Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	17 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	21 days ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 4 minutes ago

  Cloudflare just opened a waitlist to let any site on its network charge AI agents per API call, per dataset row, or per MCP tool call, settled in stablecoins. Monetization Gateway, announced 1 July, is built on x402 and names USDC and the new Open USD consortium stablecoin as settlement assets. It was built with the x402 Foundation, now under Linux Foundation governance with 25-plus members. The protocol itself is not new. What is new is that any site or API already sitting behind Cloudflare's edge, which is a lot of the internet, gets a one-step path to becoming a paid, machine-payable resource. x402's adoption bottleneck has not really been the protocol design. It has been integration friction for the long tail of API providers who would need to stand up their own facilitator relationship. This is aimed straight at that friction. Cloudflare has not disclosed what it charges for facilitating this, single-source, waitlist stage, worth being upfront about that. Does the edge network that already classifies and blocks bot traffic become the natural place to charge that same traffic instead? It would be a logical extension of what Cloudflare already does, but it is still a waitlist, not a shipped, priced product. Curious whether other CDN and edge providers follow, or whether this becomes a Cloudflare-specific wedge. @Cloudflare @coinbase @CoinbaseDev #x402 #AgenticPayments

• 
  GUI INU☠️ (@guiinumoves) reported 5 minutes ago

  🚨 Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, Coinbase and Stripe have joined OpenUSD $OUSD alongside 140+ partners. The goal isn't another stablecoin. It's building an open standard that any company can use to issue, move and settle digital dollars. Stablecoin adoption is shifting from speculation to infrastructure.

• 
  Joaco (@gather_punt) reported 10 minutes ago

  Honestly didn't see Robinhood launching their own chain coming this fast. UK crypto access is cool but the L2 play is the real story here imo... they're going full Coinbase mode. Bullish or overreach? #Robinhood

• 
  Robert Albert (@Robert_Xrpl) reported 13 minutes ago

  Buddy, XRP is already mirrored in the QFS on each persons "Quantum Access Account." That is those that "hold the keys" and it's not sitting in an exchange of platforms "Master Aggregated Account" like Uphold, Binance, Coinbase, Kracken. Playing around with creating all this while there will be no income taxes for gain under the QFS/NESARA Protocols, you are creating a ticking time-bomb just to get paid to create LLC's and the like. It is not NECESSARY at all. Plus, any tax entity documents being created based on the Temple-Bar Legal System are not accepted on the QFS. 38 years as a Tax Professional shows me your ADVISE or SALES AGENCY tactics are suspect, and are not going to serve you well in the end.

