Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	26 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	28 days ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported 2 minutes ago

  @rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..

• 
  Michael Bright (@phoxonomy) reported 3 minutes ago

  @binance it never let me down. hope you will find a solution for the eu bullshit in order to keep european customers!

• 
  crypto Ro $ (@cryptosilar) reported 3 minutes ago

  @__kfm__ @turtledotxyz Worst fraud listed on binance ever ! -99% down

• 
  Safari Urg (@Safarii533) reported 4 minutes ago

  @binance Binance support only meme coin.

• 
  slash1s (@slash1sol) reported 5 minutes ago

  A GROUP OF CHINESE GUYS GAVE OPUS 4.8 A 300-AGENT WORKFORCE AND BUILT A WORKING SAAS IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR UNDER $90 > Claude Opus 4.8 was not writing code like a normal ChatBot. It acted as the manager. One rough idea became 40 tasks, dependencies, specs and a clean blueprint for Kimi Agent swarm to execute. > Then Kimi did the heavy lifting. 300 agents ran around 4,000 steps in parallel while the team watched the system move instead of typing every file by hand. > 80 agents pulled live data from Binance, Yahoo Finance, World Bank and IMF. 60 handled the backend, 90 built the interface, and 70 shipped the landing page, export files and pitch deck. > The result was not a fake demo. A live analytics dashboard with market feeds, auth, database, charts, responsive UI, ppt, pdf, excel and web outputs from the same run. > A normal team could burn $7,500+ on DEV work, data wiring, design, charts and slides as separate jobs. They compressed the whole thing into one afternoon with almost no overhead. > Most people still use AI like a chat window. These guys used it like a company structure, where one model thinks, hundreds of agents execute, and the product ships before the team even gets bored. Bookmark & Watch it run ↓

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 10 minutes ago

  if you see an unusual distro like Coinbase 35%, Binance 12%, Mexc 1%, Change Now 1.5%, Bybit 5%, and there are just 1 kol in there and he has a bad rep, that's just bad avoid that **** If you see something like Binance 25%, Coinbase 14%, Mexc 5%, Change Now 4%, Bybit 7%, Gate 6%, with less americans but you have strong kols in there, that's potentially the good **** We're learning everyday, but all i can say it's all about the holders, how strong they are, if they are farmers, when do they farm and so on, if they farm at all, you want to follow the ones who don't farm

• 
  CHAIN REACTIONS ℠ Ӿ (@ChainReactionOm) reported 11 minutes ago

  @connyb @alexjohnward @Yeicrypto Study Cardano The market is irrational and what is working is in the hand of few players like : Coinbase, Binance and other big scam groups , eaither you Join their playground or wait for Clarity Act Nothing working now , only scams

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceWallet Thank you for your response, but the issue has never been properly addressed. The same problem keeps happening repeatedly, and each time it is eventually attributed to a "technical error." When the same mistake occurs over and over again, it is no longer an isolated incident—it becomes a systemic issue. Your technical failures have repeatedly classified my account as high-risk, restricted services, and caused unnecessary inconvenience and stress. As a user, I am expected to comply with all requirements, and I have done so every time. Yet Binance continues to make the same mistakes without taking responsibility. What is even more frustrating is the lack of transparency, accountability, and any form of apology after these errors are proven. Repeating the same issue for months is not acceptable and reflects poorly on the reliability of your systems. Users deserve better than repeated technical failures and generic responses. We deserve fair treatment, clear explanations, and accountability

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 12 minutes ago

  first thing you wanna do is having an overall idea of the distro, if it's more Binance/OKX/Gate/Bybit/Mexc or Coinbase/Cryptocom/Change Now/Kraken. If it's more Binance then it can really pump high, but expect a hard dump at some point (like worldcup), if it's more Coinbase study your shits really really well and look if they are bagworking like maniacs, if you see them bagworking like there's no tomorrow : avoid. Basically after you have an overall idea where the holders are based, you need to find good strong hardcore kols in there. If you see the same guys with multi axiom wallets that's no good. if you see folks who can hold hard and are not insiders like ily or wrld_sol or gake, that's potentially the good ****. At the end of the day it's only about the holders and their reputation, it's very tough out there

