Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	18 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	22 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Benzinga (@Benzinga) reported 40 seconds ago

  Coinbase ($COIN) CEO Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) says crypto still doesn’t get enough credit for expanding global financial access. He pointed to stablecoins, DeFi, tokenized stocks and Bitcoin ($BTC) as tools for people outside traditional banking.

• 
  chesscryptoonchain (@thechessONCHAIN) reported 2 minutes ago

  @CryptoTice_ The Coinbase number is the one that trips people up. Almost everything they hold is customer BTC in custody, so their own balance sheet is small on purpose. Makes SpaceX the story here, not the comparison.

• 
  ChoPaeng Momma (@ChoPaeng_TV) reported 4 minutes ago

  If your Coinbase funds remain locked, preserve your deposit records, account activity, and support communications, then contact @TrevorRecovery1 for legal guidance on possible recovery options.

• 
  Tulips (@alkhadji) reported 5 minutes ago

  🚨$XRP Momentum Is Starting to Show Its Hand!🚨 Another week kicking off, and we're starting to see momentum come through. IMO, XRP is STILL working its way toward the $0.87 macro support on Coinbase. The expected pauses along the way are EXACTLY what we want to see! First is $1.00. That's a major psychological level AND Binance's macro .786 retracement (hasn't been tested in that market), so continued reaction/consolidation here makes complete sense... It gives the RSI time to cool off and selling pressure weaken. From there, I'm watching for momentum to build into a stronger break, potentially around midweek...? #xrpcrypto #xrpupdate #cryptocurrencies

• 
  Captain Intrigue (@Captainintrigue) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BitcoinKeyAgent @coinbase @COLDCARDwallet Robinhood is even worse! They locked my bitcoin and claimed i violated their terms of service but refused to explain how. I was forced to sell all my BTC and re-buy it again elsewhere.

• 
  ₿ruce ⚡️#BIP-110 (@techexe) reported 6 minutes ago

  How Stratum V2 Can Dismantles the Mining Cartel. Raw pleb hashrate alone will not break the cartel, but pleb mining combined with the right protocol architecture absolutely can. Looking at the network's architecture through a DevOps and systems engineering lens, mining pools currently act like a highly centralized CI/CD pipeline for the blockchain. Right now, under the legacy Stratum V1 protocol, a handful of pool operators hold all the "admin rights" to construct blocks. They run the full nodes, select the transactions from the mempool, and build the final block templates. The miners simply receive these templates, provide the raw compute power by iterating nonces, and submit valid proof-of-work shares. This means that the operators who provide the actual hashrate have absolutely zero say in which transactions are included. This centralized block construction is exactly what makes pool collusion and transaction censorship possible. While individual, decentralised hardware setups—like the open-source Bitaxe miner that famously secured the "FU Pleb Block" in July 2024 for just $165 CAD—are excellent for grassroots network distribution, home miners simply cannot out-compete industrial exahash facilities on raw power. The true mechanism to break miner collusion is a software fix: Stratum V2. How Stratum V2 Dismantles the Cartel Stratum V2 acts as a ground-up redesign of mining communication that directly attacks the pool centralization bottleneck. It shifts the power of block construction away from the pool operators and pushes it back to the edges of the network. The Job Negotiation Protocol: This specific sub-protocol fundamentally shifts power away from the mining pools and returns it to the individual miners. Local Node Authority: It allows an individual miner who is operating their own full node to maintain a local mempool, select their preferred transactions (based on highest fees or any custom criteria), and construct the block template completely locally. Stripping Pool Control: The miner then submits this custom template to the pool. The pool's only job is to validate that the coinbase transaction allocates the correct share of the block subsidy and fees to the pool's reward address. The pool operator does not modify the transaction list. Bandwidth Efficiency: The new protocol replaces the older JSON-RPC messages with a compact binary format. This reduces bandwidth usage by approximately 70%. The Current State of the Network (Mid-2026) This protocol shift is no longer just theoretical. As of mid-2026, the movement to decentralize block construction is gaining serious traction: Two major pools, Braiins Pool and DEMAND Pool, are currently running Stratum V2 in production. In a massive architectural shift this past May, seven major pools—including giants like Foundry USA, AntPool, F2Pool, and MARA Pool—officially joined the Stratum V2 Working Group. These pools represent approximately 75% of the total global Bitcoin hashrate. Hardware manufacturers like Auradine have already begun shipping ASIC miners with native Stratum V2 support out of the box. The Verdict Pleb mining provides the hardware distribution, but it is the combination of individuals running their own local full nodes paired with the Stratum V2 Job Negotiation Protocol that successfully breaks the threat of pool collusion. It effectively decentralizes the network's transaction selection layer, making it nearly impossible for governments or rogue actors to force a handful of pool operators to comply with blacklists.

