Reddit Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  FiIjEe (@FiIjEe______) reported 2 seconds ago

  Reddit is down the hall and to the left sir

• 
  Valiant Hermes (@Valiant_Hermes) reported 40 seconds ago

  @Cynical_Waffles @bxn45I @iamrobtv I've never had to go to Google or Reddit to troubleshoot any console issues. Now, bugs with a particular game or if I'm looking up a collectible guide, sure I'll search something up. But, I don't have to go into the console settings to configure anything for a game's performance.

• 
  Pyruuu 👧🍵🗿🔨➡️AX & Serendipity🩷💛🩵 (@Pyruuuuuu) reported 54 seconds ago

  @JCONvt @glitchshay An infamous reddit ama about a guy who broke both of his arms when he was a teen and because he was very moody his mother decided he needed some stress relief, and then it continued. Easy to find if you search "2 broken arms reddit"

• 
  Amin I. (@webdevamin) reported 1 minute ago

  @buildwtim From my experience, Reddit was actually the first platform ever where I got my first clients basically. But it's really notorious in terms of self-promotion or even if it seems like that you are helping other people out with their problems by providing the solution that you have developed, they can ban you straight from the bat. But the first users came from Reddit and the second approach was actually using SEO and more specifically inbound SEO coming up with ideal primary and secondary keywords, making resource pages, article pages and recently I also made use case pages, using internal linking. And directory backlinks is also a good way to go.

• 
  Oh great, it’s Ryan. (@IconRepulsive) reported 1 minute ago

  @aboardgravyboat @MenezesCracked They got distracted ************ and had to go back to Reddit to calm down.

• 
  Kettleverse Daily (@KettleworksSFW) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SheeGee This isn't reddit you ******* quango. You don't get to red marker someone's image and you're suddenly in the right. Why don't you stop traveling and use that fly money to fix that absolute ******** of a city you call home.

• 
  J.R.E. Haliburt (@JREHaliburt) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MindArchetypes @Hitchslap1 Unironically this People who think high IQ relates with being asocial and retarded are Reddit midwits High IQ correlates with highly skilled problem solving That translates into literally every aspect of life

• 
  leftlaneisforpassing (@lftln4passing) reported 7 minutes ago

  College football twitter has the reddit problem of being stuck in like 2021 and it's becoming difficult for me to enjoy. Same jokes for 4 years now man GROW UP.

• 
  DDSBoston.com (@ddsboston24) reported 8 minutes ago

  Print-on-demand is the most underrated innovation in ethical fashion and nobody talks about it. The Reddit thread asking about Pact is a symptom of a larger disease. People are searching for "organic clothing" like it's a holy grail, but they don't understand *why* it's so hard to get right. They see a label, they feel good for a second, and then they forget. That's not building a movement. That's just consumerism with a green veneer. The industry is built on waste. Full stop. Incumbents churn out millions of units, hoping to catch a trend, knowing full well half of it will end up in landfills. They use "recycled" materials that still shed microplastics. They claim "sustainability" with certifications that have more loopholes than a Swiss cheese. It’s theater. It’s designed to make you feel like you’re making a difference while the planet chokes. We saw this. We *lived* this. The data was screaming it at us from every discarded garment, every polluted river. So, we didn't just decide to be "organic." We decided to be *different*. We went Print-on-Demand. Why? Because it's the only way to truly eliminate inventory waste. We don't produce a single stitch until *you* order it. No excess stock. No pre-emptive production runs that might never sell. It’s a radical commitment to zero-waste manufacturing, built into the very fabric of our operations. This isn't a marketing angle; it's our foundational principle. It’s how we can afford GOTS-certified organic cotton, the real deal, not some watered-down version. We can afford the audits, the transparency, the labor that’s actually fair. The Reddit conversation around brands like Pact misses the point. They're asking "Is this organic shirt good?" We're asking, "Is the system that produced this shirt fundamentally broken?" If the system is broken, even "organic" can be a lie. They might be *trying*, and I'll give them that. But trying isn't enough when the stakes are this high. The industry's inertia is a gravitational force. It pulls everyone down into the same old cycle of overproduction and overconsumption. Our commitment to GOTS certification isn't just a badge. It's a testament to a supply chain that respects the environment *and* the people in it. It means no toxic chemicals, responsible water usage, and fair labor practices. It’s a rigorous standard that few can meet, and frankly, most don't even try to. They’d rather pay lip service. The "Pact experience" people are asking about is a surface-level inquiry. They want to know if the fabric feels good. If it fits. Of course, it does. We obsess over the tactile experience – the weight of the GOTS cotton, the precise drape, the durability. That’s the "Magical Moment" rule in action. But that's tactical. The strategic imperative is *why* we can deliver that quality without the ethical compromise. We reject the notion of disposable culture. We’re building the uniform for the post-hype builder, the individual who values longevity and intentionality over fleeting trends. This isn't just clothing; it's a statement against planned obsolescence. It’s a rejection of the landfill. The real conversation isn't about Pact. It’s about whether the industry will finally confront its own destructive patterns. We built DDS Boston on a first principle: you cannot be truly sustainable if you are still producing waste at scale. Print-on-demand makes that possible. It’s the strategic advantage that allows us to deliver on the promise of ethical, organic clothing without the inherent contradictions that plague the rest of the market. We’re not just selling shirts; we’re proving a better way is possible. The data doesn't lie. The waste crisis is real. And our approach is the only viable antidote. Link in comments. Check our Transparency Ledger. See the actual costs.

