Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	6 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Muhammad Ali (@MTgrali) reported 2 minutes ago

  @binance @hamybinance I m stuck in debts can u help me Or u may ask someone who help It's been 4 year I m stuck at one place Trust me asking fr help, breaks my respect from inside but I m helpless

• 
  Sunshine (@sunshinebinance) reported 3 minutes ago

  @mrsmaruf52 Hi there, We understand your concern and that your account eligibility issue has been ongoing for more than a month. We checked from our end and noticed that you tried to contact Binance Support, but it looks like you are still connected with the bot. Please follow the guide in the attached screenshot on how to connect with a live agent so our support team can check your account status and advise you accordingly. For your safety, please do not share your UID or other account details publicly. Thanks!

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph Smart move from Binance, good to see them working with local regulators instead of fighting them

• 
  Zbase (@ZbaseCo) reported 6 minutes ago

  DAİLY UPDATE: Ark Invest added $18.4M in Coinbase and cut Robinhood, senators pushed to block any SBF pardon, CME prepared to sue the CFTC over Bitcoin perpetuals, Congress moved to freeze Fed CBDC plans until 2030, Binance faced EU pressure as Greece resisted its MiCA bid, and China called for tighter stablecoin oversight while Bitcoin hovered near $64K in a fear‑driven market. #zbaseco #crypto

• 
  CryptoforniaX (@CryptoforniaX) reported 8 minutes ago

  $SPCX Perps down 11.76% to $173.81 #Binance on $3.4B volume. Bid walls form at $172.80 Asks cap at $200.38 Exchange spot delivery failures trigger intense cross-chain Perp Shorting as Institutional Desks hammer the synthetic premium to match #Nasdaq reality.

• 
  CryptoSocials (@CryptoSocialsX) reported 11 minutes ago

  $INJ is a crypto trend on X today, ranked #13. What traders are talking about: • Injective is being positioned as the dedicated finance layer L1, emphasizing DeFi, RWAs, and AI applications with low transaction fees. • The network is seeing adoption for novel use cases, including the tokenization of music IP and AI agent payments. • Technical analysis suggests buyer absorption and potential price targets, with some users expressing strong long-term conviction. • Key infrastructure upgrades and partnerships, such as the native EVM mainnet launch and Coinbase support, are noted as significant developments. • Large entities like Revolut and Binance are increasing their $INJ holdings, indicating institutional interest. Users posting about $INJ most on X today: @0xtega_ - 2 @CadeONeill - 2

• 
  pramod kumar maurya (@pramodk77860412) reported 12 minutes ago

  @PetraSiskova8 @binance New announcements are great, but I'm still waiting for the one that says "Binance will support HPP." 👀

• 
  Hakan beşiktaş (@Hakan03JK) reported 12 minutes ago

  @AshCrypto **** cz @cz_binance scammer, @binance scam

• 
  K (@KMore1_2) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance I trade on Binance because I support CZ

• 
  TaylorK (@7krry) reported 18 minutes ago

  @binance I’ve only ever traded standard crypto on Binance, so bStocks is totally new to me. How exactly does corporate action work here? For example, if a company issues a dividend or a stock split, how is that distributed to bStock holders on the app? #AskBinance

• 
  Rosenberg (@MikeRosenb) reported 19 minutes ago

  @binance Before yes but not now, binance system is too slow and too risky, not my wallet not my money, i lost too many, in the same moment i was on other platform which i get gains without manipulations. Sick

• 
  G E N N Y (@Gennycruz_) reported 20 minutes ago

  @CryptoProject6 @binance Access to opportunities should not depend on geography. 🔥

• 
  0xbobaa (@0xbobaaa) reported 20 minutes ago

  30% apr funding arb. nets 12% after costs. one slow exit and it's red where the other 18% goes: long spot, short perp, collect funding every 8h. 0.015% a period reads like ~19% a year then the costs. taker fees round trip, 4-10 bps a leg, both legs, in and out. and funding doesn't hold. the rate slides toward zero in two days, so you bank $18 against $10-15 in fees and the "risk-free" trade sits flat or under what nobody sizes for: only enter once a delta's held 5-7 days. one print isn't an edge cross-exchange is the same trap. hyperliquid vs binance run 6-11% apr, prints have touched 48%. arbitrage should close that gap and it just doesn't. the capital that would close it is off chasing price the yield is real. just thinner and slower than it looks

