Disney+ Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Chibill (@MC_chibill) reported 3 minutes ago

  @cb_swartz_art @IsThisA3DModel Issue is those companies have capital something AI companies don't have, since they only have investor money and NOTHING else. And as you saw with Disney and OpenAI, those investors are pulling out and taking thier money with them.

• 
  Infinitale: Chronicles | Available on Amazon.com! (@InfinitaleComic) reported 4 minutes ago

  @HoundShark281 @johan_1379 All of the men depicted were immature and retarded. “The movie is about mothers and their daughters respecting and understanding each other as their own individuals.” Did we watch the same film? I’m talking about Disney-Pixar’s “Brave” here. It’s about a spoiled brat that does whatever she wants and shirks her familial responsibilities so badly that she ends up magically turning her mother and little brothers into bears. She learns nothing and any consequences were immediately resolved. She was an awful protagonist. “Do whatever makes you feel good and F tradition, responsibility, and even your own family if they get in the way of your happiness. It doesn’t matter anyway, because it’ll all sort itself out in the end.” That’s a terrible lesson to teach kids.

• 
  Everything You Need To Know (@EYNTKinfo) reported 5 minutes ago

  @TEA_Connect Yes, Walt Disney Imagineering uses AI. Their goal with using it is efficiency in all aspects. "This is not about replacing you (Imagineers)," shares Ali Rubinstein, "this is about you being able to get your work done faster so your 60 hour work week turns into a 40 hour work week, so that you can actually get a lunch break."

• 
  𝐉𝐨𝐡𝐧 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐮𝐬 - 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫 🇿🇦 📖 (@JohnAPretorius1) reported 6 minutes ago

  A large problem is that (a) the trailers are not that interesting, and (b) Mando and Grogu's arc should have ended in season 2. People sensed that. But Disney wanted Baby Yoda cash.

• 
  Dr. Sherlock Patrick House (@YulianRyder) reported 13 minutes ago

  @lifeofspiders disney is the problem

• 
  Mr704 (@Mr704intheQC) reported 15 minutes ago

  @ManaByte That doesn’t matter. Declining ticket sales tell the story that Lucasfilm and Disney have to fix.

• 
  em (@drdoomarchive) reported 17 minutes ago

  @SnoopyOnCr4ck @Ss2Official I see no problem in that. they are doing what's best for them. its not like disney and imax are blood relatives

• 
  Dytanr (@Dytanr1) reported 20 minutes ago

  @thattugglife I want this more any other SW series, KOTOR adaptation a close second. But it would have to be done with such great care, I'm not sure disney can do it. Recasting can work when done right, see Lando. We know they can play the characters forever, but we all want a better continuation than we got

• 
  Ron Bassilian (@Ron4California) reported 23 minutes ago

  @michaelmiraflor @willchamberlain It’s not a hot take, it’s a serious problem for Disney: Pursue deep pockets of childless adults? Or breed a continuing customer base by catering to families with children?

• 
  ❄️𝕁𝕩𝕟-𝕂æ𝕫𝕒𝕞𝕒🇯🇲❄️ (@Junxrrcarter) reported 25 minutes ago

  The way she articulated her thoughts on AI was very accurate. Disney are actually disgusting when they basically have unlimited income. Greedy and awful

