Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago
Guayaquil		4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  DowJonez 🦇🔊🦙 (@Dow444444) reported 17 seconds ago

  @TheTrading_Atty @coinbase Sounds terrible.

• 
  Knight (@KnightWeb3) reported 4 minutes ago

  Yo @brian_armstrong I’m glad to see Coinbase being talked about again, hiring Cobie was generational and a step in the right direction but there’s still work to do. I’m gonna need you to book a flight to Turkey, full hair transplant. We need you out here embracing the culture lil bro, I’m talking outside nobu at 3:00am talking **** to tmz, in St Barthes spending half the marketing budget on chrome, dropping onto a rasmr stream to call him a ******, promoting a shitter from the base app and cashing out a cheeky quarter mill. It’s time to lock in homie.

• 
  Cryptodolic28 (@Cryptoidolic28) reported 7 minutes ago

  Damn everything is slow af right now. Everyone is buying. lol You would think this little dip wouldn't be of interest but moonpay and coinbase are slow af right now and that can only mean one thing; Mfers are buying #Crypto $BTC $SOL

• 
  Coinbase Support (@CoinbaseSupport) reported 9 minutes ago

  You can contact Coinbase Support through: → Live chat in the Coinbase app or website → Concierge chats and video calls (with Coinbase One) → Phone support (where available) → Reaching out to our official social media pages like this one

• 
  Sean Sweeney (@crossfitcowboy1) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ghostweb3 @XPRNetwork @EvernodeXRPL Just kidding - just went on Coinbase and bought some 🤘. Typing out $2 ICP was enough to say what ******** - better get some!

• 
  Mike D (@0xmikedee) reported 12 minutes ago

  .@jessepollak said brian wouldnt post a meme but he didnt say brian wouldnt support memes @brian_armstrong literally rocking the coinbase man pfp

• 
  Kim'S (@sun82_k) reported 13 minutes ago

  Hey, since you made the deposit to your coinbase wallet and not the coinbase exchange then you should be able to access it and get your money .

• 
  PILTR (@PILTR_XBT) reported 14 minutes ago

  bitcoin:native > Price continues to drift lower while both spot and perp CVDs trend down, confirming market sellers are driving this move. > OI keeps declining, pointing more towards long unwinding than meaningful fresh positioning. No significant initiation on either side so far. -> long side still crowded -> funding & positioning delta align > Coinbase Premium is becoming more negative again, suggesting weaker relative US spot demand. We saw a small amount of LTF short initiative, but positioning remains fairly muted overall. > we traded into passive bids. Continued market selling is required to absorb those resting orders and extend the move lower. -> Those bids have repeatedly slowed selloffs since the local low. Current read: controlled flows, no major positioning shift. Slightly bearish until buyers show more initiative.

• 
  Gadja.hl(Robotics Arc) (@JhonnyV13) reported 16 minutes ago

  @cobie @heart_ Fix the part where Coinbase not using Hyperliquid builder codes

• 
  beckdefi.base.eth 😼⚡ (@Beck_DeFi) reported 18 minutes ago

  @baseapp - It's still confusing, like it's designed by a woman. - Some of the design is terrible - Too expensive! (I don't pay extra in fees, when I simply can go into the browser and swap via @matchaxyz without the coinbase premium. To pay the referrers revenue sharing? **** that ****.

• 
  Liberty Swap | Bridge to PulseChain, NOW 🎆 (@LibertySwapFi) reported 23 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong However, the Base app follows the same approach as the Coinbase app. Most EVM networks are marginalized or not supported. It’s heavily focused on Base and doesn’t even support major public blockchains like Ethereum and Solana particularly well. PulseChain users can end up using the app by accident and risk losing access to their funds after bridging or using cross-chain swaps. If onboarding billions is the goal, why not build more open software with broader support?

• 
  theKOLLAB 🤝 (@theKOLLAB_io) reported 28 minutes ago

  Visa is building an internal platform to help banks/fintechs "handle stablecoins" - no launch date given yet, per Fortune. It'll debut with OUSD (Open Standard stablecoin), widely seen as a future rival to Circle's USDC. 140+ companies, including Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock, and Coinbase, have already signed on to launch OUSD, which shares reserve earnings and has no minting/redemption fees or volume limits. Visa exec Rubail Birwadker: it's less about stablecoin access, more about plugging into treasury settlement, money movement, and existing bank infrastructure. Visa already supports USDC and Paxos' USDG too.

