Dropbox status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Dropbox reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Dropbox users through our website.

• Errors (57%)
• Sign in (29%)
• Website Down (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Dropbox outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Flumet	Errors	1 hour ago
Irapuato	Errors	2 days ago
Bournemouth	Sign in	2 months ago
Paramaribo	Errors	3 months ago
Bogotá	Website Down	3 months ago
Auxerre	Errors	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Buzzing Pop (@BuzzingPop) reported 2 minutes ago

  Ariana Grande is seeking court approval to subpoena Internet provider to identify individuals who accessed her unreleased content sold online. Grande claims they allegedly stole a photographer's Dropbox login details and hacked the phone of one of her producers: “The hackers created a Gmail account and internet domain impersonating the photographer and tricked the technician into sending Grande’s materials to them.” (via @THR)

• 
  David Crysler (@DavidCrysler) reported 4 minutes ago

  An ops manager pushed back on adding a new tool: "We've got stuff on ShareDrive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Slack... you spend more time trying to figure out apps than actually doing work." He's not wrong to be skeptical. Every one of those tools was supposed to fix something. Tool skepticism is almost never about the new tool. It's about the last five. Tools may treat your symptoms but rarely solve the actual problem.

• 
  Vladic (@Vladic_ETH) reported 8 minutes ago

  OPENAI SHIPPED GPT-5.6 AND CHATGPT WORK. THE REAL WEAPON IS PRICE, NOT IQ. OpenAI shipped two things today. One of them is a costume change. GPT-5.6 landed as three models. ChatGPT Work is a new agent on top. The feeds say "new agent does your work." The real launch is the price sheet. Sol, the flagship, costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 output. That's not flagship pricing. That's what you paid for a mid-tier model a year ago. The gate half the feeds skipped Context first. Two weeks ago the US government cut GPT-5.6 access down to a small group of vetted partners over national security. The gate held about 12 days. Restrictions lifted July 8, public release July 9. Same day SpaceXAI shipped Grok 4.5. The frontier now ships when the government clears it, not when the model is ready. Anthropic went through the exact same thing with Fable and Mythos in June. A pattern, not a one-off. Three models, price as the weapon GPT-5.6 is three models, not one. Sol is the flagship. Terra is the everyday workhorse. Luna is cheap and fast. Price per million tokens, in/out: Sol $5/$30, Terra $2.50/$15, Luna $1/$6. Terra matches GPT-5.5 quality at half the cost. Luna is the cheapest entry in the line. Altman told CNBC Sol is 54% more token-efficient on agentic coding. That's the message. Not "smarter." "Cheaper for the same result." And ultra: a mode inside Sol that spins up multiple agents in parallel and hands subtasks to submodels. The market counts token bills, not benchmarks. Enterprise thinks spend first now. OpenAI heard it and made price the argument. Today's real launch is unit economics, not intelligence. "Sol beats Fable 5, Luna beats Opus 4.8 at two-thirds the cost" are OpenAI's own benchmarks. Until independent runs, treat them as marketing. ChatGPT Work is Codex in a suit Now the "new agent." ChatGPT Work runs on Codex and GPT-5.6. It moves across your apps and files, stays on a project for hours, breaks it into steps, finishes on its own. Output: docs, sheets, slides, web apps. Inside sits a Unified Plugins Directory: Google Drive, Slack, Teams, Gmail, Outlook, Salesforce, GitHub, Canva, Dropbox, more. Call one with "@" or let the agent pick the source. Sounds familiar. This is OpenAI's second run at plugins. The first was 2023 and it flopped. Brockman admitted the models weren't ready back then. Honest read: hard to tell what's actually new. Scheduled Tasks, Computer Use, connectors already lived in ChatGPT and Codex. Long tasks and data sources worked before too. The real move isn't features. It's consolidation: on desktop, OpenAI is merging Codex and ChatGPT into one super app and putting Codex in front of people who don't code. The Anthropic mirror Here's the tell. This is the exact play Anthropic ran with Claude Code -> Cowork. Take a dev agent, strip the "for coders" label, hand it to knowledge workers. Cowork just hit web and mobile, timed to get ahead of this. Two labs, one bet: whoever owns the desktop app that touches your files and apps owns the knowledge-work layer. Chat is the storefront. The desktop is the land grab. What a practitioner does with it One: rebuild pipelines around price tiers. Route bulk work to Luna and Terra. Keep Sol and ultra for the 10% that needs the ceiling. Economics is a routing problem now, not a single-model choice. Two: the real unlock is the desktop with local file access, not the web. Free tier gets ChatGPT Work on desktop right away. Web and mobile roll by tier: Pro, Enterprise, Edu first, Plus and Business next. Three: billing is usage-based and shares one pool with Codex, ChatGPT for Excel, and Workspace Agents. Count tokens before, not after. A complex task burns quota quietly. Security: OpenAI touts Auto-Review, where senior models check important actions before they run, and claims it blocked 100% of protected-data extraction attempts in red-teaming. 100% in a lab is zero confirmations in ****. Test it yourself. Sober read The model war moved from IQ to unit economics. The product war moved from chat to the desktop that holds your files. Testers are already posting "best model I've touched." Maybe. That's day-one sentiment, not fact. The real scoreboard isn't a benchmark. It's the "AI spend" line in an enterprise budget. That's a market you can actually read. The window is the next couple weeks, before prices settle and everyone re-routes spend. Rebuild your routing around three models now and you enter the quarter with a smaller bill for the same work. Everyone else reads the thread and changes nothing.

