Slack Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Slack Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Paul Thornton (@Fusspawn) reported 3 minutes ago

  @SlackHQ @dorukkavcioglu I miss the old glitch game, had fun with some of your old founders in that :(

• 
  LANGERIUS (@Langerius) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BarknTuncer @SlackHQ yeah notification sync issues are still surprisingly common

• 
  Corey Quinn (@QuinnyPig) reported 7 minutes ago

  @samlambert @joshmgross It’s almost impossible to mention a bug in Slack and get anyone at @SlackHQ to fix it.

• 
  PatrickUllrich (@ItsPatrickU) reported 11 minutes ago

  @karrisaarinen @linear @SlackHQ Linear coding agent when? 👀 currently handing it off to another service but be nice to skip the extra step.

• 
  Josh Ellithorpe (@zquestz) reported 11 minutes ago

  It is very obvious that @SlackHQ does absolutely zero QA testing on Linux. You would think they would at least do a basic sanity test. Latest release has a completely broken system tray, and broken desktop icon. Glad I hardly use this crap anymore.

• 
  Mohi (@disismohi) reported 12 minutes ago

  @SlackHQ: 40% less merge queue time, CI type-checking down from 7.5 minutes to 1.25 minutes. Canva: 58s to first error in the editor down to 4.8s.

• 
  Jori Lallo (@jorilallo) reported 13 minutes ago

  @pizzaboy @karrisaarinen @SlackHQ It's still the same agent with capability to access everything as the caller user can. If you're calling it in the channel, it has that as context so it will file issue into the project by default and answer questions about the project without you needing to name it separately. If there's situatons where it's not working as intended, would love to get screenshots

• 
  Manoj Yadav (@Manoj____Yadav) reported 13 minutes ago

  @TheNickBigar @CricTalk29 @SlackHQ No it doesn’t track time, you need to tell the time spent via message. Example- worked on X for 30 mins - remind me about checking the production issue around 3 pm The idea is to reduce friction for users on how they track time and tasks

• 
  mayberaigan (@mayberayyy) reported 17 minutes ago

  @SlackHQ your app notifications are glitching, please fix it

• 
  Captain (@Cap039) reported 19 minutes ago

  @SlackHQ One recent Slack regression: If you edit a post that contains a link, the link preview disappears. Please fix this 🙏

• 
  Assaf Kipnis (@Kipnis_a) reported 21 minutes ago

  Claude is the best corporate CYA buddy I used to have full CYA files with records of messages, emails and things I did - I was terrible at keeping those and people took advantage of that. With Claude and @meetgranola - I have canonical record of all conversations, @SlackHQ messages, emails, canonical decisions - everything Oh, you say I didnt do something? I didnt respond? Here come the receipts

• 
  Karri Saarinen (@karrisaarinen) reported 22 minutes ago

  @gustaf @ycombinator @SlackHQ I’d say Slack. Haven’t really experienced those issues you mention. Unless my internet is very bad. iMessage/whatsapp overly phone and counterparty focused so I’m more often wondering if the message actually got delivered or not and if the problem is me or them. Slack is more of a server and it doesn’t send the message if it doesn’t work.

• 
  Johan Cutych (@johancutych) reported 22 minutes ago

  first you need to fix the rate limits @SlackHQ

• 
  Stache (@stacheFonzi) reported 23 minutes ago

  It's from 2011, but I still miss Glitch. It was a browser based MMO based on collecting and crafting. Crazily enough it was made by the company that went on to rebrand and make @SlackHQ. The messaging system in the game became the basis for Slack.

