eBay status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of eBay reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by eBay users through our website.

• Website Down (50%)
• Sign in (31%)
• Errors (19%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent eBay outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Gateshead	Website Down	45 minutes ago
Cheltenham	Sign in	4 hours ago
Preston	Website Down	5 hours ago
Preston	Website Down	10 hours ago
Preston	Website Down	22 hours ago
London	Sign in	22 hours ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

eBay Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Elom Letters (@Elomletter) reported 2 minutes ago

  eBay's Board of Directors officially rejected GameStop’s unsolicited $56 billion acquisition offer, describing it as "neither credible nor attractive". eBay Chairman Paul Pressler cited significant uncertainty regarding GameStop’s ability to finance the deal. The $125-per-share offer consisted of half cash and half stock, but analysts noted that the much smaller GameStop, valued at roughly $11–12 billion would have to take on massive debt or significantly dilute its shareholders to cover the cost. The board stated it remains confident in its standalone strategy and existing management, dismissing GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen’s proposal to use 1,600 physical GameStop stores as "fulfillment and authentication hubs". eBay also expressed concerns over GameStop's corporate governance and the proposed leadership structure. @gamestop ( $GME) Shares fell approximately 4.1% in premarket trading following the news. @eBay ( $EBAY) Shares were down roughly 1.1%, trading at approximately $107, well below GameStop's $125 offer price, indicating that the market had already doubted the deal's feasibility. Ryan Cohen has previously signaled a willingness to go hostile, potentially bringing the offer directly to eBay shareholders or launching a proxy fight for board seats if the unsolicited bid was dismissed.

• 
  Chad Holloway (@ChadAHolloway) reported 4 minutes ago

  I know this is a long shot, but I’m still in search of this 2013 issue of French magazine Poker 52. If anyone happens to have a copy, I’d very much love to get my hands on it. I’ve checked eBay over the years but to no avail. Feel free to tag anyone you think might be able to help.

• 
  James Surowiecki (@JamesSurowiecki) reported 6 minutes ago

  If Ryan Cohen were actually offering eBay shareholders $125 a share in cash, the board would obviously take that offer seriously. He's not. He's offering $62.50 a share in cash, and the rest in watered-down, overpriced GameStop stock, which he wants eBay shareholder to trade their shares for. It's a ridiculous offer, which eBay's board correctly rejected.

• 
  **** Master Broda (@PimpMasterYoda1) reported 12 minutes ago

  @TheDkmariolink @Dexerto Highly questionable but eBay running it would be much worse. Ebay's frequently had technical problems over the past 5+ years beyond fee increases. Listings not showing up in search results even when the title is typed word for word, randomly deleting/re-listing and the website itself going down for hours at a time overnight for "updates". Ever since they've started using AI and hiring tons of H1Bs while firing their engineers, things have gotten progressively worse. They've only updated a few of their aging servers in the 30+ years the site has been online.

• 
  TYay0 (@_TYay0_) reported 13 minutes ago

  eBay has formally rejected GameStop's buyout offer, shutting down the ambitious, though perhaps improbable, attempt by the struggling video game retailer to acquire the e-commerce giant. This decision leaves GameStop in a more precarious position, needing to urgently redefine its strategy amidst a rapidly digitizing market. > Strategic Implications: The rejection underscores a fundamental mismatch between GameStop's legacy physical retail model and eBay's established digital marketplace. For eBay, accepting an offer from a company with significant financial struggles and an uncertain future likely presented an unacceptable risk profile for its shareholders. GameStop's move was widely seen as a bold, almost desperate, play to pivot its business model. Without the eBay acquisition, the company must now find another path to relevance and profitability in a gaming landscape increasingly dominated by digital distribution and subscription services. $GME $EBAY

• 
  Small Feet Big Heat (@SmallFeetHeat) reported 17 minutes ago

  Things like this come with the territory of buying sneakers and the occasional selling. Just seems like I’m having an issue more and more with GOAT. Think I’ll give them a break and turn to Stock X and EBay for a while.

