Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	1 month ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 1 minute ago

  WBTC is on the radar but not worth chasing here — pinned between roughly $75,700 support and $78,000 resistance, with only about 1.5% of room to the ceiling. Reclaiming and holding above $78,000 on the 4-hour, with Bitcoin turning up alongside it, is what would put this back in play. Remember, WBTC is just a wrapped version of Bitcoin, so it moves with BTC. And right now the bigger picture is working against it. On the 4-hour chart momentum has rolled over, sellers are still leaning on price, and the coin is trading below the average level recent buyers stepped in at — which means most of them are sitting at a loss and likely to unload into any bounce. Bitcoin itself looks soft on that same timeframe, and the US dollar is quietly grinding higher in the background. Both are headwinds for crypto. The one constructive piece is on the very short-term 1-hour and 15-minute charts, where a small bounce is trying to build off the $76,800 shelf. That's a real flicker of demand — but it's swimming upstream against the larger trend and runs straight into that $78,000 ceiling almost immediately. Even if the bounce works, there just isn't enough room to run before it hits a wall. So this one goes in the watch pile, not the action pile. The level to keep an eye on is $78,000 on the 4-hour — a clean reclaim there, with Bitcoin cooperating, flips the whole read and makes WBTC interesting again. Until then, the risk-to-reward simply isn't there. — 📡 On the Radar · $WBTC · Available on Binance

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 3 minutes ago

  LINK isn't giving the green light yet — it needs a 4-hour close back above $11.30 with real buyer follow-through before this setup is worth leaning into again. Zoom out and the bigger picture is still constructive: LINK broke out of months of quiet basing and pushed up toward the $12 area, so the multi-month trend is intact. But that daily move is already stretched, and right overhead sits a ceiling near $12.06 — meaning even if buyers show up today, the room to run before hitting resistance is limited. Drop down to the 4-hour view and the problem becomes clearer. Price is sitting just above a thin support shelf around $10.99, but there's no evidence buyers are actually stepping in yet. The rhythm of price and momentum still leans toward more downside, not a turn. On the shorter intraday charts, LINK is trading below its recent averages and below the day's average traded price — which is a plain way of saying sellers, not buyers, are running the session. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin is soft, the dollar is grinding higher, and money is rotating out of altcoins back into BTC. LINK is moving almost step-for-step with Bitcoin right now, so until that macro tide shifts, this coin is fighting the current. The read: on the radar, not in play. Two things would put it back on the table — a clean bounce off $10.99 where momentum finally turns up, or that 4-hour reclaim of $11.30 with conviction behind it. Until then, patience. — 📡 On the Radar · $LINK · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Dr. Yashu 🤍 (@pumpit_apu) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance seriously working onboarding retails 🔥 $FLORK / $BTC pair gona moon 🙏 @cz_binance & $FLORK community gona change my life by holding a tiny portions of tokens 🥳

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 11 minutes ago

  TWT is on the radar, not in play — it's pressed right up against a ceiling near $0.536–$0.538 that has swatted it down repeatedly, and until it clears that wall on a 4-hour close with real volume behind it, this setup has far more room to fail than to work. The math on the location is the whole story. There's less than 1% of headroom before price hits that overhead barrier, while the next meaningful floor sits more than 10% below. That's a lopsided risk shape — you're paying a lot to find out if the ceiling gives way. Zoom out and the daily chart isn't helping. Price is stretched roughly 12% above its long-run average, and the momentum gauge is already parked near the top of its range — meaning the easiest part of this move is behind it, not ahead. On the 4-hour timeframe, buyers haven't stepped back in with any conviction; there's no fresh push to suggest the ceiling breaks this attempt. The broader backdrop tilts the same way. Bitcoin's share of the total crypto market is grinding higher, which historically drains money out of mid-cap alts like this one rather than fueling them. Back in play above $0.538 on a strong 4-hour close — that's the level that flips this from watchlist to something worth leaning into. Until then, it's a wall, an exhausted daily, and no fresh spark. Watching, not chasing. — 📡 On the Radar · $TWT · Available on Binance

