Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: sign in, buffering and crashing.
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
July 25: Problems at Disney+
Disney+ is having issues since 09:50 PM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.
- Sign in (37%)
- Buffering (33%)
- Crashing (20%)
- Playback Issues (6%)
- Video Quality (4%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Sign in | 1 hour ago |
|
|
Sign in | 9 hours ago |
|
|
Buffering | 19 hours ago |
|
|
Crashing | 19 hours ago |
|
|
Sign in | 1 day ago |
|
|
Crashing | 1 day ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Liam Dickson (@LiamUKPolitics) reportedMy ex finally signed me out of their Disney+ account... This is a dark and terrible day.
-
Calum (@CalumLewis) reported@WillBiddy_ It's unclear to me how the utilisation issue is a problem here For me, it is a problem for Uber over time due to their size, but not for a new player: 1. AVs can dictate the rollout speed of vehicles and match it to peak demand. 2. They will have much more demand, so I don't see deployed vehicles sitting idle. Price, safety, and comfort win out here, and eventually speed too, as the fleet scales. 3. Uber's supply and demand is largely dictated by the free market, not controlled by Uber. If there's a lot of demand, fares increase, and drivers come online to earn money. If there's no demand, drivers leave. They don't set the "perfect amount", the market does that for them; they just adjust the fares to make it happen. This isn't the case for an AV fleet. 4. If AV fares are much cheaper, Uber loses market share and, in turn, loses drivers. So, their utilisation rate at peak times will be the first thing lost to AVs. Then, when someone needs an Uber and there are fewer drivers, they might be forced to look at other apps, like an AV service, to get somewhere. 5. Because Waymo or others would have excess demand, it doesn't matter if they lose customers at the start because they can't get a ride, as long as the fleet is at full utilisation. Over time, as they learn from that data and deploy more vehicles, they will win more market share. It will affect Uber more on the inverse. 6. Remember, these AVs can learn and store all data over time much better than Uber can. (And they probably already have been doing so this entire time during the partnership). Google is a data master; if anyone can utilise the data better than Uber, it's Google. Also remember, even if they keep a partnership, what's to stop them from having a small ad on the back of the front seat or on a screen that says, "Get your next ride 50% off using the Waymo app," and doing both? That's a huge risk for Uber. 7. It's an app, no more difficult or different than me having Disney+, Netflix, and Prime on my phone. I'll just check all three for the best pickup time to cost ratio. Even if Waymo or Tesla is slightly slower, if it's 50% cheaper, people will wait unless they're in a hurry.
-
Ash Chapel, Rogue Agent! arc (@AshChapelsGhost) reported@Juniperleafs @percyishim The problem is that Disney used that justification that it was insulting to offer roles like 'dwarf' or such to only little people. A lot of little people loudly protested this as more insulting, because roles like the dwarves, which have typically gone to little people instead went out to CGI abominations instead. I'd rather a human man in a Phrygian cap play a surly dwarf than some monster cooked up on a computer. And these are named characters; they're not generic 'dwarves', like the Oompa Loompas or the Munchkins. They're people with personalities. If Dinklage would clarify that his complaint was about ONLY being offered roles made for little people, that would clear it all up.
-
RikkityBridge (@TAGJake) reported@jihanki_hakkon Here in the States (America) AI falls under a legally gray area. It doesn't explicitly infringe on copyrights itself and uses publicly available data to be trained off of. Although there are currently some lawsuits happening over transparency issues (fiduciary neglect more specifically) that investors and shareholders were kept in the dark about. I believe the issue is about the acquisition and storage of that data. (I forget the company being sued by investors). The likely outcome of these specific lawsuits might result in purchasing copyright licenses from companies like such as, but not limited to, Disney and Warner Bros, and possibly other copyright holders (Licensing Agreements). So there's a lot of legal framework people tend to overlook generally speaking.
-
Conner Caldwell (@connerjcaldwell) reported@lego_man2008 @Lolo281996 @_shawndee_ Would be a valid point if they were singing or dancing or praying out loudly that bothered anyone, but they are talking and reading. This is not an issue. You wouldn’t bat an eye if it was a book club that met at Disney. There isn’t a difference
-
Tianas Bayou 2009 (@TianasBayou2009) reported@disneymagicguy @champ_tova One thing I feel like Disney has dropped the ball one (in the USA atleast) is maintenance of their rides. Many rides have / had rough or not fully animatronics. But when you compare it to Tokyo Disney which does amazing with maintenance all their animatronics work like new.
-
Eric Houston (@DadLifeEric) reported@ManaByte What’s bad is Disney ignoring Lucas story treatments and the EU didn’t help either.
-
Saber12valt Pendragon (@ValtSaber) reported@Bigbrourriza Yeah cause to be honest I don’t see why not age the kids at least cause in all honesty it would make a little sense. But it’s their work I nothing I can do plus it’s Disney.
-
🌠 (@box0fsand) reportedfeeling feelings only a disney movie can fix
-
Ciggy (@tjherriot) reported@Miso_the_scot I still think Disney is entirely to blame. Dinklage's problem, based on his words, was with the fact that the dwarf characters live in a cave and are thus dehumanized in a way he considered offensive. I consider that fair.
-
jule☽✩♡︎ (@3tern4ljules) reported@Nasty69st @jjeanzforme @avasPALLADIUM girl shes not good enough for you to be defending her like this, everything about her needs help, she's just not where you think she is, and her contract with disney isn't helping her either😭😭
-
Alan Nadeau III (@alannadeau2016) reported@TheSWNTom @TobyChristie Its the same issue Monster Jam fans have with how FELD is pushing things towards kids, sort of forgetting MJ has always been billed as a family experience by the same folks that own Ringling Bros. and Disney on Ice. Let the hard-core fans bring in the casuals.