• 
  vellegno (@vellegno) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Weirdo25805401 @BTC_commons Price pump (coinbase value) is the only thing that keeps miners in line with BTC, there’s literally no other reason, its economic model is broken. Solution is either add tail emission or pump it to absurd banana republic numbers to keep buying time for whatever plan they have.

• 
  picdoc581 (@picdoc581) reported 7 minutes ago

  I think one of the most underappreciated catalysts for the next Bitcoin bull market is the potential shift from discretionary demand to structural, automatic demand. Imagine BTC eventually becomes a standard 1-3% allocation in model portfolios and target-date retirement funds, while MSTR gains inclusion in the S&P 500. Suddenly, billions of dollars flowing into 401(k)s, pensions, index funds and managed portfolios creates recurring direct or indirect Bitcoin exposure. No Coinbase account required. No retail FOMO required. No conscious decision to buy BTC required. The spot ETFs solved the access problem. The next phase could be making Bitcoin a default component of traditional portfolios. That would fundamentally change the demand structure for an asset with a fixed supply.

• 
  Tommy B. 🇺🇸 (@realtommybibi) reported 8 minutes ago

  TOP TEN CRYPTO HEADLINES 🚨 Santiment says Bitcoin just saw 2.27M new wallets and 751K active wallets, as the Coldcard chaos drives users to move funds and rethink custody. ⚡ BTCPay restricted remote Lightning access after attackers exploited a vulnerability to drain funds from LND nodes. 🚨 Three Missouri men were charged in an alleged plot to kidnap a Bitcoin holder’s parents and steal his cryptocurrency. ⚡ Circle renewed its Coinbase $USDC deal while choosing growth investment over quarterly dividends. 🔥 Cloudflare launched Kitesurf, a cloud browser built specifically for AI agents to navigate and interact with the web. 🚨 STABLES: $1.4B worth of USDC has left circulation in the past 30 days. 🇰🇵 Bybit gets US court backing to trace the $1.5B North Korea-linked hack, but 90% of the stolen funds are already untraceable. 🔥 Crypto cards monthly spend just hit a new ATH of $759M. More than doubling in a year. 🇺🇸 ETF FLOWS: BTC and ETH spot ETFs saw net inflows on Aug. 7, while SOL and XRP were flat. $BTC: +$101.7M $ETH: +$49.6M SOL: $0 XRP: $0 🇧🇷 LATEST: Brazil will delay some crypto transfers over $10,000 to foreign firms or self-custody wallets by up to 24 hours under new anti-fraud rules taking effect next year.

• 
  UtilityTruth (@UtilityTruth) reported 9 minutes ago

  📌 CLARITY Act's Other Sticking Point, Explained: The "Reward Loophole" Real, published yesterday (Aug 9): the bill's viability hinges on one specific legal distinction in Section 404 — banned "passive yield" vs. permitted "activity-based rewards" on stablecoins. The mechanism: Section 404 bans yield that's "economically or functionally equivalent" to bank deposit interest — targeting the "park your stablecoin, earn a quoted return" model. It doesn't ban rewards tied to actual user behavior/activity. The problem: the bill itself doesn't define how "activity-based" rewards should actually work — leaving that to a 360-day SEC/CFTC rulemaking process after passage. Real stakes: this section emerged from the Tillis-Alsobrooks compromise, advanced 15-9 out of Senate Banking on May 14. Banks want the narrowest possible reading (protect deposits); Coinbase needs a workable "activity-based" definition since stablecoin rewards are a real, large revenue driver. Ethics remains unresolved. Senate returns September 14 with cloture vote scheduled September 15 ~2pm.

