Robinhood Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Robinhood Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  No_Flaws 🍊,💊 ADD 💢 (@FlawlessOG00) reported 3 minutes ago

  @CashmereLabs @RobinhoodApp I'm here be lucky and I hope I am so help me God 🙏🏽

• 
  Keegan Pacheco π² (@potter_sta51609) reported 4 minutes ago

  @CashmereLabs @RobinhoodApp sent my entry hopefully i finally break my bad luck streak

• 
  DEK ™️ (@Dek_xyz) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SickickZards @RobinhoodApp @We_Zards Wrote them all down thanks

• 
  Cleveland Murphy (@Clevelanda99) reported 5 minutes ago

  @CashmereLabs @RobinhoodApp filled out the doc without any trouble ready for the drop

• 
  Doyle Hoover (@DoyleHoove68986) reported 5 minutes ago

  @CashmereLabs @RobinhoodApp Ready to support this launch with full energy

• 
  Darian Parsons π² (@KarisaH90537) reported 7 minutes ago

  @CashmereLabs @RobinhoodApp glad to support this launch right from the start

• 
  Max Belov | BlueRock (@BlueRockID) reported 9 minutes ago

  @nofadsec @RobinhoodApp @HyperliquidX Automation removes the click, not the risk. The meaningful benchmark is not connected capital but behavior across volatility: execution quality, drawdown controls, intervention paths, and whether users can understand why the system acted before losses compound.

• 
  Brandi Lee (@BrandiLee22554) reported 13 minutes ago

  @CashmereLabs @RobinhoodApp Form submitted and ready to support the movement

• 
  n̷o̷x̷.exe (@Imogen157x) reported 15 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Yiur submit button sees broken man

• 
  Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) reported 17 minutes ago

