Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.

• Sign in (69%)
• Online Play (14%)
• Glitches (11%)
• Matchmaking (3%)
• Game Crash (3%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Brussels	Glitches	6 days ago
Grenoble	Online Play	6 days ago
Orléans	Online Play	9 days ago
Orléans	Sign in	10 days ago
Chatham	Sign in	11 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	12 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  SomalianGamer (@sharmake25) reported 24 seconds ago

  @Stormzy010 @HazzadorGamin Only Xbox has a limited potential of reach to monetize so they should either try one last time or go full 3rd party platform and stop the console so that they can put their GP service on PS and Nintendo similar to EA and Ubisoft.

• 
  The Rainbow Chipper (@Daocdude) reported 7 minutes ago

  @ther3n3gad3 @Asmongold @AveragePodcast1 It is a self-correcting problem - they can't afford to lose billions forever, look at how many studios Ubisoft has closed.

• 
  keworrk (@keworrk) reported 10 minutes ago

  @JariSpectre That's true, the game had a huge potential but people didn't wanted to give XDefiant the time he needed to fix everything and ubisoft choosed to give up without really trying like always. I just wish we could do something to revive XDefiant, the game deserve better.

• 
  John GameFix (@John_GAMEFIX) reported 11 minutes ago

  @ForeignG59 @UbisoftSupport @Ubisoft What's the issue?

• 
  low 🇭🇺 ⬛️⬜️🏳️‍🌈- watched TADC finale (@lowlifewastaken) reported 15 minutes ago

  r6 aim bugged, cursor showed, needed to restart since r6 crashes when I open it while I have OBS open, I had to wait for it to launch again without OBS all this time, I'm in a ranked match these are issues that have been there for multiple seasons, thank you @Ubisoft

• 
  Auri Sariel (@AuriSariel) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation the ending was never the main problem, ubisoft is so detached from reality.

• 
  𝐾𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑠𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑖 𝑅𝑦𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑢𝑘𝑒🥢 (@SkiLedZGamES) reported 15 minutes ago

  @assassinscreed Ubisoft domain mode is unbalanced fix this, it's impossible to advance this mode. I'm level 80 in domain 5 recommended level 70, I have 10 level above and I can't do anything against the boss, take this trophy or nerf this mode most people won't be able to finish this 💀

• 
  just jonez (@jonezkaranja) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft hello am having a hard time accessing my ubisoft account keeps telling me that i have attempted to login and i havent login to my account in years? I have dm support in twitter but zero response kindly assist...i cant even login ubisoft connect to playstation

• 
  AJC (@Ajsly7) reported 18 minutes ago

  @tokyosdaughter @assassinscreed @Ubisoft Out of curiosity if there was a Yasuke game but it was sci-if fantasy would you still have an issue with it?

• 
  Sebastian Aaltonen (@SebAaltonen) reported 23 minutes ago

  @HJZ_artemi This is definitely a real problem. Game project budgets have exploded lately. When I was working at Ubisoft 10-20 years ago, every project was 2x more expensive than the previous. One failed project can bankrupt a smaller studio nowadays. There's definitely budget considerations and often budget wins the argument. We are all forced to adapt new more efficient methods, some of them AI based to keep up with the growing demand of visual fidelity and bigger and bigger world sizes. Using AI to do less important / repetitive work is one way of reducing costs.

• 
  Tempest (@Tempest525) reported 24 minutes ago

  @wccftech Why doesn't EA play, Ubisoft+, and other subscription services get talked about as much as gamepass? They put their games on the subscription service day one with all the dlc.

• 
  Dead Hardware (@deadhardware) reported 30 minutes ago

  @devildog2984 @TheCartelDel @TheMattEffect_ Ubisoft needed it to do those numbers because they have 19,000 employees for some dumbass reason. They need every game to be the biggest hit ever because they won't fix their cost base.

