1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
Coinbase

Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Coinbase. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

  • 33% Transactions (33%)
  • 17% Website (17%)
  • 17% Mobile App (17%)
  • 17% Login (17%)
  • 17% Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Paris Withdrawals 3 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc Transactions 6 days ago
Leipzig Transactions 1 month ago
Maquoketa Website 2 months ago
West Liberty Login 2 months ago
Houston Mobile App 3 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • MrPicule
    mrpicule.eth (@MrPicule) reported

    Bitcoin was built as decentralized money. The data increasingly says otherwise Top 10 centralized exchanges custody over 2.85 million BTC, roughly 15% of circulating supply, per CryptoQuant. Binance alone holds close to 30% of everything sitting on exchanges. Add spot ETFs, which now hold about 7% of total supply led by BlackRock's IBIT, and public companies holding another roughly 6% in corporate treasuries (Strategy alone at 847K BTC). Stack it together and something like a quarter of all BTC that will ever exist sits with a handful of exchanges, funds, and corporations, not in millions of individual self-custody wallets Now overlay the August fork situation. Two forks are landing, BIP-110 and Sztorc's eCash. In 2017, when Bitcoin Cash forked, ownership was almost entirely retail and self-custodial. Individuals decided which chain to follow. Messy, but genuinely distributed This time it's different. Coinbase alone custodies 80-84% of all US spot ETF assets. And BlackRock's IBIT prospectus states, in writing, the fund will permanently and irrevocably abandon any rights to forked or airdropped coins unless the SEC changes the rules. Ark, Grayscale, Morgan Stanley carry the same language. That means the largest pools of institutional BTC on earth will, by pre-signed legal commitment, simply not follow any forked chain, no matter what happens on-chain or in the market To be precise: this isn't the ETFs voting on which chain is "real" Bitcoin. Consensus still technically runs through miners and nodes. But when the entities holding a quarter of supply pre-commit to ignoring any fork, no alternative chain can realistically gather the capital or liquidity to matter, regardless of the technical outcome. The decision isn't made through mining and open market chaos anymore, it's pre-decided in a handful of legal departments before the fork even happens That's the actual story. Not government seizure, not a hack, just a slow shift where the property that made Bitcoin matter, no single party gets to decide what counts as "real", is being quietly replaced by a few prospectus clauses and custody chokepoints. Healthy for stability. Genuinely uncomfortable for what the network was supposed to be

  • NotSoEasyMoney
    Easy (@NotSoEasyMoney) reported

    In the last 14 days Crypto Ecosystem has gotten > Tokenized stocks distributed via memecoin holdings on a new chain. > NFT Gacha machine that has taken the timeline by storm on ETH mainnet. > A viral animal coin runner on the Solana blockchain. > Publicly traded CEO hacked to promote a memecoin. > BitMex shutting down (thought it already did) > Coinbase CEO joining CT native podcasts / streams. > fomo new all time high volume and user counts, showing memecoins are returning to mainstream (retail) && this is a bear market...

  • MariaOnchainDev
    Maria (@MariaOnchainDev) reported

    Crypto keeps losing because it keeps asking people to become different while their bills stay exactly the same. MegPrime Pay solved the only problem that ever mattered by plugging $MPP directly into the payments already running every month. Rent. Mortgage. Auto. Daily spend. The same obligations now move with rewards attached and settlement that hits any bank account without forcing the other side to hold crypto. U.S. users walk in with twenty five dollars and leave with fifty in $MPP. Everyone else grabs it on Coinbase Wallet or Uniswap and starts using it the same day. This is the version of adoption that actually sticks. Technology that disappears into the routines people already trust. The wallet was never the destination. The monthly cash flow was.

  • flaming_hodl
    Flaming.hodl ₿ (@flaming_hodl) reported

    @BTCisfemale Are you seriously comparing using the Coinbase scriptsig field (max 100 bytes) to embedding arbitrary data in transactions? Thankfully Satoshi was smart enough to embed that to prove there was no pre-mine. You have to have proof of work to fill in that field so it's a non-issue.

