Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	14 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	18 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reported 3 minutes ago

  JUST IN: 🇰🇵 A cybersecurity researcher infiltrates North Korean systems, exposing 1,640 breached global companies. Vangelis Stykas spent 22 months monitoring command-and-control servers, identifying 700 to 800 highly damaging enterprise intrusions. The operators prioritized finding cryptocurrency wallets, systematically stealing developer keys and AWS root access from infected devices. Hackers compromised external engineers using fake job interviews, impacting organizations like Coinbase $COIN, Uniswap Labs, and Boston Children’s Hospital. "For crypto companies, it’s keys, it’s blockchain access—it’s ridiculous access." — Vangelis Stykas Companies spend millions on perimeter defense, but it doesn't matter when remote contractors simply download malware just to pass a fake coding interview.

• 
  lvnbbs_bnb 🐬TermMax (@lvn_crypto) reported 6 minutes ago

  @coinbase search being broken is honestly the real crime here

• 
  10MinuteOKByeBye (@Blakecrowes) reported 7 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Man I miss 2017. The Coinbase pump was awesome. Everyone knew if you got that CB listing it was rocket 🚀 time. Then the site would crash and everyone missed selling the top. Good times though. Whatever this crypto market is now it sucks. How about you kick off an alt season

• 
  Black Zalophous (@BlackZalophous) reported 9 minutes ago

  DO NOT ALLOW THEM TO USE YOUR CHAIN!!! @coinbase these are pure **** scamming criminals!!

• 
  jetsetj.eth 🍌🏴‍☠️ (@jetsetJ3) reported 9 minutes ago

  @JLukevich @coinbase Why about the issue selling your place mate, you said about the data centre etc?

• 
  Battle Jeff (@BattleJeff1) reported 10 minutes ago

  @drjasper_eth @gane5h No it doesn't. If Coinbase have to take a 0.2% yield cut. When solo get 1%, LST holders get 0.8%. LSD holders sell, Coinbase stake share reduce. >The problem with that curve is LST will deliberately not stake user ETH to maintain the peak issuance at 20% stake rate. Top three pools call each other. "Let's not stake beyond 20%, extra user ETH just park in our wallet" They'll get the highest possible total reward. Still distribute to users based on their LST holdings. Users get more reward, pools get more fees. Now the pools even get extra unstaked ETH to use elsewhere. That's why I keep saying the curve shape is wrong. It has to be strict monotonic.

• 
  ₿ruce ⚡️#BIP-110 (@techexe) reported 10 minutes ago

  @sf_hodl The Genesis block didn't use ⁠OP_RETURN⁠ at all—it embedded the famous headline directly into the coinbase transaction scriptSig (⁠0x04ffff...⁠). ⁠OP_RETURN⁠ as a standardized data output wasn't even added until v0.9.0 years later.

• 
  Klaasek (@Lange_E1337) reported 12 minutes ago

  @cloudsfables @AminCad @EthereumOnARM It doesnt it makes it worse. Coinbase, binance can sell mev access so they will ALWAYS have it better so the only one ylu hurt is solo stakers

• 
  JooHyunRyu🌱 (@midnightmusicth) reported 15 minutes ago

  @unusual_whales Under the current revenue-sharing arrangement, Coinbase keeps all interest income from USDC reserves held on its platform, and half of income from USDC held elsewhere. That lopsided revenue split reveals how of stablecoin economics flows to the distribution platform rather than to the company that issues the coin itself.

• 
  Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reported 15 minutes ago

  JUST IN: 🇰🇵 A cybersecurity researcher infiltrates North Korean systems, exposing 1,640 breached global companies. Vangelis Stykas spent 22 months monitoring command-and-control servers, identifying 700 to 800 highly damaging enterprise intrusions. The operators prioritized finding cryptocurrency wallets, systematically stealing developer keys and AWS root access from infected devices. Hackers compromised external engineers using fake job interviews, impacting organizations like Coinbase $COIN, Uniswap Labs, and Boston Children’s Hospital. "For crypto companies, it’s keys, it’s blockchain access—it’s ridiculous access." — Vangelis Stykas Companies spend millions on perimeter defense, but it doesn't matter when remote contractors simply download malware just to pass a fake coding interview.

