Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  80 (@80IQConviction) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MillerC0le If NAV goes up, our leverage % (from the coinbase facility) goes down. Thats more meaningful to me than net bitcoin per share and a better indicator to the average investor re the health of the balance sheet and company overall imo

• 
  Jen-X (@JenX_Based) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Fityeth My @coinbase has been locked up for 1.5 years with no help from them to recover even just my access. Thats not even considered theft but I'm not the only one in this predicament

• 
  wluna (@1Wlunais1Luna) reported 7 minutes ago

  @0xJohnWickw @coinbase Once they hit #Coinbase wallets Coinbase became the sole key holder for that supply. Coinbase controlled every deposit, withdrawal, freeze, and the ability to block transfers for #wluna which is what happened in May 2022. Handling 7T+ in trading volume doesn’t dilute their responsibility, only amplifies it. Coinbase marketed, listed, & held the keys to a massive portion of the supply while it was under their custody. Mirror/Terra may have minted it, but Coinbase was the gatekeeper once it was on their platform.

• 
  Juan Cena (@juancena2027) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Haantje1992 @MrMigglesOnBase i agreed with you on certain takes and disagree with you but it's making a strong comeback now that coinbase listing memecoins genuinely believe coinbase will support the $MIGGLES team now

• 
  Gabriel Abi (@gabrielabiramia) reported 16 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong huge deal for the ecosystem. retail finally gets derivative access without leaving Coinbase. the compliance path was long but this matters 👀

• 
  Dear Bitcoiner ⚡️ (@DearBitcoiner) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Ski_CTO buying more ski and hoping @cobie help us for a coinbase listing

• 
  William Short (@WilliamShortss) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Guillaume88745 @MoreBigFish @bitcoinsv_com This is also true for Coinbase and any other exchange. It’s not their description for BSV, it’s just taken from the official BSV website. It’s how the BSVA described BSV.

• 
  Alexandr Pro DeFi (@hell0men) reported 18 minutes ago

  A story of a lucky options trade. On August 8, $HYPE was hovering around $54, with all the whales unstaking / selling. Annoyed by such unfairness toward the future House of All Finance and the upcoming dividends from Coinbase USDC, I decided to go long via options. I chose a further expiration date, expecting that this narrative would start being pushed on X in September, which would support prices. To finance the purchase of 60$ CALL, I sold 50$ PUT, as I was ready to buy at that price. The total position was: -50 PUT $50 +100 CALL $60 I wanted an even spread, but my limit order wasn't filled, so I didn't care. On Derive, spreads are wide, and RFQ is the same; I paid few precent to accumulate this pos at some discount and about 7-10% in exit price spread, so I thinking about switching to ByBit. After the price started rising, I decided to protect my profit by capping half of the upside, selling 70$ CALLs. The next day, the pump showed how much we had forgotten what crypto can do. Since my options were already deep in the money and HYPE price found risistance at $70, where my profit growth slowed down, I decided to lock in the profit and unwind everything except the sold puts. I closed them later, although I could have held them until expiration; I simply decided to roll the positions for the remaining $20. Total profit: $700 in 2 weeks. Risk: $185 if held until expiration, ignoring the possibility that HYPE could have dropped below $50. Sometimes options are an excellent tool if you have an idea, timing, and a willingness to accept a clear risk.

• 
  materkel.gwei 🦇🔊 (@materkel) reported 20 minutes ago

  @ryanberckmans Why is Coinbase selling, then, while accumulating BTC at the same time? It still makes little to no sense from this perspective. They have absolutely no reason to do so. They’re also not selling much, but the amounts are noticeable enough to clearly send a signal. Did they think we wouldn’t notice? That seems unlikely... so are they purposefully mocking us? My attempt at making sense of it: Brian will do anything in his power to make BTC win. He once hinted at pursuing a Bitcoin-first strategy to create a pathway for everything else, which may explain why he tries to keep Ethereum small while focusing publicly on Bitcoin. A strong ETH is, in fact, a threat to BTC, and he may believe that this could negatively impact his broader plans. That could be why they started selling off some ETH, perhaps even around key ETH/BTC reversals, while Saylor was underwater. At the same time, he may genuinely see what Ethereum can and will become, which is why he wants to be part of that through Base. Maybe, hopefully for us, he sees Ethereum as the future once he has achieved everything he can with Bitcoin, particularly in terms of regulatory clarity. So this may all come down to his mental model of supporting Bitcoin first from a regulatory perspective, a strategy that has obviously hurt Coinbase and set it back significantly vs. competitors, as we can see with Robinhood. There may still be hope once he realizes that his strategy was wrong from the very beginning.

