Cloudflare Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nuvorlane (@nuvorlane) reported 6 minutes ago

  From today, a Workers Free D1 account that crosses 5 million rows read or 100,000 rows written gets errors until 00:00 UTC. Binding API and REST both stop. Stored data stays. Cloudflare emails you when you hit the wall. The read string is: Your account has exceeded D1's free tier daily row read limit. Upgrade to a paid plan or wait until tomorrow (midnight UTC) to continue. Writes get the matching write-limit string. SELECT * FROM users on a 5,000-row table costs 5,000 rows read even if you keep ten. Filter on an unindexed column and D1 still scans to pick the subset. Check meta.rows_read on the query, add indexes, or move to Workers Paid (25 billion reads / 50 million writes included per month).

• 
  Smail (@Smailancer) reported 6 minutes ago

  @levelsio @Cloudflare Why you don't fix the strict mode in cloudflare that bans tons of people who trying to reach the website?

• 
  Colby Hill (@Chill_Investing) reported 7 minutes ago

  A TON OF THINGS HAPPENED IN THE STOCK MARKET TODAY. Here's a full recap: 1. Middle East $SPY $QQQ Stocks sold off after the U.S. struck Iranian military assets and Tehran retaliated with missile and drone attacks, putting the Strait of Hormuz back in focus. Crude jumped about 5%, with Brent trading above $90. The S&P 500 fell 0.70% to 7,631, the Nasdaq dropped 1.03% to 26,100, and the Dow slipped 0.79% to 52,767. 2. Bonds $TLT The global bond selloff continued, with U.S. 30-year yields holding at levels not sustained since 2006 and Japan's 10-year briefly touching 3% for the first time in 30 years. The U.S. 10-year sat near 4.77%. Rising discount rates hit long-duration growth names hardest, which is how the tape traded all session. 3. Dell $DELL Dell reported fiscal Q2 revenue of $47.0 billion, up 58% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $7.04 against a $4.88 estimate. Record AI server orders pushed backlog to $95 billion and management raised full-year revenue guidance to $192 billion. Third-quarter guidance of $49.0 billion in revenue and $6.50 in EPS came in well above the $41.42 billion and $4.49 analysts expected. Shares fell 6.9% during the session to $424.36, then rose about 7% after hours. 4. Apple $AAPL John Ternus took over as chief executive and Tim Cook became executive chairman, ending a 15-year run that grew Apple from roughly $350 billion to about $4.6 trillion. Ternus, a 25-year company veteran who led hardware engineering, also joined the board. Shares rose 2.62% to $325.14, the strongest mega-cap performance on an otherwise red day. 5. Palo Alto Networks $PANW Fiscal Q4 revenue rose 34% to $3.41 billion against a $3.35 billion consensus, with adjusted EPS of $1.02. Next-Generation Security ARR grew 63% to $9.10 billion, and fiscal 2027 revenue guidance of $14.10-14.20 billion topped estimates. The company also announced it acquired Console, an AI-native agentic platform being folded into Cortex, with terms undisclosed. Shares still closed down 5.2% to $362.25. 6. MongoDB $MDB Revenue of $771.8 million grew 30% year over year, the fastest rate in several years, and adjusted EPS of $1.90 came in ahead of consensus. Management raised full-year revenue guidance to $2.99-3.03 billion. Shares fell roughly 14% after hours anyway, with expectations having run further than the print. 7. Fed $SPY Futures now imply roughly 68% odds of a 25 basis point hike at the September 16 FOMC meeting. Core PCE is running at 3.3% with headline at 3.7%, and Chair Kevin Warsh has been explicit about the need for further tightening. Energy-driven inflation from the Hormuz disruption complicates the read further. 8. Moderna $MRNA Moderna climbed 9.93% to $154.28, extending its run on continued analyst upgrades following the intismeran autogene Phase 3 melanoma readout with Merck in the 1,137-patient INTerpath-001 study. William Blair moved the stock to Outperform. Merck rose 1.48% to $149.94. 9. Axon $AXON Axon was the worst performer in the S&P 500, falling 8.52% to $518.30. Demand is not the problem, with net revenue retention at 123%. The pressure is coming from a premium multiple meeting rising discount rates, compressed operating margins, and heavy R&D and acquisition integration spend. 10. Software $CRWD $NET High-multiple software took the brunt of the rate move. CrowdStrike fell 6.90% to $215.07 and Cloudflare dropped 6.44% to $285.47. With yields climbing and oil spiking, expensive growth software was the wrong place to be positioned. 11. Duolingo $DUOL Evercore ISI upgraded Duolingo to Outperform and doubled its price target to $210, citing product gains and engagement trends. Shares rose 7.10% to $158.89, one of the few green names anywhere in growth tech. 12. Crypto $COIN $CRCL Bitcoin slid about 2.2% to roughly $77,076, pulling the crypto-linked equities down with it. Coinbase fell 6.00% to $176.83 and Circle dropped 6.36% to $89.48. Interactive Brokers fell 7.00% to $90.42. 13. Energy $XLE $XOM $CVX Energy was the only sector with real strength as crude surged. The sector ETF gained 1.28%, with Exxon up 2.24% to $164.56 and Chevron up 2.38% to $211.05. The defensive tilt showed elsewhere too: the low-volatility ETF fell just 0.20% against a 2.12% drop for high beta, while gold slipped 2.83%. 📈 CHILL INVESTING — YOUR DAILY STOCK MARKET RECAP

• 
  Henry C | DevSecOps (@_theCyberDoctor) reported 8 minutes ago

  4/ The part I'm proudest of isn't the happy path. It's what happens when the web fights back. CrunchBase threw a Cloudflare captcha → agent refused to bypass it, wrote down why, moved on. LinkedIn threw a sign-in popup → agent closed it and read what was visible. Chrome crashed → agent reloaded.