• 
  David McKenzie (@mckenzielaw) reported 28 minutes ago

  This is what I think is going on with the Duke-Amazon deal and why the Big Ten is whining. It's all about a direct-to-consumer model and risk allocation. Let's start with the law because the law explains the deal. College sports media rights flow through a stacked architecture that schools rarely discuss in public but that governs everything they can and cannot do. Every ACC member, Duke included, has executed a Grant of Rights to the conference— an irrevocable assignment of media rights running through 2036. The ACC then licensed that aggregated catalogue to ESPN under a parallel agreement of comparable duration. The Big Ten and Fox sit atop an identical structure on their side of the ledger. The consequence is that Duke does not own the broadcast rights to its own basketball games in any meaningful sense. ESPN does. And Michigan's rights belong to Fox. That architecture is the entire reason the Amazon deal required permission rather than a checkbook, as suggested by @RossDellenger. Duke could not license a game to Amazon any more than a tenant could sell the building. What Duke could do is ask the actual rights holder — ESPN, through the ACC — to carve out three games from its exclusive bundle and allow Amazon to distribute them. ESPN agreed. Dellenger's reporting suggests ESPN extracted a licensing fee plus future Duke scheduling commitments in return. That is a sublicense, structured as a limited waiver of exclusivity, and it is the legal mechanism that makes the entire arrangement possible. Without ESPN's consent, the deal is a straightforward breach of the Grant of Rights cascade. With it, the deal is unremarkable contract law. Which brings us to the Big Ten. Its claim that it "owns" the Duke-Michigan game is the sound of a conference dressing up a contractual reciprocity provision as a property right. The actual mechanism the B1G is invoking is an alternation arrangement between the conferences and their rights holders for neutral-site games played in shared metropolitan territory with New York, a virtual home game for Duke, being the one at issue. Even taking that at face value, it is a contract claim running between the conferences, not a proprietary interest enforceable against Duke, Amazon, or Madison Square Garden. And the party whose alternation turn was supposedly violated, ESPN, has already blessed the deal. It is hard to articulate a coherent legal theory under which the B1G or Fox enforces ESPN's contractual entitlement against ESPN's wishes. The B1G's posture is a negotiating marker, not a litigation position, and any honest reading of the underlying agreements would say so. So why did ESPN say yes? This is where the law stops explaining things and strategy takes over. I'm not just guessing here. ESPN launched its standalone streaming flagship into a market in which the most important commercial question in sports media remains unanswered: will cord-cutters pay to watch a Tuesday-night college basketball game? Disney has spent the better part of a decade rearranging its streaming portfolio without producing a clean answer, and the cost of running that experiment on ESPN's own platform —with ESPN's own marquee inventory and ESPN's own reputation on the line — is considerable. The Pac-12 tried a version of this experiment with Apple two years ago. Apple would not pay linear money, the schools would not accept streaming-only reach, and the conference disintegrated before the deal did. The lesson the industry absorbed was that premium college sports was not yet ready for direct-to-consumer exclusivity. ESPN needs to know whether that lesson still holds, and it would prefer not to find out the hard way. The structure of the Duke deal seems to be the answer. Amazon bears the production cost, the promotional spend, and the conversion risk against Prime's installed 200M+ worldwide subscriber base. ESPN collects a licensing fee, future scheduling inventory it can deploy on its own terms, and a clean read on whether streaming-exclusive premium college basketball actually works as a commercial proposition. If Amazon's experiment succeeds, ESPN learns the model and pulls future games back in-house at the next negotiation. If it fails, Amazon absorbs the loss and ESPN quietly concludes the market is not ready, having paid nothing for the information beyond the foregone value of three games it was compensated for anyway. That is not a concession. It is a hedged bet, and a clever one. Fox cannot afford the same posture, which is why the B1G is whining. Fox One and Tubi are real but considerably smaller than the combined Disney streaming footprint, and every individual rights leak feels more existential to a network without the same DTC depth to fall back on. ESPN can be magnanimous because Disney has room to be patient. Fox and the B1G have less room, so the B1G is now tasked with escalating a routine reciprocity dispute into a public claim of ownership it cannot sustain. That tells you more about the B1G and Fox's competitive position than it does about the merits of the contract. The deeper point, and the one worth dwelling on, is that the rights architecture schools accepted a decade ago to keep their conferences intact is now being tested by the schools themselves. Duke did not break the system. Duke worked within it, asked ESPN for permission, gave up something in return, and brought a streaming partner to the table that the network was apparently happy to let bear the risk of an experiment Disney has not figured out how to run on its own. The B1G and Fox would prefer that schools not learn this trick. They are about to learn it anyway. And the next negotiation, whenever it comes, will reflect what Amazon's three games taught everyone about who the audience really is and what they will pay to watch. The Duke-Amazon arrangement is being described as a turning point for college sports media. My honest guess is that it's more of a market test, structured by a rights holder who needed information from a 200M+ subscriber base more than it needed three basketball games. It's now being resisted by a competitor who cannot afford to be that patient. The law explains how the deal got done. The strategy explains why ESPN wanted it done this way. And the B1G's complaint, stripped of its proprietary language, is the complaint of a conference that wishes it had thought of it first.

• 
  Straight Off The Couch 🥱 (@_UserNameWorks_) reported 30 minutes ago

  Dear @Topps , My wife and our 2-year-old daughter were so excited to open 4 Topps Disney Neon blaster boxes together. She kept saying 'Mickey!' with pure joy. But 3 of the 4 boxes had the exact same cards… meaning we got triples of almost everything. The anticipation turned into such a letdown for my little girl. Quality control like this really hurts family collecting moments. Any chance you can help make this right? #ToppsDisneyNeon @CardPurchaser

• 
  ID_ENG (@ID__ENG) reported 30 minutes ago

  @DisneyPlus has got to have the worst user experience of any stream servic. Pay extra to have more simultaneous streaming devices.. but it doesn't count for Hulu originals. How do I have a TV that every other day I have to update my household with. Oh what I can't, hit the limit.

• 
  Jason W Kelly (@jasonkredline) reported 32 minutes ago

  @_JasonLT My single least favorite piece of art ever made What an awful, creatively bankrupt, surface level, lazy story, and what an awful direction to take Star Wars in. True disgrace. Biggest issue with Rian and Disney Star Wars, is they didn’t try hard enough.

• 
  Hydro_Og (@DocHollywood406) reported 32 minutes ago

  @EricSim27224633 @Grummz Actual gameplay is not the problem, its literally like Grummz said. They disneyfied the franchise. You have what looks like Disney movie characters running around in plate armor next to Thrall. Achmage Kadghar in a wheelchair? He couldn't summon an elemental or something?