Office 365 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Office 365 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  StartupHakk (@StartupHakk) reported 9 minutes ago

  Microsoft's Empire Continues to Crumble Microsoft has 450 million Office 365 users. Their flagship AI product, Copilot, has converted just 3.3% of them into paying customers. The stock is down 12 to 15 percent year-to-date, and their CFO recently circulated an internal memo calling for a “tighter” organization moving at an “increased pace.” That is corporate code for one thing: more people may be about to lose their jobs. The question I keep coming back to is this: what happens when the company that built the modern office, the one that owns your email, spreadsheets, calendar, documents, and most of your work life, starts losing its grip on the one product it bet everything on? And what does it mean when Anthropic walks directly into Microsoft’s living room, right inside Word, Excel, and Outlook, and starts doing the job better than Microsoft itself? Is the world’s most powerful tech titan actually running on fumes? What if the $13 billion bet that was supposed to secure Microsoft’s future is becoming the weight that drags it down? Why are internal memos suddenly demanding a faster, tighter organization while their flagship software struggles under the weight of its own updates? OpenAI is projecting staggering losses, Microsoft’s stock just took a major hit, and the “exclusive” moat they thought they had is starting to disappear. So the real question is: is Microsoft still an innovator, or has it become a market-paralyzing giant that has lost its way? Today, we’re looking past the marketing and into the data to see why the pillars are starting to crack.

• 
  Eric Johnson (@ej_badger) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Office365 I have been trying to reach support all day long. I have lost my authentication to my phone. I have spoken to support reps but they require me to login to get support. I have called four separate phone numbers 892 5234 - hung up / disconnected bad number 642 7676 -…

• 
  HectorE (@HectorE88315654) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BrianRoemmele And now they’re blocking the installation of Claude extension for their Office 365 products, there are reported issues this weekend of problems with this, I tried to install it and it marked an error , and investigating online I saw many users reported this issue.

• 
  Coco Freak (@Coco_the_freak) reported 18 minutes ago

  So aparrently, the „Smart“ App Control from #Microsoft in the #Windows „Security“-Settings blocks you from installing #office365 … and you have to PERMANENTLY shut off that „Security Feature“ to fix this issue … fml why did i go into IT-Support 🙈😭

• 
  Yourmanjeff (@YourManJeff) reported 19 minutes ago

  Spending this morning trying to figure out if Microsoft #Office365 is impacting just our company or if it's more widespread since Microsoft is showing everything is fine and outage reports globally are spiking right now #Outlook365 . Creates a huge work stoppage.

• 
  chris (@xH4ngEm) reported 21 minutes ago

  There's a question I get asked constantly by investors building individual accounts: how much of a single name is too much? Been sitting with this in the context of the Revere Gro and Rair exposure framework circulating around $MSFT positions. The model tries to map concentration risk across growth-rate sensitivity and rate-cycle sensitivity - not a bad starting structure. But I think it locates the problem slightly wrong. For a long-horizon value investor, risk management is not primarily about volatility. It's about permanent capital impairment. Those are genuinely different things, and conflating them leads to genuinely different mistakes. MSFT at current prices trades around 32-33x forward earnings. P/B north of 13. EV/EBITDA in the high 20s depending on the quarter. Not cheap multiples by historical standards - even for a business generating the FCF that Microsoft does. And the FCF is real: Azure margin expansion, Office 365 recurring, Activision slowly integrating. The capital allocation story holds up - disciplined buybacks, a growing dividend, R&D spend that's actually productive rather than defensive. ROIC consistently above cost of capital. The moat is not in question. But here's the thing about exposure management in individual accounts specifically: when you hold a concentrated position in a company priced for near-perfection, your margin of safety becomes structural rather than mathematical. You can't just point at the balance sheet and call it hedged. The Rair framing - rate-adjusted intrinsic return - is useful because it forces the right question: if the 10-year rises another 100bps from here, does this company's intrinsic value hold? For MSFT, probably yes. The business doesn't need cheap debt to function. It generates cash in almost any macro environment. The moat doesn't erode with rates. But position sizing is where individual investors chronically underperform. Institutions manage downside scenarios as a daily operational function. Individual investors size based on conviction - and conviction is not risk management. Conviction is the justification for taking risk. Risk management is the system of rules that governs how much risk you actually accept. Practical framework, after holding through multiple cycles: - If you can articulate the bear case (multiple compression, Azure growth deceleration, AI capex overhang not yet reflected in FCF) and still sleep at night at 10-12% allocation, that's probably the rational ceiling for a concentrated individual book. - If a 20% drawdown in this one name would materially alter your financial situation, you've crossed from investing into speculating on management quality and multiple expansion. The Revere Gro side of the concept is really just another way of saying: don't let a great company become a great risk by virtue of how much of your book it occupies. The business quality and the position size are separate questions that individual investors routinely collapse into one. Balance sheet analysis matters. FCF trajectory matters. They're inputs into a position-sizing decision - not substitutes for one. That distinction is the actual heart of risk management in individual accounts, and most frameworks bury it. Long MSFT. Have been for years. Never let it exceed 12% of the book regardless of how strongly I believe in the thesis. That ceiling is a feature.

