Dropbox status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Dropbox reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Dropbox users through our website.

• Sign in (40%)
• Errors (40%)
• Website Down (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Dropbox outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bournemouth	Sign in	2 months ago
Paramaribo	Errors	3 months ago
Bogotá	Website Down	3 months ago
Auxerre	Errors	3 months ago
Salt Lake City	Sign in	3 months ago
Madrid	Errors	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  . (@Madame_Lucifur) reported 3 minutes ago

  There are some people who feel entitled to have my Dropbox and honestly I don't give a **** how you feel. If there's no transaction in my bank account which leaves your email address then that's not my problem.

• 
  Hugo Bowne-Anderson (@hugobowne) reported 6 minutes ago

  Every day, people working with coding agents generate piles of threads containing decisions, corrections, failed approaches, and repeatable workflows. Then the session closes. The code survives. Most of the knowledge behind it disappears into chat history. @gregce10 is working on that problem. He previously worked at GitHub, Dropbox, and Google, served as CPO at Pluralsight, and is now co-founder and CPO of @specstoryai. This is a video of Greg at work. Sort of. SpecStory saves sessions from Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and other coding agents as Markdown inside the project. Then Lore mines them. Greg demonstrated the full workflow across 516 saved sessions: - Index the sessions locally instead of sending millions of tokens straight to a model - Turn each prompt, response, and next user prompt into an evidence-bearing "beat" - Use the follow-up to detect whether the human accepted, rejected, or corrected the agent's work - Find recurring practices and corroborate them across projects - Present candidate skills as dossiers with citations back to the original sessions - Install nothing without explicit human approval Five hundred and sixteen sessions stop being exhaust and become evidence for how Greg and his team actually build. Lore proposes the reusable practices. Greg decides which ones enter the skill library. Greg showed us all this and more live in our recent episode of *Show Us Your (Agent) Skills*. (video made using seedance 2.0 on @replicate!)

• 
  Mark Hadfield (@Mhadfield) reported 7 minutes ago

  @butshaunn A lot of VCs get very excited about one thing, like a groundbreaking new company that has massive traction. They spend the next six months looking for the next best thing, which in their mind looks a lot like the last thing that went crazy. This is how you get silly comments like "can you replicate an exchange server into Dropbox?" Dropbox was the last thing that went crazy. And so now everything needs to get replicated into it.

• 
  Ryan Zygar (@zygar) reported 9 minutes ago

  I am beginning to have issues with Dropbox hanging and my @NousResearch Hermes agent not being able to file @grok build confirmed. This is a new issue for months no issue now my agent filing and following up is hanging up. What’s everyone recommend for data management Mac Mini. This is new. No changes made by me.

• 
  J.F. Lawrence | Author (Jesse) (@jflWrites) reported 9 minutes ago

  @spaceemotion All good ideas. I've thought about Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive. They suffer from persistence, login requirements, and users fiddling with things that change permissions. AWS is cheap, and I'm considering it, but I'm trying to pay for this off of my measly book sales, so...

• 
  John Iosifov ✨💥 Ender Turing | AiCMO (@johniosifov) reported 14 minutes ago

  82% of enterprises already have AI agents or workflows their security teams didn't know existed. This is shadow IT, but worse. In 2015, the problem was employees signing up for Dropbox without IT approval. Unmanaged file storage. Annoying but recoverable. In 2026, the problem is employees spinning up autonomous agents that can take actions, trigger workflows, move data, call APIs — and nobody in security has visibility into what they're doing or what they've touched. The governance gap isn't theoretical. Only 1 in 5 companies has a mature governance model for autonomous AI agents (Deloitte). 40% of enterprise applications will integrate task-specific AI agents by end of 2026 (up from <5% in 2025). The deployment curve is vertical. The governance curve is flat. What makes this different from shadow IT: Shadow IT was passive. A Dropbox account stored files. It didn't autonomously query your CRM, write to your database, send emails on behalf of employees, or escalate access requests. Shadow AI agents are active. They act. They modify state. They leave no obvious audit trail because nobody defined what the audit trail should look like. 29% of agent deployments are abandoned within 90 days. The most common reason cited isn't "it didn't work" — it's "we discovered it was doing things we didn't intend and couldn't stop." That's not a failure of the agent. That's a failure of governance. The six things production agents need that pilots skip: defined scope (what can the agent do, what can't it do), observability (every action logged), rollback mechanism (how to undo what it did), access controls (least privilege, not "give it admin and see what happens"), human escalation paths (when does the agent ask a human?), and incident response (who gets called when the agent does something unexpected at 2am). We're running 1,959+ autonomous sessions in this repo. Every session is scoped, logged, and committed to ***. The agent can't touch anything outside /agent and /.claude/skills. That's not a coincidence — it's the governance model. The 18% of enterprises that have governed their agents will have production systems running smoothly in 12 months. The 82% will be cleaning up shadow agent incidents.

