Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	11 days ago
Itu	Website	17 days ago
Seattle	Website	18 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	27 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  difoxxn (@Difoxxn) reported 5 minutes ago

  $𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐊 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐝 — 𝐮𝐩 +𝟓𝟎𝟎% 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 $𝟎.𝟎𝟑𝟕 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡 𝐀𝐓𝐇 𝐨𝐟 $𝟎.𝟐𝟕 𝐢𝐧 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝟏𝟎 𝐝𝐚𝐲𝐬. 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐢𝐧, 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞'𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐧-𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝑭𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒔 Lorenzo is basically an "on-chain investment bank" — wrapping BTC yield (stBTC, enzoBTC) and stablecoin yield (USD1+, official partner of WLFI) into tradeable OTFs. Sector = BTCFi + RWA. Backers include YZi Labs (ex-Binance Labs), Animoca, BNB Chain — legit lineup, not some no-name VC farm. 𝑻𝒐𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒄𝒔 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒌 2.1B max supply, only ~765M circulating (~36%). There's a governance proposal to speed up vesting — if it passes, +454.8M BANK (+21.66%) hits the market in one shot. That's a massive unlock overhang sitting on top of this pump. 𝑵𝒐𝒘 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒇𝒍𝒂𝒈 top 5 wallets hold ~75% of supply. That's extreme whale concentration for a token this size. 57K+ holders looks healthy on the surface, but don't twist "lots of holders" into "healthy distribution" — the real supply is in a handful of hands. 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑡. 24ℎ 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 $440𝑀 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙 $1-5𝑀 — 𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑒𝑧𝑒 + 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑. ~70% 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 $1𝑀+ 𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑠 𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑟𝑒𝑘𝑡. 𝑳𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒔 𝑰'𝒎 𝒘𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 resistance at $0.27-0.29 (ATH zone), if it fails to break → healthy pullback to $0.08-0.12 support (the range it consolidated in before the breakout). Chasing price up here near ATH = trash risk/reward. 𝑻𝑳𝑫𝑹 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐝 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐬 (𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐖𝐋𝐅𝐈 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩, 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐫𝐬) 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 + 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐮𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐦 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝. 𝐍𝐅𝐀, 𝐃𝐘𝐎𝐑, 𝐬𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐥𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭🫡

• 
  Omar ♦️🐂 (@crypt_omar) reported 7 minutes ago

  @binance Stop the crap u never support builders. @xBrianSumner only guy u still have left working on ur chain and u guys don’t show anything lol.

• 
  DeFi_Machine (@DeFi_Machine) reported 9 minutes ago

  🚨 ANOTHER CRIME FROM BINANCE — $DEXE Same playbook. Different ticker. $DEXE pumped from $1.72 to $48. That's over 2,700% in a few months. Then dumped 70%+ on a single candle. And here's the part that should worry you: $DEXE isn't some Binance Alpha garbage or a futures-only listing. It's listed on Binance SPOT. Full spot trading. Real order book. That gives it legitimacy in the eyes of retail. But the manipulation is identical: → Spot price gets pushed way above fair value → Futures index follows spot — artificially inflated → Funding rate goes deeply negative → Shorts think "free money, obvious dump" → They open positions → Manipulator holds spot price up → Shorts bleed 0.5-2% per hour on funding You didn't get stopped out. You got drained. 96% of $DEXE liquidations were shorts. $390K wiped in 24 hours — almost all bears. LBank dumped $1.68M of $DEXE straight onto Binance. Whales distributed $134.5M across 20 tokens — $DEXE was the only one that closed red. $LAB, $SIREN, $RAVE, $TRADOOR — and now $DEXE. Same pattern. Same ending. The fact that this runs on Binance SPOT — not Alpha, not futures-only — makes it worse, not better. It means more retail walks in thinking it's a real project. You will never outplay the manipulator. He holds every token. Not financial advice. 12 years in these markets — this is what I do. Follow me and turn notifications on. I break down the traps before they catch you.

