Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.

• Sign in (56%)
• Online Play (22%)
• Glitches (16%)
• Matchmaking (4%)
• Game Crash (3%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Hannut	Online Play	6 hours ago
Heldenberg	Game Crash	4 days ago
Paris	Glitches	6 days ago
Sitten	Game Crash	7 days ago
Creil	Online Play	7 days ago
Dieppe	Online Play	12 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  redblue (@blackflametree) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Garaa0fTheRage Thats not happening btw. She quoted a leak. That's against the terms of service. You people are manufacturing your own anger. What are you so mad? Did you favorite franchise turn into slop? Yes? Well too bad. Rockstar isn't Ubisoft.

• 
  Raheem Nicholls (@IslandDeMan) reported 4 minutes ago

  Hi, good morning im having some trouble logging in to the game that started last night. Think either the server may be down or expriencing techinal diffucilities im on xbox. Tried accessing server page on ubisoft but that page wont load error code is Uniform-01 @TheDivisionGame

• 
  Rin (@HoundyManJones) reported 4 minutes ago

  @b0ysbrokenheart Ubisoft, at least in AC, always had some form of clean HUD, while yes there's moments where there's too much on screen, the same could be said for a good variety of other games. Ubisoft's biggest problem is writing and overall lazy game design, imho.

• 
  Shiny🦋 (@Shiiny77) reported 5 minutes ago

  I think a lot of people aren't understanding what im trying to say. Im not criticizing it the way you think. I know what the style is, its xcom we know that, to some people they will see it just as a mobile game because of the miniature based look, you can't change their mind. The problem is that this style is very "unique" its not something that is made for everyone, only a specific audience will like it and as a company trying to make a profit it is strange to operate this way. I could be SO wrong and the game could be super successful at launch although this is a Ubisoft game and there's patterns. I will try the game like everyone else and see if this will change my mind.👍

• 
  الباز (@ALBAZ64) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Steam I can't create a Ubisoft Connect account — every attempt fails with "An error occurred while trying to send your request" — so I can't play the Ubisoft games I bought on Steam. Ubisoft has ignored my DM and public post since July 11. Am I eligible for refunds?

• 
  Pirat_Nation 🔴 (@Pirat_Nation) reported 6 minutes ago

  Ubisoft has apologized after its new Steam release of Heroes of Might and Magic III launched without the actual game files. Instead of the full game, players initially received a 23.49 KB download containing only a dummy executable that opened a CMD Ubisoft acknowledged the mistake directly on Steam, saying: “The cause of the issue has now been resolved.” It then asked affected players to “fully uninstall and re-install the game.”

• 
  Super Sonic x (@SuperSonicx17) reported 10 minutes ago

  @super8bitgamer @RaceCrossWorlds Maybe so but it isnt quite about what you or i want but rather whats getting them guaranteed money. Transformers would end up like Godzilla, which id dislike. MLP isnt as big on a global scale as it could be. As for Rayman and Crash? It depends on if Activision and Ubisoft

• 
  Semiconductor Insider (@SemiconductorsX) reported 10 minutes ago

  NVIDIA is using games to break into Windows on Arm, not just AI demos. RTX Spark PCs start shipping as early as September. At Gamescom it lined up EA, Ubisoft and Embark. F1 25 and Arc Raiders are named. Anti-cheat support is coming too. The pitch is 1440p AAA above 100 fps with DLSS and ray tracing on the Blackwell GPU next to a Grace-class CPU. That is the Qualcomm contrast. Snapdragon already has Easy Anti-Cheat and Fortnite on Arm. Adreno X2 roughly doubled generation-on-generation, but Time Spy still sits near an older Intel iGPU, not discrete-class GeForce. Eric Demers, who ran Adreno for years, left Qualcomm for Intel this year. Asus and MSI first-wave Spark units are already reserved out, matching the Taiwan reports. Lenovo, HP, Dell and Microsoft follow. A sold-out $3,000 Arm laptop does not fix the PC cycle. It does put GeForce, CUDA and a game list on WOA before Qualcomm has an answer at that GPU tier. Software support is the gate. Hardware allocation is the other.