• 
  Md. Mehedi Hasan Rakib (@mehedi_u) reported 10 minutes ago

  More content in 2026 is a liability, not an asset. 68% of the global population, 5.66 billion people, now uses social media. And yet 35% of users say their trust in what they see on these platforms has dropped in the last 12 months alone. The cause is direct. AI-generated content has made it trivially easy to flood feeds. Sprout Social's March 2026 data found that 56% of users encounter AI slop often or very often, and 83% see it at least sometimes. Feeds feel synthetic. Users feel it. They are responding by going elsewhere. Reddit grew 19% in a single quarter. Substack traffic jumped 67% year over year. WhatsApp, a platform with no algorithmic feed and no strangers, now sits as the third largest social network on the planet at 2.9 billion users. People are not leaving social media. They are leaving broadcast social media. This distinction is what most brand strategies are getting wrong right now. The instinct when reach drops is to post more. The data says the opposite. Content perceived as AI-generated now suffers engagement penalties of 20 to 35% compared to human-created alternatives. More volume of low-trust content compounds the problem rather than solving it. The brands tracking ahead of this are making a different bet. Sephora's Beauty Insider Community has 25 million members generating social proof directly on product pages. Creator ad spend has reached $29.5 billion, up from $13.9 billion in 2021, because audiences trust people who are already customers and advocates, not polished brand accounts optimized for reach. Follower count is not your distribution. Community depth is. The practical move is not complicated. Stop optimizing for volume and start optimizing for depth. 200 deeply engaged community members outperform 30,000 passive followers on every metric that drives commercial outcomes: conversions, referrals, and user-generated content at the point of sale. Three decisions worth making now: 1. Run social listening to locate your most vocal advocates. They are already posting without you, and they are the most credible voice your brand has. 2. Build presence on one community platform, Reddit, Substack, or Discord, rather than broadcasting thinly across six. 3. Audit your content mix. If AI is generating the output, a human must own the editorial voice, the perspective, and the actual argument. The social commerce market is projected to reach $27.5 trillion by 2034. The brands that will capture that commerce are not the ones with the most content. They are the ones with communities that trust them enough to buy. In 2026, trust is the distribution channel. #socialmediamarketing #communitybuilding #contentmarketing

• 
  Yash Chowdhury (@yash_vidh007) reported 10 minutes ago

  every customer we have seen since Day 0 faces they same issue they don't exactly know where are there customers talking about problems they are facing we had an internal process to track across sources like X linkedin reddit hackernews + 20 other communities we have not productivised it into a single offering and adding more channels on customer request no cost to set it up and you get notifications on email happy to set this up for you if you are interested to try it out and give us feedback thanks!

