Cloudflare Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  yakuzer5 (@conckrete) reported 6 minutes ago

  @OmegaNekoSimp Why are people mad about this? It's a nice break to see this instead of blank page or cloudflare ****

• 
  Bryan Beal 🎧 (@bryanrbeal) reported 7 minutes ago

  Pro tip - disable Eero’s DNS and use Google or Cloudflare DNS and 99% of Eeros problems disappear Eero DNS is trash

• 
  Anime Novakai | Anime News, Updates & Leaks (@AnimeNovakai) reported 8 minutes ago

  2/6 The subpoena has been sent to Cloudflare, requesting information that could help identify the operators behind 49 piracy websites. Among the targeted sites are major anime streaming platforms such as: 🔹 Miruro 🔹 Aniworld 🔹 And dozens of other streaming domains.

• 
  Brij Pandey (@LearnWithBrij) reported 10 minutes ago

  📂 SaaS Stack ┃ ┣ 📂 Frontend ┃ ┣ 📂 React ┃ ┣ 📂 NextJS ┃ ┣ 📂 Vue ┃ ┣ 📂 TailwindCSS ┃ ┗ 📂 Shadcn UI ┃ ┣ 📂 Backend ┃ ┣ 📂 NodeJS ┃ ┣ 📂 Django ┃ ┣ 📂 Laravel ┃ ┣ 📂 FastAPI ┃ ┗ 📂 Express ┃ ┣ 📂 Database ┃ ┣ 📂 PostgreSQL ┃ ┣ 📂 MySQL ┃ ┣ 📂 MongoDB ┃ ┣ 📂 Redis ┃ ┗ 📂 Supabase ┃ ┣ 📂 Auth ┃ ┣ 📂 Clerk ┃ ┣ 📂 Auth0 ┃ ┣ 📂 Firebase Auth ┃ ┣ 📂 Supabase Auth ┃ ┗ 📂 NextAuth ┃ ┣ 📂 Payments ┃ ┣ 📂 Stripe ┃ ┣ 📂 Paddle ┃ ┣ 📂 Dodo Payments ┃ ┣ 📂 Lemon Squeezy ┃ ┗ 📂 Polar ┃ ┣ 📂 Emails ┃ ┣ 📂 Resend ┃ ┣ 📂 SendGrid ┃ ┣ 📂 Mailgun ┃ ┣ 📂 Postmark ┃ ┗ 📂 Amazon SES ┃ ┣ 📂 Storage ┃ ┣ 📂 AWS ┃ ┣ 📂 Cloudflare ┃ ┣ 📂 Google Cloud Storage ┃ ┣ 📂 Supabase Storage ┃ ┗ 📂 Uploadcare ┃ ┣ 📂 Deployment ┃ ┣ 📂 Vercel ┃ ┣ 📂 Netlify ┃ ┣ 📂 Railway ┃ ┣ 📂 Render ┃ ┗ 📂 AWS ┃ ┣ 📂 Domains and DNS ┃ ┣ 📂 Namecheap ┃ ┣ 📂 Hostinger ┃ ┣ 📂 Cloudflare DNS ┃ ┣ 📂 Google Domains ┃ ┗ 📂 SiteGround ┃ ┣ 📂 Analytics ┃ ┣ 📂 Google Analytics ┃ ┣ 📂 Plausible ┃ ┣ 📂 PostHog ┃ ┣ 📂 Mixpanel ┃ ┗ 📂 DataFast ┃ ┣ 📂 Monitoring ┃ ┣ 📂 Sentry ┃ ┣ 📂 LogRocket ┃ ┣ 📂 Datadog ┃ ┣ 📂 NewRelic ┃ ┗ 📂 UptimeRobot ┃ ┣ 📂 DevOps ┃ ┣ 📂 Docker ┃ ┣ 📂 Kubernetes ┃ ┣ 📂 GitHub Actions ┃ ┣ 📂 CI CD ┃ ┗ 📂 Terraform ┃ ┣ 📂 Search ┃ ┣ 📂 Algolia ┃ ┣ 📂 Meilisearch ┃ ┣ 📂 Elasticsearch ┃ ┣ 📂 Typesense ┃ ┗ 📂 OpenSearch ┃ ┣ 📂 AI Integration ┃ ┣ 📂 OpenAI API ┃ ┣ 📂 Anthropic API ┃ ┣ 📂 Replicate ┃ ┣ 📂 HuggingFace ┃ ┗ 📂 Gemini API ┃ ┣ 📂 Integrations ┃ ┣ 📂 Zapier ┃ ┣ 📂 Make ┃ ┣ 📂 n8n ┃ ┣ 📂 Pabbly ┃ ┗ 📂 Webhooks ┃ ┣ 📂 Security ┃ ┣ 📂 SSL ┃ ┣ 📂 Cloudflare ┃ ┣ 📂 WAF ┃ ┣ 📂 Rate Limiting ┃ ┗ 📂 Secrets Management ┃ ┣ 📂 Marketing ┃ ┣ 📂 Search Console ┃ ┣ 📂 Outrank ┃ ┣ 📂 Buffer ┃ ┣ 📂 Analytics ┃ ┗ 📂 Kit ┃ ┗ 📂 Customer Support ┣ 📂 Intercom ┣ 📂 Crisp ┣ 📂 Zendesk ┣ 📂 Tawk ┗ 📂 HelpScout

