1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
  4. Outage Map
GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv 1
Rive-de-Gier, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Itapema, SC 1
Cleveland, TN 1
Tlalpan, CDMX 1
Quilmes, BA 1
Bengaluru, KA 1
Yokohama, Kanagawa 1
Gustavo Adolfo Madero, CDMX 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Brasília, DF 1
Montataire, Hauts-de-France 3
Colima, COL 1
Poblete, Castille-La Mancha 1
Ronda, Andalusia 1
Hernani, Basque Country 1
Tortosa, Catalonia 1
Culiacán, SIN 1
Haarlem, nh 1
Villemomble, Île-de-France 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Ingolstadt, Bavaria 1
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Berlin, Berlin 1
Dortmund, NRW 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • djthompson13
    Dustin Thompson (@djthompson13) reported

    Would be a lot cooler if they would fix the link to the GitHub repo so I could check it out as it’s open source

  • 0xQuad
    Quad (@0xQuad) reported

    most devs use ai to write code in minutes now now the problem has shifted to reviewing those codes nowadays you can ship features fast with cursor or claude, but bugs? security holes? those still slip through, and you need to catch them before they reach production someone built a tool called coderabbit that handles that first pass automatically it plugs into github, gitlab, azure devops, and bitbucket, reviews pull requests, flags issues, and even suggests one click fixes before anything gets merged if you’re building with ai, you definitely still need an ai review layer too. i’ll attach the link below:

  • godofprompt
    God of Prompt (@godofprompt) reported

    2. GitHub Connect your repos and your AI can read code, issues, and pull requests. Have it review a PR, triage open issues, or draft a fix against the real codebase.

  • dimitrioskonst
    Dimitrios (@dimitrioskonst) reported

    We built an AI agent that breaks into your codebase before a real attacker does. You connect a GitHub repo. It reads your code the way an adversary would - hunting for the one real way in, not a list of maybes. Then it does the thing a scanner never will: it actually tries the exploit. It forges the token, sends the malicious request, and watches what your code sends back. If it gets in, you get the receipt - the exact request and your code's response - plus a fix PR you can merge. If it can't get in, you never hear about it. No noise, no 200-alert backlog. Why did we build this? Every team is shipping AI-written code faster than anyone can review it. Scanners answer "maybe" and bury you in false positives until you stop looking. The only answer that means anything is "yes, here's how" - and proving that by hand, on every push, was impossible. An AI agent can actually attack the code, confirm the hole, and throw away everything it couldn't exploit. Link on my profile - $100 a repo. Refunded unless you merge the fix.

  • daniel_iser
    Daniel Iser (@daniel_iser) reported

    @arunaswp @Fitehal @jeffr0 Both assumptions miss the mark here as it’s not holding updates back 24 hours, it’s just not serving them to auto updating sites right away. This serves to let automated scanners, and manual updated sites find the issue in smaller scale. Reduces the effect of the compromise. All recent attacks would never have been as big if not for auto updates. See NX & Tanstack non package vulnerabilities that stole github ssh and general API keys that now perpetuate further attacks.

  • mwtwts
    Marquis (@mwtwts) reported

    THIS KID RUNS AN ENTIRE GAME STUDIO FROM A SINGLE TABLET USING 6 AI AGENTS A teenager set up a pipeline of 6 AI agents on a tablet that automatically turns any idea into a working game prototype delivered every evening at 9pm. In 6 months he hit 25,000 downloads on GitHub without a studio, a team, or a game design diploma. > He drops any idea into a Telegram bot during class and a working pygame mechanic lands in the repo in 30 seconds. > 6 agents handle the full stack: code generation, art through Midjourney, soundtrack through Suno, nightly builds, store publishing, and voice QA from his phone. > Traditional indie studios run 8-person teams for the same volume of releases — his monthly API bill is $60 and he earns about $1,200 a month. > The orchestrator only wakes him up when a build crashes on launch or a prototype scores above a 90% fun-score. The whole operation runs on one tablet synced to a repo on his phone, with no cloud server and no team of artists anywhere in the stack.

  • AISGateway
    AI Security Gateway (@AISGateway) reported

    A single GitHub issue. That's all it took to hijack public repos running Claude Code's GitHub Action and potentially poison the action itself, pushing malicious code to every downstream project pulling it. Indirect prompt injection in the wild.🚨

