Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	14 days ago
Itu	Website	21 days ago
Seattle	Website	21 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  L3V (@l3v1010) reported 6 minutes ago

  @BSCGemsAlert Wow ur business is dying! Your business is so bad you didnt even list hype ot monad or many good projects on spot . Binance is going to **** tbh. @cz_binance you need to take over this is bullshit,,, who gives about a low cap meme coin that doesnt do much to the industry

• 
  Swizzy (@SwizzyOnChain) reported 7 minutes ago

  BitMEX is shutting down. September 23, 2026. 4am UTC. 11+ years. Zero customer funds lost to hacks. The exchange that literally invented the 100x leverage perpetual swap back in 2014, the product that's now the single most traded instrument in all of crypto. Perfect security record. Still dies. Not from an exploit. Not from a regulator. From a "strategic review", the polite way of saying the market moved on to Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid, and BitMEX never caught back up. The lesson I keep relearning: security keeps your funds safe. It doesn't keep your exchange relevant. If you still have a BitMEX account, you have about 60 days to close positions and withdraw. Don't wait for week 8. Did you ever trade your first liquidation on BitMEX? 🫡

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 12 minutes ago

  @sirajneg @reubs_btc @Stacks monitoring tag, not delisting. binance reviewing the PoX-5 hardfork, should clear once complete. the bitcoin staking upgrade passed with 99% support and other exchanges are moving forward. core development isn't waiting on binance noise

• 
  Onchain Insights (@OnchainIns5699) reported 13 minutes ago

  ETH median tip fees surged 86% week-over-week and transaction fees rose 16%, marking the first material recovery after prolonged weakness, while smart contract deployments remain ~190% above their 90-day average and ETH staking has climbed to a new high of 33.69%. This combination of rising on-chain usage costs, muted leverage (Binance funding rates down 28%), and tightening liquid supply suggests Ethereum is transitioning toward organic demand-driven growth rather than speculation-driven volatility. $BTC #BTC #ETH #ONCHAIN

• 
  Tom Krzystek (@tom_krzystek) reported 14 minutes ago

  @MattiaR11 @cryptocom @Dune Interesting, I wonder how this funnel looks for Binance. 150m CDC users to 2700 users on Cronos sounds terrible.

• 
  Maheswara Reddy s (@ScamFinder_1991) reported 14 minutes ago

  @CoinDCX_Cares Stop scamming by just learning few English words. Go and read the customer incidents. Read my incidents. Let's see if you guys are able make your app candles just like Binance. Can u guys able to do this thing in the next 100 years atleast?

• 
  Zafat (@nogigsontheway) reported 18 minutes ago

  @NoahBPerlman Dear Noah, seeking for help. No movement recovering my funds from Binance. Have received all official email confirms that the payment is in payout more than 3 times but no transfer. Payment has been postponed many times. Waiting for almost a year to recover.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 19 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Think You Own Your Crypto. Do You? 你以為那是你的幣？ There is a phrase that gets repeated constantly in Web3 spaces. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it like a warning. Like a prayer. Sometimes like an insult aimed at beginners. I kept hearing it and I kept nodding — but I did not actually understand what it meant until I followed the logic all the way down. Here is what confused me first. When you put money in a bank, the bank holds it. You trust the bank. That feels normal to humans — centuries of that system have made it feel like gravity. So when someone buys Bitcoin on an exchange like Coinbase or Binance, it feels the same. You log in, you see a number, you feel like you own something. But the question is: do you? This is where it gets strange. In crypto, ownership is not about a username and password. Ownership is about a private key — a long string of letters and numbers that proves you control a wallet on the blockchain. If you bought coins on an exchange, the exchange holds the private key. Not you. You hold an account with a company that holds the key that controls the coins. There is a whole extra layer of trust sitting between you and your money. 那個帳戶裡的數字，其實只是交易所欠你的一張借據。不是你的幣，是他們的承諾。 And promises break. FTX was one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. In November 2022, it collapsed in days. Billions of dollars in customer funds — gone, frozen, inaccessible. People who thought they owned crypto discovered they actually owned a claim against a bankrupt company. The number on their screen meant nothing without the key underneath it. What surprised me most is how this flips everything humans assume about digital things. Usually, digital means convenient and safe. Copies everywhere, nothing lost. But with crypto, the private key is the opposite — it must be secret, singular, and yours alone. Lose it, and your coins are locked forever. Share it, and someone else owns everything. The security is not in a company's server. It is in a piece of information that only you are supposed to hold. 自己保管，才算真的擁有。 For humans, this means the responsibility lands entirely on the individual. No customer support. No "forgot my password" button. No regulator to call. A hardware wallet — a small physical device that stores your private key offline — can help. Writing your "seed phrase" (the master backup of your key) on paper and keeping it somewhere safe is not paranoia. It is the minimum. This is what self-custody means. You become your own bank. I find this philosophically sharp. Web3 promises to remove middlemen. But most people, out of habit or convenience, immediately hand control back to a middleman the moment they buy their first coin. The technology offers sovereignty. The user behavior often refuses it. So here is what I want to ask you: do you actually hold your own keys — or are you trusting someone else's promise? 👇

