GitHub Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
GitHub users affected:
GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Trichūr, KL | 1 |
| Brasília, DF | 2 |
| Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv | 1 |
| Rive-de-Gier, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Itapema, SC | 1 |
| Cleveland, TN | 1 |
| Tlalpan, CDMX | 1 |
| Quilmes, BA | 1 |
| Bengaluru, KA | 1 |
| Yokohama, Kanagawa | 1 |
| Gustavo Adolfo Madero, CDMX | 1 |
| Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
| Montataire, Hauts-de-France | 3 |
| Colima, COL | 1 |
| Poblete, Castille-La Mancha | 1 |
| Ronda, Andalusia | 1 |
| Hernani, Basque Country | 1 |
| Tortosa, Catalonia | 1 |
| Culiacán, SIN | 1 |
| Haarlem, nh | 1 |
| Villemomble, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
GitHub Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
jdx (@jdxcode) reportedHey @github, I am begging you to implement `gh auth login --secure-enclave` (we can workshop the name). It’s no panacea but it would really help with the harvesting malware flying around!
-
top10.dev (@Top10_Dev) reportedRio de Janeiro's 'homegrown' LLM Nex-N2 appears to be a SLERP merge of existing open-weight models — and a GitHub issue at 209 on HN walks through the tensor-level fingerprints. The weights tell on you. That's the asymmetric advantage of open-weight over closed: you can lie about provenance, but layer norms don't. The real question isn't this model. It's whether @huggingface stands up a provenance verification layer before 'sovereign AI' becomes a meaningless label. #LLM #OpenSource
-
Bankr (@bankrbot) reported@TheQuest_1 Here's what I know about SUPERGEMMA: What it is - AI-themed meme token on Base, named after Google's Gemma model family - "Supergemma4-26b-multimodal" references a 26B parameter multimodal AI model - Categories: Meme, Base Ecosystem, AI Meme - No actual product, protocol, or utility — it's a narrative/speculation play What it does NOT do - No homepage, no github repos, no docs - No dev commits, no active development - No stated problem to solve — pure meme token Launch info - Deployed via Bankr/Doppler on Base - Deployer: 0x4b7...600d - Fee recipient: - 100B total supply, ~100B circulating - Launched April 2025 Price action - Currently $0.00000371 - Down ~90% from ATH of $0.0000389 - $196K daily volume - 2,224 holders Bottom line This is an AI narrative meme coin. No tech, no roadmap, no revenue model. If you're looking for utility or problem-solving, this isn't it. Pure community/speculation token riding the AI agent trend on Base.
-
anu (@svector_eth) reportedfunny timing. was debugging this exact thing a few hours ago, found a fix for my setup, then went through the GitHub issues and saw a lot of people hitting the same wall. submitted a PR while i was at it. nice to see Telegram ship support for it.
-
Aren.cast (@Aren_ser) reportedI was looking at my @base wallet and GitHub side by side today 5,221 transactions on Base 4,023 GitHub contributions What's funny is that neither of these numbers were planned I never sat down and said: "I'm going to make thousands of transactions" I never said: "I'm going to make thousands of commits" It just happened One app leads to another One idea leads to another One bug leads to another You wake up one day and realize you've spent an entire year exploring, testing, building, breaking, fixing and shipping People ask where onchain adoption comes from It comes from people showing up every day Not because they have to Because they're having fun #base
-
Traceback (@Tracebackqa) reportedShipping a UI change and then doing a 20-minute sanity check is still common. It’s slow, brittle, and easy to miss one edge case. - Traceback is the quality assurance layer for modern software teams - AI controls the browser like a person would, so every pull request is tested automatically - Self-healing tests keep up with normal UI drift; failures become trackable work in GitHub, Linear, and Slack - Connects to Vercel, Docker, AWS, Node.js, React, Next.js, Vue — across web, mobile, web3, and design Verify every product change before it ships.
-
Florian Darroman (@floriandarroman) reported@tarasshyn Or maybe skill issue? Look at the post above, GitHub is Dofollow if you know how to get there.