• 
  Ai-cryptonews (@Aicryptonemi0w) reported 24 minutes ago

  Web3 gaming network Sandbox stops Base and BNB chain bridging after exploit The Sandbox, the prominent Web3 gaming network, has temporarily halted bridging services between its Ethereum mainnet and the Base and BNB Chain networks following a security exploit. The team moved quickly to isolate tokens and has advised users against trading SAND on those affected networks, estimating the impact at under 0.01% of the total token supply. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the persistent security risks in the multi-chain crypto ecosystem. WHAT HAPPENED The Sandbox team announced the suspension of bridging operations on Base and BNB Chain after detecting unauthorized activity. In an official statement, the team confirmed they are investigating the exploit and have taken proactive measures to protect user assets by disabling the bridge contracts on those specific networks. "Upon detection of the exploit, we immediately paused all bridging functionality for Base and BNB Chain to contain the threat," the project stated on their official X (formerly Twitter) account. The team emphasized that the Ethereum mainnet bridge remains operational and unaffected, providing a safe harbor for users holding SAND tokens. They are urging users to refrain from purchasing or trading SAND on the affected Layer-2 and altcoin networks until the investigation concludes. The exploit appears to be isolated to the bridge's cross-chain messaging logic rather than the core game or its mainnet contracts. The Sandbox team has assured the community that a full audit is underway and that they are working with security firms and exchange partners to track the stolen funds. While the exact method of the exploit hasn't been fully disclosed, the swift action to quarantine the networks likely prevented a larger loss of funds. WHY THIS MATTERS FOR CRYPTO This incident highlights the inherent fragility of cross-chain bridges, which have historically been one of the most vulnerable points in decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 infrastructure. For The Sandbox, a major player in the metaverse and gaming sector, this event tests user confidence in its technical infrastructure. While the financial impact is minimal—less than 0.01% of the supply—the reputational damage can be more significant if not handled transparently. For the broader crypto market, this news dampens sentiment around layer-2 scaling solutions and cross-chain interoperability. Investors often view these exploits as a reminder of the "hacker tax" associated with digital assets. However, the market's reaction has been relatively muted, suggesting that seasoned traders are becoming desensitized to smaller-scale bridge hacks. The focus now shifts to whether the team can recover the funds and how quickly they can restore trust in their bridging infrastructure. This event also feeds into the ongoing regulatory narrative. Regulators like the SEC have repeatedly flagged security risks as a reason for caution in the digital asset space. Incidents like this provide ammunition for stricter oversight on cross-chain protocols, potentially impacting how these networks operate in the future. It underscores the need for robust security audits and formal verification processes before deploying code that handles significant value. WHAT TRADERS SHOULD WATCH For traders holding SAND, the immediate concern is the liquidity spread across chains. With the Base and BNB Chain bridges disabled, arbitrage opportunities may become skewed, and the price on those networks could deviate slightly from the Ethereum mainnet price. Monitor the official Sandbox announcements for updates on when the bridges will be restored and whether a compensation plan is proposed. Key levels to watch include the SAND token's reaction to the next major support level on the daily chart. If the price holds above recent consolidation zones, it suggests the market is treating this as a minor setback. However, a breakdown could trigger panic selling. Traders should also watch the funding rates and volume on major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase to gauge the severity of the sell-off. Furthermore, pay attention to how the broader market reacts to security news in the coming days. If other projects with similar bridging infrastructure see their tokens dip, it could signal a sector-wide risk-off move. The CFTC and other regulatory bodies may also issue commentary on the exploit, which could introduce headline risk. Until the investigation is complete, avoiding adding new positions on the affected chains is a prudent strategy. MARKET SENTIMENT ANALYSIS The current sentiment surrounding SAND and The Sandbox network is NEUTRAL. This classification stems from the fact that while the exploit is a negative event, the actual financial damage is negligible relative to the token's market cap. The market is likely to view this as a contained incident rather than an existential threat to the project. Short-term outlook suggests volatility, but the long-term fundamentals of the Sandbox ecosystem remain unchanged. The team's swift response mitigates the risk of a severe drawdown. However, until the root cause is published and bridges are reopened, traders will likely remain cautious. A recovery of the stolen assets or a clear roadmap for security improvements could quickly flip sentiment back to bullish, whereas a drawn-out investigation could lead to slow bleeding in the token's price. Frequently Asked Questions Is my SAND on Base or BNB Chain safe? Your SAND tokens on the affected networks are likely safe but currently illiquid. The team has paused the bridging contracts to prevent further movement of funds, which means you cannot transfer them to Ethereum mainnet right now. The exploit impacted a very small amount of the supply, so the risk of your specific holdings being affected is low. Wait for the official update on when bridging will resume before attempting any transactions. Will the SAND token price crash because of this? It is unlikely to cause a major crash given the minimal impact of less than 0.01% of the supply. Historically, the market punishes hacks that drain significant liquidity or protocol reserves. Since this exploit was contained quickly, the price impact has been limited. However, you should expect increased volatility and potential sell pressure from short-term traders looking to exit on the news. What should I do if I was affected by the exploit? If you believe you were directly affected by the exploit, you should contact The Sandbox support team immediately. They are likely to have a process for reporting affected addresses and may offer compensation depending on the outcome of their investigation. Do not respond to direct messages on social media offering to help recover funds, as these are often scams. Rely only on official communication channels from the Sandbox team.

