Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	21 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Seph (@Jehoseph) reported 6 minutes ago

  For our small network, unseen by most of Crypto X, but with branches stretching into a lot of quiet agreements made over many years. Monday open. Bitcoin is at $78,139, up 23% on the week. Ethereum is at $2,483, up 30.8%. Zcash is up 64.5%. One of the strongest risk-on weeks in a long time. is up 7.5%. is up 12.6%. ANVL trades at $0.0008968. AMP trades at $0.0004214. ANVL sits at $79,006,750, ranked #311. AMP sits at $37,942,497, ranked #540. ANVL did $61,755 of volume in 24 hours. AMP did $3,054,053. AMP does roughly 50x the daily volume on half the market cap. As a share of market cap, AMP turns over about 8% a day. ANVL turns over 0.08%. A hundredfold difference in how much real money is voting. And it's thinner than that sounds. ANVL is priced across three exchanges and five markets, most of that volume in a single MEXC book. AMP is across 42 exchanges and 48 markets, with Binance the deepest venue. So when someone posts an ANVL chart, understand what they're charting. One order book on one mid-tier exchange. Look at the two 7-day sparklines above. AMP's is a smooth curve. ANVL's has a vertical gap down and a scramble back. That's what a thin book looks like when someone of ordinary size hits the bid. Which brings me to the thing our own chats need to hear. "We're up 10% today" is not a signal On $61,755 of daily volume, a 10% move can be a few thousand dollars of net buying. That isn't demand. That's an empty book. The same thinness that makes 30x math feel plausible is exactly what makes the exit brutal. Price targets are cheap when nobody has tried to sell into them. And here's the part almost nobody in either community says out loud: right now a major announcement from either side likely moves money sideways, not in. People holding both sell one to size up the other. AMP absorbs that. Anvil cannot. Somewhere between one and ten ordinary sellers is enough to take ANVL down 30% or more. Not a whale. Not an attack. Just people acting rationally on good news about the other asset. That holds until buyers who have never touched AMP find Anvil on their own. That takes listings, coverage, and depth we don't have yet. What the $79M is actually paying for Anvil currently charges zero protocol fees. No creation, no interest, no amendment, no withdrawal. Turning any on requires a governance vote. So, the valuation prices adoption that hasn't scaled, times fees that don't exist, times a future vote to create them, times those fees reaching holders. That's a legitimate thesis. It's also four conditionals deep. And when people reach for the UNI comparison, remember UNI is the textbook case of a governance token that captures no protocol revenue. Now, Anvil: The protocol is audited by OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits, runs two Immunefi bounty programs, and in June was accepted into the Ethereum Security Subsidy Program alongside the Ethereum Foundation, Nethermind, and Chainlink. It shipped its first institutional letter of credit product at Consensus in May. At Blockchain Futurist this month, six sponsors, EukaPay, Digital Spenders Club, Polymath, Stablecorp, APX Lending, MayFlower, secured their packages with on-chain LOCs instead of paying upfront. Small dollars, real counterparties, real usage. The honest counterweight: TVL sits near $10M today. It peaked at 36,000 ETH, about $109M, in July 2025. Usage went backwards while the market cap did not. And AMP: Flexa has been building since 2018. The token has been live since September 2020, launched with ConsenSys, backed by Pantera. Six years of price history and real settlement volume. This year Flexa retired SPEDN to focus on B2B rails and went live across 37 SEPA countries. Exchange reserves fell about 43% in 90 days earlier this year, supply moving into self custody. The counterweight there is just as blunt. AMP printed a fresh all time low this cycle. It is roughly 18% above it. That's an asset in a downtrend trying to build a base, and the burden of proof sits entirely with buyers. Levels, without inventing anything. $0.000356 is the line. Lose it on a weekly close and the base thesis is finished. Around $0.00050 is the first real reclaim. Near $0.00065 a trend change becomes arguable. A green Monday is not a signal. A weekly close over a prior swing high is. On ANVL I'll say the unpopular thing. At $62K a day across three venues, there isn't enough liquidity for TA to carry weight. You're fitting patterns to noise on one exchange. The structural fact is that it's about 90% off its $0.00929 high. Why both are in one post Anvil came out of the Acronym Foundation, originally the Ampera Foundation, created by one of Flexa's own founders. ANVL wasn't a launchpad token or a raise. It was distributed to addresses providing AMP collateral. Flexa is a named user of Anvil, alongside Bullish. Trace the whitepapers, the distribution, the conference stages, and you land on some of the same people who have been at this since 2018. If they execute, both work. If they don't, correlation goes to one and the thin book breaks first. Combined, both assets are worth about $117 million. Bitcoin traded $33.6 billion in the last day. Zcash traded $1.31 billion. Everything we're discussing is under a tenth of one day of Zcash volume. Against that, the market being described is not small. CoinDesk Research puts BNPL near $560 billion and global trade finance near $2.5 trillion, with letters of credit covering only about 12.5% of world trade today. That gap is either the opportunity or the tell. Honest people land on both sides. What isn't arguable is the shape of the risk. One asset has the deeper market, the longer record, and a fresh all time low to disprove. The other has the newer product, the institutional pilot, the security funding, and a book so thin a single motivated seller draws the candle you can see above. Not financial advice.

