Reddit Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Lizzy Dansoon (@LDansoon87418) reported 7 minutes ago

  @DarkSoulsFan92 @OMBReviews To be fair they would just start a new one. And with the way twitter currently is Reddit would probably just break. He'd probably fire the majority of the staff and Reddit would just be a less fun broken site.

• 
  Capt RattleSnake (@CaptRattleSnake) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Mr_Andrew_Fox I am old enough to remember the panicians say the same thing about internet. Population aging and tax base shrink is way bigger problem than AI, which you are contributing to by not "bringing more children to the world" I feel like I am reading a Reddit post from 2005.

• 
  Toma (@thebadassdev) reported 10 minutes ago

  @HeyAliux we scrape reddit for your marketing, we find you people who have the problems your tool solves @redditfarm

• 
  ♀ emma 𖦹 (@radfemma) reported 17 minutes ago

  i always think of cases like this when i read reddit posts ab fathers deciding to troon out & placing crossdressing above being a father, often guilting their wives (who deep down know better) into giving them time around their children

• 
  NITIN YADAV (@nitindotdev) reported 18 minutes ago

  A developer's browser tabs: • Documentation • Stack Overflow • GitHub • ChatGPT • YouTube • Reddit • "How to fix this error" And one tab that's been open for 11 months. Nobody knows what it does. Not even the developer.

• 
  Lucifer🔥 (@bravobread) reported 19 minutes ago

  @AskCiti @AskCiti on hold again. Although I am certain this won’t be resolved tonight based on the hundreds of reddit threads about this same issue.

• 
  ♛ (@wanderlussstt) reported 21 minutes ago

  @selenandbenny @HaveYourWayy reddit is dragging us down as a society worst app oat

• 
  Chris Mizo (@MizoChris) reported 22 minutes ago

  a Reddit user u/TheManTh3yCallJayne noticed that the temperature for Steam Machine was PRETTY high. The CPU was reaching 90 degrees celcius as the max temp before throttle is 95 degrees. Steam Machine melting CPU's? A Reddit user noticed the Steam Machine CPU hitting around 90°C while playing Detroit: Become Human at 1440p High/Ultra. • Reddit user u/TheManTh3yCallJayne spotted the Steam Machine CPU reaching around 90°C during Detroit: Become Human at 1440p High/Ultra. • In the screenshot, the GPU is sitting much cooler at around 61°C, while the CPU is clearly doing the heavier thermal lifting. • The system is still running the game at roughly 52 FPS, so there’s no obvious sign here that performance is completely falling apart. • The important number isn’t just 90°C by itself. It’s how close the CPU is getting to its thermal limit and whether it’s actually throttling. • The reported thermal ceiling here is 95°C, meaning 90°C is hot, but still below the point where the processor would begin protecting itself by reducing clocks. • Modern AMD processors are designed around defined maximum operating temperatures and will automatically reduce performance if they reach their thermal limits. AMD lists 95°C Tjmax on several current Ryzen desktop CPUs. • The Steam Machine is also packed into a roughly 6-inch cube, so you’re dealing with a much smaller cooling environment than a normal desktop tower. • What I’d watch for is whether it stays pinned around 90 to 95°C for long periods, whether clock speeds start dropping, or whether you start seeing stuttering or performance loss. • A short spike to 90°C during a demanding game isn’t something I’d panic over. Sustained temperatures right against the limit would be more concerning. 90°C can look TOO hot, especially if you’re used to a full-size gaming PC, but one screenshot doesn’t mean the Steam Machine has a cooling problem especially higher temps are more common in modern CPUs.