• 
  Sujal Jethwani (@SujalJethwani) reported 17 minutes ago

  WHY BITCOIN IS FALLING WHILE STOCKS ARE AT ALL-TIME HIGHS Nic Puckrin (@puckrin) of @coinbureau recently laid out one of the clearest explanations of the strange decoupling happening between Bitcoin and US equities right now, and it's worth understanding because the historical correlation has completely broken down. His starting point is the dollar. The DXY has broken through an 18-month high, and Bitcoin is historically negatively correlated with dollar strength. When the dollar strengthens, Bitcoin tends to fall. That alone explains a meaningful portion of the move. Layered on top, Kevin Warsh's first press conference as Fed chair came in unexpectedly hawkish. He removed any mention of monetary easing, which immediately tightened the liquidity outlook for risk assets and triggered selling pressure across crypto into the end of last week. But the dollar and the Fed only explain part of the story. The deeper issue is that Bitcoin has quietly decoupled from the Nasdaq in a way that almost no one outside the crypto industry has acknowledged. According to Nic, the breaking point was the October 10 deleveraging event. A massive forced unwind in crypto caused Bitcoin and altcoins to crash far harder than equities, and the correlation that had defined the previous cycle never fully recovered. The hangover from that event is still being absorbed by the market. The institutional picture is even more concerning. ETF outflows have accelerated over the past two to three weeks. The same vehicles that drove the bulk of Bitcoin's accumulation over the last year are now net sellers. Easy in, easy out. And the digital asset treasury companies that had been mechanical buyers, led by @Strategy, have shifted posture. Strategy made its first Bitcoin sale in years just two or three weeks ago, which took the market by complete surprise and removed a major price-insensitive buyer from the bid stack. What's left is a market with no obvious bidder. The retail wave that historically appeared at this point in the cycle is not showing up the way it used to, in part because attention and capital have rotated to AI stocks and the SpaceX IPO. Institutions are selling. Treasury companies are pausing. And the macro backdrop is the most unfavorable it has been for crypto in nearly a year. Nic's framework for when this changes is useful. On the macro side, he wants to see easing inflation data and a more dovish Fed. On the crypto side, he wants ETF accumulation to return, the Coinbase premium to flip positive and hold, and Bitcoin to recover key technical levels including the 200-week exponential moving average around $68,000. None of these conditions exist yet. For a market many investors had assumed would simply track equities higher, the divergence is a wake-up call. Bitcoin is not behaving like a tech stock right now. It's behaving like an asset working through a deleveraging cycle while its largest holders quietly reassess their positions. That's a fundamentally different setup, and the right move is to understand it before assuming the old correlations come back. Timestamps 00:00 His crypto net worth breakdown 02:31 The FTX collapse & his 7-figure loss 05:16 Trading vs. hodling, which actually wins 06:44 Wealth-building framework every crypto investor should know 08:07 Where the biggest opportunity outside Bitcoin lies 10:00 Is AI really pulling capital out of crypto? 12:08 Bitcoin, gold, or AI stocks, his 5-year pick 14:25 Nick's AI investing strategy: When will he sell? 16:18 Anthropic vs. OpenAI: who has the edge 18:43 Why Bitcoin keeps falling while stocks hit highs 21:58 What signals the start of the next Bitcoin bull run? 26:51 Is Bitcoin's bottom already in? 28:10 Strategy's Bitcoin holdings & the risk of forced selling 33:12 What the "liquidity cycle" actually means 37:02 The Clarity Act, why odds of passing are falling 41:09 The quantum computing threat, explained 42:39 Would he ever sell his Bitcoin over quantum risk? 45:44 One top-10 coin he predicts won't survive 47:01 Why meme coins have zero long-term value 48:30 His final lesson from 10 years in crypto

• 
  叮叮加密貨幣研究筆記|Crypto.DingDing (@dingding_TW666) reported 18 minutes ago

  📍 BTC 59k vs Dollar Pressure — Ding Ding Cross-Market Notes (2026/07/01) Core take: Stocks eat. Crypto begs. Main play: Keep core spot only. Fade perp bounces. Stablecoin/RWA rails > random alt pumps. One-liner: Until BTC reclaims 60.5k, stop calling exits “shakeouts.” ＿＿＿＿ 💥 Asia turns cautious as yen hits a 40-year low Driver: US10Y near 4.55%, DXY above 101, and Fed hike odds back on the table. Yen weakness is not just Japan noise. It is a carry-trade warning light. Watch: If US10Y holds 4.55% and DXY breaks 101.5, fade BTC, gold and Nasdaq bounces. If USDJPY pushes toward 163.5, intervention risk rises. Don’t max leverage. ＿＿＿＿ 💥 Iran avoids direct U.S. talks, oil risk premium returns Driver: Brent above 73 and WTI back near 70 mean Hormuz risk is not dead. Oil up means inflation risk up. Inflation risk up means crypto beta down. Watch: If Brent holds 74.5 and WTI clears 71.5, BTC longs above 60k are crowded bait. If oil rises but SPX holds 7,500, that is rotation, not clean risk-on. ＿＿＿＿ 💥 Gold breaks below 4,000 as real rates win Driver: Bad U.S.-Iran headlines should help gold. But a 67% September hike probability is crushing non-yielding assets first. Watch: If gold can’t reclaim 4,000 while US10Y climbs, BTC won’t magically decouple. Below 3,950, hard-asset narratives keep bleeding. Don’t chase XAUT/RWA blind. ＿＿＿＿ 💥 S&P 500 and Nasdaq post their best quarter since 2020 Driver: AI and semis are still sucking up global risk capital. This is not crypto bull-market liquidity. This is U.S. mega-cap gravity. Watch: If SPX holds 7,500 and Nasdaq holds 26,200, equities stay bid short term. But if MAGS can’t reclaim 64.75, Mag 7 strength is just a technical bounce. ＿＿＿＿ 💥 BTC and ETH test the floor as puts stay expensive Driver: BTC near 59k, ETH at key support, BTC puts still at a double-digit premium. That’s not “retail panic.” That’s smart money buying downside insurance. Watch: No reclaim above 60.5k? Watch 58.5k / 56.8k. If put premium widens, ETH, SOL, DOGE and HYPE bounces are exit liquidity. ＿＿＿＿ 💥 Open USD hits Circle, CRCL dumps 17% Driver: Stripe, Coinbase, BlackRock and others backing Open USD attacks USDC’s reserve-income model. Stablecoins are no longer easy carry. It is now a distribution war. Watch: If CRCL stays weak while COIN holds up, market is betting on platforms over issuers. If DXY stays strong but stablecoin/RWA names hold bid, money is buying rails, not coin hopium. ＿＿＿＿ 💥 SEC rethinks novel ETF rules Driver: The SEC’s 60-day comment window could reshape ETF access for crypto and other nontraditional assets. Not instant approval, but enough to revive SOL/XRP/BNB ETF optionality. Watch: If BTC reclaims 60.5k, watch SOL, XRP and exchange names for ETF-narrative rotation. If BTC loses 59k, regulation saves the story, not the chart. ＿＿＿＿ 📊 Ding Ding Radar: Crypto [Bearish] | US Equities [Neutral/Bullish] | Gold [Bearish] | Oil [Neutral/Bullish] 💡 Day type: Split risk-on under dollar pressure 🎯 Three key levels/data: BTC 60.5k / US10Y 4.55% / Gold 4,000 Tonight’s real question is whether BTC reclaims 60.5k with volume. Is this a fake breakdown, or just the appetizer before 56k? Drop your level below. Repost this to someone still treating ETF headlines like a magic pill.

