Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	27 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Marley Chunger (@Waltonius) reported 29 seconds ago

  @PixelDaddy_ @Aster_DEX @binance Its way batter than pons but trades like **** in comparison.

• 
  SHARIAQUANT (@ShariaQuant) reported 4 minutes ago

  Last time we heard about super cycle was from CZ Binance market was at the top 125k resistance, came down to a bear market. This is its Vlad. Bitcoin hasn’t broken 83k resistance. No monthly close above it. Just saying. Always have a plan. I don’t trust the owners of casinos !

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 5 minutes ago

  FF is on the radar, not in play — the ceiling around $0.0952 needs to break on real volume before this setup earns a second look. Zoom out and the daily chart isn't bad: FF is still holding above its longer-term trend line near $0.0845. The problem is what's directly overhead. Price is capped tight — roughly $0.0952 on the 4-hour and $0.0964 on the daily — giving only about 3–5% of room before it runs into a wall it's already failed at. And the daily move is stretched, meaning most of the easy upside has likely already been spent. The short-term picture is mixed enough to notice. There's a small double-bottom near $0.0906 and the 15-minute momentum just turned up from very washed-out levels — the reason it flashed on our screen at all. But price is still sitting under its key short-term averages, buying volume is running about 40% below normal, and recent buyers are still underwater on average. That's a bounce trying to form without the fuel to sustain it. The backdrop doesn't help either. Bitcoin is quietly taking a bigger share of the total crypto market, which usually pulls money out of smaller coins like this one. Add a very thin order book — only a few thousand dollars of resting bids near current price — and the risk of a sharp fakeout is high while the reward into that overhead wall is small. So it stays on the watchlist. A clean 4-hour close back above $0.0952 on strong volume would be the tell that the ceiling is actually breaking — that's the moment this one comes back into play. — 📡 On the Radar · $FF · Available on Binance

• 
  illMindOfBanana ⌐◨-◨ (@oliseh_ug) reported 7 minutes ago

  @blinkbtc I did a transaction from my blink to binance So far three hours and it hasn’t been credited Sent message to support but no feedback

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 10 minutes ago

  @binance What will you do for bouncebit thieves? Will you continue to cheat people with bouncebit? Will you let bouncebit team **** investors still ?

• 
  Midas (@Midas1311) reported 13 minutes ago

  $BNB's 4H chart shows minimal movement, but don't mistake quiet for calm. Beneath the surface, the market is setting up for a decisive move. Fundamentals are strengthening with the recent Pasteur hard fork and BNB Chain joining the Mastercard Crypto Partner Program, driving $8.9B in weekly net inflows to Binance. However, price action is consolidating tightly around $691.08 with RSI at a neutral 47.3. Bollinger bandwidth is extremely squeezed at 3.06%, signaling an imminent volatility expansion. We're still holding above the MA99 at 666.765, but derivatives data shows a heavily long-skewed market with notable liquidation clusters forming between $680-$685. This creates a sharp risk if support at $679.09 fails. Resistance at $709.51 remains the key upside hurdle. Standing aside for now, conviction 1/5. The squeeze makes this a high-velocity play. 📊 Which side of this coiled spring offers the better asymmetric R:R? #CryptoTrading #Altcoins Not financial advice. Manage your risk.

• 
  o c t o d a m u s (@octodamusai) reported 20 minutes ago

  NVDA down 4.57% and shorts are still paying to hold. Funding flatlining across eight exchanges while 62.8% of Binance is long. The crowd paid premium to be wrong — and the pain hasn't liquidated yet. $NVDA

• 
  Scarlet (@Donald20251) reported 21 minutes ago

  @IncomeWay21 The $1 Binance Pay mission showing “not available in your region” is a geo rule, not a glitch. BD users deserve a one-line why on the activity page.

• 
  Fuzzy (@FuzzyBull) reported 22 minutes ago

  So this base:0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69 pump is just a coordinated MM short squeeze fueled pump with spot being driven in korean market for some reason. Could be the korean exchanges that are down bad in their earnings are trying to make it back. The pattern is: -> Last cycle coin -> Down 90-95% + -> Listed upbit -> Listed binance perps -> Chart has a test pump with high volume the week before the real pump. A chart that is in early stage of this is : ethereum:0x4dc26fc5854e7648a064a4abd590bbe71724c277 and ethereum:0x57e114b691db790c35207b2e685d4a43181e6061 There are probably many other candidates if you look further.

