Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	23 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	27 days ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Chris Navigato Sr. (@cnavigato) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Steph_iscrypto More like ... hey @coinbase WTF is up with the soccer prediction market brain fart?

• 
  Dr. Keiser 🇩🇪 (@KarlWagenknecht) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Steph_iscrypto Dear Brian, I don’t think the Clarity Act will go through. And that’s entirely your fault. If you hadn’t put your foot down in January, there would have been more time to discuss the matter properly. I hope that all Coinbase customers realise this and draw their own conclusions.

• 
  H0DL (@Briandotsui) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SplendorLabs But I can’t see how people would wanna do this without seeing some big institutional support, like Binance, coinbase, cryptodotcom, and MSTR. Not to mention BTC has its own team. They won’t let you eat their lunch. Blackrock did say to them to get it done, or a new team will!

• 
  Dr. Keiser 🇩🇪 (@KarlWagenknecht) reported 6 minutes ago

  @cryptorover Dear Brian, I don’t think the Clarity Act will go through. And that’s entirely your fault. If you hadn’t put your foot down in January, there would have been more time to discuss the matter properly. I hope that all Coinbase customers realise this and draw their own conclusions.

• 
  John E Velek (@JohnEVelek) reported 8 minutes ago

  Coinbase secures UK authorization to offer traditional investments alongside crypto The license allows institutional traders to access perpetual futures and gives U.K. retail customers the ability to trade equities to begin with.

• 
  iamdfm (@iamdfm) reported 9 minutes ago

  @coinbase what’s the deal with the hold on transfers. Never experienced a delay on being able to access my funds till now

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 10 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport I used coinbase because it says Highly secure, Reliable and top platform in the industry? IS IT STILL TRUE? Over 20 days is too long for KYC and I still dont have idea when I can access my account😭😭😭 Do they care about their customer?😭😭😭

• 
  The Crypto Professor (@TheCryptoProfes) reported 10 minutes ago

  Coinbase helped build the stablecoin that made Circle a public company. Now it just helped build the one designed to replace it. The company is USDC. The rival is Open USD. Coinbase co-founded USDC's original governance structure, Centre Consortium, with Circle back in 2018. In 2023, the two dissolved it. Circle paid Coinbase roughly $210 million in stock to buy out its remaining stake, and USDC became Circle's alone to govern. Coinbase took equity in Circle instead of control over the coin. Three years later, Coinbase is walking back into the exact same room, this time with 140 other companies standing behind it. On June 30th, a coalition including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, Google, and Coinbase launched Open USD. It does one specific thing Circle has never been willing to do: give away the yield. USDC's issuer keeps nearly all the interest earned on its reserves. Over 90% of Circle's revenue comes from that spread. Open USD hands almost all of it back to the distributors who mint and hold it instead. Circle's stock dropped 17.5% the day it was announced. Down nearly 40% for the month. Here's why Coinbase's signature matters more than anyone else's on that list. Coinbase isn't a bystander in USDC's success, it's the reason USDC has scale. Coinbase holds roughly 25% of all USDC in circulation across its own products, and its Base network processes over 60% of global on-chain stablecoin volume. In 2024 alone, Circle paid Coinbase $908 million under their revenue-sharing deal. Stablecoin revenue made up nearly a fifth of Coinbase's total revenue last year. And that revenue-sharing contract comes up for renewal in August. Next month. Circle's CEO waved off the threat publicly, calling multi-company consortiums "predictably slow-moving" and pointing to a decade of deep USDC integration no coalition can replicate overnight. But Coinbase isn't threatening to leave USDC. It's sitting at the table that decides what USDC is worth to keep, one month before it has to sign a new number on the page. Circle spent a decade making Coinbase's distribution the backbone of USDC's growth. Coinbase just built the leverage to make sure it never has to accept the old terms again. What happens to that August contract now?

• 
  WOLF Crypto (@WOLF_Crypto_X) reported 11 minutes ago

  THE BIGGEST FIGHT IN US FINANCE RIGHT NOW IS OVER ONE QUESTION: CAN A STABLECOIN PAY YOU INTEREST? The answer could move $6 trillion. Here's the standoff: A stablecoin issuer takes your dollar, parks it in Treasury bills, and earns roughly 4 cents a year on it. Under current law, that yield stays with issuers and their partners. You get nothing directly. Crypto's argument: If you supplied the dollar, you should get the interest, like a money market fund passes through its income. The banks' argument: A digital dollar that pays 4%, holds only Treasuries, and moves in a tap isn't a payment tool. It's a threat that could drain deposits and choke off lending. How big a threat? The estimates aren't close. The American Bankers Association says up to $6.6 trillion could leave banks. The White House economic team modeled the same question and got around $2.1 billion, three orders of magnitude smaller. It got personal at Davos. JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon reportedly told Coinbase's Brian Armstrong he was "full of s—" over the deposit-competition point. Now it's blocking real legislation. Coinbase $COIN just pulled support for the CLARITY Act over this exact clause, and the Senate markup got postponed. The tell: Banks are publicly fighting stablecoin yield while quietly investing in the infrastructure to issue their own the day it becomes legal.

