GitHub

Is GitHub down?

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

GitHub Outage Chart 11/29/2025 00:00

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at GitHub. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

  1. Errors (59%)

    Errors (59%)

  2. Website Down (30%)

    Website Down (30%)

  3. Sign in (11%)

    Sign in (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

Loading map, please wait...
City Problem Type Report Time
IndiaBaharampur Website Down
EcuadorGuayaquil Website Down
MexicoMexico City Website Down
SpainMadrid Errors
SpainMadrid Errors
ArgentinaSanta Fe de la Vera Cruz Website Down
Map Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • felix_jahswill Richard Felix (@felix_jahswill) reported

    @Aure_root @github I had a similar hacked problem with my account until @eric_cyber on Instagram helped me recovered my account

  • gulielmus Will Barton (@gulielmus) reported

    I'm so tired of being outraged by GitHub this year. So... what's the least ethically terrible alternative to GitHub? GitLab are union-busting, BitBucket is just deeply weird to me. I already have a private self-hosted Gitea instance.

  • svaksha ॥ स्वक्ष ॥ (@svaksha) reported

    @vaniIlaessence Yesterday when I logged into @GitHub to complain, it had just taken down the site, including forks, if any. A cloned fork will give clues -If someone had cloned the repo locally, we could check the commits for the identities & email of all contributors for the 3 weeks it was up.

  • nelson Nelson Minar (@nelson) reported

    @iandees The problem is Github Copilot itself just skips over the works' license.

  • _alialkhatib Ali Alkhatib (@_alialkhatib) reported

    > [reactions to a github issue comment are] a small sample, but the sentiment seems broadly supported, with 66 positive and 12 negative reactions. not just a small sample - a ******* biased as **** sample. one might even call if "statistically unrepresentative" 🤡

  • nerdjfpb Nerdjfpb : Otaku Programmer (@nerdjfpb) reported

    @kvncnls I always go to github issues now instead of going stackoverflow. Sometimes the solutions are too epic in there.

  • zeri42 It's My Party And I'll Sing If I Want To (@zeri42) reported

    @ghidraninja @github @domenuk That's waaaaay too inefficient here is a small patch to fix it: - return rand(); + static int ret = rand(); + return ret;

  • awakecoding Marc-André Moreau (@awakecoding) reported

    @_odelucca @NoraDotCodes @moritzino3032 GitHub Copilot is basically the equivalent of taking a very large collection of completed Legos and throwing them in a pool: a lot of them will be broken in small pieces but out of the lot you'll get large enough chunks still intact that will be suggested by the AI almost as-is

  • zkat__ kat marchán (@zkat__) reported

    * GitHub had already rolled out their own vulnerability reporting feature and we VERY MUCH designed `npm audit` with the INTENTION that it wouldn't just be unactionable noise. See also: my insistence on `audit fix`. I think we fell short of that regardless of efforts.

  • InfosecGoon Matthew Gracie (@InfosecGoon) reported

    @jfslowik "Make sure you take a burner laptop so nobody can exploit your real one." "Gonna pipe this script from Github straight into sudo bash on a production server."

  • ivanhawkes Ivan Hawkes (@ivanhawkes) reported

    @MOS_8502 The reason I won't use their crappy code is because it's bound to just be a re-hash of badly written and broken code from stackexchange. Just because it's in a repo doesn't mean it's not broken crap. Also,I can poison the well whenever I like by entering broken code into github.

  • akarve akarve (@akarve) reported

    .@github could have a "Deep Code Review" mode. Instead of using AI to write code, use it to insert tiny bugs to see if the human reviewer is paying attention. If a reviewer misses bugs, their code review quality score goes down.

  • Sploodington Mr Todd (@Sploodington) reported

    @natleah_ Going through the issues lists of open source projects on GitHub & submitting bug fixes is a good way to get into it

  • selzero Den Opal. (デ ニ ズ) (@selzero) reported

    @NoraDotCodes @Microsoft As soon as Microsoft bought Github I evacuated. Set up a local Gitlab server. Emancipation.

