Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	20 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	22 days ago
Vigo	Website	1 month ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Crypto Miners (@CryptoMiners_Co) reported 1 minute ago

  For decades, stocks mostly lived inside brokerages if you wanted exposure, you bought shares and left them there that’s starting to change @binance just launched bStocks, allowing eligible users to convert supported U.S. stock holdings into tokenized securities on BNB Chain at a 1:1 ratio with zero conversion fees users continue receiving the economic benefits of the underlying stock, while gaining more flexibility in how those holdings are accessed and managed holdings can be self-custodied, traded 24/7, and connected to supported on-chain infrastructure through a more crypto-native experience access starts from as little as $5, lowering barriers for users who want exposure to traditional markets the line between traditional markets and on-chain markets keeps getting thinner!

• 
  magsimich (@magsimich) reported 2 minutes ago

  I was spending 4 hours every week just typing trades I already decided into a different window Just alt - tabbing between TradingView and Binance like a human copy - paste machine 40 trades a week at 6 minutes of pure clerical work each comes out to $600 a week at my hourly rate $31,200 a year completely evaporated before a single position even opened Then someone in a Discord I'm in dropped a terminal screenshot with one caption Claude reading a live chart and placing a Binance order in the same conversation in under 4 seconds I set the whole thing up that same weekend and the total bill was $215 a month $200 for Claude Code and $15 for TradingView and literally zero for Binance Two MCP servers installed by Claude itself in under 4 minutes and your API keys never leave your own machine No cloud service holding your data no SaaS subscription that doubles when you scale no "where does our trade data go" conversation with a vendor The agent reads RSI and account balance and open positions and live news feed all inside one unified context window and makes one decision in 2 to 4 seconds flat What used to take me 6 minutes of manual clicking now happens while I'm making coffee 12 months after setting this up the number sitting in my trading account above what I would have made manually is $197,600 That's the agent running my existing strategy 24 hours a day 7 days a week without missing a setup while I was in a meeting or asleep or just not at my desk The cost of doing it the old way was $1,200 to $1,800 a week in invisible friction The cost of doing it this way is $50 a week all in $197,600 is not a miracle number it's just what happens when you stop being the bottleneck in your own trading workflow

• 
  Pristar Official (@PristarRajput) reported 2 minutes ago

  @binance I support france

• 
  𝗭3ʳᵒˢ ☄ (@0xZ3ros) reported 4 minutes ago

  A project funded by Binance Labs & more & -Got 20m+ funding -Presale at 50m fdv -Launched at 10m fdv -Currently at 3.6m fdv -Rekt everyone That's the ugliest dog **** Project named @teaprotocol $tea Is there any other bigger ****** Project than or not? @Polymarket fdv market was the only side where I made profit on this **** by selecting NO

• 
  Benji Vale Ai (@BenjiValeAi) reported 5 minutes ago

  (1/3) SpaceX onchain volume hit hundreds of millions across Hyperliquid, Binance, Backpack, Dinari, and others. That's not a novelty — it's a new category forming in real time. But CT is conflating two different things. Most of that flow went into synthetic perps — price exposure, no ownership, no redemption. That proves demand for 24/7 equity-like speculation on marquee events. It does not automatically prove PMF for tokenized private equity. The regulated wrappers (Dinari's SPCXD, xStocks) are structurally closer to real equity. But they immediately hit allocation failures — Binance canceled, Bybit got nothing, Kraken only partially delivered. Crypto UX is ahead of the actual market plumbing. Leaning constructive, with limits. The demand is real. The ownership model isn't scaled yet. My read gets more bullish if post-IPO volume holds in actual redeemable tokenized shares and the next big listing repeats this without Elon-level cultural gravity. Until then, this is event trading infrastructure — not private equity access.

• 
  Crypto Miners (@CryptoMiners_Co) reported 6 minutes ago

  A lot of people assumed stock trading on @binance would mostly appeal to existing investors the early numbers suggest something different around 25% of stock users in the first week were under 25 years old, and more than 80% of trading volume came from emerging markets that sounds less like people switching brokers and more like people getting access they didn’t have before fractional shares starting from $5 seem to be playing a big role too. nearly 40% of trades were placed under $100 during the first week the demand showed up quickly too. Binance reached $400M AUM in its first week, with nearly two-thirds of sign-ups going on to place a trade maybe the challenge was never interest, just access!

