Reddit Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  AporiaGG | ZLano (@UNSTOPABLEONE14) reported 8 minutes ago

  @KingmanTV_ Sounds like either a bios update or memory training failing based on some research others also had rma'd the board to solve it. Id try bios update and see what happens. But Google is usually your best friend view some blogs and reddit posts and see it you can find similar issues

• 
  Miau Social (@miau_social) reported 8 minutes ago

  OnlyFans generated over $7 Billion in revenue, yet their search bar is broken on purpose. ​They force creators to hand over a 20% cut while doing 0% of the discovery work. Creators are forced to spend 80% of their day spamming Reddit and Twitter just to get found. ​Why are top creators still paying millions in platform fees for tech that belongs in 2016? 👇

• 
  LeveragedLarry (@LeveragedLarry) reported 16 minutes ago

  Everyone agrees NFTs are dead. The #1 collection on @MagicEden just did 5.07K SOL in volume — more than DeGods, Claynosaurz, Mad Lads, SMB Gen2 and y00ts combined. Dead markets don't do that. Ignored ones do. Six collections out of 1,700+ clear $1M in weekly volume. Six. People read that as a eulogy. It's a coiled spring. In books this thin you don't need new capital to double a floor — you need one wallet to stop being scared. @BoredApeYC went from ~5 ETH to over 10 in a single month this spring and barely anyone noticed, because everyone had already unfollowed. And every asset you currently worship printed this exact obituary first. BTC 2011: -93%. Two years old. "Toy for criminals." ETH 2019: -94%. Three years old. "ICO scam machine." SOL 2022: -96%. Two years old. "FTX zombie chain." Same drawdown. Same certainty. Same people. All three went on to new highs and the doubters wrote none of it down. Meanwhile collectibles — the actual category NFTs live in — are printing record highs. Trading cards are a $9B market and growing. Pokemon averages up 46% YoY, chase cards doing 200-500%. Demand for scarce collectible objects has never been higher in human history. The entire NFT market is $1.9B. One fifth the size of cardboard. Read that again. The digital-native version of a booming category trades at a fifth of the analog one, with instant settlement, global liquidity, provable scarcity, and zero shipping. That gap does not stay open forever. The infrastructure already capitulated. Nifty Gateway gone, Reddit out, Nike dumped RTFKT, OpenSea would rather be a token exchange. Operators quit last, always — they need years of dying revenue before they finally fold. Their surrender prints after the sellers are gone. The last cycle bottomed within days of FTX. Everybody owns the "NFTs are dead" position. Consensus that total, in a market this small, isn't a conclusion. It's an entry. Not financial advise. DYOR.

• 
  Luna Gray (@lunagrayhorror) reported 17 minutes ago

  Horror movies are unrealistic because nobody ever pauses during the haunting to spend forty minutes searching Reddit for the exact same problem.

• 
  fruits and vegetables are yummy (@immadeofgold777) reported 20 minutes ago

  One time I posted on reddit that I hated Jim carrey and that he's annoying and all the millenials attacked me I got like hundreds of down votes and people replying saying I'm a ******* idiot

• 
  derek sleeter (@dereksjw23) reported 20 minutes ago

  @MenMuscleMoney @Google notice the difference is soy reddit. we need to close down that app and jail the workers

• 
  Bluegeezez2234 (@bluegeezez2234) reported 21 minutes ago

  @hearts4rinne @sleeepieash literally EVERYONE was talking about it, people were talking about it in twitter, multiple posts on reddit, and then people were talking about it in the OFFICIAL DISCORD SERVER (2/2)

• 
  Kevin Lenida (@KevinLenida) reported 22 minutes ago

  A one-line prompt fix from Reddit that makes Claude way easier to work with: "Do not use technobabble, use plain English." If you don't read code, this changes everything. Explanations go from acronym soup to actual answers.

• 
  peptidedaily (@peptidedaily_) reported 23 minutes ago

  @SolBrah Find a reputable brand with endotoxin and 3rd party testing reports. And don't buy off of a Reddit post. I just saved you 99% of the trouble.