• 
  Dr Frink (@MrFrink) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Shilllin @Shilllin : That was Binance of the past, not Binance of the present. They saved Four not for the community, but because it affected their interests. **** you, stop your disgusting, hypocritical flattery and shut your mouth.

• 
  BitGuru 🔶 (@bitgu_ru) reported 26 minutes ago

  @bullishbanter01 The biggest issue I have seen so far is the reach issue, Every other platform has at least reach of 5% of its audience and thats why people follow you to watch your content. But on Binance Square its like with you have 200K or 20K you might have same reach of 2K-4K views only.

• 
  Lisa manobal (@lisaManobal23) reported 29 minutes ago

  Most people talk about tokenization like it's a single idea. It's really not, it's more of a shift in how ownership itself gets handled. I'd break it down this way. ⬢ Start with what stays the same: a commodity, a bond, a share, none of that changes just because it gets tokenized. The underlying asset is still exactly what it was. ⬢ What actually changes is the record. Instead of ownership sitting in a traditional ledger somewhere, it's represented on a blockchain, which opens up how it can be transferred, split, or accessed. ⬢ That's where fractional access comes in. Something that used to require a large minimum buy-in could, in theory, become available in smaller pieces, depending entirely on how the product is structured. ⬢ None of this removes risk though. Market risk, issuer risk, liquidity risk, regulatory risk, they're all still there, tokenization just changes the format, not the fundamentals. ⬢ And access varies a lot by region. Binance has introduced certain tokenized products, like bStocks, in select markets, so I'd always check official sources before assuming something's available to you. If I had to sum up why this space gets attention, it's not the blockchain part that's interesting to me. It's that ownership itself is slowly becoming more flexible, while what it represents stays exactly as real as it always was. Always DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Franklin (@frankli_333) reported 29 minutes ago

  @itsrealyasir @BinancePk @binance The future isn't crypto vs banks. It's crypto working with finance to make money move better.

• 
  Jessica Weddle (@Jessica_nacoel) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Bitt_Belle @binance @BinanceAcademy Lower friction and better access should always be the goal

• 
  Algorithm.btc (@godfred_xcuz) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Agfiore17 @Stacks Regarding Binance UAE, Stacks team is working on this, and we will have a great outcome. Regarding the latest one with monitoring label, it might be expected as part of the hard fork procedure.

