Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
Ubisoft Connect is a digital distribution, digital rights management, multiplayer and communications service developed by Ubisoft to provide an experience similar to the achievements/trophies offered by various other game companies. The service is provided across various platforms (PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, etc).
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Ubisoft Connect. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.
- Sign in (70%)
- Online Play (14%)
- Glitches (10%)
- Matchmaking (2%)
- Game Crash (2%)
- Hacking / Cheating (0%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Brussels
|
Glitches | 3 days ago |
 Grenoble
|
Online Play | 3 days ago |
|
Orléans
|
Online Play | 6 days ago |
|
Orléans
|
Sign in | 7 days ago |
 Chatham
|
Sign in | 8 days ago |
|
Paris
|
Matchmaking | 9 days ago |
Full Outage Map
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Jacob Jr 🇨🇮🇺🇲 (@im_jr141204) reported@IGN Rare Ubisoft W: admitting the base game had issues and actually fixing them
-
Hank Scorpio (@Eldowzo1) reported@Glennithin @RenownedZ3r0 A problem in what regard? And do you believe the same of say and EA play or an Ubisoft + subscription?
-
keworrk (@keworrk) reported@JariSpectre That's true, the game had a huge potential but people didn't wanted to give XDefiant the time he needed to fix everything and ubisoft choosed to give up without really trying like always. I just wish we could do something to revive XDefiant, the game deserve better.
-
The **** Matrix (@TheMaxiMatrix) reported@xj0nathan Oh and also your talking a lot of **** when Ubisoft has a subscription service called Ubisoft+ which is part of a bundle known as PlayStation plus which is literally Sony version of gamepass
-
Zeus🐺 (@realZE9US) reportedPlaying at 90 Fps, I beg you please fix your game @Rainbow6Game @Ubisoft
-
MarshTopapo | (@MTopapo) reportedi hate @Ubisoft more. >played AC unity on steam >requires Ubisoft Launcher Log in >Logs in, need password change >changes password >Logs in, again, game launches >Another log in >Error Logging In
-
AJC (@Ajsly7) reported@tokyosdaughter @assassinscreed @Ubisoft Out of curiosity if there was a Yasuke game but it was sci-if fantasy would you still have an issue with it?
-
Shellshock (@The_Lego_Fan) reported@RinoTheBouncer Ai, microtransansactions, gready game publishers, live service games getting shut down because "gmthe games life is over" even though the game is still reciving players and is a GREAT game and should have been made with an offline mode from the START UBISOFT!
-
BoomerBuilds (@BoomerBuilding) reported@plainoldcj @SebAaltonen Good to know that even professionals run into this problem. It’s sad, because I got the base concept working pretty quickly with the Ubisoft LAFAN1 set, but finding a large enough animation set that is usable commercially seems almost impossible. Maybe a group of indie developers could work together on something.
-
keworrk (@keworrk) reported@episkbo @RinoTheBouncer The game was out for just couple months, it was supposed to be a game for the long run so ofc it needed some fix to make it really good but ubisoft didn't gave the little team behind the game what they needed. If the game was still there it would have been something big for sure
-
SirD 🇺🇸 (@Sir_Dammed) reportedAnd btw this doesn't mean that western games have completely regressed, or that we don't still get good games. Because we do. KCD2, BG3, Expedition 33, these are all amazing western games that were released recently, that I loved. But for every step forward, somewhere there's a step backwards. Ubisoft, dead. BioWare, dead. Rocksteady, dead. Blizzard, dying. Bethesda, dying. Naughtydog, on the verge of dying. Playground, on the verge of dying. How many more once beloved games/studios/IPs to we need to watch nosedive, in large part *because* they stop designing games for men, before we can acknowledge that there is a problem?
-
Shadow Stone (@LSXGOD812) reportedLive service games are the biggest scam in gaming history. Companies like Ubisoft and EA killed single player experiences so they could milk you with battle passes and $70+ seasons forever. Games like The Division or Anthem showed us the future: empty promises, server shutdowns, and dead player bases. Bring back complete games on release no always online bs man.
