Is Cloudflare down?
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Cloudflare is a company that provides DDoS mitigation, content delivery network (CDN) services, security and distributed DNS services. Cloudflare's services sit between the visitor and the Cloudflare user's hosting provider, acting as a reverse proxy for websites.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Cloudflare reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Cloudflare. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Cloudflare users through our website.
-
Cloud Services (47%)
-
Domains (28%)
-
Hosting (12%)
-
Web Tools (11%)
-
E-mail (3%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Cloudflare outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | ||
| Domains | ||
| Domains | ||
| Cloud Services | ||
| Hosting | ||
| Domains |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Cloudflare Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
The Laughing Burger
(@TheLaughingBurg) reported
@WSmith01984 @Nervardia @Cloudflare Ngl, I'm not suprised. They're the type of company to do that ****
-
Cringe Limbs James 🌈🇺🇦🌈🇺🇦🌈🇺🇦🌈🇺🇦🌈🇺🇦
(@BidenSuperfan1) reported
Lol twitter has turned off Keffals perma trending after they got BTFO'd by cloudflare Funny how that works, huh. The useful idiot is now no use
-
Arian van Putten 🇳🇱♥️🇺🇦
(@ProgrammerDude) reported
The whole argument holds on whether CloudFlare is an "Access Provider" (e.g. a caching service) or a Hosting Provider. As the protection is only valid for "Access Providers".
-
Mason Kortz
(@NCPtarmigan) reported
Anyway, I doubt this tweet will change anyone's mind, least of all Cloudflare's, but I think we should be careful to distinguish between moral censorship (bad) and harm mitigation (good). End 🧵.
-
mynd
(@myndxero) reported
@keffals When replies are locked and all you can do is quote tweet, not really sure if you can consider that a true ratio? I quote tweeted in support of cloudflare standing their ground against a grifter chasing internet clout.
-
Mason Kortz
(@NCPtarmigan) reported
I agree that Cloudflare role in the internet stack means it would be dangerous to deny service based on purely moral disagreements. That could lead to the kind of abuse of power they want to avoid.
-
Mason Kortz
(@NCPtarmigan) reported
Cloudflare's post talks about the dangers of denying service based on moral judgement. It mentions "reprehensible" and "disgusting" content, and analogizes to firefighters deny protection to "people who do not possess sufficient moral character."
-
Lana ✨🐶 they/them/goodboy
(@itslanabee) reported
I know @keffals has been (rightfully imo) going after @Cloudflare and i just wanna add that they also support sites that regularly post revenge porn and stolen paid content and leaked videos from non consenting parties. They don’t accept DMCAs or removal requests.
-
pearshapes
(@pearshapes) reported
cloudflare shares currently at 62.5~ USD, down from 75 before the start of the KF takedown campaign abt 2 weeks ago this is affecting cloudflare's bottom line and if they choose to die on the hill they've placed themselves upon, their stocks will not follow them up there
-
0xArchitect
(@0xArchitect) reported
@hudsonjameson The most morally correct decision is complete network neutrality. What CloudFlare is experiencing is the same slippery slope bird app and other platforms experience. Once you break that seal, down the slope you go. The decision to burn the keys is the only morally correct one.
-
MaximumChess
(@Maximum_Chess) reported
@e_urq So if I sue #cloudflare to strip them of Section 230 protection, you'll help me offset the costs? Or is it just my actions and your mouth on the team?
-
Lucy. (Sorrowful)
(@sorrowfulwrites) reported
I don't really have a specific thing to say about the cloudflare thing except to say that this is a company which consistently provides services to the worst possible groups it can out of principle, and it cannot be claimed that it's not a conscious choice on their part.
