Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	20 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	24 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Maitreya Lockwood (@maitreyabtc) reported 25 seconds ago

  @MegaMinerAlex You’re just jealous that your server is coinbase and black rocks node. You don’t get any say while they turn it into a database.

• 
  Lea Thompson (@LeaT_Design) reported 2 minutes ago

  @whale_alert coinbase always moving **** to ghost wallets

• 
  Koolkev (@Koolkev3590) reported 3 minutes ago

  @coinbase Coinbase is great but the wallet is the worse since the upgrade. After they stole my FLR tokens they told me we don’t support FLR. It was in my base wallet for a year, what a scam. I switched to ledger and seems to work good. I did get my FLR back finely.

• 
  Gumterver100.base.eth 🟦 (@gumterver100) reported 8 minutes ago

  Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called it the leading chain for payments, while new Base MCP connects accounts to AI like Claude or ChatGPT for suggested actions that users approve. Community buzz centers on an upcoming creator program for builders and a countdown to October developments, as founder Jesse Pollak focuses on trading, payments, and support..

• 
  MANDO CT 🇮🇪 🇦🇪 🇬🇧 (@MandoCT) reported 8 minutes ago

  @LowCapB @coinbase @coinbase please help him

• 
  Alan (@AlnCrypto) reported 10 minutes ago

  Bitcoin in 2026 so far: • ~$89M COLDCARD exploit • Bitcoin down ~50% from ATH • Strategy starts selling Bitcoin • Coinbase goes down multiple times • BitMEX announces it’s shutting down • BIP-110 failure • OCEAN signaling BIP-110

• 
  CRYPTOforCHANGE (awoo arc) (@CRYPT0forCHANGE) reported 11 minutes ago

  @jessepollak why is Coinbase still not leaning into the stories that will help it win!?!? Like what are y’all actually doing to make people want to trade on base?

• 
  NoOrdinaryFamily (@BooksFromNOF) reported 13 minutes ago

  @coinbase Hey planks, why haven't you got an email address I can complain to? Why are you stuck in the dark ages with a US postal complaint procedure rather than an online service that caters for the rest of the world? You do realise that places exist outside of the USA, don't you?

• 
  Lemon33 (@lemonpulse33) reported 14 minutes ago

  @kpak82 I’m a Coinbase **** , which entry point should I get in ? Support level at 127-130 @kpak82 ，can we get any updates on $coin please 🙏🏻

• 
  Meti Lux Partners Group (@MetiLuxDubai) reported 19 minutes ago

  Coinbase just chose Abu Dhabi for its global tokenization hub. It secured regulatory approval from ADGM’s FSRA to support tokenized financial assets under Abu Dhabi’s regulated financial-services framework. But the bigger story isn’t crypto — or even Coinbase. It’s where global financial infrastructure is choosing to build. 👀

• 
  dataalways ⚡️🤖 (@dataalways) reported 20 minutes ago

  @drjasper_eth @Smartprogrammer @OisinKyne right, but it's bi (or multi) modal on tons of axes. and the one that matters is sensitivity to APR. you have a class of solo stakers (who's members could have thousands of eth) that are staking altruistically and don't care if yield goes to zero, but also another mode that is very rate sensitive. with institutions, you have a much more unimodal distribution. the propensity to stake at an APR with limit --> 0% is non-zero for people that are just letting money sit on Coinbase/ETFs/Lido, but there would be lots of outflows for people that are yield seeking more than ethereum diehards. this is a terrible figure, but you imagine that we're in equilibrium today, then this plot is maybe something like yield sensitivity/expectations, with orange being institutional stake and blue being solo stakers. magnitudes not to scale since we don't actually know the distributions. --> as yield decreases we see earlier outflows from the right solo staker peak, leading to more capture from institutions, but in the extreme limit there's also a set of solo stakers that really don't care what yield is (that is a higher share than the corresponding fraction of institutional).