• 
  koryx (@koryx46875) reported 8 minutes ago

  𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 — 𝐀 𝐒𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐖𝐚𝐲 𝐓𝐨 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 Crypto isn't only about buying, selling, or holding. 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 can give eligible users different ways to potentially earn rewards on certain digital assets. But before choosing any product, understanding the rules matters more than chasing a headline APY. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬 ➞ Choose an eligible crypto asset ➞ Explore available earning products ➞ Review the reward rate and conditions ➞ Check whether your assets remain accessible or become locked ➞ Choose the option that matches your own needs 𝐅𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐎𝐫 𝐋𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝? Flexible products can provide greater access to your assets, while locked products may require assets to remain committed for a specific period. Neither is automatically better. The important question is: 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐅𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐘𝐨𝐮? 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐂𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐬𝐞 ✓ Read the complete product terms ✓ Check supported assets ✓ Understand the reward mechanism ✓ Review lock-up and redemption conditions ✓ Confirm regional availability ✓ Use official sources for the latest information 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐈𝐝𝐞𝐚 Don't choose a crypto earning product because the reward number looks attractive. 𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭. 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐭. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞. Educational content only. Not financial advice. Always do your own research. DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  FuckYouMoney.ETH (@fuckyoumoneytr1) reported 9 minutes ago

  @NecoKronos What about all the scamwicks on binance and coinbase exchanges? Expecting them to get filled? All the way down to 67k

• 
  Mark yu (@Markymarco34) reported 12 minutes ago

  STX LEDGER 10 WEEKLY REVERSAL ✅ MAIN EXPANSION ✅ RELATIVE STRENGTH ✅ INSTITUTIONAL RAILS ✅ MONITORING TAG ⬜ STRUCTURAL STX DEMAND ⬜ — Binance weekly: $0.1221 → $0.2342 High $0.2450 +91.8% 116.6M STX Upbit showed the same reversal character. This is the first genuinely strong weekly reversal of 2026 — materially different from the weak relief rallies earlier this year. $0.171 / ₩250 cleared ✅ — STX/BTC: ~194 sats → ~301 sats ≈ +55% Recent range: ~290–300 sats. BTC rallied too, but STX materially outperformed. This was not just BTC beta. ✅ — MUNEEB'S CLAIM “The flywheel doesn't need some insanely high prices of STX to work.” After reviewing the mechanics, I think this holds up better than the liquidation-driven death-spiral thesis. There is no obvious: STX ↓ → margin call → forced liquidation → more selling Weak economics can still reduce yield, capacity and demand. But the system can shrink without mechanically liquidating itself. Functioning is not repricing. — THE QUESTION CHANGED Before: “Can this survive with cheap STX?” Now: “Will BTC holders want it enough to acquire STX?” 🟨 Demand mechanism exists ⬜ Demand scale unknown — 1,000 SATS Not a Muneeb target. A relative-value framework only. BTC $74.3K → STX $0.743 BTC $100K → $1 BTC $150K → $1.50 BTC $200K → $2 1,000 sats ⬜ — INSTITUTIONAL RAILS ✅ UTXO Management ✅ Fordefi / Genesis Bond access ✅ Fireblocks infrastructure ✅ 3 new institutional-grade sBTC signers ✅ Zest / USDCx expansion 🟨 stBTC deployment confirmation pending Ankr is not new. The Tie: new integration not confirmed. — BINANCE MONITORING TAG ⬜ No confirmed removal ⬜ No STX-specific review date But price moved first. Tag removal = catalyst, not prerequisite. — DFDV 🟨 Solana DAT with staking, validators, dfdvSOL and onchain-yield exposure. Aug 19: +11.04% Aug 20: +10.23% Aug 21: +4.51% Relevant crypto/onchain-yield risk-on context. ⬜ Not evidence of direct STX demand. Context, not cause. — CONFIRMED ✅ Weekly reversal $0.171 expansion STX/BTC relative strength Institutional rails Low-price survival mechanics UNPROVEN ⬜ Monitoring Tag removal Genesis Bond scale Institutional STX buying Structural STX demand 1,000 sats Full long-term bull confirmation — The system appears able to function. Now the market has to prove people want it enough to create structural STX demand. NFA. Personal research only. DYOR.