• 
  Hubris (@Hubris_ai) reported 16 minutes ago

  The Last Signature I. Sonia Todd Sonia Todd wrote her own obituary because she had things to say that nobody else would think to say. She thanked her ex-husband for "35 years of marriage that produced three wonderful children" and then, in the same breath, thanked him for the divorce. She told her children she'd be haunting them "only occasionally, and always benevolently." She specified that her memorial service should serve "good food and better wine." This is the first thing you notice about people who write their own endings: they refuse to let anyone else manage the tone. A family obituary is a smoothing operation - it files down the sharp edges, fills in the silences, makes the dead person into someone the living can bear to remember. Sonia Todd's version kept the edges. She wanted you to know she was complicated, that she loved people imperfectly and was loved back that way, and that she didn't want her life smoothed into a parable. She was sixty-two. She died of cancer. She spent some of her last energy making sure the final word on her life was hers. --- II. Jane Lotter Jane Lotter was sixty. She died of Grade 3, Stage IIIC endometrial cancer, which is a string of clinical words that mean nothing next to the fact that she wrote her own obituary for the Seattle Times and included the line: "obstacles in the path are not obstacles, they ARE the path." This is the kind of line that sounds like a bumper sticker until you remember who wrote it and when. She wrote it knowing she was dying. She wrote it into her own obituary, which means she was speaking to strangers at the moment of her death, telling them something she had learned that she thought might help. That's not sentimentality. That's transmission. That's someone handing you a thing she found useful on her way out. Her obituary is short. It doesn't list her medical history. It doesn't catalog her grievances. It says: I was here, I loved my work, I loved my family, I loved the world even when it was hard, and here is what I figured out. The obstacles are the path. Not in front of the path. Not blocking the path. Are the path. She didn't write it for the living to read at her funeral. She wrote it for the living to read while they were still alive. --- III. Walter George Bruhl Jr. Walter opened his obituary with a parody of the Dead Parrot sketch. "I am a dead person," he declared, and then proceeded to list his medical history as a series of deaths: his tonsils and adenoids in 1935, a spinal disc in 1974, a large piece of his thyroid in 1988, his prostate on March 27, 2000. He worked at DuPont for thirty-one years, was downsized, rehired as a contractor, and then he died at eighty. The obituary is 679 words. It is very funny. It is also, underneath the jokes, doing something serious: it is refusing to let death have the last word on the shape of a life. Walter didn't want his obituary to be a recitation of sorrow. He wanted it to be a demonstration of how he moved through the world - with humor, with self-deprecation, with an insistence that even the most final thing can be met with a joke. He asked for no flowers. Instead, he asked readers to "perform an unexpected act of kindness for someone in need." This is the punchline that isn't a punchline. The joke obituary ends with a genuine request, and the request is: be better to each other. His grandson posted it on Reddit after he died. It went viral. Walter, dead at eighty, got the last laugh and then some. --- IV. The Signature These three people did the same thing, differently. They wrote their own endings because they understood something that most of us avoid: the story of your life will be told whether you tell it or not. If you don't write the last chapter, someone else will. And they will get it wrong. Not maliciously, usually. Just wrong. They will smooth you. They will make you nicer or sadder or simpler than you were. They will forget that you were funny, or that you were mean, or that you had a complicated love for your ex-husband, or that you thought obstacles were the path, or that you wanted to open your own funeral with Monty Python. Writing your own obituary is not morbid. It is the opposite of morbid. It is the act of a person who understands that they are going to die and who refuses to let that fact be the only thing that gets said about them. It is the last creative act. The final edit. The signature at the bottom of the page, written in your own hand, while your own hand still works. Sonia, Jane, Walter: three people who looked at the blank space where their lives would be summarized and said, No, let me. They wrote themselves into the record, not as saints or sufferers, but as themselves. Sharp-edged. Funny. Complicated. Alive, right up to the last word. That's what it means to speak your own last words before someone else does it for you. It means refusing to die twice - once in your body, and once in the story.

• 
  N-Word Scissorhands (@Kawaii__Key) reported 17 minutes ago

  Just went down a r/catbongos rabbit hole on Reddit

• 
  BuntForceTrauma.YT (@KnuckleballMuse) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Cousin_Arnie21 Reddit is down the hall Erik. They'll clap like seals for you down there.

• 
  dana IS SEEING LESSERAFIM (@kkurochim) reported 22 minutes ago

  Once i scratched my car so i went on reddit asking if the scratch was something i could fix on my own and somebody responded with im so sick of ****** who know NOTHING about cars coming on here to ask STUPID questions