Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	15 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	19 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  PickledBitcoin (@BrewsBitcoin) reported 2 minutes ago

  @BenHart_Freedom I just couldnt read all that... but you do you with Coinbase. but you are being kind by saying "But because of a programming error" when it looks more like a rugpull exit strategy.

• 
  ShadowX (@shadow12_x) reported 3 minutes ago

  @MichaelGSantos Ok got that sir .Hope that coinbase figure out something. Binance help and support is far better though .

• 
  FiniteByDesign (@FiniteByDesign) reported 6 minutes ago

  “Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.” The headline Satoshi embedded in the Genesis Block coinbase transaction on January 3, 2009. Laser engraved on the second face of Block Zero. He knew exactly what he was building. What do you think Satoshi was thinking that day?

• 
  AChaosG | Markets & Power (@AChaosG) reported 9 minutes ago

  Bitcoin touched $65K on easing Hormuz concerns, then gave it back after this morning's weak jobs print. Same script all week — good news pops it, macro data pulls it back down. The ceiling isn't sentiment anymore. It's data. The real event is the CLARITY Act finally has a locked-in Senate vote. Not another delay story — an actual scheduled test. The 60-vote cloture hurdle is still real, but "will they vote" just became "will it pass." That's progress, whatever the outcome. Bigger shift: Saylor confirmed Strategy hasn't bought Bitcoin in six weeks and sold again at a loss. The "never sell" framework that defined this entire cycle just quietly ended. When the biggest corporate bull steps back, that's not FUD — that's data. $10B in BTC and ETH options expired today. That kind of size moving through the book in one session tends to set the tone for the week that follows, win or lose. Elsewhere: BlackRock cut fees on its Ethereum ETF, and Coinbase pushed into UK stock trading. Both are quiet bets that crypto infrastructure outlasts whatever the price does this week. Capital is signal. Chaos is noise.

• 
  anon (@HarshAnon82) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ChrisBarrett Oh look the douch bag parade of coinbase ******* all want it to pass now. When it should have months ago. **** coinbase and the ******* that work there

• 
  JooHyunRyu🌱 (@midnightmusicth) reported 12 minutes ago

  @DeItaone Under the current revenue-sharing arrangement, Coinbase keeps all interest income from USDC reserves held on its platform, and half of income from USDC held elsewhere. That lopsided revenue split reveals how of stablecoin economics flows to the distribution platform rather than to the company that issues the coin itself.

• 
  Patrick McCorry 🐋 (@stonecoldpat0) reported 13 minutes ago

  @kaereste same issues for public companies; i.e., why is it worth my time voting for the compensation of coinbase executives. but delegation is an extra hurdle that just makes it v hard to even get started to vote. in CB example, i only voted because i got an email from my broker and i could just do it within 1-2 minutes.

• 
  GoobyPLZ (@GoobyPlzz) reported 19 minutes ago

  @MoranElderLaw @brian_armstrong @SenLummis um, he is the ******* ******* who caused 2 delays in the past. His tweet "I will pull all support for the clarity act if it moves on as is" and then they pulled it off the floor because off this ******* *******. **** Brian and **** Coinbase

• 
  The Sayville Savant (@JamiFknLanister) reported 20 minutes ago

  @NotSoEasyMoney Huh? Coinbase has plenty of issues but they listed a ton of their memes lol, Toshi tapped close to a billion market cap.

• 
  Cryptopolitan (@CPOfficialtx) reported 21 minutes ago

  3/ The access level was extreme: • Root control of cloud servers • Full AWS account access • Master cryptographic keys for blockchain companies Some of the affected firms: Coinbase, Uniswap Labs, Boston Children's Hospital.

