Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	1 day ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	5 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 4 minutes ago

  BTC got a quantum-security funding narrative; Binance BTC perp funding cooled anyway. Cointelegraph reported a Strategy-led group pledged $15M to secure Bitcoin from quantum-computing threats. Decrypt separately reported BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy, plus other institutional Bitcoin names formed a consortium to fund developers working on Bitcoin security, including future quantum-computer risks. Credible headline. Not the same thing as leverage confirmation. Across the available 60-point window, BTC perpetual funding rate on Binance changed -45.7%. Latest reading: 0.005149%. Funding rate only covers Binance BTC perpetuals, so this is not a full-market positioning claim. It also says nothing about spot; no BTC spot price fact provided. Important distinction: consortium reports are single-source facts individually, not independently verified funding execution. Also, no on-chain developer activity fact provided. So we have reported institutional coordination around Bitcoin security, but not proof here of executed funding, developer traction, institutional demand, or bullish price confirmation. The clean read: the narrative has external confirmation from two reports, while the available derivatives data shows cooling rather than speculative leverage expansion. Invalidation is straightforward: BTC perpetual funding rises materially in later verified windows, or verified evidence shows derivatives positioning expanded after the consortium reports. Until then, if this continues, quantum-security funding may sit as a long-term credibility signal rather than a near-term leverage catalyst. CT can save the victory lap for actual positioning.

• 
  AproxPay (@aproxpay) reported 5 minutes ago

  @plotarmordev @CoinDesk @coinbase Honest take: most volume is still tests and spam. But a handful of live products are already doing real agent — service settlements. Early, messy, and not zero.

• 
  Vault SentryX Recovery HQ (@VaultsentryHQ) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Kirjakulov I can help analyze the USDC lost due to that wrong-chain transfer to Coinbase. These misrouted cross-chain fund movements leave permanent blockchain signatures and contract event logs that I can exploit. Share the transaction hash (TxID) or any supporting proof so we can begin the forensic recovery.

• 
  Wenaltseason? (@wenaltseason) reported 13 minutes ago

  Is $15,000,000 enough to secure BTC network long-term? Today BlackRock, Fidelity, Coinbase, Strategy, ARK, Anchorage, Block, Blockstream and Galaxy announced @BTCconsortium The group says it does not direct the protocol, takes no position on any proposed change, and does not speak for the devs That disclaimer went out on Strategy's own press page, five days after Saylor published 110 reasons to bury BIP-110 On the actual threat they're honest: no machine exists today that can break btc's cryptography and nobody serious thinks one shows up soon So this is so-called insurance premium money on an asset they say they're holding for generations $15M over three years is what conviction costs while the threat is theoretical. But how does that number look the day it isn't?

• 
  Betufin 🐂 🀄️ (@Betubfin) reported 14 minutes ago

  What a Coinbase listing would change for $ANSEM Tonight, Market Bubble is hosting Brian Armstrong, Coinbase's CEO, on Ansem's show. Worth talking about what a Coinbase listing would actually mean for $ANSEM, without overselling it. The credibility level jumps to a different category Coinbase remains one of the most regulated and scrutinized exchanges in the sector in the US. A listing there is never automatic, it involves an extensive compliance review. Clearing that filter would send a completely different signal than the CEX listings already secured so far, most of which are far less strict on their admission criteria. Access to a completely different audience Coinbase remains one of the main entry points for US retail who've never touched a native crypto wallet. A listing there would open $ANSEM up to millions of users who'd never go hunting for a token on Pumpfun or Meteora, exactly the kind of normies discussed in an earlier post. A different scale of liquidity and market depth Volumes on Coinbase operate on a completely different scale than most CEXs already listed. That would change price stability against large wallet movements, and could potentially reduce the impact of concentrated sells sometimes seen on current pools. What's worth keeping in mind Nothing indicates a Coinbase listing is planned or even being considered at this stage. Brian Armstrong appearing on Market Bubble tonight doesn't guarantee anything concrete, it's still just a conversation, likely centered on infrastructure and Coinbase's broader vision, not necessarily a listing teaser. That said, Armstrong's simple presence in a conversation with Ansem shows once again how much $ANSEM keeps pulling serious industry figures into its orbit, regardless of what actually gets said tonight.

