Disney+ Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Disney+ users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Disney+, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Disney+ users affected:
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Saint Paul, MN | 1 |
| London, England | 26 |
| Malvern, AR | 1 |
| Aubagne, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 2 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 64 |
| Saint-Julien, Brittany | 1 |
| Attleborough, England | 1 |
| San José Iturbide, GUA | 1 |
| Milwaukee, WI | 1 |
| Harlow, England | 2 |
| Sandillon, Centre | 3 |
| Saint-Michel-Chef-Chef, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Toul, ACAL | 2 |
| Medellín, Antioquia | 1 |
| Milton Keynes, England | 6 |
| Nîmes, Occitanie | 3 |
| Acton, MA | 1 |
| Blyth, England | 2 |
| City of London, England | 3 |
| Southwark, England | 5 |
| Nashville, TN | 2 |
| Ciudad Jardín, MEX | 2 |
| Great Malvern, England | 1 |
| Choisy-le-Roi, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Valence, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Villefranche-sur-Saône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Omaha, NE | 2 |
| Ocala, FL | 1 |
| Renfrew, Scotland | 1 |
| Reading, England | 3 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
el azotador del maldito moro (@elazotedelmoro) reported@GreenCheetah99 The djs are always the worst at Disney special events
-
A L I E N R izzler (@alien_rizzler) reportedLook at this ******* douche bag loser who sent me a nasty comment and then blocked me because he’s a ******* *****. He’s a misogynist and he is a hater and he hates women and he did something completely bullying and douche bag because he obviously has some kind of problem with people who are normal he’s a freak and he worships Disney, any dude that worships Disney is a ******* loser. LOLOLOL @magicnextdoor_ Block away you *****, but I know you’re reading this because only ******* will post a comment and then block someone douche bag I’m a nice person, but I don’t put up with bullies. I will draw a line on you you dirtbag. You should change your name to magic next douche hahah
-
Proletariat (@Proletaria4520) reported@12234d @theserfstv “Sitting on (in*) a chair watching videos others but (put*) work into.” So like watching Netflix, Disney, Hulu, any piece of media that exists and people watch? Yeah, that’s a living, a lot of people do it and enjoy it
-
TREK (@trek_official) reportedWhat if the biggest entertainment empire on Earth had to perform emergency surgery on itself... and the operating table was its own future? 1. THE BLEEDING By mid-2022, Disney+ had 137 million subscribers. Wall Street cheered. Inside Disney's Burbank headquarters, CFO Christine McCarthy was looking at a different number: a streaming operating loss projected at nearly $4 billion for the fiscal year. The strategy, inherited from the Chapek era and its 'subscribers at all costs' mantra, was bleeding the company dry. Every new season of The Mandalorian, every Marvel series, was a colossal expense disguised as a win. The game was about to change. 2. THE SURGEON RETURNS October 2022. Bob Iger is back. His first memo isn't about content; it's about 'significant cost reduction.' The narrative shifts overnight from 'growth' to 'sustainability.' The Wall Street cheers for raw subscriber counts turn to skeptical questions about path-to-profit. Iger doesn't just refocus the ship; he starts throwing cargo overboard. Hundreds of shows are removed from the platform, not for quality, but for tax write-downs. The message is brutal and clear: we are no longer in the library business. We are in the profitable content business. 3. THE PRICE OF ADULTING Then came the part nobody wanted, but everyone had to pay for. In late 2022 and again in 2024, Disney hiked subscription prices. Aggressively. It wasn't a modest adjustment; it was a test of loyalty. The company was betting that families who had woven Disney+ into their digital living rooms—after subscribing for $6.99—would stomach $13.99. The bet wasn't on new shows. It was on inertia, on brand love, on the fact that cancelling feels like taking a toy from a child. And it worked. Revenue per user began climbing, even as some price-sensitive subscribers walked away. 4. THE AD-FUELED TRADE-OFF But Disney couldn't just take money from loyalists. They needed new, less price-sensitive revenue. Enter the ad-supported tier. This wasn't just another option; it was the linchpin of the new model. It allowed Disney to effectively segment the market: those who pay with their money, and those who pay with their attention. This dual engine—higher subscription fees AND ad revenue—created the financial oxygen needed to stop the bleeding. By the end of Fiscal 2025, the streaming segment, encompassing Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+, had clawed its way toward profitability. The surgery was working. 5. THE QUIET CONTENT REVOLUTION Here's what the balance sheets don't scream: the content strategy quietly mutated. The flood of mid-budget Marvel and Star Wars series wasn't just reduced; it was replaced with fewer, higher-stakes events. The model shifted from 'always something new' to 'must-see when it arrives.' Simultaneously, the focus turned to franchise extensions that could feed both streaming and parks—the true profit multiplier. Every decision was run through a new filter: does this justify its cost and drive deeper engagement across our ecosystem? 6. THE LESSON THEY LEARNED (AND WALL STREET DIDN'T) The genius of Disney's pivot was accepting a painful short-term narrative to win a long-term war. For two years, headlines screamed 'Disney+ Loses Subscribers!' as the company intentionally shed unprofitable users and raised prices. They traded the vanity metric for the vital one. Fiscal 2025 became their 'financial repair' year. They didn't just cut costs; they rebuilt the unit economics of streaming from the ground up, proving that in the attention economy, the company that can price for value—monetarily and emotionally—wins. So, was it a costly pivot? Billions in losses and two years of brutal headlines say yes. But ask a different question: what was the cost of not pivoting? Disney didn't just save its streaming business. It potentially defined the playbook for the entire industry: growth is a lie told in quarterly earnings calls; profit is the truth told in decades. The mouse didn't just learn to dance in the dark—it learned to light its own fire. source @trek_official
