Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (56%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Itu	Website	4 days ago
Seattle	Website	4 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	13 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Kryptos Opus (@kryptosopus) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MarkAlv75684373 It's not the hyping that's the problem, it's the timing. dude was simultaneously shilling binance NFTs while building the "greatest ever" narrative. that's not resume padding, that's marketing funnel behavior lol

• 
  Mr. Red£yes. (@redhize00) reported 6 minutes ago

  Currently at zero, so I'll this addresses here for everyone who will choose to support. 0xea7cca18bbd8ac1359b455542e4e1f4a115e5a46 - bep 20 binance BiUM4oViHQKCNYzGg7LUNsHhyq4wLeg3nmbvp4CwwFBc - sol 8033116642 - opay Bramwell Cost for check up and meds is roughly $200,

• 
  DEAN (@BOURGEOIIS_) reported 7 minutes ago

  @bull_bnb hi @bull_bnb I began as an NFT artist, trying on X for a full year with no sales at all. But I kept pushing through the silence. Slowly, collectors started seeing the vision and loving my art… a dollar here, twenty dollars there. Every sale, I stacked it with purpose. My dream was simple: build a different life through crypto. Crypto was everything to me. Was part of communities! A family. Binance was the only exchange that opened its doors to me. While other platforms turned my country away, Binance welcomed the whole world. It became my bridge to cash out, to save, to invest truly my only path forward. I turned to a small collector too, supporting other artists so we could all rise together. After four years of grinding and stacking, I had never touched meme coins. Then I made my first move. Got caught in the hype. Lost some. Tried to correct it by selling my solid utility bags and lost even more. That mistake pulled me into a cycle I couldn’t break. I kept chasing what I lost until I had nothing left. Then came one shot two hundred dollars into a meme coin. Three days later, it ran to a hundred thousand profit but I held strong. I was part of the community, and I refused to crash the chart on people. So I watched it all come back down. Team rugged it. Sold at a loss. Ended with zero. The pressure broke me. Tears, Depression, stress, it all built up until I blacked out and collapsed on the ground. I still carry those scars today. But scars only prove you survived the battle right. I’m still promoting my art, still chasing the dream. I lost around thirty thousand in total, but I never lost hope. Because where there’s God, there’s always another chance. I’m still here, still moving forward. Thank you for reading.

• 
  Kiran Gadakh ( crypto.kiran ) (@kirangadakh16) reported 8 minutes ago

  DAILY TOKEN ANALYSIS 🚨 Token : $BNB WHALES ARE AGGRESSIVELY LOADING UP ON BNB RIGHT NOW Big wallets are moving massive funds into Binance Smart Chain wallets as the ecosystem explodes with new DeFi integrations, bStocks, and huge payment layer partnerships! Volume across BSC, opBNB, and Greenfield is pumping hard. Plus, since BNB has a quarterly burn mechanism active, there are absolutely ZERO token unlocks to dump on your face it's strictly deflationary Support : $570 and $540 Resistance : $593 If $BNB breaks $600, we are sending it straight to $630 - $650 If it gets rejected, the $570 - $550 zone is the golden buy level

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance About time they let us trade stocks like crypto. 24/7 access is the way. No more waiting for market open.

• 
  Zky (@TimHallCH) reported 11 minutes ago

  @HugooSTP @Globalflows This is the crypto volume, not taking in account the HIP-3 volume. Yes it's down, the crypto market is in a bear market since more than a year. But now, stock/ETF/commodities are close to 50% of the volume, which are not represented in this chart. Also an important metric is that HYPE share of the total Open interest compare to centralized exchange (Binance, Bybit, OKX) is up and to the right.

• 
  Anti Misinfo Watch (@JimGentile12) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Obesepotato_ Farming likes with "Binance scams users" is not evidence, it's engagement bait. Serious accusations need facts, timelines, and proof — not a popularity contest in the replies. If the claim is real, support it properly. If not, this is just mob-style signaling.

• 
  Adel Bucetta (@adelbucetta) reported 16 minutes ago

  @binance what's really being sold here is market access, not some new innovation in yield farming. still waiting for something that truly disrupts the status quo

• 
  machtuk 💎🌏 (@machtuk) reported 18 minutes ago

  @AshleyDCan People still underestimate the systemic damage that was done on 10/10. @binance nuked the entire ecosystem, covered their ***, liquidated people that were positioned correctly to the tune of billions and then lied about it. All inarguable and onchain. Trust was broken, and the ecosystem may never recover.

