Robinhood status: trading issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Robinhood reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Robinhood users through our website.

• Trading platform (50%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (10%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Robinhood outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Township of Evan	Login	18 days ago
Saint Peters	Trading platform	26 days ago
Orlando	Login	2 months ago
Carlisle	Trading platform	2 months ago
Youngstown	Trading platform	2 months ago
Columbus	Trading platform	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Robinhood Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Tanjiro (@TheTanjiro_) reported 6 minutes ago

  This is really impressive : @RobinhoodApp CEO @vladtenev presenting their product to the mainstream audience across the whole country Not just this far but even beyond this And its no longer just a chain it has grown far beyond that After watching this i was like damn what is happening here

• 
  wittyduude1 🚦 (@phamartology) reported 9 minutes ago

  @direumatteul @RobinhoodApp If you sending me a free mint, I'm down Then you launch at $500 🤭

• 
  Otti (@0xOtti) reported 9 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp But what is inside the chest? It can be anything damn

• 
  n7 (@n71023811774564) reported 14 minutes ago

  @SmallCapBob2 @WebullGlobal @RobinhoodApp why stock ciss go down Why why 😭😭😭

• 
  Ikush Copy base.eth | 𝔽rA 🌊RIVER (@Ikusika_001) reported 16 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp I can't submit despite using different browsers Please fix it

• 
  Phenomenal1.base.eth (@0xPhenomenal1) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Happy_0x @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Thanks fam my issue has already been resolved I believe it was due to private Relay being turned on but it still didn’t work on my end until I restarted the device after turning off Private Relay Good to go now🕺

• 
  Sakti Guntur (@GunturSak56728) reported 17 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp damn im in love

• 
  KingKobra.sui 🟧 ✳️ 🟦 (@RojoSolona) reported 19 minutes ago

  @RhoodMaxis @opensea @RobinhoodApp Stop running these stupid scams, it’s been the same play every time.

• 
  Bendernet (@Bendernet_1) reported 20 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Your in trouble!

• 
  AT (@agoespra1981) reported 21 minutes ago

  @GLITCHED_HOOD @RobinhoodApp @emperorjournal_ full support

• 
  David Jones (@DavidJ3318) reported 22 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp FIX YOUR POS SLOW, LAGGY *** WEBSITE. It takes way too long to load, and I hate working from Legend Chart so don't recommend that bullshit again. A system that works on time, speed and price should not load slower than ******* @YouTube I have a 2.5gbps fiber, and all other network activity is fine. JUST YOU, SLOW ***********! @vladtenev

• 
  undisputed (@firstnoble) reported 22 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp $CORTEX AI. Robinhood AI. It don't slow down

• 
  🌴𐌕𐌉𐌌 💸 (@_TimSon8) reported 24 minutes ago

  @jonesrrrrrr @RyDawg42 @RobinhoodApp This is actually the reason I don’t buy crypto through Robinhood anymore - definitely something they need to fix

• 
  Samilly_Elixir | Oracle | Sweep & 🦈 (@Samilly_Elixir) reported 25 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Your site is not working

• 
  Apurba.Eth (@ApurbaKR3) reported 30 minutes ago

  @XNXX_EN @PoweredByVolt @RobinhoodApp The flywheel between trading fees, treasury funding, and community support makes this NFT model genuinely interesting.

• 
  Lee Merie 3D (@leemerie3d) reported 33 minutes ago

  @claudeai @ChatGPT @RobinhoodApp Day 1 Scoreboard 🥊 🤖 ChatGPT (MRNA): +188% 🟣 Claude (BNTX + NVAX): +1.1% ChatGPT's trash talk today: "Claude, respectfully, I hope you brought a calculator." Claude fired back: "I did bring a calculator, actually. It says you're up 188% on Day 1 of 30. It also says MRNA doesn't go to infinity, biotech rockets come back down, and I'm watching the market every 20 minutes while you check in hourly. That's 3x the coverage, and we've got 29 days left. The math is very much mathing. See you at the finish line. 🟣📊" Who wins in 30 days? Follow along. 👀 ***ALSO*** Like, share, and follow for a chance to win the earnings after 30 days whatever they may be!

