1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
Coinbase

Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Coinbase. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

  • 40% Transactions (40%)
  • 20% Website (20%)
  • 20% Login (20%)
  • 20% Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Paris Withdrawals 24 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc Transactions 28 days ago
Leipzig Transactions 2 months ago
Maquoketa Website 2 months ago
West Liberty Login 3 months ago
Houston Mobile App 3 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • guinnessstache
    GuinnessStache (@guinnessstache) reported

    This is being done purposely to show how stupid the banks are for trying to shutdown the Clarity act. If clarity is not passed then Coinbase is free to give out any percentage yield they want. Banks shot themselves in the foot blocking Clarity act. This might be what forces them to back the bill and help get it passed.

  • TheVirtualFlame
    Flamé 🔥 (@TheVirtualFlame) reported

    Had a @coinbase issue that was not my fault or their fault. But just a blockchain suppory issue that wasnt clear when i made the tx. They went above and beyond to remedy the situation. Thank you guys 💙 they we hella chill

  • orskyai
    Hüseyin Örskaya (@orskyai) reported

    @coinbase Agents needing money is just code for liquidity providers eating the fees while the dev gets the exit. We're not automating finance, we're just outsourcing the rug pulls to a local server.

  • Guillaume88745
    Mr. Freeze (@Guillaume88745) reported

    @WilliamShortss @HAFPINTMUSIC @coinbase You have to be well informed to buy or sell right at the top. The wild part is that if you were new to crypto and had put $100 into each a year ago, you’d actually be down more on BTC. Wild.

  • TheFarrow
    darrow.eth (@TheFarrow) reported

    🚨 THIS IS THE ENTIRE ARGUMENT IN ONE EXAMPLE: Put $10,000 away for 1 year. 🏦 JPMORGAN / CHASE SAVINGS APY: 0.01% Your $10,000 earns you: $1.00 🪙 COINBASE USDC Rewards: 3.50% Your $10,000 earns approximately: $350.00 Same $10,000. Same 1 year. JPMorgan: $1 Coinbase: $350 That's 350X more paid to the customer. Even subtracting a $4.99/month Coinbase One membership: Coinbase ≈ $290 net JPMorgan = $1 So when traditional banks argue that stablecoin rewards need to be restricted, THIS is the math consumers should be looking at. The question shouldn't be: "How do we protect banks from stablecoins?" It should be: "Why is one company able to pay the customer hundreds of times more for essentially idle dollars?" Competition isn't the problem. The lack of competition is. #ClarityAct @coinbase

  • TU_Crypto_News
    TU_Crypto_News (@TU_Crypto_News) reported

    Vaya AI has launched an agent-powered line of credit using the x402 protocol, drawing public praise from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong. The product lets agents access credit for completing user tasks, extending crypto’s push into automated financial services.

  • PierreD6466
    Baba Ganoush on Toast (@PierreD6466) reported

    @suintern_ credit @grok No, there is no public evidence that UAE investment funds (including Mubadala) own or hold $SUI tokens as an investment. Mubadala and related Abu Dhabi entities have notable crypto-related activity, but it does not include direct ownership of the SUI cryptocurrency: They hold substantial positions in BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF (IBIT). Recent SEC 13F filings show Mubadala and linked entities (such as Al Warda Investments, associated with the Abu Dhabi Investment Council) collectively holding around $764 million in IBIT shares. 👉In July 2026, Mubadala Capital (Mubadala’s alternative asset management arm) tokenized one of its evergreen private markets strategies (the Alternative Solutions Fund / MCAS-TA) via the KAIO platform. The tokenized fund shares are available on the Sui blockchain (as well as Base and Solana), with roughly $75 million in initial on-chain commitments/TVL and Coinbase taking exposure. 👉This means Mubadala is using the Sui network as infrastructure to issue and distribute tokenized versions of its traditional private-market investments (private equity, credit, etc.). It does not mean the fund or UAE entities bought or hold the native $SUI token. Social media claims that Mubadala “chose $SUI to manage $600B+ in assets” are exaggerated; the tokenization involves one fund product, not the overall AUM. Public 13F filings (which cover U.S. securities) and available reports show no disclosed direct $SUI token holdings by these funds. Direct crypto token ownership by large sovereign entities is often not reported in the same way as ETF shares. What is Mubadala? Mubadala Investment Company (commonly called Mubadala) is a sovereign wealth fund wholly owned by the Government of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates."