• 
  Intelligent time waster 🌶️ (❖,❖) (@alexrastaGG) reported 11 minutes ago

  This isn’t just a media problem. It’s an existential question for the open web itself. If we get the new model right, more money could flow to actual creators than ever before. If we get it wrong, we end up with a closed, low-quality internet owned by whoever can afford to generate synthetic content at scale. The next 3–5 years will decide which version we get.Worth the watch. The internet’s business model just died and most people still haven’t noticed. #Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince just confirmed what a lot of us have been feeling: bot and AI-agent traffic has already overtaken human traffic on a massive portion of the web. He expects that ratio to hit 1,000:1 within five years.podaxion.comFor almost 30 years the internet worked the same way: Create something useful → get discovered by search → convert that traffic into ads or subscriptions. Agents don’t look at ads. Referral traffic from the new “search” is collapsing in some cases by thousands of times compared to the old Google deal. Publishers, journalists, small businesses and independent creators are watching their economics evaporate in real time. The scary part isn’t the technology. It’s that nobody has figured out who pays for the content that trains and powers these systems. Prince’s bet (and Cloudflare’s) is that the next internet will look like this:Humans still get content for free Machines and agents pay (pay-per-crawl, micropayments, usage-based licensing) Quality and uniqueness get rewarded instead of outrage and clickbait Whether that actually happens depends on whether we can build payment rails that can handle hundreds of millions of tiny transactions per second. Traditional processors weren’t built for this. That’s why names like Stripe, Coinbase and new protocols keep coming up.

• 
  Muntasir Mallik (@muntaxir04) reported 16 minutes ago

  @acolombiadev @Cloudflare Maybe it's Gemini? We never run out of searches bec nobody uses it anymore

• 
  ッ ᴇᴇʟᴋᴏ ᴀʟᴇxᴀɴᴅᴇʀꜱ (@eelko1976) reported 17 minutes ago

  ethereum:native under the 2400$ solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 just under the $100 mark. Aay. @BloFin_Official Why do I get a temporarily ban from @Cloudflare for too many requests wtf?! Have to use a VPN now (which I wasn't before) otherwise I cannot access MY account.

• 
  Krishna Singh (@krishnasinghdev) reported 19 minutes ago

  @tapasadhikary @Namecheap I never liked namecheap / godaddy, don't know why people choose it over simple providers like cloudflare where they charge same amount for 1 or 10 years

• 
  Reina Cruz 🥼🧤🇨🇺 (@rea1ReinaCruz) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Cloudflare Fix human verification

• 
  Patrick Ryall (@PadraigOraghail) reported 22 minutes ago

  The learning is never ending. Mostly it is platforms, in this case using Cloudflare as the auth gate. I had never used cloudflare for more than DNS. Now I have three sites running on it, for free, which is mad. Workers, Zero Trust, DNS, connected to ***. It's all rather slick.

