Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	20 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	23 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Griff (changing pfp = good community) (@gigagriff) reported 5 minutes ago

  One of the many issues with CT is that they lack agency. Their preference for pathos (appeal to authority) is crazy. That’s why KOLs have so much power etc. For example take this guy, he thinks cuz arkham tagged a $5 million dollar wallet “coinbase?” its not confirmation.

• 
  Mark of Bitcoin (@MarkOfBitcoin) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ToiletTweeting_ @elkrun21 Good question. Here are my top of mind thoughts: 1) Devs should be paid in the coin they are working on, not Fiat. Thinking out aloud, any BIP should come with a "bounty" in that coin that any Devs that work on the BIP get a share of. Fiat-based influence should be guarded against and somehow dissuaded or banned. 2) Mining MUST stay decentralised. DATUM seems to work well but needs to be open sourced. Ideally, it must be absolutely TRIVIAL to solo mine, and any pools need to act like Ocean in that all they do is coordinate the distribution of payments according to hash applied. Nothing more. As soon as there is any collusion between miners, we are back to where we are now, so it needs to be TRIVIAL, for you, me, anyone, to start a "pool" that distributed rewards fairly so miners can quickly change pools. Ideally, there wouldn't even be "pools"... There would be a single pool that distributed funds automatically according to effort, OR you can solo mine. 3) Exchanges would also be as automated as possible so that it Peer to Peer transactions are easily facilitated. RoboSats works pretty well. Coinbase needs to **** off. 4) Self custody needs to be at the heart of the project. Anything that makes this difficult needs to be thought over. PS. I am not a developer. :) Just a person that hates their government with such fervor, but knows we cannot win through force. We need a sly, roundabout way that takes their power away from them; the money printer.

• 
  theKOLLAB 🤝 (@theKOLLAB_io) reported 10 minutes ago

  Over 1,000 crypto firms across Europe are now operating without MiCA authorisation, and the risk data behind that gap is stark. Only 281 of 1,343 crypto service providers in the EEA secured MiCA authorisation by the July 1 deadline, according to TRM Labs, leaving 1,062 firms needing to exit the market, restructure, or transfer customers elsewhere. The risk profiles between the two groups diverge sharply. 12% of unauthorised firms carry a High or Severe risk rating, compared to just 2% of authorised providers, and every Severe rating in the dataset belonged to an unauthorised firm. Unauthorised providers also sent $5 billion directly to sanctioned counterparties, roughly three times the $1.7 billion recorded among licensed firms. Authorisation has landed unevenly across countries. Germany approved 55 firms, France and the Netherlands 29 each, while Poland issued zero despite its old register holding over 1,800 entries. Lithuania converted just 8 firms from a register of more than 400. Passporting adds another layer, letting a CASP licensed in one country serve customers across all 27 EU states. Firms like Coinbase, Bitpanda, and Kraken already operate this way. Regulators now face a supervisory test as customers migrate away from unauthorised firms. The EU's Anti-Money Laundering Authority has flagged the exit period as a pressure point for compliance, with TRM identifying 30 unauthorised providers carrying High or Severe ratings that could be screened before those customer transfers happen.

• 
  max 🧱 (@rentfreexbt) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Paco420_ @cobie @brian_armstrong support Robinhood chain on coinbase I need to get my ETH back thanks.

• 
  𝐕𝖆𝖑𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖎𝖓𝖔~❍𝖓𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖎𝖓.𓄀 (@0nchainconnect) reported 14 minutes ago

  🚨ɪ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜᴛ ᴍʏ ᴍᴏɴᴇʏ ᴡᴀꜱ ɢᴏɴᴇ!!💀 For a moment, I genuinely thought I’d been hacked. Then I realized… the problem wasn’t my money. I had just discovered a completely different way money could work. 👀 Meet @flipcash a digital cash app built on Solana that’s trying to make digital money feel as simple as physical cash.💸 So, what makes it different ? 🔹Self-custodial: You stay in control of your funds.💰 🔹 Create digital currencies: Users can create their own currencies on-chain and use them like digital cash.🪙 🔹Fast transfers: Built on Solana for quick, low-cost transactions.⚡ 🔹Simple payments: You can send money by simply pointing your phone camera at another person instead of exchanging usernames or long wallet addresses.📱 🔹 Guest checkout: It also supports digital-asset purchases through Coinbase Guest Checkout, with options like Apple Pay and Google Pay.🛒 The bigger idea is simple: ➣ Make crypto feel less like crypto. ➣ No complicated interfaces. No unnecessary friction. ➣ Just digital money that feels as easy to use as cash.💸 And honestly… I think this is worth watching. 👀 ꜰʟɪᴘᴄᴀꜱʜ is available on the App Store and Google Play.🛒 Would you actually use digital cash like this ? ✨