• 
  LiQuiiDICE (@MrJHTheron) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @Rainbow6Game what is this matchmaking??? Im getting champs on my team who go negative every single game? Im cooked for this season for someone who either duo qeues or solo, fix the matchmaking or at least ban the cheaters on South African servers

• 
  DrFuryWolf (@DrFuryWolf) reported 34 minutes ago

  According to a new Insider Gaming report the next Ghost Recon game codenamed Project OVR is reportedly running into development issues The game recently failed to hit internal alpha targets which has led to management changes behind the scenes Sources also claim developers have been dealing with unrealistic deadlines There are even rumors inside Ubisoft that if things do not improve the project could be rebooted or canceled in favor of a different game

• 
  LazyThinker | Nemesis ✦ Apechain🦴🦍| | ETHGas ⛽ (@LazySinker) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Gh0stsNFT Big deal? This is so elementary Projects nowadays doing more than this Hey @Ubisoft is @XFunkeda one of your people? Nothing but trouble in web3. ****

• 
  Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Grummz AAA needs to re-evaluate how it's spending its money. Not throwing money at the problem. A lot of the time what they are spending on is way out of scope of what is expected for AAA. I mean hear is the definition of AAA: "AAA is an informal industry classification for high-budget, high-profile video games developed by large studios and distributed by major publishers." It just means a bit more to get that extra sheen that a AA can't quiet reach. Let's be fair here AA while improved a lot over the years isn't able to reach certain plateaus. Expedition 33 had its fair share of issues that I wouldn't have encountered in a AAA game. Might have featured a bit more content as a AAA game. AAA doesn't mean, it has to be open world or have live services. That's just Self Destructive Game Development that exists in the same venn diagram bubble as chasing industry trends instead of setting them. While niether of those two things are inherently evil in the industry, they are a problem when that is all gamers have to play. Variety is the spice of life and 30 failing live services would make anyone turn their nose up at the selection. Then blowing those budgets on ideologies instead of just crafting believable worlds, is art trying to force life to imitate it, instead of the other way around. That's a sure fire way to set your wallet on fire (literally) instead of your points of sale (figuratively) with customers demanding your product. This idea of AA vs AAA is ridiculous, it has nothing to do with either category. It boils down to those with extra blowing corporate money on bullshit schemes instead of doing as they are meant to function. Not enough money to build engine tech. Ubisoft has had 3 long running engines at its disposal that it could have easily challenged Unreal Engine by distributing to other vendors, but they don't have enough confidence in their games to release the tech and license it. A competing model would have been nice. Same applies to Fox Engine, Decima, Crystal Tools, Luminous Engine, RE Engine, and countless others. That could have helped pay for development as well as lead to development standards improving significantly. Better tools, better games. Competitive engine tool suites, competitive improvements in that space. Meanwhile we have morons like Yves Guilmote talking about the AAAA game and driving his publishing company and development studios into the ground while trying to influence culture instead of letting culture influence his product. Xbox is toast so long as they don't come to grips with these problems. Switching to UE5 from slipstream(?) probably one of the dumber things they've done. Glad Activision didn't pull the same **** with the CoD engine and finally unified their tech. say what you will about BLOPS7, the game has become infinitely more stable than entries in the franchise from 5 years ago and has started to allow them to really start dialing up features and bring back old ones that weren't easily ported between two separate engines. What about Id Tech? They have this bad *** engine used for doom, what is even happening there. Miss use of resources.

• 
  Shellshock (@The_Lego_Fan) reported 40 minutes ago

  @RinoTheBouncer Ai, microtransansactions, gready game publishers, live service games getting shut down because "gmthe games life is over" even though the game is still reciving players and is a GREAT game and should have been made with an offline mode from the START UBISOFT!

• 
  cloudy ☁️ (@Cloudy_R6) reported 41 minutes ago

  please Ubisoft wake tf up n fix your game - DMRs out - Shields nerf to the ground - nerf thorn 1.5x or LMG Meta was so much better

• 
  ItzNuyxz (@matthewspigner6) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @Rainbow6Game I just deranked because of a cheater are we gonna do something about that problem or we gonna keep ******* up the game

• 
  eA asuno (@asunoaim) reported 42 minutes ago

  @shikaiFPS @KallMeKiko I think xdefiant is tough to use for a proper comparison. The game was extremely ambitious being built on an MMORPG engine with, yes, lots of potential but also lots of starting issues. It was also backed by Ubisoft until they realized the fixed will take too long and they will not make money in the long run hence they dropped funding. I am 100% certain the game would have been able to have a great playerbase if Mark Rubin were given more time on it. It had massive issues, all fixeable and a dedicated dev team.

