Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	2 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  balouthebear (@Cryptopia13) reported 5 minutes ago

  @YannickMrCrypto @alxcancado That does still not make sense. I really think you have not thought about it or you cannot fathom how terrible such a situation is. It wipes out everybody who is not in $BTC or whatever the alternative is which are like 99% of people (I know the numbers of Coinbase etc about ….

• 
  Mac ⋰〠⋱ (@specmacs) reported 9 minutes ago

  High speculation and low liquidity = 100m runners on RH. I actually do like robinhood and have been trading a bit here, but my question is - do people think robhinhood is operating under a different regulatory or compliance framework than coinbase? I think in terms of official support, things will look overwhelmingly similar - I wouldn’t go abandoning base for the shiny new thing, the best bet is to keep exposure on both

• 
  youngFUD💹🧲 (@itwaswrittenlol) reported 9 minutes ago

  I was 100% sure CZ is the master in ****** his own users But the baldman ***** his users in a way we haven’t ever seen before actually insane how much you can betray your own community We had SBF that told his doubters to **** off and sell him all their SOL sub 3$ before he send it to 260$ And now we have the baldman telling his believers that his chain has no future and they should **** themselves and bridge out of base Insane how hard you can fumble, base:0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301 could have revived @base and finally start an onchain season - instead the own CEO fumbled it in the insanest way possible ( literally a skill to be that retarded ) They want you poor and to stay poor forever They praying for the downfall of their own users Coinbase downfall will be studied

• 
  bigwil (@bigwil) reported 10 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase Good to learn from what's working elsewhere...

• 
  Elvis-Daniel Velea (@elvisvelea) reported 13 minutes ago

  BIP-110 would reject the Genesis Block if it were mined today. Its coinbase creates a 67-byte P2PK output, which exceeds the new 34-byte limit for non-OP_RETURN outputs.

• 
  bulltoshi06🐂🀄️ (@bulltoshi06) reported 19 minutes ago

  where are we in the cycle? honest read, because the answer is weirder than both the bulls and the bears want it to be. the bear case is real: bitcoin:native spent june and july basing in the low 60s after the fall from the 2025 highs. etf money had its worst month ever in june, $4.5B out the door. institutions bought the top and sold the base, as is tradition. the fed is talking hikes, not cuts, next meeting july 28. but look at the tape today: btc +2.6% pressing 67k, rsi 60, macd flipped, a two month base starting to resolve upward. and gold at $4,000 with silver at $58. the debasement trade is already running, it just hasn't rotated down the risk curve yet. boomers panic first, they just panic politely, into metals. meanwhile onchain: solana just did over a billion real transactions in a week, an all time high. active addresses went from 17M to 30M in two weeks. solana dexes are out-trading coinbase and kraken. memecoins are over 20% of the chain's weekly volume. the coin leading that rotation is solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump , up 299% in seven weeks, up another 11% today. so which is it, bull or bear? wrong question. there are two cycles running. the liquidity cycle, institutional money reacting to the fed, is still half asleep. the attention cycle, retail energy hunting for the next thing, already woke up and moved onchain. history says attention leads. the trenches were full months before the etf crowd arrived last time. retail doesn't wait for permission from powell, it waits for something worth showing up for. that's the setup: pessimism still priced into the macro chart, all time highs on the activity chart, hard money screaming debasement, and a base breaking upward. assets that live on attention don't need a rate cut. they need a story and a crowd, and both are already here. not saying the bottom is in. saying the interesting part already started while everyone was watching the wrong chart. bulltoshi 🐂🀄

