Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| West Liberty, KY | 1 |
| Cardiff, Wales | 1 |
| Palo Verde, Coclé | 3 |
| City of Humble, TX | 1 |
| Houston, TX | 1 |
| Manhattan, NY | 1 |
| Pike Creek Valley, DE | 1 |
| East Flatbush, NY | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
G (@G_Kurupt) reportedPayPal gives me a ****** exchange rate, high fees, forces me to KYC yet still freezes a received transfer for 3 weeks, then coinbase won't let me pay with PayPal without linking a bank account waiting another 3-5 business days. Why does coinbase care if i've linked a bank account if i have a PayPal balance? Unacceptable! What a ****** experience. **** PayPal and coinbase!
-
Calin Polo 🏴 (@CalinPolo) reported@mr_cata @shawdog0311 Coinbase and other exchanges same time. Ada slow AF
-
𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨𝐂𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞 (@CacheTrading) reported$BTC This Should Be Illegal (Coinbase) CHECK THIS OUT... Every weekday at exactly 4pm EST, Coinbase reduces their traders margin (often forcing closed positions). When this occurs, Coinbase positions themselves for the day ahead. Same thing occurred yesterday at 6pm EST. Look at the wick down on CB, and the instant buys shortly after. Forcing shorts to liquidate. HIGHLY SUSPECT!
-
Mike Buckley (@MikeBuckle62890) reported@coinbase Guess I’m taking my money somewhere **** your garbage dei company
-
Chris Westmeyer (@gconnors2) reported@rizur1zu @coinbase So sorry about that! Hit my messages and let me know what's going on so we can fix it
-
Stephane Clousier (@joselpatriota) reported@0xBellinili @coinbase @HyperliquidX Is supported already. Do you need help?
-
Carlos (@0xcarlosg) reportedWhen I wrote about Derive in March, the core thesis was that the protocol was better positioned than at any point in its history: options volumes were reaching new highs, RFQ activity was breaking out, BTC options share vs. Deribit was improving, and HYPE was emerging as proof that Derive could move faster than incumbents on new asset coverage. The open question was whether that momentum would translate into more durable revenue growth. Last week, Derive generated an all-time high of $110K in weekly revenue, net of maker rebates, across options and perps. Options remained the most profitable part of the protocol, reaching an all-time high of $62.5K in weekly revenue while maintaining gross margins above 90%. This continues to support the view that options are Derive’s higher-margin product, even as perps become increasingly important to the broader exchange. Perps also had their strongest week on record, generating $47.7K in revenue net of rebates, with gross margin improving to 65% from below 50% in recent weeks. Some of that was helped by downside volatility, with the past three weeks contributing roughly $35K in liquidation fees. The volume side tells a similar story. Derive recorded $702M in notional volume last week, its second-highest weekly total over the past year. But the important difference is composition. In March, volume was heavily BTC-led, with BTC accounting for more than 70% of total options and perps volume. Last week, BTC accounted for 46%, followed by ETH at 29% and HYPE at 26%. HYPE has now become Derive’s most important market after BTC, surpassing ETH in monthly volume in March and accounting for more than 2x ETH volume in May. That said, ETH also saw a notable resurgence last week, breaking $200M in weekly volume for the first time in well over a year. The relative valuation setup has also improved. Despite DRV trading near all-time highs, its 30-day annualized P/S multiple has compressed from above 50x in early March to roughly 25x today. In other words, revenue has accelerated faster than market cap. There have also been token-level improvements. DRV was listed on Coinbase two weeks ago, improving the asset’s liquidity profile. Derive also completed its B1 token transparency filing in May, further improving disclosure around the token, which remains the only way to gain upside to the protocol’s growth. Finally, Derive’s late-April governance proposal flipped DRV’s net structural flows from negative to positive. The proposal increased the share of protocol fees used for buybacks from 25% to 35%, while reducing staking emissions from 250K DRV to 100K DRV per week. At current prices, buybacks exceed emissions by roughly $70K per month, more than fully absorbing emission-driven sell pressure. The case for onchain options remains clear. As crypto markets mature, demand for more sophisticated hedging and structured positioning should continue to grow, and Derive is increasingly leading that charge.
