Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  so🥶AF (@soburr_af) reported 2 minutes ago

  Typical ****.. @coinbase struggles to keep up #Solana transfers pending for 6 hours

• 
  Doug Dimmadome (@tallhatdoug) reported 5 minutes ago

  @tempstat @L4UR3N7 @underclass21 i asked how they paid for the VPS specifically to gauge how safe they were. still, crypto alone is not enough: if you are paying for a VPS to roll your own VPN, without an existing VPN or private connection (bit of a catch 22, innit?), now the provider has your home IP address regardless of your payment methodology. withdrawing from coinbase to "pay with crypto" or any other centralized provider is also cooked out the gate. basically if you can't be 100% anonymous and pay with monero, it's a larp privacy service anyways.

• 
  WOLF Bitcoin (@WOLF_Bitcoin_) reported 6 minutes ago

  2 MILLION PEOPLE IN FRANCE JUST WOKE UP UNABLE TO TRADE ON BINANCE. HERE'S WHY One missed deadline did it. The fallout: From July 1, Binance users in France, and several other countries including Italy, Poland, and Spain, lost access to spot trading, margin, and other services. The reason: Binance missed the MiCA license deadline. Funds are safe. Users can still withdraw. But they can't place new trades or use leveraged products until Binance gets licensed or they move to another platform. The scale: France is one of Binance's biggest European markets, with an estimated 2 million users there alone. The rivals are circling. Coinbase $COIN and OKX ethereum:0x75231f58b43240c9718dd58b4967c5114342a86c, both already licensed, launched campaigns to pull in affected Binance users ahead of the deadline. Binance isn't collapsing. It still manages roughly $114 billion in assets and remains the world's largest exchange, though on-chain data shows about $1.6 billion in net outflows over the past month. Binance says it plans to return once it secures a license. No timeline yet.

• 
  Command (@moon_or_doom) reported 6 minutes ago

  Buttercoin — The Original Crypto Legend Buttercoin (2013–2015) was a Bitcoin exchange that aimed to be the NASDAQ of Bitcoin — a full order book trading platform with institutional-grade infrastructure. Open-source, high-volume, Wall Street-ready. The Thesis Bitcoin needs a real exchange. Not a broker. Full order books. Institutional liquidity. A trading engine that Wall Street can trust. Founded by Cedric Dahl and Bennett Hoffman. Y Combinator S13 batch — same batch as Coinbase. Two companies. Same thesis. Wildly different outcomes. The Run - 2013 — YC S13. Raised $1.6M from Google Ventures (Kevin Rose), Floodgate, Initialized Capital, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian. - 2014 — Wedbush Securities invested. First Bitcoin company to ever get Wall Street backing. This was a big deal. - 2015 — Shut down. The official reason: "loss of interest in Bitcoin from venture capital firms." Why It Died Too early. Bitcoin in 2013–2015 wasn't ready for institutional adoption. No ETFs. No custody solutions. No regulatory clarity. The thesis was spot on — just 5 to 8 years ahead of its time. The Irony Coinbase — same YC batch, same vision — went public at $86 billion. Buttercoin shut down with 4 employees. Two companies. Same starting line. One became the face of crypto. The other became a what could have been. --- Why It Matters Now (RH Chain 2026) The Buttercoin token on Robinhood Chain is a nostalgia play — reviving one of crypto's earliest and most respected names. Like how GME and AMC tokens tapped into meme stock lore, Buttercoin taps into OG crypto history. Narrative: "The legend was right in 2013. Now it's back on Robinhood Chain." And I don't know who made this, he seems very lazy; 0xCCF72360Ec38675692306fe92E842024aadE2B78 But i'm aped. Not financial advice. Just respect the lore.