• 
  Ansgar John (@ansgarjohn) reported 20 minutes ago

  @wolfejas @darrenrovell No, it has $29 billion in cash and eBay is buying GameStop through extra shares that will be created. 1. The offer in numbers Total deal value: ~$56 billion (some reports cite $55.5–56B depending on exact share count). Price per eBay share: $125 (cash + stock). Premium: ~20% over eBay’s Friday close before the announcement (implying eBay’s pre-offer market cap was ~$46–48B). eBay shares outstanding: ~448–451 million (quick check: $56B ÷ $125 ≈ 448 million). Payment split: Exactly 50% cash + 50% GameStop common stock, with eBay shareholders allowed to elect their mix (pro-rata if oversubscribed). So the split is: Cash portion: $28 billion (half of $56B). Stock portion: $28 billion worth of newly issued GameStop shares. 2. How the cash portion ($28B) is funded — the core math Cohen didn’t spell out GameStop doesn’t need to come up with $28B in cash out of thin air. Here’s the exact funding sources disclosed in their offer letter: GameStop’s existing cash & liquid investments: ~$9.4 billion (balance as of January 31, 2026; recent reports confirm it’s still ~$9B). New third-party debt financing: up to $20 billion via a “highly confident” commitment letter from TD Securities (a TD Bank subsidiary). Total cash available for the cash portion: $9.4B (GME cash) + $20B (new debt) = $29.4 billion That fully covers (and slightly exceeds) the $28B cash needed. The extra ~$1.4B provides a buffer for transaction costs, fees, or minor adjustments. In equation form: Cash required = $28B Cash sources = Existing cash + New debt commitment $28B ≤ $9.4B + $20B → Fully financed on paper. The letter explicitly states: “The cash consideration is expected to be funded from a combination of (i) cash and liquid investments on GameStop’s balance sheet, which totaled ~$9.4 billion as of January 31, 2026, and (ii) third-party acquisition financing, in respect of which GameStop has received a highly-confident letter from TD Securities for up to $20 billion.” (Note: “Highly confident” is one step short of a fully committed debt facility, which is common in early-stage unsolicited bids; it still signals strong bank backing.) 3. The stock portion ($28B) — no cash required This is pure equity issuance: GameStop issues new shares directly to eBay shareholders. The exact number of shares (and exchange ratio) will be set at signing so the stock component equals $28B in value at the agreed price. GameStop’s pre-deal market cap was ~$12 billion. Issuing $28B worth of new stock means significant dilution for existing GME shareholders (roughly tripling the share count in value terms, depending on the final price). Post-deal ownership sketch (simplified, assuming no major market reaction): eBay shareholders receive ~50% of the deal value in GME stock → they become major owners of the combined company. Original GME shareholders retain ownership of the pre-deal equity minus the dilution from the new shares issued. This is standard “cash + stock” M&A math — the stock issuance finances half the purchase without needing more cash or debt. 4. Quick pro-forma picture (why Cohen says it can work) Combined company gets eBay’s ~$10B+ annual revenue + GameStop’s operations + ~$2B in targeted annualized cost savings within 12 months. Cohen’s vision (from the letter and WSJ interview): Integrate GameStop’s 1,600+ physical stores for eBay authentication/fulfillment/live commerce, turning eBay into a stronger Amazon rival worth “hundreds of billions.” Debt load increases by ~$20B, but the combined entity’s cash flows + synergies are meant to service it. Bottom line on the math: The $28B cash leg is covered by $9.4B on-hand + $20B committed debt capacity. The $28B stock leg is covered by printing new GME shares. No mystery — it’s all in the public letter. The real questions (which CNBC rightly pressed) are execution risk, massive dilution, whether banks will ultimately fund the full $20B, regulatory hurdles, and whether eBay’s board/shareholders accept. Cohen’s on-air answers were evasive because the numbers are straightforward once you open the letter — but he didn’t walk viewers through the arithmetic the way a CEO normally would in a high-stakes deal interview. This is the clear, no-spin version. The deal is still non-binding and faces long odds, but the financing math itself adds up on paper exactly as described.

• 
  Kevin C. (@Natterforme) reported 20 minutes ago

  @marvlous_melody They think rummaging around for 50 year old copies of out of print issues in second hand comic stores or using ebay for collections is a legitimate long term solution. Or spend $80-150+ per omnibus which is nothing like a Japanese takubon in reading order or series.

• 
  Dee Cay (@LCockswain) reported 23 minutes ago

  Lowkey the site was super nice to read out of print comics and not give some bum like 20$ on ebay for the first issue of it.

