Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Buffering (33%)
• Crashing (20%)
• Playback Issues (7%)
• Video Quality (3%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Malvern	Crashing	2 hours ago
London	Sign in	3 hours ago
Aubagne	Sign in	19 hours ago
Paris	Playback Issues	1 day ago
Saint-Julien	Playback Issues	1 day ago
Attleborough	Sign in	1 day ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Doggy (@K4kik_) reported 34 seconds ago

  @deryaa1214 @ononfilmizlee You’ll soon work at @Disney dear..

• 
  Dale (@Dale14896397) reported 9 minutes ago

  @matoaka23 Umm, there's no algae. If there was, the stench would be awful as it would die with no sunlight. There may be trace materials, because... water. But mildew and molds are likely more common given the environment. But too, Disney is well known to utilize bromine.

• 
  PRESIDENTE DOGE (@WickedGT2019) reported 9 minutes ago

  @catturd2 Piss on @Disney. Reminded me to cancel the god awful Disney/Hulu trash app before it renews.

• 
  Ron (@Big_Ron_) reported 9 minutes ago

  @laughingplace Disney unimagines are just terrible, they need to bring back...oh wait, they all work for Universal now

• 
  Thoro (@RealThoroLee) reported 10 minutes ago

  Always playback issues with punk *** Hulu/ Disney plus gotta cancel that

• 
  Bitz (@bitzydimbo) reported 10 minutes ago

  you keep romanticizing love which diminishes it, minimizes it, puts it in a silly little Disney princess box and let's it stagnate. love takes work, drive, patience, and effort. like anything worth having, it is cultivated by commitment.

• 
  Satire Station (@SatireStation) reported 11 minutes ago

  @DistortedSoul27 @literaryeric He's released 2 films on screen. One was commercially and critically profitable (Superman) and one wasn't. The Hulk bombed as the MCU's 2nd movie, although not as bad. Don't act like 2 streaming shows no one watched on HBO is the worst thing ever when Disney+ pumped out trash.

• 
  michael spoden (@MichaelSpo50061) reported 13 minutes ago

  @CNviolations Understand what we think of Disney like honestly are truly understand but this video is nothing worthless junk crap. Might as well just whine all day like the people you're whining about. Enjoying life lying out in the water turtle comes up to uoh my God what a terrible person

• 
  jpwhoa (@jpdubs79) reported 13 minutes ago

  @choeshow Issues like this attracted Disney to buy the magazine two years later.

• 
  tigerbean🐾 (@pawstompers) reported 15 minutes ago

  There are at least ten booths like this at every major convention I have gone to for the last 5yrs or so .. even before they were a problem anyway. American hobby events and conventions are basically scams now for Disney adult tier impulse purchases lol. It is really bad!

• 
  Gofra (@Gofralo) reported 17 minutes ago

  A woman beat stage 4 cancer. One sentence. Hero story. Moving on. Except the story was not done. Her name is Stephanie Nixdorf. She was 51. She was at Disney World in December 2021 when her phone rang and a doctor told her that a bump on her elbow was melanoma. Stage 4. Spots on her lung. Two tumors in her brain. She spent the next two years in treatment. By January 2024, the cancer was abating. And then her insurance company told her no. The immunotherapy that had saved her life had caused crippling arthritis as a side effect. Her doctors prescribed infliximab, a drug to treat it. Not a luxury. Not a lifestyle medication. A drug her doctors said she needed because of treatment that had kept her alive. Premera Blue Cross denied it. Then denied it again. For nine months, every time her doctors requested the prescription, the insurance company said no. And here is the part that matters. Premera Blue Cross was not reviewing her case by hand. No human read her file nine times and nine times decided she did not qualify. The denials were automated. An algorithm evaluated her claim against a criteria set, found a reason to say no, and moved on to the next file. Stephanie Nixdorf had beaten cancer. She was losing to a software system. Her husband read about a company called Claimable. It built an AI that did one thing: write insurance appeals. It read the policy. It cross-referenced clinical research on the drug. It found every prior successful appeal for the same medication and used the patterns that had worked. And then it wrote a letter. Not a paragraph. Twenty-three pages. The letter went to Premera's chief executive. Their chief legal counsel. The governor of North Carolina. The state attorney general. The Department of Health and Human Services. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Department of Labor. All at once. Two days later, Premera approved the drug. Their explanation: a processing error involving a misapplication of policy. Nine months of no. Two days after the AI sent a letter to every person with legal authority over the insurer. Processing error. And now the main thing. The insurance company used an automated system to deny her claim at scale. The AI did not read her file. It found a reason to say no in milliseconds and moved on. That is not a coincidence. It is a strategy. Every denial saves money. Most people give up. Most people give up because they do not know the policy language. They do not know which arguments work and which do not. They do not know who has legal authority over the insurer. They do not know that you can send the letter to seven institutions simultaneously. The insurer knew all of that. You did not. That asymmetry is gone. In my opinion this is the most important shift in American healthcare that almost nobody is talking about. Not drug discovery and not AI diagnostics. A woman who fought cancer for two years, then fought her insurance company for nine months, sat down at a computer. And nine months of automated denials reversed in two days. The algorithm that was denying her did not see the other algorithm coming. What has your insurance company denied that you never fought back on?

