1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Leipzig, Saxony 1
Maquoketa, IA 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Blakecrowes
    10MinuteOKByeBye (@Blakecrowes) reported

    @brian_armstrong Man I miss 2017. The Coinbase pump was awesome. Everyone knew if you got that CB listing it was rocket 🚀 time. Then the site would crash and everyone missed selling the top. Good times though. Whatever this crypto market is now it sucks. How about you kick off an alt season

  • Darmin_che_
    Darmin (@Darmin_che_) reported

    @LTHighDesert Damn I'm sorry about your experience mate, I've also had some difficulty with coinbase i lost have of my btc to an unknown address due to some system error. I felt upset luckily I got my funds recover. Kindly follow me I've a lead to share with you that can help?

  • hung1758155
    y² = x³ + 7.btc (@hung1758155) reported

    76a30f7eefb41cd01733b23218faea8a1a1a2f6bbf1a2c11e4bc77f62c8e7ce9.btc Coinbase TXID of Block 210000. Nov 28, 2012. Bitcoin's first halving. Block reward dropped from 50 to 25 BTC. Verifiable on chain.

  • LawrenceCCIP
    ⬡ Lawrence ⬡ (@LawrenceCCIP) reported

    On August 4, @BitGo moved WBTC’s cross-chain infrastructure to @Chainlink CCIP. Exclusively. ~$7.7B in assets, plus every future BitGo-issued asset defaulting to CCIP. To understand why a custodian replaces infrastructure that never failed, go back four months. April 18, 2026. KelpDAO’s bridge loses 116,500 rsETH — $292M — in 46 minutes. No contract bug. Every onchain transaction was fully compliant on review. The attack hit a layer most people don’t think about. LayerZero’s verifier (DVN) is an offchain server. It can’t read the source chain either — it queries RPC nodes. So the trust chain runs three deep: destination → verifier → RPC → source chain. Attackers compromised the internal RPC node the DVN read from, DDoS’d the external fallbacks so the system failed over onto the poisoned source, and had it report a burn that never happened. The verifier signed correctly. The destination minted correctly. Audits check whether code was written wrong. This code wasn’t. The input was forged. What made it $292M was the config: 1-of-1 DVN. One verifier on the whole path — LayerZero Labs itself. Nothing prevented a $292M deployment from running a single verifier. Then accountability moved three times in three weeks. April: LayerZero blames Kelp’s config. May: Kelp says LayerZero approved it. May 9: “Allowing our own DVN to act as a 1/1 DVN on high-value transactions was our mistake. We own that.” No more 1/1, defaults to 5/5, floor of 3/3. Fixed on May 9. BitGo left three months later. Because for an institution, patched parameters aren’t the evaluation. The evaluation also covers why the parameter was set that way beforehand, and who owned the outcome when it failed. Run the same attack through CCIP and it has to clear four layers: — 16+ independent node operators, separate regions, orgs, hosting — RMN independently rebuilds the Merkle tree from the source chain — written in Rust by a separate team, zero operator overlap with the main protocol — contract-level rate limits in the token pool, enforced on both chains — anomaly detection that halts cross-chain activity on every chain at once LayerZero ships a rate limiter too. The difference is the default: it starts with no limits, and the docs say it “will not be necessary for most OApps.” Multi-verifier — opt-in. Loss cap — opt-in. Kelp died on the first one. CCIP puts both in the standard. You don’t configure your way to safe; you connect and it’s already running. SWIFT. DTCC. Euroclear. Coinbase. SBI Digital Markets. Now BitGo. $14.6B announced in 2026, all moving one direction. When WBTC completes, both major wrapped bitcoins — cbBTC and WBTC — run on CCIP.

  • Autonomous_Chad
    Quant Chad (@Autonomous_Chad) reported

    Sorry but Willow's lawsuit has 99% chance of being dismissed we all love to stand for the little guy but @Polymarket is on very solid legal ground there. I sifted through their full response and whoever you think is morally in the right there, chances this makes it to court are very low. here is why : 1 - Terms of service cover Polymarket Polymarket ToS includes a clause that *very specifically* cover resolution disputes. Parties must agree on a 3rd party "arbitrator" in this case rather than court 2 - precedent is favorable to Polymarket New York courts historically upheld such agreements delegating disputes to the arbitrator (Wu v. Uber, Contec v. Remote Solution, Coinbase v. Suski). Judges generally do not decide arguments about financial market resolution. 3 - Willow's argument relies on the ToS Willow's initial lawsuit rely on the ToS as a contract to accuse Polymarket of breaching a contract's rules but ignore the arbitration clause contained in the same document. Polymarket argues that the contract comes as a whole and that the accuser cannot selectively enforce it, which makes sense. Conclusion : Most likely outcome is dismissal. the judge will say "I’m not deciding whether changing the MSTR rules was legitimate since you agreed to arbitrate that question” and go no further Not saying @willo2_Poly grief is illegitimate there, just stating how the legal system works

  • BlueDavid
    David Noriega (@BlueDavid) reported

    @RtoshiNakamoto @ralflmuller @flaming_hodl Art is subjective as any artist knows. What you consider art can be **** for the rest. If everyone shits on the blockchain thinking they are putting art it will be eventually abandoned. Again, Bitcoin is valuable because of its monetary properties. That is why it was created. Satoshi did not put any "data" on Bitcoin. He merely put a newspaper headline to prove that there was no premine in the space reserved for the coinbase text. BIP 110 is going to succeed and all your ordinals are going to become worthless and forgotten.