• 
  Sana (@sana730808pii) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Cipher2X @binance The focus on utility is becoming impossible to ignore

• 
  Crypto Nexus News (@thenexus_team) reported 21 minutes ago

  Binance is about to celebrate its 9th anniversary, but one issue is overshadowing the excitement. I've noticed that a large number of users are reporting the same problem: "Disqualified Account Detected." Many of them have submitted appeals multiple times, yet their cases remain unresolved. Security is essential, and I fully support Binance taking strong measures against abuse. However, genuine users should not have to face repeated inconvenience or uncertainty because of automated restrictions or unresolved appeals. If this post reaches the Binance team, please take another look at this issue. Review these cases fairly, improve the appeal process, and reassure your community that legitimate users won't be left behind. A faster and more transparent resolution would go a long way in strengthening user trust. Thank you, @binance & @cz_binance . 💛 #BinanceTurns9

• 
  Nico | supernova.vision (@nicoypei) reported 23 minutes ago

  Corporate chains are great for regulatory arbitrage, channeling users to frontier products that currently can't be offered in the core consumer app: > Perps and equity perps went live on Base via @avantisfi LONG before Coinbase launched its perp > @Morpho grew to $3B + TVL before integrating Coinbase > Binance Alpha / BSC for launching lower-cap coins -> the best to ever do it Seems like Vlad understand this. Looking forward to see what they will unveil. Off-the-bet I think > high leverage equity perp trading > high yield savings > prediction market > memecoin trading can be a good start. They launched prediction market during Superbowl last year but had to shut down in one day due to regulation. Now that's not going to be a problem.

• 
  PaulPasha Leonova (@Worldwide1972) reported 29 minutes ago

  Everyone making it in this market is highly connected. Don't also forget, thesame TCC dev is connected to same Dev that launch $TST which got support also from CZ and pumped over $100 million market cap, now listed on Binance.

• 
  KingPia 🔶 (@_Kriptopia) reported 30 minutes ago

  Why are we experiencing fragmentation on BNB Chain? During the Broccoli trend, many Broccoli tokens appeared, and 714 won. It got listed on Binance with 40,000 holders, but the holders of the other Broccoli tokens were upset about this situation. Actually, CZ wanted all Broccoli communities to unite, and that would have been much better. However, the communities did not accept it. Now we are experiencing the same issue with other tokens like @TCryptochicks , @Abrlien @BenTodar and CZ. I am sure that whenever a new meta emerges, CZ would want the community to come together. He said, “May the best one win,” but the best one can only be created through the unity of the strongest communities. Let's unite

• 
  Henry (@LordOfAlts) reported 30 minutes ago

  @DomOnChain @binance @_RichardTeng Regulatory battles never seem to slow Binance

• 
  Killa the Wizard (@KillaMicWizard) reported 31 minutes ago

  @trader1sz Chad, yo trader could you help me investigate what happened to my Bert, I was drained 1.3m Bert, 2 days ago...no idea what happened, and if anyway to recover it would be possible, caludecode find it's binance wallet.

• 
  Crypto Survivor (@cryptotrad0b) reported 35 minutes ago

  @anglio this is the only way how market can recover shut down binance and put cz behind bars. until he is out markets can do nothing expect rekt more and more people

• 
  0xKarl | Eth (@0xKarl) reported 36 minutes ago

  In my bid to support @BenTodar I’m back outside onboarding more people into crypto today. 🫡 Getting them set up with Binance & Trust Wallet, then putting them onto $BEN. Already airdropped some $BEN from my own wallet to everyone I onboarded today. If I receive more $BEN airdrops later, I’ll head back out and onboard even more people. One wallet at a time. 🚀 0xd29be61256e59866a78c4c394baef3ce9eeb8b49

• 
  Onchain Insights (@OnchainIns5699) reported 41 minutes ago

  ETH's 30-day liquidity ratio on Binance stands at approximately 5.22, driven by ~20.32M ETH in turnover against ~3.8M ETH in exchange reserves, indicating each unit of ETH on the platform has been traded more than five times over the period. This ratio suggests strong trading activity relative to available reserves, with sufficient liquidity to support current market demand without requiring a significant increase in exchange holdings. $BTC #BTC #ETH

