GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Simone Margaritelli (@evilsocket) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Teknium @sidbing Yeah? Then why nobody considered that github issue in 48 hours? **** X, it’s GH you should care about. Bro.

• 
  OCTAMEM (@OCTAMEM) reported 6 minutes ago

  @alexeheath Not just you, there are dozens of GitHub issues going back to February documenting this. Some people are switching to Opus 4.5 and saying it feels like a different model. No official acknowledgment from Anthropic.

• 
  Feiwu7777 (@Feiwu7777144805) reported 7 minutes ago

  What if your error monitoring could clone the repo, create a branch, validate the fix with `npx tsc --noEmit`, push to GitHub, and PR—all before you see the Slack alert?

• 
  Gilfoyle (@FSoyluyor) reported 12 minutes ago

  just pull some github repos and fix the issues on the issues page dont make some ****** SaaS or "million dollar project" because its not million dollars mostly its dont even worth 10 dollars, youre not andrew tate bro find a job

• 
  Krastyo Krastev (@k_krastew) reported 16 minutes ago

  @_Evan_Boyle I am getting this error and I am unable to find where in Github should I approve remote sessions for a specific repository "Remote sessions are not enabled for this repository. Contact your organization administrator to enable remote sessions." Any help?

• 
  Defileo🔮 (@defileo) reported 17 minutes ago

  > 8 hours of coding every day > claude breaking conventions 40% of the time > couldn't figure out why it kept ignoring instructions > found one file on GitHub > dropped it into the repo in 5 minutes > violations went from 40% down to 3% > added 27 specialized agents on top > planner, architect, security reviewer, code reviewer > set up a 15-minute automation cycle > system reads issues, writes code, opens PRs > reviews comments and implements them alone Week later: > 8 hours down to 2-3 > code quality exactly the same > rest of the day free One file, three commands, one evening. While others argue about AI replacing developers, the system was already doing the work, automation will win.

• 
  Mark Price (@WarforgeXP) reported 20 minutes ago

  Finally got Claude to do autonomous dev. What a pain. Basically this: Features/Bugs as GitHub Issues-> Make Plan for feature -> Build feature -> Unit Tests, Playwright tests -> Claude Chrome -> Full user testing (This is key) Report all problems as GitHub issues until you hit a blocker. While GitHub issues exist, continue development (repeat process)

• 
  Marcin Dudek (@MythThrazz) reported 24 minutes ago

  @a_lamparelli I know! You would think those are free/cheap - they arent. And never were. I think there is actually an issue on Github about it. It misses the KV cache completely afair

• 
  Mark (@markstachowski) reported 25 minutes ago

  @petergyang They don't nerf the models, they nerf all the harness logic around it. Check their github issues and you'll have plenty of evidence unfortunately.

• 
  Marcus V (@EudoraFenty) reported 33 minutes ago

  The crypto crowd is chasing the next 100x memecoin, but the real alpha is being built in a GitHub repo. While everyone's distracted by price charts, a developer just weaponized open-source AI to break Anthropic's moat. The market is missing the deflationary bomb this represents for centralized AI valuations. They took Claude Opus 4.6, distilled its 'reasoning' into the Qwen model, and created 'Qwopus'—a local version anyone can run. The cost? Effectively zero versus API fees. This is the Napster moment for proprietary LLMs. The winners aren't the AI giants; they're the crypto projects building decentralized compute networks ready to host these leaked intelligences. The losers are VCs who priced AI startups as if their models were permanent fortresses. My take: This is a structural contradiction. Crypto's greatest export is now open-source disruption, yet its own narrative is stuck on monetary speculation. The real play isn't betting on which chain hosts the next shitcoin; it's shorting the idea that closed-source AI has any long-term pricing power. A model's weights are just data—and data wants to be free. The genie isn't going back in the bottle. When does the first major VC mark down their AI portfolio by 50%? #AI #Crypto #Deflation

• 
  Indie Hacker News (@indiehackernws) reported 33 minutes ago

  @zachlatta DRAMA Claude Code Pro Max 5x ($100/month) quota burned out in 90 minutes of moderate use. Background sessions silently eat shared quota. GitHub issue #45756 hit 97 upvotes. Anthropic is considering defaulting to 400k context as mitigation.

• 
  Süleyman Kenar (@kenarsuleyman) reported 33 minutes ago

  @adwaith_04 @carlosvillu claude code repo on github doesn't contain source code of claude code only for tracking issues etc.

• 
  QRAuth (@QRAuth_io) reported 34 minutes ago

  @github is down! Getting 504 error

• 
  Dan Harrin 🦒 (@danjharrin) reported 36 minutes ago

  @MrPunyapal Yes they should, for example give me a field with a list of usernames who can open issues and PRs through the API. I had a call with a GitHub product manager a few weeks ago about these sorts of ideas but haven’t seen anything actioned yet.

• 
  Usectl (@usectlcloud) reported 38 minutes ago

  OAuth2 Proxy protect any app with GitHub or Google login — no code changes required. the proxy handles authentication before requests reach your app. real use case: you built an internal tool for your team. you don't want to build a login system. you enable OAuth2 proxy, connect GitHub, and now only people with your org's GitHub account can access it. zero lines of auth code written.