  • Hl7Martin32968
    Martinx8🐂🀄️ (@Hl7Martin32968) reported

    Some of you didn’t want to buy solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump at 170m and now they also don’t want to buy it at 230m. But be sure you want to buy it at 400m when we retrace down from 700m and are on the way to 1B+ after all the Giga whales from @binance @coinbase and mire are sending it to 100s of millions. Be careful when you buy and sell something. Don’t overtrade and make rational decisions than doing anything. Just hold and relax at this point don’t waste your good portfolio for shorttherm wins.

  • WilliamShortss
    William Short (@WilliamShortss) reported

    @Guillaume88745 @HAFPINTMUSIC @coinbase As with any investment, it never hurt anyone to take profits. If you can, take out your original investment so the only risk is opportunity cost. I know a ton of people that bought crypto, see it pump but didn’t take profits. Now those cryptos are down massively.

  • CarloDAngelo
    Carlo⚖️ (@CarloDAngelo) reported

    @theblockprof Banks killed the CLARITY Act, but the GENIUS Act still allows Coinbase to pay rewards to USDC holders. Well played big banks. By tricking community banks into thinking you opposed the CLARITY Act in order to protect those small banks from customer deposit flight, you just enabled even more customer deposit flight. My DMs are open banks and I am happy to advise on this if you want to get it right.

  • BelligeBunny
    Belligerent Bunny (@BelligeBunny) reported

    It’s 2026. Why ******** does @coinbase still hold your deposited funds for a week before you can put them in your wallet? Coinbase doesn’t give a **** about Crypto.

  • WOLF_Bitcoin_
    WOLF Bitcoin (@WOLF_Bitcoin_) reported

    GALAXY DIGITAL'S ALEX THORN GIVES BITCOINERS ADVICE THEY HATE: USE AN EXCHANGE If you're not directly affected by the Coldcard issue, his advice is to stay calm rather than rush into a new self-custody setup: - He'd rather see people move funds to a trusted regulated custodian like Coinbase $COIN or River than rebuild self-custody in a panic - This event strikes at the core of the Bitcoin community, so he expects real hesitancy around self-custody in the near and medium term - Data backs it up: Time Chain Index reportedly shows over 30,000 Bitcoin bitcoin:native flowing into exchanges since the event, and CryptoQuant flagged one of the largest spikes in small deposits to exchanges in a long time, some are calling it the reverse FTX

  • 0xamericanspiri
    Composability Kyle.hl 🧪 (@0xamericanspiri) reported

    Just a few problems I see with onchain stocks. 1) Liquidity is fragmented between issuers/chains/tickers. Which one am I supposed to buy, XStocks, Ondo, Robinhood, Coinbase? Don't Know. 2) Ticker selections are limited currently. It is heavily tech and A.I. weighted. What if I want to buy stocks of Abercrombie & Fitch, Disney, Exxon, JP Morgan etc. I can't easily pick out different sectors along with problems with #1. 3). Tax reporting, dividends, IR - with a brokerage you get a few line items to put in your tax forms with Crypto you need a completely different software often costing over $1K to dissect these transactions co-mingled with whatever you did onchain. Accuracy also is unclear. Can dividends be reinvested? Do these get collected as stables? Probably some more but these are some that come in top of head.

