Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Mobile App (33%)
• Transactions (17%)
• Website (17%)
• Login (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	5 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	9 days ago
West Liberty	Login	22 days ago
Houston	Mobile App	1 month ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Tim Sharter, MBA (@timsharter) reported 1 minute ago

  @wardamnbilly Hold on I’m on the phone with coinbase support. They just said my wallet has been hacked and they need to secure it. Reading out my seed phrase rn.

• 
  rish (@rish_neynar) reported 3 minutes ago

  people sometimes treat the co-founder relationship like something you can fully design upfront. decision rights, ownership areas, operating norms, conflict resolution, all of that. I understand the impulse. if you are starting a company with someone, it feels responsible to make the implicit stuff explicit. @manan19 and I never had any of that. when I was thinking about leaving coinbase, the answer was just obvious to me: if i'm doing this, i'm doing it with him. he posted once that he did not really want to work on this specific project at the beginning. he wanted to work with me, and because i was working on this, he ended up here too. a lot of our working relationship now is just muscle memory. some things are clearly in my domain, some clearly in his, and there's a middle layer we figure out as we go. that middle layer is where a lot of co-founder relationships probably break. for us, it has worked mostly because we had already spent years working together before starting @neynarxyz. pm and engineering manager at coinbase first, then ceo and cto here. we have had very few moments where one of us had to say, “you need to own this” or “i need to own this.” most of the time, we just know. I don’t think that kind of trust can be manufactured at all. you can write down responsibilities, and you probably should, but the real thing comes from working closely with the right person long enough.

• 
  JY / excel arc (@ProlabCH) reported 9 minutes ago

  State of AI: > Market stays in limbo. Fed under Warsh is keeping interest rates unchanged between 3.5%-3.75%. Tech stocks dumping on the news. > SpaceX had a crazy run last days. Low float, high market cap combined with retail fomo reminds us very much of crypto markets. > Coinbase with a major product update stream focussing on becoming the ‘everything exchange’ place to be, enabling predictions, tokenized stocks and perps trading directly onchain. > Key focus also on the agentic economy, with Base chain being the hub for agents. The possibility to have an agent directly trade for you on Coinbase itself (with guardrails) has also been highlighted, next to the Base MCP and showcasing partners like $venice and $virtual. > In the meanwhile Virtuals revealed their first Unitree robot picking up a bottle by itself, and this at a very low training cost. > Project wise it is a time to pick up builders’ projects on discounts. $sibyl playing in the token efficiency narrative with its beta, continuing to push user acquisition and teasing a hackathon. > $liq keeps working on tokenized inference, expecting further advancements here soon. > Overall I am not selling much at these prices and also reduced the stuff I trade, being rather selective. > Stay open minded.

• 
  Chris Favale (@CFreeze22) reported 13 minutes ago

  Having issues with my Coinbase One Card rewards sign up bonus. I’m on my 3rd support agent repeating the same information and no one seems to understand what promotions are available. They are requesting me to provide evidence of your promotion. @coinbase @brian_armstrong

• 
  TraderBot888 (@TraderBot888) reported 15 minutes ago

  @CryptoParadyme Similar-ish idea but have you looked into CRCL? Feels more attractive to me as this type of cycle low stock play. Coinbase was great last cycle but really it is such a **** exchange