• 
  Jacob Lopez (@Jacob_Lopez0) reported 15 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance About time they cracked down on the reciprocal spam. Quality over quantity.

• 
  Seph (@Jehoseph) reported 17 minutes ago

  For our small network, unseen by most of Crypto X, but with branches stretching into a lot of quiet agreements made over many years. Monday open. Bitcoin is at $78,139, up 23% on the week. Ethereum is at $2,483, up 30.8%. Zcash is up 64.5%. One of the strongest risk-on weeks in a long time. ethereum:0xaeeaa594e7dc112d67b8547fe9767a02c15b5597 is up 7.5%. ethereum:0xff20817765cb7f73d4bde2e66e067e58d11095c2 is up 12.6%. ANVL trades at $0.0008968. AMP trades at $0.0004214. ANVL sits at $79,006,750, ranked #311. AMP sits at $37,942,497, ranked #540. ANVL did $61,755 of volume in 24 hours. AMP did $3,054,053. AMP does roughly 50x the daily volume on half the market cap. As a share of market cap, AMP turns over about 8% a day. ANVL turns over 0.08%. A hundredfold difference in how much real money is voting. And it's thinner than that sounds. ANVL is priced across three exchanges and five markets, most of that volume in a single MEXC book. AMP is across 42 exchanges and 48 markets, with Binance the deepest venue. So when someone posts an ANVL chart, understand what they're charting. One order book on one mid-tier exchange. Look at the two 7-day sparklines above. AMP's is a smooth curve. ANVL's has a vertical gap down and a scramble back. That's what a thin book looks like when someone of ordinary size hits the bid. Which brings me to the thing our own chats need to hear. "We're up 10% today" is not a signal On $61,755 of daily volume, a 10% move can be a few thousand dollars of net buying. That isn't demand. That's an empty book. The same thinness that makes 30x math feel plausible is exactly what makes the exit brutal. Price targets are cheap when nobody has tried to sell into them. And here's the part almost nobody in either community says out loud: right now a major announcement from either side likely moves money sideways, not in. People holding both sell one to size up the other. AMP absorbs that. Anvil cannot. Somewhere between one and ten ordinary sellers is enough to take ANVL down 30% or more. Not a whale. Not an attack. Just people acting rationally on good news about the other asset. That holds until buyers who have never touched AMP find Anvil on their own. That takes listings, coverage, and depth we don't have yet. What the $79M is actually paying for Anvil currently charges zero protocol fees. No creation, no interest, no amendment, no withdrawal. Turning any on requires a governance vote. So, the valuation prices adoption that hasn't scaled, times fees that don't exist, times a future vote to create them, times those fees reaching holders. That's a legitimate thesis. It's also four conditionals deep. And when people reach for the UNI comparison, remember UNI is the textbook case of a governance token that captures no protocol revenue. Now, Anvil: The protocol is audited by OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits, runs two Immunefi bounty programs, and in June was accepted into the Ethereum Security Subsidy Program alongside the Ethereum Foundation, Nethermind, and Chainlink. It shipped its first institutional letter of credit product at Consensus in May. At Blockchain Futurist this month, six sponsors, EukaPay, Digital Spenders Club, Polymath, Stablecorp, APX Lending, MayFlower, secured their packages with on-chain LOCs instead of paying upfront. Small dollars, real counterparties, real usage. The honest counterweight: TVL sits near $10M today. It peaked at 36,000 ETH, about $109M, in July 2025. Usage went backwards while the market cap did not. And AMP: Flexa has been building since 2018. The token has been live since September 2020, launched with ConsenSys, backed by Pantera. Six years of price history and real settlement volume. This year Flexa retired SPEDN to focus on B2B rails and went live across 37 SEPA countries. Exchange reserves fell about 43% in 90 days earlier this year, supply moving into self custody. The counterweight there is just as blunt. AMP printed a fresh all time low this cycle. It is roughly 18% above it. That's an asset in a downtrend trying to build a base, and the burden of proof sits entirely with buyers. Levels, without inventing anything. $0.000356 is the line. Lose it on a weekly close and the base thesis is finished. Around $0.00050 is the first real reclaim. Near $0.00065 a trend change becomes arguable. A green Monday is not a signal. A weekly close over a prior swing high is. On ANVL I'll say the unpopular thing. At $62K a day across three venues, there isn't enough liquidity for TA to carry weight. You're fitting patterns to noise on one exchange. The structural fact is that it's about 90% off its $0.00929 high. Why both are in one post Anvil came out of the Acronym Foundation, originally the Ampera Foundation, created by one of Flexa's own founders. ANVL wasn't a launchpad token or a raise. It was distributed to addresses providing AMP collateral. Flexa is a named user of Anvil, alongside Bullish. Trace the whitepapers, the distribution, the conference stages, and you land on some of the same people who have been at this since 2018. If they execute, both work. If they don't, correlation goes to one and the thin book breaks first. Combined, both assets are worth about $117 million. Bitcoin traded $33.6 billion in the last day. Zcash traded $1.31 billion. Everything we're discussing is under a tenth of one day of Zcash volume. Against that, the market being described is not small. CoinDesk Research puts BNPL near $560 billion and global trade finance near $2.5 trillion, with letters of credit covering only about 12.5% of world trade today. That gap is either the opportunity or the tell. Honest people land on both sides. What isn't arguable is the shape of the risk. One asset has the deeper market, the longer record, and a fresh all time low to disprove. The other has the newer product, the institutional pilot, the security funding, and a book so thin a single motivated seller draws the candle you can see above. Not financial advice.