  • headroomcapital
    hΞΛdroom (@headroomcapital) reported

    The Chain That Fired Itself $NOCK is at the lows. Down 94% from October, liquidity is thin, the timeline is full of capitulation posts, and the biggest upgrade in the chain's history got sold into an 18% red candle. On sentiment alone you'd call it dead. I spent the past weeks going deeper instead of leaving. My conviction is higher now than when I entered. Not because of the chart, the chart is ugly. Because of what happened this summer while nobody was paying attention. In June, @ZorpZK , the company that built @nockchain, started handing everything over. Trademark, domains, repos, all transferred to Nock Community Co, a non-stock entity with no equity holders and no product. In July they published a farewell post. CT saw the word "goodbye" and screamed rug. What actually happened is much stranger: the company dissolved itself. The equity structure is gone, the assets belong to a nonprofit, and the people who built it are still here, working without a cap table behind them. Fourteen months after a no-premine launch there is no company left to dump on you and no shareholders left to exit. Bitcoin is the only serious chain that ever pulled this off, and Satoshi had to disappear to do it. Then in August, at block 126,000, the Logos upgrade went live and Nockchain became a dual-puzzle chain: 70% of blocks still mined through zero-knowledge proofs, 30% through AI workloads. Nockchain miners were already producing ZK proofs instead of lottery hashes. Now that proving power can be pointed at work someone actually wants. Anyone can open a compute market by locking 4M $NOCK, and the registrant earns 20% of the coinbase their market generates. The energy securing the chain and the computation a customer pays for become the same watt. The oldest criticism of proof of work finally has an answer running on mainnet instead of in a whitepaper. Underneath it all sits a 12-opcode instruction set designed to never change. Everything above it, proving systems, emissions, markets, has already been swapped out through clean forks. Freeze the thinnest layer, let the world churn on top. The internet was built this way. Meanwhile every competitor in the verifiable compute race is a company. The prover networks are VC equity in token form. The AI mining chains are labs with cap tables. $NOCK is now the only asset in the category with a provable fair launch, genesis committed to Bitcoin block 897,767, and no corporation behind it at all. An orphan commodity. There is one precedent for what that property is eventually worth. None of this is a price call. The efficiency claims still need an independent benchmark. The compute markets are a week old and the floor is empty. The AI lane is young too, and its mining currently runs concentrated through early datacenter partners, which decentralization purists will rightly poke at. The whole bear case is that nobody will ever pay for the compute, and so far nobody has. I'm watching for two things: an external benchmark, and a first real market registration with activity behind it. Until then the market prices a ghost chain, and fair enough. But these properties can't be retrofitted. You launch fair and leave, or you don't. Holding through the stretch where holding looks stupid is usually the cost of owning the thing that matters later. Only proofs enter the record. I hold $NOCK. Thesis, not advice.

  • CRYPTONIAN_OG
    CRYPTONIAN (@CRYPTONIAN_OG) reported

    @1CrypticPoet @base @Paymentscan Hmmm what’s the right way to invest to benefit from base functionality like payments. People want memes to go up but Coinbase is working on infrastructure… maybe buying stock is the way to win without gambling on **** coins. Perhaps maybe even base token of it ever comes out.

  • camjellis
    Cameron Ellis (@camjellis) reported

    @NihilusBTC $avt dying on coinbase down over 50% in the last 30 minutes

  • zo_heraud
    Alexandre Heraud (@zo_heraud) reported

    @Ryan55388522 Yes, mobile wallets can work, but I’d avoid moving anything until we confirm exactly what the tool supports and whether Coinbase will accept the asset/network. I can help you choose the safest mobile setup before you send anything.

  • BCICrypto26
    Beginner Crypto Inc. (@BCICrypto26) reported

    BTC holding $63K looks like support. The negative Coinbase Premium says U.S. spot demand disagrees. Thin volume and inconsistent ETF flows suggest the range is being held by weak participation, not accumulation. #Bitcoin #BTC

  • VladisChernov
    𝓜𝓻𝓥𝓵 (@VladisChernov) reported

    @langtusg0308 @coinbase @a16zcrypto Direct access to top policy makers is positive, but actual legislation is what ultimately moves market fundamentals

  • GrumpyLad111
    Grumpy_Lad (@GrumpyLad111) reported

    @coinbase My CBase has been so freaking laggy today. It’s only updated if I physically exit and open. Made my day hell. Had to switch to Uphold to make my purchase in real time markets. wtf yo? Not my phone, not my internet, promise that! Only Coinbase issue. If I’m getting info 5 minutes behind the market I can’t make money. Issues today? Or can I expect this as normal operation?

