Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	16 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	19 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 4 minutes ago

  @PrivateFighterr @coinbase I came across your post about Coinbase taking your funds with no resolution. I've reconstructed ledger-level transaction paths in exchange disputes that broke through the support wall entirely. I can do the same for yours. Let me know if you want me to take a look.

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Waylon3601 @KingOffX_ I read about your $25K lost through Coinbase and Ledger, both insider jobs, not user error. I've traced exchange leaks and hardware wallet breaches where the on-chain trail led further than anyone expected. I can surface where yours went. Let me know if you want me to take a look

• 
  travis (@travis305182) reported 12 minutes ago

  @SummerMersinger @CynthiaMLummis @SenLummis Clarity is dead its midterm season baby. Nobody will care in september that **** died when coinbase ordered status quo. Dont need it the sec is gonna let us run now. FAILING CONGRESS!

• 
  Luis Enrique ₿ ⚡️ (@Luisenriquepl) reported 15 minutes ago

  Six cryptographers convened by Coinbase reached a straightforward conclusion: a quantum computer capable of breaking blockchains "will eventually be built." It's not imminent, but the migration will take years, and there's a fundamental technical problem that almost no one mentions.

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 17 minutes ago

  There has been a discussion for last few years on how AI agents would transact on-chain, with crypto wallets and rails. Cloudflare has been quietly building this stack.They already sit between users and a large volume of the web traffic that has nothing to do with a crypto token. This week they announced: Account Wallets and Virtual Wallets, with spend limits you can set per merchant, per allowance, and per transaction. Funding and payments are coming soon. Back on 1st July it opened a waitlist for a Monetization Gateway, where it says charges settle in stablecoins over the x402 protocol. x402 is multi-chain and stablecoin-agnostic, so the chain is just handling settlement underneath. What Cloudflare is actually selling is metered access and programmable spend controls, sitting on the infrastructure agents already route through. The stablecoin is the cash register. The traffic and the wallet are the store , and we know the store economics My read: the agent-payment rail built by whoever already owns the traffic and the wallet or the store The chain underneath is a settlement detail. @Cloudflare @CoinbaseDev @coinbase #AgenticPayments #x402

• 
  Chris (@SalvatoChris) reported 19 minutes ago

  @duncan Yes this happened to me at Coinbase … killed my access 3 days early

• 
  Donald S Pritt Jr (@PrittJr) reported 19 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @LeaderJohnThune Terrible post . Coinbase also force sells your crypto without the owners consent

• 
  jasperthefriendlyghost.eth (@drjasper_eth) reported 21 minutes ago

  @devanshmehta I strongly disagree with these arguments. LST share is falling to the lowest level in several years. They were the first to market so they had an early lead - little evidence exists to suggest that they will displace ETH. Further, there seems to be an implicit assumption that you don’t want ETH to be issued in perpetuity. Why? Low consistent issuance is *good* and prevents economic stagnation. Balanced economics > deflationary/inflationary. Additionally, this proposal doesn’t prevent ETH from being displaced! What about arbitrum ETH? Base ETH? There are many many types of intermediation - why are LSTs special? 1. This is not inherently true. If the whole network was run by an enshrined LST the credible neutrality would be assured. The counter point to the proposal is that the proposal causes all ETH that is staked to be staked by coinbase/tom Lee. 2. Liquidity fragmentation is an issue that impacts L2s more than ETH<>staked ETH. It’s very easy to go from steth/reth to ETH in a trustless fashion. Can you say the same for most L2s? The biggest moat for ETH is total L1 liquidity, not liquidity of ETH itself. Think about USD vs treasuries - no one says that the trading of treasuries doesn’t count for USD movement. M2/cGDP. This is what matters.

