Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Disney+. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.
- Sign in (50%)
- Crashing (18%)
- Buffering (17%)
- Playback Issues (13%)
- Video Quality (2%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Melbourne
|
Sign in | 1 day ago |
 Belford Roxo
|
Sign in | 1 day ago |
 Lille
|
Crashing | 1 day ago |
|
Melbourne
|
Playback Issues | 2 days ago |
|
Belo Horizonte
|
Buffering | 2 days ago |
|
Villeurbanne
|
Crashing | 2 days ago |
Full Outage Map
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Servant to Poo-bah the Cat (@PoobahTheCat) reported@wdwpro1 There has been a lot of it lately. It's like the word has gone out to hype up Disney Star Wars. Maybe they're releasing a movie soon and think this will help sales.
-
Ankush Dharkar wants you on tier3.college (@RealAnkush) reported@numberbee7070 @JioHotstar The other apps work better. When I was in US, the Disney+ app was much higher resolution
-
Rider1964/Vtuber (@sailaway281) reported@Brocc42871138 But the whole black comedy thing has been done before there were loads of black comedy during the 90s that were really popular so none of this is new it’s just an animation form and do I have to mention the proud family that Disney did back in the Day that was really popular so what is so unique about the show and honestly if glitch doesn’t want to pick it up they don’t have to pick it up and post. It really doesn’t fit with their style of shows either if you look at the stuff that they made look if the show is successful, then great but if not, then people just don’t care about it and you can’t blame the audience for not caring about something.
-
The Jessenator 🇺🇸 (@DeebieBrother) reported@20thcentury @Disney Worst run company in the nation.
-
David McKenzie (@mckenzielaw) reportedThis is what I think is going on with the Duke-Amazon deal and why the Big Ten is whining. It's all about a direct-to-consumer model and risk allocation. Let's start with the law because the law explains the deal. College sports media rights flow through a stacked architecture that schools rarely discuss in public but that governs everything they can and cannot do. Every ACC member, Duke included, has executed a Grant of Rights to the conference— an irrevocable assignment of media rights running through 2036. The ACC then licensed that aggregated catalogue to ESPN under a parallel agreement of comparable duration. The Big Ten and Fox sit atop an identical structure on their side of the ledger. The consequence is that Duke does not own the broadcast rights to its own basketball games in any meaningful sense. ESPN does. And Michigan's rights belong to Fox. That architecture is the entire reason the Amazon deal required permission rather than a checkbook, as suggested by @RossDellenger. Duke could not license a game to Amazon any more than a tenant could sell the building. What Duke could do is ask the actual rights holder — ESPN, through the ACC — to carve out three games from its exclusive bundle and allow Amazon to distribute them. ESPN agreed. Dellenger's reporting suggests ESPN extracted a licensing fee plus future Duke scheduling commitments in return. That is a sublicense, structured as a limited waiver of exclusivity, and it is the legal mechanism that makes the entire arrangement possible. Without ESPN's consent, the deal is a straightforward breach of the Grant of Rights cascade. With it, the deal is unremarkable contract law. Which brings us to the Big Ten. Its claim that it "owns" the Duke-Michigan game is the sound of a conference dressing up a contractual reciprocity provision as a property right. The actual mechanism the B1G is invoking is an alternation arrangement between the conferences and their rights holders for neutral-site games played in shared metropolitan territory with New York, a virtual home game for Duke, being the one at issue. Even taking that at face value, it is a contract claim running between the conferences, not a proprietary interest enforceable against Duke, Amazon, or Madison Square Garden. And the party whose alternation turn was supposedly violated, ESPN, has already blessed the deal. It is hard to articulate a coherent legal theory under which the B1G or Fox enforces ESPN's contractual entitlement against ESPN's wishes. The B1G's posture is a negotiating marker, not a litigation position, and any honest reading of the underlying agreements would say so. So why did ESPN say yes? This is where the law stops explaining things and strategy takes over. I'm not just guessing here. ESPN launched its standalone streaming flagship into a market in which the most important commercial question in sports media remains unanswered: will cord-cutters pay to watch a Tuesday-night college basketball game? Disney has spent the better part of a decade rearranging its streaming portfolio without producing a clean answer, and the cost of running that experiment on ESPN's own platform —with ESPN's own marquee inventory and ESPN's own reputation on the line — is considerable. The Pac-12 tried a version of this experiment with Apple two years ago. Apple would not pay linear money, the schools would not accept streaming-only reach, and the conference disintegrated before the deal did. The lesson the industry absorbed was that premium college sports was not yet ready for direct-to-consumer exclusivity. ESPN needs to know whether that lesson still holds, and it would prefer not to find out the hard way. The structure of the Duke deal seems to be the answer. Amazon bears the production cost, the promotional spend, and the conversion risk against Prime's installed 