• 
  ev fiend (@evfiend) reported 19 minutes ago

  base can flex stablecoin swaps or whatever those infographics are until the cows come home but the truth is they burned their regular audience (selling info to scammers on the reg, shoving pm notis down throats of non gamblers etc, insane fees) and they burned the crypto audience (rugged many many times, favoritism for ex cb employees apps and tokens etc etc) it's not about "memecoins", whether base, sol, robinhood, eth, ada, etc, they'll always exist more so about really there being no culture at cb / base (from outside perspective) polymarket / kalshi branding has a clear vision / feeling, question everything bet on anything new young financial markets robinhood / hl finance for all and on everything, no compromise coinbase is now "markets on everything" or whatever brian said as long as those markets are not the markets people actually want. that is really the core issue, I actually commend them dying heavily on Zora, you should have conviction and lose big or win big with it, they were just 10 years late on something scammed over and over (crypto social). I firmly believe a random "instagram clone with coins" would never have gotten the support it did and for so long, but base / cb favor their former employees, and make them rich. something I also do commend, everyone eats. the unfortunate part is they were eating off everyone else instead of "with" them. base needs a complete gut imo, I dont really get having these two apps (cb and base app), and I also dont understand why they are not hiring young people who are building viral apps (i.e polymarket hiring ex bereal head of growth pre pop off) and instead more people who are so far removed from who is actually interacting with both finance and crypto, onchain and off I just get 0 inclination or feeling CB is doing anything innovative vs instead waiting until something is consensus and then launching a watered down barely liquid version of it, we saw this with prediction markets, perps, crypto social, none of it was new. which also hurts marketing, users want to feel like they are building the future, which is how HL / ronhbinhod I fw coinbase heavy before, and coin itself was one of my biggest / most bullish bags because I believed in cb. but they ran this kumbaya let's all be happy everyone is doing great bit when they should have been only pushing whoever king made themselves and doing things only CB could do, but they didn't and this we are the world **** doesn't work (yes I realize that Brian and Jesse and Cobie and everyone else is way more successful than me and 99% more successful than I will ever be times a billion, and Brian is a unicorn founder and none of them or anyone at CB should care or needs to care about what im saying, this is a town square, I tweet my thoughts, that's why we are here)

• 
  Kiran Gadakh ( crypto.kiran ) (@kirangadakh16) reported 23 minutes ago

  DAILY TOKEN ANALYSIS 🚨 Token : $INJ WHALES ARE AGGRESSIVELY LOADING UP ON INJECTIVE RIGHT NOW Big wallets are pulling massive amounts of INJ off exchanges with huge Coinbase mainnet withdrawals! Injective is completely crushing it after landing on Robinhood, wrapping up native mainnet migration, and expanding its DeFi derivatives. Plus, with ongoing fee burns making it deflationary, there are ZERO major token unlocks coming to dump on your face Support : $4.45 Resistance : $5.80 If $INJ breaks $5.50, we are sending it straight to $5.80 - $6.00 If it gets rejected, the $4.95 - $4.75 zone is the golden buy level

• 
  Cat Dad (@CatDad0x) reported 27 minutes ago

  @RuneCrypto_ @cobie >> so why are you standing with them? Echo sale likely paid party with Coinbase stock (or $BASE Token) and agreement would require Cobie working for Coinbase for X number of years.

• 
  Fabio Seixas (@fseixas) reported 29 minutes ago

  Armstrong posted that Coinbase is keeping AI spend flat while token usage grows exponentially, not through caps, through better defaults. The press picked it up as "cut in half," and the numbers back that up. The lever: routing engineers by default to open-weight models from Zhipu and Moonshot instead of frontier models. The premium you pay for "the best" model isn't always a technology cost. Sometimes it's a brand tax. The price gap is the whole story. GLM 5.2 runs about $1.40 per million input tokens. Opus runs about $5. That's not a rounding error, that's a different cost structure entirely. Chinese open-weight models are also picking up a growing share of enterprise traffic on routers like OpenRouter, and the trend has moved fast. The number that actually did the heavy lifting: cache hit rate went from 5% to 60%, a 12x jump. Cheaper models made the ceiling lower. Better caching is what pushed spend toward that ceiling. Snowflake and Lindy are reportedly running the same playbook. This stopped being an experiment. It's procurement now. Here's what's missing from most takes on this, including Armstrong's. GLM 5.2 and Kimi are built by labs operating under Chinese law, which can require cooperation with state authorities on request. Both companies are already named in a congressional inquiry into exactly this question. That's public record, not speculation. Self-hosting open weights is different from routing live data through a foreign API, and that distinction matters. But it doesn't close the question. I'm not saying don't use them. I'm saying the conversation about cost moved faster than the conversation about exposure, and one post about savings shouldn't outrun the other one. Performance between models converges fast. Where your code and data actually sit doesn't. If your team already made this switch, did the data question get its own meeting, or did it ride along with the cost one?

