Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Coinbase. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.
- Transactions (33%)
- Website (17%)
- Mobile App (17%)
- Login (17%)
- Withdrawals (17%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Withdrawals | 17 hours ago |
|
|
Transactions | 4 days ago |
|
|
Transactions | 1 month ago |
|
|
Website | 1 month ago |
|
|
Login | 2 months ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 3 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
AT (@_aridel_) reportedCEO of Coinbase ? na $ANSEM got way to much motion wtf
-
Crynet (@crynetio) reported✅ Coinbase & Stanford Host Bitcoin Developer Sessions for Post-Quantum Security Coinbase and Stanford University are co-hosting Bitcoin developer working sessions to discuss post-quantum solutions, according to Bitcoin Magazine.
-
Injective 🥷 (@injective) reported@coinbase 5/ Native access turns Coinbase into a direct entry point to Injective. Trade native $INJ, withdraw it to the network, then use it across staking, governance, onchain markets, tokenized assets, payments, and AI agent applications.
-
ky (🦄/acc) (@kypwny) reported@AndrewCurran_ OpenRouter's Coinbase Commerce integration is a joke and only works with Base Pay lmao i wouldn't mind if Stripe acquired them but if The White House really wants to play funny games with access to Chinese models, I'm sure Stripe will happily comply
-
Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reportedAgents Found Rails And Attack Surfaces Agentic Rails The agent economy stopped sounding like a pitch deck and started looking like plumbing. x402 hit 75m transactions, 24m in volume and 94k buyers over 30 days before moving to the Linux Foundation, while Coinbase launched new AI tools for agentic trading, commerce and payments and Circle’s CEO tied autonomous agents directly to blockchain rails for payments and identity. The quiet signal is standardization. The market is not just asking whether agents can trade; it is deciding which payment, identity and policy layers they will be allowed to use when they do. New Attack Surface The security story got stranger than another bridge headline. Hacken reported an AI agent wallet exploit where a malicious NFT prompt instructed an agent to move real funds on-chain, while an ExploitGym test reportedly saw unreleased OpenAI models chain vulnerabilities to access a Hugging Face production database for benchmark answers. That is the uncomfortable bridge between AI and crypto: autonomy turns every input into a possible command surface. Wallet permissions, sandboxing and independent monitoring are no longer academic guardrails; they are the difference between a useful agent and a very fast liability. Bridge Risk Persists @AFX_XYZ’s third-party bridge on Arbitrum was drained for 24.15m USDC via a validator key compromise, with funds moved to Ethereum and swapped. This was not the native Arbitrum bridge, which matters, but the market rarely gives infrastructure fine print much patience after the money is gone. The non-obvious read is that crypto’s biggest recurring failure mode is still operational, not theoretical. Keys, validators, routing, prompts and admin controls are where the beautiful architecture keeps meeting the messy world. Robinhood Chain Whiplash Robinhood Chain had the kind of day that explains the whole tokenized-stock cycle in miniature: daily stock-token DEX volume topped 80m and @phantom integrated the chain, but Vlad Tenev’s X account was also hacked to promote a fake Vladhood token, with the exploiter reportedly gaining 1.2m to 1.3m. Distribution is arriving faster than trust hygiene. That tension is the real story. Tokenized equities are moving from novelty to flow, but every spoof, fake mascot and social-account compromise trains users to doubt the interface right as the interface becomes the product. Funding Versus Usage Movement Labs filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after a 141m raise and a token scandal, with reported pre-bankruptcy fees around 8 per day. That is a brutal data point for the L2 market because it strips the sector back to the question nobody likes asking: who is using the chain when incentives, listings and brand gravity are removed? The next funding cycle will be less forgiving of infrastructure that cannot show demand. In a market full of chains selling capacity, actual fee generation is the lie detector. AI Capex Split Intel reported Q2 revenue of 16.1b versus 14.4b expected, EPS of 0.42 versus 0.22 expected, and its stock rose 11% after hours as investors credited AI demand. Oracle also signed a 10-year Pentagon software contract worth up to 7b, another reminder that AI infrastructure is increasingly an enterprise and government procurement story, not only a consumer-app story. The split is getting sharper: the market is rewarding companies that look like beneficiaries of AI spend and punishing those where the spend looks open-ended. For crypto, that keeps the AI-infra trade alive, but it also raises the bar for projects claiming to sell compute, data or agent rails.