-
SquintoBe4n (@SquintoBe4n) reported@mickmako No it isn't. No one had an issue with it except the devs or maybe Disney idk. But literally no one cared cause it was funny
-
XMT (@metal25x) reported@TheCriticalDri2 @heelvsbabyface Film production companies pay them to attack critics. Disney seems to be the worst
-
Caroline Fossum (@cfoss333) reportedme when I have to take my luggage to work next friday before I fly to disney 🫡😎
-
Rekter (@Rekter) reported$SPY At ~$748, within a 52-week range of $482 to $762. The jobs print I said would decide everything landed Thursday morning, and it came in soft: employers added just 57,000 jobs in June, roughly half the 113,000 to 115,000 expected, breaking a three-month hot streak. And the market loved it. The S&P 500 gained 1.8% in the holiday-shortened four-day week (markets closed Friday for Independence Day), finishing near 7,486. The Dow surged 539 points Thursday (+1.03%) to a fresh all-time record close of 52,844, up 2% on the week, with Apple up 4.8%, McDonald’s up 4.07%, and Disney up 3.84% leading. The details of the report were Goldilocks, not recession: unemployment actually ticked DOWN to 4.2% from 4.3%, wage growth held at 3.5% year-over-year, right in line, and while April and May were revised lower by a combined 74,000 jobs, 2026 monthly job gains still average about 92,000 versus just 9,700 in 2025. The read across Wall Street was uniform: slower hiring pulls the rate hike off the table without signaling a breaking economy. The week also closed the books on Q2, the best quarter for U.S. indexes since 2020. New Fed Chair Warsh, speaking at the ECB’s Sintra forum, told investors to look to the data rather than the Fed for the rate path, and the data just bought him room to wait. Oil kept collapsing, with WTI near $67, down nearly 20% in two weeks and back to levels last seen the first trading day after the war began. The jobs report was the binary and it broke bullish: soft enough to kill the hike, firm enough to avoid a growth scare. Dow at a record 52,844. Best quarter since 2020 in the books. Oil doing the Fed’s inflation work for free. The Goldilocks window is open. The question is how long 57K stays “cooling” before it becomes “stalling.”
-
Aaron McMahon (@AaronMcMahon) reported@rachel_reviews Illumination spends less than Disney and DreamWorks on animation and you can tell by the quality
-
exakic (@exakic) reportedAlso shadowplay doesnt work when you have certain websites open (streaming services like prime video and disney+) so if theres one without that issue that would be great
-
Alexsis 🏳️⚧️ (@Collectablebots) reported@TheDimmeh I feel like if you give Doctor Who to Apple TV the show would be in safe hands, unlike other streaming platforms like Disney+ or Netflix they rarely if ever cancel a show due to bad ratings and they value quality over quantity
-
🖤 JustStayin (@JStayin) reported@hewitson10 No rules were broken? (Then Farage has set a historic precedent and must be punished to set an example) Jenrick clearly thinks we're playing a giant game of Mornington Crescent under Westferry Planning Scandal; "White Faces"; Defection document; Disney mural rules?
-
Prince Yael (@GoldieLknLn) reported@AI_EmeraldApple My problem is 1/3rd of the cast is so unserious it drops it to Disney live action tier or cheap CW series. Samantha Morton is good, the 3 male leads will carry it, Anne Hathaway has HR face, Zendaya casting is awful, she’s too cartoonish to be in a serious movie.
-
Rahul Raj (@raahulll_raj) reportednvidia built a brain for robots and gave it away for free. not selling it. not gatekeeping it. just dropped it on hugging face like it's a random side project it's called GR00T one brain, any robot Before GR00T, every robotics company trained their machines from scratch. teaching one robot to pick up a cup = months of work. teaching the next robot the same thing = start over. GR00T is a general brain that any humanoid can download and use. Boston Dynamics, figure, agility, xpeng all already building on it. it thinks like us (kinda scary) the model has two systems. a fast one : pure reflex, like when you catch a falling phone without thinking. a slow one : the part that plans, "okay first i open the fridge, then i grab the milk." same way your brain works. except this one doesn't get tired or ask for chai breaks. the part that broke me. robots need thousands of hours of humans demonstrating tasks to learn. super expensive, super slow. nvidia's fix? the robot generates videos of ITSELF doing new tasks from a single image and learns from its own imagination. they made 9 months worth of training data in 11 hours. nine months. eleven hours. let that sit. the newer version was built in 36 hours the upgrade that used to need 3 months of humans recording demos? done in a day and a half using dreamed-up data. the improvement loop is compounding and most people have no idea it's happening. even disney is in nvidia teamed up with google deepmind AND disney research to build the physics engine these robots train in. those cute bdx droids you saw on stage with jensen? this tech. when disney, google and nvidia agree on one project, that's not a collab. that's a signal. why should we care? there's a global labor shortage of 50 million+ people. every warehouse, every factory, every hospital is understaffed. we spent 2023-2024 watching ai learn to talk. we're now watching it learn to move.
-
Sami Ben Said (@iOnlineSaid) reported↙💖⏸👝🍳 One of my earliest memories is being inside the recording studio and I see the shadow of a figure that looks an awful lot like Walt Disney. Then the door opened and Mr. Disney walked in and said, 'Hi Clint.' I won't ever forget that. – Clint Howard