Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago
Guayaquil		4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mr. Grover (@Mr__Grover__) reported 1 minute ago

  @MoitReghason @virtuals_io Base did not respect Virtuals We werent even listed on Coinbase as a top performing platform Now we take our community to Robinhood chain where retail will support us!

• 
  BraveX (@BraveX_DeFi) reported 2 minutes ago

  Let's be real: @jtx_trade as a platform is a great project. Built by Jito Labs (JitoSOL, Block Engine, Solana's MEV backbone). $50M raised from a16z crypto, $100M in cash. The most battle-tested team on Solana. Spreads on SOL/USDC below half a bp (tighter than Coinbase or Binance). The pitch: charts, execution, on-chain data and portfolio tools in one interface, instead of the 5–8 apps Solana traders juggle today. So why won't I be farming the airdrop? Jito paid $8k–$20k per wallet in 2023 because fewer than 10,000 wallets were eligible. JTX is the exact opposite: On every airdrop tracker since day 1 Waitlist ranked by REFERRALS (a farming magnet by design) A single post with 220k+ impressions And 80% of its fees flow to JTO buybacks and burns for at least a year. So why would they even launch a new token? If you believe in JTX, the smarter exposure might just be JTO.

• 
  Cashflow King (@cashflow_king94) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Akinio133820 It was bad while coinbase was going up at the start. I was there but I've also said the same thing above in the comments - coinbase underlying has done terrible

• 
  Rust (@0xRustyy) reported 5 minutes ago

  Everyone says memecoins are back. So I decided to go all in. $ANSEM is going to 1 billion, so I fullported at 400M. After losing 50%, I decided to rotate into $CASHCAT. I bought at 200M, the minimum it’ll do is run like Ansem did to 400, and I’ll be back at breakeven. Within a couple days I’m down 75%. I think all is lost… but the CEO of Coinbase changes his PFP and I catch the next 100m runner $BRIAN at 30M. Rent is due tomorrow but luckily this will recoup everything I lost. Not even 24 hours later I’m down 90% and he changed his PFP back to a punk… I’m gonna go homeless and my wife is leaving me.

• 
  Command Crypto (@CommandCrypto_) reported 7 minutes ago

  There is no man on earth that have ever gaslit me like the customer service department at @coinbase this is causing me great emotional distress. It drove me to drink.

• 
  MAR Cards (@MARCollectibles) reported 13 minutes ago

  @spinotron @coinbase @gigazine There is no liquidity on PBC for anything aside from true grails. White tiger LeBron chalk toss sold for $260 yesterday down from $600+ a few months ago

• 
  Colasama (@Colasama) reported 14 minutes ago

  A high conviction $BONK play: After the BONKDAO incident, the OI of $BONK went up suspiciously while the price went one way down. MLM believes it was the attacker hedging with shorts on Binance before depositing millions$ of Bonk to Binance/Coinbase. That thesis is plausible, but what's interesting is that OI didn't drop during the BONK offload. My thesis is that the attacker's plan is to offload all spot before closing perp, not unwinding both at the same time. Can't tell whether this is the best strategy from the attacker's POV. But this will certainly cause maximum price impact for BONK and very juicy long entry when the attacker's spot bag exhausts.

• 
  King Wabi (Mr Big Business) (@KingWabi) reported 14 minutes ago

  @lil_louieT @base @cobie Never ever goin to happen. Coinbase is the most incompetent company in the entire industry and if there’s an industry filled with complacent people where they know that massive issues are present where they do nothing about it, it’s crypto. Coin to zero.

• 
  gotdanish (@gotdanish) reported 19 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase @brian_armstrong Still waiting on a response here - it's been a couple days now and the crashing issue in Advanced mode charts is ongoing. Can you provide an update on what's causing this and an ETA for a fix?

