Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
Ubisoft Connect is a digital distribution, digital rights management, multiplayer and communications service developed by Ubisoft to provide an experience similar to the achievements/trophies offered by various other game companies. The service is provided across various platforms (PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, etc).
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Ubisoft Connect. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.
- Sign in (70%)
- Online Play (14%)
- Glitches (10%)
- Matchmaking (2%)
- Game Crash (2%)
- Hacking / Cheating (0%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Brussels
|
Glitches | 4 days ago |
 Grenoble
|
Online Play | 4 days ago |
|
Orléans
|
Online Play | 7 days ago |
|
Orléans
|
Sign in | 8 days ago |
 Chatham
|
Sign in | 9 days ago |
|
Paris
|
Matchmaking | 10 days ago |
Full Outage Map
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
SirD 🇺🇸 (@Sir_Dammed) reported@emceekhan So what's the point of creating a product at all, if not to earn money? Why are people putting in 5+ years creating single player games, if the goal is not a return on their time and cost investment? If investors are just handing them funds to merely exist, idk, sounds like that's not a sustainable business model and that if consumers aren't purchasing their products, they're going to have a problem. Ubisoft crashed/burned. BioWare is crashing/burning. They're not the only ones, and they both monetized their products through live service.
-
Dead Hardware (@deadhardware) reported@devildog2984 @TheCartelDel @TheMattEffect_ Ubisoft needed it to do those numbers because they have 19,000 employees for some dumbass reason. They need every game to be the biggest hit ever because they won't fix their cost base.
-
fearthecow (@Fearthecow93) reported@TheNCSmaster The issue is its what the average buyer wants. One of the heads at ubisoft said the reason they have these giant open world games is because its what people actually buy.
-
Air_Rick_Charm_Ella (@irRickCharmElla) reported@heelvsbabyface @Ashikenshinyu What makes this especially funny is that everybody told them it wasn't going to "resonate", they had a full 6 years or whatever, to fix it, and they still got caught with their pants down. Ubisoft deserves everything that's happening to them. They earned it.
-
David Haywood (@MameHaze) reportedPlus being a Ubisoft game, it tries to force you to use the Ubisoft Connect stuff, meaning you have to disconnect your Switch from the Internet to play it. Also forced version number in the corner? makes it feel like a beta build. Don't think I'll be keeping this one.
-
The Rascals Lounge Podcast (@RascalsLounge) reported@R6esports @R6esports @Ubisoft Please fix Unranked. It's so unbalanced that it's becoming unbearable to play. Mixing Copper and Bronze players with Plats, Diamonds, and Champs doesn't make Unranked fun. No map bans either? what are you guys thinking? Just make Unranked the same as Ranked, but without the rank gains or losses. Simple.
-
Alta_AF (@Alta_AF1979) reportedAs many bad things as I might have to say about Ubisoft, they are still supporting The Division 2 Long term support for live service games seems to be hard for people to figure out, SONY
-
GameBoost (@GameBoostCom) reportedNew Far Cry and Ghost Recon games could be in serious trouble. - According to a report cited by TheGamer, both Ubisoft's next Ghost Recon game and Far Cry 7 are facing serious development issues. - Ubisoft's new Ghost Recon project has reportedly missed several internal milestones - Developers are said to be "bracing for impact" as management changes and restructuring efforts take place - Far Cry 7's development has allegedly been described as "abysmal" by Insider Gaming's Tom Henderson - Unrealistic deadlines and production difficulties are reportedly affecting both projects - The problems come during a period of broader turmoil at Ubisoft, which has been undergoing layoffs, studio closures, and company-wide restructuring - Despite the setbacks, neither game has been canceled, and development is continuing
-
WARLORD12 (@WARLORD1216424) reported@popuniversee Because Ubisoft was probably trying to turn the Prince of persia remaster into live service. Why would it take 3 or 4 years to do a remaster ? All you had to do was copy & paste, so obviously you were trying to show horn in a bunch of stuff & it ended up being in vain.
-
cloudy ☁️ (@Cloudy_R6) reportedplease Ubisoft wake tf up n fix your game - DMRs out - Shields nerf to the ground - nerf thorn 1.5x or LMG Meta was so much better
-
ItzNuyxz (@matthewspigner6) reported@Ubisoft @Rainbow6Game I just deranked because of a cheater are we gonna do something about that problem or we gonna keep ******* up the game
-
entwinedspace7 (@entwinedsp71971) reported@Vara_Dark Not surprised, what did they expect telling their customers not to buy their games. They acted as if they had some infinite money glitch unlocked. Funny thing is Expedition 33 could've been a ubisoft game.
-
myXCuriosity (@myXCuriosity) reported@lmkifiwin no problem. i just stopped buying. its not hard. you don't NEED video games. and you definitely don't need @Ubisoft
-
Zeo Gaming Nerd News 🙀 特にない (@ZeoTGT) reported@ZikadaPrime Yeah, epic is whats going on. But anyways how exactly would valve be broken up if for say it was monopoly? Its primary business is game distribution, which blizzard, epic, gog, Ubisoft and others all do as well. It has a few software (games) that Nintendo, Sony, and Xbox all dominate in that space. And a couple of hardware like a controller and tablet and soon to be PC but there are also dominate marker share players already in that market like Microsoft and Apple.
