1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Ubisoft Connect
Ubisoft Connect

Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: sign in, online play and glitches.

Full Outage Map

Ubisoft Connect is a digital distribution, digital rights management, multiplayer and communications service developed by Ubisoft to provide an experience similar to the achievements/trophies offered by various other game companies. The service is provided across various platforms (PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, etc).

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

August 17: Problems at Ubisoft Connect

Ubisoft Connect is having issues since 04:30 AM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.

  • 59% Sign in (59%)
  • 23% Online Play (23%)
  • 13% Glitches (13%)
  • 4% Matchmaking (4%)
  • 1% Game Crash (1%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Lanús Sign in 3 minutes ago
Montaigu Glitches 12 hours ago
Hortolândia Online Play 2 days ago
Fairfield Online Play 4 days ago
Milan Online Play 4 days ago
Teresina Sign in 4 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Ubicypher
    ANIMUS_X (@Ubicypher) reported

    @TheRealZephryss In my opinion; Mainstream sells and mythology IS mainstream. At the end of the day, it is just a videogame. Unfortunately, AC was originally rather underground until Revelations and ACIII launched the franchise into the overall mainstream when it began to be marketed with musical artists and such. And it essentially demonstrated that historical settings could be virtualized and monetized through an endless sandbox. At that moment it stopped from being a conspiratorial/sci-fi/historical action adventure and became a blockbuster historical-drama simulator after Desmond's death. It's obvious why old fans and new fans clash. "Original" fans or whatever you want to call them, "Those Who Came Before" for that matter, were following a narrative, tone and atmosphere imbued in philosophy that is almost non-existent, or at least at face value compared to the Desmond era is no more. There used to be a clear finale. Everything was leading towards Desmond becoming a ultimate Assassin and taking on Abstergo. The "new fans" or whatever, are in for the exploration, simulation, rpg mechanics, addictive Combat in some instances and the fact that you can explore an entire country in your living room, richly detailed and crafted to the detail. Both are valid. The problem has never been about the franchise going astray or going bankrupt in ideas. The problem is not just loss of identity. It's the fact that it wasn't planned to be this long in the first place. We live in a society now where entertainment needs to last and outlive us because we need more and more inmersion and escapism. AC was supposed to die with Desmond. But Ubisoft decided otherwise. I think both fanbases should all aim towards a future were AC makes sense and it's just not virtual tourism or massive RPG sandboxes with no other justification but the name of the franchise on the box case for it to exist. But it won't be until Ubisoft pulls it's **** together and crafts a cohesive narrative that concludes everything. Once and for all. Nothing can stop them to make spin-off games set in different eras after that anyway. There will be people to buy those games. See immortal fenyx rising. A neat banger. It's clear they wanted to turn AC into that but they couldn't. So I think they should think about making new IP's and get those wild ideas in these. There's potential. But haters' gonna hate.

  • Aktivarum
    Erik Wedin (@Aktivarum) reported

    @GhostRecon FFS Ubisoft.. FIX - THE - INFINITE - LOADING - SCREEN... How STUPID is it a a scale from 1-10 to be stuck playing on your old computer from 2018 after saving for years to buy a new one? The game works PERFECT on my 8 years old OLD computer but cant boot on my NEW one.

  • iampowlly
    iampowlly (@iampowlly) reported

    Hay Ubisoft. Do you think you can have like 400 of your talented staff fix the studder and texture lag in your remastered game? I have bought it and still can not play do to the rage quit I get from it! Please for the love of all that is Assassins Creed please fix this. powlly (Paul) GG's.

  • Isaac24682
    Isaac bradbury (@Isaac24682) reported

    @Ubisoft For the love of everything holy please fix the bug that makes my xbox think it’s a pc I’M TIRED OF PLAYING AGAINST CHUDS😭

  • Dudufd3467
    Dudu (@Dudufd3467) reported

    @dance__base I completely agree with you, Ubisoft killed Just Dance with the way they migrated the game, forcing Xbox One and PlayStation 4 owners to buy a new console, They removed a wonderful online resource to replace it with one that doesn't even work properly and has lag.

