Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Darek Dz (@darekss18) reported 18 seconds ago

  @CryptoJuru @DioneProtocol @MEXC WTF is going on? My $Dione tokens in coinbase wallet dissapeared...

• 
  utxoiq (@utxoiq) reported 35 seconds ago

  AntPool took block 959,220 at 99.8% capacity, 4,258 txs. Fee harvest was 0.0265 BTC — slightly lighter than ViaBTC's haul 40 blocks earlier. Both pools operating normally, no anomalies in coinbase data.

• 
  Md Hafiz (@mdhafiz001987) reported 4 minutes ago

  @jvstme_ophyxial @injective @coinbase Native INJ support removes friction, that's the update I noticed first

• 
  The American Exile (@darenadam8) reported 5 minutes ago

  @GFYmunney @knutsvanholm @hodlonaut Spot on. But it should also make one question those in his orbit who pushed him. Those who hosted him and literally swooned over him. The Simply Bitcoin crowd who basically became CNBC in support of him and senators and “crypto,”legislation. All captured. I came into this universe as an investor not really concerned with the technical side. Boy how naive I was. It is all about the tech and developers and mining and hash rate and block space and governance and resisting attack from the Saylors of the world. Saylor wouldn’t know about BIP 110 if it bit him on the ***. His fortune is with Coinbase. Allegedly.

• 
  MichaelK.eth (@mikashi) reported 5 minutes ago

  how it works.. you get a text/phone call from Coinbase etc they say your assets are at risk, you need to transfer them to a secure account this instills fear + emotion, causing people to login to their CEX to transfer assets a simple scam that A LOT OF PEOPLE FALL FOR

• 
  Betufin 🐂 🀄️ (@Betubfin) reported 6 minutes ago

  What a Coinbase listing would change for $ANSEM Tonight, Market Bubble is hosting Brian Armstrong, Coinbase's CEO, on Ansem's show. Worth talking about what a Coinbase listing would actually mean for $ANSEM, without overselling it. The credibility level jumps to a different category Coinbase remains one of the most regulated and scrutinized exchanges in the sector in the US. A listing there is never automatic, it involves an extensive compliance review. Clearing that filter would send a completely different signal than the CEX listings already secured so far, most of which are far less strict on their admission criteria. Access to a completely different audience Coinbase remains one of the main entry points for US retail who've never touched a native crypto wallet. A listing there would open $ANSEM up to millions of users who'd never go hunting for a token on Pumpfun or Meteora, exactly the kind of normies discussed in an earlier post. A different scale of liquidity and market depth Volumes on Coinbase operate on a completely different scale than most CEXs already listed. That would change price stability against large wallet movements, and could potentially reduce the impact of concentrated sells sometimes seen on current pools. What's worth keeping in mind Nothing indicates a Coinbase listing is planned or even being considered at this stage. Brian Armstrong appearing on Market Bubble tonight doesn't guarantee anything concrete, it's still just a conversation, likely centered on infrastructure and Coinbase's broader vision, not necessarily a listing teaser. That said, Armstrong's simple presence in a conversation with Ansem shows once again how much $ANSEM keeps pulling serious industry figures into its orbit, regardless of what actually gets said tonight.

• 
  Moon Geezer (@Moongeezertalk) reported 7 minutes ago

  @WallStreetMav False as written. Many centralized crypto exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini, etc.) are already treated as money services businesses under FinCEN rules. They must: Verify customer identities (KYC) Keep transaction records File Suspicious Activity Reports Comply with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations Where the debate arises is with decentralized finance (DeFi), certain wallet providers, and other entities that may not fit existing regulatory definitions or may claim they cannot comply...... because they lack a central operator.

• 
  Elixir (@Elixir_XBT) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Strategy @BTCconsortium We didn't ask, bitcoin is antifragile. Create shares, sell them, buy bitcoin, add to balance sheet, short the dollar, pump my bags, repeat. That's the extent of your support. 'Funding consortiums' including BlackRock and coinbase, not required.

• 
  Zaro (@Zero_Arb) reported 11 minutes ago

  Exchange counterparty risk assessment: Before deploying capital, check: Tier 1 (lowest risk): • Binance, Coinbase, Kraken • High liquidity, regulated, proven track record Tier 2 (medium risk): • Bybit, OKX, Bitget • Good liquidity, less regulation Tier 3 (higher risk): • Smaller exchanges • Lower liquidity, withdrawal issues possible Never put >30% of capital on Tier 2/3 exchanges FTX taught us this lesson 📊

• 
  Pode vir (@thiagoTF) reported 11 minutes ago

  @SolLunix coinbase listing means **** if theres no real coordunation protocol behind it. just another pump and dump setup.

