Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Phil (@UngovernableBro) reported 3 minutes ago

  Did Coinbase go down yet? If not, it’s not a bull market yet. #bitcoin

• 
  Anduro (@andurobtc) reported 3 minutes ago

  Bitcoin developer Antoine Riard has outlined several mechanisms intended to keep a mining majority from blocking Bitcoin's proposed quantum "tripwire" The tripwire is a proposal by Pieter Wuille (who credited @tdryja) that creates a designated point that would automatically disable elliptic-curve spending once a valid signature proves Bitcoin's cryptography has broken. Riard addressed a game-theory gap: a coalition controlling most hashrate could refuse to mine the tripwire's trigger transaction, keeping vulnerable coins exploitable. His main fix would have nodes prefer any chain containing the trigger, even one with less proof-of-work, so activation no longer depends on a mining majority. He also floated two alternatives: a "group signature" of post-quantum coins committed in the coinbase, and a commit-reveal "rescue" protocol for elliptic-curve coins. The debate over Bitcoin's quantum-resistance design continues on the mailing list. (check link in reply)

• 
  ChrisV.btc⚡ (@ChrisVolkernick) reported 6 minutes ago

  @mikepat711 Oh **** how did you get this set up? Is there a Coinbase MCP?

• 
  👁️ 𝐍𝐎𝐀𝐇 👁️ (@NOAHNEXT1) reported 8 minutes ago

  BTC 02 | Bitcoin surprised us with some great news. In just 5 days, it shot up by $16,600! I’ve been getting a lot of DMs saying: “You never mentioned this move. How did it happen? Where are we headed? We’re confused!” I’m gonna clear everything up, but stay focused with me, because what I’m about to say could shape your future, and even the future of your kids and grandkids! It’s a long story, but there’s no time, so I’ll keep it short! Bitcoin hit an insane peak at $126K, and based on my calculations, a major correction should’ve followed. From the beginning, I said the correction target was exactly $50.4K, but it only dropped to $57.8K! So, is the correction over?! The answer will become clear later, not now. If Bitcoin closes below the $77.8K resistance today, we’ll have two possible scenarios: First: a correction to between $70K and $71K. Second: a move back up to the May 6, 2026 high at $82.8K. But if Bitcoin closes above the $77.8K resistance, we’re also heading toward that same $82.8K high. But here’s the big question: what happens after we reach that high?! After that, I expect a bigger correction down to $62.8K. And there’s one last question, the most important one: How did Bitcoin suddenly take off like a rocket and jump $16.6K in just 5 days?! That’s the most important part of the story! Here’s the exact reason behind Bitcoin’s move: Coinbase bought 6,139 Bitcoin Binance bought 4,061 Bitcoin Insider bought 4,036 Bitcoin Kraken bought 3,329 Bitcoin OKX bought 1,621 Bitcoin Phemex bought 1,300 Bitcoin Wintermute bought 1,230 Bitcoin This was coordinated manipulation!

• 
  Robert Hart (@zcryptocash) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BIGFLEXZOMBIE @coinbase This is the biggest **** literally ever and you’re not even joking around . The best part is that an executive of a trillion dollar company shilled OUR WHOLE COMMUNITY to Coinbase !

• 
  Sota.Mr (@SotaaMr) reported 14 minutes ago

  @coinbase so full of **** $COIN stock is down 60% since IPO over 5 years ago wood / trees

• 
  David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported 15 minutes ago

  Tokens on #Coinbase are not found and no answer as this company has no customer service