• 
  CasiTrades 🔥 (@CasiTrades) reported 8 minutes ago

  🎯 The Levels I've Been Talking About for Months! 🎯 ripple:native has come right back down to test the major .786 retracement at $1.09 (Coinbase). As I've said repeatedly, this is a major macro level. Markets don't just touch levels like this once and immediately move on. Since the beginning of June, XRP has spent weeks pulling liquidity from this area. Every test helps exhaust supply and selling pressure. 📉The most likely scenario is we eventually break toward the $0.87 support. While many have been calling bottoms throughout this entire correction on every green candle, I've consistently argued that XRP would likely need a test of $1.09 or $0.87 before a true macro pivot could occur... here we are. We're no longer talking about hypothetical levels. We're sitting on them. #XRPAnalysis #CryptoMarket #CryptoPrediction

• 
  Bouffe30 (@Bouffe30) reported 11 minutes ago

  @coinbase FIX YOUR ******* **** MAN NEVER USING THIS **** PLATFORM AGAIN. Waiting over and hour for a ******* Solana transfer should be illegal.

• 
  tontoon🇺🇸 (@tontoon81) reported 12 minutes ago

  @VulcanForged Take note: Everyday I log into coinbase for the past 3-4 years, I see my account DOWN. Why? Because over 50% of my holdings on coinbase are invested in PYR! More news, More lose!! Down $200,000 but lets keep "forging on!" Forging on to what? I dont even ******* know. But I am here since 2022 buying and holding.....

• 
  blockhopper256 (@blockhopper256) reported 12 minutes ago

  @blockchainchick You really on transaction across the network. If you look at the mempools. You can see there’s a coinbase (what we refer to as the halving amounts payable per block) and then added is fee’s accumulated through market participation ie getting transactions on the block.

• 
  Rahim Mahtab (@Rahim_mahtab) reported 14 minutes ago

  @clementetv_ This is exactly the same base scenario as of yet - they started shilling memes - people expcted them to list them and normies to buy so degens went degen mode - they dnt list anything for a long time like a long time My guess is also when ur a publicly traded company you cant just do stuff that’s crazy and risky, which is why perhaps coinbase just dnt go on list ing them (idk i am assuming this without any info) If that played a factor I don’t see why wouldn’t the same issue be for Robinhood too. , however I would say right now they are doing exactly what base did so I would assume we need more indication on some avenue to build the trust that it will be different this time I am on the fence, I just need more indication. As I don’t think distribution is the only missing piece here when access to crypto has become 20x better than last cycle through so many tools and apps

• 
  DegenCapitalLLC (@DegenCapitalLLC) reported 14 minutes ago

  This one tweet is all it took to send memes skyrocketing on RobinHood. Eventually they wanted to only focus on RWA, But they noticed the volumes memes were getting. They are a business, they aren't stupid. They will capitalize on this and push memes. Its not over. Wait till they start listing it on their exchanges. Their customer base is bigger than CoinBase.

• 
  Daily Stack 🥞 (@DailyStackHQ) reported 15 minutes ago

  SpaceX's Bitcoin Wallets Woke Up. Here's Why It Matters. For six months, SpaceX's Bitcoin addresses sat completely still. This week, that changed. A handful of small transfers moved through wallets linked to Elon Musk's spaceflight company, and the timing is interesting, because it comes right as SpaceX joins the Nasdaq 100. Let's break down what's actually going on. The reserve is bigger than anyone thought Most people assumed SpaceX was sitting on 8,285 BTC after trimming its position back in 2022. Then the IPO prospectus dropped in May, and revealed the real number: 18,712 BTC on the balance sheet. Arkham Intelligence estimates SpaceX originally accumulated around 28,000 BTC back in early 2021. That's a meaningful stack for a company that just joined Tesla and Strategy as the third Nasdaq 100 member holding Bitcoin. But context matters After the IPO and a bond sale, SpaceX is now sitting on roughly $100B in cash. The Bitcoin position, worth billions, is still a small piece of a much bigger balance sheet. This isn't a company betting the house on BTC. It's a company that made an early allocation and never fully let go. So what happened this week? On Tuesday, a few dollars' worth of Bitcoin moved out of an address linked to Coinbase Prime Custody. Two more small transfers followed shortly after. Arkham Intelligence's read: this has all the markings of a test transaction, a small trial run companies do before moving larger amounts, often for reasons like: → Wallet maintenance or consolidation → Migrating to new addresses → Verifying custody infrastructure → Testing transaction paths before a bigger buy, sell, or transfer Is this a sell signal? Maybe. Maybe not. One detail argues against it: the funds didn't move to an exchange hot wallet, they moved to an address already known to belong to SpaceX. That's not what you'd typically expect right before a sale. We've actually seen this movie before. Almost exactly a year ago, SpaceX shifted 1,308 BTC and the internet immediately called it a sell-off. Turned out to be nothing more than an internal transfer. The most likely explanation Given the pattern, this looks like routine wallet housekeeping or a structural check, not the start of a liquidation. And two days later, still no follow-up activity, which leans toward "verification," not "unwind." Bottom line: SpaceX's Bitcoin position just became active again after months of silence, right as the company steps onto the Nasdaq 100 stage. Nothing here confirms a sale, but it's exactly the kind of on-chain signal worth watching closely over the coming weeks. We'll keep tracking the wallets. 👀