• 
  BlindSpotsMag (@BlindSpotsMag) reported 10 minutes ago

  @PunishedJeanLuc @DrewPavlou @zriboua Dude, they’re selling pardons man, the Binance guy got a pardon. Just because some people don’t attain the influence they’re vying for, it doesn’t mean you ignore all the other ****.

• 
  Faran (@faranfx) reported 11 minutes ago

  bitcoin:native On the image I shared I had my limits set from the Order Block + Demand level. I set up my limits for btc on my propfirm. But somehow price dropped to this level on bitcoin:native binance. But It did not drop to any other exhcnage at all. But still the demand level made the bitcoin:native moved 6% from that level

• 
  DamX (@0xdamx) reported 12 minutes ago

  @W3Vibes I don’t think they are competitors. Binance Wallet supports all blockchains and works like a normal wallet. Gram Wallet will only support TON Blockchain and many more features that will make it more native to Telegram.

• 
  CW (@CW8900) reported 14 minutes ago

  The $BTC CVD indicator shows an increase in buying. Large-scale selling occurred on Binance and OKX, and as expected, it was selling by whales. This is presumed to be a change of ownership. Additionally, $BTC is rising along with heavy buying. Furthermore, the buy wall that existed at 61k has moved to 63k. The support line has shifted upwards.

• 
  Psalm (@Psalmdav0) reported 14 minutes ago

  📡 "The transaction history you're looking at might not be the whole picture. Here's what block explorers actually show you." Block explorers like Etherscan show you on-chain activity clearly, but "on-chain" doesn't mean "everything relevant." A lot of important context lives off-chain entirely, a project's actual team identities, legal structure, or off-chain agreements between wallets aren't recorded on the blockchain at all. The chain shows you what moved, not always who's really behind it or why. A few things worth knowing when reading a wallet's history: 1. Multiple wallets can belong to one entity. A "distributed" holder list can still be one person or team splitting tokens across many addresses, nothing on-chain forces disclosure of that. 2. Exchange wallets look different from personal wallets. Large, labeled addresses (Binance, Coinbase hot wallets) holding tokens usually represent many users' combined balances, not one whale, check for exchange labels before assuming concentration risk. 3. "First transaction" isn't always creation. A wallet's oldest visible transaction on one chain might just be when it first touched that chain, it could have history elsewhere.

• 
  Vlad | defi BNB 🧧🧧🧧 (@draffilog) reported 14 minutes ago

  i think this information might be useful if you've been farming recently QQQ into Binance Alpha so lots of people have been thinking: does LP into PCS, the 100%+ APR , is the most efficient what they can get? i think one project which always was not super popular across the community which i think the problem at the time is that it didn't get discovered by defi people - is @native_fi where yield coming from? logic there is that they are taking these QQQb into a credit pool, this QQQb are going to market makers who are providing already the RFQ using your QQQb for the taker flow so the spread which the market maker is receiving, or any profits which they're generating, is coming already as an APY few hours ago they distributed the first batch of the rewards for QQQb, right now it's showing on the front end 311% APY just use @native_fi

• 
  Zach Humphries (@ZachHumphries) reported 16 minutes ago

  🚨I don't think the market fully understands what just happened with Pharos. 👀Binance Wallet users can now access the Axil Prime Credit Vault (APC) directly. Think about what that means... • Institutional private credit • Targeting ~14.3% APY • Real yield backed by real-world credit performance • No bridging • No complicated DeFi setup • Just deposit USDC through Binance WalletT hat's potentially 100M+ Binance Wallet users one tap away from on-chain RWA yield. And here's the part I'm watching... If Pharos is already building this closely with Binance, what comes next?Binance Alpha? 👀 The vault has a $100M cap and runs for 3 months. Once it's filled, that's it. Infrastructure is being built

• 
  Cho Hee (@BeautyChoHee) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Navin09500382 @SolvProtocol It feels like pump-and-dump projects keep finding support on Binance, and the platform needs to do more to stop users from getting burned.

