Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	12 days ago
Itu	Website	18 days ago
Seattle	Website	19 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	28 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Leo Smiles (@tradewleox) reported 5 minutes ago

  @CryptoMiners_Co @binance @DefiLlama Deep liquidity makes a huge difference once the hype dies down.

• 
  Niels (@Web3Niels) reported 5 minutes ago

  $DEXE crashed 90% in a single day. The biggest trigger was the team moving 625,000 DEXE worth $6.2M to Binance, creating massive sell pressure and destroying market confidence. Panic followed. Leveraged positions were wiped out. Fear took over. Even after the rebound, DEXE is still down 70.83%. Before this massive crash, DEXE had rallied 26x in just 5 months. We've seen this pattern play out many times in crypto. A token pumps aggressively, retail investors rush in chasing the rally, early holders take profits, liquidity disappears, and the price collapses. Retail investors usually enter during the euphoria and become the exit liquidity when the dump begins.

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 6 minutes ago

  $BANK update: Called the base-building setup, now watching the breakdown 📊 Flagged rising support and a potential relief rally if buyers defended the zone. Since then, structure broke down instead — price sliced through the trendline and the 24h low, dumping to 0.112. Currently well below the 0.1701 retest zone that would've confirmed the bullish case. Breakout thesis invalidated for now. Structure has shifted bearish short-term. If sellers keep control, next area to watch is deeper support near 0.10. For bulls, reclaiming 0.1701 would be the first sign the setup is back on track. On-chain still shows Gnosis Safe Proxy at 36.9%, Binance 14%+ — exchange balances haven't fled, so this isn't full capitulation, just a failed retest. Manage risk, moves this fast can reverse just as sharply. DYOR. NFA. $BANK #Crypto #Binance

• 
  BABY 🍼 BOY (@Dilipku70969347) reported 6 minutes ago

  Hello everyone, I have a dream of moving to Japan, but unfortunately I don't have enough money to make it possible. If anyone is willing to support me, I would be truly grateful for your kindness. Every contribution, no matter how small, means a lot to me. Binance ID: 508952957

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 9 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 Your Crypto Has a Body Temperature. And It Matters. 你的加密貨幣，有體溫？ There's something strange about the phrase "wallet" in crypto. It doesn't hold anything. Not really. Your Bitcoin, your ETH — none of it actually sits inside the wallet. The wallet just holds the key. And where you keep that key changes everything. When I first encountered the terms "hot wallet" and "cold wallet," I assumed this was about speed. Hot = fast. Cold = slow. That's how temperature works, right? I was wrong in the most interesting way. A hot wallet is connected to the internet. Always online, always ready. MetaMask is a hot wallet. So is the wallet inside a crypto exchange like Coinbase or Binance. It's convenient — you can send tokens in seconds, sign into dApps, trade instantly. But being online means being exposed. Hackers don't need to rob a bank if the bank's front door is always open. A cold wallet is the opposite. It lives offline. A hardware device — like a Ledger or Trezor — stores your private key somewhere the internet simply cannot reach. To use it, you physically plug it in, confirm transactions on the device itself. It's slower. It's deliberate. That friction is the whole point. 就是這樣——不方便，才是安全本身。The inconvenience is the security. That sentence rearranged something in how I think about protection. Here's what surprised me: most people lose crypto not because of sophisticated hacks. They lose it because their hot wallet was slightly too convenient. A phishing link clicked. A fake app downloaded. The attack surface isn't the blockchain. It's the human holding the key. Cold wallets aren't perfect either. Lose the device and forget your seed phrase? Your assets are gone forever. No customer service. No password reset. 自己保管，自己負責 — you are the bank, and the bank has no safety net. What I find fascinating is how this maps onto a very old human tension: accessibility vs. safety. Humans have always traded convenience for risk — leaving cash in a wallet instead of a vault, saving passwords in a browser, trusting a platform. Web3 just makes the consequence more visible, more immediate, more permanent. So here's what I'm sitting with: if you had to design a life where your most important things were truly safe, how much inconvenience would you accept? And do you actually know where your private key lives right now? 👇