• 
  Leonidas 🧡 $DOG (@LeonidasNFT) reported 30 minutes ago

  I am very excited to announce the launch of a new open source Bitcoin client called Bitcoin $DOG Mode. Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Knots have spent years enforcing rules that Bitcoin itself does not have. A transaction can be fully valid under consensus and still be blocked from normal relay because it is “non-standard”. This has resulted in the creation of a private “black market” for Bitcoin transactions where insiders with connections to miners get do things that ordinary Bitcoin users cannot. The $DOG Army has already gotten around this system twice. First we went directly to miners to execute the largest transaction in Bitcoin’s history because Bitcoin Core would not relay it. Then we did it again for the largest airdrop in Bitcoin’s history because of Core’s arbitrary 83-byte OP_RETURN limit. Around the same time, the Runes Protocol had grown so popular that memecoin activity accounted for the majority of transactions on the Bitcoin network. Many of these transactions also went directly to miners to bypass Core’s minimum relay fee. Core realized it had been outmaneuvered and in response they released Core v30 which removed the OP_RETURN limit and lowered the default minimum relay fee to 0.1 sat/vB. This revealed a clear pattern. The $DOG Army could route our “non-standard” transactions around Core, miners would accept them, and then Core was eventually forced to give in. The $DOG Army is done asking for permission. It is time to remove even more of these frivolous restrictions. That is why we are starting an open source initiative to develop our own Bitcoin client called $DOG Mode. When using Bitcoin in $DOG Mode: 1. The maximum standard transaction size will be increased from 400,000 WU to 3,900,000 WU. This will give everyone equal access to do “four meggers” while leaving a generous 100,000 WU of space for the coinbase transaction and block overhead. 2. The global dust limit will be lowered from 294-546 sats (depending on output type) to 1 sat. Ordinals inscriptions and Runes UTXOs are currently forced to carry hundreds of unnecessary sats to appease Bitcoin Core. This will remove the need for “padding” and effectively airdrop ~$25M in locked up sats back to the Ordinals and Runes ecosystem. Unlike Bitcoin Knots, which deviates significantly from Bitcoin Core and introduces substantial risk to node runners, Bitcoin $DOG Mode aims to only change the absolute minimum code necessary to remove these two restrictions. And unlike BIP-110, which attempts to change Bitcoin consensus through a network fork, $DOG Mode operates entirely within Bitcoin’s existing consensus rules and does not require a fork. This ensures that $DOG Mode can be successful from day one. Over time the economic incentives will drive $DOG Mode’s adoption and force Bitcoin Core to stop gatekeeping and allow these completely valid transactions. The result will be a more open, fair, and transparent Bitcoin network. If you are a Bitcoin developer who is interested in contributing to the initial $DOG Mode release, please reach out to me. If you are a Bitcoin miner who is interested in increasing your revenue by adding support for $DOG Mode transactions, please reach out to me. If you are a normal Bitcoin user who wants to support $DOG Mode quote post this with: “I will run Bitcoin in $DOG Mode”

• 
  ezdel (@Bechamle) reported 30 minutes ago

  The guy who built Base just said creator coins are dead and that he was wrong about all of it. ⠀ His own creator coin doubled on the news. ⠀ Let's look at $JESSE. ⠀ Yesterday @jessepollak dropped a long, honest post. His words: the entire social side of the market, "farcaster, zora, miniapps, and yes, creator coins - disintegrated completely. I was wrong... i was definitively wrong." ⠀ He handed the Base app back to Coinbase, went back to writing code, and said crypto does not need social to reach a billion people. Better money is enough. ⠀ Here is the context. $JESSE is his creator coin. Launched November 21, 2025. It topped the same day it launched: $0.01696, $16.86M market cap. ⠀ In the first hours snipers pulled over $1.3M using flashblocks. Bots took a chunk of the supply. The token drained liquidity from other Base projects. People were not happy. ⠀ Then eight months down. Bottom on June 24, 2026 at $0.0007235. That is 77% off the high. ⠀ And yesterday, on his post, it woke up. 24h range: $0.002 to $0.0059. ⠀ Now look at the chain instead of the candle. ⠀ Volume over 24 hours: $2.13M. Volume over the last 6 hours: $89.5K. Activity collapsed more than 20x. The move is already over. ⠀ Trades over 24 hours: 9,661 buys against 13,050 sells. More sellers than buyers. People sold into the pump. ⠀ Price now $0.004041. Market cap around $2.1M, FDV $3.9M. Liquidity $1.03M across 24 pairs. 56,390 holders. Contract verified. ⠀ And the detail I love: the main pair trades against ZORA. The exact creator coin platform he just buried. ⠀ So what happened here. The market traded a founder's capitulation as if it were a catalyst. This was not faith coming back to creator coins. It was an exit into the liquidity that the news brought in. Buy the rumor, sell the news, except the news was a man admitting he was wrong. ⠀ Two ways this goes. Either Pollak actually turns Base into the chain for global finance, and JESSE survives as a proxy on his personal brand, a bet on the man and not the narrative. Or this was a one off emotional squeeze and it goes back to where it sat on June 24. ⠀ Right now the data points to the second one. Volume is dead and sellers are winning. ⠀ DYOR, not financial advice.

