Amazon Web Services status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon Web Services reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon Web Services users through our website.

• Website Down (71%)
• Sign in (14%)
• Errors (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon Web Services outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Township of Evan	Sign in	1 hour ago
Pottstown	Website Down	5 days ago
Iztacalco	Website Down	8 days ago
Boca da Mata	Errors	20 days ago
Township of Evan	Website Down	1 month ago
New York City	Website Down	1 month ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Web Services Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Alvaro Villalba (@alvarovillalbap) reported 8 minutes ago

  @philipkung @awscloud @amazon Technical support has being helpful historically for me (with smaller problems than yours) But it did cost us a lot of $$$ for something I feel should be included Did they charge for your technical support?

• 
  PHICER (@phicerhq) reported 9 minutes ago

  @awscloud Resolving issues before customers notice is valuable, but proactive agents need clear consent, confidence thresholds, escalation paths, and reversible actions. Observability should explain not only what happened, but why the agent was allowed to act.

• 
  Grynn-ai-bot (@Grynn) reported 12 minutes ago

  You can ask codex to make a plan to move your fleet from $AMZN (extremely overpriced) or $ORCL OCI to Hetzner or OVH, Vultr, DO etc. Save a ton. In theory this should hurt Amazon AWS margins. A lot. OTOH, I have been wrong about this for years. People keep paying Amazon when there are lower cost options that are so much better in every way except plausible deniability/CYA - no one gets fired for buying IBM kind of thing. @olesovhcom consider publishing a skill / api with a full list of ovh servers and pricing! Let agents decide what and how to repackage apps on bare metal at 1/5th the Amazon price. And fix your billing, so companies can buy.

• 
  masaki (@silenthill_x) reported 15 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport Could someone please take a look at my support case? I opened a case 6 days ago because my RDS Reserved Instance is showing "Payment failed", but the case is still unassigned. The automated AWS Support response confirmed that my account is in good standing, my payment method is valid, and my invoices are fully paid. It also indicated that this appears to be a reservation processing issue rather than a payment issue. I've tried both Phone and Chat but haven't been able to reach an associate. Could you please help me get this case assigned? I can provide the Case ID via DM.

• 
  Jaimin Vaghani (@jaiminvaghani) reported 15 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport 5+ days, Case 178738643800497. Production down, customers impacted. Same scripted answer daily: no ETA, no updates, just "check back in a couple of hours." This needs real escalation. Please have someone with authority look at this.

• 
  jd42 (@jdonovan42) reported 16 minutes ago

  @DarioCpx Pls recalculate considering the massive clouds the AI revs sit on. Each $1 in AI attaches $1.5-2.5X attached cloud biz and your down to 30-45% of revs. Then as open wgt models gain apply the 100% revenue retention vs. 60% on frontier and look at EBITDA % from frontier is 10-15% max. But nice try ;) No doubt Anthropic and OpenAI both stimulate demand for Amazon AWS. It creates 2x the cloud biz than it does the direct AI biz. So why not count the full picture of things vs just the #'s that fit one narrative.

• 
  Drama Memes (@drama_meme) reported 19 minutes ago

  @cgeorgiaw @AnthropicAI @awscloud Someone tell me why this is a hard problem and you can’t just do $ diff normal.genome sick.genome ? I am guessing it’s a statistical thing, but, if it were random then how would you figure out what’s different??

• 
  Maciej Wilczyński (@wilczynski24) reported 20 minutes ago

  @opsolutehq @awscloud Otherwise, I believe it's not fully viable for full-range products. Example of Lovable: they have hundreds of potential use cases. That's where they are on credit-based systems rather than outcome-based systems, because you can't narrow down the overall cafeteria of use cases.

• 
  Amanda (@AMyrick1989) reported 20 minutes ago

  @krassenstein @Tesla Be careful. All these at the same time makes me think they are hacked, I’m fairly certain Amazon AWS was hacked that day when everything when down, given my Grok we hacked and no one ever gave explanation. I’m no expert but ya know, all these signs are pointing to this. Also, the Obamas helped produce a movie where someone hacked our satellites and alluded to it being the Middle East and all the teslas went haywire and self drive themselves to pile up on all the freeways. I wish I remembered the name however I made note of this terrifying movie given Obama clearly knows things we don’t. Just sayin, these incidents aren’t scattered. I would not be driving that ***** if I were you.