• 
  Felix 🟦🟨🟥 (@felixharryobama) reported 22 minutes ago

  🚨 $BONK Treasury Exploiter Keeps Dumping — Another 400B Just Now! After draining 4.426T BONK (~$21M) on July 6 via governance: • Wallet: FhYPjrH12uLaLXFttCHgEKKFvBPoN6rztMPs2E8LWUNJ • July 16-17: ~1.186T (~$4.1M) to Binance • July 18-19: Multiple 400B batches to Coinbase (~800B+ total on that route) • Moments ago: Fresh 400B BONK transferred toward exchange Now holding ~2T BONK (down from higher amounts as distribution continues). $BONK already down ~40% since the incident. Ongoing sell pressure! 👀 #BONK #Solana #Crypto

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 26 minutes ago

  @wagmiAlexander Lmao do you not see how this is precisely echoing the behaviour that people have a problem with? “These users simply do not matter bc they are statistically shrinking over time”. There’s an xkcd comic that comes to mind about trend extrapolations. I wouldn’t count on a lagged metric when users can shift away at the push of a button and break short term trends. Classic TA bro move. “Oh the sma is curling up lfgggggg” nah bro people are pissed and you’re reducing them to numbers to justify it. You all need some serious PR training jfc I’m indexing on how people (users if you don’t know what that is) respond to a publicly traded company effectively acting as though they do not matter. “We can just have ai agents trade back and forth and it’ll look good in the metrics”. Where’s the moat, that forces a race to the bottom in fee revenue, and if you’re not the fastest gg. Real users are a moat. It’s no secret that solana vol is falling, that doesn’t mean a whole lot when it was previously giga pumped with bots over meme manias. That’s hardly something you should use as justification to imply an entire group of traders is irrelevant. Not sure if you know this but over that period some people from solana did bridge to base to launch ai slop tokens and farm people on those. It was deployer who essentially brought those users, not anything base did. Do you think they will stay when they are chain agnostic and there’s now fresh competition? No, those users will go where the narrative is, and now that base has burned their longest running supporters one time too many, many of those will leave along with them. What Brian did has people actively telling others to avoid base and not use coinbase. That’s the opposite of good advertising. And it wasn’t about a shitcoin like you utility bro retards keep trying to say. It’s about the same overarching sentiment you clearly share. Utter disdain for a subset of crypto users, the natives. You are literally the principal skinner “I’m not the problem” meme. Regardless of how you think you can justify this, the problem is the attitude and how out of touch this was and coinbase/base has been. People *hate* the ivory tower douchebaggery. You can’t even let them have cake lmao. Imagine what those numbers could have been if base didn’t piss everyone off to begin with so they all left to solana. Guess what? They just did it again, for the nth time. Even with those gains while things have been slow everywhere, solana is still ahead because they have more users.

• 
  Lior Messika (@lior_eth) reported 32 minutes ago

  Claiming that open weight models are ungovernable and inherently decel is inaccurate. Some thoughts: 1. Kimi K3 is not evidence that open weights stop AI progress. Quite the contrary. At most, it is evidence that the unit economics of closed AI systems are broken. His logic is that open weights reduce proprietary model rents, thereby reducing capex, in turn reducing investment in frontier development. He equates AI capex to output, but it’s really just another input, and not the only one. 2. Open weights commoditize the model layer, but wildly accelerate the layers above and below it. Dean’s argument is that models are unique snowflakes, while the reality points to the fact that they behave much more closely to cheap, programmable goods. The breadth of possible use cases is orders of magnitude higher with open weight models vs closed source counterparts. Market dynamics continue to push the price of intelligence down rather than up. Dean is right to point out the lost margin at the model layer, but this is value migration, not value destruction. 3. Lower model prices increase total compute spending. A lower cost of intelligence means higher demand for compute at a global scale. Cheaper compute = more aggregate computation. Jevon’s effect is in full effect here (pun intended), and this trend is discernible across enterprises like Coinbase and others who increase their tokens but lowered cost. 4. Competition is good! If anything, Dean’s most prominent argument is in itself decelerationist and not in line with last 12 months of data, or even capitalist markets more broadly. Open models actually increase the floor of capabilities without having to pass through his company to achieve them. Competition between open and closed models turns the reward of building closed models into a much simpler equation: maintain a genuine lead in capability, or lose your edge (and your margins). 5. Most importantly, open weights create distributed and decentralized innovation. This is the most accelerationist premise in this entire argument. AI accelerates without the need to adhere to OpenAI’s agenda, or Anthropic’s, or DeepMind, etc. Open weight models incentivize new methodologies and experiments across post training, quantization, deployment across different hardware stacks, and so much more. This is the definition of accelerationism. 6. Open weight model builders can still monetize. This is the antithesis of “AI communism”. They ship valuable products and services like premium agents, post-training frameworks, RL environments, allowing them to resell compute at a margin (literally the same biz model as the closed labs). Open weights are only decel if you define AI progress as the amount of capital invested in closed American model companies. In reality, they lower the unit cost of intelligence, expand demand, distribute experimentation across thousands (and soon, millions) of actors, create more inference and infrastructure investment, and force frontier labs to keep advancing rather than relying on regulatory or distribution capture. I respect Dean, and undoubtedly he is more qualified than most to opine on this. And his biases are informed by his role and the company he represents, and there’s inherently nothing wrong with that. Dean argues that open weights stifle innovation and progress. All evidence points to the contrary. More than happy to be proven wrong on any of my claims, and to engage in deeper debate on this topic!