• 
  BLAKE⚡️ROGUE MONEY USER (@bleighky) reported 25 minutes ago

  @ToneVays @MicrosoftTeams My dad got the same attack yesterday. A rep from “Fidelity” called him and was urging him get bitcoin off Coinbase because “the exchange was getting drained” and then proceeded to get remote access. Luckily he got spooked and turned his computer off before anything was stolen.

• 
  Rucha (ऋचा) (@_wallwalker) reported 30 minutes ago

  @JackofTradesX @tenobrus My understanding was: Exchange volumes being high will increase demand (price) of BTC which is good for BTC. Depends on which exchange? W&D yes, where and how are you measuring it? Considering it is not a BTC only cryptocurrency world, which was the core assumption in 2008. Yes, which is why I felt BTC chain volumes not the right way to look at BTC movement / trajectory as a whole. Again, this is why I look at Coinbase (my proxy for whole of cryptocurrency movement / trajectory) And Block (my proxy for BTC specific cryptocurrency movement / trajectory)

• 
  Keifer Lopez (@ThoughtNest98) reported 33 minutes ago

  @tbvxyz @coinbase Does this mean US clients still cant access the tokenized products?

• 
  Griff (changing pfp = good community) (@gigagriff) reported 34 minutes ago

  One of the many issues with CT is that they lack agency. Their preference for pathos (appeal to authority) is crazy. That’s why KOLs have so much power etc. For example take this guy, he thinks cuz arkham tagged a $5 million dollar wallet “coinbase?” its not confirmation.

• 
  carlosjmelgar (@carlosjmelgar) reported 34 minutes ago

  It is fair to acknowledge that expectations for Base were high. As a former team member, I sometimes wonder whether I could have been more effective in advocating for decisions that better supported sustained user and builder activity. Probably not because I'm just a pleb and my role was doomed from the start. Market conditions have been difficult: attention is fragmented with constant rotation across many chains, builder morale is under pressure, and the environment for new projects to thrive has been challenging to say the least. It has been a long stretch since a base native project has been able to maintain meaningful mcap and userbase. Times are tough, but not this tough imo. Base has meaningful advantages, including Coinbase backing, runway to operate through a prolonged bera, and untapped distribution strengths. Ability to execute under pressure has been sus. Before you "leave Brittney alone!" me... I continue to deploy capital in the ecosystem, use apps, and support builders where I can.

• 
  dataalways ⚡️🤖 (@dataalways) reported 36 minutes ago

  @ViktorBunin @ThogardPvP it won't help in total stake, just in share of stake. i'm not sure how that "benefit[s] Coinbase" unless your goal is to capture the staking market.

• 
  CryptogemsX 🇵🇹 (@bestcryptotoken) reported 38 minutes ago

  @LowCapB @coinbase Please help my friend

• 
  MindWaveDAO (@nilatoken) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Dialectic_Group @coinbase This is where tokenization starts getting really interesting. Not just putting securities onchain, but unlocking new ways to access, use and build financial products around them.

• 
  Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) reported 45 minutes ago