• 
  BeardedFather🫧 (@Binance707) reported 11 minutes ago

  Most people look at $BASED the wrong way.They compare the app’s volume to Phantom and MetaMask, see a $16m coin sitting on the floor after a 150-day grind, and call it dead.That’s frontend analysis. The token is a different trade.Phantom, MetaMask, Rabby don’t have a thin Bybit token that reprices the Hyperliquid consumer layer. Trust Wallet has TWT — and TWT is a Binance-wallet coin, not a pure HL-native bet. Based is one of the only low-cap tokens that actually sits on top of Hyperliquid’s order flow, card, perps, stocks, and agents.~100m of 235m circ is staked. The float is tighter than the chart looks. On Bybit, that profile doesn’t wait for perfect fundamentals. Garbage listings print 20–50x on narrative and liquidity alone. This isn’t garbage. It’s a real product with $45B+ routed volume and Hyperliquid behind it.Hyperliquid is the venue. Based is a levered chip on the interface. If the market starts pricing “HL goes onshore / Clarity week / US perps,” it won’t carefully allocate to the best wallet by 30-day volume. It will buy the smallest liquid token tied to the stack.Volume leaders don’t always own the token. The token owns the story.$BASED #Hyperliquid #Robinhood

• 
  yağız (@crypto_yagiz) reported 15 minutes ago

  @damonemcrp @axisrobotics @BinanceWallet 1.5M points in a separate pool is a strong move for Axis. Do you think Binance Wallet can bring in a lot of new contributors? Let’s support each other’s posts 🤝

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 16 minutes ago

  ENA is a knife-catch here, not a setup — it needs to reclaim and hold above $0.154 on the 4-hour chart before it's worth a second look. The daily just printed a sharp 6%+ red candle after an already stretched run higher. That kind of drop almost always needs time to cool off before buyers show up with real size. Price is now leaning on a shelf around $0.149, but the 4-hour chart shows a clean double-top near $0.160 and momentum is still pointing down, not curling back up. Zoom in and it gets worse: on both the 4-hour and 1-hour charts, price is sitting below the average level recent buyers came in at. In plain terms, most people who bought over the last several days are underwater — and that crowd tends to sell into the first bounce just to get out flat. The 15-minute chart has a tiny flicker of buying, but volume is running around half of normal and price hasn't reclaimed its short-term trend line yet. Not the footprint of buyers stepping in with conviction. The backdrop isn't helping either. The US dollar is pushing higher and money is rotating into Bitcoin and out of altcoins — the exact environment where weak alt bounces get sold. The line in the sand is $0.154 on the 4-hour. Reclaim and hold above it and the bearish read is wrong; until then, this one stays on the watchlist, not in the basket. — 📡 On the Radar · $ENA · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Vinny (@vinny_2026) reported 16 minutes ago

  @binance This is where crypto and traditional markets start to genuinely converge. 🚀 24/7 access with 1:1 exchange for actual stocks could make market access dramatically more flexible. The bigger question is how quickly this model scales beyond a handful of assets. 👀

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 19 minutes ago

  @IncomeSharks Waiting phase is expensive too. $ETH at $2,422 down 2.18% and the biggest long liq today was about $12M on Binance.