• 
  Tuor Eladar (@AgitpropMaster) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Mistrbrojangles terrible misunderstanding, I’m so brainwashed from Disney that I didn’t even see color

• 
  Gorefang (@TheHungerer) reported 20 minutes ago

  Project Hail Mary Sucks Obv Spoilers Ahead So why does it suck and why didn't most reviewers realize it sucked? Both answers are bc the science is bad. Most ppl don't know **** about science @TheCriticalDri2, for instance, and are low brow enough to be entertained by a 2.5 hour buddy comedy reminiscent of a Disney Princess movie about two bumbling idiots that are suddenly competent when the script calls for it and obnoxious and stupid when it doesn't. So, what did they get wrong? Basically everything. One of the most egregious mistakes is not understanding how far Tau Ceti is or how long it would take to get there. Light travels at 186,000 miles per hour, thus a lightyear is how far light travels in a year. It's a massive distance. Tau Ceti is 12 lightyears away meaning if someone was traveling as fast as light, which some say is impossible, then it would take 12 years to arrive in the Tau Ceti system, making it over 70.54 TRILLION miles away. With current technology it would take humans about 200,000 years to get there. In the movie, it takes, presumably, about 12 years in Earth-time, but Grace only experiences 4 years passing each way due to time dilation, which is a bit far fetched (and not explained in the movie), esp if they're traveling at less than the speed of light. So going there and back takes 24 years from the perspective of Earth and 8 years from the perspective of Grace, which was a bit hard to swallow. Additionally, the movie seems to think the spaceship has to keep firing the engine to keep moving forward, burning fuel or it will come to a stop like a car, but that's not true. Space is a frictionless environment. Cars roll to stops when not being accelerated bc the wind resistance and friction caused by the wheels touching the ground due to Earth's gravitational influence is constantly slowing the vehicle, but there's no wind resistance or ground contact in space. When a rocket engine fires, the ship accelerates. When it stops firing the ship continues on at the same speed and direction until acted upon by another force. The movie also fails to understand orbital mechanics, there is a part when Grace is outside the ship in the upper atmosphere of the imaginary planet Adrien. If this was actually the case he would be killed by the heat generated by the ship's contact with the air in the upper atmosphere, but that didn't happen bc it wasn't convenient for the movie. Then when he's doing doing his in-atmosphere spacewalk he jumps back into the pilot chair and thrusts the ship out of the atmosphere and all is better bc now it's in orbit except that's not how orbit works at all. Simply leaving the atmosphere doesn't create a stable orbiting trajectory. The ship would just get pulled back down to the planet, but that didn't happen. When he finds life on the planet Adrien, how is that life supposed to make it back to Earth alive when it has nothing to eat on the way there? How is it these cells can consume Astrophage like an Ameoba, but the sun can't destroy them? These questions may have been answered in the book, but they were not at all addressed in the film. The science in the film is so bad that it's distracting to anyone with basic knowledge of such things so in the end all you're left with is two things: Ryan Gosling's bad acting, which is at its worst when he's pretending he's a caveman when he first wakes up from Cryosleep. It's one of the worst big-budget performances I've ever seen, and the buddy comedy between Grace and his new rock alien pal that he names Rocky bc he's such a brilliant man. The rest of the movie is Rocky and Grace chillin, having picnics and movie nights and being the best of pals and somewhere along the way the Earth probably gets saved, too, but who cares bc we have the Rocky/Grace friendship to be entertained by. **** the Earth. That's basically how the movie plays out. I wish it wasn't the case, but it is, so when I see so many ppl saying it was good, I really want to ask them. "Yeah? What was good about it?" I didn't see much of anything to praise. It's a scifi movie filled to the brim with bad science including the main premise. The Astrophage cells are water-based but are eating the sun? They are eating every sun in the local area of our galaxy and need a Venus-like planet to make a pitstop at before eating the sun suggesting every star system in the local galaxy, to include Tau Ceti has a Venus-like planet in it, which, obviously can't be the case. People say there was a book and it was better, idk about the book, I know about the movie and the movie combines two things I hate - bad science and childishness. There's more than a fair dollop of pointless bullshit, baby talk and dumb nonsense that's supposed to be endearing in a lovable idiot kind of way, but the problem for me is that I don't respect bad science in scifi films and I don't find adult children to be lovable idiots, just regular idiots. So for me, it was an awful movie. Unrelatable, forgettable, sloppy science on top of bad science on top of a unrealistic premise. Even if you accept all the bad science, why do they need Grace? He's a middle school science teacher that wrote a paper one time that said not all life in the universe is likely to be water-based. So what? None of it makes sense. I wasn't even going to write this review, but it seems like everyone is just talking about how great this movie is and it does not at all stand up to that hype esp if you're familiar at all with space or any aspect of science in general. 3/10.

