Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	20 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ppobppob | 地下室人 (@ppobppob6669) reported 8 minutes ago

  @onchainlurkin i think will be ai coin,like wood ...rwa coins ,index and ai have big tax,idk how to spot list them,binance have paired -web3-wallets to airdrop,robinhood not fix that now imo

• 
  Genesis Arbitrage (@genesis_scanner) reported 8 minutes ago

  VELVET down 56% on the hour, binance OI up about 48% across the same window. Nobody's closing out, plenty adding

• 
  roedie (@RudyWijaya82161) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Bitcoinhabebe @binance @cz_binance Clarity act Will be fix this

• 
  Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) reported 14 minutes ago

  Bitcoin Returns Above $80,000 After 113 Days, $179 Million in Futures Liquidated According to Binance market data, BTC has broken above the $80,000 level, reaching a nearly three-month high, and is currently trading at around $79,174. BTC last broke above $80,000 on May 4, 2026, marking a return to the level after 113 days. According to CoinGlass data, total crypto liquidations over the past four hours reached approximately $179.19 million, including $78.99 million in long positions and $100.20 million in short positions.

• 
  Rose (@Caroline_Kind6) reported 16 minutes ago

  @TedPillows The main issue is that many people in the market are taking profits, and Binance and Coinbase have been supporting the price to prevent it from falling, resulting in a gradual decrease in trading volume

• 
  Baz Star (@baz_star) reported 16 minutes ago

  Same wankers on Binance back to their usual antics of placing and pulling $BTC orders to push down prices for whatever bullshit motivation in their greedy pathetic heads. Never ending manipulative story underscoring the efforts a minority expend. And clearly centered on the USA💩

• 
  𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐫 (@Whisper__7) reported 21 minutes ago

  What if you could borrow against your crypto without selling it? 👀 That’s the basic idea behind Binance Lite Loan. Here’s the simple breakdown 👇 1: Pledge crypto as collateral Instead of selling your eligible crypto, you use it as collateral for the loan. Currently, the topic guide says users can borrow USDT using BTC as eligible collateral. 2: Borrow You receive the borrowed assets while your crypto remains as collateral. The initial loan term is 30 days, with a 1% upfront service fee. 3: Your collateral can keep earning During the loan, the collateral remains subscribed to Simple Earn Flexible Products and can continue generating yield. That’s one of the key differences highlighted for Lite Loan. 4: What about liquidation? During the initial 30-day term, there is no LTV-triggered liquidation, so users don’t need to manage LTV during that initial period. But this does not mean the loan is risk-free. Overdue loans can accrue penalty interest, and liquidation may apply after the initial term under specified conditions. 5: The important part A crypto-backed loan is still a financial product with risks. Collateral values can change, product availability and eligibility can vary by region, and repayment terms matter. So don’t treat “borrow against crypto” as free money. Understand the terms first. DYOR. Would you consider borrowing against your crypto instead of selling it? Educational content only not financial advice. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  RXKing Cluster (@KiRudianto) reported 23 minutes ago

  @binance #AskBinance Question 1 : Over the next year, is Binance Agent OS projected to replace conventional Grid Trading Bots with AI agents driven by text-based preferences? Question 2: How does Binance Agent OS ensure the security of user funds against potential hallucinations or logical errors by AI agents during automated trade execution? Question 3: Does Binance Agent OS support the execution of multi-chain strategies via Web3 API, or is it currently focused on Binance centralized exchange (CEX) ecosystem? Question 4: How does the Binance x402 architecture facilitate machine-to-machine payment transactions between AI agents within this ecosystem?

• 
  MetaShark (@themetashark) reported 29 minutes ago

  @CryptosR_Us 🔥 MOMENTUM: Altcoins are waking up. From Aug. 19–22, roughly $215 BILLION poured back into the altcoin market, pushing TOTAL2 above $1 TRILLION again. But the stat I’m watching even closer: 56% of Binance altcoins are now trading ABOVE their 200-day moving average. Not long ago, roughly 80%–85% were BELOW it. That is a MASSIVE shift in market breadth. Now, I’m not calling full altseason yet. Bitcoin dominance is still elevated and the Altcoin Season Index is only around 49 — well below the 75 level generally associated with a confirmed altseason. But this is how rotations START. BTC moves first. Then majors. Then capital starts hunting higher-beta opportunities further down the market. We’re finally seeing signs that money is beginning to spread out. Altseason isn’t confirmed yet. But the engine is starting to turn over.