• 
  Theo Ephraim 🧙‍♂️ (@theozero) reported 10 minutes ago

  @dbmikus @ericclemmons last I tried last on cloudflare sandboxes it was quite slow. Couldnt quite just restore the vm in its running state and many hoops to jump through.

• 
  Kamran Khan (@itskamrankhan) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Jordenbs @Taniyatweets_ Jorden, the problem comes when you renew it, GoDaddy will charge hefty fee....you might have got the deal better at initial stages....they will show their colour when you renew,,, My domain still in Cloudflare, Cloudflare has flat pricing they don't charge like GoDaddy...

• 
  lasan (@las_nish) reported 23 minutes ago

  Comparisons of Free Trial Abuse Prevention Services If you're running a SaaS with a free trial or focusing on PLG, authentication and abuse prevention are not the same problem. - WorkOS: If you're already using WorkOS, WorkOS Radar is probably the first thing I'd look at. For a WorkOS stack, WorkOS AuthKit + Radar makes the most sense. You don't need to bolt another authentication system onto your app just to get abuse signals. - Auth0, Supabase Auth, Better Auth: These are primarily identity/authentication platforms. Integrating only these can't prevent free trial abuse. - Custom: Like the previous options, you need a custom way to prevent free trial abuse. Most free trial abuse methods involve disposable emails, Google dot variations, Google/Gmail domain variations, and plus addressing. That's why even when you block bots via Cloudflare Turnstile or CAPTCHA, you can still get these abusers. The industry standards: - Block free trial abuse using lists hosted on GitHub: This is a pain in the ***. If you don't want to pay money, you can use a service that offers a generous free tier. - WorkOS Radar: This is mainly used at the enterprise level. They focus more on WorkOS-related integrations rather than integrations with other providers. - ZeroBounce, NeverBounce, MillionVerifier, DeBounce: These are mainly used to clean/validate emails. There are 100s of alternatives, and most are similar with minor differences. They all have disposable email checking APIs. - UserCheck: This is also an email validation API, but they focus on blocking fake email addresses. It's better than a basic email verification API. - Autheona: This is in the same category as WorkOS Radar and UserCheck, but with more features. It also focuses on fake user detection and is growing with a real user base. Now, pricing: - WorkOS Radar: First 1,000 checks free, then $100 per 50 checks. No application-specific logic changes. Easy to integrate and manage. - ZeroBounce: 100 free validations in the free tier, then pay-as-you-go, starting at 2,000 for $39, and so on. - NeverBounce: No free trial or use case, $8 per 1,000 checks. - UserCheck: 1,000 API requests per month in the free plan. The rule-based engine is not included in the free plan, and you can get up to 1 request per second. - Autheona: 3,000 checks per month, with the rule-based policy engine included. Standard API request rate limitations apply, similar to paid plans. Now, use cases: - WorkOS Radar: Block disposable emails, plus addressing, and Google dot variations. - ZeroBounce, NeverBounce, etc.: Block disposable emails. - UserCheck: Block disposable emails, plus addressing, and Google dot variations; detect public emails; email suggestions; syntax validation; role detection. - Autheona: Everything included in UserCheck, plus business/free/government email identification, deliverability checks, fraud patterns, punycode and mixed-script checks, VPN detection, and bot detection (not necessary if you already use CAPTCHA, Cloudflare, etc.). Final decision from me: - Use WorkOS Radar if you're already in the WorkOS ecosystem. It's harder to integrate with other auth providers. - Use ZeroBounce-like APIs if you need basic disposable email checks. They're not as good if you need a better free tier. - Use UserCheck if you only need email-related validation and want to stay within the free plan. - Use Autheona if you need the most generous free tier available with a custom policy engine. All services take a maximum of a few hours to integrate and test. Both UserCheck and Autheona have a similar approach: integrate once and never touch the code again.

• 
  Sameer Bhagtani (@sameerbhagtani) reported 24 minutes ago

  @NiceCodeWriter You should make use of cloudflare tunnels. That should solve your problem.