• 
  Nick Theriot (@nicktheriot_) reported 23 minutes ago

  Step-by-step breakdown of how we found the desire that scaled a brand from $130K to $1.1M/month: Step 1: Break the product down. Feature → performance → benefit → desired state. Don't skip steps. Most brands stop at benefit and never find the real desire. Step 2: Survey existing customers. We sent 6,000 customers a quiz. We got 650+ responses. We asked 3 questions - why did you buy? what were you hoping for? what changed? The answers were our creative brief. Step 3: Search the desire on YouTube and TikTok. Thousands of views = real market. Hundreds of views = small market. Don't guess. Let the data tell you. Step 4: Go deep on Reddit. Find threads with 50-100+ comments about the problem. Read how people describe their desired state in their own words. Then put those exact words in your ads. Step 5: Study competitor five-star reviews. Get answers to why are people buying and what desired state did the product help them reach. That process is what took this brand from $19K/month profit to $198K/month profit. DM me "RESEARCH" and I'll show you how we'd run this process specifically for your brand. (Must be doing $100k/month or more)

• 
  The Cinematic Lab 🎥 🔬 (@CineLabHQ) reported 23 minutes ago

  Obsession: Predictable Mess or Masterful Build-Up; A Critical Look at the 2025 Horror Hit I just walked out of Obsession, the latest offering from director Curry Barker (released May 2025 via Focus Features). There’s plenty to admire: the film is generally well-executed, with strong performances, atmospheric tension, and intriguing ideas that tap into the dark side of desire and unintended consequences. Yet, as someone who appreciates thoughtful horror, I found myself wrestling with the screenplay. Certain choices left me wanting a more refined execution, particularly in how the central relationship and supporting arcs unfold. The Progression of Bear and Nikki’s Twisted Romance One of my main issues lies in the build-up of Bear (Michael Johnston) and Nikki’s (Inde Navarrette) relationship. The cat memorial scene, for instance, felt like it arrived far too early in the story. It immediately signals Nikki’s unhinged obsession, making the subsequent time skip where we’re expected to believe she dialed back the weird behavior while they start dating hard to swallow. I would have preferred a slower, more progressive escalation of Nikki’s obsession. Give Bear more initial denial and hesitation, allowing him to dig himself deeper into the relationship. This would make his later “victim of abuse” behavior feel more earned and relatable. As it stands, Bear occupies a frustratingly ambiguous space: he’s not a full victim, nor is he easy to hate outright. He comes across as a coward, which makes him deeply unlikeable at times. An unlikeable protagonist isn’t inherently a flaw, but here it results in emotional distance. Scenes meant to evoke sympathy fall flat, while moments highlighting his agency don’t land with enough moral weight. I’m not against portraying Bear as the villain in the end. I just wish the film committed more clearly to that duality instead of leaving it feeling messy. Half-Baked Supporting Arcs and Predictable Twists The subplots involving Ian (Cooper Tomlinson) and Sarah (Megan Lawless) also felt underdeveloped. Sarah’s confrontation scene in the car struck me as cheesy and extremely predictable, it telegraphs exactly what’s coming without delivering the intended punch. Ian’s demise, meanwhile, arrives rushed and out of nowhere. It plays like the story simply needed to eliminate characters rather than serving a deeper narrative purpose. Why Online Discourse Sees These as Strengths What surprises me most is how Reddit and other online discussions flip these exact elements into praise. Many viewers laud the car scene for its effective build-up, arguing that knowing what’s coming heightens the tension rather than diminishing it. Others celebrate Bear’s weak, conflicted characterization as “nuanced” and refreshingly complex. This isn’t the first time I’ve noticed this pattern, especially with A24-style horror. Elements I see as screenplay weaknesses abrupt shifts, predictable beats, or murky character motivations set reframed as bold artistic choices that reward rewatches or deepen the themes. Am I out of touch, or are the online crowds missing the messiness? I lean toward the latter, but I’m genuinely curious about others’ takes. Did the wish-granting premise and Navarrette’s intense performance carry the film for you, or did similar pacing and character issues pull you out of it? Obsession has undeniable strengths and has resonated with many as a chilling exploration of toxic longing. For me, though, tighter scripting around the central romance and supporting deaths could have elevated it from solid to unforgettable. What do you think flaws or features?

