Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Buffering (34%)
• Crashing (20%)
• Playback Issues (7%)
• Video Quality (4%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint Paul	Sign in	24 hours ago
London	Sign in	2 days ago
Malvern	Crashing	2 days ago
London	Sign in	2 days ago
Aubagne	Sign in	3 days ago
Paris	Playback Issues	3 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  𝔸ℚ𝕌𝔸𝔹𝔸𝔹𝕊 is in Uncertain, TX (@cheerfanatical) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Eezzrraa33 @DollyComics @Disney Nobody knows what your issue is considering all of your comments are incoherent rambling

• 
  box (@GwabGrab) reported 4 minutes ago

  @score38 @PBVALVE low quality is inherently funnier, 4k hd reaction pictures give facebook moms disney trips and corporate psyops

• 
  McBuckers (@McBuckers) reported 5 minutes ago

  @DreyfusJames Ricky was spot on at the Globes: “You say you're woke, but the companies you work for... Apple, Amazon, Disney. If ISIS started a streaming service, you'd call your agent."

• 
  Virileth (@VirilethDerg) reported 9 minutes ago

  @WhatsWildeHopps @TheYbbor @lunewilde I don't give a single **** if the world sees my oh so awful opinion that two Disney characters from a movie are friends. That's why I posted it in public you *******. I give a **** that you actually seem to think it's some kind of crime worth turning into this whole drama. Instead of just being a normal mature human being and replying with "I disagree". Complete with this disingenuous fake politeness. All while making it clear both here and in the OP that you think my post is worth putting on blast to your 71 followers. You are slime.

• 
  Douglas (@DouglasnTexas) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ChrisLynnHedges Chris a violent revolution is not required. We can peacefully take over capitalism in a fashion that steals nothing and earnds everything. Corporations are powerful tools for concentrating capital and influence. How that power is used—or shared—ultimately rests with those who create and govern them. There is no moral or practical reason why any billionaire should be forced to surrender wealth they risked everything to build and distribute it to people who contributed nothing to earning it. No one has a right to claim what they did not earn. Every adult citizen in the United States already possesses the fundamental right to risk their own money, start a company, and keep the rewards they generate. Citizens also have the right to pool their resources—month after month—to form and fund corporations together. The transformative moment comes when ordinary people realize they can do exactly that on a massive scale. They can band together to create companies that serve real societal needs, contribute as little as five dollars a month, and gain ownership in enterprises producing valuable intellectual property and profits. Think about Netflix. Millions of us already pay every month for unlimited access to movies and shows. We fund the machine like clockwork—but we own nothing. The exciting truth is: we *can* own it. We already subscribe to Netflix, Disney, Spotify, and countless others. Why not redirect that same recurring commitment into corporations we collectively own? With millions of citizens participating, even modest contributions of five dollars per month could generate enormous capital—while limiting each individual’s risk to almost nothing. This is in everyone’s self-interest. And that is not a flaw to be ashamed of—it is a powerful human reality we should harness. People reliably act in their own interest first. Rather than treating self-interest as a problem to suppress, we should design systems that turn it into a driving force for widespread prosperity. It is entirely possible to build corporations that serve both the individual owner’s financial return *and* broader societal value. When millions of citizens own and back such companies, capitalism will have reached its next evolution. Capitalism works for the masses every bit as effectively as it works for billionaires—when the masses become owners, not just consumers.

• 
  emmy !! 🍉 | SMT IV + DR1 (@21stcdigitalgrl) reported 14 minutes ago

  @medication92 never said the pfp was making me mad actually! you talk like a disney channel bully who curses, get some new words man. also, just because those are the most recent things i bought doesn't mean i'm a poser lmfao? bet you can't even name one Broken By Silence song bro

• 
  el azotador del maldito moro (@elazotedelmoro) reported 15 minutes ago

  @GreenCheetah99 The djs are always the worst at Disney special events

• 
  CZghost 🇨🇿 (@TheCZghost) reported 15 minutes ago

  @MovieFlameProd To be fair, I don't mind watching movies he's in, if it's not a Disney live action remake. Which this one is. Disney has a substantial amount of awful live action remakes output lately. I'm not watching these. What works in animation, doesn't work in live action counterpart.

• 
  Top Tier (@LondonGreenwade) reported 16 minutes ago

  All that work fighting for my life trying to take their pics working at Disney on Ice and now they learn how to pose.

• 
  Multiverse Media (@MultiverseCanva) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Phenomm_ This would absolutely backfire. Look at how DC is dominating unit metrics right now with the Absolute Universe line. Fans explicitly want high-quality print single issues. Pivoting fully to Webtoon is Disney trading long-term cultural impact for cheap digital clicks.