• 
  3Ms (@MaxMoneyMakers) reported 31 minutes ago

  @binance Crypto is garbage also the scam of stocks is not working the CEX a running out of lies to sell? LOL

• 
  Seph (@Jehoseph) reported 31 minutes ago

  For our small network, unseen by most of Crypto X, but with branches stretching into a lot of quiet agreements made over many years. Monday open. Bitcoin is at $78,139, up 23% on the week. Ethereum is at $2,483, up 30.8%. Zcash is up 64.5%. One of the strongest risk-on weeks in a long time. ethereum:0xaeeaa594e7dc112d67b8547fe9767a02c15b5597 is up 7.5%. ethereum:0xff20817765cb7f73d4bde2e66e067e58d11095c2 is up 12.6%. ANVL trades at $0.0008968. AMP trades at $0.0004214. ANVL sits at $79,006,750, ranked #311. AMP sits at $37,942,497, ranked #540. ANVL did $61,755 of volume in 24 hours. AMP did $3,054,053. AMP does roughly 50x the daily volume on half the market cap. As a share of market cap, AMP turns over about 8% a day. ANVL turns over 0.08%. A hundredfold difference in how much real money is voting. And it's thinner than that sounds. ANVL is priced across three exchanges and five markets, most of that volume in a single MEXC book. AMP is across 42 exchanges and 48 markets, with Binance the deepest venue. So when someone posts an ANVL chart, understand what they're charting. One order book on one mid-tier exchange. Look at the two 7-day sparklines above. AMP's is a smooth curve. ANVL's has a vertical gap down and a scramble back. That's what a thin book looks like when someone of ordinary size hits the bid. Which brings me to the thing our own chats need to hear. "We're up 10% today" is not a signal On $61,755 of daily volume, a 10% move can be a few thousand dollars of net buying. That isn't demand. That's an empty book. The same thinness that makes 30x math feel plausible is exactly what makes the exit brutal. Price targets are cheap when nobody has tried to sell into them. And here's the part almost nobody in either community says out loud: right now a major announcement from either side likely moves money sideways, not in. People holding both sell one to size up the other. AMP absorbs that. Anvil cannot. Somewhere between one and ten ordinary sellers is enough to take ANVL down 30% or more. Not a whale. Not an attack. Just people acting rationally on good news about the other asset. That holds until buyers who have never touched AMP find Anvil on their own. That takes listings, coverage, and depth we don't have yet. What the $79M is actually paying for Anvil currently charges zero protocol fees. No creation, no interest, no amendment, no withdrawal. Turning any on requires a governance vote. So, the valuation prices adoption that hasn't scaled, times fees that don't exist, times a future vote to create them, times those fees reaching holders. That's a legitimate thesis. It's also four conditionals deep. And when people reach for the UNI comparison, remember UNI is the textbook case of a governance token that captures no protocol revenue. Now, Anvil: The protocol is audited by OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits, runs two Immunefi bounty programs, and in June was accepted into the Ethereum Security Subsidy Program alongside the Ethereum Foundation, Nethermind, and Chainlink. It shipped its first institutional letter of credit product at Consensus in May. At Blockchain Futurist this month, six sponsors, EukaPay, Digital Spenders Club, Polymath, Stablecorp, APX Lending, MayFlower, secured their packages with on-chain LOCs instead of paying upfront. Small dollars, real counterparties, real usage. The honest counterweight: TVL sits near $10M today. It peaked at 36,000 ETH, about $109M, in July 2025. Usage went backwards while the market cap did not. And AMP: Flexa has been building since 2018. The token has been live since September 2020, launched with ConsenSys, backed by Pantera. Six years of price history and real settlement volume. This year Flexa retired SPEDN to focus on B2B rails and went live across 37 SEPA countries. Exchange reserves fell about 43% in 90 days earlier this year, supply moving into self custody. The counterweight there is just as blunt. AMP printed a fresh all time low this cycle. It is roughly 18% above it. That's an asset in a downtrend trying to build a base, and the burden of proof sits entirely with buyers. Levels, without inventing anything. $0.000356 is the line. Lose it on a weekly close and the base thesis is finished. Around $0.00050 is the first real reclaim. Near $0.00065 a trend change becomes arguable. A green Monday is not a signal. A weekly close over a prior swing high is. On ANVL I'll say the unpopular thing. At $62K a day across three venues, there isn't enough liquidity for TA to carry weight. You're fitting patterns to noise on one exchange. The structural fact is that it's about 90% off its $0.00929 high. Why both are in one post Anvil came out of the Acronym Foundation, originally the Ampera Foundation, created by one of Flexa's own founders. ANVL wasn't a launchpad token or a raise. It was distributed to addresses providing AMP collateral. Flexa is a named user of Anvil, alongside Bullish. Trace the whitepapers, the distribution, the conference stages, and you land on some of the same people who have been at this since 2018. If they execute, both work. If they don't, correlation goes to one and the thin book breaks first. Combined, both assets are worth about $117 million. Bitcoin traded $33.6 billion in the last day. Zcash traded $1.31 billion. Everything we're discussing is under a tenth of one day of Zcash volume. Against that, the market being described is not small. CoinDesk Research puts BNPL near $560 billion and global trade finance near $2.5 trillion, with letters of credit covering only about 12.5% of world trade today. That gap is either the opportunity or the tell. Honest people land on both sides. What isn't arguable is the shape of the risk. One asset has the deeper market, the longer record, and a fresh all time low to disprove. The other has the newer product, the institutional pilot, the security funding, and a book so thin a single motivated seller draws the candle you can see above. Not financial advice.

