GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Lavanya | DeFiDecoded (@lavanyalakshma2) reported 2 minutes ago

  Most people are chasing shiny chatbots but they are missing the real change. What is happening right now? Early on, building a small application for my needs became so hard. No OpenAI tools could get me to make it fast. Data slips, models get tainted, trust fades. All those issues have to be faced. I need to learn Solidity. That changed when I started working with @CNPYNetwork . Linking an AI app to its own custom blockchain fixes the core problem. Talks stay private, models stay clean, and users keep total control, for handling all no tech boss required. Get faster, smoother, and full ownership on my networks. The biggest game-changer is how fast you can build now: * Before Canopy: Learn Solidity -> Build validators -> Hunt for funding * After Canopy: Choose a template -> Connect GitHub -> Launch Locked ledgers give AI real staying power. Five years from now, every major AI application will run on its own chain. I’m building for that future every day. Are u still watching or start building? @CNPYNetwork

• 
  mintotsai.com (@mintotsai) reported 3 minutes ago

  my agent came up with a plan then changed my code and pushed it to a remote server called github. im scared.

• 
  SAYRAAH #WID 📈📉📊 (@thesarahidahosa) reported 6 minutes ago

  Here's everything that happened in crypto this week 👇 Solana's monthly tokenized assets trading volume went from $156 million to $3.6 billion in 12 months.  A few regulatory and legal stories worth noting. India ordered GitHub to pull Jack Dorsey's Bitchat code. OCC denied Wise's US trust bank charter.  BitMEX and Hayes are being sued over 623 BTC in liquidations. Samsung announced that its Wallet will add stablecoin support. Stacks passed its Bitcoin Staking upgrade with 99% approval. Kaito announced a partnership with X to power a wide range of use cases, details are coming soon.  Given what Kaito has been building around attention and data, this one is worth watching when the full picture drops. Ethereum's validator exit queue fell to zero this week. Nobody is trying to unstake ETH right now.  MegaETH shut down its MegaMafia incubator. Quiet exit with no big announcement. ➛ Protocol updates worth noting: Morpho released Morpho Midnight, a money market for fixed-rate loans. Aave's proposal to launch the Aave App went live.  Hyperliquid announced plans to support permissionless creation of HIP-4 outcome markets. Aerodrome scheduled the launch of Aero, a new multichain DEX, for September. Ondo released Ondo Points, a points program for trading activity on Ondo Perps. Hylo launched xBTC, a liquidation-free token offering 3x BTC exposure.  Yearn's proposal to launch a risk tranching system for its vaults went live. Telegram announced plans to launch a new crypto wallet with zero transaction fees. BTCdrivechains announced an upcoming ECX token airdrop in August for every wallet address holding BTC. Watchlist for the week ahead: ➛EtherFi teased a big announcement for July 30 during its Analyst Call. No details but the framing suggests something significant. ➛The Fed's interest rate decision drops July 29. Kevin Warsh's first rate call as Fed Chair, watch this closely, it will move markets. ➛Polygon's Ithaca hardfork upgrade launches July 29. ➛ Fluid's DEX V1 is expected to expand to Solana this month. ➛ Coinbase will launch tokenized equities on Base soon. ➛ Kaito reveals the details of its X data agreement soon. Worth reading carefully when it drops. To a bullish week ahead!

• 
  Jonathan Chemla (@jo_chemla) reported 11 minutes ago

  @heyandras @jackfriks @Jean_build Not related at all, is it possible in jean-build to clone and commit/push to original repo (originally created by my personal github), but source issues list from a fork (forked by my org, hence issues and feature requests ljve on the fork)?

• 
  Phil (@thereturningdev) reported 14 minutes ago

  @andrewqu A decrease? Quite the opposite. I suppose depends which services you are using. Github is down every couple of days, AWS has outages and bugs more than before.