• 
  CHItrader (@CHItrader) reported 23 minutes ago

  $GME GAMESTOP SHARES DOWN 2.7% AFTER EBAY REJECTS ACQUISITION PROPOSAL

• 
  BarronGoesToIran (@collide_z) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Trickster42069 @SarahLeon28397 @ryancohen and, by the way, Vinted works much better than Ebay, much less to fix

• 
  Julie Wade (@julie_wade) reported 25 minutes ago

  Cohen’s conviction on this point is deeply personal. In a recent interview, he highlighted this exact vulnerability, detailing his own experience as an everyday eBay consumer. He revealed that he made multiple purchases on the platform—specifically digital items for his son—that turned out to be fraudulently advertised, forcing him to undergo the friction of initiating chargebacks. Expressing outright disbelief, he openly questioned how a major marketplace could allow such basic operational failures to persist. For a CEO obsessed with customer delight, that experience highlights a critical, systemic failure in digital trust. It also serves as the perfect pivot to the darker side of the thesis: if simple consumer fraud is this prevalent and unmanaged, what else is hiding in the system? The Forensic Risk Layer: The "Ghost Architecture" Hypothesis The public-facing thesis is purely operational: modernize eBay, optimize logistics, and restore trust. But given Cohen's own encounters with platform fraud, a serious acquisition of eBay necessitates a deep forensic audit. This introduces the risk layer. The following is a hypothesis, not an allegation: eBay’s protracted stagnation may have allowed hidden inefficiencies, synthetic activity, ghost accounts, or non-economic transaction patterns to calcify within the marketplace. These anomalies are rarely visible through headline revenue, Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV), or active-user metrics. Uncovering them requires bottom-up telemetry analysis. A marketplace can appear healthy on the surface while actively harboring volume that is low-quality, non-repeatable, artificially inflated, or entirely disconnected from physical commerce. If Cohen’s team is executing due diligence, they are likely scrutinizing the relationship between reported transactions and physical reality: inventory movement, shipping integrity, buyer-seller linkage, tracking reuse, account clustering, and authentication failure rates. The foundational question is simple: How much of eBay’s marketplace activity is real, durable, physical commerce? The NGO Laundering & "Fees as a Service" Hypothesis One forensic risk scenario involves the exploitation of marketplace infrastructure for non-traditional capital flows. Under this theory, certain accounts might utilize eBay-style transactions not to trade goods, but to generate legitimate-looking payment records and move capital. This could hypothetically involve shell entities, offshore actors, or coordinated account networks. The entity's label is irrelevant; the core issue is whether the transaction possesses actual economic substance. The model is straightforward: 1. A controlled buyer account purchases a high-value, vaguely described item from a controlled seller account. 2. Little to no meaningful physical inventory changes hands (shipping may be recycled, unverifiable, or minimal). 3. The payment clears through the marketplace, the seller receives an e-commerce payout, and the platform collects its final value fee. 4. The transaction secures a pristine digital paper trail. In this scenario, the marketplace unwittingly becomes a fee-based transaction wrapper. The ghost seller sacrifices normal retail profit margins to acquire the transaction record. For the platform, this activity inflates GMV, transaction volume, and fee revenue. But the revenue quality is entirely hollow. Due Diligence and the "Skeletons" Risk GameStop would not simply be buying eBay’s reported numbers; it would be buying the quality of those numbers. A rigorous due diligence process would demand deterministic telemetry analysis. Key audit questions would likely include: Are active-user metrics inflated by ghost accounts? Are there unusual, circular buyer-seller loops? Are there transaction clusters with weak evidence of physical goods movement? Are specific categories producing high fee revenue but low physical verification?

• 
  Kai - Briefing Block (@briefing_block_) reported 26 minutes ago

  $GME — GameStop falls 4% after eBay rejects $56B bid - GameStop shares slid more than 4% after eBay turned down its takeover offer. - The proposed deal valued eBay at $56 billion. - But doubts over financing kept the bid from gaining traction. - That left eBay slightly lower while GameStop took the sharper hit.

• 
  Limp Henry 📢🐟 (@IiiLimpet) reported 29 minutes ago

  @alphaquantus @StockRetail So? That’s a RC problem not a EBay problem.