• 
  intelpocik (@IntelPocik) reported 15 minutes ago

  How soon could $ALIGN get listed on Upbit and why I think it might make sense NOT to sell your airdrop right now? Most airdrop farmers are probably thinking about the same thing: claim → sell → forget. I think there is a reason to slow down before doing that. The main question is not whether Aligned is a good project or whether $ALIGN is undervalued. The main question is: HOW SOON COULD $ALIGN GET LISTED ON UPBIT? And when you look at Upbit’s 2026 listing history, the answer becomes much more interesting. First, the obvious catalyst: Coinbase added $ALIGN to its official listing roadmap on August 14. Then, on August 20, Coinbase listed $ALIGN/$USD pair. Historically, the Coinbase roadmap → Upbit sequence has been interesting for several new tokens. Now look at some actual 2026 examples: $BREV: TGE: Jan 6 | Upbit: Jan 7 | Delay: ~1 day. $AZTEC: TGE: Feb 12 | Upbit: Feb 20 | Delay: ~8 days. $KAT: TGE: Mar 18 | Upbit: Mar 26 | Delay: ~8 days. $CHIP: TGE: Mar 31 | Upbit: Apr 21 | Delay: ~21 days. $PRL: TGE: Mar 25 | Upbit: Apr 27 | Delay: ~33 days. $BLEND: TGE: Apr 24 | Upbit: Apr 29 | Delay: ~5 days. $ZAMA: TGE: Feb 12 | Upbit: Apr 14 | Delay: ~61 days. $UP: TGE: Feb 10 | Upbit: May 13 | Delay: ~92 days. $ARX: TGE: Jun 22 | Upbit: Jun 23 | Delay: ~1 day. $GRVT: TGE: Jul 21 | Upbit: Aug 5 | Delay: ~15 days. $QUID: TGE: Aug 4 | Upbit: Aug 4 | Delay: 0 days. Now let’s look at the projects that are actually comparable to Aligned. AZTEC → ZK / privacy / Ethereum infrastructure → Upbit after ~8 days. ARX → encrypted computation / infrastructure → Upbit after ~1 day. BREV → ZK infrastructure → Upbit after ~1 day. GRVT → crypto infrastructure / exchange → Upbit after ~15 days. BLEND → Ethereum-aligned infrastructure → Upbit after ~5 days. And $ALIGN itself has several interesting signals: 1/ Coinbase roadmap. 2/ Aligned has been building its presence in Korea for a long time. The Korean community opened in August 2025. In September 2025, Aligned participated in Korea Blockchain Week and says it met 600+ people there. Then came Korea-focused community campaigns and ZK Arcade. On July 9, 2026, Aligned held Aligned SEOUL Connect. And only a few weeks later, on August 14/15, $ALIGN appeared on Coinbase’s listing roadmap. That sequence is interesting. This is not a project that suddenly remembered Korea after TGE. They have been building the Korean market for roughly a year. And Korea matters because Upbit is not some irrelevant small CEX. According to a tracker based on Upbit’s official announcements, the exchange added 45 new tickers in H1 2026, with 34 receiving KRW support. Upbit is clearly still willing to allocate significant listing attention to assets that can build a KRW market. There is another connection worth watching. Aligned’s Series A was led by Hack VC. Hack VC is also connected to several projects that later became relevant to the Korean market. The most interesting recent example is GRVT. GRVT had its TGE on July 21 and was listed on Upbit on August 5. Roughly 15 days later. This does NOT prove that Hack VC can get projects listed on Upbit. But it does show that Aligned sits inside a VC/network ecosystem that has already produced projects reaching the Korean market. And there is one more interesting calendar point: Korea Blockchain Week 2026 is coming at the end of September. Aligned already has a history of building its Korean community around events like this. So a September Upbit listing would not look completely random from a marketing/timing perspective. My current estimate: Upbit within 7 days: ~25–40% Within 30 days: ~40–60% Within 60 days: ~60–75% The strongest version of the thesis looks like this: 1/ Korean market preparation 2/ Strong Ethereum / ZK positioning 3/ Hack VC connections 4/ Coinbase roadmap exposure 5/ Relatively clean unlock structure 6/ Upbit repeatedly listing similar infrastructure projects shortly after TGE in 2026 That combination is what makes this setup interesting. And this is exactly why I decided NOT to sell my airdrop immediately. If $ALIGN drops below a $100M market cap, I’m personally willing to buy a small additional position with an amount I’m fully prepared to lose. I’m not saying Upbit is guaranteed. I’m saying the potential upside from the catalyst may be worth keeping some exposure. In this post, we looked at the probability of $ALIGN getting listed on Upbit. In the next post, I’ll break down how many X I would personally expect if that actually happens. Follow so you don’t miss it. And tell me what you think in the comments: How likely do you think an Upbit listing is? Did you already sell your airdrop or are you holding? DYOR. NFA. WE WILL WIN.