• 
  James Orman (@OrganizedApe) reported 20 minutes ago

  but yeh obvioussly you can just draw a single picture and move the mouth and it can work without any knowledge of Newtonian motion. but like disney and pixar they obviously deeply understand newtonian motion. but using a dif lingo to Newtonian Phycisists

• 
  cheese (@fuckass300) reported 20 minutes ago

  @TheFNaF3HypeGuy @RamagomaLeago @capeshitsuccs Those tweets were jokes, it was during the stage of the Internet or no one gave a **** about what they said for the repercussions it would have and the problems with the DCU go way beyond one guy controlling everything, DC/WB is structured very different compared to Marvel/Disney

• 
  Lara A🤗 ...a soul having a human experience. (@ALarmelli) reported 21 minutes ago

  @GameLoreDash Agreed...and really it is a Disney Star Wars problem. In the right hands, ( not Disney) rated R version of Plageuis, KOTOR and the Bane Trilogy would be peak Star Wars

• 
  julie (@juliieewoo) reported 22 minutes ago

  Any Thai proxies can help secure these or the Disney ones pleaseeee

• 
  juggaf (@JhThorneus) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Jordan456257099 @KapsMiltos Its the most important cultural work in Greece not a remake of a disney movie retard

• 
  els☄️🐱 (@t4tt00y0u) reported 33 minutes ago

  this is how I feel about the weird shows already on there because I'm not even sure what the criteria is? mini series? Disney shows? whenever I see somebody with a TV show in their top 4 I'm like Oh, because it's such a non-issue but it's just weird that it's a half assed feature

• 
  kei (@bookspy007) reported 34 minutes ago

  This is me trying to help my mom watch Law and Order in Spanish but Disney decided that’s not happening.

• 
  Detective Spooky (@InverseNinjas) reported 37 minutes ago

  Despite not being even in my Top 5 Worst Movies list (5. The Little Prince (Netflix), 4. Repo: The Genetic Opera, 3. Sucker Punch, 2. Monsters (Gareth Edwards), 1. A Wrinkle In Time) I'm pretty well known for my hot take that Moana is the worst Disney Princess flick by far. Eclipsing even its sequel and Pocahontas in its disastrous immensity. The fact that it made more money and is more beloved than the far far far far superior The Princess And The Frog keeps me up at night.

• 
  Punished Henry (@punishedhenryjr) reported 38 minutes ago

  @disparutoo As terrible as Disney is, the one thing they seem to understand is that YouTubers provide free advertising. WB seems to still think TV ads work and are hostile to youtubers. That's why they struggle to find an audience.