• 
  Matt Moneymaker (@MattMoneymaker1) reported 24 minutes ago

  REGARDING RECENT CONNECTICUT SIGHTING: One false assertion by the news media has been repeated by so many different news sources and journalists at this point that it has now found its way into AI Chat bots. It will be almost impossible to correct the AI Chat bots on this point going forward. The question asked to AI Chat bots: What criteria did the BFRO use to assess the Connecticut Bigfoot sighting's credibility? Here is the AI responese generated by the AI system connected to KOMO News "The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO) assigned the highest level of credibility to the July 5 sighting in Connecticut because the eyewitness provided an exceptionally detailed description of the encounter." This answer is not correct. I (Matt Moneymaker) would know the truth because I was the one who assessed and announced that the witness is highly credible. What is false about the statement? ANSWER: First of all ... WE NEVER SAID THAT. Secondly, the level of detail of a description is SEPARATE ISSUE from whether a witness is CREDIBLE. A TOTAL LIAR might provide a highly detailed description. By the same token, a witness who did not see a lot of detail (i.e a "Class B witness") might be HIGHLY CREDIBLE. How was the credibility of the witness assessed then for this Connecticut sighting? ANSWER: Every work day in court rooms across the USA juries are asked the assess the credibility of a witness after watching and listening to a witness answer questions on the witness stand. Everyone has the ability to do this. Our legal system would not function if this was not so. I spoke with the witness at length. I asked questions. I listenned to his answers and asked more questions. I also listened to his answers to questions from another investigator. This process is very similar to what police detectives do every day. After the phone interivew both of us investigators concluded that the witness was very credible. It was a SUBJECTIVE DETERMINATION that cannot be reduced to a list of objective points. We both felt he was truthful and honest, and therefore credible, after interviewing him. There is a video interview with this witness. Everyone who has seen it seems to come to the same conclusion that we reached about his credibility. It is not simply a matter of how much detail he provided. Demeanor, body language, and all the other subjective factors that juries use to assess credibility of a witness will be used by anyone who watches that interview video. Nearly everyone will arrive at the same conclusion about his credibility. It will be difficult for you to articulate all the "criteria" for your subjective conclusion. The ONLY WAY that AI Chat bots might be corrected at this stage is if the statment above and the graphic below is posted into the Bigfoot and Cryptozoology Sub-Reddits on Reddit, because AI systems will search Reddit for information when determining a response to a query. So it will be helpful if someone can post this statement and the graphic below in those particular sub-reddits.

• 
  Pixel Pusher (@pushed_pixels) reported 24 minutes ago

  @chuilaverty @oelma__ That's the problem with bubbles like yours. One sharp prick an POP, all gone. Go to Reddit, you sound like you could be a mod there.

• 
  MCOC Levi (@MCOCLevi) reported 25 minutes ago

  @SDBuuu Ok just be careful on here. Instead of addressing issues he’s going to moderate more. And it’ll be MCOC Reddit all over again lol

• 
  Ahmet Kaplan (@ahmetkaplandev) reported 32 minutes ago

  @LinkedInHelp Today, you restricted my 9-year-old account for no reason. You asked me to provide identity verification, which I did, and I submitted a support request, but my account still hasn’t been reactivated. I currently have two active business profiles and ads on my account. Because of you, all my advertising efforts have come to a halt. I’ve seen a large number of people on Reddit and other forums who have experienced this issue and whose accounts haven’t been reactivated. You keep doing this and are causing people harm. Please reactivate my account!

• 
  Wickets Hitting (@offpacedelivery) reported 37 minutes ago

  🚨 Abhishek Sharma didn’t look at Yesha Sagar even once during the entire conversation. He kept looking down at the floor, while she was clearly trying to make eye contact but failed because Abhishek kept avoiding her gaze. If we believe the Reddit rumours, they apparently had a thing for a while. This could be the reason he was avoiding her 👀

• 
  𝐇𝐚𝐦𝐳𝐚 | Networking Guy (@Hamzaonchain) reported 37 minutes ago

  The company that built its reputation around privacy, transparency, and criticizing Big Tech for practices users don't trust was just caught hiding the truth from its users. Proton appears to have been A/B testing its VPN prices. For anyone unfamiliar with A/B testing, it's basically when a company shows different versions of a website to different people to see which one performs better. In Proton's case, it appears the experiment involved the price itself. One session showed $2.77/month. Another showed $3.23/month. Proton's own website source contained an "ab-test" tag that assigned visitors to different variants, with one variant being served from a separate pricing URL. That's a pretty big deal because Proton's VPN General Manager had previously told Reddit users that the different prices were caused by a sale that hadn't "universally refreshed." If the website was actually running a pricing experiment, that explanation doesn't exactly line up with what the source code showed. And this is where dynamic pricing becomes a problem. Most people don't want to see different prices for the exact same product simply because they happened to visit at a different time or were placed into a different test group. A/B testing buttons, layouts or headlines? Fine. A/B testing how much people pay for the same subscription? That's different. And Proton should know this better than most. The company has spent years criticizing Big Tech for practices that users don't trust. So when something similar happens on your own platform, you can't just expect people to look the other way. The $0.46 difference isn't even the biggest issue. It's the trust. If Proton wasn't completely truthful about something as simple as how these prices were being served, users are naturally going to wonder: What else haven't we been told? And when you're asking people to trust you with their private emails, passwords, files and internet traffic, that's a serious question. Privacy companies don't get to say "everyone else does it." Trust is the product.

• 
  PoposhiRat 🐀 (@PoposhiRat) reported 39 minutes ago

  Rivals players thinking league is an example to follow just because they are mad at the current meta you can't make this up 😭😭 😭 League focused on the competitive pro play aspect so much they took away the fun from so many characters by keeping them in Pro-Jail, it is to a point that you can't even post on the league sub reddit if you are not talking about esports Plus League also has the same favoritism issue, almost 200 and you would see the same guys like Kai'sa ever worlds