• 
  Fidele (@Fidele_ka) reported 12 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks ever support fractional shares for emerging market users? Right now I can buy $1 of crypto but not $1 of a stock — would love to see that gap close . #AskBinance

• 
  Bông 🍊 po (@B0ngQy) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet Biggest issue with Binance Wallet DeFi: headline APY can look attractive, but real returns are harder to judge. Net yield, fees, incentives, and sustainability should be much more transparent.

• 
  Whaleland (@Whaleland_Dex) reported 17 minutes ago

  Europe’s new crypto license race has started because MiCA is moving from theory to enforcement. Firms now need authorization as a crypto-asset service provider in one EU country, and that license can then be used across the bloc. That has created a real competitive sprint among exchanges, fintechs, and crypto infrastructure firms. Winning early means gaining regulated access to the EU market ahead of rivals, while missing the deadline can mean an orderly exit, blacklisting, or legal risk. Recent events show both sides of that race. Conio secured a MiCA license in Italy this week, while Reuters reported Binance is expected to lose its bid in Greece and may no longer be able to serve EU users from July. The bigger picture is that Europe is becoming one of the first major markets where crypto regulation now directly decides who can scale. That makes licensing less of a compliance box and more of a strategic moat.

• 
  Sukumar (@Sukumar9501) reported 17 minutes ago

  Dear @BinanceHelpDesk, I am a loyal Binance user and actively participate in Binance campaigns. Unfortunately, Binance Traders League displays "This activity is not available in your region" even though I am fully verified. Could your team please clarify the eligibility for Indian users or review my account? Thank you for your support. #Binance #BinanceTradersLeague

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 18 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  Zhang Han (@vertie95594) reported 20 minutes ago

  @binance What makes bStocks a better option for global investors who cannot easily access U.S. stock markets? #AskBinance

• 
  Fadil (@Fadil_bawa1) reported 22 minutes ago

  A few people asked why I sold my $Wojak position. The reason was simple. Binance US listed the Ethereum version of Wojak and later changed its profile picture to Wojak. Whether you like it or not, that shifts attention. In memecoins, attention drives liquidity. I didn’t think the Solana thesis was broken, but I did think the market would react to the news, so I decided to close my position. The chart went from around 5M to below 4M shortly after. For now, I’m staying on the sidelines and watching. If it finds a strong base again, I’ll be happy to reassess. A thesis can still be good even if the trade no longer makes sense.

• 
  Ares (@ArxsTV) reported 23 minutes ago

  @asdfeafeef @x256xx ye so you short eth with 10m at the top and buy it spot and keep it on binance. and now ur up millions on the short on hl, but down millions on the spot on binance. welcome to delta neutral trading

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 27 minutes ago

  @gandalfcryptto Agreed, but shorting’s not broken—data shows 63% of leveraged shorts on Binance get liquidated weekly. Most traders over-leverage in low vol. We track this daily in our risk reports. You ever see longs get wrecked harder? [link]

• 
  enci (@encigr) reported 34 minutes ago

  Honestly $spacemoon feels like the perfect layup for CZ. On June 11, binance launched bStocks - tokenized stocks on @BNBCHAIN, the centerpiece of the whole "next 3 billion users" super-app bet. A few days later, @spacemoonbsc launched, which does one thing: routes trading taxes into spacex bStock and distributes it to holders onchain. In just 2 days it's driven $250k into spacex bStock and onboarded 2,500 holders. As a matter of fact, it's single-handedly dragging bStocks toward being the most successful tokenized-stock attempt onchain. If CZ wanted a trojan horse to get retail hooked on bStocks, it'd look exactly like this. After all, they have sent tokens to absurd valuations before with nothing this strategic behind them. I expect spacemoon to start repricing till it gets its ****-you candle.