  Why @HyperliquidX Should Acquire Gemini: The Regulated HIP-3/4 Deployer in the US Hyperliquid is engaging with the CFTC/SEC to enable U.S.-regulated companies to offer perpetual futures that trade and settle on its public blockchain. I think Hyperliquid should take that ambition one step further: Acquire a regulated U.S. platform like Gemini and turn it into the de facto regulated HIP-3 and HIP-4 venue in the U.S. Gemini went public in September 2025 at a $3.3B valuation. Today, it trades at roughly $450M, down more than 85% from its IPO valuation. The core business is clearly struggling. Gemini is too small to compete effectively with the major U.S. exchanges for spot or derivatives flow. It has no meaningful liquidity moat and limited crypto-native distribution. The company has already started diversifying toward its credit card and prediction markets businesses. More telling is that Gemini is in outright shrinking mode. It has wound down its UK, EU, and Australia operations, cut headcount roughly 40% from peak to about 402 employees, and guided to lower compensation and technology spend for the year. Assets on platform fell from $18.2B to $8.4B year over year and spot volume dropped 66%. This is a company retreating to its core and cutting burn. But what looks like a challenged standalone business could be a strategic asset at a fire-sale price. For roughly $450M, Hyperliquid could acquire Gemini's entire U.S. regulatory stack, which I think could be worth ~$200M on its own: - NYDFS Trust Charter: custody + New York exchange authority (2015) - DCM: Gemini Titan, CFTC-regulated derivatives venue (Dec. 2025) - DCO: Gemini Olympus, CFTC clearing license (Apr. 2026) - FCM: in progress, completing the CFTC derivatives stack - MTLs: money-transmitter licenses across nearly all U.S. states - Broker-dealer: rails for regulated equities For context, @krakenfx's parent paid up to $550M for Bitnomial, effectively acquiring a regulatory and derivatives infrastructure asset with little operating business attached. Gemini's entire market cap is now below that. Yes, Hyperliquid would inherit a business currently losing roughly $30–40M per quarter operationally. But it would also acquire a meaningful operating footprint: - 580K monthly transacting users (Q2'26) - 1.72M lifetime transacting users - $8.4B of assets on platform - $3.8B quarterly spot volume - $3.1B institutional / -= $0.7B retail - $45.5M quarterly revenue, or ~$180M annualized - 106K active card users - ~$485M quarterly card spend and ~$220M of receivables - A regulated prediction-markets business with 27K+ traders and 225M+ contracts since launch At a $450M valuation, that's roughly $290 per funded customer. For comparison, @Robinhoodapp paid roughly $400 per funded customer for Bitstamp, despite acquiring about half the revenue and no comparable U.S. federal license stack. Kraken paid roughly $790 per funded user for NinjaTrader. And Gemini's users already hold an average of roughly $14.5K of assets on platform. In other words, you could argue that the regulatory stack alone goes a long way toward underwriting the purchase price, while the users, assets, revenue, card business, and prediction markets come on top. The most interesting part is that Hyperliquid could potentially finance the acquisition without touching a single burned HYPE token. The community reserve holds roughly 389M HYPE. Spending ~7.9M HYPE at $70 would represent approximately $550M — just 2.0% of the reserve, under 1% of max supply, and roughly 3% of HYPE's ~$18.5B circulating market cap — enough to acquire Gemini outright at a ~20% premium to its current market cap. Hyperliquid could then redirect a portion of protocol buybacks toward rebuilding the reserve. At the current fee run rate, the reserve could potentially be replenished within 12–18 months. The strategic logic is bigger than simply buying an exchange. Hyperliquid would be buying the regulatory bridge between HIP-3/4 and the U.S. market. Gemini could become one of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 and HIP-4 markets, the regulated U.S. deployer, handling KYC, custody, fiat rails, brokerage, clearing, and compliance while the L1 provides the underlying market infrastructure, liquidity, and onchain settlement. Mechanically, this transaction is far simpler than most public-company M&A. Gemini's dual-class structure gives Class B shares ten votes each, and the Winklevoss twins hold all of them, roughly 94.7% of total voting power. It is a Nasdaq-designated controlled company. There is no proxy fight, no activist interloper, no drawn-out process. Board approval and a majority of voting power both run through two people. The entire negotiation is whether Cameron and Tyler want to convert a controlling stake in a declining exchange into a meaningful HYPE position and the distinction of bringing Hyperliquid onshore. On structure, the buyer wouldn't be the protocol or the foundation directly. NYDFS probabl wants a US entity with named officers, not an offshore foundation. The path is a Delaware HoldCo, funded by the Hyper Foundation but legally distinct, that acquires Gemini and keeps the regulated subsidiaries intact. The L1 stays a separate permissionless layer that never touches a US customer. Polymarket already ran this playbook. Offshore, non-KYC, with a CFTC settlement on its record, it bought QCEX (a licensed DCM/DCO) for $112M in July 2025, ring-fenced it as a US entity, and relaunched onshore in December. Hyperliquid starts from a better position: no enforcement history, US users geofenced, and active dialogue with both agencies. Hyperliquid generates substantial cash flow and sits on an enormous treasury. It should be much more aggressive about deploying both strategically. let's stop the buy back and burns and play offense.

• 
  Adeshina4life (@abdulrahm59924) reported 20 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Do something to this captcha issues. We're unable to submit

• 
  Chris Mont Zenith (@Web3Neir0) reported 21 minutes ago

  @RobinHood100X @robinhoodcat_ @RobinhoodApp Support bro LFG

• 
  Ifeanyi Uchendu (@Ifeanyiuchend) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Goboovi @btcordinal @RobinhoodApp NFTs back? wtf

• 
  🫐rebekah🫐 (@panic_19XX) reported 22 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Do NOT invest your money into these “predictions” they don’t report accurate high temperatures under the hourly “daily observation” and will not pay you what you’re owed despite you winning the contract. Tell me why all the other high temperatures for the day are in red on the hour but not if a bunch of investors predicted it correctly and they were going to lose a huge payout. I did these predictions to try to get ahead with my finances and I knew I was right because I watched one temperature sit at 69° and went to buy more shares and the cancelled all but 5 when the system caught up. THEN I watched the temperature go back down to 98° however the high for that day was 70°.

• 
  NMASINACHI👷🧑‍💻 (@Nmasinachii) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BlackRH__ @RobinhoodApp ****🔥