• 
  LUCK -E 🔥 (@D3goz4ruyo) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Zora2742 @suhostrikes @wuwapri Those ubisoft game are paid game with full finish story while Wuwa is live service tho. That would mean they have to operate two open world that need updates every few months at the same time. Sound like a hassle to manage

• 
  FuzzyQuils 🇻🇦 (@FuzzyQuills) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BrodieOnLinux My guess is that Ubisoft's initial upload got approved then someone else managing the appID at Ubisoft uploaded a broken build afterward that didn't include the game files. (2/2)

• 
  KhoyaFraqg (@LeFraqg77) reported 14 minutes ago

  40 min in blue screen nice game fix this **** pls @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport @Rainbow6Game

• 
  Raiden (@raidenpb) reported 22 minutes ago

  @DqRoman1 Are you retarded? Cdpr isn't even on 1% of level rockstar is Infact they are below ubisoft considering all their games are broken on release and are lifeless open worlds

• 
  Jack Daedules (@daedules) reported 22 minutes ago

  @mrbootybandit_ Usually some kind of pysicis bugs. Like you hit something and it decides to be an astronaut, or the dead body decides to dance across the floor. The scariest is the ubisoft face glitch

• 
  #1Republican (@CaliKev83) reported 23 minutes ago

  @TheDivisionGame @Ubisoft fix the game please. New update has broken the game and made it terrible to play. No sound. I will return when you release a fix. Missing blueprints and broken projects. I was looking forward to the update till I played it.

• 
  x0Kharnage0x (Alex) (@GeneralKharnage) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport Since you guys took away prestige crates, any chance you're going to fix the helmet bug you created while doing so?

• 
  Pepas (@doggodance) reported 32 minutes ago

  @_DavidGreenz_ @hamsoft05 @Ubisoft They think Breakpoint is a live service game like Division, lol, lmao even.

• 
  crimson knight (@crimson21212) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft idk how you guys are genuinely still a company. New season of seige. First game we get swept 0-4 cause tm8s dont work with team. Next game 2 people disconnect. 3rd game you cause me to lag out then I cant join back and im banned for 30 minutes. Please go out of business.

• 
  banteng 🐂 (@djinnsarap) reported 37 minutes ago

  @ohlookitsrafa Eh ig because ea is more of a publisher these days there's still a chance it could still be a microtransaction-free or non live service games, like split split fiction or the recent star wars games Same thing with ubisoft

• 
  Devils Advocate (@M3ta_Save) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Steve31205369 @roro__c I'm not arguing about playstations digital future I'm arguing about this point specifically. I think consumer rights for digital products should be mandatory. But in this case we don't know of sony did this because they wanted to or if StudioCanal just didn't want to renew. If it was the later then sony doesn't have a choice in the matter they just following the law. Also I dint know of any case where sony themselves has removed games from somebodies library that hasn't broken TOS without a refund. Other devs have like Ubisoft with the crew but don't think I can name a single sony owned IP that this has been the case. Although I'm happy to be mistaken.

• 
  Thomas Winkelmann(DiamantTh@troet.rocks) (@DiamantThomy) reported 40 minutes ago

  @ariange1o @Pirat_Nation I understand the argument that For Honor was not sold as a native Linux game, but that does not fully answer the refund question. The problem is not that Linux users suddenly invented a platform promise out of nowhere. The problem is that Steam now includes Steam Deck, SteamOS, Proton, Steam Machine compatibility information and a wider compatibility ecosystem that customers actually use when deciding what works for them. When Steam shows a game as playable or compatible in that environment, and ProtonDB also points toward practical usability, this becomes more than a random unsupported edge case. Ubisoft can choose to prioritize anti-cheat over that compatibility path, but the customer consequence should not simply be ignored. If a game keeps receiving updates on Steam, publishers should keep the current Steam ecosystem in mind, not only the platform label from the original release. Refund demands make sense when a practical compatibility use case existed after payment and then disappears because of a later publisher decision.

• 
  kds_burner3 (@kds_burner3) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Emberheartgames Ubisoft is clearly on the campaign to remake all of their IPs. The problem with the Heroes franchise is that it's not their original IP, so there is no wonder that they don't know who is it for and what made the series successful in the first place.

• 
  Nocturnal 🇺🇸 (@Nocturnal_FPS) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Aserback @TitaniumRolo @AussieOtterR6 The issue is, if you've played the game, you have agreed to the TOS and EULA. By doing that you've given Ubisoft the power to revoke a license for any in game item as it is not "owned" by the user. Legally you don't own the skin so they don't have to refund you.

• 
  cp (@cp12321) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft FIX YOUR **** YOU TROGLODYTES

• 
  ⚡ Clutch ⚡ (@ClutchG54096479) reported 46 minutes ago

  @JoelJ_Garcia Sony management tangled themselves with live service mess, microsoft games this gen mostly were AA gp budget fodders, like EA take two also barely released SP games and Ubisoft don't even know what they were doing (untill recently they kinda sorted their management out)

• 
  Steve Baker (@darthv72) reported 47 minutes ago

  @GTArajgaming @TYPOGRAPH1C @XBOX Ubisoft had licensing issues and were forced to revoke. As long as you have the disc, you can play it as much as you like. Even if they revoke the digital license. Forza horizon 4 has been pulled (digitally) due to licensing. I can still play it. you are overthinking it.

