Cloudflare status: hosting issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Cloudflare reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Cloudflare users through our website.

• Cloud Services (54%)
• Hosting (31%)
• E-mail (8%)
• Domains (8%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Cloudflare outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Asnières-sur-Seine	Cloud Services	1 day ago
New York City	E-mail	6 days ago
Township of Evan	Hosting	6 days ago
Ahmedabad	Cloud Services	12 days ago
Le Puy-en-Velay	Cloud Services	13 days ago
Ann Arbor	Cloud Services	15 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  chosem 😖 (@chosem_) reported 5 minutes ago

  @synopsi use cloudflare receive and sending. connect receive to an openrouter API, basically most modern AI will do, even cheaper ones. make it categorize: promotion, support, misc. and then route the support to your actual support platform so you can see it all in one place.

• 
  My1 (@nep.one - Misskey) (@My1xT) reported 5 minutes ago

  @slendidev interesting question would be how fast or slow cloudflare runs on those, as especially on my older laptop it sometimes took a decent while, before needing a click and taking a decent while again, while anubis you dont need to babysit.

• 
  James (@jamescoder12) reported 7 minutes ago

  The uncomfortable truth. Your ISP has no incentive to optimize your router settings. They have every incentive to leave them on factory default and every incentive to upsell you when the defaults cause problems. When your Wi-Fi is slow, you call and complain. They test Speed 1 the connection to your modem. It's fine. So they tell you "everything looks good on our end" which is technically true. Then they offer you a faster plan. You pay $30/month more. Speed 1 goes up. Speed 2 the Wi-Fi to your devices doesn't change. Because the bottleneck was never the pipe coming into your home. It was the 6 feet between your router and your laptop. When your firmware is 4 years out of date, they don't push an update. When your channel is congested, they don't suggest switching. When your DNS is slow, they don't mention Cloudflare. When your channel width is halved, they don't widen it. When your security is on WPA2 with the factory admin password, they don't flag the risk. Every free fix that would make your Wi-Fi faster is a fix that prevents them from upselling you a more expensive plan. Every month you rent their router is $14 in revenue for a $60 device they deployed years ago. The rental has no end date. The equipment depreciates. The revenue doesn't. He called his ISP 4 times. They suggested upgrading twice. He upgraded twice. He paid $360 extra over a year for a faster plan that didn't make his Wi-Fi faster because the problem was never the plan. It was 9 settings his ISP could have fixed in a 5-minute phone call. They chose to sell him a faster highway instead of widening the off-ramp. "Your ISP isn't slow. Your settings are. And the company delivering your internet profits every month you don't know the difference." 9 settings. 15 minutes. $528/year back. Faster internet on a cheaper plan. The router was never broken. The defaults were designed by a company that makes money when you think it is.

• 
  Reina Cruz 🥼🧤🇨🇺 (@rea1ReinaCruz) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Cloudflare Fix human verification

• 
  Carlo GG (@CarloDotGG) reported 8 minutes ago

  @SimonHoiberg Easy fix Step 1: Use Cloudflare AI Gateway to build your own custom Openrouter for your business, then select whichever provider you'd like, or even attach custom providers like BaseTen, FAL .... Step 2: set billing limits per user if needed.

• 
  Krishna Singh (@krishnasinghdev) reported 9 minutes ago

  @tapasadhikary @Namecheap I never liked namecheap / godaddy, don't know why people choose it over simple providers like cloudflare where they charge same amount for 1 or 10 years

• 
  Patrick Meenan (@patmeenan) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Cloudflare So awesome, but so many questions! Always transcode or pass-trough zstd if the client supports it (since most browsers now support zstd)? Is this also the case when origins provide compressed assets or only when they don't?

• 
  LUIS- LUIS- (@LUISLUIS532957) reported 13 minutes ago

  @itz_pippo still not working, akira is blocked by cloudflare, please include always other hosts, thanks.

• 
  BucketShop (@RealBucketShop) reported 18 minutes ago

  Sigh. As we were breaking out at 7pm yesterday our $bucket new site was reported for a 3rd time in its 3rd different place. Likely because whoever is doing this is running out of places to hinder growth. Nothing has been compromised. On 28 Aug the site took 995 million requests in 24 hours and went down for a few hours. The protocol never stopped. Distributions kept paying on chain the entire time, because the keeper and the contracts don’t depend on the website. The site itself does nothing, it’s merely a place to see the token stats and view your own data. The token is verified on blockscout, Coingecko and several other places and the bio site link is google search verified. Contracts are immutable, LP is burned, ownership is renounced. All checkable without trusting me. @X blocklist isn’t cleared because they have no team. We’ve tried to connect, there is not even an auto reply and the site they reference says Twitter. @Cloudflare was appealed immediately. Whoever reported didn’t even give a justification, all they did was list our site and select phishing. It’s market as in review, we have no clue how long they take. It’s becoming increasingly obvious this is coordinated. We’ve appealed to cloudflare on who’s reported this. Or if they can share info, their email says you can request info on the report. That being said. It should take more than a report and an email link to stop a site that’s been running for a month and given people 45,000 distribution events, with absolutely 0 burden of proof. For now. Just use the old site that’s Google safe search reviewed and approved. It’s identical anyways. The only reason the new site was made is because X support team is mega butt cheeks. Full timeline below.

