1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. BSNL
  4. Siwān
BSNL

BSNL outages and service status in Siwān, Bihar

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: internet, phone and total blackout.

Full Outage Map
  • BSNL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Siwān, including 0 direct reports.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (abbreviated BSNL) offers mobile and fixed communications, including both dial-up and broadband internet, phone service, mobile phone and mobile internet, as well as television over internet (IPTV). Mobile phone service is offered under the BSNL Mobile brand.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Siwān, Bihar

The chart below shows the number of BSNL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Siwān, Bihar and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

August 20: Problems at BSNL

BSNL is having issues since 09:10 AM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

BSNL Issues Reports Near Siwān, Bihar

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Siwān and nearby locations:

  • sangamsagar223
    sangam sagar (@sangamsagar223) reported from Siwān Bigrah, Bihar

    @DoT_India @CMDBSNL @BSNLCorporate @BSNL_BR I gave to port my number 8100456059 in to bsnl bihar jharkhand on 2nd Jan at Siwan CSC. Today morning I found the previous service provider stopped the service on this number, but further BSNL is providing service on this number.

  • Praveen77070
    Praveen Kumar (@Praveen77070) reported from Siwān Bigrah, Bihar

    My village is just 1km from bsnl exchange. But people who are under 200 meter of exchange are getting this service. So should I reallocate nearby bsnl exchange?

  • RubyChaurasia4
    Ruby Chaurasia (@RubyChaurasia4) reported from Siwān Bigrah, Bihar

    BSNL ....No Network Coverage in rural areas of Bihar/Jharkhand.... However recharges are waste of money...... what's about this... Government says that BSNL is being re-defined...How???

  • sangamsagar223
    sangam sagar (@sangamsagar223) reported from Siwān Bigrah, Bihar

    @TRAI @DoT_India @BSNLCorporate @DoT_India @CMDBSNL I gave to port my number 8100456059 in to bsnl bihar jharkhand on 2nd Jan at Siwan CSC. Today morning I found the previous service provider stopped the service on this number,but further BSNL is providing service on this number

BSNL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • boidawonda
    the boi 🐂💸 (@boidawonda) reported