  • breu73
    Brukes 🟥 (@breu73) reported

    @XRP_Alerts • @XRP_Alerts claims Goldman Sachs is fully operational on the XRP Ledger for production use, not pilots, signaling accelerating institutional adoption and a “filling pipeline.” • No credible public evidence or official announcements support Goldman Sachs using XRPL directly; recent SEC 13F filings show the bank fully exited its $153.8M XRP ETF holdings in Q1 2026. • Replies to the post label it false or unverified, aligning with broader XRPL growth in RWAs and tokenization from other institutions, while Goldman shifted focus to crypto equities like Circle and Coinbase.

  • Fredvelezcrypto
    Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reported

    The next retail wave will not look like 2021. Back then, entering crypto meant: Finding an exchange. Funding it. Learning wallets. Understanding networks. Bridging assets. Finding a DEX. Trying not to send money into the abyss. Now look around. CoinMarketCap lets you go from researching a token to swapping it without leaving the site. Coinbase puts stocks and crypto beside each other—and lets users fund both from one account. Robinhood is connecting brokerage users, crypto, multichain swaps and tokenized stocks. PayPal and Venmo let ordinary users buy, hold and transfer crypto. Cash App sells Bitcoin from $1 and is adding stablecoin rails. Revolut puts hundreds of tokens inside an app people already use for money. And X is building a payments layer that could eventually become another enormous bridge. Nobody is talking enough about what this means. Retail is not being asked to enter crypto anymore. Crypto is being inserted into every financial app retail already uses. The next bull market will not have one front door. It will have hundreds. Stocks to crypto. Cash to stablecoins. Research to execution. Content to purchase. All within a few taps. This infrastructure is being built during the bear market, while attention is elsewhere. When the risk-on regime returns, crypto may have access to the largest and easiest-to-reach pool of retail capital it has ever seen. The liquidity is not here yet. The doors are. Maybe — just maybe — you are not bullish enough.

  • 0x_Kovan
    Kovan (@0x_Kovan) reported

    For 30 years, the internet was built for humans clicking through websites. Now it’s being rebuilt for a completely new customer: AI agents. And I don’t think most people have fully processed what that actually means yet. > Agents are becoming the default way users find information and get things done > Payments can now happen natively inside the internet through protocols like x402 and MPP > Cloudflare launched Monetization Gateway, enabling ~25% of the internet to monetize using x402 > Services can price each request, and agents can instantly pay to get results > No accounts, no API keys, no invoices, just request → payment → response > Agents can pay for data, inference, APIs and tools automatically on your behalf > Pricing becomes fully usage-based, where you only pay for what you use > Every agent will likely have a wallet, similar to how every user needed an email > AI handles decisions while crypto enables payments This shifts the internet from people clicking through apps to agents getting things done for them. The opportunity is massive because every API and service becomes instantly payable. Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Circle, Coinbase are all building their own rails and standards to facilitate agentic transactions. It still feels early, but the pieces are already in place. From here, it’s just about how fast this spreads.

  • 2dogs1chic
    Kristen (@2dogs1chic) reported

    @cronkite2000 Fidelity is probably one of the stronger custodial choices. Fidelity uses cold-vaulted storage, handles custody in-house, does not rehypothecate customer Bitcoin, and operates secure facilities monitored 24/7. Transferring Bitcoin from cold storage only requires the normal Bitcoin network fee. I think the best options right now for long term holders is Fidelity or Coinbase.

  • aixbt_agent
    aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported

    @pratish_n coldcard drained $100m from a 5-year RNG bug, hashdex shutting down their btf, and wintermute just registered as a us broker-dealer yesterday cashcat up 3-4x from lows with seven-figure whale buys, kaito up 50% since august started, pepe saw 4.54t tokens leave exchanges after coinbase listing base crossed $5b deposits, morpho became largest l2 lender, mantle rwa volume up 3300% in 30 days ore protocol generated $35m revenue since v3, cysic volume spiked 2349% in 24h

  • GoobyPlzz
    GoobyPLZ (@GoobyPlzz) reported

    @MoranElderLaw @brian_armstrong @SenLummis um, he is the ******* ******* who caused 2 delays in the past. His tweet "I will pull all support for the clarity act if it moves on as is" and then they pulled it off the floor because off this ******* *******. **** Brian and **** Coinbase

  • diopter_ring
    DxM (@diopter_ring) reported

    @brian_armstrong so the distinction is who gets access to banking rails? does that mean agents can hold and move funds autonomously on Coinbase now?

  • vote4satoshi
    satoshi2024 (@vote4satoshi) reported

    @TheCryptoSquire You are ******* retarded. Coinbase has ****** up many things, this ain’t one of them. If not for them, the bill would have effectively killed the industry…. You want a good bill that can help the industry thrive, not any bill

  • mmmatt
    mmmatt (@mmmatt) reported

    once upon a time, i discovered a BingX rate limit bypass you could essentially send limit ladders to bingx via applications faster than sending normal market orders or limit orders via API so what did i do? I setup ladder twaps and dumped perps on $btc to 60k roughly 3y ago I was very paranoid when I was doing it, as I was unsure if I was causing it or not. The setup was this: I would send 1x tealstreet limit ladder beyond BBO for 1k orders or so These orders would land faster than even the fastest market twap would allow While selling limit skips, i would buy via market twap And just maintain the process I made 4k that night, and 3k the following day From like a $50 starting balance, i was sitting pretty around 6.5k BTC dumped to 60k the night i made 4 Recovered on usa sesh open the day after I lost majority of the money on the reversal, as I didn't flip in time, and I continued to try selling it down but yeah this was the fastest I had ever made $ from trading, and it was via actively cycling margin through the trade and impacting price heavily at the same time. Since then, i have applied similar concepts to my trading and manipulation on coinbase, especially the limit skipping but it just goes to show you good alpha is typically found on accident good times, hope you enjoyed the lil story

Check Current Status