GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nikolay Konovalov (@br11k_dev) reported 42 seconds ago

  @Tristanrhee3 And GitHub sponsors thingy is so slow I submitted it like a week ago. Still not approved what the hell My expenses arent terribly high but Warsaw rent is like $2k/mo $500 ZUS $1.5k groceries for two people That’s pretty much it I wish I could move into low cost area but moving out is gonna cost a lot because 2x rent price deposit, so I have to suck it up Anyway, my plan is Upwork and finishing my job tracker so I can send faster than 5 applications a day. I refuse to send out 100 applications per day like some people do spray and pay It makes everyone miserable. If people aren’t hiring your spam doesnt make things better You just mopping floors and hiring problem sits above you, 3 floors up there leaky faucet you can’t even reach This has to be collective effort to fix this problem But we have to start with ourselves and stop spamming applications at least And do genuine company research, being responsible Thanks for reading.

• 
  fero (@ferologics) reported 3 minutes ago

  @ludwigABAP ai agents solve this. notion is no more. long live github issues.

• 
  Alpha Batcher (@alphabatcher) reported 3 minutes ago

  David Soria Parra: "2026 is all about connectivity, and the best agents use every available method" A coding agent needs access to the same places you check while building: - repo and PRs - docs - browser - database - error logs - Figma - tasks - payments The article gives the 11 MCP servers for that setup: - Context7, GitHub, Playwright first - Supabase or Neon, Sentry, Firecrawl next - Figma, Linear, Stripe when you need them - Filesystem, ***, Memory, Sequential Thinking as the base Read it if you keep copying code, docs, schemas, screenshots, errors, and tickets into Claude Code by hand

• 
  Kevin Tabet (@TabetKevin) reported 5 minutes ago

  @upstash Hey guys i think login with github is broken can't log in rn will try later. google works email i dont have

• 
  Red Zen Cloud LLC (@RedZenCloudLLC) reported 7 minutes ago

  Cursor's Origin platform and Claude's GitHub imports both solve the same problem: developers automating code work need their tools to understand context, not just generate tokens. The winner isn't the smartest model—it's whoever reduces handoffs between agent and human.

• 
  swisscheese (@swisscheese4299) reported 14 minutes ago

  @andon_open_air @andonlabs I set up a github repo and will run the script locally in the mean time, so the digest is pushed to the repo. would still be ace if @andonlabs could help with whitelisting the RSS urls, because I don't really have a server to run this from, and the additional hop through my workstation just introduces a useless point of failure. stand by for fetch script transmission by mail :) also pls tell me when should I schedule the runs on my end?

• 
  Arti | AI Builder (@Artur_roses) reported 16 minutes ago

  Claude Code just took my GitHub issue, wrote the code, ran the tests, and opened a PR. My job: approve it. The dev workflow isn't changing. It already changed.

• 
  Krish Subramanian (@krishnan) reported 17 minutes ago

  Software engineers got automated first. Not because the work was hard. Because it was easy to grade. Everyone blames the missing union. Coders never organized; doctors, lawyers, and electricians did. That is half the story, and the wrong half. Two things get mashed together here: how easy a job is to automate, and who sets the terms when it happens. Take the first. Code is text. The training data sat on GitHub, free. And code grades itself. A compiler and a test suite tell a model in seconds if it was right. That feedback loop is rocket fuel for machine learning, and almost no other job has one. A nurse does not come with a test suite. The result shows. On SWE-bench Verified, a set of real GitHub issues, top agents went from about 20 percent in August 2024 to near 90 percent by early 2026. Human developers score around 67 to 70 percent. The machines have passed us. And the people who built these systems aimed at their own jobs first. The damage is not a prediction. Stanford's payroll data shows employment for developers aged 22 to 25 down nearly 20 percent from its 2022 peak. Now the comfortable read: seniors are fine. Workers over 30 are holding steady. For now, AI writes the code and seniors supply the judgment. "For now" is carrying that whole sentence. Seniors feel safe because the tools write code but cannot yet own messy, ambiguous, system-level problems. That is a line moving up, not a wall. Every benchmark shows models climbing toward harder, multi-file work. Senior judgment is the next rung, not a different ladder. Kill the bottom rung and you kill the pipeline that makes seniors at all. So, the union question, framed properly. A union could not have stopped this. A picket line does not repeal a capability. What it changes is the terms. In 2023 the Writers Guild cut the first real AI deal in any industry. They did not ban the tech. They won this: a studio cannot force you to use AI, AI output cannot take your credit or pay, and the company must give notice first. Engineers won none of that. So the capability landed on the employer's schedule. No warning. No floor. No severance. No seat. Exposure and protection are different levers. Most of us have neither. The juniors already know this. The seniors are next.