• 
  Abhishek Singh (@0xlelouch_) reported 9 minutes ago

  System design question. How would you design Dropbox file sync with conflict handling? Constraints to make it real: 1) Clients are offline for days, then reconnect over flaky networks. Upload is resumable and idempotent. 2) Same file edited on 2 devices before either syncs. You need deterministic conflict detection (hash + version vector/etag?) and a UX for duplicates. 3) Renames/moves vs edits: preserve history and avoid treating rename as delete+upload. 4) Large files (2–10GB) need chunking, dedupe, and partial re-upload (content-defined chunking vs fixed). 5) Consistency: per-file ordering vs global ordering. What is the conflict scope and how do you prevent flip-flopping? 6) Server state: metadata store vs blob store, retention for old versions, and how you garbage collect orphaned chunks 7) Security: encryption at rest, per-user keys, and how sharing folders changes trust boundaries

• 
  ṢƘĪÑlÖVẸ́R̃ṢX🇺🇲🌷 (@skinloversx) reported 10 minutes ago

  Hey Daddy I'm down for FaceTime 💧 Dropbox and all kind of nasty content message me for menu 💦💦🍆 #dmvfreaks

• 
  Eusebiu Balan (@BalanEusebiu) reported 11 minutes ago

  @gezimqaili been on dropbox for years, never let me down honestly

• 
  Kirby (@StewartKirbyTNP) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Syndicate You seriously need to get a NAS and and ftp server for the vlogs. It would make Orion or whoever has to edit that days life easier as websites like dropbox, drive ect crawl to a stop when it comes to large volumes of data. An FTP server goes WHEEEEEEEE

• 
  Jeremy Goldberg (@jeremy_goldberg) reported 19 minutes ago

  @omooretweets @midjourney and AI agent adoption isn't a unique short term issue to 'solve' - the UX of products for consumers has always been *everything*. solve that in just one niche and you can build a whole company off that - dropbox, roku, tinder…

• 
  Ihtesham Ali (@ihtesham2005) reported 21 minutes ago

  This is how you share a file when you do not trust Google, Dropbox, or the government. A free tool called OnionShare sends it directly through Tor. Nothing needs to sit permanently on someone else's server. Here's what actually happens when you use it. You drag a file into the app. Your own computer turns into the server. Tor wraps it, and you get a long address ending in .onion that you send to whoever needs the file. They open it in Tor Browser and pull the file straight off your machine. You close the app, the address dies. Compare that to how everyone else moves files. You drop it in Drive, Google keeps a copy. You use WeTransfer, that link lives on their infrastructure for a week, logged and tied to your IP. Every one of those services is a promise that a company will behave well, forever, under any amount of legal pressure. OnionShare removes the company from the sentence. Micah Lee built it in 2014. He'd worked with the journalists handling the Snowden documents and watched how many ways a source could get burned just trying to hand over a file. So he built the thing that removes the middle. It does three things. Send files with no size limit and no account. Chat with someone and keep zero record of it. Host an entire website off your laptop that disappears from the internet the moment you shut the lid. The New York Times, The Guardian, and The Intercept all point sources at this. Those are newsrooms betting other people's freedom on a free download. The interface looks like a file picker from 2011. Someone spent years making the hardest privacy problem in computing feel like using WinZip, and that's the actual achievement here. A scared person at 2am is not going to configure a server. They can drag a file into a window. It is completely open source. Most people will never need this. The ones who do don't get a second try if they picked the wrong app. What do you think about this?

