1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Cloudflare
  4. Outage Map
Cloudflare

Cloudflare Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Cloudflare users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Cloudflare, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Cloudflare users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Cloudflare is a company that provides DDoS mitigation, content delivery network (CDN) services, security and distributed DNS services. Cloudflare's services sit between the visitor and the Cloudflare user's hosting provider, acting as a reverse proxy for websites.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Noida, UP 3
Jewar, UP 1
Braga, Braga 1
Paris, Île-de-France 2
Prievidza, Nitriansky 1
Farmers Branch, TX 1
Helsinki, Uusimaa 1
Crisfield, MD 2
Nanaimo, BC 1
New York City, NY 1
Istanbul, Istanbul 1
Greater Noida, UP 2
Augsburg, Bavaria 1
Bengaluru, KA 1
Montataire, Hauts-de-France 1
London, England 1
Attleborough, England 1
Colima, COL 1
Leuven, Flanders 1
New Delhi, NCT 1
Mâcon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Amsterdam, nh 1
Ashburn, VA 1
Rosario, SF 1
Merlo, BA 1
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • boyjovi_
    Jovi Ebi | Graphic Designer🎨& Brand Strategist💻 (@boyjovi_) reported

    @AirtelNigeria why cant i use my airtel oud unlimited for youtube and x without a private network connection like cloudflare warp. i dont undertand you guys.

  • madave_lui
    Dave Lui ☀️🪝 (@madave_lui) reported

    @cosmostation888 @HugoPhilion Just based off what they say and who they're connected to. You have to dissect the facts from the noise, especially those who use "prophecy" as an investment criteria. But, if they succeed at building strong rails inside of ACH payments that directly connect to banks they could see a pretty great increase in price. I think they have a shot, but I could lose all my investment with them. They're currently in my mid-conviction tier. I do think they can do pretty alright, though, and maybe they'll even surprise us all. There's a lot of folks who are, in my opinion, overly optimistic with the dots they've connected. I'm a bit more balanced and tend to lean on what's actually been said/announced... For instance they call themselves a Ripple strategic partner. They also said Ripple invested in them. To date I can't find a single Ripple announcement that confirms that. What I did find is that Ripple granted them a lot of xrp to put on Stronghold'd exchange. At the time Xpring was solely focused only on expanding the xrp market, so that made sense. And also at the time, my understanding is that Stronghold removed the xlm/shx pair on that exchange and replaced it with xrp/shx. BUT, that exchange is dead now, the old URL resolves to their homepage. Further, they're not listed anywhere that I can find as a true Ripple investment; meaning Ripple gave them capital. There's no Form D filed with the SEC between Ripple and Stronghold (or Action Factory (Stronghold's founding company owned by Tammy)) and no official Ripple announcement. They're not even listed on the RippleX site where Ripple disclose's their investment portfolio. Does it mean that Ripple didn't invest? No, they could have in a more obscure way, but it could also mean that Stronghold is inflating the relationship and calling the xrp they received an investment/partnership... They could have been Ripple's partner in expanding xrp, but that deal could have been one-sided in Ripple's favor, and Stronghold only benefited from the exposure. Getting strong talking points is a valid growth strategy so who knows. The point is that without announcements from both sides (otherwise called "confirmation") or a paper trail that you can validate the claims yourself, you're leaving it to faith, and imaginations can run wild when you blindly believe what's claimed. Even still, Stronghold shows an impressive number of investors and advisors on their site. But again, that's coming from them. So what I have been able to track down is that Stronghold is based in SF, they have about 30+ people on LinkedIn who claim to work there full time (predominantly software engineers who live in New Zealand and a few other places), Stronghold is a Delaware entity (normal for privacy and taxes) that is owned by Action Factory, and their trademark is in fact registered and live. Action Factory and Stronghold both trace back to the same address in San Francisco. Both Action Factory and Stronghold's URL use identical CloudFlare name servers and that's a strong connection because those are unique to Cloudflare users. So the same person is managing both domains under one account. So at a minimum we know that Action Factory and Stronghold are the same entity both sitting at the same address at the time of inception. Doesn't mean they don't have a different corporate location now. There's no issue with that. Most recently they called their listing on Uphold as a partnership for institutions and tagged Uphold in the post. That's a brave move if not completely true, but those claims again have to be taken on faith. @UpholdMarkets (Uphold's marketing twitter account for their listings) did post about $shx, but they didn't mention institutions in that post. So we're back to faith there. I have never been able to confirm any of the investments or partnerships they claim outside of the now dead xrp moment with Ripple on their now dead trade[dot]stronghold[dot]co exchange. It's all Stronghold saying it, there's no confirmation from the other side. And the one everyone loves is the IBM trial in a closed loop environment. That was real, but it's long over now. Stronghold has moved away from Stronghold USD and their focus has shifted completely to leveraging other existing networks. IBM was a great name to tout for marketing, but the strength of that moment mattering has long passed for me. So my criteria won't let me over invest on what "might happen." I'd rather miss some upside than be completely wrong if they miss their shots or if they're "faking it until they make it" but never actually make it.

