Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: sign in, buffering and crashing.
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
July 22: Problems at Disney+
Disney+ is having issues since 10:30 PM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.
- Sign in (37%)
- Buffering (33%)
- Crashing (20%)
- Playback Issues (6%)
- Video Quality (4%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Crashing | 2 hours ago |
|
|
Crashing | 3 hours ago |
|
|
Sign in | 9 hours ago |
|
|
Buffering | 21 hours ago |
|
|
Crashing | 24 hours ago |
|
|
Crashing | 1 day ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
V (@vexxed_66) reportedCan't wait for even more bastardizations of my favorite characters!! Woohoo!! Seriously you people need to learn actual quality instead of just supporting whatever slop disney puts out while wearing marvel's corpse. X-Men 97 is the exception, not the rule.
-
Mari🌺🥭 (@fried_kalaMari) reported**** yall give me a black Disney prince ! Why is it a crime to want positive representation for young black boys ? Why is it a problem to see that this ***** is an amalgamation of South Asian influences? Yall look crazy as ****.
-
Jeremy Schilling (@jschil) reported@OptimumHelp @optimum There are no service issues. I'm asking if you have any update on getting the channel NBCSN (the NBC Sports Network) and if you are any further along in negotiations with ESPN/Disney to give us ESPN Unlimited.
-
Daily Tatiana Maslany (@SestraHulk) reported@TheTsengMao @Katanadragon1 @BitterCRZDLoner She never said she's willing to work with Disney again. The Radio Times twisted her words and turned them into clickbait. Her actual quote was: "the character is outside of what I feel like the corporation is doing", meaning they can bring *the character* back if they want to.
-
CAROVAN (@CarovanStudios) reported@AlisonMoyet I work with someone who has airbrushed images of herself on her screensaver and every time I’m by her desk she has these images of herself looking back at her. She’s mid-50s. Wrinkled. Looks fine. But there is something starkly reverse Dorian Grey about it. Like a Disney curse.
-
Patricia Van Ree #IBELIEVEJOHNNYDEPP (@PatriciaVanRee2) reported@TehranKnight JD will never work for Disney again , they have to get rid of Disney to have a change to get JD back ,sorry.
-
Sue Ellen Moore (@SueEllenMoore01) reported@GovMikeHuckabee Mayor, you are similar to a villain in a Disney Moue, the problem with you that you are real. Nobody can escape comeuppance.
-
Out of Context Simpsons Couch Gags (@OOCCouchGags) reportedIt's so weird with how Paramount acts this like towards those who post about Spongebob Say what you about Disney or Warner Bros but they usually don't do anything to those who post stuff from their work I should know, Disney has left me alone for 6 years of Simpsons clips
-
TomTomTwister (@TomTomTwister) reported@Dr_GrantSeeker After being at WDW last week my wife and I couldn't help but feel like every time we come back the prices go up and the amenities goes down. Universal just opened a world class theme park, and Disney has doubled the cost of LL since 2024. Hard to not be disappointed.
-
Paul Kennedy (@pck525) reported@ChiefJustinO For the 1,000,000th time, Disney owns ESPN let's stop pretending like money is the issue. They fire plenty of people all the time
-
Dawnell Schroeder (@DawnellSch99647) reported@GeraldoRivera That Disney matter this is just one state their are gonna be much more which means there is issues so yes we need to have better election integrity I don’t care if it was only one
-
Anime Industry Today / 今日のアニメビジネス (@anime_attention) reportedI think the more important question isn’t the budget. It’s whether Disney should have made another version of essentially the same movie in the first place—a film that doesn’t give audiences a compelling reason to pay to see it again. Live-action adaptations of animated films have at least carried a sense of spectacle. Watching an animated world come to life. Seeing beloved characters portrayed by famous actors. Experiencing fictional creatures and locations rendered photorealistically. Marveling at massive sets and cutting-edge VFX made possible by enormous budgets. Generative AI, however, is gradually turning the act of converting animation into realistic imagery into a commodity. If any fan can generate versions of an animated film “as live action,” “as a 1980s Hong Kong movie,” or “with an all-Japanese cast,” then simply spending $250 million to produce an official visual transformation no longer feels inherently special. AI may reduce the cost of producing live-action remakes, but it also reduces the value of the very spectacle those remakes have sold. When discussing remakes, people often focus