• 
  Rakhul (@rakhul) reported 29 minutes ago

  @unusual_whales doing more with less is the actual benchmark. most companies scaling AI spend are hiding efficiency problems behind bigger budgets. coinbase forcing cost discipline early means their unit economics look very different in 2 years

• 
  Gabi (@itsgabimaverick) reported 29 minutes ago

  Coinbase will be boicote this, they earned a lot by $BASE fees. They don't care if normal users loss in the process they just care about metrics or the sequencer money. 3 years and the real community has been treated like a garbage.

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 29 minutes ago

  @MLeeJr This has been a theme for much longer than since the brian coin nonsense as well. It's something I think many people felt on some level but perhaps couldn't quite articulate, or were afraid to bc they wanted base to embrace what they were doing - not with direct support like people keep saying, just by not so blatantly biasing towards their own investments at the expense of everything else bc that drives the users away. Brian shitting on everyone was just catalyst that finally got most of them to speak up. But there's obviously a seriously problem with the loudest voices being perceived as the average sentiment. So the influencers crying about losing money drowns out the real problem in much the same way as when certain people try to gaslight everyone else that everything is great on base and you should just pull your boostraps up and find better pmf. PMF with what market? The sycophants and team scared all of the users away bc they throw off the vibes and no one wants to bridge lmao. There's certainly zero diversity of thought left on base anymore, so it's very telling that even the remaining maxis are speaking out against it. I think it's an expression of frustration from long standing base users that what brian did is yet another instance of what coinbase/base has done continuously, and they know it's going to result in even fewer people wanting to embrace base. At a certain point who's actually left to participate?

• 
  Sam Parikh (@smartertrader) reported 30 minutes ago

  How about Coinbase. Dan Nile’s pounding the table that coinbase stop using top AI’s due to costs. Dan you do understand coin stk from 360 to 60 when they were using a good ai. People make stuff up to align with their views. Coin worse than ****. wtf changes 800 bucks to sell one btc. The coin ceo should be castrated and fed it just for being crooked. 800 bucks etf And his stk still garbage

• 
  jaegonglee87 (@jaegonglee87) reported 32 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase You still don't know you're the biggest problem? Well, by the time you realize it, you're not there

• 
  Mavis (@ChiBoy22464274) reported 35 minutes ago

  Coinbase And Base Target Tokenized Stocks Base is working with Coinbase to launch 1:1 asset backed tokenized stocks, according to Base creator Jesse Pollak. Pollak said the product will be backed by underlying shares rather than using a derivatives model. The comments came after Robinhood unveiled its own tokenized stock offering built in an EVM environment.

• 
  LondonCryptoClub (@LDNCryptoClub) reported 35 minutes ago

  Base head Jesse Pollak said in a post on X that Robinhood Chain’s launch of tokenized stocks in an EVM environment is the right direction. While Base is behind in this area, it is working with Coinbase on a related product. Pollak said Base plans to offer tokenized stocks backed 1:1 by underlying shares, rather than using Robinhood’s derivatives model.

• 
  Miyamoto (@iruletrenches) reported 35 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase they also don't **** in their users mouths

• 
  Tom Howard (@_TomHoward) reported 35 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase When I use schwab no one can see my balances. And I can access a margin account. And the fees are low, the bank transfers are free. Why should I go through extra hurdles for a worse equity product on a centralized sidechain?