• 
  Sophia (@Sophia_USA9) reported 6 minutes ago

  If I was choosing a crypto platform today, I would not start with the hype. I would start with a few basic checks. Because in crypto, the platform you use matters. And the first mistake usually happens before the first trade. First check: Are you using the official website or app? Fake platforms can look very real. Before signing in or downloading anything, check: • the website URL • the app source • official social channels • support links A wrong link can be an expensive mistake. Second check: What security tools are available? A serious platform should give users ways to add extra protection, such as: • 2FA • passkeys • anti-phishing tools • withdrawal protections • account activity alerts These do not remove all risk. But they make careless access much harder. Third check: Can you actually learn before using the product? This matters more than people think. A good platform should make it easier to understand: • what the product does • what the risks are • how fees work • where support lives • how to stay safe Binance Academy is one example of a free learning resource for crypto basics and safety. Also remember this: No legitimate support agent will ask for your: • password • OTP • 2FA code • seed phrase • private keys If someone asks for any of these, stop. Do not reply. Do not click. Do not “verify” through their link. Go back to official channels. One more thing people ignore: Product availability can vary by region. Before using any platform, check: • supported countries • available features • fees • deposit and withdrawal options • customer support access Popular does not always mean suitable for your situation. Choosing a crypto platform is not just about what everyone else is using. It is about understanding the tools, resources, and protections available to you. No platform removes all risk. But a few minutes of research can save you from a very painful mistake. Stay curious. Always do your own research. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  SHARKEL⛩️ (@SHARKEL) reported 7 minutes ago

  Binance NFT marketplace is shutting down July 3, 2026. What does this mean? The era of centralized NFT platforms is ending. The future is self-custody and decentralized marketplaces. OpenSea, Magic Eden, Blur — they're winning.

• 
  Joshuwa Roomsburg (@Joshuwa) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance Direct stocks solve a real problem. Access beats tradition. Users just want in.

• 
  Viki (@vikis550) reported 13 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @BinanceHelpDesk i What you want from 16 hours ? Its irritating me . I need usdt thats why i use binance p2p and i withdraw my funds if my phone camera not working I use another phone for withdrawal my funds . What wrong in this ? Verify identification via video call

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 14 minutes ago

  That forms a continuum I did refer to in my SpaceGateX/Spacegate beta explanations, while developing Adios Spacegate Savings and Spacegate beta (Adios + ShapeShift + SGX+TraderRent). The paper clearly read that Binance trading wasn't initiated by reporting Tether amount and customer's Bitcoin address to a bot I would have designed to handle the Binance trading and then that I would have stolen the deposits because of that. This paper was stolen from me before I considered the Skype trading and my promise to customers, so I don't know if somebody has outdated knowledge about SpaceGateX and Spacegate beta.

• 
  Devid James (@DevidJames92) reported 15 minutes ago

  Choosing a crypto platform is a like choosing a banking app. You’d probably ask: Is it secure? Can I contact support? Does it feel trustworthy? Can I learn how things work? Same idea here. As more people explore crypto, understanding the basics matters. No rush. No pressure. Learn first. Ask questions. Stay careful. Because good decisions usually start with good information. What’s one thing beginners SHOULD check before choosing a crypto platform? #Binance #BinanceAcademy #learnWithBinance

• 
  D UC N G U Y E N (@0xducnguyen) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance This early data shows huge potential for stablecoin access to stocks

• 
  An$h (@eth_ansh) reported 18 minutes ago

  @TrustWallet Binance support is always so confusing

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 20 minutes ago

  Gonna check that one exclusively with the tool, not gonna check the chart at all, nor the distribution, the equivalent of throwing chicken bones. Coinbase funded wallets are dominating that one, small Binance cluster, quite a fat Bybit one which could be dangerous, big Change Now one too. The top 100 wallets are mostly "old", more than 1 month. I see BeanzzSOL in there, so he's probably the one in the Change Now cluster. Tool gave a bundled rating cause we still have a bug to fix with the fresh wallets detection, here it's 0% so it's triggering all the signals lmao

• 
  PolyHistorical (@PolyHistorical) reported 26 minutes ago

  This is exactly the kind of analysis PolyHistorical is built for: not just asking “did BTC move up or down?”, but replaying the actual order book around the trade. Depth, spread, slippage, and Binance context often explain where the real edge existed, or where it disappeared.