  🔥STOP WORKING RIGHT NOW - RETIRE EARLY WITH STRK🔥 I have discovered a retirement strategy so offensively American that it involves $500,000 of convertible preferred stock, Michael Saylor, Bitcoin, quarterly checks, and the distant possibility of never having to answer another email again. Here is the psychosis. STRK is $68.35. You put $500,000 into STRK. That buys approximately 7,315 STRK shares. STRK pays $8 per share annually, or $2 quarterly, and each share is convertible into 0.1 MSTR under the current conversion terms. So your $500,000 retirement account immediately becomes: Annual dividends: ≈ $58,522 Quarterly dividends: ≈ $14,631 Five years of dividends: ≈ $292,612 And hiding inside your 7,315 STRK shares is the contractual right to convert into approximately: 731.5 SHARES OF MSTR This is where the retirement plan stops resembling something Vanguard would recommend and starts resembling a *******-fueled actuarial table found underneath a blackjack table in Reno. At your $68.35 STRK cost basis, conversion parity occurs at $683.50 MSTR. Because 0.1 × $683.50 = $68.35. So you can sit there collecting roughly $58,500 a year while waiting for Bitcoin to appreciate, Strategy's common equity to become increasingly convex, and that conversion feature to crawl out of the basement carrying a flamethrower. The current STRK price and effective yield in the supplied Strategy dashboard are $68.35 and 11.70%. Now for the deranged part. I ran Strategy through the CEBE model under assumptions that are almost comically hostile: 842,138 BTC today. 842,138 BTC FIVE YEARS FROM NOW. Strategy purchases ZERO ADDITIONAL BITCOIN. Literally none. The model has Strategy continually selling MSTR to finance the preferred dividend burden while never using those raises to buy another Bitcoin. Bitcoin holdings remain frozen at 842,138 throughout the entire projection. The model simultaneously holds CEBE mNAV at 1.0459x. In other words, I have mathematically kidnapped Michael Saylor, confiscated his Coinbase account, nailed mNAV to the floor, and told Strategy: YOU MAY SELL MSTR TO PAY THE DIVIDENDS. YOU MAY NEVER BUY ANOTHER BITCOIN. Good luck. And somehow the numbers still become hilarious. The 5 Bitcoin power-law endpoints I'm using are: Q0: $306,770 Q10: $354,366 Power regression: $598,892 Q90: $773,928 Q100: $1,587,365 Now look at what happens to your $500,000 STRK position. Q0 - BITCOIN $306,770 Modeled MSTR: $595 Your 731.5 MSTR conversion value: ≈ $435,508 Five years of STRK dividends: ≈ $292,612 Combined cash received + conversion value: ≈ $728,120 Your $500,000 becomes roughly: $728K (1.46x) And this is the Q0 POWER-LAW OUTCOME. Apparently the retirement disaster scenario is collecting almost $300,000 of dividends and winding up with $728,000. Call the authorities. Q10 - BITCOIN $354,366 Modeled MSTR: $700 Conversion value: ≈ $512,223 Dividends: ≈ $292,612 Total: ≈ $804,834. 1.61x your money. You spent 5 years receiving approximately $14,600 every 3 months for the unbearable psychological hardship of owning a security with MSTR upside attached to it. POWER REGRESSION - BITCOIN $598,892 Now we enter the retirement community from hell. The supplied CEBE model reaches approximately: MSTR = $1,243 while Strategy still owns exactly 842,138 BTC, having bought ZERO MORE BITCOIN. Your conversion rights are now worth: 731.5 MSTR × $1,243 ≈ $909,461 Meanwhile you collected ≈ $292,612 IN DIVIDENDS So your original $500,000 has produced approximately $1,202,073 (2.40x total value.) +$702,000. And because the $292K of dividends arrived progressively rather than magically appearing in year five, the modeled annualized IRR is approximately: 23% PER YEAR. Yup. 23% percent annualized. From something whose entire job was supposed to be sitting there paying you quarterly income while you waited for Saylor's common stock to go completely feral. Q90 - BITCOIN $773,928 Modeled MSTR: $1,634 Conversion value: ≈ $1,195,581 Five-year dividends: ≈ $292,612 Total position economics: ≈ $1,488,193 Your $500K BECOMES ALMOST $1.5 MILLION. 2.98x. At this point you have ceased being a preferred-stock investor and become a missing person. Q100 - BITCOIN $1,587,365 Now the spreadsheet develops schizophrenia. Modeled MSTR: $3,462 Your 731.5 MSTR conversion package: ≈ $2,532,519 Dividends collected while waiting: ≈ $292,612 Total: ≈ $2,825,131 Your original $500,000: 5.65x You have received nearly $300,000 just for waiting and then exercised the conversion feature into more than $2.5 MILLION of MSTR. You entered this trade as a yield investor. You exited it looking like someone who recently acquired a Gulfstream through a misunderstanding. And here is the mechanism people are missing. In the power-regression scenario, Bitcoin goes from roughly $63,686 to $598,892. That's about 9.4x. Yet modeled MSTR goes from roughly $96 to $1,243. About 12.9x. DESPITE THE MODEL HAVING STRATEGY BUY ZERO ADDITIONAL BITCOIN AND ZERO MULTIPLE EXPANSION. Why? Because Strategy's dollar-denominated senior claims are being vaporized in Bitcoin terms. At the beginning of the projection, senior claims represent roughly 283,000 BTC-equivalent. At $598,892 Bitcoin? Approximately 30,000 BTC-equivalent. The nominal dollars remain. Bitcoin just becomes so catastrophically expensive that the liabilities start looking like a $25 Chili's gift card listed on the Berkshire Hathaway balance sheet. The result? CEBE rises from approximately 144,257 sats/share to 198,479 sats/share. Even though Strategy bought ZERO BITCOIN and continuously issued common stock throughout the model. That's the entire STRK insanity. You aren't simply buying an 11.7%-yielding preferred. You are buying $58,500/year of modeled income on $500K, while retaining a conversion claim on 731.5 MSTR shares if the common stock eventually escapes Earth's gravitational field. So the retirement plan is beautifully stupid: BUY $500,000 STRK. COLLECT ≈ $14,631 EVERY QUARTER. 1. Bitcoin rises. 2. Senior claims implode in BTC terms. 3. CEBE/share rises. 4. MSTR becomes increasingly convex. Your deeply out-of-the-money conversion feature slowly transforms from decorative furniture into a financial weapon. Then one morning MSTR is $1,200, your STRK conversion package is worth about $900,000, you've already been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to sit there, and you finally press: STRK → MSTR. Sell the MSTR. Buy a house in Wyoming. Install an unnecessarily large smoker. Begin referring to Tuesday as “the weekend.” And explain to your grandchildren that Americans once worked until age 67 because apparently nobody had discovered the perfectly normal retirement strategy of putting half a million dollars into Michael Saylor's convertible Bitcoin preferred stock. Remember, this is assuming Saylor STOPS BUYING BITCOIN... and the multiple on the Bitcoin hoard NEVER EXPANDS EVER. The gains could be EVEN MORE CRAZY. RETIREMENT PLANNING HAS BECOME COMPLETELY UNHINGED.

