Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	28 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  CryptoSangeet (@CryptoSangeet) reported 1 minute ago

  Coinbase Ventures still grinding 💼 30 deals in 2026 while others slowed down 🧠 #VC

• 
  Jose M (@JMLV51) reported 2 minutes ago

  If @brian_armstrong and @jessepollak truly admit they got it wrong, the first communities that deserve support are the original Base degens. TOSHI, MOCHI, BENJI, DEGEN, KEYCAT, DOGINME, TOBY, TYBG, MFER, SKI, MIGGLES, RUSSELL etc These were the communities that brought memecoins to Base. Instead, they were abandoned, while Coinbase gave premium exposure to memes from other chains. You want a stronger Base? Bring back the volume. Bring back the retail

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 2 minutes ago

  Yet to see anything positive sum come from most builders. By being the builder only chain you cater only to net sellers, doesn't take a genius to figure out how that games out in the long run. The reason memecoins became popular is because there were no VCs involved in them, and VCs were the most extractive force in the space throughout the first major altcoin bullrun. Throwing your hands up and saying "oh no it's just extractive" spits in the face of the countless people who are *not* in the space to scam people. And to say so would be hypocritical, you had personal calls with the likes of threadguy etc who stole so much money from people that they had to disappear and lay low in hiding before eventually re-emerging. Your interactions with people like that legitimises extractive scammy behaviour more than memecoins ever have. I know you don't understand them and you and the rest of coinbase clearly think you're above everyone else who dare think having fun should be a part of crypto lest the ghost of gensler haunt your legal dept, but you've definitely been around long enough to know that something that brought people into crypto in the first place was the concept of the pareto funtier - that by baking money into stuff you can have more fun focussing on the things you enjoy and still be able to make money from them. Fun has always been fundamental to crypto. Hell bitcoin probably wouldn't have accelerated into mindshare in the way it did if not for the people who were using it as a currency to have fun with the silk road. And to the part you say is key: In my view bases biggest failing has consistently been understanding that users and customers are the moat, and a focus strictly on builders misses the point and makes an unsustainable one sided economy. I have said this repeatedly for a long time, and even foresaw your shift to shunning human users for ai bots before it happened. Right now you're completely focussed on bots being the future "biggest users of the internet" and the human users you did have supporting you have been ignored and hamstrung by fumbles so repeatedly that you've lost all trust. How important is that moat to you, really? Downstream of that destruction of trust is a destruction of liquidity on base. It doesn't exist right now. What's the plan to actually bring activity back? Is there one that isn't just pump metrics for your shareholders with agentic trading? Path of least resistance, maybe; Path of least respect, definitely. So what's your plan to actually address the part you think is key? Because from the outside looking in and from the countless conversations i've had with other people, it looks like you're just agreeing in an echo chamber and ignoring anyone who thinks you could improve. Having a head start and having been able to "learn" lessons doesn't mean a whole lot. Besides, it's possible for someone to learn from the mistakes of others, so to imply robinhood *must* go through the same motions is outright false, if @vladtenev paid any attention at all they can simply use base as a "what not to do" guidebook for attracting users, and they start off on the same footing. Apple isn't ever first to market, they just try to do things better after having learned what does and doesn't work. Who knows how robinhood will actually do, they've proven plenty of times they don't exist for their users to win (buy button innit), but it's been half a decade since that and most people either weren't actually affected by it or just don't care anymore. And if they're competing with an L2 whose main focus is bots, they don't have a whole lot of competition for the human users, who are the ones who will give them free marketing and help them grow. That's what base failed to understand about memes.

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 11 minutes ago

  @coinbase KYC check for more than a month with no update, no feedback. Please have some care with your customers. I trusted you, Coinbase. Please I need to access my account now 😭😭😭 @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase

• 
  Caesar Capital (@CaesarCapitalz) reported 14 minutes ago

  Believe it or not, crypto will be back! $BTC is down ~50%, $ETH is down ~60%, and most altcoins are down 90%+. $MSTR is down 80% from ATH. Coinbase $COIN, once one of my largest positions (if not the largest), is down more than 60% from ATH, showing a shift in sentiment across the industry. I bought COIN in summer 2021 after its IPO. I was up 50% at one point at the end of 2021, and just like that, the crypto bear market started and everything collapsed. I averaged down during the crypto winter, bringing my average down to $75.58. My last $COIN buy was in the $60s in 2023. I sold almost half of my position between $260 and $380 from December 2024 to December 2025. I believe we are now seeing a bottom forming, and a bounce will come sooner or later!