-
kitten with a whip
(@spaceandguns) reported
maybe I'm naive but @Cloudflare's response seems to have lit up more controversy than it put out. @eastdakota really ****** up this statement, bad. if anything, breaking the silence for *this* is going to motivate people even more. truly a hell of their own creation
-
Zurab Akhvlediani
(@deadlyembrace6) reported
Stopping the bad guys with Cloudflare: 827,542 malicious requests blocked or challenged in the last month #cloudflare #CyberSecurity
-
Daniel Micay
(@DanielMicay) reported
@Euclaise_ Cloudflare banned Switter from using their DDoS protection which is provided as part of their caching reverse proxy. Cloudflare's main service is the reverse proxy. They weren't hosting Switter, they were proxying to it, which they say doesn't count as hosting the content.
-
Daniel Micay
(@DanielMicay) reported
@hisokussy Cloudflare says both Kiwi Farms and previously Switter are in violation of the same terms of service. The difference is that Cloudflare now says the terms of service doesn't apply to their reverse proxy as their reasoning for not banning Kiwi Farms despite it being in violation.
-
Daniel Micay
(@DanielMicay) reported
@Euclaise_ Cloudflare's pull-based CDN (caching reverse proxy) is what provides DDoS protection. That's the service which they banned Switter from using. They were not the ones hosting the origin servers for Switter. That's not part of what Cloudflare provides to websites.
-
Bräd
(@BradleyMassen) reported
@daphnehk @Cloudflare @eastdakota Are you slow? Strong move? Wtf
-
ErikTheBearik
(@ErikTheBearik) reported
Definitely a case of poor leadership and negligence for @cloudflare to prioritize sticking with a hate group over their own stockholders, but what can you do? Besides sell, obviously.
-
Jinnie
(@jiangtu0916) reported
Cloudflare outage affects multiple crypto exchanges . Users attempting to visit certain websites were met with a “500 Internal Server Error” notice due to a Cloudflare outage.
-
Jørn 💛💙
(@jornane_no) reported
@nuintari I see many tweets form other people "Hey <at>Cloudflare! Please stop hosting Ki\/\/iF/\rms, I love your service, kthxbye <3" while (1) Cloudflare has been problematic for many years for different reasons and (2) The only sensible thing is to stop using their service; free or paid
-
Mason Kortz
(@NCPtarmigan) reported
However, that does not mean Cloudflare should ignore the actual impact of the sites it protects. I think it would be entirely reasonable for Cloudflare to deny service to sites that cause harm - for example, doxxing and swatting people.
-
Daniel Micay
(@DanielMicay) reported
@Euclaise_ Cloudflare's DDoS protection is provided by their caching reverse proxy, which hosts content on their edge nodes and serves it from there. There is no separation between Cloudflare's CDN and DDoS protection. It's the same service. They do not provide a traditional web hosting.
-
🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️Geo🟠🌤
(@GeoCyberwolf) reported
i am joining the entire internet in saying "oh for **** sake cloudflare"
-
John
(@lackingdev) reported
@eevee it's also pretty easy to draw some lines "DNS providers"; actual providers can and do censor, but root servers don't (which is good). in the 'free market' we live in, ultimately, cloudflare will decide based off of the demand of their customer base as a whole.
-
danedevalcourt
(@danedevalcourt) reported
Hey @Cloudflare your response regarding Kiwi Farms is abhorrent. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Put me down as another network engineer who will never work with your service again. You are complicit!
-
Daniel Micay
(@DanielMicay) reported
@hisokussy Cloudflare says both Kiwi Farms and previously Switter are in violation of the same terms of service. The difference is that Cloudflare now says the terms of services doesn't apply to their reverse proxy as their reasoning for not banning Kiwi Farms despite it being in violation.
-
MyLittlePersona
(@MLPersona) reported
@keffals But you yourself support cloudflare??
-
mummaofarchie
(@katiejaygee) reported
@shiftygeek @Becs Hmmm. I need to look them up and figure out if any aps I use are cloudflare based. Kiwi farms need shutting down as soon as possible.
-
Harmful Opinions
(@HurtfulOnions) reported
@LightningShade0 Two things: The example they're sharing is from back in 2018, close to the time they cut off the other sites they mention in their post - which they say was incorrect to have done. In the case of Switter, cloudflare *wanted* to continue providing service[...]