    alright boys, got a bunch of requests on it so wanted to do a *mega* tweet on the data center build out with my research so here goes, the indian data centre stack, listed names only, 60-odd companies, one pass through the whole thing long one, grab a coffee OPERATORS -- who actually has live mw e2e networks: 5,100+ gpus live, in-house tir and jarvislabs platforms, q1 fy27 ebitda margin 75.2%. the one operator where the margin is right there in the filing (ebitda though, the capex and d&a bill is the other half of that story) nxtra (bharti airtel): ~150 mw live, mgmt talking a path to 1 gw over 3-4 yrs adaniconnex (adani ent): 65.4 mw operational, 960+ mw *******, a 400 mw hyperscale order on the books l&t vyoma: 26 mw operational, a 36 mw ai-ready build at mahape scalable to 100 mw, sells colo + sovereign cloud + gpu/cpu compute techno electric: chennai 36 mw live, noida and kolkata in development, plus a 102-site edge network anant raj: operating dc capacity + cloud/iaas disclosed, and an expansion plan far bigger than what's live tcs hypervault: multi-year openai partnership, initial 100 mw with an option to 1 gw, tpg funded. nil turnover through 31 dec 2025. biggest programme in the set and it is pre-revenue public sector: railtel has two edge dcs done and a 10 mw noida build with the first 5 mw expected shortly. powergrid runs a 400g backbone and is building a 1,000-rack govt dc pilot at manesar. delaplex has a class 4 micro-dc design, a hyderabad pilot, a pan-india bsnl-site rollout and a 3-yr psu-bank contract context only: hcltech's odisha sovereign ai park is an mou with a ₹14,257 cr planned outlay. reliance carries dc ops inside its digital business with nothing broken out outside e2e, nobody breaks out dc utilisation or segment margin. planned mw is a headline, not a p&l *the boi's favorite pick here: e2e* SERVERS + STORAGE -- what goes in the rack netweb: designs and builds ai systems, hpc, private cloud, servers and storage in india. ai systems were 62.29% of q1 revenue esconet (hexadata): ai servers, gpu workstations, storage, hpc. 6,000+ servers/workstations installed, ~28 pb of storage out there. q1 fy27 ebitda margin 8.55%, now pitching a sovereign stack panache digilife: ai servers for edu/smb/dc plus dr/dc capability. q1 fy27 operating ebitda margin 10.2%, dc revenue not separated dynacons: dc/cloud systems integrator, calls it a core growth engine. integration is a crowded room black box is here as an integrator, it doesn't own the server ip. redington and rashi are distribution. selling boxes is not building them order books prove demand. none of these disclose product-level margin, so pricing power here is a guess *the boi's favorite pick here: bbox* FIBRE + NETWORK -- more gpus, more east-west traffic sterlite tech: >₹500 cr of dc portfolio orders in q3 fy26, first commercial g.654.e order, neuralis for ai white-space and dci, india-first hollow-core fibre cable, multi-core fibre, 780+ patents, glass to assembly in-house hfcl: usd 51.98m / ₹495.80 cr export order for optical-fibre-cable dc connectivity, due by dec 2026. mgmt says the interconnect mix should earn above blended margin tata comm: izo dc dynamic, on-demand dci up to 100g across 44 dcs on five continents, own subsea footprint, consumption-based pricing black box: end-to-end network infra for hyperscaler ai-campus builds, large direct programmes, low blended ebitda tejas, d-link: enterprise networking, no ai-dc order located orders and patents are direct. how many vendors each hyperscaler has qualified, and what the dc segment earns, nobody discloses *the boi's favorite pick here: stltech* POWER TO THE FENCE -- grid, gensets, transformers, green ppas cummins india: data centres were 30-35% of domestic power-gen revenue in fy26. mgmt says pricing largely held after cpcb iv+, low-end competition persists kirloskar oil engines: hypernext programme, 192 mw, 96 units of 2,500 kva optiprime dual core gensets, expressly for an ai hyperscale dc powerica: hhp dca-approved gensets with install/epc scope bolted on, multiple colo and hyperscaler projects done, dc was 12% of its cummins business in fy26, 9-12 months of work visibility hitachi energy india: dc named as a new segment for capacity expansion, ~15% of dc capex addressable per mgmt, 12-15 month transformer lead times, price-variation clauses in the contracts cg power: ~₹900 cr / usd 99.2m of power transformers for a us dc project (tallgrass), deliverable over 12-20 months siemens energy india: grid connection in india plus exports into us dc transformer applications ge vernova t&d: 400/765 kv kit, mgmt says current dc backlog is insignificant and should become meaningful kec: first 400 kv transmission line to power a data centre, western india, buried inside a ₹1,180 cr package so the dc value is not broken out bajel: ₹300+ cr gis substation order for a dc customer, 400/220/33 kv, single-digit blended ebitda cleanmax: 5.7 gw operational + contracted renewables, ai/dc ~42% of contracted volumes, stt partnership >130 mw across dc hubs, new ppas plus a 21 mwp solar add ntpc green: mous with ctrls (up to 2 gw) and nxtra (up to 500 mw). mous are not ppas taril, shilchar, voltamp, td power: hot transformer cycle, zero dc-specific order located. a hot cycle is not dc linkage order value is disclosed. margin, escalation, cash terms are not, for basically every one of these *the boi's favorite pick here: powerindia and gvt&d* POWER INSIDE THE BUILDING -- switchgear, pdus, ups vivid electromech: data centres ₹99.94 cr = 49.95% of fy26 operating revenue, software-integrated pdus made in-house, mgmt cites 5-6 of the top-ten operators as customers and a 45-50% win rate abb india: dc ~12-13% of order book, band 12-16%, full mv/lv/ups/pdu/automation stack schneider electric infra: dc transformer orders plus high-volume relay and retrofit orders aimtron: usd 12m custom ups programme, six skus, 1/2/3 kv variants, made at vadodara, for a fortune 500 ohio dc player marine electricals: ₹75.19 cr of orders from stt and princeton digital group for power distribution, 12-18 month execution, lv/mv, busduct, automation, ibms. competes with schneider, abb, eaton, l&t, siemens kei, polycab: cables go into dcs, no dc segment disclosed. prostarm: ups/power quality, materiality unresolved product owners and installers land in the same tenders here. blended margin is the only tell anyone files *the boi's favorite pick here: vivid* COOLING -- where the heat goes aeroflex: 9,000 liquid-cooling skids disclosed, target 15,000 by q3 fy27, 16 products in r&d, plus the fluid-transfer hoses/assemblies going into those skids krn heat exchanger: data centres ~18.7% of q4 revenue, order booking called strong. fin-and-tube heat exchangers for chillers and dry coolers today, adding microchannel, developing cdu plate heat exchangers blue star: says it is working on dc liquid cooling, no scaled commercial programme located thermax: a dc cooling/energy opportunity won or under development, size and timing not quantified voltas: hvac scale, no dc-specific cooling revenue located dc-specific cooling margin: disclosed by nobody. skid counts and revenue share are the hard numbers rn *the boi's favorite pick here: not listed (iykyk)* BUILDERS -- civil, mep, prefab, commissioning black box: hyperscaler ai-campus builds, large backlog, 9.3% q1 ebitda margin aurionpro: repeat global hyperscaler order close to ₹100 cr for an ai-ready dc in navi mumbai, build plus project management, mechanical through fit-out in one scope techno electric: owner-operator that also does the power epc epack prefab: 4-5 dc projects, repeat orders, an adani dc order, dc ~4-5% of order book. rockwool panels, envelope, peb cemindia (ex itd cementation): dc construction incl mep listed as a business activity, no project values attributed sathlokhar: aerohub data centre under construction, value undisclosed konstelec: bidding on a few dc projects, mgmt calls it exploration and flags margin pressure. no order yet l&t builds its own campuses. lloyds engineering/siscol has a historical dc portfolio with nothing current attributed the builders who do print a margin sit in single digits to low teens. order flow proves demand. who keeps the money is a different filing *the boi's favorite pick here: bbox* PRECISION PARTS -- the small stuff inside the big stuff mtar: ₹35 cr first-article export order for ai-dc assemblies, ~70% value addition per mgmt, described as profitable, "steep learning curve". first article is not serial production yet thermax: >₹400 cr of boiler pressure parts for a us data-centre project, sits in industrial products aeroflex again, for the fluid-transfer assemblies inside liquid-cooling skids *the boi's favorite pick here: aeroflex* whether any of these becomes a repeat serial line is the whole question. none of the filings answer it yet so, what's actually filed: live mw at half a dozen operators, one visible 75% margin, five orders between ₹300 cr and ₹900 cr, a few names where dc is already a fifth to two-thirds of a revenue line, a lot of first orders, a lot of mous what isn't filed: dc segment margins, almost anywhere in the stack i have views on which slice of this keeps the money. those stay in the journal not advice, dyor. i'm more wrong than i am right

