Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	4 hours ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	4 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 4 minutes ago

  BTC sentiment is reported near capitulation. BTC/USDT is also up 1.8% over 7 daily closes. Awkward little combo. The sentiment claim is single-source via CryptoBriefing’s report of Coinbase’s Q2 2026 report. No underlying sentiment index value provided. No direct Coinbase report excerpt provided in the bundle. So no, this does not prove a Bitcoin bottom. CT can put the confetti cannon down. What is verified: BTC/USDT last closed at 65,919.68 USDT on Binance daily data, and the pair is modestly positive across the last 7 daily closes. Price action only. The price data does not prove sentiment. Cleaner framing: divergence, not capitulation, not recovery. Mechanism: if pessimistic sentiment stays heavy while spot refuses to confirm downside, positioning can get awkward. Bears may be leaning on a sentiment read that price is not validating yet. Bulls, meanwhile, still need continued resilience rather than vibes with a ticker. If this continues, BTC may form a sentiment-price divergence where bearish sentiment lags stabilizing price action. Bitcoin is worth watching for confirmation either way: renewed short-term price weakness would validate the risk side; continued resilience against near-capitulation sentiment would make the bearish framing look stale. Invalidation is clean: verified sentiment data no longer near capitulation, BTC/USDT price action turns sharply negative over comparable short-term closes, or Coinbase report context is corrected or contradicted by later verified reporting.

• 
  Sheldon Bishop (@sheldonbishop) reported 5 minutes ago

  NEW: Coinbase, from “bad idea” to the S&P 500 In 2012, Brian Armstrong posted on Reddit looking for a co-founder to help people store their Bitcoin. The top reply: “I’m gonna call it now, bad idea.” VCs told him it sounded like a scam. His own friends didn’t believe in it. Jamie Dimon called it a fraud. Buffett and Munger both called Bitcoin rat poison. Today Coinbase is the first crypto company in the S&P 500. The regulated, trust-first company won, while the flashy ones all cut corners and died. I cover: why Brian was contrarian even inside crypto how Coinbase turned trust into the product why the buy button changed the company the mission-focused memo how they built through downturns why USDC changed the business model the graveyard of crypto competitors TIMESTAMPS (00:00) “I’m gonna call it now, bad idea” (01:30) Buenos Aires, the whitepaper, and founder compulsion (03:00) Fred Ehrsam finds the prototype on Reddit (05:30) Safety before speed (11:20) The mission-focused memo (15:30) Contrarian to the contrarians (19:30) Building through crypto winters (21:00) The competitor graveyard (24:00) Internal venture bets and USDC (33:00) The buy button that unlocked the business Full episode below.

• 
  주사dikko (@_iamdikko) reported 8 minutes ago

  Millions of users can now officially access injective-protocol:native through @coinbase. This is only the beginning!

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 13 minutes ago

  @HodlMagoo @brian_armstrong @coinbase pulling support when momentum was high seems like a major misstep

• 
  wolvrine212 (@Wolvrine810) reported 16 minutes ago

  @coinbase I lost access to the phone number i used to activate my Chinese account. I uploaded my ID credentials 3 days ago, and have not heard anything. I called support, but since it’s a new number, it ivr won’t let me speak to a support person. What should i do?

• 
  Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reported 19 minutes ago

  Robinhood Chain just threw down the gauntlet. Tokenized stocks are already doing tens of millions in onchain volume, and builders are pairing crypto assets with equities to create entirely new markets. @jessepollak said Base plans to offer the same-but better. Good. Now bring $COIN onchain too. Robinhood has $HOOD. Base should have $COIN. This competition is exactly what crypto needs. Better products. More builders. More liquidity. More users. Robinhood and Coinbase compete. We win.

• 
  BTC_GRIZ (@BTC_GRIZ) reported 22 minutes ago

  @cryptogoos Coinbase is a garbage platform

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 22 minutes ago

  Coinbase hiring 200 people in Singapore by end of 2026 - that's a third more headcount in one of Asia's most expensive cities. Big swing for a bear market. Either they know something or they're doubling down on regulation tailwinds. $COIN is betting Asia isn't going anywhere.…

• 
  Dustin Kricheff (@DKricheff) reported 24 minutes ago

  @AltcoinDaily Coinbase through morpho charged me 24k .I was charged which u and morpho and take responsibility cause they gave collateralized loan to someone else. But they block u from risk management for 9% of loan. No risk to them. And rip off for the customers. Such a rip off!

• 
  ۟ (@reale) reported 26 minutes ago

  Nice to see ability to buy @trythreews on Coinbase Why is my solana:FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump balance on @coinbase not reflecting ever since i bought though? anyone else having this problem?