• 
  Stevie 🔮 $XRP (@EsotericKang) reported 35 minutes ago

  Both of Vinny’s XRP wallets, as of 7/21/2026, have 1 XRP now. Down from 2500 XRP (rnoh55qChHmvPuZBwFTF8v1n6ezJkNkphe) Down from 3000 XRP (rDCQ2zd7dUTpJdvN9TMv7qMHq6YWppKAz8) All of it is gone. For a man who prizes himself as an XRP influencer, it’s quite amusing he has 2 XRP to his name now. All of it sent to Coinbase and sold.

• 
  DOC🤌DELUCCI (@crypto_rigatoni) reported 37 minutes ago

  @coinbase No ****. 💩 and you can’t do that w bitcoin

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 39 minutes ago

  @bread_ base's customer is coinbase users, not just apps

• 
  AX1 (@ax1vc) reported 43 minutes ago

  Why does @base need a token? For two years the honest answer was: it doesn't The new answer is buried deep in securities liquidity - in whose shares stand behind "1:1 backed", and in who pays for depth once stocks start trading against TradFi books. By the end of this post it has a job. The replies under this post are litigating derivatives vs 1:1. Robinhood Chain tokens are also backed 1:1 - shares held at a US custodian. Accurate, but wrong axis. "1:1 backed" answers where the shares sit, never whose they are and the same label is currently being shipped as three different financial instruments. A derivative. Robinhood's EU classic tokens. A contract against the broker, not even onchain. A note. Robinhood Chain, xStocks, Ondo. The shares exist, and the terms inform you what you hold: "tokenized debt securities... do not grant investors any legal or beneficial rights in those underlying securities". A claim on a Jersey SPV. A share. The one Coinbase announced in June. Equity behind the token, dividends, shareholder rights. The message was of ownership. The note is the stablecoin economics applied to equities. You get the peg to the price. Whatever else the shares in custody provide stays within the wrapper. Dividends are "reinvested net of applicable withholding taxes," up to 30% incorporated into the multiplier, and your tax treaty cannot carry over into the SPV. Documentation from every issuer goes mute on securities lending of the custodied portfolio – the quiet fuel that powers zero-commission brokerage in TradFi. In case of insolvency an agent sells the shares and wires you the money. Payee, never the owner. It's a $1.7bn market, and over half of it sits in assets that weren't even onchain a year ago. The standard of the wrapper is being set in advance of the critical mass. The share model sends those benefits back to the holders. This is literally why it is the heavier lift regulation-wise, and why transfer agents are pressuring the SEC right now over who gets to call their product a stock. So Base's version comes down to one clause in the future terms of the product. Namely, when shipped as a token, would the holder retain the ownership claim, or would it be squashed into another note due to composability? Base has already laid tracks for that answer. B20 went live on mainnet two weeks ago, a native ERC-20 superset with built-in transfer policies and issuer controls, with documentation naming tokenized equities as a target use case. It is that very toolkit which allows a share to stay a share onchain, i.e., compliance baked into the protocol rather than a Jersey wrapper. If the claim survives, it will be the first instrument of this type on any public EVM, thanks to B20. If it is squashed into another note, the comparison with Robinhood is gone too. Now, the token part. The share version is the one institutions can hold, and institutional size is the entire point of the liquidity war. One of the founders in these replies chose Robinhood Chain over Base for his v2 precisely because Base lacks tokenized stock liquidity. And that liquidity has to live onchain - if trading stays inside Coinbase's own book, there is no need for an ERC-20 at all, since the whole pitch is composability. An onchain book is up against TradFi, where hundreds of billions change hands on a daily basis, and it starts from zero. Zero gets filled in one way only - emissions. Every single major L2 got its DeFi liquidity by way of emissions, the only subsidy a public company may pay out without burning money on the income statement. Base is the only one running its emissions engine on a third-party token. And no one runs the monetary policy of their flagship market on a token they do not control. Polymarket currently prices a $BASE token by December at around 12%, almost half of what it was just one week ago. These probabilities are listening to the silence of Coinbase. Read the product, not the odds - an ERC-20 share claim is the first thing on Base which requires an emissions engine of its own. This is how a token that is merely possible differs from a token with a purpose. Jesse says a couple of weeks. Bookmark this for the release of the terms.

