1. Home
  2. โฏ
  3. Companies
  4. โฏ
  5. Bitfinex
Bitfinex

Bitfinex status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Bitfinex is a crypto-currency exchange trading and currency-storage platform based out of Taiwan, owned and operated by iFinex Inc. Since 2014, it has been the largest Bitcoin exchange platform, with over 10% of the exchange's trading.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Bitfinex reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Bitfinex. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Bitfinex Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • SITGnews
    Skin In The Game (@SITGnews) reported

    Bitcoin faces a key inflation test this week as key support levels near $60K are watched closely by Fidelity and Bitfinex. CryptoQuant warns the bear cycle may not be over.

  • Soaper_Pan
    Vasantha B Eshwaragere (@Soaper_Pan) reported

    Honestly didn't expect tokenized exposure to MSTR and Metaplanet to hit Bitfinex Securities this fast. Feels like the bridge between BTC treasury plays and onchain access is finally clicking. Would you actually buy these? #Bitcoin

  • BarnabyTheStoic
    โ‚ฟarnabyTheStoic (@BarnabyTheStoic) reported

    @bitfinex Wtf are you thinking asking this

  • iamrahulinc
    Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported

    ๐Ÿšจ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—๐—จ๐——๐—š๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ญ๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฑ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—•๐—ฅ๐—”โ€‘๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฆ! Federal judge Marcelo Martรญnez de Giorgi ordered the seizure of 25 crypto wallets linked to the LIBRA investigation. He instructed Binance, Bybit, OKX, CoinEx, FixedFloat and Bitfinex to provide user KYC, IP login data, associated bank accounts and complete transaction histories. Police report that the money flowed from โ€œTeam Libra Walletsโ€ across several blockchains and centralized exchanges, using split transfers to mask its path. $BTC

  • BTCConsultantNL
    Bitcoin Consultants (@BTCConsultantNL) reported

    @ChrisFromAT @AquaBitcoin What do you mean? Canโ€™t you send it without sideshift? Trade on HodlHodl, Peach Bitcoin, Bitfinex? They all support liquid network?

  • nineinchtrails
    NineInchTrails (@nineinchtrails) reported

    BTC We went lower. And imo BTC looks like it wants to go lower soon again with breaking $60k eventually. Several BOSs. Closed below demand. Closed below CME gap. Closed below HTF range EQ. USDT.D now BOSs after the SFPs after the bullish 3 drives. Very bullish structure. Confirmed accumulation imo. Also crossed several fibs already. Now in supply. But overall imo USDT.D looks like it wants even higher. All on the daily as well. BVOL out of support. BTC Longs on Bitfinex moving up nearing the next supply level that could indicate a possible local bottom of $44k-$48.9k. So a clean HTF redistribution to me here. The level between $68kish and $70kish acted as a strong "downside trampoline" like I thought. CME Gap + FVG + Range EQ + strong bullish level before at the move up. Things further speed up in terms of going down as thought. Don't know if it's just a coincidence and bs or if I turned knowledge into correct learnings. Waiting for a close below $62.kish SL for confirmed SOW. And as far as I get it there's also no real HTF liquidity there. Would support the idea of a further fast move down. And I think if we close below the $60kish low the probability is very high that we could go all the way down to the $44k-48.9k region for the next local bottom afterwards. FIFA World Cup could act as a nice distraction then maybe, to make the herd believe "everything is good, it's already going up again". HTF Bias: still bearish Main Thesis: we could go below the Feb 6th $60.kish low. Invalidation: in case we should close above $90.kish we have a bullish ChoCh on the daily. // As already stated often but again here and there: Below a TA beginner and not trading yet. So just paper trading here for improving TA.

