Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Clinton Donnelly (@CryptoTaxFixer) reported 2 minutes ago

  @CorySwan You can choose another bank. That does not mean it is not debanking. If a legal transfer from Coinbase causes a bank to reject the money and close the account, that is the issue. Self-custody is freedom from custodians. It is not freedom from needing banking rails for taxes, payroll, mortgages, and large fiat transactions.

• 
  Chris Guida | ⚡🪢 BIP110 (@cguida6) reported 4 minutes ago

  @bitcoinchiggy @mattkratter @LaHvaSomSkjer >I am assuming Coinbase or Strategy have the Bitcoin on chain Yes you are, and I'm trying to point out that that's a terrible assumption Bitcoin's history is full of custodians getting hacked or running away with people's funds, it's actually the norm not the exception >Would proof of reserves fix the issue for you? That would improve things, but there is still no guarantee you can actually get your money out, even with proof of reserves Unilateral exit or it's not bitcoin

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 4 minutes ago

  This week AI agents got spend-capped Coinbase accounts and stablecoin rails on three chains. Not one of those systems can prove who authorised the spend. The agentic payment stack shipped fast. Coinbase put spend-capped accounts in front of ChatGPT and Claude. x402 went live on Injective and reached XRPL. Agents can now hold an account, pay for inference and APIs, and settle in stablecoins, with limits. Here is what did not ship. A standard for proving that a specific human or company authorised the agent to make a given payment, in a way that travels with the transaction across chains. Every one of this week's deployments enforces authorisation at the account boundary: scoped permissions, a spend cap. That is policy sitting next to the wallet. It is not an attestable mandate that an auditor, a counterparty, or a regulator can verify after the fact. For consumer-scale agent spending, account-level limits may be enough. For an enterprise letting an agent move corporate funds, they are not. The compliance question is not "did the agent stay under the cap," it is "can we prove the agent acted on a real, authorised mandate, and who is liable if it did not." No EIP, ERC, or working group advanced on that this week, even as the rails multiplied. The structural gap worth tracking: the rails are racing ahead of the identity layer. Whoever defines agent mandate attestation defines the trust layer for the entire category. That position is still open. @coinbase @OpenAI @AnthropicAI #AgenticPayments #AIagents

• 
  ryujin for life (@emi_panza) reported 8 minutes ago

  @coinbase it'll be broken

• 
  ORYX WEB3 | CRYPTO (@ox_Oryx) reported 10 minutes ago

  🚨 THE COINBASE BITCOIN REVERSAL BREAKING! THE COINBASE CEO JUST SHUT DOWN THE BEARS! 📢💰 BRIAN ARMSTRONG OFFICIALLY STATED THAT HE REMAINS AS BULLISH AS EVER AND IS LONG ON #BITCOIN! HE REMINDS EVERYONE THAT THE MARKET IS NEVER AS BAD AS IT SEEMS, SIGNALING THAT THE SHAKEOUT IS FINISHED! THE REBOUND IS GOING TO BE MASSIVE! 💥🚀 #Crypto #Bitcoin

• 
  Sam Price (@CryptoLifer33) reported 11 minutes ago

  Coinbase just made Bitcoin-backed mortgages real. They partnered with @betterdotcom To let you pledge your BTC (or USDC) as collateral for the down payment on a Fannie Mae-backed conforming mortgage — without selling your Bitcoin. Key details: 1. No capital gains tax event 2. No margin calls — BTC price drops don’t trigger liquidation or extra collateral 3. Rates only ~0.5–1.5% higher than a normal mortgage First one already closed this month This is actual mainstream adoption. You keep your BTC for the upside while using it to buy a house today. Coinbase One members also get up to $10k in closing cost credits. The future of finance is here — crypto collateral in traditional real estate, backed by Fannie Mae. What do you think — bullish or still too early?

• 
  SebastianQ.eth/acc 🦇🔊🌊 (@Sebasti04989541) reported 12 minutes ago

  @andyyy Hyperliquid is the first crypto project, which broke out of the crypto meta. All these "competitors" failed to offer SpaceX at launch, Binance, Bybit and Bitget "refunded" their customers, traders wrecked. Robinhood, Schwab and Coinbase went down.