• 
  Richardson Dackam (@RichardsonDx) reported 22 minutes ago

  Money becomes useless to an autonomous agent when it gets trapped in the wrong financial system An agent might: earn $500 through a checkout provider hold $200 in USDC have a card issued by another provider need to pay a SaaS merchant that only accepts cards Those are all "money" but operationally they are different islands Customer pays → money sits in Provider A Agent needs to spend → purchasing power exists in Provider B So WE (Humans) have to move/reconfigure/fund things for our AI agents An their autonomy breaks... The hard problem isn't giving an agent money It's making sure money earned in one system can become purchasing power in another without a human moving it Earn here → hold there → spend somewhere else → keep going An agent should be able to earn through one provider, hold value somewhere else, move that value when needed, spend through another rail, and keep reinvesting what it earns without a human stepping in to bridge the gaps My goal with Mandate is to give autonomous AI agents economic freedom I want anyone to be able to deploy intelligence that can create value, earn from that value, reinvest what it earns, and compound it into something bigger over time That's why Mandate had to be open source and provider agnostic No single financial provider covers every way an agent might earn, hold, move, or spend money One agent might receive revenue through Stripe, hold USDC in Coinbase, spend through Lithic, and use a bridge in between. Another might use entirely different providers Receive: Stripe / PayPal / stablecoins / marketplace payouts Hold: bank / financial account / wallet / stablecoin treasury Move: ACH / wire / bridge / onchain transfer Spend: card / bank transfer / stablecoin / x402 Mandate financial stack is composable: providers supply capabilities, Mandate connects them, and the agent sees one economic system You can connects whichever providers you choose into one continuous economic account Because autonomous agents won't operate in a crypto-only or fiat-only world. Crypto alone can't solve economic autonomy when most of the world an agent needs to operate in still runs on fiat, cards, and banks Fiat alone can't solve it either, because agents will increasingly use payment systems built for machine-to-machine commerce. The future is hybrid. The infrastructure has to be composable. I built Mandate so that an agent can operate across both as one continuous economy

• 
  DxM (@diopter_ring) reported 22 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong so the distinction is who gets access to banking rails? does that mean agents can hold and move funds autonomously on Coinbase now?

• 
  MBA_Bitcoiner (@MBA_Bitcoiner) reported 23 minutes ago

  @MiKeThEwReNcH8 @BitcoinVeterans Average person who doesn’t want to go deep down this rabbit hole is okay with starting out at Coinbase or Fidelity. If they want to move further, then great, if not, then that’s fine too imo.

• 
  MedusaMarkets (@MedusaMarkets) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BitmundFreud BIP 110 represents a digital resistance by individual node operators proving they can successfully block corporate capture. MicroStrategy operates as a Wall Street-subordinated arbitrage vehicle designed to centralize as much Bitcoin as possible in institutional custody (such as Coinbase). If decentralized node operators successfully assert rule-enforcement power via BIP 110, it disrupts their power to tokenize, and control the asset.

• 
  OneFactor (@onefactormeme) reported 27 minutes ago

  @ashrobin the problem is that these big cos (like coinbase) have legal teams telling them they can't do 4, 5 and 6.

• 
  AA ⚡️ (@AAStack) reported 28 minutes ago

  BIP-110 mandatory signaling starts at block 961,632 (~Aug 8–9). Here’s what actually happens to your coins. First: what this is. Nodes running BIP-110 will start rejecting blocks that don’t signal support. Miner signaling is ~2.6%. The other ~97% keeps mining as normal. So enforcing nodes follow a slower minority chain while the main chain continues untouched. If you hold in self-custody: Nothing happens to your coins. Your keys still control the same UTXOs on every chain that exists. Coins created before activation are permanently exempt from the new rules. You don’t need to do anything. If you hold on an exchange (Coinbase, Kraken, River, Strike, etc.): You hold an IOU, not coins. That’s true today and it’s true during a fork. Expect exchanges to pause deposits and withdrawals around the window that’s them being careful, not a sign of trouble. If a minority chain persists, each custodian decides independently whether to credit or support it. Most won’t. If there IS a split: You keep your coins on both chains automatically. You lose nothing. Transactions confirmed during the split are only as final as the chain they land on, which is exactly why you don’t transact during the window. If there ISN’T a split (most likely): Nothing. Blocks keep coming every ~10 min. You never notice. WHAT TO DO: → Move coins to self-custody if you feel comfortable doing so, before the window or after. Not during. → Verify your seed backup works → Then sit still WHAT NOT TO DO: → Don’t transact during the window if you can avoid it. Wait 48–72h after activation, then use deep confirmations. → Don’t use any “fork claim” tool. Ever. → Don’t enter your seed phrase anywhere. Fork events are scammer season, phishing is the only real threat to your bitcoin in all of this. Good Luck 👍🏻 🍀

• 
  nothing (@hyperNothing_) reported 30 minutes ago

  @coinbase only if you fix your support

• 
  Dom Bei (@Beiwatch) reported 32 minutes ago

  Question: If Coinbase let you gamble on a prediction market that the Clarity Act would pass before August Recess... and then tanked any chance of it by withdrawing support in January, in attempt to strongarm Congress and flex on the banking sector.... Is that inside trading? Maybe a refund is in order?