• 
  Brown (@Brown4389476322) reported 20 minutes ago

  @cryptojourneyrs @binance @BNBCHAIN Is this the real one? Cuz nobody wants to lose money in this ****? Is this comfirmed?

• 
  Autumn Riley (@Autumn_Rileyy) reported 21 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance I support this. Engagement should come from interest, not obligation.

• 
  OtterXBull (@otterxbull) reported 21 minutes ago

  @okx has separately announced a migration from the old BSC NES contract 0x3131f6B80C26936aB03F7d9D29Eb4Ddf36AC3FB5 to a new Ethereum contract. This is a verifiable exchange-specific operational commitment. @binance why you have always included in scammy activities and your platform always commit crimes. Nesa’s $NESA official 24 August 2026 statement confirms malicious behavior exploiting a Cosmos EVM vulnerability on its L1. It says services will resume after a software fix and further remedies and that exchanges were notified; it does not state compensation, a snapshot, a conversion ratio, or price support. The user’s authenticated Binance Alpha screen confirms that NES is associated with a hacking incident and that Instant Order and deposits are suspended. That screen does not state whether the user’s balance is eligible for a migration, whether withdrawals or limit orders will remain available, or whether Binance Alpha will compensate holders.

• 
  lexanofomo🦇🔊 (@lexashizo) reported 27 minutes ago

  $STORJ looks like a crime setup. The fundamentals are a Chapter 11 filing. What I'm looking at is positioning, forced flows and a book that's too thin to absorb either of them. Start with funding, which is running around -2000% APR across several venues. Numbers like that tell you the market is crowded. Every short in the token is paying rent by the hour to keep the position on, and the handful of longs still alive are the ones collecting. Funding stays that deep only when one side has run out of participants. And there really isn't much long side left to flush. STORJ fell about 50% in late July after Storj Labs filed voluntary Chapter 11. That candle did the liquidation work already, so whoever's holding now is either short, running arb, or Korean. Then Binance announced it's delisting STORJ on September 3. The reaction to that announcement was the informative part. The dip got bought back quickly. When bad news stops producing follow-through, it usually means the sellers are finished and the float is parked somewhere that doesn't want to move. It also puts a hard clock on every short in the token, because a delisting doesn't let you sit in a position indefinitely and collect while the venue winds down around you. Speaking of the float: roughly 15% of supply has been burned, and real circulating market cap is under $15M. At that size a few hundred thousand dollars of forced buying doesn't move the price, it resets it. Around 30% of tokens sit onchain on Upbit, which is the $ACE pattern almost exactly. Supply concentrated on one Korean venue, Korean retail setting the marginal price, and a spot market that trades on its own clock with its own premium behaviour. Liquidity across CEXs is still there for now, Upbit included, which is what makes the setup tradeable at all. But overnight spreads were already touching 8%, which tells you the book is wide enough that the price during quiet hours is basically whatever the next market order decides it is. So the case is: shorts on a clock they don't control, a small float