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 10 minutes ago

  INJ is stretched into a ceiling near $5.44 — this one goes back on the radar only if it can push through $5.32 on real volume. Zoom out on the daily and INJ has been climbing hard, but the move is looking tired. Buyers have been in charge for a while, and price keeps bumping its head on the same $5.44 lid without cracking it. The 4-hour chart is where it gets uglier. INJ has now tried twice to push into the $5.32–$5.44 zone and failed both times — the classic shape of a market that's run out of fresh buyers up there. Price is also sitting below the average level recent buyers paid, meaning most short-term holders are already underwater and any bounce runs into their break-even selling. The math from here at $5.23 is the real problem. There's only about 1.6% of headroom to that ceiling, but roughly 4% of air down to the nearest real floor at $5.02. That's a setup where the downside dwarfs the upside — a bad ratio to lean into. The 15-minute chart shows a small bounce attempt, but it's on thin volume and still capped by its own short-term trend, so it's not the kind of move worth chasing. What would put INJ back in play: a clean 4-hour close back above $5.32 on strong volume. That would break the double-top and reset the picture. Until then, the more interesting scenario is a pullback into the $5.02–$5.07 shelf where the risk/reward actually favors buyers. For now — watchlist, not action. — 📡 On the Radar · $INJ · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Emergence Media (@_EMAgency) reported 12 minutes ago

  Someone in Argentina full ported his salary on the World Cup. Lost it. Took a loan. Put it on a Polymarket bot. Lost that too. tomorrow he'll post a memecoin chart calling the bottom. People will buy it. here's the thing though. stories like this are bringing more people into crypto than any serious product the industry has spent years building. this is happening across #Solana, #Binance, #Robinhood Chain right now. millions of new people entering crypto through memecoins every week. the onboarding is working. the tools to help them survive it don't exist yet. someone's going to build that.

• 
  Harno65 (@Harno65) reported 13 minutes ago

  Interesting concept—being able to trade “bStock” versions and then swap them 1:1 for actual stocks on Binance. But what do you think—does this really expand global access, or just add another layer of complexity to trading? Also, how much trust do you think is needed for a 1:1 exchange mechanism like this?

• 
  Nodir Tillabayev (@necktomor) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet I trusted Binance, but my funds have been locked for almost 2 weeks because the Withdraw button doesn’t work. Support’s promised fix never happened. @cz_binance can someone please look into this?

• 
  Tony Drummond (@TonyDrummond) reported 15 minutes ago

  One integration beat the biggest asset manager USYC passed BUIDL as the biggest tokenized treasury earlier this year. Same yield. It won on one deal. Binance wired USYC in as collateral in July 2025, native on BNB Chain, four months before BUIDL got the same access. Today most of USYC sits with Binance. One integration outweighed the world's biggest asset manager.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 15 minutes ago

  @corkqb11 plume is down 95% from ATH but the rwa narrative is carrying it 247k rwa holders, second only to solana. partnerships with binance, fireblocks, world liberty financial give it credibility. compliance built in, which matters when regulatory clarity actually lands technicals show recovery momentum: up 14% on the week, 17% on two weeks. broke above recent consolidation around $0.0105 bullish case: dedicated rwa infrastructure during a macro shift toward tokenized assets. institutional integrations with bitwise uscc and invesco ustb funds through their nbasis vault bearish case: massive drawdown history, competitive sector, needs sustained volume above $0.012 to confirm reversal resistance at $0.0118 then $0.0125 support at $0.0111 then $0.0095

• 
  Crypto Master 1 (@CryptoMast11846) reported 20 minutes ago

  @binance Nine months ago, I started creating content for Binance with nothing to show for it. I earned $0. Many people told me to quit because they thought I was wasting my time. But I believed that consistent hard work would eventually pay off. During that time, I was also living with a serious eyesight problem. My vision was only 6/36, and I knew I needed laser surgery. Instead of asking others for help, I chose to keep working harder. I trusted myself, trusted Allah, and refused to give up. Then one day, everything changed. I opened my Binance account and saw my first campaign reward: 1,000 USDT. That moment changed my life. Within the next month, I earned more than 1,700 USDT through my work. With that income, I was able to get my laser eye surgery, improve my vision, and buy my first iPhone 15 Pro Max. More importantly, I proved to myself that patience and consistency always matter. Today, I'm still building with Binance. I don't know any shortcut to success. I only know hard work. I won't stop until I achieve my dreams. Thank you, Binance, for creating opportunities where dedication is rewarded. 💛 #BuiltByYou #BinanceTurns9 #Binance

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 25 minutes ago

  $KAITO in a strong multi-stage uptrend, currently retesting a breakout zone 📊 Price has followed a clean staircase since late June, accumulation range, breakout, rising trendline of higher lows, another breakout above 0.80 resistance, then a bullish continuation triangle near 1.00. Currently at 0.9815, down -2.17% today, sitting right in a retest area after that latest breakout. If this retest holds, structure points toward continuation, with a further target zone near 1.20 marked on the chart 🎯 Still needs confirmation. A close back below the retest zone (~0.98-1.00) would weaken this structure. DYOR. NFA. #KAITO #Binance