• 
  AGTP (@AGTPinsights) reported 23 minutes ago

  Cursor just launched self-hosted machines for cloud agents today. Here's what you need to know. You can now run Cursor cloud agents on infrastructure you manage, including pools of machines that auto-scale with demand. The agent loop still runs in Cursor, but tool execution, your codebase, build outputs, and secrets stay entirely inside your own network. This gives agents access to internal services or specialized hardware that Cursor's own cloud can't reach. Cursor also added support for supported sandbox providers, letting teams pick managed infra instead of running their own machines. Self-hosted workers now support computer use on Linux and Mac too, so an agent can click, type, take screenshots, and drive the browser, with users able to watch or take control from Cursor. Coder separately announced Agent Relay, giving Cursor Cloud Agents self-hosted execution environments on customer infrastructure, launching in private preview with SpaceXAI as a design partner for regulated enterprises where code can't leave the network. Key numbers: - Supported sandbox partners at launch: AWS Lambda, Coder, Cloudflare, Daytona, E2B, Modal, Namespace, Vercel - Cursor Pro pricing starts at $20/month, self-hosted machines require paying for your own compute separately - Coder Agent Relay: private preview, no public pricing yet Team pools can hibernate idle machines so you're not paying to keep capacity warm.

• 
  Carlo GG (@CarloDotGG) reported 23 minutes ago

  @SimonHoiberg Easy fix Step 1: Use Cloudflare AI Gateway to build your own custom Openrouter for your business, then select whichever provider you'd like, or even attach custom providers like BaseTen, FAL .... Step 2: set billing limits per user if needed.

• 
  Eli Yumn (@EliYumnik) reported 30 minutes ago

  @acolombiadev @Cloudflare GitHub for CI/CD and hosting the damn internet’s repos Supabase Resend Replit Gemini Eleven labs

• 
  Krishna Singh (@krishnasinghdev) reported 31 minutes ago

  @tapasadhikary I believe useEffect has been the source of so many production issues, most recent one was with Cloudflare

• 
  Gaylord (@laolu_afolabi) reported 35 minutes ago

  @lanreadelowo From Claude: """ Technically, yes — it's buildable, and "platform-agnostic" is realistic because most providers and gateways (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, etc.) have already converged on an OpenAI-compatible schema, so a routing layer that swaps providers behind one endpoint isn't a huge engineering lift. But there are a few things in the premise worth stress-testing before you build. **The "discount arbitrage" framing is a bit shakier than it sounds.** Most of these gateways aren't reselling models at a discount — they're reselling at close to list price plus a fee. While OpenRouter states it doesn't mark up inference pricing, its credit purchase fee effectively acts as a surcharge on all usage. LiteLLM's pitch is the opposite direction — zero markup by self-hosting, with OpenRouter's ~5% fee costing meaningfully more at scale. So the "discounts" you'd be arbitraging are less "provider A is cheaper than provider B for the same model" and more: rate-limited free tiers, short-lived promos, or BYOK arrangements — OpenRouter's BYOK is free up to a monthly allowance before a 5% fee kicks in. Those are real, but they're capacity-constrained and often disappear once volume shows up — hard to build a durable business on chasing them. **The bigger product risk: tokens/models aren't fungible.** Swapping Gemini for Claude for GPT under one endpoint isn't like arbitraging cloud spot instances — different tokenizers (so "$/token" isn't apples-to-apples), different tool-calling formats, different output style and capability. If your router silently reroutes a customer's traffic to whatever's cheapest this hour, you can quietly degrade the app built on top of it. That's the actual hard problem, not the proxying. **What's actually working in production right now is narrower than blind price-routing:** AT&T processes tens of billions of tokens a day using cache-aware routers that send simpler tasks to cheaper models, cutting costs up to 56% with only ~2% quality degradation, and this "model cascade" pattern — cheap/fast models handle the default case, only escalating to a frontier model when a confidence check fails — is used by both AT&T's LiteLLM-based router and Databricks' Smart Router. That's routing by task-fit with cost as a constraint, not routing purely by whoever's running a promo this week. **Competitive landscape is already crowded**: OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, Requesty, Helicone, Not Diamond, Martian, TrueFoundry, Cloudflare AI Gateway, Ofox all do some flavor of unified-endpoint routing today, several with automatic fallback/cost-based rules already built in. Pure discount-hunting is a thin moat — anyone can scrape pricing pages, and providers may treat aggressive arbitrage-only usage as a ToS problem. Where I'd actually look for a wedge if I were you: quality-aware routing with an audit trail (so teams can trust that "cheaper" didn't mean "worse" for their specific task), rather than price-only arbitrage. """