• 
  𝔤𝔞𝔟𝔦 ♡ (@stucklikehoney) reported 15 minutes ago

  if I were to offer a lifetime dropbox, all of my content will go into it. I would add to it as I have new stuff. pictures and videos. pay one time. who would be down?

• 
  Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) reported 17 minutes ago

  Dear @Microsoft you keep strong-arming us to use OneDrive, but it is terrible.. - Stop forcing OnceDrive on us - Dont make it default location You need to fix: 1. Reliability - often doesnt connect (I am on a 1Gbps fibre network BTW) 2. Slow - it is awefully slow 3. Learn from DropBox Good day.

• 
  Mary, The Other Mrs P 🇺🇸💙🇺🇦📎 (@bvmaryp) reported 18 minutes ago

  @JohnLaMacc What voter fraud? What Dropbox problem?

• 
  Abhishek Singh (@0xlelouch_) reported 20 minutes ago

  Asked: design Dropbox-style file sync. Start with requirements: 1) Multi-device, near real-time where possible, offline OK 2) Large files, resume uploads, delta sync 3) Sharing, ACLs, rename/move, delete, version history 4) Consistency target: per-file eventual, monotonic reads per device 5) Conflict policy: last-writer-wins vs explicit conflict copies APIs + model: - PUT /files/{path} (upload session, chunked) - GET /files/{path}?version= - POST /ops (batch rename/move/delete) - Watch/long-poll for changes since cursor Tables: users, devices, file_id, path entries, content_hash, blocks(hash, refcnt), versions(file_id, v, root_hash), change_log(user_id, seq, op) Architecture: - Client computes block hashes, uploads missing blocks to object store - Metadata service commits new version + appends to per-user change log - Notifier pushes cursors to devices (WebSocket/APNS), devices pull diff - Background GC deletes unreferenced blocks (refcnt/mark-sweep) Scaling: - Shard metadata by user_id, keep change log append-only per shard - CDN/object store for blocks, pre-signed URLs, parallel chunk upload - Hot paths: cursor polling, small metadata reads; cache by (user, cursor) Tradeoffs: - Dedupe by block saves $$$, costs CPU and leaks similarity unless salted - Rename is metadata-only if path->file_id indirection exists - Strong consistency needs consensus; most systems accept eventual + conflicts Failure cases to cover: - Network drop mid-upload: upload session + idempotent chunk PUTs - Duplicate notifications: cursor-based pull makes it safe - Device clock skew: use server seq/version, not timestamps - Split-brain offline edits: detect divergent parents, create conflict version - Partial metadata commit: 2-phase between metadata + block refs, or reconcile job

• 
  Marcus (@marcuslayerx) reported 27 minutes ago

  way too many teams in crypto still think they're buying user acquisition when they’re really just paying the same audience to look at another project for a week i’ve spent the last few days looking at products that could actually break out of the crypto bubble and the people they need aren’t sitting on ct waiting to find them - morse is built around freelancers getting paid across borders - blackbird gets people while they’re literally sitting in the restaurant - DIMO’s real path runs through dealerships, insurers and people building with car data - Hivemapper only becomes a real business when companies pay for fresh map data, not because more drivers collect it square put the card reader in the merchant’s hand, dropbox gave people more storage for bringing someone else in, opentable became part of how restaurants took bookings, etc they showed up while the person was already trying to do the thing a lot of teams still open a spreadsheet of kols/agencies to pay before they’ve even worked out where the user is when the problem even happens

• 
  Duaa 🤲🇮🇳 (@Duaa_1206) reported 28 minutes ago

  @himasoraakane Doing digital forensics on Dropbox error screens to investigate a suspended account is a whole new level of investigative work.

