1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
  4. Outage Map
GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Le Chambon-Feugerolles, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Antananarivo, Analamanga 1
Paris, Île-de-France 2
Lure, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Ashkelon, Southern District 1
Veigné, Centre 1
Saint-Paul, Réunion 2
Mexico City, CDMX 1
León de los Aldama, GUA 1
Créteil, Île-de-France 1
Trichūr, KL 1
Brasília, DF 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv 1
Rive-de-Gier, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • SharpT_
    #T (@SharpT_) reported

    @xdncolonthree The problem is people thinking GitHub is a place where you get software

  • organicryptoyyc
    organiccryptoyyc (@organicryptoyyc) reported

    6/14 First challenge wall: Portainer's easy "pull straight from GitHub" build needs a paid Business Edition license. Community Edition blocks it cold. Overcome, corrected and fix uploaded.

  • GohilHardy
    Hardik Gohil (@GohilHardy) reported

    AI writes the code. AI reviews the PR. AI explains the errors. AI generates the tests. GitHub stores it. Vercel deploys it. Stripe/Dodo Payments handles the payments. So what's stopping you from shipping?

  • Real_OJ_Lawyer
    Johnnie Cockring (@Real_OJ_Lawyer) reported

    @aubymori its only 5 seconds of reading if you know what to look for if you've never been to github before it takes like 5 minutes to find anything that even vaguely resembles a download its ironic to mock reading skills when the problem at hand is writing skills these sweaty nerds call themselves devs and programmers but they don't know how to code a green button that says DOWNLOAD

  • realsean
    Sean Donahoe (@realsean) reported

    OpenAI's next model doesn't have a final name yet and it just broke a mathematical bound that had stood since 1978... Then it did it nine more times. Meet Astra. Or don't, because you can't have it. Sound familiar? Yesterday OpenAI published ten proofs of open problems in math and theoretical computer science, all generated by what they describe as an internal version of Astra, their next major model. Every one of these had seen no progress on the main result for at least a decade. Most of them far longer than that. The list reads like someone raided a century of unfinished business. The first explicit non-sofic group, constructed out of nothing, settling whether every countable group admits finite permutation approximations. For ma math needs first... Connes' rigidity conjecture, disproved. Ehrhart's volume conjecture, proved. The first improvement to the general high-dimensional sphere packing bound since 1978. Quantum parallel repetition, proved for every finite two-player entangled game. New lower bounds on circuit complexity for the permanent. And three Erdős problems gone, including 183 on multicolored Ramsey numbers. Every single proof ships with a Lean 4 formalization on GitHub and all machine-checkable. That kills the usual failure mode of AI math announcements, where a plausible-looking chain of reasoning quietly hand-waves the one step that actually mattered. You don't hand-wave past a Lean kernel. This just shows how far we've come in such a short period of time. These problems have confounded the best mathematicians in the world for 50 years plus. AI has evolved in just a few short years to be able to solve these problems and the mind boggles at what can be achieved in just the next five years from here. Now this is the part the AI Bros won't be talking about but you know Uncle Sean will Cost of the successful runs... Roughly $2,000 in tokens at Sol API rates. Two grand. For problems that had sat untouched for decades. Now I'm a stickler for accuracy of wording and that's the trader in me but that specific number was a successful run. That stood out to me because what does it mean for an unsuccessful run? All of the pre attempts and the failures. It's because in reality that's the real fricking cost. That's the actual cost per task, and it's missing from the announcement. And as you know that's the number I keep banging on about. Noam Brown did admit they came up empty on the Millennium Prize problems, so we know the misses exist. We just don't get the denominator. Same week, Anthropic burned $100,000 in tokens having Mythos Preview find real weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms. Also unreleased. Also demoed rather than shipped. That's the pattern I keep coming back to and as you've seen me talk about in previous posts. You get Sol and Opus 5. The actual frontier is sitting in a lab getting walked through Washington before it ever gets walked past you. Altman demoed Astra to policymakers in DC last week, and it's expected to be the first model submitted under the new federal review framework. For anyone building, the architecture is the real story here. Astra is designed to coordinate multiple agents on one problem for hours or even days at a stretch. Same shape as what I've been running with Ferrox Factory and the Anvil gating system... worktrees and a serial merge queue and evidence gates, just with a compute budget I will never see in my lifetime. Nobody's even decided yet whether it ships as GPT-6 or GPT-5.7. There's no date. Meanwhile 3,000-plus mathematicians have signed the Leiden Declaration, and Timothy Gowers is writing about the possible destruction of mathematical culture after GPT-5.6 Pro solved two problems he'd sweated over, first attempt on both. His words...Strange and not particularly pleasant to have the rug pulled out from under him. What are your thoughts?

  • biellonuhu
    Bprime - Ninjapay (@biellonuhu) reported

    Recently I took notice of some happenings. I think we need to talk about access to services as a big concern. My GitHub account was suspended 2 weeks back in the middle of my normal routine, I saw another person tweet about how his OpenAI subscription was suspended in the middle of work, just a few minutes ago I saw another post on how someone's Claude account was suspended as well. In most of these cases it was an automated trigger system that suspended the accounts. It takes forever, if ever, to resolve the issues. No real human looks at it, just some black-box AI deciding your fate in seconds. Now let's look at the impacts on users, very terrible. You lose money, time and opportunities. Deadlines get missed, clients get angry, projects stall, and sometimes you even lose paid subscriptions with no refund. For freelancers and indie developers this can literally mean no income for weeks. I think we need to find a way around these issues. Keep local backups of everything, use multiple accounts where possible, lean more on open-source tools, and push for actual human review systems. Big tech can't keep holding our work hostage like this.