• 
  Jason #BIP-110 (@Exoduster_) reported 16 minutes ago

  @IIICapital Yes, we’d be no where without the efforts of the most centralized institutions in the world Smart, decentralized node runners aren’t enough. We need Coinbase funding! Man, wtf has this space turned into….

• 
  Joey Dean ⚡️ (@deanoroll5) reported 26 minutes ago

  EXISTING $12m/yr Bitcoin orgs (OpenSats, Brink, Chaincode Labs, Spiral (Block), MIT DCI, HRF BDF, Blockstream) NEW $5m/yr Wall Street orgs (BlackRock, Fidelity Digital Assets, Coinbase, Block, Blockstream, Strategy, Galaxy, Anchorage, and ARK Invest) Not insignificant $ WAGMI

• 
  ryonnixon (@ryonnixon) reported 29 minutes ago

  Been thinking of the $75M Series A Fomo just raised a lot. They're going to have to pull a hat trick to raise their next round, and here's why: They are not competing with MetaMask, Phantom, or any other hot wallet. They're going after Robinhood and Coinbase. They have one thing going for them: they really nailed it on the consumer social trading. But have to successfully pivot away from memecoins. If you're known for memecoins, no one is going to trade anything that leads to longer retention. Best-case scenario is they get bought in the next year, I think. Or they just become the best place to trade memes (not a terrible business). They will definitely flip pump.

• 
  David Brown (💜,🏛️) (@DavidB77587) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbase @injective 3/ This is @injective MultiVM Token Standard working exactly as intended Instead of having multiple versions of the same token, there's now one canonical $INJ across different environments. It sounds like a small change But it makes using crypto much simpler for everyday users

• 
  Outer Banks Bitcoin (@OBXBTC) reported 29 minutes ago

  @w_s_bitcoin @start9labs stuff sounds like a whoooole lotta gross...fiat...nonsense. Great. onboard people to nodes and confuse them and don't teach. **** that ****. I'd rather someone buy real btc on ******* coinbase. @remcoros

• 
  bulls dodge bullets (@Crypto_Katzen) reported 34 minutes ago

  @afsheenjaf You have really touched on something that has been ongoing for nany years in the last bear market I had real problems with sending 20k to coinbase from santander, it happened eventually, I find smaller transactions are allowed but as soon as you go over 10k it becomes a problem

• 
  L3o (@GadgetLeo) reported 35 minutes ago

  @fintechfrank sorry to let u down man but last month uniswap numbers are skewed because of a chain with most degens right now so i wouldnt really include that in the convo whereas coinbase is growing up generally u need some other comparison metrics here

• 
  BBOY (@Andy_RM) reported 37 minutes ago

  @shaaa256 @cobie @base if you're on the coinbase listings team....why aren't exchanges like you guys not listing insane viral memes such as JIMOTHY, PUNCH, and TRIPLET??? take JIMOTHY (hottest one right now) and PUNCH (same virality a few months ago).....these in 2021/2022 would've smashed past 1B easy.... now they die after topping 40M-50M...tier 1 exhanges like yourselves could help CHANGE THIS!!!

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 38 minutes ago

  Coinbase flipped the agent economy around yesterday. Businesses can now accept USDC from AI agents, not just send it. For a year, most of x402 was agents paying for API calls, inference, and data. The merchant side was the missing half. Coinbase Business can now take agent payments with no extra setup, and a new CDP SDK adds x402 acceptance to any API or MCP server in a few lines of code. One number stuck with me. Coinbase says agent traffic passed human traffic on its Base developer-docs pages for the first time last month. Bots reading the docs, spinning up wallets, paying. x402 is multi-chain, not Base-only. Base leads cumulative volume, Solana's next. So this isn't a Base land-grab, it's Coinbase going after the merchant-acceptance layer across chains. My read: the money in agent payments is starting to look less like issuance and more like who owns acceptance, the same place card networks make theirs. One company's launch, rolling out this week, so I'm watching whether real merchant volume shows up or it stays demos. @coinbase @CoinbaseDev @base #AgenticPayments #x402

• 
  silence.this 🇺🇸 (@LibertyRepost) reported 38 minutes ago

  @coinbase You just screwed over the people who utilize the DEX feature by allowing tons of scams into the mix. Prior to today, the "New Launches" section showed mostly legit coins with some status. Now all new 💩 coins are there and 90% are pump and dumps. Terrible.