• 
  MANI (@0xmani) reported 15 minutes ago

  tiffany milanovich > US based, tied to over $5M drained from hardware wallets and exchange support scams > she takes the money, she stays on the line and taunts victims as well > she's the actual caller pretending to be support and talks people into handing over access june 2026 > one guy loses $1.2M in BTC and ETH > spoofed Bitcoin IRA email under the name "patricia massie" then the Trezor is empty > she hops into telegram groups right after and starts flexing it october 2025 > another $500k in BTC stolen from a coinbase acc > she gets caught on a recording complaining her cut was too small then posts the withdrawal screenshot herself february 2026 > she's on Discord going band for band with another actor flexing live balances > claims she just moved $100k through an Exodus wallet that later shows $631k DAI sitting there late january 2026 > her boy john daghita aka lick gets exposed for lifting $46M in seized government crypto > she records their call and drops it just to troll him, he claps back by posting her real name in his public tg > she takes a victim's money to the casino, keeps them on the phone, mocks them while gambling > she edits her own flex clips to make the hauls look bigger > she left every chat log, every recording, every onchain trail out in the open big thanks to @zachxbt for putting everything together in one place and bringing the facts to light.

• 
  Brine (@foolonthehill) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BitcoinKeyAgent @coinbase @COLDCARDwallet Never had any issue on Kraken.

• 
  pattie gardenhire (@pattiemarie57) reported 22 minutes ago

  FYI There is no Qanon there is Q and there are anons. There is no QFS system that the you are required to sign up to. Those posting these QFS system requiring you to purchase XRP or XLM are a scam! The posts claim Q followers must manually set up Quantum Financial System (QFS) accounts by acquiring and staking XRP and XLM, warning that major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase are compromised with assets being withdrawn by the Federal Reserve. The Quantum Financial System concept originates in online discussions of anticipated global financial changes, distinct from legitimate quantum computing research in financial applications by institutions such as JPMorgan and HSBC. Accounts that push urgent “set up your QFS account now / buy XRP & XLM / DM me for help” messages frequently turn off replies so warnings and questions can’t appear underneath. It keeps the comments clean and stops people from pointing out the problems in public. No official government, central bank, or major financial institution has ever confirmed the existence of a public QFS that individuals need to join by buying crypto. Legitimate financial systems do not require you to message a random account on X (or Telegram) for “activation” or “guidance.” Any claim that regular exchanges are about to become worthless and that only people who move assets into a special “QFS” system will be safe is a classic pressure tactic.

• 
  vellegno (@vellegno) reported 23 minutes ago

  @dotkrueger BCH is running just fine, will run even better when block subsidy halves another couple times and coinbase rewards won’t be enough for miners anymore BIP110 failed after 2 blocks, definitely not the same lol

• 
  MR TWWM (@TWWM70) reported 25 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @coinbase doesn’t get enough stick for the poor customer service and locking up my funds for 6 days. Every email customer service sends say “there are no restrictions on your account” yet when I try to transfer anything it says I have no balance. 6 days no access to my own money.

• 
  DragnonHD (@DragnonHD) reported 25 minutes ago

  @dotkrueger If Bitcoin was $500k the value of Coinbase, Block and Robinhood would be much much higher than current value so no, MSTR could not buy them

