1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Tata Docomo
  4. Manikonda
Tata Docomo

Tata Docomo outages and service status in Manikonda, Telangana

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Tata Docomo generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Manikonda, including 0 direct reports.

Tata Docomo Ltd is an Indian mobile network operator, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tata Teleservices, founded on November 2008. It is one of India's largest operators with 26.62 million subscribers offering mobile phone and mobile internet service, including voicemail and SMS.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Manikonda, Telangana

The chart below shows the number of Tata Docomo reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Manikonda, Telangana and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Tata Docomo. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Tata Docomo Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Alpeshkotharii
    ALPESH KOTHARI (@Alpeshkotharii) reported from Mumbai Suburban, Maharashtra

    @TataTeleBiz @tatadocomo This is not what Costumers expect from Thier service Providers. Complaints are not being solved even after so many Emails and calls to thier Costumer Care Ends over a Period of above month. 022-66362333 @TataCompanies

  • Bandish19
    Bandish Sarvaiya (@Bandish19) reported

    Very poor service of Tata Tele, our grievance for landline number 022 66313138 is not resolved inspite of our complaint filed with them from last more than two weeks on their portal and intimating to higher authorities of the company.@tatadocomo

  • TPrabhat1008
    Prabhat Tiwari (@TPrabhat1008) reported

    @tatadocomo hi, I want my lost number 7275108123,7275376587 SIM pls help me for activate

  • Prakash25370316
    Prakash (@Prakash25370316) reported

    @tatadocomo Res sir I was spoken to your "Vi" VOIP EXECUTIVE JUST NOW , I asked HIM intials will be create any future audit problems, he replied null, hence please retain NEXT UPCOMING BILL PRAKASH ALONE, due to future CA audit crisis I was sent request include my intials,

  • SultaanOfSwing
    Sketchy Sultaan (@SultaanOfSwing) reported

    @tatadocomo Have been troubled by your incessant ask for a payment in return for no services that were provided. Have been struggling for more than a year to close this issue! #dotindia #tatabroadband

  • SachinBanawadi1
    Sachin Banawadikar (@SachinBanawadi1) reported

    @tatadocomo - Why permanent deactivation should take 15 days and why customer should pay for these 16 days ????

  • NipulPau
    Smart Boy (@NipulPau) reported

    @tataplayfiber @tatadocomo @tata_comm Never imagined that TATA will give such a bad service. Since 3 months with more then 5 complains, we are still facing Internet issues. It seems Tata does not have any permanent Solution for frequent disconnection of Internet.

  • mkjmohit4all
    MOHIT झंवर (@mkjmohit4all) reported from Hyderabad, Telangana

    @tatadocomo what is this since last 30 days whole area landline not working & they are telling to pay bill amount

  • BharatPronam
    Pronam Bharat (@BharatPronam) reported

    @tatadocomo I had got my broadband connection disconnected on 24 March. Despite that bills for payment till June is being forwarded. Also the service stops within two weeks, despite that demand for non use of services is being made for 3 months @TataCompanies

  • atwin90frames
    Aroundtheworldin90fr (@atwin90frames) reported

    @tatadocomo @TataCompanies I have been facing a problem with my landline since a while , and the same has not been rectified