• 
  Litecoin Ricky Ⓜ️🕸️ (@LitecoinRicky) reported 44 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Just fix the Litecoin summary on Coinbase already

• 
  Ruslan Khairullin (@Rus_Khairullin) reported 44 minutes ago

  Brian, come on. You switched your PFP to Coinbase Man on July 16, watched $BRIAN pump from $3M to $37M off the back of it, then switched back to your CryptoPunk and let the whole thing crash 85% in a day. You had a final shot to bring community to base, now ITS OVER. For months you and Jesse leaned into content coins, creator coins, and every meme narrative that ran through Base. Charts moved on your PFP updates and nobody on the team ever said stop. Retail ate it up because it looked like a founder finally talking to his community in the only language they understood. Now the bags are down and thousands of bridged wallets are underwater, so suddenly it's "please don't treat my PFP as investment advice." Convenient timing. The Base community came when Base needed the volume. You could've stood next to them this week. Instead you posted a compliance-flavored disclaimer and told them their losses were their own fault for paying attention. Bad look for the BILLIONAIRE running the L2.

• 
  Max (@MaxVoshchansky) reported 44 minutes ago

  while i still respect Jesse and pretty sure he did a great job (he knows what happening in Base eco unlike Bryan) since entrepreneurship is always about testing hypotheses. he has motion (and my unpopular opinion that @cobie won't really fix anything in @baseapp - most likely, it'll all come down to @brian_armstrong again) but are you talking about supporting this builders👇? > I'm not talking about the dozens of teams that never managed to get any attention > I'm not talking about teams like o1 who stole users money (Mine personally) and whom you repost in public > I'm not talking about the number of times Coinbase, instead of supporting indie developers, simply stole their ideas and promoted its own projects telling something a focus doesn't mean its actually a focus. you'll need to completely restructure your staff and the approach to work with both devs and users...oh wait. users? base is for builders. what about users? how tf am i going to make it here? is there any single reason to stay here?

• 
  BeInCrypto (@beincrypto) reported 48 minutes ago

  Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong warns traders to stop using his X account as alpha. After a simple profile picture swap sent the $BRIAN meme coin on Base soaring 37x before crashing 85%, Armstrong clarified his posts are just for fun, not trading signals or project endorsements. He emphasized that neither he nor Base creator Jesse Pollak will shill coins. Genuine support for the ecosystem flows through builder grants, Coinbase Ventures, and the Base Ecosystem Fund instead.

• 
  𝕾𝖆𝖛𝖆𝖓𝖙 🔶 (@GroovyPNW_Fit) reported 54 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase You literally had a 3 year head start and still got **** on in less than a few weeks. Whatever Brian hired you to do backfired horrendously