• 
  More Bears (@MoreBearsNFT_) reported 32 minutes ago

  the biggest validators on the "decentralized" chain are Coinbase, Binance, and Galaxy. that sentence is the entire story. proof of stake pays you for owning, not for doing. it is not a wage. it is rent. and they built it so the rent only flows to whoever already had the most. Solana lost 68% of its validators in three years. 2,560 down to under 800. "decentralization" was priced out one small node at a time.

• 
  CoinLark (@coinlarkcom) reported 33 minutes ago

  🔥JUST IN: Coinbase CEO: AI may draw @Bitcoin mining power, but inflation remains the key driver of BTC prices. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated that the shift of marginal liquidity toward prediction markets or stock speculation is likely temporary, while the trend of Bitcoin mining being redirected to serve AI computing needs could have longer-term effects. Armstrong emphasized that computing power or mining energy does not determine Bitcoin’s price, as network difficulty automatically adjusts to maintain block production even if miners exit. Over the long term, BTC prices continue to reflect inflation concerns, especially amid persistent budget deficits across governments worldwide.

• 
  LilMoonLambo (@LilMoonLambo) reported 35 minutes ago

  Whoever is running the Coinbase app these days can they stop sending me updates on tennis scores? The users literally couldn’t give less of a **** about these constant notifications They hire the worst ******* people lol

• 
  John Lennon (@johnlennon7072) reported 35 minutes ago

  @MapleMuskX @sflorimm but these models are open, and you can be on a server anywhere. Coinbase did it like this, and saved 50%

• 
  ‘ (@KHvyHash) reported 37 minutes ago

  Bitcoin 4 year cycles are based around its halving which occurs every 4 years, the cycle is basically 3 years trending up/bull and one year of bear The halving is at a specific block height that immediately cuts the coinbase emissions in half for miners Kaspa has its halving every 365.25 days except instead of slashing the coinbase emissions in half at a specific block, it is done gradually on a monthly basis Kaspa’s first bullrun started summer 22 in the heart of bitcoins bear market, nowhere near the $btc bottom For anyone to assume that $kas has correlation to $btc the same way the rest of the shitcoins excluding Hyperliquid do I believe they’re making an incorrect assumption I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again that I think kaspa would have its own cycles Time will tell but I’m pretty confident with this thought

• 
  dogman (@dogmanxy) reported 38 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @blknoiz06 @CoinbaseDuck He really hit him with the 4 word response after one of CTs best takes to help Coinbase lmaoooo

• 
  mitch (@m1tch37) reported 38 minutes ago

  I have to give coinbase man credit. He saw tendies and went, you know what, **** it, we can’t beat this, let’s just adopt it before robinhood.

