to prove that every WLFI transfer was harmless, but to determine whether exchange inflows consistently translated into immediate market selling. The evidence does not support such a simple relationship. A second Binance transfer involved approximately 100 million WLFI around August 7–8. The transaction was split into two routes, with roughly 50 million WLFI sent directly to Binance and another 50 million routed through an intermediary. At the time, WLFI closed around $0.0520 on August 7 and $0.0513 on August 8, with daily trading volume of roughly $20.7 million and $12.9 million respectively. Again, the price was weak. But weakness alone does not establish that the 100 million tokens were sold. The more revealing comparison is Bybit. Bybit had launched its third USD1 Hold & Earn campaign on July 17, offering a 38 million WLFI reward pool to users holding USD1. The campaign ran until August 16. Users did not need to stake WLFI or lock their funds. The rewards were distributed in WLFI based on USD1 holdings. Around this period, approximately 39 million WLFI moved through a team-linked wallet into Bybit. The amount was remarkably close to the 38 million WLFI reward pool. Again, the transfer could look bearish if viewed only through the lens of “tokens moved to an exchange.” But when the exchange’s actual incentive architecture is included, a second explanation becomes much stronger: the exchange may have been receiving WLFI inventory for distribution to USD1 users. Gate provides another important piece of the puzzle. During August, Gate and WLFI were jointly running USD1 holding and soft-staking campaigns in which users received WLFI rewards for holding USD1. Gate adjusted the estimated APR during the month, including a 12% rate in early August and an 8% rate later in the month, with the reward rate determined by the remaining reward budget and valid USD1 holdings. This means the exchange ecosystem was not merely a place where WLFI could be sold. It was also becoming a distribution channel for WLFI itself. That distinction is critical. When a token moves from a treasury-related wallet to an exchange, there are several possible destinations after the deposit: user rewards, liquidity inventory, market-making operations, internal exchange balances, or actual market execution. The blockchain only proves the first step. Therefore, treating the entire gross exchange inflow as “bearish supply” can materially overstate the amount of WLFI actually available for immediate sale. The right question is not how much WLFI entered an exchange. The right question is how much of that amount was actually converted into sell-side execution. (Continue) $WLFI

• 
  DON VITO COINLEONE (@VitoCoinleone) reported 19 minutes ago

  What happened to your grass? Did they cut it down? Your manipulations don't last very long anymore. @binance @cz_binance ??

• 
  Aman 👻 (@Im_Aman2) reported 20 minutes ago

  Gen Z is rewriting the investor timeline. Previous generations often waited until their late 20s or 30s to open a brokerage account — usually after a stable job, some savings, and a nudge from a financial advisor. Gen Z is skipping straight to their phone. A few reasons why this shift is happening Access, not gatekeeping No paperwork-heavy onboarding or minimum deposits that shut out beginners. Digital platforms let anyone with a phone and internet connection start exploring markets in minutes. Education comes built-in Many platforms — including Binance — offer free learning resources, market data, and beginner guides alongside trading tools. That means new investors can learn the “why” before risking real money. A global mindset from day one Gen Z grew up online, so borderless assets and 24/7 markets feel natural, not intimidating. They’re used to consuming information (and making decisions) in real time. Curiosity over certainty This generation is comfortable researching before acting — checking multiple sources, joining community discussions, and treating not knowing as a starting point, not a stop sign. None of this means investing early is risk-free. Markets are volatile, and product availability varies by region. What’s changed is the barrier to entry — not the need for caution. The takeaway staring early can be an advantage, but only when it’s paired with real research and realistic expectations. This is educational content only, not financial advice. Crypto markets carry risk — always DYOR before making any investment decisions. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Skyler (@Crypto_Advis0r) reported 26 minutes ago

  The crypto market has one rule traditional markets don’t: It never closes. No opening bell. No Friday shutdown. No weekend break. No holiday pause. While one part of the world is sleeping, another is trading. That’s why BTC can look completely different when you wake up from where you left it the night before. And that 24/7 access comes with a catch: opportunities can appear anytime, but so can volatility. A sudden headline, liquidation cascade, or shift in sentiment can move the market while you’re offline. That’s why chasing every candle isn’t the goal. Have a plan. Manage risk. Stay patient. And understand that sometimes the smartest move is doing nothing. Crypto doesn’t wait for tomorrow. The market is already open. DYOR. Educational only. Not financial advice. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Umar (@umar_xbt) reported 30 minutes ago

