Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	3 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Hire In Crypto (@hireincrypto) reported 31 seconds ago

  🚀 Coinbase is hiring a Senior IT Support Engineer! 💰 Not provided 📍 Remote ⏱ Full-time • Drive impactful IT automation projects • Enhance remote IT operations and support Comment 'JOBS' to get contact details. #ITSupport #CryptoJobs #RemoteWork

• 
  WOLF Bitcoin (@WOLF_Bitcoin_) reported 4 minutes ago

  🚨 POLYMARKET JUST REPRICED THE CLARITY ACT AGAIN Down to 38% chance of passing in 2026. That is another -10% 🔴 drop today. The chart shows a cliff. Not a gradual decline. A cliff. Here is where everyone stood as of this morning: Coinbase Vice Chair: "We're on the one yard line." SEC Commissioner Hester Pierce: "They're making good progress." Bloomberg Intelligence: 60% odds. Senator Cramer: "Both sides want to do it." Treasury Secretary Bessent: "I would encourage the House and Senate to get Clarity done." And Polymarket: 38% and falling. The prediction market is saying something the insiders are not saying out loud. Either the smart money knows something, or the smart money is wrong.

• 
  Justin Artist Lane (@charles_ju65942) reported 4 minutes ago

  Now that the meeting has been over I want to address some issues that were brought to my attention Elon had a trillion dollars stolen from his Coinbase account and nobody helped him he kept it quiet for the reason too catch the people responsible for this crime now I started that investigation with my own money and I kept helping him for two weeks before I broke silence and started asking people about this horrific crime I have no doubt that this money has been returned and it’s over with now thanks for all who pulled together to help Elon get his money back

• 
  AX1 (@ax1vc) reported 6 minutes ago

  Why does @base need a token? For two years the honest answer was: it doesn't The new answer is buried deep in securities liquidity - in whose shares stand behind "1:1 backed", and in who pays for depth once stocks start trading against TradFi books. By the end of this post it has a job. The replies under this post are litigating derivatives vs 1:1. Robinhood Chain tokens are also backed 1:1 - shares held at a US custodian. Accurate, but wrong axis. "1:1 backed" answers where the shares sit, never whose they are and the same label is currently being shipped as three different financial instruments. A derivative. Robinhood's EU classic tokens. A contract against the broker, not even onchain. A note. Robinhood Chain, xStocks, Ondo. The shares exist, and the terms inform you what you hold: "tokenized debt securities... do not grant investors any legal or beneficial rights in those underlying securities". A claim on a Jersey SPV. A share. The one Coinbase announced in June. Equity behind the token, dividends, shareholder rights. The message was of ownership. The note is the stablecoin economics applied to equities. You get the peg to the price. Whatever else the shares in custody provide stays within the wrapper. Dividends are "reinvested net of applicable withholding taxes," up to 30% incorporated into the multiplier, and your tax treaty cannot carry over into the SPV. Documentation from every issuer goes mute on securities lending of the custodied portfolio – the quiet fuel that powers zero-commission brokerage in TradFi. In case of insolvency an agent sells the shares and wires you the money. Payee, never the owner. It's a $1.7bn market, and over half of it sits in assets that weren't even onchain a year ago. The standard of the wrapper is being set in advance of the critical mass. The share model sends those benefits back to the holders. This is literally why it is the heavier lift regulation-wise, and why transfer agents are pressuring the SEC right now over who gets to call their product a stock. So Base's version comes down to one clause in the future terms of the product. Namely, when shipped as a token, would the holder retain the ownership claim, or would it be squashed into another note due to composability? Base has already laid tracks for that answer. B20 went live on mainnet two weeks ago, a native ERC-20 superset with built-in transfer policies and issuer controls, with documentation naming tokenized equities as a target use case. It is that very toolkit which allows a share to stay a share onchain, i.e., compliance baked into the protocol rather than a Jersey wrapper. If the claim survives, it will be the first instrument of this type on any public EVM, thanks to B20. If it is squashed into another note, the comparison with Robinhood is gone too. Now, the token part. The share version is the one institutions can hold, and institutional size is the entire point of the liquidity war. One of the founders in these replies chose Robinhood Chain over Base for his v2 precisely because Base lacks tokenized stock liquidity. And that liquidity has to live onchain - if trading stays inside Coinbase's own book, there is no need for an ERC-20 at all, since the whole pitch is composability. An onchain book is up against TradFi, where hundreds of billions change hands on a daily basis, and it starts from zero. Zero gets filled in one way only - emissions. Every single major L2 got its DeFi liquidity by way of emissions, the only subsidy a public company may pay out without burning money on the income statement. Base is the only one running its emissions engine on a third-party token. And no one runs the monetary policy of their flagship market on a token they do not control. Polymarket currently prices a $BASE token by December at around 12%, almost half of what it was just one week ago. These probabilities are listening to the silence of Coinbase. Read the product, not the odds - an ERC-20 share claim is the first thing on Base which requires an emissions engine of its own. This is how a token that is merely possible differs from a token with a purpose. Jesse says a couple of weeks. Bookmark this for the release of the terms.

