Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	4 days ago
Itu	Website	10 days ago
Seattle	Website	11 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	20 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Project Nebula (@NebulaOnIC) reported 19 seconds ago

  @SnassyIcp N+3/N ...to constantly pull prices from the "outside" world. ICP's latency means price updates would take 1 to 2 seconds to execute. If a piece of news drops and BTC instantly pumps on say Binance, an HFT bot running on a fast server sees that move milliseconds before...

• 
  DoOnlyGoodEveryday (@doge__rh) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Binance_intern You’ve been working at Binance for the entire 9 years? 😲

• 
  Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) reported 5 minutes ago

  🔥CZ: BINANCE REACHED WORLD'S NO. 1 EXCHANGE IN JUST 5 MONTHS AND “STAYED THERE” Celebrating Binance’s 9th anniversary, founder CZ says several factors drove the exchange’s success: “The product has to be good. Customer service has to be good.” “You have to have a mission. Our mission was to increase the freedom of money.” CZ says "protecting users" helped Binance keep its lead.

• 
  Onchain Chemist (@OnChainChemist) reported 6 minutes ago

  @kashdhanda @solana Binance listings known as down only scams - this isn't who you want to be comparing Solana to

• 
  Safi (@ZRealSafi) reported 7 minutes ago

  I was literally seconds away from buying bibi-3:native at 3.8m since today is Binance anniversary and there is some chance of CZ interaction but I just had a flashback from ethereum:0xf280b16ef293d8e534e370794ef26bf312694126 that Im down 70% on, so I decided to move on. I still think its a valid bid over here but the risk is not worth it for me rn. Lets see if I ****** up or nah

• 
  Master (@mastercrypto64) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ZAAfrikaner @PRDG_ZA @binance I stopped using Binance years ago because I lost trust in how the platform handles users and ongoing regulatory issues.

• 
  J Feng 🌕 (@stablefeng) reported 12 minutes ago

  This is not an abstract theoretical debate. It is a question of understanding basic economics and what actually happened on Terra Classic. You said: “Tax forces transactions off-chain.” A tax can affect the cost of certain high-frequency trades, arbitrage and market-making activity. But transactions do not happen simply because a tax is low. People transact because they have a reason to transact: useful applications, demand, liquidity, arbitrage opportunities or the possibility of earning a profit. Nobody wakes up and makes transactions for no reason simply because the tax is lower. The fundamental reason Terra Classic lacks on-chain volume is that we do not currently have enough meaningful applications, profitable opportunities or products that people genuinely want to use. Removing the tax does not automatically create any of those things. You then said: “It’s cheaper to trade LUNC on Binance.” Trade it for what purpose? Short-term traders and speculators already use centralized exchanges because that is where the liquidity and order books are. They are buying and selling LUNC based on price movements. That is not the same thing as genuine on-chain economic activity. People do not move on-chain simply to trade for the sake of trading. They move on-chain when there is something useful or profitable to do there. You also said: “There is no money validating the chain unless you’re in the top three.” That is simply not true. Burrito Node is currently around 13th in voting power. It earns approximately $150 per month in LUNC and USTC. I do not sell those rewards; I compound them because I view them as a long-term investment. Whether a validator is profitable depends on delegation, commission, operating costs, token value and overall network activity. It has no direct connection to whether the burn tax exists. You then said: “People are losing interest as compounding losses is not the best business model.” Of course people lose interest when an asset keeps falling and they are losing money. That is true throughout crypto and traditional markets. But again, that does not prove that the burn tax caused those losses. Low prices, weak demand, limited development and the absence of useful products are much larger issues than the transaction tax. Finally, you said: “We have had the tax for five years.” No, we have not. The original 1.2% burn proposal was approved in 2022, and the tax was implemented on-chain on September 21, 2022. That is not five years. I have been part of Terra Classic since the chain was created after the collapse. I remember every stage of its history. After the collapse, the chain was effectively abandoned and the community was in chaos. Community developers and contributors, including Edward Kim, Zaradar and others associated with Terra Rebels, worked with validators to restore and upgrade the chain. The recovery work included both implementing the community-approved 1.2% burn mechanism and re-enabling delegation and staking. These proposals gave validators, developers and the wider community a common objective at a time when the chain had almost no direction. The burn movement helped reunite the community. It encouraged validators to coordinate upgrades, brought holders back on-chain, restored public attention and helped attract support from major exchanges. Binance later began burning the trading fees generated from its LUNC spot and margin pairs. You can debate whether 1.2% was the ideal rate. You can propose reducing it, changing it or replacing it with a better mechanism. Governance exists precisely for that reason. But rewriting the chain’s history and blaming every current problem on the burn tax is not a serious analysis. Terra Classic does need more on-chain volume. But volume comes from utility, applications, liquidity and opportunities—not merely from reducing a tax and hoping people begin making meaningless transactions. Build something people want to use, and transactions will follow.

