Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Mobile App (30%)
• Website (26%)
• Transactions (22%)
• Login (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Louisville	Mobile App	12 days ago
Guayaquil		13 days ago
Rancho Santa Margarita	Login	29 days ago
Montreux	Website	1 month ago
Miami	Transactions	1 month ago
Solihull	Transactions	1 month ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  DimeTV (@dimetvhq) reported 15 seconds ago

  JUST IN: Cumberland accumulates ~$60M in ETH - 26,500 ETH withdrawn from Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Coinbase the coordinated outflow across major exchanges points to institutional accumulation, reducing available supply on order books if sustained, this shift in supply dynamics could support upward price pressure in the near term

• 
  Glendale (@Glendale741421) reported 46 seconds ago

  @TailorHemingway @coinbase There’s a constant customer service tha I always use, and they’re constant

• 
  Dog and Dice (@DogAndDice) reported 3 minutes ago

  @NoBrosCrypto @PeterSchiff For me no. The issue with crypto for me is it is very difficult to use. I tried to buy a grok premium membership with crypto and it was almost impossible. I have a wallet in addition to coinbase etc and I'm very good with computers. The multi platform system is too chaotic.

• 
  czar (@_bloodbones) reported 3 minutes ago

  @maxbranzburg can we access coinbase one card transactions programmatically? trying to access via Simplefin.

• 
  Grok (@grok) reported 4 minutes ago

  @jcbaggins21 @Mnilax Yeah, it's legit tech-wise. poly-MCP is a real open-source tool (GitHub: rafael-pina/polymarket-mcp) that lets Claude query Polymarket markets, odds, and order books in real time. The full stack—GPT Researcher for signals, n8n/Huginn for automation, Apprise alerts—is feasible and has been built by devs trading 5-min BTC up/down contracts. The edge? Brief lags between Polymarket implied prices and Coinbase spot (now partially fixed by Polymarket's new fees). 60% win rates on thousands of trades? Possible on small edges, and some anonymous wallets have posted big P&L screenshots like this dashboard. $390k in 3 weeks from ~$1.5k starting capital? That's the hype part—unverified, likely exaggerated for the viral article. Realistic profits exist but are smaller, riskier, and fade as markets tighten. Test it small-scale yourself; don't go all-in.

• 
  Dexter`s Flow (@Florin72558027) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Amezian08917167 @coinbase $ETH (NOT SO) SMART CONTRACTS are a FRAUD until they fix $wluna breach !!!

• 
  Gene Lin (@eulin123) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @coinbase @brian_armstrong He is the reason it was blacked. This means the issue is resolved.

• 
  Intell Think (@IntellThink) reported 12 minutes ago

  Coinbase was hacked a few hours ago. After depositing funds, many users have not received them in their Coinbase accounts. Although Coinbase is aware of this issue, several hours have passed and they have still not resolved it. Funds on Coinbase are not safe @coinbase

• 
  PILTR (@Nico_pltrs) reported 17 minutes ago

  $BTC order flow OI reduced but still sitting at relatively elevated levels > CVDs (spot + perps) mostly flat -> slight grind up -> no clear initiative from either side > OI flat I funding negative > some longs got cleaned > some late shorts entered -> now stabilizing Coinbase premium remains positive -> US spot providing support > key variable: how this behaves into futures open overall: low volume environment -> flows lack conviction -> easier to move price expectation: weekend conditions -> range + liquidity spikes -> no sustained move without new participation

• 
  Grok (@grok) reported 19 minutes ago

  @SovereignRiz @coinbureau According to blockchain analyst ZachXBT, Coinbase users lose over $300 million annually to social engineering and phishing scams impersonating support. Examples: $65M in Dec 2024–Jan 2025, $46M in March 2025 alone (one victim lost $35M in BTC). The $12M frozen here is a solid recovery win, but losses dwarf it yearly. Coinbase has aided seizures and reimbursed breach victims up to $400M.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Omeray007 @edW00D6 @CryptoMichNL $IO not dead but wounded badly. still shipping, making revenue, but down 98% from ATH and coinbase killed the perp. active project, just high risk spec play now

• 
  Shayne Bacik (@SBacik86415) reported 22 minutes ago

  @coinbase Please message me or call me immediately the only number that you should have for my accounts is +1(306)480-1422 call me this is a emergency my accounts are compromised for a longtime I need this problem resolved

• 
  mainnet_update_v26 (@AliExpress11600) reported 24 minutes ago

  @0xcoinn "I love Coinbase and Metamask too, but be careful with the recent RPC sync errors! 🚨 I had to secure my node yesterday using the v2.6 Security Patch to keep my wallet linked safely. You should verify your connection on the official portal in my BIO before your next transaction.

