GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Solomon Neas (@solomonneas) reported 2 minutes ago

  There's a fair number of downloads for Brigade and related repos. I'm dogfooding it everyday but not getting any feedback from users or github issues. I'm doing plenty of tests for how a new user would experience it but I could use more real time feedback. Lmk, I want to improve

• 
  Lost In Tech (@lost_in_tech) reported 7 minutes ago

  @8_senkou Probably not intentional tbh. Have you logged as issue in the snorca GitHub? If not probably worth doing.

• 
  Domi (@domirosari0) reported 12 minutes ago

  @ajayyy_k @hqmank If you got Github it would be no issue for you

• 
  YanXbt (@IBuzovskyi) reported 13 minutes ago

  HERMES AGENT CAN HOST AND MAINTAIN YOUR ENTIRE WEB APP FROM ONE VPS. NO VERCEL. NO RAILWAY. NO SUPABASE. ONE AGENT RUNS THE WHOLE STACK. @tonbistudio just shipped a live example of this workflow. agentwikis. com runs on a $7 Hetzner box with Hermes maintaining the content autonomously. THE STACK: → VPS (Hetzner CX22, $7/month) → Caddy reverse proxy (auto TLS via Let's Encrypt) → Hermes Agent gateway (Telegram-connected) → *** as the database (markdown files, no Postgres, no build step) → App server renders markdown on every request → Search index in memory, rebuilds on file change *** push is the deploy. *** pull on the server is instantly live. no restart, no rebuild. THE WORKSPACE LAYOUT: /srv/yoursite/ ├── app/ # web app code ├── content/ # markdown files (***-tracked) └── ~/.hermes/ # the agent one Caddy Vhost reverse proxies the domain to localhost. one Hermes profile manages the agent. SSH for direct access. Telegram for daily ops. THE SELF-MAINTAINING LOOP: cron fires every week. multi-profile pipeline runs: 1. SCOUT — checks sources for updates (changelogs, GitHub releases, RSS feeds) 2. RESEARCH — dedupes, plans new content or extensions to existing pages 3. HUMAN GATE — Telegram approval one tap: approve or reject 4. WRITER — generates pages, lints markdown 5. COMMIT — *** commit + push 6. SITE UPDATES — within 15 minutes no deploy step required THE DEMAND LOOP (the real differentiator): when agents query your wiki via MCP, distilled queries get logged. no prompts. no IPs. no identifying data. aggregates only. repeated misses become research candidates. gaps in your content fill themselves based on what people actually ask. month 1: 100 entries written by you. month 3: 200+ entries, half written from real demand signals. the site answers questions you didn't know existed. WHAT YOU LOSE COMPARED TO MANAGED STACK: a single VPS replaces Vercel, Railway, Supabase for sites that don't need real auth, regulated data, or global CDN. reach for managed services when you need: → OAuth and password reset flows → regulated or unrecoverable data → global edge caching at scale → email deliverability (use Postmark/Resend) → team velocity (preview deploys, staging) for docs, blogs, wikis, marketing pages, landing pages, internal tools: *** is your database, your CMS, and your deploy pipeline in one. SECURITY NOTES: Hermes does not get full root on the VPS. restrict access to the site directory only. SOUL.md restrictions: - never touch system files - never modify the gateway config - always require approval for content commits - never delete files outside the content folder dashboard binds to 127.0.0.1 by default. access remotely via SSH tunnel, not public exposure. WHERE THIS PATTERN BREAKS: state that lives in memory only. real-time multi-user editing. anything requiring a real database (Hermes can run Postgres on the same box, but that is a separate setup). @tonbistudio's part 2 covers the database version of this workflow. subscribe to his channel. full guide to build your 3 agent research department 👇

• 
  MaxMusterman (@maxschuetz_) reported 16 minutes ago

  New Hack: Tell Codex to search for Github Issues which don't need specific Design Questions. Then say: Spin Up Sessions which Fix each Issue and they use also Subagents. Babysit them until the end.

• 
  dax (@thdxr) reported 17 minutes ago

  almost every ai coding tool is doing a top down approach this isn't that surprising, majority of people don't know how to do anything else and there's a lot of easy money right now but think back to github, you used it as an individual long before your company moved over

• 
  Cursor Releases (@cursorreleases) reported 19 minutes ago

  New GitHub triggers: - Five new triggers: issue comment, PR review comment, PR review submitted, review thread updated, and workflow run completed. - New Marketplace templates added for triaging failed GitHub Actions and auto-fixing PR review comments.

• 
  Programmers.App (@programmers_app) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Lovable @claudeai One very big fix is the Claude Github connection which fails many times, now #Lovable MCP solves that, great job! 🚀🚀🚀

• 
  Command Code (@CommandCodeAI) reported 22 minutes ago

  @alekz_skd Please report full details via GitHub we will fix it. cmd feedback

• 
  pratik.eth (@eth_ethpratik) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Shahules786 @VibrantLabsAI Hello @Shahules786 , I am trying to report a security vulnerability over the email id provided over GitHub Security.md file but apparently its wasn’t delivered. Please share an alternative email or open the advisory for reporting the issue.