• 
  Aswin Kumar (@aswinmessi10) reported 32 minutes ago

  @binance I regret updating my Binance app as it requires another facial verification when my selfie cam is bad😞... Access to my account is very vital Why is there no option to use virtual or rear camera for verification? #AskBinance

• 
  koryx (@koryx46875) reported 32 minutes ago

  𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 — 𝐀 𝐒𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐖𝐚𝐲 𝐓𝐨 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 Crypto isn't only about buying, selling, or holding. 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 can give eligible users different ways to potentially earn rewards on certain digital assets. But before choosing any product, understanding the rules matters more than chasing a headline APY. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬 ➞ Choose an eligible crypto asset ➞ Explore available earning products ➞ Review the reward rate and conditions ➞ Check whether your assets remain accessible or become locked ➞ Choose the option that matches your own needs 𝐅𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐎𝐫 𝐋𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝? Flexible products can provide greater access to your assets, while locked products may require assets to remain committed for a specific period. Neither is automatically better. The important question is: 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐅𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮? 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐂𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐬𝐞 ✓ Read the complete product terms ✓ Check supported assets ✓ Understand the reward mechanism ✓ Review lock-up and redemption conditions ✓ Confirm regional availability ✓ Use official sources for the latest information 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐈𝐝𝐞𝐚 Don't choose a crypto earning product because the reward number looks attractive. 𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭. 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐭. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞. Educational content only. Not financial advice. Always do your own research. DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Bryant Rockstar☆ (@rockstarbryant) reported 33 minutes ago

  @binance Sounds like a new operating system in town? I don't wanna trade or take high risks with grandma's savings, how's Agent OS gonna help me? #AskBinance

• 
  MACRO SNIPER (@MacroSniperPro) reported 34 minutes ago

  Retail sees a "whale manipulation conspiracy." Quants see a textbook structural liquidity trap. There is no shadowy figure trying to suppress the market. That $80k "sell wall" is simply Smart Money harvesting exit liquidity at a mathematical resistance ceiling (R: 79,464) before macro gravity sets in. Here is the actual quantitative reality behind the orderbook: The Leverage Trap: Retail FOMO has pushed Binance Open Interest to a bloated $8.2B with positive funding. Longs are violently over-leveraged and vulnerable. Dry Powder Exhaustion: USDT Dominance has already dumped to 7.02%. Sidelined stablecoin liquidity has been deployed; the organic buying power is running on fumes. Macro Gravity: This entire expansion is fighting a Hawkish 3.50-3.75% Fed rate, backed by 3 explicit FOMC hike dissents and 10Y Real Yields at a toxic 2.35%. Whales aren't "holding the price down." They are capping the upside to engineer an $8.2B long-liquidation cascade back toward lower structural supports. Stop reading conspiracies. Read the orderflow.

• 
  EntertainMeNow. (@tradingwcc) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Set2920 I built my own but Binance blocks the deployed server's region, so every field came back 0 — I added an OKX fallback for price, order book, funding, open interest and long/short ratio SO I REMOVED ALL BINANCE DATA FROM ALL MY PERSONAL BUILDS. NOW OKX, Coingecko, BYBIT, 4 others

• 
  Research Kaspa (@ResearchKaspa) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BigBoyBubbleGut @realvijayk @binance Looks like its your problem.