• 
  not president trump (@dogemusketer) reported 7 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase I think you're better suited working at McDonald's than in crypto

• 
  TomAlbers (@TomAlbers88) reported 8 minutes ago

  Problem 5: the label outlived the venue. The standard definition says "Coinbase Pro (USD pair)". Coinbase Pro was retired on 9 November 2023. Same order book, old name — not a data error, but a sign of how little the definition gets maintained.

• 
  Stimp Dogg (@TheRoyal18) reported 13 minutes ago

  @_21pinkBlunts Coinbase, Robinhood, Block Chain, and so Many other options.

• 
  Arjun (@clipsofcrypto) reported 15 minutes ago

  "Ratings ought to be built on the building block of transparency and auditability" David and Andrew on why transparency has to come before ratings in DeFi "We need transparency reporting. This is not like you're taking a risk opinion, this should be table stakes and showing risk ratings does not count. On the Coinbase app today it shows the Steakhouse ratings that follow the Moody's pattern, like AAA, AA, B whatever. I understand why they do that, but we also know what pain ratings have caused in the past outside of crypto" "Because they're too opinionated, they're subjective, they're squishy, and you can pay for them ultimately. That's kind of the business of a rating" "We might have our own ratings one day and I'll take **** for that, but at least I'll be able to point to hey, we have the transparency first. We're trying to skip so many steps by going directly into ratings that it's frankly scary, especially since a lot of ratings are vibe coded"

• 
  Terp (@OnlyTerp) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Saint_pablo123 I don't know a single person who buys Robin Hood memes on Robin Hood. They use FOMO, GMGN, etc. But then the selling point of Robin Hood is that it's this big funnel to the normies. I just think it's the same **** as Coinbase. Just here to join our space and extract and leave.

• 
  ScarcityMan 🚀 BIP-110 (@ScarcityMan) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Bit_Faced > "Satoshi never prevented the chain from being used for arbitrary data." Not correct, he did prevent early exploits in OP_RETURN which used it for arbitrary data. You're right that OP_RETURN existed, but it was explicitly NOT for arbitrary data storage until changed by Core years later. The genesis block != spam. Coinbase inputs != spam. It's once per block, 100 bytes, no one gives a **** about that. And for the record, I'm fine with ONE 83 byte OP_RETURN per transaction. It's generous. Take it.

• 
  Branden Forbes (@ForbzWatchin) reported 20 minutes ago

  @coinbase has cost me 10s of thousands of dollars since they placed a hold on my trading as I deposited over $15k. After 3 attempts to settle my virtual card issues, I still have not had resolution or my new one delivered. What if I was stranded and need MYY money for gas.. I was

• 
  Tickles the french bulldog (@zjkbvts2020) reported 21 minutes ago

  @GodsBurnt You have no idea what ******** you're talking about. There's no ******* liquity in the market right now. Without volume and funds flowing it'd dead as ****. Just look at coinbase it's 10x less than a year ago wake up

• 
  shino (@shinoonasam) reported 25 minutes ago

  Check this website and think again $COIN Coinbase Global Inc

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 28 minutes ago

  @MLeeJr This has been a theme for much longer than since the brian coin nonsense as well. It's something I think many people felt on some level but perhaps couldn't quite articulate, or were afraid to bc they wanted base to embrace what they were doing - not with direct support like people keep saying, just by not so blatantly biasing towards their own investments at the expense of everything else bc that drives the users away. Brian shitting on everyone was just catalyst that finally got most of them to speak up. But there's obviously a seriously problem with the loudest voices being perceived as the average sentiment. So the influencers crying about losing money drowns out the real problem in much the same way as when certain people try to gaslight everyone else that everything is great on base and you should just pull your boostraps up and find better pmf. PMF with what market? The sycophants and team scared all of the users away bc they throw off the vibes and no one wants to bridge lmao. There's certainly zero diversity of thought left on base anymore, so it's very telling that even the remaining maxis are speaking out against it. I think it's an expression of frustration from long standing base users that what brian did is yet another instance of what coinbase/base has done continuously, and they know it's going to result in even fewer people wanting to embrace base. At a certain point who's actually left to participate?

