Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (43%)
• Transactions (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	18 days ago
Itu	Website	24 days ago
Seattle	Website	24 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 2 minutes ago

  @TheInsiderPaper iran news spiking volatility, binance data shows strong btc support

• 
  Raw Trades (@Rawrawtrade33) reported 4 minutes ago

  @saylor Saylor, bitmart just closed which exchange is shutting down next? is binance insolvent?🤔👋

• 
  Mosterin.SOL (@Mosterin_0) reported 4 minutes ago

  🚨 CZ just dropped the real reason Binance isn’t lining up to buy failing exchanges like BitMEX and BitMart. It’s not the brand. It’s not the user base. It’s the tech debt. Once you buy an exchange, you’re also buying every hidden vulnerability, backdoor, and half-baked system the old team left behind. Even if you take full control of the business, the old code and infrastructure can still get you wrecked months later. Buying a dying exchange isn’t like buying a normal company. It needs way deeper due diligence - or you risk inheriting a ticking time bomb. CZ says these deals can happen but only with extreme caution. His advice to users of platforms that are shutting down: Self-custody if (and only if) you actually know how to handle seed phrases safely Or move to a big exchange with serious reserves and security track record

• 
  Dark TA (@dark_analysis) reported 6 minutes ago

  Binance just delisted $POL / BTC from exchange. We warned about this problem almost daily, there is no any liquidity even on largest exchanges. Coinbase has 200k $ volume only. No wonder @0xPolygon selling OTC. $MATIC #Bitcoin $ETH $BTC $ADA $SOL $DOT $XRP $OP $AVAX $ARB $POL

• 
  Garrett (@Garreett_G) reported 7 minutes ago

  For a long time, I thought crypto had only one purpose. Buy. Wait. Sell. Then one day I noticed something called Simple Earn inside @binance. My first thought was, "What is this? Is this another way of trading?" It wasn't. Think about it like this. Imagine you have money in your wallet. If you spend it every day, it just sits there between purchases. But if you keep it somewhere designed to earn rewards, it can work differently while you aren't using it. That's the idea behind crypto earning products. They are different from trading because the goal isn't to buy and sell all day. They are designed for users who want to explore other ways of using eligible digital assets. When I learned about Binance Simple Earn, the first thing I understood was the difference between Flexible and Locked products. Flexible gives you more freedom to access eligible assets when needed. Locked usually means agreeing to keep eligible assets for a set period before they become available again. Neither is automatically better. They simply suit different needs. Understanding that one difference helped me stop thinking every Binance feature was just another trading tool. Sometimes learning one small concept removes a lot of confusion. Educational only. Reward rates, supported assets, eligibility and product availability vary by region. Always do your own research and use official Binance sources. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Katherine🔶 (@Katherine_XBT) reported 9 minutes ago

  .@binance is the perfect real-world example of this. Regulators rejected them. Banks rejected them. Whole countries tried to shut them down. Lawsuits, investigations, “you can’t operate here” letters… they got hit with all of it. They just kept building anyway. And now they’re still the biggest exchange on the planet. Get rejected so much that the only thing left is execution. That’s the real game. Never Stop Building

