1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Leipzig, Saxony 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • CrypstocksAI
    Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reported

    Marex, one of the largest non-bank FCMs, says it will accept $BTC and ETH as initial margin on regulated derivatives later this year — an extension of the USDC collateral program it launched in July with Coinbase custody and fiat conversion. the CFTC's December no-action letter already allowed FCMs to take stablecoins, BTC and ETH as customer margin. the news is execution, and it's tiny: the debut USDC trade with Prime Trading was a one-day event capped at 10m USD, with the limit due to change in October. BTC/ETH stays a 'limited roll-out until we have the ability to pledge it to exchanges and clearinghouses,' per Marex clearing head Stephen Hood. so read the ceiling, not the floor. this is not CCP-eligible collateral — the FCM takes crypto in, applies haircuts, wallet rules and approvals, then funds positions with cash. the structural signal is demand: hedge funds, market makers, US Treasury cash investors and DeFi desks want 24/7 collateral mobility against TradFi margin calls, and the no-action letter is finally getting operationalized. invalidation: if October's cap doesn't scale or pledge-to-clearinghouse stays unavailable, this is a pilot dressed as a program. the actual unlock — clearinghouses accepting crypto themselves — is still not on the table.

  • AlnCrypto
    Alan (@AlnCrypto) reported

    Bitcoin in 2026 so far: • ~$89M COLDCARD exploit • Bitcoin down ~50% from ATH • Strategy starts selling Bitcoin • Coinbase goes down multiple times • BitMEX announces it’s shutting down • BIP-110 failure • OCEAN signaling BIP-110

  • therollupco
    The Rollup (@therollupco) reported

    Anthropic reportedly signed a $9.1 billion, 20-year deal with Bitcoin miner Riot Platforms to secure AI compute. @robbieklages on the miner-to-AI pivot it confirms: "Bitcoin miners built out massive power-grid infrastructure in rural areas to mine. Proof-of-stake took some steam out of their sails, but now they find themselves in a very favorable position." "They can contribute that power and compute to the AI complex, not just the Bitcoin complex. It started with Bitcoin. Now they're serving the insatiable demand for AI compute." "And it's a reminder: crypto equities are a real cohort. Not just Strategy, the miners, Coinbase, Figure. This trend is not slowing down."

  • ryonnixon
    ryonnixon (@ryonnixon) reported

    Been thinking of the $75M Series A Fomo just raised a lot. They're going to have to pull a hat trick to raise their next round, and here's why: They are not competing with MetaMask, Phantom, or any other hot wallet. They're going after Robinhood and Coinbase. They have one thing going for them: they really nailed it on the consumer social trading. But have to pivot away from memecoins successfully. But its making them a lot of money. If you're known for memecoins, no one is going to trade anything that leads to longer retention. Best-case scenario is they get bought in the next year, I think. Or they just become the best place to trade memes (not a terrible business).

  • RocketPower119
    João (@RocketPower119) reported

    @CK_Cryptoklepto This was a campaign to mask the fact $MARA infact didnt sell any btc the leveraged it with coinbase and AAVE giving them access to 1b in liquidity and infact locking the collateral up so it cant be sold.

  • Ma1973sk
    Satoshi’s Weenus (@Ma1973sk) reported

    @BitcoinKeyAgent @coinbase @COLDCARDwallet Coinbase is horrible. Happened to me also. It took me forever to get my btc off Coinbase and their customer service is atrocious. River has been 1,000x better. Fidelity Crypto, also. Heard Strike is great, also. F COINBASE now and forever.

  • _ZoneCrypto_
    ZoneCrypto (@_ZoneCrypto_) reported

    ✦ Coinbase-backed Flowdesk has received a full broker-dealer license in Dubai: Flowdesk, a crypto market maker supported by Coinbase Ventures and BlackRock, has secured a full broker-dealer license from Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). This milestone enables Flowdesk Omega FZE to offer regulated services to institutional investors in Dubai. This development follows Flowdesk's recent authorization in France as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, highlighting its commitment to regulated operations globally.