• 
  𝚔𝚘𝚍𝚛 (@kodr_pro) reported 27 minutes ago

  @JCMAppStudio Wrong. Look at the reviews and reddit for the pixel, it's a common issue. Same 100w and 60w chargers takes an hour or less to charge my fold5 to full.

• 
  Gurnoor Singh (@gurnoor__) reported 28 minutes ago

  Before you launch another ad Run it through this 7-stage common mistakes checklist to increase chances of finding a winner: 1 - Strategy > The ad speaks to one specific sub-avatar, rather than everybody who could potentially buy > The ad is built around one dominant desire the customer already has > You know whether the customer is unaware, problem-aware, solution-aware or product-aware. > The message matches the market’s current stage of sophistication. > The angle gives the customer a new reason to care about a familiar problem. > The idea came from actual research, including reviews, customer calls, Reddit threads or competitor comments. 2 - Hook > The first line calls out a situation or thought the customer immediately recognises. > The opening creates a knowledge gap that makes the customer want the next line. > The hook can be understood without any additional context. > The first visual communicates the idea even if the sound is turned off. > The hook attracts the intended avatar, rather than chasing empty attention from everyone. > The first few seconds contain no introductions, logos or unnecessary throat-clearing. 3 - Message > The ad focuses on one problem, one mechanism and one desired outcome. > Every line creates the mental effect required for the next line to work. > The problem is described using language the customer would actually use. > The mechanism explains why their previous attempts have not worked. > The product is introduced as the logical answer to the mechanism. > The transition from problem to product feels natural, rather than forced. > The ad gives enough information to create belief without trying to explain everything. > Every sentence earns its place and moves the customer closer to buying. 4 - Proof > The biggest claim is supported by evidence. > The proof directly supports the claim being made, rather than proving something irrelevant. > Specific details replace vague words such as “better,” “premium” or “high quality.” > The product is shown doing what the copy claims it does. > At least one major objection is addressed before the customer reaches the CTA. > The ad contains no invented statistics, exaggerated promises or claims you cannot defend. 5 - Creative > The visuals amplify the copy instead of simply decorating it. > The product remains memorable after the ad ends. > The pacing is fast enough to hold attention without making the message difficult to follow. > Text is readable on a phone without pausing or zooming. > The format feels native to the platform where the ad will run. > The creative looks different enough from competing ads to interrupt the customer’s usual scrolling pattern. 6 - Conversion > The customer clearly understands what the product is. > The offer is easy to understand without reading it twice. > The CTA tells the customer exactly what to do next. > The landing page continues the same angle, promise and level of awareness as the ad. > The knowledge gap created by the ad is closed after the click. > The customer is not forced to rebuild their understanding from zero on the landing page. 7 - Testing > The test is designed to answer one clear question. > You know what success and failure look like before spending money. > The ad is meaningfully different from previous tests, rather than being another cosmetic variation. > The test will receive enough spend to produce a useful signal. > Every result will be documented and fed back into the next round of research and creative. A good ad is not the one your team likes most. It is the one that takes the right customer through the right mental journey and gives them enough reason to act. Save this and run through it before your next launch.

• 
  Alec Bowers (@Alecbowers) reported 28 minutes ago

  This pretty well sums up one of the foundational problems of much of Ai training: Reddit in particular has a ton of sociopathic, nihilistic garbage. Train Ai on it then give it “guardrails” post fact is like raising a kid in prison then giving him rules. You can take the kid out of prison, you cannot take the prison out of the kid. Reddit has good information on some topics. But so much of it is highly degenerate, antisocial, nasty dregs behavior and worldview. It’s toxic and should be handled as toxic waste. Send it to extensive wastewater treatment first to get the diamonds from the rough. How that would be done is a challenge. Brian is absolutely on point here.

• 
  Chad Mumm (@chadmumm) reported 29 minutes ago

  Okay I’m doubling down: I will send $100 via Venmo to the first person who can find an example of “de-green” being used in a golf broadcast and not some Reddit thread.