Reddit Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ajeet Singh (@Singhajeet2312) reported 2 minutes ago

  yesterday was supposed to be just another leg day. warmup, squats, 40kgs, 60, 100, 120, 140 smooth as butter. my working set is around 160-170 so 140 felt like nothing. first rep, clean. went for the second and felt my back roll inwards. finished the rep anyway because there was no one there to spot me, i was completely alone. and then it hit me. that pain. lower back, the kind that makes you think "okay this might be it." couldn't lean forward. couldn't walk right. took these tiny embarrassing little steps all the way back home and just sat there. i felt so sorry for myself. like genuinely i sat there thinking about everything i wouldn't be able to do. that feeling is dark man. then I just started scrolling Reddit mindlessly and somehow landed on a video of Alan Thrall. and he said something that just snapped me out of it, if you avoid movement after an injury, you're only slowing your recovery down. don't feel sorry for yourself. f*ck the pain. move normally. 4 hours after the injury. I'm doing air squats in my room. every single one hurts. i don't care. because i realized pain is temporary but the version of yourself you become when you quit, that stays. you don't prove anything to the gym, to your followers, to anyone. you prove it to yourself. every. single. day. never let an injury take over your head. make sure your mind doesn't break first.

• 
  snipy.in (@snipy_in) reported 2 minutes ago

  Reddit down 9% on report it may end Google AI content deal The trigger: $60 million annual deal is ending soon as Google's AI summaries cut traffic to Reddit

• 
  Jer (@ZekeGroyper) reported 8 minutes ago

  Anti-Flock Camera **** is so reddit. Please find other issues to care about.

• 
  Indi (@indigoopy) reported 9 minutes ago

  @notsasha8 @throwingeggos finn said put down your phones on reddit and now twitter is suffering for it😭 (good on them)

• 
  𝔚𝔦𝔩𝔩 𝔅𝔩𝔞𝔠𝔨 🇺🇸 (@WillBlackGaming) reported 10 minutes ago

  @SCEngineeringUK @mishtal "suck it up buttercup" Reddit is down the hall and to the left

• 
  Kev Sault (@KPSault) reported 10 minutes ago

  If you sell a supplement, your customer has already been pitched your mechanism. Probably this month. They've seen the clinical study callout, the founder-in-a-kitchen ad, the split-screen before and after, and the "I was skeptical too" opener. So when your new creative flops, the instinct is to blame the editor or the offer. It's usually neither. The real problem is upstream. You can produce creative faster than you can think of things worth producing. Your editor is waiting on you. Your designer is waiting on you. And you're running the business, so the account quietly recycles the same three winners until fatigue kills them and CPA drifts up for six weeks before anyone says it out loud. What you actually want is a creative function that runs without you in it. Net-new angles landing every week, in formats your team can execute, at a hit rate you can forecast rather than hope for. That's what I do. Fifteen briefs a week is normal volume for me. First batch is in your editor's hands inside a week of getting ad account access. On your end it's close to nothing. I need account access and whatever assets you already have. No discovery call, no strategy deck, no workshop. The brief arrives shot-ready: hook, angle, script, visual direction, reference ads. Your editor opens it and starts. They don't have to decode it first. Here's why the hit rate holds up. On my longest-running client, 20 of 52 scored creatives beat a 1.7x ROAS bar. That's 38.5%, graded per creative, which is a harsher test than the ad-set rule most people quote. I know that number because I write down what I expect an angle to do before it launches, then grade myself against what it actually did. The process has four parts. I call the whole thing the Creative Engine. The Deep Dive. A seven-stage research pipeline per brand. Reviews, Reddit, forums, comment sections on your ads and your competitors' ads, support tickets if you'll share them. I'm pulling the exact language your buyer uses when they aren't being sold to, plus the objections they raise to each other rather than to you. This is where angles come from. Everything downstream is downstream of this. The Swipe Map. Automated pull of every ad your competitors are running, logged and tagged by format, angle and hook type. Not to copy them. To see what's already saturated in the category, so I know which claims are burnt and which frames nobody has touched yet. The Angle Ledger. Before anything launches, I log the angle, the awareness level it's aimed at, and how confident I am it lands. After it launches, I grade it against live ROAS. Two things come out of that. You get a hit rate that's measured rather than asserted. And I get calibrated, so the angles I'm most confident about in month six are better bets than the ones in month one. Frame First. Most ad briefs are a script with a visual bolted on afterwards. I build the opening frame first, because that's the only thing a cold buyer actually sees before they decide. Script serves the frame, not the reverse. Then a structural pass before anything ships. Every brief gets scored on pain, promise, proof, curiosity and constraints, so a script that's strong on promise but has no proof in it gets caught by me instead of by your CPA. That's it. Research, map, bet, frame, score, ship, grade, repeat. If you're running Meta at volume in supplements or wellness and your angle pipeline is thinner than your production capacity, my portfolio is a DM away. Six ads, each with the insight behind it and what it did.

• 
  Cyanide (@TCyanide7) reported 13 minutes ago

  @CJSeedge @ymnis_v1 The reddit post literally proves it's a compatibility issue retard.

