1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Office 365
  4. Outage Map
Office 365

Office 365 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Office 365 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Office 365, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Office 365 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Office 365 is an online productivity suite that is developed by Microsoft. Office 365 contains online and offline versions of Microsoft Office, Skype and Onedrive, as well as online versions of Sharepoint, Exchange and Project.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Bogotá, Bogota D.C. 2
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Milly-la-Forêt, Île-de-France 1
Unión de Crédito Agrícola de Hermosillo, SON 1
Mumbai, MH 1
Antiguo Cuscatlán, La Libertad 1
La Rochelle, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Reims, ACAL 1
Dreux, Centre 1
Merlimont, Hauts-de-France 1
Puteaux, Île-de-France 1
Valence, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 2
Saint-Malo, Brittany 1
Saint-Denis, Réunion 1
Réunion, Réunion 1
Saint-Paul, Réunion 1
Melbourne, VIC 3
Montpellier, Occitanie 1
Redruth, England 1
Cheltenham, England 1
Tewkesbury, England 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Office 365 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • xH4ngEm
    chris (@xH4ngEm) reported

    There's a question I get asked constantly by investors building individual accounts: how much of a single name is too much? Been sitting with this in the context of the Revere Gro and Rair exposure framework circulating around $MSFT positions. The model tries to map concentration risk across growth-rate sensitivity and rate-cycle sensitivity - not a bad starting structure. But I think it locates the problem slightly wrong. For a long-horizon value investor, risk management is not primarily about volatility. It's about permanent capital impairment. Those are genuinely different things, and conflating them leads to genuinely different mistakes. MSFT at current prices trades around 32-33x forward earnings. P/B north of 13. EV/EBITDA in the high 20s depending on the quarter. Not cheap multiples by historical standards - even for a business generating the FCF that Microsoft does. And the FCF is real: Azure margin expansion, Office 365 recurring, Activision slowly integrating. The capital allocation story holds up - disciplined buybacks, a growing dividend, R&D spend that's actually productive rather than defensive. ROIC consistently above cost of capital. The moat is not in question. But here's the thing about exposure management in individual accounts specifically: when you hold a concentrated position in a company priced for near-perfection, your margin of safety becomes structural rather than mathematical. You can't just point at the balance sheet and call it hedged. The Rair framing - rate-adjusted intrinsic return - is useful because it forces the right question: if the 10-year rises another 100bps from here, does this company's intrinsic value hold? For MSFT, probably yes. The business doesn't need cheap debt to function. It generates cash in almost any macro environment. The moat doesn't erode with rates. But position sizing is where individual investors chronically underperform. Institutions manage downside scenarios as a daily operational function. Individual investors size based on conviction - and conviction is not risk management. Conviction is the justification for taking risk. Risk management is the system of rules that governs how much risk you actually accept. Practical framework, after holding through multiple cycles: - If you can articulate the bear case (multiple compression, Azure growth deceleration, AI capex overhang not yet reflected in FCF) and still sleep at night at 10-12% allocation, that's probably the rational ceiling for a concentrated individual book. - If a 20% drawdown in this one name would materially alter your financial situation, you've crossed from investing into speculating on management quality and multiple expansion. The Revere Gro side of the concept is really just another way of saying: don't let a great company become a great risk by virtue of how much of your book it occupies. The business quality and the position size are separate questions that individual investors routinely collapse into one. Balance sheet analysis matters. FCF trajectory matters. They're inputs into a position-sizing decision - not substitutes for one. That distinction is the actual heart of risk management in individual accounts, and most frameworks bury it. Long MSFT. Have been for years. Never let it exceed 12% of the book regardless of how strongly I believe in the thesis. That ceiling is a feature.

  • FreddSays
    Fred Says (@FreddSays) reported

    Looks like you may be using Office 365 which is online. Better to buy a one-time purchase to install on your PC or Mac. Office Home 2024: £119.99 Office Home & Business: £249.99 Fully supported with updates and trouble shooting.

