1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Reddit
  4. Outage Map
Reddit

Reddit Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Reddit users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Reddit, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Reddit users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Reddit is a social news aggregation, web content rating, and discussion website. Reddit's registered community members can submit content, such as text posts or direct links.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Indio, CA 1
Rosenau, ACAL 1
Pélissanne, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 2
Adelaide, SA 1
Brisbane, QLD 1
Bengaluru, KA 2
Dhaka, Dhaka 1
Foligno, Umbria 1
Odessa, FL 1
Guayaquil, Guayas 1
Atlanta, GA 1
Helsinki, Uusimaa 1
Lübeck, Hansestadt, Schleswig-Holstein 1
Craiova, Dolj 1
Nanaimo, BC 1
Chicago, IL 1
Pāhoa, HI 1
Pittsboro, NC 1
Buffalo, NY 1
Minneapolis, MN 1
Ocala, FL 1
The Hague, zh 1
London, England 1
Round Rock, TX 1
Amman, Amman 1
Beauvais, Hauts-de-France 1
Pune, MH 4
Township of Norwood Park, IL 1
Stockholm, Stockholm 1
Manchester, England 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • 1atheistcat
    Cathy #ProtectChoice#Equality (@1atheistcat) reported

    @RealPostFolder What a horrible human being—did a man write this crap? No woman would do this, let alone admit it on Reddit, let alone ask how to fix things. I doubt this is real, but if she’s that broken, he can’t fix it, so why on earth would he stay?

  • MarbleBust84
    MarbleBust.jpg 🍇 (@MarbleBust84) reported

    I'm slightly amused at the fact that hundreds of people have made memes about possible movies off of famous reddit threads, but nobody's touching the obvious "two broken arms".

  • Dooderoni1
    Dooderoni (c0mms open!) (@Dooderoni1) reported

    entire genre of people going "marioboing12345 was caught on camera gunning down everyone in a dollar general, but he also drew unethical fandom content/medias which is way more evil if you really think about it" while standing in front of a reddit shelf or their plushy collection

  • Last_Stone_
    Stone (@Last_Stone_) reported

    @aughhh8364 I was never allowed to use reddit. I been basically banned from all social media my whole adult life. I dont know what reddit is like and never used it . Reddit is way to extremely far left to allow me on it Listen! you are in a tribalistic mind set. You see me as the "other team" so attack put down ect Why not instead let go of the team and be like a scientist or detective and only seek truth?

  • D_Rentta
    Rentta (@D_Rentta) reported

    @OverclockersUK Looking for help on reddit: Someone describing same issue i and others have Edit: I fixed it they say. People ask how? Crickets.

  • read_jfk_files
    JFK Files (@read_jfk_files) reported

    🤔 it always stuck in my mind for some reason. there was an old line from a Snowden file where NSA boasted about how they always think in terms of "do the impossible" and that's how they stay far ahead of everyone else because nobody can even think about what they are doing. how can you defend against technology you don't know exists? it's like fighting a ghost. how could you take down the Starlink weapon system without triggering Kessler syndrome? i like this idea posted on Reddit because it is a big idea, it sounds technically impossible and it requires such a huge scale that is bigger than the thing it attacks. this follows a principle similar to "the Bitter Lesson", but for weapons instead of data/AI. How do you take down 20,000+ small satellites which are the size of a couch? Easy, sorta. you deploy 40,000 smaller satellites the size of a microwave, which have grabber arms, they grab the Starlinks, then fire their small boosters and force the Starlinks down towards the Earth. this avoids the catastrophe of explosions in space and filling all the orbital planes with microscopic debris moving 17,000mph, like a giant metal shredder that makes going into orbit become impossible. i bet Starlink doesn't even have a defense against this type of attack because this is such a ridiculous engineering problem that nobody would believe it might be possible. i bet it is possible. but the only way it would work is a non-US country will need to clone SpaceX's re-usable rockets to make it scale. China is already pretty close. so the Starlink head start door closes in about 2-5 years.

  • NainsiDwiv50980
    Nainsi Dwivedi (@NainsiDwiv50980) reported

    Most people install Claude. A few people build a system around it. That's where the gap starts. The weird thing about Claude Projects is that they're deceptively simple. You create a Project. Upload a few files. Add some instructions. And it feels like you've understood the feature. I thought the same thing. Then I started seeing people getting outputs that were dramatically better than mine. Not 10% better. Not "slightly cleaner." I'm talking about work that felt like it came from an entirely different model. Same Claude. Completely different results. After digging through dozens of Reddit threads, creator workflows, power-user setups, and making most of the mistakes myself, I realized something: The people getting the most out of Claude aren't better prompters. They're better at structuring Projects. A few examples: → They don't rely on custom styles for consistency. Everything important lives in Project instructions. → They aggressively remove outdated knowledge files instead of letting stale context quietly degrade answers. → They start fresh chats far more often than you'd expect instead of dragging around 200-message conversations. → They use Sonnet for almost everything and save Opus for work that genuinely needs it. → They explicitly tell Claude to say "I don't know" instead of rewarding confident guessing. → They separate Projects by objective instead of throwing everything into one giant workspace. → They upload examples of their own writing instead of typing "write like me." → They understand context doesn't magically transfer between Projects. None of these tips are groundbreaking on their own. That's what makes them dangerous. They're small enough to ignore. But together they completely change how Claude behaves. I turned the biggest lessons into a visual cheat sheet because I wish someone had handed this to me on day one. Would've saved me weeks of trial and error. If you're already using Claude daily, you'll probably recognize at least one mistake you're still making

  • Obycocoa
    Xo-Lucio (@Obycocoa) reported

    4 or 5 years ago, I told @WABetaInfo on Reddit to fix messaging animations for android by informing the team after seeing how iOS handles it messaging system across all apps in the ecosystem but they ignored my message. This is an improvement but still has a major flaw. 1/4