• 
  Luke Hutchison (@LukeHutchison) reported 23 minutes ago

  Why we're SaaSmaxxing at Perfect Venue Three months ago I tried vibe coding our way out of half our SaaS stack and racked up a $20k Replit bill. Now we are doing the opposite, doubling down on our existing vendors and adding more to our stack. It started small. A better prospecting tool built in Replit. ICP scoring, competitor signals, enrichment. It "worked," and that was the problem. I could come up with an idea and within minutes a version that "worked" was in front of me. It was a lot of fun at first. Once you see how fast you can build exactly what you want, scope creeps hard. Within weeks I was eyeing our ATS, our feedback board, and parts of HubSpot. Part of me also wanted to try vibe coding because when you're leading a company where "apocalypse" is being added to your industry category, I thought it would be good to know if it was a real threat or just hype. We sell software to restaurants and venues. Homegrown spreadsheets and internal tools have always been our biggest competitor, long before AI. So the real question wasn't "can you build your own?" It was: has that math actually shifted, or does it just feel like it has? But then reality set in. I was quickly reminded of the saying in engineering that "the first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, and the remaining 10% takes another 90% of the time." Getting a demo working was fast, but feature requests and bugs quickly piled up. Obviously we could put the feature requests in the icebox, but that defeats one of the main goals of custom software: being able to customize it to your business. The problem is that customization requires a customizer. Every field and edge case routed through one person. Me. Next, we explored having an engineer work on building a more sustainable solution. However, the direct cost of that engineer working on an internal tool was much higher than all of our SaaS spend combined. The indirect cost was even higher, because it meant that engineer was not working on our core product and building features that could drive much more revenue than the costs they would be able to reduce, not to mention stronger market positioning. There were also other indirect costs. I was interviewing for a recruiting role and explaining to her that we were moving off Ashby to a vibe coded tool. As soon as the words came out of my mouth, I could tell that decision was a bug and not a feature. The reality is that people have worked with many popular SaaS tools for years. They may not love them, but they know how to work with them, and they can focus on doing their job instead of being a design partner for a vibe coded tool. Another challenge was that growth meant building. Even if we were able to build and maintain a custom solution, it was just for a point in time. As the team and company grew, we needed new functionality. With a SaaS vendor, it is very rare that we would need something they didn't already have. They've been solving for the needs of thousands of businesses for years, it's rare we would really need something that another one of their customers had not come across before. Often we'd have to pay more, but it was as simple as a quick upgrade. With a vibe coded solution, it meant understanding the problem, designing and building a solution, and then maintaining it. So where are we today? We're SaaSmaxxing. We're getting everything we already paid for out of the tools we already have - here is how we're doing it. Use AI to better use our SaaS tools. Instead of seeing the problem as AI vs. SaaS, we're using AI to help us better use the tools we have. One of the most frustrating things about SaaS products is that they can be complex and hard to use, with settings buried and functionality hidden. Help centers only go so far. With Claude, I'm able to explain what I'm trying to do, and it can help me configure our existing tools or find a product that integrates with our existing software and solves the problem. Use vibe coding to prototype functionality we wish we had. When there is functionality that we wish we had with our vendors, we'll vibe code a prototype and then find ways to recreate that functionality with our existing tools. Take the 80/20 and move on. Almost every improvement we wanted had a good-enough version in a product we already paid for. Solving for the last 20% was far more expensive than it was worth. Clearly define the problem. As a business owner, my problem was that it was frustrating to log into all of these different tools to understand what was going on with my business. I now use a tool called Viktor to easily pull information across all of our different tools and send reports to me in Slack. File the feature request. Their roadmap is free engineering. A vendor building it once for a thousand customers beats me building it once for us. Has the build-versus-buy line moved? Yes. Building the feature list is dramatically cheaper than it was two years ago. But the feature list was never the expensive part. Owning it is. For the vast majority of our vendors, the amount we pay is a fraction of the value we get, even in the AI era. Our industry is changing faster than ever, and who knows what functionality new models will bring, but this is where we've landed for now. We're buying @HubSpot, @SlackHQ, Canny, Ashby, etc - and focusing on building Perfect Venue faster than ever with the help of AI. Great work @dharmesh and team on the continued updates!