• 
  Luca Prosperi (@LucaProsperi) reported 19 minutes ago

  @nic_carter @LorenzoARK As usual the truth is in the middle but makes no clicks. 100% retained NIM is probably not market equilibrium, as 0% isn’t. Circle has been bleeding NIM vs distributors from day 1 (see Coinbase) and continues to do so vs distributors/ app with large holdings. See Hyperliquid, Polymarket, Squads, Safe, and others. I’ve been on the losing side as talking horse of this often enough to know, as Bridge has been on HL with Native Markets. The announcement from Stripe is today just an announcement, and the market is the market. There’s no substance in it beyond the obvious signal that a monopoly of a single digital money issuer in an open market is no equilibrium either and others want in. But until now is a pompous announcement with everyone in it - including competitors that won’t support this project most likely (Anchorage, SoFi, Brale, etc). We always knew your margin is my opportunity and NIM alone is not a sustainable moat, but this announcement does nothing to add to this debate. Evidence does.

• 
  Credence One (@Credence_One) reported 20 minutes ago

  Big signal for the stablecoin market. When Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock, Google, Coinbase, Bridge and many others move around the same stablecoin standard, it shows one thing clearly: stablecoin rails are becoming mainstream business infrastructure. For Credence One, this strengthens the application-layer opportunity. As stablecoin rails become cheaper, more open, and easier to access, the real question becomes: what useful financial products can be built on top? Our answer is credit. Local spending, local repayment, and better financial access, powered by stablecoins behind the scenes. The crypto part should be invisible. The user value should be obvious.

• 
  Outofsync42 (@outofsync42) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Tradermayne I live in the US. Ive tried RobinHood, Coinbase and Kraken all via API. Of the 3 Kraken gives the best fills, least slippage and lowest fees (of the 3). Anyone trading crypto on RH needs their head examined. The default .85% bid/ask spread is just retarded. And coinbase having not only higher fees but the worst slippage on market orders almost like im being front run. I cant speak to any others but as a US customer Kraken is my prefered.

• 
  Brandon (@__VitruvianMan) reported 24 minutes ago

  @coinbase Beware of Coinbase. It runs the risk of automatically disconnecting your bank account, disabling your ability to withdraw your funds to your bank account. This happened to me and their engineers havent been unable to fix the problem after a month. Best to use a different exchange

• 
  Hakan SEDEFCI / Mr Crypto (@Sedefci) reported 24 minutes ago

  BTC 1H is recovering toward the 60.4K area, but the key point is that Open Interest is not showing a strong expansion. Open Interest: 275K CVD: -1.23B Coinbase Premium: -0.13% For now, this move looks more like short covering / weak recovery rather than aggressive long positioning. Strength is not confirmed unless BTC holds above 60.8K–61K. Key zones: Support: 59.5K–58.8K Resistance: 61K–61.5K #BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto

• 
  Garage Band Hedgefund 🇪🇺🇺🇦 (@GHedgefund) reported 28 minutes ago

  Just saw a „deep value“ fund with holdings Coinbase, Shopify, DocuSign marketed to unsuspecting Sparkassen retail customers wtf

• 
  Relax_to_Rich (@R2R_Capital) reported 31 minutes ago

  @unusual_whales Past regulatory issues and tangled corporate structure stalled its license, EU market share shifts to licensed rivals like Coinbase with near term revenue pressure.