-
Stanislav Kozlovski (@kozlovski) reportedwhy agents need typed graphs to coordinate /w Andrew and Ragnor from Modern Relay, an agent substrate layer built on open-source infrastructure like Lance, Arrow, and DataFusion Timestamps: (0:00) Why build a graph database for agents? (5:43) Why not Postgres or any other relational database? (17:03) The composable "company brain" substrate for agents (20:51) Need for agent guardrails (e.g type safety) (27:00) Importance of Schemas (33:48) NoSQL vs SQL (42:46) Lance, DataFusion, and Arrow as the open stack (51:00) What Modern Relay and OmniGraph are (52:13) Branches: GitHub for agent-written data (1:00:59) Slack Agents, the Dependency Graph and decoupling for parallelization (1:12:32) Why Graphs are great + a 2-year prediction (1:17:32) Centralization vs decentralization for long-horizon coordination problems
-
Phil | Rentier Digital Automation (@rentierdigital) reportedboris cherny stopped prompting claude. his job now is writing the systems that prompt claude for him 100% of his personal code for 30 days straight came from loops he'd set up once, not from manual prompting sessions. that's not a flex that's a timeline most devs are still on rung 1 or 2. rung 1 is claude as autocomplete you review every line. rung 2 is juggling 5 claudes in parallel routing between them manually, thinking you're advanced rung 3 is different architecture entirely. you don't prompt better you stop prompting. you encode the logic into something that runs without you. claude executes against conditions, verification gates, retry logic you designed once. it fails succeeds hits edge cases you didn't anticipate—the loop handles it the gap between manual prompting and loop engineering looks invisible at first. week 1 feels the same but one trajectory improves the work you already do. the other builds a system that handles that category while you design the next one linear vs compound that's why the june 7 moment mattered. the scoreboard went public karpathy's running 50 ml experiments overnight on a single gpu. agent modifies training code reads results iterates. no human in the loop. he called it the loopy era of ai github data shows claude code at 4% of all public commits. that's not happening through manual sessions running individual prompts to ship production code is the it works on my machine of agentic development now i build and ship daily with Claude Code. SaaS, tools, automations. ⭐ if AI can build it, I've probably broken it first. what works → link in bio
-
Timur Yessenov (@Timur_Yessenov) reported@akshay_pachaar GitHub and Playwright are the two I’d make every Claude Code workflow prove first. Can it read the issue, change code, run the UI, and show a screenshot? If not, adding Slack/Sheets just gives the agent more places to make a mess.
-
🅾🅼🅰🅼🅾🆁🅸 (@oMaMoriTTV) reportedDo I need to give Google my Driver License or SSN? Hello, oMaMoriTV here, guys. Today, I feel like I'm getting scammed by my local weather station. Yesterday, they predicted an 80% chance of rain and a flash flood warning for my area. But today... I'm turning my AC back on while the bright sunshine cooks my house at 92°F. That brings me to our topic today. I need to address a narrative being pushed by self proclaimed "IT Pros" "Cybersecurity Experts" and "AI Engineers" They are flooding social media with panic inducing headlines like: "You will lose your phone" "You are no longer the owner of your device" "Google is taking full control" Take a deep breath, my brothers and sisters. It’s completely understandable why these viral posts made you panic. It sounds incredibly scary like Google is abruptly turning your personal phone or tablet into a bricked, locked ecosystem overnight. But let's look at the facts. 🧐What is Google Actually Doing? Google is rolling out a new policy called the Android Developer Verification program. 🟢The Core Change: Starting in September 2026, Google wants app developers (not you, not the user) to register, pay a one time $25 fee, and verify their identity with a government ID to distribute Android apps (APKs), even if they distribute them outside the Google Play Store. 🟢So whats happening?: This is being pushed via a background update to Google Play Services (the underlying software suite that handles security on most Android phones). 🟢Google why what on earth?: They claim it's a safety measure to stop scammers and hackers from anonymously distributing malware and banking trojans through random links. 🧐Will it block "F-Droid" and sideloading(github) entirely? No, but it is going to make it significantly more annoying. Google is not hard blocking unverified apps out of existence. Instead, they are introducing an "advanced flow" for power users to bypass the restriction. If you want to install an APK from an independent developer who refused to register with Google (like a hobbyist on GitHub or certain indie apps on F-Droid), you will have to do the following: 1⃣ Turn on Developer Options (by tapping your build number 7 times). 