1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Ubisoft Connect
Ubisoft Connect

Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Ubisoft Connect is a digital distribution, digital rights management, multiplayer and communications service developed by Ubisoft to provide an experience similar to the achievements/trophies offered by various other game companies. The service is provided across various platforms (PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, etc).

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Ubisoft Connect. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.

  • 70% Sign in (70%)
  • 14% Online Play (14%)
  • 10% Glitches (10%)
  • 2% Matchmaking (2%)
  • 2% Game Crash (2%)
  • 0% Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Brussels Glitches 3 days ago
Grenoble Online Play 3 days ago
Orléans Online Play 7 days ago
Orléans Sign in 7 days ago
Chatham Sign in 8 days ago
Paris Matchmaking 9 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • LazzieMan2626
    BazzieMazzie (@LazzieMan2626) reported

    @piecaruso97 @partialmean8 ???? you would need to bribe 27 people who were with them and most likely it would have been blown whistles and gotten them into trouble ubisoft doesnt have money to give and risk it to be caught

  • bum_lao
    bum lao (@bum_lao) reported

    @LikeToBeBossy You do realize its not just Xbox having to fix itself right? The industry as a whole is in trouble. Sony has closed multiple studios over the last couple years same with Ubisoft and Square sold off some studios and ip etc. Its not just an Xbox problem.

  • NewsProspector
    Prospector (@NewsProspector) reported

    @lmkifiwin "And the part that says everything: according to the campaign, Ubisoft got a seat at a closed-door meeting with the Commission before the decision. The 1.3 million people who signed did not." Anyone that buys any Ubisoft game going forward is part of the problem. They are simply the worst company in games development/publishing in regard to consumer rights. They need to go bankrupt.

  • criticalhitsTV
    The Critical Thinker (@criticalhitsTV) reported

    @ThaBeefDev @Pirat_Nation Why would I or any consumer care about Ubisoft? So your concern is Ubisoft profit...not the consumer? The problem here is too many of you are ignorant about business. Ask yourself a simple question, "why not offer the lower price on steam as well on Uplay". One price across the board. That would benefit consumers wouldn't it?

  • MREVILA55
    MREVILA55 (@MREVILA55) reported

    The problem is Ubisoft.

  • entwinedsp71971
    entwinedspace7 (@entwinedsp71971) reported

    @Vara_Dark Not surprised, what did they expect telling their customers not to buy their games. They acted as if they had some infinite money glitch unlocked. Funny thing is Expedition 33 could've been a ubisoft game.

  • keworrk
    keworrk (@keworrk) reported

    @episkbo @RinoTheBouncer The game was out for just couple months, it was supposed to be a game for the long run so ofc it needed some fix to make it really good but ubisoft didn't gave the little team behind the game what they needed. If the game was still there it would have been something big for sure

  • ChakaalStarr
    Chakaal Starr (@ChakaalStarr) reported

    @LikeToBeBossy It's an industry problem, just remember this when Sony starts paring down bungie and some of its studios soon. Ubisoft and Embracer are laying people off too. Bluepoint recently got shutdown by Sony.

  • wyaendless
    ØØøØØ (@wyaendless) reported

    @Joshinken1 @Dexerto Where was this energy when you were accepting the terms of service? You are demanding that Ubisoft be held accountable for a bad TOS, but you get out of jail for free for accepting said TOS? Okay.

  • Dammit_Ivaldi
    Dammit! Ivaldi (@Dammit_Ivaldi) reported

    @ChikaBubbly @Cal03333 Do you ever think Valve controls 80% of the market because no other platform offers a better service? Epic Games offers free AAA titles every single month and still cant hold a fanbase, EA is dogshit, Ubisoft is dogshit, WoW/Activision is bad. GOG is the only close one.

  • TektheSatNav
    Satnav -the unbroken (@TektheSatNav) reported

    @PaulTassi I said to some friends “if *** 3 doesn’t go under due to Ubisoft money issues, it’ll straight up be destiny numbers from its prime! Coz all the destiny players will flock to it! Us included!!”

  • silky_919
    mankar camoran apologist🔻 (@silky_919) reported

    advertising end of service for a ******* ubisoft single player game but not for destiny 2 i can’t help but laugh

  • AetherScore22
    Aether 🗡️ (@AetherScore22) reported

    @SynthPotato Damn camera cut rm double murders, what's the problem with ubisoft? Nobody likes it and everyone asks to take it out on their discord

  • BoomerBuilding
    BoomerBuilds (@BoomerBuilding) reported

    @plainoldcj @SebAaltonen Good to know that even professionals run into this problem. It’s sad, because I got the base concept working pretty quickly with the Ubisoft LAFAN1 set, but finding a large enough animation set that is usable commercially seems almost impossible. Maybe a group of indie developers could work together on something.

  • TheMaxiMatrix
    The **** Matrix (@TheMaxiMatrix) reported

    @xj0nathan Oh and also your talking a lot of **** when Ubisoft has a subscription service called Ubisoft+ which is part of a bundle known as PlayStation plus which is literally Sony version of gamepass

  • WARLORD1216424
    WARLORD12 (@WARLORD1216424) reported

    @popuniversee Because Ubisoft was probably trying to turn the Prince of persia remaster into live service. Why would it take 3 or 4 years to do a remaster ? All you had to do was copy & paste, so obviously you were trying to show horn in a bunch of stuff & it ended up being in vain.

  • HardBoyJoe
    Ckopen🏳️‍🌈 ACAB (@HardBoyJoe) reported

    @FrostedYukio @gamingnoobdev see, my issue is that ubisoft regularly violated steam TOS and would seemingly intentionally make the steam versions of their games function considerably worse, so until i see the actual proof i cant really trust ubisofts word on this.