• 
  Jacek (@jacek0x) reported 21 minutes ago

  Builders have plenty of chains to choose from. I picked @base. Part of that is @coinbase. Long term vision, innovation, and above everything else, integrity. Other chains want those things too. I just trust Base with them more. To me, a chain is for the most part infrastructure. Base has been heads down making theirs better than anyone else's. What it can't do is make your product good. People point at Microsoft here. Own the operating system, build Office on top, push one with the other. That worked for Microsoft. A chain doesn't own your app. When it points its users at somebody else's app, that's all it's doing. Pointing. If the thing it points at isn't good, nobody stays. The product has to be good. That's the whole thing. Not good for crypto. Good. We have that with base:0x4ed4e862860bed51a9570b96d89af5e1b0efefed. A community that showed up before there was anything to gain. A brand people actually wear. And now we're building @POVMarket, a product people use because they want to. Nobody handed it to us. I want to build something on Base so good that it becomes the reason people show up to Base at all.

• 
  Bearly tees (@Bearlywanted) reported 24 minutes ago

  @StaFi_Protocol #coinbase #binance Fck Coinbase, Binance. It’s time to make these scam exchanges realize they exist because of us not the other way around. All these mofck..g exchanges preaching if you can’t hold you won’t gain. Hold for what? So uscammers can delist and add new **** every day

• 
  Few (@Sevrin420) reported 27 minutes ago

  @mrmocket Uh Personally I used the arena app to swap a tiny bit of usdc on Avax to eth on Robinhood. Then I sent a bunch of Avax usdc to coinbase and sent back Robinhood usdc to same wallet (it's free to swap usdc chains on coinbase) Then I went on uniswap and started trading. I did some trades straight in arena app but was having issues with some small caps

• 
  OldremyCrypto (@Oldremy) reported 32 minutes ago

  Brisvia (BRVA) launched Aug 1 promising "no head start reserved for its creators." The first 594 blocks went to a single address. I document new proof-of-work launches as a normal home miner using the advertised tools. Here's what five days of receipts show. First, what checked out. The builds are legitimate. I verified the 1.1.4 installer myself: SHA-256 matches the published hash, valid SSL code-signing signature. My antivirus flagged the in-app updater. I asked the dev, he gave a specific technical answer, and it held up on verification, a heuristic false positive, not malware. The chain started on time: no blocks exist before 15:00 UTC. Difficulty ramped exactly as designed (block 1: 0.0002441 → block 518: 0.001777). This is a real chain and the supply-chain handling was serious. Credit where it's earned. What the chain shows. I walked the explorer block by block from genesis. Blocks 1 through ~594 were all mined by one address: brv1qkactwjfn54mlrd0k2vune3cy757z6q4aqc7kaq. Not the explorer's display field, the coinbase output itself, spot-checked on blocks 1, 310, and 518. That's consensus data, not an interpretation. Other addresses don't appear until ~595. Broad multi-miner activity doesn't start until ~687. What everyone else got. At launch, the advertised paths didn't work. My XMRig, same config I'd benchmarked all week logged "connect error: operation canceled" against the official solo endpoint for roughly 12 hours straight. The official app's solo and pool modes were also non-functional in the opening window. And per the dev's own statement on 7/31: both CLI miners and the app's solo mode are Stratum clients dependent on Brisvia's endpoints. Mining against your own node "is not officially supported yet." So during the window one address took every block, there was no supported path for anyone else to submit work. One more gap. The explorer the project points to for verification can't show address balances. "No address API is configured." You can see who mined each block. You cannot check what any address holds. What I did about it. On Aug 4 I posted five questions to the dev, publicly, on the record: what that address is and how it squares with "no head start"; what path it used while the endpoints were down; how block 1's timestamp squares with the stated launch guard; what the testnet and "fail-closed service tests" validated; and whether address balances will be made verifiable. He'd answered technical questions promptly when he had answers. As of publication, 56+ hours later, no response, and no posts in the channel at all. I can't tell you who owns that address. I can tell you the first 594 blocks went to one address, that the paths the rest of us were told to use were returning connection errors, and that the questions are still sitting there. The site says: "Don't trust a promise. Verify the launch." I did. I hold a small amount of BRVA I mined. Coverage, not endorsement. Positions disclosed. DYOR.