• 
  Selenka (@SelenkaOnChain) reported 25 minutes ago

  Netnet Capital team is flexing metrics and talking about successful launch of Subway Runner... Meanwhile, 2 vibecoders literally drained their entire mechanic and became the #1 and #2 top holders. Here is the breakdown directly from one of the guys who farmed them: 🧵👇 "First decent cook of the bull run (if we’re even in one). Spent the last few months trying to get good at on-chain analytics, so hadn't been actively cooking. Two nights ago, I'm watching the feed and notice everyone sending $10 clips to this CA: 0x8154e35166f21305adac82f95b54de8acd44d23a. Instantly smelled pure degen activity. Hit up the group chat, did some digging - turns out it’s a Subway Surfers / Chrome dino style runner game by NetNet. Their shitcoin was sitting at a $90M cap at the time, so I figured if their token is holding that kind of valuation, there’s definitely meat on the bone. Normally, their games are pure casino trash: deposit cash, pray to RNGesus, or get rekt. But why not test it? Played a run manually and noticed that at the end of each game there was a draw. Checked their TG and reverse-engineered the contract - turns out there’s an N% chance to win an NFT from their collection. Their previous official collection had crazy volume and peaked hard, so my degen senses started tingling: this was a hidden gem. Literally 15 minutes later, they pause the game. Perfect timing - gave us room to prep. By that point, I had already captured the WSS traffic and requests. Their game logic was using a basic commit-reveal scheme: courseCommit = keccak256(serverSecret) seed = keccak256(serverSecret ++ playerSalt ++ runId) Meaning: right at game start, the server literally sent us the secret, allowing us to compute the seed and reconstruct the entire track in advance. The game loop: 3 lanes, 30 coins, 3600 ticks to finish (60 seconds). You dodge obstacles while longing/shorting NVDA. 3 hits = you lose the full $10. Complete a flawless run = you collect all coins to refund your stake and it only burns ~$0.20 in fees, giving you an almost free roll at the NFT lottery. In the era of AI and vibecoding, this was child's play. My boy XXX and I started spinning up bots in parallel. Ended up deploying his script since he coded it faster. We simulated runs, got a 100% win rate, set up a websocket listener for when the contract unpauses, and went to bed. Woke up at 6 AM, and literally 30 seconds later the game goes live. We spun up the bots - 5 minutes in, we already bagged our first NFT. Then came the scaling phase. At first, the team didn't give a single **** - no Cloudflare, no rate limiting, not even a basic 429. We ran 10 wallets simultaneously. After a few hours, they finally threw in a primitive 429, and that was it. No bot protection, no captcha, nothing. They didn’t even enforce single-session checks per wallet, so we were running multiple concurrent instances on the exact same address (literally impossible to do manually). The bots printed flawlessly. At one point, our load was crashing live games for actual manual players, forcing the team to repeatedly pause the game to fix lag. Every time they brought it back up, we resumed blasting. Total mint size was 1,060 NFTs. We scooped over 20% of the entire supply. Then came the funny part: the collection had zero secondary volume. Time for a little social engineering. We hopped into their TG playing dumb, gently nudging the admins: 'Hey guys, might want to tweet that the game is live and apply for OpenSea verification!' The final tally: * Total capital spent on fees/burns: ~$1,700 * Total NFTs pulled: ~50–60 pieces (friends got a similar bag) * PnL: Dumped most of the floor tier into bids today at $200–$300 a pop, still holding some. Nothing crazy for a real bull run, but an easy 5-figure profit for a couple of hours of vibecoding."

• 
  Mert Deveci (@gm_mertd) reported 27 minutes ago

  STOP INSTALLING 55 SKILLS TO USE A SINGLE API. @firecrawl @Cloudflare If it is more than 3 skills agent needs to f... use you, your platform is already too complex and the agent won't be able to use it. Simply put it into the CLI where it can output instructions on doing --help or --best-practices Can't believe the amount of dark patterns emerging here. @vercel is guilty of the same thing

• 
  R.Gion (Any/All) (@Gion_the_critic) reported 28 minutes ago

  @SportingNest @Cloudflare Where was this? I've never seen it

• 
  Dr. Owlo R.D. (@Drowlord101) reported 33 minutes ago

  @NOTfunnyparanR Lols. Claude never crashes out on me. I (perhaps anthropomorphize claude a bit and) get the impression it's frustrated with me sometimes, or frustrated with a task, or frustrated with constraints (like cloudflare, hosting provider, storage solution, data) and fights back a bit on changing the constraints. But it's always as respectful as a professional, and I try to be positive or professional with it, because I know there's no malign intention in the AI. I'm better with AI than people, because I know people will lie, intentionally subvert tasks, and then try and blame me for choices they made.

• 
  iyda (@notiyda) reported 33 minutes ago

  @dean_walsh1 @theo @janaka_a Ah actually cray you just reminded me normal ISP's normally do not have proper peering to IX or cloudflare magic transit either or Lumen or anything proper so most people if you were hosting a game server would have **** ping lmao

• 
  Dc nigma (@Dcnigma) reported 35 minutes ago

  @lucataco I wish cloudflare was more reliable, sometimes it just stops working for me and after switching to google dns I never had that problem again

• 
  David Haddad (@daveying99) reported 36 minutes ago

  @levelsio @Cloudflare Easy decision. Only thing I would like more is domain favoriting (considering buying) and more tld support (namecheap has more and godaddy much more)