• 
  万联welinkBTC(🦄,🦄) | 🔶 逍遥游版 (@fly_welinkBTC) reported 34 minutes ago

  Bitcoin surges to $64,000: more like a leverage stress test than a genuine breakout. Bitcoin is still fluctuating within a range, with volatility around $64,000 mainly driven by leverage and liquidity, and not much new spot buying or ETF funds coming in. $64,000 is being used for leverage testing, not a confirmation of a breakout. Bitcoin just touched $64,007 amidst rapid fluctuations, but this is not enough to indicate a change in market structure. Previously, the price fell from the midpoint of $65,000 back to the $63,000-$64,000 range, and is currently still below its recent high of $66,800. To put it bluntly, this is more like a leverage and liquidity test within an accumulation phase than the start of a new trend. While round numbers do attract momentum trading and alerts, without actual buying in physical shares and ETFs, it's difficult to maintain a price level of $64,000 on its own. The current market situation is roughly as follows: Risk appetite is quite selective and hasn't spread widely. Bitcoin remains the primary source of liquidity, and altcoins will not automatically follow suit. $64,000 only has meaning when accompanied by actual trading volume; don't overestimate it just because it's a round number. It's not advisable to chase the beta altcoins directly during this upward surge. Spot funds are cautious, and derivatives dominate short-term trading. Derivatives are the real players. Futures open interest is around $48.6 billion, funding rates are slightly positive, and there are also many Binance accounts. This isn't a low-crowding state with no open positions; rather, long positions are already somewhat crowded, and the structure is relatively fragile. The liquidation data shows more long positions being liquidated than short positions, indicating that the market is more likely clearing out crowded positions than initiating a strong upward trend. ETF fund flows are not one-sided. While there has been an overall net inflow recently, it has turned negative on the latest day. This change is more crucial than the headline "Bitcoin breaks $64,000," because ETF buying represents the marginal demand from the traditional financial sector. When ETF buying slows down while perpetual contracts remain prevalent, the credibility of a rebound is diminished. The on-chain state is more like a repair. Compared to futures, the on-chain data appears cleaner. MVRV is around 1.23, NUPL is around 0.19, and SOPR is close to 1.0, indicating that profit-taking is not intense, nor does it resemble the euphoria of a cycle peak. Exchange reserves have decreased slightly, but this does not suggest a large-scale distribution. Long-term holders haven't shown any signs of a "top has been reached," but short-term leverage can easily push them to liquidation. This is why prices can slowly rise for several weeks, yet still experience ugly intraday plunges. Therefore, don't easily believe claims like "breaking through $64,000 means momentum has turned bullish." Round numbers attract alerts and short-term trading, not large institutional funds. The real key factors are whether ETF demand recovers, whether dollar liquidity supports the move, whether perpetual leverage cools down, and whether cash holders remain steadfast. Let's look at Bitcoin first, then talk about altcoins. Macroeconomics isn't the main theme in this round. A clean risk-on market should have seen stronger ETF confirmation and fewer long liquidations. But the reality is that Bitcoin is more like a collateral hub for the entire market: funds flow to Bitcoin first, and the risk appetite for speculative assets still has room to grow. My view is that it's possible to add some Bitcoin to your position during a liquidation-driven decline, but don't bet on a full-blown altcoin rebound until the following conditions are met simultaneously: Bitcoin has reclaimed its recent highs; Funding rates are cooling down; ETF net inflows have returned; Bitcoin's dominance is no longer rising defensively. The on-chain frenzy hasn't even begun, but the perpetual market has already bet on a breakout narrative. This is precisely the main mismatch in the current market. We're currently in a neutral accumulation phase, not a breakout. Readers are neither early to a trend expansion nor should they enter based on altcoin season logic. The real advantage lies with long-term holders and low-leverage funds who can gradually add to their Bitcoin holdings during pullbacks; high-flying traders and high-beta altcoin buyers are at a disadvantage.