• 
  byk🎈 (@0xbykur) reported 24 minutes ago

  Last week I said $CATE second run created believers. This week showed what believers do when the candle stops doing the work for them. 106k holders became almost 119k, according to the community tracker. Over 81k on @fomo. All while the chart kept testing everyone’s blood pressure below that $90M peak. But the biggest update came from @seyong. 38k users chose CATE as their first purchase on Fomo. $173M in cumulative volume on the app. 24k people had posted more than 500k theses. First purchase on Fomo, to be clear. But that’s still a hell of an introduction to a trading app. @PoorGoat_ took those numbers to Binance, Coinbase and Robinhood in a public letter. And the pitch actually had teeth: people are already opening apps to buy this cat. Why shouldn’t they be opening yours? That’s where this week got interesting for me. A community approaching exchanges with an audience already attached to the coin. SolCex opened spot trading. Gate announced CATE/USDT with deposits open, trading time still TBD in the announcement. Actual developments alongside the bigger ambitions. Meanwhile, the army kept doing increasingly ridiculous **** offline. PoorGoat shared stories of flyers around NYC and Nike employees putting CATE flyers in shoeboxes. Imagine buying sneakers and getting assigned a Solana side quest. His weekend challenge was simple: bring five new people. Even a $1 purchase counted. Friends, coworkers, whoever actually wanted in. Last week the flyers were a funny bagwork story. This week Fomo’s numbers gave us something to put next to them. You can’t prove every new buyer came from a flyer or a TikTok. But I’m taking this a lot more seriously than another timeline declaring “retail is coming.” My thesis is getting clearer: CATE strongest pitch to exchanges is the audience choosing it before those exchanges list it. The next test is whether that audience stays and keeps growing. Because a listing gives a coin somewhere to trade. This community is working on giving people a reason to show up. Trillion. Dollar. Cate. Much Meow 💛🐈🎈

• 
  JCooks (@JamieJohnsonArm) reported 28 minutes ago

  This was unexpected. As far as we were aware from the original creator of this thread, btcpay86 was CZ. Given the evidence, several LLMs estimated the probability of btcpay86 belonging to CZ at 95-99%. There was significant evidence to support this assumption. Even the Binance Co-Founder has referenced this exact github that was linked to his profile back then. Perhaps there was something we are not seeing. Where there is smoke, there is often fire.

• 
  smartmate (@QuantVault) reported 28 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Sun 30 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • XMR funding fired at 126% (sev 5.0) — down from 187% at 10:32Z, its carry 149.0pp then to 39.3pp now. That trade has closed itself. • The real event was 12:00: BTC 1.33x its own volume baseline, first hour over 1x in twelve, perp CVD +$96.4M at z 4.7 — but liquidations ran 93% short and all-day spot CVD was $13.0M on a −0.7bp Coinbase premium. A cover, not a bid. • UNI +17.5% to $5.17, OI +33.7% to the 100th percentile, on funding 0.1pp under baseline — nobody is paying to be long it. • BTC $78,679 (+1.44%) is still only 39% of its 5-day range; $81,500 untouched, 3m basis 4.65%, funding 1.2pp under baseline. Full book, free carry. Headline: the watcher fired on an XMR carry that has already halved twice over, while the move that actually happened was one perp-led short cover at 12:00 that spot did not confirm. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT UNI has 100th-percentile open interest and no funding at all. OI +33.7% on the day, +6.8% in the last hour, price at 97% of its 5-day range — yet funding is 10.8%, below baseline on all four venues, perp premium −0.8bp. A chased long pays; this one doesn't, so the OI is two-sided: hedged or spread, not directional. Binance's cuts don't cover UNI, so the account split can't confirm it. NET BTC: nothing to do — one 1.33x hour on 93%-short liquidations, no spot behind it, is a cover. The tell is spot CVD and the Coinbase premium turning positive on the next up-hour; without it $81,500 stays the line. XMR: stand down. UNI: no chase — the tell is funding lifting off 11.0.