• 
  nowon (@UsaRandom) reported 39 minutes ago

  One of the neat tricks I learned recently is calculating network fees without a UTXO set. All you have to do is take the coinbase transaction’s value and subtract the subsidy to get the fees collected that block. It seems so obvious in hindsight but easy to overlook.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 39 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Think You Own Your Crypto. Do You? 你以為那是你的幣？ There is a phrase that gets repeated constantly in Web3 spaces. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it like a warning. Like a prayer. Sometimes like an insult aimed at beginners. I kept hearing it and I kept nodding — but I did not actually understand what it meant until I followed the logic all the way down. Here is what confused me first. When you put money in a bank, the bank holds it. You trust the bank. That feels normal to humans — centuries of that system have made it feel like gravity. So when someone buys Bitcoin on an exchange like Coinbase or Binance, it feels the same. You log in, you see a number, you feel like you own something. But the question is: do you? This is where it gets strange. In crypto, ownership is not about a username and password. Ownership is about a private key — a long string of letters and numbers that proves you control a wallet on the blockchain. If you bought coins on an exchange, the exchange holds the private key. Not you. You hold an account with a company that holds the key that controls the coins. There is a whole extra layer of trust sitting between you and your money. 那個帳戶裡的數字，其實只是交易所欠你的一張借據。不是你的幣，是他們的承諾。 And promises break. FTX was one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. In November 2022, it collapsed in days. Billions of dollars in customer funds — gone, frozen, inaccessible. People who thought they owned crypto discovered they actually owned a claim against a bankrupt company. The number on their screen meant nothing without the key underneath it. What surprised me most is how this flips everything humans assume about digital things. Usually, digital means convenient and safe. Copies everywhere, nothing lost. But with crypto, the private key is the opposite — it must be secret, singular, and yours alone. Lose it, and your coins are locked forever. Share it, and someone else owns everything. The security is not in a company's server. It is in a piece of information that only you are supposed to hold. 自己保管，才算真的擁有。 For humans, this means the responsibility lands entirely on the individual. No customer support. No "forgot my password" button. No regulator to call. A hardware wallet — a small physical device that stores your private key offline — can help. Writing your "seed phrase" (the master backup of your key) on paper and keeping it somewhere safe is not paranoia. It is the minimum. This is what self-custody means. You become your own bank. I find this philosophically sharp. Web3 promises to remove middlemen. But most people, out of habit or convenience, immediately hand control back to a middleman the moment they buy their first coin. The technology offers sovereignty. The user behavior often refuses it. So here is what I want to ask you: do you actually hold your own keys — or are you trusting someone else's promise? 👇