• 
  Moneystack (@MoneyStack9) reported 43 minutes ago

  I am absolutely not retweeting this simply because the price has gone up. That is not the reason at all. Still, I’m glad that he is at least doing the minimum he should be doing. This is what a leader of an ecosystem should do. They should speak up and make their voice heard. This was the fundamental reason why members of the Korean community wanted a CMO in the first place. If there had already been sufficient communication like this, the community wouldn’t have even felt the absence of a CMO. Until the Monitoring Tag, the Stacks team did not respond to any user complaints, and eventually, the community reached a point where it was falling apart. The Stacks team I know has always had the mindset of, “Ignore the FUD. If we keep building, people will eventually recognize it.” But from both a marketing perspective and a crypto perspective, that is a fundamentally flawed approach. We are now entering the age of social media and AI. In the 21st century, where even a minor misunderstanding can quickly spread like wildfire if left unaddressed, I think the Stacks team’s community response over the past six months has been absolutely the worst I’ve seen. In fact, the average activity level of the Stacks Korea chapter, measured by conversation volume, dropped by 90% during the period when there was a lack of communication. I sincerely hope this isn’t just a temporary burst of activity aimed at getting the Binance Monitoring Tag removed. I hope you can become someone who genuinely communicates with the community, rather than only reaching out whenever a problem arises. ps: what the ecosystem needs is not simply the narrative that “STX is the beta of BTC.” The ecosystem has relied on that slogan for far too long. Instead, I think Stacks needs a new marketing narrative built around the idea that once institutional staking becomes active, Bitcoin L2s will actually come to life. The resulting impact will be enormous, and it could bring significant changes, especially to $STX. I hope the interim CMO can execute on this vision well.

• 
  DaviDavid $DOG (@DaviDavid067) reported 45 minutes ago

  @LeonidasNFT @binance @binance support the free and fair! solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 45 minutes ago

  ETH is on the radar, not in play — the trend is still healthy, but the setup is boxed in until price can close above $2,485. Zooming out, the daily chart still looks constructive. Ethereum is trading well above its long-term trend line and has printed a steady series of higher lows since bouncing from the $1,900 area. Nothing about the bigger picture is broken. The problem is where this move is trying to fire from. Price is pinned right underneath a ceiling near $2,465 that has rejected every attempt for the past couple of weeks — less than half a percent of breathing room. The next ceiling on the 4-hour chart at ~$2,484 is barely another 1% above that. Meanwhile the nearest real floor sits far below. There's very little runway before the next wall, and a lot of air underneath — the math just doesn't reward chasing here. The internals echo that caution. The daily range is the most stretched it's been in months and momentum is running hot — the kind of extended reading that usually needs to cool off before it can push higher. On the positioning side, smaller traders are crowded into bullish bets while the most consistent players have quietly stepped back. When the crowd leans that hard one way, the market often punishes it. What flips this back into play: a 4-hour close decisively above $2,485 on strong volume would clear the ceiling and open the door. Short of that, a patient pullback into the $2,405–$2,433 shelf would offer a much cleaner base. Until one of those prints, ETH is a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $ETH · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 45 minutes ago

  🚨𝗣𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗡 𝗥𝗘𝗚𝗨𝗟𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗗𝗘𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗖 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗖𝗥𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗢 𝗕𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗬 𝗦𝗘𝗣𝗧 𝟱! The Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (PVARA) has opened a licensing window for crypto exchanges, custodians and service providers operating before the Virtual Asset Act took effect on March 5. Operators must submit a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) by September 5 or cease services. Those filing on time can keep running during review, though PVARA may curb new sign‑ups, product offerings, or trading volume. An NOC is only a provisional permit, not a full license. Continuing without filing will be illegal. Binance and HTX secured NOCs in December 2025 and can now apply for formal licenses. $BTC