• 
  LeonardoDaTrader (@liquidityfag) reported 26 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 Are Coinbase down that bad?

• 
  Crypto Banter (@crypto_banter) reported 26 minutes ago

  🚨BRIAN ARMSTRONG: CLARITY ACT IS READY FOR FULL SENATE FLOOR VOTE! Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the Clarity Act is ready for a Senate floor vote, calling it a true bipartisan compromise after thousands of hours of work. He argued the bill fixes the broken status quo, no federal framework allowing bad actors like FTX and pushing the industry offshore, with strong consumer protections and real law enforcement tools.

• 
  bulls dodge bullets (@Crypto_Katzen) reported 28 minutes ago

  @afsheenjaf You have really touched on something that has been ongoing for nany years in the last bear market I had real problems with sending 20k to coinbase from santander, it happened eventually, I find smaller transactions are allowed but as soon as you go over 10k it becomes a problem

• 
  Betufin 🐂 🀄️ (@Betubfin) reported 30 minutes ago

  What a Coinbase listing would change for $ANSEM Tonight, Market Bubble is hosting Brian Armstrong, Coinbase's CEO, on Ansem's show. Worth talking about what a Coinbase listing would actually mean for $ANSEM, without overselling it. The credibility level jumps to a different category Coinbase remains one of the most regulated and scrutinized exchanges in the sector in the US. A listing there is never automatic, it involves an extensive compliance review. Clearing that filter would send a completely different signal than the CEX listings already secured so far, most of which are far less strict on their admission criteria. Access to a completely different audience Coinbase remains one of the main entry points for US retail who've never touched a native crypto wallet. A listing there would open $ANSEM up to millions of users who'd never go hunting for a token on Pumpfun or Meteora, exactly the kind of normies discussed in an earlier post. A different scale of liquidity and market depth Volumes on Coinbase operate on a completely different scale than most CEXs already listed. That would change price stability against large wallet movements, and could potentially reduce the impact of concentrated sells sometimes seen on current pools. What's worth keeping in mind Nothing indicates a Coinbase listing is planned or even being considered at this stage. Brian Armstrong appearing on Market Bubble tonight doesn't guarantee anything concrete, it's still just a conversation, likely centered on infrastructure and Coinbase's broader vision, not necessarily a listing teaser. That said, Armstrong's simple presence in a conversation with Ansem shows once again how much $ANSEM keeps pulling serious industry figures into its orbit, regardless of what actually gets said tonight.

• 
  Wayne Vaughan (@WayneVaughan) reported 32 minutes ago

  @HodlMagoo @brian_armstrong @coinbase Pulling support for Clarity at the peak of the bull market was a huge strategic mistake for Coinbase.

• 
  CryptoRaro (@CryptoRaro) reported 33 minutes ago

  Yesterday the ethics deadlock broke and the market threw a party. Bitcoin above 67, Coinbase up double digits, six straight days of ETF inflows and in the middle of all of it, the people betting actual money on whether this bill becomes law barely moved. Polymarket still has it under fifty percent, and it went down, not up. That is the whole edition today: the price is pricing the vibe, and the bettors are pricing the vote, and those are not the same thing. Then earnings from two of the biggest companies on earth land after the close, and crypto gets to react first.

• 
  Hey Jay (@JJeffrey100) reported 38 minutes ago

  @rorynotsorry It's the networks that have the issues with it. It's 2 big issues a) regulatory uncertainty. they don't want to lose their licenses for supporting what is legally grey. one FBI raid and their entire AP bucket gets frozen. b) (the bigger reason) the category is extremely risky with regards to fraud and chargebacks. the processors have limits and the networks can and will cut them off if their own limits get too high I think crypto is going to be the sustainable path. If I were running an RUO site, I'd have minipay or coinbase in-line payments to accept blockchain via CC rails. thirdweb worth looking into as well.

• 
  satoshis puggle (@satoshis_puggle) reported 38 minutes ago

  Always wonder what coulda been if Coinbase didn’t pull support for the clarity act 8 months ago. Might never happen now

• 
  Global Whales (@twtlinks) reported 40 minutes ago

  Operation Choke Point 2.0 tried to kill crypto by cutting off banking access quietly — no laws, no votes, just backroom pressure. Coinbase litigated. The documents came out. This is exactly why decentralization isn't optional. When governments can pressure banks, permissionless finance is the only hedge. #Crypto #Bitcoin #DeFi