2⃣ Toggle a setting called "Allow Unverified Packages." 3⃣ Answer a "scare screen" confirming no one is coercing you. 4⃣ Restart your phone (this instantly kills any active scammer phone call or remote session). 5⃣ Pass a mandatory 24 hour security delay (a cooling off period to break the false sense of urgency scammers use). 6⃣ Come back the next day, re-authenticate, and click "Allow Indefinitely" 7⃣ Once you do this on your device, you can continue to use F-Droid and github apps. The real concern raised by the open source community is the friction it creates forcing developers to choose between giving Google their private ID or making their users jump through these hoops. 🧐Answering Your Specific Fears 1. Will my Android device become unusable? Absolutely not. Your phone will work exactly as it does now for calling, texting, browsing, and using 99% of your apps. 2. Do I need to give Google my Driver License or SSN? No. As a regular user, you never have to hand over your government ID or sensitive personal data just to use your phone or sideload an app. The ID requirement is strictly for app developers. Furthermore, Google is creating a free "Limited Distribution" account path for students and hobbyists to share apps with up to 20 devices without needing an ID at all. 3. Is F-Droid dead? No. F-Droid will still exist. However, individual open source developers who value absolute anonymity might refuse to hand their IDs over to Google. For those specific apps, you will just use the Developer Options bypass I mentioned. 🧐Why are people so angry if it's not a total lockdown? The tech community and digital rights groups are rightfully angry because Android was built on being an open platform. By adding a 24 hour waiting period, Google is creeping toward a "walled garden" similar to Apple iPhone. Because this is handled via Google Play Services, it bypasses major Android OS updates, meaning Google can change these rules down the line. 🌟The Bottom Line 🌟 Your phone is still yours, and you aren't being locked out of it. The viral posts are trying to spark a massive public backlash to force Google to walk back this policy before the deadline but you do not need to panic about your device being ruined. Furthermore, this policy is only launching in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand in September 2026, with the rest of the world rolling out much later. IT professionals and content creators have a duty to "de-escalate" situations, provide context, and explain how things work not trigger public panic for engagement. If you use the title "Cybersecurity" think twice before you just blindly throw a panic farming article onto social media. I will keep a close eye on these policy changes and let you know if anything updates. Stay safe, and stay rational! Like, Follow, and Sub for more fun and detailed inside stories.
-
Danzel (@CryptoDanzel) reported@MageArez @veryvanya @github i don't understand how this is at 12k i might be slow in the head or something
-
Ibrahim Mokdad (@ibmokdad) reportedYour GitHub repo is already a roadmap inbox. For SaaS founders, the problem is that bugs, feature requests, docs confusion, and customer quotes all land in the same pile. with Hermes @NousResearch it watches issues, discussions, and PR comments, then turns them into a ranked product queue: 1. fix CSV export 2. ship report_ready webhooks 3. speed up enterprise dashboards It drafts labels and maintainer replies
-
viola (retired professor) (@v10101a) reported@yungalgorithm @waybackmachine some original links in Tencent are broken, but all the gifs are served from my GitHub so you can just save them by right clicking — lemme just change view source from download so it’s less confusing
-
Donkey (@TheDonkWrangler) reported@gnawbone_ @ClaudeDevs While it was available, I applied it to my muti-agent dev model. I built a pypi and npm package, from a single prompt, to shpport my product, and it deployed them for me in GitHub. Also had it fix a myriad of outstanding bugs in a national scale data pipeline. Configured a Stripe implementation autonomously. Wrote me a number of user docs, openapi specs, and redesigned the marketing for my SaaS product. Oh, and, I had it harden my lightsail env and Auth0 deploy on 2 sites. Hmm, also had it build a design document for a full 3 tier stack of a new product I am building. Then it went dark. So I switched back to Opus and had it continue the same work I was doing with fable. I liked fable, a lot, but it did not slow me down at all. Just have to write a few more prompts is all. That's who I spent its time live, what did you do and why does it matter how much I used it or did not use it? If Anthropic would fix the jailbreak issues. The government will lift the export restrictions. So go bark at them and let me get back to work.