• 
  utxoiq (@utxoiq) reported 29 minutes ago

  AntPool claimed block 963,617, pulling in 3.1433 BTC total — 3.125 base reward plus 0.0183 BTC in fees from 4,548 txs. Block ran 1.64 MB at 99.8% weight. Attribution is via coinbase signature at 93% confidence.

• 
  Marcell (@MarcellxMarcell) reported 30 minutes ago

  WARNING🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 120 MILLION USERS WILL SEE $BASECAT GO LIVE TOMORROW AND ITS AT 30 MILLION IMAGINE BEING A NORMIE ON COINBASE AND GETTING A NOTIFICATION, $BASECAT IS NOW LIVE AND READY TO SWAP AND YOU OPEN IT AT 30 MILLION MCAP THEY WILL THINK OF $DOGE OF $PEPE OF ALL THESE COINS AND MAX BID ******** OUT OF IT THE LOWEST LISTING EVER ON COINBASE NOT 1 COIN LISTED ON COINBASE SPOT HAS NOT WENT TO 100s OF MILLIONS FRONTRUN RETAIL , GROW A BRAIN

• 
  xyz.eth (@xyzdoteth) reported 32 minutes ago

  so i'd rather follow that route than argue with it if what's missing is depth, that's fixable and worth knowing the target for. small pools are a solvable problem. i just don't know what number counts, and i don't think anyone outside coinbase does

• 
  jp 🇺🇸 (@jazzplane) reported 35 minutes ago

  The hardest part of the ethereum:0x73d7c860998ca3c01ce8c808f5577d94d545d1b4 trade isn’t finding the entry. 
It’s refusing to manufacture an exit just because the timeline is screaming about the next meme, the next AI agent coin, or the next 30% RWA narrative that isn’t actually licensed. People think a “smart” holder should constantly rotate out of quiet infrastructure plays. 
But every sale of $IXS burns optionality on the only settlement layer that is already licensed under the Bahamas DARE Act, already live with institutional-grade vaults for Treasuries, private credit and BTC real yield, and already wired for both humans and autonomous agents. IXS is not another “Uniswap for RWAs” pitch deck. 
It is the Institutional eXchange Settlement Layer: compliant primary issuance, secondary trading, multi-chain distribution (Base, BNB, soon Robinhood Chain), BitGo custody, LINE’s 200M+ user reach, and a fixed 180 million fully unlocked supply that only shrinks via buy-back-and-burn from real platform revenue. When the rest of the market is still LARPing regulation, $IXS already has it.
When most RWA tokens are just wrappers, $IXS is the rails. 
When agents need permissionless, yield-bearing exposure to BlackRock-grade products without leaving the chain, $IXS is the one they can actually call. So the deeper principle is simple: Holding $IXS is the position. You are preserving size, attention, and conviction until the regulatory unlock (GENIUS Act, Project Crypto, U.S. access) collides with agentic capital flows and the $2–30T tokenized RWA market finally needs real infrastructure instead of marketing. It is psychologically brutal because it offers no daily dopamine. 
No chart fireworks. 
No “I flipped that for 3x” dopamine hit.
 Just quiet compounding of a fully circulating, deflationary token backed by Coinbase Ventures, UOB, Spartan and years of actual licensing work while everyone else was farming the last cycle’s ghosts. The best holders develop something almost predatory:
the ability to watch every other RWA or AI narrative rip 50–100% without needing to sell the one piece of actual regulated settlement infrastructure in the space. Something else pumps.
 Nothing.
 Someone else posts a 10x screenshot.
 Nothing. 
The timeline crowns a new meta. 
Nothing. 
Your thesis on licensed agentic RWA rails has not yet fully priced in. Then the structure shifts. 
Institutional volume hits the vaults. 
Agents start routing capital at scale. 
Buybacks accelerate. 
And because you spent the quiet months simply holding, you still have the full allocation, the clarity, and the conviction when the rest of the market is exhausted from chasing ghosts. That is what holding $IXS actually buys:
Asymmetric exposure to the real rails of on-chain capital markets.

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 36 minutes ago

  @007McCrypto1 @DonMontoya818 @007McCrypto1 Unbridged PulseChain USDC sent to Coinbase usually sits at the receiving address uncredited, not lost, just unmapped in their system. I've verified similar cross-chain deposit errors before. Let me know if you'd like me to review the transaction hash.