• 
  J.F. Lawrence | Author (Jesse) (@jflWrites) reported 21 minutes ago

  @spaceemotion All good ideas. I've thought about Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive. They suffer from persistence, login requirements, and users fiddling with things that change permissions. AWS is cheap, and I'm considering it, but I'm trying to pay for this off of my measly book sales, so...

• 
  Bhavyam Arora (@AroraBhavyam) reported 22 minutes ago

  99% startups who applied to yc today will get rejected. here's what the smart ones do next: a no from yc isn't the end. they literally encourages you to reapply and tracks your progress across applications. the founders who get in later treat rejection as round one, not game over. the playbook: "don't wait for feedback" yc doesn't tell you why you got cut at the application stage. so stop self-doubting firstly. the reasons founders get rejected are almost always the same: - no visible progress between "idea" and "application" - not the perfect answer why you're the right team for the problem - vague answers that read as ai slop or unclear thinking reapply. it actually works. - dropbox: drew houston applied solo, got rejected, was told to find a cofounder. he did, reapplied, got in. - reddit: rejected for a completely different first idea. yc liked the founders and told them to come back. they did. the pattern never changes: build, show progress, come back stronger! you can apply again right now yc's decision lets you apply for the next batch. no need to wait months to get another chance. don't put your life on hold other strong programs are still open while you regroup. check the attached tweet below for whole list where you can apply as well. apply in parallel, not "later." the real unlock is traction a reapplication that says "we listened, we built, here are the numbers" beats a first application every time. the 6 months after a no matter more than the no itself. rejection quietly filters out the founders who were never that serious. don't be one. 💀 follow @arorabhavyam for weekly content around founders, startups and AI! 🫡

• 
  Zafar (@zafartalks) reported 23 minutes ago

  @asidorenko_ I understand but sometimes at some point our brain started telling us just make it public. You never know. Let’s not forget Dropbox which layed the foundation for their file sharing competitors. He was solving a problem for himself which turned out to be a successful business.

• 
  Fougars (@fougars67) reported 23 minutes ago

  @GaleTRogersJr @vaNlabs Three replies and you still have not answered the actual question: how does Leadpoet revenue accrue to alpha holders? V440 is not a permanent top-32 cartel. There is no hard cutoff and the threshold is dynamic. Dropbox is piloting Leadpoet, not “signed as a customer.” The fact that everyone sold the announcement candle is precisely the point. The business may have value, but the token has not demonstrated durable value capture. Sorry your bags are down bad, but insulting me does not fix the alphanomics.

• 
  Mike Nolan - ⌬CatalyticComics⌬ (@CatalyticComics) reported 25 minutes ago

  As a developer I wanted to build something that addresses every issue I've run in to as a reader. These are my top ones: - Campaigner emails a Dropbox link and maybe you miss it - DRM/server requirements that amount to "you don't really own it" - No above-board way to share

• 
  Taka (@takanola) reported 35 minutes ago

  why can't @Dropbox stayed sign in anymore?

• 
  Sol!A3800 (@SolA3800) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Dropbox I have loads of upload problems with Dropbox, scarce access to customer support inside the app, whilst when trying to get customers support from outside the app, the information says get customers support from inside the app. Have paid £19.99 for more than a year with little use benefit of the service, am considering closing the account.

• 
  Abhi • AMZBoosted.com (@AbhiChauddhari) reported 40 minutes ago

  Everyone downloads Seller Central reports manually. Every. Single. Day. The problem isn’t downloading reports. It’s remembering to do it before you need the data. AMZBoosted schedules report downloads automatically and sends them wherever you want. Google Sheets. Dropbox. Telegram.

• 
  Jack (@jackcoder0) reported 41 minutes ago

  1. Kill the Login Items the apps launching before you even sit down. Every time you log in, your Mac quietly launches 10-25 apps in the background. Spotify. Slack. Zoom. Google Drive. Dropbox. Creative Cloud. OneDrive. Each one consumes CPU and memory before you've opened a single window. System Settings → General → Login Items & Extensions. Review the list. Remove everything you don't need the instant you log in. You can always open them manually when you actually need them. His Mac had 19 login items. He needed 3. He removed 16. Boot time dropped from 2 minutes to 18 seconds. The first few minutes of every session — that sluggish, unresponsive window where nothing works gone.