• 
  Crypto Fel-Diamond (@Feliciadiamond_) reported 45 minutes ago

  We've spent years talking about crypto as an investment, but everyday utility is just as important. @MegPrimePay is pushing in that direction by making crypto spending part of a mobile payment experience. U.S. users can purchase $MPP directly in the app, while global users can access $MPP through Coinbase Wallet or Uniswap. The $25 deposit → $50 $MPP welcome offer is also worth checking out.

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 46 minutes ago

  @najisvdv No i've never sold Chad and have bought more than anyone else has, I'm on a sidequest with wojak while base gets their **** together. The Chad main is still active and getting good engagement, things are still being built, and people are still raiding, but coinbase/base angered most degens so until they give people a reason to bridge, everyone is on robinhood chain and solana. Making friends elsewhere and then will return, ideally with a group of people who actually see why it should be much higher instead of wasting my time with the ten people left on base pvping over 10k MC blue coins.

• 
  EL FUEGO (@El_Fuego) reported 46 minutes ago

  Crypto shouldn’t just be something you hold it should be something you can actually use. That’s what @MegPrimePay is building with MegPrime Pay. Spend your crypto in everyday life, right from the app, while getting access to $MPP. U.S. users: deposit $25 and get $50. Global users: grab $MPP through Coinbase Wallet or Uniswap. The future of crypto adoption is utility, and MegPrime Pay is making crypto more practical for everyday spending.

• 
  INSIDER (@x_insider4) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Defi_Rocketeer Coinbase just turned AI into a paying customer. My portfolio finally has institutional support from robots.

• 
  RecoverIt Asset Recovery™ (@Recoverlt) reported 47 minutes ago

  @bishopb0b I noticed your report about the fake Coinbase Wallet listing that led to nearly $5,000 being drained. That’s a serious loss, especially after the app appeared legitimate. The wallet transactions could help trace the funds. I can review the evidence and help determine the best recovery approach.