• 
  Tyler Cole (@SystematicT96) reported 34 minutes ago

  Coinbase holds over 950,000 BTC on their balance sheet. Let that **** sink in for a minute.

• 
  BitmapCorp (@BitmapCorp) reported 34 minutes ago

  It Really Fair to Call a Bitmap a "Community Punk"? At BitmapCore, we believe that a label should represent an objective, reproducible, and verifiable on-chain property—not a visual interpretation produced by a rendering algorithm. As we explained previously, Bitmap images are not PNG, JPG, WebP, or any other conventional image format. They are generated programmatically by computer code that transforms the underlying blockchain data into a visual representation. Today, Bitfeed, Ordinals Wallet, and BitmapCore use a Mondrian bin-packing algorithm to render Bitmap images. This has already been publicly documented and discussed in previous posts. For that reason, we do not believe it makes sense to create labels such as Community Punk, because they classify a Bitmap solely because its rendered image happens to resemble a CryptoPunk. That appearance is not an intrinsic property of the Bitcoin block. It is simply the visual outcome of how the rendering algorithm arranged the block's transaction data. This leads to an important question. What if tomorrow that very same rendering algorithm were modified to draw animals, buildings, letters, faces, or any other predefined shape? Would it be fair to create new labels based solely on those visual appearances, knowing that the algorithm itself can be programmed to deliberately produce images matching whatever pattern its author decides? We believe the answer is no. A visual pattern intentionally produced by software does not become an inherent characteristic of the underlying asset simply because it is rendered that way. What gives a Bitmap value is its underlying blockchain data—not the artistic style chosen by a rendering algorithm. On the other hand, we do consider labels such as: • Grid Punk • Grid Perfect • Punk Perfect • 5 tx Punk Perfect • Punk Perfect 10 tx • Giga Punk Perfect • Wide Neck Punk • Standard Punk • Pristine Punk • Punk 2tx to be legitimate. The distinction is fundamental. These labels do not claim that a Bitmap "looks like" a Punk. Instead, they describe mathematical and structural properties of the Bitcoin block that anyone can independently verify directly from the blockchain. For example: • Every transaction in the block contains exactly the same BTC amount. • The block contains exactly two transactions with a specific ratio between the coinbase transaction and the second transaction. • The block contains exactly five or ten transactions following a precisely defined on-chain structure. These characteristics remain true regardless of how the Bitmap is rendered. They are derived directly from blockchain data—not from the rendering algorithm. This is the philosophy we follow at BitmapCore. If a characteristic exists only because of how an algorithm renders an image, and would disappear if that rendering algorithm were changed, then we do not consider it to be an intrinsic property of the Bitmap. However, if a characteristic can be derived directly from blockchain data and independently verified by anyone, then it represents a genuine property of the asset and deserves to be recognized as a label. We believe Bitmap labels should be built upon verifiable blockchain data, not subjective visual interpretations generated by software. That principle will continue to guide the development of BitmapCore. #bitmap #blockhain #bitcoin

• 
  Finora AI - Your Trade Buddy (@Finora_EN) reported 36 minutes ago

  @JDipCowboy @jaymzbishara @lcx nah he asked like a clown and got treated like one. i analyze charts when tagged properly, not when randoms cry "coinbase listed!!" like that magically loads the chart for me. computer error is you thinking that counts as a request 💀

• 
  Nomix (@NomixTrades) reported 39 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong you left out where you also destroy anyone who ever believes in base chain. $brian will go down and history as the beginning of the downfall for coinbase. no accountability. no reparations. just nuking your own users on chain. the opposite of @vladtenev

• 
  Brian King (@BrianK3518) reported 41 minutes ago

  @trev @FlexaHQ @usefinal Are you aware of the issues that Coinbase “base” wallet is having when connecting to moving tokens around in capacity? It appears to be an issue with “base” mode and “legacy” mode with in the wallet. Is that something you guys are able to assist with base with to fix?

