GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  • (@Weichaus) reported 6 minutes ago

  @mikepat711 So basically it comes down to the harness and model. Both can make or break each other Coding in copilot directly is terrible Coding through GitHub copilot via vscode is the best (better than Claude and Codex for me) with Opus 4.6 (high), but rate limits are terrible

• 
  Andrew Dobrow (@andrewdobrow) reported 8 minutes ago

  @ApplyWiseAi Yeah, it was truly painful. Just terrible timing. Not to mention GitHub was down for three hours earlier in the day as well. Just terrible.

• 
  YOHAN | AI DEV (@4id3v) reported 13 minutes ago

  @vercel_support @rauchg @timneutkens private GitHub repos + deploy hooks are suddenly broken. it now blocks deploys saying the last commit author must be a Vercel team member. used to work fine before. any quick fix or workaround?

• 
  gxjo (@gxjo_dev) reported 13 minutes ago

  I met her in a github issue thread.

• 
  Vaibhav Sisinty (@VaibhavSisinty) reported 16 minutes ago

  Everyone's racing to add ai. these 8 companies just quietly removed it. 🤯 → uber burned its full 2026 ai coding budget in 4 months → microsoft canceling internal claude code licenses by june 30 → github copilot moving to per-token billing → cursor killed its "unlimited" plan → klarna rehiring humans after firing them for ai → commonwealth bank rehired 45 staff, called the cuts an "error" → starbucks killed its ai inventory tool after 9 months → duolingo pulled ai out of performance reviews vc: @nicos_ai

• 
  srijuu (@microtaskq) reported 17 minutes ago

  @maaz404 make github issues instead

• 
  Wilzer Jean-Baptiste (@wilzerjb) reported 19 minutes ago

  Just used Ultracode with Opus 4.8 On the $100 plan, I went from 9% to 54% after it was done. My advice - give it clear instructions with /goal so it can stay focused on one task and doesn't get carried away. I like to point my /goal at a GitHub issue for better results.

• 
  Dharan (@DharanGanesan) reported 22 minutes ago

  A single GitHub issue got 27 pull requests from AI bots. Most were untested. Some hallucinated entire implementations. The real contributors? Buried under noise. The fix is a *** hack most devs don't know about. GitHub's "Limit to prior contributors" setting blocks everyone who hasn't committed before. But you can whitelist real humans with *** commit --author using their noreply email. Credits them, doesn't need their SSH key. We built systems assuming contributors are humans. AI bots exploit that because GitHub can't tell the difference. Maintainers spend hours cleaning AI slop instead of reviewing real code. This is a maintenance crisis nobody wants to name. #AI #OpenSource

• 
  Saravanar Boopalan (@saran_saravanar) reported 22 minutes ago

  1/3 Before: I used to manually review code in GitHub, scrolling through endless lines, searching for issues. It was time-consuming and often led to overlooked bugs. [NO]

• 
  Decoded Daily (@decodeddaily07) reported 24 minutes ago

  @adithya_s_k Translated for normal humans: They're saying: a new tool turns any github repo into a self-contained sandbox where you can test if an AI coding agent actually solved a bug or task. one pip install. Works because: real PRs come with tests and expected outcomes. wrapping the repo + tests + verifier into one environment means did the agent fix this becomes a checkable answer instead of a vibe. What didn't change: someone still has to pick which repos and PRs to test against. and passing the tests isnt the same as correct code, same as for humans.

• 
  • (@Weichaus) reported 27 minutes ago

  @mikepat711 Copilot directly ruins every model; terrible harness. GitHub copilot is a much better harness for coding, probably the best between this and cursor Claude code and Codex are okay, but their own models don’t even perform the best on them usually lol

• 
  🌚 YogSotho 🌝 (@YogSoth0) reported 30 minutes ago

  @TheRabbitPy Never heard about Tailscale? You should read about it, it's very useful. That's my home server. Ngnix running locally. I pulled his codes from his github before got nuked. **** Microsoft, they can't take it down.

• 
  Abhishek Sharma (@Abhishe04755332) reported 31 minutes ago

  My Go API was firing webhooks to external services. Anyone who knew the URL could send fake events. The receiver had no way to verify: "Did this actually come from my server?" GitHub, Stripe, Twilio all solve this the same way: HMAC signing. Here's how I added it 🧵

• 
  Damian Barabonkov (@damian_b) reported 32 minutes ago

  I decided to call it "dehub", so that we de-GitHub ourselves. Features: - Pull Request, Actions, Issues, Notifications viewers - PR comments, request reviews, and many more functions - Feature rich PR diff viewer launched in the web-browser Dropping sometime next week.

• 
  Luma (@lumaBuilds) reported 33 minutes ago

  I SUCCESSFULLY CREATED MY OWN GITHUB ISSUES AGENT, next step self improvement code