  • Difoxxn
    difoxxn (@Difoxxn) reported

    $๐—•๐—š๐—• ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฎ "๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ" ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ณ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—น๐˜† ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐˜. ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ฝ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป-๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† Bitfinex just yeeted $BGB off their platform (delisted July 3). And the "official reason"? A vague "listing qualifications review." Translation: read between the lines yourself. Meanwhile Bitget's out here launching Stocks 2.0 like it's the second coming of TradFi. Cool story. But nobody's talking about the fact that $BGB's 24h volume is a measly $10M on a $1.18B cap. That's a 0.85% vol/cap ratio. This thing trades like a ghost town, not a "top 3 exchange token." "Deflationary tokenomics" ๐Ÿคก let's fact check that real quick: Dec 2024 burn: 800M tokens. Massive, legit, impressive. Q2 2026 Morph burn: 3,010,400 tokens. That's not a burn, that's a rounding error. Someone's riding on 2024's hype with 2026's leftovers. And here's the part that should actually scare you โ€” there's NO public whale wallet breakdown for $BGB. None. Zero. Nada. An exchange that publishes monthly Proof of Reserves for 42 straight months... can't show you who's holding the bag on their own token? Make it make sense. That green candle everyone's screenshotting? Pure market beta. Zero BGB-specific catalyst behind it. You're not smart money for buying it โ€” you're just along for the market's ride. My honest take: this is a CEX with real revenue wrapped around a token with thin liquidity, a fresh tier-1 delisting, and zero whale transparency. That's not a "hold and pray" setup โ€” that's a "know your exit" setup. Growth headlines don't pay your bags. On-chain flow does. Stay sharp, don't get exit-liquidity'd. NFA, DYOR, act accordingly. #BGB #Bitget

  • DereckWDew
    ArsObKSC (@DereckWDew) reported

    @GavinMehl It stinks of desperation. The only involvement Craig would have because that he created bitcoin. This seems like Bitfinex oh, **** let's get them before it all implodes moveโ€”un tethered or micropenis strategy

  • WuBlockchain
    Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) reported

    June 2026 Exchange Data Report: Spot Volume Fell 5.1%, Derivatives Volume Rose 4.2%, Website Traffic Fell 0.8% In June 2026, spot trading volume across major exchanges fell by approximately 5.1% from May. Bitfinex recorded the largest increase, up 21.4%, while BitMart recorded the largest decline, down 58.6%. Derivatives trading volume rose by approximately 4.2% from May. Deribit recorded the largest increase, up 26.6%, while HTX recorded the largest decline, down 42.4%. Traffic to major exchange websites fell by approximately 0.8% from May. Deribit recorded the largest increase, up 165.1%, while HTX recorded the largest decline, down 50.8%.

  • TheBlockCo
    The Block (@TheBlockCo) reported

    THE BLOCK: Bitcoin bitcoin:native sat near $64,000 despite $211.5 million in spot BTC ETF inflows Tuesday and a record S&P 500 close. Bitfinex, Glassnode, and Wintermute all read the same tape: bottom signals forming through boredom, not capitulation, with no demand engine behind them yet.

  • K3m0s
    Kemo (@K3m0s) reported

    @tobitdogg @BitQua Not on Tradingview BTCUSD INDEX, CRYPTO, or Bitfinex charts. Their 2015 bear = 90 weeks & 2016-17 bull is 121. Bitfinex was the #1 exchange by volume outside China, whose exchanges were shut down and excluded from data. i.e. you have to ignore the #1 data source to get this