• 
  Justin Merz (@jdaydreamer77) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Dwood1x @StarWarsDaily_ A huge problem with TLJ is that the audience had given Disney the benefit of the doubt that Rey, Poe, Finn, and Ren would grow on them as the trilogy progressed.... Instead, they added other new characters they cared even less about.

• 
  Eric Goldman (@TheEricGoldman) reported 18 minutes ago

  @August_7th_ I know people had issues with Season 3 and 4, but I also found it bizarre Disney stuck to binge releases for The Bear given it locked in with a core audience who would have been talking about it/spreading word week to week if they'd moved to weekly episodes.

• 
  Odyssey Of The Force (@force_odyssey21) reported 22 minutes ago

  Force Fam, So for the holidays I'm headed to Disney and I'm thinking about doing the whole build-a-lightsaber thing. Does anyone have experience doing that? Is it worth it, in your opinion? Are the sabers good quality, or would I be better off buying from one (of the many) saber shops online? #starwars #swtwt #starwarsfan

• 
  YWK Entertainment (@YWK_on_TTV) reported 24 minutes ago

  @horrormuseum @JDoh2983 Exactly If he does come back it's not for fame, money, or to help Disney... it's for the fans 100% he's one of the handful of good ones left in Hollywood

• 
  Burunman the 2nd (@JoeWilson1470) reported 37 minutes ago

  @SimplyShae13 @kodiak_attack She ISN'T bigoted though. You're just a sheep who bought into Disney's crap with the hilarious irony being that Disney are actual bigots or at least donated millions to some of the worst bigots on earth. You think you're progressive but in another life you'd be burning a witch.

• 
  Cane Allesta (@caneallesta) reported 39 minutes ago

  Midjourney's legal strategy just flipped Hollywood's lawsuit on its head: if you're going to sue us for training on protected content, show us what you're doing behind closed doors first. 👀 The case started in June 2025 when Disney and NBCUniversal filed the first major Hollywood studio lawsuit against an AI company, accusing Midjourney of generating images of Darth Vader, the Minions, the Little Mermaid, and dozens of protected characters from a simple text prompt. Warner Bros. joined months later. The suit describes Midjourney as "a bottomless pit of plagiarism" and seeks up to $150,000 per infringed work with more than 150 works identified in an exhibit, potentially exceeding $20 million in damages. Midjourney's defense has always been fair use: training models on publicly available images, including copyrighted ones, is transformative and legal — the same argument playing out in dozens of parallel lawsuits against OpenAI, Stability AI, and Meta. CEO David Holz put it bluntly: "AI doesn't steal ideas, it learns like humans do." Now comes the interesting procedural move. A judge had already ordered the studios to turn over documentation about their own generative AI usage but limited it only to cases where that use produced "consumer-facing" content, meaning videos or images the public actually saw. Midjourney filed a motion to strike down that limitation, arguing it lets the studios cherry-pick only the documents that support their market-harm case while hiding exactly the ones that would prove they're doing internally the same thing they're accusing Midjourney of doing. The key line from the motion: the documents the studios are withholding are "precisely the ones that would reveal whether, behind closed doors, they are doing exactly what they're suing Midjourney for doing." Midjourney's point is direct if Disney or Warner have internal image-generation models for storyboarding or content ideation for film and TV, that would prove that downloading and training on protected content without a license is, in fact, "industry custom" even among the studios themselves. The company also wants access to every prompt the studios used on Midjourney and every output generated, not just the prompts that produced the images they consider infringing. In other words: they want the full pattern of how Hollywood used the tool, not just the cherry-picked evidence prepared for trial. The studios' lead attorney, David Singer, has already called this a "fishing expedition" an attempt by Midjourney to generate discovery noise rather than build a real defense. Singer insisted the studios "aren't trying to stop AI technology or shut down Midjourney's business," just to make it "stop copying their movies and shows and distributing, displaying, and creating derivative works featuring their famous characters without authorization." What makes this bigger than the individual case: if Midjourney gets access to the studios' internal AI systems and it turns out Disney, Universal, or Warner do train or use generative models on protected material for internal work storyboards, animatics, visual development that wouldn't just weaken the "we don't do this" moral argument, it could become the precedent that defines what counts as fair use for the entire entertainment industry, not just AI startups. 💀 The legal move is elegant: force the accuser to expose itself to the same standard it's trying to impose on the accused. If Hollywood says training on protected IP without a license is theft when a startup does it, the question Midjourney is putting in front of the court is simple and when you do it, what is it?