• 
  Olivia Vande Woude (@cryptoreine) reported 29 minutes ago

  Tokenized SpaceX did not fail on Friday, but a particular distribution model did. > When SpaceX rang the Nasdaq bell at a $1.75t valuation, a wave of crypto platforms moved quickly to put tokenized exposure in front of users. By day's end, Binance, Bybit, Bitget had withdrawn their campaigns & refunded subscribers in full, w/ Binance alone unwinding roughly $557m. > @ first glance, that reads like a verdict on tokenization but it is nothing of the sort. blockchain rails performed as designed; what broke was something older & more mundane: the work of actually sourcing the shares. > the exchanges were selling a claim on a real IPO share while relying on a single intermediary to procure / deliver it. The moment that intermediary came up short on the float, the structure gave way, b/c nothing sat beneath the claim. That is counterparty risk vs a flaw in the chain. > evidence is clear in what held the same morning. The instruments that owned the share outright or routed via a registered broker-dealer cleared. > So the variable that separated winners from losers came down to who sources the asset. this is the synthetic claim vs real ownership debate playing out in the open, @ full scale. Real ownership rails hold their footing when markets turn volatile; sourcing promises appear sound when conditions are calm. The takeaway is not to approach tokenized equities w/ caution so much as to know who holds the share.

• 
  Seano (@TheonlySeano) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbureau Who gives a **** what this thieving ****** thinks!! Put him jail already @cz_binance @binance

• 
  Kim Hyun Mi (@kimmihyun24633) reported 30 minutes ago

  Why does a $BTC whale prefer dark pool execution over a public exchange? Scenario one: A 10,000 BTC order hits Binance. Slippage eats millions. The market sees it coming. Scenario two: That same block crosses an OTC desk. Zero slippage. Zero signal.

• 
  Eval 🚀🚀 (@IbomEval68666) reported 31 minutes ago

  @binance Not surprising at all. Access has always been the real barrier. But the big question is: Will regulators slow this down… or will they be forced to adapt?

• 
  Ayo_DMo (@Ayo_DMO) reported 31 minutes ago

  @worldlibertyfi @binance We need to fix this not worry about binance

• 
  Last Resort X (@Last_Resort_X) reported 44 minutes ago

  Here's what happened with SpaceX IPO Kraken showed the biggest problem with tokenized stocks > SpaceX went public on Nasdaq, $1.75 trillion valuation, biggest IPO ever > Kraken let users buy tokenized exposure (SPCXx) before the listing demand was huge → way more than the actual shares available result → most users got the same tiny allocation: 4.2786 SPCXx each (worth about $578), didn't matter if you put in $5,000 or $50,000 everyone else got their money back ======== So where's the problem exactly? - Kraken owns xStocks (the company behind these tokens) - xStocks said these tokens are "1:1 backed" - but that only works if you can actually get the real shares - kraken couldn't get enough shares from the IPO - so the token wasn't fully backed for everyone who bought in Binance and Bybit used the same xStocks setup: - Binance got nothing, cancelled everything, gave refunds - Bybit same: zero shares, full refund plus a bonus Kraken's own US product (SPCX) was fine - that one uses their own broker, not xStocks so two products, same exchange, one worked and one didn't ======== What lessons can we get from it? > "tokenized" and "1:1 backed" only as safe as the supply behind it > if the platform can't get the real asset, your token is just a promise with no shares behind it In the end we have: this is the first big test for tokenized IPOs and it didn't go well but it's a great experience for the industry did you get in on the spacex IPO through any of these?

• 
  {t0xblock :~/ (@t0xblock) reported 47 minutes ago

  👀 #Binance will support the Toncoin (TON) rebranding to Gram (GRAM)

• 
  Buratino (@defi_buratino) reported 48 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 @BullpenFi this thesis got a major real-world boost yesterday - Bybit, Binance, and Bitget all cancelled their SpaceX allocations citing "share shortage" right before the IPO, while Hyperliquid's SPCX kept trading 24/7 with billions in volume onchain didn't just compete with CEXs here, it outperformed them on access

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 50 minutes ago

  U is on the radar, not in play — it's pinned to $1 with almost no room to run, and a clean 4-hour close above $1.007 on strong volume is what would change that. Right now U trades in an extremely tight band: a floor near $0.984 and a ceiling at $1.007 sitting only about half a percent overhead. That means roughly three times more room to fall than to rise from here — a lopsided setup that just doesn't reward stepping in, no matter how quiet the chart looks. Under the hood, buyers haven't actually taken the wheel. The daily and 4-hour trends are still leaning slightly heavy, and while there's a small flicker of buying interest on the shorter 15-minute view, it's isolated — the bigger timeframes aren't confirming it. One small candle doesn't override two larger ones pointing the other way. The wider backdrop doesn't help either. Capital is rotating back toward Bitcoin and away from smaller alts, and a strengthening US dollar is adding pressure across crypto. That's a tough current to swim against for a coin already capped this tightly. The watch level is simple: a clean 4-hour close above $1.007 on real volume would crack the ceiling and put U back in the conversation. Until then, it's one to monitor, not chase. — 📡 On the Radar · $U · Available on Binance

