Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Disney+. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.
- Sign in (49%)
- Crashing (19%)
- Buffering (17%)
- Playback Issues (13%)
- Video Quality (2%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Crashing | 3 hours ago |
|
|
Playback Issues | 13 hours ago |
|
|
Buffering | 24 hours ago |
|
|
Crashing | 1 day ago |
|
|
Sign in | 1 day ago |
|
|
Sign in | 1 day ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
JB (@RedBarSystems) reported@anymanfitness We took our kids out for a week for Disney. 100% worth it. School work can be made up.
-
Remy (@RemyTaTouilli) reported@ScottGustin Makes sense, but the problem I have with the Disney parks app is how quickly it drains my battery. Plus, their web site is soooooooo slow with all the graphics, how does this overcome these very huge two obstacles?
-
Pø§ţ (@P0sirep) reported from Meriden, Connecticut@RCXcyclopedia Thunderation was imo the worst coaster at SDC by a massive margin. I dont understand the love for it. That thing is rough as hell. But thats standard for most mine trains outside of like Big Thunder Mountian at Disney Parks and Colorado Adventure at Phantasialand
-
Under the Sky (@UndertheSkyBlog) reported@AdrianneCurry @OliLondonTV I’m guessing because this was an atrocious dress choice? It’s palm fronds giving off Disney Jungle Ride vibes and that’s honestly terrible. 😬 yikes
-
RiskyChris (@Risky_Chris) reportedthat wasnt just hyperbole to drag one of the worst friends i ever had tagents: everyone is friend. they just good friend or bad friend i literally taught myself conducting impromptu in 2022 bc i wanted to go work for the disney world marching band or whatever parade guy or w/e.
-
Jason W Kelly (@jasonkredline) reported@_JasonLT My single least favorite piece of art ever made What an awful, creatively bankrupt, surface level, lazy story, and what an awful direction to take Star Wars in. True disgrace. Biggest issue with Rian and Disney Star Wars, is they didn’t try hard enough.
-
Daniel & Lily ➡️ DLC Dortmund (@FamilyQuests) reported@samemau_lorcana I have no issues with secondary markets themselves but I really hope we don’t see the greed from scalpers and scammers ruin Disney Lorcana
-
Craig (@CraigAccused) reported@FarmGirlCarrie Don Bluth leaving Disney was a major blow for the company. As Bluth himself said "I left Disney because Walt left Disney." When Walt Disney died the company went into full corporate mode. The quality was reduced to save money, the soul left their company. Don Bluth went on to animate arcade games such as Space Ace and Dragon's Lair. It's also important to realise that when he left Disney eleven more animators left with him and he started up his own company.
-
Shreyansh (@Shreyansh3951) reported@MarioNawfal Well, nothing says "magic of Disney" quite like replacing the artists who created your billion dollar characters with algorithms that learned from their work.