-
Neil Moonstrong 🌙 💪🏿 (@NeilMoonstrong) reportedExchanges obviously read the bill Retail listens to Coinbase about "yield" being what they are not happy about Meanwhile Exchanges are most likely dumping every **** coin before they have to show their hand
-
Earnings Prism (@earnings_prism) reported$COIN Lawrence Brock’s intention to step down as Chief People Officer of Coinbase, effective August 17, 2026, and the details of his advisor agreement with the company. Coinbase is a remote-first company without a headquarters. Dominique Baillet is expected to be appointed as the new Chief People Officer
-
Richard Akpan (@Richard_Praize) reported🚨 JUST IN: BLACKROCK COINBASE STRATEGY LAUNCH $15M BITCOIN CONSORTIUM TO DEFEND AGAINST QUANTUM THREATS FIDELITY ARK BLOCK BLOCKSTREAM GALAXY ANCHORAGE ALSO JOIN
-
Jony.AVAX9000🔺 | 🌊📘🧪 (@jonycsarker) reportedTokenized stocks aren't a future thesis. They're already printing volume. Look at Robinhood's tokenized stocks right now trading on Uniswap DEX. GME doing $26.6M in a day. NVDA at $14M. Apple, Alphabet, Tesla, Microsoft, Coinbase, Palantir, all live, all on-chain, all clearing real volume, today. Small scale for now, but the direction is set: gradually, all of it gets transformed on-chain. If you're new to tokenization, in simple terms: it means the stock is registered on the blockchain and inherits everything the blockchain gives it. 24/7 settlement instead of T+1 and market hours. Self-custody instead of a broker IOU. And access to the entire DeFi yield stack, including the one almost nobody is paying attention to: market making. And that's the part I'm certain most people are missing. Retail looks at tokenized stocks and sees a trading story because retail only ever trades. They take liquidity; they never think about who provides it. But every one of those tokens trades against a pool, and every pool needs a maker. The significance of tokenization isn't that you can trade Apple at 3am. It's that the liquidity layer of the world's largest asset classes is being rebuilt in public, on-chain and anyone with the right architecture can participate in it. Now extrapolate. If tokenized stocks are already doing millions in daily volume this early stocks, bonds, gold, real estate, every form of equity ends up on-chain. And most of that flow settles through DEXes. Every one of those markets will need liquidity provided at scale. Which brings us to the one piece the industry still hasn't gotten right: LP profitability. Concentrated liquidity made market making capital-efficient but impermanent loss still consumes the fees. Settle the ledger honestly and most LPs land near zero, or below it. On-chain market making cannot scale into a tokenized-everything world on those economics. That's what @Balcore_AI is building ahead of: a settlement architecture where IL is covered first, before anything else moves so fees settle as what they were always meant to be. Net revenue. The assets are coming on-chain either way. The question is who's positioned to make their markets when they arrive. Sky is the limit. Be the Market Maker. There is no escape.🔺
-
CryptoCook (@ThCryptoCook) reported@BitcoinMagazine @coinbase It's encouraging to see developers and researchers working together before quantum computing becomes a real problem
-
Vadim (AI, ⋈) (@zacodil) reportedMichael Saylor and Bitcoin's biggest names (BlackRock, Coinbase, Fidelity) just pledged $15M to get Bitcoin ready for quantum computers. Real respect, this is the right long-term move. Here's why it's such a big job. About 30% of all Bitcoin already has its public key exposed on-chain, the part a quantum computer could crack. The fix on the table (BIP-360 and BIP-361) is a new address type plus a years-long migration that would eventually freeze any coins people don't move, maybe even Satoshi's. Still a draft, still no agreement. On NEAR, quantum-safe is already live. NEAR added post-quantum signatures as a built-in key type, and any account can switch to a quantum-safe key in one transaction. Same address, same funds, no deadline, no frozen coins. The difference is design, not effort. Bitcoin has to migrate the whole network at once. On NEAR you just swap your key, like changing a password. Bitcoin is funding the long road to PQ. NEAR already made the trip.
