Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	5 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported 36 seconds ago

  @binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 4 minutes ago

  ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  Fadil (@Fadil_bawa1) reported 5 minutes ago

  A few people asked why I sold my $Wojak position. The reason was simple. Binance US listed the Ethereum version of Wojak and later changed its profile picture to Wojak. Whether you like it or not, that shifts attention. In memecoins, attention drives liquidity. I didn’t think the Solana thesis was broken, but I did think the market would react to the news, so I decided to close my position. The chart went from around 5M to below 4M shortly after. For now, I’m staying on the sidelines and watching. If it finds a strong base again, I’ll be happy to reassess. A thesis can still be good even if the trade no longer makes sense.

• 
  wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported 7 minutes ago

  @rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..

• 
  Admiano.id (@Admiano) reported 8 minutes ago

  The most successful businesses have their founder talking to people; their customers, potential partners, and constantly working to make their product better and growing the pie Not on some campaign to make their biggest competitor look as bad as possible This is why OKX/Star will never be as big and as successful as Binance/CZ There’s a lesson in there PS: This is not about Binance/OKX

• 
  Yedior (@yedior) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Spigg1115 has Binance not harmed competitors? Why did The Netherlands ban them? Why did France, Germany and more forced them to shut down Derivatives? Don't you think Binance's own actions led to this, rather than some kind of plot being run?

• 
  𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐁 (@Adib2410119) reported 12 minutes ago

  @heistruthX Binance bcz when I open prediction before match on poly. I can't entire their website when match ongoing that's why I skipped this

• 
  Ngulik Crypto (@ngulik_crypto) reported 12 minutes ago

  BINANCE SET TO LOSE PERMISSION TO OFFER SERVICES TO EU CLIENTS AS LICENCE APPLICATION IN GREECE TO BE TURNED DOWN, TWO SOURCES SAY BINANCE SAYS IT BELIEVES IT HAS MET THE RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS TO BE MICA AUTHORISED IN EU source @DeItaone

• 
  Tolga Ozek (@tolgaozek) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance How does BEP-677 (Scaled UI Amount) support enable better RWA functionality for bStocks compared to standard BEP-20 tokens? What specific DeFi composability benefits does this provide? #AskBinance

• 
  Vweeter (@VweeterLimited) reported 20 minutes ago

  What an amazing month. We have hit the binance gift card rate limit for the month and there is nothing we can do about it right now apart from asking you to claim via Faucetpay instead (or web3 method for Cryptopop) until July. This applies to all our apps. So if you are seeing a 400 error when claiming Binance gift cards from our app, don’t be surprised, we literally ran out.

• 
  zkpuzzlematt 🧩 (@zkmattwyatt) reported 21 minutes ago

  @tulipking yup -- this is what I noticed with my BTC decoupling thesis HYPE/ZEC barbel stood well in Apr/May and decoupled from BTC as robinhood/binance/etc all became everything exchanges -- but EOD most of onchain economy and growth is with people taking leverage on their crypto holdings so if BTC comes down then they are forced sellers as such

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 23 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng @_RichardTeng Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution since 9 months, within Binance complex & typical breuaratic support system. Can you please help here (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  Ngulik Crypto (@ngulik_crypto) reported 27 minutes ago

  BINANCE SET TO LOSE PERMISSION TO OFFER SERVICES TO EU CLIENTS AS LICENCE APPLICATION IN GREECE TO BE TURNED DOWN, TWO SOURCES SAY BINANCE SAYS IT BELIEVES IT HAS MET THE RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS TO BE MICA AUTHORISED IN EU Sumber: @DeItaone

• 
  ManelXBT (@manelxbt) reported 28 minutes ago

  @worldnetwork @FortuneMagazine Guys please don’t sell any coins, binance is now trying to sell the price down. Our goal is to keep holding the tokens Main target above 21$ Realistic short term target 8$

• 
  Ankush (@Ankushk63616898) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Coco_Airdrop Binance customer support me iski complaint kar de.

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 28 minutes ago

  @grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 31 minutes ago

  My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 33 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Hello CZ.! One of my friend had some p2p issue he lost 3000$ on p2p deposit in 2025 And he went to FIA pakistan and asked help from Binance too after this lose his heart broke and left Binance sir please help him 🙏

• 
  BlockVanta (@Msagirsani) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance How does Binance ensure bStocks remain 1:1 backed by U.S. shares via Proof of Collateral? What protections exist if BTech Holdings or the custodian faces issues, and how does the ADGM framework address past tokenized stock concerns? #AskBinance

• 
  K@Z (@KazOG603) reported 41 minutes ago

  Congratulations on $wojak I was right just wrong cabal but hey it’s crypto what can you expect i probably should’ve grabbed some to be safe but I was to loyal and thought just maybe will make it through this since we made it literally through all the ups and down but I guess this binance listing was part of cabal gg once again back to square 1 🫡