• 
  Seriously Best (@SeriouslyB19884) reported 13 minutes ago

  @RobinHub_xyz @BinanceWallet **** no don’t want binance involved

• 
  ini ini Kingsley (@inicheery) reported 15 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @binance The earliest widely documented crypto exchange to introduce P2P trading to Nigeria is Binance. Binance says its P2P marketplace first launched on mobile in October 2019, and it later announced P2P support for Nigerian users in February 2023.

• 
  Seb247 (@Seb7247) reported 23 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @binance **** @binance and **** you scamming ****

• 
  RetardRgr (@rgr_park) reported 25 minutes ago

  Just got off work to find $ANSEM got rejected pretty badly with buying volume dying w/ sell volume only increasing. So took like 5 minutes to research and it seems like $HBULL launched, promising some $ANSEM related benefits, sucking volume away from $ANSEM. Would-be $ANSEM buyers got distracted and took their money to buy $HBULL instead. And a whole bunch of $ANSEM supporters also aped, same as $ANSEM holders who sold $ANSEM to buy $HBULL. Seriously? Of course all this seems to have taken the wind out of current effort to breakthrough and we actually lost one support level. Additionally, with $CASHCAT getting listed on binance, some whales that were on the fence as to which coin they were gonna put their money in, went with $CASHCAT instead. All to say, **** sometimes happens, but $ANSEM bullievers will persevere. Actually hoping the guys that went to $HBULL come back with more money to pump $ANSEM later. Oh well, I'm just holding strong for at least another 3 months. You never know when that 10X ***** will pop up.

• 
  PR1Mo.eth (@nxloan50) reported 25 minutes ago

  @yellowpantherx @binance Please bro i need 1 bnb for my school fee. 🤧 It will help me a lot