-
PepThird💀 (@PepThird) reported@PaulTassi Hate ubisoft all you want but they always maintain their live service games (except xdefiant that game is very odd indeed)
-
LazyThinker | Nemesis ✦ Apechain🦴🦍| | ETHGas ⛽ (@LazySinker) reported@Gh0stsNFT Big deal? This is so elementary Projects nowadays doing more than this Hey @Ubisoft is @XFunkeda one of your people? Nothing but trouble in web3. ****
-
Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported@Grummz AAA needs to re-evaluate how it's spending its money. Not throwing money at the problem. A lot of the time what they are spending on is way out of scope of what is expected for AAA. I mean hear is the definition of AAA: "AAA is an informal industry classification for high-budget, high-profile video games developed by large studios and distributed by major publishers." It just means a bit more to get that extra sheen that a AA can't quiet reach. Let's be fair here AA while improved a lot over the years isn't able to reach certain plateaus. Expedition 33 had its fair share of issues that I wouldn't have encountered in a AAA game. Might have featured a bit more content as a AAA game. AAA doesn't mean, it has to be open world or have live services. That's just Self Destructive Game Development that exists in the same venn diagram bubble as chasing industry trends instead of setting them. While niether of those two things are inherently evil in the industry, they are a problem when that is all gamers have to play. Variety is the spice of life and 30 failing live services would make anyone turn their nose up at the selection. Then blowing those budgets on ideologies instead of just crafting believable worlds, is art trying to force life to imitate it, instead of the other way around. That's a sure fire way to set your wallet on fire (literally) instead of your points of sale (figuratively) with customers demanding your product. This idea of AA vs AAA is ridiculous, it has nothing to do with either category. It boils down to those with extra blowing corporate money on bullshit schemes instead of doing as they are meant to function. Not enough money to build engine tech. Ubisoft has had 3 long running engines at its disposal that it could have easily challenged Unreal Engine by distributing to other vendors, but they don't have enough confidence in their games to release the tech and license it. A competing model would have been nice. Same applies to Fox Engine, Decima, Crystal Tools, Luminous Engine, RE Engine, and countless others. That could have helped pay for development as well as lead to development standards improving significantly. Better tools, better games. Competitive engine tool suites, competitive improvements in that space. Meanwhile we have morons like Yves Guilmote talking about the AAAA game and driving his publishing company and development studios into the ground while trying to influence culture instead of letting culture influence his product. Xbox is toast so long as they don't come to grips with these problems. Switching to UE5 from slipstream(?) probably one of the dumber things they've done. Glad Activision didn't pull the same **** with the CoD engine and finally unified their tech. say what you will about BLOPS7, the game has become infinitely more stable than entries in the franchise from 5 years ago and has started to allow them to really start dialing up features and bring back old ones that weren't easily ported between two separate engines. What about Id Tech? They have this bad *** engine used for doom, what is even happening there. Miss use of resources.
-
SPΞCTΞR (@SpecterGr1d) reported@JezCorden As much as I am against some of the stuff they do, they don't need to. Microsoft is a software company, a very dominant one at that. THAT IS THEIR LANE. Microsoft literally could rival steam if they focused on that aspect. They could find a way to flip gamepass into a service that Sony may agree to like they did with ubisoft classics, Microsoft we don't want your new games day one, but if you archive your older titles into a tier that benefits our plus customers, hey why not? To me that gives Microsoft leverage. There is obviously interest in their products from the reaction of Eday and the sales of FH5. They just need to find a way.
-
Ddynamite (@The_ddynamite) reported@ThaBeefDev @Beat_Rev @Pirat_Nation Screwing over ubisoft is a public service
-
Tempest (@Tempest525) reported@wccftech Why doesn't EA play, Ubisoft+, and other subscription services get talked about as much as gamepass? They put their games on the subscription service day one with all the dlc.
-
IMRavnos (@Imravnos) reported@Shurikanblade @AussieGamr As to re-releases, Nintendo has been doing this since the Wii. Just look up the list of re-releases, remasters and remakes. It may surprise you. To be clear, this is NOT a “Nintendo” problem, it is a AAA problem. Sony and M$ do this as well. As does EA, Ubisoft etc…
-
HunterEatsHunter (@ShadowMaster53) reported@AullorNothing You have no problem with the games releasing on Steam, Ubisoft plus, and GeForce now. Why are you so angry if it releases on PlayStation? These aren’t exclusive. They’re available on non-Xbox platforms. The next Xbox will be a PC, & trust me,no one is using the XBOX store.
-
Bethel (@bethelabraham_) reported@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @khadroth The game was being sold for 40$ on steam, so ubisoft was earning 28$ (after the 30% cut). Steam would've allowed for 30$ or smth but 15$ literally is not justifiable. And the game got listed on Steam for 15$ only 1 day after that too so what is your problem with this exactly..?
-
James Headnail (@Zerocross013XV) reported@TonyMichaelX No wonder. Change your idols. Meanwhile Ubisoft fix the rain.
-
Clo (@cl0det2e) reported@alexlimitedart @lus1naut this was an joke edit someone made regarding pamela anderson's upcoming ubisoft game VIP, how is it gonna promote rayman2 if it literally says ''tonic trouble between drugs and prostitution we found him'' ???
-
David Haywood (@MameHaze) reportedPlus being a Ubisoft game, it tries to force you to use the Ubisoft Connect stuff, meaning you have to disconnect your Switch from the Internet to play it. Also forced version number in the corner? makes it feel like a beta build. Don't think I'll be keeping this one.
-
Ckopen🏳️🌈 ACAB (@HardBoyJoe) reported@FrostedYukio @gamingnoobdev see, my issue is that ubisoft regularly violated steam TOS and would seemingly intentionally make the steam versions of their games function considerably worse, so until i see the actual proof i cant really trust ubisofts word on this.
-
cloudy ☁️ (@Cloudy_R6) reportedplease Ubisoft wake tf up n fix your game - DMRs out - Shields nerf to the ground - nerf thorn 1.5x or LMG Meta was so much better
-
BigPurr (@offuzbekistan) reportedPeople only complain about linearity being a problem for games when it's Ubisoft and for Twitter likes
-
✟ 🌹 (@KayCiMakaveli) reported@Higgs_GG I think I saw a video that stated that the actor they modeled Desmond's/Ezios face around was having major problems with Ubisoft, so they ditched him and tried to make their own models
-
BazzieMazzie (@LazzieMan2626) reported@piecaruso97 @partialmean8 ???? you would need to bribe 27 people who were with them and most likely it would have been blown whistles and gotten them into trouble ubisoft doesnt have money to give and risk it to be caught
-
myXCuriosity (@myXCuriosity) reported@lmkifiwin no problem. i just stopped buying. its not hard. you don't NEED video games. and you definitely don't need @Ubisoft