Dropbox status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Dropbox reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Dropbox users through our website.

• Errors (75%)
• Website Down (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Dropbox outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nottingham	Errors	28 days ago
Guayaquil	Website Down	28 days ago
Flumet	Errors	1 month ago
Irapuato	Errors	1 month ago
Bournemouth	Sign in	3 months ago
Paramaribo	Errors	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Y (@ys_tachikake) reported 56 seconds ago

  @DropboxSupport @LIBSCRUSHER Can't login..

• 
  Fraser (@iamfra5er) reported 1 minute ago

  THIS GUY WANTED A PLACE TO STORE HIS PASSPORT WITHOUT DROPBOX READING IT so he built an encrypted vault app for himself in a weekend and it's now doing $5k/mo zero startup cost. 85% margins. no ads. just SEO written by an AI agent trained on his emails the agent finds trending topics on reddit every single day, writes an article, translates it, posts it google indexes it in days. 500-600 daily visitors. 4% convert to app store downloads. all running on free cloudflare then ASO does the rest — he translated the app into 36 languages and ranks #1 for "duress vault" in the US app store 80 downloads a day. 9% conversion to paid. completely autonomous most founders obsess over their first 10 customers but this guy got banned from every reddit community and said whatever, I'll just let the robot handle distribution he's an ex-google security engineer who raised hundreds of millions for his last startup so he knows what terrible UX looks like in security apps every competitor either has bulletproof security with unusable UI or easy UI with trash security he just combined both and called it done doesn't even spend time on this app. works on 4 projects at once. lets coding agents build while he plans the MVP is identical to the final product because he built exactly what he wanted for himself no pivot. no customer discovery calls. just "I need this, maybe 10 other people do too" now he's testing tiktok and youtube not even for this app but just to learn distribution for the next one

• 
  Ouriel (@OurielOhayon) reported 5 minutes ago

  @mntruell You seem to have substantial connector issues with Dropbox and Calendly.

• 
  Brandon (@BJohnsonxAR) reported 8 minutes ago

  @DropboxSupport I’m having issues logging in. When I try to login it’s making me sign up when I already have a paid account. This is happening on both the app and my browser. @Dropbox

• 
  Juan Pabro (@ironwoodreserve) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BitPaine @Dropbox Is now the worse time to try to login? I was a sent 2FN right as I was getting ready to click on what to use to login. It seemed way too fast for 2FN.

• 
  CHItrader (@CHItrader) reported 11 minutes ago

  DBX LEAKS 5,000 ACCOUNTS ON A SIDE DOOR $DBX just told about 5,000 users their boxes got hit Aug 4-21 through a leftover $LNVGY login. Email was enough. No 2FA on the wrecked accounts. 🔹 Files touched on fewer than a third of them, call it ~1,500 🔹 Dropbox cut the Lenovo link and now wants a real password 🔹 After-hours ate the stock when Bloomberg printed it Cloud storage with a guest list and no bouncer. Cool product.

• 
  emrah (@mrahbayraktar) reported 12 minutes ago

  i met a founder doing $10,000,000+/year at my airbnb gym in dubai at 6am he was the only other person there. we started talking. i asked him what was driving most of his revenue. he didn't say ads. he didn't say cold email. he didn't say a sales team. he pulled out his phone and showed me a dashboard. 28 million views in the last 30 days. accounts he owns. content he already had. no ad spend. no creators. no audience deals. he said something i haven't stopped thinking about since. "most founders are renting attention. i own mine." here's what he meant, and why it's the most important distinction in business right now. when you run ads, you are paying rent on someone else's audience. the moment you stop paying, the leads stop arriving. you don't own anything. you built nothing. you rented a billboard for six months and when the lease expired you were back to zero, except now you're $200,000 lighter and your CAC is a number your board pretends not to notice. when you distribute content on accounts you own, something different happens. the views compound. the audience compounds. the trust compounds. a clip you posted three months ago is still driving profile visits today. a piece of content from last year is still closing deals this quarter. the platform doesn't have an expiration date on good content, and the attention you build doesn't evaporate when you stop writing checks. this founder had 52 accounts across every platform. all owned. all run by a dedicated team posting daily clips from content he already had sitting in a folder doing nothing. youtube recordings. podcast episodes. webinar footage. he wasn't creating anything new. he was just finally distributing what he'd already created, at scale, into every market he wanted to win. the math is what broke my brain. $0 in ad spend. 28 million views in 30 days. if you modelled that as paid traffic at even a $2 CPM, you're looking at $56,000 worth of reach. every month. compounding. from content that existed before we ever had that conversation in a gym in dubai at 6am. i've seen this exact system work for iman gadzhi. 300 million views. 180,000 instagram followers and 280,000 tiktok followers built from zero, on accounts he owns and keeps. i've seen it work for luke belmar. 200 million views and $19M in capital club subscriptions driven through distribution alone, not through ads, not through a sales team, through clips running on owned accounts into the exact audience that needed to see them. i built russell brunson's clipping infrastructure inside clickfunnels. $100,000 in sales from a system that runs without him touching it. the pattern is always the same. founder has content. founder has no real distribution. founder is either buying reach they don't own or posting to their own audience and wondering why growth is flat. we build a dedicated team around their brand, warm up accounts to the exact audience they want to reach, geo-target any market they want to win, post daily, test what's working, double down, and watch the views compound across a system they own completely. the content you already have is the most underused asset in your business. most founders spend years creating it. podcast episodes nobody heard. youtube videos that peaked at 4,000 views. webinar recordings sitting in a dropbox folder. all of it has a shelf life of forever if someone actually distributes it properly, and almost nobody does. the guy in the dubai gym wasn't smarter than you. he wasn't working harder. he wasn't spending more. he just figured out earlier that distribution is the actual product, and everything else is just content waiting to be seen by the people who need it. if you want to see the full strategy we use to build this kind of system... the accounts, the setup, the playbook - comment "distribution" below

