Disney+ Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Savethemagic (@Savethedmagic) reported 3 minutes ago

  @trojanjustin It does look awful. It's a disgrace to everything Disney stood for.

• 
  Kent Beyers (@kingofcities) reported 3 minutes ago

  @PwrRngr Love in the article where it says they're not moving forward because superhero series are expensive to make LOL Everything Disney does is expensive, so much bloat. Why did they bother? Somehow it was made for years by other people in New Zealand on a modest budget, no problem.

• 
  Kat • KH4 RIKU REVEAL D23 (@Legend_MythaKat) reported 6 minutes ago

  I don't mind if they make more frozen films but... I need them to up the quality cause the 2nd movie had some interesting ideas but I didn't think it did a lot of it well and was all over the place. Also a lot of the Disney movies as of late has not been it

• 
  Sirmugen (@sirmugen) reported 9 minutes ago

  @SMB_Attorney I use to love Reunion, then the traffic gets really bad on the I4. If they fix it soon then maybe. Don’t stay there for Disney if you hate traffic.

• 
  Tony D'Orazio (@TonyForLP) reported 15 minutes ago

  @itsemileeharper Disney seems to be especially guilty of this. They tried a similar approach to High School Musical and it didn't work. OK, that gave us Olivia Rodrigo, but still. But I also don't have problems with the last generation's icons holding on to pass the torch - Madonna handing it off to Sabrina Carpenter (and Britney before her, I guess), for example.

• 
  Caty⁷ ✨ art&personal (@c_art_y) reported 17 minutes ago

  Doing frozen 3 Elsa fix it fanart already and calling the new design chopped… you are not better than the artists at Disney, be humble

• 
  Surprise Castle (@SurpriseCastle) reported 17 minutes ago

  The Power Rangers Disney+ reboot is cancelled, and fans are back in the same loop again. The franchise was never the problem, the commitment behind it is.