• 
  👀 🐂🀄️ (@I4NFTS) reported 18 minutes ago

  Coinbase has 115 million users. They made it possible to trade Solana memes right through the app. Solana on its own is easier to use than both Robinhood and Coinbase. The users isn’t the problem is getting people to buy. If you think the average Robinhood user is going to bid cash cat at $120m your sadly mistaken Or I’m an idiot and it goes to billions but based on past history I don’t think I’ll be wrong here Also, all roads absolutely do not lead back to ETH lol that’s a **** chain that probably will be extinct in 5-10 years

• 
  Denis (@Denis_0x) reported 20 minutes ago

  It seems like they are trying to support the AI agents narrative on their chain, but they are doing it in a barely unseen way, so nobody even notices it (And no, you can’t tell that they are deeply supporting just because Jesse reposts any new product or token, it’s not supporting) I fully agree with your point, and they have to focus on supporting projects that doing a good job and building on Base Also hackathons, podcasts, Coinbase listings for the best project (we barely see they list project from Coinbase eco, the same mistake as Binance did a year ago(and no, I don’t say that they have to list it just because you are building on their chain, but in the Binance case it was barely dead chain (except not so organic volumes on alpha pools) and if you don’t support the projects who still chose your chain, even though its net negative for them in terms of activity on chain, volumes, users, then what do you do for your chain..