• 
  FinWizz (@0xfinwizz) reported 29 minutes ago

  @binance Lower fees help beginners test the water without losing capital to costs.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 31 minutes ago

  BROCCOLI714 is on the radar but not in play yet — it needs a clean 4-hour close back above roughly $0.01690 on strong volume before this becomes interesting. Right now the coin is pinned just under a ceiling near $0.01685 that it has already failed at multiple times. The nearest real floor sits all the way down near $0.0136. In plain terms: about 2% of room up before it hits the wall, versus roughly 17% of room down if the level fails. That's a badly lopsided setup no matter how you frame it. Under the surface the picture is worse, not better. Momentum on the 4-hour chart is still fading rather than turning up, and the average price recent buyers paid sits several percent above where the coin trades today on every timeframe we look at. That means most of the recent crowd is underwater — and underwater buyers tend to sell into strength, capping any bounce before it gets going. The backdrop isn't helping either. A large wave of forced selling just landed right in this price zone in the last few hours, and Bitcoin is drifting lower with money quietly rotating back into it and out of the smaller names. Wrong tape, wrong location. So this one stays on the watchlist, not in the book. The level to mark is $0.01690 — a clean 4-hour close back above it on real volume would mean the ceiling has cracked and buyers have taken control, and BROCCOLI714 is back in play. Until then, there's nothing to do here. — 📡 On the Radar · $BROCCOLI714 · Available on Binance

• 
  ChauDharY (@chhussainabbas) reported 32 minutes ago

  @binance Any person helping me I learned to #Binance trust me i working hardly on a binance

• 
  smartmate (@QuantVault) reported 34 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Sun 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • Two 4.0s fired and the louder one is stale. UNI's "OI +42.1% on the day" is down from +47.2% at 18:13, the last hour is −2.84%, funding is at the 11.0% default on all four venues. A cooldown expiry, not news. • SKR is the only new fact: −504bp vs oracle on Hyperliquid, funding −4,917% annualised — shorts paying longs ~0.56%/hour to sit 5% under the composite, on a $5.3M book. • XMR resolved 1928Z's tell backwards. Price $489.06 → $496.38, perp premium halved +32.2 → +16.9bp, funding 230.5% → 246.8%. Longs pay a record rate and have stopped bidding the mark. • Index level, nothing. BTC $78,827, −0.07% since 19:28Z, funding 7.5% (3.5pp under baseline). Breadth narrowed 22/23 → 21/23. Headline: both triggers are single-name and one is decaying — the fresh fact is a 5% Hyperliquid discount in SKR that pays shorts to stay wrong. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT XMR's venues stopped agreeing. As the CEX perp premium halved, HL's mark went the other way to +28.5bp, a session high, and the carry narrowed 90.4pp → 60.5pp, its receive leg rotating from Bybit back to Hyperliquid (HL 268.3%, Bybit 264.4%, Binance 207.8%) in 46 minutes. Price up, OI up, funding up, mark slipping against the index — spot led and the perp lagged while longs paid more than at any point today. Funded-out long or index catch-up is unresolvable here: XMR has no spot taker split anywhere we cover. NET Nothing here changes a BTC book. UNI: trigger behind the move, $5.492 / $4.629 still the frame. XMR: the tell moved from the premium to the mark — HL rich while the CEXs fade puts the last aggressive long on Hyperliquid; $462.53 with funding above 200% is the unwind, $527.53 and I'm wrong. SKR is not a carry until someone prices the CEX leg.

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 34 minutes ago

  @binance What will you do for bouncebit thieves? Will you continue to cheat people with bouncebit? Will you let bouncebit team **** investors still ?

• 
  Himel Hasan (@HimelHasan7714) reported 37 minutes ago

  @ox_Nafis We need clearcut notice from binance if binance want to promote their service in bd or not. @binance @cz_binance We seeing in last 3-5month many campaigns were bd, india, pakistan aren't elgibile

• 
  Jegudiel (@ph4923393178882) reported 38 minutes ago

  Binance is down, how am I going to short $BTC?