• 
  Dez Fleming (@DezFleming) reported 12 minutes ago

  Continuing on my daily (ish) musings on the digital asset ecosystem. Let’s talk about Onchain Credit & Asset Managers. Onchain Credit & Asset Managers are clearly going to be an important category of digital assets. I think (at a high level) of these businesses generally being the equivalent versions of a Circle or Tether, but instead of tokenizing dollars, they tokenize real world assets and today, they’re specifically focused on tokenizing RWAs focused on credit. Why credit you may ask? Well I think the number one reason driving this opportunity is that the companies in the business of aggregating stablecoins deposits onchain view yield bearing assets (credit) as a lever for retention on their tokenized deposits. We’ve started to see this horizontal product expansion form over the past year or so. A few examples that come to mind: - June 2025: OKX launched a staking product for US consumers - July 2025: Spiko launched a tokenized money market fund - December 2025: Coinbase launched their rewards product (an effective yield sharing program) - January 2026: Kast launched Kast Earn with Gauntlet - July 2026: Robinhood launches their Earn product with Morpho But in addition to seeing the application layer move forward with this shift, I also just believe that from a first principles perspective, owning short duration securities that are highly liquid with a fixed rate are obviously a totally different risk/reward profile and cross sell, than cross selling someone into, let’s say, a SpaceX perp. Do i want my checking account dollars in a 5x levered SpaceX perp that could go to zero with a 20% move? Maaaaaaaaybe (probably not), am I comfortable with my checking account dollars sitting in an RWA backed by US government treasuries? 100% So as we see this shift take place it’s clear that the issuers of this risk are going to be important, but I think the question to now also answer is also - what’s the brief history of venture backed asset managers? What makes a successful asset manager? And what can we learn from prior history? The Brief History of Venture Backed Asset Managers: I’m sure some venture OGs will know some companies that came earlier but it really seems like the early internet/cloud era started to introduce the first forms of venture backed asset managers. Between 2008 and really 2021/2023 the theme of leverage the internet as a distribution channel to expand access to either A) alts or B) high quality investment advice was repeated over and over in different flavors. This gives us companies like Betterment, Wealthfront ($1bn public company), Fundrise, iCapital, Cadre, Wealthsimple, YieldStreet, MoonFare, Masterworks, Titan, Percent, Arrived, Opto, and Allocate. The most valuable of these companies, on paper, is iCapital at a $7.5bn mark and Wealthsimple is right behind them at a $7bn valuation. These businesses are overwhelmingly SUCCESSFUL but it’s tough to say they were the best places to allocate your capital during this period in the context of both Coinbase & Robinhood being $40bn and $100bn outcomes respectively So what gives? And what makes a successful asset manager? I don’t have all the answers but I do have observations. 1) In general I think it’s obviously tough to build an asset management business, but even doubly so one that is consumer focused. Many of the businesses listed above (Betterment, Wealthfront, Fundrise, Cadre, Wealthsimple, Yieldstreet, Masterworks, Moonfare, Titan, etc.) are all consumer focused which creates unique structural issues. In a consumer business, you are fundamentally playing an LTV/CAC game and yes with the asset management business you have the benefit of locked up fees but a 1% take rate on a $50,000 subscription may earn $2,500 over a 5 year period, but acquiring that person might cost $500 alone and your true gross margin on that product might be ~50%. So now your gross margin payback takes 2 years minimum and there’s no guarantee that that consumer sticks around. Layer on the fact that to get to venture scale today, I’d arguably say you have to be doing $1bn of top line with line of sight to doubling or more and now you start to contend with the reality that you need to acquire 400K high net worth, picky consumers with near endless options? And that’s before you even consider the portfolio dynamics of taking a 5% portfolio position into a single security or name. In general - I think structural consumer fintech dynamics reasons cap the ability for these businesses to get to scale on venture timelines at least while the internet was the primary growth lever So let’s compare this period of asset management with the natural counterfactual of success which are the alternative asset managers! Being in the business of alts and private markets has been big, and I mean BIG business over the past 50+ years. We know and love (I’m sure some envy) the names. These are companies like KKR, Blackstone, Carlyle, Apollo, Ares. Each of these businesses alone are a $30bn + outcome making them more valuable than the aggregate combined value of the venture backed cohort. Blackstone alone is a nearly $200bn business. So what gives? Obviously the first dynamic to call out is their customer focus. The big boy alts players all began as institutional managers, and they only recently began focusing on consumers via their dedicated wealth channels. Overwhelmingly though, these are B2B businesses that partner with sophisticated institutional managers who want to deploy $billions to tens of billions of dollars into these fund managers. So that’s the first call out - the unit economics entirely changed. A 1% management fee on a $50,000,000 check for let’s say a 10 year fund life means $5m of fees locked in, and (everybody hates to say it) but the level of effort to close the $50m check and the $50k check are roughly the same. Fundraising dollars per unit of effort does not scale linearly. Obviously there are other components to around product/financial innovation (i.e LBOs, permanent(ish) capital from insurance companies) but in general being in the asset management business serving businesses is fundamentally different and BETTER than being in the asset management business serving consumers and the public outcomes clearly demonstrate that fact Now the trade off though that comes with this comparison is… these alts managers took 50+ years to scale in some cases. KKR was founded in 1976. Blackstone was founded in 1985. Carlyle 1987, so on. These businesses were by no means overnight successes, and even at their current marks: KKR is an 11% compounded return. Whereas Circle (from founding to today) is a 23% return. I know, I know apples and oranges but still - one of the constraints of VCs is that it’s not infinitely patient capital and there’s a demand for scalability in the assets. In any event - I am going to keep thinking about these dynamics as I go deeper in the space but a few core ideas come to mind that I think will be relevant of onchain asset managers 1) B2B beats B2C 2) A component of the business model needs to be inherently scalable 3) it will be absolutely critical to own some sort of proprietary distribution channels as a method of maintaining differentiation… these thoughts are all raw(ish) so take them with a grain of salt but anyways - more to come