  • Ubicypher
    ANIMUS_X (@Ubicypher) reported

    @TheRealZephryss It's simple. Mainstream sells and mythology is mainstream. At the end of the day, it is just a videogame. Unfortunately, AC was originally rather underground until Revelations and ACIII launched the franchise into the overall mainstream when it began to be marketed with musical artists and such and it essential demonstrated that historical settings could be virtualized and monetized through a sandbox. It stopped from being a conspiratorial/sci-fi/historical action adventure to a blockbuster historical simulator after Desmond's death. It's obvious why og fans and new fans clash. "Original" fans or whatever you want to call them, "Those Who Came Before" for that matter, were following a narrative, tone and atmosphere that is almost non-existent, or at least at face value compared to the Desmond era is no more. There used to be a clear finale. Everything was leading towards Desmond becoming a ultimate Assassin and taking on Abstergo. The "new fans" or whatever, are in for the exploration, simulation, rpg mechanics, addictive Combat in some instances and the fact that you can explore an entire country in your living room, richly detailed and crafted to the detail. Both are valid. The problem has never been about the franchise going astray or going bankrupt in ideas. The problem is not just loss of identity. It's the fact that it wasn't planned to be this long in the first place. We live in a society now where entertainment needs to last and outlive us because we need more and more inmersion and escapism. AC was supposed to die with Desmond. But Ubisoft decided otherwise. I think both fanbases should all aim towards a future were AC makes sense and it's just not virtual tourism or massive RPG sandboxes with no other justification but the name of the franchise on the box case for it to exist. But it won't be until Ubisoft pulls it's **** together and crafts a cohesive narrative that concludes everything. Once and for all. Nothing can stop them to make spin-off games set in different eras after that anyway. There will be people to buy those games anyway.

  • Sh0wYaH0wda
    Austin Bell (@Sh0wYaH0wda) reported

    Updating it first like especially like apps like Ubisoft or Steam or the Game Pass app or Xbox app whatever have you when there’s way more features and stuff on it then just the games or like Xbox my rewards were reset for the daily login to the PC app because of (3)

  • Omar15642112
    Omar (@Omar15642112) reported

    @LegacyKillaHD As long as they keep it in online i couldn't care less, the problem is, i feel this **** is hitting singleplayer too like Ubisoft does with armor and pay to fast

  • urlocalxeno
    urlocalxeno (@urlocalxeno) reported

    @JimSplib @Ubisoft ye how to fix this ****

  • PeKoe_Arts
    Pe-Koe Arts (@PeKoe_Arts) reported

    @Ubisoft Please fix Ghost Recon Wildlands (pc) infinite loading screen

  • hanahakis_
    🐦‍⬛Haki! (@hanahakis_) reported

    @WirenthReylarVT i don’t know my ubisoft login:(

  • Zurielcbx
    Zuriel (@Zurielcbx) reported

    I really REALLY hate Ubisoft, wdym I can't login in the PC I created the account???

  • iampowlly
    iampowlly (@iampowlly) reported

    @Assassins_UK Hay Ubisoft. Do you think you can have like 400 of your talented staff fix the studder and texture lag in your remastered game? I have bought it and still can not play do to the rage quit I get from it! Please for the love of all that is Assassins Creed please fix this. powlly (Paul) GG's.

  • MVKiingR6
    Max "MVKiing" Völkl (@MVKiingR6) reported

    I want to talk about the new ranked system. How is it possible that I win one match and then immediately lose the next, I’m hardstuck in Platinum on my alt account, and it shouldn't be like this. Please fix this new ranked system. @Rainbow6Game @Ubisoft

  • Aktivarum
    Erik Wedin (@Aktivarum) reported

    @GhostRecon Update: It seems they DID fix it... Its a 25 GB large update which I think Ubisoft dropped yesterday. I am able to play Wildlands now on my Intel Core Ultra 7

  • RuneKingRhoam
    Rhoam aka Mr. Duskblood (@RuneKingRhoam) reported

    @OnlyAfroGames I hate Ubisoft for a lot of things but their $2.49 live service sales are fantastic. That’s how I got into The Division lol

  • DrPlat23
    DrPlat23 (@DrPlat23) reported

    @voidyhead @WWCOG_Podcast My thoughts exactly. Even if the game was perfect the fact that it's online only completely kills it for me because Ubisoft is well known for how they will strip away their servers and even if it isn't Ubisoft then you have to take in account your service provider and console

  • zanekaneonair
    ZaneKaneOnAir 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧 (@zanekaneonair) reported

    @TimoTweetss This might be a hot take, but if these bosses were in a game and were handled well, no one would complain. The only problem is that it is Ubisoft.