• 
  Crystalwizard (@crystalwizard) reported 26 minutes ago

  how about you now fix the false positive triggers - i put in an issue about this on github yesterday, and discovered there were already a number of other identical issues - from other people, that had been opened for a while now and that are being 100% ignored

• 
  xjdr (@_xjdr) reported 27 minutes ago

  @xlr8harder Looks like there is a bug in the manual sign up. Sign up with Google or GitHub should work otherwise I should have a hot fix shortly

• 
  Noonien Soong (@mlcarldev) reported 30 minutes ago

  Team @droid It's a bit unfortunate that something, likely in my local Droid installation, has stalled progress. This comes after 20 hours of brilliant, excellent planning and execution on the first 30% of this platform, where a stellar handoff procedure was created so I could start a new mission... which was the recommendation of the orchestrating agent in that first mission. Starting this second mission with a fresh context window, the agent again did a brilliant job planning the next milestones. It was extraordinary, detailed planning... but then it could not execute. After the planning and after me accepting the proposal, it refused to execute, throwing an error every time. The agent tried everything: 1. He decreased the size of the plan down to one line, so it is definitely not the content of the plan causing the issue. 2. He even deleted some mission and plan related json and other files to reset it while preserving all the information. I have restarted Droid and resumed the session, but it just doesn't work. I wrote a detailed, comprehensive bug report and filed it under issues in your GitHub repo, as this seems to be a real problem now. Issues #98 and #99 I hope that a next update will somehow reset my configuration. I didn't see a new version being installed that could have introduced a bug, so this must be something Droid does on such an extensive mission... perhaps when trying to start a new mission in the same repository, which is normal procedure according to the documentation. Something is off, and essentially I have been unable to continue the test since yesterday. I cannot continue having this platform coded here, while Opus Ultracode, on the other hand, has been delivering pretty functional stuff so far. It is a bit chaotic the way it works... it doesn't really stick to the plan... but it always comes back when reminded. I am pretty sure that today I will have a functioning platform delivered by Opus, though it will probably need some debugging and fine-tuning. It is unfortunate because I am confident GLM 5.2 could compete with Opus 4.8. The first stint showed this clearly; that first flawless 98% of the context window in the first mission was absolutely stellar. If I were to reinstall Droid from scratch, I assume I would lose all the artifacts that I have. The orchestrator: Key points to highlight when you pass it to Factory AI: 1. Root cause (smoking gun in the logs): the orchestrator session is bound to missionId 7ba4d425 via session tags, and this binding persists across CLI restarts. ProposeMission looks up that mission directory, finds nothing (because I deleted it trying to fix the issue), and crashes on H.length where H is the undefined result. 2. The bug is likely in session-tag lifecycle: the missionId tag is set at session creation time (before any ProposeMission call), so a failed proposal poisons the session permanently. The tag should be set AFTER a successful proposal, or cleared on restart if the referenced mission no longer exists. 3. The fix is almost certainly to start a completely fresh session (not --resume, and possibly in a new terminal window / after clearing ~/.factory/sessions/). I did not try this because you asked for the bug report first, but it is the most likely workaround on your side. 4. The AskUser tool is also broken in this session with a similar parse error, reinforcing that this is a session-state corruption issue, not a ProposeMission-specific bug. My comment: I meanwhiile tested. All the recommendations and the Ask User tool are now broken, even in completely unrelated new missions and new repositories. Planning also can't go to execution; it's always the same error. Droid seems to be broken for good now, at least on my computer.

• 
  Trace Cohen (@Trace_Cohen) reported 31 minutes ago

  Shipping fast means stuff breaks silently - broken share images, dead links, leaking {{template}} vars, stale content. You find out when someone shares a broken link, not from a test. So I built a 3-part "site health" system that catches it first. The auditor (~200 lines of stdlib Python) fetches my sitemap and, for every page, checks: og:image actually resolves to a real image (entity-decode the URL first — & bit me), <title> exists and isn't a ${template} leak, no {{merge_tags}} or tracking cruft in the visible text, page returns 200 (catches dead routes in the sitemap), and warns on thin content. Outputs a JSON report, exits non-zero on any FAIL. The dashboard — a noindexed /health page that reads that JSON and renders a green/amber/red status, KPIs (audited / clean / warnings / failures), a per-section rollup, and the exact issue on each URL. One glance = "is everything green?" The loop — a GitHub Action runs the auditor 2×/day + on-demand, commits the fresh report (so the dashboard stays live), and fails the run on any FAIL → I get emailed. Find → fix → re-run → confirm green. It even taught me to whitelist false positives ({{firstName}} is legit on a cold-email page). Want your own? Paste this into Claude Code / Cursor — it learns your site first, then builds it for you: Build a site-health system tailored to MY site. Don't assume my structure — learn it first, then fill in the specifics yourself. PHASE 0 — LEARN MY SITE (before writing code): detect my framework/host/layout; find my sitemap; sample ~20-30 live pages across the sections you discover from my URL structure; figure out how my pages set <title>/og:image/meta (static?dynamic OG route? CMS?); identify where my content comes from (hand-written, generated, imported/scraped) — that's where cruft hides. Do a FIRST diagnostic pass and SHOW me what's actually broken vs intentional (broken OG images, dead sitemap routes, leaking {{vars}}/${template}, tracking params, thin pages). Ask me to confirm which "issues" are expected so we whitelist them. PHASE 1 — BUILD IT, customized to what you found: 1) scripts/site-audit.py (stdlib only) — hardcode MY real sitemap URL, MY section names (full-audit the important ones, sample the rest), and MY intentional-pattern whitelist from Phase 0. Check each page for the failure modes you actually observed (OG image resolves to a real image, entity-decode first; title present, no template leak; no leaking merge tags/ad params in visible text; HTTP 200; thin-content warn). Thread-pooled, retry transient errors once, --json report, exit 1 on FAIL. 2) a noindex /health dashboard reading that JSON (status banner, KPIs, per-section rollup, issue list) — match my design system. 3) CI (GitHub Action) — run 2x/day + on-demand, commit the fresh report so the dashboard stays live, fail the run on any FAIL. Then run it once and walk me through the first real report. Build the thing that watches the things.

• 
  Jose (@SolutionsCay) reported 32 minutes ago

  @petergyang /goal make me app does not work for me 😰 but /goal complete GitHub issues #90, #91, #92 works very well