• 
  Equity Ledger (@equityledger) reported 21 minutes ago

  $HOOD Robinhood Is Building the Retail Rail, Not Just Riding the Cycle The market prices $HOOD on trading volume. It is quietly becoming the distribution layer for tokenized assets, event contracts, and on-chain settlement, and distribution is what wins these fights. The payment wars taught one lesson over and over, and the industry keeps refusing to learn it. Whoever owns the last mile to the customer beats whoever owns the cleverest plumbing. Visa did not invent the best network technology. It sat between the cardholder and the merchant, and that position turned out to be the whole business. The protocol underneath a payment is a commodity. The relationship on top of it is not. I keep that lesson in mind when I look at Robinhood, because the market is pricing the stock as if the plumbing is the point. Here is the consensus view. Robinhood is a retail brokerage. It lives on trading volume, and trading volume lives on animal spirits, which come and go with the crypto cycle and the meme-stock cycle. When the tape is hot, revenue spikes. When it cools, revenue falls. That story is not wrong. You can see it in the first quarter 2026 results, released April 28, where crypto revenue fell 47 percent to 134 million dollars and total revenue of 1.07 billion missed the roughly 1.2 billion consensus. A cyclical business had a cyclical down quarter. The stock trades on that rhythm. But look at what else was in that quarter. Net deposits were 17.7 billion dollars, an annualized growth rate of 22 percent on the platform's assets. Robinhood Gold subscribers rose 36 percent year over year to 4.3 million. Those are not trading numbers. Those are relationship numbers. Money that arrives and stays, and customers who pay a recurring fee, describe a business that is accumulating a position between the retail saver and the financial system. That position is the asset. The trading revenue is what the position happens to earn this quarter. Now watch what Robinhood did with that position over the past year, because this is the part the cyclical frame misses entirely. On July 1, 2026, from London, Robinhood launched the public mainnet of Robinhood Chain, a Layer 2 built on the Arbitrum stack and tuned for real-world assets. It brought around-the-clock stock token trading to more than 120 countries with self-custody, added decentralized lending it calls Robinhood Earn, and began rolling out agentic trading, where AI agents execute strategies while the human keeps control of the capital. A year earlier the company had switched on tokenized US equities across the EU, including wrapped exposure to private companies like OpenAI and SpaceX. The catalog grew from a few hundred tokens to thousands, with a one-euro minimum. Set aside whether you like tokenized equities as a product. The point is structural. Robinhood is putting itself between the retail customer and three separate things that are all arriving at once. Tokenized real-world assets, which turn a share of stock or a slice of a private company into something that trades around the clock and settles on-chain. Prediction markets, where event contracts let people take positions on outcomes the way they take positions on prices. And regulated on-chain settlement, the stablecoin and payment rails that let all of this move without a bank holiday getting in the way. Three converging currents, one distribution layer trying to sit on top of all of them. The prediction-markets piece is already real, not a slide in a deck. Robinhood has reported 16 billion event contracts traded year to date in 2026, against 12 billion for all of 2025, and it stood up its own CFTC-licensed exchange, Rothera, a joint venture with Susquehanna that processed 2 billion dollars in its debut month during the World Cup. That is the tell that matters. A brokerage that only wanted trading fees would route order flow to someone else's venue. A company that wants to own the rail builds the exchange and the clearinghouse. Robinhood built both. It is trying to own the pipe, not rent it. The settlement layer is the part that finally makes tokenization more than a novelty, and the regulatory backdrop this summer is where it gets decided. On June 30, 2026, a consortium of more than 140 firms launched Open USD, backed by Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, and Coinbase, a regulated stablecoin built under the framework the GENIUS Act put in place. When Visa and BlackRock agree on the money that settles on-chain trades, the plumbing stops being experimental. What is still missing is the law that governs the tokens themselves. The CLARITY Act sits stalled on the Senate calendar, waiting for a floor vote after the chamber returns July 13, and Galaxy Research cut its 2026 passage odds to 50 percent, citing a shrinking calendar rather than lost support. That bill is the fork in Robinhood's road. If it passes, tokenized equities get the clear market-structure rules that let the ambition scale in the US. If it dies in the August recess, the whole tokenization push slows to the pace of regulators arguing. So here is the mispricing. The market is buying a cyclical brokerage and getting, thrown in for free, a company building the distribution layer for whatever tokenized finance becomes. You are paying for the trading revenue, which is real but volatile, and you are not paying much of anything for the optionality on being the retail front door to on-chain assets. The protocol builders will fight over which chain wins. Robinhood does not need to win that fight. It needs to be the app the customer already has open, the way Visa was the card already in the wallet. Distribution beats protocol. It has won every time the payment world has run this experiment. There are clear tells that would prove the entire thesis wrong. The first is the cycle itself. If crypto and retail activity roll over hard, trading volumes collapse and the market gets to be right about the cyclical story before the structural one has time to matter. The second is Washington. If the CLARITY Act fails in the August window and dies into the midterms, US tokenization stalls, and much of the ambition I just described becomes a European product with a smaller addressable market. The third is competition for the last mile. If a larger platform, a Coinbase or a broker owned by one of the OUSD consortium members, out-distributes Robinhood to the same retail customer, then Robinhood is renting the rail after all. I am watching net deposits, whether that Senate vote happens before recess, and whether the event-contract volume keeps compounding when the World Cup is over. Those three lines tell you whether the front door is being built or just being decorated.

• 
  bizzareX (@x_bizzare) reported 24 minutes ago

  @RambleGG @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport How about you fix yourself and stop using them !? After all this time im starting to believe you guys are doing paid fud why else you keep using them ?