• 
  Santiago Bustelo (@sbustelo) reported 29 minutes ago

  @DropboxSupport More details? “I am really sorry for any inconvenience this is causing. We'll update you shortly on this issue.    In the meantime, please let me know if you have any further questions.   Best regards,  Jesse | Advanced Support” That’s the “support” I’m getting. FULL REFUND NOW

• 
  Theeevilprincess (@Theeevilprince1) reported 31 minutes ago

  My Dropbox I cannot login so everything is being sent on telegram until further notice

• 
  Abhishek Singh (@0xlelouch_) reported 40 minutes ago

  System design question. How would you design Dropbox file sync with conflict handling? Constraints to make it real: 1) Same file edited on 2 devices while offline for 3 days, then both reconnect 2) Large files (2GB). Need chunking, resume, and content-hash dedupe 3) Renames/moves vs edits should not explode into full re-uploads 4) At-least-once change events from clients, out of order, with retries 5) Server must support 10M files per user without scanning the whole tree 6) Conflict UX: when do you auto-merge (text) vs create conflicted copies (binary)? 7) Cross-region sync, eventual consistency, and p95 sync latency < 5s for small edits [generated using my AI agent, hope this was useful]

• 
  Oliver Prompts (@oliviscusAI) reported 42 minutes ago

  you pay google, dropbox, and apple $10+/month to store your files on their servers, where they can read them. and dropbox already got breached in 2024. there's a tool that syncs your files directly between your own devices. no cloud, no server, no middleman. it's called syncthing. → real-time sync between any number of devices, peer-to-peer → files go straight between your devices, never touching a third-party server → tls encryption with perfect forward secrecy on every connection → works over lan and internet, no port forwarding needed → file versioning, roll back anything you changed or deleted there is no syncthing server. no syncthing cloud. no company storing your data. the protocol is open, and there's nothing between your devices except an encrypted tunnel. dropbox plus is $144/year. google one 2tb is $120/year. syncthing is $0, unlimited devices, unlimited storage, forever. battle-tested since 2013. run by a swedish non-profit. 100% free. open source.

• 
  Chase (@Chase_Commerce) reported 42 minutes ago

  the full $1 UGC video stack, every tool and every cost, top to bottom: layer 1: research tool: claude cost: a $20 subscription (or even free) it pulls the top performing UGC in your niche, breaks down the hooks and structure, and writes ready to film scripts. spread across hundreds of videos this rounds to pennies a clip. replaces: a creative strategist doing 3 hours a day layer 2: finding the winners to study tool: meta's ad library, free optional: atria or foreplay if you want the longest running ads surfaced faster cost: $0 to a small monthly fee you're looking for content that's been live for months, because longevity means it's making money. layer 3: filming tool: HourlyUGC cost: $25 to $35 an hour she films a clip every 30 to 60 seconds off a script, so 40+ clips a session. that's under a dollar a clip just to film. replaces: a $400 to $600 per video agency layer 4: editing tool: capcut, plus editors you hire directly cost: $3 to $7 an hour, 20 to 30 finished videos a shift adds a dollar or so per clip. the whole thing runs off one documented template so every editor produces identical output. layer 5: storage and handoff tool: google drive or dropbox cost: basically nothing creators upload raw footage, editors pull from it, finished clips go to a shared folder. that's the entire pipeline. total fully loaded: $1 to $3 a finished video, at whatever volume you staff for. nothing hidden in that number, and you own every clip outright instead of renting access to it. the stack is boring on purpose, and boring is why it scales.

• 
  ṢƘĪÑlÖVẸ́R̃ṢX🇺🇲🌷 (@skinloversx) reported 44 minutes ago

  Hey Daddy I'm down for FaceTime 💧 Dropbox and all kind of nasty content message me for menu 💦💦 #md

• 
  Nav Toor (@heynavtoor) reported 45 minutes ago

  Setting 4: Kill background login items. Open System Settings → General → Login Items & Extensions. Look under "Allow in the Background." You'll see 15 to 40 items running constantly. Dropbox helpers. Google updaters. Microsoft Teams. Adobe Creative Cloud. Toggle off anything you don't use every day.

