1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Cloudflare
  4. Outage Map
Cloudflare

Cloudflare Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Cloudflare users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Cloudflare, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Cloudflare users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Cloudflare is a company that provides DDoS mitigation, content delivery network (CDN) services, security and distributed DNS services. Cloudflare's services sit between the visitor and the Cloudflare user's hosting provider, acting as a reverse proxy for websites.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
New York City, NY 4
Township of Evan, KS 1
Ahmedabad, GJ 1
Le Puy-en-Velay, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Ann Arbor, MI 1
Palermo, Sicily 1
Los Angeles, CA 1
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Cassiel1137
    Cassiel (@Cassiel1137) reported

    @SportingNest @Cloudflare Quite spectacularly a scam. Luckily anyone who might fall for it (cough... everyone has their off days fella... cough) wouldn't have the first clue how to do any of that ****.

  • spectragai
    Girish (@spectragai) reported

    @UthaaleReDeva @acolombiadev @Cloudflare It serves different purposes. But I’m just answering the post: name a generous free tier service

  • joearizzo
    Joseph Rizzo (@joearizzo) reported

    @pcshipp Everything cloudflare and will never go back

  • BertosonHunter
    Hunter Bertoson (@BertosonHunter) reported

    Was wondering if anyone from @Cloudflare could help me with some Emdash issues im having?

  • patmeenan
    Patrick Meenan (@patmeenan) reported

    @Cloudflare So awesome, but so many questions! Always transcode or pass-trough zstd if the client supports it (since most browsers now support zstd)? Is this also the case when origins provide compressed assets or only when they don't?

  • AGTPinsights
    AGTP (@AGTPinsights) reported

    Cursor just launched self-hosted machines for cloud agents today. Here's what you need to know. You can now run Cursor cloud agents on infrastructure you manage, including pools of machines that auto-scale with demand. The agent loop still runs in Cursor, but tool execution, your codebase, build outputs, and secrets stay entirely inside your own network. This gives agents access to internal services or specialized hardware that Cursor's own cloud can't reach. Cursor also added support for supported sandbox providers, letting teams pick managed infra instead of running their own machines. Self-hosted workers now support computer use on Linux and Mac too, so an agent can click, type, take screenshots, and drive the browser, with users able to watch or take control from Cursor. Coder separately announced Agent Relay, giving Cursor Cloud Agents self-hosted execution environments on customer infrastructure, launching in private preview with SpaceXAI as a design partner for regulated enterprises where code can't leave the network. Key numbers: - Supported sandbox partners at launch: AWS Lambda, Coder, Cloudflare, Daytona, E2B, Modal, Namespace, Vercel - Cursor Pro pricing starts at $20/month, self-hosted machines require paying for your own compute separately - Coder Agent Relay: private preview, no public pricing yet Team pools can hibernate idle machines so you're not paying to keep capacity warm.

  • WCTranslations
    Witch Cult Translations (@WCTranslations) reported

    We're aware our site is experiencing increased load times again. This is due to increased traffic following the episode and issues with our Cloudflare integration. Unfortunately, we can't do much right now to improve load times, so please be patient and try not to spam refresh.

  • nuvorlane
    Nuvorlane (@nuvorlane) reported

    Cloudflare AI Gateway monthly usage invoices no longer break out input and output tokens. Previously you got two lines, e.g. 40k input at $0.000001 ($0.04) and 24k output at $0.000005 ($0.12). Now one line: anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 — $0.16. Model names on invoices and logs also normalize to provider/model, so dated suffixes disappear from the identifier. Credit-purchase invoices are unchanged. If a FinOps parser keys on token line items or version suffixes, fix it before the next month-start invoice lands.

  • yash_d_desai
    Yash Desai (@yash_d_desai) reported

    Stopping the bad guys with Cloudflare: 20,273 malicious requests blocked or challenged in the last month #cloudflare

  • andykn101
    Andy Knowles (@andykn101) reported

    @SportingNest @Cloudflare It's absolutely a scam. If you don't know what those instructions do listen to those who. If you're not clicking on the ads in your search results you've probably already got malware poisoning your search results. Get help.