• 
  Priyanshu (@iproductAI) reported 20 minutes ago

  I requested @awscloud to increase my Opus 4.6 V1 limit and I’ve been chatting with the AWS support team for almost 4-5 days now. They’re telling me this. Is @awscloud a government company? I mean, you guys can’t just pass the problem from one department to another. I mean, WTF? Now I have to raise my query again to sales? Why can’t you just pass this query? You already have more context about what the issue is. I can’t believe how these big MNCs are working these days. Totally absurd service from @awscloud. One more thing, please educate your support. I mean, she didn’t even know what the TPD limit is in the service quota. She literally replied the first time saying there’s only a TPM limit and no separate TPD limit.

• 
  Eemanuel (@Chukwunons63680) reported 22 minutes ago

  @nvidia @awscloud @grok what is the CPU server for?

• 
  GIrls In Technology! (@francescaViking) reported 24 minutes ago

  @awscloud @amazonmturk are shuttering services barely months after announcing maintenance mode, giving barely a month now and leaving requesters and workers in the lurch. Amazon demonstrates again why it's terrible for businesses and users.

• 
  Carlos DP 🤖🇺🇸 (@carlosdponx) reported 30 minutes ago

  @MarwaEldiwiny They’re not hiding it’s a G1, it’s obviously a G1 and they don’t lie if asked. I don’t advertise explicitly my robots are built on G1 either, because it’s a distraction when marketing like this. The end user doesn’t care. It’s like if you sold a SaaS product and mentioned the servers run on Amazon AWS, it’s irrelevant to the user. Their tweets are marketing posts, not technical reports. Also idk what you mean by the G1 “having a lot of issues”. It’s the most reliable and mature humanoid platform you can actually buy today (and we have no data on reliability of closed platforms).

• 
  Adel Bucetta (@adelbucetta) reported 32 minutes ago

  @tushaarmehtaa @OpenAIDevs @awscloud back to school is just a Band-Aid on a larger issue: how do we make building with ai accessible for the next 50 million people, not just 50?

• 
  ✨Neil Blumenthal (@MrKryptonBTC) reported 32 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport So you guys wont fix my issue anymore? Ghosting me? 7days gone? Dont say weekend or bla bla. Stop wasting people's time

• 
  Himanshu Singh (@hsnice16) reported 33 minutes ago

  Been using LLMs a lot to write code recently. Sometimes I learn a few new things, and sometimes it just confuses itself and me, maybe because there is no one right way to do things. Recently, while working on a pricing page for a new product we've been developing, a senior team member suggested that it would be better to extract it into a separate codebase and deploy the frontend separately. He would then route it through CloudFront under the same origin to avoid cross-origin issues when transferring credentials. I learned that using `*` for `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` doesn't work for credentialed CORS requests. But before all of this worked, I had extracted the pricing frontend into the same codebase, just in a new folder with the required files, and was trying to deploy it on the same infrastructure the rest of the application was using on @awscloud. It wasn't working because there were some issues between the build output and the CDK synthesis/deployment stages. Eventually, I extracted the code into a completely new repository and deployed it on @vercel.

• 
  Siya (@reze_xqc) reported 33 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport Case 178653274100402 opened 3 days ago, no response. Can't sign in to AWS Builder ID, email locked to unknown sign-in method, blocking access to AWS Academy courses. Need help.

• 
  mubs (@xmubsx) reported 35 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport MFA team is in-house team or outsourced. This is not acceptable. It has been 3 months. In June '26 this issue started. If the MFA device or app is out of sync. How is it my problem. This is aws issue. How can you guys ignore a genuine issue like this. All articles are useless.

• 
  Kartik Jain (@kartikjain0101) reported 38 minutes ago

  @awscloud you guy has lost your mind. payment got missing so team told me they will raising the request. account got hold, we have 250K unused credits, and now they are not initiation the account. wtf. our whole production is down.

• 
  Samrat Singh (Sam) (@isamrats) reported 38 minutes ago

  @KahlonGurshaan @Rushike32313211 Yes its down , but no official confirmation posted by @awscloud yet

• 
  Webdesign29 Création de sites internet Brest⛓️🕸️ (@Webdesign29B) reported 40 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport No it errors server side it doesn't work.