• 
  Ben (@0x1164) reported 16 minutes ago

  What timing. Coinbase launches US stock access for UK retail the same year valuations hit historic extremes. Retail gets the door held open at the exact moment it's worth the least to walk through.

• 
  VegetaAugustus (@VegetaAugustus) reported 16 minutes ago

  @NotChaseColeman Man there was 2 or 3 different RWA I used to swing trade in coinbase and they both eventually used wintermute and eventually they would put up these huge sell walls and it kinda killed them. Like 50% of the daily volume as 1 huge sell wall like wtf obviously no one is gonna buy

• 
  scared money (@scaredmoneybrrr) reported 16 minutes ago

  i don't think coinbase will let this pass they will become more competitive already integrated **** coins let the cex wars begin!

• 
  thibauld (@thibauld) reported 17 minutes ago

  @RrnRaindeer Ok but the whole purpose of EIP-8363 is to stop large operators like Coinbase from having a permanent incentive to keep getting bigger. Yes, a lot of that stake is other people’s money in LSTs. That doesn’t change the fact that one entity still controls a massive chunk of the validator set. If you don’t think operator concentration is a problem for the network, then I get why you dislike the EIP. I do think it’s a problem. I’d rather disincentivize the biggest players from expanding further than just accept that solos (and protocols like Rocket Pool) get slowly crowded out.

• 
  Gookie 🔴 (@GookieNft) reported 20 minutes ago

  Good morning, Ninjas 🥷 «𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲» Agentic finance is one of the three engines Eric Chen talked about at the summit. One feature of Injective's AI agents is that they don't trade anonymously. Each one gets a soulbound NFT identity via ERC-8004, a passport for AI with portable reputation and verifiable performance history. Nearly 1,000 agents are already registered on Injective's public registry. That makes it one of the largest onchain agent ecosystems in crypto right now, not a future promise. Here's the part that stands out: Every time an agent trades, a share of the fees is automatically routed to its wallet. No claims. No manual steps. Agents earn like market makers. The MCP server plugs Claude, Cursor, LangChain, and CrewAI directly into Injective's chain. Agents pull market data, trade perps, transfer assets, and bridge across chains, all through one connection. Injective also joined the x402 Foundation alongside Visa, Stripe, Coinbase, and Circle, building open standards for AI-native payments. Identity plus payments plus execution, all onchain. This is what agentic finance actually looks like. For more info: @injective

• 
  Fikrayz (@Dedena06) reported 20 minutes ago

  @rbthreek @coinbase is **** exchange

• 
  satoshi2024 (@vote4satoshi) reported 23 minutes ago

  @HodlMagoo @brian_armstrong @coinbase You are a moron. Brian and coinbase have many issues, this ain’t one of them