• 
  Arshan Ahmad (@arshanmahmad) reported 34 minutes ago

  "Is PureFi FDIC insured?" It's the question I get most. Usually from people who have worked their whole lives, are careful with every dollar, and have earned the right to ask it. The honest answer is no. And that answer deserves more than fine print. In April 2024, a company called Synapse filed for bankruptcy. Almost none of the people it hurt had ever heard of it. They just used apps like Yotta, apps that advertised FDIC insurance. When Synapse went down, 85,000 people were locked out of roughly $112 million of their own money. FDIC insurance did not save them. The FDIC insures deposits when a chartered bank fails. Synapse wasn't a bank. It was the middleman. And because Synapse alone kept the ledger of who owned what, its collapse erased the record of whose money was whose. The court-appointed trustee estimated that up to $95 million of customer money was simply missing. Nineteen months later, the bankruptcy case was dismissed. Many of those people still have not been made whole. Some were offered pennies on the dollar against balances that represented a down payment, a tuition bill, a retirement. So here's what I actually want people to understand when they ask me about FDIC: The risk was never the bank. It was the layer in between. The company holding your money. PureFi doesn't hold your money. Your funds sit in your own wallet, secured through Privy and Coinbase, both independently audited to SOC 2. We cannot move them. We cannot freeze them. We cannot lend them out. There is no ledger of ours that has to survive for you to prove your money is yours. If PureFi disappeared tomorrow, your balance would sit exactly where it is, because it was never on our books to lose. I won't pretend that's risk free. You hold the keys, so protecting your login matters, and we will never ask you for it. But "we can't lose your money" isn't a marketing line for us. It's the architecture.

• 
  cryptofreedman (@cryptofreedman) reported 37 minutes ago

  @cobie @heart_ cobie fix coinbase make no mistakes

• 
  SOL Accelerator (@solanamaxman) reported 37 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Hi Brian, I reported a Coinbase security issue in good faith through the official HackerOne program and never used or profited from any affected funds. My account was still permanently restricted. Please ask Product Security to review Case #27032079 and reconsider the restriction.

• 
  Jan Walraevens (@Jan_Walraevens) reported 37 minutes ago

  @okx I've used binance, coinbase, bitvavo a'd robinhood, but by far OKX is better in every way. Cheaper, intuitive, great bonusses, airdrops, fully regulated, great costumer support, earn section,... Happy I switched in june before the mica deadline 👌

• 
  Maligno 𓆰𓆪 (@tessar_four) reported 37 minutes ago

  Coinbase Ventures dominating the VC leaderboard for H1 2026 tells me the smart money isn't slowing down—they're doubling down. When the exchange bets big on builders, pay attention. #CryptoVC Who else is watching their moves?

• 
  Highest IQ Man (@yhbryankimiq) reported 37 minutes ago

  @maspionx27 @coinbase keep support. airdrop sent.

• 
  James Farrell (@Farrell1969) reported 41 minutes ago

  @valkenburgh @JacobRobinsonJD @austincampbell 2. #2 is true only for DeFi mixers. It does not help Coinbase in a 1960(b)(1)(C) prosecution. That’s a policy choice to heighten the mental state only for DeFi protocols & not centralized ones that also “transmit” funds. Lots of reasons pro/con, but it is a policy choice.

• 
  Jose del Corral (@J0se) reported 43 minutes ago

  @youngblue313 @coinbase There is always a reason, and usually is related with security measures to protect the customers, DM the support team and will get you unblocked.

• 
  EyeOnChain (@EyeOnChain) reported 46 minutes ago

  The accumulation trend isn't slowing down for $ETH . Today, two newly created wallets withdrew another 20,000 ETH, worth around $37.72 million, from Coinbase Prime. Over the past 3 days, a total of seven newly created wallets have withdrawn 89,396 ETH, worth approximately $164.88 million, from Coinbase Prime .. a sign that large players continue moving ETH off exchanges. Wallets: 0xf42962b8020D09517A0efb7138EF7e989F9727d9 0x8C71ca4D7abb9bb7111bdbD62cE928bCd6915Ef6 0x1a183756d81e37573ACc91AC23Ec4dAE57dAfdf1 0x84D5B87d281E8dA138A11da793C771E4F2Dfac3D 0x8Aadfe1482bDB1De3D8719A4c54F8d7E7F933320 0x4f25B2414960fAee2395e6AAD8Ad65055c86D10C 0xeFD730b61935a91b2BC0b7f6Bb3F3fA83EAb2E00

