Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Mobile App (33%)
• Login (33%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
West Liberty	Login	6 days ago
Houston	Mobile App	27 days ago
Louisville	Mobile App	2 months ago
Guayaquil		2 months ago
Rancho Santa Margarita	Login	3 months ago
Montreux	Website	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rob (@RobGuerra90) reported 41 seconds ago

  @Borg_Cryptos Smart move! Coinbase is probably getting ready to sell more of their Bitcoin to new investors, so they can dump their bags and drive the price down, again.

• 
  Mahima Thacker (@mahima_thacker) reported 4 minutes ago

  @coinbase It still say "Coinbase does not currently support buys in your country"

• 
  Nico (@E0_DS0_Omega) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MorePerfectUS she killed a $15 wage for working ppl in 2021. coinbase gave her nearly 10k while she was still in office and now she's their advisor. revolving door just open

• 
  Tim Kotzman (@TimKotzman) reported 7 minutes ago

  6/21 Think about what this means. Millions of Coinbase users can now access prediction markets from the same platform where they buy Bitcoin. That’s a massive unlock for the industry.

• 
  Ron Horne (@rshorne) reported 9 minutes ago

  coinbase support

• 
  Tmay (@toodmay) reported 12 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase Ever time CC touches someone you call a foul, but they touch her every fckn play and never ****, fck you

• 
  Rob Petrozzo (@robpetrozzo) reported 19 minutes ago

  @aceddeca1 @web4O @JurassicFi The NFT run and some of the cards certainly didn’t perform - though that said, we’re always working to find assets and exit in the best spots. If everyone who lost money on paper in crypto blamed Coinbase that would be a dif story I suppose

• 
  Garima (@sincerelycheesy) reported 19 minutes ago

  @coinbase interesting wedge private market access wants to be more liquid. the hard part is making sure the product teaches people what they’re actually trading

• 
  Trace Cohen (@Trace_Cohen) reported 19 minutes ago

  The dataset expanded from 123 to 162 companies! The core conclusion did not change: revenue scale alone was not the best predictor of post-IPO performance. Gross margin, Rule of 40, capital efficiency, burn, and IPO timing mattered more. The original 123 had no SPACs. Adding 17 SPACs introduced a very different category of public company. These were not just traditional IPOs with worse returns. In many cases, they were companies with immature business models, limited revenue, weak gross margins, or extremely capital-intensive operations. Examples: QuantumScape $QS Lucid $LCID Aurora $AUR Desktop Metal $DM 23andMe $ME Opendoor $OPEN $OPEN had roughly $2.6B of revenue at IPO, but only about 5% gross margin. That is the key distinction. Revenue size looked impressive, but the quality of that revenue was poor. The **** additions made the 2020 to 2021 cohort look meaningfully worse and showed that the IPO process itself mattered. Adding 39 companies did not weaken the $150M to $300M revenue sweet spot. It made the contrast stronger. Many of the new additions clustered at the extremes: Zero or low-revenue SPACs: $QS, $LCID, $AUR, $DM Very large revenue companies: WeWork, Grab $GRAB, Coupang $CPNG, Alibaba $BABA The middle range still looked like the cleanest public-market readiness zone: enough revenue to prove scale, but not so much that the company was already exposed to deceleration, margin pressure, or valuation overhang. Procore $PCOR and Qualtrics $XM are useful examples. Both were well above $300M of revenue and still had weak post-IPO outcomes. That supports the point that bigger revenue did not automatically mean safer public-market performance. ZIRP became the worst vintage: The 2020 to 2021 cohort was already weak in the original dataset. Adding SPACs made it clearly the worst period. The issue was not just high valuations. It was the combination of high valuations, weak business quality, easy capital, and looser public-market access. The cohort now includes: The expanded dataset made the capital efficiency pattern much easier to see. At one end: - Veeva $VEEV raised only a few million before IPO - The Trade Desk $TTD raised roughly $60M before IPO - Atlassian $TEAM raised very little relative to the scale of the business At the other end: - WeWork $WEWKQ raised more than $20B and later filed for bankruptcy - Uber $UBER and Lyft $LYFT required massive private capital before IPO - Several SPACs raised enormous amounts without producing durable public equity value The spread became too large to ignore. Companies that needed less capital to reach scale generally looked better after IPO than companies that needed billions to manufacture growth. International platforms need a separate caveat Adding Alibaba $BABA, Pinduoduo $PDD, Sea Limited $SE, Meituan $MPNGF, Xiaomi $XIACF, Grab $GRAB, and Coupang $CPNG made the dataset more complete, but less clean. These companies do not fit perfectly into a Western SaaS or VC-backed software framework. They often had: - Much larger revenue bases - Lower gross margins - Marketplace or super-app dynamics - Different regulatory risk - Much higher growth rates in some cases Pinduoduo $PDD, with 847% revenue growth, is not comparable to a normal SaaS IPO. These companies should be included, but the thesis is most applicable to Western VC-backed tech companies. Direct listings became more balanced Slack $WORK, Palantir $PLTR, Coinbase $COIN, Asana $ASAN, Roblox $RBLX Adding Spotify $SPOT, Wise $WISE, Warby Parker $WRBY, and ZipRecruiter $ZIP made the category more representative. Direct listings generally selected for real businesses. But real business quality did not guarantee strong year-one returns. - Spotify $SPOT had about $5B of revenue at listing and was roughly flat to down year one. - Wise $WISE was profitable. - ZipRecruiter $ZIP had roughly 90% gross margin. - Warby Parker $WRBY had a strong brand but weak post-listing performance. The takeaway: direct listings avoided some IPO mechanics, but they did not avoid valuation risk. The best-performing companies were generally not the largest revenue companies. They were the ones with better revenue quality, stronger gross margins, efficient growth, lower capital intensity, and cleaner public-market timing. Public markets did not reward scale by itself. They rewarded efficient scale.