• 
  IT Guy (@T3chFalcon) reported 43 minutes ago

  The code itself is just a pattern that encodes a URL. it's not dangerous. what it points to might be. The attack is called: Quishing. QR code phishing. It works so well because can't see where a QR code goes before you scan it. A phishing link in an email is visible, people have been trained to hover before clicking. A QR code gives you nothing to hover over. you scan and you're already there. And security tools are mostly blind to it. email filters scan text and URLs but a QR code is an image. 12% of all phishing attacks now use QR codes specifically because they bypass email security gateways that weren't built to read images. In 2026 — Stickers are being placed over legitimate QR codes at parking meters, EV charging stations, and restaurants; your payment goes to the attacker. — QR codes in emails leading to fake Microsoft 365 or bank login pages. 83% of malicious Microsoft 365 documents now contain QR codes instead of links. — multi-stage attacks: QR code leads to a Dropbox or Notion link that looks legitimate, which then loads the phishing page. — fake address bars on mobile called Browser-in-the-Browser. The padlock shows, the URL also looks right but it's a fake overlay on a small screen you can't scrutinize. QR code phishing attacks increased fivefold in 2025 alone. The FBI also issued a public advisory.

• 
  Jordan (@GoodLordJord) reported 43 minutes ago

  @SmugFecundity @techsaleshackz One million paying customers narrows it down to only a handful of saas companies in the world. Something with that many customers is obviously mature and has a ton of smb business. Probably something like docusign or dropbox which I could totally see a 50 yo doing ok at.

• 
  Grant B. (@GrantB423) reported 44 minutes ago

  yo Sam, anyway you could dm the Dropbox link for your “ghosts’n’stuff” remix? it was taken down off every single platform @Jauzofficial

• 
  Sunil Thakare 🇮🇳 🦀 (@thakares) reported 45 minutes ago

  @TLYShortener offering a genuinely useful, privacy-friendly app (no login, no ads) that seamlessly integrates with the company's core product (t_ly short links), is indeed a standard growth tactic seen in tools like Canva, Notion, or Dropbox. The QR app lowers barriers for users while creating natural upsell opportunities: frequent QR creators may later pay for t_ly analytics, custom domains, or branded links without feeling forced. Trade-off is transparent here; users get a solid free scanner but feed data into t_ly's ecosystem, which benefits the provider through increased link volume and potential premium conversions.

• 
  Paulius Eidukas (艾文) ☭ (@nilsenist) reported 45 minutes ago

  @RavenT1me Sorry about that! The hacked account asks to download a virus disguised as an "indie game". I've reported that both to Discord and Dropbox/GitHub/YouTube which help distribute the file. Hopefully that shuts down the hacker at least temporarily. Hope you get your account back!

• 
  AaronAlamary | Parking (@aaron0505) reported 45 minutes ago

  I saved my grandfather's voicemails for years. Birthday wishes. Questions about his computer. Who to call to fix his A/C. Upgraded my iPhone and they were gone. Devastated. Found them today sitting in my Dropbox. SO glad I get to hear him again!

• 
  Rocinante (@wb9rms6gyz) reported 47 minutes ago

  @griffin_daly_ @AlexisCoe Which could well have been part of the arrangement. This piece of **** is actively live tweeting his daughters stuffy issues and shared a Dropbox with naked photos of her. He’s a lunatic. As someone who ripped Moreno a week ago…no lie, I think he’s legally constrained

• 
  quantzoid (@quantzoid) reported 48 minutes ago

  @gurishsharma sorry, you're in YC to take down dropbox but you didn't know how to approve a PR on github? what?

• 
  komm64 (@komm64) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Celeriumcore I see, thanks. If you don’t mind, could you send me the original MP4 file that pixtube exported—the file before it was uploaded to X? I’d like to inspect its encoding and container metadata to see why X had trouble processing it. A Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, or WeTransfer link sent by DM would be perfect. Please send the original file without re-encoding it. No worries if that’s inconvenient!