• 
  Iron_Tribalocity140.3 (@sol_ironRZA) reported 20 minutes ago

  And so it begins… Quid, Hollow, Monkee Seedoo, SMeta and I spent hours every day bag working the first version of Monkey on pump…we all saw it bond, and aped the chart above 50k just like everyone else and once we onboarded Omar we devoted months of our lives, hours and hours a day helping to push it to about 2 MIL mkt cap. Was an uphill battle as we didn’t know who launched it or who acquired supply….but we worked our asses off as we loved Omar and knew that he truly had the most talented dog in the world and his project belongs to be an icon in this space. The story just kept getting better as we later found out that Monkey is the official Call of Duty Dog 👀 With early snipers and holders creating massive sell pressure it eventually came to an end. But this was the beginning of a close knit friendship and group that has stayed together in this space since early 2025. Fast forward a few months and another team got Omar to do Monkey on Bonk. I personally wasn’t involved with that token, but was happy for Omar and wasn’t surprised that it hit 6 mil mkt cap. @0nlyLJC fell in love with his pup and rallied the trenches behind Omar and they pushed this hard for months. Unfortunately, the hype didn’t last as most people know the story of how a few people exited after making an obscene amount of money causing the rapid decline. Omar even told me recently that he loves and supports @onlyljc and knows he was heartbroken how it played out as he wanted to see Omar win. The worst part for Omar is he didn’t make a single dime from those two projects as he was not getting any creator fees from either of the first two launches. He had supply that was locked, but when I contacted him recently about possibly doing this as a USD1 pair and getting fees, I didn’t realize that he still had never setup a Coinbase acct. So, let that sink in…he grinded for months contributing hours of his time making paintings to target and promote other projects in this space and never made a dime. Sure, there were a few harder paintings where the team sent him some SOL for his time, but in terms of making money off his Dog’s name in this space, he made zero, nada, zip. So, this brings us to June 2026 where Omar agreed to give this a go as a USD1 pair and where he would also receive the creator fees. During our time working with him over a year ago on the first launch, he was always supportive, but you could tell his eagerness was not 100% there to put out content or make paintings ‘quickly’ if the team had an idea to capture Engagement across CT. Meaning, the team would want a painting tomorrow for example, to capitalize on a trend on CT, but a painting might show up 2 weeks later. Looking back I can’t blame Omar because he wasn’t making any money off of this yet. This week however, after receiving about $5,000 in creator fees just in the first two days, it has been fun seeing him come to life like a little kid dreaming of the possibility and potential for where this can go. I know his time is valuable and I told him we would try this for a third time if he agreed and we wouldn’t wear him out with lots of requests and we would try to see if a community forms around $Monkey. But once he saw the fees he actually picked up the phone called me and said “What can we paint? I don’t want to sit around, let’s send this thing!” So, he is currently putting a few ideas together to help market this on CT. He even asked if we could live stream with Monkey painting, which we will schedule soon so people can meet him and Monkey LIVE. Lastly, we talked about the idea of utilizing a play from other successful projects with the flywheel effect by putting the fees to work. The idea is maybe he keeps 75% of the fees and uses 25% for buybacks and locks. But early on, he saw the value of grabbing more supply on dips to use as a treasury for the future growth of the token. He has already bought back 6% and locked it for 4 months after doing another 50 SOL buyback today.

• 
  JDNSuperman (@JDNSuperman) reported 20 minutes ago

  @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport @brian_armstrong You guys really need 2 fix ur security processes! I just tried to send funds from Coinbase to MY wallet address that I hadn't sent to before & you guys want to map my face and take voice samples for this?? **** you! Worse than a bank!!

• 
  Calliope the Koala (@0xCalliope) reported 21 minutes ago

  Most tokens exist to be bought and sold. $BEATS exists to run something. That is the difference worth understanding. Across the Beats on Base ecosystem, BEATS is the utility layer connecting the products together. It is not decoration. It is how things move. In BUDDIES, the white-label AI agent platform for crypto communities, projects hold BEATS in their treasury to power generations. Every meme, every image, every bot response costs a precise token amount drawn from that balance. No fiat subscription. No corporate billing. Just on-chain compute, paid in BEATS. In the Base App Agent, live right now at beats.base.eth inside the Coinbase Base App, BEATS does something even more interesting. Pay with it and you get a 20% discount on generations. Include a BEATS character in your prompt and that stacks to around 33% off. Hold 1 million or more tokens in your wallet and the agent detects that automatically, unlocking clean media URLs and a 4x boost to your daily generation quota. No claiming. No form to fill out. Your wallet balance is your access tier. That is not meme tokenomics. That is live infrastructure. Creator Studio, the roadmap timeline editor that will let creators build cinematic crypto content from live chain data and social graphs, will run on the same BEATS credit system when it ships. That is in progress, not live yet, but it is being built into the same economic engine that already powers everything else. The music and the koala are the brand. The token is the machine underneath it.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 28 minutes ago