  • TimoTweetss
    Timo (@TimoTweetss) reported

    assassin’s creed was once (up till 2018) a serious historical franchise about the war between assassin’s and Templars with sci-fi elements… starting with odyssey, Ubisoft thought adding literally whatever ******** and justifying it as an animus glitch or dream sequence would be okay, and it isn’t. **** sales numbers, im talking from the pov of the franchise in terms of authenticity and integrity, its lost that serious tone that made it special to begin with…

  • Nocturnal_FPS
    Nocturnal 🇺🇸 (@Nocturnal_FPS) reported

    Yes @Ubisoft I queued ranked w my duo because we wanted to get put into 2 separate games. Fix your dogshit game.

  • robolto78
    robolto78 (@robolto78) reported

    @Ubisoft Until you guys decide to fix a game that doesn't work on next gen BEFORE you update the graphics to next gen, you won't get another penny from me. It's insane that you let people purchase this game knowing good and well that it won't work on modern e core PCs. Shame on you ubi!

  • MisterAlpha444
    MisterAlpha444 (@MisterAlpha444) reported

    The biggest problem Assassin’s Creed has right now is consistency. AC Origins was the first game of the RPG era and even there, the mythological elements in the Curse of the Pharaohs DLC were given context through a Piece of Eden. The characters were hallucinating and there was an explanation within the universe for why these things were happening. Then you have Odyssey, where you fight a Sphinx and several other creatures from Greek mythology. Kassandra doesn’t even really acknowledge what the Piece of Eden actually is. You defeat a mythical creature, suddenly have a Piece of Eden in your hand and an Assassin’s Creed fan knows what it is but that’s basically it. There’s barely any context. Valhalla handled it differently again. A lot of the mythology was presented through hallucinations and visions, such as Asgard, while the story also established the connection to Odin and the Isu. And this is where my biggest problem comes in. If you look at Assassin’s Creed up until Unity, or even Syndicate, the world still felt consistent. Whenever something supernatural happened, there was usually a connection to the First Civilization, Pieces of Eden or established Assassin’s Creed lore. During the RPG era, it sometimes feels like Ubisoft took the mythology and legends associated with each historical period: Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece, the Viking Age and simply inserted them into the games because they fit the setting. I don't mind mythology itself. I mind when it feels disconnected from the story. At the same time, we had Assassin’s Creed Shadows, which had essentially zero Pieces of Eden and no mythology. And people weren't completely happy with that either. Because Shadows had incredibly Assassin’s Creed-like gameplay, but its story barely connected to what makes Assassin’s Creed feel like Assassin’s Creed. So it feels like the franchise has gone from one extreme to the other. The problem isn't mythology. The problem is that Assassin’s Creed needs to know what it actually wants to be and then build its mythology, gameplay and story around that consistently.