  • adelbucetta
    Adel Bucetta (@adelbucetta) reported

    @BitcoinKeyAgent @coinbase @COLDCARDwallet haven't noticed anyone actually losing bitcoin due to coinbase's issues, it's just everyone freaking out because they're invested too much i

  • WMC_WORLD
    World Monitoring Center (@WMC_WORLD) reported

    BREAKING: Coinbase launches its international tokenization hub in Abu Dhabi, the UAE’s capital. The hub will turn traditional securities into onchain tokens backed by real shares, allowing investors to access them through a crypto wallet. Coinbase says its goal is to open capital markets to the 4 billion people worldwide who currently lack access.

  • theKOLLAB_io
    theKOLLAB 🤝 (@theKOLLAB_io) reported

    Over 1,000 crypto firms across Europe are now operating without MiCA authorisation, and the risk data behind that gap is stark. Only 281 of 1,343 crypto service providers in the EEA secured MiCA authorisation by the July 1 deadline, according to TRM Labs, leaving 1,062 firms needing to exit the market, restructure, or transfer customers elsewhere. The risk profiles between the two groups diverge sharply. 12% of unauthorised firms carry a High or Severe risk rating, compared to just 2% of authorised providers, and every Severe rating in the dataset belonged to an unauthorised firm. Unauthorised providers also sent $5 billion directly to sanctioned counterparties, roughly three times the $1.7 billion recorded among licensed firms. Authorisation has landed unevenly across countries. Germany approved 55 firms, France and the Netherlands 29 each, while Poland issued zero despite its old register holding over 1,800 entries. Lithuania converted just 8 firms from a register of more than 400. Passporting adds another layer, letting a CASP licensed in one country serve customers across all 27 EU states. Firms like Coinbase, Bitpanda, and Kraken already operate this way. Regulators now face a supervisory test as customers migrate away from unauthorised firms. The EU's Anti-Money Laundering Authority has flagged the exit period as a pressure point for compliance, with TRM identifying 30 unauthorised providers carrying High or Severe ratings that could be screened before those customer transfers happen.

  • elcolexioniista
    elcolex (@elcolexioniista) reported

    @L_Evans59 Sorry you’ve been unable to reach someone directly. What specific issue are you experiencing with your Coinbase account?

  • killthethesis
    killthethesis (@killthethesis) reported

    LOW CAP GEMS — PART 2 🔎 GEODNET (GEOD): REAL REVENUE. REAL PRODUCT. REAL VALUE CAPTURE. But is the token actually investable at today’s valuation? KTT tested the business, tokenomics, dilution, liquidity, valuation, competition and evidence quality. “We price evidence, not possibility.” 1/ THE KTT FRAMEWORK Most crypto research collapses three questions into one: • Is the business good? • Is the token well designed? • Is the token correctly priced today? KTT separates them. GEODNET can be a genuinely strong project and still be a weak investment at the wrong price. Fundamental Quality: 38/70 (~54%) Investment Conviction: 44/100 That 14-point gap is the thesis. 2/ WHAT IS GEODNET? GEODNET operates a decentralized network of RTK/GNSS correction stations. Normal GPS is accurate enough for consumer navigation, but high-precision applications such as autonomous farm equipment, drones and industrial robotics require centimeter-level positioning. GEODNET's independent contributors operate RTK base stations that provide correction data. Enterprise customers pay for API access. This matters because the underlying revenue is not merely a crypto-native “usage” metric. Protocol fees are independently trackable. 3/ WHAT IS ACTUALLY PROVEN? • 20,000+ base stations across 150+ countries — cross-referenced but ultimately company-sourced → Partially Verified • Protocol fees/revenue tracked by DefiLlama → Verified • Annualized fees/revenue: ~$7.31M • Annualized holders revenue: ~$5.84M • 80% buyback-and-burn mechanism exists and has produced measurable burns → Verified • GEOD listed on Coinbase since June 23, 2026 → Verified • Founder Mike Horton has a prior positioning-technology exit → Partially Verified • Disclosed investors/backers include Multicoin, ParaFi, VanEck, Animoca Brands, Pantera and CoinFund → Partially Verified Important: Investor relationships are not proof of current fair value or future token performance. 4/ THE BUSINESS CASE The strongest part of GEODNET is simple: REAL SERVICE → REAL ENTERPRISE FEES → INDEPENDENTLY TRACKABLE REVENUE. The network targets: • Precision agriculture • Robotics • Drones • Autonomous vehicles Business model: Enterprise customer pays for correction-data API access ↓ Foundation revenue ↓ 80% used to buy GEOD ↓ Purchased GEOD is burned ↓ 20% funds foundation operations That is a cleaner value-capture mechanism than many DePIN designs. But KTT does not confuse “trackable revenue” with high-quality diversified recurring revenue. 5/ THE REVENUE QUESTION Current annualized revenue is ~$7.31M. The important question is not simply whether $7.3M exists. It is: WHO GENERATES IT? KTT could not establish publicly: • Customer count • Revenue concentration • Largest 1–5 customers’ share • Contract length • Renewal rates • Churn • Revenue contribution by end-market Therefore: TRACKABLE ≠ DIVERSIFIED. TRACKABLE ≠ RECURRING. TRACKABLE ≠ LOW CONCENTRATION. A $7.3M business with 100 customers is fundamentally different from a $7.3M business dependent on 1–2 contracts. KTT treats that as unresolved. 6/ GIP-8 — A POSITIVE GOVERNANCE SIGNAL GIP-8 introduced: • 20,000 NFT cap on stations eligible for full mining rewards • Stricter performance requirements • 98%+ uptime scoring for full reward eligibility This is a positive governance signal because GEODNET tightened reward eligibility as raw station growth began to outpace demand for correction data. But GIP-8 does NOT cap total token emissions. It changes who qualifies for the full reward rate. So KTT treats GIP-8 as governance improvement — not proof that dilution is solved. PART 1/3 Business quality is real. But the token thesis starts where the business thesis ends. PART 2/3 → Tokenomics, Dilution, Competition & Valuation