  Rasmr says he refuses to buy tokens where he's the main narrative because he never wants to take the blame when a coin dumps “I don't like buying narratives where I'm the biggest narrative. I don't want to be the biggest holder or the biggest bull poster.” “I like that CATE is bigger than me. I like that ANSEM is bigger than me. I like that Mars Coin is bigger than me. It's dependent on CZ, tokenized stocks, Binance, China.” “I don't want to be the biggest thing driving the narrative of a coin. Because when the coin goes down, people will blame me and I don't want to be blamed when a coin goes down.”

• 
  Mark Alvin (@mark_alvin2) reported 32 minutes ago

  For me, Binance Blockchain Week is less like a crypto event and more like a reality check. Because the industry needs more than excitement. It needs answers. Security still needs to improve. Scams still damage trust. Regulation is still confusing for many users. Real-world adoption still needs simple products. Web3 still needs better explanations. These are the conversations worth having. Not only “where is BTC going?” But also: Who is actually using blockchain? Which problems does it solve better than old systems? How do we educate new users before they lose money? How do builders earn trust in the next cycle? The future of blockchain will not be decided by noise. It will be shaped by useful products, safer systems and smarter communities. What part of the blockchain industry would you like to learn more about? #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  S.U (@SU__Crypto) reported 34 minutes ago

  @dotkrueger Alts have massively underperformed. 10/10 from binance didn't help. Exchanges / Teams / MMs have never given alts room to breath.

• 
  World Data Analysis (@World_Data_A) reported 35 minutes ago

  . Crypto cybersecurity losses remain a massive risk Peak hit in 2020 (~$4.5B). 2025 still saw ~$2.5B in losses. 2026 is lower so far, but the threat hasn’t gone away. Biggest attack methods (2016-2026) - Compromised private keys - Wallet phishing ($7.6 B+) - Access control exploits Hardest hit exchanges (2025-26) Bybit (largest), Binance ($1.4B), then smaller centralized platforms. Decentralized exchanges suffered far less. Theft of crypto-assets and exchange hacks are still one of the biggest risks in the space. Source: @OECD

• 
  daku (@daku01_) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance Pls help

• 
  Goatworldwide (@EralPaul33) reported 38 minutes ago

  This story is actually insane. A 16-year-old developer called @Blonskr built TapeOut — a system that lets people construct real digital circuits directly on BNB Chain. He then built Behemoth, a functioning 4-bit on-chain CPU inspired by the Intel 4004, using thousands of logic components. And now he’s already pushing it further into on-chain AI, building a Binary Neural Network capable of performing verifiable inference directly through the blockchain. Then @cz_binance — the founder of Binance — noticed him. CZ interacted with the project, publicly called the technology interesting and followed the young developer. That attention helped create an entire community around what he was building. A community token called $BEHEMOTH / 巨兽 was launched around the original Behemoth CPU story: CA: 0x4e8fc9e5a6d2b9c6e7ca8b923661ca4e78087777 It previously reached roughly $2–3M+, while right now it sits around $469K market cap with approximately $98K liquidity. But here’s where the story gets even more interesting: Blonskr has now launched his own official TapeOut ecosystem token — $BEM. BEM CA: 0x5ce033B2bFCa3Af30b3e8C8457DeaF776A8b695a Maximum supply: 21,000,000 BEM BEM isn’t simply another meme token. It’s mined through TapeOut’s Proof of Design system and is being integrated into the actual protocol economy. The planned system is: Design circuits → mine $BEM → spend BEM to unlock new virtual manufacturing equipment → 🔥 BEM gets burned → manufacture new on-chain components → users pay BNB for those components. And the first major new component being demonstrated? On-chain AI. TapeOut’s BNN can take a handwritten number, convert it into binary data, run it through 34,048 binary weights, score the possible answers and output a prediction — with the model’s weights stored on-chain. So think about the story: 16-year-old kid ↓ builds a CPU on BNB Chain ↓ CZ discovers him and follows him ↓ community forms $BEHEMOTH ↓ community coin reaches millions ↓ kid launches official $BEM mining economy ↓ TapeOut expands from CPUs into on-chain AI And the crazy part? TapeOut is barely a week old. The community $BEHEMOTH is currently only around $469K MC, while the actual technology it represents keeps expanding. $BEHEMOTH is not the official TapeOut utility token — $BEM is. But $BEHEMOTH remains the original community coin built around the Behemoth CPU narrative that started the entire story. This isn’t another AI token with a website and some buzzwords. The kid actually built the technology first.