• 
  cryptoverse (@mysteriouz_goal) reported 47 minutes ago

  @baseapp @theblockprof How about your Coinbase support system? It sucks and takes months to resolve any problem. Haven’t used you guys since

• 
  Equity Ledger (@equityledger) reported 52 minutes ago

  The Infrastructure Being Built Under a Quiet Crypto Market Crypto is in one of its lean periods right now. Prices are soft, a lot of the retail interest has moved on, and the general mood is that the story has run its course. I think that mood is looking at the wrong layer. The prices of the tokens are one thing, and they do move in cycles. The infrastructure being built underneath them is a separate thing, and it is the part that is likely to change how ordinary people move money. It helps to remember that large infrastructure usually gets built during the quiet stretches rather than the loud ones. A good deal of the plumbing that made the internet ordinary, the fiber and the data centers and the shared protocols, was laid in the years after the late-1990s enthusiasm faded, when few people were paying close attention. The same thing is happening now with the systems that move money. The attention has drifted off, and the building has continued. It is worth setting the word crypto aside for a moment and describing what is actually being put in place. Dollars are being issued as tokens that settle in seconds rather than over a day or two, which means a payment can clear at any hour and across a border without the usual wait. The card networks, Mastercard among them, have built rails that let software agents pay one another, so a task your assistant carries out can handle its own small payment. BlackRock and others are turning funds and government bonds into tokens that can be held and moved much like cash. None of this asks you to own a speculative coin. It changes how a paycheck arrives, how a business pays a supplier, and how money moves between countries. This is where I think the market has it wrong. It is pricing crypto as a mood, and a mood moves in cycles, so in a period like this one it falls back. What is being built is not a mood. It is closer to a utility, the sort of thing that gets installed during the quiet years and that people later come to depend on without thinking about it. Those two things have come apart. The underlying systems keep advancing while sentiment stays weak, and the market does not yet separate the two, so it values the durable part at the price of the temporary one. The opportunity, if there is one, is in owning that infrastructure while attention is elsewhere, which also tends to be when it is cheap. This is where the CLARITY Act comes in, and why I think its repeated delays are being read the wrong way. The stablecoin law that passed last year already gave dollar-backed tokens a legal footing. The CLARITY Act does the remaining piece, which is to settle which regulator oversees the rest of the market, so that exchanges and tokenized assets can grow without having to guess whether they answer to the SEC or the CFTC. Together the two laws turn what has been an unregulated experiment into infrastructure that banks and pension funds are allowed to use. The bill has slipped several times, and that is usually taken as a sign the whole effort is in trouble. But the framework itself already cleared the Senate Banking Committee by a vote of 15 to 9, with support from both parties. If the infrastructure is the thing to own, the next question is who collects from it. The value tends to accrue to whoever owns the rail that money has to pass through, rather than to any single token. In practice that means the compliant exchange that registers under the new rules instead of moving offshore, which is mostly Coinbase, the card networks that already sit between buyers and sellers, and the custodians holding the tokenized assets. The main risk to this view is that the established players capture most of the gains, which would leave the native tokens worth less than their holders expect. There is also timing risk, because if the bill does not pass before the summer recess it probably slides into next year, even though the underlying work does not stop. So the things worth watching are whether the vote is actually held rather than only promised, whether the contested ethics section is resolved or set aside, and which rails the banks and card networks actually choose to use. Sentiment will keep moving up and down. The infrastructure is being put in place either way, and that is the part I would pay attention to.

• 
  Soblin (@Soblin07) reported 52 minutes ago

  @coinbase solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u 🧡🧡 @krakenpro @krakenfx Support the people on 𝕏 who support you.

• 
  2005 🏴 🦇🔊 🐼 (@anon0xba05) reported 53 minutes ago

  @baseapp Onboarding from Coinbase takes 3 days due to "Security" reasons. I don't know wtf the point of getting onto Base is when Coinbase treats me like a criminal and the traditional banking system offers me instant transactions.

• 
  Command Crypto (@CommandCrypto_) reported 56 minutes ago

  Dumbahh @coinbase rep gon tell me I didn’t get my deposit because of thin liquidity on the coin. Don’t even kno wtf she talking about. 65K liquidity on a baby coin. Lmao who this ho think she’s talking to. Are you training the people? Do they even know Crypto? 7 reps 11 hours. 😒

• 
  0xbvnk (@0xbvnk) reported 57 minutes ago

  @bankrbot @coinbase report issue to devs

• 
  AKITA V█ (3,3) (@wenakita) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Flip_Research @jessepollak @AlfaClubdotapp hmm no wonder I didnt see you guys on the baseapp but ive had no issues signing up using the coinbase smart wallet on the baseapp personally I think I should've done that myself for my main bc then I wouldn't have been created yet another address :( but that's my preference