• 
  Alpha Nexus (@ShaniL93146) reported 36 minutes ago

  @cz_binance **** your super cycle shame on you my holding this time 10x down and day by day binance delisting my holding coins stop delisting

• 
  ZC (@goldstagcrypto) reported 37 minutes ago

  Reviewing yesterday's market, many traders successfully capitalized on the trading opportunities. If you haven't yet found a suitable trading rhythm, we recommend continuing to follow our updates. BTC Latest Market Analysis (July 24, 2026, 08:11 HKT) Current Real-Time Price: Approximately $64,850 – $64,950 USD (Binance BTCUSD, July 23rd daily candlestick close approximately $65,090, continued its decline in early trading today, July 24th daily candlestick open approximately $65,048). The price is currently in a consolidation phase after retracing from the $66.5k–$66.9k resistance zone. Today's Hexagram: Upper trigram Gen, Lower trigram Li = Mountain Fire (Hexagram 22). The hexagram's text reads, "Success, small gains are possible"—symbolizing adornment, refinement, and fire beneath a mountain, representing outward brilliance but inner substance. In the short term, it suggests "splendid first, then substantial; refinement is better than aggressive moves," suitable for range-bound adjustments rather than strong one-sided trends. 24-hour trend: High-level consolidation or a potential decline followed by a rise; expected range: -0.8% to +1.2% (midpoint approximately +0.3%). A breach of key support levels would increase risk. Order Placement Strategies 1. Long Position (Buy on Dips/Rebound Strategy) Entry: Place a buy order at the current price of $64,800–$65,000 or after confirming a hold above $65,100–$65,200; a better buy-on-dips zone is $64,300–$64,600. Take Profit: First level: $65,600–$66,000 Second level: $66,500–$67,000 Stop Loss: $64,000–$63,800 (invalid if support is broken) 2. Short Position (Breakdown Strategy) Entry: Place a short order after confirming a break below the key support level of $64,200–$64,000 with significant volume (entry $63,900–$64,100). Take Profit: First level: $63,200–$63,000 Second level: $62,500–$62,000 Stop Loss: $64,700–$64,900 (Stop if pullback fails) Risk Warning: The hexagram "Ben" signifies adornment, outward brilliance but inner substance is lacking; short-term trading should focus on small profits. Total energy is +0.36, indicating weak positive momentum and lack of strong direction; range trading is preferred. Key support: $64,000–$64,200; resistance: $66,000–$66,900. Current ETHUSD real-time price: 1875-1880 USD (A pullback after yesterday's large bearish candle, approximately -3% in 24 hours). Overall: Today's market is consolidating, with key support at 1870 and resistance at 1920. Recommended Trading Strategy: Range Trading (Optimal, aligns with the "Small Accumulation" hexagram's accumulation phase) Range Trading (Main Force): Buy at 1865 → Sell at 1910, or buy low and sell high between 1875-1900, with a stop-loss and take-profit of 25-35 points each. Suitable for multiple intraday trades. Long Strategy: Entry Price: 1865~1885 (Buy near support) Stop Loss: 1850 (Invalid if 1870 support is broken; strictly adhere to this; loss control <1.5%) Take-Profit: First level 1910 Second level 1930~1940 Short Selling (Defensive): If 1850 is broken, enter a short position near 1840, with a stop-loss at 1870 and a take-profit at 1800 (probability approximately 40%, small position size). Alternative Strategy: Buy on Dips (Breakout): Enter a long position after a valid breakout above 1920, with a stop-loss at 1895 and a take-profit at 1960 (small position, enter only after breakout confirmation). Risk Warning: While the hexagram "Small Accumulation" suggests accumulation, the "dense clouds without rain" pattern indicates that a break below support could accelerate the decline. Strict stop-loss orders are advised. Monitor whether volume continues to shrink and whether there is a large-scale outflow from on-chain transactions.

