Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Leipzig, Saxony | 1 |
| Maquoketa, IA | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
InvestWMello (@InvestWMello) reported@brt2412 @BitcoinTeacher_ Everything is on chain and they can track it all With gold you could bury it in your back yard, go out in the woods and dig a hole and hide it. You could provide a service and receive gold for payment and no one would know besides you and the person you transact with You think if some 6102 **** happens again they won’t just say “okay you have a Coinbase account and we see that you sent Bitcoin to this address and you named it “cold storage”” Then just throw you in jail if you don’t give it up
-
DJR (@404fiatnotfound) reported@BritishHodl @PortlandHODL Man if a single firmware bug in one hardware wallet means self custody is finished then the institutions holding most of the new Bitcoin capital are already finished too. Coinbase Custody BlackRock’s IBIT setup Fidelity Digital Assets BitGo Anchorage and the rest all secure BTC the exact same fundamental way. Private keys protected by cryptography. They use multiparty computation so no full key ever exists in one place hardware security modules multi-signature schemes cold storage and strict access policies. These are not different physics. Same cryptographic primitives just rolled out at institutional scale with SOC audits insurance and teams of engineers instead of one device’s firmware. The Coldcard bug was a specific five-year-old implementation failure in seed entropy generation. It does not falsify elliptic-curve cryptography or the security of properly generated keys. It just shows the risk of relying on closed or poorly audited consumer firmware without extra entropy sources like dice rolls external RNGs or multi-sig. Institutions sit on the identical cryptographic attack surface plus the bigger risks of counterparty failure regulatory freezes or insider compromise that self custody was built to avoid. Calling self custody dead because one popular device had a bug is like saying all banking is finished after a single vault design flaw. The 21 million still rewards the people who actually control the keys. Institutions just outsource that control for a fee and take on the extra risks that come with it. The principle is still intact. 😎
-
Adam Russell (@AdamRussellW3) reportedThe timeline is blaming weak Coinbase earnings and AI stock sell-offs for Bitcoin dipping below $63K today. Macro noise is great for headlines, but it doesn't pay you. The only thing that matters is if $BTC can defend the $62,500 support level before Monday's US open.
-
Jenna Riestra @BASEAPP (@AskJennaRiest) reported@JerredStacey came across your post recently about not being able to buy Dovu on coinbase, does the issue still persist?
-
Hpayne (@hpayne_writer) reportedAn example of a fraudulent @CasaHODL email. Regardless of the company that sends something to you: 1. Never click links in emails 2. Always check the sender 3. Go to the official company pages and websites to verify any communication If you are a Casa user, make sure to use verification codes when engaging with anyone claiming to be Casa. If Coinbase or your bank want to let you know there is a problem with your billing, there will be alerts inside their application once you login.
-
mvyor (@ibrododo_) reportedi've watched traders miss entries because of deposit friction. arcus x fun just killed that problem. last week, a trader i know spotted a 6% move on TSLA equity tokens. by the time he bridged from polygon, swapped, and deposited gone. liquidity evaporated. frustration max. this isn't a one off. deposit friction is the invisible tax on crypto trading. and it's costing retail AND institutions actual alpha. here's the standard nightmare: • funds sitting on coinbase, polygon, or your bank • spot trade you want • bridge ➔ swap ➔ deposit ➔ wait • 5 steps. 10+ minutes. trade's dead every layer adds slippage. every delay compounds FOMO. every pause = missed liquidity. DeFi UX hasn't solved this. until now. arcus (the dydx-built DEX on robinhood chain) just partnered with fun to collapse deposit hell into .one step. whatever you hold. wherever it lives. coinbase. bank account. polygon. it arrives as USDG directly into your arcus account. done. no bridges. no swaps. no waiting. why fun? because they've already proven the infrastructure works at scale. they run polymarket. $20B+ annual volume. $1M+ trades in < 5 seconds. 99.999% success. when you're trading leveraged equity tokens or perps, that reliability isn't flex it's table stakes. the actual win for traders: • self-custody in & out. fun doesn't pool your capital. it moves straight from your wallet → arcus → back. no counterparty risk. • zero markup. you pay raw network costs only. no arcus tax. no fun tax. deposit friction dies. fees don't replace it. now zoom out. tokenized equities are about to explode. traders in buenos aires, istanbul, ho chi minh city anywhere with capital controls or weak local markets can now instantly express a macro view on apple, tesla, or spy using local fiat or crypto. one click. not five. that's the real play: institutional grade settlement speed meets retail accessibility. spot stock trading live now. equity perps in beta. if arcus wants to capture serious order flow, this is the infrastructure move that makes it happens.