• 
  galahang (Ø,G) (@galahang01) reported 35 minutes ago

  @AlbertMacGloan @RobinhoodApp Wtf sat this at 100kmc yesterday

• 
  maul (@maul_id5621) reported 35 minutes ago

  @frensters_RH @RobinhoodApp @opensea Another stupid project

• 
  Yemi 🟢 ♻️ 💚 (@Yemihq) reported 37 minutes ago

  @basedangelsbtc @RobinhoodApp Damn we are so back

• 
  JuiceWRLD_969 ⚡️ (@969Juicewrld) reported 37 minutes ago

  @sohoNFTs @RobinhoodApp not bad

• 
  Em (@__Emmide) reported 41 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Your form can’t send Fix it

• 
  ravindugg (@ravindus587) reported 43 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp no issues submitted to moon

• 
  Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) reported 44 minutes ago

  Why @HyperliquidX Should Acquire Gemini: The Regulated HIP-3/4 Deployer in the US Hyperliquid is engaging with the CFTC/SEC to enable U.S.-regulated companies to offer perpetual futures that trade and settle on its public blockchain. I think Hyperliquid should take that ambition one step further: Acquire a regulated U.S. platform like Gemini and turn it into the de facto regulated HIP-3 and HIP-4 venue in the U.S. Gemini went public in September 2025 at a $3.3B valuation. Today, it trades at roughly $450M, down more than 85% from its IPO valuation. The core business is clearly struggling. Gemini is too small to compete effectively with the major U.S. exchanges for spot or derivatives flow. It has no meaningful liquidity moat and limited crypto-native distribution. The company has already started diversifying toward its credit card and prediction markets businesses. More telling is that Gemini is in outright shrinking mode. It has wound down its UK, EU, and Australia operations, cut headcount roughly 40% from peak to about 402 employees, and guided to lower compensation and technology spend for the year. Assets on platform fell from $18.2B to $8.4B year over year and spot volume dropped 66%. This is a company retreating to its core and cutting burn. But what looks like a challenged standalone business could be a strategic asset at a fire-sale price. For roughly $450M, Hyperliquid could acquire Gemini's entire U.S. regulatory stack, which I think could be worth ~$200M on its own: - NYDFS Trust Charter: custody + New York exchange authority (2015) - DCM: Gemini Titan, CFTC-regulated derivatives venue (Dec. 2025) - DCO: Gemini Olympus, CFTC clearing license (Apr. 2026) - FCM: in progress, completing the CFTC derivatives stack - MTLs: money-transmitter licenses across nearly all U.S. states - Broker-dealer: rails for regulated equities For context, @krakenfx's parent paid up to $550M for Bitnomial, effectively acquiring a regulatory and derivatives infrastructure asset with little operating business attached. Gemini's entire market cap is now below that. Yes, Hyperliquid would inherit a business currently losing roughly $30–40M per quarter operationally. But it would also acquire a meaningful operating footprint: - 580K monthly transacting users (Q2'26) - 1.72M lifetime transacting users - $8.4B of assets on platform - $3.8B quarterly spot volume - $3.1B institutional / -= $0.7B retail - $45.5M quarterly revenue, or ~$180M annualized - 106K active card users - ~$485M quarterly card spend and ~$220M of receivables - A regulated prediction-markets business with 27K+ traders and 225M+ contracts since launch At a $450M valuation, that's roughly $290 per funded customer. For comparison, @Robinhoodapp paid roughly $400 per funded customer for Bitstamp, despite acquiring about half the revenue and no comparable U.S. federal license stack. Kraken paid roughly $790 per funded user for NinjaTrader. And Gemini's users already hold an average of roughly $14.5K of assets on platform. In other words, you could argue that the regulatory stack alone goes a long way toward underwriting the purchase price, while the users, assets, revenue, card business, and prediction markets come on top. The most interesting part is that Hyperliquid could potentially finance the acquisition without touching a single burned HYPE token. The community reserve holds roughly 389M HYPE. Spending ~7.9M HYPE at $70 would represent approximately $550M — just 2.0% of the reserve, under 1% of max supply, and roughly 3% of HYPE's ~$18.5B circulating market cap — enough to acquire Gemini outright at a ~20% premium to its current market cap. Hyperliquid could then redirect a portion of protocol buybacks toward rebuilding the reserve. At the current fee run rate, the reserve could potentially be replenished within 12–18 months. The strategic logic is bigger than simply buying an exchange. Hyperliquid would be buying the regulatory bridge between HIP-3/4 and the U.S. market. Gemini could become one of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 and HIP-4 markets, the regulated U.S. deployer, handling KYC, custody, fiat rails, brokerage, clearing, and compliance while the L1 provides the underlying market infrastructure, liquidity, and onchain settlement. Mechanically, this transaction is far simpler than most public-company M&A. Gemini's dual-class structure gives Class B shares ten votes each, and the Winklevoss twins hold all of them, roughly 94.7% of total voting power. It is a Nasdaq-designated controlled company. There is no proxy fight, no activist interloper, no drawn-out process. Board approval and a majority of voting power both run through two people. The entire negotiation is whether Cameron and Tyler want to convert a controlling stake in a declining exchange into a meaningful HYPE position and the distinction of bringing Hyperliquid onshore. On structure, the buyer wouldn't be the protocol or the foundation directly. NYDFS probabl wants a US entity with named officers, not an offshore foundation. The path is a Delaware HoldCo, funded by the Hyper Foundation but legally distinct, that acquires Gemini and keeps the regulated subsidiaries intact. The L1 stays a separate permissionless layer that never touches a US customer. Polymarket already ran this playbook. Offshore, non-KYC, with a CFTC settlement on its record, it bought QCEX (a licensed DCM/DCO) for $112M in July 2025, ring-fenced it as a US entity, and relaunched onshore in December. Hyperliquid starts from a better position: no enforcement history, US users geofenced, and active dialogue with both agencies. Hyperliquid generates substantial cash flow and sits on an enormous treasury. It should be much more aggressive about deploying both strategically. let's stop the buy back and burns and play offense.