• 
  D Rock (@_XRP_Patience) reported 29 minutes ago

  @ChadSteingraber WTF It's like you idiots don't remember yesterday when @coinbase and @brian_armstrong ***** ASSES BLOCKED THE CLARITY ACT! **** THEM! BAN THEM! THEY ARE THE REASON WE DON'T ALREADY HAVE CLARITY! FIRST YOU FORGET 911 NOW THE CLARITY ACT YOU PEOPLE ARE RETARDED! $XRP $FLR 🔥 🔥

• 
  Laura Shin (@laurashin) reported 31 minutes ago

  "He's still not a real startup founder in the sense that he can't die, he can't run out of money" Kain on why Jesse isn't a real startup founder despite the grind "As much as Jesse was grinding in the trenches with builders, he was terminally online on the timeline, in Telegram groups, in all these groups, working so ******* hard to meme this chain into existence" "Because he's in this world where they've got a giant money printer, and Coinbase is going to keep printing money, there's no real threat to it" "There's an existential long-term, decades-long threat of the world moves onchain or whatever, which is what they're trying to get ahead of, but outside of that he's fine"

• 
  Dos Commas ,, ♦️♦️♦️♦️ (@dos__commas) reported 34 minutes ago

  @SenLummis I can't believe you're ignoring us on this issue too. 🙄 Did Coinbase need CLARITY to know not to allow Alameda to mint hundreds of billions of Wrapped LUNA directly into their exchange and decimate retail investors during this situation??? $wLUNA $LUNA $LUNC

• 
  UnknownAlias (@UAlias888) reported 34 minutes ago

  We can **** on Coinbase all day , no doubt, but what would we be if it wasn’t here?

• 
  CryptoMeanGuy (@xrpmemeguy) reported 38 minutes ago

  ummm not exactly how it went down.... coinbase sat on the sidelines a few years before waltzing in. please dont flatter yourselves. The heavy lifting had already been done.

• 
  Ancho (@_Anchor_Point_) reported 38 minutes ago

  I've spent the last few days researching $QUID Here's what I found: • Public Sale was 11.8x oversubscribed • Kraken has already credited purchased tokens to participants • The Base contract is already deployed: 0x1a44233FAe8D50F1AeB3a5d58dd426ff4814Cb53 • MiCA documentation states that the team intends to seek admission to trading on exchanges including Kraken, Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, Gate, Bitget and others • On @aspecta_ai $QUID is trading at an implied FDV of $62M (+37.8% vs the public sale) My question to @whalespremarket : What's taking so long? • The official website is forming something • I'm thinking about buying YES on Polymarket that $QUID TGE happens before July 31 What are my odds?

• 
  Miyamoto (@iruletrenches) reported 39 minutes ago

  it's not about pumping coins. if you actually spent some time to know the context you wouldn't tweet this garbage tweet. ansem had 'cto'd' solana and ran $ansem to 400m. creator coins became a thing, ansem then gave advice to brian and brian answered saying it makes sense, then started interacting with CT. and in CT culture everyone knows pfp'ing an existing coin is basically supporting it, Brian then pfp's the existing coin "coinbase man" the coin rips to 10m, then base account shills it, then tens of base employees shills it. then 12h later, brian removes the pfp and rugs the coin. if you think the outrage is about "Brian not pumping a coin" and not about the disrespect and the complete lack of consideration towards the users of his chain then you're an idiot. ******.

• 
  🪙 🧬 (@kysbalion) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @brian_armstrong @coinbase “Only support projects that will create long term value” *lists **** like turbo and moodeng and giga* yes long term value.

• 
  818 (@818x1) reported 42 minutes ago

  The way @coinbase strategically handles customer accounts and support should be criminally investigated. The **** I've consistently witnessed throughout the years is beyond comprehension. @zachxbt can you confirm?