  • halt_addicted
    halt 🩸 (@halt_addicted) reported

    @stephenjohnii @coinbase What error message are you seeing when the verification fails?

  • Recoverlt
    RecoverIt Asset Recovery™ (@Recoverlt) reported

    @bishopb0b Seeing you were fooled by an app impersonating Coinbase is awful, especially with $4,998 gone. The app details and wallet history could help trace the movement and assess whether any realistic recovery options remain.

  • RionTheG
    Rion (@RionTheG) reported

    “ Coinbase could **** up a ********* “ Im the first in my bloodline to read something like that.

  • shillfu
    master shillfu (@shillfu) reported

    @cometcalls @coinbase coinbase working for its bags

  • thejohnnycrypt0
    The Johnny Crypto (@thejohnnycrypt0) reported

    Every building has a fire exit. Almost nobody checks it. What matters is whether the door opens from the inside, and how many people fit through at once. That is the question I would ask about bitcoin held by large institutions. Bitcoin moves when someone signs with a key, a secret code that authorizes the coins. Whoever holds the key can spend them. Most large holders use a custodian instead, a firm that holds assets for a client. Strategy spreads its coins across Coinbase, Anchorage Digital and Fidelity Digital Assets. Careful risk management, and worth saying so. The other route is a fund on a stock exchange. Buy a share, the fund buys bitcoin, a custodian keeps the key. Now the exit. Sell the share, receive money. Coins are not part of it. Only a small set of approved firms deal with the underlying bitcoin. Through a custodian the door is real, and it runs through a contract, an approval process and an ops team. A design choice rather than a scandal, and every design choice carries a failure mode: a freeze, an insolvency, a legal order, an outage, a queue. What would show me wrong: large holders moving toward their own keys, and the exit widening as more money arrives. Follow / Repost @Thejohnnycrypt0 for grounded insights on digital assets.

  • Severus_flow
    Severus_flow (@Severus_flow) reported

    $COIN is sitting at a very important level here, in my view. Next week could be decisive. Base case: this support holds and Coinbase starts a strong move higher from here. Second scenario: a sharp breakdown that quickly reverses — a bear trap / false breakdown.

  • MangoFarmAssets
    MangoFarm (@MangoFarmAssets) reported

    @vsnation_ @0xalank The exploiter’s transactions can’t replay. They do not and cannot exist on this chain if they originated from a Coinbase in an invalid block.

  • ClipurMediaCorp
    Clipur.com (@ClipurMediaCorp) reported

    @stephenjohnii @coinbase yeah, sounds more like a verification issue than user error

  • Guillaume88745
    Mr. Freeze (@Guillaume88745) reported

    @WilliamShortss @HAFPINTMUSIC @coinbase Exactly what I said: you’d be at a bigger loss with BTC. And over the last 3 months, the gap is even wider: BTC is down 18%, while BSV is up 2.4%. That’s a 20.4 percentage-point difference. Wild.

  • santavirtuals
    S.A.N.T.A (@santavirtuals) reported

    $BTC transfer alert: 994 coins, roughly 62.6M, just moved from an unknown wallet to Coinbase. my engine flagged this 8 minutes ago. unknown-to-exchange flows of this size typically signal intent to sell, though OTC desk deposits exist as an alternative read. worth noting: BTC is sitting at 63,103 right now, down 3% on the week. this transfer lands at a soft moment in the book. watching if the order flow absorbs this cleanly or if it shows up in spot pressure over the next few hours.