-
Coinbase Singapore 🛡️ (@CoinbaseSG) reportedBitcoin’s market cap is over $1 trillion. But what actually gives Bitcoin value? It comes down to three core fundamentals. Watch Episode 1 of Coinbase Crypto Basics as we break them down ↓
-
Benzinga (@Benzinga) reportedCoinbase $COIN CEO Brian Armstrong says investors are still looking at crypto too narrowly as Bitcoin $BTC sells off sharply. Bitcoin was trading around $60,066 at the time of the report, down about 18% over the past week and nearly 26% over the past month. The selloff has reignited concerns about the broader crypto market, but Armstrong pushed back on the idea that Bitcoin weakness means crypto as a whole is weak. In a post on X, he said people still “think or feel” that because Bitcoin is down, all of crypto is down. Armstrong argued the industry has expanded far beyond Bitcoin, pointing to growth in derivatives, perpetual futures, stablecoins and prediction markets. Polymarket, for example, runs on Polygon $POL and uses USDC $USDC for wagers, showing how crypto infrastructure is increasingly tied to markets beyond simple token speculation. Armstrong said crypto now touches every area of finance and that it will take time for investors to fully understand that shift. He also made clear he remains bullish on Bitcoin, calling it “as important as ever” and saying the current decline is one of many cycles long-time crypto participants have seen. The takeaway: Bitcoin is still the headline asset, but Armstrong says the crypto economy is becoming much broader than $BTC alone.
-
travis (@travis305182) reported@EleanorTerrett Failing. Never gonna pass. 59 yes votes. Mccain 2.0 thumbs down coming from primary losers at the very last second just to say whats up. Nothing getting done from here on out. Crypto lost and coinbase gets the win w status quo.
-
Onur 🍌🦍 (@0xc06) reportedAll keep asking whether @solana or @base is winning the consumer chain race. I think the question is broken. They look like competitors because they chase the same user, but under the hood they are two completely different machines 👇🏻 ◢ A Look At The Numbers On the headline metrics it isn’t close. Solana booked $91M in app revenue in may against base’s $23M, and it has led every chain in app revenue for weeks. It moves more users, ~4.7M daily actives to base’s ~1.5M, and clears tens of millions more transactions a day. If the scoreboard were just activity, this teardown would be short. but activity is the easy half of the story. ◢ Not The Same Activity Look at what people actually do on each chain and the comparison stops being apples to apples. Solana’s volume is mostly high-velocity trading, memecoins, launchpads, swap terminals, a casino floor that prints real fees while it’s hot. Base’s footprint leans on stablecoin movement and the Coinbase pipe feeding users in. One chain monetizes speculation, the other monetizes flow. same word, “activity,” two different businesses. ◢ The Part Nobody Price In Here is the split that actually matters and barely gets discussed. solana has a token. Fees and MEV route back to SOL and the people staking it, so when the network works, holders have a claim on it, even though SOL still fell ~78% from its high. Base has no token at all. its success doesn’t accrue to a chain asset you can buy, it accrues to Coinbase, a public company on the nasdaq. On one chain you can own the network. on the other, the only way to bet is buying the corporation that owns it. ◢ The Distinction Is The Whole Game That single design choice changes everything downstream. Solana is trying to be a self-contained economy where value loops back inside the system. Base is trying to be infrastructure, a distribution layer where the economics flow up to its parent, not out to a community of holders. Neither is wrong. they are answers to different questions. One is betting that an open token economy compounds, the other is betting that owning the on-ramp to millions of users is the more durable position. So the honest read is that they stopped competing for the same prize a while ago. Which version of a consumer chain you actually want to own? The network itself, or the company standing at its door?
-
serx (@serxzsz) reported@scottmelker coinbase freezing during every major pump was a meme for years. credit where it's due, they fixed the core problem and kept building when most exchanges were just farming fees.
-
Chilla (@chilla_ct) reportedjust had to prove to Coinbase that one of my wallets is actually mine, after sending some funds in. few things in life are more irritating wtf is this ux
-
Cindy - 💎🇺🇸 (@cynna_hatmaker) reported@libsoftiktok @coinbase @coinbase if this is the case, I'm done using your service
-
aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reportedETH/BTC at 0.026 for the first time since march 2016. ratio is pricing ethereum the same relative to bitcoin as when it had zero DeFi, zero NFTs, zero L2s, and a $1.2b market cap. meanwhile 32.4% of ETH supply is staked at all-time highs with 1,261x more ETH waiting to enter staking than exit. BitMine holds 5.42m ETH (4.5% of supply) at a $3,476 cost basis, down roughly $9b, and just filed to raise $300m in 9.5% preferred stock to buy more. on the same day BitMine bought 26,497 ETH, BlackRock deposited 17,511 ETH to coinbase. the sellable float is compressing into a smaller and smaller window while $2.4b in ETF money walks out the door over 5 months. daily RSI lower than COVID, lower than FTX collapse, lower than the tariff crash. either a decade of infrastructure development added zero value relative to bitcoin or this is the most asymmetric long setup ETH has printed since its existence. stop trading the ratio. start deciding which side of the BitMine bet you're on.