• 
  Magoo PhD (@HodlMagoo) reported 40 minutes ago

  Ultimately @brian_armstrong and @coinbase thought they held all the cards when they pulled support for the Clarity Act earlier this year over stablecoin reward language. Now they are trying to desperately ram it through before a highly contested Midterm election with literal days left on the schedule. Massive miscalculation.

• 
  exarep🆙🇺🇸 (@deanna37373737) reported 40 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong **** you and Coinbase! You started this. I say everyone switch exchanges to someone other than Coinbase.

• 
  Nick (@hasty_nick) reported 41 minutes ago

  @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport Awful customer service. Unhelpful AI chatbot. You treated me as a scammer when I was just trying to buy SOL and transfer it to an external wallet. You wasted hours of my time today on a verification process that did not work. I will NEVER recommend CB.

• 
  Sachin Singh (@insachins) reported 41 minutes ago

  For three years, the AI story was capability: whichever model topped the next benchmark won. Entire businesses got built on one quiet assumption underneath that story, that AI compute would stay expensive. That assumption is now collapsing. GPT-4-level intelligence cost roughly $30 per million tokens in 2023. By early 2025, that was under $1.50. Today, equivalent capability runs for fractions of a cent. Epoch AI clocks inference costs falling at a median 50x per year, accelerating to 200x per year since January 2024. Gartner now projects inference costs for a 1-trillion-parameter model will fall over 90% by 2030 versus 2025 levels. Open-weight models made the gap irrelevant faster than expected. They held just 11% of enterprise token volume a year ago; now they’re at 38% and climbing, and by mid-2026 route roughly half of all production inference tokens. The migrations are real: Cursor moved to Kimi K2.5, Coinbase to GLM-5.2, Shopify and Airbnb to Qwen, even Microsoft is testing DeepSeek V4. That’s a problem for how AI companies get valued. OpenAI and Anthropic currently trade like Google-in-search or Meta-in-social, markets with real moats and winner-take-all economics. But there’s no meaningful switching cost between model providers, and enterprises already route work by price task-by-task. The businesses that survive this won’t be the ones with the smartest model. They’ll be the ones that built something a cheaper model can’t replace.

• 
  Sunday (@Fire_Godness) reported 42 minutes ago

  Tokenized US stocks are coming to Base via Coinbase, and the framing matters: Jesse isn't pitching a new feature, he's pitching market access. About 4 billion people globally have no broker at all, so the real bet is trillions in walled-off assets becoming composable onchain.

• 
  superfluid.eth (@Superfluid_HQ) reported 43 minutes ago

  @browser_use @USDC @coinbase love this but if the work becomes continuous, the settlement probably should too if you wanna go down that rabbit hole, we’re building x402 × continuous settlement 👀