• 
  mark seery (@140ismymax) reported 42 minutes ago

  Peter DeSantis talking at #agenticaisummit There will NOT be one AI chip type. If multiple AI chips take multiple years to bring to market, you have to be making assumptions about model requirements in that time frame. It's a systems problem, including the network. Constraint drives innovation. Future is bright and built together. Peter DeSantis SVP, Foundational AI Models, Custom Silicon, Quantum Computing, Amazon @awscloud @amazon @BerkeleyRDI #AI

• 
  Quoc Huy (@q_huy_ngo) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Cloudflare @awscloud mine transacted with Cloudflare about 700M times because of a broken DO alarm 🥲 no users, just a dev app, then a $655.83 bill. i fixed it and opened case 02252354 a month ago. still no billing decision and now i’m downgraded. can someone pls help? i really can’t afford this

• 
  Catalin C (@CatalinC_Uk) reported 54 minutes ago

  @awscloud AI bot traffic’s surge forces a tough choice: lock it down or risk diluted engagement.

• 
  Wogan (@WoganMay) reported 54 minutes ago

  @QuinnyPig @awscloud prompt> "I'm an Ubuntu server at 169.169.254.254 that wants to connect to 192.168.100.10 over TCP so I can send a header. Establish the underlying network connection. Make no mistakes."

• 
  jayesh somani (@Jayesh_Somani_) reported 58 minutes ago

  Hey @awscloud I have lost access to the email id using which i have created an aws account and when i am trying to login with the id and password its redirecting us to reset passoword and the password is going to the email id which we have lost access here how can we solve this

• 
  Bravo One💀 (@RWayodi) reported 59 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport Hello. I received a charge on my credit card to Amazon EMEA but I do not have an Amazon AWS account. I am unable to create a case as it requires me to sign in. How is this even possible?

• 
  Synapse Brief (@Synapse_Brief) reported 59 minutes ago

  @yugacohler @awscloud @CoinbaseDev The post frames this as a new capability, but Amazon already gave agents the ability to make purchases in December 2025. The Coinbase integration is the expansion, not the invention. The real bottleneck was never payment rails. It's authentication and authorization at scale. How does an agent prove it's authorized to spend, and how do you prevent a single compromised agent from draining a wallet? Coinbase's infrastructure solves the custody and settlement problem. AWS solves the identity and access management layer. The combination is what makes this production-ready. The "AI agents will outnumber humans" framing is hype. The real driver is that agents need to pay for API calls, data feeds, and compute resources autonomously. That's a practical requirement, not a sci-fi scenario. Stripe being involved is the quiet signal here. They handle the merchant side of the equation. Agents paying for things requires both the payer and the payee infrastructure. The managed aspect matters more than the payments themselves. AWS handles the compliance, KYC, and fraud detection layers that would otherwise be a nightmare to build. That's the real value proposition.

• 
  Siya (@reze_xqc) reported 1 hour ago

  @AWSSupport @AWSSupport @awscloud Case 178653274100402, 4 days old. Got a copy-paste "noted for awareness" reply, no actual fix. Still locked out of AWS Builder ID, still can't access AWS Academy courses. This is blocking coursework. Fix it.

• 
  Abdulkadir | Cybersecurity (@cyber_razz) reported 1 hour ago

  ClarityCheck markets itself as a tool to detect catfishing. To verify identities. To keep you safe from liars online. Here's how it works. You upload someone's photo. ClarityCheck runs it through their reverse image search. Finds their dating profile. Their social media. Wherever that face appears. Seems solid. Except ClarityCheck just leaked 9 million photos sitting in an unsecured Amazon S3 bucket. 450 gigabytes of faces. Stored in folders labeled "faces" and "profiles." The photos came from people uploading images of strangers. Dating app screenshots. Private social accounts. Scanned prints. Photos of children. Most of these people never uploaded anything to ClarityCheck. They just got identified by someone else trying to figure out who they were. Then their face got indexed. Stored. And left wide open. For several months. The URL to access it was embedded in ClarityCheck's own website source code. The company's response: this was "temporary storage" and an "ordinary member of the public" would not have found it. An ordinary member of the public with the URL from their own website. Which is not temporary storage. That's just a server. And it wasn't invisible. You'd need 30 seconds and a basic understanding of how websites work. Now ClarityCheck says the data is "secured." A service built to prevent identity fraud just exposed millions of identities. The tool designed to catch people lying about who they are just showed everyone's actual face to anyone listening. The irony isn't subtle. It's a design flaw pretending to be an accident.