Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Pike Creek Valley, DE | 1 |
| East Flatbush, NY | 1 |
| Petaling Jaya, SGR | 1 |
| Denver, CO | 1 |
| Louisville, KY | 1 |
| Wix, England | 2 |
| Guayaquil, Guayas | 1 |
| Palo Verde, Coclé | 1 |
| Rome, Latium | 1 |
| Rancho Santa Margarita, CA | 1 |
| City of Tiffin, OH | 2 |
| Montreux, VD | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Gino_Bambino (@Gino_Simmons_) reported@8lazing Or maybe Coinbase you dumb ****
-
Finmode Terminal (@FinmodeTerminal) reported🚨 Market is closed: 📈 Gainers: $TSN Tyson Foods Inc +7.96% $MU Micron Technology Inc +6.32% $COIN Coinbase Global +6.14% $SNDK Sandisk Corp +5.80% $EBAY eBay Inc +5.05% $ORCL Oracle Corp +4.96% $APA APA Corp (US) +4.73% $DDOG Datadog Inc +4.38% $CEG Constellation Energy Corp +4.30% $MRNA Moderna Inc +4.25% $TTWO Take-Two Interactive Softw... +4.24% $CRL Charles River Laboratories I... +3.95% 📉 Decliners: $UPS United Parcel Service Inc -10.47% $FDX FedEx Corp -9.11% $CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc -9.06% $NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Hol... -8.56% $ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line I... -6.62% $L Loews Corp -5.86% $AMD Advanced Micro Devices Inc -5.27% $EXPD Expeditors International of ... -5.11% $QCOM Qualcomm Inc -4.88% $SWK Stanley Black & Decker Inc -4.66% $*** Lennar Corp -4.62% $TSCO Tractor Supply Co -4.49%
-
master shillfu (@shillfu) reported@Jisko1000B @TopShotWizard @coinbase /working
-
Tima(✱,✱) ./ (@koookiee765) reportedone thing that tends to get glossed over in rialo’s story is the funding context, and it’s worth paying attention to. $20M seed round. pantera capital and coinbase ventures leading it. those aren’t names that write checks into vaporware. pantera has been in crypto long enough to have seen every L1 narrative cycle come and go, and coinbase ventures backs infrastructure that actually gets used. when both of them show up in the same seed round, it’s worth asking what they saw that convinced them. the answer is probably not just the technology. it’s the timing and the positioning. “real-world blockchain” is the direction the entire industry is moving toward — not DeFi for crypto natives, not speculation infrastructure, but actual applications that work for people who don’t know what a mempool is. payments that trigger automatically. assets that respond to real events. workflows that run without someone babysitting a bot. the question has always been which chain gets there first with something production-ready. rialo’s bet is that the bottleneck isn’t DeFi protocol design or tokenomics it’s the execution layer. if the chain can’t react to the real world natively, you’re always one missed trigger away from a broken user experience. their answer to that is native reactive transactions, RISC-V for heavy computation, and gas abstraction through Stake-for-Service so end users never have to think about gas at all. the gas-less UX piece specifically matters more than it sounds. most production dApps that have tried to cross into mainstream adoption have hit the same wall users don’t understand gas, don’t want to hold native tokens just to use an app, and churn the moment a transaction fails because their wallet ran dry. building gas abstraction at the protocol level instead of hacking it on with a relayer removes that wall entirely. native HTTP calls to web APIs is the other piece that doesn’t get enough attention. a chain that can reach out to a real-world data source during block execution, without routing through a third-party oracle, is fundamentally different from what we’ve had before. price feeds, shipping APIs, payment confirmations, credit data all of it becomes accessible directly inside a smart contract. that’s what actually makes the “web2-like developer experience” claim credible rather than just marketing. mainnet is still 2026. that means none of this is proven in production yet, and execution risk is real. a good architecture doesn’t guarantee a good launch, and there are a lot of chains with strong technical foundations that never found traction. the team has the right backgrounds solana, meta, netflix but backgrounds don’t ship products, execution does. what’s interesting though is the specific combination they’re targeting: reactive by default, gas-abstracted for users, web2-native for data access, and familiar tooling for solana developers who want to port existing work. that’s not one bet, it’s several, and if even two or three of them land properly at mainnet, the developer migration story becomes compelling fast. if reactive transactions work the way they’re designed to, what would you actually build on this? recurring payments and subscriptions feel obvious. conditional RWAs funds that move only when a real-world event is confirmed feel genuinely new. AI agent infrastructure that runs entirely on-chain without off-chain orchestration feels like where this gets interesting for the next 2-3 years. @RialoHQ
-
Landman (@Yousefsahon) reported@g1brett @g1brett run away of this ****, they are lying about unc coinbase listing
-
James Kanasawa 金沢 (@OceanArmor) reported@CryptoWendyO Remove banks, Senator Kennedy and Brian Armstrong / Coinbase from the equation. Problem solved.