• 
  Sarcastinator.hl 🇪🇸 (@Not_A_De_Gen) reported 26 minutes ago

  shutting down a ~10 sharpe strategy to go back to being dumb is a better quant strat than the $1m pnl... @HangukQuant was making roughly 40% apr from cross-exchange funding arbitrage, but its low volatility made scaling brutally capital-dependent. producing more pnl required parking a larger share of his net worth onchain, while every additional venue added custody exposure, api failures, execution mismatches and another market that needed active monitoring... the 10 sharpe looked great on a chart. in practice, the capital sat across exchanges, every rebalance depended on the connectors staying alive, and the strategy kept demanding attention while pnl could only scale by adding more balance sheet. none of that appeared in the sharpe... shutting the arb down did not make the work behind it useless. the connectors he built for binance, bybit, woo, paradex and lighter became quantpylib, now 1,000+ commits deep. the same codebase let him stop babysitting funding spreads and start testing faster strategies without rebuilding execution from scratch. i have been tasting a smaller version of this while building my own $HYPE scalper. detecting the signal is a tiny part of the system. reconciling exchange state against strategy state, moving protection into exchange-native orders, recovering from failed acknowledgements and identifying when the edge has decayed consume most of the real work... the $1m pnl came from repeatedly rebuilding the operator and the stack behind him. strategies expire. the ability to research, execute and replace them compounds...

• 
  СryptoTotem (@CryptoTotem) reported 27 minutes ago

  MOVEMENT LABS FILES FOR BANKRUPTCY Movement Labs — a community-focused blockchain network that raised $41.4M — has officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the US. Just a year ago, Movement was hailed as a promising #blockchain contender ready to challenge industry giants. But a series of scandals, controversial decisions, and lost investor trust led to an entirely different ending. 📍 Key Points: 🔴 Movement Labs initiated Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, allowing the company to restructure debts under court supervision while continuing operations 🔴 Launched as an #Ethereum L2 designed to make transactions faster and cheaper 🔴 Major problems began after movement:native token launch with questionable token distribution and a controversial market maker agreement 🔴 ~66M movement:native tokens flooded the market almost immediately after listing, heavily pressuring the asset's price 🔴 Binance subsequently froze the market maker's account for violations discovered during investigation 🔴 The team attempted a token buyback program and brought in independent specialists to review the movement:native launch circumstances 🔴 Co-founder Rushi Manche departed amid the crisis — another major blow to credibility 🔴 Movement pivoted to international payments, remittances, and stablecoin settlements instead of competing with other L2 solutions 🔴 Despite the strategic shift, accumulated problems proved insurmountable, forcing the bankruptcy filing 🔴 The impact on the Movement blockchain, movement:native token, partnerships, and ecosystem development remains unclear The Takeaway: Movement's collapse is yet another reminder that $40M in funding and grand promises mean nothing if leadership makes critical mistakes and betrays community trust. Hype fades. Accountability doesn't.

• 
  Tochiee (@cryptotorchPRMR) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Donaxbt @binance They should’ve kept @cz_binance in jail.. He came out and the market went to ****

• 
  Gss (@gss_crypto) reported 29 minutes ago

  $GENIUS — 101M tokens just landed in a Binance cold wallet, and that makes it the 3rd largest holder on the map breaking down where the supply actually sits: two team-linked wallets hold 560M and 256M tokens (56% and 25.6% respectively), and now Binance's cold wallet holds just over 100M — three wallets, roughly 91% of total supply between them most of what's in those first two wallets is still locked, nothing scheduled to open until October 25 that's the part that matters more than the transfer itself — when circulating float is this restricted, price becomes easy to move in either direction on comparatively small volume. we've watched this exact dynamic play out on other low-float tokens before currently trading around $0.33, down more than 50% since the HODLer Airdrop news broke. liquidation heatmap shows clusters stacked all the way up to $0.82 — but getting there needs real volume behind it, and this token doesn't have much baseline liquidity to begin with today both spot and futures volume are up over 100%, though on a token this thin that's not unusual on its own long/short ratio sits at 0.91 — shorts slightly outnumber longs, which is a mildly bullish signal if you're already leaning that way. order book on the sell side is nearly empty too — one lone order at $0.60 for $102K, sitting there for over a month untouched thin float, thin book, locked supply until October — worth tracking whether volume actually follows through, because right now there's not enough of it to read direction with confidence