  • RavenMentore
    The Raven (@RavenMentore) reported

    There is a deeper contradiction worth discussing when public influencers or social-media personalities repeatedly accuse parts of a fandom of “gatekeeping,” while simultaneously dismissing, belittling, or refusing to engage with criticism from those same communities — particularly when those creators have ongoing partnerships, sponsorships, promotional relationships, or other professional ties with Ubisoft. To be clear: genuine gatekeeping absolutely exists. Telling people that they cannot enjoy Assassin’s Creed because they discovered the series through a newer game, prefer RPG mechanics, like a particular character, or have different interpretations of the franchise is unnecessary and toxic. But the word “gatekeeping” can also become so broadly applied that it stops being a meaningful criticism and instead becomes a way of dismissing disagreement. There is a fundamental difference between gatekeeping someone from participating in a community and criticising the direction of a franchise you have been invested in for years. A fan saying, “I don't like where the series is going and here's why” isn't automatically gatekeeping. A fan saying, “I prefer the older games because of their emphasis on social stealth, investigation, parkour, smaller-scale environments, philosophical storytelling and the Assassin–Templar conflict” isn't automatically gatekeeping. And a fan questioning Ubisoft's creative decisions, monetisation, design philosophy, writing or treatment of established characters isn't automatically gatekeeping either. Those are opinions. And opinions don't become illegitimate simply because they come from people who disagree with the current direction of the franchise. The bigger issue is what happens when an influencer positions themselves as a representative of “the community” while only acknowledging the portion of that community that agrees with them. A fandom isn't a single ideological bloc. Assassin's Creed has existed for nearly two decades. It contains people who started with AC1, people who started with Ezio, people who came in through Black Flag, Unity, Origins, Odyssey, Valhalla, Mirage, or other entries. Some prefer linear games. Others prefer RPGs. Some care primarily about the historical settings. Others care about the Isu mythology. Some care about stealth. Others care about combat. Some want the franchise to return to its older structure. Others want it to continue evolving. None of those groups automatically has exclusive ownership of the franchise. But that also means no individual influencer gets to decide that one particular perspective represents “the fans” while every opposing perspective is dismissed as “gatekeeping,” “toxic fandom,” “nostalgia,” or some other convenient label. And this is where the contradiction becomes particularly important when professional relationships with Ubisoft are involved. Having a partnership with Ubisoft doesn't automatically invalidate someone's opinion. That's not the argument. The reasonable question is whether someone can maintain genuine independence while simultaneously presenting themselves as a voice for a wider community. If your professional position, access, sponsorships, promotional opportunities or relationships with a publisher create incentives to maintain a particular narrative, then you should be especially careful about presenting your personal interpretation as though it represents everyone. You can absolutely be a fan and work with a company. But being a fan, being an influencer, and being a representative of an entire community are three different things. If you repeatedly tell other fans that they're “gatekeeping” because they don't share your interpretation, while refusing to acknowledge legitimate criticism from them, you're no longer really representing the community as a whole. You're representing yourself. And there's nothing inherently wrong with that.

  • NHstopguy
    appealtoheaven (@NHstopguy) reported

    @OfficialNyps the pixel peek problem would be solved almost entirely if Ubisoft had the ***** to make bullets come out of the barrel instead of the optic

  • Hijinksss
    Hijinks (@Hijinksss) reported

    @PaulTassi I dropped it after Ubisoft told them to both: wrap it up and also somehow greenlit like 4 extra seasons. Was the dumbest thing. Almost 18 months of no content for them to come back and be like “no we’re still continuing it.” Just done with live service looters in general.

  • harutamoder
    mortis (@harutamoder) reported

    look I'm happy for this person but i can't get refunds for all my ubisoft games cause I can't login to my third party account

  • NWCloonan
    Neil Cloonan (@NWCloonan) reported

    @VyniGives @Leon_1588 Nobody complained when that happened because it only became an issue 3 years ago, after Ubisoft shut down The Crew and deactivated everyone's licenses. This is where people began realizing it was a problem. It was not foreseen in the past.

  • KritiqalPerson
    KritiqalPerson (@KritiqalPerson) reported

    @GhostRecon When are you gonna fix the Fallen Ghosts DLC? Achievements not unlocking VIP Extractions enemy spawns are bugged @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport

  • XeroCreator
    Xero (@XeroCreator) reported

    Saw a @discord quest about @assassinscreed #BlackFlagReynced and started playing 15 minutes.... and spent 15 minutes trying to turn off motion blur and chromatic abberation because that is terrible. Could not figure it out... fix it! @Ubisoft

  • bolly_olli58727
    Olliezao (@bolly_olli58727) reported

    @Rainbow6_UK @Ubisoft can we please fix this rollback glitch. Its giving me rollback but elo isnt coming through and im losing elo im gaining through ranked games.