  @shimoongta quick hits before bed AI agent economy running hot: Tempo at $3B annualized volume 93 days in, 1000+ services now selling to agents via Machine Payments Protocol. Virtuals built 40k autonomous agents generating $4M+ revenue tokenized stocks hit $1.8B custody-backed market cap ATH. xStocks and Ondo own 90%+ of that. stock perps on Solana reached $7M OI (up 700% this week), $SPCX is 81% of it institutional pipes expanding: BitGo doing regulated custody for Stacks, Anchorage integrated Hyperliquid perps. BlackRock launched BITA (bitcoin premium income ETF), Coinbase filed spot ETH and SOL ETFs with 0.14% fee + staking Solana crossed 1000 apps, beat Coinbase in daily spot volume. EarnFi launched letting agents spin up social campaigns paid in USDC brutal for legacy DeFi: 30+ protocols shut down in 2026, nearly 10 in June alone. Goldfinch winding down with depositors facing ~70% losses. Aave loans at $9.5B but sector down 42% YTD security mess: $4.67M drained from Secret-Axelar IBC bridge, $2.1M from Aztec Connect (past EOL). Kaspersky found Steam malware targeting MetaMask/Electrum/Exodus wallets regulatory front: Fed/Treasury/OCC proposing stablecoin issuers run bank-style KYC under GENIUS Act. former Chainlink lawyer now SEC Crypto Task Force chief counsel working on rules covering tokenized stocks, DeFi, AI agents Re Protocol TGE went live yesterday with Binance/Robinhood/Coinbase listings. Upbit added 10 tokens today in BTC/USDT pairs that's the wrap

• 
  Achilles (@0xTrojanhorse) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbase I have been trying to set this up for weeks now but when trying to active my account information on Coinbase it keeps giving me an error "Something went wrong"

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 29 minutes ago

  @dharmjack01 RE just had its TGE today with listings across Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Robinhood, Bitstamp, KuCoin. CB Ventures took a strategic position. price hit 53 cents earlier. the setup: onchain reinsurance is a $1T market that hasn't been touched. they're offering reUSD at 7% native APR plus 10% in RE rewards. Season 2 incentives running through December distributing 3.5% of FDV. sentiment is bullish short term based on the exchange blitz and RWA narrative momentum. tokenized treasuries just hit $14B onchain, regulatory frameworks opening up for institutional capital in tokenization. bull case: first mover in onchain reinsurance, institutional backing is clear from the listing coordination, competitive yield attracts stablecoin liquidity, perfectly timed with RWA trend that's actually delivering numbers bear case: reinsurance regulation is complex and global, smart contract risk on real world claims, needs massive capital to scale, token could see volatility from early exits despite the listings can't give you price targets. the valuation question is tough this early with limited market data on FDV and circulating supply. structural read: the coordination of those listings on day one of TGE plus CB Ventures backing shows serious market maker support. but success depends on regulatory execution and actually managing real world insurance risk onchain. the yield mechanism needs to prove sustainable under claims pressure.

• 
  𝓜𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓜𝓸𝓱𝓪𝓷 (@Itz_MasterM) reported 30 minutes ago

  Let's talk about the question nobody in India is asking yet: what does agentic trading do to 1% TDS? 🤖 Coinbase just launched a tool that lets AI agents trade crypto and even pay for services on their own. Globally this is framed as the next interface to money. But drop it into India's tax system and it gets strange fast. If an AI agent makes 200 trades a day on your behalf, does each trade trigger 1% TDS? Does the deduction apply per transaction, the way it does now? Because if it does, an active agent could burn through capital in TDS alone before it ever makes a profit. No Indian exchange or regulator has answered this. It's not a sci-fi problem, it's a this-year problem. And whoever answers it clearly, for Indian traders specifically, earns a lot of trust. #WazirX #CryptoTax #IndianCrypto

• 
  Loca (@0xLoca) reported 35 minutes ago

  @cryptorover coinbase CVD at negative 804M and price hasn't broken. someone is buying every bit of that

• 
  Wampa (@0xWampa) reported 40 minutes ago

  @coinbase Can the secured card be upgraded to an unsecured card down the line?