• 
  Jamie Walters, CAIA (@JWalters314) reported 25 minutes ago

  @SMB_Attorney The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act materially strengthened the tax incentive to buy properties like these giant Disney-area short-term rentals. The basic mechanism was that TCJA expanded bonus depreciation to 100% for qualifying property acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before 2023. It also changed the rules so that used property could qualify, not merely brand-new property. That was enormously important for real-estate investors because someone buying an existing vacation home could potentially obtain accelerated deductions on qualifying components of the property. Imagine a simplified version of the Kissimmee house $694,000 purchase price less, say, $100,000 allocated to land leaves $594,000 depreciable basis. Suppose a cost-segregation study classified $150,000–$200,000 of that basis into qualifying 5-, 7-, or 15-year property. During the 100% bonus-depreciation period, much or potentially all of those qualifying components could be deducted immediately rather than slowly over many years. That alone created a large tax deferral. But short-term rentals had an additional advantage that conventional landlords generally didn't have. Under the passive-activity rules, ordinary rental real estate is generally treated as passive. That matters because a $150,000 depreciation-generated loss usually cannot simply erase $150,000 of salary earned at someone's unrelated job. But IRS Publication 925 contains an important exception: an activity isn't treated as a "rental activity" for these passive-activity rules when the average period of customer use is seven days or less. Then comes the second requirement: material participation. If the owner materially participates, the activity can potentially produce a non-passive tax loss. That means a high-income household could, depending on its facts, use a large depreciation loss from an Airbnb against wages or business income rather than merely carrying the loss forward as a passive loss. Plenty of American's from the top 10% have inherited wealth and "business income," that was eager to take advantage of the 2017 tax law incentives. Economic return=Airbnb cash flow+property appreciation+tax savings/deferral. During 2020–22, an investor could plausibly model all three as positive at once. The tax code didn't require investors to finance the house entirely with equity. Someone might put down $140,000 on a $700,000 property while depreciation deductions were based largely on the property's depreciable basis, not merely on the buyer's cash down payment. TCJA also created a particularly powerful timing coincidence Look at the timeline: 2018–2022: 100% bonus depreciation. 2020–2021: extraordinarily low mortgage rates. 2020–2022: pandemic-era vacation-rental demand boom. 2020–2022: enormous housing appreciation. 2020–2022: investors increasingly marketed cost segregation + STR tax strategies. You therefore had fiscal policy, monetary policy and tourism-market expectations all pushing in essentially the same direction. The owner's actual economic experience doesn't equal simply a $204,000 loss. You would need to reconstruct: purchase price + closing/furnishing costs + operating losses + interest + insurance + HOA + taxes−rental income−tax benefits−principal reduction and then account for transaction costs and tax consequences upon sale. The story does not end with TCJA. After the original TCJA bonus-depreciation percentage began phasing down, Congress subsequently restored permanent 100% bonus depreciation for qualifying property acquired after January 19, 2025. So the accelerated-depreciation incentive itself is alive again. People will 1031 exchange. If the 2023 buyer operated this successfully as a high-rate Disney short-term rental for three years, collected positive net operating income, and used cost segregation plus bonus depreciation to shelter other business income, then a large portion of the apparent capital loss may already have been economically recovered. At a 37% marginal federal rate, a $160,000 usable first-year depreciation loss would have an immediate tax value of roughly: $160,000(0.37)=$59,200. Now add the operating business. Suppose this seven-bedroom Disney property produced, after Airbnb/Vrbo fees, management, utilities, HOA, insurance, property taxes, repairs and interest, an average $30,000 of actual cash profit per year for three years. That's another: 3($30,000)=$90,000. $90,000 of operating profit plus perhaps $70,000 of accumulated tax savings already puts the investor around $160,000 ahead of the simple purchase-price-to-sale-price comparison. So before transaction costs and disposition taxes, the economic loss might be closer to: −204,000+90,000+70,000=−$44,000​ rather than −$204,000. And if the Airbnb generated $50,000 annually rather than $30,000, you'd have: 3(50,000)=$150,000 of cumulative operating profit, and the investor could conceivably have made money over the entire holding period despite selling the house for $204,000 less than he paid. Suppose he put 20% down: $694,000(20%)=$138,800. He didn't have $694,000 of personal capital at risk. He may have controlled a $694,000 depreciable income-producing asset with roughly $139,000 of initial equity. Now suppose during ownership he got: $90k cash flow+$70k tax savings=$160k of cumulative economic benefits. That exceeds the original $139,000 down payment before considering financing costs already embedded in our assumed net cash flow. This is why the return on investor equity is a much better framework than Nick Gerli's purchase-price-versus-list-price graphic. There is, however, an important complication at sale. Accelerated depreciation isn't simply forgotten. Depreciation reduces tax basis, and sales of depreciable business property can trigger the rules applicable to Sections 1245 and 1250. IRS Publication 544 specifically addresses depreciation recognition/recapture upon disposition. But here's an especially interesting feature of this particular case: the property has fallen so far in price that the disposition analysis may be much less painful than it would be if the house had appreciated. If the buyer's adjusted tax basis has fallen substantially because of depreciation but the property is nevertheless being sold at $490,000, you have to allocate the sales proceeds among the land, building and cost-segregated components and calculate gain/loss asset by asset. You can't simply say “all $160,000 of depreciation gets recaptured.” The exact outcome depends on those allocations and adjusted bases. The investor may have only about 10% of the accelerated depreciation come back as §1245 ordinary-income recapture. For this particular $694k → $490k example, >80% of the accelerated depreciation escaping immediate recapture is not inherently implausible at all. What looks like a loss to regular W2 slaves may have been a nice gain to an investor with inherited business income to offset and an accountant who can work the books. An investor could rationally bid more for the house than an owner-occupant could justify, because the investor was purchasing not merely housing services but a bundle of: Disney STR income + leveraged appreciation + accelerated tax deductions. The tax code therefore helped capitalize some of those benefits into the acquisition price itself.

• 
  💜❤️ Bailee 💜❤️ | Hidden Heroes era (@xoxoShadowfan03) reported 27 minutes ago

  @godzillaboy_54 Its a remake and it's not originally owned by Disney and we all know with remakes it was gonna be terrible anyways.

• 
  Josh (@BartoHawk764) reported 30 minutes ago

  @LEGOTtNewsI Disney owned X-Men in all aspects except movies, they just stopped including X-Men because it might help Fox

• 
  moni ⸆⸉ 卌 皿 (@wildfloweromine) reported 31 minutes ago

  lowkey think everyone is overreacting about the peter pan disney adult lady like yeah she’s weird but everyone’s acting like she’s the worst person to ever interact with a character actor in the history of ever

• 
  Chris Roberts (@Robbins17Chris) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Nomoremutants22 as conclusion to wandvision trilogy yes.some wondering if they will finally make aos official mcu canon.if anyone can make all the ais from films work in human form it's materal.paramount stupid to let disney sign him up

• 
  Kukla (@Skamet_Kukla) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Milajoy The moment he buys it they collectively will reject the program, just like Disney did to x. He'd have to fight for the channel to be alive, but for what? CNN was never worth it. Neither the quality of their output, nor the people in it.

• 
  steven MAYHEM (@steventargaryen) reported 33 minutes ago

  they’re calling it the worst land in any disney park in the world

• 
  Matt (@wrecklessdrive1) reported 33 minutes ago

  @MrJonesSTRs My brother owns a Disney air bnb rental. Bought in 2021. It pencils out. Tho he bought a 340k house and gets it all to work at $150/night. These are luxury homes and are much riskier to get the rental income day after day. Essentially lower price points make sense still.