  • laolu_afolabi
    Gaylord (@laolu_afolabi) reported

    @lanreadelowo From Claude: """ Technically, yes — it's buildable, and "platform-agnostic" is realistic because most providers and gateways (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, etc.) have already converged on an OpenAI-compatible schema, so a routing layer that swaps providers behind one endpoint isn't a huge engineering lift. But there are a few things in the premise worth stress-testing before you build. **The "discount arbitrage" framing is a bit shakier than it sounds.** Most of these gateways aren't reselling models at a discount — they're reselling at close to list price plus a fee. While OpenRouter states it doesn't mark up inference pricing, its credit purchase fee effectively acts as a surcharge on all usage. LiteLLM's pitch is the opposite direction — zero markup by self-hosting, with OpenRouter's ~5% fee costing meaningfully more at scale. So the "discounts" you'd be arbitraging are less "provider A is cheaper than provider B for the same model" and more: rate-limited free tiers, short-lived promos, or BYOK arrangements — OpenRouter's BYOK is free up to a monthly allowance before a 5% fee kicks in. Those are real, but they're capacity-constrained and often disappear once volume shows up — hard to build a durable business on chasing them. **The bigger product risk: tokens/models aren't fungible.** Swapping Gemini for Claude for GPT under one endpoint isn't like arbitraging cloud spot instances — different tokenizers (so "$/token" isn't apples-to-apples), different tool-calling formats, different output style and capability. If your router silently reroutes a customer's traffic to whatever's cheapest this hour, you can quietly degrade the app built on top of it. That's the actual hard problem, not the proxying. **What's actually working in production right now is narrower than blind price-routing:** AT&T processes tens of billions of tokens a day using cache-aware routers that send simpler tasks to cheaper models, cutting costs up to 56% with only ~2% quality degradation, and this "model cascade" pattern — cheap/fast models handle the default case, only escalating to a frontier model when a confidence check fails — is used by both AT&T's LiteLLM-based router and Databricks' Smart Router. That's routing by task-fit with cost as a constraint, not routing purely by whoever's running a promo this week. **Competitive landscape is already crowded**: OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, Requesty, Helicone, Not Diamond, Martian, TrueFoundry, Cloudflare AI Gateway, Ofox all do some flavor of unified-endpoint routing today, several with automatic fallback/cost-based rules already built in. Pure discount-hunting is a thin moat — anyone can scrape pricing pages, and providers may treat aggressive arbitrage-only usage as a ToS problem. Where I'd actually look for a wedge if I were you: quality-aware routing with an audit trail (so teams can trust that "cheaper" didn't mean "worse" for their specific task), rather than price-only arbitrage. """

  • stutireal
    Stuti (@stutireal) reported

    tired: dog ate my homework wired: cloudflare was down inspired: three consecutive ai civilizations rose and fell inside my macbook during a forced restart. My notes app and chrome tabs did not survive the third regime

  • the_cia_hacker
    Justin Liverman (@the_cia_hacker) reported

    FunFact: Blackhat hackers put @cloudflare on the map back in 2011 when LulzSec was getting DDoS by @th3j35ter and @eastdakota decided to not drop them as a customer they became the defacto DDoS protection service forever after this

  • ric_orna
    Ric Orna (@ric_orna) reported

    @yongfook Or you gotta be doing something that actually has a moat still. Eg a network of sensors and API. Nobody is gonna vibe code physical stuff. Or something so big and boring a lift that nobody would want to and couldn’t in short order anyway. Vibe code your Cloudflare competitor.

  • HanifCarroll
    Hanif Carroll (@HanifCarroll) reported

    At a previous job, I was lucky to work with a staff-level front-end engineer who was very good at what he did and thorough like no one else I had worked with. I didn’t always appreciate that thoroughness. At first, I found it maddening. Meetings with product and design would drag on because he always had an enormous list of questions about whatever feature we were discussing. I was usually eager to finish the meeting and start coding. It took me a while to understand that he wasn’t making the process longer. He was asking the questions we would otherwise have to answer halfway through development, when an unanswered question could block the feature or send it in the wrong direction. Every unanswered question holds an assumption, and that assumption might not match what product or design had in mind. I thought about him recently while reviewing the search process for Casamo, a product I’m building to help people compare furnished stays. Before changing the code, I started asking questions: Why were we processing listings already known to be over the user’s budget? Why were hotel-like properties entering the process when the user had asked for an entire place? Why did we stop after finding six suitable stays if ten were available? How old could a review be before it stopped being useful evidence? Those questions exposed decisions that had been made when Casamo ran on a low-powered VPS and needed to do as little work as possible. They didn’t all make sense now that the product runs on Cloudflare. We changed the search process to reject known mismatches earlier, treat six results as the minimum rather than the target, continue until it finds ten suitable stays, and only use reviews from the previous year as evidence. If I had started coding immediately, I probably would have made the existing process faster without questioning whether it was still the right process. I don’t know if I’ll ever have as many questions as he did, but now I understand what he was protecting us from.

Check Current Status