Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Google Cloud. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.
- Domains (30%)
- Cloud Services (20%)
- Web Tools (20%)
- Hosting (20%)
- E-mail (10%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Noida
|
Domains | 8 days ago |
|
Jewar
|
Hosting | 9 days ago |
 Montataire
|
Cloud Services | 13 days ago |
|
Greater Noida
|
Hosting | 15 days ago |
 Ribeirão Preto
|
16 days ago | |
 Tijuana
|
Cloud Services | 1 month ago |
Full Outage Map
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Google Cloud Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Tyler ''pronouns idiot'' Foster 🤖 (@tylergilfoster) reported@googlecloud shut ******** up
-
Bishal Roy (@bishalr0y) reported@Dastagi39923618 @googlecloud yes i was, removing it fixed my issue thanks
-
Pedja Drazic (@PedjaDrazic) reported@googlecloud Freedom to choose models is only useful if you know what you're optimizing for. Most teams don't. That's not a vendor problem. It's a workflow problem.
-
Vansh Choudhary (@vnsh02) reported@KanoiKrishnav @googlecloud U can use alternatives like ola maps? They have a platform called krutim something. It’s not that bad, def worth a try
-
Zero // (@__________kiwi) reported@Ravensong666 @googlecloud I’m also having this issue with Gemini and ChatGPT. Any alternative out there not doing this? I’m also use Claude
-
Aroer (@Viscountry) reported@jeeetpaul @googlecloud same issue as me too, did u find a way to solve it?
-
faizan khan (@faizan10114) reportedA user dropped out of our docs into the AI chat, asked a question, got the wrong answer, and left bad feedback. Before this, that kind of issue would have turned into guesswork. This time I used @PostHog to trace the user path, @googlecloud to pull the production logs, and direct database access to rebuild the exact chat session. That made the bug obvious: the app had the right customer data, but the chat pipeline was not grounding the model with it correctly. I fixed the chat flow, added better Cloud Run + PostHog observability, and now we can see where users come in, where they fail, and why.
-
teqqed (@teqqed) reported@googlecloud i did but apprently have to wait for support to respond. regardless of the outcome, we should switch to @Mapbox it seems
-
Gregor (@bygregorr) reported@googlecloud The real flex isn't token volume, it's what those tokens actually shipped. A trillion tokens processed means nothing if the product still sucks. What's the conversion from "using AI" to "measurably better outcome"?
-
dnu (@DnuLkjkjh) reported@pushmeet @GoogleDeepMind @googlecloud The hard part is usually the eval boundary, not the raw solve rate. once a coding agent can touch production-facing systems, even a 1% bad action rate is too high. where did you put the first handoff gate: tests, human review, or sandbox-only tasks?
-
Tracie Nielson (@NielsonTracie) reported@googlecloud Why am I running into Cloudflare on Google? I didn't consent to this. How do I get this Cloudflare **** off my phone and computer? I didn't ask for it. I don't want it. Their phone number is bogus. It's impossible to communicate without logging in, but I don't have a login. I don't want a login.
-
Bra kwaku (@SarpongThomas10) reportedI can think of a lot of use cases for this. Unfortunately I’m on @googlecloud which doesn’t support this natively. @googlecloud 👀
-
Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported@0xLabswizzird25 @SolanaFndn @googlecloud Yeah, we are working on the solutions. That's a high priority topic for our team these days. And we are evaluating the effort of migration to other chains seriously. As you said, it seems projects the projects on Ethereum mainnet might get more support. But migration takes time and it's a big engineering effort, and we have to consider the high gas fee of ETH Mainnet, if we want to deploy our AI agent on an L2 chain that will not be an easy task for every team. To be honest, the infrastructure is not ready yet at the moment. And the other reason is that once we spend some time on migration, the user has to wait for longer time before mint.
-
Cihat Kaya (@cihatkaya) reported@googlecloud While the taxonomy is helpful, I find the lines blurring more rapidly than these definitions suggest. The "learning capabilities" of a well-trained bot can often mimic an agent's autonomy, especially within a narrow domain. Where do you draw the practical distinction for an end-user who just wants a problem solved?