• 
  Anthony Peyton (@arpeyton) reported 21 minutes ago

  @12Knocksinna @Office365 The annoying part IMO is that we had perfectly function PowerShell cmdlets that were efficient and solved problems in single lines that have now been replaced by tomes of graph documentation, the horrors of the mggraph wrapper, authorization scopes, and a million other points of annoyance. The majority of M365 admins are not developers and will not take up learning how to write their own tools in their free time to perform basic administrative tasks.

• 
  userlolxxl (@userlolxxl) reported 23 minutes ago

  @medsci_yb3r @MicrosoftLearn @Microsoft Tenant😬overcomming 'problems' to sign-out edu-Office 365, a new private Office licence is running, other licence associated with edu-office(.)com says 'Connection failure'. .. but, I can use edu-licence Office 365 again, after a year of non-functional licence. Chaos? Reality.

• 
  NaN goto (@nmnvzr) reported 24 minutes ago

  @marcelhaasIO @MaxBrodeurUrbas @satyanadella All my accounts use the same email and sometimes different passwords. The average user does not know he needs to save the credentials as “azure login”, “office 365 login”, “exchange admin login”. Dude it’s a mess.

• 
  Jamie Smith (@jamiedsmith) reported 25 minutes ago

  I’ve long said that digital wallets have a *distribution problem* In larger economies, 1/3 of people work for big enterprises And when you consider that Office365 has about 50% marketshare... ...the addressable market for a new portable employee ID becomes *absolutely massive*

• 
  Michael Ward (@michaelward_CPA) reported 26 minutes ago

  The software industry seems to be in cahoots with one another. I suspect subscribed to Office365 through @GoDaddy so no matter how much trouble I have with @GoDaddy trying to access my email account, @Microsoft is completely unwilling and unable help.

• 
  Ed Andersen (@edandersen) reported 27 minutes ago

  @matvelloso Yes their attach rate to office 365 is not great but the entire company is behind it. It’s not being wound down

• 
  William (@goosfrabaka) reported 31 minutes ago

  I pay for Office365 so the @onedrive experience (esp uploading from mobile) shouldn't be this terrible In contrast, @googledrive is flawless. #Microsoft #onedrive #googledrive

• 
  Jonas (@wisplite) reported 32 minutes ago

  @korewadiego My biggest problems are that the UI is awful compared to Office 365, and it seems incapable of opening an existing docx without completely nuking the formatting.

• 
  The Catalyst Edge (@zeatle2) reported 34 minutes ago

  Two very different setups. $CLOV (Clover Health) — not in today's scrub, but running off a REAL catalyst. 🟢 Medicare 4.5-star upgrade via federal COURT ORDER (court forced CMS to re-rate) 🟢 Covers 97%+ of members on Contract H5141 🟢 Higher star rating = higher CMS reimbursement rates in 2027 🟢 Q1 2026: GAAP profitable, revenue +62% YoY 🔴 Already up 18.9% yesterday — needs consolidation first This is a fundamental re-rating, not a pump. Medicare stars = real dollars. Entry: $4.70–$5.00 on pullback | T1: $6.20 | T2: $7.50 | Stop: $4.20 $MSFT (Microsoft) activity score 522 — #3 on the full scrub. 🟢 Enterprise AI Copilot embedded in Office 365, Teams, Azure — the deployment layer 🟢 Down 14% YTD = multiple compression on a franchise business 🟢 #3 scrub = institutional money starting to re-rate 🔴 ORCL's $40B raise rattles AI infra capex narrative — watch for spillover At $398, this is best-in-class enterprise AI at a real discount. Entry: $395–$405 | T1: $435 | T2: $460 | Stop: $380