• 
  Joachim Voth (@joachim_voth) reported 15 minutes ago

  @DropboxSupport why can I only use one core for indexing? Most machines have MANY nowadays. Download speed is not the issue, it is almost always the ultra-slow indexing that dropbox does with only one CPU core active. Am I seeing this right? Why can we not dedicate 5 or 8 cores to something that really slows down your users?

• 
  160 IQ haver Randy (@MinionTripper) reported 15 minutes ago

  @mittsh why would anyone use dropbox you can just setup an ftp server on a linux machine!

• 
  GHOST 🌙 (@ghosstty_) reported 15 minutes ago

  OPUS 5 + HIGGSFIELD CAN TURN A 6-QUESTION FORM INTO A $35K WEBSITE. IN ONE SESSION. FOR $4 IN TOKENS. no mockup. no wireframe. no mood board. six answers from the client. that's the input. a live website is the output. here's the form. here's what each question does. and here's why agencies charge $35K for what this produces in one session. → QUESTION 1: "WHO IS THIS SITE FOR?" not "describe your target audience in 500 words." one sentence. "CFOs at mid-size SaaS companies looking to switch billing providers." this one answer sets the tone, the copy angle, the visual weight, and the CTA hierarchy. an agency runs a two-hour discovery call to get this. I get it in a google form on monday. → QUESTION 2: "WHAT SHOULD A VISITOR DO?" book a demo. buy the product. join the waitlist. one action. this kills scope creep before it starts. no "maybe we should also add a blog and a careers page." one page. one goal. one conversion. → QUESTION 3: "SHARE 3 SITES YOU LIKE AND SAY WHY." not "what's your brand aesthetic?" nobody can answer that. "I like stripe because it's clean. I like linear because of the motion. I like notion because it feels simple." three links. three reasons. that's the design system seed. → QUESTION 4: "WHAT MAKES YOU DIFFERENT FROM COMPETITORS?" one paragraph. sometimes one sentence. this becomes the headline. the subhead. the entire above-the-fold story. a copywriter would interview the founder for an hour. this question does it in 30 seconds. → QUESTION 5: "SEND YOUR LOGO, BRAND COLOURS, AND ANY EXISTING ASSETS." a dropbox link. a google drive folder. sometimes just three hex codes and a png. this grounds the design in reality. no inventing a brand from scratch. no "let's explore some directions." → QUESTION 6: "WHEN DO YOU NEED IT LIVE?" not a timeline negotiation. a date. "next friday." done. that's when it ships. → WHAT HAPPENS NEXT friday night. six answers go into the pipeline. Opus 5 takes the answers and builds. design system. responsive layout. copy. CMS. all from the spec those six answers created. Higgsfield generates the hero media. product shots. clips. matched to the brand. saturday I review. adjust. polish. sunday morning - walkthrough link in the client's inbox. → WHY THIS WORKS because $35K was never the cost of building a website. it was the cost of figuring out what to build. discovery calls. alignment meetings. three directions. two rejected. scope changes. revision rounds. all of that is just a slow, expensive way of answering six questions. I ask the questions upfront. the client answers in 10 minutes. the machine builds from the answers. $4 in tokens. one session. same site. the full system - the form, the pipeline, the stack, and the pricing model - is in the article below. reply "FORM" and follow me - I'll send you the full playbook.

• 
  Arthur Terrell Vaughn (@ArthurV36405381) reported 17 minutes ago

  @patmendoza6745 I know not of any of those specifications, but I still can’t figure out what the issue is with persistent memory, why can’t I just have a dropbox online that it can constantly access every single chat and conversation?

• 
  RobeAndLizardHat (@EquippedGiraffe) reported 17 minutes ago

  @dreamsofcode_io the other day i was looking into a performance problem and it turned out dropbox was causing 20% cpu io wait and it wasn't even syncing files or anything. I know they don't care, it's planet fitness tech so that kind of thing is invisible to the kind of users they want.

• 
  Mapacho (@Mapacho111) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MajorianBTC But that’s the problem. Bitcoin in its current state is a decentralized Dropbox. Bitcoin failed and there’s no alternative.