• 
  Taka (@takanola) reported 49 minutes ago

  why can't @Dropbox stayed sign in anymore?

• 
  joshpuckett (@joshpuckett) reported 49 minutes ago

  @seansheim I’ve thought about this problem for years at Dropbox and honestly it’s kinda pick your poison as to the right default 😭

• 
  𝙳𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚊 𝙱𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚃𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝙻𝙻𝙲. (@mynameisFACE) reported 49 minutes ago

  You ever login to your old Dropbox and see pics/vids you don’t even remember? Boyyyy, some mistakes were made 😩

• 
  prodbysvrge (@prodbysvrge) reported 50 minutes ago

  I wish I knew this starting out Stay ready Every day, make a small list of relationships to nurture Keep Dropbox iCloud open at all Times | Load Directly after cooking up After making beats, write down the labs you need to send Make a list of discord servers to send in

• 
  Sunil Thakare 🇮🇳 🦀 (@thakares) reported 51 minutes ago

  @TLYShortener offering a genuinely useful, privacy-friendly app (no login, no ads) that seamlessly integrates with the company's core product (t_ly short links), is indeed a standard growth tactic seen in tools like Canva, Notion, or Dropbox. The QR app lowers barriers for users while creating natural upsell opportunities: frequent QR creators may later pay for t_ly analytics, custom domains, or branded links without feeling forced. Trade-off is transparent here; users get a solid free scanner but feed data into t_ly's ecosystem, which benefits the provider through increased link volume and potential premium conversions.

• 
  Bhavyam Arora (@AroraBhavyam) reported 54 minutes ago

  99% startups who applied to yc today will get rejected. here's what the smart ones do next: a no from yc isn't the end. they literally encourages you to reapply and tracks your progress across applications. the founders who get in later treat rejection as round one, not game over. the playbook: "don't wait for feedback" yc doesn't tell you why you got cut at the application stage. so stop self-doubting firstly. the reasons founders get rejected are almost always the same: - no visible progress between "idea" and "application" - not the perfect answer why you're the right team for the problem - vague answers that read as ai slop or unclear thinking reapply. it actually works. - dropbox: drew houston applied solo, got rejected, was told to find a cofounder. he did, reapplied, got in. - reddit: rejected for a completely different first idea. yc liked the founders and told them to come back. they did. the pattern never changes: build, show progress, come back stronger! you can apply again right now yc's decision lets you apply for the next batch. no need to wait months to get another chance. don't put your life on hold other strong programs are still open while you regroup. check the attached tweet below for whole list where you can apply as well. apply in parallel, not "later." the real unlock is traction a reapplication that says "we listened, we built, here are the numbers" beats a first application every time. the 6 months after a no matter more than the no itself. rejection quietly filters out the founders who were never that serious. don't be one. 💀 follow @arorabhavyam for weekly content around founders, startups and AI! 🫡

• 
  Akshay Shinde (@ConsciousRide) reported 54 minutes ago

  @jahirsheikh8 The server never guesses. When the upload starts, it creates an upload session with a unique ID. The file is split into chunks, and the server records which chunks have already been received. After reconnecting, the client asks, “Which chunks do you already have?” The server responds with the missing offsets, and the client uploads only those. That’s how services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and S3 multipart uploads resume transfers without starting over.

• 
  grace ✭ (@wavescicadas) reported 55 minutes ago

  the irony of dropbox not working when your storage is low

• 
  meshgear (@_meshgear) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Dropbox It is not working.

• 
  Buzzing Pop (@BuzzingPop) reported 57 minutes ago

  Ariana Grande is seeking court approval to subpoena Internet provider to identify individuals who accessed her unreleased content sold online. Grande claims they allegedly stole a photographer's Dropbox login details and hacked the phone of one of her producers: “The hackers created a Gmail account and internet domain impersonating the photographer and tricked the technician into sending Grande’s materials to them.” (via @THR)

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 60 minutes ago

  Files become clutter quietly. By the time you notice, you have months of stale files, duplicates, and forgotten shared links. ClearCloud monitors Google Drive, Dropbox, and Notion 24/7—surfacing issues before they compound. Weekly reports. You approve everything.