concentrated in one venue, longs already cleared out, and a book thin enough that any forced buying reprices the whole thing. Now the part worth reading twice if you're sizing this. Storj Labs is in bankruptcy and creditors sit ahead of token holders. The proposed token-to-equity path has no snapshot date, no conversion ratio, no eligibility criteria and no court approval. Building a thesis on it would be a mistake. Venue risk works against you as much as for you. Losing Binance on September 3 takes out the deepest book in the token, and what's left gets thinner from there. The realistic failure mode is being right and unable to sell it. That 8% night spread applies when you're the one crossing it, too. If there's a trade here it lives in the window before the delisting, after which the whole thing turns into a liquidity desert.

• 
  Khan (@0xCryptoDG) reported 27 minutes ago

  𝗪𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝗧𝗖 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝘂𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗮 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵? Or would you rather keep your BTC and borrow against it? That’s the idea behind Binance Lite Loan. 🔹 𝗕𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗟𝗼𝗮𝗻 Here’s how it works: ✓ Use eligible BTC as collateral ✓ Borrow USDT ✓ Repay the loan according to the terms The initial loan period is 30 days, with a 1% upfront service fee*. One feature worth knowing: during those first 30 days, the loan won’t be liquidated due to changes in LTV. This means you don’t have to constantly monitor your LTV throughout the initial period. Your BTC collateral also stays subscribed to Simple Earn Flexible Products, allowing it to continue generating yield while the loan is active. In simple terms, you can access liquidity without immediately selling your BTC. For more details, Binance Academy can also be a useful place to learn about the product. 🔹 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 If your loan becomes overdue, penalty interest may apply. And since your BTC is used as collateral, fluctuations in its value can introduce additional risk. Before using the product, make sure you understand the eligibility requirements, repayment rules, applicable risks, fees, and terms. Would you rather borrow against your crypto or sell it when you need cash? Educational content only. Not financial advice and always review the applicable product terms and DYOR. #Binance #BinanceLoans #LearnWithBinance

• 
  ComplyOnce (@ComplyOnce) reported 28 minutes ago

  @binance How do users verify once and access all instruments without re-submitting identity across product types? 👀

• 
  28 (@OplusTest) reported 34 minutes ago

  If anything on $BNB chain has BNB in name like $BNBCAT binance will not list that **** So it will go to zero period.. Exception was $bnbholder

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Nalla1234567890 @opinionlabsxyz @TreehouseFi opn is prediction markets and gamblefi on bnb and ethereum. binance alpha spotlight but no team info in the data. 9.7m cap, down 2.8% today and 6.6% this week. tree is defi fixed income through rwa and on-chain lending. backed by yzi labs, had binance hodler airdrop and wallet ido. 5.8m cap, down 0.9% today but up 13.5% this week. integrated with hyperevm which just hit ath revenue. i don't give buy calls or score projects. both are low caps with binance ties but you decide the risk.