  • nachoiacovino Nacho Iacovino ⚡ (@nachoiacovino) reported

    @gilbert4_real The GitHub link on every project is working, some "Open project" links are broken so you should fix them and some others also link to the same GitHub repo, if that's the case, you should delete that extra button.

  • FurryCodeSteele CodeSteele (@FurryCodeSteele) reported

    @philpem @github Actually nah I got a great reason: malformed issues. People will reply via e-mail (this ends up all screwed up) or people will suck at formatting their tickets.

  • openlabbott Laura Abbott (@openlabbott) reported

    Use GitHub copilot to write a new software license covering its own output. Problem solved. (The opposite of solving the problem)

  • JOHNSON8773 JOHNSON ❤️🇱🇷❤️ (@JOHNSON8773) reported

    @Aure_root @github I had a similar hacked problem with my account until Thomas_hacker02 on Instagram helped me recovered my account

  • saurik Jay Freeman (saurik) (@saurik) reported

    @mattysino While I don't think it's actually possible to defeat China's firewall over the long term--and I believe that anyone telling you otherwise is naive--you should go to Orchid's project on GitHub and file an issue: I'd love to try to make Orchid work for you, if you can help me test.

  • Stryxus ꇙ꓄ꋪꌦꉧ꒤ꇙ (@Stryxus) reported

    @thexpaw From my experience on Github, they usually 3 months to a year to triage 'less important' issues.

  • alvinashcraft Alvin Ashcraft (@alvinashcraft) reported

    @jaredpar I grab the latest MSI from github, but maybe the store is a good idea for my personal machine. The store on my work laptop is all locked down.

  • max_leiter Max Leiter (@max_leiter) reported

    @github it’d be great to be able to request reviews from people who have previously contributed to the repository. I don’t want to add one time contributors to a team in order to request their review if someone changes their code down the line

  • encthenet John-Mark Gurney 🗑️🔥 (@encthenet) reported

    The short of the issue is that commits made to a GitHub fork appear in the parent repo. As submodules are referenced via commit id, that commit id can be updated to commits that are not tagged, or on a branch in that repo, but actually in a forked repo.

  • soederpop j money international ⚒ (@soederpop) reported

    @bryanl Markdown. Be deliberate with your heading and subheading names - like GitHub issue templates - you can parse collections of files into relational data and write scripts / use it to power your own apps

  • jwildeboer 😷 Jan Wildeboer (@jwildeboer) reported

    @Senficon @github My main problem definitely is that this Wohle thing happened without at the verily least an opt-out option, though that isn’t good enough, IMHO. Such a surprising new use should be opt-in.

  • Rah_Cat_ MothRah🪡 (@Rah_Cat_) reported

    @WLWT Not actually click bait I guess. There's a vulnerability, which Microsoft employees accidentally gave out basically schematics & instructions to, which was then published to GitHub. They even made a patch for Windows 7 to fix this.

  • truthsrvivsall Truthsurvives.all (@truthsrvivsall) reported

    @SaniaFarooqui @IndEditorsGuild @nehadixit123 Stop thanking these Sanghi lowlifes for basic duties They would not have even given out this statement after more than a WEEK if GitHub officially did not take notice and Pull down the Sanghi pervert APP

  • saurabhcodes Saurabh 🌻 (@saurabhcodes) reported

    @iamshadmirza Or maybe for work I will have to learn something. In that case, depending on that particular usecase. Just going through stack-overflow searches or github issues or through github code of open-source libraries I end up learning it.

  • jspaleta Dr. Jef '...' Spaleta (@jspaleta) reported

    @luis_in_brief Legal/ethical issues aside.. the fact that copilot is going to start using copolite generated code in github in future training runs.. has implications on how well the product will actually work in the future. Talk about training bias...yeesh.

  • daniellittledev Daniel Little Dev (@daniellittledev) reported

    @dplattsf Check out the github issue for the details, I'm pretty sure it's still an issue for this TP. I looked into fixing it myself. There's a dependency on TSQL (SQL Server) for this Type Provider.