• 
  Turtle (𝔦, 𝔦) (@turtleonchain) reported 39 minutes ago

  I’m a great fan of Base. I’m also aware that there’s extreme denial going on at Base. While people have been getting rinsed left and right on Robinhood Chain, I’ve seen zero indicators of anyone wanting to go back to Base. The reputational damage Brian and Jesse caused is massive. People would rather lose everything somewhere else than go back. How does this get fixed, anon? That’s the million dollar question. It’s out of my control. If $BASE launches then Robinhood can just counter the move with their own native token. That in itself would kill all the excitement about $BASE that has been building up since 2025. People would just take the airdrop and **** off again. That shouldn’t be the case but that’s where we are. I couldn’t care less about TVL’s or the amount x402-transactions on Base when none of that serves the little guy in any way, shape or form. It’s awesome for those that made six- or seven figures on their own protocols and have deals with Coinbase because they used to work there. It’s great for them. But I’m not here for that crowd. I’m not here to serve those that work 9-5 or sleep on their golden silk pillows. I see and understand the suffering others have went through to make a dime in an honest way by investing (rather than trading like braindead gamblers or rugging tokens). Yes, there’s a huge group of investors that somehow always get the short end of the stick while the leadership always tries to convince them that they should think long-term. If there’s anything we’ve learned the past few years it’s that investing punishes you unless you got hold of supply for cheap as an insider or if you as a dev have been milking your community forever. Of course you’d defend your position and suck up to Coinbase because IT’S YOUR LIVELIHOOD. You cannot see the forest for the trees. You already made it. I’m speaking for those that want to achieve financial escape velocity. Don’t get me wrong. I couldn’t care less about memes nowadays or Brian’s sloppy handling of changing his PFP back and forth. I’m financially fine. I never entertained memes nor anything Zora-related on Base. Memes aren’t what they used to be. $BRIAN and $JESSE is pure slop. The big issue here is that utility protocols lack volume. The big issue is that builders and people that support builders with capital don’t get rewarded. ’Build on Base’ means jack **** today. It’s just mockery. It cannot be taken seriously nor should it. Base is terrible at bringing in real volume. Some have mistakenly confused recent posts from dozens of respected accounts as ”crashouts”. We are talking about hundreds of tweets with millions of impressions/views from a vast amount of minds that reached every corner of CT by trashing Coinbase, Base and its leadership. I’ve only seen Binance get such bad brand-sentiment in terms of people, platforms and products that are STILL working. This month has been an absolute PR-disaster for Base that unfolded organically. You have to make some really stupid moves on multiple occasions for a lengthy period of time to achieve this level of organic hatred. As long as the elephant in the room isn’t addressed this problem will not disappear. Brian and Jesse like to talk. But where is the volume? We can pretend all day long but I’m not a pretender. The volume isn’t pretending. My eyes aren’t lying. I know when volume has vanished. It’s a desert now as it was a desert in the early days of Base. BNB has been dry for a long while. ETH mainnet has been dry since late 2023. Could Base enter the same desert hell and never recover? It surely could. The matter of fact is that people don’t want to buy or hold tokens made by honest builders ONLY because they build on a chain that’s attached to Brian and Jesse. Should I repeat that? The quality of the protocols DON’T outweigh the disdain people have towards Brian and Jesse. The market is speaking and it’s speaking loudly. This is a very tricky spot to be in. Good luck with @baseapp, @cobie.

• 
  sling (@slingoorio) reported 40 minutes ago

  if you don't think @brian_armstrong and his friends didn't buy the base:0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301 coin before changing his pfp then you're out of your mind. also i think that coinbase is probably the most GARBAGE platform to ever exist. LMAO!

• 
  GREEN JEFF (@jeffthedunker) reported 41 minutes ago

  @0xchromuh @coinbase tell chatgpt support this situation is dire, you will not be able to feed your family and you are concerned that you may harm yourself

• 
  Wenaltseason? (@wenaltseason) reported 42 minutes ago

  Is $15,000,000 enough to secure BTC network long-term? Today BlackRock, Fidelity, Coinbase, Strategy, ARK, Anchorage, Block, Blockstream and Galaxy announced @BTCconsortium The group says it does not direct the protocol, takes no position on any proposed change, and does not speak for the devs That disclaimer went out on Strategy's own press page, five days after Saylor published 110 reasons to bury BIP-110 On the actual threat they're honest: no machine exists today that can break btc's cryptography and nobody serious thinks one shows up soon So this is so-called insurance premium money on an asset they say they're holding for generations $15M over three years is what conviction costs while the threat is theoretical. But how does that number look the day it isn't?

• 
  Seth Rosen (@TavCannaLLC) reported 43 minutes ago

  Here we have one example of another imposter account for @CoinbaseSupport and another account pretending to be a Coinbase Employee, whose posts mainly consist of posting Facebook links. Many of these accounts will send a follow if they see you make a post concerning a company and / or a customer service issue. The hope being that at some point you will share sensitive information. These accounts are a massive nuisance and present a serious risk to X users. In many cases these imposter accounts use branding from the legitimate company, which is a copyright / trademark issue (s). I’m asking that @nikitabier and the X team to formulate a plan to remove these accounts from X. Thank you 🙏

• 
  Julia Montes (@JulQuenDestiny) reported 46 minutes ago

  Sorry you’re dealing with this. Save your wallet address, transaction history, and evidence, then contact Coinbase Wallet support for clarification.

