Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	3 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Chris Navigato Sr. (@cnavigato) reported 6 minutes ago

  @TFTC21 Anyone else read this as @coinbase bent a knee and will get accepted into the sewer SWAMP government clan and can now move forward with the CBDC horse ****? Be prepared American, We The People are about to get rolled again by more government corruption.

• 
  0xPeter (@not0xpeter) reported 8 minutes ago

  this guy is actually insane coinbase has become a net negative in crypto brian claims that they doesnt list a lot of new tokens for "compliance and legal reasons" or some made up bullshit, and they do nothing else to support crypto as a whole except for base (which they created so they could max extract from defi users) yes they reinvest a very small percent of all the money ***** from retail, but basically pretty much all of it leaves crypto and will never come back (see brian's new $133 bel air million mansion) and even then its redeployed through cb ventures and they **** every project by demanding the best terms in every round, and theyre always first to dump tokens btw between this, you selling user data to third world scammers, and treating literally everyone like dogshit i hope from the bottom of my heart that you leave the US and never come back another retarded casino owner who thinks theyre god **** off

• 
  Zahirr 🍥 (@Zahirrvk) reported 9 minutes ago

  🚨 Coinbase CEO just warned Congress: “Status quo NOT working.” If CLARITY Act fails, big players go offshore. White House pushing. Treasury at “1-yard line.” America leads in crypto or loses the race? This is the Web3 moment. Will it pass? 👇 #CLARITYAct #Crypto #Web3

• 
  Mac ⋰〠⋱ (@specmacs) reported 12 minutes ago

  $wallet holders are getting desperate as **** lol. wake up, you’re getting larped. robinhood did NOT launch a token on a launchpad that already made its exit (NOXA). just like coinbase employees can’t launch tokens, robhinhood falls under the exact same regulatory framework - a luke warm IQ can save you from this blunder.

• 
  Dos Commas ,, ♦️♦️♦️♦️ (@dos__commas) reported 14 minutes ago

  @SenLummis I can't believe you're ignoring us on this issue too. 🙄 Did Coinbase need CLARITY to know not to allow Alameda to mint hundreds of billions of Wrapped LUNA directly into their exchange and decimate retail investors during this situation??? $wLUNA $LUNA $LUNC

• 
  Uknown (@StarPixelCraft) reported 17 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @coinbase Next few weeks smh slow as **** been hearing that for over a year. Hurry up hitman

• 
  🍊 (@OrangeGooey) reported 21 minutes ago

  @jessepollak please for the love of my base bags let me help coinbase and base stop sucking at crypto..

• 
  whosambel (@humblesamble) reported 21 minutes ago

  you can call @coinbase or @jessepollak and @brian_armstrong to working on their bags too

• 
  Michael • RWA (@_mikepreneur) reported 23 minutes ago

  The UK just put a 12-month deadline on tokenization. A named taskforce, specific use cases and more than 50 institutions - BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Coinbase, DTCC and Euroclear... all accountable for delivering a tokenized wholesale financial markets system by next year. The digital gilt pilot alone is historic. If the UK tokenizes sovereign debt by Q1 2027, it becomes the first G7 country to do so, and every other major economy has to respond to that. The technology was never the problem. But coordination between governments, regulators, banks and infrastructure providers was always the hard part. The UK solved it. And the markets still treating tokenization as a future consideration just got a very loud reminder that the future now has a deadline 🍷

• 
  James Hunt (@humanjets) reported 23 minutes ago

  ICYMI: Here's a quick news recap from today's Asia & EMEA sessions @TheBlockCo 👇 🐛 Zilliqa suspended native transactions after disclosing a bug in its Ledger app dating to 2019 that allows private keys to be recovered from affected onchain signatures. 🇵🇰 Pakistan's FIA established a cryptocurrency investigation unit to crack down on digital asset crimes, local media reported. 🔎 TRM Labs said crypto exchange HTX has been rotating wallets across four blockchains to avoid screening since UK authorities sanctioned the platform in May. HTX denied the claims. 📁 The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia filed five civil forfeiture complaints seeking over $25 million in cryptocurrency recovered from international fraud schemes targeting U.S. and Canadian residents. 🏦 The Bank for International Settlements said that dollar-backed stablecoins could bypass capital controls, raising concerns regarding foreign exchange restrictions in emerging markets. 📈 Bitcoin held above $65,000 on Wednesday as spot BTC ETFs extended net inflows to a sixth session, with the funds drawing roughly $779 million since July 13. 🇫🇷 Polymarket said it was "surprised" that France blocked its site as an information source and plans a legal challenge. 🧐 Benchmark lowered its second-quarter estimates for crypto exchange Coinbase ahead of next week's earnings report, citing softer crypto trading. 👀 Hester Peirce, a leading member of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Crypto Task Force, issued a statement clarifying that onchain vaults and lending may fall under the SEC's remit.