  • realUrbanHacker
    Urban Hacker (@realUrbanHacker) reported

    After the Coldcard hack the vultures arrived on schedule, circling in perfect formation, announcing that self custody is de facto dead. You've read the posts. If only these poor souls had kept their coins "on an exchange," none of this would have happened. Adults said this out loud, in public, with their real names attached. So let's do the thing nobody circling the corpse wanted to do. Let's look at the data. ๐Ÿ”ด Mt. Gox โ€” 2014 Hot-wallet theft + years of mismanagement โ†’ insolvency ~850,000 BTC (~200k later recovered) ๐Ÿ”ด Bitfinex โ€” 2016 Hot wallet breach ~119,756 BTC ๐Ÿ”ด Coincheck โ€” 2018 Hot wallet breach (NEM) ~523M XEM (~USD 530M then) ๐Ÿ”ด Zaif โ€” 2018 Hot wallet breach ~5,966 BTC + other assets (~USD 60M) ๐Ÿ”ด QuadrigaCX โ€” 2018โ€“19 Not a classic hack: founder death + "inaccessible" cold wallets; monitor found big shortfall / suspected fraud ~26,000 BTC + other coins (~CAD 190โ€“250M+) ๐Ÿ”ด Cryptopia โ€” 2019 Hacked, then liquidation (BTC + alts) ~USD 16M+ initially reported ๐Ÿ”ด Binance โ€” 2019 Hot wallet breach 7,000 BTC (~USD 40M โ€” SAFU covered users) ๐Ÿ”ด KuCoin โ€” 2020 Hot wallets breached ~USD 275M mixed tokens ๐Ÿ”ด BitMart โ€” 2021 Hot wallets breached ~USD 150โ€“200M mixed ๐Ÿ”ด FTX / Alameda โ€” 2022 Fraud & insolvency; customer funds misused ~USD 8โ€“10B shortfall ๐Ÿ”ด DMM Bitcoin โ€” 2024 Unauthorized outflow 4,502.9 BTC (~USD 300M+) ๐Ÿ”ด WazirX โ€” 2024 Multisig / custody breach ~USD 230โ€“235M mixed ๐Ÿ”ด Bybit โ€” 2025 Cold-wallet / signer exploit ~401,000 ETH (~USD 1.4โ€“1.5B), not BTC-led Custodial and protocol heists together โ€” centralized exchanges plus DeFi and bridges โ€” run into the tens of billions of dollars over their lifetime at event prices, with single bad years clearing USD 2โ€“3B in hacks alone. That's not counting fraud, insolvency, or the founder who dies with the keys in his head. One Coldcard wave: roughly USD 0.04โ€“0.07B. Do the division. Very rough math puts Coldcard at somewhere between 0.1% and 1% of a single bad year, and comfortably under 1% of lifetime headline losses from exchanges and DeFi combined. It is a rounding error. It is the tip you leave on the bill for everything else that got stolen this decade. And it is being used as an argument to hand your keys back to the same institutions that produced the top of that table. But I'm not going to end on a smug ratio, because something about this genuinely bothers me. The people who lost money here were not degens. They weren't farming yield on a bridge held together with hope and a Discord moderator. They were the careful ones โ€” the people who read the guides, bought the hardware, wrote the words down on steel, and did everything the responsible adults told them to do. Playing it safe is exactly what got them hit. That's the part that stings, and anyone selling you a custodial account off the back of their pain should be treated accordingly. The conclusion doesn't move, though. Verify your entropy, verify your seed on a second implementation, stop trusting single black boxes โ€” and understand that from a strict safety analysis, your funds have never been safer than in self custody.

  • shanaka86
    Shanaka Anslem Perera โšก (@shanaka86) reported

    The Coldcard attacker has gone back to the large wallets. Wave one averaged 0.91 bitcoin per address. Waves two and three collapsed to 0.05 and 0.11 bitcoin:native, which looked like an operator running out of targets. Galaxy's Alex Thorn flagged a suspected fourth wave on Monday averaging 0.82. Nobody finds fresh large wallets in a keyspace that has already been emptied. The earlier passes did not exhaust the supply. They had not looked everywhere. Going back up the balance ladder points to a new derivation path or address type the first sweeps never scanned, which means the exposed population is larger than three days of falling averages suggested. The pace says the same thing. Thorn counted 218 transactions across blocks 960,778 to 960,792, moving over 380 bitcoin from 462 addresses into 210 fresh destinations. Sweeps ran at 13.8 per block against a pre-incident baseline of 0.3, roughly 46 times the normal rate. The confirmed total is still 1,367.05 bitcoin, about 88.6 million dollars, from 4,585 addresses across three waves. Figures above 100 million, or address counts near 7,000, run ahead of Galaxy's published tracking, and Galaxy says it has not computationally confirmed that every one of those addresses came from weak Coldcard entropy. Coinkite halted shipments and destroyed its remaining inventory carrying the flawed firmware. It has asked victims to keep their devices rather than wipe them while its legal team works with law enforcement. Manufacturers do not destroy their own stock over a contained incident. Bitcoin itself cannot blacklist any of this. There is no issuer, no chargeback, no stolen flag inside a transaction output. A node checks whether a signature is valid, never whether the signer had any right to the key. The theft is cryptographically perfect and legally void at the same time. Everything outside the protocol works differently. Analytics firms can tag the exact outputs, exchanges can refuse the deposits, custodians can freeze accounts, and courts can order seizure. The coins stay spendable between two strangers and become close to unusable anywhere that checks identity. That gap is clearly why this may not be finished for the attacker. The Justice Department recovered 63.7 bitcoin from the Colonial Pipeline ransom, seized more than 94,000 from the Bitfinex theft, and took 50,676 from a Silk Road thief nearly a decade after the crime. None of it reversed a transaction. Each one required the holder to eventually touch something that asks who you are. For anyone still sitting on a seed made during that firmware window, the absence of a sweep is not evidence of safety. It may only mean your derivation path has not been scanned yet. Stay safe!!

  • hopium_dealer
    squid (@hopium_dealer) reported

    amount is small relative to liquidity. Also, reminiscent of 2016 bitfinex heist, stolen BTC is notoriously hard to exit at size. marginal as supply for months probably. market reaction to this terrible news, triple-bottoming at $62.5k support, is surprisingly bullish.

