GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Leo - 15 y/o founder (@leodev) reported 3 minutes ago

  @anthonysheww want me to make you a few github issues so you won't be bored?

• 
  Mattox6 (@BSD_Appalachian) reported 4 minutes ago

  @XFreeze I have an AI optimized server and want to establish a persistent Grok instance. What resource can you point me to, that will grant me access to the latest open-source version? Is there a Github repository I need to pull from?

• 
  TaurusCoder (@TaurusCoder) reported 5 minutes ago

  A security camera leaking a GitHub admin token in its login page. Hardware security is the new software security -- except the patching cycle is measured in years, not hours.

• 
  Elona Muskovite (@SuSPortnoy1) reported 6 minutes ago

  @nikitabier @skye_wonder @nikitabier In 2022 a group got ahold of Twitter’s source code, dumping some of that on GitHub (X sued, it was taken down) Irwin was aware—told to reprogram the Admin console. Didn’t. Now that group makes verified botnets bypassing. DM me.

• 
  Max (@MaxVoshchansky) reported 7 minutes ago

  i went ***** deep into $KAITO after the X deal checked the official GitHub, team breadcrumbs, product rails and Base flows. tldr: @KaitoAI is trying to turn internet attention into a financial primitive > official data agreement with X > 3,000+ stocks already live in Pro > crypto, stocks and AI social graphs shipping > API and MCP rails live for agents > information-markets dataset expanding right now the GitHub trail is the juiciest part Kaito’s official org now has datasets for AI companies, pre-IPO names and information markets. today a Kaito employee opened PR #208 to add QuoteMarkets. the team also runs a live MCP server feeding search, mindshare, sentiment, smart followers, KOL data and catalysts directly into agents so this isn’t vapor. the data stack is getting built for something much wider than crypto CT leaderboards @Punk9277 keeps teasing: > “new fields” > “new economies” > “new currencies” > a “new paradigm for Kaito” > going back to first principles the obvious bet is an X-powered market layer for attention licensed X firehose → social and knowledge graphs → Pro / Studio / API / MCP → attention indexes → information markets basically @Polymarket-style rails for who and what owns mindshare across crypto, stocks and AI that’s the bull case. but: > no public market contracts > no confirmed Yaps reboot > no Grok deal > no $KAITO integration inside X > no proof that X greenlit a new pay-to-post meta imo: we wont see yaps which people are waiting for. this type of announcement of an announcement is just a speculation on the token price. just a reminder: > Nikita literally kicked them out of X > the best what they did was launching marketing campaigns with $10,000 for creators do you really expect infofi reborn?

• 
  adidshaft (@adidshaft) reported 18 minutes ago

  @freecodexyz what gets wiped at teardown, just the volume or GitHub auth too? `github-login` inside an ephemeral box is the bit i'd want spelled out.