  • MyklTheYankee
    Mykl Ü (@MyklTheYankee) reported

    @Smileyyeg Works for me. But it was better before the office365 crap was shoved down your throat at every turn.

  • YvnCdric
    Cédric Yvon (@YvnCdric) reported

    @JesterJum Use open office. Why office 365 that is slow?

  • goosfrabaka
    William (@goosfrabaka) reported

    I pay for Office365 so the @onedrive experience (esp uploading from mobile) shouldn't be this terrible In contrast, @googledrive is flawless. #Microsoft #onedrive #googledrive

  • kimtaikennedy
    Cockatrice (@kimtaikennedy) reported

    Just login to entra dashboard portal as office365 admin and delete all MFAs there and login back to email easy

  • AlastairGrayson
    JT (@AlastairGrayson) reported

    @authorjoyshaw I use Microsoft's VibeVoice to read it back to me. It's probably the same thing offered by Office365, just on their server and not my local machine.

  • gcutechsupport
    GCU Tech Support (@gcutechsupport) reported

    Attention Lopes! Some active students aren't receiving their Office 365 license, so they can't access any of the included apps. Error message: “Error: Your school account is no longer active.” This issue is currently being looked into. Global Ticket Number: 3937295

  • SJM0911
    If you must know, its for my Schnauzer (@SJM0911) reported

    looks like @Office365 Outlook servers are down anyone else having trouble?

  • KQrios
    Kamal The Qrios (@KQrios) reported

    @umarsaif They won't get a chance to become "real". The issue is AI Agents are removing the need for abstraction, UI and unwanted code layers. Entire office suite is now useless. Forget about office 365. Mails, comm channels will survive for sometime. Where Indian IT will contribute?

  • UK_Daniel_Card
    mRr3b00t (@UK_Daniel_Card) reported

    @arinwaichulis Out of office replies reveal the address. When you say bounced emails reveal the source email; what do you mean by this? As in the mail server rejects it? Eg office 365 exchange online?

  • Spheniscidae007
    Penguin Capital (@Spheniscidae007) reported

    @jukan05 Let them fix office integration? How the fk u getting crushed by Anthropic on office365 integrations?

  • npaladin2000
    npaladin2000 (@npaladin2000) reported

    @Itsfoss Microsoft actually subsidized the cost of Windows in order to sell OneDrive and Office365 subscriptions. And yes, that's back to the same old anti trust issues.

  • real_dude_guy
    Real Dude Guy (@real_dude_guy) reported

    @gabefollower Those lawsuits from those companies are straight up retarded. They claim Valve is monopoly and then in next sentence they say that 30% cut is too much. What they think will happen if Valve lowers it to like 15%. Consumers will choose Steam less? Hell no, they will like Steam even more then. As a result those companies will cry wolf even more that Steam is monopoly. Competition offers trash service, tries to bait with discounts and loses and them cries like babies. C’mon now. Epic owner cries every day about Valve and Steam and his “Game Launcher” is still mega slow and looks more like launcher for Office 365 than game launcher.

  • Malakai1174
    Kyle Smith (@Malakai1174) reported

    @Anas_Sloth @Yetee_ @WildSentences no, you are with your utter idiocy. what does "365" have to do with literally anything in this conversation? do i need 365 attacking computers? Do i need to use office 365 like a micro simp? If you can't even clearly make a statement, don't bother trying to talk to people. What document on 365? What ******** does that gotta do with anything? Your answer is clearly dumb and has no sustenance behind it. Just make a little sense will ya. like you started off telling me it isn't a network problem, it is a backup problem. while responding to my message talking about data replication(A ******* backup). Thanks for pointing out the obvious! If anyone is a troll here it is you. I say it is a backup issue, and then you tell me "No, it is a backup issue not a network issue." Like a backup doesn't live on a network, requiring networking knowledge. All while telling me about bandwidth( A ******* networking Issue!!!!!)

Check Current Status