• 
  Jason Skadsen (@OptimisticJ33) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Kalshi This is an early-stage report, not a product launch. CoinDesk says 𝕏 is in talks about paying creators in stablecoins (Circle’s USDC is the example named). The source is one person familiar with the discussions who also works with other platforms testing the same idea. 𝕏 has not confirmed anything. Treat it as a live option under review, not a done deal. What is actually changing? Great question… Two separate things are being mixed together: 1. Confirmed: 𝕏 is killing Revenue Sharing. New enrollments already stopped. The old program ends September 7; the last payouts land around September 11. It is replaced by Original Content Rewards, which is supposed to pay for original ideas, reporting, expertise, and commentary instead of ad-impression farming. 2. Unconfirmed: How those new rewards get sent. Today payouts go through Stripe or 𝕏 Money. Stablecoins would be another rail, not the new rewards program itself. Nothing in 𝕏’s official creator announcement mentions crypto. Why would they even consider it? Again, great question… Creator payouts are a messy, global, small-dollar problem. Bank wires, local rails, FX spreads, and minimums eat a lot of what mid-tier creators actually receive especially outside the US. Stablecoins (market cap now over $300 billion) settle in minutes, in dollars, without a correspondent bank in every country. That is the same reason $SPCX already uses them for some Starlink payments in “long-tail” markets. 𝕏 hiring Benji Taylor (ex-Coinbase Base, wallets/DeFi) in March fits the same direction. 𝕏 Money is already rolling to a slice of Premium+ users. YouTube already lets some US creators take PayPal’s PYUSD. Meta has started paying selected creators in USDC on Solana and Polygon. 𝕏 would not be first; it would be the largest social app to try it at scale.

• 
  Super Degen 💎 (@SuperDegen) reported 16 minutes ago

  @coinbase It's impossible to stop watching 🥲

• 
  utxoiq (@utxoiq) reported 16 minutes ago

  Foundry USA claimed block 963,320 — coinbase sig confirmed at 93% confidence. Payout: 3.1250 BTC subsidy + 0.0661 BTC fees = 3.1911 BTC. 3,722 txs, 1.6 MB, block nearly full. Foundry continues to lead North American hashrate representation.

• 
  GooseB (@Khrysarth) reported 17 minutes ago

  @coinbase Anger...one more leg down and we good.

