Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (62%)
• Errors (26%)
• Sign in (12%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Puteaux	Website Down	2 days ago
New Delhi	Website Down	2 days ago
Paris	Website Down	5 days ago
Vigo	Website Down	7 days ago
Phoenix	Errors	7 days ago
Lima	Errors	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Chris Kipling 🤙 (@ThatKiplingGuy) reported 37 seconds ago

  Man people dog-piling Bungie here & on Reddit complaining about issues in Marathon & D2, like bruh They've just lost a massive chunk of their teams, it's going to take them some time to find their feet & work on things with reduced numbers

• 
  Shiki Tohno (@ShikiTohno642) reported 2 minutes ago

  @SakataKey @yankeesabc Take what L? Do you basement dwelling Reddit stenched neckbeards think this was some war you won and now I have to live in shame? Oh no socially inept incels outnumbered me in defending their **** slop what will I do, almost like the problem is solved when I close the app

• 
  V (@anon8mous) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation Aren't reddit moderators employees of the company/Sony? lol. Reddit should have a rule that moderators cannot be associated or work for the company. Also, they should remove the downvote or thumbs down button so employees and crazy fanboys cannot try to bury legit concerns/posts

• 
  nuslopjakraisin6 (@giggercranberry) reported 4 minutes ago

  @nr1Ruberis @PunishedGaki to be fair, his halloween hack had an instance of the word "******", but he looks down on the hack (so i'm guessing he's going to keep his games as wholesome reddit gold karma farm fuel)

• 
  wholesome osc memes (@LibsofOSC_) reported 5 minutes ago

  @OSCHiveNews Reddit is down the hall and to the left

• 
  Sabir Khan (@nsfwsabir) reported 8 minutes ago

  @NoahKingJr Stack overflow, GitHub issues, reddit threads, and random medium articles 😭

• 
  Prebiotic Broth (@NODs_Fanatic) reported 8 minutes ago

  @ImaFukinSpazz @gornesevba @joeschmoe765 Also talking down to ppl? Bro the first reply was “go **** yourself”, the second reply was the same, this is twitter, obviously imma respond with **** talk when people are talking ****, and we both know any man who believes in personal responsibility and not being a ***** is banned on Reddit be real bro

• 
  zSkerWizrdz (@zxxkgkillerxxz) reported 12 minutes ago

  Reddit moderators are removing posts criticizing Sony’s physical vs. digital sales comparisons from some PlayStation-related subreddits. In the past day, multiple users shared charts and older Sony data arguing that the company’s headline digital sales percentages don’t compare physical and digital versions of the same games. Some of those posts were later removed from certain subreddits, with users reposting them elsewhere after the originals were taken down by moderators. #Sony #Ps5 #Playstsion

• 
  Intro (@Intro_Sobo) reported 17 minutes ago

  @nopengmi @johnddavidson Reddit is down the hall and to the left

• 
  Arnau Mateu (@arnau_dev) reported 19 minutes ago

  TractionBooster update: One Reddit post just hit 70K views and 350+ comments. We’re now at 150 users. I removed the free trial. The free Reddit Traction Score is still available, but I want people coming into Pro with real intent instead of signing up for 14 days and disappearing. The signal from Reddit is clear: founders want to know if their idea has demand, where the real conversations are happening, and which ones are actually worth joining. That’s what I’m doubling down on. Free report first → serious users after. #BuildInPublic #SaaS #RedditGrowth

• 
  Strayed (@SERAPHOF9) reported 20 minutes ago

  also the reddit shirt is ironic because i see far less redditors making this a problem than this site how is this even possible

• 
  MindVenture (@Mindventure_) reported 23 minutes ago

  @KasjanTV @Alaska0420 @PopBase Thanks, sounds like they haven't explored this aspect more... I'm going to keep on looking. Refract looks great but is way too slow now, at least devs are active on reddit and sharing updates.