• 
  Valentin.exe (@PujaMak0302) reported 55 minutes ago

  @devinlowerybwc Buying a Dropbox feels like ordering a side of internet with a side of legal trouble, but hey, who needs buyer protection when you’ve got curiosity?

• 
  JP Invests (@JP_Invests) reported 55 minutes ago

  $DBX - Dropbox added 96,000 paying users this quarter. I said this morning to watch that line after last quarter's roughly 14,000 sequential adds. They did seven times that, a third consecutive quarter of growth, to 18.19M. The stock is down 4%. Everything I said to watch on the growth side came in fine. Revenue $631.5M, above both the $624-627M guide and the $627M street. Non-GAAP EPS $0.75 against $0.74. Non-GAAP operating margin 39.7%, above the full-year range. ARPU $139.68, up from $138.32. What went the wrong way is the part I said would actually move it. Free cash flow fell to $235.2M from $258.5M a year ago, and the margin went from 41.3% to 37.2%. And the buyback decelerated: $330M this quarter against $410M in the same quarter last year, with first-half repurchases down 19%. Unlevered free cash flow rose to $283.5M, and the gap between the two numbers is interest. Cash paid for interest went to $48.3M from $17.9M. The buyback is debt-funded and the debt now costs something. Diluted share count is down 18% year over year to 226.8M, which is the one thing still working mechanically. Two things about the release itself. Guidance isn't in it — Dropbox moved the numbers to supplemental materials on its investor site this quarter, which breaks with how it has reported. And the entire release is quoted by a co-CEO who writes "stepping into this role." The 8-K contains no disclosure of a leadership change. Twenty-nine percent of the float is short. $DBX

• 
  Genius Business (@GeniusBusiness_) reported 58 minutes ago

  How Dropbox Spaces was conceived Spaces didn't start as a product idea. It started as a problem Drew Houston says he and his customers were all living. "[Spaces] is part of a bigger evolution we've been on that really started with our customers and realizing that the experience of using technology at work has become incredibly fragmented and distracting." The more he looked at it, the more he saw a cruel irony: the tools built to help us were the ones breaking our concentration. "A lot of the tools we're using that you think would be helping us focus have unintentionally made it impossible to focus. And that's a problem if you need to use your brain at work, because your brain works best when you can focus." That, he decided, was the real enemy. Not a missing feature, but lost focus. He called it "the higher level problem." He could see where it came from. Work simply doesn't look the way it used to: "It's very different from 20 years ago when we got five emails a day, not 500." Twenty years ago you might have just used Office. Now you're in Office and G Suite and Slack and Zoom and Dropbox all at once. 100 tabs, everything blinking at you all day, apps that don't work together. So the framing question became: how do you fix the environment itself? "How do we evolve Dropbox into the app that makes all your other apps work better together?" The breakthrough was a shift in how Houston understood what Dropbox already was. Watching customers, he realized they didn't treat it as a place for their stuff, or as just a folder on the desktop. "It's the place you're going to work." Once he saw it that way, the design conclusions changed: "When we thought about it that way, we realized we would have made a bunch of different decisions, and realized that Dropbox is actually really well positioned to help people focus at work." Two conclusions followed. First, Spaces had to move beyond files. Teams collaborate on far more than documents: Google Docs, Airtable, Figma, Trello and there had never been one place to hold all of it. So Spaces became “an evolution of the shared folder” that “moves it beyond being a folder full of files to an intelligent team workspace for any kind of cloud content.” "You can still have your PowerPoints and PDFs, but they can be next to your Google Docs and Trello boards and whatever else you have. Give you one space, not 10." Second, and this is where the concept sharpened. Spaces had to become a workspace, not a filing cabinet. Houston traced the problem back four decades. The thing we call "the desktop" is, functionally, the operating system: "The interface is the operating system." And it had been frozen in time: "That user experience hasn't really changed... it basically looks the same as the early 80s when it was first introduced on the original Mac." It was designed for a world that no longer exists: "It's this single player static experience that was perfect for when our whole life fit on a couple of floppy discs." So the team ran a thought experiment, start from scratch, for now: "If you were to redesign this for 2019, you'd make a bunch of obvious changes." You'd still want the files and cloud content. But you'd add the things the 80s interface never had: people, activity, comments, a record of what's been happening. You'd organize around the projects you're actually working on. You'd see your calendar, get Slacked, and start a Zoom meeting all without leaving the app. That thought experiment became Spaces.