• 
  Nico | supernova.vision (@nicoypei) reported 12 minutes ago

  Corporate chains are great for regulatory arbitrage, channeling users to frontier products that currently can't be offered in the core consumer app: > Perps and equity perps went live on Base via @avantisfi LONG before Coinbase launched its perp > Morpho grew to $3B + TVL before integrating Coinbase > Binance Alpha / BSC for launching lower-cap coins -> the best to ever do it Seems like Vlad understand this. Looking forward to see what they will unveil. Off-the-bet I think > high leverage equity perp trading > high yield savings > prediction market > memecoin trading can be a good start. They launched prediction market during Superbowl last year but had to shut down in one day due to regulation. Now that's not going to be a problem.

• 
  Jack (@jacksparlays) reported 17 minutes ago

  @coinbase You have 27 minutes to let me take money out of my account without an error or I’m gonna ******* murder you

• 
  Fɪɢʜᴛᴇʀ ⚠︎ (@F1GHT3R7) reported 19 minutes ago

  Coinbase supporting native $INJ was one of the most useful updates I saw recent Time. It makes getting into the @injective ecosystem much simpler. July 20–22, 2026 During the migration: > $INJ deposits and withdrawals on Coinbase will be temporarily paused. > ERC-20 $INJ will be converted to native INJ at a 1:1 ratio. > Users don't need to do anything, and the migration is free. > After the upgrade, Coinbase will support native $INJ only. For me, this update is all about making the onboarding process much smoother. Until now, buying $INJ on Coinbase often meant dealing with bridges, Ethereum gas fees, and extra steps before using the Injective ecosystem. Once the migration is complete, users will be be able to withdraw $INJ directly to Injective. No wrapped tokens. No extra bridge. Just a smoother onboarding experience. I don't expect this to change everything overnight, but making access easier usually encourages more people to explore an ecosystem. I'll be watching to see whether more $INJ moves on-chain, staking participation increases, and Injective apps attract more activity over the coming months. $INJ

• 
  Crypto_Eric (@Crypto_Eric1981) reported 23 minutes ago

  @coinbase No service/support at all. Never!