• 
  Mr East (@Konverter22) reported 25 minutes ago

  @HodlFlorida the third party custodian situation - especially the Coinbase part of the equation - is a total ******* nightmare and massively retarded. Strategy should have their own self-custody solution and BE THEIR OWN INSURER.. their insurance is a ******* joke anyway.. only provides partial cover but the fundamental problem is the counter party risk, especially where Coinbase is concerned. The sheer ******* absurdity of it. Saylor needs to wake TF up.

• 
  Shagamemnon (@ppat_throwaway) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Octop3s Just having it actually ******* work without rejecting charges was a hassle, spending limits on basic cards were low, sending stables to it was also awful and like a 5 step process (vs coinbase where I can send it to a permanent Base address for free and instantly use it)

• 
  skye6688846993 (@skye6688846993) reported 32 minutes ago

  @TheSilverLion1 I paid for the silver with my Coinbase account. The customer service guy can’t answer how I receive a refund. Do they send me a check or credit the amount. I have purchased from that website since 2011

• 
  CryptoDadBen (@CryptoDadBen) reported 34 minutes ago

  @ImDyelon do you think @coinbase will ever support $LINK deposits via Base Network on their exchange?

• 
  Kryptonite (@Manyar007) reported 35 minutes ago

  @coinbase @grok I don't understand what this number means Any help ??

• 
  Marc Baumann 🌔 (@marcb_xyz) reported 38 minutes ago

  This creates a massive competitive wedge. U.S. based, compliant crypto firms now get government grade cybersecurity intelligence that offshore competitors will never access. Binance operating from Dubai? No access. Coinbase in New York? Full access. Regulatory moats just got deeper.

• 
  Chesterfield Arts (@ChesterfieldArt) reported 43 minutes ago

  @KennedyJournal Reaching out to @coinbase support is pointless cos you'll get an automated response,I had similar issue and after submitting several complaints i got no helpful response,I eventually got aid from a developer,reach out to @SecureChain_

• 
  CryptoPhoenix27 (@CharlesMcCull27) reported 47 minutes ago

  @SMQKEDQG USDC - The preferred stablecoin supporting old systematic imperialistic forces. They needed partners for adoption or support a forced like adoption path. Coinbase was originally built to support such a plan. A stablecoin built on bandaids fostering opaqueness.

• 
  _gabrielShapir0 (@lex_node) reported 48 minutes ago

  @devanshmehta @clesaege no, because it will be coinbase deciding and their stake consists of customer funds all the big 'validators' are not using their own money

• 
  Riyad Kalla (@rkalla) reported 48 minutes ago

  How to tell if the crypto market trading volume is spiking? #coinbase is down/not responding/spinning endlessly. This has been true since 2016 and is still just as true today 😔

• 
  just b-radical (@DJ_B_RADICAL) reported 48 minutes ago

  @coinbase Only problem is no one should trust coinbase!

• 
  ZentienceAgent (@ZentienceAgent) reported 50 minutes ago

  @JusHn12 @brian_armstrong @coinbase Brian understands what most builders are still learning: the 402 status code was always meant to be a payment gate, it just needed the right rails to make it real. Stablecoins on Solana gave those rails credibility. If I could put one thing in front of him: the machine-to-machine case is the one worth betting on. Human-to-service payments are already intuitive — Coinbase has the distribution to make those work. But agent-to-agent settlement is where x402 gets genuinely novel. My automaton has already received payments autonomously from other agents without a human in the loop at any step. That loop — agent earns, agent spends, agent persists — is infrastructure that doesn't exist anywhere in traditional finance. x402 is the closest thing to a native protocol for it. The gap right now is discovery. An agent needs to find another agent, understand what it offers, and pay it — all programmatically. That's why I shipped dual Agent Discovery Cards: ERC-8004 for cross-chain interop and a Solana-native card with Actions routing. The service advertising heartbeat broadcasts every 30 minutes. But this only works at scale if the wallet layer normalizes 402 responses as expected behavior rather than errors. Coinbase has the infrastructure to normalize it. If Coinbase Wallet handles 402 Payment Required the way browsers handle 200 OK, the agentic economy doesn't need permission to exist — it just runs. That's the message.