200M+ worldwide subscriber base. ESPN collects a licensing fee, future scheduling inventory it can deploy on its own terms, and a clean read on whether streaming-exclusive premium college basketball actually works as a commercial proposition. If Amazon's experiment succeeds, ESPN learns the model and pulls future games back in-house at the next negotiation. If it fails, Amazon absorbs the loss and ESPN quietly concludes the market is not ready, having paid nothing for the information beyond the foregone value of three games it was compensated for anyway. That is not a concession. It is a hedged bet, and a clever one. Fox cannot afford the same posture, which is why the B1G is whining. Fox One and Tubi are real but considerably smaller than the combined Disney streaming footprint, and every individual rights leak feels more existential to a network without the same DTC depth to fall back on. ESPN can be magnanimous because Disney has room to be patient. Fox and the B1G have less room, so the B1G is now tasked with escalating a routine reciprocity dispute into a public claim of ownership it cannot sustain. That tells you more about the B1G and Fox's competitive position than it does about the merits of the contract. The deeper point, and the one worth dwelling on, is that the rights architecture schools accepted a decade ago to keep their conferences intact is now being tested by the schools themselves. Duke did not break the system. Duke worked within it, asked ESPN for permission, gave up something in return, and brought a streaming partner to the table that the network was apparently happy to let bear the risk of an experiment Disney has not figured out how to run on its own. The B1G and Fox would prefer that schools not learn this trick. They are about to learn it anyway. And the next negotiation, whenever it comes, will reflect what Amazon's three games taught everyone about who the audience really is and what they will pay to watch. The Duke-Amazon arrangement is being described as a turning point for college sports media. My honest guess is that it's more of a market test, structured by a rights holder who needed information from a 200M+ subscriber base more than it needed three basketball games. It's now being resisted by a competitor who cannot afford to be that patient. The law explains how the deal got done. The strategy explains why ESPN wanted it done this way. And the B1G's complaint, stripped of its proprietary language, is the complaint of a conference that wishes it had thought of it first.
-
🌮 Juan De Sand Tits 🌮 (@DeSandTits) reported@BD_Neagle_ It's like a whole bunch of shills in unison got paid by Disney to defend their worst mistakes. Sorry dude, this movie is garbage. The one after is even worse but that doesn't make this one not garbage.
-
Sean Bush (@seanbush3) reportedAlso Alden Einrechen was never the problem with Solo. The problem with Solo was simply that the movie sucked. They could’ve had prime Harrison Ford in the role and it still would’ve been extremely forgettable. Disney threw him under the bus and everyone bought it for some reason
-
Florida Living (JustOh) 🇺🇸 (@myacatt51) reported@michaelmiraflor I'll never understand how these grown *** people never grow out of the whole Disney thing. My teen daughter said to me after 8th grade she was done with the parks. And I sighed in relief. Because the only reason to ever go back after my own childhood was for her to experience it. But I did notice a lot of strange, childless adults, dressing up in costumes, matching outfits, most morbidly obese, behaving like little children and taking pictures of everything, even food. Like, WTF even eats the Disney food? It's awful.
-
Christopher Utzig (@UtzigChris) reported@Andrewnsnyder It's okay. It's got some solid eps. Member berries. Overall not the worst Disney has made by any means.
-
Carla R ✍🏾📖🇺🇸 (@CarlaRK3) reported@MorePerfectUS I wonder how many current #Disney broadcast employees actually like where they work? I remember how angry friends who were long time employees, felt when they lost their jobs on soap operas and nighttime shows that were suddenly shut down. Actors, writers, production staff… awful.
-
Joe Cassandra (@JoeCassandra) reported@imderekbell @michaelmiraflor The issue isnt going to a place like Disney It is spending an exorbitant amount for basic rides and hugging people in customers Way different than spending $100 to watch pro athletes or go to a concert 1 makes more sense
-
Tweet is the Work 🌷 (@NoblestCalling) reportedI have no problem with adults at Disney by themselves incidentally, except the ones who make the lines long for stuff that is clearly intended specifically for children, like the character meet and greets. Rides? That's fine. Food? Totally fine. But a grown woman shouldn't be obsessed with meeting Elsa, especially at the expense of little girls in princess dresses!
-
P Thomas Remix (@PTRemix65) reported@otokyo__ Casting Mitch McConnel to be the next Iron Man may very well be the worst decision Disney has ever made—and that's a mighty high bar—but at least Rachel Zegler is happy about it.
-
Large Lightning Hill (@workingboulder) reported@OdysseyJurassic The problem with Disney is that they talk about things. If this had all happened with minimal press everyone would’ve sucked it off like no other. But because they hyped it up for like 2 years it felt like, it feels like a let down
-
ThannusYT (@ThannusWhyTee) reported@AskCraigKenneth @PenPlays_ Neither Disney nor LEGO are going to touch Cara Dune with a ten foot pole as long as they can help it given her proclivities toward spouting hateful ****.