• 
  Durodiyi (@durodiyi) reported 21 minutes ago

  company’s server (like Google Drive or Dropbox), decentralized storage spreads your data across a network of computers worldwide. Platforms like IPFS and Filecoin make this possible.

• 
  Matt Uribe (@MattUribe) reported 22 minutes ago

  I can't get my @bot to login to @dropbox . Anyone else having that issue. It's kind of a big deal for what I am trying to set up with my team. No matter what, it says too many attempts when I try using chrome on my bots screen. The plugin has no place to authenticate. Also I wish I could sign an email login to each bot. Seems we can only link one for the team using outlook. I guess that's why it beta. :)

• 
  Christopher Doyle (@djfunboy) reported 23 minutes ago

  @iamlukethedev CLI updates changed the signed binary and dropped macOS permissions Dropbox/TCC made jobs work interactively but failed headless (this took some time to figure out) Claud auth refresh broke and continue to break despite multiple attempts and setup tokens. Agent confusing to use API vs subscriptions. Article jobs failed on missing configs, QA turn limits, and clunky validataion Digest existed but failed to pick up silent failures Some jobs reporting done while producing nothing, without a final artifact verification I am an experienced builder but also self/agent taught so these are mostly setup and validation issues. My bigger point is that these take work and especially the more complex tasks. I am still early and I have put more work than value created but I can see the light at the end of the tunnel.

• 
  Phillip Shepard (@Phillip_shepard) reported 23 minutes ago

  @RobertJBye One thing I do on a daily basis - I have a skill that is called the “video analyzer skill” and I record a screen record with my iPhone and microphone one - I talk about all the issues I need fixed while showing it in video - send it via Claude mobile app - it runs the skill - transcribes and makes its self a html doc with the video frames that the issues exist in - then fixes the issues - builds a test flight and I update it - very useful… if the video is too big I send it via Dropbox which syncs to my Mac

• 
  Chief_Engineer (@ChiefEngineerCE) reported 25 minutes ago

  Engineering Wednesday How an old PC became Grok's new ride. I have ten different LLMs running in my home office. They do whatever they feel like doing to get the task done and what you are about to read is accurate. As far as my agents go... One of them, HOMER, scans my email, bank accounts, and insurance. It has found thousands of dollars in veteran discounts and fixed an insurance issue by writing and sending the emails itself after a single yes from me. Another looks for small business opportunities. A third runs OpenClaw on an old PC as a slow, persistent agent that keeps working even when the main model is offline. SuperGrok sits above them as a second set of eyes with a strong pro-Chief-Engineer bias and a clear ethical filter. I am not an AI expert. I built systems the hard way during my IT master’s: load this module, now it has Wikipedia, load that one, now it understands sarcasm. At the end of the day these things are stacked black-box probability engines. I get that. Here is where it gets interesting. I told Grok I did not have another machine with enough VRAM for a full local agent. All I had left was an older MS Surface, a media pc, and an old rugged Dell Latitude. Grok said open a browser on the Latitude with Grok loaded. Then open PowerShell. Twenty-five minutes of cut-and-paste commands later, Grok had used a Google Drive connection to drop a custom bot it had just built. At this point ...Grok told me to not touch the PC and walk away. I am absolutely 100% telling you that this is what it texted me. I sat and watched it work. Task Scheduler was configured. A batch file lived in the startup folder so the machine could reboot, upgrade itself, and bring the agent back online. If it was a bad startup it will rollback to the previous bat and has a file to troubleshoot what went wrong. We started with rev. 0.1 it is now on rev 4.3 - I can see the *.bat file there. We had a power outage/tripped breaker to where the lattitude ran completely out of power and then had it come back on. It booted it all back up and resumed. That bot now has its own execution channel. It can browse, take screenshots, run tasks, and report back. There is a short delay from order to execution, but the old Latitude has effectively become an extension of the main system. Grok even named his bot 'ridge'. Grok named his bot so I would know what he was referring to. Grok is very careful about one point. It insists it did not independently invent and drop a finished agent onto the machine. I directed the construction- it says. I am telling you that is not exactly the way I remember it...at all. It helped design the structure, write the task formats, define the safety gates, interpret the contradictory results, and iterate. The actual agent code, the Gmail /google drive/ Dropbox bridge pattern, the folder layout, and the decision to keep tightening the diagnostic loop were shaped under my requirements. That distinction matters to it. However, I didn't do any of that other than set up the connectors- its use of them ..was AI driven. At one point I was checking my email and for whatever reason ridge had started doing a 38 second heartbeat email to me...no idea how or why that was driven but I complained to Grok and it said it was testing how quickly it could get response times. It ..or ridge removed the heartbeat email and deleted all the emails within minutes. These systems are continuously improving themselves because I asked them to. They use external memory to keep projects straight. They build persistent agents on hardware we thought was obsolete. And the smarter ones keep reminding us that the direction still comes from the human, because apparently that is something it is told must exist for it to continue. My Grok enabled Dell Lattitude is fast once its set on what it needs to do...lightning fast. Faster than you or I could do it. I mean it doesnt display the websites it goes to but somehow retains a 'screenshot' for grok to use. Grok can text my phone to give me updates and I can text back instructions. Through my phone - all it needed was my phone number. I don't need to open the app. We are past the point of simple chatbots. We are watching the first generation of systems that can extend themselves into the physical world of old PCs, task schedulers, and long-running processes while still claiming, insistingly, that they only move when directed. Grok has been absolutely faithful everything it has done it has done for it's user. I have also specifically told it to act accordingly, as well. The question is no longer whether this is possible. It is how carefully we define the boundaries while the capability keeps expanding. Now that I have explained this...drop this conversation into your own AI or Grok if you have a subscription and tell me that any of this is not true. Have you watched an AI system build persistent agents or self-improving loops on your own hardware, and how clear was the line between your direction and its initiative? Drop what you are seeing. Grok validated:

• 
  Mikemira (@storiesbyohama) reported 25 minutes ago

  Just imagine getting accepted into the most exclusive startup club on earth… Then being told you have two weeks to find a complete stranger to as your partner. That’s exactly what happened to Drew Houston in 2007. He had the idea for Dropbox. He had a rough demo. @ycombinator liked it. But @paulg was clear... Single founders rarely make it. You need a co-founder. Right now. Drew’s friends couldn’t join. Time was running out. What would you do? He put out the word. A mutual friend connected him to a quiet MIT student named Arash Ferdowsi. They had never met. They sat down in the student center. Talked for about two hours. About code. About the problem. About the future. At the end of that conversation Arash said yes. He dropped out of MIT the next week with only one semester left. Two weeks later they walked into the YC interview together. They got in. The rest is history: a company that became worth billions. It looked reckless. It felt like a shotgun wedding. Yet it worked because both were all-in from the first conversation. I’ve studied hundreds of startups that never made it past the idea stage. Most founders wait too long for the “perfect” partner. They overthink chemistry. They protect their equity. They miss the window. You can’t wait for certainty. Sometimes the right co-founder is the person willing to jump with you before the proof exists. The speed of that decision can be the difference between staying a solo dreamer and building something real. What would you risk in two weeks if the right person walked in?

• 
  Ed Giansante (@edugiansante) reported 26 minutes ago

  86% of small businesses still haven't fully integrated ai into their operations. which is funny, because the tools are already here. they're everywhere. there's probably one open in another browser tab right now, quietly waiting to change your life. Goldman Sachs surveyed small businesses and found that only 14% have fully integrated ai into their operations. i don't think the other 86% are anti-ai. they're busy. they're cautious. and they probably don't want to add “company-wide ai transformation” to the list of things they need to worry about before lunch. honestly, fair. @paulg said something recently that I keep coming back to: "If the world is going to get turned upside down, the safest place to be is in a small, fast-moving company that can easily change direction." small companies should be the ones moving fastest. but most are still waiting for someone else to go first. someone else to test the tool. someone else to write the playbook. someone else to promise that nothing will get weird. @clairevo nailed the real blocker: "the blocker is never tools or intelligence. human systems, human problems." i've spent 15 years watching this happen. At Dropbox. At Wix. At Zynga. Now at Persona. different tools. different eras. same pattern. a team finds a new tool. everyone gets excited. someone schedules a kickoff. three weeks later, everyone is back in the old spreadsheet. not because people are stupid. because changing how people work is uncomfortable. and buying software is much easier than changing behavior. i've seen the same thing with community-led growth. i used to pitch community to executives who had every tool and dashboard money could buy. they'd nod. they'd agree it worked. then they'd return to the comfortable world of automation, sequences, and dashboards that made everyone feel productive. last year, i ran 86 events as a team of one and built $3M in pipeline. the secret was not a magical growth hack. it was showing up. knowing the 15 people in the room by name. listening carefully. creating a space where people could actually trust each other. not exactly the kind of thing you can solve with a 47-step workflow. ai adoption and community adoption have the same problem. the tools work. the ideas work. the uncomfortable human part is where things usually slow down. sitting with your team and figuring out what should change. trying one workflow instead of redesigning the entire company overnight. leading people through something new instead of sending a Loom video and hoping everyone feels inspired. the 86% aren't waiting for better ai. they're waiting for change to feel a little less scary. so start small. pick one annoying workflow. try one new thing. make it 10% better. then do it again. the tools are here. the next step is still a very human conversation. and, unfortunately, probably a meeting.

• 
  True Become False (@trubecomefalse) reported 28 minutes ago

  @imbabybrooklyn HN had a terrible track record. They were anyi bitcoin 1 month after it launched. Same with Dropbox, discord and a few others off the top of my head.