• 
  SPΞCTΞR (@SpecterGr1d) reported 43 minutes ago

  @JezCorden As much as I am against some of the stuff they do, they don't need to. Microsoft is a software company, a very dominant one at that. THAT IS THEIR LANE. Microsoft literally could rival steam if they focused on that aspect. They could find a way to flip gamepass into a service that Sony may agree to like they did with ubisoft classics, Microsoft we don't want your new games day one, but if you archive your older titles into a tier that benefits our plus customers, hey why not? To me that gives Microsoft leverage. There is obviously interest in their products from the reaction of Eday and the sales of FH5. They just need to find a way.

• 
  DoYou K Now The Brokeboi Insider (@wllmlew) reported 43 minutes ago

  @JusticeSolid @PoniesTearsHQ @JeremyBrouwer why is it people like to bring up "well they removed COD and it's still more expensive" do you guys forget there were other things added that caused the price to increase to $30 that are still available. $3 increase for an added $20 value Fortnite Crew - $12/month standalone Ubisoft Classics- $8/month standalone. not to mention adding more day ones to the service

• 
  Kooks12 🎮 (@Kooks12onX) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation No amount of updates will fix this game Ubisoft. You can stop trying pulling off a Cyberpunk or No Man's Sky now. The game was DOA.

• 
  Pemabble ☕️🪡🔨🎹✨🗿🪶🕊️🍋‍🟩⏳️🚃💨 (@pemabble) reported 49 minutes ago

  @TheAngelKing47 There are some misunderstandings here and statements being misconstrued One of the issues with Ubisoft Steam lawsuit isn't exactly "price parity" but "material parity" as the SKU's being sold on steam and Ubisoft was different Valve has also disputed the contents of the call

• 
  ØØøØØ (@wyaendless) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Joshinken1 @Dexerto Where was this energy when you were accepting the terms of service? You are demanding that Ubisoft be held accountable for a bad TOS, but you get out of jail for free for accepting said TOS? Okay.

• 
  The **** Matrix (@TheMaxiMatrix) reported 53 minutes ago

  @xj0nathan Oh and also your talking a lot of **** when Ubisoft has a subscription service called Ubisoft+ which is part of a bundle known as PlayStation plus which is literally Sony version of gamepass

• 
  Spoil-t (@Cynickal_Bane) reported 54 minutes ago

  @RealKingiman @trending_tony That's not the issue. People want the game to be playable after the publisher pulls the plug. We don't want what Ubisoft did to the Crew where they legit took the game away from people.

• 
  Frankiestein of shedtwt⚧️ 💛🤍💜🖤 (@HyunOfShedTwt) reported 55 minutes ago

  @CrustyMcTurd @RottytopsW @Ubisoft its mainly a production issue. The ps5 disc has legends retold on it but origins remastered is downable my guess is that its finished later. For switch 2 a $40 game cant really release on a full card without taking major profit hits. Either way the game will be preserved

• 
  Achilles, not really it is Charles, unfortunately (@CHARLESLOVESTV6) reported 56 minutes ago

  @TheRealZephryss Ah its ubisoft, but ok, not the same, though, if it was uncharted 5 hell yeah. Or tlou3, also I heard a rumour saying naughty dogs woke trash space game is delayed indefinitely trouble at the former top dog of playstation. Also no more pc releases of ps singleplayer games.

• 
  Just Harry (@hahayeahmate) reported 57 minutes ago

  Ranked 3.0 matchmaking is genuinely awful. It should not be the case you have 1 decent win and then the next 3 you are unfairly matched against people who clearly should have been placed much much higher than they are! Same bs from 2.0 repackaged, fix up! @Ubisoft @Rainbow6Game