Airtel India outages and service status in Hayuliang, Arunachal Pradesh
Some problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: internet, wi-fi and total blackout.
- Airtel India generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Hayuliang, including 0 direct reports.
Airtel India is the second largest provider of mobile telephony and also second largest provider of fixed telephony in India, and is also a provider of broadband internet and subscription television services.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Hayuliang, Arunachal Pradesh
The chart below shows the number of Airtel India reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Hayuliang, Arunachal Pradesh and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
August 26: Problems at Airtel India
Airtel India is having issues since 05:10 PM IST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Airtel India Issues Reports Near Hayuliang, Arunachal Pradesh
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Hayuliang and nearby locations:
-
Om Prakash Choubey (@opchoubey1707) reported from Hayuliang, Arunachal Pradesh@airtelindia Airtel authority must know the speed of their Airtel4G Network where a simple file of Kilobyte is not downloading. How can we expect a YouTube video for students depending online classes & comp.Exams. My all emails to their office went in-vain so far.Remedy expected.
-
Suresh Tiwari (@suresht38) reported from Lepānglāt, Arunachal Pradesh@airtelindia Postal pin code 792104 Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh ..... There is no network of Airtel since last 2(two) days.....
Airtel India Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
PATEL NARESH (@nareshpatel567) reportedMore than 10 compliant within 10 months. Without Any resolution they closed complaint. Even we call they told do one more complaint. Same results. Still problem not solved Nothing happened. Airtel is third class company. @airtelindia @Airtel_Presence @airtelnews
-
Achindra Bhatnagar (@achindra) reported@airtelindia @DoT_India After months of chasing, Airtel's answer is SIM replacement. We asked for a doorstep visit to my parents in Secunderabad. Instead, the Nodal Officer sent a template response for them to visit an Airtel store. After 10 months without service, is this really the best Airtel has?
-
Meghnad Dutta (@MeghnadDutta) reported@airtelindia From yesterday the WiFi is not working. A ticket has been raised. But no solution. No technician has been visited yet. Still no internet. Horrible support experience! Could you please take this seriously and fix soon? @Airtel_Presence
-
Deepak Kumar (@DeepakK55429438) reported@pbhushan1 @airtelindia I have complained about 5G network. No 5G network since last two months. @airtelindia has not been able to fix it despite complaining multiple times.
-
शुभम (@meshubhamthakur) reportedMy Airtel ₹349 plan has Unlimited 5G active,and the @airtelindia app clearly shows“5G Data Top-up: ∞ Unlimited”.However, even while my phone is connected to 5G,my daily 1.5GB data quota is being deducted. Please check this issue and fix the Unlimited 5G entitlement on my number
-
iamBLACKHORSE (@iamBLACKHORSEcs) reported@airtelindia kindly help??
-
TJ (@PLATINUMTJ_2K02) reported@airtelindia @Airtel_Presence 2/3 Complaint logged: CCNOR3EST20260826708901. Airtel set the resolution date to 10-09-2026—long after the trip ends! When asked for a refund, @Airtel_Presence refused, citing arbitrary 3-day rules, and asked to buy another pack. Pure harassment.
-
Akshay Badkas (@akshaybadkas199) reported@airtelindia Your pathetic service has made me regret using Airtel. I requested disconnection of my Airtel Wi-Fi almost a month ago and clearly asked for the bill to be waived since the connection hasn’t been used. Yet, I receive at least 10 calls EVERY DAY
-
Lokesh Kumar (Sikar .Raj.) (@Lokeshmicroseft) reported@Airtel_Presence @airtelindia 3 @Airtel_Presence Service installation ke baad se usable hi nahi hai, phir bhi billing July se show ho rahi hai. Jab internet mila hi nahi to payment kis baat ki? Wrong billing/activation date correct karo, unusable period ke charges adjust karo aur connection actually fix karo.
-
Rajendar Reddy (@chrajendarreddy) reported@TRAI @DoT_India @airtelindia — A question from a consumer, viewed through an impact-assessment lens: Should telecom QoS be assessed only by network parameters and complaint-closure statistics, or should we also consider the real-world impact of persistently poor/unstable connectivity on consumers? My experience with operators involved repeated 4G/5G inconsistencies at the same premises, multiple tests, G-Net coordinates, repeated information requests and complaints being marked “resolved” while the underlying experience continued. There is another dimension worth examining. Weak/unstable cellular connectivity can make a handset work harder to maintain connectivity, increasing energy consumption. At an individual level this may be small; at population scale, however, any systematic increase in device energy consumption represents additional electricity demand and potentially an environmental footprint. I am not suggesting that this impact has already been quantified or that it should automatically be attributed to a particular operator. I am asking whether it should be studied. TRAI is already assessing mobile network quality across locations and publishing QoS performance. Could future QoS assessment consider not only network availability and speed, but also actual customer experience, complaint-resolution effectiveness, premature closures and—where scientifically measurable—the wider energy implications of persistently poor connectivity? A network should ultimately be evaluated by the quality of service actually experienced by the consumer—not merely by whether the network exists or the complaint is marked closed.