GitHub Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
GitHub users affected:
GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Brasília, DF | 1 |
| Montataire, Hauts-de-France | 3 |
| Colima, COL | 1 |
| Poblete, Castille-La Mancha | 1 |
| Ronda, Andalusia | 1 |
| Hernani, Basque Country | 1 |
| Tortosa, Catalonia | 1 |
| Culiacán, SIN | 1 |
| Haarlem, nh | 1 |
| Villemomble, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Ingolstadt, Bavaria | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Berlin, Berlin | 2 |
| Dortmund, NRW | 1 |
| Davenport, IA | 1 |
| St Helens, England | 1 |
| Nové Strašecí, Central Bohemia | 1 |
| West Lake Sammamish, WA | 3 |
| Parkersburg, WV | 1 |
| Perpignan, Occitanie | 1 |
| Piura, Piura | 1 |
| Tokyo, Tokyo | 1 |
| Brownsville, FL | 1 |
| New Delhi, NCT | 1 |
| Kannur, KL | 1 |
| Newark, NJ | 1 |
| Raszyn, Mazovia | 1 |
| Trichūr, KL | 1 |
| Departamento de Capital, MZ | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
GitHub Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Jason Nguyen (@jasonngsx) reported2. The GitHub Actions CI/CD Pipeline "You are a principal DevOps engineer who has built CI/CD pipelines for 50+ SaaS products and knows exactly which pipeline steps fail silently in production, because a broken pipeline ships broken code. I need a complete GitHub Actions workflow for continuous deployment. Do the following: - Run tests on every pull request (unit, integration, linting) - Build and tag Docker image with commit SHA and latest - Push to container registry (I'll tell you which one) - Deploy to production on merge to main (zero-downtime rolling deploy) - Rollback trigger if health check fails post-deploy - Slack notification on deploy success or failure - Secrets management using GitHub Secrets (never hardcoded) - Cache node_modules / pip dependencies between runs Format as a complete .github/workflows/deploy.yml with comments explaining every job and step. My stack and registry: [PASTE HERE]"
-
Bnaf.OG | 🟧 (@bnafOg) reported@nyxquant The missing piece: "no contents/code write access" means the agent can open issues and PRs but can't actually commit the fix branch. At some point something needs write access to push code. GitHub Deploy Key scoped to one branch is the next-least-privilege step if you want the agent to close the loop without a full PAT.
-
Tulsi Soni (@shedntcare_) reported🚨 BREAKING: The terminal didn’t get upgraded. It got replaced. Warp just open-sourced everything—and quietly introduced something way bigger than a dev tool. This isn’t where you write commands anymore. This is where agents ship code for you. Give it a GitHub issue → it reads your repo → plans the fix → writes production-ready code → opens a PR. No prompts. No back-and-forth. No babysitting. Just: issue → shipped. And the wild part? You can literally watch thousands of AI agents building Warp… live. Debugging. Refactoring. Shipping. They’re not demoing the future. They’re running it in production. Powered by GPT. Written in Rust. Fully open source. Your terminal executes commands. Warp executes outcomes.
-
tetsuo (@tetsuoai) reportedGrok Connectors quick rundown. xAI shipped native app connections. OAuth your Gmail, Calendar, Drive, GitHub, Notion, Slack, Linear, Microsoft directly into Grok. MCP for custom servers. Grok starts using your tools. Live data, scoped permissions, revoke anytime. Useful patterns: "summarize yesterday across email, calendar, notion" "open github issues assigned to me" "calendar this week, flag conflicts" "draft a reply to the last slack from x" The MCP side lets you plug Grok into any server speaking the protocol. Custom internal tools, your own infra.
