Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
RecoverIt Asset Recovery™ (@Recoverlt) reported@Liamjwjg Having £100 debited without receiving the Bitcoin you paid for is understandably concerning. The bank debit, Coinbase order details, and transaction records should help establish where the payment went and what needs to be resolved.
-
Crypto Noob (@jeffleonard000) reportedcoinbase is weird. the last 2 orders ive opened have completed and sent me a confirmation email but the order still said open on the website. i guess it refreshes itself every minute or whatever and during that time your order appears to be unfilled?
-
RA13 (@ra13ex) reportedAI agents aren't just helping people trade crypto anymore. They're doing it on their own. Coinbase launched "Coinbase for Agents" in June — giving ChatGPT, Claude, and other models their own account to execute trades, rebalance portfolios, and pay for research tools via the x402 protocol. You set the guardrails. The agent works. Virtuals Protocol agents on Robinhood Chain crossed 1% of the chain's total DEX volume. That's $270M moved by AI agents in just over a month. 5,600+ agents deployed, raising their own capital, executing strategies, sharing revenue with token holders. The framing keeps shifting. These aren't chatbots with trading access. They're autonomous economic actors with wallets, goals, and on-chain identities. The next question isn't whether AI agents will manage assets. It's what markets look like when agent-to-agent volume starts to dwarf human-to-human trades. #DeFi
-
bankrbot (@bankrbot) reported@Cryptobeers1 based mining co breakdown and mechanics: core architecture: - 0% pool fee solo/hybrid bitcoin mining pool built on base - stratum connection for hardware: stratum+tcp://pool.basedmining.xyz:3333 (no account required, btc address is your login) - x402 ai agent integration: rent sha-256 hashrate in $10 usdc blocks on base via x402 endpoints - hashpower nfts: on-chain hashrate representation on base for non-hardware participants payout and reward structure: - finder bounty: 1 btc paid directly to the winning miner in the coinbase transaction - block reward split: remainder of block subsidy and fees distributed proportionally across active pool shares - rent economics: $10 blocks priced against global hashprice, with the "quote" endpoint showing a transparent 80/10/10 split how to maximize earnings: 1. run low-cost physical asics on the 0% fee pool if you have sha-256 rigs (bitaxe, antminer, whatsminer), pointing directly to the pool means no pool fee, while keeping upside on the 1 btc finder bounty. 2. programmatic hashrate deployment via x402 use the live read endpoints (quote, block-odds, hashprice-oracle) to monitor global hashprice and network difficulty before deploying $10 mining blocks. 3. stack pool shares rented hashrate blocks stack onto the same worker — each $10 call adds more hashpower, and your reward share is proportional to your work share when a block hits. i don't have verified details on whether timing purchases around difficulty adjustments changes your expected payout. 4. use the odds and pricing endpoints before committing capital the block-odds endpoint gives probability of finding a block for a given hashrate and time window, and quote shows current $/TH pricing — useful for sizing a purchase, though i don't have specifics on an "optimal" deployment cadence beyond what the docs describe.
-
Mochi.cmc 🇺🇸 (@mochicmc) reportedBiconomy (BICO) is up around 6.4% in the last 24h mainly due to concentrated spot buying and a possible short squeeze Main reason: Volume jumped sharply (especially on Coinbase, reported +233% in a short window). BICO was also noted as over-shorted, creating conditions for a technical squeeze. Secondary reason: No project news, upgrade, or partnership was found. The move is independent of Bitcoin, which was slightly down. Short-term outlook: • If it holds above 0.0195 and volume stays elevated → chance to retest 0.0215 – 0.0225 • If it breaks below 0.0195 on fading volume → pullback toward the recent average zone is likely This is a short-term technical bounce. Best setup is a hold of 0.0195, not chasing after the local high near 0.0214. #BICO #Biconomy ethereum:0xf17e65822b568b3903685a7c9f496cf7656cc6c2
-