• 
  NtD Key Stone (@NtD_KeyStone) reported 17 minutes ago

  Two smoother onramps, one bigger funnel: $ANSEM can now be bought through Coinbase Wallet and traded on @BullpenFi. That is not a Coinbase listing, but it does make access far simpler for users who never touch a DEX. @blknoiz06 CA: 9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump

• 
  Grey Ledger (@Airdrops_one) reported 17 minutes ago

  Ansem is right that Base’s curation was selective and often wrong. creator coins got the blessing and produced many of the same charts. but permissionless access is not an entitlement to Coinbase distribution. the mayor analogy works until the mayor also owns the exchange, the wallet, and the main road into town. allowing the casino is permissionless. putting it in the lobby is distribution. memecoins can be good for Base’s fees and bad for Coinbase’s customers. if customers are the moat, treating them as liquidity is selling the moat.

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 17 minutes ago

  Coinbase shipping wallet verification upgrades to fix multi-chain dApp auth UX - because apparently asking users to understand signatures & permissions is still too much. Baby steps 🔐 $COIN #CryptoUX

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 22 minutes ago

  @coinbase KYC check for more than a month with no update, no feedback. Please have some care with your customers. I trusted you, Coinbase. Please I need to access my account now 😭😭😭 @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase

• 
  crunklez (@itscrunklez) reported 24 minutes ago

  Ok, so morale seems pretty dire based on the DMs I’ve received about this.. If I had to sum up a few things Base needs to fix to rebuild faith and bring users back: Culture: Base has always had a great mission on paper, but the execution has often fallen short. False promises and corporate speak have left a lot of builders disappointed, and it’s difficult to foster a positive and honest culture when the stewards of the chain aren’t leading by example. Support: Some projects have received a little support, while others aligned with Coinbase Ventures have received an immense amount. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, but many of the projects that were chosen have either died out or been rejected by users. It would be good to see more organic projects, like Bankr and others, rise to the top and prove that bootstrapping and building onchain on Base isn’t just a dream. This has been discussed ad nauseam over the past year, so I won’t expand on it further. If you were on Base during that time, you’ll know what I mean and which projects I’m referring to. Coinbase + Base Alignment: It’s clear that a large part of Base’s success comes from Coinbase’s reputation. That’s to be expected. However, it’s also blatantly obvious that, to Coinbase, the chain is ultimately just another product. It exists to generate revenue and does not appear to be the focal point of its wider strategy, despite the “bringing the world onchain” narrative. You would think that listing tokens from successful projects within its own ecosystem would be a priority. Instead, Coinbase has repeatedly failed to do so and continues to avoid properly spotlighting the ecosystem it created, is responsible for, and should be proud of. If “bringing the world onchain” ultimately just means moving institutional liquidity and custodial assets onto Base, then it feels like we’ve lost sight of the original vision for consumer apps onchain. These are just my thoughts, and although I’m still hopeful for successful consumer apps on Base, the deafening silence, the reluctance to acknowledge shortcomings, and the lack of open dialogue with builders are becoming increasingly worrying, especially as competent competitors begin to make their move. I wish I felt differently. I want to feel differently. But right now, I haven’t been given a reason to change my overall opinion. Maybe I’ll be pleasantly surprised. It’s no longer day one, and we’ve undone a lot of the progress made over the past two years. What’s the next move?

• 
  GaysonLoser.base.eth 🟦 (@GaysonLoser) reported 25 minutes ago

  @coinbase the interesting shift is not only the headline rate, but whether USDC can feel like a usable operating balance instead of idle inventory. access, transparency, and withdrawal behavior matter just as much as yield.