• 
  The Gamer Dad (@TheGamerDad_GG) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Shpeshal_Nick BUT!!!! They do say licenses can change due to licensing issues in the future etc etc So, you would need the disc to play said game if a licensing changes. Example, Ubisoft puts their library available, but then decide to no longer support it in the future.

• 
  jh0rge (@jh0rge_) reported 51 minutes ago

  @justdancegame The real issue is that Ubisoft has zero competition, so they give us bare-minimum effort, no updates/fixes. They forced a broken live-service launcher full of lag and crashes, while stripping away core features like the World Dance Floor and downgrading Unlimited into JD+. (1/2)

• 
  Songanta (@HaileSelasie13) reported 52 minutes ago

  There’s a version of the digital future that I don’t think people take seriously enough because nothing about it looks dystopian while it is being built. It mostly looks convenient. Games download instantly. Software follows you between devices. Your photos live in the cloud. Cars get new functions through updates. Accounts remember everything you purchased years ago. All of that is genuinely useful, but somewhere along the way, ownership started changing meaning. A lot of digital products no longer really end at the moment of purchase. They continue depending on authentication servers, publisher accounts, DRM, cloud infrastructure and databases that sit completely outside your control. That sounds like a technical distinction until one of those dependencies disappears. Ubisoft already showed what this looks like with The Crew. People had paid for the game, but once the servers were shut down the purchase itself wasn’t enough to keep the product alive. California now literally requires companies to be clearer when the “Buy” button is actually selling a license rather than permanent ownership. Europe has had to debate whether publishers should be allowed to make purchased games completely unusable after support ends. None of these stories are particularly dramatic on their own, but together they point in a strange direction. We’re building a world where ownership increasingly depends on somebody else continuing to recognize it. And cybersecurity makes that arrangement even more interesting. Take a company like Rockstar. Whatever anyone thinks about the recent GTA VI situation, this is one of the most valuable entertainment projects on earth, controlled by a giant publisher with serious security infrastructure and an enormous financial incentive to keep unreleased material private. Yet even companies operating at that level still suffer breaches, leaks and internal security failures. That doesn’t mean someone is going to break into Steam tomorrow and erase everyone’s library. Large platforms have backups, audit trails and redundancy precisely because they understand that risk. What bothers me more is the architecture underneath it. The same centralized system that makes it possible to restore your entire library after buying a new PC is also the system capable of deciding whether that library exists for you at all. Usually that power is useful. Sometimes it is necessary. But once enough of our lives depend on these systems, the distinction between owning something and being continuously authorized to use it starts getting blurry. And gaming is probably just the easiest early example because we notice immediately when a game disappears. It gets more uncomfortable when the same logic moves into cars, appliances, professional software, personal archives and devices whose physical hardware we actually paid for. The darker version of this future probably won’t arrive through some cinematic cyberattack where everything switches off at midnight. It would be much less obvious. A feature here becomes account bound. Another product requires permanent authentication. An old service closes. Something stops receiving updates. A company changes its terms. A platform decides a ten year old product is no longer worth maintaining. Twenty years later everyone is still surrounded by things they technically purchased, but fewer of those things can function without permission from infrastructure they do not control. Maybe regulation stops that trajectory. Maybe consumers eventually start demanding offline fallbacks and stronger ownership rights. Maybe companies themselves realize that permanent access is a selling point. Nothing about the direction is inevitable. But I do think we should be paying attention while the meaning of “buy” is still being rewritten, because once an entire economy is built around conditional access, changing it afterward will be much harder. At what point does a product stop being something you own and become something you are merely allowed to keep using?

• 
  oneminutewonder (@1MinuteWonderin) reported 58 minutes ago

  @ErikWeldon45 @lulludovico They're ******* gamers over by charging $100 for some sloppy **** Ubisoft would make. Also pro marketing tip: If you can't even fix **** for a showcase then odds are your end product isn't going to be good either.

• 
  cltur (@R6Flush) reported 59 minutes ago

  @VarsityGamingTV Honestly I think everyone knows it HAS to be wrong, but Ubisoft being Ubisoft cannot claim they made a massive elo error so they won't speak on it or do anything about it.