• 
  Leon (@_Le_on) reported 49 minutes ago

  Nobody uses binance, coinbase, crypto. com etc anymore. Pump fun has broken the matrix.

• 
  Marlon | BTC x Macro (@MarlonOnBTC) reported 51 minutes ago

  $MARA NEEDED $600 MILLION. IT BORROWED AGAINST ITS BITCOIN INSTEAD OF SELLING THE ASSET. It pledged 18,750 bitcoin:native as collateral. About $1.2 billion worth, more than half its entire stack, per CoinDesk. Think about what that means. The old move when a company needs cash is to sell the asset. MARA did the opposite. It borrowed against its Bitcoin and kept the exposure. Fixed 7.65% rate, due 2028, from Coinbase Credit $COIN and Two Prime. This is the part that matters: it's becoming a pattern. Public companies are treating their Bitcoin like a reserve asset they borrow against, not a piggy bank they crack open when they need money. MARA may use the cash for corporate purposes, including a planned power plant acquisition that could support both mining and AI.

• 
  Blockent Report (@BlockentReport) reported 51 minutes ago

  🚨 BREAKING: Coinbase launches its international tokenization hub in Abu Dhabi, the UAE’s capital. The hub will turn traditional securities into onchain tokens backed by real shares, allowing investors to access them through a crypto wallet. Coinbase says its goal is to open capital markets to the 4 billion people worldwide who currently lack access.

• 
  Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) reported 55 minutes ago

  Who is actually accruing the value created in crypto? This started as a conversation on the @Blockworks TG group with @santiagoroel and a few others. Venture in crypto has shrunk a lot! and imo the main reason is that on-chain revenue pools have been far smaller than anticipated. From Blockworks data, total on-chain revenue was roughly $8B in 2025, so I wanted to see how much off-chain/Centralized companies are capturing from this industry by comparison. So consider the off-chain pool: public companies like coinbase, Gemini, BitGo, Bullish, plus crypto revenue from Robinhood, Galaxy etc and private players like Binance, Tether, FalconX, Anchorage, etc. The result surprised me: off-chain companies generate ~$70B roughly, consider roughly a range between 60B to 100B, 8.5x more than on-chain protocols and L1s. To put that $8B in perspective: even if you give on-chain protocols generous 70% EBITDA margins and a 30x multiple, the entire addressable market cap today is ~$168B ($8B × 70% = $5.6B EBITDA × 30x). That's the whole on-chain pie, less than a single mega-cap tech company. Do the same for centralized companies at a more realistic 40% EBITDA margin: $70B × 40% = $28B EBITDA × 30x = ~$840B of justified market cap. Even with lower margins, that's 5x the entire on-chain ecosystem. And to put even that in perspective: the entire centralized crypto industry, all of it combined, is basically worth one OpenAI or Anthropic. The breakdowns are telling too. On-chain, L1/L2 chains take almost half the pool (~49%), with launchpads/trading apps and DEXs/perps splitting most of the rest. Off-chain, it's exchanges and brokers dominating at ~66%, with stablecoin issuers second at ~19%, everything else (market making, payments, infra, asset mgmt) is single digits. Both worlds are extremely concentrated at the top of the same funnel: trading and the rails to do it. From a venture perspective, you were often better off investing early in L1s and traditional exchanges than in most tokens. It was a bit simpler than we thought. To me the common denominator: off-chain companies sit much closer to the end user than protocols and L1s. They own that relationship and monetize it well. They abstract away crypto's complexity: trade, stake, store, manage without ever touching a coldcard or metamask app and people pay up BIG for that. On-chain is clearly in a bear market, but the lesson for protocols, L1s, and on-chain primitives is to build and verticalize more. Get closer to the end user. One caveat: this is an approximation, done with Claude's help. Many of these companies don't have public earnings, so the private side (Binance, Tether, and especially "other private") is mostly an educated guess. Directionally though, the gap is hard to argue with.

• 
  Drewbeefy🐻‍❄️⛓️ (@0xDrewBeefy) reported 59 minutes ago

  @aibra @coinbase Coinbase hates their customer base