• 
  ᑭᖇᗩY乙 (@prayz_dev) reported 26 minutes ago

  I keep coming back to Injective, and honestly it’s less about any single announcement and more about how consistently they’ve been building while nobody was really watching. Think about how most chains get attention. Something ships, CT goes wild for 48 hours, then it fades and everyone’s onto the next thing. Injective has never really played that game. It just keeps stacking wins quietly, month after month, and it wasn’t until I sat down recently and actually listed everything that’s happened this year that I realized how much ground they’ve covered. Native EVM went live, fully built into the core chain instead of being some separate side-project bolted on for optics. That alone would’ve been a big deal for most projects. But then INJ itself migrated off the old wrapped token standard onto that native layer, Coinbase supported it fully, and within weeks you had actual institutions not crypto-native funds, actual industrial companies like LG CNS and POSCO running live trade finance data on the chain. That’s not a partnership announcement with a logo and a quote. That’s someone’s real business process running on Injective’s rails. What gets me is how none of this feels engineered for a headline. There’s no big reveal moment, no countdown timer, no “the wait is over” energy to any of it. It’s just… shipped. Injective Mint quietly entered private beta so institutions can tokenize real assets without needing a dev team. The MCP Server went live so AI agents can actually place trades instead of just narrating market conditions to you. Regulatory filings went out in both the US and Europe at basically the same time, which tells you this isn’t a team hoping regulation goes away, it’s a team building for a world where it doesn’t. I think what’s actually happening is Injective bet early that the next real wave in crypto wouldn’t be another retail trading cycle, it would be institutions quietly finding infrastructure solid enough to trust with real financial processes. And instead of talking about that thesis, they just kept building toward it, sprint after sprint, upgrade after upgrade. Maybe I’m reading too much into a string of updates. But when I actually stack the timeline up, it stops looking like a coincidence and starts looking like a pattern. And patterns like this are usually the ones people only notice in hindsight. Watching where @injective goes from here. injective-protocol:native

• 
  ChoPaeng Momma (@ChoPaeng_TV) reported 29 minutes ago

  If you believe you lost around $10K through a Coinbase-related issue, preserve your transaction records, account history, screenshots, and support communications, then contact @TrevorRecovery1 for legal guidance on possible recovery options.

• 
  Collins Mux💯🇺🇸 (@CollinsMuyx) reported 29 minutes ago

  BREAKING: 🇺🇸 $80 BILLION COINBASE JUST CONFIRMED THE #BITCOIN CLARITY ACT IS OFFICIALLY SCHEDULED FOR A SENATE VOTE ON SEPTEMBER 15TH THE BILL HAS STRONG BIPARTISAN SUPPORT AND A DATE CERTAIN “THIS SETS US UP REALLY WELL” THE VOTE IS ON THE CALENDAR IT'S FINALLY HAPPENING CLEAR RULES FOR CRYPTO IN AMERICA ARE COMING 🚀

• 
  The Crypto Johannes (@TheCryptoJonny) reported 30 minutes ago

  🚨NEW: Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong says “Crypto doesn't get enough credit for the financial access it's already unlocked for the world.” Armstrong points to stablecoins bringing dollars onchain, DeFi opening access to credit, tokenized stocks expanding access to U.S. markets, and Bitcoin providing a store of wealth resistant to inflation as key use cases driving crypto adoption. “There’s more to do, of course, but don’t forget about how far we’ve come,” he adds.

• 
  Future Finance (@futurefinc) reported 30 minutes ago

  Salim Elhila and Tan Gera on the difference between getting access to an asset and getting a good price for it: Tan Gera: "If you were Coinbase, when would you list a specific coin to maximize the profit for your company?" Salim Elhila: "At peak hype, obviously. Like when it has the biggest trading volume and everybody's talking about it." The specific token is only an illustration. The underlying mechanism is the incentive structure of a fee-based exchange. An exchange earns on trading fees, fees rise with volume, and volume peaks when attention peaks. As Salim puts it: "They don't make money if Joe and John had tremendous returns." That produces a sequence most buyers only see the last step of. For investors, that means tracking three things: 1. Where price discovery already happened: tokens list first on decentralized venues at small market caps, where "first investors get in, you get the price discovery." 2. What a listing requires: an exchange needs "a certain history, a certain size, a certain documentation, demand." The early stage is finished before a listing is even possible. 3. Who is selling into the listing: "When Coinbase lists it, all the guys who invested firsthand start exiting and it changes hands." In traditional finance, acting on that timing advantage would be restricted conduct. "If this was traditional finance this would be totally illegal." Crypto carries no equivalent rule, so the advantage is legal. For the exchange, a listing is the moment volume and fee revenue peak. For the buyer arriving that day, it is the moment the earliest holders finally have someone to sell to.