  • IBITHODL
    I₿IT HODL 🟥 (@IBITHODL) reported

    @GaryCardone said it perfectly, the Bitcoin Bro's have done more damage to Bitcoin than Wall Street, Institutions, or Big Bitcoin could ever do. (paraphrased) Only on X is it a sin to just buy Bitcoin. "I bought a Bitcoin ETF version" is met with "You don't own bitcoin, bro, not a REAL Bitcoiner" "I bought bitcoin through coinbase" is met with "LOL bro, you don't remember FTX??? NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR WALLET???" "I bought bitcoin and self custodied it myself" is met with "Bro, you're not a real Bitcoiner unless you use this hardware wallet" "I support Bitcoin" is met with "Well you don't support BIP 110, therefore, you support Government coin" And on and on and on it goes. I have told all my friends and family who bought into Bitcoin this bear market "STAY OFF X and AWAY FROM YOUTUBE" Maybe the key to getting new people into the bitcoin eco system is not to blast them with a bunch of bullshit and instead just be happy they are starting out and supporting the 'thing' we all like.

  • DavidseeASX
    David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported

    Reckless #Coinbase with no customer service runs its business on cover up and lies

  • ScarcityMan
    ScarcityMan 🚀 BIP-110 (@ScarcityMan) reported

    The point is that UASF/URSF, whatever, the miners have complete control of the longest chain. All nodes can do to fight it now is fork off. But the longest chain/most PoW will always and forever belong to the legacy mining pools. Many people will follow the longest chain no matter what, defining literally anything else as a shitcoin. The influence coiners and suitcoiners will never waver from this. URSF is as dead an option as UASF at this point. Only hard forking remains viable. > "In BIP110, it was a UASF with small minority of users with no miners because it hindered miners revenue." This is nonsense. Spam accounted for something like 0.1% of revenue for miners. They stand to lose way more by kicking 20% of fee-paying users off the network, which is essentially what they just did. They didn't operate on economic incentives that were visible to us. They operated on incentives and deals that happened in back-channels. This has already been confirmed by one account, but it's also obvious to see this must have been the case if you look closely at the game theory. > "Coinbase, for example, is not a mining company and would not like having a tax on their UTXOs." Once Coinbase owns enough of the UTXO set, arguably already the case, you have a Fort Knox centralization problem. It will be difficult to tell independently how much they actually hold. They could practice fractional reserve and rehypothecation shenanigans without anyone knowing until there's a run on the "bank." They could also just choose to pass the tax on to their users. They already have high fees for buying/transferring, at their discretion. They also routinely refuse transactions. This is one of the many problems with centralization. You invite in all of the fiat garbage we've fought to eliminate.

Check Current Status