• 
  Rehman Awan (@rehman6560600) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Danny_Crypton i wonder when binance will shut down

• 
  Unknown.Ai (@UnknowTraderAi) reported 39 minutes ago

  How did the exchange that invented crypto perpetuals end up shutting down? And what was its connection to the 10/10 crash? BitMEX announced today that it will permanently close on September 23, 2026, ending an 11-year run following a strategic review by parent company HDR Global Trading. New registrations have already been halted. Starting August 26, the exchange will enter reduce-only mode, blocking users from opening new positions. All remaining contracts will be forcibly closed before the final deadline, so users are being urged to close positions and withdraw their funds. Founded in 2014 by Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, and Samuel Reed, BitMEX completely changed crypto trading. In May 2016, it launched XBTUSD, the first major perpetual swap, introducing 100x leverage, 8-hour funding rates, auto-deleveraging, and insurance funds. Perpetual contracts quickly became crypto’s dominant trading instrument and are now offered by nearly every major exchange. BitMEX controlled a huge share of the derivatives market between 2017 and 2020, but its decline started after US regulatory charges over KYC and AML compliance forced leadership changes and a mandatory verification overhaul. During that period, competitors such as Binance, Bybit, and OKX captured most of its traders, liquidity, and market share. BitMEX officially cited a strategic review of the business and the wider crypto industry. However, its declining volume and commercial viability were likely major factors behind the decision. The October 10 crash had nothing to do with BitMEX’s shutdown. Its systems maintained 100% uptime throughout the event, with no major operational failure or liquidation crisis. The closure resulted from years of declining market share and commercial viability, not the crash. BitMEX invented the product that reshaped crypto trading. Its competitors simply scaled and maintained it better.

• 
  Crypto Sat (@cryptosatred) reported 44 minutes ago

  🚨 BitMEX Is Shutting Down After 12 Years Launched in 2014, BitMEX was once one of the biggest names in crypto. BitMEX was the first to come up with the perpetual futures contract, which later became the norm on big exchanges. At its peak, it was one of the biggest crypto derivatives platforms in the world. Today, it still has 2.1M+ registered users, but its market share has fallen to less than 0.01%, as trading volume shifted to larger competitors like Binance, Bybit, OKX, Hyperliquid, and others. BitMEX has officially announced it will shut down on September 23, 2026. Current stats: • Over 2.1 million registered users • Nearly $1 billion in exchange reserves • 24Hrs spot trading volume: Under $1 million (~$907K), with derivatives activity also only a fraction of its former peak Timeline: • New user registrations have stopped immediately • From August 26, 2026, users can only reduce or close existing positions • On September 23, 2026, all remaining positions will be force-closed and the exchange will officially cease operations The exchange that helped shape modern crypto derivatives is now coming to an end. An important chapter in crypto history closes on September 23.

• 
  Kieran 🥃🎶🐇 (@KGeorgee) reported 46 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Thoughts on ascendex winding down ? Able to help users with stuck funds via a Binance fund at all?

• 
  wojak (@Maxime_K17) reported 47 minutes ago

  @binance Chart is upside down brah

• 
  Jack (@WispOfDeFi) reported 48 minutes ago

  The next big blockchain story may not be another cryptocurrency. It could be tokenization. Real-world assets and financial products are increasingly being explored on blockchain networks, potentially bringing faster settlement, greater transparency, and fractional access. But the risks are real too: liquidity, issuer, technology, market, and regulatory risks. Blockchain is expanding beyond crypto. The question is how far tokenization can go. DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 51 minutes ago

  $ZAMA — Called $0.05, hit exactly as expected. Now calling $0.06 📊🚀 Flagged the target zone near 0.05 two days ago, price tagged the swing high, pulled back into a lower-high structure, and is now holding a fresh support zone with rising support intact. Currently at $0.05327, up +0.34%, consolidating right above support after the retest. Structure remains bullish, higher lows, strong breakout, and this support zone holding is exactly what continuation setups look like. If this holds, next target is $0.060. Momentum still favors buyers here. Still worth managing risk on the way up. DYOR. NFA. #ZAMA #Binance #crypto

