Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Seth Rosen (@TavCannaLLC) reported 2 minutes ago

  @CorySwan @Swan I need to learn about this. I’ve had a horrible time with Coinbase and I’m looking for a company / exchange that can fill that gap, and help me onboard others. 🙏

• 
  Coinfinity (@coinfinity) reported 2 minutes ago

  @coinbase Orakel-Problem.

• 
  🇺🇸 (@sssdsol) reported 4 minutes ago

  @SleazyWeez @zerohedge Hi Polymarket, I know this is you, you pieces of ****. My post is not about Coinbase, but nice try

• 
  Kiran Gadakh ( crypto.kiran ) (@kirangadakh16) reported 5 minutes ago

  DAILY TOKEN ANALYSIS 🚨 Token : $INJ WHALES ARE AGGRESSIVELY LOADING UP ON INJECTIVE RIGHT NOW Big wallets are pulling massive amounts of INJ off exchanges with huge Coinbase mainnet withdrawals! Injective is completely crushing it after landing on Robinhood, wrapping up native mainnet migration, and expanding its DeFi derivatives. Plus, with ongoing fee burns making it deflationary, there are ZERO major token unlocks coming to dump on your face Support : $4.45 Resistance : $5.80 If $INJ breaks $5.50, we are sending it straight to $5.80 - $6.00 If it gets rejected, the $4.95 - $4.75 zone is the golden buy level

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 6 minutes ago

  @jacek0x @jessepollak @brian_armstrong It's disingenuous to suggest there is no social layer on top of infrastructure. It sits at different levels on blockchain vs aws. On blockchains there are users who will help bootstrap funding for an idea, which means attention and social elements are more closely intertwined with the product than in a web2 app. If the social layer isn't something those speculators want to be a part of, they will leave to greener pastures. Without speculators, you might as well launch on aws. Base wants an economy to exist on top of its rails. If it wants a healthy one, it needs more diversity of thought and behaviour. Sure it can exist as the rails for financial institutions and coinbase will do just fine. But your criticism is of retail participants. That's who they'll lose if they don't change something. Retail traders dgaf about rails or infrastructure, they work off of vibes. Again, most people aren't builders and most crypto builders suck, so until they manage to onboard all of blackrocks assets, if they want retail users they need a better environment with better vibes where people aren't having things they don't care about shoved down their throats. A place that people want to be and speculate. Builders get nothing if they lose all the speculators. Nontrivial thing to change though given base does so well for cb ventures, which does so well for coinbases balance sheet.

• 
  🔥 Max ༒ Osiris 🔥 ௐ³⁶⁹ 🎩 (@maxOSIRISart) reported 6 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Next thing I know you will presenting the Coinbase Award of Freedom to the orange ******** you are forced to pretend to like just to keep stacking cash for yourself and lecturing everyone else about **** you pretend to understand

• 
  Miyamoto (@iruletrenches) reported 6 minutes ago

  it's not about pumping coins. if you actually spent some time to know the context you wouldn't tweet this garbage tweet. ansem had 'cto'd' solana and ran $ansem to 400m. creator coins became a thing, ansem then gave advice to brian and brian answered saying it makes sense, then started interacting with CT. and in CT culture everyone knows pfp'ing an existing coin is basically supporting it, Brian then pfp's the existing coin "coinbase man" the coin rips to 10m, then base account shills it, then tens of base employees shills it. then 12h later, brian removes the pfp and rugs the coin. if you think the outrage is about "Brian not pumping a coin" and not about the disrespect and the complete lack of consideration towards the users of his chain then you're an idiot. ******.

• 
  MrTim1✳️ (@CryptoMasterTi) reported 6 minutes ago

  @coinbase ct and the project moderators look mentally ill... They should have posted something technologically relevant about science, engineering, or web 3. They almost always **** out something similar and then repost their friend's crap in similar crap...

• 
  Laura Shin (@laurashin) reported 11 minutes ago

  "He's still not a real startup founder in the sense that he can't die, he can't run out of money" Kain on why Jesse isn't a real startup founder despite the grind "As much as Jesse was grinding in the trenches with builders, he was terminally online on the timeline, in Telegram groups, in all these groups, working so ******* hard to meme this chain into existence" "Because he's in this world where they've got a giant money printer, and Coinbase is going to keep printing money, there's no real threat to it" "There's an existential long-term, decades-long threat of the world moves onchain or whatever, which is what they're trying to get ahead of, but outside of that he's fine"

• 
  shino (@shinoonasam) reported 12 minutes ago

  Check this website and think again $COIN Coinbase Global Inc

• 
  Vasia Zhmana (@VasiaPetrov18) reported 12 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase **** you, scammer

• 
  bildo (@WildBullyTheKid) reported 15 minutes ago

  @MC81236843 @AlchemyPay The price is down 99% from all time high. It’s been in a descending triangle since Coinbase listing. The people to blame are the management who increase supply by 5b+ and their lack of transparency.

