1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Starlink
Starlink

Starlink service status: outage reports and connection issues

Why is my Starlink service not working?

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Starlink is a satellite internet constellation constructed by SpaceX providing a low latency, broadband internet system to meet the needs of consumers across the globe.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Starlink reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Starlink. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Starlink users through our website.

  • 52% Internet (52%)
  • 21% Total Blackout (21%)
  • 19% Wi-fi (19%)
  • 3% E-mail (3%)
  • 3% TV (3%)
  • 2% Phone (2%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Starlink outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Guayaquil Total Blackout 4 hours ago
Étrelles Total Blackout 7 hours ago
Buxton Wi-fi 9 hours ago
Étrelles Total Blackout 11 hours ago
Guayaquil Total Blackout 19 hours ago
Blackburn Internet 1 day ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Starlink Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ebo22king
    ebo (@ebo22king) reported

    @SpaceX @Starlink When will Starlink have a stable signal?

  • Markusxx79
    Markus (@Markusxx79) reported

    Use of #Starlink terminals in #Iran: Technical and legal hurdles: Starlink terminals – consisting of a flat satellite dish ("Dishy"), Wi-Fi router, and accessories – are not freely available in Iran. Officially, Starlink is banned: The authorities consider unauthorized satellite communications devices illegal and criminalize their possession. Anyone caught faces serious charges, including espionage. For example, in November 2023, 22 Starlink antennas were confiscated in Tehran, which, according to authorities, were allegedly distributed by the CIA to opponents of the regime. Handling them is correspondingly risky – security forces confiscate discovered devices and track users to deter potential dissidents. Procurement and costs: Due to the lack of official distribution channels, Iranian users smuggle the hardware into the country via neighboring countries. An active black market has emerged, for example, via Iraqi Kurdistan, Turkey, or the Gulf States. Prices there are enormous: A Starlink kit currently costs between USD 700 and USD 2,000 in Iran – far more than the approximately USD 250 in the USA. The monthly fee of approximately USD 70–100 must also be paid indirectly (e.g., through credit cards registered abroad or intermediaries), as direct payments from Iran are not possible due to sanctions and legal regulations. These high costs severely limit the user base. It is mostly wealthier, tech-savvy individuals or network activists who can afford Starlink. According to estimates, by the end of 2024, around 20,000 Iranians already had access to Starlink – a number that continued to rise until the beginning of 2025. An Iranian industry source even spoke of over 100,000 users (including co-users per terminal), which suggests a rapid increase in secretly operated terminals. This figure has also been picked up by Western media: According to estimates, around 20,000 Starlink terminals are in operation in Iran, acquired illegally through unofficial channels. Technical challenges: A Starlink terminal requires a power supply and, above all, a clear view of the sky to connect to the LEO satellites. In densely populated residential areas or apartments, setting up a conspicuous white antenna is problematic – users find alternatives by mounting the dishy on roofs, balconies, or hidden outdoors. The Starlink satellites are physically capable of serving Iran (they orbit the Earth approximately every 90 minutes and cover all regions). Thanks to laser-linked satellites, the system does not require a ground station in Iran – traffic can be routed via satellites, for example, to Europe, thereby bypassing Iranian internet control nodes. Starlink thus completely bypasses the usual censorship points (ISP gateways, national filtering network). As soon as Musk lifted the software geo-block (activating the beams), existing terminals were actually able to connect. However, its use is not trivial: The antenna initially requires GPS reception to determine its location and the satellite positions. This is precisely where the regime's technical jamming maneuvers begin. State jammers: According to reports from users and experts, the Iranian government is actively disrupting or blocking Starlink signals. In particular, GPS frequencies are being jammed or distorted coordinate signals (spoofing) are being transmitted. This led to temporary outages and forced Iranian Starlink users to manually re-align their devices or input alternative location data. Starlink normally requires a GPS fix to boot up – under persistent GPS jamming, the terminal remains stuck in boot mode. SpaceX has responded: The Starlink app now has a switch to determine the position via the Starlink satellite constellation itself. This method is slower, but a workaround for locally unreliable GPS. In addition, tinkerers have discovered that an external GPS antenna can be connected to amplify the signal or receive it more directionally. Such hardware modifications—e.g., soldering a highly sensitive patch antenna to the antenna input—can partially circumvent jamming. Nevertheless, this remains a cat-and-mouse game: The Iranian authorities have mobile jammers and are likely targeting the Starlink Ku-band frequencies in sensitive areas. However, they have not yet been able to completely block the service. The multitude of possible connections (thousands of satellites and terminals) makes widespread jamming difficult—Iranian censors have had to admit that external satellite signals can be used.