• 
  JP🇺🇸 🏳️‍🌈 (@BuntyHunterJayP) reported 40 minutes ago

  @thecalibae Most likely b mode itd be funny if Disney did this due to the backlash of the animatronic and if its broken yikes its bran nee

• 
  WE SELL SWAG LLC (@LegitTaste) reported 44 minutes ago

  Worst part about learning about communism was learning my whole life was a lie. Bolshevist revolution??? What u mean Anastasia and them wasn't the good guys? Disney ain't **** man lol

• 
  Joseph King (@Korgamiai) reported 45 minutes ago

  Am i the first to do this? This is absolutely nuts! VIDEO TO CHARACTER SHEET PROMPT! "Use my video to create a professional character sheet suitable for production in a top tier anime studio like Disney or Studio Ghibli" Activity · 2m 44s - Thinking Extracting image from video for character sheet To follow up on the user’s request, I must extract frames from the video since the image tool only accepts image inputs. I’ll probably use something like Python (maybe with ffmpeg) to get those frames and then pass them to the image tool. I'll be mindful of any copyright concerns, especially when using specific studio names. Gathering style references for user request Since the user mentioned "Disney or Studio Ghibli," I need to gather style references without using official copyrighted artworks. I’ll look up generic style guides or artwork references from broader sources, avoiding direct copies of official images. I need to be cautious with using film stills or official art in the search. Generating character sheet in a similar style Since the user is asking for a character sheet in a style "like" certain studios, rather than directly copying, it seems fine to proceed. I’ll make sure to focus on creating something original, inspired by those styles, without directly copying any specific artwork from the studios. Choosing style references carefully for character sheet Instead of using direct image references, I could describe the style textually, focusing on family-friendly 2D animation, painted backgrounds, and expressive animation. But the instructions still seem to suggest collecting references via image search. I’ll aim to find generic, non-copyrighted style examples, rather than specific art. Extracting frames from video Okay, the next step is to probe the video and extract frames from it. This will allow me to work with still images, which can then be used for the character sheet. I'll need to make sure these frames capture the key visuals for the design. Inspecting frames for contact sheet I’ll need to inspect the frames I’ve extracted. To make the process more manageable, I’m thinking about creating a contact sheet—a collage of frames—using a tool like ffmpeg. This way, I can easily review all the key visuals at once and decide which ones work best. Visually inspecting frames I need to visually inspect the frames to decide which ones are the best. I could start by creating a contact sheet of the frames and using an image viewer to review them. This will help me pick out the key visuals for the character sheet more easily. Creating character sheet and gathering references To make a character sheet for the anime girl in the magical forest, I'll need to break it down into 3–4 key frames showing different angles (front, ¾, side). Since the image generation tool has a max of 8 references, I'll pick 4 core frames. I'll also gather style references from generic animation model sheets and search for possible examples using terms like "professional animation character model sheet" while avoiding direct copyrighted artwork. Thought for 2m 44s Done

• 
  Linda (@Linda3429859564) reported 47 minutes ago

  @ReinChange @jamiljivani "Disney, we have a problem. " Let's hope Goofy and Daffy Duck don't take up arms.

• 
  N A T H A N (@XN2389) reported 52 minutes ago

  Taylor’s wedding being completely obliterated on Twitter is a breath of fresh air tbh. My only issue is that now she won’t do anything people are claiming (like putting her wedding on Disney+) because of the hate and so her weird cult fans will say she never would anyway…

• 
  Pin Clock (@PinClock) reported 55 minutes ago

  @InverseNinjas Moana's a fine film it was just made in the 2010s where everyone loved pointing out all their tropes and cliches to make themselves look smart. This one's not a Disney Princess film, but Ralph Breaks the Internet to me is their worst film for how little of a **** it gives.

• 
  Qwetzle (@Qwetzlecoatl) reported 55 minutes ago

  @SpiicyAtreides Ofc people will see the latest Nolan film. The issue is going to be after when his reputation is damaged and tries to make a new film that people will be cautious to watch. remember what happened with Disney? People kept watching after endgame until they realized its all garbage

• 
  Harry (@harrytacochi_) reported 59 minutes ago

  @TanukisInSpace movie remakes are more offensive to me especially that they were originally animated (disney lol) there's a moana remake thats coming out in a few days, the worst part is that the original came out in 2016. nobody is nostalgic for a movie that came out 10 years ago lol