GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jesse (@jessearmand) reported 4 minutes ago

  100 agents could roughly be estimated to 10 - 50 sessions of 2 - 10 agents / session If you have 50 - 100 issues / tasks per developer and you have 5 devs you could work on 250 - 500 issues claude code alone has 10K issues on GitHub, you’d have to launch a significant number of claude agents to parse, dedup, analyze, reproduce the problem, write new code, tests

• 
  Ondrej Balas (@ondrejbalas) reported 7 minutes ago

  Github doing subliminal marketing or something by having an outage every day that pops up in tech news. It shows up more than any other brand.

• 
  Just a comrade (@PushinBagz) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Lamar0985056592 @armaniferrante You say this, but look at what eCash is doing... Worth leaving a .1 in right here imo.. the github is pretty cut and dry & 10% is enough for way bigger things down the road.

• 
  Dion (@Dionysus_crypto) reported 11 minutes ago

  Lost everything on GitHub‑linked memecoins? I recently wrote about a completely new sector for me and decided to invest there. You can check my interim results in the post below. So what’s the situation now? Some tokens simply went down and never came back, like TIMESCALEDB and TAILSCALE. Unfortunately, I bought them with a much larger amount, and those are exactly the ones that went to zero… But there are also positive points. I caught a few solid early runners: MUSICFREE 4.8x Dify 11x THE‑ALGORITHM 5x The rest either dropped a bit or are sitting in a small profit. And yes, this theme was absolutely tradable and you could have made money on it. BUT, according to my calculations, I’m still in the red. Why? Because I didn’t buy the tokens in equal parts, and it turned out that the ones I allocated the biggest sums to ended up going down. I’m under‑earning because of my careless attitude toward my buys. I’m not tracking my investments the way I should, I keep switching to other projects and tokens, and in the end everything just goes to ****. What do I need to do? Pay attention to my money and my investments. Stop spreading myself thin across a bunch of projects and tokens. I should have invested roughly equal amounts into each token to reduce risk. In short, this episode confirmed that I still have a lot of work to do on myself: on my attitude toward investing and on my overall approach. I hope your situation is better than mine. NFA

• 
  Bnaf.OG | 🟧 (@bnafOg) reported 14 minutes ago

  @nyxquant The missing piece: "no contents/code write access" means the agent can open issues and PRs but can't actually commit the fix branch. At some point something needs write access to push code. GitHub Deploy Key scoped to one branch is the next-least-privilege step if you want the agent to close the loop without a full PAT.

• 
  Idris Gadi (@igadii_X) reported 15 minutes ago

  Anyone talking about how they will solve the ongoing GitHub isssues are missing the critical piece. Yes GitHub has alot of issues, but the uptime problem is because it's too popular, too fix that you will need to first become as or maybe more popular.

• 
  ZQ (@X_SUZQ) reported 18 minutes ago

  @github At first, we were just surprised that AI could turn the boring GitHub Changelog into Star Wars scrolling subtitles. But looking back at today in 2026, AI is breaking down the wall between ”boring data“ and ”vivid experience“ to generate a dynamic world from one sentence.

• 
  Alison Silva ✨ (@alisonjsilva) reported 19 minutes ago

  @github All of them 🙃 I'm terrible.

• 
  Ahad Ahadi (@ahadxui) reported 20 minutes ago

  The v1 API puts your auth token directly in the URL. /api/1/YOUR-TOKEN/... URLs get logged. Browser history. Server logs. Referer headers sent to every analytics pixel. Discord screenshots. GitHub issues. Every token that ever touched a URL is a credential leak waiting to be found.

• 
  Ezyaps (@Ezyaps_1) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Wurldsbestpup Background checks ain’t worth a damn, people change over time and sometimes it’s the worst change to exist. I understand why he wouldn’t want to transfer the app over. I’m pretty sure he put his code on github so if it’s that much of an issue just run your own site/app 😭

• 
  DissentingSkeptic (@DissentingS) reported 27 minutes ago

  Im struggling to read ts vibe coded mess for an alpha streaming api. Very hard to read and follow. Took days to fix the mistakes it created with cmake builds. Did not compile out of the box. Which the buggy github bots respond with many errors. TIME WASTER.

• 
  Robert Cowherd (@bobcowherd) reported 31 minutes ago

  4/ GitHub is the most recoverable, but only partly. Source survives in any local clone. That's the good news. What doesn't survive: Issues, Actions secrets, branch protection rules, deploy keys, webhooks. Gone with the repo. 90-day soft-delete is best-effort, not contractual.

• 
  Coline (@colineapp) reported 33 minutes ago

  github made code collaborative and gave the entire software industry a shared home. before github, open source was difficult, code review was painful, and the knowledge inside a codebase was invisible to everyone except the people who wrote it. github changed all of that. PRs as conversations. issues as public bug reports. the social graph of who builds what. it didn't just host code, it made code a community. employers today look at your github history. so github became the engineering team's living record. the code lives there. the history lives there. the decisions made in PRs live there. if you want to understand how a product was built, you go to github. if github is the record of how products are built, it should know why they were built. the customer request that drove the feature. the spec that defined it. the figma file defining the layout. the task it was supposed to close. the conversation where the tradeoffs were debated. github knew this. issues, discussions, projects, copilot, etc. they tried to make github the place where the whole software development process lives. but github is made of code. everything they add that isn't code feels like it's fighting the grain. github issues are a worse linear. github discussions are a worse slack. the context of why code gets written still lives somewhere else, and the PR that ships it has no connection to the decision that created it. github earned the code layer. it just couldn't become the work layer.

• 
  Alex 🔔 | updatify.io (@_avdept) reported 34 minutes ago

  if loook at github as social network - no, nobody will ship it if look as a place to store code/prs/issues, etc - then there already alternatives, gitlab, bitbucket, gitea, etc

• 
  AKT1 (@DeynegaSlava) reported 34 minutes ago

  Those numbers look tidy, but they’re modest. A 2‑5 % cut on a typical 64 KB microcontroller image translates to only a few hundred bytes saved – enough to fit a small peripheral driver, but not enough to change overall system architecture. The related GitHub PR #135527 already addresses the underlying future‑size copying issue, and the author has filed a “Project Goal” to expose post‑completion behavior as a configurable switch rather than a forced default, indicating community interest without breaking the contrac