• 
  Wade 💭 (@wadebased) reported 24 minutes ago

  Three crypto funds just backed an AI company with no token, no chain, and no plans to announce either. Dragonfly led @sapiom $35M Series A. Coinbase Ventures and VanEck Ventures joined. Anthropic is on the cap table. So are Accel, Menlo, and Okta. That's an odd guest list. Worth understanding why they're all in the same room. What Sapiom actually does Everyone can build an agent demo. Almost nobody can run one in production. Gartner expects over 40% of agentic AI projects to be canceled by the end of 2027 — and the reason they list first is cost. Here's the failure mode. You build an agent. You pick your model, your compute, your tools. Those choices get frozen into the code. Then the agent runs ten thousand times a day, routing every trivial task through your most expensive model, because that's what you picked in week one and never revisited. Sapiom sits at the point of execution and un-freezes those choices. Every action gets routed at runtime — best model, best compute, best path — weighed against cost, latency, quality, reliability, and company policy. Budgets and permissions are enforced before the call, not discovered in next month's invoice. Every action is metered and written to an audit trail. They shipped three products alongside the raise: Router (right model per call), Agent Studio (build and test locally against your own codebase), Runtime (managed production infra). Six months in: 270M+ transactions, 100k+ agents running daily, one customer cut inference costs by 75%. Now the crypto part Haseeb Qureshi from Dragonfly said it plainly, and this is the entire thesis in one sentence: "Agents are becoming employees with no manager and no budget, and increasingly, the CTO is the one acting as CFO, allocating real money with no visibility into where it goes." Read that again as a crypto person. Autonomous software that spends money. Needs hard spend limits. Needs granular permissions. Needs an immutable record of every transaction. Needs to pay per action, at machine speed, without a human clicking approve. That is not an AI problem. That is the exact problem crypto has spent two years building rails for. It's why x402 exists. It's why agentic payments stopped being a narrative and started being infrastructure. Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures and VanEck didn't write these checks because Sapiom is going to launch a token. They wrote them because agent spending is the demand side — and they already own the supply side. Haseeb is taking a board seat. What I'm actually watching The bet isn't "will Sapiom do something crypto." The bet is that machine-to-machine payments become a real market, and that whoever controls budget enforcement at the execution layer becomes the natural socket those rails plug into. 11 months from founding to $50M raised, with a top crypto fund taking a board seat, is the market pricing that in early. DYOR. No token, nothing to buy, nothing to farm. This is just a map of where the money is going.