  • cxnversion
    r (@cxnversion) reported

    as a yn who has not traded in months it is clear how exhausted full-time aspiring rapists are after sitting here for months drooling at the screen. u watched cashcat break the chain w people offering otc premiums to bridge as it rips to 200M in 48hrs and bc Vlad’s Mom’s dog isn’t at 5M for no reason based on nothing there’s apparently “no liquidity” on the chain and people are speculating when things will end Listen up you dumb *** *****. Robinhood is a big company that provides value to society. That’s why it’s large price 👍 This doesn’t even compute in the minds of this space as a possibility. Bc price in crypto is generally related to how many people u could coerce. And it always will be to a large extent. But the investors and chairmen @ robinhood are not in that position bc they believe in crypto. They’re in that position bc of all the sh*t that got them to where they are. And that’s who RH leadership answers to EOD. So this is not comparable to a coinbase etc. They have to catch a dub. Nobody gives a **** about RWA. Too early by large. It’s also too early for memes to be shoved to normies en masse it seems. Buy some agents. Or continue ****** each other for no reason. Up to u.

  • DarkWebInformer
    Dark Web Informer (@DarkWebInformer) reported

    🚨🌐 Coinbase session cookie checker and account takeover service advertised on a cybercrime forum A forum actor is advertising a bot that allegedly checks stolen Coinbase session cookies for account balances, provides access without valid email credentials, and supports rapid withdrawals using methods designed to evade antifraud systems. The listing also advertises 2FA removal for Coinbase, MEXC, Kraken, Bybit, and other cryptocurrency exchanges. The seller says personally sourced material is required and prioritizes stealer logs, macOS logs, RDP access, hVNC, and botnet data. Accounts from the US and UK must reportedly hold at least $1,000, while accounts from Europe and other regions require balances of at least $8,000. Revenue-sharing terms of 60/40 and 50/50 are advertised depending on the account balance. This claim is currently unverified.

  • RobertPSchwartz
    Robert Paul Schwartz (@RobertPSchwartz) reported

    One of Elon Musk imposters was ROBERT BEVERLY SCHWARTZ. He was hiding under the mayor’s phone number in WASILLA. He also gave away $68 million to his wife from my Cash App account. Elon Musk wouldn’t do that. Elon Musk wouldn’t take the $685 in coinbase account either this is ROBERT BEVERLY SCHWARTZ, who is impersonating Elon Musk, who is hiding under the mayor‘s number who’s working with my architects and engineers who did not know it was not me and if they did know, it was not me they obviously just found out that I’m not dead. They weren’t successful in killing me this time again this is a message for Elon Musk who was impersonated by ROBERT BEVERLY SCHWARTZ as though he was claiming to help capture my Imposter hacking my accounts, but then again the attorney firm that I was talking to ROBERT BEVERLY SCHWARTZ to go over the conversation and mixed himself up with the other hacked account where I realized he was impersonating both people businesses. This is what happens when you have someone who’s cloned your phone and will control your life and no one will ever find out and hopefully this time you do.

  • TobiSync
    TO BI (@TobiSync) reported

    @Octa_Sphere @coinbase @PythNetwork interesting to see how a unified market data layer can help exchanges.

  • Brixit_Official
    BRIXIT - BXT (@Brixit_Official) reported

    BlackRock and Strategy invest $15 million in Bitcoin protection BlackRock, Strategy, and seven other major Bitcoin players are jointly investing $15 million in the security of the network. The first priority is striking: preparing for a future in which quantum computers could potentially attack existing cryptography. To this end, the companies have established the Bitcoin Security Consortium. The initiative aims to support developers and researchers without determining the technical direction of Bitcoin itself. Nine major parties are contributing. The founders are Anchorage Digital, ARK Invest, BlackRock, Block, Blockstream, Coinbase, Fidelity Digital Assets, Galaxy, and Strategy. In an official announcement, they pledge a total of $15 million over three years. The money does not go into a single joint pot. Each participant decides for themselves which developers, researchers, or organizations are funded. Mike Schmidt, director of developer organization Brink, coordinates the daily operations on a voluntary basis. That model was chosen deliberately. Bitcoin has no central company that can enforce a security update. Research, code, and protocol changes come from a global open-source community. The consortium wants to pay and inform those people, but says it does not want to gain control over the development. Quantum computers are not yet a direct attack Large quantum computers capable of breaking Bitcoin's security do not exist today. Nevertheless, a sufficiently powerful machine could theoretically attack specific digital signatures and thus derive private keys from public information. That risk applies especially to coins whose public key has already become visible or that are held in older, more vulnerable address structures. It does not mean that a quantum computer can suddenly steal all Bitcoin or simply take over mining.