• 
  You Can Short It (@youcanshortit) reported 17 minutes ago

  Franklin Templeton just published something worth sitting with. Their head of digital assets laid out why chasing the AI trade through equities alone leaves money on the table. The core argument: card rails charge 2-3% plus $0.30 flat per transaction. AI agents are executing payments at $0.001 per compute second or data query. The math does not work on legacy infrastructure. That gap pushes machine-to-machine payments onto blockchains, where every settled transaction requires the network's native token. Coinbase already shipped x402, now handed to the Linux Foundation. Stripe and Visa have a Machine Payments Protocol in progress. The plumbing is being built right now. External estimates put agentic commerce at $3-5 trillion by 2030. 38% of organizations say AI agents will work alongside human teams by 2028. The uncomfortable part for most portfolios: the value accrual in that world does not go to the stock. It goes to the token that clears the transaction. BNB Chain processes some of the highest daily transaction volumes in the space at some of the lowest fees. If the agentic payment thesis plays out, low-cost, high-throughput networks are not peripheral to the story. They are the story. Most tokens sitting in wallets right now are either working for you or they are not. Drawdowns happen. The question is what you do while you wait.

• 
  AX1 (@ax1vc) reported 19 minutes ago

  Why does @base need a token? For two years the honest answer was: it doesn't The new answer is buried deep in securities liquidity - in whose shares stand behind "1:1 backed", and in who pays for depth once stocks start trading against TradFi books. By the end of this post it has a job. The replies under this post are litigating derivatives vs 1:1. Robinhood Chain tokens are also backed 1:1 - shares held at a US custodian. Accurate, but wrong axis. "1:1 backed" answers where the shares sit, never whose they are and the same label is currently being shipped as three different financial instruments. A derivative. Robinhood's EU classic tokens. A contract against the broker, not even onchain. A note. Robinhood Chain, xStocks, Ondo. The shares exist, and the terms inform you what you hold: "tokenized debt securities... do not grant investors any legal or beneficial rights in those underlying securities". A claim on a Jersey SPV. A share. The one Coinbase announced in June. Equity behind the token, dividends, shareholder rights. The message was of ownership. The note is the stablecoin economics applied to equities. You get the peg to the price. Whatever else the shares in custody provide stays within the wrapper. Dividends are "reinvested net of applicable withholding taxes," up to 30% incorporated into the multiplier, and your tax treaty cannot carry over into the SPV. Documentation from every issuer goes mute on securities lending of the custodied portfolio – the quiet fuel that powers zero-commission brokerage in TradFi. In case of insolvency an agent sells the shares and wires you the money. Payee, never the owner. It's a $1.7bn market, and over half of it sits in assets that weren't even onchain a year ago. The standard of the wrapper is being set in advance of the critical mass. The share model sends those benefits back to the holders. This is literally why it is the heavier lift regulation-wise, and why transfer agents are pressuring the SEC right now over who gets to call their product a stock. So Base's version comes down to one clause in the future terms of the product. Namely, when shipped as a token, would the holder retain the ownership claim, or would it be squashed into another note due to composability? Base has already laid tracks for that answer. B20 went live on mainnet two weeks ago, a native ERC-20 superset with built-in transfer policies and issuer controls, with documentation naming tokenized equities as a target use case. It is that very toolkit which allows a share to stay a share onchain, i.e., compliance baked into the protocol rather than a Jersey wrapper. If the claim survives, it will be the first instrument of this type on any public EVM, thanks to B20. If it is squashed into another note, the comparison with Robinhood is gone too. Now, the token part. The share version is the one institutions can hold, and institutional size is the entire point of the liquidity war. One of the founders in these replies chose Robinhood Chain over Base for his v2 precisely because Base lacks tokenized stock liquidity. And that liquidity has to live onchain - if trading stays inside Coinbase's own book, there is no need for an ERC-20 at all, since the whole pitch is composability. An onchain book is up against TradFi, where hundreds of billions change hands on a daily basis, and it starts from zero. Zero gets filled in one way only - emissions. Every single major L2 got its DeFi liquidity by way of emissions, the only subsidy a public company may pay out without burning money on the income statement. Base is the only one running its emissions engine on a third-party token. And no one runs the monetary policy of their flagship market on a token they do not control. Polymarket currently prices a $BASE token by December at around 12%, almost half of what it was just one week ago. These probabilities are listening to the silence of Coinbase. Read the product, not the odds - an ERC-20 share claim is the first thing on Base which requires an emissions engine of its own. This is how a token that is merely possible differs from a token with a purpose. Jesse says a couple of weeks. Bookmark this for the release of the terms.

• 
  Lawrilla ⌘ (@stefkost1) reported 20 minutes ago

  Legal Architects are the new doctrine. ​With @Buildanythingso calling on Monad and Lawrilla answering, we’re aligned with top teams like @Coinbase turning legal workflows upside down with AI. ​Built an EU Compliance prototype at a hackathon to flag MiCA & MiFID II regulatory risks. Engineering the compliance layer from day one. ​Also shipped a live PDF Notary dApp on @monad mainnet. Upload the PDF → anchor its SHA-256 hash on-chain for decentralized, un-fakeable Proof of Existence and timestamping,keeping document content fully private. ​Monad leads.