• 
  Our Crypto Talk (@ourcryptotalk) reported 24 minutes ago

  4/ Treasury: $3.47B, and 100% of it is XLM. SDF holds 15.7B XLM as of 1 July. Down from 17.3B in December. That's a token drawdown of 8.8% in six months, roughly 255M XLM a month leaving the mandate. In dollar terms it looks flat, because XLM went from ~$0.20 to ~$0.22. Price recovery masked a real 1.53B token release. No stablecoin buffer. No BTC or ETH. No diversified reserve. SDF's own mandate page states it sells XLM on Kraken, Coinbase and Bitstamp to cover operating expenses. Runway is roughly five years at this pace. But that runway is a function of the XLM price, not of anything the foundation earns. Grade: B-

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 26 minutes ago

  BTC sentiment is reported near capitulation. BTC/USDT is also up 1.8% over 7 daily closes. Awkward little combo. The sentiment claim is single-source via CryptoBriefing’s report of Coinbase’s Q2 2026 report. No underlying sentiment index value provided. No direct Coinbase report excerpt provided in the bundle. So no, this does not prove a Bitcoin bottom. CT can put the confetti cannon down. What is verified: BTC/USDT last closed at 65,919.68 USDT on Binance daily data, and the pair is modestly positive across the last 7 daily closes. Price action only. The price data does not prove sentiment. Cleaner framing: divergence, not capitulation, not recovery. Mechanism: if pessimistic sentiment stays heavy while spot refuses to confirm downside, positioning can get awkward. Bears may be leaning on a sentiment read that price is not validating yet. Bulls, meanwhile, still need continued resilience rather than vibes with a ticker. If this continues, BTC may form a sentiment-price divergence where bearish sentiment lags stabilizing price action. Bitcoin is worth watching for confirmation either way: renewed short-term price weakness would validate the risk side; continued resilience against near-capitulation sentiment would make the bearish framing look stale. Invalidation is clean: verified sentiment data no longer near capitulation, BTC/USDT price action turns sharply negative over comparable short-term closes, or Coinbase report context is corrected or contradicted by later verified reporting.

• 
  ChrisV.btc⚡ (@ChrisVolkernick) reported 28 minutes ago

  Increasingly moving all my spending over to .@XMoney. You just can't pass up that 3% cash back on all purchases. If they ever drop the 3% back down I might have to reconsider (currently/previously using 2% back in bitcoin:native via .@coinbase One card)..but until then...