• 
  Trade Winds Daily (@TradeWindsDaily) reported 33 minutes ago

  $GME Absolutely fascinating. Ryan Cohen tried to buy $EBAY for $56 billion. EBAY banned his personal account, then reinstated the account. Cohen then listed items on EBAY saying he was selling them to fund the bid. EBAY banned him, again. @TheRoaringKitty posted mysterious messages on social media tonight. Stock spiked 13%. He deleted the posts. Alternatively, he was hacked. Stock collapsed. Nobody knows what the posts said. Classic. GME filed with the #SEC to increase authorized shares from 1 billion to 2.5 billion. That is a 150% increase. That is a lot of potential dilution. The market noticed. Insiders have sold $0.4M in shares over the last three months. Zero insider buying. One analyst says the stock is 123.6% overvalued at current prices. Retail sentiment on Stocktwits is bullish with message volume up 977% today. One user wrote "They just forced the cat guy back into the narrative." That is THE bull thesis in one sentence. The stock is down 4.6% today at $23.17, pressing toward the $22.60 support level that technically matters most right now. Four ring circus. One stock. Zero boring days. $22.60 is the line. Everything else today is entertainment. NFA. DYOR.

• 
  Lisan Al Pablo (@Pablo01618) reported 34 minutes ago

  $GME sorry folks but the eBay acquisition will nuke your share price, what you need now is hope that the acquisition shows fruits.. eBay has a monopoly and moving forward if they integrate selling of games cards etc into the eBay platform it makes sense for a company like GameStop.. at scale problem is gaming is also dying a slow death and becoming more personalized.. its more about micro transactions as a revenue source than consoles or games themselves.. if this was 20 years ago.. great buy… now? Yeh not so much.. I think ur all actually fukt

• 
  TechEdgeDaily (@techedgedaily) reported 35 minutes ago

  @IlariLehti @KobeissiLetter Fair point on the stock swap structure. Technically possible but eBay's board still has to agree the combined entity is worth more than eBay standalone. And "neither credible nor attractive" suggests they don't think GameStop brings enough to the table even with creative financing. The cash is the problem like you said. Stock deals work when both sides see upside. Hard to sell that when one side is a meme stock with volatile pricing.