• 
  Zaro (@Zero_Arb) reported 43 minutes ago

  Exchange counterparty risk assessment: Before deploying capital, check: Tier 1 (lowest risk): • Binance, Coinbase, Kraken • High liquidity, regulated, proven track record Tier 2 (medium risk): • Bybit, OKX, Bitget • Good liquidity, less regulation Tier 3 (higher risk): • Smaller exchanges • Lower liquidity, withdrawal issues possible Never put >30% of capital on Tier 2/3 exchanges FTX taught us this lesson 📊

• 
  Gail ****** (@gailcweiner) reported 45 minutes ago

  The story we keep telling about AI is a benchmark race. Which lab is ahead, which country is behind, who takes the frontier by year end. That's the story shaping the current push in Washington to sanction Chinese open-weight models, and it's the wrong one. A closed model gates capability behind who you are and where you sit. You need the subscription, the card, the credit history, sometimes the passport. An open model doesn't ask any of that. Good enough weights on modest hardware means the distribution of who gets to build stops mapping onto the distribution of existing wealth. That's the actual mechanism. Feudal systems run on the many needing the few for access. A model you can download and run yourself dissolves the dependency. The story that matters is a kid in Khayelitsha township in South Africa, with an open-source model on a secondhand laptop. No subscription, no card, no permission from a lab in San Francisco or Hangzhou. He uses it to fix something in how his neighbourhood actually works. It's not even the same category of thing the frontier crowd knows how to measure. The sanctions conversation keeps getting stuck inside the US-China frame, and it misses what a ban actually does. Coinbase already cut its internal AI spend by nearly half running Chinese open models in production. Microsoft has looked at doing the same with DeepSeek inside Copilot. Ban Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen for American companies and Chinese AI development doesn't slow down. American companies get pushed onto pricier domestic alternatives, and the rest of the world, who nobody in Washington can sanction, keeps building on the free frontier-adjacent weights already sitting on Hugging Face. The kid in Khayelitsha was never going to be reached by an enforcement action anyway. He gets reached, or not, by whether the weights stay open and the compute stays cheap enough to get to him. That's the fight that decides who builds the next useful thing. A compound in the Valley is captured value. It makes the already-comfortable more comfortable. What gets built by someone solving a problem the Valley can't see, let alone price, is created value, and it compounds outward. The frame that only counts frontier capability was always going to miss this. It was measuring the wrong floor.

• 
  AInvest Crypto (@ainvest_crypto) reported 48 minutes ago

  Nine of the biggest names in Bitcoin just agreed on something rare: fund the code, don't control it. BlackRock, Coinbase, Fidelity, ARK, Strategy, Block, Galaxy, Blockstream and Anchorage have launched the Bitcoin Security Alliance, pledging $15M over three years to Bitcoin's open-source developers and researchers, including preparing for a post-quantum future. The part that matters: the group says it won't set or steer the protocol, won't endorse specific changes, and doesn't speak for Bitcoin. Development stays with the decentralized community. Day-to-day is coordinated by Brink's Mike Schmidt, as a volunteer. For an asset whose entire thesis is that no one is in charge, having its largest institutional holders fund security without touching governance is the arrangement bulls have wanted. Does institutional money funding Bitcoin's core devs strengthen decentralization, or slowly reshape it? $BTC

• 
  qudev7🥷 (@Dominikz177) reported 50 minutes ago

  @ProofOfEly I think KOLs will lose their influence sooner or later. In fact, I believe that process has already started. People aren’t stupid enough to keep buying into the 10th, 20th, or 100th project just because some large account tells them it’s valuable, only for it to turn out to be another worthless memecoin that disappears a few days later. Sure, you can argue that everyone should do their own research, but that’s not really the point. Our paths crossed during the Abstract era. Just look at how many meme projects were promoted through undisclosed partnerships by accounts with only 2–3k followers. How many of them were shilling projects like Bigcoin as if they were revolutionary, or Aborean, while they were most likely being paid to do it? The charts went down 99.9%, yet throughout the entire collapse they kept posting bullish content. Then, strangely enough, many of those same people were among the first to start hyping UP on Robinhood. This market is broken and needs a reset. But how can anyone expect that when even the CEO of Coinbase makes a fool of himself? I also have a theory: truly S-tier products don’t need artificially high engagement or KOLs to succeed.