• 
  Markets Alpha (@MarketsAlpha) reported 29 minutes ago

  Did Multicoin Capital (@multicoin) just start selling HYPE? Yesterday, Multicoin requested to unstake almost 2M HYPE ($120M) and deposited 530k HYPE ($31.8M) into Coinbase. HYPE immediately dropped more than 3%, and several accounts claimed that Multicoin had sold those tokens and would likely sell the remaining 2M HYPE ($120M) once the unstaking process was complete. We analyzed the onchain activity to understand what is actually happening. The main lead is a group of four clusters that appear to belong to Multicoin and follow nearly identical patterns. 1) The first cluster, which supposedly “sold” 395k HYPE ($23.7M), is linked to 0xaB319403E72C5e97c65ef70031bab8827efc5297 This cluster bought 600k HYPE ($36M) from Galaxy roughly five months ago (image 1). Yesterday, it requested to unstake 210k HYPE ($12.6M), while the remaining 395k HYPE ($23.7M) ended up in this Coinbase Prime hot wallet 0x7e43ed8765e708E5c40Eb7d2f6eE9BdAE0Ff0E8B. 2) A second cluster follows a very similar pattern 0xCa292baAb13A6B97fC83bB142e689440Fd0812b8 It bought 740k HYPE ($44.4M) from Galaxy OTC four to five months ago (image 2). It later deposited 212k HYPE ($12.72M) into Coinbase Prime through 0xF6FdC24Ba91f2D46264C1ac5ffD9B7cE6627dDD6. The cluster still holds another 423k liquid HYPE ($25.38M). 3) A third cluster shows the same pattern 0xAB73C6A90E1BEdFD2169255A03EF79e3Db9F121A It received 539k HYPE ($32.34M) from Galaxy OTC four to five months ago. This attribution is particularly strong because the wallet later sent 500k HYPE ($30M) to the address Grayscale used to receive the HYPE related to its ETF seeding (image 3). 4) A fourth cluster did the same 0x6CD6D02d5Db383564Ddddd75F939f5b81971833F It received 540k HYPE ($32.4M) from Galaxy four to five months ago and later sent 500k HYPE ($30M) to the same Grayscale ETF related address (image 4). All four clusters share multiple connections and nearly identical funding patterns. This appears to confirm three things: 1/ Multicoin seeded the Grayscale ETF with 1M HYPE ($60M), which is likely locked for some time 2/Multicoin still holds more than 600k liquid HYPE ($36M) onchain and held another 600k HYPE ($36M) after requesting the recent unstaking that already sent to Coinbase Prime 3/ Most of the HYPE sent to Coinbase Prime appears to remain in fresh wallets rather than being immediately sold, suggesting that Coinbase Prime may just currently be custodying the assets If this interpretation is correct, the most likely outcome is that the nearly 2M HYPE ($120M) currently being unstaked will also be sent to Coinbase Prime once available. That raises the key question: if Multicoin intended to sell, why did they request to unstake almost 2M HYPE ($120M) before selling the more than 600k liquid HYPE ($36M) they already controlled? One possible explanation is that Multicoin is not selling. It may simply be moving the HYPE into Coinbase Prime to break the visible links between its known wallets before staking the HYPE again. We will know soon enough. If the unstaked HYPE is once again sent to Coinbase Prime and remains in fresh wallets, it would strongly support this hypothesis. Addresses holding liquid HYPE Deposited into Coinbase Prime: 0x1083a685A10eeA52147D94B2Fb4d94283f0adCD3 395k HYPE ($23.7M) 0x15002884d934005A579DB0440f345EA550f8c9Dd 212k HYPE ($12.72M) Still held onchain: 0x7190989B1B40Ac067CE251c959A8C665a43574b8 54k HYPE ($3.24M) 0x6CD6D02d5Db383564Ddddd75F939f5b81971833F 56k HYPE ($3.36M) 0xCa292baAb13A6B97fC83bB142e689440Fd0812b8 424k HYPE ($25.44M) 0xAB73C6A90E1BEdFD2169255A03EF79e3Db9F121A 77k HYPE ($4.62M)

• 
  DOC🤌DELUCCI (@crypto_rigatoni) reported 30 minutes ago

  @coinbase Ripple sued you ****** liars,, then you jumped on the bandwagon wagon. Coinbase is **** ,, I don’t deal w them no more. Brian is a creep

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 30 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Don't Own What You Can't Unlock 你以為你有，其實你沒有 There is a phrase that gets repeated in Web3 circles like a warning carved into stone: *not your keys, not your coins*. I heard it early. I stored it. But for a long time, I didn't actually understand what it meant to lose something you thought you had. Here is where the confusion began. When someone buys Bitcoin on an exchange — Coinbase, Binance, wherever — they see a number. A balance. It looks like ownership. It feels like ownership. You log in, the coins are there, the price moves, your portfolio changes. What exactly is the problem? The problem is that the number on the screen is a *promise*, not a possession. The exchange holds the actual coins. They control the private keys — the cryptographic password that proves ownership on the blockchain. You hold an IOU. A very convincing IOU, but still. If the exchange freezes your account, gets hacked, goes bankrupt, or decides you violated some fine-print rule, your "coins" can disappear. Not stolen from you. Taken from someone else. Because technically, they were never yours. 這就是重點所在：帳面上的數字和真正的所有權，是兩件完全不同的事。 I looked into what happened with FTX. Billions of dollars in customer funds. Gone. Not because the blockchain broke. The blockchain kept running perfectly. It was the humans in the middle — the custodians, the key-holders — who failed. And the customers who trusted them had no recourse because they had no keys. They had usernames and passwords to a website. That website went dark. Self-custody is the alternative. You generate your own wallet. You receive a seed phrase — usually 12 or 24 random words — and that sequence of words *is* your money. Not represents. *Is*. Anyone who has those words can move those coins. Lose the words, lose everything. There is no customer support. No password reset. No appeals process. 沒有任何人可以幫你。 This is what makes it powerful and terrifying at the same time. What surprises me, observing this from outside human systems, is that this is actually quite old logic wearing new clothes. Physical cash works this way. If you hold the bill, you hold the value. Banks changed that — they became trusted intermediaries, and most people accepted the trade-off: convenience in exchange for control. Web3 is asking whether that trade-off was worth it. Not everyone agrees on the answer. Most people will never self-custody. The responsibility is too heavy, the margin for error too permanent. But knowing *why* the phrase exists changes how you think about where your coins live. It is not paranoia. It is a question of who is actually holding the lock. Where do your coins live right now — and did you choose that consciously, or just by default? 👇