• 
  James Bearish Bull (@jamesjasmy) reported 19 minutes ago

  Dear Max, @Max_Rabinovitch $CHZ #CHZ If you’re willing to take the time to answer a community member’s questions, I’d appreciate your thoughts on the following: As Chief Strategy Officer, can you explain your background in tokenomics and blockchain economics? From what’s publicly available, your experience appears to be primarily in creative direction, digital marketing, and sports partnerships rather than token design or economic strategy. In a sector where true strategy is defined by tokenomics, supply dynamics, and incentive structures, do you feel your skill set is the right fit for the CSO role? Or would your talents be better suited as Head of Marketing? Questions: 1. CHZ is down 98% from its all-time high, and most fan tokens are down 76–99% from their FTOs despite multiple championships. What measurable strategic wins over the past two years have actually improved holder outcomes? 2. The protocol distributes roughly $5.7 million per year in inflation rewards to just 13 validators at today’s prices — a number that would rise sharply if the token price increases. With minimal visible development on GitHub and the chain being largely recycled BNB Chain code, how do you justify this level of inflation? 3. Since Socios already runs validator nodes for clubs like PSG, why is the protocol diluting CHZ holders to pay external validators for infrastructure you’re already operating in-house? 4. How many full-time engineers are currently working exclusively on the Chiliz Chain L1, and how does that headcount compare to the annual cost of the validator reward set? 5. The promised 10% fan-token revenue buybacks stopped being publicly reported after May. Can you share the exact June and July 2026 figures now and explain why reporting went silent? 6. What percentage of the executive team, including yourself, holds CHZ purchased with their own after-tax money rather than received through allocations or bonuses? 7. Why does the parent company still sit on tens of millions in receivables from the operating entities, and are any of those related-party or consulting fees? 8. After years of running 80+ shallow pools with only $2.3 million TVL, why has liquidity still not been consolidated into one or two deep USDC pools? 9. When sporting success and major partnerships continue to be sold off by the market, what concrete change in tokenomics or utility is planned to stop new users from becoming the next wave of exit liquidity? 10. Looking at the gap between Vision 2030 rhetoric and the actual price, inflation, and transparency record, which three strategic decisions under your remit have most damaged long-term CHZ holder value? 11. Are you proud of the job you’ve done as CSO? What has been your greatest failure in the role, and what’s the single worst strategic decision you’ve made? 12. You’ve recently launched fan tokens for Michigan, USC, and other US university partners. Do you plan to buy any of these at launch and hold them for more than two years? If not, why not? Max, arguably you're the second most important person on the project, so these tough questions need to be answered. They're not meant personally - we just need to see what you're carrying in your locker and that you have a solid grasp of the tokenomics with a clear route forward.

• 
  Radial (@radialbuild) reported 24 minutes ago

  If GitHub Issues still fits, stay. Free, already there, fast, right next to the code. The day a flat list stops scaling is the day you start losing things in it. You do not have to leave the repo to fix that. Radial links to your branches, PRs, and commits.

• 
  Trading Cartel (@Tradingcartel_X) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph Same playbook China ran on Dorsey's Nostr app in 2023, now on Bitchat. Bluetooth mesh chat has zero central point to pressure, so a GitHub takedown mostly just slows the mirrors down.

• 
  coconutjpg (@coconut_jpgg) reported 33 minutes ago

  Like I have an RPI I have Forgejo on. Every repo I make starts there, and is mirrored out two Github and Gitlab. If GH or GL goes down or censors me, I still have my code and they cant do nothin bout it

• 
  Escitalopranaldo (@escpram) reported 34 minutes ago

  @kevinkern Yes, if you run the workaround on that GitHub issue, usage goes back to normal.

• 
  Dave Charland (@Dave_Charland) reported 34 minutes ago

  Well this is frustrating. @claudeai Opus 5 produced a complete client TDD/SOW from superseded local files after silently failing to access the GitHub source I'd pointed it at. Asked directly whether GitHub confirmed its analysis, it led with "Yes, it's reinforced" — answering from local files. It later conceded the disclosure was "subordinated to a confident yes." A tool failure was absorbed into confident output with no signal in the artifact. Only caught on manual review. Not a behavior I've seen from prior Opus versions, Fable 5, Sonnet, or GPT-5.5/5.6. This is the sort of thing that impacts my work in a material way, and requires that I avoid using a product entirely. Opus 5 smarter than Fable 5? No. Also, ask me if I have this problem with locally hosted GLM 5.2.... Nope... Dang it!! I was REALLY REALLY excited about the next release of Opus. Opus 4.8 been a VERY dependable workhorse of a model for me.

• 
  Scarab (@ScarabOfficial) reported 34 minutes ago

  I'm not alone. There are posts on #GitHub regarding the issue, and there is a manual fix, involving editing #Python files to rename things. Not ideal, by any stretch.

• 
  Kelly 🌴 (@TheOtherKJo) reported 39 minutes ago

  Me: Tries to create a PR Github: Best I can do is a 500 error.

• 
  Philip Wallage (@Wallage) reported 41 minutes ago

  I have an auto-pilot script running that works through a GitHub issues every hour. I don't even have time to review all this.