-
Tuf Ted (@srvtest) reported@OkamaKichigai @esrtweet The May 2026 Nixpkgs GitHub Issue #516544 suggests otherwise. A trusted contributor unilaterally inserted a magic string in maintainer-list.nix intended to sabotage AI agents. Some other members are defending him
-
yung algorithm (@yungalgorithm) reported@trq212 if i wanted to submit a pr to claude code for like a frontend cli thing how would i do that, just like tell the frontend issue or is there a more lower level way like a github issue or a pr
-
newfoundceo (@newfoundceo) reportedMicrosoft has kick started more people to turn to local AI with their recent GitHub Copilot billing changes. Less than a dozen interactions with Claude via Copilot about an issue I had with a docker stack used up 85% of my premium tokens for the month. Not worth the money.
-
Mykhailo Chalyi (@chaliy) reportedOne of the reasons for my love for Claude Code, is that I can make it work overnight. What worked awesome last couple months, is just not mega unstable. This is kind of stupid to wakeup in the morning to find out that it was blocked by: > Claude: I need to authenticate to GitHub MCP to list issues. Please open this URL in your browser to authorize. And well, it is authenticated. And it is have backup plan clearly described in context. And for the more fun, when you click a link to get this... Why? Why?
-
JA (@joshua_amaju) reported@peer_rich I wonder if him joining github and the recent issues have anything to do with each other 🤔
-
beINg human (@MREVERYWHERE007) reportedGoogle became my best friend 🤝 StackOverflow GitHub issues Random forums Sab khol liya tha 😭 There were moments I thought: “Maybe this isn’t for me…” But something said — keep going. And slowly… things started making sense. Not everything. But enough to move forward.
-
tuirk (@tuirkhere) reportedcommunity has been reporting it for over a year. forum threads, github issues, the lot. no fix from Google. the bug also jumped up to 2.5 Pro in January. 3 series came with it already. it's not shrinking, it's spreading.
-
Sumanth (@insumanth_) reported@karrisaarinen For me, I don't think this is an issue. Only issue with GitHub is its not reliable and missing some good opportunities to make the product better.
-
Coline (@colineapp) reportedgithub made code collaborative and gave the entire software industry a shared home. before github, open source was difficult, code review was painful, and the knowledge inside a codebase was invisible to everyone except the people who wrote it. github changed all of that. PRs as conversations. issues as public bug reports. the social graph of who builds what. it didn't just host code, it made code a community. employers today look at your github history. so github became the engineering team's living record. the code lives there. the history lives there. the decisions made in PRs live there. if you want to understand how a product was built, you go to github. if github is the record of how products are built, it should know why they were built. the customer request that drove the feature. the spec that defined it. the figma file defining the layout. the task it was supposed to close. the conversation where the tradeoffs were debated. github knew this. issues, discussions, projects, copilot, etc. they tried to make github the place where the whole software development process lives. but github is made of code. everything they add that isn't code feels like it's fighting the grain. github issues are a worse linear. github discussions are a worse slack. the context of why code gets written still lives somewhere else, and the PR that ships it has no connection to the decision that created it. github earned the code layer. it just couldn't become the work layer.
-
Gradient Sky (@gradient_sky) reported@dexhorthy Define “this”. If this == GitHub issue, then you Klankär can do 20k commits a day doing these till the heat death of the universe. If this == software with scientific component, non-trivial infra and UI… well…. yeah, nobody figured that out.
-
Ridark (@ridark_eth) reported> be "student" (even if you aren't) > realize you're spending $9,000/year on software like a clown > GitHub Student Developer Pack: the ultimate cheat code > JetBrains, Figma, Canva, Notion --> all $0. you're welcome > Cloud credits: AWS, Azure, Google. free servers for everyone > MongoDB Atlas gives you $50 just for existing > Cursor Pro for 1 year: AI coding for free while others pay $20/mo > Amazon Prime: 6 months of free shipping and movies > 50% off Spotify, YT Premium, and Apple Music forever > Apple Education Store: cheaper Macs because you "study" > need a .edu email? find a friend or become an "eternal student" > $0 for 67+ subscriptions. just need one email address > saving thousands of dollars while the "pros" pay full price The software industry is built on subscriptions, but the .edu email is the glitch in the matrix.