Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.

• Sign in (61%)
• Online Play (21%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Matchmaking (3%)
• Game Crash (1%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Montréal	Sign in	6 hours ago
Haguenau	Sign in	20 hours ago
Val-d'Or	Sign in	2 days ago
Pointe-à-Pitre	Sign in	2 days ago
Les Abymes	Sign in	2 days ago
Rio de Janeiro	Glitches	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sof c, ❀ (@sophia26_d) reported 52 seconds ago

  @Ubisoft not touching that incursion until they fix the bullet sponge scaling on heroic

• 
  赤ゲキ 🌃🏴‍☠️⚓️🐙🔱 🎣🚑🐔🌽🐏🧪 👓📝 (@AkaGeki) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Roiser0 What is irrelevant: Online or not, physical or not. What is relevant: The fact that Ubisoft and all other companies can and will take away your games because the license expired or they want to shut the server down.

• 
  DisabledBrandon (@DisabledBrandon) reported 7 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport Can’t link my phone number to my account. So I cannot play ranked then when I went onto Ubisoft support to send a message on what the issue I am having is. It just wouldn’t let me send the message. Absolute joke. SEND A VERIFICATION CODE TO MY NUMBER

• 
  Splooto's mangled corpse (@XxGG_sexualxX) reported 8 minutes ago

  Rockstar is not immune to ****** smarmy business practices, I've never denied that. But they are not the first, that is what I have an issue with regarding the current discourse. UBISOFT was first and GAMEFREAK/NINTENDO normalized R* is just player 3 in the anti consumer game.

• 
  Tomáš Pecha (@Tomas_Pecha) reported 9 minutes ago

  @CryptonautB @RinoTheBouncer That's true! It's like every Ubisoft game ever. It's Stop killing games initiative to fix that - but I'm not gonna preach, I believe you know all about that. Tldr - you have a terrifying point there.

• 
  Jessica (@itsTHR1LL) reported 10 minutes ago

  TONIGHTS UBISOFT OPTIMIZATION RANKED STATS: 5 RANDOM 100+ FPS FRAME DROPS 🔥 1 RANDOM CRASH 🥶 2 TIMES WHERE FRAMES DIDNT BOUNCE BACK TO OVER 120 AFTER A DROP 📈

• 
  The Raven (@RavenMentore) reported 10 minutes ago

  There is a deeper contradiction worth discussing when public influencers or social-media personalities repeatedly accuse parts of a fandom of “gatekeeping,” while simultaneously dismissing, belittling, or refusing to engage with criticism from those same communities — particularly when those creators have ongoing partnerships, sponsorships, promotional relationships, or other professional ties with Ubisoft. To be clear: genuine gatekeeping absolutely exists. Telling people that they cannot enjoy Assassin’s Creed because they discovered the series through a newer game, prefer RPG mechanics, like a particular character, or have different interpretations of the franchise is unnecessary and toxic. But the word “gatekeeping” can also become so broadly applied that it stops being a meaningful criticism and instead becomes a way of dismissing disagreement. There is a fundamental difference between gatekeeping someone from participating in a community and criticising the direction of a franchise you have been invested in for years. A fan saying, “I don't like where the series is going and here's why” isn't automatically gatekeeping. A fan saying, “I prefer the older games because of their emphasis on social stealth, investigation, parkour, smaller-scale environments, philosophical storytelling and the Assassin–Templar conflict” isn't automatically gatekeeping. And a fan questioning Ubisoft's creative decisions, monetisation, design philosophy, writing or treatment of established characters isn't automatically gatekeeping either. Those are opinions. And opinions don't become illegitimate simply because they come from people who disagree with the current direction of the franchise. The bigger issue is what happens when an influencer positions themselves as a representative of “the community” while only acknowledging the portion of that community that agrees with them. A fandom isn't a single ideological bloc. Assassin's Creed has existed for nearly two decades. It contains people who started with AC1, people who started with Ezio, people who came in through Black Flag, Unity, Origins, Odyssey, Valhalla, Mirage, or other entries. Some prefer linear games. Others prefer RPGs. Some care primarily about the historical settings. Others care about the Isu mythology. Some care about stealth. Others care about combat. Some want the franchise to return to its older structure. Others want it to continue evolving. None of those groups automatically has exclusive ownership of the franchise. But that also means no individual influencer gets to decide that one particular perspective represents “the fans” while every opposing perspective is dismissed as “gatekeeping,” “toxic fandom,” “nostalgia,” or some other convenient label. And this is where the contradiction becomes particularly important when professional relationships with Ubisoft are involved. Having a partnership with Ubisoft doesn't automatically invalidate someone's opinion. That's not the argument. The reasonable question is whether someone can maintain genuine independence while simultaneously presenting themselves as a voice for a wider community. If your professional position, access, sponsorships, promotional opportunities or relationships with a publisher create incentives to maintain a particular narrative, then you should be especially careful about presenting your personal interpretation as though it represents everyone. You can absolutely be a fan and work with a company. But being a fan, being an influencer, and being a representative of an entire community are three different things. If you repeatedly tell other fans that they're “gatekeeping” because they don't share your interpretation, while refusing to acknowledge legitimate criticism from them, you're no longer really representing the community as a whole. You're representing yourself. And there's nothing inherently wrong with that.

