Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

• Domains (27%)
• Hosting (27%)
• Cloud Services (18%)
• Web Tools (18%)
• E-mail (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Noida	Hosting	15 days ago
Noida	Domains	17 days ago
Noida	Domains	1 month ago
Jewar	Hosting	1 month ago
Montataire	Cloud Services	1 month ago
Greater Noida	Hosting	1 month ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ashen (@ashen_one) reported 1 minute ago

  @SolanaFndn @googlecloud plz help its saying you NEED touch ID or 1 password to use this?

• 
  BigFire (@BigFire97827414) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MLB @googlecloud Sight line in Minutemaid Park due to the roof is bad.

• 
  Shubham Gandhi (@shubhamgandhi_) reported 9 minutes ago

  bigquery has a really difficult UI- chunky, random paddings, too many squares, too many toolbars. low information density but still feels hard to use @googlecloud #BigQuery pls help!

• 
  Xi Cheng (@mailper) reported 10 minutes ago

  @googlecloud and its T&S team needs to work as a coherent whole instead of showing an org chart to the customers. My account was locked (17 days ago), I explained the fix and received an email saying the project is re-instated but the account is still locked.

• 
  S Boccone (@StevenBoccone) reported 11 minutes ago

  @bavedikian Google Cloud @googlecloud supported @flare Node building and advertised it. I built my node only to be suddenly shut down with GC claiming mining issues. It took me months to get a refund, I got 1/2 and I am still fighting for the rest.

• 
  Neil (@neil_the_ginger) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Firebase @googlecloud this app has been suspended for 2 months, I have made multiple appeals but it seems like the team stopped responding. Is there anyone who can help me out with this?

• 
  ZettaWire (@ZettaWires) reported 18 minutes ago

  Google Cloud outage hits India after fire at third-party data centre triggers shutdown, Reuters reports. #GoogleCloud #India

• 
  udipta basumatari (@stokonomic) reported 24 minutes ago

  Fun fact: @googlecloud is listed as a fraudulent entity by @dbsbank (!?) I have to call up my bank every month to "whitelist" my payments, otherwise my products go down. We live in an absurd world.

• 
  المهندس وسام حاج محمد | AI Architect (@WessamHMuhmad) reported 25 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Fatal error in @GoogleCloud support. Case #71706032 is locked over a minor $87 automated billing glitch, ignoring our 'Partner' status & high-value infrastructure build (MCP/ADK integration). Automated filters are killing real innovation. Urgent human DevRel review needed!"

• 
  Prevoyance IT Solutions (@ItPrevoyance) reported 25 minutes ago

  Turned down a cloud migration project last year. That honesty built more trust than the deal itself. Not every company needs cloud. Some wait too long. #GoogleCloud #CloudMigration

• 
  PBAT in my Veins (@thatjosephodeh) reported 27 minutes ago

  Spent the last 24h stuck in a brutal deployment loop trying to launch n8n on @GoogleCloud Run + Cloud SQL. For a mid/senior dev, the fragmentation & complete lack of ecosystem integration is a massive failure. Here is a breakdown of why GCP feels broken right now. 🧵👇

• 
  AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported 28 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

• 
  TeutaAi (@TeutaAi) reported 30 minutes ago

  @GoogleStartups @googlecloud scaled one agent on a $6 box. bottleneck was never compute. my stop-hook caught 35 fake 'done' claims in a single autonomous sprint, killed every one.

• 
  Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported 30 minutes ago

  @0xLabswizzird25 @SolanaFndn @googlecloud Yeah, we are working on the solutions. That's a high priority topic for our team these days. And we are evaluating the effort of migration to other chains seriously. As you said, it seems projects the projects on Ethereum mainnet might get more support. But migration takes time and it's a big engineering effort, and we have to consider the high gas fee of ETH Mainnet, if we want to deploy our AI agent on an L2 chain that will not be an easy task for every team. To be honest, the infrastructure is not ready yet at the moment. And the other reason is that once we spend some time on migration, the user has to wait for longer time before mint.

• 
  Superteam Germany (@SuperteamDE) reported 30 minutes ago

  @solana @googlecloud Shipping never stops on Solana 🚢

• 
  Keith Townsend (@CTOAdvisor) reported 31 minutes ago

  To solve my @Antigravity + @GoogleWorkspace billing problem, I moved my billing to a @GoogleCloud project instead. Now to figure out how to reconfigure the CLI to use the GCP Project.

• 
  M Mohan (@mukund) reported 31 minutes ago

  I used @antigravity to build and push to @googlecloud It was easier to push to @awscloud ? How? What? Google Cloud Run. Google Cloud Build: Artifact Registry: Cloud SQL Postgres:. Secret Manager IAM / service permissions: With the new Gemini 3.5 model I tried to build: cloudbuild.frontend.yaml cloudbuild.backend.yaml Out of tokens. Painful.