  • DammnGirll
    Hazel🖤 (@DammnGirll) reported

    @RealR4bbit BSNL is that bad?

  • DeepalPatel1
    Deepal Patel (@DeepalPatel1) reported

    @BSNLCorporate i have made several complaints online and at the bsnl office but seems like you dont want us to have a landline. Kindly resolve it or never ask for payment as i am not going to pay

  • sneaky_sen
    Sneakysen (@sneaky_sen) reported

    @JioCare your network is getting wrose day by day. Complaint raised,no action taken. Planning to switch other network. BSNL is far better than you in my area. in the name of unlimited 5g you are doing a scam. It switches automatically to 4g.

  • bsnl_care
    BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported

    @mahesh_world7 Dear Sir, We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused. We understand your concern regarding the “Not Found” / service not available error while trying to book a BSNL SIM online for PIN code 444404. Online KYC availability does not necessarily mean that SIM delivery is currently available at every PIN code, as delivery depends on local service and logistics feasibility. We request you to kindly visit your nearest BSNL CSC/authorised retailer to check SIM availability at your location. Regards, BSNL Care (Shatrughan)

  • Kamble1Praveen
    Praveen (@Kamble1Praveen) reported

    BSNL network Reliable network

  • shubhmandal
    Shubh Mandal (@shubhmandal) reported

    @JM_Scindia @BSNLCorporate @CMDBSNL My father's phone with BSNL sim is lost and customer care is asking for last 3 called numbers to block the Sim. This sim is connected to all banking channels and not used for calling so he does not know last called numbers. PLEASE HELP!!!!!