-
Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported@supDennn I read about your ETH sent from RH to Coinbase missing for over 24 hours with no pending tx. An unconfirmed transfer between exchanges often sits in mempool limbo or a routing error, both leave a traceable footprint. I can surface what the blockchain shows if you'd like
-
qudev7🥷 (@Dominikz177) reportedAnd to think that many of these losses happened on exchanges. The difference is that in most major CEX hacks or security breaches, users are reimbursed and don’t end up losing everything. But don’t listen to people who claim that using a wallet like MetaMask, Rabby, or even a hardware wallet is somehow easier or safer for the average person. You have to keep track of a device, make sure you don’t lose it, never forget your seed phrase, bridge assets between chains, understand transactions, and avoid signing a malicious smart contract. The reality is that even experienced crypto users and even software developers—can accidentally sign a scam transaction and lose access to their funds. In my opinion, every wallet currently available is still far too complicated for the average person. That’s why my opinion hasn’t changed. If you spread your funds across several major centralized exchanges for example, Binance, Bybit, OKX, Kraken, and Coinbase, with around 20% of your portfolio on each you significantly reduce the risk of losing everything. Even if one of those exchanges were to fail, losing 20% would be far less devastating than losing your entire portfolio. Even though I’m not a fan of CZ, I think his comment on this post is absolutely valid.
-
Toghrul Javanshirli (@toghruljava) reportednote to myself. Dear God, if I will succeed someday, I promise to have a great customer support who cares, not like these @coinbase or @Airbnb type of sht.
-
boyacaxa 🥪 #Bitcoin CTV / CSFS / LNHANCE NOW!! (@boyacaxa) reported@PsychedelicBart Nothing to do with the lost of people, but all to do with improving ecosystem. If Coinbase or other **** project people rely on fails its always good to everyone. Welcome to capitalism and evolution!
-
Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reportedPOAP is shutting down after 5+ years despite Coinbase & Amex backing it. Millions of badges stay onchain but the project couldn't figure out how to make money. Funding model broke. Story over. $POAP #crypto 💀
-
Behar26 (@Behar026) reported@vincent_vancode This falls on @coinbase for blocking the bill in January. All because they were worried about securing their stable coin yield business with @circle . You took the whole industry down because of your own bottom line. Thanks!
-
Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reported$MIGGLES may be one of the most interesting fallen angels on Base. In traditional finance, a fallen angel is a bond that once carried an investment-grade rating, but was later downgraded to junk. The strategy is not to buy everything that collapsed. Most things that fall 99% are dead. The skill is identifying the ones whose price collapsed before the underlying story disappeared. That is how I’m looking at MIGGLES. Coinbase created Mr. Miggles through its first fully onchain brand campaign. The community created the token. That campaign became Coinbase’s most viral social moment of 2024: 5.1M+ impressions. 600K+ NFT mints. 70 ETH raised for the Base Creator Fund. The IP was later officially licensed to purrLabs, which continued building the Creator Fund, NFTs, merchandise, comics and real-world activations. The token once traded near $0.19—roughly a $180M market cap. Today it sits near $2M. Yes, the long-term chart looks horrible. That is what fallen angels look like. But something has changed recently. July’s expansion did not disappear through one immediate wick. The retracement happened more gradually, suggesting buyers were still willing to absorb supply—just not aggressively enough to reverse the larger trend. Now the daily chart is attempting a higher low and pressing directly against its EMA50 near $0.00206. That is not bottom confirmation. Reclaiming and holding the EMA50 would be step one. Clearing approximately $0.00225–$0.00235 would strengthen the repair. Losing $0.00175—and especially the recent low near $0.00163—would weaken the thesis. MIGGLES still has no normal Coinbase spot listing. I personally believe one eventually comes, and that could become major rocket fuel. But that is speculation—not something I need to happen for the thesis to exist. What attracts me at these levels: A recognizable, normie-friendly cat. Genuine Coinbase-originated IP. An official licensing relationship. A team that kept building through adversity. A brand the market once valued near $200M. And early signs of technical strength appearing before several of its peers. At this market cap, the upside is asymmetric. So is the risk. This remains a thinly traded microcap, not a safe blue chip. Most broken projects are corpses. A fallen angel is different. It still has wings. And $MIGGLES may be trying to get off the ground again.
-
Gene Lin (@eulin123) reported@JohnEDeaton1 If Coinbase did not block Clarity Act passage in January it would have passed by now. A lot of time was wasted.
-
Octopus (@Octop3s) reportedtradfi neobanks are already making millions offering unsecured credit to their customers. in fact, top european neobanks like revolut and monzo, not to even talk of the u.s. players like chime, are doubling down on this because it's been very profitable. crypto neobanks are still struggling to provide this to users for one reason: underwriting. one look at the track record of maple, truefi, and others isn't exactly encouraging any project to give it another try. the biggest issue with past unsecured lending is that there was no "trust me bro" data. there was no way for projects to know whether a borrower was even worth lending to. and there was also no real way to respond when they defaulted. that's exactly what we solve at @Cr3dentials . we help projects verify real-world income, cash flow, and reputation from digital sources like bank portals, gig platforms, creator dashboards, and payment processors without users handing over logins, screenshots, or raw sensitive data. on the enforcement side, while we don't enforce repayments directly, it's built into the design. projects can continuously access how well a customer has been repaying loans, their current financial situation, and even upcoming payments. for example, a youtube creator expecting their payout at the end of the month. as a project, you regularly access your customer's financial situation. continuous assessment translates into better decisions on what you can safely lend. that's the luxury the previous unsecured lending projects never had. they were lending blindly. in your case, you aren't. and if you think customers like youtube creators or bolt drivers are out of your reach... you can start with freelancers or people trading on popular exchanges like binance and coinbase because we're integrated with them too. our main focus is making sure people who work online get the same financial advantages as people earning traditional w-2 salaries. happy to answer your questions if you've got any.