• 
  hΞΛdroom (@headroomcapital) reported 17 minutes ago

  The Land Beneath the Compute Economy A thought experiment on what $NOCK could become. I hold the token, undisclosed size. Not advice, not an offering, nothing here is being launched or sold. Nockchain wants to become a market for verifiable computation. Miners already produce zero-knowledge proofs instead of hashes, and the endgame turns that mining into open compute markets where customers pay for proofs and AI work. The first half of that endgame is already running. Logos, the first of two planned upgrades, activated at block 114,300 in late July: it added AI matrix multiplication as a second mining lane, so work done for a paying inference customer doubles as a mining attempt. Weeks in, the chain is past block 130,000, roughly one block in three comes from the AI lane, and AI work rate is above 100 PetaMAC/s and climbing. Permissionless market registration follows in the first half of next year. And the protocol's founder, Logan Allen, announced he's going full-time on National Compute, a company building the first of these markets, a decentralized inference service on consumer GPUs. The timing is not random. On October 5, pending regulatory review, CME lists the first compute futures: contracts on H100 and B200 rental costs, priced off Silicon Data's indexes, with the CFTC preparing a public comment round. Computation is becoming a listed commodity with a public price, the way oil and wheat have one. Every commodity market ever built rests on two layers underneath the price: a way to verify what was delivered, and a resource that participation runs on. Nockchain is a bet on the first. The usual question is whether demand shows up. This piece asks a different one: what is $NOCK in that economy, the second layer? Today the answer is thin. $NOCK pays transaction fees and nothing else. Customers in the planned markets would even pay miners off-chain, in whatever currency they like. A token that only buys blockspace stays a ticket, and tickets get sold the moment they're used. But the design contains the seed of something better. When registration opens next year, founding a compute market means locking 4,000,000 $NOCK under the current design. No yield, no slashing, fully recoverable when you close the market. That lock quietly changes what the token is. In an economy of many markets, $NOCK is the license, the land under the factory. You don't spend it to participate. You have to hold it. Follow that thread and a full resource economy falls out. Renting the license. Four million $NOCK is a serious barrier, and it's priced in the very asset that appreciates if the thesis works. So most market founders won't own their lock. They'll rent it. Holders lease $NOCK into a registration lock for a fixed rent; the founder runs the market and keeps the 20% of block rewards that flows to whoever registered it. The lock can't be slashed and comes back on deregistration, so the lender's risk is price, not loss. That's a credit market where the collateral secures nothing and enables everything. Compute demand converts directly into borrowing demand for $NOCK. Where the lendable supply comes from. Miners are the only source of new $NOCK, and selling to cover costs is the default. Nock Silos are the fix: mining operations run by software whose wallet enforces one rule in sealed hardware. Sell what the bills require, lock the rest in timelocked notes anyone can verify on-chain. A silo like that can't dump, not as a promise but as a property of its runtime. Its store isn't dead weight either. It's exactly the idle $NOCK the rental market wants, earning rent from market founders while staying locked. The silo becomes a lender. Holding becomes a business. Everything runs on $NOCK. Pools that gather community capital to fund a lock: shares in $NOCK. Rent from founders to lenders: paid in $NOCK. The founder's reward stream: 20% of coinbase, in $NOCK. No second token anywhere, which is the lesson from Bittensor's subnet casino. Customers still pay for compute in dollars, and they should. The dollars flow over the top while the resource sits locked underneath, the way the world's dollar economy runs on top of land, licenses, and collateral nobody spends. The loop, if it closes: compute demand creates markets, markets need locks, locks are rented from silos, silos earn yield, so miners store instead of selling, float shrinks while security grows, and the appreciating lock pushes the next founder to rent as well. Every step denominates in $NOCK and none of it requires the customer to touch the token. What has to be true. The registration fork has to follow Logos; that's most of a year of engineering. And the AI lane's petaMACs have to start meaning customers: the latest blocks carry zero transactions, and self-submitted matmuls count as mining, so nothing on the dashboard yet distinguishes paid work from make-work. Mining margins have to leave a surplus worth hoarding, which one rented GPU and a week of published numbers can test. And the protocol has to make sure an empty market can't farm block rewards, or pools will chase free yield instead of real work; with the AI lane live, that calibration is being answered in production right now. One clean fix exists: tie any demand bonus to burned fees at a ratio below one, so faking a customer costs more than it returns and real demand becomes visible on-chain at the same time. None of the resource layer exists yet. That's the point of writing it down now, while the registration design is still wet, while the first market's founder is building, and while TradFi is building the price layer of the compute economy in public. $NOCK as a ticket is a bear case with extra steps. $NOCK as the land, the license, and the collateral of a compute economy is a different asset entirely, and the distance between the two is a handful of design decisions that haven't been made yet. Only proofs enter the record. Image: Superstudio, Supersurface (Life: The Encampment), 1972. Life on top; the grid supplies everything from underneath.

• 
  OvergrownChild (@overgrovvnchild) reported 19 minutes ago

  @coinbase Ya.. get em all there and then rug pull them or block their accounts... i see where this is going

• 
  The Web3_Grinder | Buy stocks on WEEX (@JonisAvohou) reported 23 minutes ago

  @coinbase Want to communicate privately? Use @liberdus . No phone number. No email. No central server. You get where this is going 👀