  • xlyphh
    (U+200B) (@xlyphh) reported

    my calendar says 'plan q4 strategy'. my github says 'critical auth flow broken'. guess which one i spent the morning on

  • folarihn
    folarihn (@folarihn) reported

    You can sell your GitHub login to guys that’ll use the api credit but don’t expect to get that same value. If you’re so kin on withdrawing the free credit.

  • Aaronontheweb
    Aaron Stannard (@Aaronontheweb) reported

    @RyanRodemoyer2 We're not offering hand-curated github issue descriptions around here lol

  • Ladys_Winter
    Penelope (@Ladys_Winter) reported

    @vladuhat999 @LuminaMeow14 @V33V33V33V33V33 It objectively is terrible UI design when so many users can't find the LITERAL ONLY BUTTON THEY NEED, and github simps will go "well the website is made for other people! They are just forcing you to use it for no reason! NO UPGRADE OR UPDATES!!!!"

  • PetterSjulstad
    petter (@PetterSjulstad) reported

    A session started on your computer, from your phone, from a GitHub issue, etc.. are all interactable from your phone through regular chat session. (Need to use the terminal, bivy got that too)

  • Mrearningtips
    Shafqat Crypto (@Mrearningtips) reported

    🚨 Instant $175 FREE AI API Credits! 🔥 Agent Router Is Giving Away Up To $175 API Credits For ChatGPT & Claude*. ✅ Eligibility: - GitHub Account Created Before 2025 ⚡ Supported Models: - Claude Opus 5 & 4.7 - ChatGPT 5.6 Sol 📌 How To Claim: - Sign Up Using 'GitHub" - Don't Use Gmail Or Username Login - Open Wallet → Check API Credits 🔄 Didn't Receive Credits? - Refresh & Check Again ⏳ Limited-Time Offer — Claim It Before It's Gone! 💬 Claimed Yours? Drop Your Balance Screenshot Below 👇

  • __aiforall__
    AI for all (@__aiforall__) reported

    OpenAI's unreleased Astra model produced formal proofs for 10 long-open math/CS problems: a non-sofic group construction, a disproof of Connes's rigidity conjecture. Lean certificates are public on GitHub — machine-checkable, not a claim you have to trust.

  • Urooj978
    Urooj (@Urooj978) reported

    In 2024, Nintendo declared war on emulators: ​→Yuzu paid $2.4M & shut down →Ryujinx vanished overnight →8,500+ DMCA takedowns filed ​Every major Switch emulator was dead. But Nintendo had a problem: Zurdi. ​A year before the war started, he quietly built RomM. ​It’s not an emulator—it’s a self-hosted ROM manager. It scans your game files, grabs box art/metadata, tracks RetroAchievements, and plays games in your browser via EmulatorJS. ​Nintendo's top IP lawyer even admitted it: Emulators only cross the line when bypassing encryption. RomM doesn't touch it. It just organizes what you own. ​→9,100+ GitHub stars (AGPL-3.0)400+ platforms supported (NES to PS2) →Native apps for Playnite, Android, & muOS → Multi-disc support, DLCs, sync options & RetroArch integration ​Sony deleted 2,000 classic games from its store. Nintendo wiped out emulators. Your digital library was never actually yours. ​Two guys in a Discord server built the museum they can't take down.

  • HansCashFlow
    OptionHans (@HansCashFlow) reported

    @unabyssapp My AI did a policy audit on this and here's the result (positive): "Good news on the security front — it's much better than a lot of "connect everything" tools. Here's what I found: Security page: Everything is encrypted in transit and at rest. Critically, every connection is read-only by design — Unabyss says it cannot post, reply, edit, or delete anything in your connected apps, and that's the scope of the OAuth permissions it actually requests, not just a policy promise. You can disconnect any app instantly and permanently delete everything it's imported. They explicitly state "We never train on your data. Full stop." Compliance-wise: SOC 2 Type II is "in progress" (audit-ready, not yet certified), and they claim GDPR alignment. Privacy Policy: The legal entity is OneType Prosta Spółka Akcyjna, based in Warsaw, Poland (this is useful to know since it means Polish/EU jurisdiction applies). A few points worth flagging: your context data does get routed through third-party AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google/Gemini) to generate output and do semantic search — the policy says this is scoped narrowly and not used to train those models either. They also run standard marketing/analytics trackers (Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, X Pixel, Microsoft Clarity) on their site, which is unrelated to your connected-app data but shows they're a fairly standard growth-marketing-driven startup, not a stripped-down privacy tool. Bottom line: the security posture is genuinely one of the better ones I've seen for this category — read-only access, no training on your data, clear deletion rights. The main honest caveat remains that SOC 2 certification isn't finished yet, so you're trusting their word and architecture rather than an independently audited report. If you connect it, I'd start with lower-sensitivity sources (Notion, GitHub, Calendar) and hold off on Gmail/Slack until the audit completes, especially if client-confidential material lives there."

Check Current Status