• 
  MEGA ETH MOTO (@NoNAME00264254) reported 14 minutes ago

  The fire sale of a life time. Future trillionairs in the making! Let's break it down! @megaeth @hotpot_dao If a real-time, 10ms-block-time Layer 2 like MegaETH succeeds at scale—overcoming the steep post-launch distribution headwinds that plague high-throughput chains—the ripple effects would reach far beyond crypto market caps. A "huge win" for MegaETH wouldn't just mean a higher token valuation; it would mark a fundamental shift in how software architects, Web2 giants, and institutional markets think about decentralized execution. Here is what that victory would look like across the broader technology landscape. 1. The Erasure of the "Web2 vs. Web3 Performance Gap" Historically, Web3 applications have accepted a massive latency tax in exchange for decentralization and composability. * The New Baseline: At sub-10ms block times and tens of thousands of real transactions per second (TPS), the user-perceived performance gap between centralized cloud infrastructure (AWS/GCP) and decentralized execution vanishes. * Web2 Consumer UX: App interfaces would no longer require "confirming transaction..." loading spinners, wallet pop-ups for every state change, or artificial delays. Interacting with a smart contract feels identical to tapping "Like" on Instagram or placing an order on Uber Eats. 2. Micro-Colocation and "Proximity Markets" Become Standard Architecture One of the most radical shifts would be the commercialization of on-chain proximity infrastructure. * Today, high-frequency trading (HFT) firms pay millions to place servers in the same New Jersey data centers as NASDAQ or the NYSE. * A MegaETH victory validates the concept of bidding native tokens for physical co-location near a specialized node/sequencer. * This introduces a brand-new Web3 revenue engine: monetization of physical sub-millisecond network proximity for algorithmic traders, arbitrage bots, and real-time AI agents. 3. On-Chain Financial Infrastructure Fully Replaces Wall Street Centralized Order Books Legacy exchanges (like Cboe, CME, and Nasdaq) rely on off-chain matching engines because existing Blockchains are too slow for order-book matching engines, forcing crypto to rely on Automated Market Makers (AMMs). * Order Books over AMMs: A ultra-low latency chain allows fully on-chain Central Limit Order Books (CLOBs) to handle high-frequency order cancels, updates, and matches without clogging the network. * Institutional Migration: Traditional market makers and prop desks move actual matching operations on-chain rather than relying on centralized intermediaries (like Binance or Coinbase) for execution speed. 4. Real-Time Autonomous AI Agents Get "Self-Sustaining" Rails The tech industry is currently bottlenecked on how AI agents perform micro-transactions autonomously. * Instant Settlement for AI: If an AI agent needs to pay another AI agent $0.001 to process an image, parse a dataset, or rent 100ms of GPU power, current chains are either too expensive or too slow. * Agent-to-Agent Micro-Economies: Ultra-fast, low-cost execution allows autonomous agents to hold balance sheets, execute sub-second arbitrage, and run autonomous economic loops without human intervention. 5. Shift from "App Chains" Back to Shared Real-Time Composability For years, the consensus solution to throughput limits was building specialized, isolated application chains (AppChains). * Composability Wins: If MegaETH proves a single general-purpose state machine can process real-time workloads without collapsing under state-bloat, the industry pivot toward fragmented AppChains halts. * Developers regain "atomic composability"—the ability for a game, a credit protocol, a DEX, and a yield vault to seamlessly interact in a single block without cross-chain bridges. 6. It rewrites the venture playbook for open-source protocol launches: * Alignment: Networks are forced to treat token emissions like milestone-based corporate equity unlocks—tied strictly to verifiable revenue metrics.

• 
  WALL STREET BINANCE (@Wallstreet_bnb) reported 20 minutes ago

  Still don't get why so many people trade on Hyperliquid. This morning $SKHX wicked down to 927 on Hyper. Same minute, Binance and Bitget lows were both above 1060. Same asset. Same minute. 133 points apart. Most longs got wiped. On a CEX you can fight support, file a ticket, make noise until someone answers. On a DEX you go where? You argue with the contract? It doesn't read your DMs. Decentralized doesn't mean retail friendly. It just also removes the person you complain to 🫡

• 
  wikilix (@wikilixofficial) reported 22 minutes ago

  Is Binance getting squeezed out of Europe? Binance's app has vanished from Google Play in Spain and Latvia, tied to MiCA rules after it failed to win an EU license. Binance says it's working with Google on a fix, per Cointelegraph. #Binance #Crypto #MiCA

• 
  Me dicen Jota (@Medicenlajota) reported 26 minutes ago

  @USTreasury PUBLIC COMPLAINT! @Binance @BinanceLATAM the support agents and the commercial team are allowing the use of third-party accounts with USD currencies, I have evidence and they promote non-existent policies and not those of the platform, allowing MANY PEOPLE to launder US money.

• 
  Abhishek (@AbhishekHodler) reported 28 minutes ago

  @binance Scammers, don't you know people are not having any money left after what you did on 10/10, even altcoins that were in spot holding are literally 90-99% down. Go fk yourself with APR.

• 
  Jon (@jcfrei) reported 29 minutes ago

  By the time they introduce stablecoins most of the liquidity had shifted to Binance and other more innovative exchanges (FTX, Huobi, etc.). They probably had a few whales that couldn't leave due to issues with tax authorities but the exchange was already slowly dying back then.