on how faithfully they recreate the original, but I suspect audiences don’t actually pay for fidelity itself. They pay for what is different. For example: - A fresh interpretation. - New emotional depth. - A different cultural perspective. - The physical performance of actors. - A stronger connection to today’s society. - Relationships between characters that the original never explored. - New experiences made possible by changing the medium itself. Perhaps the criticism surrounding Moana isn’t simply that it stays too faithful to the original. It’s that audiences don’t see enough difference to justify buying another movie ticket. AI will almost certainly reduce financial risk. If production costs fall dramatically, studios can afford more failures, but lower production costs don’t automatically make studios more creative. In fact, as AI continues to improve, it may become even easier to mass-produce sequels, remakes, spin-offs, character-specific editions, and region-specific versions. The loss from any single project may become smaller, but audience attention—and trust in the brand—can erode much faster. AI may lower financial risk. It cannot lower the risk of brand dilution. For Disney, the real issue isn’t whether one film turns a profit. It’s whether audiences continue believing that “a Disney movie is worth seeing in theaters.” AI may reduce the cost of producing remakes. At the same time, it may destroy the scarcity that once made remakes feel like events. Even if thousands of people work on a film and hundreds of millions of dollars are spent...if the result merely copies the surface of an existing work, repeats past successes, rearranges familiar elements based on market research, and lacks any strong creative conviction, then perhaps it deserves to be called human-made slop. Conversely, what if a film is created with AI but clearly reflects an author’s unique voice, perspective, themes, and artistic intent? Perhaps the phrase “AI slop” isn’t really about AI but maybe it describes a work whose creators can no longer answer a simple question: Why did this work need to exist? If we focus only on opposing AI, we risk overlooking a deeper problem—the growing lack of creative ambition within the existing entertainment industry itself. Even if a $250 million movie could someday be made for $250,000 with AI, it still won’t succeed commercially if audiences never wanted that movie in the first place. AI lowers the break-even point but it does not automatically create audience interest, reasons to visit theaters, cultural conversation, or passionate fandom. As AI becomes part of filmmaking, perhaps the industry’s most important metric will no longer be how much money was spent, but rather “why was this story worth telling?” and “what new emotions, conversations, or experiences does it give audiences?”
-
Dannette Taylor (@TaylorD9870) reported@LawrenceScorpus That is me being careful. I smelled my hair on fire, lost attention on the diamond grinder, hit my knuckle, went thru the glove into the knuckle- close to bone but not bad. Put my hair out like Hades in a Disney movie, washed my hand, went back to work and burned my fingers on hot metal. It was glorious. Sometimes I astound myself with my own dumbassery.
-
StealthObserver (@SpeedBHHD) reported@bestdamnstrippa @stoneoreye Dude, real life is not Disney. Terrible advice. I’m not saying test everyday but if you want to spend the rest of your life with someone you certainly need to do some checks. Just like respect, trust is earned too.
-
The_Katana_1 (@TheKatana11) reported@LangmanVince I really hope they never recover. Because recovering this without a full leadership change at parent Disney Corp, won’t fix anything
-
SoL in the Wild (@SoLInTheWild) reportedThis “Disney sidewalk” approach is just another way of saying, “build the plane while we’re flying it.” In my experience, that’s a really bad idea when it comes to education for a number of reasons, including the lack of a coherent vision, inconsistent implementation, and the difficulty of evaluating whether a change actually solved a problem, had no effect, or created new problems when the approach is constantly changing. Again, in my experience, when leaders present perspectives like this, it signals that they don’t have a clear plan or a coherent theory of action. Instead, the message often seems to be, “This sounds good, so let’s do it,” rather than, “Here’s the problem we’re trying to solve, here’s why we think this approach will work, and here’s how we’ll know if it did.”
-
Ceyéhausen Targaryen 🐉 (@EMPR_Subarashii) reportedDisney+ won’t let me cancel my account cause there’s an “error” but keep trying to charge my old debit card. GIRL LMFAO. I don’t even use yall anymore!
