Cloudflare Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  William Bello (@belljobs94) reported 9 minutes ago

  THE GOAT on their free service !! @Cloudflare hands down

• 
  Ryan Chandler (@ryangjchandler) reported 9 minutes ago

  Both sites get loaded in a headless browser on a Cloudflare Worker. Page weight and request count come from the real network log when the site loads, probably the most accurate way to retrieve this information.

• 
  Dave Bettin (@dbettin) reported 15 minutes ago

  @dillon_mulroy @EffectTS_ Where is the cloudflare support?

• 
  My1 (@nep.one - Misskey) (@My1xT) reported 15 minutes ago

  @slendidev interesting question would be how fast or slow cloudflare runs on those, as especially on my older laptop it sometimes took a decent while, before needing a click and taking a decent while again, while anubis you dont need to babysit.

• 
  J. (@munchivelo) reported 18 minutes ago

  @dillon_mulroy @EffectTS_ hm. what do you mean great cloudflare support? if i'm building apps for cloudflare ecosystem, what benefit does using EffectTS have over regular typescript/tailwind? can you be specific.

• 
  SyntaxError » CEO of "CEO of..."-names (@SyntaxError2505) reported 18 minutes ago

  @NewAgeRetroNerd It never failed on me Cloudflare should have a look

• 
  shownotover (@shownotover) reported 19 minutes ago

  @adnaannasir_ Does Cloudflare really provide hosting? I have never tried it.

• 
  Joseph Rizzo (@joearizzo) reported 19 minutes ago

  @pcshipp Everything cloudflare and will never go back

• 
  Krishna Singh (@krishnasinghdev) reported 20 minutes ago

  @tapasadhikary @Namecheap I never liked namecheap / godaddy, don't know why people choose it over simple providers like cloudflare where they charge same amount for 1 or 10 years

• 
  Wes Roth (@WesRoth) reported 22 minutes ago

  Cursor cloud agents can now run on infrastructure you manage, including machine pools that automatically scale with demand. Self-Hosted Machines let agents execute inside your network with access to internal services, source control, custom hardware like GPUs and Macs, and existing build infrastructure, while inference, planning, and the agent loop remain in Cursor’s cloud. Cursor also supports AWS Lambda, Cloudflare, Coder, Daytona, E2B, Modal, Namespace, and Vercel. Cursor says cloud agents now create more than 60% of the pull requests it merges internally.

• 
  Bobby Lansing (@dataguybobby) reported 23 minutes ago

  Bot is grepping logs in CloudFlare, Azure, Supabase, and Vercel. Then triggering Cursor agents to build a fix. I am mentioning issues and approving PRs.

• 
  Yash Desai (@yash_d_desai) reported 29 minutes ago

  Stopping the bad guys with Cloudflare: 20,273 malicious requests blocked or challenged in the last month #cloudflare

• 
  Henry C | DevSecOps (@_theCyberDoctor) reported 33 minutes ago

  4/ The part I'm proudest of isn't the happy path. It's what happens when the web fights back. CrunchBase threw a Cloudflare captcha → agent refused to bypass it, wrote down why, moved on. LinkedIn threw a sign-in popup → agent closed it and read what was visible. Chrome crashed → agent reloaded.

• 
  Aldo (@aldozampatti) reported 34 minutes ago

  @jmsuth @ChadMoran @monarch_money BTW, If you aren't using Cloudflare for your MCPs, LMK and I can help. Not sure what's the reason behind but I'm just extending a hand :)

• 
  lasan (@las_nish) reported 35 minutes ago

  Comparisons of Free Trial Abuse Prevention Services If you're running a SaaS with a free trial or focusing on PLG, authentication and abuse prevention are not the same problem. - WorkOS: If you're already using WorkOS, WorkOS Radar is probably the first thing I'd look at. For a WorkOS stack, WorkOS AuthKit + Radar makes the most sense. You don't need to bolt another authentication system onto your app just to get abuse signals. - Auth0, Supabase Auth, Better Auth: These are primarily identity/authentication platforms. Integrating only these can't prevent free trial abuse. - Custom: Like the previous options, you need a custom way to prevent free trial abuse. Most free trial abuse methods involve disposable emails, Google dot variations, Google/Gmail domain variations, and plus addressing. That's why even when you block bots via Cloudflare Turnstile or CAPTCHA, you can still get these abusers. The industry standards: - Block free trial abuse using lists hosted on GitHub: This is a pain in the ***. If you don't want to pay money, you can use a service that offers a generous free tier. - WorkOS Radar: This is mainly used at the enterprise level. They focus more on WorkOS-related integrations rather than integrations with other providers. - ZeroBounce, NeverBounce, MillionVerifier, DeBounce: These are mainly used to clean/validate emails. There are 100s of alternatives, and most are similar with minor differences. They all have disposable email checking APIs. - UserCheck: This is also an email validation API, but they focus on blocking fake email addresses. It's better than a basic email verification API. - Autheona: This is in the same category as WorkOS Radar and UserCheck, but with more features. It also focuses on fake user detection and is growing with a real user base. Now, pricing: - WorkOS Radar: First 1,000 checks free, then $100 per 50 checks. No application-specific logic changes. Easy to integrate and manage. - ZeroBounce: 100 free validations in the free tier, then pay-as-you-go, starting at 2,000 for $39, and so on. - NeverBounce: No free trial or use case, $8 per 1,000 checks. - UserCheck: 1,000 API requests per month in the free plan. The rule-based engine is not included in the free plan, and you can get up to 1 request per second. - Autheona: 3,000 checks per month, with the rule-based policy engine included. Standard API request rate limitations apply, similar to paid plans. Now, use cases: - WorkOS Radar: Block disposable emails, plus addressing, and Google dot variations. - ZeroBounce, NeverBounce, etc.: Block disposable emails. - UserCheck: Block disposable emails, plus addressing, and Google dot variations; detect public emails; email suggestions; syntax validation; role detection. - Autheona: Everything included in UserCheck, plus business/free/government email identification, deliverability checks, fraud patterns, punycode and mixed-script checks, VPN detection, and bot detection (not necessary if you already use CAPTCHA, Cloudflare, etc.). Final decision from me: - Use WorkOS Radar if you're already in the WorkOS ecosystem. It's harder to integrate with other auth providers. - Use ZeroBounce-like APIs if you need basic disposable email checks. They're not as good if you need a better free tier. - Use UserCheck if you only need email-related validation and want to stay within the free plan. - Use Autheona if you need the most generous free tier available with a custom policy engine. All services take a maximum of a few hours to integrate and test. Both UserCheck and Autheona have a similar approach: integrate once and never touch the code again.