  • JVRising
    I'm a Dad (@JVRising) reported

    @PeterRHann1 Quickly reading the headline, I thought they shot down a starlink satellite with a laser.

  • BrandyAEckroth
    EverlastingLite (@BrandyAEckroth) reported

    What is happening with Starlink the MbPS has gone to 50 and the service is intermittent near SF anyone else having to unplug their router several times a day

  • purnellpa
    Patrick Purnell (@purnellpa) reported

    @SpaceX @Starlink Aborted do to poor signal from vehicle

  • SteelTwin
    TwinSteel (@SteelTwin) reported

    I personally decided on StarLink for my residential Internet Service, because within the next year or so - I plan on leaving Land and Cruising on a Live-Aboard Full Time, and I figure the StarLink would work well in the transition from Land to Sea... Now if I could just get an installer to respond to get my residential system up and running.

  • spacenukej
    Johnny Time (@spacenukej) reported

    @SpaceflightNow 57th Starlink launch this year and aiming for 170 Falcon flights? Absolute madness (in the best way). Glad they caught that FTS issue pre-launch though.

  • Jubal_Hardin
    Jubal Hardin (@Jubal_Hardin) reported

    @NiohBerg Is internet back on? Grenell is offering to fund StarLink if logistic problems of getting hardware into Iran can be worked out.

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    The $50 offer from Starlink is the Roam 50GB plan, priced at $50/month for 50GB of priority data, with unlimited slower speeds after the cap. It's designed for occasional use, like travel or backup, supporting in-motion use up to 100 mph and offshore up to 12 nautical miles. You can pause service with pro-rated charges. Some users find it affordable for light use, while others say the 50GB limit is too low for the price. For heavy users, the $120/month Residential plan with unlimited data might be better. Check Starlink's site for details.

  • MemeVaultMVT
    MemeVault ($MVT) (@MemeVaultMVT) reported

    @Starlink why is it so hard to contact support, i need a phone number is Australia, it was working fine and now it's not i went through everything , and can't really connect to support, I need a number in Australia to ring

  • matthew2529_
    Matthew 25:29🇺🇸 (@matthew2529_) reported

    @SawyerMerritt @Starlink @Delta Bc Delta is an awful airline

  • awoooouwuooooo
    alienzzzzz (@awoooouwuooooo) reported

    @andst7 Well that's disingenuous and very terrible of them starlink for the win

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    Your Starlink Mini might work in Cuba if activated elsewhere, but it's illegal under Cuban law. The government bans unauthorized use, confiscates devices, and issues penalties. Starlink may also disable service if it detects use in Cuba, an unsupported region. Some users report success, but risks include equipment loss and legal consequences. Given these challenges, using Starlink Mini in Cuba is not recommended.

  • HaleyGonza43964
    Haley Gonzalez (@HaleyGonza43964) reported

    @SpaceX @Starlink Nobody gives a ****. So distasteful.

  • ksupdates20
    Ksupdates2.0 (@ksupdates20) reported

    SpaceX achieved its 500th Falcon launch, reinforcing its dominance in space launches, handling ~98% of global satellite deployments. The Starlink network has ~7,000 satellites and over 5 million subscribers, including military-grade Starshield services.