• 
  Karthik 🇮🇳 (@beastoftraal) reported 39 minutes ago

  Jeep's new ad (premiered during Cannes Lions this year) is an AI-generated marvel because no humans were used in the ad (except the brief cameo in the end)! The narrative is straight out of Disney-Pixar book of story-telling, giving agency and life to the hero inanimate object and make it behave like humans (anthropomorphism). To be fair, it looked more like a tyre brand's ad than an ad for Jeep, the vehicle, and it was impressive to see that the lone tyre was able to traverse almost the same route the vehicle covered, without any human help whatsoever. But when you see the larger 'love story' (a discarded tyre looking for a new home), it does add contextual value to Jeep. But in terms of the use of AI (Google's Veo and Luma Dream Machine were used throughout the development, to scout locations, develop characters and generate scenes!), this is truly ground-breaking. Because this is an official Jeep ad, the team at Highdive, the creative agency, built the vehicles to millimeter-level product accuracy (and did not use actual vehicles because there was no shoot). And it was useful that they did not need to work on humans, human faces/eyes, or emotions, which is where AI's magic starts to erode (for now, at least). But what truly holds the ad together is not AI (which is merely an enabler), but the ability to tell an affecting story even while using inanimate objects, using very human emotions! #advertising #AI #creativity

• 
  A ****** Dog (@aweinerdog) reported 39 minutes ago

  @fairygod_asha It’s more of a studio problem, Disney constantly makes the issue worse.

• 
  SquintoBe4n (@SquintoBe4n) reported 41 minutes ago

  @mickmako No it isn't. No one had an issue with it except the devs or maybe Disney idk. But literally no one cared cause it was funny

• 
  Conan the Bernsbarian (@EarlNoahBernsby) reported 43 minutes ago

  @ingelramdecoucy As long as Mel Gibson is put in charge of the FFECU, I'll be happy. But, so help me, if they go with James Gunn, or if Disney is in any way involved... 😤

• 
  Not Sapna Patel-Wheeler (@SapnaPatelAW) reported 44 minutes ago

  @hollywoodscifi @Dani_WSDK The reason he mentions those people in that video is they were back working on Doctor Who with RTD in the Disney+ era. They were not working on it throughout. Do the minimum of research.

• 
  Sailor Park Boy (@fantail49834087) reported 44 minutes ago

  @DavidJHarrisJr The Disney memo describing the mandatory DEI hires in film is damning. Those with higher skill or more seniority could end up losing work because of DEI quotas.

• 
  imSohaya (@savageone21) reported 47 minutes ago

  Can Disney go back to 2D animated movies again? With the quality of movies from mid to late 90s and early 2000s? I miss those.

• 
  MATOWIG (Matthew T. Reinhardt (@LordMatowig) reported 51 minutes ago

  @xsphyre @restoreZSJL Yes. And I know I've been saying that I wanted to work at 20th Century Fox but that dream was disrupted by Disney. And since Paramount is buying Warner Brothers. That would be a miracle.

• 
  Richard 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 (@Richard20617101) reported 51 minutes ago

  @HorrorHammer1 Knowen as 'Captain Clegg' to UK audiences. The 1962 Hammer production is based on the Doctor Syn stories by R. Thorndike. The plot closely follows the earlier 1937 Dr Syn film. Hammer altered the name to of central character to parson Blys to avoid copyright issues with Disney.

• 
  ♿️CyborgBarbey📀 (@CyborgBarbey) reported 54 minutes ago

  No respect for old animation either, like yes, Disney is evil as a company, but those early work were monumental achievements.

• 
  DaSwoogmeister (@ArabianBrothel) reported 56 minutes ago

  @GPrime85 ... its male-coded down to its DNA, and as much as disney tried to make it a female franchise, that just ain't gonna work.

• 
  Em (@Noturbaby_) reported 56 minutes ago

  @martynbass27 @DuxVul I use a vpn to access online bookings for restaurants in Orlando before my trip & to book tours through Disney as their uk site doesn’t work. I don’t have anything to hide

• 
  Power ***** 🏳️‍⚧️🇵🇸🇮🇱🇳🇪🇹🇩🧛☭ (@Groqui_) reported 57 minutes ago

  @ShitpostRock They really went from >Disney star wars is just as good as the old one to >star wars was always bad, you're just nostalgic chud Eventually they will accept that deisney sw is just awful period

• 
  Dan Abnormal (@mkDANabnormal) reported 59 minutes ago

  @bigmonkeong It’s a cycle. It happens with directors too. People end up dismissing directors due to ****** MCU films like Nia DaCosta until she directed 28 Years Later The Bone Temple or Chloe Zhao until Hamnet when the issue with MCU movies always ends up being Disney/Marvel’s fault