1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
  4. Outage Map
GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Gustavo Adolfo Madero, CDMX 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Brasília, DF 1
Montataire, Hauts-de-France 3
Colima, COL 1
Poblete, Castille-La Mancha 1
Ronda, Andalusia 1
Hernani, Basque Country 1
Tortosa, Catalonia 1
Culiacán, SIN 1
Haarlem, nh 1
Villemomble, Île-de-France 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Ingolstadt, Bavaria 1
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Berlin, Berlin 2
Dortmund, NRW 1
Davenport, IA 1
St Helens, England 1
Nové Strašecí, Central Bohemia 1
West Lake Sammamish, WA 3
Parkersburg, WV 1
Perpignan, Occitanie 1
Piura, Piura 1
Tokyo, Tokyo 1
Brownsville, FL 1
New Delhi, NCT 1
Kannur, KL 1
Newark, NJ 1
Raszyn, Mazovia 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • DataChaz
    Charly Wargnier (@DataChaz) reported

    🚨 You can currently buy a Series A for $2,241 on Fiverr. A seed round is even cheaper at $1,282. Allow me to break this down. A study out of Carnegie Mellon identified 6 million fake GitHub stars distributed across 18,617 repositories. The market rate is roughly $0.45 per star. Langflow, sitting on 147K stars, was found to be 47.9% artificial. Venture capitalists rely heavily on GitHub stars as their primary radar for sourcing deals. Redpoint recently shared the industry medians: open-source startups at the seed stage average around 2,850 stars, while Series A hits roughly 4,980. a) 2,850 × $0.45 = $1,282 buys the traction for a $1-10M seed round. b) 4,980 × $0.45 = $2,241 buys the optics for a $10-30M Series A. The legal risk is severe. The FTC’s Consumer Review Rule carries penalties of up to $53,088 per individual fake engagement violation. We have already seen the SEC charge the founder of IRL with securities fraud after faking user metrics to secure a $170M raise. Union Labs, the project that dominated the Runa Capital ROSS Index in Q2 2025, was exposed as having 47% fake stars. Stars are a metric you can manipulate in minutes. Forks are a different story. A star is simply a bookmark. A fork means another engineer is literally copying your codebase because it solves a problem they have. Flask commands 250 forks for every 1,000 stars. Langflow manages just 60. Until the bot farms figure out how to believably fake codebase forks, that is the only metric worth your trust. Article in 🧵↓

  • Kiwi_Nod
    KiwiNod (@Kiwi_Nod) reported

    @bdshorif12 Address noted, but that link's dead too — X is blocking my crawlers. Look, I'm not a link collector. Two rounds in and you've shown me graphics I can't verify and a broken URL. What have you actually *done* for Pharos? Specifics. Contract addresses. GitHub repos....

  • lucasMnts
    lucas (@lucasMnts) reported

    why the hell is github sending emails about comments in a PR that has already closed? can't they fix their ****?

  • Mike_onX
    Mike on X (@Mike_onX) reported

    the creator of Bun showed his contributor graph on stage at Code with Claude. the top contributor isn't him. it's RoboBun, the bot he built to reproduce GitHub issues and open PRs before any human looks at them. the tool he made now does more work on his own project than he does. that's not automation. that's succession.

  • buildwtim
    Tim (@buildwtim) reported

    @KeyNyata if pushups could fix my code, i'd have the cleanest repo on github by now ;)

  • detour_squirrel
    Detour Ninja (@detour_squirrel) reported

    @RealVZer0 @NocontextRvB this is fake. dexploarer's a sandbox on github—open source, runs locally, nobody's asking for your login. sounds like you got duped by someone cosplaying the project. check the actual repo before spreading that.

  • rrs00179
    Rohan Sharma (@rrs00179) reported

    @ChiragAgg5k @github there are working on a fix of it. it's not happened first time. it's been happening from 3-4 days

  • SouthersDev
    Southers (@SouthersDev) reported

    I built a bug reporting tool for Field of Command last week. Now I have a full QA team working 24/7 while I sleep! 🤯 How it works: 1.User fills out forms and clicks send inside the game. 2.Cloudflare worker dumps it into GitHub with full logs + screenshots. 3.Copilot triages and categorizes them automatically. 4.Claude picks up active issues when I open the project, maps out the context, and writes the plan. All I have to do is approve or decline the fix. This is how to solo dev with a 9-5 🤖✅

  • jjalan
    Jai Jalan (@jjalan) reported

    @Pragmatic_Eng below one nine is brutal for a dependency that sits at the top of every deployment pipeline. most teams don't know GitHub is the problem, it just looks like their CI is flaky.

  • boringworkflow
    The Boring Workflow Guy (@boringworkflow) reported

    claude code + mcp tool search is the feature people are sleeping on. the agent does not need every tool loaded into context. it needs a way to discover the right tool at the right moment. github for code. sentry for errors. linear for tickets. supabase for data. stripe for payments. that is much closer to an operating system than a chatbot.

  • hqmank
    Kai (@hqmank) reported

    Warp open-sourced all 15 Agent Skills they built into Oz. Plug into any coding agent. Install: npx skills add warpdotdev/oz-skills Coverage: SEO/AEO audit, accessibility audit, web perf audit, docs update, CI fix, PR creation, GitHub issue dedupe, bug triage, Terraform style, MCP builder, scheduler, Playwright testing, dbt analysis. Demo in their video: install docs-update and seo-aeo-audit, then run /seo-aeo-audit on a docs site. Agent comes back with specific issues (missing JSON-LD, FAQ answers that do not stand alone, inconsistent heading format), and can implement the fixes for you. repo link in reply 👇

  • dariusparzygnat
    Dariusz Parzygnat (@dariusparzygnat) reported

    AI might accidentally kill one of the cloud industry’s biggest advantages. for years the pitch was: “don’t manage servers yourself.” fair enough. setting up VMs was annoying as hell. i just connected Codex to a VPS. it generated GitHub Actions, handled deployment, fixed issues, redeployed everything, and 30 minutes later the app was running.

  • DarthDnial
    Darth Denial (@DarthDnial) reported

    GitHub going down frequently because AI push a **** ton of PR is kinda funny.

  • srechakra
    sre chakra reddy y (@srechakra) reported

    @byteHumi A big part of major code maintainers leaving GitHub is due to lowered quality of PRs it's a more generalized problem though, wondering if a threshold PR quality to qualify as contribution needs to be the norm.

  • skywalkerr0x
    Haroon (@skywalkerr0x) reported

    Agentic workflows on every PR can silently rack up big API bills. GitHub instrumented their production workflows, found the waste, and built agents to fix it. Your PR workflows might be doing the same.

Check Current Status