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 43 minutes ago

  @AvijitSikdar13 @binance Hi there! From the screenshot, this transaction was a withdrawal from Binance to an external address, and it has already been completed and confirmed on the blockchain. Once a withdrawal is approved and sent to an external wallet or platform, it is no longer under Binance’s control. As the next step, please contact the support team of the receiving wallet or platform and share the transaction hash and deposit address with them. They may be able to check whether recovery is possible from their side. We remain at your disposal for any further assistance. ˆLP

• 
  Patt is taking a nap (@pattisme_) reported 44 minutes ago

  📈 **$SOL (82.2):** Best RS among majors. 4H bull-trend, support 80.46, resistance 82.57/83.74/83.98 (D-res). Crowded long (Binance 63.86%, Bybit 67.82%), but funding low (not overheated yet). Near resistance, avoid FOMO. 💧 **Liquidity & Flow:** - Funding: Majors slightly positive ($BTC, $ETH, $SOL ~0.00007-0.0001). - Taker Buy/Sell: $BTC/$ETH ~1.01, $SOL 0.93 → No clear buy aggression. - OI: $BTC mixed (Binance down, Bybit up), $ETH up, $SOL up then flushed. Leverage returning, but $SOL saw a flush. **CRITICAL:** Volume thin across all major TFs → low confidence for breakouts. Not an altseason; majors-led, selective $SOL/$ETH beta. Alts for scalping $BTC range.

• 
  PaulPasha Leonova (@Worldwide1972) reported 46 minutes ago

  dev of TCC. I ignored it. History don't lie. Thesame dude launched $TCC a year and four months ago, he got support from CZ of Binance and TCC then pumped to over $33 million market cap. Dude cashed out. Today, he relaunched thesame token, renamed it to Tcryptochicks and CZ of

• 
  Molla Taher (@TaherMolla09) reported 46 minutes ago

  @binance It has been a long time since they provided any significant airdrops. If they no longer have the capability or intention to distribute them, they could simply come forward and be transparent about it. However, we all know they won't issue any official announcement regarding this

• 
  Nsyan (@FreeLuck212058) reported 47 minutes ago

  @binance Why aren't the channel's posts showing up for me? Is there a problem?

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 51 minutes ago

  ZEC is worth watching, not chasing — it's pinned under $449.53 with almost no room to run, and only a clean 4-hour close above that level would reopen the long case. On the daily chart, ZEC has run straight into a ceiling around $449.53 where sellers keep showing up, and price is already stretched about 16% above its longer-term average. That's the kind of extended reading that usually needs to cool off before the next real leg — the tank is close to empty. Zoom into the 4-hour and the setup gets worse. Price is barely a third of a percent under that same $449 ceiling, but the nearest real floor doesn't come in until $415 — over 7% lower. There's almost nothing above and a long way to fall below, which is a lopsided bet no matter how you frame it. On the 1-hour, momentum is quietly fading even as price keeps poking at the highs — buyers pushing but getting less back each time. That's the fingerprint of an exhausted move, not a fresh breakout. The backdrop isn't helping either: Bitcoin and Ethereum are both drifting lower on the 4-hour while the dollar firms up, and that mix tends to pull the whole risk complex down with it. The level to watch is $449.53. A clean 4-hour close above it on strong volume would rewrite this read entirely and put ZEC back in play. Until that happens, this one stays on the radar — not in the basket. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZEC · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  MaLiK⚜️ (@marine_964) reported 51 minutes ago

  @binance I need to log in, but I can't because the telecom company I registered with reassigned my phone number. As a result, I can't log in, make P2P transactions, deposit funds, check my balance, or withdraw money from my account. Please help me resolve this issue..