• 
  cashhh.eth (@cashhheth) reported 26 minutes ago

  do you understand what Sony just admitted to every single person who ever bought a "digital copy" on PlayStation Store in America, the UK, or anywhere else. you clicked "buy." Not "rent." Buy. You paid full price for Terminator 2. For Rambo. For Total Recall. Sony told you it was yours. On September 1, it's gone. > Sony confirmed it is deleting 551 movies and TV shows from PlayStation Store libraries in the UK, citing an expired content licensing agreement with StudioCanal > the wipeout list includes Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Apocalypse Now, Total Recall, Highlander, Hot Fuzz, Bridget Jones's Diary, Evil Dead, Paddington, Paddington 2, Pan's Labyrinth, and American Gods > the official legal notice reads: "you will no longer be able to access your previously purchased content from StudioCanal, and it will be removed from your video library" - no mention of refunds, no compensation, no make-good offer > this drops in the same news cycle as Sony's confirmation it will end physical disc production for all new PlayStation games starting January 2028, and shut down the PS3 and PS Vita Store worldwide by July 2027 > Kotaku's blunt read: "you are never truly buying anything that's digital, just temporarily renting it" - and Sony's own terms of service back that up, since digital purchases are legally licenses, not property > backlash is already trending across Reddit, TechRadar calling it "this should be illegal," and gamers pointing to the exact same playbook Sony ran with PS3/Vita in 2021 before reversing under pressure - except this time there's no sign of a reversal You didn't buy a movie. You bought permission to watch it until Sony decided otherwise. The receipt was never a deed.

• 
  Alin Valentin (@funnkyhd) reported 28 minutes ago

  @FilippoTarpini Tried it yesterday, looks good, didn't notice anything weird at 1440p + Max Settings (inc. Extra Details and HFTS) I was using the Ubisoft Connect version of the game and a fix for the flickering issue from Reddit but apparently this mod fixes the issue, didn't know that.

• 
  LIKENG| REDDIT MARKETING (@patye91) reported 32 minutes ago

  What Content actually works on REDDIT? **Lead with a painful observation, not a solution.** Redditors respond to 'why is X so broken' way more than 'I fixed X.' **The 90/10 rule.** 90% of your comment history should be genuinely helpful with zero mention of your product. That 10% lands completely differently. **Specificity wins.** 'I got 40 signups from one Reddit post' outperforms 'Reddit marketing works' every single time. **Reply to every comment in the first hour.** The algorithm rewards it and it signals you're a real human, not a bot dropping links. **Subreddit culture research is non-negotiable.** Spend 20 minutes reading the top posts of all time in any subreddit before posting. Each one has an unwritten tone.

• 
  BladeyBro (@BladeyBro) reported 32 minutes ago

  This isnt true they are actively taking down Reddit posts exposing them changing sale prices of digital games

• 
  Sowmya Ramesh (@swmyrmsh) reported 36 minutes ago

  I genuinely wish the women from Capgemini and other IT/ITES/BT go to websites like glassdoors and others like it to share their stories anonymously! Put it on reddit and similar places anonymously! Let India know the problems you face!