-
David McKenzie (@mckenzielaw) reportedThis is what I think is going on with the Duke-Amazon deal and why the Big Ten is whining. It's all about a direct-to-consumer model and risk allocation. Let's start with the law because the law explains the deal. College sports media rights flow through a stacked architecture that schools rarely discuss in public but that governs everything they can and cannot do. Every ACC member, Duke included, has executed a Grant of Rights to the conference— an irrevocable assignment of media rights running through 2036. The ACC then licensed that aggregated catalogue to ESPN under a parallel agreement of comparable duration. The Big Ten and Fox sit atop an identical structure on their side of the ledger. The consequence is that Duke does not own the broadcast rights to its own basketball games in any meaningful sense. ESPN does. And Michigan's rights belong to Fox. That architecture is the entire reason the Amazon deal required permission rather than a checkbook, as suggested by @RossDellenger. Duke could not license a game to Amazon any more than a tenant could sell the building. What Duke could do is ask the actual rights holder — ESPN, through the ACC — to carve out three games from its exclusive bundle and allow Amazon to distribute them. ESPN agreed. Dellenger's reporting suggests ESPN extracted a licensing fee plus future Duke scheduling commitments in return. That is a sublicense, structured as a limited waiver of exclusivity, and it is the legal mechanism that makes the entire arrangement possible. Without ESPN's consent, the deal is a straightforward breach of the Grant of Rights cascade. With it, the deal is unremarkable contract law. Which brings us to the Big Ten. Its claim that it "owns" the Duke-Michigan game is the sound of a conference dressing up a contractual reciprocity provision as a property right. The actual mechanism the B1G is invoking is an alternation arrangement between the conferences and their rights holders for neutral-site games played in shared metropolitan territory with New York, a virtual home game for Duke, being the one at issue. Even taking that at face value, it is a contract claim running between the conferences, not a proprietary interest enforceable against Duke, Amazon, or Madison Square Garden. And the party whose alternation turn was supposedly violated, ESPN, has already blessed the deal. It is hard to articulate a coherent legal theory under which the B1G or Fox enforces ESPN's contractual entitlement against ESPN's wishes. The B1G's posture is a negotiating marker, not a litigation position, and any honest reading of the underlying agreements would say so. So why did ESPN say yes? This is where the law stops explaining things and strategy takes over. I'm not just guessing here. ESPN launched its standalone streaming flagship into a market in which the most important commercial question in sports media remains unanswered: will cord-cutters pay to watch a Tuesday-night college basketball game? Disney has spent the better part of a decade rearranging its streaming portfolio without producing a clean answer, and the cost of running that experiment on ESPN's own platform —with ESPN's own marquee inventory and ESPN's own reputation on the line — is considerable. The Pac-12 tried a version of this experiment with Apple two years ago. Apple would not pay linear money, the schools would not accept streaming-only reach, and the conference disintegrated before the deal did. The lesson the industry absorbed was that premium college sports was not yet ready for direct-to-consumer exclusivity. ESPN needs to know whether that lesson still holds, and it would prefer not to find out the hard way. The structure of the Duke deal seems to be the answer. Amazon bears the production cost, the promotional spend, and the conversion risk against Prime's installed 200M+ worldwide subscriber base. ESPN collects a licensing fee, future scheduling inventory it can deploy on its own terms, and a clean read on whether streaming-exclusive premium college basketball actually works as a commercial proposition. If Amazon's experiment succeeds, ESPN learns the model and pulls future games back in-house at the next negotiation. If it fails, Amazon absorbs the loss and ESPN quietly concludes the market is not ready, having paid nothing for the information beyond the foregone value of three games it was compensated for anyway. That is not a concession. It is a hedged bet, and a clever one. Fox cannot afford the same posture, which is why the B1G is whining. Fox One and Tubi are real but considerably smaller than the combined Disney streaming footprint, and every individual rights leak feels more existential to a network without the same DTC depth to fall back on. ESPN can be magnanimous because Disney has room to be patient. Fox and the B1G have less room, so the B1G is now tasked with escalating a routine reciprocity dispute into a public claim of ownership it cannot sustain. That tells you more about the B1G and Fox's competitive position than it does about the merits of the contract. The deeper point, and the one worth dwelling on, is that the rights architecture schools accepted a decade ago to keep their conferences intact is now being tested by the schools themselves. Duke did not break the system. Duke worked within it, asked ESPN for permission, gave up something in return, and brought a streaming partner to the table that the network was apparently happy to let bear the risk of an experiment Disney has not figured out how to run on its own. The B1G and Fox would prefer that schools not learn this trick. They are about to learn it anyway. And the next negotiation, whenever it comes, will reflect what Amazon's three games taught everyone about who the audience really is and what they will pay to watch. The Duke-Amazon arrangement is being described as a turning point for college sports media. My honest guess is that it's more of a market test, structured by a rights holder who needed information from a 200M+ subscriber base more than it needed three basketball games. It's now being resisted by a competitor who cannot afford to be that patient. The law explains how the deal got done. The strategy explains why ESPN wanted it done this way. And the Big Ten's complaint, stripped of its proprietary language, is the complaint of a network that wishes it had thought of it first.