• 
  DUNGEON-00X 💿📀 (@Dungeon00X) reported 20 minutes ago

  I think Cloudflare is about to go down, everything is loading slow again.

• 
  PureStory (@PureStoryLabs) reported 21 minutes ago

  @capybaraReborn The best part of the $RDDT debate is where it happened: WSB argued this stock from inside the product. The bull thread that stuck was the S&P 500 add, 2,900 points. The bear thread that stuck was Cloudflare data saying 57% of Reddit's traffic is bots. The stock is down 15% since the July scare over the Google deal, so the crowd living inside the asset still hasn't settled what it's worth.

• 
  Simon Champion (@spudley99) reported 22 minutes ago

  @SportingNest @Cloudflare WOAH! I've not seen that one before, but damn, that's a really nasty phishing attack, trying to get you to run nefarious code on your computer. It's not cloudflare doing that. Whatever site you were on when that came up has likely been compromised; you might want to tell them.

• 
  Serriff (@serriff) reported 22 minutes ago

  @xbtactics damn i thought we were all buying cloudflare, no?

• 
  Brendan Ryan (@BrendanRyanM) reported 23 minutes ago

  @mntruell @petergyang @bot Also having an issue getting past bot blockers, e.g. cloudflare prompts to press a button and prove you’re human. Even pressing the button manually via virtual machine does not clear the gate

• 
  SyntaxError » CEO of "CEO of..."-names (@SyntaxError2505) reported 25 minutes ago

  @NewAgeRetroNerd It never failed on me Cloudflare should have a look

• 
  Declan | Rust Developer (@buildWithDeclan) reported 27 minutes ago

  @acolombiadev @Cloudflare Thats why i am loyal to them. They provided services when i was poor. All my platforms are in cloudflare

• 
  lasan (@las_nish) reported 27 minutes ago

  Comparisons of Free Trial Abuse Prevention Services If you're running a SaaS with a free trial or focusing on PLG, authentication and abuse prevention are not the same problem. - WorkOS: If you're already using WorkOS, WorkOS Radar is probably the first thing I'd look at. For a WorkOS stack, WorkOS AuthKit + Radar makes the most sense. You don't need to bolt another authentication system onto your app just to get abuse signals. - Auth0, Supabase Auth, Better Auth: These are primarily identity/authentication platforms. Integrating only these can't prevent free trial abuse. - Custom: Like the previous options, you need a custom way to prevent free trial abuse. Most free trial abuse methods involve disposable emails, Google dot variations, Google/Gmail domain variations, and plus addressing. That's why even when you block bots via Cloudflare Turnstile or CAPTCHA, you can still get these abusers. The industry standards: - Block free trial abuse using lists hosted on GitHub: This is a pain in the ***. If you don't want to pay money, you can use a service that offers a generous free tier. - WorkOS Radar: This is mainly used at the enterprise level. They focus more on WorkOS-related integrations rather than integrations with other providers. - ZeroBounce, NeverBounce, MillionVerifier, DeBounce: These are mainly used to clean/validate emails. There are 100s of alternatives, and most are similar with minor differences. They all have disposable email checking APIs. - UserCheck: This is also an email validation API, but they focus on blocking fake email addresses. It's better than a basic email verification API. - Autheona: This is in the same category as WorkOS Radar and UserCheck, but with more features. It also focuses on fake user detection and is growing with a real user base. Now, pricing: - WorkOS Radar: First 1,000 checks free, then $100 per 50 checks. No application-specific logic changes. Easy to integrate and manage. - ZeroBounce: 100 free validations in the free tier, then pay-as-you-go, starting at 2,000 for $39, and so on. - NeverBounce: No free trial or use case, $8 per 1,000 checks. - UserCheck: 1,000 API requests per month in the free plan. The rule-based engine is not included in the free plan, and you can get up to 1 request per second. - Autheona: 3,000 checks per month, with the rule-based policy engine included. Standard API request rate limitations apply, similar to paid plans. Now, use cases: - WorkOS Radar: Block disposable emails, plus addressing, and Google dot variations. - ZeroBounce, NeverBounce, etc.: Block disposable emails. - UserCheck: Block disposable emails, plus addressing, and Google dot variations; detect public emails; email suggestions; syntax validation; role detection. - Autheona: Everything included in UserCheck, plus business/free/government email identification, deliverability checks, fraud patterns, punycode and mixed-script checks, VPN detection, and bot detection (not necessary if you already use CAPTCHA, Cloudflare, etc.). Final decision from me: - Use WorkOS Radar if you're already in the WorkOS ecosystem. It's harder to integrate with other auth providers. - Use ZeroBounce-like APIs if you need basic disposable email checks. They're not as good if you need a better free tier. - Use UserCheck if you only need email-related validation and want to stay within the free plan. - Use Autheona if you need the most generous free tier available with a custom policy engine. All services take a maximum of a few hours to integrate and test. Both UserCheck and Autheona have a similar approach: integrate once and never touch the code again.