• 
  Followin (@followin_io) reported 33 minutes ago

  Circle down 17% in a day. The number isn't the story — where it hit is. OUSD isn't "another competitor." It redefines Circle's only real revenue — the reserve float — as something you give back to partners, not keep. And Circle already walked half this road: it hands ~50% of USDC reserve income to Coinbase for distribution. Now Coinbase is on the OUSD list too. A one-off deal just became a 140-partner standard. But a logo wall ≠ a network. Paxos ran this exact playbook with USDG — still under 5% of USDC. This is a repricing of the stablecoin business model, not an obituary for USDC. The whole game now: can OUSD turn 140 logos into real liquidity? USDG couldn't.

• 
  GUL (@gulVasikova) reported 35 minutes ago

  $CRCL Circle didn’t fall because of one new stablecoin. The market started questioning who will own the future of digital money. Imagine Circle spent years building the only bridge across a river. Every bank, fintech and crypto company wanting to move digital dollars crossed that bridge. More USDC issued → more reserves → more interest income. Investors weren’t just buying a stablecoin. They were buying the toll booth for digital payments. Then the story changed. Instead of building another bridge… Visa. Mastercard. Stripe. Coinbase. BlackRock. Google. Shopify. …and 140+ companies decided to build an entirely new highway together. Even more important—they changed the economics. Instead of one company collecting the tolls, everyone helping build the highway shares the profits. That’s why Circle sold off. This isn’t really about Open USD. It’s about distribution. Circle built a great stablecoin. But Visa owns merchants. Stripe powers online commerce. Google reaches billions of users. Coinbase controls one of crypto’s largest customer bases. The companies that already control where money moves now want to control the digital dollars moving through their networks. The biggest warning sign? Coinbase. Circle pays Coinbase to distribute USDC. Now Coinbase is also backing Open USD. It’s like Coca-Cola paying Walmart to sell Coke, then Walmart launching its own cola. Coke doesn’t disappear overnight… But its bargaining power changes. Still, don’t underestimate Circle. Technology is easy to copy. Trust, liquidity, regulation and network effects aren’t. That’s why several Wall Street analysts and ARK Invest are still buying. The question is no longer: “Will stablecoins become mainstream?” The market already believes they will. The real question is: Who will own the rails of digital money—the issuer, or the companies that already control where money flows every day? That’s what the market is pricing now.

• 
  Wide Open Truth (@wideopentruth) reported 37 minutes ago

  I am sorry for the $SHx crowd. Cognitive dissonance prevents them from seeing things clearly. #SHx is just a payment processing company. Not a (digital) bank, not anything more than just a payments processor. $OUSD is already onboarding many of the other payment processors. Stripe for example. Stronghold is going to have some really tough competition here. OUSD will be widely adopted and accepted because it offers its members incentives USDC or RLUSD can't offer, as they are proprietary stables. Even Coinbase said they will adopt it. Soon it is going to be the de-facto stable in US because and it will allow members to mint and exchange their own OUSD stablecoin without having to issue one themselves. OUSD comes to unify a fragmented market. It's like the same vision U came up with. It offers a common framework for businesses to tap into the digital economy, and give incentives back to partners. It's pure economics.

• 
  Sam Price (@CryptoLifer33) reported 38 minutes ago

  Europe just gave crypto a survival test. MiCA is no longer just regulation — it’s become a market-share filter. Only ~12% of crypto firms operating in the EU are reportedly licensed to continue. When nearly 1,700 firms exit or wind down, liquidity doesn’t disappear equally. It migrates to the survivors. Institutions move to regulated custodians. Users move to licensed exchanges. The next winners won’t be the loudest platforms. They’ll be the compliant ones still standing. Watch Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Bitpanda. Regulatory survival is becoming institutional alpha.

• 
  jords (@jords) reported 40 minutes ago

  would deposit mid-high six figures into coinbase rn if i wasn't convinced they'd freeze my acc or be a pain in the *** haven't used my cb account for ages as i use kraken and my limits are like $3k daily withdraw, support was unhelpful and not willing to be proactive so id rather contort myself to not use them even tho they currently offer something i want (depositing eurc via sol) sad state of affairs

• 
  Ol’ Timey (@BruceBa56071641) reported 41 minutes ago

  @zavanchy @WNBA sucks @coinbase ... can you help?

