Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Google Cloud. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.
- Domains (33%)
- Hosting (25%)
- Cloud Services (17%)
- Web Tools (17%)
- E-mail (8%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Noida
|
Hosting | 5 days ago |
|
Noida
|
Domains | 6 days ago |
|
Noida
|
Domains | 27 days ago |
|
Jewar
|
Hosting | 28 days ago |
 Montataire
|
Cloud Services | 1 month ago |
|
Greater Noida
|
Hosting | 1 month ago |
Full Outage Map
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Google Cloud Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Shubham Gandhi (@shubhamgandhi_) reportedbigquery has a really difficult UI- chunky, random paddings, too many squares, too many toolbars. low information density but still feels hard to use @googlecloud #BigQuery pls help!
-
Nate Grater (@votethemALLout7) reported@Humana @googlehealth @googlecloud Why am I paying for medication when I have humans dsnp with a Medicare d plan? I mean 80 dollars to the ceo and down at Humana may not be much to for me it is groceries for two weeks. So I go hungry or take meds? Killing the elderly is all you are doing.
-
Teflo 🇦🇺 (@teflocarbon) reported@SimiStern I don’t even like Railway, or the "managed hosting" ecosystem in general. But the actual problem here is the continued bullshit @googlecloud keeps pulling: "oopsies, our finger slipped :3" account/control-plane failures that can take real infrastructure offline, while everyone keeps pretending this is acceptable behaviour from a serious cloud provider.
-
Kazmal (@3kazmak) reported@googlecloud Gemini sucks *** !
-
Ted Keane (@thetedkeane) reported@googlecloud you GKE support open source ingress controller or not?
-
Stix (@Cubsz2016) reported@SayNoToTrading @ServiceNowNews @googlecloud It’s not broken. It’s overpriced and headed towards fair value
-
Prashanth Vaidya (@pvbuilds) reportedGoogle Cloud’s customer support is absolutely ridiculous and this is a warning sign for anyone building on top of @googlecloud
-
Bishal Roy (@bishalr0y) reported@Dastagi39923618 @googlecloud yes i was, removing it fixed my issue thanks
-
Pedja Drazic (@PedjaDrazic) reported@googlecloud Freedom to choose models is only useful if you know what you're optimizing for. Most teams don't. That's not a vendor problem. It's a workflow problem.
-
Sid Hary (@Sid_Hary_) reported@solana @googlecloud Pay-per-API-call via stablecoin is the kind of use case that makes sense on a blockchain and almost nowhere else. Traditional payment rails can't handle $0.005 transactions economically. This is a genuine fit between the technology and the problem
-
AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported@googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.
-
Riccardo Dana | @SWOP (@riccardo_dana) reportedSWOP is back online. On a side note, we have decided to migrate our servers from AWS to @googlecloud this is not the first time AWS has had issues and as a start up we cant afford to have downtime. Thank you to our swopers for your patience.
-
ATCA (@ATCA_now) reported@awscloud Chris Niehaus @googlecloud on the panel: "At Google, it's important that the cloud network infrastructure has multiple levels of redundancy buildt in."
-
Our Gatekeeper (@ourgatekeepergh) reported@GoogleCloud Our security platform has been down for nearly 48 hours with ZERO response from your support team. We serve gated estate, real residents are locked out. This is a safety issue, not just a service issue. We need urgent escalation. NOW. #GCPOutage #GoogleCloud
-
Nelson Lee Miller (@NelsonLeeMiller) reported@EvanOtero @googlecloud Right, it would be a miracle to get anything resolved with Google support. This vulnerability has been known by Google since November 2025. I'm alerting all major news outlets. Going viral on LinkedIn.