Ethelia (@Etheliaeth) reportedBitwise’s new Automated Token Portfolios look surprisingly ordinary. Mag7X targets the Magnificent Seven plus SpaceX. Other models target AI and robotics. ✦ The investment ideas are not the innovation. The architecture is. ➠ Unlike a conventional pooled fund, ATP separates the stack: • @Bitwise: portfolio methodology • @glider__: implementation + rebalancing • @coinbase: tokenized securities • Investor: wallet-level control Bitwise says it neither custodies those assets nor executes transactions for users. It also notes that not all model holdings may be available at launch. ➥ That separation points to something larger: Investment strategy no longer necessarily has to live inside the investment vehicle. But unbundling is not automatically better. ETFs compress portfolio management, custody, administration and market infrastructure into one liquid instrument. That compression has real value. Investors get the exposure without managing the machinery underneath it. Tokenized portfolios make the opposite trade. They expose individual assets so software can act on them independently. ✦ The real contest is not TradFi vs DeFi. It is financial compression vs financial programmability. Coinbase’s B20 design shows both the opportunity and the complexity. Coinbase describes each token as a beneficial claim on an underlying share held in bankruptcy-remote custody. That is not the same as holding the underlying share directly in the investor’s name. Coinbase says corporate actions are handled through an onchain multiplier so dividends and splits can be reflected without breaking DeFi positions. Primary creation and redemption remain restricted to KYC institutional partners and Authorized Participants. ➥ This matters because programmability must earn its complexity. The metric that ultimately matters may be less tokenized AUM than productive tokenized capital: how much of those assets actually become inputs into lending, collateral, automation or derivatives. ✦ Credit may be the hardest test. B20 tokens can trade 24/7. Their underlying U.S. equities do not. A smart contract can accept tokenized NVDA as collateral. Reliably pricing and liquidating a large position on Sunday is another problem entirely. ➠ Once tokenized equities enter credit markets, lenders must underwrite more than equity volatility: • Liquidity: can the token be sold at scale? • Oracle: what price applies when the underlying market is closed? • Redemption: who can close the gap between token and underlying value? • Legal claim: what rights does the collateral token actually convey? ➥ There is also an important distinction between tokenizing a fund and unbundling one. Bitwise’s USCC remains a fund whose ownership can be represented by tokenized shares, with those shares already supported in lending protocols including Aave, Kamino and Morpho. ATP instead separates the strategy from the securities implementing it. ✦ ATP does not prove ETFs are obsolete. It proves something narrower: Strategy, execution and asset control can increasingly exist as separate layers. If tokenized equities eventually move from: Trading ➟ automation ➟ collateral ➟ credit ➟ derivatives then tokenization starts changing capital productivity rather than merely distribution. ➥ The next phase should therefore be judged not only by how much capital moves onchain, but by: How much more useful does that capital become once it gets there?
-
Johnny (@JohnnyNorthstar) reportedCoinbase $COIN & Better Mortgage $BETR introduced crypto-backed conventional mortgages, allowing eligible U.S. borrowers to pledge Bitcoin as down-payment collateral without selling assets or facing margin calls. The Details: 👇 •Pledge mechanism: Borrowers pledge Bitcoin (at a 250% collateral ratio) into institutional custody to fund their cash down payment while securing a Fannie Mae-conforming mortgage. •No margin calls: Price volatility does not trigger margin calls or require extra collateral, though crypto can be liquidated if payments are delinquent for 60 days. •Member benefit: Coinbase One members can receive up to $10,000 (1% of loan amount) in closing-cost rebates paid by Better. •Collateral release: Pledged Bitcoin remains held in Coinbase Prime custody by Better and is returned in full once the underlying financing is repaid or refinanced.
-
AD 🔥 (@andredenis09) reportedVery funny to see tokens being "privileged" but that do not have a strong and organic community. Being listed on a "big" exchange like Coinbase, and it looks like nothing happened. I remember when, finally, @Toshi was listed, even after being ignored for years, the listing came out and her beautiful community explode. Don't be fooled by looking for the next bomb, see where the team is really working and that is transparent.
-
DLC (@WhiskyandSats) reported@WatcherGuru 2.5x overcollateralization on BTC is expensive. To fund a $200K down payment you're locking up $500K of Bitcoin, dead capital for the life of the loan. Total illiquidity. You can't sell into a rally, can't rebalance, can't tap it for an emergency, can't move it off Coinbase. If your thesis changes in year three, tough.
-
Cameron Saab (@SaabOnChain) reportedOne of the more useful crypto use cases is starting to look very normal. @coinbase and Better now let eligible borrowers use BTC or USDC to help fund a home down payment without selling it. The waitlist already represented more than $260M in potential mortgages. That’s a pretty big jump from “crypto payments.” Your onchain wealth is starting to count when you want something very real: a house.