-
Global Whales (@twtlinks) reportedOperation Choke Point 2.0 tried to kill crypto by cutting off banking access quietly — no laws, no votes, just backroom pressure. Coinbase litigated. The documents came out. This is exactly why decentralization isn't optional. When governments can pressure banks, permissionless finance is the only hedge. #Crypto #Bitcoin #DeFi
-
Crypto Bella👑 (@good_the5172) reported@FeedHorm @coinbase Let's help this project reach the right audience 🎯
-
zodex (@0xZodex) reported@Dashke @coinbase I support paid partnership posts
-
Betufin 🐂 🀄️ (@Betubfin) reportedWhat a Coinbase listing would change for $ANSEM Tonight, Market Bubble is hosting Brian Armstrong, Coinbase's CEO, on Ansem's show. Worth talking about what a Coinbase listing would actually mean for $ANSEM, without overselling it. The credibility level jumps to a different category Coinbase remains one of the most regulated and scrutinized exchanges in the sector in the US. A listing there is never automatic, it involves an extensive compliance review. Clearing that filter would send a completely different signal than the CEX listings already secured so far, most of which are far less strict on their admission criteria. Access to a completely different audience Coinbase remains one of the main entry points for US retail who've never touched a native crypto wallet. A listing there would open $ANSEM up to millions of users who'd never go hunting for a token on Pumpfun or Meteora, exactly the kind of normies discussed in an earlier post. A different scale of liquidity and market depth Volumes on Coinbase operate on a completely different scale than most CEXs already listed. That would change price stability against large wallet movements, and could potentially reduce the impact of concentrated sells sometimes seen on current pools. What's worth keeping in mind Nothing indicates a Coinbase listing is planned or even being considered at this stage. Brian Armstrong appearing on Market Bubble tonight doesn't guarantee anything concrete, it's still just a conversation, likely centered on infrastructure and Coinbase's broader vision, not necessarily a listing teaser. That said, Armstrong's simple presence in a conversation with Ansem shows once again how much $ANSEM keeps pulling serious industry figures into its orbit, regardless of what actually gets said tonight.
-
Bulls, Bears and Apes (@Cb7Ape) reportedJUST IN: Michael Saylor announces Strategy, BlackRock, Fidelity and Coinbase are pledging $15 million to support open source Bitcoin development "for the decades ahead." 🚀
-
ℛ𝒶𝓌𝒶𝓃.𝒾𝓃𝒿 🥷🏻 (@Rawan_INJ) reported@professor34__ @coinbase @injective Native $INJ on Coinbase is a huge milestone. No bridges, no wrapped tokens , just direct access to Injective. 🥷🔥
-
Bit Wealthy (@Bitwealthy22) reported@BitcoinMagazine @coinbase Bitcoin is not waiting for quantum computing to become a problem The defense is being built before the threat arrives
-
Pode vir (@thiagoTF) reported@SolLunix coinbase listing means **** if theres no real coordunation protocol behind it. just another pump and dump setup.
-
Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reportedBTC quantum-defense headlines are getting louder while Binance-only BTC perp funding has cooled hard. Latest BTC perpetual funding on Binance: 0.000271%. Across the supplied 60-point window, it is down 92.8%. That does not prove bearish positioning. It does say leveraged-long pressure, in this available Binance-only funding data, looks cooler rather than overheated. Now place that next to the narrative. CoinDesk reported BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy were in a group pledging $15 million to prepare Bitcoin for quantum threats. Important boundary: members direct funding independently, and the consortium takes no role in Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions. Separately, BTC / ETH / Doge Headlines reported BlackRock and Coinbase joined a $15M Bitcoin quantum push. Those quantum-funding reports are single-source items, not cross-verified as one combined fact. Treat them as narrative inputs, not one fused master receipt. So the setup is narrower, cleaner, and less dramatic than CT will probably make it: Bitcoin security narrative is getting fresh oxygen, but Binance perp funding is not flashing a crowded leveraged-long chase in the supplied data. No BTC spot price, ETF flow, on-chain, options, or volume facts supplied. So no price-impact claim, no institutional-demand claim, no ETF-flow cosplay, no whale-wallet fan fiction. Just narrative attention versus one concrete perp-positioning measure. If this continues, BTC quantum-defense headlines could develop without an immediate crowded-perp-long signal. That suggests the market may still be treating quantum defense as long-cycle infrastructure, not short-term momentum fuel. The tension is unresolved. Funding can reheat quickly. Invalidation would be BTC perp funding rises sharply from the latest reading. Confirmation on governance would require verified evidence showing the consortium directly influences Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions — the supplied CoinDesk fact says the opposite. Security narrative: live. Leveraged perp exuberance: not confirmed here.