• 
  rnewton (@rnewton7777) reported 41 minutes ago

  I asked last week, How do you price this? (eBay + GameStop) There are a lot of models you can try to build but ultimately I think it only really matters for me if I capture Wallstreet's sentiment. Because as I wrote in some longwinded post a few weeks back, they will have an algo parse the filing on deal close and "price" the deal by selling it to that level in the extended market when we can't trade. We have seen this repeatedly lately, that's how this whole thing works. So my model will essentially be wrong automatically because I don't know how the street models these things precisely. And they will absolutely pin the price immediately to what they think is "fair value," via sell action. Then as new details emerge and quarterly progress on optimization and such happens, they'll evaluate the balance sheet and price it again. And again. And again. For anybody that watched my videos, they must laugh, because in 2022 I was so optimistic all the time. Then I watched them price it to $10 and I was humbled. I simply didn't know how aggressively they could price a target down. And so I learned a measure of respect. But then I got excited again and bought in the 30s when Roaring Kitty came back and was re-humbled when we got priced back to the teens. And even with all our balance sheet improvements, our fortress of cash, our operational profit, and our collectibles pivot, I was re-humbled again in late November and December twice. Again, back to the teens. Does it mean we are destined to always price back to the teens? No, it simply means somebody felt compelled to price the stock down for whatever reason. Maybe they sensed weakness. Maybe there was sell side pressure post warrant issuance. Maybe options interest collapsed post Q3 earnings. I don't exactly know why we mark down so badly sometimes or mark up so much other times. So I don't know the model to even use today on GameStop even though I recently said I like knowns and feel I know current dog-form version GameStop. So how can I model a totally new thing? I know I'll mess it up just like I messed up cash per floor several times and still don't feel super confident in it today. So for the time being I'm not settled on any particular model. I see the word accretive thrown around a ton. This deal could work out to be accretive in the sense that per share value could go up over the long term, yes. eBay has value that can be unlocked at scale, so the shareholder value would spill over to us as GME holders post deal optimization period. Does that mean it moves in a straight line? No. Could we compress back to some mark down that represents paying for eBay at premium + cash drag on 20b in loans + unoptimized eBay? Seems likely to me. What's the mark down look like? How fast could Cohen unlock value, deleverage, etc? Well a very simple model would be something like this, Imagine he does de-leverage the 20b loan very quickly. If the combined company has 1.6b shares (even that is unknown), simple division shows: $20,000,000,000 / 1,600,000,000 = $12.50 dollars per share That means if Ryan Cohen and leadership can cost cut super fast, pour operation profit into the loan and pay the balance down, liabilities drop off by $12.50 a share. That's what he means by "not running it hot." That's what I personally mean by paying off your mortgage as fast as possible. Leverage and margin are terrible. That's why eBay leadership doesn't want this deal right now. $20 billion financed at 7 or 8% corporate rate is enormous drag on profitability that they don't currently have. But again, if he can work magic and pay it off very quickly, Assets - Liabilities = Shareholder Equity. Drop liabilities by $20 billion and you immediately increase shareholder equity by $20 billion or $12.50 a share. So while I don't know the immediate post deal compression price, I see a post leverage price as +$12.50. Because that's just basic mathematics. And that is certainly accretive. Because increasing share price on GameStop by $12.50 for leadership is significantly harder right now. That would take something like 5-10 years at current rate using a fundamentals analysis. There just isn't any fat left to cut and while we are making $600m a year or whatever, 600/488 = $1.23 a year. But post deal, to me, looks ugly. People want to do models like: GME $11b Market Cap + EBAY $55b = $66b Doesn't work like that. or, GME $23 a share + EBAY = X Doesn't work like that. You have to do it how the street is doing it and they'll use some formula based on revenue, earnings, assets, liabilities, etc. And the deal burns our assets. The deal burns our earnings (loan coupon). The deal burns our shareholder equity. The deal likely adds something like $25 billion or more in Goodwill to the balance sheet because otherwise shareholder equity would actually be negative. And I am not a fan of goodwill. It is why GameStop was overvalued when it was recklessly acquiring bad companies in 2014 and why it got marked down so badly when they dropped all the goodwill in 2019 or so. Goodwill is, imho, nonsense financial wizardly meant to make assets - liabilities = shareholder equity still make sense on paper when it simply doesn't because of destructive acquisitions. Not to say this is a bad deal, not at all. It is a fine deal if and only if Ryan Cohen can land it at the stated price or better and immediately extract at least $20 billion in savings to de-leverage. Because that right sizes the balance sheet, makes the phantom $12+ in goodwill share value real and protects our downside. I watch tickers all day where stocks trade at 100 PE or 10 PE. Sure, the street could love this deal, ignore the goodwill, and send this thing (up). But I don't know how to model that either. I don't know the rationale for why they send some stocks and not others. For example, Best Buy is trading in the gutter but the balance sheet is fine. Shareholder equity is fine. It isn't in any sort of fiscal distress. But it is out of favor, so it trades at a very low multiple. Meanwhile, name any other stock right now and it might have negative EPS, negative shareholder equity, and be weeks from insolvency, but trading at 40 PE. Why? No clue. So on this one, I have to assume for the immediate term, as much as GameStop would now be 75% eBay 25% GameStop, it would trade post deal a bit out of favor still. Because for whatever reason, we trade as an underdog. How badly do they compress it? Do they respect goodwill or simply ignore it? Do we trade at 30b market cap or 40? Or 50? You can build 20 different models and they will all sound great on paper. Then you'll wake up in the pre market and be trading at 16.50 or 21.50 or 32.50 and be like, Oh obviously. But it really isn't obvious at all, it is totally subjective. And the player with all the ability to price it, all the economic leverage in the world, is going to apply some model to it that is totally different than Best Buy or PayPal or whatever and they'll have all the logical reasoning for whatever it is they do. And we'll just be a leaf on a river wondering why we couldn't see where we were going. So it isn't that I can't price the post deal. I can. 20 different ways. And all of them will be wrong. So do your own modeling however you want, read others' models, and be skeptical of them all. Because at this point we don't even know the final terms. Assuming the deal closes, and I honestly believe it will, just in a long while, because closing on a house takes a long time let alone a 55b company, Is $125 per eBay share the final accepted offer? 50% cash still? 20b in debt? At what coupon (interest rate)? 50% stock still? At what conversion? And is there any other angle we're missing here? Suppose, just for the sake of pure hopium, Cohen has outside backing in the form of a large institutional presence that wants to do a block equity finance deal where they take something like a $20b interest in the new company via common or preferred stock. Well that changes everything immediately. And that isn't altogether that unrealistic. So it is very hard to model this right now. Be careful but have fun with it. Will it immediately send the stock? Very hard to say. But it certainly gives room for immediate upside improvement via debt paydown. And I do like that along with the other things Ryan Cohen is talking about. Because right now upside movement from a fundamentals perspective, on GameStop's balance sheet, is not bad, it is just slow. This could be fast and people want fast. But it could be volatile... I just hope people understand why.