• 
  Snassy.icp (@SnassyIcp) reported 26 minutes ago

  The more I discuss Multidex with Fable the more bullish I get. As always NFA, not recommending investments, and I’m no financial expert. But here’s the picture that is starting to dawn on me, after intense debates with Fable, and also with @NebulaOnIC : Multidex is not made to attract the standard DeFi liquidity in the form of ”mercenary” Market Makers (MMs) who go wherever the ”bribes” (subsidies, free tokens, other advantages) and the MEV opportunities are greatest. It’s built to attract a more slow moving, but potentially much larger, capital base. Multidex is for patient capital, that wants to park their BTC and USD somewhere safe with reasonable yield for long term. They don’t want to have to hop around between Binance Chain one day, Solana the next, then Robinhood-chain, just to follow the crowd that keeps jumping ship as soon as the subsidies they came for run out, all for a lot more work and risk but not that much greater yield, especially for larger positions. To this crowd, if Multidex can provide similar yield at lower counterparty risk than a CEX, it becomes interesting. It may take a while, such capital moves slowly and wants to see a lot of proof, but the huge upside is that it’s real - not pumped by subsidies. This capital once it moves in isn’t quick to move out again as soon as subsidies end. @dominic_w has a long record of stating he does not want to pump ICP price with the help of mercenary markets makers. That means the MMs that only come for the subsidies and leave when they end, turning the token/project into another pump and dump. Some thought he must have changed his tune on such MMs and DeFi with Multidex. But that doesn’t seem the case. Instead he’s built what looks like a dream machine for non-mercenary, serious capital. In a nutshell, Multidex tries to replace every extractive middle man in the market with machines that fulfill the same role but at minimal profit. What profit it does accrue for itself (what’s not shared with liquidity providers) goes to keeping the exchange in gas, and any surplus above that goes to the network and NNS DAO that hosts it by burning ICP. By creating a sophisticated and atomic trading machine with minimal extraction opportunities, and where all parked capital has the same market making conditions via the AMM Vault, it becomes a serious venue for traders to get the best deals and for non-mercenary, long term capital to rest safely and at potentially quite decent yield. Multidex will need to prove several things. Some will be able to be verified in the play run with play money - that mechanisms like liquidations work like they should, that everything is transparent, that the oracle lag is acceptable and doesn’t lead to big losses in times of volatility. But many things can only be proven once play time is over, with real capital. HFT bots, that could be a problem (in theory not, according to Fable, in practice…we’ll see once real money is on the line) won’t bother trading for play money. It’s likely that capital, if it comes, will come slowly. First see that ”X” amount seems to rest safely, then deploy a little more, proving the protocol can handle more, and so on. This is similar to how capital enters BTC - the more value the protocol can handle without getting hacked (by now +$1T) the more it is safe to deploy. But the flip side is the capital also leaves slowly - if it leaves at all. That’s how I like it. Solid, long term, real execution creating real values as the moat. This is how Dom and Dfinity builds. Multidex makes total sense in this perspective. Multidex will need to be bootstrapped, seeded with initial liquidity. Someone has to be first out on the dance floor and take the risk to prove the machine. I don’t necessarily expect this will happen on its own. Dfinity will presumably have to provide this seed liquidity. But it would make sense for them to do so: if Multidex is successful it would provide returns on their investment and potentially improve ICP price, making their holdings more valuable. Long term, much of the credibility will have to come from a much more decentralized liquidity, but to prove the engine it will work fine and can benefit Dfinity and all ICP holders. NNS stakers gain control over its first (potentially) profitable business and goes from just network governance to potentially something even more interesting. There’s a lot I still have to understand, and rely on Fable’s patient explanations for. But the more I understand, the more it all comes together and the more brilliant it seems. I will post more where I try to go into more detail how and why, but this is the general outline of a picture that is becoming more clear by the minute. And, pertinently, Fable seems very enthusiastic and thinks the whole puzzle makes a lot of sense, so there’s that. But the bottom line is Multidex is making me more bullish on ICP than I have been in a long time, it perfectly showcases ICP’s advantages because it really couldn’t be built anywhere else, not with all the pieces coming together into such a coherent whole. It is built to attract much bigger and more serious capital than the ”crypto casino”, and if it gains volume it will lead to not just gas being burned but ICP being burned as well - this fact, and that Multidex doesn’t have its own token (beyond ICP) seems to be one of the things that impresses Fable the most. In short, alien tech again and Dom is ahead of everyone as per usual.

• 
  Ucaird (@Ucaird_zenith) reported 29 minutes ago

  @0xnguyenkien You think Binance Alpha is the problem now?

• 
  mick maguire 🔸️🔶️🔸️ (@The51stGreen) reported 33 minutes ago

  @binance @EowynChen Faith loves Irony when ur own user securtity methods are isolated and do not update across the binance app. 2 Customer support is not user security and should not be dropping third party links in CS chats that take bincance users off app.

• 
  Notsu (@Notsu311406) reported 33 minutes ago

  @BittexXBT tbh spot liquidity is still terrible except Binance/CB

• 
  ZachXBT (@zachxbt) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Nova_life22 @binance @Gate_io Why would you buy a meme coin called “The African Bull” and not think it’s a grift? Sorry no one can help you when your IQ is 0

• 
  Robert fails (@Roberto9green) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Romer i dont want to wagger if i won i will taje it to my binance, exodus wallet i am suffering a lot this could realky help me now faith in god @Romer @creativebond007