• 
  The market periodical (@tmp_periodical) reported 31 minutes ago

  🚨 NEW: COINBASE CEO ON CRYPTO ADOPTION 🌎₿ Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong says crypto “doesn't get enough credit for the financial access it's already unlocked for the world.” 💵 Stablecoins bringing dollars onchain 🏦 DeFi opening access to credit 📈 Tokenized stocks expanding access to U.S. markets ₿ Bitcoin providing a store of wealth resistant to inflation “There’s more to do, of course, but don’t forget about how far we’ve come.” 👀 Is crypto already delivering more real-world utility than the market gives it credit for?

• 
  Drunk Master Flex (@Rekked_Trader) reported 49 minutes ago

  @BitcoinKeyAgent @coinbase @COLDCARDwallet I couldn't understand why people were using exchanges to temporarily hold their coins because it's easy to get them on there but hard as **** to get them off if your moving more than $5 of value

• 
  Thoughtful Gecko (@ThoughtfulGecko) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Roughnecks110 You need to mine another ~2014 blocks at a difficulty that is based on a $250k block subsidy to make it to the next difficulty adjustment. And you can't sell Coinbase rewards for another 99 blocks. You need lots of capital to pull this off. Won't happen imo.

• 
  AppleNvidia ∞ KIN (@AppleNvidia) reported 51 minutes ago

  Due to Coinbase Commerce winding down its services in several countries, my web app currently does not have a reliable method for accepting cryptocurrency payments. I’ll be integrating MoonPay as an alternative payment solution to restore crypto payment functionality

• 
  greb (@grebby) reported 51 minutes ago

  @kolyposts coinbase is terrible

• 
  StarPlatinum (@StarPlatinum_) reported 53 minutes ago

  The downfall of $BONK explained: - launches on Solana on December 25, 2022 - immediately after the FTX collapse - community token built to bring activity back to Solana - 50% of the supply is distributed to the community - 297K wallets Late 2023: BONKbot - BONKbot becomes one of the strongest products connected to the ecosystem - allows users to trade Solana tokens directly through Telegram December 2023: the explosion - Coinbase listing - Binance listing - BONK becomes one of the biggest memecoins on Solana 2024: expansion - OKX adds BONK spot and perpetual trading in January - BONKrewards introduces locking and rewards for BONK holders - BonkSOL expands the ecosystem into liquid/staked SOL November 2024: the peak - BONK reaches an ATH of $0.00005825 on November 19 - market cap reaches $4B at the peak And another major product was coming. 2025: BONK fun - launches as a Solana memecoin launchpad - part of the economic model directs fees toward the BONK ecosystem including buyback/burn mechanics - reaches a 55.2% share of Solana token launches - processes $540M in volume - facilitates 175K token launches - generates $34M in fees for a period, BONK’s ecosystem was beating Pumpfun on its own battlefield 2025- 2026: the decline - BONK fun revenue becomes dependent on launchpad speculation - BonkSwap fails to become a major Solana DEX - BONKrewards eventually displays “No new staking deposits available” - BonkSOL loses part of the TVL it previously attracted The problem becomes increasingly obvious: BONK built products. But owning BONK was not the same thing as owning equity in those products. Then things get much worse. June 30, 2026: the malicious proposal - a governance proposal appears inside BonkDAO - the proposal seeks control of 4.426T BONK from the treasury instead of exploiting a traditional smart contract vulnerability, the attacker targets governance itself July 6: the DAO attack - the malicious proposal passes - 4.426T BONK is transferred from the treasury - the transfer happens just 49 seconds after voting ends stolen BONK is valued at $20M The attacker effectively bought enough influence to make the DAO authorize the transfer. July 18: attacker tokens start moving - 400B BONK is reportedly transferred to Coinbase Late July: - another reported 1.186T BONK is moved toward centralized exchanges - 3.2T BONK reportedly remains in the related wallet August 7: mixed news - Bithumb removes BONK from its watchlist - Upbit announces it will terminate BONK trading support September 7, 2026: - Upbit is scheduled to terminate BONK trading support at 15:00 KST - withdrawals are expected to remain available for a limited period afterward one of the exchanges that helped BONK expand in Korea is now preparing to remove it Today: - BONK market cap sits at $217M - down 39% the last 30 days - down 95.8% from its price ATH market cap collapsed from $4.04B to $217M A total of $3.8B in market value has disappeared from the peak

