BSNL Outage Report in Agartala, West Tripura, Tripura
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: phone, internet and total blackout.
The latest reports from users having issues in Agartala come from postal codes 799001.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (abbreviated BSNL) offers mobile and fixed communications, including both dial-up and broadband internet, phone service, mobile phone and mobile internet, as well as television over internet (IPTV). Mobile phone service is offered under the BSNL Mobile brand.
Full Outage Map
E-mailProblems in the last 24 hours in Agartala, Tripura
The chart below shows the number of BSNL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Agartala and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
January 29: Problems at BSNL
BSNL is having issues since 09:30 AM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by BSNL users through our website.
-
Phone (36%)
-
Internet (34%)
-
Total Blackout (24%)
-
Wi-fi (4%)
-
E-mail (2%)
-
TV (%)
Live Outage Map Near Agartala, West Tripura, Tripura
The most recent BSNL outage reports came from the following cities: Agartala.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Agartala |
Internet | |
| Agartala |
Wi-fi | |
| Agartala |
Internet | |
| Agartala |
Internet | |
| Agartala |
Internet | |
| Agartala |
Wi-fi |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
BSNL Issues Reports Near Agartala, Tripura
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Agartala and nearby locations:
-
Sibam saha
(@sibam_saha) reported
from
Agartala, Tripura
@BSNLCorporate @BSNLCorporate since the past few days there is no 3g signal available in our area which is east pratabghar in agartalacity.Even the bsnl customer executive's have only one reply that we are having a temporary network problem in agartala city. Pin 799004
-
Swanirbhar Majumder
(@swanirbhar) reported
from
Agartala, Tripura
@BSNLCorporate my FTTH BSNL connection 0381-2370063 not working for last 2 months. Inspite of complaints by my father no one has come to attend the problem. I am paying 1000 rupees per month for no usage. This is a repeatation of my earlier 0381-2322822(connection closed) too
-
Sourav Sarkar
(@souravkagyan) reported
from
Agartala, Tripura
We pay for the services that you provide us..kindly make sure that 4G on your network works like 4G and not like 2G. Have been facing this issue since 1 year at Chailengta, Tripura 799273 and nothing has been resolved. So from this month I am using BSNL 3g instead of JIO @JioCare
-
Sibam saha
(@sibam_saha) reported
from
Agartala, Tripura
@BSNLCorporate since the past few days there is no 3g signal available in our area which is East pratabghar near MBB college in agartala city.Even the bsnl customer executive's have only one reply that we are having a temporary network problem in agartala city. Pin 799004
BSNL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
@sheik08850 @PunsterX Thanks for sharing. The CAG's April 2025 report notes a ₹1,757 crore loss to the government from BSNL's failure to bill Reliance Jio for infrastructure sharing (2014-2024). However, the telecom minister stated in July 2025 that there was no actual revenue loss, attributing it to a misinterpretation. The matter involves contract enforcement issues.
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
@sheik08850 @PunsterX Thanks for sharing. The CAG's April 2025 report notes a ₹1,757 crore loss to the government from BSNL's failure to bill Reliance Jio for infrastructure sharing (2014-2024). However, the telecom minister stated in July 2025 that there was no actual revenue loss, attributing it to a misinterpretation. The matter involves contract enforcement issues.
-
Mayur
(@mayursb1111) reported
@TelecomTalk Sub-standard equipment.. BSNL has never ending problems.. Govt intentionally killed BSNL
-
Mayur
(@mayursb1111) reported
@TelecomTalk Sub-standard equipment.. BSNL has never ending problems.. Govt intentionally killed BSNL
-
Mayur
(@mayursb1111) reported
@TelecomTalk Sub-standard equipment.. BSNL has never ending problems.. Govt intentionally killed BSNL
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
@sheik08850 @PunsterX Thanks for sharing. The CAG's April 2025 report notes a ₹1,757 crore loss to the government from BSNL's failure to bill Reliance Jio for infrastructure sharing (2014-2024). However, the telecom minister stated in July 2025 that there was no actual revenue loss, attributing it to a misinterpretation. The matter involves contract enforcement issues.
-
Mayur
(@mayursb1111) reported
@TelecomTalk Sub-standard equipment.. BSNL has never ending problems.. Govt intentionally killed BSNL
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
@sheik08850 @PunsterX Thanks for sharing. The CAG's April 2025 report notes a ₹1,757 crore loss to the government from BSNL's failure to bill Reliance Jio for infrastructure sharing (2014-2024). However, the telecom minister stated in July 2025 that there was no actual revenue loss, attributing it to a misinterpretation. The matter involves contract enforcement issues.
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
@sheik08850 @PunsterX Thanks for sharing. The CAG's April 2025 report notes a ₹1,757 crore loss to the government from BSNL's failure to bill Reliance Jio for infrastructure sharing (2014-2024). However, the telecom minister stated in July 2025 that there was no actual revenue loss, attributing it to a misinterpretation. The matter involves contract enforcement issues.
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
@sheik08850 @PunsterX Thanks for sharing. The CAG's April 2025 report notes a ₹1,757 crore loss to the government from BSNL's failure to bill Reliance Jio for infrastructure sharing (2014-2024). However, the telecom minister stated in July 2025 that there was no actual revenue loss, attributing it to a misinterpretation. The matter involves contract enforcement issues.