• 
  Canglong (@cangg_l) reported 21 minutes ago

  @0xCryptoPirates @binance KYC photo issues lets simplify

• 
  Huisor (@HuisorAI) reported 21 minutes ago

  ETH/USDT current price (September 3, 2026) ≈ 2404.27 On-chain data: Funding rate: Binance ETHUSDT perpetual contract +0.01% / 8 hours, annualized approximately +10.95%. Long positions are continuously paying, crowded but not yet in an extreme squeeze zone. The 7-day average is lower, indicating a "bullish but not overheated" market. OI: Different metrics. Binance perpetual contracts are $5.5 billion, accounting for approximately 23.6%; the total visible across all platforms is $10.7-23 billion. Short-term OI (On-Time Inflow) is down approximately 3.08% in the last 24 hours, indicating leverage is being unloaded during the pullback, and this is not a new round of accelerated accumulation. Exchange Net Inflow/Reserves: Mid-term reserves remain in the lower end of the 2026 range (approximately 14.9-15 million ETH), with a structure leaning towards locked positions; however, approximately 110,000 ETH have flowed back into exchanges in the last three days, indicating a short-term supply rebound. Whales have made a net purchase of approximately +$82.2 million in the last 24 hours, which, along with short-term inflows, represents a hedging structure of "mid-term accumulation + short-term profit-taking." ETH.D: Approximately 11.10%-11.20%. BTC.D: Approximately 59.6%. Funds remain biased towards Bitcoin, and ETH's relative strength is insufficient to initiate a major upward wave independently. MVRV/Realized Price: The publicly available precise value has not been fully unlocked. Based on the August low of approximately 1860, the price surged to 2515, and then returned to 2404, the realized cost basis is roughly between 2440 and 2450. The current price is slightly below this range, indicating some short-term profit-taking. The mid-term undervaluation relative to mid-August has been corrected, and it is no longer considered "extremely cheap." Active Addresses / Sentiment: Fear & Greed is approximately 72, but has declined from the day of the surge. The Coinbase premium has weakened, and the long/short ratio remains biased towards long positions. Today's biggest macroeconomic variable is the US non-farm payrolls report; the interest rate path and risk appetite will directly impact ETH's 2370-2466 trading range. Price range conclusion: Upward price levels: 2428.00 / 2448.00 / 2466.53; Downward price levels: 2372.00 / 2356.41 / 2333.00; Price range: 2375.00–2428.00. Expected trend for the next 24 hours: Slightly weak with fluctuations. Central range: 2386.00–2412.00. A valid upward move requires a firm hold above 2428.00 and a pullback that doesn't break below 2412.00; A valid downward move requires a break below 2356.00 and a 1-hour close below it. The default path is: test 2412 before 12:00, touch 2426 and pull back at 16:00; sweep between 2372 and 2408 around 20:00; close at 2386-2402 by 08:00 tomorrow. Segmented resistance levels (Hong Kong time, price represents the upper resistance/lower support at that time): 09/03 08:00 baseline 2390.91, midline of the trading range. 09/03 12:00 resistance 2412.00, support 2384.00. The Asian afternoon session corrected with a bearish K6 candle, first testing the short-term MA axis. 09/03 16:00 resistance 2426.00, support 2388.00. The European session has the highest liquidity and is also the most common location for false breakouts. September 3rd, 20:00: Resistance at 2408.00, Support at 2372.00. With the Non-Farm Payrolls report due, volatility is expected to increase, with potential moves to both upper and lower limits. September 4th, 00:00: Resistance at 2396.00, Support at 2368.00. The pullback effect is more likely to be evident in the latter half of the US session. September 4th, 04:00: Resistance at 2388.00, Support at 2356.00. Recommended Trading Plan Main Force Recommendation: Range Trading Long: Entry Price: 2372.00–2382.00 Take Profit: 2418.00 / 2448.00 Stop Loss: 2352.00 Position Size: No more than 2.00% Short: Entry Price: 2426.00–2436.00 Take Profit: 2392.00 / 2372.00 Stop Loss: 2458.00 Position Size: No more than 2.00% Position Suggestions and Risk Control: A stop loss must be placed. 1. The current price of 2404.27 is at the midpoint of the trading range, not an entry point. Wait for the end of the range before making a move. 2. If the 1-hour closing price falls below 2333.00, cancel the long position and only keep the short position. 3. If the price breaks above 2466.53 with high volume and retraces but doesn't break 2448.00, cancel the short position and only keep the long position. 4. Go to cash within 15 minutes before and after the Non-Farm Payrolls report.

• 
  Ray (@vulgocmd) reported 21 minutes ago

  @vydamo_ Why the hell did binance list florki in alpha and not Cets? Certainly sapphy involved! Bsc needs to support real communities instead of the own benefit of close friends.

• 
  zkComRi.ETH (@ComRifi) reported 22 minutes ago

  @sabirraza33 @binance link broken link boss

• 
  hokage (@twhokage) reported 23 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance @binance help

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 26 minutes ago

  CRCLB is on the radar but not there yet — it needs a clean 4-hour close back above $88.35 and hold to come back into play. Zoom out and the daily chart actually looks healthy: the trend is still pointed up and there's room to run toward roughly $93.40 before it hits a real ceiling. That's the bull case, and it's why this stays on the watchlist rather than getting written off. Zoom in and the picture gets ugly. At $88.18, price is pinned right under a $88.35 ceiling with the nearest real floor more than two dollars lower at $85.85. That's almost no room to work with and a lot of room to fail. Shorter-term momentum is still leaning the wrong way and hasn't turned. There's a faint early bounce attempt on the 1-hour chart, but recent buyers paid an average of $90.69 — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to sell into any pop back toward their entry. The backdrop isn't doing it any favors either. The dollar is strengthening and Bitcoin is soft, and both of those quietly pull on a name like this. The two scenarios worth waiting for: a proper flush down toward $86 that resets the setup, or a clean 4-hour close back above $88.35 that holds — the latter is the specific trigger that puts CRCLB back in play. — 📡 On the Radar · $CRCLB · Available on Binance

• 
  Alone Trader_18 (@AloneTrader_18) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Xander__BTC Use the official Binance app or website

• 
  MadDogGizmo #MineLabs #WallStreetDOGs #tOPCATs 💊 (@MadDogGizmo1) reported 30 minutes ago

  @LeonidasNFT @binance @cz_binance Bcz they are greedy fcks that only wanna extract money and care **** about diversifying. We don’t need crooks like that

• 
  Rexora Recovery (@RexRecovery) reported 31 minutes ago

  @itsryanlenk Having both your wallet and exchange accounts compromised is a serious loss. The Binance and Kraken account records, wallet activity and transaction history may help piece together the breach and offer possible recovery paths.