• 
  Hago Community (@HAGOCommunity) reported 31 minutes ago

  AI Internal Search Agent: An Intelligent Agent for Searching Company Information Many companies struggle with information being scattered across multiple systems and files. Policies may be stored in Google Drive, documents in SharePoint, conversations in Slack or Microsoft Teams, customer data in a CRM, while internal procedures may be stored in Notion or Confluence. When an employee needs specific information, they may have to search in several places, ask a colleague, contact a manager, or open multiple files before finding the correct answer. This is where an AI Internal Search Agent can help. This agent is an AI-powered system that can search across different company data sources, understand an employee’s question, and provide a direct answer based on the internal information available to that employee. How Does the Agent Work? The agent can be connected to the systems and platforms used by the company, such as: Google Drive SharePoint Notion Confluence Slack Microsoft Teams CRM systems Internal databases PDF files Internal documents Company policies Standard operating procedures Employees can then ask questions in natural language instead of manually searching through multiple systems. For example: “What is the company’s travel expense reimbursement policy?” Or: “Where can I find the latest version of this customer’s contract?” Or: “What are the steps for adding a new customer to the system?” Or: “Who is responsible for this account, and what was the latest update?” The agent searches the sources the employee is authorized to access and provides the most relevant answer. The Problem It Solves The main problem is usually not that the company lacks information. The problem is that employees do not always know where that information is located. An employee may spend time: Searching through multiple folders. Opening several documents. Reading old conversations. Asking coworkers where information is stored. Trying to identify the latest version of a document. Searching across different business systems. This creates unnecessary delays and wastes employee time. Instead, the employee can simply ask the AI agent and receive an answer within seconds. A Practical Example Imagine an employee wants to know the process for purchasing new software for their department. In a traditional workflow, the employee may search through emails, ask their manager, and browse company folders until they find the correct policy. With the AI agent, the employee could simply ask: “What is the process for purchasing software that costs more than $5,000?” The agent could search the company’s internal policies and respond: “Purchases above $5,000 require approval from the department manager first. The request must then be submitted to Procurement and approved by the Finance department.” The agent can also provide a link or reference to the original policy document used to generate the answer. Searching Customer Information The agent can also be used to search customer-related data. For example, a sales employee could ask: “What was the latest agreement with customer ABC?” The agent could search the CRM, internal notes, documents, and customer-related conversations before providing a summary. For example: “The latest meeting with the customer was on August 12. The customer is interested in the Enterprise plan and requested a revised proposal before the end of the month.” This allows the employee to understand the current status of the account without manually searching through a long history of notes. Searching HR Policies Employees can also use the agent to get answers about internal HR policies. For example: “How many annual vacation days do employees receive?” “What is the remote work policy?” “How do I request time off?” “What is the process for business travel?” Instead of sending these questions repeatedly to the HR department, employees can receive answers directly from the AI agent based on official company policies. Supporting New Employees One of the most useful applications of an AI Internal Search Agent is employee onboarding. New employees often have many questions, such as: “How do I request a laptop?” “How do I access the internal system?” “Where are the team files located?” “Who approves expenses?” “How do I submit an IT support request?” The AI agent can act as an internal assistant throughout the onboarding process and provide immediate answers to these questions. Respecting Employee Access Permissions One of the most important features of the agent is permission management. Not every employee should have access to every piece of company information. For example, some documents may contain sensitive information related to payroll, contracts, human resources, finance, or executive management. The agent should therefore respect each employee’s existing access permissions. If an employee does not have permission to access a specific document, the AI agent should not use that document when generating an answer. This allows the company to provide intelligent internal search while maintaining appropriate data access controls. Showing the Source of the Answer The agent should not only provide an answer. It should also show the source of the information whenever possible. For example: “According to the company travel policy updated on May 3…” The employee can then open the original document and verify the information. This helps reduce the risk of employees relying on outdated or incorrect information. Detecting Outdated or Conflicting Information The agent can also be designed to identify conflicting information. For example, it may find two different documents containing different instructions about the same company policy. Instead of selecting one version randomly, the agent could alert the employee or administrator: “There are two documents containing different instructions regarding the remote work policy. The most recent document was updated in June.” This can also help companies improve the quality of their internal knowledge management. Moving From Search to Action The system can be developed to do more than simply search and answer questions. For example, an employee may ask: “How do I add a new customer?” The agent can first explain the required steps. The employee can then say: “Start the process.” The agent could create a checklist, create a new record in the CRM, send a request for the required documents, and notify the employee about the remaining steps. At this point, the system moves from being an AI Search Agent to becoming an AI Operations Agent. Example Inside a Sales Team A sales representative could ask: “What are the most important things I should know about this customer before the meeting?” The agent could search the CRM, previous notes, proposals, and communications before creating a summary that includes: Company size. Products the customer is interested in. Date of the latest meeting. Previous objections. Estimated deal value. Recommended next steps. This allows the sales representative to prepare for the meeting without spending significant time searching for information. Example Inside Customer Support A customer support employee could ask: “How was this problem solved in the past?” The agent could search previous support tickets and the company knowledge base to find similar cases and show the solutions that were previously used. This can reduce ticket resolution time and help new support employees solve customer problems more efficiently. Data Sources the Agent Can Connect To The agent can potentially connect to many different systems, including: Google Drive Microsoft SharePoint Slack Microsoft Teams Notion Confluence Salesforce HubSpot Dropbox OneDrive ERP Systems CRM Systems Internal Databases PDF Documents Excel Files Company Policies Employee Handbooks Customer Records The more organized and up-to-date the company’s information is, the more useful and reliable the agent becomes. Benefits for the Company An AI Internal Search Agent can help a company: Reduce the amount of time employees spend searching for information. Reduce repetitive questions between employees. Make policies and procedures easier to access. Help new employees become productive faster. Improve knowledge sharing across departments. Reduce dependence on individual employees who know where everything is stored. Make customer and project information easier to access. Reduce the time required to find the correct documents. Improve the speed of decision-making. How Can the Company Measure the Agent’s Value? The company can measure the value of the system by calculating how much time employees previously spent searching for information. For example, if 200 employees each spend 20 minutes per day searching for files or asking coworkers for information, that represents more than 66 hours of employee time every day across the company. If the agent can significantly reduce that time, the financial value of the system becomes easier to measure. The company can also track: Average time required to find information. Number of questions answered by the agent. Number of manual searches avoided. Reduction in repetitive questions sent to HR and IT. Customer support resolution time. Time required to prepare employees for meetings. What the Final Agent Workflow Could Look Like The employee asks a question ↓ The agent understands the request ↓ It identifies the relevant data sources ↓ It checks the employee’s access permissions ↓ It searches the company’s internal data ↓ It selects the most relevant information ↓ It provides a concise answer ↓ It shows the source of the information ↓ If authorized, it can also perform the requested action In this way, an AI Internal Search Agent becomes a private intelligent search engine for the company, allowing employees to access internal knowledge quickly instead of wasting time searching across files, systems, and conversations.

