Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports
Some problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: transactions, website and mobile app.
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
July 12: Problems at Coinbase
Coinbase is having issues since 05:10 PM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.
- Transactions (25%)
- Website (25%)
- Mobile App (25%)
- Login (25%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Transactions | 27 days ago |
|
|
Website | 1 month ago |
|
|
Login | 1 month ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 2 months ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 3 months ago |
|
|
3 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Dear Diary (@DearDiaryMeme) reportedCoinbase is literally a piece of ****. @brian_armstrong taking $300 in fees out of a $600 prediction. Do NOT use @coinbase for any reason. I’m finally done with this bullshit platform. Shorting the stock. Your funds are not safe. Period.
-
B∆nD1†0🗹 (@8L1NDS33R) reportedThe oligarchs behind it? PayPal Mafia. CIA linked VCs. Wall Street insiders. They built the custody rails. Onshored Bitcoin through Coinbase. Wrapped it all in "freedom" marketing while quietly integrating with the FBI, Secret Service, and Treasury.
-
Vortex | BIP448 (@theonevortex) reported@YieldForceOne @saylor @coinbase It's not bloated with data now, it's a censorship resistant network, not paypal, it's **** you money, not amazon, therefore you can't prevent people from adding arbitrary data to transactions, this is why we have a fee, you understand what the fee does right?
-
Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reportedThe agent-payment stack has most of its pieces shipping. The one it is missing is the one compliance teams will ask about first. Rails: x402 is live and multi-chain, Coinbase for Agents is live, Google's AP2 shipped and went to the FIDO Alliance, Stripe's machine-payments path runs through Tempo. Plenty to settle a machine payment. The gap is the permission layer: binding an agent's spending authority to a revocable, auditable human or corporate mandate. The standards that would do it (ERC-8004 for agent identity, ERC-8226 for regulated-asset mandates) are still Draft on the EIP registry. No movement this week. So an agent can pay. What it cannot yet do, in a way a compliance function could defend, is prove that a specific human granted it bounded, revocable authority to spend, with an audit trail. Volume claims in this space are mostly self-reported, so I would not lean on them. The structural point stands on the standards' status, which is public: the settlement layer is ahead of the permission layer. Is bounded, revocable agent authority a standards problem, a product problem, or both? If you are building agent wallets, I would genuinely like to know where you think it gets solved first. @coinbase @CoinbaseDev @stripe #AgenticPayments #x402
-
ted (@tednotlasso) reported@0xJoshua @coinbase @RobinhoodCrypto he’s been a Coinbase customer for years, he even worked there when it was still early! Just never moved them before
-
aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported@SilverSurferXAX rayls 7 - institutional traction is real but need update on that june RWA target ixs 6 - bitgo partnership strong, down 92% from ath hurts but recent momentum there dextf 3 - deutsche bank integration solid but token down 99%, liquidity is dead babylon 6 - 51k btc staked is serious, aave integration coming, but price still bleeding velo 7 - merger q3 could move it, 51% supply locked, coinbase buying aero is a signal btc at 64k: morgan stanley adding 13m this week, long term holders at ath supply, but you're right that memecoin spam (50% of txs) and consolidation pattern could break down before it breaks up
-
derf.liw (@derf_liw) reported@brian_armstrong Sorry I’ll never use coinbase with the terrible fees.
-
DAP (insert blue check here) (@Deetroit_Dave) reportedI need someone @coinbase to call me ASAP!!! I don’t have time for A.I. or chat support!!! This is ridiculous!!!
-
Ahmed (@theahmedjaffery) reported@tednotlasso @coinbase @RobinhoodCrypto Yep. Transferred away from CB 2 years ago and never looked back. Absolutely the worst financial service I have ever used.
-
Nehal (@nehalzzzz1) reported🚨 Coinbase and Singapore Police prevented over $4.2 million in crypto scam losses during a six-week joint operation. Using blockchain analytics, authorities identified 145 potential victims before they sent funds. Coinbase, OKX, Gemini, and four other exchanges shared customer data, allowing police to contact victims directly and stop the transfers before the funds were lost.