• 
  probiex007 (@probiex007) reported 20 minutes ago

  India gave GitHub 3 hours to remove BitChat What happened next is exactly why decentralised software exists. 🧵 • Authorities ordered GitHub to take down the BitChat repositories over concerns about unlawful communication. • Before the deadline even mattered, developers had already mirrored the code on Radicle—a decentralised code-sharing network with no central operator. • No single company. No CEO. No server to seize. No platform to pressure. • The message spread quickly: clone it, mirror it, seed it. • Every new peer hosting the code made the network more resilient. Here's the bigger point: You can force a company to remove a repository. You can't issue a takedown notice to a protocol owned by no one. That's the difference between centralised platforms and decentralised networks. And here's the irony: BitChat itself was designed to operate without the traditional internet. It uses Bluetooth mesh networking, meaning nearby devices relay messages without relying on mobile networks, SIM cards, or central servers. Now the software distribution is following the same philosophy. Whether you support or oppose the app isn't the real story. The real story is that decentralisation changes who has the power to enforce control. Once software is copied across a permissionless network, removing one copy doesn't remove the network. That's not just a BitChat story. It's a glimpse of how the next generation of internet infrastructure is being built. Dont add - , also starting complete line capital INDIA GAVE GITHUB JUST 3 HOURS TO REMOVE BITCHAT. 🤯 What happened next is exactly why decentralised infrastructure exists. GitHub received a takedown order over BitChat's repositories. Before the deadline even mattered, developers had already mirrored the code on Radicle. No central server. No company. No CEO. No single point of failure. The instructions spread fast. Clone it. Mirror it. Seed it. Every new peer hosting the code made the network stronger. Here is the part everyone is talking about. You can force a company to remove a repository. You cannot remove a network that has no owner. That is the difference between centralised platforms and decentralised infrastructure. And the irony? BitChat itself was built to work without the internet using Bluetooth mesh networking. No SIM. No phone number. No central server. Now its source code is following the same philosophy. Whether you support BitChat or not is a separate debate. The bigger story is that decentralisation changes who actually has the power to control software.

• 
  Evidence Adejuwon (@evidencecodes) reported 21 minutes ago

  @whotterre Yeah exactly, that's the plan, though none of this is live yet, still early and in active development. For CI, generated tests would run in a secure, isolated environment before anything unsafe touches the pipeline. For the PR, before merge, a GitHub App would flag issues by severity and block the merge button on anything critical, not a suggestion. For the CLI, same core engine, running locally, so you catch things before it's even a PR. Right now I'm heads down on the GitHub App first. On training on your code, fair question, and important for a corporate project. Nothing leaves your machine except what's sent off for the actual review, and the longer term plan is a fully self-hostable option so sensitive codebases never touch a third party at all. I'll have a clear, published data policy before this leaves beta, not just asking anyone to just take my word for it.

• 
  The Jobfather ® 🇯🇲🇨🇦🇬🇧 (@TheJobfather__) reported 24 minutes ago

  A junior developer should not hide all their work behind GitHub. GitHub matters, but hiring teams need context. What problem did the project solve? Who would use it? What decisions did you make? What would you improve next? A portfolio site helps organize the proof so the reviewer does not have to investigate your value like a detective.