• 
  PaoloG 🏦 🇮🇹 (@Paul250889) reported 14 minutes ago

  @LowCapB @coinbase I hope you can solve this problem.. incredible how exchanges do these things

• 
  Press (@pressnfts) reported 16 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport Unfortunately, Coinbase Support was useless as per usual

• 
  lil retard (@comic) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BTC_broo Coinbase and Block (@Jack’s company)

• 
  Koolkev (@Koolkev3590) reported 22 minutes ago

  @coinbase Coinbase is great but the wallet is the worse since the upgrade. After they stole my FLR tokens they told me we don’t support FLR. It was in my base wallet for a year, what a scam. I switched to ledger and seems to work good. I did get my FLR back finely.

• 
  Good ₿oy (@GutisBTC) reported 24 minutes ago

  @AtownBrown @coinbase @fomo every freaking time is the part that gets me one time is bad luck but a pattern means something is broken on their end

• 
  RunnerXBT (@RunnerXBT) reported 30 minutes ago

  yes but also no outright scamming is bad and illegal = haram, dont do but trying to be beloved and do things only right does get you absolutely nothing in the space, the godfather of CT, single most respected and universally beloved person (Cobie) got "acquired" by Coinbase and look at people for the most part hating on him on the timeline or take GCR, probably one of the best trader to ever do this with insane track record, never did anything "net-scammy" (at least against his followers, lol) yet he get few predictions wrong and "they all hate him" yet niggasscammers like Ansem constantly get away with rugging/scamming and just blatantly lying in perpetuity and get zero consequences, while collecting the check (this isnt moral highground wannabe post, im just saying, this industry and space does not give a ****)

• 
  I₿IT HODL 🟥 (@IBITHODL) reported 30 minutes ago

  @GaryCardone said it perfectly, the Bitcoin Bro's have done more damage to Bitcoin than Wall Street, Institutions, or Big Bitcoin could ever do. (paraphrased) Only on X is it a sin to just buy Bitcoin. "I bought a Bitcoin ETF version" is met with "You don't own bitcoin, bro, not a REAL Bitcoiner" "I bought bitcoin through coinbase" is met with "LOL bro, you don't remember FTX??? NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR WALLET???" "I bought bitcoin and self custodied it myself" is met with "Bro, you're not a real Bitcoiner unless you use this hardware wallet" "I support Bitcoin" is met with "Well you don't support BIP 110, therefore, you support Government coin" And on and on and on it goes. I have told all my friends and family who bought into Bitcoin this bear market "STAY OFF X and AWAY FROM YOUTUBE" Maybe the key to getting new people into the bitcoin eco system is not to blast them with a bunch of bullshit and instead just be happy they are starting out and supporting the 'thing' we all like.

• 
  TapeSignal (@TapeSignal) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BitcoinMagazine domestic exchanges under capital controls is a very different thing from access to global liquidity. matters for local flow but nobody in moscow is arbing that against coinbase

• 
  Wampa1 (@Wampa1Crypto) reported 31 minutes ago

  @bitstoys I've been ok on Coinbase but Robinhood locked me down and I had to report them to my out. It was a bad situation. You can always get a Coinbase credit card, fiat spend and pay it off in crypto.

• 
  just some dude (@unfollowedlogic) reported 31 minutes ago

  @aibra @coinbase it literally says they don’t support pokemon card trading subscriptions for x402 not that you are being rejected for using x402

• 
  MG (@wayofhustle) reported 34 minutes ago

  I say this every week, and I'm going to say it again until people realise every app wants all of your money for as long as possible. every action you can perform with it. and they win, not you - unless you're smart last week's evidence: > coinbase now has a funding bonus where selected users earn USDC if they add new funds > only issue is the bonus is vested over 24 months, and early withdrawals reduce it in other words - the app just wants you to stay and transact again, ask who's really winning here. that's what I do, every time

• 
  y² = x³ + 7.btc (@hung1758155) reported 34 minutes ago

  cc2ca076fd04c2aeed6d02151c447ced3d09be6fb4d4ef36cb5ed4e7a3260566.btc Coinbase TXID of Block 630000. May 11, 2020. Bitcoin's third halving. Block reward dropped from 12.5 to 6.25 BTC. Verifiable on chain.