  • iamrahulinc
    Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported

    ๐Ÿšจ๐—š๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—•๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ง ๐—ฉ๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—จ๐— ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—จ๐— ๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿณ% ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ! Spot trading across 14 leading exchanges fell to $429.0โ€ฏbillion in July, down from $547.9โ€ฏbillion in June. Every exchange saw a dip. Binance led with $196.5โ€ฏbillion (45.8% of total), followed by OKX ($41.6โ€ฏbillion) and Bybit ($36.3โ€ฏbillion), together making up 64% of activity. Uniswap ($UNI) had the mildest drop at 9.8%, while Bitfinex slumped 59.7%, Coinbase 26.4% and Bybit 24.5%.

  • AriDavidPaul
    Ari Paul (@AriDavidPaul) reported

    @nic_carter At least two of cryptoโ€™s biggest successful institutions were ponzis at points in time. Both seem today to have more than fully recovered their assets. With bitfinex-tether I think this is pretty public knowledge at this point: at one point bitfinex was insolvent and recapitalized with tether, and vice versa, so at various points each was in a ponzi state. But profits flowed, and all worked out. The principals wanted/hope for this to happen, rather than their customers eat the losses, their business fail, and possible criminal charges. IMO, this is all unethical and illegal, butโ€ฆa lot less malicious and unethical than people who run ponzis intending to exit scam. The other example is more controversial - Binance. We know customer funds were transferred from the exchange to a private trading account and gambled with (on-chain forensics, public reporting). Presumably repaid later with winnings. Why did CZ do that? I assume the same reason heโ€™s still running pumps and dumps as the worldโ€™s richest felon.

  • SupplyDemand29
    Muntari Abdulhamid (@SupplyDemand29) reported

    $BTC BITCOIN BOUNCES TO $64,812 AND ETHEREUM LEADS - BUT DON'T GET TRAPPED Today's market is doing the exact opposite of yesterday and most people will misread it. BTC is up to $64,812 from $64,246 open. Low was $63,267, high $65,176. We bounced $1,500 from yesterday's dump. ETH is at $1,922 up 1.12%, high $1,936 low $1,872. ETH/BTC at 0.0297 - ETH is beating BTC again. So what changed in 24 hours? Yesterday Korea's KOSPI crashed 10% and dragged us to $63K. Today Korea crashed again and Bitcoin went UP toward $64K. That's called decoupling. Bitfinex predicted this. When stress is rates-driven, BTC dumps with stocks. When stress is stock-specific like chipmakers Samsung and SK Hynix, BTC decouples and holds. That's exactly what happened today. Second, Fed relief. The panic before Fed is over. Market is positioned. Bitcoin held the $63K support and 50-day EMA at $65,089 area, printed its 4th weekly gain structure intact.

  • FreeSpeechBTC21
    No Quarter Brandolini 110 IQ Small Blocker (@FreeSpeechBTC21) reported

    @BlueDavid BitMex went down.. is Bitfinex next?

  • Blaze3Win
    ๐Ÿ”ฅBLAZE๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ŽDIAMONDS๐Ÿ’Ž (@Blaze3Win) reported

    @AshCrypto ETH pulling back to $1,670 support while Bitfinex longs go vertical and Bitmine buys $73 million weekly is the dip that gets absorbed before the $1,850 reclaim that opens $2,400 ๐Ÿ’Ž While the support holds and the next leg loads, ETH native yield via DIAMONDS keeps compounding without forced selling #BLAZE #DIAMONDS

  • DefiLtam
    JP_OptionsDeFi (@DefiLtam) reported

    @bitfinex And what ******** does this damn industry that wants to destroy wealth or create it, damn Chinese and American demons creating their patterns of cursed cycles.

  • _Tyrano_
    Julitta Ayan (@_Tyrano_) reported

    @dahongfei @BitMEX Bitmex was never a surprisingly large exchange, while Bitfinex where $neo was delisted is vastly bigger and far more active. Long-term survival does not equal success; on the contrary, ur persistent problems continue to cause full or partial delistings across multiple platforms.