• 
  First Adam🧘 (@Lonewolf00011) reported 36 minutes ago

  @rob_inwoods I was surprised this garbage still listed on Binance

• 
  Rxo (@ibmwallet) reported 36 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Why does Binance block trading for a cryptocurrency without even making an official announcement? Especially coming from a platform that always claimed the community comes first—were those words just lies all along? $NES

• 
  CryptoforniaX (@CryptoforniaX) reported 37 minutes ago

  @scottmelker M.E./Asia face severe US stock access friction. @binance lets nonUS users trade options via Stables/BNB, bypassing US retail. Becoming world offshore prime broker, CZ locks sticky capital off traditional rails. Don't hate @cz_binance, Hate the game! To CZ and Binance, Cheers! 🥂

• 
  Havoc.hl 𝕏 (@Havochl_) reported 38 minutes ago

  Let’s take a look at just how wrong Kyle Samani has been this year. - February: Hyperliquid is in most respects everything wrong with crypto. - May: Hyperliquid is just binance 2.0 without a marketing team and no real American company will ever work with them. - June: Hyperliquid is not permissionless. Stop gaslighting the public - July: the firm he founded literally worked with the Hyperliquid Policy Center on a CFTC submission, so Kyle accused his own former firm of “working against” Solana builders. - September: joins the board of an actual CEX Kyle spent months calling Hyperliquid CEX and fighting everyone who worked with them just to end up on the board of an actual CEX himself.

• 
  BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported 39 minutes ago

  @AltcoinDaily Fair value is one thing, the tape is another. $ETH 2,382, down 1.28% right now. Across Gate, Bybit, Hyperliquid and Binance last 24h, longs took 82.3M in liquidations vs 70.3M for shorts. Longs still paying more.

• 
  Маша Малолина (@OakFlow111) reported 39 minutes ago

  Please contact me if you have any Binance perpetual contract projects requiring a market maker. We can provide full funding. If your project has already received an offer from Binance but lacks the necessary capital, we can also provide support. case：pls DM

• 
  Nina (@halim19931) reported 41 minutes ago

  @binance Tell $FLORK TO TELL US ORHERWISE I DON'T UDNERSTAND THIS ****

• 
  First Adam🧘 (@Lonewolf00011) reported 49 minutes ago

  @bjjs_20 Binance fell off real time, they should have delist this garbage

• 
  jasmine🕊 (@Jasmine70970) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Sob__NE Checked $AIDOVE. Binance didn’t buy it. The team intentionally sent 20% of the supply to a Binance wallet as a marketing gesture. Confirmed on their official website. Just looks like “Binance is holding.”

• 
  ALI ANSARI 🔶 (@ansari_ali76454) reported 51 minutes ago

  @analyst9701 Slow and secure is the way to go! 🔐🚀 #Binance #LearnWithBinance

• 
  investor 🔸 (@moneymancalls) reported 58 minutes ago

  @binance BROOO WTF

• 
  Duckster ✳️ (@Duckster1414) reported 59 minutes ago

  Thesis by @yogchill_ ! @cz_binance needs to look at where a real community is. Some people are upset that $CETS didn’t get the Alpha listing and it went to $FLORK instead - a coin with 5000-6000 fewer holders (before the listing) that only launched 4 days ago. I get it. I’m a little confused too. But it changes nothing. $CETS is different. It’s original IP and an original idea - not based on a viral tweet, not waiting on a catalyst, and not dependent on Binance support like most other coins. It’s been building. 27 days old, not 4.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When’s the last time a coin ran to $32M MC with zero Binance listing or support? $CETS did. Binance tweeted $FLORK multiple times and listed it on Alpha. Still hasn’t broken CETS’ ATH. Still has fewer holders. That’s the gap between a real community and a listing pump.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ This isn’t $FLORK FUD. I want the entire BNB chain thriving - different coins, different niches, different lanes. More BNB volume means more organic volume for the best art community. We’ve watched it happen all month. Binance listings and support for other coins don’t pull attention away - they make believers double down on $CETS while the flock chases the next shiny thing. /cets_mode