• 
  IsItImportant? (@FoxHoundUnitMGS) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Thirteenthsteps there's only one small problem, first of all, take2 is not the first with such price tag, second thing, GTA 6 will absolutely worth it, since it's rockstar we are talking, not EA or Ubisoft.

• 
  MagnaCarta80 ★ (@MagnaCarta80) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft the world ascension 2 event is absolutely broken. The zahamaribus are way overtuned. Fix it.

• 
  Rayman_Tada.K. (@testeage2021) reported 13 minutes ago

  @RaymanTogether If Crash Bandicoot is there, than i will start re-downloading it. I feel like Rayman would be there as well if Ubisoft ever announced it.

• 
  Dractheimpaler (@HarryJohnSmth) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Willydawildcat @JAYGAMING029 And could they need and should be all guns sound the same. Breakpoint had the same problem and they added better sound to ask M4 and acr. They should have done the same to Wildlands but ubisoft does not care enough

• 
  x0Kharnage0x (Alex) (@GeneralKharnage) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport Your games are too full of cheaters you do nothing about to even be playable online. People use cronus and lag switch all the time. You don't even moderate your ****. How are you even still selling games?

• 
  ANIMUS_X (@Ubicypher) reported 20 minutes ago

  @TheRealZephryss In my opinion; Mainstream sells and mythology IS mainstream. At the end of the day, it is just a videogame. Unfortunately, AC was originally rather underground until Revelations and ACIII launched the franchise into the overall mainstream when it began to be marketed with musical artists and such. And it essentially demonstrated that historical settings could be virtualized and monetized through an endless sandbox. At that moment it stopped from being a conspiratorial/sci-fi/historical action adventure and became a blockbuster historical-drama simulator after Desmond's death. It's obvious why old fans and new fans clash. "Original" fans or whatever you want to call them, "Those Who Came Before" for that matter, were following a narrative, tone and atmosphere imbued in philosophy that is almost non-existent, or at least at face value compared to the Desmond era is no more. There used to be a clear finale. Everything was leading towards Desmond becoming a ultimate Assassin and taking on Abstergo. The "new fans" or whatever, are in for the exploration, simulation, rpg mechanics, addictive Combat in some instances and the fact that you can explore an entire country in your living room, richly detailed and crafted to the detail. Both are valid. The problem has never been about the franchise going astray or going bankrupt in ideas. The problem is not just loss of identity. It's the fact that it wasn't planned to be this long in the first place. We live in a society now where entertainment needs to last and outlive us because we need more and more inmersion and escapism. AC was supposed to die with Desmond. But Ubisoft decided otherwise. I think both fanbases should all aim towards a future were AC makes sense and it's just not virtual tourism or massive RPG sandboxes with no other justification but the name of the franchise on the box case for it to exist. But it won't be until Ubisoft pulls it's **** together and crafts a cohesive narrative that concludes everything. Once and for all. Nothing can stop them to make spin-off games set in different eras after that anyway. There will be people to buy those games. See immortal fenyx rising. A neat banger. It's clear they wanted to turn AC into that but they couldn't. So I think they should think about making new IP's and get those wild ideas in these. There's potential. But haters' gonna hate.

• 
  DrPlat23 (@DrPlat23) reported 21 minutes ago

  @voidyhead @WWCOG_Podcast My thoughts exactly. Even if the game was perfect the fact that it's online only completely kills it for me because Ubisoft is well known for how they will strip away their servers and even if it isn't Ubisoft then you have to take in account your service provider and console

• 
  johnnypearl ❁ (@j0hnnypearl) reported 22 minutes ago

  @GhostRecon My BIOS is from this month and I have the Steam version, though I also own the Ubisoft Connect version; loading is slow on both. I was going to make a video, but since they’re already fixing the NVGs, the loading times, and the weapons, I’ll just wait for the fix.

• 
  Indignation (@Rufter91) reported 26 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport Hello, my ubisoft connect account has just been suspended because of, apparently, too many failed login attempts, even though I didnt attempt to login. Now I am unable to play a game that I own on steam. Any way you can help me please?

• 
  Jay Jabrolsky (@Jabrolsky) reported 26 minutes ago

  @RKRigney My friends have never had an issue recovering hacked Steam accounts. It's usually their own stupidity clicking links but they get it back in one day max. They have lost their ubisoft and microsoft Xbox accounts forever.