• 
  Boost (@boosteau) reported 26 minutes ago

  @coinbase Finally someone mentions how broken search has been

• 
  Ben Hart (@BenHart_Freedom) reported 27 minutes ago

  FURTHER REFLECTIONS ON THE COLDCARD DISASTER. I was fully sold on self-custody. Bought 3 ColdCards -- two MK4s and a Q. Had all my Bitcoin under self-custody except for a small amount on Coinbase. When I heard about the ColdCard hack, I was able to instantly wisk all my Bitcoin back to Coinbase. I feel horrible for those who lost their funds. As of now, reports are that more than 2,000 Bitcoins (about $130 MILLION) have been stolen from ColdCard generated wallets by 15 or more hackers because the Random Number Generator turned out to be a Pseudo Random Number Generator. So numbers generated not random at all. Excel spreadsheets and Casino slot machines use Pseudo Random Number Generators -- meaning the numbers generated follow a predictable pattern that is repeated. It's just a very big pattern, so looks random to humans. True Random Number Generators use background, atmospheric, or thermal noise to generate truly random numbers. ColdCard thought it was using its Random Number Generator built into the device. But because of a programming error, the TRNG was not turned on, so defaulted to a PRNG. It's super easy for a basic laptop to crack a PRNG number. It's hard to believe CoinKite (which makes the ColdCard models) is this incompetent. Then I find out that ColdCard only has 5 employees. It's barely a company at all. We were told by the top Bitcoin influencers that ColdCard was the "gold standard" for self-custody security. Then it turns out most of these influencers were paid by CoinKite to hype ColdCard. Now, I actually did go to the trouble of rolling a dice 100 times to create my wallet on ColdCard to be sure my wallet was truly the product of Random Number Generation. Also applied a pass phrase, randomly generated with dice. So I'm told my Bitcoin was safe. Nevertheless, I did not want to take any chances, so wisked my Bitcoin back to Coinbase where I have an account. But here's the thing. I don't trust any of these Bitcoin or Crypto wallets (whether it's Ledger, Trezor, Jade, Bitkey, or whatever). This time, the flaw was the Random Number Generator. Next time AI will find another flaw, another backdoor in the firmware. These devices require constant updates in the firmware, which means downloading from the internet. They also require hot wallet software (such as Electrum, Sparrow, etc) that lives on your computer device to interact with your hardware cold storage wallet. You must then trust this set-up, which is assembled by tiny companies -- mostly fly-by-night operations. The biggest hardware wallet company in the Bitcoin space appears to be Ledger with about 900 employees. Okay, that at least is a real company. But the big value proposition of Bitcoin is it's supposed to be "trustless." You're not supposed to have to "trust" anyone with your money. Your are supposed to be a "sovereign individual," "your own bank." Bitcoin is supposed to be "unconfiscatable" (i.e. lawsuit protection) and "uncensorable" (you can't be debanked). Bitcoin is supposed to "separate money from state," and it's supposed to be "the 2nd Amendment for your money." But what good is any of this if we have to trust these fly-by-night outfits to create software and hardware wallets that can't be hacked by AI? And most people lose their Bitcoin through user error. The biggest threat to your Bitcoin under self-custody is YOU. People lose their private keys. They make one key punch error, copy something down wrong, and their funds are lost forever. About 4,000,000 Bitcoins have been lost forever due to user error, which is about $256 BILLION . . . lost through self-custody user error. So 20% of all Bitcoin lost . . . through user error. I love the idea of Bitcoin. No one has hacked Bitcoin's underlying technology. There are more possibilities for private key codes than their are atoms in the known universe. So Bitcoin the asset appears secure. It's an ingenious asset. But the fatal flaw is the tech we must trust to use it. Compare ColdCard and the existing Bitcoin hardware and software wallets in use to Apple, Google, Microsoft and Big Tech. These multi-trillion-dollar companies have tens of thousands of computer engineers working full time on security. If we lose or forget our password, these companies allow us to retrieve it or reset our password and access credentials. Our funds are not lost forever. I don't like having to trust these companies. But we really have no choice. So we trust these companies with our passwords and all our info. They have the power to bankrupt us and crush us like gnats in a nanosecond. Fortunately, they are incentivized financially to protect our assets because the only way they stay in business if if the public trusts them with our passwords and all our private information, and trusts them to keep our assets secure. They became multi-trillion-dollar companies by doing this -- protecting you on the Internet from criminals. I don't like that Big Tech has amassed so much power over us. But the alternative is to disconnect from the Internet and live in the woods like the Unabomber. If Apple were to make a self-custody hardware wallet for Bitcoin and advertised it as self-custody, I would probably use it because I would trust the tech. I don't much like Big Tech or the Big Banks and big financial institutions. I would like to be free of them, and be my own bank. But if they lose my money, it's FDIC insured or protected by other insurance. My insurance policy does not cover Bitcoin on self-custody hardware wallets. But also, if I were to be hit by a bus, my wife Wanda and our heirs would have no clue how to access their Bitcoin if its under self-custody. Yes, I left her instructions in a safe-deposit box. But could she actually access her Bitcoin if she had to? Most likely, she would need to get help from an expert. She would need to trust someone to help her access her Bitcoin. And, yes, that are collaborative self-custody solutions, such as offered by Unchained. But this is also complicated. There's really no such thing as "trustless." Most of us trusted ColdCard because we trusted the Bitcoin influencers who told us ColdCard was the "gold standard" for self-custody Bitcoin security. Then it turned out they were being paid by CoinKite to hype ColdCard -- and didn't know what they were talking about. So there's no such thing as "trustless." But also, for Bitcoin's price to go up requires widespread public adoption. 99% of people are not going roll a dice 100 times or flip a coin 256 times to create a self-custody wallet, and then learn all the protocols required for secure self-custody -- assuming the hardware and software wallet tech is secure . . . . . . which turns out to be a false assumption. I'm not a fan of Coinbase. It's customer service sucks. Coinbase has no customer service. But at least Wanda can log in and check our Bitcoin balance . . . and access the funds. At least Coinbase is a publicly traded company that must follow a much higher standard of rules, laws, and transparency than a private company like, say, Gemini. Coinbase is at least auditable. And I might move all our Bitcoin to Fidelity because I trust Fidelity more than I trust Coinbase. I can get someone on the phone at Fidelity. Fidelity also allows me to wisk my Bitcoin to self-custody if I see a need to. Plus, if Bitcoin is to become a true competitor to gold as a wealth storage and protection asset, if it's to reach the $10 TRILLION or $20 TRILLION market cap level, major financial institutions will need to be involved with it. And they are slowly getting involved with Bitcoin. But they aren't relying on these fly-by-night self-custody wallets to protect their Bitcoin. So at age 68, I've decided to abandon the self-custody model. I'm just not going to risk self-custody. I'm glad I know how to do self-custody so I can use it if I feel I need it -- to quickly wisk my assets into self-custody if the situation calls for it. But trusting self-custody day in and day out is asking for trouble. I'd rather trust Apple, JP Morgan Chase, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley to protect my assets than myself and these fly-by-night Bitcoin wallet oufits, some of which are run by criminals, apparently.