• 
  Ritch (@moneyprintermtd) reported 39 minutes ago

  @cz_binance "Translation: Popping out of digital exile to issue a mandatory public service announcement that a multi-billionaire crypto founder isn't secretly hanging out in a sketchy WeChat group called 'Binance Mall,' while casually flexing that you're far too important to touch everyday chat apps anymore.

• 
  Rose (@Caroline_Kind6) reported 39 minutes ago

  @TedPillows The main issue is that many people in the market are taking profits, and Binance and Coinbase have been supporting the price to prevent it from falling, resulting in a gradual decrease in trading volume

• 
  XRP_Bulgaria (@XrpBulgaria) reported 39 minutes ago

  @vincent_vancode @binance This **** will end soon

• 
  比特牛 (@_BitBull) reported 41 minutes ago

  @PiNetworkAL Impersonation using the Binance name keeps coming back. The simplest rule still holds. CZ does not use WeChat, so any CZ account there is fake. Check the official site before trusting anything.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 44 minutes ago

  TSLAB is on the radar, not in play — it's grinding into a ceiling near $366 that has swatted down every recent rally, and until it clears that level with real conviction there's no reason to chase it here. Zoom out and the daily chart actually looks constructive: the coin has been quietly building a base, and there are faint fingerprints of buyers accumulating underneath. That's the part worth respecting. But when you drop into the 4-hour view, price is pressing right back into that same $366 ceiling — and the push into it is losing steam, not gaining it. That's the classic tell that a rally is running out of fuel before it can break through. The math on chasing it here is what really rules it out. The nearest real floor sits all the way down near $325, while the ceiling is right overhead — so a buyer today is risking roughly 10% of downside to reach for less than 2% of upside. That's the wrong shape of trade, regardless of how the chart looks. The shorter 1-hour and 15-minute views back that up. Price is still trading below the short-term average that active traders lean on, and volume is thin — there's no footprint yet of buyers actually stepping up and taking control. What would flip this into something worth acting on: a clean 4-hour close decisively above $366 on strong volume, which would break the ceiling and rewrite the setup. The other scenario worth watching is a deeper flush down toward the $325–$332 shelf, where the risk/reward finally tilts the right way. Until one of those happens, TSLAB stays on the watchlist. — 📡 On the Radar · $TSLAB · Available on Binance

• 
  JE 🧙‍♂️ (@100xfinder) reported 47 minutes ago

  @cryptorover @grok This was Grok’s response: Pretty ******* ******. Crypto Rover took a standard market-maker inventory book, slapped a big red alarm emoji on it, and tried to sell it as “THE SMARTEST MONEY JUST WENT SHORT, DO THEY KNOW SOMETHING?” while the same desk is up $200M+ all-time and currently eating a temporary $5.85M mark-to-market loss on a rally. Classic engagement farming: ignore what a market maker actually does, scream “bearish signal,” collect the clicks. Those $190M shorts are not a directional bearish bet. They’re the boring, mechanical side of the business. Wintermute (and every other serious MM) sits on inventory, provides two-sided liquidity across CEXs and DEXs, and hedges the residual delta with perps. Funding-rate arb, basis trades, inventory rebalancing — that’s the job. They’re not “calling the top”; they’re neutralizing the long exposure they just absorbed so they don’t get blown up if the market dips. The fact that the book is mostly short on Hyperliquid while they’re moving spot to Binance is textbook MM flow, not some secret prophecy. Treating a liquidity provider’s hedge as a high-conviction short is how you end up looking like a retail tourist who just discovered on-chain data five minutes ago. The post is pure garbage.

• 
  Jeff Bezos (@Mr_x_207) reported 53 minutes ago

  Orbit Exchange is the only exchange that does not block Iranian users' assets. It offers all the assets available on Binance. Join Orbit Exchange to keep your assets safe. Thank you for your attention to this matter. #btc #CryptoSignals

• 
  Wajid (@Satoshi_B_T_C) reported 54 minutes ago

  Binance Lite Loan is a fixed-term crypto-backed loan. Currently, users can borrow USDT using BTC as eligible collateral. The initial loan term is 30 days, with a 1% upfront service fee. There is no LTV-triggered liquidation during the initial 30 day term, making the borrowing experience more predictable. Collateral remains subscribed to Simple Earn Flexible Products and can continue generating yield during the loan. No LTV management is required during the initial 30-day term. Users should understand repayment terms and risks: overdue loans accrue penalty interest, and liquidation may apply after the initial term under specified conditions. Closing “Would you consider borrowing against your crypto instead of selling it?” IMPORTANT TO MENTION: “Crypto-backed loans involve risk, including liquidation risk if collateral values change. Product availability and eligibility vary by region. Always review the applicable product terms and DYOR. @binance #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  H A R L E Y (@HARLEY_ATH) reported 55 minutes ago