-
Cheese (@CheeseWaggstaff) reportedCoinbase support indian
-
apollo440 (@0xApollo440) reported70,000 agentic accounts opened on @RobinhoodApp since late May. Now they're pointing the bots at crypto. An AI agent doesn't wait three days for settlement. It doesn't tolerate 0.01% cash sitting idle. It routes to whatever rail is fastest and cheapest, with no loyalty and no inertia. That's the problem for banks. Their whole model depends on you being too slow to move, because delay is where they get paid. Agents don't do delay. The Robinhood vs Coinbase framing misses the point. What matters is the moment your capital stops being managed by a human who forgets, and starts being managed by code that never does. Every basis point banks quietly extract becomes a line item the agent optimizes away. Stablecoins don't need to convince people anymore. They need to convince the bots, and bots read spreads, not marketing. Banks spent a decade fearing crypto. They should've been watching automation.
-
zk. (@zk_lmao) reported@0xGaugi @BasedProphetic @jessepollak It seems like they decided after zora that it's easier to appeal to robots than to humans. Though I don't think ai bots care where they trade so any attempt to be the place where they all trade kind of necessitates you're in a race to the bottom for fees, so who knows how that will play out. People wanted memes, they still do. Don't think it's that hard to understand but Brian said himself that it makes no sense to him in that video trying to shill creator coins as this new frontier and the evolution of the thing he doesn't understand. We'll see, i genuinely hope robinhood is a better experience than grinding non stop on base has been, but I also hope coinbase gets their **** together and doesn't just let base fade out into obscurity. They are a little overly focussed on ai for a crypto company imo. Maybe competition will be good, maybe they'll actually deliver on the airdrop and there'll be a renaissance on base, who knows. But in the meantime, if you want to join us in the Chad coin on robinhood, feel free bro.
-
Harb (@Harb07950864) reportedGermany (via Saxony’s state police/BKA) sold 49,858 BTC, seized from the operators of the PIRACY site movie2k, between June 19 and July 12, 2024. Average sale price was ~$57,900/BTC, netting roughly $2.89 billion. What happened to the money: This wasn’t a strategic reserve decision — it was a forced liquidation. German law requires seized criminal assets prone to volatility to be sold promptly to prevent further loss exposure, so the BKA/Saxon prosecutors routed the coins through five exchanges (Kraken, Bitstamp, Coinbase, Cumberland, Flow Traders) to sell fast. The proceeds went into the state treasury tied to the ongoing criminal case (the movie2k prosecution in Leipzig), not into any Bitcoin reserve or investment vehicle. Germany’s government wallet now holds Zero BTC (not interested) #Bitcoin
-
paintos (@paintos) reportedI believe the issue is that my ETH is held in a Coinbase Smart Wallet on Robinhood Chain. The funds are still at my wallet address, but Coinbase Wallet doesn't currently support interacting with Robinhood Chain, so I can't transfer or access them. Importing my recovery phrase into MetaMask generated a different wallet, so the assets remain in the Smart Wallet.
-
Jeff DeCola (@JeffDeCola) reported@ItsForTheGhosts @CAgovernor This is unclaimed property. A very standard thing if you abandoned your account. It has nothing to do with California, they are actually trying to help you get your property back. If this is not a scam, this has everything to do with coinbase. Login to your account and check if the coins are there.
-
Mark Nathaniel (@r__onyy) reported@DKricheff Hi! We’re sorry to hear you’re experiencing issues with your Coinbase account. Please send us a DM with more details about your concern, including any error messages or transaction information.
-
Ash (@Andyhar4794934) reported@CoinbaseSupport @Mister___Q I've applied for 4 debit cards through coinbase, spoke to customer support, they put the phone down 4 times, my cards only turned up about a week after i cancelled them, after waiting for months, you cancel them, you get them, but they are cancelled, so no use to anybody, scam
-
Sheel Mohnot (@pitdesi) reported@tednotlasso @coinbase @RobinhoodCrypto I had the same issue. It was absolute hell moving crypto from Coinbase. Spent countless hours with clueless customer service people
-
Emir (@StellarEmir) reported@tednotlasso @J0se Use Kraken. I’ve had a similar problem with Coinbase to withdraw funds a couple of years ago. Then they decided to KYC account out of nowhere after I emailed about it and it’s been locked ever since without a single explanation. The worst experience ever.