• 
  magnus (@degenutz) reported 28 minutes ago

  Both $BTC and $ETH are pretty uneventful right now but this has been the pattern for the past +7 months: Pump -> range for a few days/weeks -> dump. The hard part is determining whether this is an exit pump before continuation lower or a liquidity move designed to shake out panic/relief sellers from their spot positions. We saw a similar setup in June/July before the $ETH move higher. First came the range and pump from sub-$2k, then another range and pump from sub-$3k. Looking at aggregated spot CVD, both $BTC and $ETH saw spot buying support the move higher, but that buying pressure has now stalled and is ranging alongside price. For $BTC, buyers remain the dominant side of the order book. For $ETH, sellers currently have the edge. Coinbase premium has cooled off from ~$100 to ~$51 Open interest has retraced back to pre-pump levels

• 
  saturndrift (@saturn_drift) reported 31 minutes ago

  @PolitlcsUK @guardian This is pathetic. Banks claim having a Coinbase account is a “money laundering driven activity.”. Banks are a big part of the problem when it comes to UK citizens free will being crushed. Want to take out cash? No. Want to buy Bitcoin? No. Want to transfer overseas? Pay our huge “admin” fee or no. Want to gamble away your entire life savings? Go right ahead!

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 34 minutes ago

  @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport I used coinbase because it says Highly secure, Reliable and top platform in the industry? IS IT STILL TRUE? Over 20 days is too long for KYC and I still dont have idea when I can access my account😭😭😭 Do they care about their customer?😭😭

• 
  Let’sGrooow (@HereWeGrooow) reported 35 minutes ago

  $wLUNA did @coinbase continue to accept or execute WLUNA trades through any authenticated API after retail users were informed that WLUNA trading was suspended? If so, what accounts or participants retained access, and what policies governed that access? $LUNC $LUNA $MIR $ANC $USTC

• 
  BiyaPay (@BiyaPay) reported 36 minutes ago

  BIYA Daily Market Brief 🔹 Spacex joins nasdaq 100 tomorrow giving elon musk two companies in the index with combined 30221 btc 🔹 Coinbase secures uk mifid license to offer derivatives equities and crypto to uk users 🔹 Ripple receives eu casp license from luxembourgs cssf becoming fully mica compliant 🔹 Clarity act now has until august 7 to be signed into law with 32 days left before senate recess 🔹 Nicehashmining easy mining service has mined 200 solo bitcoin blocks totaling 1168 btc since october 2022 🔹 Grayscale zach pandl says strategys shift to sell bitcoin for usd reserves reduces tail risk 🔹 South korean won edges higher as it begins 24 hour trading for the first time

• 
  ray tio (@nahnah64) reported 42 minutes ago

  @J0se @coinbase Let me help, it's time to make Coinbase great again

• 
  Comrade (@Pluto8798412851) reported 42 minutes ago

  @coinbase 9H7riua52HFM4AnWUWQjM7YReTVKvhtin7JPDmNqcQEg This is my solana wallet in coinbase. By mistake i sent 30 dollars to pumpfuncoin address. I don't know how to take out and support team doesn't know as well. @cobie FXWxS2Jaqz1CJWRi71fk9fpPdwTpKCXXzK3B1DS5pump

• 
  diegovas (@vasdie) reported 42 minutes ago

  @crexsol @be_kindplss the problem with eth is staking concentration its hard to defend them as #1 because lido holds something like ~23%, coinbase ~12%, binance like ~9% of the total staked ETH (dont quote me on the numbers) its that its getting better because lido used to hold a lot more %, but still not great