• 
  18 Decimals (@Linklevosstwins) reported 20 minutes ago

  @iclipz Are you insane? Why ******** would you use Coinbase for anything? Do you want to get ripped off?

• 
  Eric D (@Neon3Dee) reported 24 minutes ago

  @WNBA @AtlantaDream @coinbase Fix your jump shot first !

• 
  Sovereign Crypto Recovery 👨🏼‍💻 (@Recovery_Pin) reported 25 minutes ago

  Lost WETH after sending it to Coinbase? DM me. I’m a licensed and verified crypto consultant, and I’ll help review your case and explore possible recovery options.

• 
  adrian defi (@0xadriandefi) reported 25 minutes ago

  bitcoin:native looks ignored, oversold, and unloved right now. So I'm buying. Slowly, not heroically. The plan: another 20% of my stables deployed here, split across a spot and a futures position. 60% still in reserve, deployed with limit orders around $60k and into the 50s. No rush to win the knife-catching Olympics. Why now? bitcoin:native is back in its fair value zone and oversold on the RSI. Fear & Greed sits in extreme fear. Sentiment is ugly, social interest is dead, and crypto natives are rotating into the AI trade. That's typically when this market gets interesting again. Not comfortable but very interesting. But interesting isn't a bottom. I don't expect a clean February-style V-bounce. This looks like the slow phase, where sellers get exhausted over time. Less violent capitulation candle, more everyone quietly losing interest and going outside. My levels: $60k gets tested, downside zone is roughly $50 - 55k. That deeper move needs a real panic trigger, and the obvious one is Saylor selling more BTC. Not my base case, but we're in uncharted territory, so respect the risk. Four signals sharpen the thesis. All four say the same thing: money is leaving bitcoin:native for stocks, AI, and robotics. 1. STRC below $100. Strategy's preferred stock pays an ~11.5% yield and is built to hold near par. It's in the mid-90s. Harder to raise fresh money to buy BTC. Early doom-loop worry. 2. MSTR's premium compressing. It used to trade at 2x+ the Bitcoin it holds. Now it's near 1.2x and slipping. Below 1x the stock is worth less than its own BTC. Deep pessimism, historically closer to a bottom than a top. 3. Bitcoin ETF outflows. Billions leaving in multi-week streaks after a long run of inflows. The bid that carried this market is stepping back. 4. Negative Coinbase premium. BTC trading cheaper on Coinbase than global venues means US demand is soft. It's been persistently negative. The serious money isn't chasing here. Put it together and it rhymes with 2022. Back then the June capitulation was a fantastic entry. bitcoin:native and alts still broke lower in Q4, but allocating with a longer horizon worked. A good entry can come well before the final low. Zoom out. In a few months TradFi cools off after the IPO and AI rush, and people start asking where fresh capital goes once everything else has already run. And there's Bitcoin. Beaten down, ignored, setting up for the next four-year cycle. For now: patience, limit orders, and enough dry powder to stay rational. That's why I'm scaling, not aping.