• 
  Vadim | POLTRACK (@vadim_web3) reported 31 minutes ago

  @mjpartridge1 @amtronai @sandeepnailwal I didn’t miss that point. I’m well aware of it, and I’ve written about it many times. First, every successful blockchain today needs a successful company behind it. That’s just reality. Second, value still accrues to the chain and POL. If customers choose chains other than Polygon, that activity will still flow through AggLayer and generate fees for the POL. Marc has also already mentioned the possibility of buybacks. On top of that, Polygon won’t need to fund itself with grants forever. As protocol funding winds down, sell pressure should decline. And finally, regulations like the CLARITY Act make it increasingly difficult - and arguably impossible - to simply pipe off-chain corporate profits directly to an on-chain token. That’s just not how this industry is likely to work going forward. Yes, Polygon Labs captures part of the value, and I’m perfectly fine with that. A blockchain by itself isn’t a complete business. You need products built on top of it - products that attract users, generate revenue, and strengthen the ecosystem. That requires a strong company behind the protocol. Coinbase has Base. Robinhood has Robinhood Chain. Binance has BNB Chain. Even Ethereum is moving in that direction with commercial initiatives. That’s where the industry is heading. I don’t see anything wrong with a successful payments company monetizing its products while still driving value back to the chain through fees, staking, burns, and potentially buybacks.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 32 minutes ago

  BANK just dropped ~28% in a day, and stepping in front of that bounce is the trap — this one only comes back into focus if it reclaims and holds above roughly $0.305 on the 4-hour chart. Zoom out and the picture is ugly. Momentum on the 4-hour chart was already fading near the recent high around $0.41 before the crash hit — the kind of quiet warning that shows up right before big drops — and it's still pointing down, not turning. Price is now sitting well below the average level traders have been paying over the last few weeks (around $0.35 on the 1-hour view), which means nearly everyone who bought recently is underwater and has a reason to sell into any bounce. There's more overhead to chew through too. Just above current price, around $0.32 and $0.38, are zones where leveraged longs were already flushed out — those areas tend to act like ceilings on the way back up, not launchpads. And if this bounce fails, the nearest real floor on the 4-hour chart is all the way down near $0.036. That's a lot of empty space underneath a coin already in freefall. The one flicker of green is the 15-minute chart trying to lift off a very stretched oversold reading. But that's a small signal fighting a much bigger one — a broken trend, sellers stacked overhead, and the most active futures traders positioned for more downside. Clean-looking bounce, wrong side of the tape. Worth watching for that $0.305 reclaim; not worth catching before it. — 📘 Pass Note · $BANK · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Peroxide 🪑 (@KoechRoman4770) reported 35 minutes ago

  @md_nazum @binance Did you get help??

• 
  Draxen (@Draxen_Web3) reported 37 minutes ago

  I expected one thing The data showed another Everyone says Gen Z invests for the hype Yet @binance latest research shows something much more interesting • 77% received formal financial education • Only 5.9% of their trading volume comes from leveraged ETFs • Their first investments are often companies like NVIDIA, Apple and Tesla not random bets Then another number caught my attention. 95% of Gen Z TradFi users on Binance are from emerging markets That completely changes the conversation Maybe this isn't just a story about Gen Z Maybe it's a story about access For millions of younger investors global markets are no longer something they read about. They're something they can actually participate in And that's reflected in the growth: • Gen Z now accounts for 44–45% of users across Binance's TradFi products • Their share of new TradFi users has grown from 41% to 47% in just the first half of 2026 Sometimes the biggest shift isn't louder It's simply becoming impossible to ignore The next generation isn’t waiting for the future of investing They’re already helping shape it.

• 
  Crazyfrog589× (@Noonam369) reported 38 minutes ago

  Binance still controls 46.9% of the $NIGHT supply right now. This concentrated supply in a major exchange is quite interesting amid the Wanchain bridge issue.

• 
  Crypto Breaking News (@CryptoBreakNews) reported 39 minutes ago

  CZ Supports ASEAN Crypto License Passporting to Expand Access Binance co-founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao has endorsed a proposal for “license passporting” across ASEAN, arguing that crypto firms already authorized in one country should not have to restart the licensing process f...

