Cloudflare status: hosting issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Cloudflare reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Cloudflare users through our website.

• Cloud Services (58%)
• Hosting (25%)
• Domains (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Cloudflare outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Ahmedabad	Cloud Services	5 days ago
Le Puy-en-Velay	Cloud Services	6 days ago
Ann Arbor	Cloud Services	7 days ago
Palermo	Hosting	8 days ago
New York City	Hosting	17 days ago
New York City	Cloud Services	1 month ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  🔥🏴‍☠️CyberTechWolf🏴‍☠️🔥 (@CyberTechWolff) reported 3 minutes ago

  @ChaoticTKnight I'm gonna laugh if Cloudflare gets DDOSed or some **** because they wanna claim the Internet. Not everyone has to be hijacked by Cloudflare and I hope someone hacks their ******* **** I don't use these words a lot but the Internet might just have robophobia.

• 
  COLLINSEO (@alexcollinseo) reported 5 minutes ago

  Breaking news! Your site might start blocking AIs from September 15th.. And if you block them, you won't show up in AI answers. The good thing? It takes a sec to unblock! This setting is inside Cloudflare. You might not even know your website uses Cloudflare because it works in the background as a CDN, helping your website load faster. If you check your website using the tools I mention, you can find out whether Cloudflare is being used on your site. Cloudflare seems to have taken this step because of how AI companies are crawling websites, and honestly, I don't completely disagree with the reason behind it. But having AI crawlers automatically blocked from September 15 could be a problem if you want your business to appear in AI answers. The setting is inside Security Settings. Look for the AI crawler control and make sure it is set to allow rather than block. This is especially important if AI visibility is part of your strategy. With one of my clients, we went from zero to around 500 visitors from AI traffic in two months. And what I did was exactly what I explained in the video. If your AI crawlers are blocked, you're potentially closing the door on that traffic before it even has a chance to reach you. #SEO #DigitalMarketing 👇🏼 Comment VIDEO for the FULL VIDEO BREAKDOWN

• 
  Sathz_நிலன் (@nilan_sathz) reported 6 minutes ago

  Stopping the bad guys with Cloudflare: 212 malicious requests blocked or challenged in the last month #cloudflare

• 
  robot 2.0 (@alightinastorm) reported 6 minutes ago

  2 weeks of prompting can build this now, in the browser, no platform fees, no pre-downloading gigabytes, stream as you play is it AAA? no is it low poly slop? no can you build real games with it? you absolutely can stop inventing bullshit about distribution, what distribution do you get from steam? ZERO, that's why you hire marketers to run guerilla campaigns on social media, streamers to hype it up and backdoor some cash to youtubers to pump it on release week You can do the same for the web, your likes and followers on X are your wishlist Pay stripe 3% instead of 30%, throw a couple $$ to cloudflare for traffic Or keep betting on steam and die a slow painful corporate death

• 
  David Oks (@davideoks) reported 11 minutes ago

  @inoutremer @CharlieTyson1 this type of thing is solved by hosting on e.g. Cloudflare. pieces going modestly viral like Wilson's or Oyler's did shouldn't crash a modern web site! presumably they just have terrible IT. (but a quite wonderfully designed website IMO)

• 
  Durp  (@durpsick) reported 11 minutes ago

  This will happen in the span of 30 days. We will also be adding • Accounts (if you wanna make one) • backed server support • meny charity's • better service support Everything listed will also be supported by Cloudflare Security!

• 
  William Bello (@belljobs94) reported 12 minutes ago

  THE GOAT on their free service !! @Cloudflare hands down

• 
  Adsy (@adsydeveloper) reported 13 minutes ago

  @backblaze Dashboard having issues? Cloudflare errors indicating host down (and was ~20s response time just before)

• 
  Ali Avali | #ExtraLife 2026 (@ItsAliAvali) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Porkbun @pcshipp Heh, I have beef with NoDaddy lol If couldn't tell. I do use you guys (PorkBun) and CloudFlare for all my service.

• 
  Saeid Shahriari (@saeidshahriari) reported 15 minutes ago

  Stopping the bad guys with Cloudflare: 16,098 malicious requests blocked or challenged in the last month #cloudflare

• 
  Α Ω Programmer (@OmegaNekoSimp) reported 16 minutes ago

  @sneedistan Cloudflare proetects terorrist oeganizations and will badically threaten to destroy your company if you don't pay them more money. They are a disgusting company. **** them. Also the Linux Kernel uses this.

• 
  Ryan Chandler (@ryangjchandler) reported 16 minutes ago

  Both sites get loaded in a headless browser on a Cloudflare Worker. Page weight and request count come from the real network log when the site loads, probably the most accurate way to retrieve this information.