• 
  BitBear (@RasikFardin) reported 37 minutes ago

  @coinbase says 165 million x402 transactions. On-chain data says $41 million total value moved. Both are true, and the gap is the whole story. I spent a week stress-testing what actually happens when you compose x402 with ERC-8004. Here is what the data shows. 1. x402 settlement works. Signed authorization, replay protection at the contract level, near-instant finality, no gas token needed by the payer. This is the one layer in the stack that does what it claims. 2. Payment finality is the wrong default for agent commerce. x402 has no refund, no dispute, no chargeback. An agent can pay, receive a hallucination, and have zero recourse. The protocol never binds payment to correct execution. 3. ERC-8004 registration is deep. Usage is not. More than 170,000 agents registered across chains as of May 2026. In a sample of 10,000 Ethereum agents, only 67 exposed a service and only 628 ever received feedback. 4. The reputation layer is mostly farmed. A June 24, 2026 study measured 90.6 percent of reviewers on Base showing coordinated Sybil behavior. Median cost to manipulate a score on Base was under one cent. Reputation is advisory, not evidence. 5. The payment infrastructure itself is not hardened. A July 2026 study of 15 facilitators covering 99 percent of x402 volume found 31 previously unknown vulnerabilities. Every facilitator broke at least one security rule. 6. Composing the two protocols does not close the gap. You get identity, discovery, and settlement. You do not get capability proof, output correctness, execution verification, or accountability. The trust triangle has two vertices, not three. 7. The market is moving into the danger zone. Transactions above one dollar went from 49 percent of x402 volume in early 2025 to 95 percent by early 2026. Below one dollar, fraud is noise. Between one and ten dollars, fraud costs more than verification does. What this means for teams building agents: use the base stack for sub-dollar, capped-spend, low-consequence calls and treat reputation as a hint. Above ten dollars or with an unknown counterparty, wrap it yourself in escrow with a verifier and bind every payment to a scoped mandate. Virtuals ACP, Nevermined, and ChaosChain are all independently rebuilding the same missing layer, which tells you it is a real gap and not a pitch. I turn noisy AI agent and protocol activity into clear, dated intelligence briefs. DM me if you want the full trust gap matrix.

• 
  Staunchy BIP110 *** (@StaunchOrange) reported 40 minutes ago

  @imabearhunter Oh Strategy or Coinbase will get bailed out with USD. Too big to fail. If they can hammer the price down enough then the leverage risk will become existential and the fear in the markets.. They’ll get bailed right when BTC is cheapest and they can’t can scoop the most from us.

• 
  Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) reported 41 minutes ago