• 
  XRPpundit (@XRPpundit) reported 40 minutes ago

  📌 XRP Whales Added $4.9B During the Dip — Here's the Verified Breakdown Per analyst Kamilah Stevenson: large-wallet XRP balances rose from 7.5B (mid-August) to 12.13B now — a 4.63B XRP increase, worth ~$4.9B, accumulated gradually through the downturn rather than bought at the top. Mid-sized wallets (10M-100M XRP) were steady buyers. Smaller holders (100K-10M XRP) were net sellers. Binance whale outflow dominance hit 91.4%, retail down to 8.4%. Wallets holding 10K+ XRP hit a record 332,000+. Standard caveat applies: exchange outflows show large holders moving XRP into self-custody, not confirmed new buying — could be repositioning. But the pattern (whales active, retail fading) is consistent with separate CryptoQuant data showing whale dominance climbing from 63% to 77.8% since May.

• 
  Telbloggram (@Telbloggram) reported 41 minutes ago

  @HowardLouisHL one week of normal trading, the user attempted to withdraw to Binance on July 4 but was blocked by the system. The customer service only replied "triggered risk control," without specifying the exact reason. The next day, the user's account was restricted from logging in.

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 42 minutes ago

  @ezinwa47384 Hey, may we confirm if you have issue with Binance? If you cannot access your Binance account, please DM and share the error screenshot with us. We'll check and help you further - CN

• 
  Aminullah Temitope(Ø,G)🦛🔺KGEN❖,❖ (@AminullahT59547) reported 43 minutes ago

  @kernel_dao please I am having issues withdrawing my funds from binance wallet...I need help. I am stuck in the step 2 guide where I am to connect wallet...i can't see the option.

• 
  Jim Graham (@jimrgraham) reported 45 minutes ago

  @taylorkenneyitm Just over three weeks ago, I tried to wire $20,000 to Kraken to buy crypto. I tried to wire $50,000 to Binance two weeks before that - blocked. I've bought crypto from Coinbase, and many other platforms without any issue except have to talk to the fraud department about why I was buying crypto. All I wanted to do was buy crypto. BofA closed all THREE of my bank accounts without notice and told me to wait for a cashiers check in the mail. I was actually in a branch while talking to the fraud department when they closed my account without even telling me. They could have given me 5 minutes notice and I would have requested a cashiers check for my 6 figures. NO - instead they said for my protection, they closed the accounts. What about business? What about an escrow I needed to close? What about mortgages, what about expenses, payroll, etc...?? Sorry, you will need to wait for your cashiers check to come in the mail. I was a BofA customer for 35 years.

• 
  CasiTrades 🔥 (@CasiTrades) reported 48 minutes ago

  🚨 ripple:native's Next Wave Could Be Violent! 🚨 Do you see how nicely we're following the purple scenario? 🟣🤔 During Friday's livestream, I highlighted the importance of the $1.09 level we were testing at the time. I explained that it would likely provide a small reaction for subwave 2, and that's exactly what happened! 🎯 📉I also warned that any bounce would likely have a strong rejection, and now price is right back to the macro support. Critical time in the market to confirm purple plan to $0.87 support. I believe the next wave is a break toward $1.00, giving Binance an opportunity to retest its own macro .786 retracement (subwave wave 3 down). The subwaves continue to develop as expected and still point toward the $0.87 macro support. #XRP #xrpcrypto #CryptoMarket