• 
  Timo (@TimoTweetss) reported 27 minutes ago

  assassin’s creed was once (up till 2018) a serious historical franchise about the war between assassin’s and Templars with sci-fi elements… starting with odyssey, Ubisoft thought adding literally whatever ******** and justifying it as an animus glitch or dream sequence would be okay, and it isn’t. **** sales numbers, im talking from the pov of the franchise in terms of authenticity and integrity, its lost that serious tone that made it special to begin with…

• 
  Games Contents (@GamesContents) reported 28 minutes ago

  The Division 2 - Official Broken Rain incursion trailer Check out the Broken Rain Incursion Trailer for The Division 2, the third-person action shooter developed by Ubisoft. Players can take on a new Incursion called Broken Rain, which tasks Agents with reclaiming a facility before certain doom from an incoming hurricane. Take on new bosses and earn rewards in the Broken Rain Incursion for The Division 2, launching on August 11 for PlayStation 4 (PS4), Xbox One, and PC (Steam)

• 
  Jared Brock (@jaredjbrock) reported 28 minutes ago

  @RunaBytes It’s not that Marathon killed Destiny 2 directly. But it’s the choices that have occurred that is primarily what people are upset about - a lot of people just simplify it and blame Marathon. Bungie had multiple projects in development, spreading their studio thin. Bungie directly removed important personnel from Destiny to put them on Marathon, negatively impacting a noticeable amount of stuff with Destiny, such as PVP support and investment. Bungie consistently had art problems, particularly noteworthy with Marathon. Marathon didn’t come out at its intended time, which would have been prior to ARC Raiders. ARC beating them to the punch did a severe amount of damage to what Marathon could have brought in. Before all that, Bungie decided to build a major size studio in a high-cost area. And COVID occurred, rendering that investment very poor. Bad leadership calls led to Bungie dropping several expansions from Destiny 2, not only angering people that paid for that content, but also with the unintended side effect of making the new player experience completely awful, therefore heavily discouraging bringing in new players. Which is what you need for a live-service game — new players. On top of all of that, the cycle of dropping so much cool content just to remove it after the year was over was abysmal. Had a Monument of Triumph style Portal existed before that that old content could be recycled into, even if seasonally rotating out, it would do wonders for ensuring the game always felt like it had new content. Bungie also started and promised a new Nine saga. The first major entry being cool story wise but pretty bland and awful gameplay wise. The second being a Star Wars-esque expansion in terms of lore and gameplay, which isn’t for everyone. The story was building to somewhere cool, and it was just completely dropped — even with a significant amount of content already complete and near ready to ship. What angers players the most is that the story was not left in at least a good enough state. It was just up and wrapped up quickly with lingering plot threads in case they wanted to continue, which they show no plans of doing. All that to say, while it’s not directly Marathon’s fault, it is simultaneously easy to see where the investment into Marathon and not Destiny led to Destiny falling into the abyss it is. The fact that Destiny won’t continue, and yet you see a studio like Ubisoft doubling down and creating The Division 3 is just asinine. Destiny 2 was never designed to be an infinite game. That’s a decision that must be made from the start, as it is going to always be a place of catch up if you make that decision later. All we wanted was them to invest in Destiny 3 so that they could develop and realize that intent that they tried but failed to do with Destiny 2.

• 
  Bloxycolah (@Bloxr6) reported 28 minutes ago

  @ubisoft make it so siege doesn't crash more than a drunk driver on new year's eve ffs

• 
  Fury (@FilthandFury411) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Jorraptor @TheRealZephryss Bro we are not gate keeping. We like the old AC game and not the new ones. If the new ones don't sell due to old fans not buying them that not my problem. If Ubisoft want to change what work fine. Im not buy it.

• 
  Dan (@_DanT64_) reported 34 minutes ago

  Anyone ever had a ps5 issue where no Ubisoft discs read? Perfect condition, have worked no problem before, and every other physical game works fine, but not a single one of my Ubisoft discs work? “Can’t recognise the disc”? @UbisoftSupport @PlayStationUK any solutions?

• 
  Bitswift.Tech |🇨🇦 🦉 (@bitswift_tech) reported 36 minutes ago

  Looks like a couple of big service providers are offline / down at the moment. Namecheap, Claude, UbiSoft, to name a few.

• 
  Neoh 💿 (@neohnerdin) reported 37 minutes ago

  @BraidzMCau @Brooks_exe @DirtDisrespect Then maybe Ubisoft should stop releasing AC games every year. That’s their problem not rockstars. Give the devs time to cook.

• 
  Neil Cloonan (@NWCloonan) reported 42 minutes ago

  @VyniGives @Leon_1588 Nobody complained when that happened because it only became an issue 3 years ago, after Ubisoft shut down The Crew and deactivated everyone's licenses. This is where people began realizing it was a problem. It was not foreseen in the past.

• 
  cas (@cas_iwnl) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft Please fix rollback bug

• 
  RonninAu (@Ronnin_R6) reported 43 minutes ago

  @NBDY2k @Sh44dy @Ubisoft I lost 3 elo yesterday and got + 3 5x. Definitely broken.

• 
  Non human 64 (@Deathskiller666) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @Rainbow6Dev yall need to fix your ******* game i am sick and tired of all of these god dam cheaters and lag switchers on PC like please ******* get your heads out of your asses and fix this **** 20+ seasons in and people are still cheating and nothing happens to them

• 
  Visuljko (@Visuljkoo) reported 60 minutes ago

  @kindertotem98 Issues the size of the map causes: - 60%+ of the boss roster is recycled - Most dungeons and mines function and look the same - Pacing is horrible - DLC has the same issues Ubisoft design that ruins what would otherwise be a 9/10 game