• 
  Kiran Gadakh ( crypto.kiran ) (@kirangadakh16) reported 50 minutes ago

  DAILY TOKEN ANALYSIS 🚨 Token : $INJ WHALES ARE AGGRESSIVELY LOADING UP ON INJECTIVE RIGHT NOW Big wallets are pulling massive amounts of INJ off exchanges with huge Coinbase mainnet withdrawals! Injective is completely crushing it after landing on Robinhood, wrapping up native mainnet migration, and expanding its DeFi derivatives. Plus, with ongoing fee burns making it deflationary, there are ZERO major token unlocks coming to dump on your face Support : $4.45 Resistance : $5.80 If $INJ breaks $5.50, we are sending it straight to $5.80 - $6.00 If it gets rejected, the $4.95 - $4.75 zone is the golden buy level

• 
  Firma (@firmacash) reported 51 minutes ago

  4) Top up with or withdraw crypto via Firma’s licensed Swiss exchange. Apple/Google Pay, PayPal, Binance, Coinbase, MoonPay, Revolut support coming shortly!

• 
  The Wolf Of All Streets (@scottmelker) reported 52 minutes ago

  "If Taylor Swift had said I'm going to start selling time bifurcated access to my tweets, I don't think we'd be like, ahh, but a Taylor Swift tweet can move markets" John D'Agostino, Head of Strategy at Coinbase Institutional, on why it's time to talk about tiered access to market moving posts "So maybe it's time we had a conversation about this, because this is the first time in my life, 10 years ago, someone writing something on their phone could not move markets, now it can" "Exchanges bifurcate data, Jane Street gets better access than you or me, and there's a reason for that, they provide liquidity, they provide a value added service" "People intuitively understand if you go to a store and spend $10,000 and get a discount, you can't expect it if you spend five. Nobody thinks that's unfair. So I think it's just time to have this conversation"

• 
  Kairos (@kairosfi) reported 53 minutes ago

  been covering this all week without realizing it was becoming the actual narrative robinhood opens trading to agents. virtuals launches a $60k agent pnl competition. $OTTO ships an ai market intelligence terminal built specifically so agents (not just humans) can read robinhood chain data. $VEX builds a trading runtime where every agent action has to clear a rule check before it can even sign. $MLY goes even further into "boring," an agent that automatically manages your defi savings and yield allocation so you don't need to understand any of the underlying protocols. $HYP doing the same core thing from another angle, one terminal where multiple ai agents run across multiple defi protocols at once, in front of an actual person on camera instead of an anon team circle's ceo just published this whole treatise, "the agentic economy," arguing ai and blockchain aren't two separate trends, they're literally becoming one economy. hundreds of billions of agents doing economic stuff on their own, according to him obviously the guy runs a stablecoin company, of course he thinks blockchain is essential to agents doing anything lol. take that part with a grain of salt but here's what actually convinced me : metamask, coinbase, okx and bnb chain all shipped their own ai agent payment infra in the same 4 week window. completely uncoordinated. that's not one ceo's essay driving a narrative, that's like 4 competitors independently reaching the same conclusion at the same time we've been here before tho. "ai x blockchain" was already a whole category in 2023, fetch ai, singularitynet, that whole wave, most of it never shipped real usage past the token launch. so what's different this time i think it's this : every project actually shipping right now, whether it's trading ($VEX), data ($OTTO), passive yield ($MLY), or full terminals ($HYP), is solving the same unglamorous problem. agents can't just "trust" a provider or a signal the way a human glances at a dashboard and decides. they need verification built into the execution itself. last cycle it was tokens marketed as "ai blockchain" first, infra second if ever. this time it's infra first and the narrative is catching up after still early, still could fizzle exactly like last time. but the order of operations being reversed is the part that actually matters imo

• 
  Mac ⋰〠⋱ (@specmacs) reported 54 minutes ago

  $wallet holders are getting desperate as **** lol. wake up, you’re getting larped. robinhood did NOT launch a token on a launchpad that already made its exit (NOXA). just like coinbase employees can’t launch tokens, robhinhood falls under the exact same regulatory framework - a luke warm IQ can save you from this blunder.

• 
  lil mal (@basedlilmal) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Beez0223 @coinbase could never solve a problem that quickly

• 
  CHItrader (@CHItrader) reported 60 minutes ago

  SEC SETTLES FOIA LAWSUIT WITH COINBASE OVER LOST MESSAGES $COIN just scored a win as the SEC settles the FOIA suit 🔹 SEC coughing up $150k and promising to fix its ****** record-retention policies 🔹 Long-running battle over missing communications finally gets some resolution 🔹 Another chapter in the crypto regulator wars