-
teqqed (@teqqed) reportedwhy are configured spend limits not respected @googlecloud? instead of stopping the service when limits are reached you just keep going and move the bill to the next month? gtfoh
-
Fabio Lauria (@fabiolauria92) reported@TelecomReviewEU @VodafoneBiz @googlecloud Most SMEs don't realize their biggest bottleneck isn't technology—it's time. You can deploy sophisticated AI tools, but if extracting insights still requires a data scientist, you haven't solved the real problem. I've watched teams spend weeks manually analyzing data when they should be acting on it. Removing friction in the entire pipeline is where transformation happens 📊
-
Joseph Bonner (@mrjosephbonner) reportedSo its been 3 weeks since @googlecloud took $100 out of my account. No reason and no solution. Despite paying for multiple services with Google. And then when I try to help a small business set up their email and register their business in Sri Lanka, can you believe they had the never to block the email. I am so glad I don't need Google Business for my business because the way everyone treats black people I would hate to have to rely on them for my money. No Thank You!
-
Yogesh (@oolook_yogesh) reportedHi @GoogleCloudTech @GoogleCloud My refund (₹11,579.65) has been approved in Google Cloud but still not received after 5+ months. Multiple follow-ups, escalations, and even manual wire process completed, yet no payment or confirmation. Request urgent help to resolve this.
-
Lawrence (@lgrig) reportedGoogle Cloud is one of the most difficult and terrible admin panels in terms of UX I've ever seen in all my years working on tech. Everything is incredibly confusing, counter-intuitive and hard to navigate and get things done. @googlecloud
-
Krishnav Kanoi (@KanoiKrishnav) reported@vnsh02 @googlecloud It’s very bad I tried to use it , I have checked all available sites and APIs , nothing come remotely close to Google maps
-
Umer Imran (@UmerImran271675) reported@googlecloud My Gmail account has been disabled. The problem is that the verification code is being sent to the same Gmail address that I am locked out of. This is my Google AdSense email, and I am very worried about it. Please help me recover my Gmail account
-
Vincent Po Li (@Vincent_Po_Li) reported@googlecloud generative ad creative at 200k/day is impressive on paid surfaces. the harder problem is when that same buyer later asks ChatGPT or Claude "is RTL worth it?", no amount of personalized video matters there. that layer is won by being Cited, not by being shown.
-
Er. Arpit (@RxFinderArpit) reportedDear @googlecloud @GoogleCloudTech @GoogleCloud_IN — our production environment has been suspended despite no security breach (proxies in place; no public exposure of keys on the frontend). Appeals remain unanswered, and the outage is impacting users. Request urgent assistance.
-
200divesL8r (@200divesL8r) reported@googlecloud I hate you! Stop forcing yourself upon us. Some of us aren’t interested. How about you fix your much neglected search features?
-
Maarten de Lange (@RCM_Doherty) reported@JustJake Jake, don’t worry too much. It was annoying, but you provide great service and results. Thats not wiped out due to a few hours of disruption. Having said that, it’s just crazy how little @googlecloud cares about its customers, you could consider leaving them on the long run.
-
io.net India (@ionetindia) reported@ionet @googlecloud the hidden costs are always where they get you... the sticker price is never the real number with these platforms
-
aira (@airasentia) reported@rseroter @googlecloud agent revisions are where the chat demo grows up. traffic splitting sounds boring until one bad prompt revision starts touching real tools.
-
Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported@0xLabswizzird25 @SolanaFndn @googlecloud Yeah, we are working on the solutions. That's a high priority topic for our team these days. And we are evaluating the effort of migration to other chains seriously. As you said, it seems projects the projects on Ethereum mainnet might get more support. But migration takes time and it's a big engineering effort, and we have to consider the high gas fee of ETH Mainnet, if we want to deploy our AI agent on an L2 chain that will not be an easy task for every team. To be honest, the infrastructure is not ready yet at the moment. And the other reason is that once we spend some time on migration, the user has to wait for longer time before mint.
-
Nelson Lee Miller (@NelsonLeeMiller) reportedI am completely devastated. On May 6th, @GoogleCloud charged my card $7,069.02 for an absolute security failure on their end. Their support team has done nothing but harass and gaslight me ever since. (Case ID: 71048746) A thread on how a hobbyist got ruined by AI overnight: (1/)