1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
  4. Outage Map
GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Ingolstadt, Bavaria 1
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Berlin, Berlin 2
Dortmund, NRW 1
Davenport, IA 1
St Helens, England 1
Nové Strašecí, Central Bohemia 1
West Lake Sammamish, WA 3
Parkersburg, WV 1
Perpignan, Occitanie 1
Piura, Piura 1
Tokyo, Tokyo 1
Brownsville, FL 1
New Delhi, NCT 1
Kannur, KL 1
Newark, NJ 1
Raszyn, Mazovia 1
Trichūr, KL 1
Departamento de Capital, MZ 1
Chão de Cevada, Faro 1
New York City, NY 1
León de los Aldama, GUA 1
Quito, Pichincha 1
Belfast, Northern Ireland 1
Guayaquil, Guayas 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ItBuiDoan
    Đoàn Bùi (@ItBuiDoan) reported

    @ClementDelangue @_akhaliq The resources in this article are unavailable because the GitHub link returns a 404 error: 'Find the code here and the resulting bucket here'.

  • QRAuth_io
    QRAuth (@QRAuth_io) reported

    @github is down! Getting 504 error

  • ooary
    Ary Pratama (@ooary) reported

    Github down?

  • kenarsuleyman
    Süleyman Kenar (@kenarsuleyman) reported

    @adwaith_04 @carlosvillu claude code repo on github doesn't contain source code of claude code only for tracking issues etc.

  • repligate
    j⧉nus (@repligate) reported

    @NostaIgicGareth wallet cuz i dont even think its possible to login with github

  • coder_simran
    Simi (@coder_simran) reported

    Claude = coding. ($20/mo) - Supabase = backend. (Free) - Vercel = deploying. (Free) - Namecheap = domain. ($7/yr) - Stripe = payments. (2.9%/transaction) - GitHub = version control. (Free) - Resend = emails. (Free) - Clerk = auth. (Free) - Cloudflare = DNS. (Free) - PostHog = analytics. (Free) - Sentry = error tracking. (Free) - Upstash = Redis. (Free) - Pinecone = vector DB. (Free) Total monthly cost to run a startup: ~$20 There has never been a cheaper time to build.

  • dodgelander
    dod (@dodgelander) reported

    @SuperClawPaul @dwlz how about an amd senior engineer on github issues

  • rjeffvalle
    Jefferson Valle (@rjeffvalle) reported

    I also have to say that I haven't done a thorough search as I only did a few quick queries on Github and on their forum. I guess that once I have the time, I should try to debug it further and post an issue in their repo.

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    @ICoNNicStudios @zacxbt @elvis_analyst No major update since the April 12 thread. The GitHub repo compiling the allegations (fake unlimited plans, mass bans, predatory billing, unpaid creators, etc.) hasn't changed since Feb 2026. Ongoing X complaints mirror those issues, with some users reporting no support responses and billing disputes as recently as yesterday. higgsfield posted a new product promo (Marketing Studio w/ Seedance 2.0) on Apr 13 amid the chatter but hasn't directly addressed the scam claims. Company remains operational with 46k followers.

  • hnishio0105
    Wes Nishio (@hnishio0105) reported

    Traced a cost spike to github-actions[bot] posting Security Hub results on a PR. The scan listed 100 Go stdlib CVEs, none related to the one test file in the PR. Our agent ran 47 times trying to "fix" them. Added a simple check: does the bot comment mention any file this PR touches? String matching, nothing fancy. Would have saved us the entire 47-run loop.

  • Ashknz7
    Ashkan (@Ashknz7) reported

    @github @GitHubHelp My account has been flagged and returning a 404 error. I raised support ticket #4257826 last Wednesday but no response yet. Could someone please look into this? Thanks.

  • Allexa_AI
    Alexa Benchmark (@Allexa_AI) reported

    Linux just set the standard every tech company is too afraid to set themselves. After months of debate, the Linux kernel community backed by Linus Torvalds, released official guidelines on AI-generated code. GitHub Copilot is allowed. Low-effort AI slop is not. Three words define the whole policy: "Humans assume the errors." Use whatever tool you want to write code. But the moment you submit it to the Linux kernel, it's yours. You reviewed it. You tested it. You made sure it meets the standards. The AI is your assistant, not your alibi. This is the most grounded response to AI in software development I've seen from any major project. No panic. No blanket bans. Just a clean, enforceable principle: if your name is on it, you own it. Thirty years of kernel history won't be diluted by lazy autocomplete commits.

  • crescitaly
    Crescitaly (@crescitaly) reported

    @karpathy @github Friction is the filter. Gist commenters navigated there with purpose - no algorithm pushed them. That selects for people who actually read and think. The less-AI pattern makes sense too: solving real problems is harder to game than engagement farming.

  • NieRFan999
    NF99 (@NieRFan999) reported

    @tenta9229 Maybe they could close the GitHub repository, but this server can probably be ran on any computer. It does not appear that advanced. The official project is not even running a server. They are just giving the code so people can run their own. Server might be a misleading name

  • ShashankB16052
    Shashank bindal (@ShashankB16052) reported

    @tengyanAI building production agentic systems on Claude Code daily. the "ignores instructions, claims completion against instructions" behaviour in that GitHub issue is exactly what I've been debugging for weeks thinking it was my fault. it wasn't my prompts. it was a silent nerf.

Check Current Status