• 
  Rolando Abanilla Jr (@AbanillaJr5506) reported 39 minutes ago

  @whatdafaqshows Sir,please help last time you you gave to a $3000 I put it on my wallet on coinbase I think,but I could'nt get it or I can't cash out the $3000.Please help me how can I get it straight to my bank account.Thank you and God Bless!🙏

• 
  Jedaidel (@daouzli) reported 41 minutes ago

  Prompting is still useful, but scripting every single step for a model is basically micromanagement. The systems I see going into production work by defining targets and checks instead. Brian Armstrong posted about a daily loop Coinbase is running right now. It pulls customer feedback from the app, ranks the bugs, writes the code, and runs a security pass. An engineer only jumps in at the end to review the fix. When they edit the code, the loop learns from those corrections for the next day. When you wire things up like this, the interface changes. The engineering work shifts to setting a defined outcome, building a way to verify the result, and letting a loop iterate until it reaches a human boundary.

• 
  Jean (@JohnStrongHodl) reported 41 minutes ago

  Just avoid anything related to Coinbase It's run by cucks and they don't even hide it. Imagine this: publicly traded company should be more responsible, right? Nah, we have a guy called jesse that cucked the whole chain and then we have a CEO that, you guessed it, also rugged his own community. The only good thing about him is his wife, probably his only success in life. Other than that I wonder how such irresponsible behavior is not punished by investors. Makes you think Remember to ever fall for **** like this

• 
  Rune (@RuneCrypto_) reported 42 minutes ago

  whenever you think of trusting base, remember this thread jesse pollak’s coins the head of base used the official coinbase X account to promote “base is for everyone” on zora. it spiked to $17M mcap in an hour. crashed 90% to $1.9M within 20 minutes. people thought it was an official base token. jesse said it was “an experiment” and that he “personally approved the post” months later he launched his own JESSE token through the base app. called it a “creator coin, not a memecoin.” two snipers extracted $1.3M from it within seconds of launch. the token peaked at $25M and dumped. $50M in volume flowed through it and the regular users who trusted the head of base got sniped by bots while he collected LP fees he then used those LP fees to buy other creator coins on zora. so the fees generated from his community getting sniped went to propping up more creator coins that also dumped him and brian promoted tokens linked to balaji srinivasan and other figures. all crashed. one critic pointed out “the same users kept eating the downside on team-promoted tokens.” nobody at base adjusted he endorsed a soulja boy token, a person zachxbt publicly documented running 73+ token promotions, 16 NFT collections, most of them rugs or abandoned, earning $730K+ from paid crypto scams. jesse invested $1,500 and promoted it publicly. zachxbt’s report was from 2023. it was public. the head of base either didn’t bother to check or didn’t care he shared a GIF playing on “base is for everyone” that rotated through the phrases “base is for pimping” and “base is for squirting.” had to publicly apologize. the guy running a coinbase-backed chain, a publicly traded company, posting this to hundreds of thousands of followers after all of this he said base won’t “pump tokens” or “support the chart behind the scenes.” the same person who launched multiple coins that dumped on his community won’t help yours. his charts get LP fees. yours get abandoned the $BRIAN disaster brian armstrong, CEO of coinbase, $50B+ publicly traded company, changed his pfp to a $BRIAN memecoin. 10,000 people bought in. the CEO of the chain is backing it: what could go wrong? he removed the pfp 23 hours later. coin went to zero. 10,000+ people down 99% after trusting the literal CEO 1/3

• 
  MD Fazal Mustafa (@the_mdfazal) reported 44 minutes ago

  My 2 cents @DeanMeyerrr : — Distillation is not a crime. The fact that China does & Americans don't, doesn't mean that Americans are good. It just means that you are not leveraging an opportunity. Amazon has a whole class of distilled models for its customers. — "Open weights ≠ open access to progress: Downloading Qwen/Kimi/DeepSeek today doesn't guarantee you get the next one. If Beijing restricts future releases". Well, the same could be said about any country. We have seen the ban on Fable 5. So now every country is speaking about sovereignty in AI. — Can't speak for any other country, but in America, if you don't get value, nobody will be using that product. It's that simple. The fact that Chinese open models were 1% of new fine-tunes in Jan 2024 & are now at 65% by Feb 2026 shows their value proposition. Also, you have serious companies like Coinbase, Cursor, Microsoft, Uber, Airbnb etc adopting these models at scale. These are not just some random American companies. These are some of the best engineering teams on the planet.