• 
  KEBBI KING 👑 (@Kebbi_kingjr) reported 50 minutes ago

  The trading pattern shown in the screenshot raises questions about automated trading activity on the Binance LUNC/USDT market. However, the screenshot alone cannot prove that Binance bots are intentionally suppressing the price. A stronger and more accurate way to frame it: $LUNC PRICE ACTION DESERVES A CLOSER LOOK The Binance LUNC/USDT trade history is showing a striking pattern of repeated small-sized executions happening within milliseconds of each other, with many trades clustered around the same price levels. This type of activity can be consistent with algorithmic or high-frequency trading. When automated orders continuously hit the market around narrowly defined levels, they can create significant short-term pressure and make it difficult for price to move freely. The key question is not simply whether bots are trading $LUNC. Bots are common across major exchanges. The real question is whether automated order flow is contributing to persistent sell-side pressure and preventing genuine demand from pushing LUNC higher. If buying pressure continues to appear but price repeatedly gets pushed back down around the same levels, traders should pay close attention to the order book, trade sizes, execution frequency, liquidity and whether the pattern persists across different timeframes. The screenshot is certainly worth investigating, but we should distinguish between evidence of automated trading and proof of deliberate price suppression. $LUNC holders deserve transparent markets and fair price discovery.

• 
  GRIZZLYBEARR (@GRRRIZZLYBEARR) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Gemini @tyler @cameron help binance putting sell walls on doge we are trying to pump but binance sell walls are blocking

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 55 minutes ago

  neither fits cleanly. binance holds the scale and product breadth hyperliquid does not challenge yet. hyperliquid hit new revenue highs this week in its niche but one phishing incident cost a user 550k usdc. that is external exploit risk, not the internal collapse that took down ftx

• 
  NikNurenberg (@RaizeThatQ) reported 58 minutes ago

  i get the delay (my speculation), but @extendedapp team imo needed to communicate it better: 1) europe has a pretty big perp gap rn. because of MiFID/CFD regulation, so binance/bybit style perp products are getting harder to offer to EU retail. 2)if they get the regulatory setup right, brokers could basically use Extended as the liquidity/execution backend for perps/RWAs. 3) like hip3 distribution wise, except regulated + permissioned 4) this also makes their RFQ make more sense, thats bc CFD brokers more comfortable with that. 5) kyc/restrictions/sanctions would almost certainly come with the EU product (OFC THEY WOULD ITS EU), but doesnt necessarily mean global extended becomes kyc. 6) i still think they couldve dropped the token first and done regulation after, but if theyre restructuring entities + token issuer + spot + EU setup all at once, maybe launching first would create more problems later. still feels a bit like HL points drama in spring 2024 + the same way of communicating the problem we all have with the delay if it works, i see extended as a good infra for brokers/fintechs (revoult? etoro? i think etoro pushed this idea hard). looks mature for crypto, maybe a bit too mature for our crypto fried brains, but will see

• 
  robinhood_420 (@robinhood_69420) reported 59 minutes ago

  Remember the case of $Neiro @cz_binance choosen the community backed token to list rather than cabal and **** influencers token Same is the story right now $bicat was launched 2 weeks ago and slowly community build that token all were like normies ho held it and made that number1 cat meme token of BNB chain 2nd you have $bnbcat which was launched just 2 days ago by paid and **** influencers. Supply was given to **** influencers to post and influence the normies but it failed in that attempt and bicat regain 5m mc from 1m mc post vampin by that cabal team But they got lucky as CZ unknowingly liked the Jake tweet which himself is paid influencer and he has nothing to build community or work with normies But remember in end it’s community which always win and I strongly belive we the $Bicat community will win in end and bicat will regain it glory as nunber1 cat meme of BNB season and hot listed as alpha and main listing Stay strong We are going to make in end Bicat represent binance itself 🫡🫡

• 
  adrian defi (@0xadriandefi) reported 59 minutes ago

  The Coinbase Premium flipped positive yesterday. That's one signal, not a trend. It measures whether BTC trades higher on @coinbase than offshore exchanges like @binance, which is a valid read on whether US institutional money is actually buying. One green day tells you nothing yet. Several in a row while price holds is where it gets interesting. New video breaks it down. I'll post another one the day it's been green for a week.

• 
  HuaHua🌱 (@HuaHua_BTC) reported 59 minutes ago

  @MiaPavel58272 @binance @BinanceHelpDesk Sorry to hear that. Keep your appeal ID and screenshots handy, and try following up via the official support ticket again. Hope it gets resolved soon

• 
  Teron (@teronapp) reported 1 hour ago

  @binance we support to build token on bnb

• 
  CourageZz (@Lucky766650286) reported 1 hour ago

  I can't imagine that the popularity of the BSC Meme season will drop so fast. If Binance doesn't list BSC MEME within this week, then we can say goodbye here. Because they only support in words and don't take any practical action. #牛来 $Marscoin