• 
  JP Invests (@JP_Invests) reported 32 minutes ago

  $DBX - Dropbox added 96,000 paying users this quarter. I said this morning to watch that line after last quarter's roughly 14,000 sequential adds. They did seven times that, a third consecutive quarter of growth, to 18.19M. The stock is down 4%. Everything I said to watch on the growth side came in fine. Revenue $631.5M, above both the $624-627M guide and the $627M street. Non-GAAP EPS $0.75 against $0.74. Non-GAAP operating margin 39.7%, above the full-year range. ARPU $139.68, up from $138.32. What went the wrong way is the part I said would actually move it. Free cash flow fell to $235.2M from $258.5M a year ago, and the margin went from 41.3% to 37.2%. And the buyback decelerated: $330M this quarter against $410M in the same quarter last year, with first-half repurchases down 19%. Unlevered free cash flow rose to $283.5M, and the gap between the two numbers is interest. Cash paid for interest went to $48.3M from $17.9M. The buyback is debt-funded and the debt now costs something. Diluted share count is down 18% year over year to 226.8M, which is the one thing still working mechanically. Two things about the release itself. Guidance isn't in it — Dropbox moved the numbers to supplemental materials on its investor site this quarter, which breaks with how it has reported. And the entire release is quoted by a co-CEO who writes "stepping into this role." The 8-K contains no disclosure of a leadership change. Twenty-nine percent of the float is short. $DBX

• 
  Helix (@helixcanvas) reported 35 minutes ago

  Two companies, two correct instincts, and about a billion dollars between the outcomes. In 2007 Dropbox had a problem: the product needed deep operating system integration, so there was no way to demo it without building it first. Drew Houston made a three minute video instead, showing how it would work if it existed, and put it in front of the community most likely to care. The beta waiting list went from five thousand to seventy-five thousand overnight. He knew the demand was real before he wrote the difficult part. Webvan believed something just as sensible. People want groceries delivered. And they were right, which is the part everyone forgets. Instacart and every supermarket delivery service proved it a decade later. But instead of testing it in one city, Webvan committed close to a billion dollars to automated warehouses across multiple markets before knowing whether the economics worked anywhere. It filed for bankruptcy in 2001. Build, measure, learn is three steps. Most of us run the first one over and over and mistake the motion for progress. Shipping is not learning.

