BSNL outages and service status in Mandi, Himachal Pradesh

Problems in the last 24 hours in Mandi, Himachal Pradesh

The chart below shows the number of BSNL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Mandi, Himachal Pradesh and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

BSNL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported 7 minutes ago

  @barun_kanhar Dear Customer, Greetings of the day! We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused. Your concern has been noted, and BSNL is continuously working to improve service quality and network performance. Our team is taking necessary steps to address the issue and provide a better service experience at the earliest. We appreciate your patience and understanding. Regards, BSNL Care (Neha)

• 
  BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported 8 minutes ago

  @vjalagam Dear Customer, We apologize for the inconvenience caused. Our team is working on your issue and is making every possible effort to resolve it promptly. We kindly request you to please be patient, and we will provide you with a solution soon. Regards, BSNL Care (Dinesh)

• 
  Shivangi Choudhary (@TweetShivangiii) reported 11 minutes ago

  @questguyontrip I have BSNL and its internet sucks

• 
  Abhay Gupta (@stockster_in) reported 14 minutes ago

  Here's why now, and not some other year. Airtel's ARPU sits around ₹254, Jio's near ₹214 — both companies want that number higher to justify what they've spent building out 5G. And the market's down to basically three real players plus BSNL, so none of them are worried about losing you to a cheaper competitor if everyone moves at the same time. One estimate going around has Airtel's 28-day unlimited plan going from ₹319 to ₹419. Jio's daily 1.5GB plan, ₹299 to somewhere near ₹359. Nothing's official yet. But three separate research houses landing in the same range in the same few weeks isn't a coincidence — that's a company telling the market what it's about to do before it tells you.

• 
  Gopal Patha (@The_Gopal_Patha) reported 18 minutes ago

  Fascinating post. Let me understand the argument correctly. The more government companies a Prime Minister creates, the more he has "worked for the nation." Nehru created 33, so he's a hero. Modi created zero, so he's a traitor selling the country. That's the logic. Okay. Let's run with it. Air India was born under Nehru. It was loved, protected and funded by every single government that came after him. Congress, Janata, BJP, back to Congress. Nobody touched it. Nobody fixed it. You know what Air India did in return? It accumulated ₹61,500 crore in losses. Every single rupee of that came from Indian taxpayers. Farmers, salaried employees, small business owners. Their taxes kept a bleeding airline alive for decades because letting it die would have been "anti-national." That is what your scoreboard celebrates. Not outcomes. Just creation. BSNL. Another government jewel. Created, protected, never reformed. It topped India's loss-making PSU list for years running. Consecutive years. While the government was pumping money into BSNL to keep it breathing, Jio connected 400 million Indians in under three years. A private company did in three years what a government company couldn't do in three decades. Tell me which one served the nation. Now let's talk about the "sold to friends at throwaway prices" line. Air India was sold to Tata Sons through a competitive bidding process. It was not gifted. It was not backdoor dealt. Multiple parties were invited. Tata won. And Air India, which was hemorrhaging thousands of crores annually from public funds, is now being rebuilt. New planes. New routes. Actual accountability. Compare that to the 70 years of government ownership where the losses just kept stacking and nobody resigned, nobody was fired, nobody answered for anything because it was government money so who cares. Here is the actual question your post refuses to ask. Of the companies that were created by Nehru, Indira, Rajiv, Manmohan and everyone else on your list, how many of them made money? How many of them served the public efficiently? How many of them innovated, competed, grew? Because if creating a government company that bleeds for 40 years is "working for the nation," and selling that same bleeding company after it has cost taxpayers lakhs of crores is "hollowing out the country," then your entire framework is built on sentiment, not sense. The government's job is not to run airlines. It is not to run telephone companies, hotels, steel plants and bread factories. Its job is defence, law, infrastructure, healthcare and education. Every rupee the government spent propping up loss-making PSUs was a rupee not spent on a government school, a government hospital or a road in a village that still does not have one. That is the actual cost of your scoreboard. That is what those 190-odd companies Nehru and Indira created actually meant in practice for ordinary Indians. Modi created zero new government companies. Good. The government has no business being in business. Disinvestment is not betrayal. It is basic governance. The only people who call it betrayal are the ones who benefited from government jobs in those companies regardless of whether the company made a single rupee of profit. Count the companies created all you want. Some of us are counting the losses.