  • Nakshbhati1
    Naksh Raj Bhati (@Nakshbhati1) reported

    @TRAI Please update #BSNL #5G SERVICE . BHARAT NEED #BSNL BEST SERVER

  • bsnl_care
    BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported

    @Jass__bhathal Dear Customer, Greetings of the day! We acknowledge your concern and are working on a resolution. Your complaint has been escalated, and you can expect a response shortly. Your complaint number is H1912194308462 . Regards,  BSNL-Care (Neha)

  • onlinenewsporta
    OnlineNewsPortal.In Online News Portal (@onlinenewsporta) reported

    Mobile Recharge Prices May Rise 12–15% in Next 3–4 Months; Jio, Airtel and Vi Users Could Face Higher Bills Millions of mobile users in India could soon have to pay more for their monthly recharges. A fresh industry assessment suggests that telecom tariffs may rise by around 12–15% over the next three to four months, putting another strain on household budgets. The projection comes from Centrum Institutional Research, which said the telecom industry's pricing environment has become more favourable for operators following consolidation in the sector. The report expects another 12–15% tariff increase as companies seek to improve average revenue per user (ARPU). The potential increase would affect the country's major private telecom operators, including Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea (Vi). However, it is important to note that the 12–15% figure is an analyst expectation, not an officially announced tariff increase by all three companies. The possibility of a hike has gained further attention after Airtel recently restructured its prepaid portfolio. The company withdrew several plans, including the popular ₹299 recharge, along with ₹579, ₹619 and ₹649 options. For some Airtel customers, the impact is already visible even without a formal across-the-board tariff hike. The withdrawal of the ₹299 plan means users seeking a comparable 28-day unlimited daily-data option may have to move to a costlier plan. Analysts estimate that the effective impact of Airtel's recent portfolio rationalisation could be around 3–4% overall, while some individual users face a much larger increase depending on the plan they previously used. The bigger question is whether Jio and Vi will follow Airtel with a much broader increase. Industry analysts believe the probability has increased because India's telecom market has effectively consolidated around three major private operators, alongside BSNL. The last major industry-wide tariff increase came in July 2024. Since then, operators have focused on improving monetisation through changes to plans, data benefits and customer segmentation. The expectation now is that another significant hike could help telecom companies raise revenue without relying entirely on subscriber growth. Rising data consumption is another important factor. Millions of customers have moved from basic 4G services towards higher-value data usage and 5G services. Telecom companies need to recover the substantial cost of network expansion and 5G investments, making higher ARPU increasingly important. Vodafone Idea is under particularly strong pressure to improve its financial position and generate sufficient cash for network investment. The company has outlined a large multi-year revival plan, while recent financial results showed its ARPU rising to ₹177 and its subscriber base reaching about 193.1 million. Jio, meanwhile, appears to be preparing its customers for a changing pricing environment in another way. The company has reportedly brought back Jio Prime with a one-year price-guarantee feature, allowing eligible users to protect their tariff rates for a year. The move comes immediately after Airtel's latest restructuring of its prepaid plans. If a 12–15% increase is eventually implemented, the impact could be significant for regular prepaid users. A ₹299 plan, for example, would theoretically become about ₹335–₹344 after a 12–15% increase, while a ₹599 plan could move to roughly ₹671–₹689. Actual prices would depend on how each operator restructures its plans and whether benefits are changed at the same time. The increase could be even more noticeable for annual and long-validity plans because customers generally pay a larger amount at one time. At the same time, operators could choose to redesign plans rather than simply increase every recharge price by the same percentage. For consumers, the immediate takeaway is that a 12–15% hike should currently be treated as an industry forecast rather than a confirmed nationwide price increase. No final tariff schedule covering all Jio, Airtel and Vi plans has been officially announced on the basis of the analyst projection. But the direction of the market is becoming clearer. Airtel's recent plan withdrawals, expectations of higher ARPU and the industry's need to recover network investment costs are all strengthening the case for another tariff cycle. If Jio, Airtel and Vi ultimately move together, mobile connectivity could become noticeably more expensive for Indian households before the end of 2026. The next major trigger will be whether operators convert the current analyst expectations into actual tariff revisions—and whether the three companies make their moves simultaneously or one operator breaks first.