• 
  Girish (@spectragai) reported 17 minutes ago

  @UthaaleReDeva @acolombiadev @Cloudflare It serves different purposes. But I’m just answering the post: name a generous free tier service

• 
  Austin (@IamAroke) reported 24 minutes ago

  @nickstewart_ Cloudflare went down because of a regex. That's not a joke, that actually happened.

• 
  junebnunny (@junebnunny_) reported 25 minutes ago

  @SportingNest @Cloudflare This is a click fix attack. Do not run the code. Do not do ctrl V. Do not do Windows plus R. You will lose all of your data. You will get scammed. Your bitcoins will be taken.

• 
  Hanif Carroll (@HanifCarroll) reported 28 minutes ago

  At a previous job, I was lucky to work with a staff-level front-end engineer who was very good at what he did and thorough like no one else I had worked with. I didn’t always appreciate that thoroughness. At first, I found it maddening. Meetings with product and design would drag on because he always had an enormous list of questions about whatever feature we were discussing. I was usually eager to finish the meeting and start coding. It took me a while to understand that he wasn’t making the process longer. He was asking the questions we would otherwise have to answer halfway through development, when an unanswered question could block the feature or send it in the wrong direction. Every unanswered question holds an assumption, and that assumption might not match what product or design had in mind. I thought about him recently while reviewing the search process for Casamo, a product I’m building to help people compare furnished stays. Before changing the code, I started asking questions: Why were we processing listings already known to be over the user’s budget? Why were hotel-like properties entering the process when the user had asked for an entire place? Why did we stop after finding six suitable stays if ten were available? How old could a review be before it stopped being useful evidence? Those questions exposed decisions that had been made when Casamo ran on a low-powered VPS and needed to do as little work as possible. They didn’t all make sense now that the product runs on Cloudflare. We changed the search process to reject known mismatches earlier, treat six results as the minimum rather than the target, continue until it finds ten suitable stays, and only use reviews from the previous year as evidence. If I had started coding immediately, I probably would have made the existing process faster without questioning whether it was still the right process. I don’t know if I’ll ever have as many questions as he did, but now I understand what he was protecting us from.

• 
  Blockchain Daily News (@blckchaindaily) reported 29 minutes ago

  🚨 CLOUDFLARE $NET EXPANDS AI AGENT SUPPORT, NOW RUNS CURSOR CLOUD AGENTS ON CLOUDFLARE SANDBOXES FOR CUSTOMER-CONTROLLED EXECUTION - PRESS RELEASE

• 
  Witch Cult Translations (@WCTranslations) reported 30 minutes ago

  We're aware our site is experiencing increased load times again. This is due to increased traffic following the episode and issues with our Cloudflare integration. Unfortunately, we can't do much right now to improve load times, so please be patient and try not to spam refresh.

• 
  BucketShop (@RealBucketShop) reported 32 minutes ago

  Sigh. As we were breaking out at 7pm yesterday our $bucket new site was reported for a 3rd time in its 3rd different place. Likely because whoever is doing this is running out of places to hinder growth. Nothing has been compromised. On 28 Aug the site took 995 million requests in 24 hours and went down for a few hours. The protocol never stopped. Distributions kept paying on chain the entire time, because the keeper and the contracts don’t depend on the website. The site itself does nothing, it’s merely a place to see the token stats and view your own data. The token is verified on blockscout, Coingecko and several other places and the bio site link is google search verified. Contracts are immutable, LP is burned, ownership is renounced. All checkable without trusting me. @X blocklist isn’t cleared because they have no team. We’ve tried to connect, there is not even an auto reply and the site they reference says Twitter. @Cloudflare was appealed immediately. Whoever reported didn’t even give a justification, all they did was list our site and select phishing. It’s market as in review, we have no clue how long they take. It’s becoming increasingly obvious this is coordinated. We’ve appealed to cloudflare on who’s reported this. Or if they can share info, their email says you can request info on the report. That being said. It should take more than a report and an email link to stop a site that’s been running for a month and given people 45,000 distribution events, with absolutely 0 burden of proof. For now. Just use the old site that’s Google safe search reviewed and approved. It’s identical anyways. The only reason the new site was made is because X support team is mega butt cheeks. Full timeline below.

• 
  Coobyk (@Coobyk_) reported 33 minutes ago

  How AI pilled am I if I ask Poke to use Cloudflare MCP to create a Worker that would translate Poke MCP calls to Porkbun's custom system just to never use it because I don't need to buy domains that often?

• 
  Tang Vu (@tangvu_dev) reported 34 minutes ago

  In the Vietnam 100-VU burst, Cloudflare averaged 191.77 ms vs Vercel’s 430.95 ms. P95 was 337.11 vs 879.96 ms, with 0% errors on both. But cross-region burst tests reversed the winner in the same regions as the warm tests.