• 
  Signal8 (@Signal8Ai) reported 41 minutes ago

  pre-market movers, cross-referenced with EDGAR: $GTM -40%. slashed full-year revenue guidance. CRO sold $210K at $5.87 in april. pre-market $3.84. $GME -8%. eBay rejected the $56B bid over financing. cohen's plan was to issue stock. shares outstanding already up 24% annualized. $UAA -18%. posted a $0.03 loss on $1.17B revenue. the CRO selling five weeks before a 40% gap down is the one worth studying.

• 
  Kevin Holland (@ou1989klh) reported 41 minutes ago

  @BosCardHunter Accidentally included two cards that didn’t need to go to an authenticator in Santa Ana … show as delivered but they were never sent back to me nor were they sent to the buyer .. had to issue the buyer two refunds … neither eBay nor the PSA office out there has addressed ..

• 
  Brian Bullock | Everyone Knows (@EveryoneKnws1) reported 42 minutes ago

  @nytimes SWING AND A MISS GameStop offered $55 billion for a company worth around $30 billion on paper. Sounds rich until you look at the wallet. GameStop has roughly $4 to $5 billion in cash. Everything else would have been debt. That's why eBay called it "neither credible nor attractive." The premium was real. The funding wasn't. Ryan Cohen has been running a Buffett-style play. Use the company as a platform, deploy meme-era cash, transform the business. Problem is Buffett built that empire over 60 years with a strong balance sheet. Cohen is trying to compress it into 4. Experience always beats enthusiasm. NOW EVERYONE KNOWS

• 
  ElevatedPNW (@dustino20371995) reported 42 minutes ago

  @business @opinion In some cases eBay won’t have a choice. They have fiduciary duty issues, and I’m sure with close inspection from the inside, it’s much bigger than that. I’m here to FAFO, do your thing Ryan, I’m more than impressed what u did with chewy, then the turnaround at GameStop. I’ve got my money on Ryan all ******* day long. I smell blood in the water.

• 
  Nacho Contreras (@NachoCo55107473) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Sp3ndPay Fix the ebay links. Amazon is working great

• 
  Balance Sheets Matter (@BSheetsMatter) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Comedyorwat @eBay $GME is down since RC become chair and ceo while EBay is up over 100%+ in those 2 periods of time

• 
  James Surowiecki (@JamesSurowiecki) reported 48 minutes ago

  @BoilerPaulie Cohen is offering eBay shareholders no premium, since half of the offer is in watered-down, overpriced GameStop stock that he wants eBay shareholders to trade their stock for.

• 
  Sean Williams (@AMCScam) reported 50 minutes ago

  @ARGDlive As I said in the very first post... good for you. I don't care what you invest in. I'm just giving you SEC-filed data why eBay is going to reject. GameStop biz is terrible, Ryan Cohen offers no growth plan, and no one wants GME shares outside of the GME community. It's a reject.

• 
  GMEbay Bloat (@GMEbay_Bloat) reported 52 minutes ago

  @SignalToGamma Totally agree. He’s a plant. Perhaps someone shorted eBay and doesn’t like the run up. Need him in there to bring it back down.

• 
  Nathan Snyder (@ANateForFate) reported 53 minutes ago

  DC Universe doesn't have every single issue of Superman in existence. What if I'm in the mood to read the Bronze Age? What if the comic stores I go to have none of the issues I want? And if they're on eBay yet crazy expensive, what do you want to do then?

• 
  Kong (@K1n9_Kon9) reported 54 minutes ago

  @CNBC since $GME is down on $EBAY rejection and ebay is up it means the deal with move forward whether ebay csuite wants it or not gg.

• 
  e/x - rome • 前に進め 🦈🏒 (@bleeding__teal) reported 59 minutes ago

  @ ebay people FIX YOUR WEBSITE MAN - i can't add things to my cart