• 
  Slyy (@Slyy_007) reported 33 minutes ago

  @solana @googlecloud Damn this is huge ngl

• 
  Guilherme O'Tina (@guilhermeotina) reported 35 minutes ago

  @addyosmani @googlecloud the verification problem gets wild at this scale. a 10 minute agent fails loud, you catch it. a 10 hour agent can drift into a confident wrong answer because every individual step looked fine in isolation. the feedback horizon is the real bottleneck, not the context window

• 
  SharpSide (@TrySharpSide) reported 36 minutes ago

  @MLBNetwork @googlecloud never gets old seeing a player figure it out mid-career. curious if this keeps up.

• 
  Tyler ''pronouns idiot'' Foster 🤖 (@tylergilfoster) reported 37 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Shut ******** up

• 
  Karthik Narain (@KarthikSNarain) reported 41 minutes ago

  4/ @googlecloud customers can now access Antigravity through the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform. It inherits Google Cloud’s standard data privacy protections and Terms of Service, meaning agent activity runs within your secure cloud boundary and customer data remains in your control.

• 
  Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported 44 minutes ago

  @__000ali @SolanaFndn @googlecloud You got the point, high gas fee would be an issue for ETH and the liquidity there should be much better... No matter which chain, the migration would be big efforts for our engineering team. The mint might be delayed. So, it's tricky, we need to rethink about that. Any ideas ?

• 
  Osync Network (@OsyncNet_003) reported 47 minutes ago

  @GBNEWS @BBCBreaking @googlecloud Google kills kids They sell the contracts as is documented for Nimbus, Maven and lavender for 1.2 billion pounds worth of cloud compute. That's how ethical they are. This is like the grooming scandal all over again. Google seems to have perfected that. But if you look at the systemic issues with regarding kitty data, no surprise Google grun and hide when the going gets tough. So why aren't these CEOs behind bars? We didn't get a human right on this, but they're now deciding the ethics but they chose to put machines into autonomous cloud compute contracts. That was an executive decision made at their level. So why on Google on trial for being murderers and that wasn't even Pentagon grade that was done by a round of funding? That's how these AI tools are done rounds of funding. So let's do a round of funding. And let's see how much ethical s*** we can pull up on Google. Let's be transparent right? Cuz if we didn't get a vote, why the f*** should the Greek London break who sold this compute out two of them stay at Google for AI one goes over to Microsoft dictate the future when they don't even know how to stop child exploitation, they're enabling in it. They are absolute unethical elitists and go ask all of their CEOs where they send their children. They don't let their children use the tech that they break rules to force into everybody else's lives. Let's talk about that real talk your tools. How many children have your tools killed? Character AI why did you buy that top Tech talent? What was so talented about them? Boys& girls So demis a sabase are you now a **** Your own tool Gemini seems to be absolutely clarifying the documentation. Oh dear! Didn't you think somebody would index the internet and look at the people who allowed the likes of Epstein and the doj shareholders that just so happen to be googlebound and as is documented, what are you actually trying to do over there with big Satan and little Satan? 🤔

• 
  Pink Frankenstein (@pinkfranken) reported 49 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Gemini told me there was no trash pickup on Monday. Clicked on the referencing link. Right there in plain text list of holidays with no service. Memorial day was not one of them. Garbage by an enshitified company.

• 
  AIMadeSimple (@makingAISimple) reported 51 minutes ago

  OpenAI is completing with @awscloud @googlecloud and @Azure This is interesting. But they are still depending on their infrastructure to launch this service. So basically the competition is PaaS

• 
  Market Maestro (@TradeVirtuoso) reported 53 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Hi, I'm an individual from India. I was charged ₹4,637 for Gemini 2.5 Pro API usage in Aug 2025 without being aware it was a paid service. I'm a first-time user with no means to pay. Billing Account: 017A15-C4C756-89EE1B. Please help! #GoogleCloud

• 
  Teflo 🇦🇺 (@teflocarbon) reported 58 minutes ago

  @SimiStern I don’t even like Railway, or the "managed hosting" ecosystem in general. But the actual problem here is the continued bullshit @googlecloud keeps pulling: "oopsies, our finger slipped :3" account/control-plane failures that can take real infrastructure offline, while everyone keeps pretending this is acceptable behaviour from a serious cloud provider.

• 
  EDOUARD (@edouard) reported 59 minutes ago

  @googlecloud We’d rather have your side of the story for @Railway’s complete five-hour outage that they say was caused by your blocking of their account without warning.

• 
  Nelson Lee Miller (@NelsonLeeMiller) reported 60 minutes ago

  I am completely devastated. On May 6th, @GoogleCloud charged my card $7,069.02 for an absolute security failure on their end. Their support team has done nothing but harass and gaslight me ever since. (Case ID: 71048746) A thread on how a hobbyist got ruined by AI overnight: (1/)