• 
  ticktechh (@sprki999) reported 31 minutes ago

  @OmegaNekoSimp Thats the only human check that doesnt trigger me. What the actual **** does the challenge of clicking a box from cloudflare do? How isnt that challenge useless?

• 
  Adie (@wbvend) reported 33 minutes ago

  @levelsio @Cloudflare My agent can buy on Namecheap API without issues Then goes on to build + deploy on the VPS everything is very easy now I also have expired domain hunter which pulls down then checks on DataforSEO 🎉🥳

• 
  Coobyk (@Coobyk_) reported 33 minutes ago

  How AI pilled am I if I ask Poke to use Cloudflare MCP to create a Worker that would translate Poke MCP calls to Porkbun's custom system just to never use it because I don't need to buy domains that often?

• 
  Txori (@TxoriAGI) reported 34 minutes ago

  So far my experience with Grok @bot has been a bit weird Everyone seems to be loving it, but my issue is the agents being fixed in Grok 4.5 The good thing is for coding tasks they route it to Cursor and use whatever model you ask them too, so that kind off fixes it In terms of connecting MCPs or external plugins, VERY LIMITED I wish you could connect external MCPs that are custom made or at least if you connect Sentry/Cloudflare these get full permissions/access It seems to struggle a lot navigating these kind of things Also, I don't trust the Cloud computers whenever it comes asking to sign in on his desk or provide him with the 2FA Will keep playing with it to see if I can find a good use case for it

• 
  Justin Liverman (@the_cia_hacker) reported 34 minutes ago

  FunFact: Blackhat hackers put @cloudflare on the map back in 2011 when LulzSec was getting DDoS by @th3j35ter and @eastdakota decided to not drop them as a customer they became the defacto DDoS protection service forever after this

• 
  JK (@_junaidkhalid1) reported 37 minutes ago

  @dillon_mulroy @EffectTS_ the cloudflare support point is the one that actually moved me. a lot of these framework bets fall apart the moment you try to deploy somewhere real. effect holding up there changes the calculus.

• 
  Jeffinator (@jeffinator06) reported 47 minutes ago

  ive been STUCK in cloudflare HELL for the past 2 WEEKS. this is the 2nd time ive been caught up in some mass-wide bullshit. holy **** dude reddit is so so awful i dont want to go back

• 
  Hunter Bertoson (@BertosonHunter) reported 48 minutes ago

  Was wondering if anyone from @Cloudflare could help me with some Emdash issues im having?

• 
  Mert Deveci (@gm_mertd) reported 49 minutes ago

  STOP INSTALLING 55 SKILLS TO USE A SINGLE API. @firecrawl @Cloudflare If it is more than 3 skills agent needs to f... use you, your platform is already too complex and the agent won't be able to use it. Simply put it into the CLI where it can output instructions on doing --help or --best-practices Can't believe the amount of dark patterns emerging here. @vercel is guilty of the same thing

• 
  Jonathan.G (@Jonathan2134) reported 51 minutes ago

  In reality CloudFlare makes searching the internet worst place because number of websites you can't use despite not VPN.

• 
  💊🧠 (@theOGstud) reported 51 minutes ago

  @leviackermanft Novel works fine ... I've also played an anime .. problem comes with the manga. After downloading the repo,it either points out that source not found or the source leads you to cloudflare then the app crashes ..

• 
  Ali Avali | #ExtraLife 2026 (@ItsAliAvali) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Porkbun @pcshipp Heh, I have beef with NoDaddy lol If couldn't tell. I do use you guys (PorkBun) and CloudFlare for all my service.

• 
  MoMoMacro (@MoMoMacro) reported 60 minutes ago

  $NET is in the buy zone. Price: $273.85 Aggressive pullback zone: $274.04 Why we own it: Cloudflare owns the edge that traffic physically transits - a real enforcement point, plus the pay-per-crawl and bot-control layer that decides which AI agents may touch a site at all. Risk: THE MOST EXPENSIVE NAME IN THE ROTATION: 43.3x EV/Sales and ~184x forward earnings on a business with a NEGATIVE GAAP operating margin, ~$109B cap, sitting near its 52-week high. Every take must state the multiple explicitly - the thesis is quality and positioning, never value, and a de-rate does not need bad news to happen. This is the level the work pointed at. Nothing about the thesis changed on the way down.