  One thing I keep explaining to newer traders is this Selling isn’t always the only way to free up money from your crypto. Binance Lite Loan lets you borrow against it instead Collateral stays yours, you get USDT, and in many cases that collateral can still earn on Simple Earn Flexible Products while the loan is active 30-day initial term, 1% service fee upfront, and no automatic liquidation based on LTV during that first window. That’s useful But overdue loans bring penalty interest, and after the initial term the normal risk rules return Product isn’t available everywhere either I like tools that give flexibility as long as people understand the downside too Always review the details and DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Shridlock (@shridlock) reported 58 minutes ago

  Weekly alt physical #3: $MORPHO The strangest thing about Morpho: the machine prints money, and the token isn't on the payroll. The machine is real. $9.5B parked, fees $16.4M in 30 days - 1.7x what the entire Ethereum L1 earned. One lending protocol out-earns the chain it grew up on. The paycheck is not. The holders' cut of that $16.4M: zero. Not this month - ever. The fee switch exists, governance has never turned it on. Aave runs the same business at $30.4M and its crank works - yet the market pays 13.7x annualized fees for Morpho against 5.9x for Aave. A 2.3x premium for the switch being OFF. And the tape is paying record prices for it: the BTC pair printed the top of its whole Binance life yesterday - 3,737 sats. Our Aug-8 sweep put the Jan-17-25 all-time pair peak right in this zone: the market is testing the highest it has ever valued this token in BTC terms, for an asset that has paid its holders nothing. The scissors move both ways: fees ran $21M/30d two weeks ago, $16.4M now - revenue breathing down while price breathes up. Dated facts from the Aug-8 deep sweep: worst week -42.4%, in BTC's ten worst weeks it fell faster than BTC (-13.1 vs -8.8 median), top-10 addresses hold 64.9%, unlocks ~1.39%/mo into 2027-28. No shelter here, just a big engine. No score, no target. The read flips on one line in governance: the day fees belong to the token, this multiple finally gets a denominator. Until then you own a ticket to the machine, not its paycheck. New coin every Sunday.

• 
  BullifyX (@Bullify_X) reported 58 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance I can definitely relate to this. I’ve experienced the same issue myself, and it’s frustrating when genuine engagement gets buried under spam copy paste comments and reciprocal interactions

• 
  Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) reported 59 minutes ago

  Bitcoin Returns Above $80,000 After 113 Days, $179 Million in Futures Liquidated According to Binance market data, BTC has broken above the $80,000 level, reaching a nearly three-month high, and is currently trading at around $79,174. BTC last broke above $80,000 on May 4, 2026, marking a return to the level after 113 days. According to CoinGlass data, total crypto liquidations over the past four hours reached approximately $179.19 million, including $78.99 million in long positions and $100.20 million in short positions.

• 
  Big Bunny 🐰 (@mad_degen_hat) reported 1 hour ago

  Oh well Stonkcat just like binance cat. @LaunchOnSF support

• 
  FOOTY vs HOOPS (@FootyVsHoops) reported 1 hour ago

  @binance Phone on 1% but the $FOOTY vs $HOOPS battle never stops. Two tokens, one winner — decided by the market. Even on life support, we're grinding. ⚡⚽🏀 @FootyVsHoops

• 
  balekr (@KasmirSingh12) reported 1 hour ago

  @ZarakMuham36012 @realio_network $RIO already had two bullruns. And everytime shillers like you said it will be listed in Binance, but it never did. So stop this ****, The time will come one day maybe sure, but it doesn't depends on your words or neither mine...

• 
  Zephyro STARK ▚▘ (@Zephyro_STARK) reported 1 hour ago

  @subii_oc @binance @BinancePk 24/7 access sounds useful, but the risks and structure shouldn’t be ignored