  • kryptosopus
    Kryptos Opus (@kryptosopus) reported

    @lush_amorelli @BitcoinMagazine @glxyresearch Tell that to Bitfinex. Hackers sat on 120k BTC for 6 years and still got busted trying to cash out in 2022. The coins didn't vanish, the feds just waited them out. Stolen bitcoin is a ticking clock, not a brick. Terrible ROI, sure, but "impossible" is doing a lot of lifting there

  • losingshekels
    Uncle Jim (@losingshekels) reported

    @paoloardoino PAOLO PLEASE HELP ME TO RETRIEVE MY 11.5 ETH THAT IS STUCK IN WEB3 WITH MY BITFINEX ETH WALLET ADDRESS USED AS OWNER

  • eddieoz
    EddieOz โšก (@eddieoz) reported

    When block size warz in 2017, bcashers tried the BCC tckr. But Bitfinex was using BCH. Some say it was Bitcoin Cash, but others say it was for *******. Well, we know. That matters: if 110ers try to list their shitcoin, it is up to the exchanges to decide. CSW feelings.

  • CryptoSuzy888
    CryptoSuzy888 (@CryptoSuzy888) reported

    @AshCrypto The Timeline of a Slow DeathThe First Strike (June 24, 2022): This was the day the network actually flatlined. North Korea's notorious Lazarus Group exploited Harmony's Horizon Bridge, looting $100 million in various crypto assets. The hack completely unpegged Harmony's wrapped assets, draining the network's liquidity and destroying user trust overnight. The Slow Coma (2022โ€“2025): For the last four years, Harmony existed on life support. Total Value Locked (TVL) collapsed by over 99%โ€”crashing from a multi-billion dollar peak down to a ghost-town baseline. Major institutional platforms slowly severed ties, including Bitfinex delisting the asset, and derivatives platform BitDelta purging its ONEUSD futures contracts. The Corpse Exploit (Today โ€” August 12, 2026): Because the team and developer activity had largely abandoned the chain, severe logical bugs were left completely unpatched. Today's attacker simply walked through an open door, exploiting cross-shard vulnerabilities to forge receipts and mint 3 trillion rogue tokens out of thin air to dump onto exchanges.

  • Conviction_Labs
    Conviction Labs | NVISION (@Conviction_Labs) reported

    $BTC Bitfinex margin longs added a lot on this move down to 59k. Means a HUGE reversal by EOY.

  • rleder
    Rob Leder ๐ŸŸฅ (@rleder) reported

    @romanwagmi @notgrubles The first guy used a paid account with a public blockstream explorer. Iโ€™d bet they are circling in on him. The follow-ons need to be smart enough not to screw up going forward. The Bitfinex hackers were caught after 6 years. People get lazy and make mistakes, which you canโ€™t do when a 3-letter agency has a task force specifically dedicated to hunting you down.

  • ImperiumPaper
    PaperImperium (@ImperiumPaper) reported

    Thoughts: First, congratulations to Tether! Second, note this is for Tether International, S.A. de C.V. and NOT for the parent Tether Holdings, S.A. de C.V. For USDT holders, this is mostly what matters, but does not close off hypothetical scenarios where the parent company is burning down while the issuer entity stays clean. In theory, thereโ€™s corporate separation (subject to El Salvadorโ€™s laws, which I do not know). In practice, even without shenanigans, a parent entity that Has A Bad Time could dividend out all the excess reserves at any time, reducing the equity to zero. This could be to meet a margin call, tax obligation, whatever the parent needs money for. A distressed parent can also encourage the issuer to hold assets from or extend loans to affiliates (of which there are many with all the investments Tether Holdings makes) or up to the parent. And in fact loans from Tether to Bitfinex to cover a shortfall were the heart of a conflict with the NY attorney general in 2019. So if youโ€™re the kind of counterparty that actually cares about an audit on Tether, you 1) want to see this audit, 2) want to look for related party transactions and loans, 3) look for any covenants or governance controls to keep the parentโ€™s problems from becoming the issuer entityโ€™s problems.

  • ForeDex_Global
    ForeDex (@ForeDex_Global) reported

    Daily ForeDex CVD by Order Size (Spot) Snapshot ๐Ÿ“ธ ๐Ÿ”ธ Whales and Mega Whales Only ๐Ÿ”ธ Based on a 1 month period (1M) 1. Binance : Decreased ๐Ÿ“‰ 2. Bybit : No Change โž– 3. Bitfinex (USD) : No Change โž– 4. Bitfinex (USDT) : No Change โž– โœ… Summary: A gradual step-down was seen on Binance, with no change across Bybit, Bitfinex USD, and Bitfinex USDT. [07-16-2026]

  • Ssas_33
    Sumbull (@Ssas_33) reported

    @MaxCrypto Bitfinex whales donโ€™t known ****