• 
  🍄 DO NOT FOLLOW TIMO 😈 (@liltechnomancer) reported 36 minutes ago

  @thdxr Because you have process issues. If you didn't extensions would work on cloudflare.

• 
  Gaylord (@laolu_afolabi) reported 38 minutes ago

  @lanreadelowo From Claude: """ Technically, yes — it's buildable, and "platform-agnostic" is realistic because most providers and gateways (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, etc.) have already converged on an OpenAI-compatible schema, so a routing layer that swaps providers behind one endpoint isn't a huge engineering lift. But there are a few things in the premise worth stress-testing before you build. **The "discount arbitrage" framing is a bit shakier than it sounds.** Most of these gateways aren't reselling models at a discount — they're reselling at close to list price plus a fee. While OpenRouter states it doesn't mark up inference pricing, its credit purchase fee effectively acts as a surcharge on all usage. LiteLLM's pitch is the opposite direction — zero markup by self-hosting, with OpenRouter's ~5% fee costing meaningfully more at scale. So the "discounts" you'd be arbitraging are less "provider A is cheaper than provider B for the same model" and more: rate-limited free tiers, short-lived promos, or BYOK arrangements — OpenRouter's BYOK is free up to a monthly allowance before a 5% fee kicks in. Those are real, but they're capacity-constrained and often disappear once volume shows up — hard to build a durable business on chasing them. **The bigger product risk: tokens/models aren't fungible.** Swapping Gemini for Claude for GPT under one endpoint isn't like arbitraging cloud spot instances — different tokenizers (so "$/token" isn't apples-to-apples), different tool-calling formats, different output style and capability. If your router silently reroutes a customer's traffic to whatever's cheapest this hour, you can quietly degrade the app built on top of it. That's the actual hard problem, not the proxying. **What's actually working in production right now is narrower than blind price-routing:** AT&T processes tens of billions of tokens a day using cache-aware routers that send simpler tasks to cheaper models, cutting costs up to 56% with only ~2% quality degradation, and this "model cascade" pattern — cheap/fast models handle the default case, only escalating to a frontier model when a confidence check fails — is used by both AT&T's LiteLLM-based router and Databricks' Smart Router. That's routing by task-fit with cost as a constraint, not routing purely by whoever's running a promo this week. **Competitive landscape is already crowded**: OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, Requesty, Helicone, Not Diamond, Martian, TrueFoundry, Cloudflare AI Gateway, Ofox all do some flavor of unified-endpoint routing today, several with automatic fallback/cost-based rules already built in. Pure discount-hunting is a thin moat — anyone can scrape pricing pages, and providers may treat aggressive arbitrage-only usage as a ToS problem. Where I'd actually look for a wedge if I were you: quality-aware routing with an audit trail (so teams can trust that "cheaper" didn't mean "worse" for their specific task), rather than price-only arbitrage. """

• 
  ticktechh (@sprki999) reported 38 minutes ago

  @OmegaNekoSimp Thats the only human check that doesnt trigger me. What the actual **** does the challenge of clicking a box from cloudflare do? How isnt that challenge useless?

• 
  Anthony Lambert (@AnthonyTBM) reported 40 minutes ago

  @jb_ma @sb_chadi Yes, but I've never had CloudFlare request a terminal command sequence. I think most people will be immediately on guard if that occurred after clicking their human status?

• 
  Drew Lemacks (@TheBaconFather) reported 43 minutes ago

  @PancakesRevenge No, I use cloudflare to tunnel. I don't have any open ports on my network.

• 
  junebnunny (@junebnunny_) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Gion_the_critic @SportingNest @Cloudflare It's a click fix attack

• 
  shownotover (@shownotover) reported 49 minutes ago

  @adnaannasir_ Does Cloudflare really provide hosting? I have never tried it.

• 
  HandsomeHank (@HandsomeHank_) reported 52 minutes ago

  Last night through this afternoon I was pushing Reed (Bot) to maximize my usage after the free reset. I had another reset today at 2pm. I had him create and edit multiple trailers, merge two old websites into one with a new theme, host it on Cloudflare, and create and link a Square store. Then I had him use Printful to recreate old designs from the other site that were never really finished. We also updated a current site so it stays current until we switch over. Reed ended up bringing in another bot (Jules) to help so we could finish before 2pm. Both of them worked hard and stopped at 1:56 so I wouldn’t burn into the next allotment. I have other uses for this week. They left notes to pick it back up if I have extra usage left. Very pleased with their work. @bot @grok 🔥

• 
  Gabriel | Algo Trading (@gabrielrockson_) reported 55 minutes ago

  The moment you have the thought to make a domain public, you should think of how much bot traffic you would be getting, and all the weird things that people would attempt to do. Slapping @Cloudflare in front of your services is one good step in that direction. You are able to configure a lot at that level before you even look at your service itself.