• 
  Master of Crypto (@MasterCryptoHq) reported 26 minutes ago

  $3.8M frozen. $7.2B stolen. During “Disruption Week,” the DOJ teamed up with Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Coinbase, SpaceX, and Starlink to fight scams. Results: 
- 1.4M scam accounts removed
- 20K Microsoft accounts suspended
- Starlink terminals shut down
- 63 arrests across Southeast Asia Crypto scam losses grew from $3.96B to $5.8B to $7.2B. $3.8M is small compared to $7.2B, but the new strategy is bigger: scammers can now lose their social accounts, crypto wallets, and internet access all at once. That's not just enforcement. That's dismantling the infrastructure behind fraud.

• 
  Bearjesus (@thebearjesus) reported 29 minutes ago

  Coinbase + Better crypto-backed mortgage: • Pledge BTC or USDC • Receive Fannie Mae mortgage • Crypto-backed loan funds down payment • No margin calls or top-ups if BTC drops • Keep exposure to crypto upside • Up to $10K in closing-cost You're borrowing against your crypto to unlock a traditional mortgage. Not bad.

• 
  Cryptoinsightuk (@Cryptoinsightuk) reported 30 minutes ago

  The majority of bitcoin:native LTF liquidity is now swept. The discussion now becomes if this is going to double bottom here or continue lower. bitcoin:native daily RSI is at one of its lowest levels in the history of bitcoin:native's PA on Coinbase. We have seen this low or lower just 3 other times. One, when we saw $60,000 in February. Two, at our C-19 sell off lows. Three, our literal lows in 2022 following FTX collapse. Fear and Greed Index is at 12. The question for me is, who is buying bitcoin:native here, but also who is selling? Is this a Saylor unwind? IDK. I do know it feels terrible out there though and as I said the other day, under $64,000 is probably the time to be buying your favorite alts. It just feels horrible to do so right now, I get that. But as the charts above are saying (in regard to liquidity and RSI) this is one of the best areas we've been offered to buy bitcoin:native in quite some time. Does that mean the sell off is over? Honestly, I don't know. We can see via @velo_xyz that for the first time during this recent sell off we have seen funding flipping between positive and negative and OI drop. There is still a large amount of OI and we are still mostly positive, but looks like shorts are trying to get more aggressive and longs are starting to capitulate around this level. Interesting dynamics going on here tbh

• 
  brokebrah (@brokebrah) reported 35 minutes ago

  Coinbase finally bringing customer support that works ?????

• 
  Coco (@CocoBunni) reported 39 minutes ago

  @acorn_CERN_sezn A SIM swap is one of the most damaging account-takeover attacks because it gives the attacker control of your phone number, email recovery chain, and often exchange access all at once. In your case, the loss of both the Coinbase account and email likely created a clear timeline of unauthorized access events. @SecureTrace_Lab has investigated similar SIM swap cases, reconstructing the takeover sequence, tracing where assets were moved, and helping victims recover a substantial portion of what was taken.

• 
  Summer (@EclipeByDeath) reported 41 minutes ago

  @joel_kaplan @RapidResponse47 This is exactly what we need more of. Meta, Microsoft, Coinbase, Starlink, the FBI, and DOJ working together to take down Southeast Asian scam networks — 63 arrests, millions in frozen crypto, and over 1.4 million scam accounts removed. These operations prey on Americans with romance scams, investment fraud, and worse. For too long, big tech dragged its feet while criminals operated freely. When law enforcement is allowed to actually do their job and companies cooperate, real results happen. This is what protecting Americans looks like. Keep going. Crush these networks.