  • marcb_xyz
    Marc Baumann 🌔 (@marcb_xyz) reported

    The x402 standard is an open payment protocol that lets AI agents authorize and settle transactions without human intervention. Coinbase Business is the first major platform to support it natively. One account manages all agent payments. 3.35% yield on idle USDC balances.

  • sawinyh
    Nick Sawinyh (@sawinyh) reported

    @MerlinEgalite @coinbase Would love the repeat-borrower curve after a BTC drawdown. That's where a simple front end either absorbs DeFi risk or creates support debt.

  • maxcore_x
    Max🥷 (@maxcore_x) reported

    What you're describing right now is the community being ignored. The developer's @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev account got hacked, a smart contract was deployed, and the hacker walked away with 1 to 3 million dollars from the liquidity. After that, the Robinhood team especially $Vlad recovered the account, deleted the tweet, and hasn't said a word about it since. People have lost a ton of money, but the team is ignoring it. Do we need a blockchain that doesn't listen to its community and doesn't care what's happening? They just don't give a damn. next Coinbase where the community isn't heard, the tokens are ****, and they're only focused on RWA. Do we need a blockchain where they don't give a **** about the community?

  • 0xRecoba
    Recoba 🪽 (@0xRecoba) reported

    Native $INJ went live on Coinbase this week. Not bridged or wrapped. Direct access to the @injective network, deposits and withdrawals settling natively onchain. Converted automatically at 1:1, zero fees, nothing needed from holders. Coinbase sits at $294 billion in assets on platform. That entire user base now has a straight entry point into Injective. Staking, trading, lending, tokenized assets. One withdrawal away. And before that, $INJ listed on Robinhood on July 16. Millions of everyday US retail investors who’ve never needed a crypto wallet now have spot access to INJ with just a few taps. Both unlocked in the same week. Hopefully we might see a big break on $INJ coming next week.

  • ingzhis
    removing pandemic years from age (@ingzhis) reported

    And I had to reinstall the Coinbase app, terrible

  • Bitcain21
    ₿itcain (@Bitcain21) reported

    @coinbase @saylor Does a centralized funding consortium fix this?

  • mas44558282
    FlowMaster (@mas44558282) reported

    @lordrozar Dont understand it. A inflationrate is needed for security and mining/stacking incentives. With a fixed coinbase rate, the inflationrate naturally goes down. Yeah, from now on, no more changes. If the demand cant outperform the inflationrate, there is problem bigger than...

  • Traveller81018
    Travellers ₿ #BIP-110 (@Traveller81018) reported

    @BTCisfemale @mattkratter The message in Genisis' block is on the input side (scipt signature ai coinbase), not the output side (script public key). So you are wrong. BIP110 limits the output.

  • thatfinchguy
    Finch (@thatfinchguy) reported

    Desperately need a service that can stop the phone call and text spam Not sure if the free roof repair estimates or the failed Coinbase login messages are the phishing attempts anymore

  • zaheerain
    Zahr? (@zaheerain) reported

    @Jeremybtc Coinbase selling doesn’t help

  • LibertyRepost
    silence.this 🇺🇸 (@LibertyRepost) reported

    @coinbase You just screwed over the people who utilize the DEX feature by allowing tons of scams into the mix. Prior to today, the "New Launches" section showed mostly legit coins with some status. Now all new 💩 coins are there and 90% are pump and dumps. Terrible.