  • GoonItForward
    Throwaway9001 (@GoonItForward) reported

    @IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @eurogamer uplay is a subscription service

  • Revision_124c41
    Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported

    @Grummz AAA needs to re-evaluate how it's spending its money. Not throwing money at the problem. A lot of the time what they are spending on is way out of scope of what is expected for AAA. I mean hear is the definition of AAA: "AAA is an informal industry classification for high-budget, high-profile video games developed by large studios and distributed by major publishers." It just means a bit more to get that extra sheen that a AA can't quiet reach. Let's be fair here AA while improved a lot over the years isn't able to reach certain plateaus. Expedition 33 had its fair share of issues that I wouldn't have encountered in a AAA game. Might have featured a bit more content as a AAA game. AAA doesn't mean, it has to be open world or have live services. That's just Self Destructive Game Development that exists in the same venn diagram bubble as chasing industry trends instead of setting them. While niether of those two things are inherently evil in the industry, they are a problem when that is all gamers have to play. Variety is the spice of life and 30 failing live services would make anyone turn their nose up at the selection. Then blowing those budgets on ideologies instead of just crafting believable worlds, is art trying to force life to imitate it, instead of the other way around. That's a sure fire way to set your wallet on fire (literally) instead of your points of sale (figuratively) with customers demanding your product. This idea of AA vs AAA is ridiculous, it has nothing to do with either category. It boils down to those with extra blowing corporate money on bullshit schemes instead of doing as they are meant to function. Not enough money to build engine tech. Ubisoft has had 3 long running engines at its disposal that it could have easily challenged Unreal Engine by distributing to other vendors, but they don't have enough confidence in their games to release the tech and license it. A competing model would have been nice. Same applies to Fox Engine, Decima, Crystal Tools, Luminous Engine, RE Engine, and countless others. That could have helped pay for development as well as lead to development standards improving significantly. Better tools, better games. Competitive engine tool suites, competitive improvements in that space. Meanwhile we have morons like Yves Guilmote talking about the AAAA game and driving his publishing company and development studios into the ground while trying to influence culture instead of letting culture influence his product. Xbox is toast so long as they don't come to grips with these problems. Switching to UE5 from slipstream(?) probably one of the dumber things they've done. Glad Activision didn't pull the same **** with the CoD engine and finally unified their tech. say what you will about BLOPS7, the game has become infinitely more stable than entries in the franchise from 5 years ago and has started to allow them to really start dialing up features and bring back old ones that weren't easily ported between two separate engines. What about Id Tech? They have this bad *** engine used for doom, what is even happening there. Miss use of resources.

  • MisterNobody171
    Mister Nobody (@MisterNobody171) reported

    @Lazgar_lockman The problem is you idiots are so addicted to their games. Ubisoft should be put out of business. No game they put out should be purchased or downloaded. Any game they have created should be deleted and not played. End them. No petition needed.

  • MTopapo
    MarshTopapo | (@MTopapo) reported

    i hate @Ubisoft more. >played AC unity on steam >requires Ubisoft Launcher Log in >Logs in, need password change >changes password >Logs in, again, game launches >Another log in >Error Logging In

  • pipesandstrings
    pipesandstrings (@pipesandstrings) reported

    @SOCOMandChill @UbisoftSupport @Ubisoft Yeah I'm 3 tickets deep with them and no further forward in recovery of my account absolutely useless service for me personally 😭.

  • Phaet0nn
    Phaeton (@Phaet0nn) reported

    @Pirat_Nation Ubisoft thinking the story is the problem the game is not selling, is exactly why the game failed. They are that stupid.

  • asunoaim
    eA asuno (@asunoaim) reported

    @shikaiFPS @KallMeKiko I think xdefiant is tough to use for a proper comparison. The game was extremely ambitious being built on an MMORPG engine with, yes, lots of potential but also lots of starting issues. It was also backed by Ubisoft until they realized the fixed will take too long and they will not make money in the long run hence they dropped funding. I am 100% certain the game would have been able to have a great playerbase if Mark Rubin were given more time on it. It had massive issues, all fixeable and a dedicated dev team.

  • Wolf_Eisberg
    Wolf_Eis_Berg (@Wolf_Eisberg) reported

    @RANDOMOCITY327 @Pirat_Nation Ubisoft was not advertising that starter pack on Steam at all. It really was a problem of Ubisoft having a cheaper package on their store and not on Steam.

  • Blinding_One
    luvad (@Blinding_One) reported

    @cyberprince_rwo More-so the issue is that the company is infamous for making bad decisions. deterring their playerbase. Dropping 12 million players casually off of age verification mistakes and continuing to become less and less of a good idea to invest in. It won't be a winner. It'll Ubisoft.

  • MaD1n3ss
    (MaDness) (@MaD1n3ss) reported

    @J19_Gaming89 I dont think the side content was the problem. Most of it wasn't great butnit was how if felt like an ubisoft game. Crimson desert has alot of fluff but not only is it optional but you have to seek it out its not cluttering your experience.

  • LSXGOD812
    Shadow Stone (@LSXGOD812) reported

    Live service games are the biggest scam in gaming history. Companies like Ubisoft and EA killed single player experiences so they could milk you with battle passes and $70+ seasons forever. Games like The Division or Anthem showed us the future: empty promises, server shutdowns, and dead player bases. Bring back complete games on release no always online bs man.

  • Tempest525
    Tempest (@Tempest525) reported

    @wccftech Why doesn't EA play, Ubisoft+, and other subscription services get talked about as much as gamepass? They put their games on the subscription service day one with all the dlc.

  • John_GAMEFIX
    John GameFix (@John_GAMEFIX) reported

    @ForeignG59 @UbisoftSupport @Ubisoft What's the issue?