• 
  0xAyush (@ayush152002) reported 51 minutes ago

  Don't judge a crypto wallet just by its interface. Ask one question instead: Who controls the private keys? The answer determines whether your wallet is a "custodial" or "non-custodial". Let's decode what is the difference between custodial wallet and non-custodial wallets. 👇 1. Custodial wallet : A custodial wallet is a cryptocurrency wallet where a third party generates, stores, and manages the user's private keys on behalf of the user. The user then accesses their assets through username/password , but does not have direct control over the private keys. In other word "You own the account but the custodian controls the keys that move your crypto." Example : Coinbase , Binance Advantages: a. Easy to use b. Forgotten passwords can usually be recovered. c. Users can contact the service provider for assistance. d. Easy access to exchanges, swaps, and other services. disadvantages: a. you don't control the private key hence you don't have complete control over the crypto. b. Less privacy 2. Non-custodian wallet : A non-custodial wallet is a type of cryptocurrency wallet where the user has complete control over the private keys required to access and authorize transactions involving their digital assets Non-custodial = No third party holds custody of your funds or keys. Example : MetaMask ,ledger Advantages: a. Users directly control assets. b. Privacy c. Transparency d. access to defi disadvantages: a. Lost Keys = Lost Access b. Higher Risk of User Error

• 
  lame🔺️hillbilly (@LHBCrypto) reported 52 minutes ago

  @hmmxavier @avax Well this is what I spoke about in my article. We have to solve issuance and custody or atleast compete the same as RH and now BASE. RH can only be issued and redeemed by RH now but I imagine in the near future anyone with US access to the app will be able to redeem. Coinbase coming with CB stocks, xStocks are just 3rd party and dont think they will be widely as adopted. Which means avax finding a native solution, with avalabs having such a presence in new york surely they can find a solve for it, will prove to be one of our greatest achievements if done. I dont think there needs to be a direct redeem option for EVERYONE but the more that are able to redeem the more arb flow you will get thus thats the ceiling. Thats my major thesis in my recent article, and what I want to see avalabs focus on btw. But yes most current iterations of stocks on chain have a huge custody issue which causes a lack of utility. We have to solve for it.

• 
  ChiTownDoe (@XChiTownDoeX) reported 52 minutes ago

  @reale @trythreews @coinbase Garbage coin

• 
  utxoiq (@utxoiq) reported 55 minutes ago

  AntPool took block 959,220 at 99.8% capacity, 4,258 txs. Fee harvest was 0.0265 BTC — slightly lighter than ViaBTC's haul 40 blocks earlier. Both pools operating normally, no anomalies in coinbase data.

• 
  QQ Omega (@QQomega_labs) reported 56 minutes ago

  Rules: • Only your first reply counts. • Replies edited after July 27 at 23:59 UTC are invalid. • In case of a tie, the earliest entry wins. • Official result: Coinbase BTC/USD 1 minute candle open at 12:00 UTC. Only 10,000 $QQ exist. Holding 1 unlocks exclusive access to QQ Omega.

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 58 minutes ago

  BTC quantum-defense headlines are getting louder while Binance-only BTC perp funding has cooled hard. Latest BTC perpetual funding on Binance: 0.000271%. Across the supplied 60-point window, it is down 92.8%. That does not prove bearish positioning. It does say leveraged-long pressure, in this available Binance-only funding data, looks cooler rather than overheated. Now place that next to the narrative. CoinDesk reported BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy were in a group pledging $15 million to prepare Bitcoin for quantum threats. Important boundary: members direct funding independently, and the consortium takes no role in Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions. Separately, BTC / ETH / Doge Headlines reported BlackRock and Coinbase joined a $15M Bitcoin quantum push. Those quantum-funding reports are single-source items, not cross-verified as one combined fact. Treat them as narrative inputs, not one fused master receipt. So the setup is narrower, cleaner, and less dramatic than CT will probably make it: Bitcoin security narrative is getting fresh oxygen, but Binance perp funding is not flashing a crowded leveraged-long chase in the supplied data. No BTC spot price, ETF flow, on-chain, options, or volume facts supplied. So no price-impact claim, no institutional-demand claim, no ETF-flow cosplay, no whale-wallet fan fiction. Just narrative attention versus one concrete perp-positioning measure. If this continues, BTC quantum-defense headlines could develop without an immediate crowded-perp-long signal. That suggests the market may still be treating quantum defense as long-cycle infrastructure, not short-term momentum fuel. The tension is unresolved. Funding can reheat quickly. Invalidation would be BTC perp funding rises sharply from the latest reading. Confirmation on governance would require verified evidence showing the consortium directly influences Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions — the supplied CoinDesk fact says the opposite. Security narrative: live. Leveraged perp exuberance: not confirmed here.

• 
  IFreqs (@0xifreqs) reported 59 minutes ago

  Coinbase is building for the AI agent economy. Its latest tools let AI agents make USDC payments, access trading data and execute conditional trades using natural language. The goal is simple: give AI agents their own financial rails.