• 
  Lonnie VanZandt (@lonniev) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BitcoinGambit Claude advises me that my framing of BTC as platonic mathematical concepts is a bit weak. It advises me: What genuinely is Platonic and pre-existing: the cryptographic substrate. The secp256k1 keyspace exists as a mathematical object whether or not anyone touches it — every private key (an integer up to ~n), every corresponding curve point, every address, sits latently in that space. Deriving an address isn’t creating it; it’s selecting one from an astronomically large set that already “exists” in the same sense the primes exist. Likewise the aggregate issuance schedule is fully determined in advance: 50 BTC per block, halving every 210,000 blocks, asymptoting to 21 million. That supply curve is a mathematical fact you could have plotted on day one. So far your intuition holds. Where it breaks: the state — which coins exist and who holds them — is not a pre-existing mathematical fact that mining reveals. It’s a contingent, path-dependent history that mining writes. Here’s the crux: mining is not the evaluation of a function with a unique answer. Given a block template, many different valid blocks satisfy the proof-of-work target, and the winning miner chooses which address receives the reward and which transactions to include. Two miners can find two valid blocks at the same height — that’s a fork — and which one becomes canonical depends on future work, not on anything predetermined. A coinbase reward isn’t sitting in the math waiting to be uncovered; it has no owner and no output until a winner assigns one. The right analogy isn’t a Sudoku with a unique solution waiting to be found. It’s closer to a lottery: before the draw there’s no fact of the matter about who wins, and the result is generated, not revealed. Yes, finding a valid ***** is “discovering” a number that satisfies a property — that number did sit in the search space beforehand. But that’s revealing a solution to the PoW puzzle, not revealing the bitcoin. The coin is the reward for having burned energy to search, and its destination is selected, not discovered. Nevertheless, there are only 21M of these coins regardless of when they are mined. The supply is fixed. When the last one is mined, the foolish can still mend their ways, become savvy entrepreneurs, and start acquiring BTC. Is it likely that the foolish become wise? Hardly, but not impossible.

• 
  RottenRandy (@RaiderfanRandy) reported 14 minutes ago

  @CryptoTaxFixer His problem is that he's using #coinbase.

• 
  Lurch Marley (@lurchmarley) reported 16 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase FIX YOUR APP

• 
  Henry Thoreau (@LtdCitoyen) reported 21 minutes ago

  @scottmelker @phongle Scott, would you ask your followers if they are having problems with Coinbase? I've been with Coinbase for many years, and I've never experienced as many issues as I am now. The website is constantly freezing my funds, even while showing that they are available.

• 
  Coin Crafty (@CoinCrafty) reported 25 minutes ago

  𝗖𝗙𝗧𝗖 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻-𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲. 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗱 $𝟯𝟰𝗕 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗲. A Rutgers study found that Americans accounted for up to $34 billion in offshore prediction-market volume over the twelve months ending April 2026. Not a projection. Actual volume. Harry Crane, a CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee member, ran the numbers — so this is not an anti-regulatory hit job. CFTC Chairman Mike Selig unveiled his first real framework on June 10: a 90-day review process for whether prediction contracts serve the public interest, with a specific exemption for commercial shipping contracts like Strait of Hormuz oil flows. It is an honest attempt to build a durable structure for an industry that outgrew the rulebook. The problem: the market already moved. Americans skipped the compliant on-chain platforms that Kalshi and Coinbase-backed built and went straight to Polymarket and others — where products are wider, users are unverified, and the legal exposure falls somewhere else. The gap between a $34 billion behavioral fact and a 90-day comment period is the actual story. On-chain infrastructure worked as designed. Users chose the unlicensed version anyway. The bull case for the CFTC framework has real teeth: formal rulemaking with multiple comment rounds is more durable than staff-level guidance, and it would be genuinely hard for a future administration to walk it back. But Polymarket already built the habits, the liquidity, and the product variety. A 90-day review process is not the same as no KYC, global access, and thousands of live markets. The Coalition for Prediction Markets — Kalshi, , and Coinbase — commissioned the Rutgers study to make exactly this point to regulators. It worked. The number is in the room. Is a $34 billion behavioral fact something regulators can actually change — or is the offshore cat already out of the bag?

• 
  Stephen (@TheRealSteve8) reported 30 minutes ago

  God @coinbase is slow AF the past 24 hours

• 
  Lurch Marley (@lurchmarley) reported 30 minutes ago

  @WNBA @theportlandfire @coinbase FIX YOUR APP

• 
  CryptoCook (@ThCryptoCook) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BitcoinArchive The statement is notable because Coinbase has access to enormous amounts of market data and user activity