• 
  Gopal Patha (@The_Gopal_Patha) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Imdineshpurohit Fascinating post. Let me understand the argument correctly. The more government companies a Prime Minister creates, the more he has "worked for the nation." Nehru created 33, so he's a hero. Modi created zero, so he's a traitor selling the country. That's the logic. Okay. Let's run with it. Air India was born under Nehru. It was loved, protected and funded by every single government that came after him. Congress, Janata, BJP, back to Congress. Nobody touched it. Nobody fixed it. You know what Air India did in return? It accumulated ₹61,500 crore in losses. Every single rupee of that came from Indian taxpayers. Farmers, salaried employees, small business owners. Their taxes kept a bleeding airline alive for decades because letting it die would have been "anti-national." That is what your scoreboard celebrates. Not outcomes. Just creation. BSNL. Another government jewel. Created, protected, never reformed. It topped India's loss-making PSU list for years running. Consecutive years. While the government was pumping money into BSNL to keep it breathing, Jio connected 400 million Indians in under three years. A private company did in three years what a government company couldn't do in three decades. Tell me which one served the nation. Now let's talk about the "sold to friends at throwaway prices" line. Air India was sold to Tata Sons through a competitive bidding process. It was not gifted. It was not backdoor dealt. Multiple parties were invited. Tata won. And Air India, which was hemorrhaging thousands of crores annually from public funds, is now being rebuilt. New planes. New routes. Actual accountability. Compare that to the 70 years of government ownership where the losses just kept stacking and nobody resigned, nobody was fired, nobody answered for anything because it was government money so who cares. Here is the actual question your post refuses to ask. Of the companies that were created by Nehru, Indira, Rajiv, Manmohan and everyone else on your list, how many of them made money? How many of them served the public efficiently? How many of them innovated, competed, grew? Because if creating a government company that bleeds for 40 years is "working for the nation," and selling that same bleeding company after it has cost taxpayers lakhs of crores is "hollowing out the country," then your entire framework is built on sentiment, not sense. The government's job is not to run airlines. It is not to run telephone companies, hotels, steel plants and bread factories. Its job is defence, law, infrastructure, healthcare and education. Every rupee the government spent propping up loss-making PSUs was a rupee not spent on a government school, a government hospital or a road in a village that still does not have one. That is the actual cost of your scoreboard. That is what those 190-odd companies Nehru and Indira created actually meant in practice for ordinary Indians. Modi created zero new government companies. Good. The government has no business being in business. Disinvestment is not betrayal. It is basic governance. The only people who call it betrayal are the ones who benefited from government jobs in those companies regardless of whether the company made a single rupee of profit. Count the companies created all you want. Some of us are counting the losses.

• 
  Ajeet Yadav (@AjeetYadav59413) reported 21 minutes ago

  @bsnl_care @JM_Scindia Dear sir..BSNL Side this reply again and again previous 1 years approx.. but issue not resolved..dear sir please respond this case and resolve issues please 🙏

• 
  A Non-technical Engg. (@MSriv14) reported 21 minutes ago

  @yabhishekhd Time to move to "swadeshi network" BSNL.

• 
  SAMRAT SARKAR (@boxoffce) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BSNLCorporate @BSNL_WB hey bsnl kindly check my location where your service mobile network available west bengal, alipuduar , 736208

• 
  Ramesh (@Decoder_Space) reported 24 minutes ago

  @IndianTechGuide Why they increasing this much ? BSNL come fast with high speed network plz 🙏🙏