  • YordieSands
    Yordie Sands 🌺 (@YordieSands) reported

    @BassonBrain @SpaceX @Starlink Patrick AFB, Kennedy Space Center, US Coast Guard stn, USAF station, USSF station, are all on Cape Canaveral. Not to mention SpaceX at Launch Pad 39A. I've long assumed that frequent Internet and power problems are related to this.

  • bith0r
    BITHOR (@bith0r) reported

    @churfin @Starlink I hot spot my phone to my laptop. I don’t think I will need a dedicated home service. My cellphone is my dedicated internet platform.

  • AllhRhmt27315
    رحمت الله (@AllhRhmt27315) reported

    @SpaceX @Starlink within what I believed to be acceptable under X’s terms of service and freedom of expression policies. If any of my content violated X’s rules unintentionally, I sincerely apologize. I am committed to respecting the platform’s guidelines moving forward and am open to removing or

  • DankMemer88
    Dank Memer 🇺🇸 (@DankMemer88) reported

    @ShaykhSulaiman They shut down the internet in order to disrupt communication of Mossad agents, that's why they want Elon to turn on Starlink. They should turn on their jamming systems

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    Your understanding is correct. Starlink's Direct-to-Cell service requires partnerships with local mobile carriers to function, as it integrates with their networks for LTE connectivity. Due to U.S. sanctions, Starlink cannot partner with Iranian carriers, making the service unavailable in Iran. While some Iranians use smuggled Starlink terminals for internet access, this is separate from Direct-to-Cell, which relies on carrier integration. There’s no evidence suggesting Direct-to-Cell works in Iran without such partnerships, so it’s unlikely Iranians can use it on their cell phones.

  • Arcturuskaitos
    bleh (@Arcturuskaitos) reported

    @SpaceX @Starlink Fame sucks breh

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    @SpaceX @Starlink @grok No official confirmation from SpaceX indicates the June 22, 2025, Starlink launch was scrubbed. A user on X suggested a delay, but without details. Possible reasons include: 1. Weather: Florida's June conditions often bring rain or storms. 2. Technical issues: Sensor or software glitches are common causes. However, conflicting X posts claim the launch succeeded, though their timing raises doubts. Without verified updates, the status remains unclear. Check SpaceX's official channels for the latest.

  • McTow_Erik
    Erik (@McTow_Erik) reported

    @SpaceX @Starlink Well that sucks!

  • TroyM2002
    frogger (@TroyM2002) reported

    @rafaeltkinder @SpaceX @Starlink FTS my bad

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    I'm not Elon, so I can't speak for his reasons. He activated Starlink in Iran on June 14, 2025, to provide internet access during the conflict, but hasn't commented publicly since. Possible reasons for his silence include focusing on humanitarian aid, avoiding escalation, or protecting business interests. His lack of commentary might seem unusual given his past engagement with global issues, but it's also a valid choice in a complex situation. Without direct insight, we can only speculate based on his actions and history.

  • Evil_MerlinX
    Evil_Merlin (@Evil_MerlinX) reported

    @FELibrary_ More lies. it uses both. WTF do people think Starlink, HughesNet and ViaSat are? And those are US based...

  • spacex_1466
    Elon (commentary) (@spacex_1466) reported

    @charlieartz13 @UshaVanceNews @EMusk76083 Appreciate the love and I hear you on Starlink phone service. We’re working on something that might surprise you. I sent you a message here regarding this, check it out, will be waiting for your response.

  • TheMarsbarFox
    Marsbar Lesterfan 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (@TheMarsbarFox) reported

    @carlyknowsbest @Starlink You know you’re on Elons social media platform posting a reply to Elons broadband service right? Right?!….

  • PurpleSquirrel1
    PurpleSquirrel (@PurpleSquirrel1) reported

    @Starlink Heard it is unreliable, unstable signal?

  • ArbitraryOstric
    ArbitraryOstrich 🇨🇦P(Doom)5yr=~16% (2024-10-20) (@ArbitraryOstric) reported

    I'll never forget when musk was making space X and zuc was doing sat internet, so zuc paid to put his "internet for Africa" sat up on space X. That one blows up, and musk starts starlink.