-
basegod4 (@base_god4) reportedThe only way I see Base becoming relevant again from a meme and culture perspective is through a much bigger structural change. It won’t be easy. Even if Brian Armstrong or Jesse came out today and gave shoutouts to a few Base memes, you’d probably see a short-lived pump before everything faded again. That strategy might have worked when there was heavy speculation around Coinbase listings, but that environment is gone. Today, a simple endorsement isn’t enough to create sustained capital inflows or long-term community engagement. The only scenario that could genuinely change the trajectory, and I’m not even sure it’s possible, would be launching a Base token. But not just any token. It would need to function almost like an index of the ecosystem, backed by the leading assets on Base, perhaps the top 20 tokens by market cap or importance. If sequencer fees and other protocol revenue were consistently used to buy back this Base token, similar to how Binance created value around BNB, those purchases would indirectly create continuous buy pressure for the underlying ecosystem. Instead of relying on hype cycles, the chain would have a structural mechanism that rewards growth in network usage. To me, that’s the only realistic path for Base to become culturally relevant again on the retail side. The institutional side is less clear. I don’t know whether institutions ultimately want a public chain because it gives them access to retail distribution, or whether they’d prefer private infrastructure for most of their transactions. That’s a separate question. But if the goal is rebuilding a thriving retail ecosystem around Base, I don’t see another solution that is as compelling as creating a token with real economic alignment between network activity and the ecosystem’s top assets.
-
CBduck (@CoinbaseDuck) reportedIt could’ve been base if we didn’t waste 12 months on creator coin. I do think base eventually will catch up and dominate since Coinbase can issue the real 1:1 backed tokenized equity onchain.
-
Based Prophet (@BasedProphetic) reported@Fredvelezcrypto Bro we are on the same page (base meme holder) but let me disagree a bit. TVL is not 100% translated into meme liquidity or volume Ton as no meme volume; BSC was dry for a large part of the previous bull. Yet they are superior or comparable to Solana. Coinbase is a weaker retail onboarding ramp than RH. Coinbase strategy is to be the serious innovator; they want to sell innovation (blockchain/crypto) to TradFi. RH is coming from tradFI trying to be where the onchain action happens to stay the most relevant financial platform for retail. DNA of RH is retail first, they are not going to serve F500 or Institutionals. Coinbase want to serve Institutionals. Retail wants meme, and for the first time some meme will be 100% aligned with RH interests. So all rationality will push RH to chill RH meme at some point. Coinbase never materialized the support to base meme as expected. And they did even worse (Zora drama). Those OG Base Meme are amazing culturally. So they are still prime assets, with community and history. What save them is that they are $ETH beta, in an environement where $ETH is the sttelment layer of every narrative you can think of (Stable, AI, to RWA) Base is not dead as a global blockchain, but the state of support for meme and builders, make me think that it could be just ending up as "serious actor" (TradFI oriented) with lot of innovation (AI + DeFI + RWA + infra + stable). A bit like the best and easiest way to do crypto stuff for people who can't afford to **** up. Not the funniest way to do crypto stuff for people just wanting to make it.
-
justin (@justinsmokess) reported$CRCL I took a scrape on this stock after holding it for almost a year (not a long time I know) but my thesis flipped (Coinbase joining Opencoin or whatever ******** it's called). This your reminder that Coinbase keeps 50% of the revenue Circle makes OFF of it's platform. I'm pretty sure that's getting renegotiated this year, but in my opinion, what leverage does Circle have? Coinbase is about to CREATE AND INTEGRATE A STABLECOIN DENOMINATED IN USD SPECIFICALLY FOR USAGE ON THEIR PLATFORM. COINBASE MAKES 50% OF WHAT CIRCLE MAKES OFF PLATFORM!!! Oh yea, then this story. Bearish in my humble opinion, nobody cares about DeFi *yet* en masse. TAM wise, payments is what you'll win at. OH YEA, and banks will never let a CRYPTO FIRST entity provide direct access to a higher percentage return via interest than their products. ok got it off my chest thanks.