-
Hibiki lui (@hibikibear) reported@catwives Marketed it as an OG show, just taking place in the Tangldd universe. We know Tangled and Frozen are in the same universe and Disney never mentions that, so i dont think that rlly would've been the issue, there have been plethora of shows where the side character becomes the MC-
-
Arkselta 🏳️⚧️ (@Arkselta) reportedWhy we never Got an accurate Peter Griffin. Originally he was developed for Ch2 s5. Fox was very strict with their ip, (this was pre-disney owning fox Area) he was originally gonna look more accurate to how he looks in the show. (There is a storyboard trailer out there proving this) (Rumor part) fox didn't like Peter being a sorta bad guy so they pulled out of the collab. Years later around chapter 5 s1's development They tried again for the Family guy collab, which they got because disney now owned fox and was less restrictive as to what they could do with the Ip. (Also rumor part), the main reason for Peter not being fat, is because Epic only modeled the Strong Peter style. This was due to them losing budget, every Epic team has a set amount of budget, if they use it all they can't do anything else. The resources were going to Eminem at the time. He wanted lots of revisions of his skin. So skins like Peter, and many ch5 s1 battle pass outfits never got as many styles as they could have. Ch5 s1 and Eminem's skin were developed around the same time. But this part is a rumor so don't take me literally. I hope we get the real Peter griffin one day. We could very well get him. Since they released an accurate Cleveland and Giant Chicken skins. Him not getting an accurate skin has nothing to do with: "He's too fat he wouldn't be able to work" "They don't want to make him accurate because it is mean" "Disney forced them to make him buff"
-
Dal (@DeadOnThePage) reportedLike Moana and Encanto, very good, but not without qualifications Frozen? I mean, it's closer to great, but it has some issues too, and it's hard not to have ought against it for introducing a lot of the problems that would go on to plague future Disney movies for a decade
-
Jared Flippin (@KyloJared) reported@DisneyPlus I would like to return to Neverland removed from Disney+. I was never a fan of that movie replacing the crocodile with an octopus was an awful idea.
-
.vic ⊬ (@riskofnoreturn) reported@jumpsuitlive i’m literally gonna be like those people seeing the disney castle for the first time when i see this sign in october
-
BasketChase (@BasketCh4s3) reported@sayntsanguis @yumejosheep Disney wound up having to lay off a BUNCH of artists and animators after the black cauldron was a box office failure. Pretty much every single one of those laid off were hired to work on the chipmunk movies. Many of them went on to produce their own animated series.
-
Globalsuperstar (@Theeiconi) reportedI wanna do sum high quality level customs of dc superhero’s or Disney princess who first?
-
smaden_shmuki (@smaden_shmuki) reportedIt’s so funny how Disney was (rightly) like “Joss Whedon is evil and Marvel will never work with him again” but then spent the next 10 years forcing every MCU screenwriter to write exactly like him but worse lmao
-
cane (@canelaslow) reportedseeing people hate on toy story over the whole pixar situation when disney is literally the real problem but okay
-
Gordon Cramsay (@GordonCramsay) reported@jytaxe @basedgizmo Can you people use your brain for a gd second? Whats the point of box office earnings if the quality Disney puts out is mediocre, AI driven ****? Cmon dude, this isnt an "own the haters" situation.
-
ᴵᴺᶠᴬᴹᴼᵁˢᴷᴵᴰ January 27th 🇵🇪🇺🇸 (@infamouskid) reportedThey trying to rewrite history and it won’t work… plus she burned her bridges and Disney is petty and hold grudges so yeah…
-
Distaste for Corruption - No IMs (@Naiveisme) reported@LoveSpooney @Real_RobN We were frugal when I got out of the military. Our big entertainment was 3 video tapes and 2 cheese pizzas. A 10 year old car, one vacation in 5 years. We made a mortgage payment every week and paid our first home off in less than 6 years. I did all of my own vehicle maintenance and home repairs. We made almost 70% profit on that house without a realtor (it sold in under a week with a sign in the window) and bought our new home with zero bills going into it. The initial payment was $15k from veterans affairs for back pay. We used $11k to transform the shed into a guest house, the rest we took our kids on vacation to Disney. We absolutely did EVEYTHING I said.
-
VampiricLegz (@VampiricLegz) reportedOkay fair, but like, which Disney films? You can cry at Chip N’ Dale Rescue Rangers and I’ll allow it but if Ian Garry is crying because of the live action Moana remake, we got a problem.