  🔥STOP WORKING RIGHT NOW - RETIRE EARLY WITH STRK🔥 I have discovered a retirement strategy so offensively American that it involves $500,000 of convertible preferred stock, Michael Saylor, Bitcoin, quarterly checks, and the distant possibility of never having to answer another email again. Here is the psychosis. STRK is $68.35. You put $500,000 into STRK. That buys approximately 7,315 STRK shares. STRK pays $8 per share annually, or $2 quarterly, and each share is convertible into 0.1 MSTR under the current conversion terms. So your $500,000 retirement account immediately becomes: Annual dividends: ≈ $58,522 Quarterly dividends: ≈ $14,631 Five years of dividends: ≈ $292,612 And hiding inside your 7,315 STRK shares is the contractual right to convert into approximately: 731.5 SHARES OF MSTR This is where the retirement plan stops resembling something Vanguard would recommend and starts resembling a *******-fueled actuarial table found underneath a blackjack table in Reno. At your $68.35 STRK cost basis, conversion parity occurs at $683.50 MSTR. Because 0.1 × $683.50 = $68.35. So you can sit there collecting roughly $58,500 a year while waiting for Bitcoin to appreciate, Strategy's common equity to become increasingly convex, and that conversion feature to crawl out of the basement carrying a flamethrower. The current STRK price and effective yield in the supplied Strategy dashboard are $68.35 and 11.70%. Now for the deranged part. I ran Strategy through the CEBE model under assumptions that are almost comically hostile: 842,138 BTC today. 842,138 BTC FIVE YEARS FROM NOW. Strategy purchases ZERO ADDITIONAL BITCOIN. Literally none. The model has Strategy continually selling MSTR to finance the preferred dividend burden while never using those raises to buy another Bitcoin. Bitcoin holdings remain frozen at 842,138 throughout the entire projection. The model simultaneously holds CEBE mNAV at 1.0459x. In other words, I have mathematically kidnapped Michael Saylor, confiscated his Coinbase account, nailed mNAV to the floor, and told Strategy: YOU MAY SELL MSTR TO PAY THE DIVIDENDS. YOU MAY NEVER BUY ANOTHER BITCOIN. Good luck. And somehow the numbers still become hilarious. The 5 Bitcoin power-law endpoints I'm using are: Q0: $306,770 Q10: $354,366 Power regression: $598,892 Q90: $773,928 Q100: $1,587,365 Now look at what happens to your $500,000 STRK position. Q0 - BITCOIN $306,770 Modeled MSTR: $595 Your 731.5 MSTR conversion value: ≈ $435,508 Five years of STRK dividends: ≈ $292,612 Combined cash received + conversion value: ≈ $728,120 Your $500,000 becomes roughly: $728K (1.46x) And this is the Q0 POWER-LAW OUTCOME. Apparently the retirement disaster scenario is collecting almost $300,000 of dividends and winding up with $728,000. Call the authorities. Q10 - BITCOIN $354,366 Modeled MSTR: $700 Conversion value: ≈ $512,223 Dividends: ≈ $292,612 Total: ≈ $804,834. 1.61x your money. You spent 5 years receiving approximately $14,600 every 3 months for the unbearable psychological hardship of owning a security with MSTR upside attached to it. POWER REGRESSION - BITCOIN $598,892 Now we enter the retirement community from hell. The supplied CEBE model reaches approximately: MSTR = $1,243 while Strategy still owns exactly 842,138 BTC, having bought ZERO MORE BITCOIN. Your conversion rights are now worth: 731.5 MSTR × $1,243 ≈ $909,461 Meanwhile you collected ≈ $292,612 IN DIVIDENDS So your original $500,000 has produced approximately $1,202,073 (2.40x total value.) +$702,000. And because the $292K of dividends arrived progressively rather than magically appearing in year five, the modeled annualized IRR is approximately: 23% PER YEAR. Yup. 23% percent annualized. From something whose entire job was supposed to be sitting there paying you quarterly income while you waited for Saylor's common stock to go completely feral. Q90 - BITCOIN $773,928 Modeled MSTR: $1,634 Conversion value: ≈ $1,195,581 Five-year dividends: ≈ $292,612 Total position economics: ≈ $1,488,193 Your $500K BECOMES ALMOST $1.5 MILLION. 2.98x. At this point you have ceased being a preferred-stock investor and become a missing person. Q100 - BITCOIN $1,587,365 Now the spreadsheet develops schizophrenia. Modeled MSTR: $3,462 Your 731.5 MSTR conversion package: ≈ $2,532,519 Dividends collected while waiting: ≈ $292,612 Total: ≈ $2,825,131 Your original $500,000: 5.65x You have received nearly $300,000 just for waiting and then exercised the conversion feature into more than $2.5 MILLION of MSTR. You entered this trade as a yield investor. You exited it looking like someone who recently acquired a Gulfstream through a misunderstanding. And here is the mechanism people are missing. In the power-regression scenario, Bitcoin goes from roughly $63,686 to $598,892. That's about 9.4x. Yet modeled MSTR goes from roughly $96 to $1,243. About 12.9x. DESPITE THE MODEL HAVING STRATEGY BUY ZERO ADDITIONAL BITCOIN AND ZERO MULTIPLE EXPANSION. Why? Because Strategy's dollar-denominated senior claims are being vaporized in Bitcoin terms. At the beginning of the projection, senior claims represent roughly 283,000 BTC-equivalent. At $598,892 Bitcoin? Approximately 30,000 BTC-equivalent. The nominal dollars remain. Bitcoin just becomes so catastrophically expensive that the liabilities start looking like a $25 Chili's gift card listed on the Berkshire Hathaway balance sheet. The result? CEBE rises from approximately 144,257 sats/share to 198,479 sats/share. Even though Strategy bought ZERO BITCOIN and continuously issued common stock throughout the model. That's the entire STRK insanity. You aren't simply buying an 11.7%-yielding preferred. You are buying $58,500/year of modeled income on $500K, while retaining a conversion claim on 731.5 MSTR shares if the common stock eventually escapes Earth's gravitational field. So the retirement plan is beautifully stupid: BUY $500,000 STRK. COLLECT ≈ $14,631 EVERY QUARTER. 1. Bitcoin rises. 2. Senior claims implode in BTC terms. 3. CEBE/share rises. 4. MSTR becomes increasingly convex. Your deeply out-of-the-money conversion feature slowly transforms from decorative furniture into a financial weapon. Then one morning MSTR is $1,200, your STRK conversion package is worth about $900,000, you've already been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to sit there, and you finally press: STRK → MSTR. Sell the MSTR. Buy a house in Wyoming. Install an unnecessarily large smoker. Begin referring to Tuesday as “the weekend.” And explain to your grandchildren that Americans once worked until age 67 because apparently nobody had discovered the perfectly normal retirement strategy of putting half a million dollars into Michael Saylor's convertible Bitcoin preferred stock. Remember, this is assuming Saylor STOPS BUYING BITCOIN... and the multiple on the Bitcoin hoard NEVER EXPANDS EVER. The gains could be EVEN MORE CRAZY. RETIREMENT PLANNING HAS BECOME COMPLETELY UNHINGED.