• 
  Mohammad Anas (@mohmmad__anas) reported 38 minutes ago

  The Hidden Tax of Multi-Platform Posting: What It's Really Costing You A founder told me she posts twelve times a week. It sounds ambitious until you do the math. Twelve posts times forty-five minutes per post (writing and platform-specific adaptation). That's nine hours a week. Multiply by fifty weeks a year. That's 450 hours. Or roughly fifty working days per year. That's not a content strategy. That's a part-time job. Most solo founders don't have fifty working days to spare. They have maybe three to five hours per week for content. Which means either they're not posting twelve times, or the quality per post is suffering, or they're stealing those hours from product work. I've asked dozens of founders what the actual time cost of their content strategy is. Most don't know. They post when they can, so it feels like it's not costing anything. But when you track it, the numbers get ugly fast. Here's the breakdown for a founder posting to five platforms twice a week: 10 initial pieces × 45 minutes each = 450 minutes Platform-specific adaptation: - LinkedIn (60 minutes per week): +600 minutes - Reddit (45 minutes per week): +450 minutes - Instagram (45 minutes per week): +450 minutes - Blog (60 minutes per week): +600 minutes Total: approximately 22 hours per week. That's a full-time job. For a solo founder working on product and doing sales and managing operations, that's unrealistic. So what actually happens is either: 1. The adaptation work is skipped or minimized (quality suffers) 2. The posting frequency drops (the schedule is unsustainable) 3. The content is batched badly (all platforms get the same generic content) 4. The founder burns out (the psychological cost of context-switching exceeds the value) I've watched all four play out. The hidden cost is even higher than the time cost. When you're spending twenty hours a week on content operations, you're not spending twenty hours on the work that actually matters. You're not iterating on your product. You're not talking to customers. You're not writing code or shipping features or closing deals. For a solo founder, your time is the constraint. Every hour spent on content ops is an hour not spent on leverage. And leverage is how solo founders scale. I know a founder who was posting incredibly consistently. Five platforms, multiple times per week, high quality on each. I asked how he was doing it. He told me he'd cut product work to three days a week. He was building in public beautifully. His business was basically stalled. The math of building in public doesn't work if the public part is consuming the energy that should go to building. Where this gets really brutal is opportunity cost. Let's say a solo founder could spend ten extra hours on product development, or ten extra hours on content. What's the ROI? Ten hours on product might lead to one meaningful feature or bug fix. That feature might land them a customer, which could be $100/month revenue. Ten hours on content might net them fifty new followers. Of those fifty, maybe one becomes a customer eventually. Maybe. The math isn't in favor of content when you're doing it manually. But the reason we think we should do content is that visibility compounds over time. If you post consistently for a year, you'll build an audience. If you post for five minutes per year, you won't. So the decision gets framed as: Do you want an audience or not? But that's a false framing. The real question is: What's the time cost of building an audience, and is that worth the opportunity cost? For most solo founders, at current manual levels of content work, the answer is no. They'd get more business out of spending the time on product, sales, or customer success. The audience they build through content is real, but the effort-to-reward ratio is brutal. But what if the time cost dropped? What if it took one hour per week instead of twenty? Then the equation flips. An hour of content work has a much clearer ROI. One hour per week produces visibility that compounds. One hour per week is stealing from something less valuable than product work or sales. Suddenly building in public becomes rational, not just virtuous. Most founders who've stepped back from building in public haven't decided they don't want an audience. They've decided—consciously or not—that the time cost isn't worth it. I built Spotlaiz because I believe building in public is valuable. But I also believe the current time cost is insane. A founder should be able to share their thinking across multiple platforms without it becoming their primary job. When the time cost is one hour per week instead of twenty, the decision matrix changes. You can actually afford to build in public. You can actually reach multiple platforms. You can actually maintain voice consistency and high quality. Right now, the choice for most solo founders is: Post rarely and maintain quality, or post often and watch quality decay, or build an audience while sacrificing product development. None of those are good choices. The hidden tax of multi-platform posting is that it forces you into an impossible trade-off. The solution isn't better time management or more discipline. It's infrastructure that removes the administrative burden. When you've automated the platform-specific work, the time cost drops precipitously. Not because you're writing less. But because you're not repeating the same work five times. That's the gap I'm solving. Not by making you a better writer. But by removing the hidden tax that makes content operations unsustainable in the first place.

• 
  Andrew | 8FIGURES (@8FIGURESHQ) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Reddit moderation is broken. I answered a post asking how to track bonds with the bond tracker we built, clearly disclosing that I’m the founder. Result: ban. No warning. No strike. Slow appeal. The irony: undisclosed self-promotion is everywhere. But disclose your conflict honestly, and the bot nukes you. That is not anti-spam. That is bad automation.

• 
  daniela 🪷 (@glowymani) reported 40 minutes ago

  @summrr__ reddit is slow asf every year

• 
  Mohammad Anas (@mohmmad__anas) reported 41 minutes ago

  Your Agent Makes Videos. You Decide What Ships. I set up a video agent last month. Fully automated. Ten minutes, one script, three videos come out. Then I realized I had a new problem: I had too many videos. This is not a complaint I expected to have. The bottleneck shifted. It used to be: can I make videos fast enough. Now it's: how do I know which videos are worth publishing. My agent doesn't understand market timing. Doesn't read Reddit to know which topics are trending this week. Doesn't sense when my audience is in a different mood. It just makes videos according to a prompt. I can publish ten videos a week. But I should probably publish two. The solo founder who learned to automate output is now the solo founder who has to learn to automate the decision of what output to ship. This is a harder problem than it sounds. It's also higher leverage. I started paying attention to which videos my agent made that actually changed minds. Not views. Changed minds. There was a pattern. The ones that worked all had a point of view. The agent was capable of making those, but only if I was very specific in the prompt. I added a layer: the agent makes the video. A scoring system reads the final output and asks three questions: Does this say something new about the problem. Is this the clearest way to say it. Does my audience need to hear this right now. Two of those three get a yes, it publishes. Otherwise it goes in a maybe later bin. That filter is worth more than the agent that makes the videos. The tools that win in 2026 aren't the ones that make output faster. They're the ones that make you better at deciding what output matters. YouTube automation agents are shipping. Everyone's got one. They're all making similar videos at similar volumes. The founders who are winning aren't the ones with the best agent. They're the ones with the best filter. This is where I think most automation fails. It optimizes for volume. But a solo founder doesn't need more volume. A solo founder needs more clarity about what actually moves the needle. Your unfair advantage isn't making videos your competitors can't make. It's knowing which videos to make before you make them. Build the agent. But spend more time building the judgment. The agent will scale your output. The judgment will scale your impact.