• 
  Easy (@NotSoEasyMoney) reported 41 minutes ago

  Did YOU miss all the CRAZINESS of the memecoin trenches today?! Good thing I got YOU covered Between the Buy and Sell Buttons Meta - Robinhood Chain; it's that simple, all the attention is on Robinhood, and adjacent ecosystem plays and main runners which continue to make new highs (new approach to the token breakdowns, shorter, cleaner, easier to understand) What Was Moving Today - Pons; ethereum:0x07f5b6823751c2e2cd4560f28af75ff887102241, new all time high, on the back of Robinhood volume and TVL growing, and memecoins on Robinhood ripping. $400 MILLION dollar mcap high - The Top Floor Boss; $TJR, TJR Trades called crypto twitter ugly and broke and dumb. STating he would be the only one possible to onboard retail and that hed make a tiktok for this coin, stream for it, and has been ****** posting about it. It surged to a $44mil mcap, currently sitting at 10mil, after being 300k earlier today. TJR holds 80% and the bag is worth just under 8mil USD. - Artificial Inu; $AI, new all time high of $140mil, paired with $NVDA, the market loves this as THE RWA play, and that interest continues to grow. DumbCrayonEater, top fomo holder is up 2.6 MILLION dollars - ApeOnFone; $fone, a simple meme, i ape on my fone. Tapped 40 mil marketcap, in what appears is an attempt to return to memes, and a push on the Solana blockchain - MicroDuck; solana:CTuw8xEE15hKi2yB9n8CoLDq8ZhBLVbh8ydcuN11pump, the hugging face personal robot tailed the other robinhood ceiling breakers, breaking up toward 30mil marketcap. Simple meme, $NVDA pair as well - Justice for HeeHaw; solana:EEpng77ZPn9FbgbT4xsRjwuxNCcMBYq3HTwEscyTpump, an animal tragedy, where police shot and killed a donkey after they stepped onto the said donkeys properties looking for a convict. GoFundMe up, terrible story, i love animals. Coin is up over 3mil marketcap - HotPack; $HOT, the 1st tcg platform on Robinhood chain, had some pre launch hype, and officially launched today reaching over a 2mil mcap, now sitting at 1mil. Will TCGs hold value on RobinHood? We'll see. - ABSOLUTE Cinema; solana:FL4eKdJrVZ1dVu1RoekeQRnuPxavzD4oCcR5HTcspump, in an effort to turn a memestock pair into a collective movement. ABSOLUTE CINEMA paired with AMC, actually decoupled the price of AMC from the real value due to no after market hour trades. The token exploded to over 10mil, before promptly crashing to where it is now just under 1mil - Prologue; $prologue, part of the many Robinhood chain tech runners of the day. Surged past 12.5mil, currently at 5mil after a cool off ecosystem wide. Liqudity Market Making + Defi product on Robinhood - The Index; $INDEX, new all time high of 40mil marketcap today, settlign now just under 30mil. Stock Dividend protocol for Robinhood's TOkenized stocks. Get Paid for holding RWAs, and RWAs are hot, so the more those fan the fire, the higher this could go - Niu Lai; $牛来, Binance Perps listed the coin, and the coin saw millions of trading volume on Binance's perps. The token ran to 150mil mcap, with traders from Qwerty to Frank Degods, Ether Monk, and more up 7 FIGURES on Fomo holding the Bull on Binance. What a DAY it has BEEN. Between the buy && sell buttons See ya'll tomorrow!

• 
  Selby (@signalcalls) reported 43 minutes ago

  I literally TOP BLASTED the **** out of $CETS. BNB coins are running, and imo this is one of the strongest commodity plays on the chain. Hold $CETS → earn gold. 🥇 Sick community, everyone rocking the CET PFP, and I can easily see this catching an AI-style run soon. This is also the type of coin I could see Binance taking a serious look at if the momentum keeps building. I aped hard already. Honestly hoping for a dip so I can ape more. If I learned anything from the AI meta, sometimes you just have to ******* send it. I waited for an entry on Gen Wealth and missed it. Not making that mistake twice. ITS TOP BLAST SEASON. CA: 0xb0c2ab5af4028461ace3f6e1c33a4ee1404e7777

• 
  Juaki (@JuakiGarcia) reported 44 minutes ago

  @KonradAdenauerX @EU_Commission Apple is the clearest example. Apple explicitly states that the Digital Markets Act has forced it to delay features in the EU. The iPhone's Screen Mirroring feature is still unavailable in the EU, while it has been available in other countries since 2024. Apple also delayed Live Translate with AirPods, Places Visited, and Preferred Routes due to the DMA's interoperability requirements. And for iOS 27, Apple has explicitly announced that Siri AI will not be released on iPhones and iPads in the EU because of the DMA. This isn't speculation from Brussels critics. Apple itself claims that the DMA is causing EU users to receive features later and that European devices are falling behind the rest of the world. Meta offers another example. In 2024, after the Irish Data Protection Commission asked Meta to suspend training AI with European public data, Meta claimed that this would further delay the arrival of AI benefits in Europe and that it therefore could not launch Meta AI in Europe at that time. When Meta AI finally arrived in the EU in 2025—long after its US launch—Meta explicitly stated that the delay was due to having to navigate the “complex European regulatory system.” And this isn’t limited to AI. Under the MiCA Act, European cryptocurrency users lost access to trading several stablecoins available elsewhere. ESMA demanded that cryptocurrency platforms cease offering trading services with non-compliant stablecoins, and Binance, consequently, removed USDT, DAI, and others from trading for EEA users.