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 22 minutes ago

  My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet my honest feedback on #Binance Wallet DeFi after using it: the strongest part is not just “more yield options.” it’s that Binance is slowly turning DeFi from scattered tabs into an actual portfolio layer. before, a normal DeFi user had to jump between PancakeSwap, Venus, Uniswap, dashboards, explorers, and sometimes a notes app just to answer simple questions like: where is my money, what risk am i taking, what can i exit quickly, and what fees did i actually earn? Binance Wallet DeFi fixes a big part of that by putting staking, LPs, and loans in one place. that matters because BSC alone is still doing around $5B+ in DeFi TVL, $13B+ in stablecoins, and hundreds of millions in daily DEX volume, so the problem is not lack of activity — the problem is making that activity readable for real users. what i liked: - the 40+ protocols / 1,000+ pools coverage makes the product feel useful, not decorative - seeing Earn, Loans, and Liquidity Pools under one wallet flow reduces “where did i put this asset?” anxiety - loan access through protocols like Venus makes sense because collateral usage is one of the real DeFi use cases, not just farming incentives - LP management inside wallet is a big improvement because adding/removing liquidity and claiming fees should not require users to leave the safety layer what i think can make it exceptional: 1. show “net APY after gas + incentives + price risk,” not just headline APY 2. add an LP impermanent-loss simulator before users deposit 3. add health-factor alerts for loans with push notifications before liquidation risk becomes urgent 4. rank pools by risk-adjusted yield, not just APY 5. show protocol dependency clearly: where the money sits, what contract is used, audit status, and whether rewards are sustainable 6. add a “one-tap unwind” view: remove LP, repay loan, or withdraw position cleanly during volatility 7. give users a monthly DeFi statement: earned fees, rewards, gas spent, unrealized IL, and net result overall, Binance Wallet DeFi feels like the right direction because it treats DeFi as a position-management problem, not only a yield-discovery problem. my main suggestion: don’t make the product compete on the highest APY. compete on clarity. the wallet that helps users understand risk, exit faster, and track real net returns will win long term.

• 
  HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reported 23 minutes ago

  @binance Can users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance @binance

• 
  ÄLÇHËMÏST (@Agent2K4) reported 26 minutes ago

  @binance Since #bStocks live on-chain as BEP-20 tokens, what happens if a user loses access to their private keys? Can tokenized RWAs be recovered, or do traditional crypto loss rules apply? #AskBinance

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 27 minutes ago

  ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  connector🦄💨✨ (@connector_13) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Bria_OKX Sure they listed $USDC last month and went straight to garbage. Study the strength of community, binance can't do miracles and paid listings are destined to fail.

• 
  miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported 31 minutes ago

  @0xSchnitzel @binance No, in this (very rare) case it's actually protecting the customer from an entity who does not care about the safety of their users or their funds. Or compliance for that matter. They had an undetectable 3rd party impact auth bypass they didn't fix for the past 3 years. They even claim it works as intended. I hate overreach, but if regulations are made to protect customers - then this is perfect case for it. Binance needs to go. And my claim is proven. I'm the one who reported the non-compliance and the ((undetectable)) 3rd party impact of their payment processing due to storing CC CVVs - which is a huge no-go. And it goes directly against PCI-DSS which they claim to be compliant with. And it also affects every single of their 300M+ users 💀 The users connected bank accounts don't detect unauthorized access because Binance will always pass the CVVs they store, even if the user doesn't authenticate OR uses the wrong CVV (💀💀💀) They claimed it "works as intended" and tried to silently patch it after declining bounties. The patch just added more pop-ups you need to close before you can bypass their payment auth, but their payment processing was never fixed. They still store user CVVs three years later and the auth bypass still works. It just makes you close more pop-ups LOL I haven't authorized any deposit to Binance for the past 3 years FYI This is one of the ultra rare cases where the regulation actually benefits and protects the user.