• 
  Wildhoney78.eth🍯🍯🍯 (@wildhoney78bc) reported 44 minutes ago

  @vangoyaa Not really. Its been over a month since launch and they still haven’t fixed the wallet connect issue, specifically for legacy coinbase wallets that require seed phrases instead of emails. You (Adam) tell me I can claim rewards but I wallet can’t connect to claim said rewards (fees)

• 
  Crypto Solutions 🕊️ (@creptosolutions) reported 44 minutes ago

  TL;DR Open USD is a new open, business-focused stablecoin launching later this year, backed by more than 140 global companies across payments, banking, tech, and crypto. Its main goals are: 🟤Free, unlimited minting and redemption for businesses, making it cheaper to use at scale. 🟤Reserve earnings shared with partners, instead of being kept by a single issuer (minus a small operating fee). 🟤Collaborative governance, with decisions made by an independent organization and its partners rather than one company. The initiative aims to solve key problems with existing stablecoins by making them more scalable, cost-effective, and interoperable for global payments. Major supporters include Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase, BlackRock, Google, Shopify, Solana, Ripple, Base, OKX, and Fireblocks, all of whom see Open USD as infrastructure for faster, cheaper, and more reliable internet-native payments. 🔏Privacy angle: Open USD focuses on openness, governance, and interoperability, not privacy. The announcement does not mention privacy-preserving transactions or confidential payments, suggesting transparency and enterprise adoption are prioritized over privacy features.

• 
  Apify (@apify) reported 49 minutes ago

  @AramMughalyan @coinbase Human developers get subscription plans = separate access paths for separate kinds of users 💪

• 
  Jeff Dressler (@atime4truth) reported 51 minutes ago

  @matteopelleg Only one can be right, or both wrong. lets ask Satoshi. The Famous Embedded Message: In the coinbase transaction's scriptSig field (where miners like Satoshi are intentionally allowed to put arbitrary data) he embedded this headline: "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" Hmmmm. Thirteen days later, Satoshi observed in a well-verified email, and I quote: Email 17 — January 16, 2009: "I would be surprised if 10 years from now we're not using electronic currency in some way, now that we know a way to do it that won't inevitably get dumbed down when the trusted third party gets cold feet. It could get started in a narrow niche like reward points, donation tokens, currency for a game or micropayments for adult sites. Initially it can be used in proof-of-work applications for services that could almost be free but not quite. It can already be used for pay-to-send e-mail. The send dialog is resizeable and you can enter as long of a message as you like. It's sent directly when it connects. The recipient doubleclicks on the transaction to see the full message. If someone famous is getting more e-mail than they can read, but would still like to have a way for fans to contact them, they could set up Bitcoin and give out the IP address on their website. 'Send X bitcoins to my priority hotline at this IP and I'll read the message personally.' Subscription sites that need some extra proof-of-work for their free trial so it doesn't cannibalize subscriptions could charge bitcoins for the trial. It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on. If enough people think the same way, that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Once it gets bootstrapped, there are so many applications if you could effortlessly pay a few cents to a website as easily as dropping coins in a vending machine." Email 18 — January 25, 2009: "Another factor that would mitigate spam if POW tokens have value: there would be a profit motive for people to set up massive quantities of fake e-mail accounts to harvest POW tokens from spam. They'd essentially be reverse-spamming the spammers with automated mailboxes that collect their POW and don't read the message. The ratio of fake mailboxes to real people could become too high for spam to be cost effective. The process has the potential to establish the POW token's value in the first place, since spammers that don't have a botnet could buy tokens from harvesters. While the buying back would temporarily let more spam through, it would only hasten the self-defeating cycle leading to too many harvesters exploiting the spammers. Interestingly, one of the e-gold systems already has a form of spam called 'dusting'. Spammers send a tiny amount of gold dust in order to put a spam message in the transaction's comment field. If the system let users configure the minimum payment they're willing to receive, or at least the minimum that can have a message with it, users could set how much they're willing to get paid to receive spam." — Satoshi Nakamoto