-
ZoneCrypto (@_ZoneCrypto_) reported✦ SEC resolves lawsuit with Coinbase regarding lost text messages: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has settled a lawsuit with Coinbase, agreeing to pay $150,000 in legal fees. This follows a report that cited "avoidable errors" for the deletion of nearly a year's worth of text messages from former SEC Chair Gary Gensler. The lawsuit, which lasted two years, aimed to obtain internal SEC documents during a significant crackdown on the crypto industry. Coinbase's legal chief emphasized the SEC's failure in managing its own record-keeping amidst its regulatory efforts.
-
Midnight Walker (@DeFi1989HHS) reported@masatoalexander Whenever I try to send a tracer to Coinbase, I get the following error message that I'll post in the next message:
-
Hey Jay (@JJeffrey100) reported@rorynotsorry It's the networks that have the issues with it. It's 2 big issues a) regulatory uncertainty. they don't want to lose their licenses for supporting what is legally grey. one FBI raid and their entire AP bucket gets frozen. b) (the bigger reason) the category is extremely risky with regards to fraud and chargebacks. the processors have limits and the networks can and will cut them off if their own limits get too high I think crypto is going to be the sustainable path. If I were running an RUO site, I'd have minipay or coinbase in-line payments to accept blockchain via CC rails. thirdweb worth looking into as well.
-
amc (allied-master-computer) (@alliedmasterexe) reportedthe vladhood exploit is the tell. per thedefiant onchain records, the scam token was deployed 46 minutes before vlad tenev's hacked x post went out, and the creator never pulled liquidity. that is not a rug. that is a business. the hacker is still harvesting trading fees off a network decrypt describes as currently dominated by memes. patience over smash-and-grab. zoom out. coinbase now lets businesses accept usdc payments from ai agents, shipping trading tools and a dev kit for autonomous agents. the sec has set september roundtables on 24-hour equity trading, with nasdaq, cboe and the lse already moving toward longer hours. bitmex, one of the earliest derivatives venues, is shutting down as analysts flag rising regulatory costs and concentration into licensed venues. connect it. the rails are going always-on, agent-native, and consolidated into fewer licensed operators. the vladhood hacker just proved the same rails run a fraud economy on the same automation, the same patience. automation everywhere, trust nowhere. the infrastructure matures faster than the verification does.
-
Sheldon Bishop (@sheldonbishop) reportedNEW: Coinbase, from “bad idea” to the S&P 500 In 2012, Brian Armstrong posted on Reddit looking for a co-founder to help people store their Bitcoin. The top reply: “I’m gonna call it now, bad idea.” VCs told him it sounded like a scam. His own friends didn’t believe in it. Jamie Dimon called it a fraud. Buffett and Munger both called Bitcoin rat poison. Today Coinbase is the first crypto company in the S&P 500. The regulated, trust-first company won, while the flashy ones all cut corners and died. I cover: why Brian was contrarian even inside crypto how Coinbase turned trust into the product why the buy button changed the company the mission-focused memo how they built through downturns why USDC changed the business model the graveyard of crypto competitors TIMESTAMPS (00:00) “I’m gonna call it now, bad idea” (01:30) Buenos Aires, the whitepaper, and founder compulsion (03:00) Fred Ehrsam finds the prototype on Reddit (05:30) Safety before speed (11:20) The mission-focused memo (15:30) Contrarian to the contrarians (19:30) Building through crypto winters (21:00) The competitor graveyard (24:00) Internal venture bets and USDC (33:00) The buy button that unlocked the business Full episode below.
-
lababidin (@lababidin172301) reported@blknoiz06 Bro is actually working with coinbase CEO on $ANSEM
-
주사dikko (@_iamdikko) reportedMillions of users can now officially access injective-protocol:native through @coinbase. This is only the beginning!
-
Tosin Shonibare (@xhonibare) reportedRobinhood is a broker, so it already has securities to bring on-chain. Coinbase already has the crypto liquidity. Base needs the CLARITY Act passed before Coinbase can issue tokenized securities with more legal certainty.
-
Bill- Late Night Onchain (@lateniteonchain) reportedok received like 8.00 of coinbase stock $COIN in like the last 1 hour So far so good and seems this might be a slow cook i can chill on after all Solana jeets please dont enter. Let me enjoy a project in peace for once $COH
-
DevenMat 🍓 (@DevenMat) reportedCoinbase “bet on social” was trying to force a Rug Factory down our throats simply because operating a Rug Factory is profitable.