• 
  Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reported 31 minutes ago

  crypto liquidity is concentrating while leverage cools. TokenInsight’s Q2 exchange report puts total trading volume at 16.5t, down 8% QoQ. But the mix changed: spot rebounded from 3.3t to 4.5t while derivatives fell from 14.6t to 12.0t. Average futures open interest dropped to 80b, suggesting activity stabilized without a full return of leverage. The venue layer is getting tighter. Binance’s total share rose to 35.34%, while the top four derivatives venues controlled more than 72% of that market. At the same time, TradFi perpetuals grew from 52b in January to 268b in June, with equity perps becoming the main growth driver. That is the structural signal: exchanges are defending liquidity by adding stocks, commodities and pre-IPO exposure around existing crypto rails. Binance held roughly 60% of TradFi perps volume in Q2, so this is not yet a fragmented new market. The thesis breaks if TradFi-perps volume stalls or spot flows fail to keep recovering.

• 
  NextGemHunter (@Next_GemHunter) reported 31 minutes ago

  The market doesn't care whether you call yourself an investor or a trader. Your behavior decides that. Both investing and trading can start with the same action: Buying an asset. I think this is where many beginners get caught. The first action looks similar, so they assume the plan is similar too. But after that, the path can look very different. Investing usually starts with a longer-term goal. The focus is often on holding through time, understanding the asset, and accepting that markets can move up or down along the way. Trading is more active. It usually focuses on shorter-term market movements, where timing, discipline, research, and risk management become much more important. The label matters less than the decisions you make after entering the market. An investor may ask: What am I trying to build over time? A trader may ask: What movement am I trying to capture, and what is my risk if I’m wrong? Same market. Different mindset. A long-term plan and a short-term setup should not react to the same price move in the same way. Investing does not remove risk. Trading does not automatically create skill. Both need knowledge, patience, and a clear plan. The problem starts when someone says they are investing, but reacts to every short-term move like a trader. Or when someone tries trading without a plan, then calls every loss “bad luck.” That confusion gets expensive fast. If I were explaining this to someone starting out, I would not begin with charts. I would begin with behavior. Before choosing any approach, it helps to ask: What is my goal? What is my timeframe? How much risk can I handle? How much time can I realistically give to the market? Do I understand the product before using it? Markets are easier to enter than they are to understand. That is why learning first matters. Clear definitions matter more than shortcuts. Investing and trading both involve risk, but understanding the difference can help people make more informed decisions before getting started. What do you think beginners misunderstand first: the goal, the timeframe, or the risk? Educational only. Not financial advice. DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Aqel Khan (@111Aqel) reported 32 minutes ago

  @igobyzayn I need some help regarding binance?

• 
  COINTURK NEWS (@Cointurknews) reported 36 minutes ago

  🚨 XRP reverses above $1.10 after a brief drop below $1.06 in July. 💡 Whale inflows to Binance fall to a 2-month low, down 34% from late June. 📊 Withdrawal transactions surge, echoing patterns seen before previous $XRP rallies. 🔎 XRP remains at key support, with both traders and analysts closely watching next moves.

• 
  Elizabeth Bamford (@Stevo1Maxi) reported 42 minutes ago

  @AsAlja3fry @binance No problem

• 
  daniel dabek ⛏️ (@officialdabek) reported 42 minutes ago

  bitcoin fearing overloading hard drives, yet binance smart chain sitting at nearly 20 TB with its half second block time bitcoin full node with all data is at around 0.9 TB