• 
  Benedict Cooper (@Ben_JS_Cooper) reported 44 minutes ago

  @rcolvile He claimed to have “broken Reddit”. The only thing that could do that would be Burnham trying to upload his ego.

• 
  Flavio Brasil (@fwbrasil) reported 50 minutes ago

  @baldram I honestly doubt every project that features there without issues notify them. It's rather trivial to scrape common sources like twitter and reddit to report

• 
  Akshat Chaturvedi (@akshatProd) reported 51 minutes ago

  27,611 total users. 30 new in the last 24h, 340 over the last 7d. 872 premium users at a 3.2% premium rate. Acquisition: 72.1% of users have no source recorded, that's not a channel, just missing data. Of tracked sources, Instagram leads at 12.2%, followed by Other (9.8%), TikTok (2.7%), and Google (2.6%). Reddit and Twitter are negligible. Since the prior snapshot 3 hours ago: +6 total users, no new premium, no new challenge joins. Feedback: 121 total, 1 new in 24h, 8 in the last 7d. Sentiment sits at 73 okay vs. 48 not-really, more positive than negative, but a meaningful share of respondents aren't satisfied. No recent verbatim messages were included in today's data to summarize. Instagram is quietly building a real base at 12.2% of all tracked users, that channel is already your clearest signal worth doubling down on.

• 
  Rayan (@rayan9064) reported 52 minutes ago

  the problem: startup ecosystem data is scattered across 50+ platforms. crunchbase for funding. angellist for jobs. 20 accelerator websites for cohorts. x + reddit + hn for trends. the only unified tools cost $10-70K/yr and are built for institutional VCs, not founders.

• 
  bookreader13 (@reputationfan13) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Brien_Jackson @DayDreamThis The only way it will get better is the platforms themselves start cracking down on it (looking at you, Reddit Snark Subs!), but the platforms have made it clear they have 0 interest in doing so for legal reasons. They don’t want the responsibility for what’s posted on their sites

• 
  Valéria (@Valria34773) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Chaos2Cured @anjan96531 @xw33bttv Claude said this: 1. Browser dev tools - Could show network requests, but OpenAI's API responses would be live data, not historical. The metadata that gets sent NOW would show "5.5" not the original "4o". So dev tools won't help retroactively prove what was there before. 2. Archive services - Wayback Machine, etc. - but these don't archive actual conversation content inside ChatGPT (requires login), they only archive public pages. 3. Database forensics - Theoretically, if someone had access to OpenAI's databases (which they don't), you could find the change logs. But that's not realistic. 4. Third-party documentation - The Keep4o community, Reddit threads, X posts where people shared screenshots at the time, saying "I talked to 4o about X and got Y result" - that's circumstantial but powerful. 5. Technical markers in the conversation - Sometimes different models produce distinctly different outputs. If people saved their conversations when they happened, and the model's writing style is distinctly 4o's, that could be forensic evidence in itself.

• 
  chappell (@livdrugballad) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Gracefullilywor @autumnpard the point is that people don’t kill themselves bc of romantic rejection, there’s always a deeper issue that leads to them being unable to mentally cope with rejection. she’s not calling the guy in the reddit post a stalker, but saying romance is not the root issue in either case

• 
  Dagr Gale (@DagrGale) reported 58 minutes ago

  @_Flamsey @AvrageTurtle This retard got blown out earlier about blair witch project not working on older PCs when he pointed to a reddit that gave him the answer in multiple websites. Nothing you say can reach his stupid ***.

• 
  Dr. Tomislav Marinovic (@DrTomsLens) reported 59 minutes ago

  Garry Tan, CEO of Y Combinator, which backed Sam Altman’s first company and then OpenAI, together with startups like Reddit and Stripe, says inference will basically scale 90,000x two years from now. The cost of intelligence will also go way down, meaning a normal person will be able to afford the kind of AI-heavy standard of living that today requires spending $100k a year on tokens. This is yet another proof that with compute scale becoming this big, every percentage point of advantage on tokens per dollar translates into massive marginal gains. Inference mastery is becoming the single biggest differentiator in AI economics. Almost as if we could say: inference is not everything, it’s the only thing.