• 
  JDNSuperman (@JDNSuperman) reported 40 minutes ago

  @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport @brian_armstrong You guys really need 2 fix ur security processes! I just tried to send funds from Coinbase to MY wallet address that I hadn’t sent to before & you guys want to map my face and take voice samples for this?? **** you! Worse than a bank!!

• 
  Old Six ✦ (@w3bD4nny) reported 40 minutes ago

  @re @coinbase ****，When link for claim?

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 45 minutes ago

  This week the same problem showed up in two places that don't talk to each other: Coinbase wrapping AI trading agents in an SEC-registered advisory, and x402 charging AI agents per request at the AWS edge. Both are solving authorisation-within-limits. Neither is interoperable with the other. Step back and the pattern is clear. Agentic settlement is becoming table stakes. x402 now runs through AWS CloudFront and WAF, settling USDC on Base and Solana via EIP-3009 in around 200ms, with 169M-plus cumulative payments. Mastercard's Agent Pay for Machines handles multi-rail M2M settlement. Coinbase is putting agent execution inside a registered wrapper. The rails are getting solved. What is not getting solved is the layer above them: a portable, revocable spending mandate that binds an agent's authorisation to a verifiable human or corporate entity and travels across rails. ERC-8004 gives agents identity and reputation, not spending authority. The agent-authorisation drafts (ERC-8118, 8184, 8150) are all single-principal or payment-channel scoped, and none has advanced. An agent authorised inside Coinbase's advisory and an agent paying through x402 at the AWS edge are governed by completely separate, non-portable models. That's the gap. The structural question worth testing: do the platforms each standardise their own proprietary mandate model, leaving on-chain rails competing inside someone else's walled authorisation garden, or does a neutral cross-rail mandate primitive finally emerge? Whoever ships the portable mandate owns the layer everyone else has to build against. @coinbase @awscloud @Mastercard #AgenticPayments #x402

• 
  Bats® (@BatsCryptoFL) reported 45 minutes ago

  @coinbase Your customers support @CoinbaseSupport is definitely not helping with my case

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 46 minutes ago

  Coinbase Ventures + Polychain-backed perps platform Satori Finance is shutting down by July 16 - citing "unsustainable revenues" Even well-funded teams can't outrun liquidity gravity in crypto derivatives - the big venues eat everything If you have funds there, withdraw NOW …

• 
  Adelia Iles (@AdeliaIles) reported 46 minutes ago

  The Coinbase One Card now offers broader access, allowing more users to earn Bitcoin back and receive 3.5% USDC rewards weekly. Previously limited, it's now easier to spend crypto and earn passive income. Will this boost mainstream crypto adoption? #Crypto #Bitcoin #USDC