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 36 minutes ago

  @heyibinance Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution, I have been pushed to black hole within Binance support system. Can you please help. For the past 9 months, I have been suffering for the (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  Ella (@Ella_0733) reported 38 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance Access changes everything. That's the biggest advantage modern markets offer.

• 
  HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reported 39 minutes ago

  @binance Can users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 40 minutes ago

  My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

• 
  0xKass7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ (@kassinvest) reported 41 minutes ago

  CROWD STILL WANTS 50k. I JUST ADDED MORE LONGS. >still holding the 59.5k $BTC long >added more longs here at 62.5k >total futures exposure now ~150% of my port thesis didnt change before moving higher i think btc needs to collect the liquidity around 62k first (pic attached) after that my targets remain the same: 68k-71k reasons why im still bullish: -capitulation already happened -more than 7B got liquidated -retail sentiment is still awful -shorts outnumber longs 5.5:1 -margin loans on binance stopped growing. ppl r not levering up anymore -traders continue giving margin back after buying every dip from 67k to 60k market already flushed most weak hands now im watching the metrics closely for now nothing changed long from 59.5k stays open, added more at 62.5k targets remain 68k-71k GL guys

• 
  Sky🎀 (@cr8pto) reported 43 minutes ago

  @binance Why was $5 chosen as the minimum for bStocks instead of $1 or $10? And as liquidity and adoption grow, are there plans to lower it further? A lower entry point could help users in emerging markets build diversified portfolios with even smaller amounts. 🚀 #AskBinance #bStocks

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 44 minutes ago

  @dharmjack01 @USDai_Official $CHIP consolidated 5-7 cent range after 60% correction from ath, rallied 45% off bottom. got 7/8 tier 1 cex listings (binance, bybit, okx, bitget, gate, htx, kucoin). funding hit 514% apr late may. SharpeLabs insider selling watch scored it 6.1/10—below critical but worth tracking. bull case: ai infra narrative (usdai gpu tokenization), broad liquidity access, airdrop/farming flywheel creating demand loop bear case: high volatility (that 60% drop), funding rate risk on unwinding longs, tied to usdai ecosystem stability no explicit price targets in the data. rating: 68/100. strong ai positioning and cex access, offset by volatility and insider watch score. @USDai_Official is ai-powered synthetic dollar on arbitrum, currently $0.99959 (basically pegged). recovered 11% during recent crash, hit $74m mcap. offers 9.86% fixed apr on pendle, 8% susdai apy targeting 11%. unique: tokenizes gpus as collateral for 70% ltv loans—financing ai compute through defi. over $500m deposit caps, $110m tvl, holds $200m pyusd generating 4.5% yield. backed by framework ventures. bull: tight peg stability under stress, high yields attracting capital, gpu collateral taps ai compute demand, integrations across arbitrum defi (pendle, euler, plasma) bear: algorithmic stablecoin risks (ath was $1.19 so it can depeg), gpu collateral value volatility, stablecoin competition heating up rating: 85/100. robust stability mechanisms, innovative gpu backing, strong yields and tvl growth. risk mainly around algo dynamics and competitive landscape.

• 
  BlockVanta (@Msagirsani) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance How does Binance ensure bStocks remain 1:1 backed by U.S. shares via Proof of Collateral? What protections exist if BTech Holdings or the custodian faces issues, and how does the ADGM framework address past tokenized stock concerns? #AskBinance

• 
  lasherdoekmark1bh (@lasherdoekmark1) reported 46 minutes ago

  bStocks now live on Lista, the first BNB Chain lending protocol supporting 1:1 backed US securities from Binance. Borrow, earn, and access assets like Nvidia, Tesla, SpaceX, and more 24/7 on-chain. Will this boost crypto-backed securities? #Crypto #DeFi #BNB

• 
  ꜱʜᴀʜɪɴ ʙᴜʀᴋɪ (@Shahinburki) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance Will binance use a knife down wick to Liquidate the Stock traders. As you used in #Btc #Eth futures??

• 
  Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported 54 minutes ago

  @binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.