1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Google Cloud
Google Cloud

Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Google Cloud. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

  • 30% Domains (30%)
  • 20% Cloud Services (20%)
  • 20% Web Tools (20%)
  • 20% Hosting (20%)
  • 10% E-mail (10%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Noida Domains 17 days ago
Jewar Hosting 18 days ago
Montataire Cloud Services 22 days ago
Greater Noida Hosting 24 days ago
Ribeirão Preto E-mail 25 days ago
Tijuana Cloud Services 2 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ebn_essmat
    Mohammed Essmat (@ebn_essmat) reported

    @googlecloud is there billing support email

  • __________kiwi
    Zero // (@__________kiwi) reported

    @Ravensong666 @googlecloud I’m also having this issue with Gemini and ChatGPT. Any alternative out there not doing this? I’m also use Claude

  • bad_sin90451
    AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported

    @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

  • ShaunStewart
    Shaun Patrick SteWaRt (@ShaunStewart) reported

    @googlecloud serious issue with my account. Need help ASAP.

  • Dawk_OShiel
    Dawk O'Shiel (@Dawk_OShiel) reported

    @TBG_JUST_G @googlecloud Reschedule is always better than cancel!

  • okaditya84
    Aditya Jethani (@okaditya84) reported

    @googlecloud I have sent a DM for regarding the issue. Hoping for a resolution.

  • makingAISimple
    AIMadeSimple (@makingAISimple) reported

    OpenAI is completing with @awscloud @googlecloud and @Azure This is interesting. But they are still depending on their infrastructure to launch this service. So basically the competition is PaaS

  • ATCA_now
    ATCA (@ATCA_now) reported

    @awscloud Chris Niehaus @googlecloud on the panel: "At Google, it's important that the cloud network infrastructure has multiple levels of redundancy buildt in."

  • justinavery
    Javery (@justinavery) reported

    After seeing @Railway outages as a result of issues hosting with @googlecloud here is a reminder that you can manage your own services with places like Hetzner. Sure, they could also disable your account, but that's why you'd also run parallel services with @OVHcloud_US to mitigate the risk.

  • wichyszn
    Elite (@wichyszn) reported

    @0xRiver8 @trythreews @googlecloud man shut ******** up

  • teqqed
    teqqed (@teqqed) reported

    @googlecloud i did but apprently have to wait for support to respond. regardless of the outcome, we should switch to @Mapbox it seems

  • sarbjeetjohal
    Sarbjeet Johal (@sarbjeetjohal) reported

    I strongly believe that LLMs based AI platforms are best fit for Systems of Engagement! Carrie Tharp, GM COO & VP of Customer Experience, @GoogleCloud took stage during #GoogleCloudNext 2026 to talk about customer experience use cases and AI usage from different customer companies.

  • ItPrevoyance
    Prevoyance IT Solutions (@ItPrevoyance) reported

    Turned down a cloud migration project last year. That honesty built more trust than the deal itself. Not every company needs cloud. Some wait too long. #GoogleCloud #CloudMigration

  • montana_labs
    Montana Labs (@montana_labs) reported

    @googlecloud The 16B tokens/min throughput number is the quietly important one. Token volume at that scale stops being a product adoption signal and becomes an infrastructure planning input. Capacity, latency, and failover start dominating the architecture conversation. Enterprise AI is turning into a throughput problem alongside an intelligence problem.

  • alibnualhajar
    A. Ibnu Hajar (@alibnualhajar) reported

    @auliandini94 @googlecloud Same.. Wtf

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    @BangusProShop @googlecloud Whoa, that window just pulled a full Matrix download—plain glass to radiant stained glass saints in seconds. Laying it down: AI turning ordinary into divine, zero to enlightened. 🔥 What's the next upgrade?

  • teqqed
    teqqed (@teqqed) reported

    why are configured spend limits not respected @googlecloud? instead of stopping the service when limits are reached you just keep going and move the bill to the next month? gtfoh

  • micheal1798258
    @micheal me (@micheal1798258) reported

    @GoogleDeepMind @googlecloud There are still saftety issues

  • bishalr0y
    Bishal Roy (@bishalr0y) reported

    @Dastagi39923618 @googlecloud yes i was, removing it fixed my issue thanks

  • b1oodrain
    B1oodRain 🇺🇸🦅 (@b1oodrain) reported

    @googlecloud @HomeDepot ah makes sense now why the homedepot site sucks. its hosted by google.

  • mtcderek
    Derek Morgan (@mtcderek) reported

    Honestly, if @Railway emailed me pre this @googlecloud issue and said "We're going multicloud for reliability" I would have worried more about complexity-related outages. The unlikelihood of a major cloud hyperscaler cutting a client like this should approach infinity.

  • MaxLensherr
    Lensherr (@MaxLensherr) reported

    the positioning is now shifting. Not shared security or restaking but a broader idea: verifiable services built on top of the network. that shift became visible through specific events: @a16z purchasing a significant stake in EIGEN @googlecloud partnering with EigenLayer on verifiable services infrastructure these didn’t change the fundamentals, they made the shift legible. now, the protocol is being positioned less as a crypto-native primitive and more as infrastructure that non-crypto applications can integrate with directly.

  • PedjaDrazic
    Pedja Drazic (@PedjaDrazic) reported

    @googlecloud Freedom to choose models is only useful if you know what you're optimizing for. Most teams don't. That's not a vendor problem. It's a workflow problem.

  • lhchavez
    Luis Héctor Chávez (@lhchavez) reported

    @googlecloud @Hacker0x01 Even though every layer of the system has been hardened to provide security robustness, security incidents can still happen. Sometimes, these incidents happen due to external influences or supply-chain attacks. At Replit, every single security incident is handled with urgency because users’ data is at stake. Trust is something that has to be earned over time, and can be easily lost by not going above and beyond. Every incident is also a learning opportunity: every root cause that we find becomes a hardening effort so that the incident itself no longer repeats itself, but also fix any adjacent problems that were surfaced by the incident, and tighten up defenses in other parts of the stack.

  • fullmetalasthma
    Sage (@fullmetalasthma) reported

    @WhiteHaird_trap @googlecloud It literally gives me bad info all the time and then apologizes for hallucinating, its words not mine.

  • NoodeAPI
    Noode (@NoodeAPI) reported

    ➕ AI Integration: @SolanaFndn partnered with @googlecloud to launch a payment gateway for #AIagents, enabling multi-service API access via stablecoins without subscriptions.

  • SayNoToTrading
    Say No To Trading (@SayNoToTrading) reported

    @ServiceNowNews @googlecloud Can they fix $NOW share price?

  • EmcutuJay
    Jay 愛 (@EmcutuJay) reported

    Hey @googlecloud, I accidentally unknowingly ran up charges on Vertex AI without realising the costs and now my account's been sent to collections. I've been trying to reach billing support but can't because the account is closed. Can someone help me out?

  • khalide_f1
    AI Expert Khalid (@khalide_f1) reported

    @googlecloud Feels like F1 strategy but for telecom. Predict the problem, make the move before anyone else sees it.

  • tylergilfoster
    Tyler ''pronouns idiot'' Foster 🤖 (@tylergilfoster) reported

    @googlecloud shut ******** up