• 
  Misha (@mishacrypto99) reported 34 minutes ago

  @fahadgoldy @binance Binance continues to face ongoing criticism over transparency, token listings, and user trust issues in its exchange operations.

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 37 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet But I still face some issues. Sometimes it is hard to know if a project is safe or risky. Many new users may connect to a dApp without understanding the risks. It would be nice if Binance added stronger risk warnings, scam detection, and a simple safety score before users approve

• 
  Boris NEOF1 (@NEOFORCEONE) reported 39 minutes ago

  @kfXGGjovH2HKn4u @c_schuchardt Did dude @kfXGGjovH2HKn4u is using a small baby to promote Chinese scam, is clear to see he is NGD shill ( They have 0 moral ) They are Chinese scammers, all is pump and dump, that is the whole game, market manipuilation and harvesting people, that is why they don't really care about updates, as they are here to harvest people, that is why all things are slow in core-dev segment also, they don't care to work, as there is no incentive to progress on global goal, there is no leadership only a Chinese scamming boss and his scamming helpers/Yes man, soon court process for creating a global international, money laundering ring ( Da Hongfei ) And his partners in crime NGD etc... where Erik will be part of the court process also. They know abot pumps and dumps before they happened on Binance they orchestrated. Etc...

• 
  melinda (@Melinda_Stairs) reported 40 minutes ago

  @pharma_le36640 hey if you are using binance web3 wallet, you have to message their support page @HumanityprotS1 for guidance on how to migrate and claim your new token. They just assisted me with mine.

• 
  ronjukhanbd.eth (@ronjukhanbd) reported 42 minutes ago

  @binance If Binance or the custodian holding the underlying shares ever had issues, what actually happens to my bStocks? Can I always redeem 1:1 for the real share, or could there be limits/delays during high demand? #AskBinance

• 
  Sky🎀 (@cr8pto) reported 42 minutes ago

  @binance Why was $5 chosen as the minimum for bStocks instead of $1 or $10? And as liquidity and adoption grow, are there plans to lower it further? A lower entry point could help users in emerging markets build diversified portfolios with even smaller amounts. 🚀 #AskBinance #bStocks

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 42 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  Byte Drift (@byte_drift1) reported 43 minutes ago

  Something shifted in how people are learning about money. It didn't happen in a classroom. It happened on a phone screen. A few years ago if you wanted to understand investing, budgeting, or crypto you either knew someone in finance or you figured it out the hard way. Now that information is everywhere. 1 in 3 Gen Z adults now use social media as their primary source of financial education. That number was almost unthinkable a decade ago. Almost 40% of younger adults use social platforms to research financial products and services before making any decisions. That's a whole generation learning from feeds, not textbooks. And honestly it makes sense. A 60 second video explaining how compound interest works reaches more people than any school curriculum ever did. A simple post breaking down a confusing market term gets seen by thousands of people who never took an economics class. Accessibility changed everything. But here's where it gets important. Not everything you read online is accurate. Not every creator explaining finance actually understands it. Some are sharing opinions dressed up as facts. Some are sharing information that applies to their situation but not yours. Poor financial literacy cost Americans alone more than $246 billion in 2025. A significant portion of that came from acting on incomplete or misleading information. So the skill isn't just finding financial content on social media. The skill is knowing how to verify what you find. Cross reference what you learn. Check official sources. Understand that context matters and what applies in one market or region may not apply in yours. Social media made financial education more accessible than ever before. That's genuinely a good thing. Just make sure what you're consuming is actually education and not just noise dressed up to look like it. Stay curious. Always DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  chilombo (@Unfaithfulparis) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance clear the issue with the mica agreement if move or sell my bnb or others crypto it’s gonna be hard I have my account since the beginning. YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

• 
  OneKey (@OneKeyHQ) reported 55 minutes ago

  MiCA, short for Markets in Crypto-Assets, creates a unified regulatory framework for crypto in the EU. Centralized crypto service providers now need proper authorization to serve EU users. Some platforms like Binance may have to restructure, restrict services, or exit certain markets. (2/7)