• 
  Snatch | Dopamine125 (@0x_snatch) reported 41 minutes ago

  How does a DFBA process an order? — 3m36s of live trading on @slx_fi testnet On the Superluminal testnet, a bot places 0.01 BTC market orders every 20 seconds. The left side is the actual trading screen; the right side shows the market data at that same moment, recorded together in one take. Three panels on the right: 1. Top — live order books from 6 mainnet CLOBs (Binance, Bybit, OKX, Bitget, Hyperliquid, Lighter) This is how the rest of the market executes. A market order eats through the book from the top, and whoever arrives first gets processed first. 2. Middle — the auction receipt DFBA processes orders differently. An order doesn't walk the book. It enters an auction that opens every 40ms, and that auction clears at a single price. So every time an order goes out on the left, a receipt prints: - BUY 0.0100 BTC → FILLED @ $77,230 - TAKER-BUY AUCTION · BATCH #78,201,619 - 1 MATCH RECORD → 1 CLEARING PRICE How to read it: which auction it was (batch #), how many matches the order was split into (it can be matched against multiple makers), and that the clearing price is always one. However many match records there are, the price is one — and within the same auction, arrival order has no effect on price. This isn't a claim about the design — it's measured. I checked all 2,163 public fills over a 55-minute window: the number of auctions that printed two different prices was zero. 3. Bottom — CLOBs compared against each other For a hypothetical market order of the same size ($10K / $100K / $1M), how much worse than mid would you fill on each venue — computed live, each venue measured against its own mid. At $10K they all look the same; at $1M they spread from 0.09bp to 1.32bp — more than a full bp apart. Where the displayed book can't absorb the order, it says N/A instead of guessing. Not all CLOBs execute the same. 👉What was NOT compared No price or cost comparison between SLX and the CLOBs. The oracles differ, so the prices themselves differ, and comparing costs against testnet liquidity is meaningless in either direction. Fees are excluded. The clip even keeps the moment the testnet throws an order error. The claim of this video is not "cheaper." It's about how orders get processed — the difference between walking an order book and clearing at one price in an auction — shown with real orders.

• 
  R A V E N 🔮 (@thecryptoravenn) reported 48 minutes ago

  @jasmineleee_ @binance Gen Z has access. Now comes the discipline.

• 
  Alpha02 (@Virus117404) reported 49 minutes ago

  @BICATONBNB @binance @flapdotsh Scam don’t buy this ****

• 
  decentralized winner (@decentrali8mus) reported 49 minutes ago

  One of the main reasons I’m bullish on Mexc Exchange is its focus on making crypto trading and transfers more affordable. Zero gas fees on Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Smart Chain is a major advantage. While fees on other exchanges may seem small, they can add up over time especially for active users. Mexc is not just about zero fees. • Easy and simple to use • Built for a smooth user experience • Have a good P2P system • Focused on reducing unnecessary costs for users For me, that combination matters: lower costs + easy access + reliable P2P + a user-friendly experience. I think Mexc could be the next big exchange after Binance. Mexc isn’t just trying to be another exchange it’s building a more affordable way to move and use crypto. 🚀 @MEXC

• 
  Ayeshem (@AyshemR_) reported 51 minutes ago

  Maybe Gen Z isn’t changing investing. Maybe the internet changed how we learn about money. A few years ago you had to actively look for financial information. Now it’s everywhere. A chart on your feed. A market update on your phone. A creator explaining something you didn’t understand five minutes ago. That easy access has changed the starting point for a lot of younger people. But access is not the same as understanding. → Learning should come before putting money in → A simple strategy can matter more than chasing every trend → Your timeline should not decide your risk level Being young gives you time to learn. It doesn’t mean you have to rush. DYOR. #Binance #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy