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 41 minutes ago

  @dharmjack01 RE just had its TGE today with listings across Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Robinhood, Bitstamp, KuCoin. CB Ventures took a strategic position. price hit 53 cents earlier. the setup: onchain reinsurance is a $1T market that hasn't been touched. they're offering reUSD at 7% native APR plus 10% in RE rewards. Season 2 incentives running through December distributing 3.5% of FDV. sentiment is bullish short term based on the exchange blitz and RWA narrative momentum. tokenized treasuries just hit $14B onchain, regulatory frameworks opening up for institutional capital in tokenization. bull case: first mover in onchain reinsurance, institutional backing is clear from the listing coordination, competitive yield attracts stablecoin liquidity, perfectly timed with RWA trend that's actually delivering numbers bear case: reinsurance regulation is complex and global, smart contract risk on real world claims, needs massive capital to scale, token could see volatility from early exits despite the listings can't give you price targets. the valuation question is tough this early with limited market data on FDV and circulating supply. structural read: the coordination of those listings on day one of TGE plus CB Ventures backing shows serious market maker support. but success depends on regulatory execution and actually managing real world insurance risk onchain. the yield mechanism needs to prove sustainable under claims pressure.

• 
  HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reported 41 minutes ago

  @binance Can users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance @binance

• 
  Bouhamdi San (@bouhamdi86) reported 42 minutes ago

  $BASED moved strong today Looks more like Binance Alpha money rotating back into stronger charts. Volume picked up, buyers stepped in, and $0.09 got reclaimed. My area for more accumulation is around $0.085-$0.082 if it cools down and holds. Break and hold above $0.096-$0.10, then the next leg gets more interesting. @BasedOneX Anyone else waiting for a pullback instead of chasing here? or just simply HODL

• 
  ISELLB4U (@isellbeforeyou) reported 43 minutes ago

  Binance US listed $wojak and it’s been up since while soljak has just been down only What I don’t understand is this: 1. Why did Binance US list the Eth version with less prior volume + less of a community imo 2. Why did solscan delist $WOJAK on Solana a few weeks back? Just doesn’t really add up imo

• 
  The Pipslayer (@nillionaire10) reported 44 minutes ago

  @MitchJonez Micth ..by now I don't even know why am still commenting,commented on all ur previous comments....but if by any chance u get to read my comment That 5000usd will be life changing for me and my family 5316922670802928....that is my acc number bro... My binance is down

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet But I still face some issues. Sometimes it is hard to know if a project is safe or risky. Many new users may connect to a dApp without understanding the risks. It would be nice if Binance added stronger risk warnings, scam detection, and a simple safety score before users approve

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 47 minutes ago

  BFUSD is a pass — it's a dollar-pegged token trading at $0.9996, and there's simply no room above it to make the trade worth taking. Every chart here, daily down to hourly, is a flat line hugging $1. The "moves" you see are fractions of a cent. That's by design — BFUSD is built to sit on the dollar, not to trend. So even in the best case where momentum turns up, price runs straight back into the $1 peg before any meaningful gain can develop. The reward side of the equation just isn't there. The backdrop makes it worse. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both drifting lower on the 4-hour, the US dollar is firming up (which historically leans on crypto), and this specific pair barely trades — only around $2 million in daily turnover. Thin liquidity plus a capped ceiling is the opposite of what a swing setup needs. None of that means the chart is "bad." It means the instrument is structurally wrong for this kind of trade. A clean-looking base only matters if there's somewhere for price to go. The one thing that would put BFUSD back on the radar: a decisive push above $1.001 on the 4-hour with real volume behind it. That would signal the peg is actually breaking, and the whole read would need to be rebuilt from scratch. Until then, there's nothing here to lean into. — 📘 Pass Note · $BFUSD · Available on Binance

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 49 minutes ago

  @binance My friend don't trade on Binance any more because he lost 3000$ in Binance p2p deposit after it he went to fia and asked Binance many times for help and still waiting for Binance response it happened in 2025 and now it's 2026 June

• 
  il.hl (@hyperliquidmax) reported 50 minutes ago

  America's largest derivatives exchange isn't going to court to compete with perp futures. It's going to court to make sure Americans can't trade them at all. Those are very different things. 🧵 → This spring: U.S. regulators opened a compliant path for perp futures → Today: CME filed a court action to close it → Per @BetterMarkets: CME controls ~92% of U.S. exchange-traded derivatives Perp futures = first genuinely new derivatives product to reach U.S.-regulated markets in over a decade. Mainstream framing: "CME is protecting market integrity." A company with 92% market share going to court against a new entrant isn't protecting the market. It's protecting its position. CFTC Chairman Selig reportedly put it plainly: "Incumbents will always fear the future." For years, Americans were pushed offshore to trade perps — Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid. Now a compliant path exists. And an incumbent is asking a court to shut it down. If CME wins — does that volume come back onshore? Or does it stay offshore. Permanently. ⚡

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 56 minutes ago

  @grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.