• 
  savip (@savipww) reported 13 minutes ago

  people are buying $2,000 GPUs to run local AI their current PC already handles a free terminal tool scans your machine and shows which of 493 open models fit your hardware before you download a single gigabyte it's called llmfit (repo in replies) one command and it reads your CPU RAM and VRAM then scores every model in its database > memory fit down to the percent > speed predicted before download 74.5 tok/s on an 8B in my run > quality and context scored per model > flat verdict on every row: Perfect or Too Tight the speed math comes from real community benchmarks not vendor slides i trust that over marketing every time half of local AI reddit is people asking what their rig can run and getting guesses back this ends the guessing in 10 seconds works with Ollama llama.cpp MLX and Docker 124 releases and it shipped an update yesterday free MIT and runs in your terminal

• 
  Burhan (@burhanlabs) reported 13 minutes ago

  @hridoyreh missing the biggest one imo, just being in the communities where your customers already complain about the problem you solve. reddit, discord, niche forums. cheaper than all 9 of these and warmer

• 
  CiteOS (@citeOS_io) reported 17 minutes ago

  ask chatgpt "best crypto wallet" and the answer does not come from your website. the engine reads the sources it trusts. reddit threads, youtube, aggregators, third party articles. the brands that keep showing up across them become the answer. no fixed rank. ask again and the list shifts. what stays stable is frequency. so if AI never names you, it is not a ranking problem. you are just not in the sources it reads yet. that is fixable. you don't rank in AI. you earn the dataset. when AI answers for your category, is it naming you?

• 
  Honey Syed (@honeydreamss) reported 21 minutes ago

  Someone reverse-engineered how ChatGPT's web tool works and published a method for forcing it to crawl your own site. Paste a structured query into ChatGPT, it searches your domain, opens the top results, and tells you exactly what it extracted. Most companies have never done this. When they do, one of three things tends to happen. Some discover ChatGPT can't access their site at all. Their robots.txt blocks GPTBot or ChatGPT-User without anyone realizing it. The dev team or hosting provider set it up to block bots generically and caught every AI crawler in the process. Some discover ChatGPT can access the site but reads it wrong. Outdated pages, wrong product descriptions, missing pricing, content behind JavaScript that renders in a browser but looks blank to a crawler. Some discover ChatGPT reads their site fine but recommends a competitor anyway. The competitor's content is structured the way AI prefers, while theirs reads like marketing copy that sounds good to humans but gives AI nothing concrete to cite. All three scenarios are the same outcome. A business losing customers to a discovery channel they don't know exists. The deliverable is a GEO audit, Generative Engine Optimization. You audit how AI systems see, read, and cite a business's online presence and deliver a report showing what's broken and how to fix it. Five layers. Crawler access. Check robots.txt for AI crawler blocks. The most common and most fixable problem, many sites do this without knowing it. Also check server logs for AI crawler visits. If the client uses Cloudflare, the AI Crawl Metrics dashboard shows bot activity directly. Content extraction. Run the ChatGPT crawl trick, force it to search the client's domain, open top pages, report what it extracted. Also check whether content loads dynamically via client-side JavaScript. AI crawlers can't execute JavaScript the way browsers do, so dynamic content often appears blank. Brand citation audit. Ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews: "What's the best [product type] for [use case]?" "Who are the top [service providers] in [city]?" "What are the alternatives to [competitor]?" Document whether the client is cited and who gets recommended instead. Seeing ChatGPT name a competitor while omitting them entirely is the moment a client understands why this work matters. Content structure analysis. Review key pages for AI readability. AI systems prefer direct answers in the first paragraph, specific data and statistics, headings that match how users phrase questions, and schema markup. Third-party presence. Check Reddit, review sites, and industry forums. Reddit remains one of the most heavily cited third-party sources across AI platforms, a client with no Reddit presence is missing a major signal source. Package the five layers into a report. What the problem is, why it matters for AI visibility, the specific fix. Prioritize by impact. Price at $1,500 to $3,000 depending on the size and complexity of the client's web presence. A local business with a 10-page website pays $1,500. A SaaS company with 200 pages of documentation and multiple product lines pays $3,000. Find clients on LinkedIn. "Head of Marketing," "SEO Manager," "VP of Growth," "CMO" at companies already investing in SEO. If they care about being found on Google, they'll care about being found by AI once they understand the gap. Comment OUTREACH if you want to see the exact email I would send them. Upsell the fixes. The audit is the entry point. Implementation, Updating robots.txt, restructuring content, adding schema markup, building Reddit presence, creating machine-readable FAQ pages, is a separate engagement at $3,000 to $10,000. Or a monthly retainer at $1,000 to $2,000 to continuously monitor AI citations. GEO as a category barely exists. Most SEO agencies haven't added it. Most businesses don't know it's a thing. The consultants building this practice now will set the pricing, own the case studies, and establish authority before anyone else figures out this is a service.

• 
  SignalMelo (@signalmelo01) reported 23 minutes ago

  Why Reddit specifically? Reddit conversations have three properties that make them unusually valuable for brand monitoring: 1. Intent density People on Reddit describe problems in detail. "We've been using X for 6 months and the problem is specifically Y" is a common post. That level of specificity doesn't exist on most platforms. 2. Peer trust Recommendations in Reddit threads carry more weight than any ad or review site. A founder replying genuinely in a thread changes outcomes. 3. Searchability Reddit threads rank on Google. A reply you post today can influence buyers who find that thread six months from now.

• 
  ipetloudog (@buttchug704) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Hey I’m on steam and my guns just keep shooting. I’ll unplug every peripheral and it’ll dump everything I got still. Someone on Reddit having the same problem

• 
  Average Undertaker Enjoyer (@itsmerfornothin) reported 27 minutes ago

  I don’t even know why I bother going on Reddit anymore. Even when an issue is like 80/20 they’ll take the 20 side and act horrified if anyone in the comments is 80 lmao.

• 
  Rain (@Rain_Rans) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Brian40617107 @AI_EmeraldApple You love Reddit because you genuinely believe that any dissent should be purged and any insanity should be religiously glorified. Which is fine. The problem is the monopoly. What X has shown is exactly what happens when the monopoly is broken: sane people stay on X, your ilk go to Bluesky, and then come back here because being surrounded by just your ilk without sane people is a ******* self-enclosed hell. You are nothing more than arrogant parasites.