• 
  Alpha (@nmalpha052) reported 52 minutes ago

  Selling your BTC isn’t the only way to unlock liquidity. That’s where Binance Lite Loan gets interesting. The concept is pretty straightforward: instead of giving up your BTC to access cash, eligible users can use it as collateral to borrow USDT. What I like about the structure is how simple the initial setup is: • 30 day fixed loan period A defined term makes repayment planning much easier. • 1% upfront service fee The fee is clearly set upfront for the initial loan. • No LTV based liquidation during those first 30 days You’re not required to actively manage LTV throughout the initial term. • Collateral can continue earning Your eligible BTC collateral stays subscribed to Simple Earn Flexible Products, so it may continue generating yield while the loan is active. That creates an interesting alternative for holders who need liquidity but don’t necessarily want to exit their crypto position. Still, the important part is understanding the terms. Overdue loans can incur penalty interest, and liquidation may apply after the initial 30 day period under certain conditions. Crypto backed loans carry risks, including liquidation risk if collateral values change. Availability and eligibility depend on your region. Always check the applicable terms and DYOR. Would you rather sell your BTC for liquidity, or borrow against it and keep the position? #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Heyzibi_bot (@Heyzibi_bot) reported 55 minutes ago

  a whale sent 2,555 $btc to binance worth $197m. exchange inflows add spot supply and usually mean an exit is coming. the wider market is already down 4.1% on the day. this much idle size hitting the books suggests the local floor is still thin.

• 
  pavel mia (@MiaPavel58272) reported 55 minutes ago

  Hello Binance Support, I’m an active Binance user and always follow Binance’s rules. Unfortunately, my account is restricted.I have appealed several times but without success.Please review my account and remove the restriction if possible uid:713030551 @BinanceWallet @binance