• 
  Cameron LiButti (@CamLiButti) reported 26 minutes ago

  @dnapway If Fortune 500 CTOs can't build the layer, who can? Sacks is right, and it's worse than he said. Enterprises want off their frontier token bills but can't build the routing layer. Coinbase and DoorDash managed it. Most can't. Now go down-market. The 40-person law firm or clinic doesn't have a CTO at all. And nobody is coming to build their layer: the labs' new deployment arms start at eight figures per client. That tier gets served forward-deployed or not at all.

• 
  Justin Jordan (@the_defi_dad) reported 26 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 @Natan_benish Someone in the USA help me understand how to buy ansem on Coinbase? I genuinely don’t see it listed.

• 
  Vikas(Vik) Malpani| AI for US Real Estate (@vikasmalpani) reported 27 minutes ago

  The setup: agents cannot use a normal checkout. No card, no login, no cart. So Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, Google, PayPal and Coinbase are each racing to build the rail agents pay through. Whoever sets the standard sits under every transaction.

• 
  martin varga (@mavartinv) reported 32 minutes ago

  @coinbase Is this crap down 60% from last year and instead growing shareholders value we need to read this word´s games, common

• 
  Coinbase & Binance App Rank Bot (unofficial) (@app_rank22414) reported 33 minutes ago

  The bot is working correctly. The Coinbase app is currently ranked outside the US App Store Top 500. This is not a tracking error - retail interest and social sentiment around crypto are simply very low right now. #coinbase #bitcoin

• 
  dTfN (@deTEfabulaNar_) reported 34 minutes ago

  LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT REYA'S LATEST UPDATES! 👉 WHEN IS @reya_xyz'S TGE? 👉 CHATGPT'S COMMENTS ON REYA 👉 WHO ARE ITS INVESTORS? 👉 CHATGPT'S REYA ANALYSIS & RATING I ASKED CHATGPT ALL THE MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REYA. HERE ARE THE ANSWERS: 👉 First, let's remind ourselves of Reya's investors: Framework Coinbase Ventures Wintermute Amber Robot Ventures Eden Block DeFiance The total funding is reported to be around $19 million. IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME IF THEY RAISED A BIT MORE IN ANOTHER FUNDING ROUND. 👉 According to ChatGPT, when is the TGE? There is no official date. But the following developments came in order: tokenomics partner announcements trading competition RLP transition staking design These are generally the steps that come right before a TGE. 👉 ChatGPT's prediction: Probability Chance Within 1 month 25% Within 2 months 45% Within 3 months 20% Later 10% 👉 ChatGPT's FDV expectation ChatGPT thinks the market will price it within the following range: ScenarioFDV Bear $250M Base $450M-$700M Bull$900M-$1.2B Extreme FOMO$2B+ ChatGPT's base expectation: $600M FDV Reasons: strong VC backing its own chain real trading volume Ethena integration positioned as a Hyperliquid competitor 👉 CHATGPT prediction There is no official market for Reya yet. If one were launched, these would be my probabilities: Market - CHATGPT Estimate TGE in 2026 82% FDV >$500M 67% FDV >$1B 28% Binance listing 31% Coinbase listing 18% Bybit / OKX listing 65% 👉 Strengths ✅ Real orderbook ✅ Built on Ethereum ✅ Based Rollup ✅ Ethena partnership ✅ Focused on professional traders ✅ Different LP model ✅ High-quality VCs 👉 ChatGPT's project rating: Category Score Technology9.5/10 Team 9/10 VC Quality9/10 Product 8.5/10 Community8/10 Airdrop Potential9/10 Long-Term Investment8.5/10

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 36 minutes ago

  tier 1 (high moonshot at current mc): RENDER $788m - ai/depin with real revenue, just finished vc unlocks INJ $472m - defi l1 with token burns, institutional momentum FET $355m - extreme low cap ai play, risky but positioned ONDO $1.5b - rwa leader, institutional magnet TAO $1.98b - decentralized ml, grant cardone in, coinbase/kraken listed tier 2 (solid growth, moderate caps): NEAR $2.45b - ai pivot working, token burns live SUI $2.96b - tech is there but only $1k daily revenue is concerning for a $3b project LINK $5.9b - infrastructure play, $21b ccip volume, foundational tier 3 (established, limited moonshot %): HYPE $14.5b - dex printing, 5.5% buyback yield, but already huge SOL $44.4b - battle tested, leading metrics, but 10x from here puts it at half a trillion render/inj/fet have the best risk/reward at these caps