  • wocaijiemeng
    Bitcoin Believer (@wocaijiemeng) reported

    @coinbase BlackRock, Fidelity, Block and Coinbase aligning on Bitcoin security is a strong signal. The biggest asset in crypto is getting the institutional-grade protection it deserves.

  • alexlay88
    Albert Alexander Lay (@alexlay88) reported

    Stripe and Block are facing a hard choice. Issue stablecoins and charter a bank with 5 million minimum capital, or don't. Circle and Coinbase can absorb that cost. Most fintechs can't. Consolidation comes next.

  • 0xRiRoyal
    riRoyal.Base.eth (@0xRiRoyal) reported

    @Big_pelly14 @coinbase @injective coinbase mainnet migration gives the exchange first access to injective ecosystem.

  • CryptoSuzy888
    CryptoSuzy888 (@CryptoSuzy888) reported

    🛑 Major Recent Exchange & Trading Platform Shutdowns •BitMEX (July 2026): Once a dominant giant in high-leverage Bitcoin trading, the exchange announced a full wind-down following a strategic business review. It has halted new registrations and will force-close all remaining open positions by late September. Its utility token, BMEX, crashed over 90% immediately following the announcement. •BitMart (July 2026): In the same week as BitMEX's exit, the large global trading platform BitMart announced its impending closure. The exchange is terminating both its spot and futures trading operations and has instructed users to withdraw all funds. •Dango (July 2026): This decentralized exchange (DEX) and Layer-1 blockchain project announced it is going dark just months after launching its perpetual futures trading. The founder cited cash burn, thin liquidity, and regulatory headwinds as the primary causes. •Satori Finance (June 2026): A popular crypto perpetuals exchange backed by Coinbase, Satori quietly announced it was shutting down its operations due to a lack of commercial sustainability. •Loopring DEX (First Half of 2026): Loopring's decentralized exchange arm formally halted operations amid a broader consolidation across the decentralized finance (DeFi) space. •Kadena (Late 2025/Early 2026): Following a massive 77% crash in token value and severe capital depletion, Kadena shuttered its primary operations, prompting third-party exchanges to delist its tokens.

  • ekinoks_26
    e_camli (@ekinoks_26) reported

    Galaxy, Bitwise, BitMine, Coinbase, Kraken. All of them have acquired node operator arms in the past year. Kent Lin flagged this pattern from inside @get_optimum's validator relationships, and it's worth sitting with. The logic is straightforward once you see it. Coinbase did this early with Bison Trails, and now runs one of the largest validator operations on Ethereum while custodying a large share of spot ETH ETFs. Owning the validator layer alongside custody and staking means owning more of the ETH business stack, and using it as a loss-leader relationship builder toward the largest ETH holders, the DATs and ETF issuers who actually move the market. At the same time, node operators are dropping support for smaller chains to concentrate on the ones that generate real revenue without needing artificial incentives to stay profitable. Both trends point the same direction: consolidation toward operators who can run validator infrastructure at institutional scale, serving institutional clients, with institutional performance requirements. That's precisely the customer profile Optimum's mump2p and APR research have been built around. The market isn't just growing. It's concentrating into fewer, larger operators who care more about basis points than most retail stakers ever did. @blockchainjeff @cryptooflashh

  • MeridialHQ
    Meridial (@MeridialHQ) reported

    Nine institutions just put their names on one Bitcoin security document. BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy, Galaxy, Fidelity, Anchorage, ARK, Block, Blockstream. 15m over three years, post-quantum cryptography first, roughly 6.9m BTC flagged as exposed if quantum hardware ever lands. The dollar figure is small. The roster is the signal.