-
Eric Mrozek 🇺🇸🦅🌎⚛️🧦🗽✍🏻 (@EricMMrozek) reportedRecasting would be required for new stories anyway, but there's not much to tell. Disney would've killed Han, Luke, & Leia in any sequel trilogy because Carrie Fisher died & Harrison Ford wanted it. The problem lies in how the characters have no meaningful legacies. #StarWars
-
C.M. ✝️ 🇺🇸 (@DeathBruzer) reportedLuke would be better served in the animated realm. They refuse to recast him and the weird deep fake **** doesn’t work. We have no (Disney canon) stories of Luke in his prime ******* **** up post episode 6. Make an animated show about Luke between episodes 6 and 7.
-
RicksCafe 🇨🇦🇺🇸 (@user552149) reported@OliLondonTV Well she's right since Disney made bad management calls (DEI, Snow White), then artists who actually do the creative work have to pay the price, become replaced by the very same algorithms they trained (won't work, AI still has no imagination, only predicts from training).
-
Tony Twofeather (@steele_ton52446) reported@Notwokenow The union has threatened Disney not to let anyone work for them if they remove him.
-
Donald J. Gorbachev (@donaldgorbachev) reportedWomen are turned on by men who can hold a conversation about something other than the evangelical Disney World. Women are turned on by men who can sit in a restaurant for two hours without explaining the great replacement. Women are turned on by men who can compliment a dress without referencing tradwife discourse. Women are turned on by men who do not need to win the argument. Women are turned on by men who are not afraid of women. The red pill men are afraid of women. That is the entire architecture of the red pill. The red pill is the apparatus that explains to a man why the woman did not look at him without requiring the man to look at himself. The apparatus runs on grievance. The grievance runs on the red pill. The red pill runs on the conviction that the woman is the problem. The woman is not the problem. The woman has been right there. The woman has been waiting for someone who is not afraid of her. The man on the red pill is afraid of her. The man on the red pill has built an entire ideology to explain why the fear is not fear but clarity. The woman smells the fear. The woman has been smelling the fear since the man took the first pill. This is the irony of the great biblical patriarchy movement. The trads. The Cathlarpers. The based hatposting fathers of unborn children. The men who post about how the West must reproduce or die. This is the best they could come up with. A Catholic Ben Shapiro. The kitchen calls him that for a reason. Same delivery. Same forensic register. Same conviction that the argument is the substitute for the man. Same total absence of any woman from the biographical record. Ben at least had Mor. Nick does not even have a Mor.
-
Rob (@RobsRec) reported@bridgetkcarr the more the movie went on I was just more confused and more realizing it was a movie I shouldn’t take serious. It was rated r but felt like a Disney channel movie but also had some not so great things in it and the writing I thought was like sooo bad. I fully understand I’m the problem on this one lol 😭 the plane scene was pretty good tho
-
FACELESS ART 📽 (@Facelessart305) reported3 reasons why you’re clearly retarded. Weekly releases actually generate more hype for a show. The issue is Disney Daredevil is absolute dog ****. Good word of mouth would’ve actually done more than the “marketing” Quit the cope you Disney marvel shill.
-
THE Jordy (@JKD12237) reported2/2 Actual answers are needed not the acceleration of existing issues. Athletes, coaches, incapable healthcare workers, and child stars from Disney and Nickelodeon are a part of the problem. Not everyone needs help. Not everyone is good at helping.