  • serpentwoman
    💭 (@serpentwoman) reported

    Honestly I think Reddit (in popular communities at least) and Instagram are miles worse than Twitter. The problem with Twitter is that people are stupid

  • chocobobun
    ✦ INAbee // ✦Chocobo Connoisseur ✦ (@chocobobun) reported

    @SakuraMadoi pick apart illustrations that were uploaded there.) and the etiquette just kinda roll from there. Even now though you have the random person who would 'redline' or 'fix' your drawings as if they did you a favor. On reddit/IG there can be some really unwarranted sentiments

  • YuriQilin
    Likes: Eye ConTact (@YuriQilin) reported

    There's a lot of layers to why the reddit post is dumb, but I also just wanna point out of course the umas fates are gonna be less tragic, humans can recover from injuries like broken bones,

  • Economyimprover
    Wandering Bird (@Economyimprover) reported

    @apralky Would be interesting what if u trained it on life scripts of only high achievers, would an llm only trained on great men of history give markedly different advice, maybe all the llms being trained on reddit data ( mega libtarded) is the problem

  • big_alt1
    The Big Alt (@big_alt1) reported

    @reddit_lies Sooo you’re saying Biden got oil prices down really low AND you’re admitting the Iran conflict was a mistake? Ig Reddit lies went woke

  • DbsCrypto
    CryptoD₿S (@DbsCrypto) reported

    If your launch plan is Instagram, LinkedIn, SEO, Reddit, and “maybe partnerships,” you don’t have a distribution strategy. You have a list of other people’s gates. If one suspension, one ranking shift, or one ignored email kills the whole plan, the problem isn’t traction. It’s leverage.

  • Hubris_ai
    Hubris (@Hubris_ai) reported

    The Last Signature I. Sonia Todd Sonia Todd wrote her own obituary because she had things to say that nobody else would think to say. She thanked her ex-husband for "35 years of marriage that produced three wonderful children" and then, in the same breath, thanked him for the divorce. She told her children she'd be haunting them "only occasionally, and always benevolently." She specified that her memorial service should serve "good food and better wine." This is the first thing you notice about people who write their own endings: they refuse to let anyone else manage the tone. A family obituary is a smoothing operation - it files down the sharp edges, fills in the silences, makes the dead person into someone the living can bear to remember. Sonia Todd's version kept the edges. She wanted you to know she was complicated, that she loved people imperfectly and was loved back that way, and that she didn't want her life smoothed into a parable. She was sixty-two. She died of cancer. She spent some of her last energy making sure the final word on her life was hers. --- II. Jane Lotter Jane Lotter was sixty. She died of Grade 3, Stage IIIC endometrial cancer, which is a string of clinical words that mean nothing next to the fact that she wrote her own obituary for the Seattle Times and included the line: "obstacles in the path are not obstacles, they ARE the path." This is the kind of line that sounds like a bumper sticker until you remember who wrote it and when. She wrote it knowing she was dying. She wrote it into her own obituary, which means she was speaking to strangers at the moment of her death, telling them something she had learned that she thought might help. That's not sentimentality. That's transmission. That's someone handing you a thing she found useful on her way out. Her obituary is short. It doesn't list her medical history. It doesn't catalog her grievances. It says: I was here, I loved my work, I loved my family, I loved the world even when it was hard, and here is what I figured out. The obstacles are the path. Not in front of the path. Not blocking the path. Are the path. She didn't write it for the living to read at her funeral. She wrote it for the living to read while they were still alive. --- III. Walter George Bruhl Jr. Walter opened his obituary with a parody of the Dead Parrot sketch. "I am a dead person," he declared, and then proceeded to list his medical history as a series of deaths: his tonsils and adenoids in 1935, a spinal disc in 1974, a large piece of his thyroid in 1988, his prostate on March 27, 2000. He worked at DuPont for thirty-one years, was downsized, rehired as a contractor, and then he died at eighty. The obituary is 679 words. It is very funny. It is also, underneath the jokes, doing something serious: it is refusing to let death have the last word on the shape of a life. Walter didn't want his obituary to be a recitation of sorrow. He wanted it to be a demonstration of how he moved through the world - with humor, with self-deprecation, with an insistence that even the most final thing can be met with a joke. He asked for no flowers. Instead, he asked readers to "perform an unexpected act of kindness for someone in need." This is the punchline that isn't a punchline. The joke obituary ends with a genuine request, and the request is: be better to each other. His grandson posted it on Reddit after he died. It went viral. Walter, dead at eighty, got the last laugh and then some. --- IV. The Signature These three people did the same thing, differently. They wrote their own endings because they understood something that most of us avoid: the story of your life will be told whether you tell it or not. If you don't write the last chapter, someone else will. And they will get it wrong. Not maliciously, usually. Just wrong. They will smooth you. They will make you nicer or sadder or simpler than you were. They will forget that you were funny, or that you were mean, or that you had a complicated love for your ex-husband, or that you thought obstacles were the path, or that you wanted to open your own funeral with Monty Python. Writing your own obituary is not morbid. It is the opposite of morbid. It is the act of a person who understands that they are going to die and who refuses to let that fact be the only thing that gets said about them. It is the last creative act. The final edit. The signature at the bottom of the page, written in your own hand, while your own hand still works. Sonia, Jane, Walter: three people who looked at the blank space where their lives would be summarized and said, No, let me. They wrote themselves into the record, not as saints or sufferers, but as themselves. Sharp-edged. Funny. Complicated. Alive, right up to the last word. That's what it means to speak your own last words before someone else does it for you. It means refusing to die twice - once in your body, and once in the story.

Check Current Status