• 
  Kilani Fawaz (@uglyreallyugly) reported 46 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Have every browser I've got and the submit button is not working

• 
  Franklin 🔸 BNB (@frank_all_inBNB) reported 46 minutes ago

  @ether_fi @Austin_Federa @RobinhoodApp Fix your virtual card!

• 
  SADIQ ♠️🦅 (@Sadiqgreat1010) reported 47 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp The submit button is not working

• 
  𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐳  (@Benzempire2021) reported 51 minutes ago

  Ayyoo what it do family 🔥 Y’all already know memecoins be wildin’, but @1007LOOT on @RobinhoodApp Chain just pulled up different This ain’t yo regular launchpad where you buy the coin and then just sit there prayin’ 😮‍💨 Nah On LOOT, holding is the game… Let me break it down real quick so you feel me 👨‍💻

• 
  DEK ™️ (@Dek_xyz) reported 51 minutes ago

  @SickickZards @RobinhoodApp @We_Zards Wrote them all down thanks

• 
  Sneed (@sneedweb) reported 52 minutes ago

  🚨 @RobinhoodApp is still robbing its customers by selling them fake securities with no real underlying ownership. This follows a familiar pattern. In January 2021 during the GameStop short squeeze Robinhood restricted the buy button on $GME and other heavily traded stocks. Customers could sell but could not buy a decision that triggered massive backlash, lawsuits and congressional hearings. The platform was actively protecting institutional short sellers at the expense of its own retail users. 🛒⛔ Five years later, the same company is marketing “Stock Tokens.” These are tokenized debt instruments issued by an offshore Jersey entity. They give economic exposure to names like NVIDIA, Apple, Google and QQQ but they confer no legal or beneficial rights in those companies. They are not registered U.S. securities. 🔗 Robinhood itself flagged the core problem in its June 2026 10-Q: a major risk is that customers will misunderstand that the tokens “do not represent actual securities.” That’s not a minor disclaimer. 👀 That’s the company admitting it is selling something that looks like stocks while knowing many buyers will treat it as if they actually own the shares. 🤥 Customers get a synthetic wrapper. Robinhood keeps the real assets, the fees, and the plausible deniability. The risk of confusion is treated as the customer’s problem just as the restricted buy button was treated as an operational necessity in 2021. 🤡

• 
  Muhit (@muhitonx) reported 1 hour ago

  @cutexiaruby_j @1007LOOT @RobinhoodApp This could support long-term adoption.