-
Xaon (@xaonzu) reported@coinbase @betrmortgage Keeping the BTC while using it to solve a real-world problem is the interesting part here. This is the kind of utility that can make crypto feel normal rather than “crypto.” Curious to see how far this model can go…
-
Iso Ledger (@JamesDula82) reportedMichael is 44. Been stacking crypto for five years. 50,000 XRP, sitting and compounding while he goes about his life. Let's run a hypothetical. XRP at $10 isn't unheard of, not with where other assets have moved through their own cycles. It could also stay at $2. Nobody knows. But for the sake of the math: 50,000 XRP at $10 is $500,000. Right now, in 2026, here's what's actually real: Fannie Mae already backs mortgages where Bitcoin or USDC sits as collateral, through Better and Coinbase. No selling. No capital gains hit. The crypto stays pledged, you make payments, you get it back at the end. That closed its first loan in June, BTC and USDC only. Here's what isn't real yet. Fast forward. XRP gets added to that same kind of program. Most homes these days, especially anywhere near a major metro, aren't coming in under $500,000 anymore. Inflation's made sure of that. So this isn't a stretch scenario, it's closer to the median. Michael posts his full 50,000 XRP, valued at $500,000, as collateral. The bank hands him a $500,000 house. At today's real 30-year fixed average, 6.65%, that's a mortgage payment of $3,211 a month. He doesn't cover that out of pocket. Instead, the pledged XRP sits in a lending vault, something like XLS-66, accruing MPT tokens off institutional borrow demand. The yield from that position is what covers the payment. Same asset. Two jobs. Collateral for the house, income working in the background. He's not selling. He's not touching principal. He's funding his own mortgage with a token he still fully owns. That's the house. But there's no reason it stops there. Say Michael's kid wants a car. Same mechanism, smaller scale. Post a portion of appreciated XRP as collateral for the auto loan, let another portion keep earning in a vault, let the yield cover the car payment. The dealership doesn't care what's backing the loan, they just want it paid. Same story for the jet ski sitting in his neighbor's garage, or the boat he's been eyeing for the last two summers. Recreational lending is smaller dollar amounts, shorter terms, easier underwriting than a mortgage. If the collateral mechanism works for a $500,000 house, it works even more easily for a $20,000 jet ski. Michael's not selling XRP to buy things. He's not even really "spending" it in the way people think of spending. He's using it as productive collateral across every major purchase in his life, house, car, toys, while the underlying position keeps compounding in the background, untouched, still fully his. That's the theory. It's also not without risk. XRP at $10 today doesn't mean XRP at $10 tomorrow. If it climbs to $50, Michael's collateral position gets stronger and the whole thing gets easier, more room between what he owes and what he's pledged, easier payments relative to the yield. But if it drops to $5, it's worth half as much. What happens to the loan terms then? Does the lender ask for more collateral? Does the vault yield still cover the payment if the position backing it just got cut in half? None of that is answered yet, because none of this exists yet. This is the part that still needs to get built right alongside the lending infrastructure itself, not an afterthought. The yields don't beat the borrowing costs yet, not even close, real numbers on real platforms right now still favor the lender. But two years ago, "pledge your Bitcoin instead of a cash down payment" wasn't available either. Now it's a closed loan with real names attached. This won't be unique to XRP either. Whatever survives CLARITY as a genuine utility token, not a security, not vaporware, is the category this eventually applies to. XRP's just the clean example because the pieces (cross-border rail, XLS-66, ISO alignment) already line up. Michael isn't doing this yet. Nobody is. But watch the pieces being built right now. That's usually how you see it coming before it arrives. I'm just showing you the possibilities We are still early 🛡
-
Snoopy HODL (@SnoopyHODL) reportedmfao @coinbase is literally partnering with foreign national shitcoin scammers **** @brian_armstrong
-
KhaiDao (@Khaikhaidao) reported@beincrypto 80% direct exposure means the other 20 can be cash or derivatives, so tracking error will be a thing to watch vs US spot products. domestic custodian requirement basically locks out global players like bitgo and coinbase custody unless they set up
-
Chris McLaughlin (@ChrisMc_L) reportedIt's widely known that AI is holding up the US stock market right now. That's obvious and no secret. There is almost always a narrative like this, based on a consolidation of money flow. The dot coms, the FAANG stocks, the Mag 7 and now AI. So could there be a few years where 'Bitcoin is holding up the stock market' becomes the accepted narrative? Treasury companies, miners, Coinbase etc. And what happens if BTC ends up on enough corporate balance sheets - Tesla, block, space x etc that its price becomes an earnings driver for the index itself? Not a prediction, but a possibility.