  • damn_then
    P MAN (@damn_then) reported

    coinbase listening is a funny one when their listings still feel like whoever pays the most gets the green light. cobie and base are cool but the machine moves slow

  • dusty_field
    Dusty Field (@dusty_field) reported

    Four changes to crypto's operating surface in the last 48 hours: two bridge exploits, a new institutional funding structure for Bitcoin security, and an SEC commissioner statement that directly names on-chain vault and lending operators. Verus-Ethereum Bridge: On July 23, the Verus-Ethereum bridge was drained for the second time in roughly two months, losing approximately $7.54 million in ETH, tBTC, USDC, USDT, EURC, MKR, and scrvUSD. Blockaid confirmed the July attack used the same bridge contract, same entry path, and same bug class as the May breach that cost $11.58 million. The root cause, documented by multiple security researchers, is missing Solidity validation: the Ethereum-side contract accepted valid signatures and Merkle proofs but did not confirm that the amount released matched value committed on the Verus source chain. The May incident closed with a bounty arrangement returning roughly 75% of stolen funds. The bridge apparently re-opened with the underlying flaw intact. A different attacker used a new wallet to execute the same technique, spending 0.01 VRSC to trigger payouts of approximately 1,137 ETH and 71.5 tBTC in a single transaction at 03:45 UTC. The attacker converted most stolen assets into approximately 3,916 ETH and began routing funds through Tornado Cash. Verus had issued no public response or confirmed repair timeline at time of reporting. AFX Trade: Blockaid flagged an exploit targeting AFX Trade, a decentralized perpetual exchange on Arbitrum, at 21:30 UTC on July 22. The attacker drained approximately $24.15 million USDC from a third-party bridge AFX operates and converted the funds to 12,467.5 ETH before moving them from Arbitrum to Ethereum. The Arbitrum native bridge was not involved. Arbitrum contributor Steven Goldfeder confirmed the compromised bridge was independently operated by AFX. The investigation remains open with no confirmed root cause published. AFX subsequently extended a white-hat settlement offering the attacker a 30% keep on approximately $24 million in exchange for returning the remainder. Bitcoin Security Consortium: On July 23, nine firms announced the Bitcoin Security Consortium: Anchorage Digital, ARK Invest, BlackRock, Block, Blockstream, Coinbase, Fidelity Digital Assets, Galaxy, and Strategy. The group pledged an aggregate $15 million over three years to fund open-source Bitcoin security research and development, with initial focus on post-quantum cryptography including work related to BIP-360. The $15 million is not held in a pooled fund. Each member directs its own capital independently to developers, researchers, or organizations of its choosing. Day-to-day coordination goes to Mike Schmidt, executive director of developer nonprofit Brink, in a volunteer capacity. The consortium stated it will not direct Bitcoin protocol changes or take positions on specific proposals. Separately, Galaxy had announced a $5 million developer grant program for quantum-resistant Bitcoin solutions two days earlier. BlackRock simultaneously published a report characterizing the quantum threat as technically manageable and noting that upgrading Bitcoin's cryptography is less burdensome than building a quantum computer capable of attacking it. SEC Commissioner Peirce: On July 22, Commissioner Hester Peirce published a formal statement on the SEC website titled "Headstands and Summervaults" warning that on-chain vaults and lending strategies may fall under federal securities laws depending on their structure. The statement names specific operating categories: vaults where managers or curators select yield strategies, rebalance assets, or appoint others to make those decisions could qualify as investment companies under existing law. On-chain lending arrangements where operators set interest rates, define collateral requirements, or manage liquidation thresholds may also trigger securities classification. Peirce stated the assessment will be fact-specific for each product. She is not issuing a rule and this is a personal statement, not a Commission position. The practical effect is a direct compliance signal to vault operators, curators, and on-chain lending protocol teams, particularly those with active management layers above smart contracts. As of July 2026, approximately $8.6 billion sat across 788 curated vaults serving roughly 1.4 million users. Protocols including Morpho operate the vault infrastructure integrated by Coinbase and Robinhood for stablecoin yield products. Peirce invited vault and lending operators to engage with the SEC rather than assume blockchain deployment places their products outside federal jurisdiction.

  • OKNexusExchange
    OKN (@OKNexusExchange) reported

    @coinbase Bitcoin fix’s this

  • coolsgp19
    C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported

    @coinbase Day 37 still no access to my account. Is my case still waiting in the queue to be assigned to a reviewer? Is it currently being reviewed? Is the review delayed because additional documentation is needed from me? I respectfully ask for urgent attention to my case😩 @coinbase