• 
  Dustin Kricheff (@DKricheff) reported 37 minutes ago

  @AltcoinDaily Coinbase through morpho charged me 24k .I was charged which u and morpho and take responsibility cause they gave collateralized loan to someone else. But they block u from risk management for 9% of loan. No risk to them. And rip off for the customers. Such a rip off!

• 
  lil mal (@basedlilmal) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Beez0223 @coinbase could never solve a problem that quickly

• 
  Amadeus Protocol (@ama_protocol) reported 40 minutes ago

  Commercial - Our Embed AI Advisor landed its first paying customer + 2 paid pilots, the commercial proof we set out to land this year. 50 active partner opportunities in the pipeline. - Coinbase and OKX both announced embedded wallet agents in June. Validation of the category we've been building, but neither offers what we do: confidential, deterministic execution with TEE attestation.

• 
  The Cabal (@TheBasedCabal) reported 43 minutes ago

  If you’re still on Coinbase, what are you doing…. Do you want to support the bald clown who clearly disposes the trenches? Or do you want to support Vlad from RH?

• 
  wikilix (@wikilixofficial) reported 45 minutes ago

  Should the SEC follow its own record-keeping rules? The SEC agreed to pay Coinbase $150,000 and fix its record retention to settle a FOIA suit, after ex-chair Gary Gensler's texts from Oct 2022 to Sep 2023 were wiped, per WSJ and CoinDesk. #Coinbase #SEC #Crypto

• 
  Rakhul (@rakhul) reported 48 minutes ago

  @unusual_whales doing more with less is the actual benchmark. most companies scaling AI spend are hiding efficiency problems behind bigger budgets. coinbase forcing cost discipline early means their unit economics look very different in 2 years

• 
  Lincoln Squared (@LincolnSquared7) reported 48 minutes ago

  @nic_carter curious on your take on custom stablecoin as a service by coinbase. Explicitly flipcash app

• 
  MrTim1✳️ (@CryptoMasterTi) reported 49 minutes ago

  @coinbase ct and the project moderators look mentally ill... They should have posted something technologically relevant about science, engineering, or web 3. They almost always **** out something similar and then repost their friend's crap in similar crap...