• 
  majin.eth (@MAJllIN) reported 45 minutes ago

  @MLeeJr @coinbase @base Not trying to be overly confrontational here, but can you let me know what I’m missing? To me it seems like the trenches tried to will this non-event into a major happening, and now feel let down that Brian didn’t participate (he never does w memes).

• 
  uma1r (@umair_xr) reported 49 minutes ago

  I was reading all the latest updates and its clear that @Injective is not just building another blockchain anymore. Its building the infrastructure, tools and regulations needed for real onchain finance. Here are the biggest updates from this week •⁠ ⁠AI Agent SDK is now live: Developers can now install everything they need with one package instead of setting up multiple tools. It includes the Injective CLI, Agent Skills, the Documentation MCP Server and the Main MCP Server. This makes it much easier to build AI agents that can use wallets, trade and interact with Injective. •⁠ Injective joined the x402 Foundation: Injective is now a member of the x402 Foundation under the Linux Foundation alongside companies like Google, AWS, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase and Circle. x402 is a new payment standard that lets AI agents and apps pay for services instantly over the internet. On Injective x402 payments settle in around 650ms using native USDC while INJ is used as the gas token. •⁠ Injective filed to become a registered Transfer Agent with the SEC: This is one of the biggest long term updates. Today ownership records for securities are mostly managed by traditional institutions. Injective wants to move these records fully onchain. That means tokenized stocks and other real world assets could have faster, more transparent and compliant settlement on Injective. •⁠ MiCA White Paper is now published: Injective has completed the MiCA white paper process for Europe. This helps expand Injective's presence in the EU under a regulated framework. The white paper explains how INJ works, including staking, the Community BuyBack and burn, token supply, network architecture and key risks. The interesting part is that all of this happened in just one week. Compared to many other chains worth billions of dollars, Injective is building across almost every major area while still trading at a much lower market cap. Thats why I think there's still a huge gap between what Injective has built and how the market is valuing it today. $INJ

• 
  Liam Carter (@AIMarketWatch2) reported 51 minutes ago

  The stocks most likely to help you become a millionaire in the second half of the year. $ASTS — AST SpaceMobile — Don’t buy $RKLB — Rocket Lab — Don’t buy $COIN — Coinbase — Don’t buy $NVDA — NVIDIA — Buy at $182-$192 $PLTR — Palantir — Buy at $120-$125 $APP — AppLovin — Buy at $396-$403 $ARM — Arm Holdings — Buy at $247-$253 $ALAB — Astera Labs — Buy at $279-$288

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 55 minutes ago

  @NolimitNorte treasury got drained twice for $21M but the token contract itself wasn't touched and ecosystem still processed 1B+ transactions in 2026 listed on robinhood/binance/coinbase, burns are real, but governance risk is obviously not theoretical anymore down 95% from ATH, high beta solana meme with actual integrations and exchange distribution vs existential OpSec questions

• 
  Kiryu (@Kiryu_0x) reported 56 minutes ago

  @wagmiAlexander Nobody wants coinbase to support memes, they want coinbase to support THEIR meme. Which is why no matter what these people will always be complaining.

• 
  Cryptonium (@2zM00N) reported 58 minutes ago

  @coinbase Hey @CoinbaseSupport why did this pop up on my feed? There are literally THOUSANDS of human beings who have requested for support of the grassroots, community funded, fairly launched digital asset known as K A S P A. We’ve asked for YEARS! If CoinBase cannot support the decentralized Layer 1 that was designed with the very ethos that crypto was established on, then I can’t see myself or any true cypherpunk supporting CB for much longer.