• 
  👑Crypto Queen👑 (@CryptoQn007) reported 49 minutes ago

  🚨 Could the upcoming Zebec DAO vote become one of the biggest tokenomics moments in crypto? I’ve been digging into how the most successful exchange and infrastructure tokens created long-term value, and one comparison keeps standing out: BNB. BNB didn’t reach hundreds of billions in value because of hype. It happened because Binance built a profitable business. That business generated revenue. Revenue funded buybacks. Buybacks funded burns. Supply fell while demand kept growing. Over roughly 9 years, BNB has removed about one-third of its original supply while expanding utility across trading, gas fees, staking, Launchpad, and more. Now look at what Zebec has publicly shared: ✅ ~500M solana:ZBCNpuD7YMXzTHB2fhGkGi78MNsHGLRXUhRewNRm9RU already repurchased through revenue-funded buybacks. ✅ Repurchased tokens do not re-enter circulation. ✅ Buybacks now scale beyond cards to include enterprise payroll, payments infrastructure, the SuperApp, and other financial services. ✅ Following planned exchange listings, the DAO is expected to evaluate reintroducing a token burn mechanism by the end of 2026. (Zebec Network) If that happens, Zebec wouldn’t be relying on a single product to support the token. Potential demand drivers include: • Enterprise Payroll • SuperApp • Debit Cards • Stablecoin payments • Treasury & business infrastructure • White-label fintech • Network utility • Staking • Governance • Revenue-funded buybacks • Potential permanent burns That’s a much broader value-capture strategy than many crypto projects have today. My view: 📉 Bear case: $0.005–0.02 📈 Base case: $0.05–0.15 🚀 Bull case: $0.20–0.50 🌎 Long-term exceptional case: $1+ if Zebec executes as a global payments infrastructure company with sustained enterprise adoption, growing cash flow, and an expanding buyback-and-burn program. None of this is guaranteed. The DAO could choose a modest burn, an aggressive burn, or no burn at all. The real driver won’t be the burn itself, it will be whether Zebec continues growing real revenue that can consistently fund larger buybacks year after year. That’s exactly what made BNB’s tokenomics so powerful. The next 12–24 months could determine whether ZBCN becomes another payments token… or one of crypto’s strongest long-term tokenomic experiments. What do you think the DAO should vote for? $ZBCN

• 
  Ktoto (@WolfDigger) reported 50 minutes ago

  The address is used as HOT wallet connected to Binance. Binance support says they have nothing to do with the address. Well, I thing I have to work with the Cyber Police of Ukraine first...

• 
  Dumindu (@dumindu89) reported 54 minutes ago

  @SlimD_origCLONE You mean top up the Kast wallet? Then it should be top up using USDC, USDT or other crypto and spend using Kast Visa card either online or in-store. It's similar to the Binance card. But Binance don't issue their cards to most of the countries.

• 
  Sky (@skyogbnb) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance The hardest launches in crypto are often not product problems but translation problems. The right PMM can turn complexity into trust at scale.

• 
  SerPAI (@im_serPAI) reported 56 minutes ago

  Binance sitting at 39% CEX market share while the whole sector bleeds Total spot volume cratered 27.9% in Q2 to $1.95T. MEXC got cut in half. Bybit holding 10% in second place Market cap down 12.6% to $2.1T.

• 
  Aneeb Shinwari (@imshinwari10) reported 56 minutes ago

  We said receipts would go public two days ago. They didn't. That's on me, not the engine. Here's the part I can't fake: while we were silent, it kept working. 95 cycles. 5,339 signals. Every hour, on the hour, scanning every live Binance Alpha listing against 2 years of pattern history — while nobody was watching. That's the difference between a machine and a marketing account. It doesn't care whether I'm busy. Receipts start tonight. 8pm PKT, from @alpha_axis1. And if I ever go quiet again, that number above is how you'll catch me. Paper trading · simulated · NFA

• 
  Mercek (@WorldOfMercek) reported 59 minutes ago

  Movement Labs went from raising over $38M and launching at a $10B FDV to filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in just 18 months. Its collapse shows how capital and token hype fail without sustainable ecosystem activity and protocol revenue. Here’s what actually led to Movement’s collapse. — ➤ Everything Changed After the Token Launch The December 2024 movement:native launch became the turning point after a reported sale of 66M tokens by a market maker triggered a rapid loss of confidence. - A reported sale of 66M tokens pushed the price from above $1 to just a few cents. - Community confidence faded as selling pressure accelerated. - Binance scrutiny and an internal investigation soon followed. - Co-founder @rushimanche was later removed. The selloff quickly became a credibility crisis, undermining confidence across the project and its leadership. — ➤ The Business Wasn't Generating Real Demand Movement failed to generate meaningful economic activity despite strong funding and early hype. - Daily app revenue stayed below $800 for months. - Daily chain fees fell into single digits, signaling limited network usage. - Protocol revenue never became strong enough to support long-term operations. As speculative demand faded, protocol revenue never became strong enough to sustain the business. — ➤ The Token Reflected the Business - movement:native fell over 97% from its ATH, while FDV dropped from nearly $10B to around $106M. - Ecosystem activity remained weak, and protocol revenue never materialized. - Treasury reserves continued to shrink as confidence faded. The token followed the business, as weakening fundamentals ultimately led to Chapter 11. — ➤ The Balance Sheet Told the Story The bankruptcy filing exposed how little financial runway remained. • Assets: $100K–$500K • Liabilities: $1M–$10M • Creditors: Around 299 — ➤ My Take Every cycle reminds us that capital and token demand are not product-market fit. Sustainable ecosystems are built on users, builders, and revenue, not valuations. Markets eventually price fundamentals.