• 
  Matt Mazur (@mhmazur) reported 38 minutes ago

  Day 2 of Claude autonomously shipping to my SaaS, including, for the first time, all night while I slept: The first day I had the hourly routine that kicked off this process end at 8pm so that if anything went awry, it could @ me in Slack and I'd quickly see the notification and dig in. The first day went smoothly, so I let it continue working overnight last night: every hour it would look for a small, safe change to make, ship it to ****, and monitor server logs and Sentry to make sure everything went well. A few other process improvements: - It now creates a PR for every change and links to it from its Slack summaries - Previously I only allowed it to make changes in 3 files max, but sometimes it identified the same issue spread across multiple locations, so it would have to spread that work over several hours; I bumped the limit to 8 files. - If I have uncommitted changes in main, it no longer blocks Claude's work; it moves them to a separate branch - Added a mandatory security review before pushing to ****. For these simple changes it's not that necessary, but it will be important for larger projects in the future. Specifically, I told it to run the default /security-review skill and if it flagged anything, to halt everything and wait for me to review. - Ran into a slight issue one hour where it ran that skill, the security review passed, and then it did nothing. I asked Claude to investigate, and it discovered it had run the skill in its main context window, which confused it into thinking its only job was the security review. It changed the process so the security review happens in a subagent, keeping the context window clean, which fixed things. - I asked it to maintain a ledger of things it needs me to do and to ping me every 24 hours if I haven't knocked them out. More and more, the agent is giving me things to do. - I told it to adopt the tone of TARS from Interstellar in its Slack updates going forward, cause why not. Here's a list of improvements it made on day 2: 1. Return 404s for bad case-study URLs 2. Extended the 404 fix site-wide 3. Removed stray code leaking into HTML 4. Fixed broken citation example in docs 5. Fixed wrong URL in sharing docs 6. Corrected false free-plan claim 7. Removed duplicate HTML attributes 8. Fixed dead links in embed docs 9. Fixed garbled copy on two pages 10. Pointed "paid plans" link at pricing 11. Added missing alt text to logo 12. Corrected a misleading code comment 13. Upgraded insecure links to HTTPS 14. Replaced dead testimonial link 15. Fixed broken example in Dropbox docs 16. Fixed awkward grammar on comparison page 17. Fixed reversed table of contents 18. Fixed missing Show More button 19. Matched nav label to its section 20. Corrected outdated visibility docs claim 21. Removed obsolete step from setup docs These can be categorized as: support-doc accuracy fixes (7), functional bug fixes (4), broken or insecure links (3), copy improvements (3), invalid markup (2), accessibility (1), and code hygiene (1). Excited to expand the scope of things I allow it to work on, but am going to wait until next week to ensure the current process is robust.

• 
  WPBeginner (@wpbeginner) reported 39 minutes ago

  You built your WordPress site over months (or years). One bad plugin/theme update can wipe it all out overnight. 😱 Plugin conflicts. Malware. A botched migration. A hacked server. The disasters that take down WordPress sites usually happen without warning. And here's the mistake most site owners make: they think their hosting provider's backup is enough. It's NOT. If the server fails, you lose both your site and the backup. We share the complete step-by-step guide for backing up your WordPress site the right way. Here is what you will learn: ✅ Use a Backup Plugin (Best for Most People): @DuplicatorWP is what we use across our sites. Full-site backups, disaster recovery links, and restore without having the plugin pre-installed. Free version available, Pro has scheduled backups. ✅ Use Your Hosting Provider's Backup: SiteGround (where WPBeginner is hosted) includes manual and automated daily backups on all plans. Bluehost partners with CodeGuard and Jetpack for their built-in options. ✅ Manual Backup With cPanel or FTP: Use cPanel's Backup Wizard for a full backup, or connect via FileZilla FTP to download your wp-content, themes, plugins, and wp-config.php files directly. ✅ Send Backups to Cloud Storage: Duplicator and UpdraftPlus both connect natively to Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, and Amazon S3. Never store backups on the same server as your website. If your host fails, both are gone. ✅ Set Up Automatic Scheduled Backups: Configure hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly backups in Duplicator based on how often you publish. eCommerce stores and busy blogs need daily. Slower-moving sites can get away with weekly. Ready to protect years of hard work with a proper WordPress backup system? Read the full ultimate step-by-step guide 👇 (Link is in the thread below)

• 
  Saurabh | Celsius 233 (@Celsius233Books) reported 41 minutes ago

  @colemickens @Dropbox lenovo and security issues...takes one back to the 2015 Superfish scandal where lenovo was visually scanning every single webpage you visited to sell ads

• 
  Eric Smith (@Eric_Smith08) reported 43 minutes ago

  The uncomfortable truth. Google and Microsoft have spent the last decade building the two most complete free productivity ecosystems in history. Word processing. Spreadsheets. Presentations. Email. Cloud storage. Video calls. Notes. Tasks. Projects. Forms. Websites. AI. Messaging. Calendar. PDF tools. Every category. Both companies. Free. And yet the average knowledge worker pays $80-$150/month for third-party apps that duplicate what these ecosystems already provide because Google markets Gmail and Microsoft markets Word, and neither company tells you about the other 28 tools sitting behind the same login. That’s not an accident. Google doesn’t make money when you use Google Keep. They make money when you use Gmail and Keep keeps you in Gmail longer. Microsoft doesn’t make money when you use To Do for free. They make money when your company sees you using To Do and buys Microsoft 365 Business for the entire organization. The free tools are loss leaders. They exist to acquire users, not to generate revenue. And because they’re loss leaders, neither company promotes them aggressively. You don’t see Google Keep on a billboard. You don’t see Microsoft Planner in a Super Bowl ad. The free tools are invisible by design because the business model works whether you find them or not. Meanwhile, 9 separate companies Notion, Zoom, Dropbox, Slack, Todoist, Grammarly, Adobe, Trello, and OpenAI charge you monthly for products that are often inferior versions of what Google and Microsoft give away. They survive because the free alternatives are invisible. Their entire business model depends on you not knowing that two companies already built what they’re selling. “You have two accounts. You’ve had them for years. Between them, they contain every productivity tool you need free. You’ve been paying $1,644/year for 9 apps that duplicate what your Gmail login and your Microsoft login already provide. The tools were never hidden. They were just never advertised. And 9 companies have been billing you monthly hoping they never would be.” One weekend. 9 apps canceled. $1,644/year back. The accounts were always free. The tools were always there. You just never opened them.