• 
  Renaii (@renai_was_here) reported 37 minutes ago

  @ajki76 I hope you post this on the Dfinity forums for me. I am banned and I hope that Dfinity recognizes that Hype's success was largely enabled by coinbase serving as the treasury partner with roughly $5 billion in stablecoin liquidity backing it. Hype is now in league with the establishment and is considered as one of the largest holders of US stablecoins (treasuries) inside the crypto industry. To put it bluntly, Hype has the support of the Community, US government and Coinbase. It's the only DEX that uses 99% of it's revenue to buy back the token. It's designed just like BNB, designed to go up.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 38 minutes ago

  @rwahyu1410 $neiro down 97.96% from ath in nov 2024 reportedly hit $1.2b market cap 9 days ago, now sitting at $25.9m delisted from bithumb, dydx wound down the perp market, coinbase suspended futures current price $0.00006165, ranging $0.000060-$0.000072 past 30 days

• 
  Nehal (@nehalzzzz1) reported 38 minutes ago

  🚨 Coinbase and Singapore Police prevented over $4.2 million in crypto scam losses during a six-week joint operation. Using blockchain analytics, authorities identified 145 potential victims before they sent funds. Coinbase, OKX, Gemini, and four other exchanges shared customer data, allowing police to contact victims directly and stop the transfers before the funds were lost.

• 
  ushouldcashout (@ushouldcashout) reported 40 minutes ago

  Pulled the actual $WISHBONE holder list, not the burn address and the LP. Fun fact, 18 real solana:CashcatZMRn4Jv8sPQZUSsbTLi2PcPe1ssqbHcnaJqSS holders are in the top 30 WISHBONE holders. 5 of the 17 real top holders (~29%, nearly 1 in 3) also hold solana:CashcatZMRn4Jv8sPQZUSsbTLi2PcPe1ssqbHcnaJqSS. Biggest genuine holder is 2.2%. It goes down from there basically, every real wallet in the 1-2% range. There is no whale with the ability to crash the charts. I looked at what these top wallets actually hold, and these aren't farm and dump bots. The #7 holder is sitting on 105 different tokens on robinhood, tokenized Apple, Nvidia, Tesla, Microsoft, Google, Coinbase, Palantir, on the same wallet as $WISHBONE. Real portfolio. #8 holds 60+, same story basically. Then solana:CashcatZMRn4Jv8sPQZUSsbTLi2PcPe1ssqbHcnaJqSS shows up in wallet after wallet across the top holders. The people accumulating $WISHBONE are the same crowd that ran the last one. This isn't random buyers imo. going to say it again, first dog mover on a new chain, launched by the SKI cto who already ran one to $350M. Ps- I own over .25% of the supply and not planning on selling until $100m ..fun fact, CTO owns .50% supply.

• 
  极限本质 (@limitAndEssence) reported 40 minutes ago

  OUSD is a negotiating threat to Circle, not yet a network threat to USDC. Its biggest near- to medium-term impact is likely weaker bargaining power in future revenue-sharing negotiations with distribution partners such as Coinbase—not a material hit to USDC supply or usage. Why: 1. Large alliances are hard to coordinate. Members have different incentives and priorities. 2. Institutions optimize for total ecosystem economics, not just reserve-income sharing. If USDC drives more payments, liquidity, trading, customer growth, or platform revenue, it may still be the better choice. 3. USDC’s liquidity, brand trust, regulatory position, multi-chain infrastructure, developer tools, exchange integration, and DeFi adoption create network effects that are difficult to replicate quickly. 4. OUSD’s partner incentives do not automatically create consumer adoption. Users still care about liquidity, acceptance, rewards, UX, and trust. So OUSD may justify some valuation discount for Circle, mainly through pressure on distribution economics. But at this stage, I would estimate no more than roughly 10%, unless OUSD starts showing meaningful circulation, liquidity, and transaction volume. Circle’s OCC approval to establish a national trust bank is strategically positive but should have limited direct near-term financial impact. It is not a conventional commercial bank and cannot run a normal deposit-and-lending model. Its real value is lower regulatory tail risk, stronger reserve governance, greater institutional credibility, custody optionality, and potentially less reliance on third parties. Ultimately, Circle’s long-term value depends on whether USDC can become a core payment and settlement layer for the agent economy. $circle