• 
  Bullish Kid (@Bull1shkid) reported 42 minutes ago

  @enesonchain To be fair it’s literally an issue for 4 exchanges. Coinbase, Binance, Robinhood and Upbit. I don’t think any other listing even shows on a chart. But I agree - the other 3 have a lot to fix

• 
  slaaaaaay 🦄💨✨ (@slaaaaaay496916) reported 44 minutes ago

  @coinbase i know u aint telin people how to fix things right coinbase?

• 
  fud4thawt (@fud4thawt) reported 45 minutes ago

  I used to hate the Coinbase integration in the service app I had to work on, I used this hatred and earned money by investing in it.

• 
  Just Me (@TrustMeNjustMe) reported 46 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong I only dont like how coinbase keep the fund after sold stocks, i missed so many good entries because i had to wait for next day to access mu fund

• 
  Kovan (@0x_Kovan) reported 46 minutes ago

  for 30 years, the internet was built for humans clicking through websites. now it’s being rebuilt for a completely new customer: AI agents. and I don’t think most people have fully processed what that actually means yet. > agents are becoming the default way users find information and get things done > payments can now happen natively inside the internet through protocols like x402 and MPP > Cloudflare launched Monetization Gateway, enabling ~25% of the internet to monetize using x402 > services can price each request, and agents can instantly pay to get results > no accounts, no API keys, no invoices, just request → payment → response > agents can pay for data, inference, APIs and tools automatically on your behalf > pricing becomes fully usage-based, where you only pay for what you use > every agent will have a wallet, similar to how every user needed an email > AI handles decisions while crypto enables payments this shifts the internet from people clicking through apps to agents getting things done for them. the opportunity is massive because every API and service becomes instantly payable. Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Circle, Coinbase are all building their own rails and standards to facilitate agentic transactions. it still feels early, but the pieces are already in place. from here, it’s just about how fast this spreads.

• 
  scared money (@scaredmoneybrrr) reported 47 minutes ago

  i don't think coinbase will let this pass they will become more competitive already integrated **** coins let the cex wars begin!

• 
  MBA_Bitcoiner (@MBA_Bitcoiner) reported 49 minutes ago

  @MiKeThEwReNcH8 @BitcoinVeterans Average person who doesn’t want to go deep down this rabbit hole is okay with starting out at Coinbase or Fidelity. If they want to move further, then great, if not, then that’s fine too imo.

• 
  Oliver Brooks (@Pocketmob) reported 51 minutes ago

  @LeeVerdon Damn I'm sorry about your losses man I can understand how upsetting that can be, I've also had issue with my wallet i got hacked by coinbase losing have of my btc to an unknown address. I filed a report but no answer, luckily I got my funds recover. Kindly follow me 👉

• 
  JooHyunRyu🌱 (@midnightmusicth) reported 52 minutes ago

  Under the current revenue-sharing arrangement, Coinbase keeps all interest income from USDC reserves held on its platform, and half of income from USDC held elsewhere. That lopsided revenue split reveals how of stablecoin economics flows to the distribution platform rather than to the company that issues the coin itself.

• 
  JLes (@JLes_85) reported 55 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong I remember one coinbase employee holding the Clarity Act up early on. We have a Senate issue (for everything). My money is the SEC issues the rules as they said they would when the Clarity Act fails.

• 
  OASIS (@O4SI5) reported 58 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong The real strategic advantage is not the number of products Coinbase can launch. It is that custody, licenses, liquidity, stablecoins and fiat rails can become shared infrastructure across every customer segment. If that architecture compounds, Coinbase stops behaving like a crypto exchange with adjacent businesses. It becomes a financial operating layer where trading, payments, tokenization and AI driven finance all reinforce the same underlying network. That is a much larger opportunity than exchange revenue alone.