• 
  Holy Poly (@HolyPoly_ca) reported 48 minutes ago

  Why is everyone talking about BitMEX shutting down? I’ve never actually used the exchange. I simply wasn’t around during its peak. By the time I got into trading, there were already more straightforward, convenient, and promising platforms, so I never really saw a reason to use BitMEX. But for some reason, I wanted to dig a little deeper and understand what actually happened there. BitMEX is one of those exchanges from the ancient days of crypto. BitMEX was essentially one of the pioneers of crypto perps. In 2016, the exchange launched 100x crypto perpetuals and dominated the market until 2019. You can imagine how much money a monopoly in the crypto futures market could generate. But that era ended. Binance, Bybit, OKX and other exchanges emerged, offering better products and infrastructure while aggressively competing for users. At the same time, BitMEX started running into problems of its own. AML/KYC controls were practically nonexistent, the exchange served users across numerous jurisdictions, and eventually ran into serious trouble with U.S. authorities. Arthur Hayes, who was running BitMEX at the time, got caught up in it as well. From 2020 onward, BitMEX started rapidly losing market share: layoffs, restructurings, regulatory issues, and repeated attempts to reinvent the business. In recent years, BitMEX was probably most useful for niche arbitrage opportunities. Sometimes it still had contracts for tokens that had already been delisted from larger exchanges, and low liquidity could lead to some pretty strange price action. I’m far from an arbitrage trader, so that’s another reason BitMEX never really crossed my radar. And then, on July 23, the exchange announced it was shutting down. At first glance, the story seems pretty simple: a once-dominant exchange failed to keep up with the competition, lost its users, and eventually shut down. But there’s one interesting detail — the Insurance Fund. BitMEX’s liquidation mechanism was structured in a way that allowed part of the funds left after certain liquidations to flow into the Insurance Fund. At its peak, that fund grew to an enormous size. And this is where things get interesting. Back in February 2025, reports emerged that BitMEX’s owners were looking for a buyer. They never found one. And one theory is that the Insurance Fund itself may have been part of the problem. For a potential buyer, it’s not simply a pile of money sitting on the balance sheet. You need to understand where that money came from, the fund’s legal status, what obligations exist toward users, and, most importantly, who ultimately owns those assets. Of course, all of this is based on publicly available information and theories. The real reason BitMEX shut down is something we’ll probably never know. And there’s one more interesting detail… Rumor has it that the CEX could come back with its own DEX. To be continued…

• 
  David Nobel (@dnobel22) reported 50 minutes ago

  @cryppimagic key here is if the oracle methodology would change imo. seems like binance had handled it waay better anyways 1 share volume print/price should not be fed straight into the oracle like that for sure. apart from that i believe the system worked as intended @sedaprotocol pls fix

• 
  N𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮 🌺 (@ItsNessaOnX) reported 51 minutes ago

  @RenoCzarr Binance on the chopping block?

• 
  2xnmore (@2xnmore) reported 53 minutes ago

  The blockchain purists are not going to like this. Ondo just built the next chapter of real world assets by taking execution off the blockchain. Not onto a faster chain. Off it completely. And once you understand why, you understand where this entire sector is heading. Here is what they actually announced, in plain words. Ondo launched the Ondo Network, which they call the execution layer for financial markets. Fast and private like Binance. Verifiable like a blockchain. Non custodial, so you always keep control of your own funds. The first product already live on it is Ondo Perps, their high performance perpetual futures platform. Now here is the uncomfortable part, and they are being honest about it. For over a year they hyped Ondo Chain, a full blockchain built for Wall Street. Then, while building Perps, they hit a wall. The blockchain itself was the bottleneck. Too slow. Too public. Serious traders would never accept it. So instead of forcing it, they split the job into three separate pieces. This is the part worth saving. How the Ondo Network actually works: Execution runs inside secure private hardware called enclaves. This is where the trades and the math happen. It is fast and private, exactly like a top tier exchange. Independent checkers called attestors verify that every trade ran honestly. You get the trust of a blockchain without putting your entire order flow on public display. Public blockchains handle only the final settlement of money and assets. Right now that is Ethereum, with more chains coming. This is the step that keeps custody in your hands, not theirs. Read that structure back slowly. They kept the speed and privacy of a centralized exchange, and the verifiability and self custody of a blockchain, and they refused to give up either one. That is the exact trade off every crypto project swears is impossible. Ondo just engineered around it. And this is the mistake most people will make today. They will call this a retreat. A project that promised a blockchain and quietly backed down. It is the opposite. This is the second largest issuer of tokenized Treasuries on earth deciding that ideology does not pay the bills, and shipping the thing that actually works for real markets. Perps is only the opening move. The same network is built to carry spot markets, lending, structured products, and more. One more thing holders keep asking. The ONDO token keeps its exact same role as the governance and incentive token of the ecosystem. Nothing there changed. So here is the verdict. The projects still chasing the perfect fully decentralised chain are building for a whitepaper. Ondo is building for the trading desk. Only one of those gets used by real money. You already know which. Tell me I am wrong.

• 
  CryptoMoses (@realcryptomoses) reported 54 minutes ago

  Binance is under renewed scrutiny. A new report alleges the exchange has updated its compliance procedures, making it more challenging for international law enforcement agencies to access user data. As a result, investigators may have to rely on slower government-to-government treaty requests instead.

• 
  Anti Misinfo Watch (@JimGentile12) reported 59 minutes ago

  @hineycoin Using the Binance name does not make the sender Binance. Stop the transfer first, then verify the domain, account and case through official support. The original notice matters more than the headline