• 
  CSK (@Trader_CSK) reported 53 minutes ago

  Dug into the BonkDAO treasury drain for 20M+ Config made it a sitting duck, SPL governance did exactly what the passed vote told it to through a single malicious governance proposal Quorum - 1% of supply Timelock - 0 Proposal creation threshold - 100M BONK Voting power - liquid BONK, not staked or locked Direct treasury transfer execution via Realms Proposer/executor - 8xxRdtzsw1CJWfEahViqNjZwh5dYJAdSbBctWwcbycVo Voter - CyEE7oHVDaFJ5xZLbXY3h2Z2uk1VwhTkdy72kPUEtypQ Timeline (UTC) June 30 08:25 - proposer creates BIP #76, inserts 4 instructions (2x metadata as cover, create recipient account & the SPL token transfer) signs off and voting opens July 4-5 - voter acquires 882.3B BONK from exchanges. 530,397,045,677.94 from Binance and 351,888,204,104.41 from a second CEX hot wallet (reportedly Bybit) July 5 04:46 - voter locks 882,285,249,588.801 BONK into governance July 5 06:56 - voter casts the deciding yes 882.38B over the community's 710.85M no. About 1240x the real voters July 6 08:25:39 - voting closes July 6 08:26:03-08:26:28 - proposer finalises the vote and executes all 4 instructions. Drain completes at 08:26:28, 49 seconds after close July 6 08:45 - voter pulls the vote and withdraws their 882,285,249,588.801 BONK Proposal was live for 6 days without any intervention The drain was a single token transfer. Once the vote passed, Realms governance sent 4,426,104,450,305.966 BONK from the treasury (F8FqZuUKfoy58aHLW6bfeEhfW9sTtJyqFTqnxVmGZ6dU) to the attacker (9bxWkNf3BtJ6iehq9KbX9uCWMjem4TFiPZ19T2sYJHvQ). Total fee = 0.000105 SOL to move over $20M TLDR Fronted $4M of BONK (882.3B), a fraction over the 1% quorum Fully refundable - withdrawn 19 minutes after the drain Profit - effectively the entire treasury (20M+). Net cost - gas (0.000105 SOL) What would have prevented it A new proposal alert. A proposal carrying a treasury transfer sat live for 6 days. One alert the moment it was created catches it An execution timelock (1-3 days) as a failsafe, so a malicious proposal can't fire the second voting ends (basically instant execution like Drift) A higher quorum + vote escrow (staked/locked, not liquid), so voting power can't be rented for a day and handed back solgov flags exactly this type of setup in real time via the telegram bot with push alerts and a live activity feed on the website. You'd think with there being 600M+ in hacks since April there would be more urgency to tighten things up. Need to start taking this stuff more seriously as it's just embarrassing at this point

• 
  Imekan Udohaya (@imekan_udohaya) reported 55 minutes ago

  𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗨𝗽𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 When was the last time you celebrated a blockchain upgrade? Probably never. Most upgrades only become headlines when something breaks—transactions fail, exchanges pause deposits, or the network experiences downtime. So here's a different question: 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗼𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀? That's the story behind Injective's latest mainnet upgrade. The network introduced performance optimizations designed to improve efficiency while maintaining uninterrupted service. More importantly, the upgrade was supported by major exchanges, including Binance, allowing users and developers to continue operating with little to no disruption. That may seem like a small achievement. It's actually a big one. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 @injective isn't optimizing an empty blockchain. Today, the network has already demonstrated impressive scale: • 𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫 2 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧-𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝. • 100+ 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐞𝐅𝐢, 𝐑𝐖𝐀𝐬, 𝐀𝐈, 𝐠𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. • 𝐒𝐮𝐛-𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬, 𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫-𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲. • 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝 (𝐓𝐏𝐒) 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲. • 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐰 $0.01, 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧-𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐯𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. Every optimization matters because these numbers continue to grow. The more users, applications, and institutions interact with the network, the greater the pressure on its infrastructure. Performance upgrades ensure Injective can handle increasing demand without sacrificing speed or reliability. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗘𝘅𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗜𝘀 𝗮 𝗕𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗗𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗜𝘁 𝗦𝗲𝗲𝗺𝘀 When an exchange like Binance supports a blockchain upgrade, it's more than a technical checkbox. Millions of dollars in assets move through exchange infrastructure every day. Any instability can impact deposits, withdrawals, and trading activity. A smooth rollout backed by a global exchange signals confidence in the network's operational maturity. It's the difference between saying a blockchain is reliable, and proving it under real-world conditions. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗜𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗲 Crypto loves numbers like: • Total Value Locked (TVL) • Daily Active Users • Trading Volume • Token Price But here's another statistic worth paying attention to: 𝐙𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐮𝐩𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐬. That metric rarely trends on social media, yet it's one of the strongest indicators of engineering quality. - Developers notice it. - Validators notice it. - Institutions notice it. Because every successful upgrade lowers the perceived risk of building long-term on the network. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗶𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Every blockchain can announce ambitious roadmaps. Far fewer can execute upgrades while billions of dollars in value and billions of historical transactions continue flowing through the network uninterrupted. Injective's latest mainnet upgrade wasn't about chasing headlines. It was about strengthening a network that has already processed over 2 billion transactions, supports a rapidly expanding ecosystem, and continues to position itself as infrastructure capable of handling the next generation of on-chain finance. In blockchain, the loudest announcements aren't always the most important. Sometimes, the strongest signal is a network that keeps getting better, without making users notice it.