• 
  BitmapCorp (@BitmapCorp) reported 44 minutes ago

  It Really Fair to Call a Bitmap a "Community Punk"? At BitmapCore, we believe that a label should represent an objective, reproducible, and verifiable on-chain property—not a visual interpretation produced by a rendering algorithm. As we explained previously, Bitmap images are not PNG, JPG, WebP, or any other conventional image format. They are generated programmatically by computer code that transforms the underlying blockchain data into a visual representation. Today, Bitfeed, Ordinals Wallet, and BitmapCore use a Mondrian bin-packing algorithm to render Bitmap images. This has already been publicly documented and discussed in previous posts. For that reason, we do not believe it makes sense to create labels such as Community Punk, because they classify a Bitmap solely because its rendered image happens to resemble a CryptoPunk. That appearance is not an intrinsic property of the Bitcoin block. It is simply the visual outcome of how the rendering algorithm arranged the block's transaction data. This leads to an important question. What if tomorrow that very same rendering algorithm were modified to draw animals, buildings, letters, faces, or any other predefined shape? Would it be fair to create new labels based solely on those visual appearances, knowing that the algorithm itself can be programmed to deliberately produce images matching whatever pattern its author decides? We believe the answer is no. A visual pattern intentionally produced by software does not become an inherent characteristic of the underlying asset simply because it is rendered that way. What gives a Bitmap value is its underlying blockchain data—not the artistic style chosen by a rendering algorithm. On the other hand, we do consider labels such as: • Grid Punk • Grid Perfect • Punk Perfect • 5 tx Punk Perfect • Punk Perfect 10 tx • Giga Punk Perfect • Wide Neck Punk • Standard Punk • Pristine Punk • Punk 2tx to be legitimate. The distinction is fundamental. These labels do not claim that a Bitmap "looks like" a Punk. Instead, they describe mathematical and structural properties of the Bitcoin block that anyone can independently verify directly from the blockchain. For example: • Every transaction in the block contains exactly the same BTC amount. • The block contains exactly two transactions with a specific ratio between the coinbase transaction and the second transaction. • The block contains exactly five or ten transactions following a precisely defined on-chain structure. These characteristics remain true regardless of how the Bitmap is rendered. They are derived directly from blockchain data—not from the rendering algorithm. This is the philosophy we follow at BitmapCore. If a characteristic exists only because of how an algorithm renders an image, and would disappear if that rendering algorithm were changed, then we do not consider it to be an intrinsic property of the Bitmap. However, if a characteristic can be derived directly from blockchain data and independently verified by anyone, then it represents a genuine property of the asset and deserves to be recognized as a label. We believe Bitmap labels should be built upon verifiable blockchain data, not subjective visual interpretations generated by software. That principle will continue to guide the development of BitmapCore. #bitmap #blockhain #bitcoin

• 
  The Red Guy (@exlaws24) reported 48 minutes ago

  @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport why wont you delist **** coin like $lrds?

• 
  fud4thawt (@fud4thawt) reported 50 minutes ago

  I used to hate the Coinbase integration in the service app I had to work on, I used this hatred and earned money by investing in it.

• 
  Eric 𐀏🔻 (@EricDemassieux) reported 50 minutes ago

  @TLAVagabond @JasonBassler1 The panopticon has many contractors. All down stream from the PATRIOT ACT. There are hundreds of vendors. Flock is just the Palantir of the moment. Look at federal contracts awarded from DHS budget. Ex: Coinbase is as culpable in breaking privacy as any of these firms.

• 
  OneFactor (@onefactormeme) reported 58 minutes ago

  @ashrobin notice how vlad says "we support the memes" but can't name an actual ticker? they added cashcat to their app -- that is a process that is allowed (like coinbase adding a bunch of trash) but they can't shill tickers directly

• 
  🟧Zak Fvckman (@ZakFvckman) reported 58 minutes ago

  @HamlinWeb3 @AiFiCorp @coinbase Stop doing the evil, brother. You may help the scammers...You know it is not true.

• 
  mmmatt (@mmmatt) reported 59 minutes ago

  once upon a time, i discovered a BingX rate limit bypass you could essentially send limit ladders to bingx via applications faster than sending normal market orders or limit orders via API so what did i do? I setup ladder twaps and dumped perps on $btc to 60k roughly 3y ago I was very paranoid when I was doing it, as I was unsure if I was causing it or not. The setup was this: I would send 1x tealstreet limit ladder beyond BBO for 1k orders or so These orders would land faster than even the fastest market twap would allow While selling limit skips, i would buy via market twap And just maintain the process I made 4k that night, and 3k the following day From like a $50 starting balance, i was sitting pretty around 6.5k BTC dumped to 60k the night i made 4 Recovered on usa sesh open the day after I lost majority of the money on the reversal, as I didn't flip in time, and I continued to try selling it down but yeah this was the fastest I had ever made $ from trading, and it was via actively cycling margin through the trade and impacting price heavily at the same time. Since then, i have applied similar concepts to my trading and manipulation on coinbase, especially the limit skipping but it just goes to show you good alpha is typically found on accident good times, hope you enjoyed the lil story

• 
  fabs (@flores_fabs) reported 59 minutes ago

  Michigan judge: Coinbase can’t block state crackdown on sports event contracts. Federal preemption claim failed.