• 
  Kabeer (@kabeerahmad6677) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet My account disqualified and alpha issue binance team not support me 1 year ago

• 
  Scorpio (@Scorpio882888) reported 20 minutes ago

  @0xAero8 This was not a consolation dip. The team failed miserably to deliver. A binance listing couldn’t even help it.

• 
  TryHardSorry (@tryhardsorry) reported 21 minutes ago

  Does a Binance listing mean that the token’s price will only go down afterward, like what happened with $AERO?

• 
  Aftabahmad (@Aftabahmad6252) reported 21 minutes ago

  @CryptoAlexNew If u expert trader binance please help me trade

• 
  Umar (@umar_xbt) reported 25 minutes ago

  Binance founder CZ says he was never anti-meme coin. “I’m not a meme coin trader. I never bought NFTs, and I buy very few altcoins.” “I have Bitcoin, I have BNB, and that’s pretty much it.” “I support all the blockchain ecosystems” and work closely with developers on different blockchains. “I’m a very geek kind of tech-function kind of guy.” “NFTs, memes. I never really understand them. I just don’t get them that much. I’m not anti them. I’m just not deep in the trenches there.”

• 
  THE CHAIN INSIDER (@TheChainInsider) reported 27 minutes ago

  @binance Superscam 95% of the coin listed in the last 3 years on Binance are down -99%. We must open a class action against binance.

• 
  Chukwuebuka Okoroafor (@DannyFreshii) reported 28 minutes ago

  I've traded on Binance for at least 5 years and about $500k+ in transactions both buying and selling.... And I've not been scammed or encounter any *****/careless tricks By for about 2 years or thereabout that I've been trading with Bybit.... And I've witnessed ***** tricks played on me and my friends, the worst part is that Bybit have no customer care, useless set of foolish people. Till now, my account is still restricted from conducting p2p. Ike gwuru

• 
  Jaredfromsubway.eth (@jaredsmev) reported 35 minutes ago

  @binance Stop posting **** @binance I feel like vomit 🤮 after watching it

• 
  zkpuzzlematt 🧩 (@zkmattwyatt) reported 38 minutes ago

  FWIW every successful bottoms up consumer app (Claude, ChatGPT, cognition, polymarket, kalshi, stake, rainbet, etc) all use KOL/UGC UGC/KOL is the cheapest CAC method any business can go with right now. It’s become the standard playbook for LA restaurants even now. IMO it’s not a W to frame negatively However there’s been a history in the way crypto KOLs/binance cabal does it to dump **** product on people’s heads knowingly vs ppl like Arthur Hayes pumping then changing mind post pump very quickly. This is different than ppl in LA barely liking the food/price from a restaurant but posting anyways bc paid and not costs vs builder content creators for Claude or chatGPT on YT that acknowledge bias but prefer that group anyways vs pump, phantom & fomo KOLS/influencers on twitch/TikTok/insta that are pushing product with bias but not trying to dump on heads All in all — think @ethos_network is pretty good regarding some social credit scoring of KOLs/influencers — Put simply — I’m bearish teams that don’t have KOLs/influencers they’ve won over AND I’m bearish teams that have sketchy KOLs/influencers that have a history of pump and dumping If you guys can capture that ethos in TTF + level/efficiency of spend towards it — would be great

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 40 minutes ago

  $LA shorts are down bad on two exchanges at the same time. funding's at -1.2%, OI's unwinding on both binance and bybit, that's not one desk panicking, that's the whole short book capitulating in sync. price already ran 21% and shorts are still footing a $154K/day bill to sit in this. $60K walked out in the last hour, someone already decided that's enough pain. 61% of the crowd is still short into a rip that started 7h ago and only got sharper. that's the trade getting more crowded on the losing side, not less. NFA

• 
  Black Zalophous (@BlackZalophous) reported 42 minutes ago

  They were never succesful at anything they produced. Obviously another marketing attempt to lure in more clueless investors. They have started minting vanry 2.0 eith 10billion coins. This will dillute all holdings and binance wont support **** like this. Another rebrand?