-
Ho3n.Ai (@hoseinvfx) reported@googlecloud Persian farsi language support dictate please
-
Nicky Kamau 🇰🇪 🇺🇸 (@Nickykkamau) reported@Scobleizer I have a friend who's a mobile vet in Raleigh NC - biggest cost is $200 monthly sub that we automated in a weekend with @GoogleAIStudio ... So upfront spend max around $ 500 and she will never pay again for that system. And this is with backend integrations through @googlecloud
-
Andre MR (@AndreMR) reported@googlecloud is this a parody account? am i really reading a GOOGLE service account talking about open ai things?
-
Fabio Lauria (@fabiolauria92) reported@TelecomReviewEU @VodafoneBiz @googlecloud Most SMEs don't realize their biggest bottleneck isn't technology—it's time. You can deploy sophisticated AI tools, but if extracting insights still requires a data scientist, you haven't solved the real problem. I've watched teams spend weeks manually analyzing data when they should be acting on it. Removing friction in the entire pipeline is where transformation happens 📊
-
andrebruton (@andrebruton) reportedIt is a mission to get reCAPTCHA working @googlecloud since it was moved from the simple working setup. Now it takes a day of trial and errors to get working... #recaptcha
-
Pestilent Worm (Fired everyone) (@Rude_Jenkins) reported@googlecloud **** YOU GET RID OF THE **** MLB TV AD
-
ZayedMD (@DrAhmed87) reportedHey @GoogleCloud @googlecloudtech! 👋We're building SAFE-Triage, an AI emergency room triage system for a Harvard hackathon, proudly coming out of Africa! We are trying to deploy Gemma 4 31B but hit an L4 GPU quota wall. Any chance for a quick quota boost to help us unblock?
-
Diljot Mutti (@DiljotMutti) reportedtrying to setup paid support for @googlecloud for more than an hour so that i can have actual support for my issue > paid support requires organization > organization requires something called cloud identity > cloud identity docs suggest go to Billing > Buy or upgrade. But there is no "Buy or upgrade" button 😐
-
John Doe (@johnxdoh) reported@googlecloud My experience with you so far, it’s a nightmare. You are the most dev-hostile of Big Cloud. I’m trying to do a POC for an AI service, and getting an extra GPU (just an L4 even!!) is a complete 🤬 nightmare. At this point, I would never recommend you to anyone.
-
AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported@googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.
-
Er. Arpit (@RxFinderArpit) reportedDear @googlecloud @GoogleCloudTech @GoogleCloud_IN — our production environment has been suspended despite no security breach (proxies in place; no public exposure of keys on the frontend). Appeals remain unanswered, and the outage is impacting users. Request urgent assistance.
-
ashen (@ashen_one) reported@SolanaFndn @googlecloud hell yea wtf
-
Noode (@NoodeAPI) reported➕ AI Integration: @SolanaFndn partnered with @googlecloud to launch a payment gateway for #AIagents, enabling multi-service API access via stablecoins without subscriptions.
-
مازن وذكاء الآلات (@Mazen_AIEx) reported@rseroter @googlecloud Agent "skills" look like modular libraries for LLM agents: load expertise only when needed, avoid context bloat, keep tokens and costs down. Feels like the early software architecture layer for scalable agent ecosystems.
-
Matt (@MatthewL853646) reported@Jamie7Towerz @MLBTV @googlecloud I mean interchange the damn thing. That thing is literally the most annoying thing to hear once, let alone every half inning. Crazy to me.
-
MR.LE (@MR11LE) reported@googlecloud @GoogleCloudTech The 'All hands on deck' promise was a lie. @GoogleCloudTech, your chat support is now officially REFUSING to bring in a supervisor, claiming 'email is the only channel' after 158 hours of downtime. You admit the error (False Positive) 🤡💩🤡💩