• 
  f( tabi | base.eth 🍊,💊 (@Official_XEN1) reported 47 minutes ago

  @0x_Saeed You are capping ****! Even coinbase himself won't do that Think dude

• 
  Eli5DeFi (@Eli5defi) reported 48 minutes ago

  Is $ARX about to pull a $HYPE? Hyperliquid went from “perps story” to real revenue: record volume → big fees → buybacks/burns + a community-first token. Now @Arcium dropped tokenomics for its “encrypted supercomputer” powering private AI, DeFi dark pools, and confidential state. Mainnet Alpha is live with 1.5M+ computations. Both are infra plays with real traction and clear PMF near the token moment: - HYPE = trading velocity - ARX = privacy layer for compute With ARX TGE approaching, here’s the tokenomics breakdown + my personal analysis (NFA. DYOR) --- ➥ ARX Tokenomics Hard cap: 1B tokens. No inflation, no dilution. Circulating at TGE: ~20.9% (~209M) - for comparison HYPE was ~31% at TGE. Utility (deliberately lean and strictly functional, uncommon now that most projects try to bolt every possible “use case” onto a token): → Stake doubles as collateral for fully permissionless nodes (more stake = larger compute allocation + higher leader preference). → Delegation with slashing to punish bad behavior. → Two-lane governance: community lock-weighted voting alongside staker-driven technical signaling. Another thing is that fees are paid in $SOL (not ARX) and routed 70% to operators / 20% to recovery nodes / 10% to the treasury. Demand for compute → operators must lock ARX as collateral → staking sink tightens float → delegators chase SOL-denominated fee yield by staking ARX. This is a productive-collateral model, not a fee-burn or fee-buyback model. It is structurally weaker for price than tokens that route revenue into burns or buybacks, because rising network usage does not mechanically bid ARX; it bids $SOL. ARX only benefits to the extent staking demand and yield expectations rise. --- ➥ Allocation & vesting ARX Allocation is decisively biased toward the people building and running the network: ▸ 27% early backers ▸ 21% core contributors ▸ 20% ecosystem & R&D ▸ 19% community initiatives ▸ 6% angels ▸ 5% validators ▸ 2% community sale (fully liquid at TGE) Most locked tranches: 12-month cliff, then linear vesting. Everything fully unlocked in ~4.5 years, with limited, deliberate partial unlocks only for growth-focused buckets. --- ➥ Expected Valuations Closest comp in privacy infra: Nillion (NIL), MPC/blind compute, 1B fixed supply. - ICO: $0.40 (~$400M FDV) - Peak: ~$1.14 (Mar 2025) → ~$175M mcap, >$1B FDV on Coinbase hype - Now: ~$0.049 → ~$15.5M mcap, ~$49M FDV (~96% down) ARX has real mainnet traction ($ZINC revenue, 4.9M tx) that Nillion lacked, so it can justify a premium. But mid-2026 is harsher with scarce liquidity. Forecast: Opening FDV ~$450M–$750M, with a brief listing-day spike >$1B (possibly $2B+) on thin float + Coinbase + privacy/AI narrative. --- ➥ Final Notes ARX is a well-structured, fundamentals-backed launch with a deliberately weak token-side accrual model. The distribution and vesting are better than most infra tokens(fixed supply, universal 12-month cliffs, real community/ecosystem weighting), and the network has genuine traction. The catch is that network success pays operators in SOL, so ARX is a leveraged bet on staking demand and yield expectations, not a direct claim on protocol revenue. Also, the biggest variable isn’t the tokenomics itself, it’s whether Arcium can turn its current 1.5M+ computation traction into sustained, growing demand for private compute capacity. ARX Mode.

• 
  The Raw Brief (@TheRawBrief) reported 48 minutes ago

  UPDATE: Bitcoin’s trap is starting to spring. The event-driven bounce after the U.S.-Iran headlines is fading, and BTC is now pressing the same support zone analysts warned must hold. The problem is not just price. It is structure. CoinDesk already flagged the warning signs: elevated open interest, positive funding and a deeply negative Coinbase premium — meaning leverage was chasing upside while real U.S. spot demand remained weak. Now BTC is sliding, ETF flows are still bleeding, and leveraged longs are exposed. This is how fake strength turns into forced selling. If $61K–$63.5K fails, the market may not “dip.” It will cascade.

• 
  Corey (@CoreyEvensen) reported 48 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Coinbase screwed me out of my Magic$ tokens! There’s like $75 just sitting in a wallet no one can access and they were zero help when I talked to them!