-
josephJoestar (@josephJ72737827) reported@ReignOfPride where was this energy for Disney buying Fox, marvel, Star Wars? Netflix has already said that they don’t care about theaters and said that they will NOT work with Directors who expect their moves to have theatrical releases Hollywood wants to keep theactrical releases Paramount/
-
₣2₣ⱠłVɆ 🛸 (@RayyansElvis) reportedPlease don't interpret anything cause @Disney is releasing it's own interpretations of the current productions, submit your requests if you feel your language should be priority in production. Work like a donkey 🫏 to build a future no pirate can taste, keep hoping 🌈 #CTU
-
The Daily Show Couch (@TDSCouch) reported@_HiddenMagic I stayed there once... worst hotel ever. Only Disney Magic could save it.
-
aytee🦇 (@ayteexbt) reportedif it's not broken don't try to fix it changing the art style like it’s for disney kids ???
-
ramo141 (@rickyart141) reported@bnrealwithu @bgardner9969 @veve_official Totally agree with bnreal. Hours of that nonsense may be fun for a handful of people that get a kick out of it and want to flip the 30 commons they got after hours of issues… good for them, but the amount of people that enjoy that is niche. If you want to scale VeVe to the masses, you need a better user experience. Only by increasing the user base we go back to every drop selling out. It will never be perfect, giants like Disney still struggle with user experience and continue to tweak things all the time. They did well with the Star Wars drops, so I was actually really shocked it went down so poorly for such a comic grail. I love VeVe and I’m here to stay but that was a terrible experience and look, specially in the middle of SDCC and with a highly anticipated drop. Hope some lessons were learned
-
FFVII Music (@FFVIImusic) reported@akiriith They'd probably have to work with Disney on licensing, and I imagine that would be kind of a pain in the ***.
-
Twiki 🍉 🚜 🐙 (@timtron2020) reported@TheHerefordian Like Disney went it realised everyone hated its Star Wars trilogy, the reaction was to try and control the narrative rather than admit the outcome was horrific. Interviews with actors/directors were controlled and fans who pointed out the manifold issues were smeared as "haters".
-
Ghost Santana (@JamesSm84013519) reported@TheDarkHumours If it’s just your turn, then why do u get so butthurt when she cheats? Men are the real Disney princesses who get their hearts broken, women actually know how to move ******** on.
-
Polarity (@PolarityVEVO) reportedmovie isn't out so maybe a badly paced 3 hour slopfest will change my mind but you gotta understand - i've *tried* to workshop this movie. i've gone over ideas again and again and nothing works without huge compromises that disney will not make. it's broken at its foundation
-
masc by moonlight 🦇📺🔞 (@finalbutch) reportedthe worst the disney house style has ever looked + endlessly ripped off and replicated by other studios and then used to spawn one hundred billion disgusting AI images. "cute giant childish eyes but the confidence smirk" regardless of age species or tone. soulless
-
mezcal era (@macrodos3) reported@theonlyjordan__ everyone who followed the trial knows why. Disney was his cash cow and he ruined it bc he was constantly late, drunk, or belligerent, which delayed filming and cost Disney money, and nobody saw the movie anyway. His reputation is awful, he is uninsurable, and it’s his own fault.
-
Mark Berg (@markwberg1012) reported@01Funkytown Hes a liar get that Disney money make it problem see why hes the ***** Sean diddy proved that. Doing stuff a man wouldn't do
-
phel:p (@phellyos) reported@CaptainToonimar Me too and that goes for honestly most of the splatbands those localization names were terrible 😭 but Quinn and Mashup still sounds like a ****** Disney channel/Nickelodeon sitcom title I'm cryin
-
Gustavo (@gustavobarakat) reported@dkmbookworm Classic stories didn’t invent little people. They simply took a real physical trait and placed it inside a fantastical framework. That is not a degrading stereotype — it’s fiction. Wanting a wider range of roles for little people is legitimate. But calling fairy-tale roles “worse” or “harmful” just because they are archetypal is an exaggeration. A well-written fairy-tale dwarf can still be an excellent part. The “one-dimensionality” is part of the genre’s nature, not necessarily a flaw. If you take the criticism to its logical end, the alternatives are bad: either you remove dwarfs from the stories (which can itself be accused of exclusion), or you stop adapting fairy tales altogether, because almost all their characters are archetypal by definition. Blaming the stories because some people in real life are incapable of separating fantasy from reality is putting the responsibility in the wrong place. If someone sees a short man on the street and decides to call him “*****” or treat him like a magical creature, the problem lies with that person, not with the Brothers Grimm or Disney. Dehumanization is done by those who dehumanize. The story only exists on the page. Peter Dinklage has every right to refuse those roles. But turning the classic stories into villains because part of the audience confuses fiction with real life is a lazy logical leap.
-
Ram Truck Month (@WarhammerMents) reported@DiscussingFilm As long as it's Disney or Netflix doing the mergers or acquisitions, it's no problem.
-
Auroki (@Auroki3) reported@EltaninMc This movie did it right in that it went all in on making something fun not accurate. That's the issue later media fails at. They keep trying to be "accurate but we changed __" Disney changed so much that it just feels like an alt universe that we can watch over again cause the characters are well written
-
Daniel Tiger Is Out (@daniel87111) reported@MarvvVal That is perfectly on brand for Disney if you're aware of even a small portion of the awful **** they've done throughout their existence.
-
Eric (@RebelEdgeSec) reported@phoebeisg1nger So take the redhead to Disney. Problem solved.