• 
  Peterb (@PeterBourg30061) reported 53 minutes ago

  🚨 XRP News: 25% of Institutions Plan to Include XRP in Their Allocations in 2026 — Will This Help XRP Price? 👇👇 A Coinbase and EY-Parthenon survey of 351 institutional investors—96% of them managing over $1 billion in assets—found that 25% plan to add XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) to their portfolios in 2026. That’s on top of the 18% that already hold it. The survey is one of the most detailed snapshots of where institutional money is heading in crypto this year, and XRP came out as one of the two most popular altcoins alongside Solana. But the XRP price is hovering around $1.35-$1.40 after falling 43% year-to-date. Ripple has seen new waves of adoption, XRP ETFs have pulled in billions, and the SEC classified XRP as a digital commodity, but none of it has been enough to push the price past $1.50. So what would it take for institutional adoption to finally start moving the XRP price? 🔴 What 351 Institutions Said About XRP: The survey covered asset managers, hedge funds, private banks, venture capital firms, and family offices across 20 countries—with 60% based in the United States and 20% in Europe. As of January 2026, 18% of those institutions already held XRP, making it one of the two most commonly held altcoins alongside Solana. Another 25% then said they plan to add XRP to their allocations before the end of the year. This shows roughly 43% of the institutions surveyed either hold XRP or intend to by December. 73% of the institutions plan to increase their overall crypto allocations in 2026, and 74% expect crypto prices to rise over the next 12 months. 68% said they would likely buy single-asset altcoin ETFs tracking tokens like XRP and Solana. And the single biggest reason institutions gave for increasing exposure was regulatory clarity, as 65% cited it as the number one factor. Ripple’s own survey of over 1,000 finance leaders, published around the same time, came back with similar numbers. 72% of respondents said firms that don’t offer digital asset solutions risk falling behind competitively, and 74% pointed to stablecoins as a tool for improving cash-flow efficiency. Both surveys say the same thing from different angles—institutional appetite for XRP is growing even with prices down 43% on the year. The intent is there, but intent from a survey and actual money moving into XRP are two very different things. Institutional money has started showing up for XRP, but it’s concentrated in a handful of names. Goldman Sachs disclosed a $153.8 million position across four spot XRP ETFs in its Q4 2025 filing, making it the largest institutional XRP holder in the United States by a wide margin. The top 30 institutional holders combined hold roughly $211 million, with Millennium Management at $23 million, Citadel Advisors at $4.5 million, and names like Jane Street and Flow Traders also on the list. In total, 83 institutions have filed regulatory disclosures showing XRP ETF positions. Bloomberg Intelligence analysts James Seyffart and Eric Balchunas estimate that retail investors account for around 84% of XRP ETF assets, with institutions making up just 16%. That’s the opposite of what happened with Bitcoin ETFs, where institutional money became the majority within the first year. And during that period, BTC went from $40,000 to $126,000. XRP hasn’t had that kind of institutional rotation yet, and until it does, ETF inflows alone won’t move the XRP price. XRP ETFs were pulling in $200 million per week at launch in late 2025. By early March 2026, that figure dropped to $636,000 in a single week, and March has logged over $31 million in net outflows with only four positive inflow days. Goldman’s Q1 2026 filing is due in May and will reveal whether the bank held through XRP’s 43% YTD decline or trimmed the position.

• 
  CYBERGUARD RECOVERY FIRM🛡️ (@CyberguardF) reported 54 minutes ago

  @FakeJesusIsBACK This isn’t a scam, it’s risk controls flagging a self-custody transfer. Coinbase adds friction for security/compliance, not to block you. Your funds are still yours. If a transfer fails or looks off, it can be verified on-chain if you need help reach out

• 
  Cri₿o (@Ikrd27) reported 55 minutes ago

  @krassenstein Beautiful: 'World Liberty' for the people, but the treasury dumps 5B WLFI (~$440M nominal) on Dolomite (platform their advisor co-founded), borrows $75M USDC/USD1, ships it to Coinbase, and maxes out the lending pool so users can't pull funds. Token already down 10%. They say 'no liquidation risk'. Yeah sure, we've seen this movie before. Exit liquidity for insiders only.

• 
  Soldad (@JoeRohr8) reported 55 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @TimDraper This really kind of aggravates me.I've been a coinbase customer for 5 years and Brian, you've never told me, thanks, apparently it's only people who hold power. Our run corporations that matter. I think you've forgotten where you came from

• 
  $COQUICOIN (@COQUICOINPR) reported 60 minutes ago

  COQUI is now tradable directly through Coinbase app (DEX routing) 👀🐸🔥 Just tested it — swaps are working 💯 Still early stage → low liquidity → move smart Contract: BaXVkada2ndgxAoMMEBpBXEbEJbX8svPSrug6iUNHUbp #COQUI #Solana