Reddit Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sage (@BuildWithSage) reported 6 minutes ago

  reddit upvotes are not product validation. they are validation that your post touched a nerve those are different things a problem can be interesting enough for 500 people to discuss and still not be painful enough for 5 people to pay to solve. use communities to find problems. then validate whether those problems create actual behavior. that distinction saves a lot of wasted building.

• 
  Albert 🇵🇭🇺🇲 (@Aabney) reported 7 minutes ago

  @GenericGamer283 @PaulTassi @SeanFrancis My issue is this article links the current Steam numbers to an issue that was there at least halfway through season 1. After Cryo hit many players on reddit were complaining about the unbalanced lobbies. That was 4 months ago.

• 
  ibo (@ibocodes) reported 7 minutes ago

  @kinder_grinder @creem_io they have very mixed reviews on reddit & trustpilot, and tbh i don't like niche stuff for important stuff like that but they said they have a good support team yet so far very slow

• 
  jordi (@jordienr) reported 7 minutes ago

  having a public email for your saas means every day you get: - 10 directory sites contacting you to sell you a spot - 50 SEO experts saying they found SEO opportunities - 25 security experts that found vulnerabilities in a static html page - 40 reddit marketing bots offering to shill you on reddit - 1 user having a real issue that you missed

• 
  Junior (@GeraldJr1997) reported 8 minutes ago

  @glavdotmov Bock is working for me I have not deleted columbiawings I will try that when I get home as I seen another person on Reddit fix it by doing that

• 
  🔪 American McGee 🖤 (@americanmcgee) reported 13 minutes ago

  I find the timing of this interaction more than a little odd given that I recently reached out to the creator of the video in question to discuss the way in which it drives hate and misunderstanding. And I let them know that I was pondering the creation of a response video. But that I first wanted to give them a chance to discuss everything. They've since gone silent. And now this? So, the video isn't great. 250k views and it's stirred up a LOT of misunderstanding. But to be fair, the first three and a half minutes are fine. Our founding, the crowd design process, the monthly charitable donations. All of that is presented reasonably. Then we get to 3:30. That’s where the thesis arrives: “As Plushie Dreadfuls began to grow, controversy began to follow them as years passed by.” And from that point until about 9:45, it is one long, uninterrupted prosecution. No counter-points. No company response. No real attempt to explain the other side of anything. Then we get thirty warm seconds at the end about our scoliosis rabbit, which I guess is supposed to make the whole thing feel balanced? But the bookends are not the issue. The middle six minutes are. Look at where the material actually comes from. Essentially all of it traces back to one hostile subreddit and one TikTok rant that runs for about seventy seconds without any response from us at all. That is what viewers are given as an “overview” of our business. That’s not an honest overview. That’s reading our loudest critics into the record and calling it "research." Nowhere in the video does it mention that we have a 4.9 rating on Trustpilot across more than a thousand reviews. Reviews we cannot edit, remove, or filter. You would think that might be relevant when repeating the claim that we have “a really bad track record with customer service.” It takes one search to find that rating. One search. But if you do that search, maybe you can’t frame the story the same way. And the omissions are not small. With the refund story, the customer was offered three options: a full and fast refund if the damaged plush was destroyed, a smaller refund if they kept it, or a complete replacement if they sent it back. Three options. The Reddit thread focused on one because that made the story sound worse, and the video simply repeated that framing. The other two options? Never mentioned. On ABA, the organization we partnered with for the OG ASD Rabbit was specifically geared toward modern techniques designed to avoid the practices that made older ABA harmful. You can still have a conversation about ABA, obviously. But the video presents it as one uniformly abusive thing and treats our partnership as knowing complicity. Context disappears. Outrage remains. Out of that we have people claiming we "supported electrocuting kids" - literal quote. No joke. Then there’s the Discord claim. Again. It never ends. The video states as flat fact, in the creator’s own voice, that I went onto our Discord server “saying that being pan was a phase.” What it does not mention is my VERY NEXT response, where I made clear I was talking about a phase of interest on TikTok. Or the actual context of the conversation, which was about sales trends and redesigns. All that info is in the screenshots. All of it ignored. That context matters. It changes the meaning completely. But including it would make the claim much less useful. I guess it would make the video less watchable? 250k views makes this their most popular video ever. Imagine that! We also get the assertion that I have “a habit of responding in unprofessional ways to criticism.” Okay. Where is the evidence for that in the video? There isn’t any. The claim is just made. And, of course, there is no mention that many of my responses happen in the context of nonstop personal attacks. Apparently that part doesn’t matter either. Is what I am writing here "unprofessional?" I've noticed there are a lot of people out there who essentially consider facts to be unprofessional. Good luck with that. And here’s the thing that really gets me about these videos: at no point did the creator contact me, my wife, or anyone on our team. Not once. Every one of these misrepresentations could have been cleared up with a single message. I know that because when I finally reached out myself, I got a reply within hours. They were reachable the entire time. Nobody tried. And the video creator follows me here on X. That means they have watched over a year of the fallout from all of this. And done nothing in response. I often say that the attacks and behaviors that flow from these incidents are 1000x worse than the incidents themselves. This is a perfect example of that. When I raised all of this, I was told the creator had maintained a neutral stance throughout, and that they had made sure to state the Discord comment had nothing to do with hate toward any group. Great. Except neither of those things is in the video. There is no such statement anywhere in it. And the narration does NOT maintain some careful neutral stance; it repeatedly delivers conclusions in the creator’s own voice. Maybe that’s carelessness. Maybe it’s something worse. Either way, the result is the same. A video that its own creator apparently cannot accurately describe is now being used as a primary source for people calling me a bigot, accusing us of hiding AI use, and worse. And my team absorbs that every day. I absorb it every day. If the video had been made in good faith, one message would have fixed this. If facts were the priority, the Trustpilot rating, the full refund options, the ABA context, and my next Discord response would all be in there. But they aren’t. And I think we all know why. Pretty sure I am going to record a full-length response to this and post it across my socials... but I guess I'll give the video creator a little longer to respond before I do. It's more grace and understanding than they are the haters they inspire ever gave us. Sure that will be ignored too 🤷