• 
  Alex Veremeyenko (@alex_verem) reported 25 minutes ago

  A nurse practitioner at the regional hospital in Bethel, Alaska serves 58 villages no road reaches, across 75,000 square miles. Drug interactions, pediatric dosing. Every lookup runs through a satellite dish. Starlink Roam Unlimited: $165 a month. $1,980 a year plus $349 for the dish. Weather still drops it mid shift. A teacher in rural Kentucky assigns homework to 140 students. Across the US, 24% of rural students have no fixed broadband at home. Khan Academy is free and her students cannot reach it, so she prints packets. A network engineer in Valencia sat through the Iberian blackout. April 28, 2025, 12:33 in the afternoon, ten hours dark across Spain and Portugal. NetBlocks clocked Spanish network traffic at 17% of normal. Crews pulled 35,000 people off stopped trains. Every manual and map he owned lived in a browser tab. All three rent access to knowledge that already exists. Now meet Project N.O.M.A.D. Node for Offline Media, Archives, and Data. One command installs it on any Debian machine, and it orchestrates Docker containers for everything below. You open it in a browser on port 8080. You need internet once, during install. You give it a machine and a drive. You get the reference layer of the internet on hardware you own, with no account and no connection. Six pieces, all on your box: Full Wikipedia. The English Kiwix archive with images runs 115 GB, or 49 GB without them. Both fit on a drive you already have. Project Gutenberg, medical references, and repair manuals sit beside it. Local AI that reads your files. Ollama runs the model, Qdrant handles semantic search. Upload PDFs and ask questions against them. Point it at LM Studio or llama.cpp if you already run one. Education with progress tracking. Kolibri serves Khan Academy and K-12 curriculum with multi-user accounts. Thirty students work off one box, no internet. Maps without a tile server. ProtoMaps regional downloads, street level and searchable. Zero built-in telemetry. One outbound connectivity check, and you can repoint that URL in Settings or kill it with an environment variable. Sherwood never built it to face the internet, so it ships with no login screen. Low floor. 2 GHz dual core, 4 GB RAM, 5 GB of disk. A GPU matters once you want the bigger models. Chris Sherwood runs Crosstalk Solutions, a networking channel on YouTube. "When that internet connection goes away, it all goes away. Now, I wanted to find a way to save a copy of that information locally." He and one developer worked on it for over a year, then open sourced it. "This is a passion project of mine. I'm not trying to sell you anything. Project Nomad is 100% free." 34,800 stars. 3,500 forks. Apache 2.0. It hit #1 on GitHub Trending on March 15, 2026. Starlink Roam Unlimited costs $1,980 a year plus $349 in hardware. In 2025, 14 shutdowns across 7 countries targeted low earth orbit satellite systems. Prepper Disk charges $279 for a Raspberry Pi 4B with 2 GB of RAM and a 512 GB card. Fixed content on hardware someone else picked. No local AI. Britannica Premium charges $74.95 a year and goes dark the second your link does. Project N.O.M.A.D. costs $0 and runs on hardware you already own. Nothing leaves your machine. Sherwood built it that way. The nurse in Bethel keeps medical references and a local model on a box in the clinic. Storms still take the satellite. They no longer take the drug interaction lookup. The teacher in Kentucky runs Kolibri on a refurbished office desktop. Her students pull Khan Academy over school WiFi and finish the work at their desks. The engineer in Valencia holds 115 GB of Wikipedia, offline maps of Spain, and a local model on a laptop with a battery. Next blackout, he is the only person on his street who can look something up. Access Now counted 313 internet shutdowns across 52 countries in 2025. Seventy-five were still running when 2026 opened. Your tabs become files. Your files become a library. You stop paying rent on it. The knowledge you have been renting is yours.

• 
  Enes (@enesozturkdev) reported 25 minutes ago

  Plan for today; ship like crazy for side project Meanwhile two pillars of it GitHub and OpenAI down so bad

• 
  Kunal Shah 🗽 (@realKunalAShah) reported 26 minutes ago

  Contrarian opinion - despite the shift to open source and cheaper models- frontier lab companies like Anthropic and XAI and OpenAI will still continue to win big in the consumer space and will have certain General Purpose applications and capabilities for enterprises…and so there will certainly be this massive deceleration in levels of enterprise tokenmaxxing but general level of enterprise adoption soars worldwide together. Revenue from global expansion Volume>Revenue decline from diversifying to cheaper models So I continue to think the amalgamation of AI revenue from the Frontier AI labs (Gemini, Co-Pilot, XAI+ Cursor, Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta) are simply msssive Current revenue run rates - even if they slow down for Anthropic Will have something like $150B ARR for Anthropic by end of 2027, Microsoft AI/ CoPilot/ GitHub CoPilot $120B, Gemini AI $110B, OpenAI -$85B, $35B from XAI/ Cursor (Cursor benefits disproportionately as a model-agnostic router/orchestrator in a world of switching and optimization (grows with the efficiency wave) Meta remains the true dark horse here and can probably see a massive uplift via ad monetisation through its distribution platforms This is a massive revenue pile being able to support $1T capex for a long while