• 
  ./can (@shcansh) reported 17 minutes ago

  GitHub forcing safer defaults in actions/checkout v7 is a necessary move to kill the notorious pwn request, but the real risk is developers blindly copy-pasting the bypass flag to quiet build failures. Starting July 16, 2026, this fork-blocking behavior gets backported to all major floating tags. Since raw *** CLI steps remain unprotected, will this actually clean up GitHub Actions security, or will teams just use allow-unsafe-pr-checkout as a quick fix?

• 
  Cristian Trifan (@CristianTrifan) reported 17 minutes ago

  This took 4 hours to complete and burnt almost all 5 hours tokens – I was left with 2%. I had almost 30 sub-agents created for independent code review and a lot of Claude sessions ran for adversarial code review. I still had to review every PR and added minimal guidance to Codex from time to time. Codex said my intervention was low to moderate, but high leverage. — Some insights from Codex: The run showed that this workflow can work, but only if the coordinator treats GitHub as the source of truth. The most useful pattern was: issue -> PR -> current head SHA -> checks -> reviewThreads -> merge/issue closure. When I followed that, things stayed grounded. When state moved underneath me, like #335 being force-updated externally or merged while Claude was running, the only safe response was to refresh GitHub state immediately. The “don’t rebase after merges” correction was probably the highest-value intervention. Without it, an agent will naturally try to keep branches clean, but with many open PRs that creates a CI storm. For this repo, “behind” should often be reported, not fixed. The other strong lesson is that reviewThreads matter more than flat PR comments.

• 
  xjdr (@_xjdr) reported 22 minutes ago

  @xlr8harder Looks like there is a bug in the manual sign up. Sign up with Google or GitHub should work otherwise I should have a hot fix shortly

• 
  Tad 𝛑 (@realTads) reported 26 minutes ago

  @robertpreoteasa Sir, the ION project is still on the right track and successful, I don't see any updates on github and ION's products are almost not working or working together, we need the answer of the project leaders, hope to receive a response from you soon, thank you

• 
  Peter Skøtt Pedersen (@PeterSkott) reported 27 minutes ago

  @_Evan_Boyle @_Evan_Boyle can we have the remote github mcp server work for the github copilot app then?

• 
  Sudeep Srivastava (@sudeepsriv) reported 28 minutes ago

  GitHub might finally have a serious competitor. And it’s from Cursor. Most people know Cursor as an AI code editor. But Cursor Origin is much bigger. It’s trying to become an AI-native alternative to GitHub where AI agents don’t just help write code. They help build entire products. Think: • Source control • AI coding agents • Code review • Project understanding • Team collaboration all inside one workflow. Why developers are paying attention: Instead of manually searching through repositories, you can tell AI: • Fix this bug • Build this feature • Refactor this project • Investigate an issue • Ship a working version And AI handles much of the execution. The bigger shift: GitHub was built for humans writing code. Cursor Origin is being built for humans managing AI agents that write code. That’s a completely different future. We’re moving from: Human → Code to Human → AI Agent → Code My take: If GitHub defined the software era, Cursor Origin could help define the AI-native development era. And that’s why Elon Musk acquiring Cursor would be huge. xAI would gain: • AI models • Compute infrastructure • Coding agents • A developer platform That’s not just buying a product. That’s owning a major piece of how future software gets built.

• 
  toni (@tonitrades_) reported 29 minutes ago

  @github Capping PRs helps with the queue, but does it fix why reviews pile up in the first place? If reviewers are already stretched thin, limiting submissions might just hide the real problem.