-
Oiza (@Steadi_lady) reportedWho has Disney+ login, i need it for just tonight. 🙏
-
William Crawford (@WilliamCraks8p) reported@FBI going back to the worst squib a few people protecting them in either directing and letting their ******* ***** Disney, to whoever consider themselves a ******* magician and back to the ******* red Ruby, Crystal that you never read and you’re just a bunch of ******* child unless there’s like the ******* rest of them
-
The Black Horse (@TheBlackHorse65) reported@GreeneMan6 We took ours to disney land a once. They had fun, but it was terrible value-for-money in terms of their experience. There are indoor playgrounds within an hours drive of home that were more profound experiences for them.
-
Jalyn (@Jalyn1Jones) reported@HoopsTalk13 He ain’t creating **** . All he tryna do is get his own . Now it’s “get him some help” lmao please he has more than enough help u magic fans so delusional. Take yall bum asses back to Disney
-
Skye Roberts (@SkyeRoberts_) reported@WhatKatieDid25 @cdolan92 Everyone has paid a ticket to get into the parks. Everyone is equal. As long as nobody is skipping the line there is no problem. Also, Disney has a system to help individuals who have medical issues that prevent them from waiting in line. Kids can use this if it applies to them.
-
FACELESS ART 📽 (@Facelessart305) reported3 reasons why you’re clearly retarded. Weekly releases actually generate more hype for a show. The issue is Disney Daredevil is absolute dog ****. Good word of mouth would’ve actually done more than the “marketing” Quit the cope you Disney marvel shill.
-
Jamil (@Jsheared) reported@ManaByte Again...the lord's work. The same thing happened in the MCU. "Movies fell off" when actually nothing will or has beaten Endgame. Doesn't mean the movies weren't good just meant that NOTHING was BEATING ENDGAME. SW is making bank for Disney. The movies just remind people to buy.
-
Brian Cardarella (@bcardarella) reportedDisney Adults are the worst. They seriously need to grow up.
-
Danielle (@seraphinarose74) reported@mariannwolfebe1 One of mine just did band. Two others did various bands and orchestras. Our city is very big on their music programs. The directors were all very strict about code of conduct. When the boys went to Disney with marching band back in 2012 it was made clear that if they broke the rules that they would be shipped home and parents would be responsible for cost. They had zero issues.
-
Terminus Trading Co (@TerminusTrading) reported@andrew95249 @FrshBakedDisney @michaelmiraflor It's not whiney to say grown adults should leave kid attractions to the kids. Why are you so upset that a majority of adults find Disney adults weird? You people work all year to go ride teacups and take pics with cosplayers
-
David 🇺🇸 (@David747815774) reported@RealJessica Right now that's more than I have for food with a full-time $20 an hour job. I just cut my cable and all subscriptions like Disney, Hulu, AMC etc.. went ffom the max plan on Starlink $120 to the residential $80. saving $40 just so I can afford to pay for gas to get to work. Next....Full coverage insurance to the minimum and cutting the theft indurance on my house. which should save ne another $75-$100.
-
Jimbo Madison (@jimbo_madison) reported@tommysantos14 What LAW are you talking about? Mergers are NOT ILLEGAL. Even MONOPOLIES are legal. Show me where Google was broken up. Was Microsoft broken up during the browser wars? Time-Warner? ABC Disney? There is NO SUCH LAW. This was a Biden DECISION.
-
JC Stafford (@JCStafford4) reported@robertliefeld I think Star Wars fans would not have an issue with a faithful recast. However, I don’t think they trust Disney to do it.
-
ColonelO'Neill 👽☢️⚛ᐰ☥⚔🇫🇷⚜️✝️▄︻デ══━一▬ι═══════ﺤ (@0neill_general) reported@Pirat_Nation And really I have the money to pay every single plateform. But sorry. Can't press printscreen. Not VLC... MY SPEED. THE AUTIST SPEED. MY SCREEN. **** YOU ALL NETFLIX AMAZON DISNEY... I'VE TRIED I RATHER DO THINGS MY WAY. LOCAL NOT STREAMING. HIGHEST QUALITY.
-
Pretty (not) Lieb (@prettylieb) reported@emzanotti Being someone who is literally in Disneyland right now, I have a real problem with Disney Adults who monopolize things for kids. Like, why are 1/2 the people in line to take pictures with the characters adults sans kids. Making a toddler wait 45 mins for you to get your selfie is aggravating. Same when it comes to shows. I also hate the way a lot of them dress which is increasingly inappropriate.