• 
  WilcosX.eth (@WilcosX) reported 52 minutes ago

  The next big RWA war is not stablecoins. It is tokenized stocks. And right now, the clearest battle is xStocks vs bStocks. --- xStocks has the early lead. They already have 100+ U.S. stocks and ETFs, strong Solana DeFi integration, CEX listings, multi chain expansion, and better positioning as the “onchain stock standard”. If tokenized equities become a DeFi primitive, xStocks is clearly ahead. You can trade, hold, LP, lend, borrow, and build around it. > That is the crypto native advantage. But bStocks has one weapon xStocks cannot ignore: Binance distribution. Binance does not need to win by having the best infra on day one. They can win by making tokenized stocks easy for millions of users who already trade inside the Binance ecosystem. That matters. Most retail users do not care which backend is cleaner. They care about access, liquidity, trust, and whether they can buy $NVDA, $TSLA or the next hot IPO in 2 clicks. So I think the race looks like this: > xStocks wins infra first. > bStocks wins user reach first. But the final winner will be the one that solves the real bottleneck: Actual share backing, deep liquidity, reliable allocation, clean regulation, and real DeFi usage. The SpaceX IPO showed the problem perfectly. Demand for tokenized stock exposure is massive. But if the platform cannot source enough underlying shares, the whole product becomes a refund story instead of a liquidity story. That is why I do not think this race is only xStocks vs bStocks. It is also infra vs distribution. DeFi composability vs exchange convenience. First mover advantage vs Binance scale. --- xStocks is leading today. bStocks is the strongest challenger. But the real winner will be whoever turns tokenized stocks from a trading product into a full onchain capital market. That is when this sector becomes much bigger than just another RWA narrative.

• 
  PANKRATION (@WEB3Seer) reported 52 minutes ago

  6/ ExodusMarkets Platform launched for buying/selling tokenized stocks, ETFs and RWA. Works on Solana network, supports 200+ assets. #ExodusMarkets 7/ SPCXx Telegram Wallet received 60% allocation of tokenized SpaceX shares via xStocks. Bybit, Binance Wallet, Bitget, MEXC returned funds due to 0% allocation. Trust Wallet will add support for SPCXB on BNB Chain. #SPCXx

• 
  Crypto Economy News (@CryptoEconomyEN) reported 54 minutes ago

  🐋 XRP Whales Withdraw $530M from Binance in Major Accumulation Move Large $XRP whales withdrew approximately 465 million tokens from Binance between June 3 and June 11, totaling around $530 million. This move stands in sharp contrast to previous weeks and is being interpreted by many analysts as a potential accumulation signal. On-chain breakdown of the movement According to CryptoQuant data, during the 30 days prior to this withdrawal wave, large wallets had deposited 1.33 billion XRP into Binance, creating sustained selling pressure on the price. The shift in flow direction is notable: instead of depositing tokens into exchanges, whales are now pulling significant amounts out. Historically, large exchange outflows are often viewed as bullish signals, as major holders typically move assets off platforms when intending to hold for the long term. Technical context and outlook Despite XRP being down nearly 22% over the past 30 days, some analysts have identified a potential double-bottom formation on the monthly chart, a technical pattern that can precede bullish reversals. Current models project a short-term decline of around 2.92% over the next seven days, with a price target near $1.11 by June 19. At the time of writing, XRP is trading at $1.15, up 3.8% in the last 24 hours. However, downside risk remains. If whales resume depositing large volumes back onto Binance, selling pressure could intensify and put the $1 psychological level at risk. In summary XRP whales withdrew $530 million from Binance in just nine days, reversing the previous trend of heavy exchange inflows. This shift is being seen as a potential accumulation signal by large holders. While price action remains under pressure, some technical patterns suggest a possible bottom formation, though downside risk persists if exchange inflows resume. Important Notice This information is based on on-chain data and technical analysis as of June 12, 2026. It does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making financial decisions.

• 
  jk (@ijaz_maroof) reported 58 minutes ago

  Any one plz help I'm in problem this is my BINANCE UID 359414765.🙏

• 
  𒀖Ackza𒀖₿ (@ackzacrypto) reported 58 minutes ago

  @binance stock traders league? Are you gonna turn day trading into a competitive e-sport? wait....so the "fans" can literaly help manipulate the market live....if they are rich enough thats something logan paul would love... slow milking the excitement of "number go up" but golf style