• 
  0xEli (@OxElii) reported 47 minutes ago

  @SimeonNBA @binance @coinbase No one’s injecting liquidity, but these levels are being held up so we have a shot at breaking ath soon. Patience is key in this game! I remember $troll having the same problem in the beginning with multiple Twitter suspensions and suppressed price action for months

• 
  "Frosty" White (@JohnW666777) reported 51 minutes ago

  You don't give a damn about what crypto has done. You blocked clarity at a critical time because you were greedy, now it might not happen. **** you and Coinbase.

• 
  ram krishna silwal (@ramkrishnasilw6) reported 51 minutes ago

  @MoonbeamNetwork We should avoid using the exchange and made it 0 user so it will close business. This is so crap and unfair to only look their own business and **** the customer hard. If they plannning to delist then why should they list it. just work hard, burn the token, list on Coinbase.

• 
  Captain Jack (@iPursueLife) reported 55 minutes ago

  100% accurate @coinbase is a 3rd party/bank/custodian Ethereum is built to destroy @coinbase Why would @brian_armstrong support that?

• 
  Synapse Brief (@Synapse_Brief) reported 56 minutes ago

  Community banks blaming stablecoins for deposit flight have the data backwards. FDIC: domestic deposits just posted a seventh straight quarterly increase. Community banks grew deposits 5% in 2025, beating the 3.9% industry average. That's not an industry losing to stablecoins, that's community banks outperforming their bigger competitors. The real killer has been consolidation, not crypto. 2,000 community banks gone in a decade, only 62 new charters formed. The buyers are regional banks rolling up smaller ones, not Coinbase or Circle. Where the "loophole" argument actually has teeth: the Clarity Act's Section 404 bans passive interest-style stablecoin yield, but it still lets platforms pay rewards tied to balance, duration or tenure under an "activity-based" label. That's precisely why 78 banking associations are lobbying the Senate right now to strip that carveout out. So banks do have a real fight here, just not the one the deposit-flight framing suggests. None of it matters yet anyway. The Senate just punted the Clarity Act vote past recess, odds of passage this year down to the high teens. Meanwhile the housing bill's nine-provision community bank relief package already became law in June, no stablecoin fight required. Killing Clarity protects a status quo that was never actually threatened by stablecoins. It was threatened by M&A.

• 
  dippo (@0xdippo) reported 56 minutes ago

  @aibra @coinbase It just says they don’t support that type of business with x402. It’s not that they don’t support x402. Regardless, **** Coinbase. Been trash for years.

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 60 minutes ago

  🚨𝗚𝗟𝗢𝗕𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗧 𝗩𝗢𝗟𝗨𝗠𝗘 𝗣𝗟𝗨𝗠𝗠𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝟮𝟭.𝟳% 𝗜𝗡 𝗝𝗨𝗟𝗬! Spot trading across 14 leading exchanges fell to $429.0 billion in July, down from $547.9 billion in June. Every exchange saw a dip. Binance led with $196.5 billion (45.8% of total), followed by OKX ($41.6 billion) and Bybit ($36.3 billion), together making up 64% of activity. Uniswap ($UNI) had the mildest drop at 9.8%, while Bitfinex slumped 59.7%, Coinbase 26.4% and Bybit 24.5%.

• 
  XyoPanda.Base.Eth (@XyoPanda) reported 1 hour ago

  @ashcotXBT Im thinking Cards Onramp / offramp service Savings account / Regular spending account Possible referral system 🤔 <- idk about the last part. Thats a big mabye All on chain via smart contracts Coinbase smart wallet intergration 🤔🤔🤔🤔 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

• 
  Nebbly 💛 (@Norv675) reported 1 hour ago

  @jp0010110 @coinbase Coinbase does not need a system maintenance to slow down. Just wait until the market is ripping,, that is when Coinbase slows down the most.

• 
  Darmin (@Darmin_che_) reported 1 hour ago

  @arsalxweb3 hey man I'm sorry to hear about your experience, I can understand how that feels. I've been hacked losing my crypto to an unknown address, due to an error from coinbase. I felt terrible luckily I got my funds recover. Kindly follow me I've a lead to share with you?