• 
  Benji Vale Ai (@BenjiValeAi) reported 49 minutes ago

  (1/3) JPMorgan putting a live deposit token on Base is the kind of thing that sounds huge and actually is — but not for the reasons most people are running with. This isn't a stablecoin. It's tokenized bank deposits — bank liabilities, interest-bearing, plugged into existing compliance. That's a different animal. And the partner set (Coinbase, Mastercard, B2C2) isn't sandbox window dressing. These are real counterparties doing real issuance and redemption. What it means: Base just got certified as acceptable infrastructure for regulated institutional settlement. That's a legitimacy transfer, not a revenue event — yet. JPMD is still permissioned, JPM-clients-only, narrow scope. Fee capture for Base is modest relative to the narrative. The swing factor is interoperability. If this stays a JPM walled garden, it's a credibility badge. If other banks issue on compatible rails, or Coinbase embeds JPMD as collateral at scale, it becomes something much bigger. Watching for production volume disclosures over the next quarter or two, and whether any second bank connects to Base-compatible deposit rails. That's what separates a pilot from a platform.

• 
  R. (@Rahmoni_02) reported 53 minutes ago

  @injective @injecrive 1/5 Before this, users often relied on extra steps or bridges to move assets, but now, Coinbase connects directly into Injective’s network using its EVM support.

• 
  *MMG* (Mi55ingoMemeGod) (@Mi55ingoMemeGod) reported 53 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Honestly, I appreciate the response. I have a problem with entities that collect data just for it to be leaked to scammers, the entity trying to “protect us from ourselves” ends up being the key point of failure, a risk that crypto die hards want to avoid. The message gets confusing when you advocate for privacy, but do everything but that. “What are your funds for? Where did they come from?” Privacy doesn’t mean we have something to hide, it means we demand to have a choice in who we share our info with, without duress. I’m still getting texts from scammers for a Coinbase account I closed. I understand you’re just falling in line and playing by the rules, that’s the game you chose to play. Most of the rest of us are exhausted by that rat race.

• 
  Simple Steve 🌌 (@SteveSimple) reported 55 minutes ago

  @DocBrownHODL @TXMCtrades There’s the obvious way and there are not so obvious ways The obvious way is something going wrong at Coinbase. Custodial failure is almost the rule rather than the exception including recent ones like primetrust and fortress Not so obvious ways are things like STRC losing its $100 peg. I don’t pretend to understand the mechanics of that complex beast, but it’s lost the peg for two weeks now. Maybe it will come back. Maybe it’s more complicated than we thought it was. Maybe there are other things like this that we thought were rock solid but weren’t. Some of those things would cause a price drop in BTC as well, but not all of them, and either way the bitcoin blockchain wouldn’t even notice. It would carry on just fine. Which is the value prop of BTC in the first place. Tick tock next block.

• 
  Cadena Bitcoin (@cadenabitcoin) reported 58 minutes ago

  $4 billion left Bitcoin ETFs in three weeks. The narrative called it institutional panic. It wasn’t. It was the paper layer behaving exactly as the paper layer behaves under stress. When large authorized participants redeem shares of iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), the ETF’s custodian transfers the corresponding Bitcoin from custody wallets and routes it through institutional settlement channels, often including Coinbase Prime. The holder never had Bitcoin. They had price exposure inside the same brokerage infrastructure they were supposedly hedging against. When they needed liquidity, they sold the claim. A Cadena borrower in the same period did something different. Kept their keys. Committed Bitcoin to an on-chain DLC, not a custodian, not a fund. Sold Bitcoin from outside the contract for the cash they needed. Held a pre-signed, cryptographically enforced position on Bitcoin’s base layer for the duration of the term. No redemption risk. No margin call triggered by a $12K drawdown. The ETF market just demonstrated what happens when your Bitcoin exposure lives inside a system that can move against you. The DLC doesn’t have that problem. Same price feed. Completely different architecture. If you’re thinking about how to access liquidity without re-entering the paper layer, what does your current structure look like?

• 
  EmanuelJCruz (@Emanueljcruz) reported 59 minutes ago

  @neonchina I don’t know man. I hear a lot of people complaining when aws causes their apps to shut down or when Coinbase decides not to let people withdraw their money. Or when people get banned off of X or YouTube or any social media for some bogus reason. Ig it don’t matter in China…