-
luvad (@Blinding_One) reported@cyberprince_rwo More-so the issue is that the company is infamous for making bad decisions. deterring their playerbase. Dropping 12 million players casually off of age verification mistakes and continuing to become less and less of a good idea to invest in. It won't be a winner. It'll Ubisoft.
-
SimoQB🇮🇹 (@SimoQB_) reported@Jaden_Nakahara GKC are not bad, the problem are the 3rd party devs that choose those. Like a normal switch 2 cart can go up to 64 gb, and there are games that are bigger than that (FFVII). In that case gkc are ok imo, but then there are devs like ubisoft who uses them just cuz of money.
-
A Good Shepherd (@AgentSIMMONS_AL) reported@Npweezy215 @oliver_drk Ubisoft Plus was on the service before they hiked the price. I think most gamers paying for GAME Pass would prefer having Call of Duty over a trial for sports.
-
The Rainbow Chipper (@Daocdude) reported@ther3n3gad3 @Asmongold @AveragePodcast1 It is a self-correcting problem - they can't afford to lose billions forever, look at how many studios Ubisoft has closed.
-
TAK (@Tak225Th) reported@M4Ximizando nope I would unsubscribe and buy select games I want say one games is the only reason I sub to the service I would rather they removed EA access and Ubisoft plus and Fortnite crew
-
Qoel (@qoe999) reported@kabrutusdeid I have ultimate and wouldn't mind a three month wait period before new games are added to game pass. They could also trim the fat. No need for EA games or Ubisoft games as part of the service and ten billion metric tons of indie slop that I doubt anyone plays.
-
TheDezembro (@TheDezembro) reported@Lazzy102 @Sevvy_707 For you, maybe. But really they were both awful games in their franchises. Watered down core aspects in comparison to previous entries, had notably worse writing, and Shadows toyed with live-service elements that made it the worst experience out of the 4 RPG AC games. But anyway that wasn't even the point here. Point here was that they were games with lots of online impressions that underperformed. Veilguard, devastatingly so. Shadows is hard to tell because we didn't get any numbers besides "activations" lol which counted the people using an 18 dollar subscription service where the game was playable. But given the absolute financial shitshow that Ubisoft was in last year (& still is now) it clearly didn't do well either.
-
eA asuno (@asunoaim) reported@shikaiFPS @KallMeKiko I think xdefiant is tough to use for a proper comparison. The game was extremely ambitious being built on an MMORPG engine with, yes, lots of potential but also lots of starting issues. It was also backed by Ubisoft until they realized the fixed will take too long and they will not make money in the long run hence they dropped funding. I am 100% certain the game would have been able to have a great playerbase if Mark Rubin were given more time on it. It had massive issues, all fixeable and a dedicated dev team.
-
Walkabo (@soaplexi) reportedis this tweet funded by ubisoft and live service investors
-
Chakaal Starr (@ChakaalStarr) reported@LikeToBeBossy It's an industry problem, just remember this when Sony starts paring down bungie and some of its studios soon. Ubisoft and Embracer are laying people off too. Bluepoint recently got shutdown by Sony.
-
Kai (@kai_xbt) reportedAsmongold explains why the biggest game studios became too big to succeed "These big studios, Blizzard, Ubisoft, EA, Activision, they didn't become too big to fail. They became too big to succeed. They're so big they can't move, pivot, or be agile enough to respond to what players actually want." "Think about it, if Diablo had 600, 700 people working on it, how long does it take to get a consensus on anything? Seven layers of administration, console compatibility, red tape. They make a decision and it takes five years to ship. In five years the entire gaming landscape is completely different." "It's like turning a ship. In a small Viking longboat you could've easily turned away from the iceberg, but the Titanic can't turn that fast. That's the world we're in, and it's why you're seeing these small, sharp games like Vampire Survivors and Helldivers win while hundred million dollar live service games launch and nobody plays them."
-
匡生 (@kohak_82) reported@UbisoftSupport The message “Not connected to the game server” appears, and I get disconnected during matches multiple times. I’ve already tried restarting the game, Ubisoft Connect, my PC, and checking my internet connection, but the issue still persists.
-
Rawa (@rawafps) reported@PandaFu17 I spoke out and they got me panda literally no ubisoft service work on my pc
-
Motta (@OfficialMottaWR) reported@assassinscreed Doesn't work in my country. It says the service must be used through its providers; is ABYA also offering the free trial of Ubisoft+?
-
mankar camoran apologist🔻 (@silky_919) reportedadvertising end of service for a ******* ubisoft single player game but not for destiny 2 i can’t help but laugh
-
MahagonyWell (@MahagonyWell) reported@quanzBAYBAY And the little ******** casuals are the problem, they don't complain, they don't have standards, they will support whatever dogshit vomit all big companies feed them. Just like 2k games, or Ubisoft, or EA. They'll support companies no matter what flavour of **** they are fed.