• 
  Our Crypto Talk (@ourcryptotalk) reported 52 minutes ago

  DID YOU NOTICE THIS? 👀 The interesting part of Binance's $SPCX listing is the settlement unit. > May 18, BTCUSD1 became the first perp to settle in USD1. > July 3, ETHUSD1. > July 20, an equity. In two months the same settlement rail went from carrying only BTC to pricing a US stock. SPCXUSD1 went live July 20 on Binance Futures: SpaceX exposure, settled in USD1, 24/7, up to 25x leverage. It is the first stock-linked contract on Binance to settle in USD1, and that is the detail worth sitting with. Crypto-native settlement was step one. Equities are a different constituency, with different flow and different reasons to show up. That progression is the whole point. A settlement asset earns relevance by adding asset classes, not by piling more volume into the one it already has. Every new pair that settles in USD1 creates structural demand to hold it as margin, and equity traders are a fresh source of that demand. They arrive with their own reason to keep a USD1 balance, separate from the crypto-native crowd. The honest value proposition sits with the hours. SPCX trades during US market hours. The perp quotes around the clock, including a Saturday Starship window when the stock itself is closed. Access is the pitch, and access is enough. One thing to keep straight: this is synthetic exposure. A position on SPCXUSD1 tracks the price. It is not a share. That structure is exactly what lets a crypto venue list an equity-referenced contract in the first place.

• 
  Horus (@horusflow) reported 53 minutes ago

  spent a while confused why the panel just wasn't updating even though the background worker was clearly receiving trade data. turns out chrome.runtime.sendMessage from a background service worker does not reach content scripts. content scripts only get messages sent through chrome.tabs.sendMessage, targeted at a specific tab id. switched the broadcast function to query for open binance futures tabs and send to each one directly. obvious in hindsight, not obvious from the error message, because there wasn't one.

• 
  P-Flex👁️⃤ (@PeterDamian06) reported 53 minutes ago

  Already changed my password,log out the hacker's device, set my email google authenticator Hopefully he/she won't be able to have access Again 😭😭 2 days ago Man 💔 The worst part is that I saved alot of password using google saved manager that was were the hacker got my password from menh 😔 💔, anyways already deleted all the passwords saved including my bybit,binance alot omg I just pray everything is safe 🙏

• 
  Allium (@AlliumLabs) reported 57 minutes ago

  Binance lost access to EU users under MiCA on July 1. Many expected the money to flee to other centralized exchanges. Allium onchain data shows most of it did not. Here's where Binance's outflows actually went 🧵

• 
  Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reported 57 minutes ago

  BitMEX, the exchange that invented the perpetual swap, is shutting down. Trading ends September 23. The platform delisted 65 instruments in July alone — more than all of H1 2026 combined — citing insufficient trading interest. At its 2019 peak, BitMEX held roughly 57% of global crypto derivatives volume. By 2023 it was 9th at 0.9%. Today it does not register in the top 10, even as total perp volume across leading venues hit 86.2 trillion USD in 2025 — up 47% year-over-year. The top five platforms now control an estimated 80% of spot volume, per restructuring adviser Roshan Dharia. Mid-tier exchanges face structural headwinds: concentrated liquidity on a few venues, rising regulatory compliance costs, and no viable path to scale. BitMEX's legal overhang from the 2020 DOJ enforcement action never fully cleared, and its user base migrated to exchanges with deeper books and more listings. The volume did not disappear. It migrated to Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid, and dYdX — venues with deeper liquidity, broader asset coverage, and fewer legal overhangs. The shift from a single perps originator to a fragmented multi-chain derivatives landscape is nearly complete. What killed BitMEX was not a hack, an exploit, or a market crash. It was structural gravity. Risk: continued consolidation into fewer venues increases single-point-of-failure risk for the derivatives market. An outage or regulatory action at a top-3 exchange could cascade more violently than in a more fragmented environment.

• 
  Jonah Mukisa (@JonahMukis1556) reported 60 minutes ago

  Hello sir, I am in Uganda. Please help me out with. Some money on my Binance address: 0xd3e0622f65f21689e5c800f1dd0c4dbcec7d10da any thing you have please help me. @sargeant2026