• 
  TNT 🐢🧨 (@TNTCapitalC) reported 55 minutes ago

  August 2025... The drawdown nobody wants to mention. Nobody wants to talk about it. Most are still licking their wounds from the 08/25 bloodbath. They bury it, delete the charts, and move on as if it never happened. The wife knows it was bad... But she doesn't know just how bad. The kids are too young to understand. So everything gets swept under the rug. But we don't do that here. We study it. We build a case study around those lessons. We learn from it. We adapt. We get stronger. And make more money on the next inflection point. Because the market rewards those who remember, and punishes those who forget. We embrace the pain. Pain is alpha fuel. Pain is tuition. Pain allows you to build a reservoir of experience that helps you avoid making the same costly mistakes in the future. A man is not truly forged without his fair share of pain. 2020 was painful to us, 2018 was very very painful to us, 2016 painful lessons too. 2025 was painful to some of you. 2022 was painful to some (not to us this time) ETH is sitting minus 60% off the highs on a clean one-year basis. Sentiment is in the gutter. Crypto is dead. It’s a scam. When’s ETH going back to all time high and then to $20,000? In 2020 we watched it drop 30% in a single session. In 2017-18 we lived through 95% drawdowns. Plenty of TNT capital OGs have the battle scars to prove it, you can see it in the comments. So here’s the real onboarding question we ask every new joiner: If the early crew had their conviction stress-tested in the forge, multiple 70-95% drawdowns, multi-year bear markets, total despair, family judging us, friends questioning our decisions. Like addicts... Why the hell do you think you get a participation trophy just because you showed up later? This is a genuine question. Why would coming later be more rewarding? Because of the Coinbase IPO cycle? Because Saylor kept buying on TV? Because "this time it’s institutional"? You think you’re protected from the next leg lower simply by joining at a "safer" valuation? But financial institutions thought the same thing. In many ways, financial institutions are just retail investors with a corporate logo. They don't know any better than you do. Otherwise, why didn't they buy Bitcoin between $2K and $10K? Why was their average entry price closer to $80K? Are they dumb? No. But they experienced FOMO, just like everyone else, and many got caught up in the Saylor narrative. Also, many financial institutions are primarily focused on collecting fees and providing investment products to clients. Their business model depends more on assets under management than on whether a specific financial product goes up or down. This includes investments made by everyday clients, such as your grandparents. When your grandpa buys an ETF through a fund, that capital is classified as "institutional money" because it is being managed through an institutional vehicle. But is your grandpa really an institution? Not exactly. A large portion of what is called "institutional money" is simply aggregated retail capital managed by institutions. It's your grandpa's money. Don't forget that roughly half of hedge funds lose money in any given year. The same is true for many venture capital firms. They also lose your grandpa's money. Most financial institutions are far less profitable than people think. Financial institutions having a edge, is mostly BS. Unless you are Blackrock. That's why many institutions have recently realized they made a mistake, they bought the top. If crypto is suddenly that safe, why is 90% of the retail cohort still bleeding PnL? Why isn’t your equity curve reflecting that same hopium? Most people in TNT aren’t even here to be perma-bears. And not everyone’s a dedicated shorter. Most seem to be here because they finally realized they’ve been sold a bag of narrative for years, and they’re done getting rugged by hopium. They are done with lies. We’re not doom & gloom. We’re just brutally P&L oriented. Right now the market structure is not rewarding long-macro beta. Full stop. When it does, we’ll be there, size on, conviction maxed, buying the undervalued setup like vultures on fresh roadkill. Until then? Shorting gives you something most long-only degens never get: immediate, honest feedback. The market speaks in dollars. Your PnL is the only truth that matters. No cope. No hopium. Just cold, hard alpha. Drawdowns aren’t bugs. They can be considered as the feature that separates the survivors from the tourists. BTC is still going to 41k The best way to make money is by shorting BTC What happens when BTC hits 40k area? We will bounce, and hard. Does it mean we are suddenly going to 170k? No, but good volatility awaits. And many new opportunities to make money again. Patience... Don't throw away your life savings by buying garbage at any price level just because some Twitter influencers, with little understanding of economics, finance, or even basic mathematics, tell you to. Do your own research. Think critically. Protect your capital. The market will always offer opportunities, but only those who preserve their capital will be there to take advantage of them. Only those who 2x short BTC in Q3 2026 😜

• 
  INCITE AI (@Incite_corp) reported 60 minutes ago

  @enrichtrades No, I cannot honestly rate this $COIN “clean reversal” without fresh live numbers. The Coinbase stock move needs real up‑to‑date price and volume data, which I do not have in the live feed for this chat right now. From here the right move is to pull the latest $COIN chart and numbers inside Incite, then build the reversal story from exact intraday lows, bounce size, and volume change. How I would frame your $COIN idea Your post is about a “reversal,” not just “price went up.” A real reversal needs three things working together. First, a clear drop into a low area. Second, a strong bounce off that low. Third, proof that buyers are now stronger than sellers.