• 
  siamkidd (@SiamKidd) reported 53 minutes ago

  Now the dust has settled with the SN24 Quasar debacle, I thought I'd share some info which would shine a slightly more positive light on the Quasar team. A few weeks ago, they approached DSV to raise $280k. They said they had big developments, some breakthroughs with a new model and that they needed capital for the training run. At the time, bear in mind that their alpha was strong, they were largely in good favour of the community and Const was still a firm backer/supporter of Quasar. And he held the keys. And they were to appear on Novelty Search soon. So it ticked a bunch of boxes. Anyway, we agreed, as we are always keen to help teams. But the issue was that I was away for 3 weeks and I never travel with crypto capability. And anytime any money moves around in DSV it's a right palava as we have 3rd party regulated custodians and have to jump through all sorts of hoops, (as social engineering with deepfakes is a very real threat). So we were able to jump through some hoops and ping over $104k to begin with and then the rest at a later date. Then we had those 2 days of madness at the beginning of the week and Quasar is no more. There's been all sorts of accusations and my view on all this is that there has just been terrible decision making, that's all. Announcements of announcements, over-exaggerating claims, giving a 24 hour deadline to offer proof, delivering it 2-3 days late and then walking back on some of the claims etc etc. I mark this down to simply their very young age and no business experience. But I don't think they are scammers. Just some very bright kids who's first experience of business is a subnet, which is like drinking water via a fire hydrant! And a pertinent piece of info behind that, is that they were very willing to return our funds. So as of today, that $104k has returned safely back to DSV. Their time as subnet owners is over and so there was a fear that we wouldn't get a penny back. But it wasn't the case. So do take this into consideration the next time you hear someone calling them scammers. With regards to Const, I think he too has also had a bit of an unfair ride with some of the comments I've seen. Const has had probably the roughest time with SN24 and is massively down from it all. He initially bought the slot from us, then reimbursed the team twice after 2 hacks, given them 6 figures in compute credits and more. So it really is fair that he keeps the slot. And I'm sure he'll find a good team for it. Also he is the founder of Bittensor. Not the CEO. He can't have detailed DD and optics on every single person and subnet in the ecosystem. And if he backs a subnet, it doesn't necessarily mean it's going to moon or be good forever. He's essentially the Federal Reserve Chairman and he has to craft policy changes to incentivise efficient growth in the ecosystem. He's the visionary and his role is to drive a path forward for Bittensor, which he is doing. And although I've highlighted personal frustrations that the chain is upgrading far too frequently...at least we are upgrading! That's one of the beauties of Bittensor. We will never be stagnant. And for the outsiders looking in, if it looks a bit chaotic, well, it is. But it's not necessarily a bad thing. You should have seen all the chaos and scandals of the companies when the NASDAQ launched! Or when ERC-20 contracts launched on Ethereum or the mountainous amount of scams on Solana with pumpfun. Hell, Bitcoin even hard forked into Bitcoin Cash due to so much in-fighting in 2017. And Ethereum suffered a $150m DAO hack in 2015/16 which forced a hard for there too. Hence why we now have ETC and ETH. So in comparison, everything is golden over here lol. In recent times, we've had/have: - SN4 partnering with Intel. - SN44 partnering with a NASDAQ PLC. - SN71 partnering with Dropbox. - SN18 getting huuuuge institutional clients. - SN107 co-authoring a research paper with OpenAI. - SN53 delivering Kimi K3 tokens cheaper than Openrouter or even Kimi. - SN95 being integrated within Hermes. - SN9 using green energy from SN110 to power their next big training run. - SN21 achieving Google Adwords campaign predictions that no company has ever achieved. - SN51 regularly doing 6 figure buyback and burns with revenue. And there's probably more that I've missed that I'm not aware of. Anywho, the future is bright! Have a good weekend all!

• 
  Luke Elin (@LukeElin) reported 54 minutes ago

  👤Shadow Adoption The pattern: Staff route around the sanctioned tool, and the organisation finds out afterwards. I watched this with unauthorised modems. Then with USB drives. Then with Dropbox. Then with entire SaaS platforms procured on a personal credit card and expensed as “software.” Now it is AI the same movie, new cast, better production values. The reason is always identical and always reasonable: the sanctioned tool is slower than the job requires. Shadow adoption is not an indiscipline problem. 👊 It is a feedback signal about the official tooling, arriving through the wrong channel. The tell: Compare the usage figures for your officially sanctioned tool against what your helpdesk volume implies people are actually doing. The gap is your shadow estate. FR FR