  • 0xnagii
    Nagi (NFT Arc) (@0xnagii) reported

    Every major technology wave had an infrastructure bottleneck that nobody talked about until someone fixed it > AI had data pipelines The models existed The training infrastructure didn't until S3, distributed compute, and GPU clusters made it possible to actually run them at scale > Streaming had CDNs The content existed Delivery infrastructure couldn't handle the load until Akamai and Cloudflare built the edge network layer > Blockchain has the same problem, and it's in a place most people aren't looking: the P2P networking layer Everyone's working on execution EVMs getting faster, cheaper, more parallelized Everyone's working on consensus PoS, BFT variants, single-slot finality research Everyone's working on data availability EIP-4844, Danksharding, blob markets The actual movement of data between nodes? Still running gossip protocols The same architecture from the early 2000s, largely unchanged. This isn't a criticism Gossip worked fine when Ethereum had a few thousand nodes It doesn't scale cleanly to 560,000 validators distributed across six continents, all needing the same block within milliseconds The networking layer is the one part of the stack that hasn't had its infrastructure moment yet No one has built the equivalent of a CDN for block data No one has replaced the gossip primitive with something mathematically better suited to large, decentralized networks. That gap exists It's measurable And it's the most underleveraged place left to push on blockchain performance. TBC

  • AndrewP53992622
    Andrew Peterson (@AndrewP53992622) reported

    @xai @Cloudflare @xai your image generation tool is NOT WORKING. I have not been able to generate ANY images for dayS. SuperGrok user. Very disappointed.

  • RanchWife_com
    RanchWife.com (@RanchWife_com) reported

    @jgseddon @IricMidel Cloudflare is, literally, the worst registrar. no ability to change nameservers. Anyone willing to save 3 cents on a .com registration, over the competition, to wind up with a crippled domain name, should not be trusted to "find" anything of any significance.

  • alanefuller
    Alan | Broadcaster | WhatsApp for trades (@alanefuller) reported

    @uglyrobot @KatieKeithBarn2 For instance I use complex products like Amazon Web Service, Cloudflare, Google Cloud, and my method of operation now is ask an LLM how to do something,.

  • topmass
    topmass (@topmass) reported

    fable 5 recommended using cloudflare email sending service on its own vs resend and its still in beta from just knowing that I lean toward using cloudflare in my stack that's pretty nice!

  • Dayhaysoos
    Nick DeJesus 🛒🎉 - Former Unpaid CTO @BTPipeline (@Dayhaysoos) reported

    @thomasgauvin @CloudflareDev I tried building a code review tool on top of cloudflare, I gave up because I felt like I was going in the wrong direction and not using everything the best way. I saved the repo to look at later, would you be down to still chat and help me prepare for attempt number 2?

  • sahilyaps
    Sahil Nawaz (@sahilyaps) reported

    ChatGPT can think. Claude can reason. Grok can search. None of them can buy a $5 API. That's the bottleneck. Everyone is obsessed with AI intelligence. Almost nobody is talking about AI payments. But that's where the next trillion-dollar market is forming. @awscloud just launched AgentCore Payments with @coinbase infrastructure. @Cloudflare and Coinbase are pushing x402. The entire premise is simple: (1) An AI agent discovers a service. (2) An AI agent pays for that service. (3) An AI agent consumes that service. No human in the loop. For 30 years, HTTP 402 ("Payment Required") was basically ignored. Now it's becoming the payment layer for machine-to-machine commerce. Most founders still think AI is a content tool. The biggest opportunity may actually be AI becoming an economic actor. Question: What happens when there are more agents spending money online than humans?

  • BrandonWaselnuk
    Brandon Waselnuk (@BrandonWaselnuk) reported

    @eastdakota “The internet never forgets” + Cloudflare powers the internet = oh… my

  • ChrisCarranza
    Chris (@ChrisCarranza) reported

    @zebassembly As a Cloudflare eng, you know better than most how critical controlled access and sandboxing are for real privacy and security. Sure, in theory users should be able to hand over their phone's data to any third-party AI if they want. But in practice, that's exactly why platforms build guardrails instead of wide-open APIs. Take Cloudflare WARP as an example. You route all a user's device traffic through Cloudflare's network for speed and security. But you don't just give arbitrary third parties unrestricted access to snoop, log, or act on that traffic. Cloudflare maintains strict no-logging policies for personal data, sandboxing, encryption, and audited controls precisely because handing over broad device-level access to random providers creates massive risks – malware, data leaks, abuse by shady apps, etc. Users think they know what they're agreeing to, but most don't read the fine print or understand the downstream implications. Apple's point (and the "Trusted System Agent" proposal) is similar: opt-in is fine for apps, but deep system-level AI assistant integration with private data + app control is different. The DMA forces Apple to open that up on regulators' terms, without adequate safeguards. It's not "protecting users from themselves" out of paternalism – it's refusing to be the liable middleman when a third-party AI (or the app granting it access) gets breached or misused.

  • Dystechgirl
    Lynn Elena (@Dystechgirl) reported

    When Mythos was first leaked in March: CrowdStrike fell -7% Palo Alto fell -6% Zscaler fell -4.5% Okta and Netskope fell -7% Tenable crashed -9% Cloudflare fell -13% Thomson Reuters fell -19% RELX fell -15% LegalZoom crashed -20%. The S&P 500 Software and Services Index fell 2.6% in a single session and is now down 12% since January. The reality is that people rushed into this “new feature” as if it were a coming Claude model or product launch. it’s a calculated pre-IPO growth narrative for Wall Street. Stop watching Polymarket odds and treating them like a technical signal.

  • itsshiji
    ハムザ (H) ⟡ (@itsshiji) reported

    @quintendf @rabois People are concerned about the low integrity and lying, not about being fair and truthful. Everyone who runs a company should aim for truth-maxing, but the pattern with Vinod in the Cloudflare case is the opposite. Hopefully, it is a lesson for him to change; it's never too late.

  • Tben_77_
    Tben (@Tben_77_) reported

    @eastdakota @pmarca Cloudflare is currently messed up. I can't even login to my dashboard at the moment. And it's been like this for over a week now. Whatever cloudflare is doing, it's not working. They should consider firing their entire leadership and going back to the drawing board.

  • shiweidu
    Seven Du (@shiweidu) reported

    @Cloudflare This must be your most expensive service. Can you reduce the cost? Using it to build idempotent services, WebSockets, or agents is really expensive.

Check Current Status