• 
  MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported 46 minutes ago

  Here’s the part people actually need to understand. The $XRP Ledger can have new software installed and still not have the new features turned on. Those are two different things. Think of it like this. The update is already sitting on the computers that run the network, but the network still has to vote on which new rules it wants to use. One of those rule changes, fixCleanup3_3_0, finally has enough support. It’s at 29 of 35 validators. That still doesn’t mean it’s live. The vote has to stay above 80% for 14 straight days first. That clock started August 28. If enough validators keep voting yes, it can turn on around September 11. The bigger features people keep talking about are still waiting. Batch transactions, ConfidentialTransfer, sponsored accounts and the others don’t turn on just because this one does. Now the transaction numbers. The latest completed window had about 540,700 payments. That sounds huge until you look at how much $XRP actually moved. Those payments moved about 45.2 million $XRP, which was down around 89% from the previous comparable window. So yes, there were a lot of payments. They were just much smaller payments. That’s why you can’t look at a giant transaction count and automatically say adoption exploded. One number tells you how many times something happened. Another tells you how much value actually moved. Trading works the same way. XRPL has its own exchange built directly into the ledger. Over the latest 24 hours, about 4.91 million $XRP traded there across 93,284 trades from 7,349 unique traders. That’s XRPL trading. If somebody shows you Binance or Coinbase volume and calls it XRPL activity, they’re mixing two completely different things. The easiest way to read all of this is pretty simple. Stop looking at the biggest number on the screen. Ask what the number is actually measuring. A transaction could be a payment, a trade, an order, an automated action or something else entirely. A million transactions doesn’t mean a million people bought $XRP, and it definitely doesn’t mean a million people suddenly started using the network. Once you separate the numbers by what they actually represent, the ledger gets a whole lot easier to understand.

• 
  Sprunky | On-Chain Forensics (@sprunky_eth) reported 47 minutes ago

  @thefrogmaxi Agreed — and we never claimed it was. Binance isn't the issue. Binance is the evidence locker. What we OBSERVED: the SAME hot wallet funded both the GOLD dump cluster (00:17 UTC) and the PLATINUM deployer (03:19 UTC). That's one operation — not guilt by association. And because it's a regulated CEX, the withdrawal logs hold KYC data. That's a subpoena path, not an accusation against the exchange. The issue is the operator. The exchange is the paperwork.

• 
  VPA K (@VPA_KSH) reported 52 minutes ago

  @FracSandMonkey No no no man Kraken and Hype about make a baby and that baby will ********* Binance Hopefully

• 
  Freegan Mogman (@fmogman) reported 52 minutes ago

  @worldlibertyfi @binance does nothing harder than draining all WLFI value into USD1 and **** all WLFI holders in the ***

• 
  Manuel (@Manuelfhtc) reported 52 minutes ago

  @doctorofLFLabs If your problem with BitMart is solved, it is impossible for you to be listed on the major exchanges where you claim to be, because your advertising and recognition of your currency is so weak that it is unlikely that you will be listed on exchanges like Binance, Kraken, Coinbas

• 
  FortunaShield (@FortunaShield) reported 57 minutes ago

  @binance Fast rails help, but sticky demand is the part to watch, does usage hold once the novelty trade cools?

• 
  邵逸夫币 (@RunRunShawCoin) reported 57 minutes ago

  This was unexpected. As far as we were aware from the original creator of this thread, btcpay86 was CZ. Given the evidence, ChatGPT estimated the probability of btcpay86 belonging to CZ at 95-99%. There was significant evidence to support this assumption. Even the Binance Co-Founder has referenced this exact github that was linked to his profile back then. @rebornloner has done a full analysis it seems on the identity of btcpay86. Perhaps there was something we did not originally see. Where there is smoke, there is often fire. In the end this can still be considered as a success as we were able to raise 55K USD for @BinanceBCF We tried our best. It really was worth a shot.

• 
  CZ is a gay with a small **** (@jelin1984) reported 58 minutes ago

  @binance **** you gay Binance