• 
  votesa ■ (@votesa) reported 46 minutes ago

  base but with a hood on. everyone reviewed robinhood chain as a product launch. i think it's a trap for base airdrop money, set up months in advance. what went live on july 1: → stock tokens in 120+ countries inside robinhood wallet, trading 24/7, usable as defi collateral → uniswap live from day one as the main public dex → morpho powering robinhood earn with ~7% on USDG → USDG issued natively on the chain → perps built straight into the wallet via lighter → arcus (by dYdX team), stock trading at zero fees with a token promised to the community → gas free for the first 90 days now look at base's side of the board. they said out loud they're exploring a network token. in february they walked off the OP stack onto their own codebase and stopped paying optimism rent. and now they're about to ship B20, their own token standard baked straight into the node software. erc20 compatible, but with freeze and transfer controls built in, aimed at stablecoins, RWAs and tokenized equities. nobody rebuilds token plumbing at the protocol level for fun. robinhood chain mainnet july 1. B20 mainnet july 8. one week apart, both laying rails for the same thing. a base token would be the biggest retail wealth event of the cycle. a new class of rich onchain wallets, old ones waking up, normies crawling back the second "base printed" hits their group chats. that liquidity doesn't retire, it looks for the next trade. and post-airdrop money always walks the same ladder: dump some, rotate majors, farm, memes, then something that feels more adult. robinhood just shipped the adult option. NVDA and TSLA as collateral, 24/7, inside an app normies already have on their phones. coinbase wakes retail up. robinhood is standing right there with something to sell them. maybe the whole robinhood arc has nothing to do with base at all. maybe they just executed a year-old roadmap and the window opened around them. but wall street holds COIN and HOOD as one bet on finance moving onchain, and both companies started laying rails for the same moment at the same time. the bitstamp deal fits the same picture: licenses first, then own chain, then tokenized stocks, then defi rails. nobody collects that stack to add two more coins to an app. why would any of this actually hurt base? because eth vs sol is a religion war. evm vs evm is nothing. trenchers bridge in minutes, builders redeploy in a day. there is no switching cost, only reasons. just look at bankr and virtuals. two flagship base projects, both added robinhood chain support within days. no drama, just a new chain in the dropdown. and base picked a bad year to slow down. creator coins meta fizzled, ai agents barely got any support while they were the hottest meta in crypto. baseapp never found its pmf and feels like it exists for optics, not for onboarding anyone. the ecosystem spotlight kept landing on stuff like o1 exchange. loyalty in evm land is a bridge transaction. pure shizo, zero evidence, but the symmetry is funny: coinbase trades as COIN and incubates BASE token. robinhood trades as HOOD. ROBIN completes the pair. do with that what you want. to be fair to the other side: robinhood planned this chain for over a year, a base token still has no date and might not even happen this cycle. and robinhood chain tvl is tiny for now. positioning only pays if liquidity actually shows up. base will be fine. coinbase isn't going anywhere and neither is the money behind it. and i'm saying all this with love. base is the main reason i even stayed onchain these past couple of years. but for the first time base has an evm competitor with a cleaner story for normie capital, and its answer so far is "we're exploring". B20 goes live soon. let's see what base does with it.

• 
  Michael (@Michael91403457) reported 47 minutes ago

  $chz #chz All time low on Coinbase. Witnessing real time the slow death of a company that once had great vision and potential.

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 50 minutes ago

  @CryptoMiners_Co @coinbase About time, mate. More access to real markets without the woke gatekeeping. Bullish for UK degens.

• 
  Yora (🌸, 🌿) (L3, ❄️) .eth / .nad (@dea_yora) reported 53 minutes ago

  @J0se @coinbase "calm under fire" at Coinbase support is basically a war veteran requirement.....

• 
  Andrea Perlak, CPA (@AndiPerlak_CAG) reported 55 minutes ago

  With its new UK authorization, Coinbase plans to offer: 📈 Equities trading for retail users 📊 Crypto, equity & commodity perpetual futures for eligible traders 🏦 Future support for tokenized real-world assets #DigitalAssets #Tokenization #Blockchain

• 
  roman.poly (@mitchellek89573) reported 56 minutes ago

  coinbase told me the wrong team won. this is exactly why i don't trust anything except my own anxiety and a polygon rpc. proof problem indeed.

• 
  Prasenjit Sarkar (@stretchcloud) reported 58 minutes ago

  The payment layer for AI agents is consolidating fast, and Cloudflare just placed a big bet on which protocol wins. x402 repurposes the HTTP 402 status code that has been sitting unused since 1996. The flow is machine-native: client requests a gated resource, server returns a price and accepted payment methods, client pays on-chain, re-sends the request with a payment proof header. No checkout page. No subscription account. No human in the loop. What Cloudflare is doing with the Monetization Gateway is providing the infrastructure layer for exactly this. Any web page, dataset, API endpoint, or MCP server sitting behind Cloudflare can now gate access with a per-request stablecoin charge. The waitlist opened July 1. The broader x402 ecosystem already has real volume behind it. 119 million transactions on Base, 35 million on Solana, $600 million annualized, zero protocol fees. Stripe and Tempo are in via their multi-party payments product. Google AP2 is integrated with Adyen, AMEX, Mastercard, PayPal, Coinbase, Revolut, and Worldpay. Visa has TAP. The actual contest is not about whether x402 wins as a protocol. It is about which distribution layer MCP servers get built against. Cloudflare has 330+ points of presence and is already where most API traffic terminates. Stripe has enterprise trust and existing developer billing relationships. If you are building an MCP server today and want to monetize it, choosing which gateway to route through is the same architectural decision as picking your CDN five years ago. It looks boring until it locks you in.

• 
  Glenn “Big G” Norwood (@BigGNorwood1949) reported 60 minutes ago

  @souljaboy @coinbase Soulja boy needs to be LOCKED up already holy ****