• 
  unur48❖❖ (@unur481515) reported 39 minutes ago

  Dear @Binance, my account was unexpectedly restricted from participating in campaigns due to an alleged Terms of Use violation. I believe this may be a mistake. I have always tried to follow the rules and would greatly appreciate it if my case could be reviewed. Thank you for your time and support. 🙏💛 UID: 740869704 #Binance #BinanceSupport #Crypto

• 
  Signal_guy (@Cryptoprime00) reported 41 minutes ago

  Pushing down 📉 Binance Futures #BAKE/ #USDT Take-Profit target 2 ✅ Profit: 155.7377% 📈 Period: 2 Days 3 Hours 15 Minutes ⏰

• 
  Bikramgurung (@Bikramg123456) reported 42 minutes ago

  Report to FED These MF Seeing these report any one can tell Binance is playin with dog with motivation to break it down. Dog army should demolish these thieves to grow

• 
  Tommy Famous (@TommyBeFamous) reported 44 minutes ago

  If you aren't aggressively locking down a position in Heima $HEI right now, you are completely missing out. This isn't just an ordinary Layer 1 rebrand from Litentry $LIT - this is a Binance Labs-backed chain abstraction powerhouse that has DWF LABS managing its structural liquidity parameters! With DWF anchoring the order books and a tiny sub $10M market cap, the float is being completely choked out on spot exchanges. The countdown to mid-October is ticking. SECURE YOUR BAGS NOW! 🚀💎

• 
  CoasT🫥 (@yusufziill) reported 45 minutes ago

  The AI narrative is still hot and $HEI market is one project in that sector that has been pretty much into the sector. Now, the onchain doesn’t look too good for me but what interests me is the upcoming burn 🔥 they have lined up. - Whenever they come up with announcement 📣 regarding burning of the token, price always reacts positively (you can see it on the chart 📈 since May, 2026 till now) and I feel the token burn is essential as it helps reduce supply over hang. One good thing I like about the project team is how active they’ve been both on chain and on media. - Now the 16.5 million token is scheduled to be burnt around mid July which I feel should be around 17th or 18th of July judging from the recent announcement, and regardless of price not showing good strength I feel there could be some crime pump especially with Binance holding more than 70% of the total supply. -the key thing to look at here is the chart which just broke support on 4 HTF and if the price closes above 0.11 then I feel a crime is imminent and never fade a token that binance controls much supply plus the token burn is another factor to help push the price.

• 
  merijncrypto (@merijncrypto) reported 46 minutes ago

  Im pretty sure the $ansem team and @blknoiz06 are working on a tier 1 listing, probs @binance

• 
  ੧ (@biggtegzz) reported 47 minutes ago

  @ObaDeleke Thought binance was having issues before

• 
  Battle Force CL8Y Node (@BattleForceLunc) reported 47 minutes ago

  Tax forces transactions off chain. We need volume on-chain. It’s cheaper to trade #LUNC on Binance. We are slowly dying. There is no money validating the chain unless you’re in the top 3. People are losing interest as compounding losses is not the best business model. We have had the tax for 5 years, the chains trend is constantly down. Surely it’s time to try something else?

• 
  Bulls CryptO〽️ (@Bulls_Crypt0) reported 47 minutes ago

  @_rise @binance Wtf bro

• 
  Erlopez (@Shesh2212) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Romer Honestly, those 5k would help me a lot but I think my friend @adelin2904 deserves it way more, lilbro got scammed all his savings he had from grinding (50k) by a fake binance agent. I am pretty sure those 5k would make him happy & maybe he can grind back up! 🤠

• 
  Symbiotic Lion 🦁 ♒️ (@AbstractLamar) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Greenpeace06_09 If there was no plan then why was binanace was doing a 100% burns and when they made that stupid proposal they cut it to 50% I didn't see a single other validator that was trying to create a proposal to piggyback to help binance. They just caused major confusion.

• 
  Nostradamus (@moonsunaligned) reported 54 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @binance Binance need you, CZ. I am user since 2017 and the exchange never been soooo slow to list good projects like now. Even the website is slow, tried this week and took almost 10 seconds to load a page. Lmao