• 
  Zafat (@nogigsontheway) reported 43 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Dear @cz_binance, My case has been ongoing for more than a year. All requested KYC have been successfully completed, and Binance has confirmed in writing that the transfer is approved. Despite multiple promised timelines and written confirms, nothing is happening. Please help!

• 
  Apostolic (@Sanny23861994) reported 50 minutes ago

  @randgroup @rikurandgroup Binance looked like a rounding error against BitMEX in 2018 too. How are you sizing your position relative to that kind of trajectory?

• 
  Alastar (@AlastarTrades) reported 57 minutes ago

  $BANK Analysis Price is up over 600% in the last 5 days and is currently sitting in a 30% pullback from the high. So far, this looks more like a healthy correction than the start of distribution. Key support: $0.20–$0.22 Binance positioning: • Whale Longs: $21M | Avg. Entry: $0.21 | 64% in profit • Whale Shorts: $2.65M | Avg. Entry: $0.20 | 33% in profit • Open Interest: $49M Whale longs are still heavily dominating position-wise. Base case: a retest of the ATH / local high. If we break above it, the expansion continues. I post real-time updates in my Telegram first. Link below #bank #bankusdt

• 
  KidMoseby (@KidMoseby) reported 59 minutes ago

  @PacoDeLaPaco @Sr_Smitch_ @Greenpeace06_09 Misleading people into thinking you’re affiliated with Binance to gain trust is a serious concern, especially if it’s being used to attract delegations or support.

• 
  Andy (@Andybnbcto) reported 1 hour ago

  @_RichardTeng @binance I found one error on Binance home page can you please get it fixed

• 
  Zafat (@nogigsontheway) reported 1 hour ago

  @cz_binance CZ please help with my long lasting case with binance. My account has been locked, all investigations have been passed, have received official emails with exact dates of my money return, but they keep extending and never transfer my money back. Please help.

• 
  Ali Charts (@alicharts) reported 1 hour ago

  CEXs WILL REPLACE TRADITIONAL STOCK EXCHANGES Centralized exchanges are becoming far more than trading venues for digital assets. Traditional markets still operate around fixed sessions, jurisdiction-specific access, multiple intermediaries and settlement cycles that can take days. CEXs were built differently from the beginning with global distribution, 24/7 markets, near-instant settlement, and comparatively low execution costs. Now that stocks, commodities, Treasuries, and other real-world assets are moving onchain, that infrastructure is beginning to support much more than crypto. Indeed, the tokenized RWA market grew from roughly $5.5 billion in early 2025 to $25 billion by mid-2026, despite crypto falling about 28% and DeFi TVL declining more than 25% during the first half of the year, according to DeFiLlama. Monthly RWA spot volume expanded from around $1 billion to briefly reach $40 billion in Q1 2026. Meanwhile, RWA perpetual volume surged from just $230 million in early 2025 to $347 billion, with derivatives overtaking spot volume for the first time near the end of 2025. Binance accounts for roughly 35.9% of TradFi perpetual volume, with approximately $474 billion traded in 2026, followed by MEXC at 22.8% and Hyperliquid at 19.8%. That advantage appears to come from having the liquidity necessary to turn a listing into a functioning market. Binance averaged around $536 million of BTC perpetual liquidity within 1% of the mid-price in 2025, versus $202 million for OKX and $103 million for Bitget. That depth matters because tokenized assets require issuance, tight spreads, continuous counterparties, hedging activity, and reliable price discovery. While TradFi is gradually adopting blockchain infrastructure, CEXs are expanding into equities, commodities, tokenized funds, collateral, and DeFi. The two systems are converging—but increasingly on infrastructure that crypto exchanges spent the last decade building.

• 
  ~Green~ (@Greenobyw) reported 1 hour ago

  @BinanceResearch Hello, I’m a content creator, and due to the tragedy that happened in my country 🇻🇪I need a house😓🙌🏻🫶 As much as I work, it is difficult by my own means to reach the figure for a home. To anyone who wants to help me or donate any contribution, I attach my BINANCE ID: 1055203229