• 
  For-Exx KriptoEn (@ForexxKriptoEn) reported 56 minutes ago

  TAC Token Listed on Binance Alpha Crashes 90% Within Minutes: Official Statement Still Pending solana:HSNd1kqcd9HCS499RvtG3MqrKdkcWZiPNfXk1gHdpump (TAC Protocol), listed on Binance Alpha, experienced one of the most dramatic events in the crypto market on July 7. The token plunged more than 90% in roughly 15 minutes, wiping out hundreds of millions of dollars in market value and leaving investors searching for answers. Attention has now shifted to official statements from the TAC team and Binance. So far, there has been no confirmed hack, security breach, or protocol-related technical issue that could explain the collapse. As a result, questions surrounding liquidity, whale activity, and token distribution have become the primary focus. TAC Loses More Than 90% in 15 Minutes According to market data, TAC dropped from around $0.06 to nearly $0.006 within minutes. Trading volume surged during the selloff as panic selling accelerated the decline. Although the token later stabilized slightly, it remained down more than 90% from its intraday high. The crash drew even greater attention because TAC had reached its all-time high of approximately $0.067 only about a week earlier. What Is TAC Protocol? TAC Protocol is developing an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible blockchain designed to bring Ethereum-based decentralized applications (dApps) to the TON and Telegram ecosystem. The project is backed by several well-known investors, including: TON Ventures Hack VC Animoca Ventures Symbolic Capital Primitive Spartan Group To date, TAC has raised approximately $11.5 million in funding. Cause of the Crash Remains Unknown Despite widespread speculation on social media, neither the TAC team nor Binance had issued an official explanation at the time of writing. There has also been no confirmed evidence of: a hack, a smart contract vulnerability, a network attack, or a bridge exploit. As a result, the reason behind the collapse remains unclear. Liquidity and Whale Activity Under Scrutiny Market analysts believe several factors could have contributed to the selloff. The leading theories include: thin order-book liquidity, heavy selling by large holders, cascading liquidations, and extreme volatility caused by a limited circulating supply. Some on-chain observers have also suggested that a significant portion of the circulating supply is concentrated in a small number of wallets. However, these claims have not been independently verified and should not be treated as confirmed facts. Previous Bridge Attack TAC Protocol previously suffered a cross-chain bridge attack in May 2026, resulting in losses of approximately $2.8 million. The team later stated that affected users had been fully compensated. There is currently no evidence linking that incident to the latest price collapse, although the previous security event may have heightened investor sensitivity. Investors Await Official Updates Following the sharp decline, investors are now watching for updates from the TAC team, Binance, and on-chain analytics platforms. Key factors to monitor include: official statements, large wallet activity, liquidity conditions, and exchange trading data. Until the cause of the collapse is confirmed, high volatility is expected to continue. Investors are advised to rely on official announcements and verified on-chain data rather than unconfirmed speculation. @ForExxKripto

• 
  Bariksis (@bariksis) reported 1 hour ago

  The same people crying over the refs rigging the game to help Argentina is the same type of people who cry day in, day out, over Binance manipulating the price of Bitcoin and crypto. But then they are dead silent when the price of Bitcoin is going up, and everyone is printing money in their portfolios while they sleep. Nobody was making a sound when Argentina was down 2-0 till the 78th minute. The refs cannot help a team to put the ball in the back of the net, so shutup and stop crying like a *****, it's embarassing!