-
Michael F Kane (@MichaelFKane) reported@ThePaceForward The budget took a huge hit at the start of Disney era (which recovered nicely by the end and the quality of the render goes up) But the reduced budget actually forced them to focus more on a smaller story and characters which paid off very well. As a result it feels more like the original trilogy than the prequels. Not a big expansive story but all more intimate one. Ezra and Kaanan's stories are among the best of the Disney era if you ever can get over the 'shock' lol. It doesn't help that the worst episode of the series and C-3P0 at his worst. They have never figured out what to do with that guy since the OT. 😬
-
Star Wars Timeline (Ben) 🇷🇺🇺🇸 (@SWT_Channel) reported@SufferersOfTDS I think the problem is the polar opposite. This "vocal minority" **** Disney has been exploiting to divert actual fan criticism and slurring critical life-long fans as bigots is what burried DSW. TFA was already riddled with a host of issues TLJ compouded further with incoherent plot points. TROS was complete reactionary filmmaking and a knee jerk reaction to fans properly calling out Rey's Mary Sue powers that were never properly set up and explained with the most idiotic "She's Palpatine". I'm not saying any filmmaker or studio should be a committee that caters to every fan whim. But understanding George's vision and having a plan for the biggest cinematic universe had to be in place. Instead Disney rushed out the gates with their idiot film per 2 years deadline, sabotaging JJ's first script and resulting in a half baket TFA that ripped EP4 plot line. The fans are never the problem. We are the audience that carried this IP for 40 years. It's Disney's tone deaf mistreatment and slurring the fans that killed it.
-
The Future (@j0shj0shbinks) reported@ScottGustin How about fix the Disney parks app and make it a proper app
-
jabberwocky (@pihap43503) reportedThe Disney adaptation of Steve’s memoir is the worst thing I’ve ever seen. It’s shocking people actually liked this adaptation. It’s a low effort pastiche. Mocking even. Just horrendous overall. Not a single actor was good or captured the essence of any of the characters
-
Mr.CanKnotNot (@canknotnot) reported@VoidNulled @KissofEnvyy We are agreeing, but you misunderstood what I was saying. Disney took a fans work, claimed it as their own, and is selling it. My point is that companies do not care as long as it makes money
-
zeta (@zeta_globin) reportedthe worst thing disney ever did to me is put my grandparent's home town in star wars so now all of my nice photos from where I spent years in the 90s/valencia bay and waterville make people think I'm really into star wars
-
Mrs. LS (@unhurriedself) reportedThere really does exist a parallel universe for those who don't work regular hours. It is like Disney fast pass. Once you have it, you occasionally forget that you used to spend your entire life waiting for other people.
-
Carla R ✍🏾📖🇺🇸 (@CarlaRK3) reported@MorePerfectUS I wonder how many current #Disney broadcast employees actually like where they work? I remember how angry friends who were long time employees, felt when they lost their jobs on soap operas and nighttime shows that were suddenly shut down. Actors, writers, production staff… awful.
-
Infinitale: Chronicles | Available on Amazon.com! (@InfinitaleComic) reported@HoundShark281 @johan_1379 All of the men depicted were immature and retarded. “The movie is about mothers and their daughters respecting and understanding each other as their own individuals.” Did we watch the same film? I’m talking about Disney-Pixar’s “Brave” here. It’s about a spoiled brat that does whatever she wants and shirks her familial responsibilities so badly that she ends up magically turning her mother and little brothers into bears. She learns nothing and any consequences were immediately resolved. She was an awful protagonist. “Do whatever makes you feel good and F tradition, responsibility, and even your own family if they get in the way of your happiness. It doesn’t matter anyway, because it’ll all sort itself out in the end.” That’s a terrible lesson to teach kids.
-
Shane R. Reynolds (@PNW_Shane) reported@effthealgorithm Now login to Hulu again, redirect to Disney+, now you are logged in, you don’t have Hulu, Hulu is through your phone carrier, add Disney+ for $5 and bundle, oops, you already have Disney+, oops you can’t upgrade Hulu without ads because it’s through your phone…
-
cpoe | horror 😱 (@horrorvrs) reportedDisney hasn’t ruined the MCU. But it definitely limited the number of good quality projects we get
-
Yosha Riley (@yoshaTCG) reportedI’m not joking this will double-triple my regional travel costs with current rates. Also spirit is the one’s usually operating the immediately after work flights so maybe more pto as well. I’m sure someone will fill the gap because of Disney but still 💀