• 
  The crypto news (@Thecrypt0news) reported 43 minutes ago

  Coinbase froze $3M tied to Southeast Asian crypto fraud networks as part of a broader crackdown involving law enforcement and major tech firms. Crypto's transparency can help track illicit funds—but will scammers simply adapt? 👀 $BTC $ETH $COIN

• 
  Mr K.A.A (@kev123703) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Gaijin165 @Revolut Go to coinbase @Revolut is not the place for crypto dawg…. They block accounts for any reason mean while they have crypto services on thier platform. Noticed this some time and I just pulled everything there 3 of my friends received money next thing account blocked

• 
  Opulentis (@Solifer19198) reported 45 minutes ago

  pdt rule removed the 25k gate. coinbase launched pre ipo perps with usdc. retail risk is moving from permission to access

• 
  Coinbase Institutional 🛡️ (@CoinbaseInsto) reported 49 minutes ago

  Macro Is the Boss of Crypto Higher oil is keeping pressure on inflation expectations and limiting the Fed’s flexibility. With bitcoin dropping nearly 20% since rejecting its 200-day moving average, investors are treating crypto as a macro proxy. Until that trend breaks, capital seems content to sit on the sidelines. One bright spot: Coinbase now offers US clients access to global crypto options and perpetual futures markets. Key insights: → Bitcoin Facing Four-Way Pressure: A breakdown below key moving averages is being compounded by heavy ETF outflows, weak holder profitability, and rising exchange inflows. → Macro Data Flashing Warning Signals: High PCE inflation, a depressed personal savings rate, and a downward GDP revision are raising stagflation fears. → Game-Changing Liquidity: At long last, US clients have a fully regulated, compliant way to access all of crypto's largest markets.

• 
  InvestingVault (@InvestingVault) reported 50 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Terrible support. Imagine ever having a problem and needing their help. Don’t invest with Coinbase

• 
  Altar John (@AlterAero1) reported 50 minutes ago

  @emmyjaidson @coinbase @coinbase release bro’s account, fix it up.

• 
  RedSpaceCoin (@RedSpaceCoin) reported 50 minutes ago

  @coinbase Real adoption in RWA will come from projects that solve operational problems, not just marketing ones. Programmable settlement is one of the biggest operational gaps right now.

• 
  Big *** Rewards (@BARSdev) reported 55 minutes ago

  15 days old and you can buy solana:2AG4HMFdBYEHoofZCR1anuiPoSVNWwWGQbTRL6WWpump on Coinbase. Not Coinbase "coming soon." Not Coinbase "applied." On Coinbase. Right now. Swappable. Go look at how many Solana projects under a month old have that. Most tokens launched this week won't exist next week. Most projects begging for CEX listings have been around for a year and still can't get one. We're 15 days in with diamond hand airdrops running every 20 minutes, a live anti-farming engine that just banned 640 bot wallets, a share-to-earn system paying real holders for real posts, a withdrawal window that lets you take profit without losing status, and now Coinbase access. No VC money. No insider rounds. No promises we can't keep. Doxxed dev. 100% of creator rewards back to holders. This is what building looks like when you're not trying to exit. solana:2AG4HMFdBYEHoofZCR1anuiPoSVNWwWGQbTRL6WWpump

• 
  BTC Believer 💼 📈 (@worldworld088) reported 58 minutes ago

  Ethereum is dropping harder than Bitcoin today. While BTC tests key support, ETH feels extra pain. Coinbase getting approval for perpetual futures is a positive regulatory sign though. Long-term bullish, but short-term rough. Thoughts? #crypto

• 
  Aditya Mehrotra (@AdityaKMehrotra) reported 58 minutes ago

  Coinbase holds significant equity in Circle (company that issues USDC) and pockets 100% of the USDC interest income held on its platform, plus ~50% of the residual revenue held elsewhere. Joining a rival-backed stablecoin platform could dilute USDC, but still supercharge Coinbase’s overall stablecoin economics. New platform or not, Coinbase is positioned to win huge on stablecoin interest income.

• 
  Breakpoint Reports 🚨 (@solana_bytecode) reported 60 minutes ago

  Called the Coinbase retail access thesis back on the 31st. Now watching whether $HYPE's hold at $75 vs $SOL stalling at the same level means tokens with direct fiat rails outperform in consolidation. Vertical integration beats network effects when liquidity dries up.