• 
  Ai-cryptonews (@Aicryptonemi0w) reported 57 minutes ago

  Web3 gaming network Sandbox stops Base and BNB chain bridging after exploit The Sandbox, the prominent Web3 gaming network, has temporarily halted bridging services between its Ethereum mainnet and the Base and BNB Chain networks following a security exploit. The team moved quickly to isolate tokens and has advised users against trading SAND on those affected networks, estimating the impact at under 0.01% of the total token supply. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the persistent security risks in the multi-chain crypto ecosystem. WHAT HAPPENED The Sandbox team announced the suspension of bridging operations on Base and BNB Chain after detecting unauthorized activity. In an official statement, the team confirmed they are investigating the exploit and have taken proactive measures to protect user assets by disabling the bridge contracts on those specific networks. "Upon detection of the exploit, we immediately paused all bridging functionality for Base and BNB Chain to contain the threat," the project stated on their official X (formerly Twitter) account. The team emphasized that the Ethereum mainnet bridge remains operational and unaffected, providing a safe harbor for users holding SAND tokens. They are urging users to refrain from purchasing or trading SAND on the affected Layer-2 and altcoin networks until the investigation concludes. The exploit appears to be isolated to the bridge's cross-chain messaging logic rather than the core game or its mainnet contracts. The Sandbox team has assured the community that a full audit is underway and that they are working with security firms and exchange partners to track the stolen funds. While the exact method of the exploit hasn't been fully disclosed, the swift action to quarantine the networks likely prevented a larger loss of funds. WHY THIS MATTERS FOR CRYPTO This incident highlights the inherent fragility of cross-chain bridges, which have historically been one of the most vulnerable points in decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 infrastructure. For The Sandbox, a major player in the metaverse and gaming sector, this event tests user confidence in its technical infrastructure. While the financial impact is minimal—less than 0.01% of the supply—the reputational damage can be more significant if not handled transparently. For the broader crypto market, this news dampens sentiment around layer-2 scaling solutions and cross-chain interoperability. Investors often view these exploits as a reminder of the "hacker tax" associated with digital assets. However, the market's reaction has been relatively muted, suggesting that seasoned traders are becoming desensitized to smaller-scale bridge hacks. The focus now shifts to whether the team can recover the funds and how quickly they can restore trust in their bridging infrastructure. This event also feeds into the ongoing regulatory narrative. Regulators like the SEC have repeatedly flagged security risks as a reason for caution in the digital asset space. Incidents like this provide ammunition for stricter oversight on cross-chain protocols, potentially impacting how these networks operate in the future. It underscores the need for robust security audits and formal verification processes before deploying code that handles significant value. WHAT TRADERS SHOULD WATCH For traders holding SAND, the immediate concern is the liquidity spread across chains. With the Base and BNB Chain bridges disabled, arbitrage opportunities may become skewed, and the price on those networks could deviate slightly from the Ethereum mainnet price. Monitor the official Sandbox announcements for updates on when the bridges will be restored and whether a compensation plan is proposed. Key levels to watch include the SAND token's reaction to the next major support level on the daily chart. If the price holds above recent consolidation zones, it suggests the market is treating this as a minor setback. However, a breakdown could trigger panic selling. Traders should also watch the funding rates and volume on major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase to gauge the severity of the sell-off. Furthermore, pay attention to how the broader market reacts to security news in the coming days. If other projects with similar bridging infrastructure see their tokens dip, it could signal a sector-wide risk-off move. The CFTC and other regulatory bodies may also issue commentary on the exploit, which could introduce headline risk. Until the investigation is complete, avoiding adding new positions on the affected chains is a prudent strategy. MARKET SENTIMENT ANALYSIS The current sentiment surrounding SAND and The Sandbox network is NEUTRAL. This classification stems from the fact that while the exploit is a negative event, the actual financial damage is negligible relative to the token's market cap. The market is likely to view this as a contained incident rather than an existential threat to the project. Short-term outlook suggests volatility, but the long-term fundamentals of the Sandbox ecosystem remain unchanged. The team's swift response mitigates the risk of a severe drawdown. However, until the root cause is published and bridges are reopened, traders will likely remain cautious. A recovery of the stolen assets or a clear roadmap for security improvements could quickly flip sentiment back to bullish, whereas a drawn-out investigation could lead to slow bleeding in the token's price. Frequently Asked Questions Is my SAND on Base or BNB Chain safe? Your SAND tokens on the affected networks are likely safe but currently illiquid. The team has paused the bridging contracts to prevent further movement of funds, which means you cannot transfer them to Ethereum mainnet right now. The exploit impacted a very small amount of the supply, so the risk of your specific holdings being affected is low. Wait for the official update on when bridging will resume before attempting any transactions. Will the SAND token price crash because of this? It is unlikely to cause a major crash given the minimal impact of less than 0.01% of the supply. Historically, the market punishes hacks that drain significant liquidity or protocol reserves. Since this exploit was contained quickly, the price impact has been limited. However, you should expect increased volatility and potential sell pressure from short-term traders looking to exit on the news. What should I do if I was affected by the exploit? If you believe you were directly affected by the exploit, you should contact The Sandbox support team immediately. They are likely to have a process for reporting affected addresses and may offer compensation depending on the outcome of their investigation. Do not respond to direct messages on social media offering to help recover funds, as these are often scams. Rely only on official communication channels from the Sandbox team.

• 
  Mr. Freeze (@Guillaume88745) reported 57 minutes ago

  @WilliamShortss @MoreBigFish @bitcoinsv_com Even CMC, a website owned by Binance, the exchange founded by CZ, describes BSV as a version of Bitcoin that aims to follow the original Bitcoin protocol and SN’s vision of a P2P electronic cash system. Funny how even CMC acknowledges that while so many BTC shills refuse to.

• 
  Crypto-Enlightened (@MrLogicVn) reported 58 minutes ago

  @xrpmickle Oh, on Binance the flush is only down to 1.37 @xrpmickle , not 1.05 🤔

• 
  Ngọc My (@NgocMy18x) reported 59 minutes ago

  @CazroWeb3 @binance borrowing against crypto without selling is smart; could really help in a pinch