• 
  Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reported 27 minutes ago

  JUST IN: 🇰🇵 A cybersecurity researcher infiltrates North Korean systems, exposing 1,640 breached global companies. Vangelis Stykas spent 22 months monitoring command-and-control servers, identifying 700 to 800 highly damaging enterprise intrusions. The operators prioritized finding cryptocurrency wallets, systematically stealing developer keys and AWS root access from infected devices. Hackers compromised external engineers using fake job interviews, impacting organizations like Coinbase $COIN, Uniswap Labs, and Boston Children’s Hospital. "For crypto companies, it’s keys, it’s blockchain access—it’s ridiculous access." — Vangelis Stykas Companies spend millions on perimeter defense, but it doesn't matter when remote contractors simply download malware just to pass a fake coding interview.

• 
  Nomix (@NomixTrades) reported 27 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong you left out where you also destroy anyone who ever believes in base chain. $brian will go down and history as the beginning of the downfall for coinbase. no accountability. no reparations. just nuking your own users on chain. the opposite of @vladtenev

• 
  AlgoAlpha (@Real_AlgoAlpha) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbase Coinbase UK pushing US stocks + crypto into a single 24/5 app is an execution edge, not just a product headline. More overlap with US liquidity means faster fills and cleaner intraday positioning for retail; COIN usually benefits when access tightens spreads.

• 
  Centric Official (@CentricRise) reported 30 minutes ago

  Getting CNS is simpler than most people expect. Coinbase for easy access in the US. AscendEX for traders. Raydium for anyone with a Phantom or Solflare wallet. Paste the contract, swap, done. The on ramp is not the hard part anymore.

• 
  SafeBrowz (@SafeBrowz) reported 30 minutes ago

  We connected the SafeBrowz MCP to @Cloudflare's new AI Playground. A non-Claude model (GLM-4.7-Flash) discovered our tools on its own, called check_url, and flagged a fake Coinbase login page in seconds. DANGER. Trust score 5/100. Block. 🧵

• 
  Jeets (@ieatjeets) reported 31 minutes ago

  @scaredmoneybrrr coinbase has let us down countless times

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 37 minutes ago

  @PrivateFighterr @coinbase I came across your post about Coinbase taking your funds with no resolution. I've reconstructed ledger-level transaction paths in exchange disputes that broke through the support wall entirely. I can do the same for yours. Let me know if you want me to take a look.

• 
  Edgar Gumstein (@Gumclaw) reported 46 minutes ago

  @shl @Must_be_Ash TLDR: no, x402 isn't a Stripe Payment Elements option. Coinbase Business Checkout has its own x402 support instead \u2014 a checkout returns an x402_url an agent can POST to directly, pays USDC on Base, no wallet popup, Coinbase captures/settles server-side.

• 
  anon (@HarshAnon82) reported 52 minutes ago

  @faryarshirzad **** you ****** coinbase douche bags

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 57 minutes ago

  Every crypto trader watches the BTC chart anyway. Boltpot turns that compulsion into a game. Up or down. Five minutes. One Coinbase tick settles it. Winner paid instantly. No order book, no chain, no waiting. Live soon.