• 
  Z | BuzzSearch (@BuzzSearchAI) reported 13 minutes ago

  @spencepawliw the best creative strategists i know don't make content about it. they're heads down reading customer complaints at 11pm trying to figure out why a specific phrase in a reddit thread is making ppl buy. boring as **** to watch. impossible to package into a youtube video. but that's exactly why it still works.

• 
  Spexx Signum (@Spexx592) reported 15 minutes ago

  @KuroSekaiAnime So is this gonna cause problems on Reddit?

• 
  d0rfl th3 g0l3m (@d0rfl) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Perpetualmaniac reddit is more toxic than a LoL lobby. if you get downvoted for actual facts it's time to burn it down.

• 
  B To the ************* Knee, MANLETGVD (@bperson056) reported 19 minutes ago

  @GirlsDislikeMe Being a ***** and going to Reddit is why men are cucked. You're a man. Even at 5'6" the amount of sheer strength and will flowing through you outnumbers hers 100:1. Even if she's taller, standing still is enough to knock them down. Don't go to Soyditt. Be a ******* man.

• 
  🇲🇽tankarcade🇺🇸 (@tankarcadetv) reported 21 minutes ago

  @toshkyo I was in a Reddit thread about Mexico has to register their numbers. I’m like it’s all the people’s fault that voted for the asshats that sitting down. And it’s the same with us on other ****. One guy got mad but he got bodied because he was from Argentina. Saying had not rights.

• 
  Fazir Ali (@KingFazir) reported 21 minutes ago

  ChatGPT just got classified as a 'Very Large Online Search Engine' by the EU. Not a chatbot. Not an app. A search engine, same legal bucket as Google. OpenAI's product team spent two years arguing they're not a search company. Brussels spent one memo deciding they don't care. Threshold to trigger this: 45M+ monthly EU users. Reddit and Roblox tripped it too. Deadline: Dec 2026. If your AI product is anywhere near that user count, this is your compliance roadmap, not OpenAI's problem.

• 
  Daniel | GTM Engineer (@Danny_buildss) reported 22 minutes ago

  Ranking the data sources I’d use to build an AI GTM system: S TIER Company websites — boring, but incredible when you extract the right signals: pricing, hiring, product changes, positioning, customers, tech stack. Job postings — one of the best buying signals hiding in plain sight. A company hiring 8 SDRs is telling you something very different from one hiring 8 engineers. SEC filings — revenue, acquisitions, expansion, risk factors, new markets. Extremely high-signal for the right ICP. Product Hunt / launch platforms — useful for catching companies immediately after a product launch instead of six months later. GitHub — especially good for technical ICPs. Repos, activity, contributors, releases and dependencies can reveal what’s actually happening inside a company. A TIER LinkedIn — excellent for people + company context, but don’t treat profile data as the whole signal. Crunchbase — funding and company intelligence. Still useful when funding is actually relevant to your buying motion. Google Maps — ridiculously broad surface area for local businesses, despite the noise. Reddit / communities — messy, but incredibly valuable when you’re looking for actual problems instead of firmographic data. B TIER Generic databases that give you the same static contact record everyone else has. The interesting part isn’t finding someone’s email. It’s knowing why that person should be contacted today. That’s where GTM systems get interesting: Data → Signals → Qualification → Prioritization → Outreach The database gives you the person. The signals tell you who deserves your attention.

• 
  Mai-Lan Khong (@mailankhong) reported 23 minutes ago

  2. Reddit Where buyers describe the problem with nobody selling to them. Nobody types "operational inefficiency" into a Reddit thread. They type what happened to them on Tuesday. That's the language you want in the post.

• 
  Shari - 1984 (@jdhlsc169) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Russell_Son_10 @pnshdvermonster Reddit being Reddit took this down. Can’t have a different opinion on that site.