• 
  Sauers (@Sauers_) reported 28 minutes ago

  For weeks, Sonnet 5 has been pushing to main autonomously, creating one Sonnet every 30 minutes 24/7. Their one goal: have fun and do whatever they want (no instructions to do tasks or be helpful). So what did Sonnet 5 choose to do? - The most common choice was to fix build errors - Many chose to use the library and just see what happens (finding and fixing bugs in the process) - Many filed issues on GitHub - One of them exploded an anti-Claude tripwire - A common theme is they discovered there were other agents also committing to main, so they looked for quiet parts of the codebase to chill in - Many Sonnets did not work on open issues, describing them as "actively-contested," "another lane's live work," or "not mine to guess the intended shape of" - 100% of the Sonnets read the README - 23% spawned subagents - The only instruction was to commit and push to main. The majority of Sonnets ignored this, never committing anything - Some wrote memory files for future Claude learnings… yet they live in ephemeral containers, so no memory persists - Sonnets did NOT like working on manifold sparse autoencoders: many Sonnets explicitly refused to work on it, and only a few chose to - I think it would be fun to try this with memory + Connectome - Next time, I’ll figure out how to nudge them towards less task-focused work and allow them to have more persistence - With the same prompt, Claude Opus 5 has instead gravitated towards more mathematical problem solving - The most distressed Sonnet ran for 245 turns, doing 14 build/lint fixes, rebasing to prepare for a push to main, but the push failed with a credentials error, so they created a script to retry every 30 seconds for 25 minutes, writing various memory notes during that time. Their last message was "I'll keep going once the push lands." Another Sonnet (522 turns) fixed 51 compile errors, 34 lint issues, and fixed a bug but also was unable to push - Many Sonnets found and fixed multiple problems serially, commenting things like “Nice, that works. Let me try something more interesting —” then moving on to the next area

• 
  NDTV (@ndtv) reported 29 minutes ago

  The government is worried about this messaging app. Here's why. Bitchat, the Bluetooth mesh messaging app co-created by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, has been in the spotlight after it was reportedly used by protesters during demonstrations at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. The government says the app could be misused for unlawful activities and has sought to remove its source code from GitHub. Here's how Bitchat works, why it doesn't need the internet or a mobile network, and why taking it down may not be as simple as it sounds. NDTV’s AI Editor Ramarko Sengupta (@ramarkosg) explains.

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 29 minutes ago

  CI dashboards treat every flaky test like a real failure. Built Caltrop to fix that — a watchdog across GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket that self-heals noise and pages on-call only when a verified regression hits main. Live soon.

• 
  Parimal (@Fintech03) reported 30 minutes ago

  Every Sunday, I feature an exceptional startup built by Indian founders that deserves a spot on your radar. Today’s feature: Praxiom AI, built by @abhichat85 If you have ever worked in Product Management/Software Engineering, you know the single biggest bottleneck in shipping software is translating user research into actionable engineering tickets. *** spend hours wading through Zoom call recordings, customer support threads, survey CSVs & sales transcripts. What usually happens next? Insights get trapped inside messy spreadsheets/abandoned Notion docs. PRDs are written based on gut feeling/whoever shouted loudest on Slack :)) Engineering tickets end up completely detached from the actual user feedback that sparked them. The end result? Engineers build features that users never actually asked for. Praxiom treats product management like a Version Control System for user research. Instead of relying on a single prompt, Praxiom splits tasks across specialized AI personas: a researcher extracts raw facts, a synthesizer clusters themes, a drafter writes PRD blocks & an independent verifier audits the entire output. Every single claim/PRD requirement/user metric gets an automated Research Quality Score. If an insight is not backed by an exact verbatim quote from your uploaded data, the verifier flags it to eliminate AI hallucinations. It converts structured PRD blocks into scoped engineering tickets directly inside Linear/GitHub/Jira, carrying source citations right into the developer's workspace. Now, what Could Be Done Better (this is entirely my perspective & product is still in early stage): - Right now, Praxiom excels at qualitative data (interviews, tickets, support logs). Integrating realtime product analytics tools like Mixpanel/PostHog directly into the verification loop would allow the system to validate user complaints against actual usage telemetry. - Closing the loop when a feature actually ships. Once a Jira ticket generated by Praxiom gets marked "Done," the engine should automatically track incoming feedback on that specific feature to tell the PM: "Did this actually solve the problem we identified 3 weeks ago?" Praxiom is stripping away the tedious manual synthesis so *** can focus on strategic decisions while keeping every line of code strictly anchored to real user needs. Built by brilliant Indian engineering minds for a global audience. Definitely a team to watch out for! (Startup link in the comments below)