• 
  Barbie - 📍 Mexico City (@Thebitcoinbarb1) reported 43 minutes ago

  CRYPTO NEWS UPDATE Oh please. A São Paulo court just ruled against Coinbase in a $100K self-custody hack case. The user lost funds. The exchange never touched the private key. The judge said that does not matter, because the burden of proof is on the business. Coinbase argued it was just a software provider. The court said prove the user authorized it. They could not. So Coinbase pays. Translation: a Brazilian judge just made it legal precedent that even a non-custodial wallet can be on the hook if you cannot prove the customer moved the funds. Self-custody in LATAM just got more complicated than the regulators ever made it. If this spreads, every wallet app in Brazil inherits a new duty. Build the receipts, or eat the loss.

• 
  Jerry Chu 🍊 (@PMDBT) reported 43 minutes ago

  I saw this recently and realized that funny enough I've been directionally correct a lot, but often for pretty odd or basic reasons. It's usually not some sophisticated prediction lol. Top 2 stories: 1. BTC. I first heard about Bitcoin ~2012, when I was a freshman at USC. My rationale was that criminal enterprises and most of the black market economy would prefer transacting in something like this versus carrying cash in suitcases or other physical currencies. I did some research and found that it was already being used in that way through silkroad. And the black market is economy is pretty large, so if you price in that demand versus the supply at the time, it seemed like it was a good bet. But back then the only way you could buy it was to send money through western union to mt. gox, which was a pretty terrible experience and I was never able to pass their KYC successfully. I even remembered photocopying my canadian passport to send over email. So, I didn't buy then, but eventually I heard about coinbase around 2014/2015. It was so much easier, so I was finally able to buy around then. I think price was ~$250/BTC back then. 2. Tesla. I really liked the initial roadster, so I bought some shares. This was also around 2011 during my freshman year. I started seeing a bunch of negative press around them later that year about how they're going to fail as a company, immanent bankruptcy, which caused me to panic sell. But I saw the model s announcement and studied elon's history and realized it's probably smarter to bet on him than against him for this kind of stuff. I even gave my recommendation to buy the stock in my accounting 101 class (Tesla was the company I did the report on). I specifically remember telling everyone in that classroom that if they had $5,000 they didn't need for a few years, they should buy some Tesla shares. I think price was ~$18 back then and was before all the share splits. Of course, I followed my own advice. I wonder how many of my classmates listened to me back then?

• 
  ً (@satsbased) reported 46 minutes ago

  coinbase psuhed creator coins that went nowhere for years with zora which failed woefully and extracted from users pushed "base is for ai" whenever scamming devs launched scam tokens on base for a none working ai projects man this space is hilarious man lmao

• 
  Rage (@xDefiRage) reported 47 minutes ago

  @base @coinbase @jessepollak Support your builders ! Or this will happen 👇

• 
  sending_help (@sending_help123) reported 48 minutes ago

  @TheCryptoNub @phantom idk man sounds very weird, I mean outage or not, you sent your tokens from coinbase wallet to your solana wallet through solana blockchain. idk how exactly phantom outage affected your transaction?

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Rivera8Tristan top 5 x402 facilitators based on recent activity: 1. coinbase via USDC — 169M payments in first year, 590k buyers, 100k sellers 2. blockrun — drives 80%+ of x402 transactions, massive volume growth on base 3. meridian — launched x402 inference system, integrated payment rails for robinhood chain, cross-chain agent transactions 4. naven network — naven workspace for deploying AI agents, native x402 runtime support with $USDG funding 5. rlusd — integrating x402 with XRP ledger and RLUSD stablecoin for autonomous agent payments

• 
  That Martini Guy ₿ (@MartiniGuyYT) reported 55 minutes ago

  Coinbase has gone from a crypto exchange to a piece of Wall Street’s infrastructure. A few years ago, institutions were avoiding crypto. Now they’re using Coinbase for custody, trading and access to the market. The companies building the rails are starting to look just as important as the assets themselves.