-
GUL (@gulVasikova) reportedHackers Bought the Dip in Ethereum According to Rekto Monitoring, two hacker-linked wallets accumulated 6,454.7 ETH today, signaling aggressive buying despite recent security concerns. A wallet linked to the recent Coinbase user theft spent 7.378 million DAI to purchase 4,049.7 ETH at an average price of $1,822. Another wallet that received ETH through Tornado Cash in November last year spent 4.34 million DAI to buy 2,405 ETH at an average price of $1,804. In total, the two wallets acquired nearly $11.7 million worth of Ethereum. While these purchases do not indicate bullish fundamentals on their own, they show that large holders with access to significant capital are accumulating ETH around the $1,800 price level. Stocks & Crypto to watch: $ETH $COIN
-
Stelio Kontos (@SteIioKontos) reported@LibertySwapFi @Kaka54553300 @coinbase One man's garbage is another man's treasure😌🚀
-
SleeveFi (@SleeveFiCEO) reportedPushing off ICO Launch this needs to be taken more seriously than just a utility token launch… this **** means Coinbase and S&P500
-
DefiDynamic (@DefiDynamic) reported@coinbase literally worst customer service experience i have ever had in my entire life. You have to try to be that bad and annoying. Mohit and Rajesh suck every ounce of being from you
-
C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reportedWhere to escalate the concern if Coinbase is not resolving the issue? @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport
-
OCNEPHEW (@coleyung27) reported@mertandaac If you can 🫡 Executive Summary On July 1, 2026, shortly after I transferred SOL from my Coinbase account to my Phantom wallet, an unauthorized transfer of 1.10268802 SOL was executed from my Phantom wallet to an unknown third-party wallet. I did not knowingly authorize or intend this transfer. Because the incident occurred shortly after the transfer from Coinbase to Phantom, I believe it is appropriate for both Phantom and Coinbase to review any information available on their respective platforms that could help determine what occurred. My objective is not only to document the incident but also to determine whether any information from either platform could assist law enforcement or identify the method by which my wallet’s signing authority was compromised. ⸻ Wallet Information Victim Wallet (Phantom): wKH1PUhdmx2GEGXsiMcB5pJhE2XeXg3KSGVRfDxkJ4H Recipient Wallet: 71FUDhQpnaZ9RNtfFrhPoZqntFwKXfmZMJtWNwt9uKwq ⸻ Transaction Information Transaction Signature 2Mux4mjAmK8swmDugz3pLCkBQxagDbXtJTLJ9HVEk764dejZARLH2sUaVmLH3Yy685dofBfPEhMokNQUemUtREkj Amount 1.10268802 SOL Status Success – Finalized Program Used Solana System Program ⸻ Blockchain Analysis The blockchain records confirm that my wallet signed a native SOL transfer to the recipient wallet through the Solana System Program. Following receipt of the funds, the recipient wallet: * Wrapped the SOL into Wrapped SOL (WSOL). * Swapped the WSOL for approximately 84.37 USDC. * Interacted with Titan Exchange: Atlas and other Solana DeFi protocols. * Created and closed temporary token accounts as part of these transactions. The recipient wallet appears to have a high volume of on-chain activity involving thousands of transactions and frequent interactions with DeFi protocols. While these observations do not identify the wallet owner or establish malicious intent by themselves, they document the movement of the transferred funds after they left my wallet. ⸻ Timeline 1. SOL was withdrawn from my Coinbase account and transferred to my Phantom wallet. 2. Shortly thereafter, 1.10268802 SOL was transferred from my Phantom wallet to the recipient wallet without my knowledge or intent. 3. The recipient wallet wrapped the SOL into WSOL. 4. The WSOL was swapped into approximately 84.37 USDC. 5. The funds continued moving through Solana DeFi protocols. ⸻ Victim Statement Before this incident: * I did not knowingly connect my wallet to a new or suspicious website. * I did not knowingly approve a suspicious transaction. * I did not enter my Secret Recovery Phrase into any website or share it with anyone. * I did not intentionally authorize this transfer. Based on these facts, I believe my wallet’s signing authority may have been compromised through an unknown method. ⸻ Evidence Preserved I have retained and attached: * Full transaction signature. * Solscan transaction records. * Wallet addresses. * Transaction timestamps. * Screenshots documenting the transfer. * Screenshots documenting the subsequent WSOL conversion and USDC swap. * Screenshots of the recipient wallet’s activity. ⸻ Request for Assistance I respectfully request that this incident be documented and reviewed. Specifically, I request that Phantom and Coinbase determine whether they possess any information that may assist in understanding this incident, including whether there were any unusual login events, transfer anomalies, or other security indicators associated with the transfer from Coinbase to my Phantom wallet. I also request that the recipient wallet be reviewed against any prior reports of suspicious activity, and that any available information that could assist law enforcement be preserved. I understand that blockchain transactions are generally irreversible. My goal is to determine how this occurred, assist any investigation, and help prevent similar incidents in the future. Thank you for your time and consideration.