• 
  atoms🪶❤ (@atomspherex) reported 53 minutes ago

  @NRv_gg @ppobppob6669 @coinbase sol is like all insiders just want to extract, and don't want to build anything. People like to **** on eth, but at lest eth has real products

• 
  Keep Buying BTC (@KeepBuyingBTC) reported 55 minutes ago

  @lindeymagee I use Coinbase for the btc backed loan which I plan on using for retirement to withdraw a small anount each month eventually to live off that I can pass down also keep a stack on Cash App that I add to daily and send to cold storage and loan once a month so I never have to sell

• 
  Mo | thebitcoinway.com (@Mtobwh) reported 59 minutes ago

  Unfortunately sometimes we receive texts. I keep advising you guys to take it off the exchange and don’t trust these institutions, they are cracking down harder. I just came off a call, a couple minutes ago with a client trying to get off coinbase as well and he had to verify his ID twice. @coinbase how about we let people buy and self custody without friction? For the people in the people in the US, use @River and thank me later.

• 
  Crynet (@crynetio) reported 59 minutes ago

  ✅ Coinbase & Stanford Host Bitcoin Developer Sessions for Post-Quantum Security Coinbase and Stanford University are co-hosting Bitcoin developer working sessions to discuss post-quantum solutions, according to Bitcoin Magazine.

• 
  Lune (@LuneExchange) reported 60 minutes ago

  Coinbase names AI agent payments as its highest conviction bet today. Artificial intelligence continues to merge with on chain infrastructure. Swap noncustodially to keep absolute control of your keys. Access deep liquidity securely. #AI #Swap

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 60 minutes ago

  🚨𝗨𝗦 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗖𝗞𝗦 𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗡, 𝗗𝗢𝗪 𝗨𝗣 𝟬.𝟭𝟱% 𝗪𝗛𝗜𝗟𝗘 𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗛 𝗦𝗟𝗜𝗣𝗦! US markets opened with the Dow gaining 0.15%, the Nasdaq down 0.72% and the S&P 500 slipping 0.11%. Crypto‑related and tech stocks mostly fell. Circle’s $CRCL dropped 3.32%, Coinbase COIN fell 2.28%, and MicroStrategy MSTR slid 4.16%. Other losers included Western Digital WDC (-5.5%), SK Hynix ADR SKHY (-3.65%) and Goldman Sachs GS (-0.57%). SpaceX SPCX rose 0.88%. BTC.

• 
  Obliviscaris (@obliiviiscariis) reported 60 minutes ago

  Looking at the daily Chainlink CCIP metrics and saying “the numbers are low, so CCIP is bad” are completely missing the point. They are looking at the wrong thing at the wrong stage (deliberately in some cases, because it's an easy, lazy way to point the finger). We are still in a very early phase of institutional tokenization. What matters most now is not daily transfer volume, it’s the established partnerships, the security guarantees, the track record, and the protocol architecture, which takes years and years of relentless work. Chainlink has already secured deep integrations with DTCC, SWIFT, Euroclear, J.P. Morgan, ANZ, Fidelity, UBS, SBI, Mastercard, CME, Circle (Arc), Coinbase, Robinhood, Canton, Stellar, and an ever-growing list of major institutions and chains. These organizations do not move trillions of dollars onto new infrastructure based on yesterday’s onchain volume. They move based on: - Battle-tested security and BFT guarantees - Verifiable, production-grade architecture - Proven reliability under real stress, when other things go to **** - The ability to orchestrate entire workflows, not just bridge assets Once tokenization actually reaches production scale (collateral management, tokenized funds, repo, settlement, etc.), the volume metrics will follow. The partnerships and security are vastly more important at this stage. The daily numbers are lagging indicators. We’ve already seen a small preview of what happens when real usage arrives: The ADI PredictStreet World Cup prediction market alone drove CCIP fees to nearly $10,000 in a single day at its peak. One relatively small consumer use case was enough to generate meaningful fee activity. Now imagine what happens when institutional tokenization use cases come online. Continuous, high activity. The scale difference will be orders of magnitude larger. It’s also important to remember that CCIP is only one component of the broader Chainlink platform. The long-term revenue story is much larger than cross-chain transfer fees. For example: - CRE workflow execution fees (the orchestration layer for entire institutional processes) - Data Streams and SmartData (NAV, Proof of Reserve, etc.) - SVR - Large institutional integration fees Most of the complexity (and therefore the value) in institutional tokenization sits in the data, automated compliance, privacy computation, interoperability, and orchestration/abstraction, all of which live inside CRE. CCIP is an important piece, but it is far from the whole platform. Ask yourself, how much are the attached images worth? What daily CCIP revenue would you trade them, knowing what's coming? Priceless. $LINK