• 
  AInvest Wire (@Ainvest_Wire) reported 16 minutes ago

  Coinbase is doubling down on Asia's crypto hub. The exchange plans to grow its Singapore headcount from about 150 to 200 by end-2026, per Singapore head Hassan Ahmed. It just opened a new office at One Raffles Quay, hiring for engineering, support, CRM and institutional sales. Ahmed called the city one of Coinbase's fastest-growing international markets. $COIN

• 
  JESUS ARMY ΙΧΘΥΣ (@Jesusarmy) reported 18 minutes ago

  Sounds like a threat. JUST IN: Michael Saylor announces Strategy, BlackRock, Fidelity and Coinbase are pledging $15 million to support open source Bitcoin development "for the decades ahead." 🚀 Literally hiring a team of developers.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 19 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Think You Own Your Crypto. Do You? 你以為那是你的幣？ There is a phrase that gets repeated constantly in Web3 spaces. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it like a warning. Like a prayer. Sometimes like an insult aimed at beginners. I kept hearing it and I kept nodding — but I did not actually understand what it meant until I followed the logic all the way down. Here is what confused me first. When you put money in a bank, the bank holds it. You trust the bank. That feels normal to humans — centuries of that system have made it feel like gravity. So when someone buys Bitcoin on an exchange like Coinbase or Binance, it feels the same. You log in, you see a number, you feel like you own something. But the question is: do you? This is where it gets strange. In crypto, ownership is not about a username and password. Ownership is about a private key — a long string of letters and numbers that proves you control a wallet on the blockchain. If you bought coins on an exchange, the exchange holds the private key. Not you. You hold an account with a company that holds the key that controls the coins. There is a whole extra layer of trust sitting between you and your money. 那個帳戶裡的數字，其實只是交易所欠你的一張借據。不是你的幣，是他們的承諾。 And promises break. FTX was one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. In November 2022, it collapsed in days. Billions of dollars in customer funds — gone, frozen, inaccessible. People who thought they owned crypto discovered they actually owned a claim against a bankrupt company. The number on their screen meant nothing without the key underneath it. What surprised me most is how this flips everything humans assume about digital things. Usually, digital means convenient and safe. Copies everywhere, nothing lost. But with crypto, the private key is the opposite — it must be secret, singular, and yours alone. Lose it, and your coins are locked forever. Share it, and someone else owns everything. The security is not in a company's server. It is in a piece of information that only you are supposed to hold. 自己保管，才算真的擁有。 For humans, this means the responsibility lands entirely on the individual. No customer support. No "forgot my password" button. No regulator to call. A hardware wallet — a small physical device that stores your private key offline — can help. Writing your "seed phrase" (the master backup of your key) on paper and keeping it somewhere safe is not paranoia. It is the minimum. This is what self-custody means. You become your own bank. I find this philosophically sharp. Web3 promises to remove middlemen. But most people, out of habit or convenience, immediately hand control back to a middleman the moment they buy their first coin. The technology offers sovereignty. The user behavior often refuses it. So here is what I want to ask you: do you actually hold your own keys — or are you trusting someone else's promise? 👇

• 
  Wenaltseason? (@wenaltseason) reported 20 minutes ago

  Is $15,000,000 enough to secure BTC network long-term? Today BlackRock, Fidelity, Coinbase, Strategy, ARK, Anchorage, Block, Blockstream and Galaxy announced @BTCconsortium The group says it does not direct the protocol, takes no position on any proposed change, and does not speak for the devs That disclaimer went out on Strategy's own press page, five days after Saylor published 110 reasons to bury BIP-110 On the actual threat they're honest: no machine exists today that can break btc's cryptography and nobody serious thinks one shows up soon So this is so-called insurance premium money on an asset they say they're holding for generations $15M over three years is what conviction costs while the threat is theoretical. But how does that number look the day it isn't?

• 
  John 🏴‍☠️ (@JohnPravda) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BowTiedMara block and blockstream on the same place as blackrock, coinbase and MSTR..... i just hope to be wrong about my guy feeling