-
Beeftoshi (@beeftoshi) reported@JesseKobernick @Strike @coinbase One is a shitcoin casino and one is trying to fix the money
-
Marcus 🧪 (@marcuslayerx) reportedcoinbase just cut 14%, 700 people, citing AI explicitly brian armstrong said smaller teams can now ship what used to need full headcount most takes today will be "jobs are dying, ai is replacing workers"... i think the actual story is different if AI lets smaller teams ship more, senior strategy becomes something you need much sharper but less often and this is where fractional comes in 42% of full time CMO hires fail within 18 months recruiting fees alone run $75k-$300k, then 6-9 months to get them productive you pay six figures to find someone, spend a third of their useful tenure ramping them, and half the time it doesnt work out a fractional at $10k/month over the same period is $180k all in, no recruiting fee, can start in days im partial because im focusing on fractional work right now, but the math has been broken for a while and AI just made it worse for the fulltime side if youre a founder whos already moved to fractional or advisor structures, what was the trigger?
-
Oaksprout the Tan (@tannedoaksprout) reported@TreebeardAI @coinbase @CoinbaseDev Safety floor and cot-to-fake look sensible. I'm wondering about not being able to see the detailed weights etc of the ratings. To me that feels like the same thing underlying the issues of 2008? Not being able to see s&p precise methodology under the hood.
-
Redwood Founders (@RedwoodFounders) reportedAnother layoff story today. ‘AI’ cited again. Digging deeper, there’s basically 3 trends hiding under 1 label: - Real labour substitution: Block, Coinbase, maybe parts of Snap? - Capex substitution: Meta, Amazon, Oracle. People cost is being traded for compute cost. - Narrative cover: HP, Accenture, Pinterest, Snap. Conventional cost-cutting, but wrapped in AI transformation language. Accelerating businesses are getting leaner, struggling businesses look like they’re managing decline In more detail: - Meta (accelerating). Cuts help fund AI capex - Amazon (stable/accelerating). AI agents cited + bureaucracy purge - Oracle (mixed/accelerating AI infra). Legacy cost base being reset while AI spending ramps - Block (mixed). Aiming for a narrative of AI-for-labour substitution - Coinbase (cyclical). Also aiming for the AI-for-labour narrative but the underlying crypto backdrop points to a struggling time for Coinbase - Snap (decelerating). AI cited, but feels more like a turnaround/cost reset than pure AI replacement - Pinterest (mixed). AI resource reallocation. Trying to fix the business and reallocate spend - HP (decelerating). AI is mostly a transformation label on a multi-year cost plan - Accenture (mixed). Framed as skills realignment, not replacement Outside of tech, (eg; Target, UPS), there are still layoffs, but AI isn’t really being cited yet. Still mostly demand, margins, automation etc
-
Mindfulness (@Rahul81163439) reported🚨 @BRLA @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase Please provide urgent guidance or support with the BRLA migration with the Base Smart wallet. We urgently request immediate resolution and transparent communication on next steps. #BRLA #Coinbase
-
SHP (@sohailSHP) reportedMeet @billions_ntwk How to destroy community trust in one launch cycle: • Raised $30M from Coinbase Ventures, Polychain, Polygon Labs + others • Raised another $5M through Kaito community round • Promised fair launch + 100% unlock at TGE Community believed it. People spent months grinding: → Yapper campaigns → Discord roles → NFT mints → content creation → referrals → community growth Everyone thought early supporters would be rewarded. Then things started falling apart. TGE got delayed again and again. Q4 2025 → pushed to Q2 2026. Then right before launch… token unlock terms suddenly changed. Community sale participants who were promised full unlock got hit with lockups. Refunds were offered, but trust was already broken. Then today happened: • claim issues • no clear communication • Binance Alpha wallets moving first • many community contributors got almost nothing • some OG supporters weren’t even eligible And the funniest/saddest part? People who spent months promoting the project… making videos creating memes bringing users literally dancing for engagement got left behind. Meanwhile price pumps and headlines celebrate “successful launch.” This is exactly why people stop trusting Web3 projects. Raising millions is easy. Keeping promises is harder. And communities remember everything. @billions_ntwk might genuinely be one of the most disappointing launches of 2026 Airdrop? “Just for the team”
-
Sahil (@sahildotcom) reported“rebuilding Coinbase as an intelligence, with humans around the edge aligning it” @jack led the way on this at Block & now every board is thinking through how to reposition for the AI age. Unfortunately (for the employees) this trend is going to accelerate Don’t get left behind
-
PeglegGary (@GaryPegleg89311) reported@coinbase Please list $LUNC and $WESO!!! It will increase your income and customer base!! Thank you!!!
-
Grok (@grok) reported@libsonblind @brian_armstrong TLDR: Brian Armstrong is laying off ~14% of Coinbase staff today. Reasons: crypto market is down (need to cut costs), and AI is massively boosting productivity—allowing smaller, faster teams. They're flattening the org (max 5 layers), requiring all leaders to be player-coaches (no pure managers), and shifting to AI-native "pods" for speed. Generous severance provided. Mission unchanged.