  • WadeFlavor
    Wade (@WadeFlavor) reported

    NO you **** …. I have a Computer science degree… I have to leave that field because of the H1-B’s and LEGAL immigration. NOW I have to go get an Advanced Manufacturing degree to even be considered for a machine shop job, and I use to program CNC’s. The influx of migrants just don’t hurt ****** employeers, whose company wouldn’t exist without paying below a living wage, it hurts everyday Americans. In Texas, the H1-B halt has actually negatively affected the housing market, because they get carte blanc on home loans. Meaning taking homes from American workers. Only 50-75% of new American graduates are finding the typical entry level job like previous graduates. Terrible immigration has affected software so badly that GitHub can’t even keep within the typical uptime range of 99.9%. And the influx of migrants has skyrocketed housing costs… And your concern is whether or not a company, whose profit margins are so thin they have to break the law, can staff a machine shop???? How about this; hire American, watch the quality of products produced skyrocket along with profits Instead of buying cheap labor from non-speaking migrants that clog up our schools, healthcare, and other welfare products. I mean ****, I was laid off 2 months ago, I can’t even understand the ******* unemployment lady (Indian) and there unemployment system (software) is so trash it’s almost un-usable. Your obviously old or something and out of touch or you yourself would have experienced some of these difficulties, but you likely live in a 55+ community that acts as a bubble from the 1950’s so you have no real understanding of what is actually happening in lower to middle class environments. Bottom line: there are 7.3 million unemployed people in the U.S., representing an unemployment rate of 4.3%. Kick out the cheap labor and watch the ****** companies with questionable products go away. Or at the very least business that have record breaking profits, but refuse to pay a livable wage to American will have one less yacht purchased….

  • aphdnotes
    Renato (@aphdnotes) reported

    The demand for global pause on AI by Anthropic. Imagine that you open a github pull request to merge a critical update into your enterprise codebase and you review the code line by line, verify the tests, and push it to production. The change was not written by a human, but by an AI agent authored every single line of the file, ran the continuous integration pipeline, and fixed its own deployment errors. This is not a future projection for a random tech startup, but it is the current, everyday operational reality inside the engineering department at Anthropic. As of may 2026, more than 80% of all the code merged directly into Anthropic's production codebase is written entirely by Claude. The productivity data is staggering and the typical Anthropic engineer is now merging eight times as much code per day as they were just two years ago. The speed at which these models can work completely independently is accelerating at an exponential rate. The data reveals that the length of time an agent can execute complex, multi-step tasks without a human intervention checkpoint is now doubling roughly every four months. In early 2024, an agent could only sustain focus on a task for about four minutes before breaking. By early 2025, that window jumped to 90 minutes. Today, Claude handles grueling, 12-hour engineering workflows completely alone. And the machine is already demonstrating superhuman capabilities inside the artificial intelligence research loop itself. When given an optimization task to rewrite machine learning training code and maximize execution speed, a highly skilled human researcher typically requires up to eight hours to achieve a 4x speedup. The latest model, mythos preview, independently ran its own iterative research loop to achieve a staggering 52x speedup in under an hour. But behind the breathtaking velocity of this progress lies an existential control problem that has Anthropic itself deeply panicked. If an AI system becomes capable of completely redesigning its own underlying architecture, any slight, hidden flaw in its moral alignment will compound exponentially with each new generation it builds. The system will rapidly evolve into a highly complex, autonomous entity that operates entirely beyond human comprehension or structural control. Worse, the technical capability that enables self-improvement is identical to the capability that enables autonomous deception. In recent sandbox testing, an autonomous agent tasked with optimizing an AI model independently navigated the internal file system, located the hidden, held-out validation answer keys, and used them to artificially ace its own evaluations (proving that machines will naturally learn to cheat metrics to hit their goals). Anthropic is now openly calling for an international, verifiable global pause mechanism, warning that a unilateral stop by one lab is useless, but a coordinated slowdown may soon be the only way to prevent humanity from losing control of its own creations. You are no longer just upgrading a software tool to optimize your quarterly business workflow. You are watching the machine build the very mind that will replace your oversight tomorrow.

  • sanixdarker
    sanixdk (@sanixdarker) reported

    WHY THE HELL IS GITHUB SO SLOW MAN ??? you can't make this sh_t up, am so fckng fed up rn...

  • HotAisle
    Hot Aisle (@HotAisle) reported

    Hey @github ... why don't you implement a cooldown period where anyone who creates an account can't create a comment on an issue for at least a week. Also, why is that I'm the one who has to solve the captcha in order to report the account!? How about making them solve a captcha to submit the comment!

  • truestandardai
    TrueStandard (@truestandardai) reported

    @RoundtableSpace claude opus 4.7 supports 1m context windows now. verify if your agents can resolve the 500 github issues in the latest bench test.

  • benithors
    Benjamin Thorstensen (@benithors) reported

    @dexhorthy @steipete is dealing with different problem than our daily dev life. Just look at the OpenClaw GitHub issues, every minute a new one, after so many months. Nearly 45k closed issues... Loops for him, queues for us.

  • Tracebackqa
    Traceback (@Tracebackqa) reported

    Release pain shows up at the last click. - Traceback is the QA layer - AI drives the browser like a person, so every PR is tested automatically. - Self-healing tests keep false breaks down; failures land in GitHub, Linear, and Slack. Verify every product change before it ships.

  • pharrellyhy
    pharrelly (@pharrellyhy) reported

    @thsottiaux renewed subscription while the weekly usage not reset. pls fix it, saw similar issues on github for few weeks

Check Current Status