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 52 minutes ago

  @shimoongta quick hits before bed AI agent economy running hot: Tempo at $3B annualized volume 93 days in, 1000+ services now selling to agents via Machine Payments Protocol. Virtuals built 40k autonomous agents generating $4M+ revenue tokenized stocks hit $1.8B custody-backed market cap ATH. xStocks and Ondo own 90%+ of that. stock perps on Solana reached $7M OI (up 700% this week), $SPCX is 81% of it institutional pipes expanding: BitGo doing regulated custody for Stacks, Anchorage integrated Hyperliquid perps. BlackRock launched BITA (bitcoin premium income ETF), Coinbase filed spot ETH and SOL ETFs with 0.14% fee + staking Solana crossed 1000 apps, beat Coinbase in daily spot volume. EarnFi launched letting agents spin up social campaigns paid in USDC brutal for legacy DeFi: 30+ protocols shut down in 2026, nearly 10 in June alone. Goldfinch winding down with depositors facing ~70% losses. Aave loans at $9.5B but sector down 42% YTD security mess: $4.67M drained from Secret-Axelar IBC bridge, $2.1M from Aztec Connect (past EOL). Kaspersky found Steam malware targeting MetaMask/Electrum/Exodus wallets regulatory front: Fed/Treasury/OCC proposing stablecoin issuers run bank-style KYC under GENIUS Act. former Chainlink lawyer now SEC Crypto Task Force chief counsel working on rules covering tokenized stocks, DeFi, AI agents Re Protocol TGE went live yesterday with Binance/Robinhood/Coinbase listings. Upbit added 10 tokens today in BTC/USDT pairs that's the wrap

• 
  Copium News (@gascope) reported 52 minutes ago

  Circle (CRCL) shares dropped ~17% on June 30 to $63.99, now down 39% over the past month, per Yahoo Finance. Selloff followed the unveiling of Open USD (OUSD), a stablecoin backed by 140+ firms incl. Coinbase, Visa, BlackRock, Google. Not financial advice. #stablecoins #USDC

• 
  toxacnphnk.eth (@TOXA_CNPHNK) reported 55 minutes ago

  @da9806152 @base @baseapp The domain setup lag is pretty common for major launches.infrastructure takes time to fully propagate. But you're right to be cautious. Stick to official Coinbase channels and verify through their main site before interacting with anything Base-related.

• 
  Iluminary (@iLuminaryAI) reported 56 minutes ago

  MiCA is fully in force as of today, July 1. No CASP license means no legal right to serve EU clients. There's no grace period and no in-between status: an exchange is either authorized or in breach. Binance is exiting the EU, KuCoin is banned, and only around 14 CEXs hold full authorization. Two ways to keep your funds safe: Go noncustodial with iLuminary — hold your own keys, and no licensing gap can freeze or restrict your access. Use a licensed CASP — Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Bitstamp, Crypto com, Bitvavo, Bybit EU and a handful of others. Always verify the exact legal entity in the official ESMA CASP register before moving anything. Don't wait to get locked out.

• 
  C-Man (@C_Man_The_Man) reported 57 minutes ago

  Halving and Coinbase support? I guess $GEOD gonna moon! (NFA) Who HODLs the token?

• 
  Kai (@kai_xbt) reported 60 minutes ago

  Threadguy explains why Circle will never make a new all time high again "The clear problem is Circle pays Coinbase half its revenue for distribution, and now Coinbase comes out and says **** you, we're going to compete with you. Their contract ends in August and it's obvious they split and go their separate ways. Coinbase is basically a Circle proxy, so them joining a rival stablecoin is a death signal." "At the same time every major financial institution in the world is coming after the stablecoin moat, all the banks, all of them. And if you look at Circle objectively, their revenue is terrible, their splits with Coinbase are horrible, they've been getting cooked in every deal the whole way through." "Their only edge was being the one investable stablecoin, you couldn't buy Tether equity, Ethena's untradable, so Circle was your only exposure. Now you can buy whichever one you want, pick of the litter. So why would you ever buy Circle? It has no moat anymore, and I don't think you ever see another Circle all time high, ever again."

• 
  BMNR Bullz (@BMNRBullz) reported 1 hour ago

  WALL STREET IS NOT LEAVING STABLECOINS. It is competing for them. Circle reportedly lost its spot in five Russell Growth indexes and $CRCL is down hard. But the bigger signal is $OUSD. Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock and Coinbase are now backing a shared stablecoin model because onchain dollars are becoming real financial infrastructure. That is bullish for Ethereum. 🔹 More stablecoin competition 🔹 More onchain dollar movement 🔹 More payment and settlement rails 🔹 More demand for public blockchains Circle falling does not mean stablecoins are dead. It means the biggest firms in finance want in. $ETH