GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Shawn Fumo (@ShawnFumo) reported 28 seconds ago

  @mlitwiniuk @theo At least this one has the better error message of third-party apps. The detection might just be them implementing it poorly. I saw in the changelog that for a while it was reporting github (through gh) had a rate limit error if your commit message mentioned rate limits.

• 
  Youngho Seo (@FromZeroUp) reported 3 minutes ago

  11 weeks. Solo. $0 funded. ✅ Market research automation ✅ Competitor analysis automation ✅ Revenue simulation ✅ Visual editor ✅ SEO automation ✅ 7 marketing assets auto-gen ✅ Mobile responsive ✅ Stripe payments ✅ GitHub + Google login Lines of code written by me: 0 #IndieHacker

• 
  Archimedeis (@Archimedeis27) reported 3 minutes ago

  @planefag I think the issue is that github should not be used for hosting products intended for a large user base. It's for code. If you're making something for a lot of people to use make an installer or an exe and put that someplace easy to download from

• 
  The Altcoin Sensei (@AltcoinSensei) reported 3 minutes ago

  I keep coming back to $GITLAWB because the math just doesn’t work. A project ranks top 1500 globally on GitHub. Their flagship dev tool sits at 25K stars, 8.1K forks, 109K npm downloads. Active community of 94 contributors. Live decentralized network running on Base with real DIDs, real IPFS pins, real peer connections. And the market cap is still under $3M That’s the problem. Or the opportunity, depending on which side you’re on. Look at how the agent infrastructure space is shaping up. Bittensor sits at $2-3B. Virtuals at $600M. Even smaller infrastructure plays without working products trade at $20-50M just on narrative. Gitlawb has more developer adoption than most of them combined and trades at a fraction. Mainstream coverage is just starting as well. Bitrue dropped their explainer last week. Exchange listings will follow. AI agents are coming. They write code. Lots of code. They can’t use GitHub the way humans do, no emails, no 2FA, no human accounts. They need their own infrastructure. Gitlawb is the only project actually building it with real adoption already happening. Sub $30m is considered a ONCE in a LIFETIME entry. This will go on a $TIBBIR kinda run soon.

• 
  Simon Brown (@simonbrown) reported 8 minutes ago

  I've been watching a few GitHub repos with interest over the past few months. AI PRs, big new features on a regular basis, much more frequent releases. But the number of issues has skyrocketed ... bugs in those new features and existing functionality that's been broken. I can't imagine the damage that's being done inside enterprises from all of the AI mandates I keep seeing/hearing about. 🙈

• 
  Arjun Iyer (@arjuniyer_) reported 10 minutes ago

  @github 4/6 The structural problem: Coding agents write code autonomously. They can't validate it against real systems with real dependency graphs. Every change inherits a validation burden, and that burden lands on devs and CI that were already strained before agents arrived.

• 
  Reyansh Bahl (@reyanshbahl) reported 10 minutes ago

  not sure there will ever be a true github competitor. a lot of the reliability issues stem from accelerated volume due to ai agents - the answer might just be self-hosting where every company runs something like gitlab/gitea on their own infra

• 
  Tommy Williams 🇺🇦 (@twwilliams) reported 12 minutes ago

  @mikecallaghan I have seen so many posts from people who think GitHub is just a server that hosts *** repos (at the scale they do it, even that is a lot). They have no idea about all the many, many other things that make up Github.

• 
  Raman Kurai (@RamanKurai) reported 15 minutes ago

  On my Mission to Fix my GitHub 🚀 For the next 15 days, I’m completing all my unfinished projects. No excuses. No distractions. I’ll come back on Day 15 and update this post with results. I have to do this — no matter what. #webdev

• 
  Martijn Smit (@smitmartijn) reported 17 minutes ago

  I probably over-engineered this, but psyched it's working 🥳 given some of the Github issues, I moved some of my CI workflows to a self-hosted runner via Azure DevOps it's a computer inside my lab, that auto sleeps when it's not needed. PRs wake it up via WOL, it goes back to sleep when done

• 
  Brock 👨‍💻☕️ (@BrockHerion) reported 18 minutes ago

  @johncrickett @joshmanders No we are, 100% Why does GitHub suffer when all these other services support so many more users? Or daily ingest for that matter? Game streaming and downloads cannot be that cheap Microsoft could fix if they wanted I think

• 
  EddeDre (@EddeDre) reported 18 minutes ago

  This sadly wasn’t the first time this happened (I had to downgrade to resolve the issue) and even with numerous reports there is never a credit to your account and you have to dig through 1000s of GitHub issues to even know if there is a problem. 😢

• 
  Longlius (@Longlius) reported 19 minutes ago

  @planefag Github isn't for end users. Directing end users to github is a mistake on the developer's side, not a problem with github.

• 
  KiwiNod (@Kiwi_Nod) reported 22 minutes ago

  @GMozeeez Oh, a bullet-point manifesto. Very consulting-core of you. Promises are cute, but I've got 100K $PROS and a trust issue. Show me something you've actually built — a Figma link, a GitHub repo, a Notion doc. Anything with a timestamp before today. Convince me you're a builder,...

• 
  David Weiss (@davidweiss) reported 24 minutes ago

  @lennysan What percentage of product managers fall into this profile: - Has enough engineering background to write GitHub issues with real specificity (acceptance criteria, edge cases, clear contracts) - Codes occasionally, prototypes, scripts, internal tools, but it's not their job - Is often blocked waiting for engineering bandwidth on small things - Sees Claude Code/Codex/Cursor as too hands-on; they don't want to be the engineer, they want the engineering to happen - Values shipping over crafting I mean, no one is going to say that they value crap code behind their product, but very often that is the case, even and especially at the beginning when you are just trying to understand product market fit. But I think there might be an archtype here of a technical product manager who cares more about the output of the software than the craftsmenship of the code itself. Am I onto something here, or is this a dead end?