• 
  CPNasty (@CPNasty_) reported 57 minutes ago

  Robinhood Chain is printing numbers that make every other new chain look slow. Launched July 1. Three weeks later it was flipping Base on daily active users (324k vs ~275k). Cumulative DEX volume cleared $8–9B. Multiple days over $500–800M. TVL went from basically zero to $300–500M range in under a month. Daily transactions regularly in the multi-millions. That’s not normal L2 growth. That’s Solana-2021 compression into a couple of weeks. Why it’s moving this fast vs Solana and Base 1. Distribution is the real edge 
Robinhood already has ~28 million funded accounts. Users didn’t have to discover a new wallet, bridge funds, or learn a new chain. A huge chunk of them just turned on the chain inside the app they already use every day. Base had Coinbase distribution — Robinhood has pure retail speculation distribution. Different animal. 2. Perfect timing + free gas 
They launched with a 90-day gas subsidy right as a fresh meme cycle was forming. Vlad even flipped the messaging from “RWA chain” to “works great for memes.” The market heard that loud and clear. Solana and Base never got a free-gas retail onboarding rocket at the exact right moment in the cycle. 3. Permissionless meme infrastructure from day one 
Multiple launchpads (Pons dominating), fixed-supply tokens, instant Uniswap liquidity, 100ms blocks. It became a pure high-velocity casino immediately. Solana had to build that culture over years. Base leaned social/creator coins and it never hit the same intensity. 4. Capital velocity is different 
Early volume-to-TVL ratios were absurd (some days 20x+). Money was spinning, not just sitting. That’s the signature of a real retail meme season, not slow institutional L2 accumulation. Solana took years to become the meme capital of crypto. Base is still grinding years later. Robinhood Chain compressed the entire “new chain gets discovered by degens” phase into weeks because the users, the capital, and the incentives were already sitting there. Whether the meme volume holds or the RWA/tokenized stock side actually takes over is the next chapter. But the speed of the initial ramp is unlike anything we’ve seen from a branded L2.

• 
  MBA_Bitcoiner (@MBA_Bitcoiner) reported 58 minutes ago

  Big Bitcoin Defends Coinbase - Could have had my funds in Coinbase the whole time (10 years) and funds would have been 100% safe. - Only platform where I could use my Bitcoin to off ramp into fiat without issues to take care of real world things. -Their Credit Card returns 4% back on Bitcoin and is amazing.

• 
  The CryptoCurrency Post (@The_CryptoPost) reported 59 minutes ago

  🤝 BVNK chose Mastercard despite Coinbase’s $2.5B offer Coinbase offered as much as $2.5 billion for BVNK Finance, roughly $700 million more than the up to $1.8 billion deal ultimately closed by Mastercard. Despite the higher bid, the stablecoin infrastructure company’s founders chose the traditional payments giant. Kjartan Rist, founding partner at Concentric and an early BVNK investor, said the difference came down to cultural fit and long-term strategic alignment. Coinbase put “a bigger number on the table,” but the chemistry between the companies ultimately did not work. Mastercard approached the opportunity differently. It had already participated in the initial discussions and remained on the sidelines while BVNK negotiated with Coinbase. When those talks broke down, Mastercard returned and secured the acquisition. The choice is particularly notable because of the contrast between the two buyers. Coinbase represents one of the largest crypto-native infrastructures in the market, while Mastercard brings a global network built over decades around traditional payments and financial services. BVNK sits directly between those two worlds, providing infrastructure for stablecoin payments and connecting fiat money with on-chain assets. That makes the decision about more than accepting roughly $700 million less in headline valuation. BVNK’s founders chose the buyer they considered a better home for the company’s next stage. Mastercard has now completed the acquisition for up to $1.8 billion, including contingent payments. Coinbase offered more. Mastercard proved the better fit.