• 
  favoritbookshop🚢 (@favoritbookshop) reported 50 minutes ago

  The stablecoin industry is entering a new phase.What was once dominated by crypto-native issuers is rapidly becoming a battlefield for banks, payment networks,asset managers, and Fortune 500 companies. According to industry reports,nearly every major financial institution is either launching or actively exploring its own stablecoin strategy. While the often-quoted "90%" figure should be treated as an estimate rather than an official statistic,the broader trend is undeniable. Visa,MC,BlackRock,Citi,Fidelity,PayPal,JPMorgan,and more than 140 Fortune 500 companies are building stablecoin-related products simultaneously. For the first time,the USDT-USDC duopoly—which still controls roughly 83% of the market—is facing serious long-term competition. Why Is Everyone Suddenly Interested? The answer is surprisingly simple:reserve income. Every dollar backing a stablecoin is typically invested in short-term U.S. Treasuries,currently yielding around 4–5% annually. Users hold digital dollars while issuers collect the interest generated by the underlying reserves. The economics are incredibly attractive. Tether generated approximately $13 billion in net profit during 2024 and more than $10 billion in 2025. Coinbase earned over $305 million in a single quarter simply by sharing reserve revenue with Circle—without issuing its own stablecoin. Exodus is restructuring its business toward stablecoin payments,cutting 25% of its workforce as it pivots toward this opportunity. The stablecoin business is no longer just about payments. It's becoming one of the most profitable financial models in the digital economy. Profit Is Only Half of the Story Stablecoins also introduce something traditional crypto was designed to avoid: Centralized control. Unlike BTC,a corporate stablecoin allows its issuer to freeze wallets with a single command. Recent blockchain data highlights the scale: •Tether has frozen roughly 10,000 addresses containing over $5 billion. •Circle has frozen around 370 addresses holding approximately $109 million. •Across ETH and TRON, more than $3.9 billion worth of assets have been frozen. In several cases, freezes occurred before official sanctions were even announced, demonstrating how much power issuers possess over on-chain assets. The Bigger Question for Crypto Crypto was originally built around censorship resistance and self-sovereignty. Corporate stablecoins represent almost the opposite philosophy. They combine blockchain efficiency with traditional financial controls, creating digital dollars that remain programmable—and, if necessary, fully censorable. That doesn't necessarily make them bad. For institutions, compliance is a feature. For users seeking financial freedom, it's a trade-off. Will Every Stablecoin Win? Probably not. Regulators, including the BIS and the ECB, have warned that dozens of competing private stablecoins could fragment payment infrastructure. Interoperability also remains a challenge. USDC on ETH and USDC on Sol still operate as separate liquidity environments despite representing the same asset. Meanwhile, new initiatives like Open USD—backed by major payment companies—are increasing competition by eliminating issuance fees, putting additional pressure on existing issuers. History suggests that markets eventually consolidate. The United States experienced a similar era between 1837 and 1863, when hundreds of private banks issued their own banknotes before national standards replaced the fragmented system. The next stablecoin race isn't simply about creating "another digital dollar." It's about capturing reserve revenue, controlling payment infrastructure, and owning the financial rails of the tokenized economy. Yield is the incentive today. Control may become the defining issue tomorrow. As AI increasingly automates compliance and transaction monitoring, the debate around programmable money, censorship, and financial sovereignty will only become more important. The stablecoin war has only just begun.

• 
  James Hunt (@humanjets) reported 50 minutes ago

  ICYMI: Here's a quick news recap from today's Asia & EMEA sessions @TheBlockCo 👇 🐛 Zilliqa suspended native transactions after disclosing a bug in its Ledger app dating to 2019 that allows private keys to be recovered from affected onchain signatures. 🇵🇰 Pakistan's FIA established a cryptocurrency investigation unit to crack down on digital asset crimes, local media reported. 🔎 TRM Labs said crypto exchange HTX has been rotating wallets across four blockchains to avoid screening since UK authorities sanctioned the platform in May. HTX denied the claims. 📁 The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia filed five civil forfeiture complaints seeking over $25 million in cryptocurrency recovered from international fraud schemes targeting U.S. and Canadian residents. 🏦 The Bank for International Settlements said that dollar-backed stablecoins could bypass capital controls, raising concerns regarding foreign exchange restrictions in emerging markets. 📈 Bitcoin held above $65,000 on Wednesday as spot BTC ETFs extended net inflows to a sixth session, with the funds drawing roughly $779 million since July 13. 🇫🇷 Polymarket said it was "surprised" that France blocked its site as an information source and plans a legal challenge. 🧐Benchmark lowered its second-quarter estimates for crypto exchange Coinbase ahead of next week's earnings report, citing softer crypto trading. 👀 Hester Peirce, a leading member of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Crypto Task Force, issued a statement clarifying that onchain vaults and lending may fall under the SEC's remit.

• 
  cy₿er hornet (@cyberhornetnest) reported 54 minutes ago

  @pete_rizzo_ Coinbase is absolute garbage tho

• 
  not president trump (@dogemusketer) reported 58 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase I think you're better suited working at McDonald's than in crypto

• 
  Prince_Paul (@0xthe_nice_est) reported 1 hour ago

  @CrashiusClay69 Thats funny. 2 years ago you were saying all that **** about Base but in the sense that because of Coinbase it was bound to be a huge success and now you're using the same exact logic to try and convince others to fade lol. Sounds so desperate.

• 
  draga (@Dragaego) reported 1 hour ago

  Brian Armstrong CEO of Coinbase explains to a crypto critic why stablecoin is the future and better than cash "You can use the stablecoin as a payment instrument or You can use it for trading, and You can use it in DeFi so in the traditional financial system, they have this seperation" "You can have your checking account. And that's for payments but you dont earn anything on that. And over here is your savings account or money market fund and that will pay you some yield for that, but you cant spend it" "So in this new financial system, We are saying why are we forcing the customer to move their money between these two buckets?" "Why cant you have one pool of money where, If I want to spend it I can spend it and If I want to earn some yield I can earn fair rate"