1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. BSNL
  4. Udaipurwati
BSNL

BSNL outages and service status in Udaipurwati, Rajasthan

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • BSNL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Udaipurwati, including 0 direct reports.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (abbreviated BSNL) offers mobile and fixed communications, including both dial-up and broadband internet, phone service, mobile phone and mobile internet, as well as television over internet (IPTV). Mobile phone service is offered under the BSNL Mobile brand.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Udaipurwati, Rajasthan

The chart below shows the number of BSNL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Udaipurwati, Rajasthan and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at BSNL . Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

BSNL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • bsnl_care
    BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported

    @vaibhav74911467 Dear Customer, Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you.Please provide your alternate number for better assistance as we couldn’t find the same. Regards, BSNL- Care(Sonu)

  • bismil_prasad
    Ashish Joshi (@bismil_prasad) reported

    Telecom Ministers since 1st October, 2000 are responsible for the BSNL mess . BSNL was made to bleed, while TRAI and the dispensation helped Jio & other private operators . Bharti Airtel launched India’s first commercial 4G service on 10 April 2012 in Kolkata. BSNL could only launch 4G in 2025 because it was mandated to launch 4G based on indigenous technology . In 2010 Spectrum a small firm Infotel (later bought by Reliance) won pan-India 4G spectrum. Licence upgrade was allowed to add voice services by paying old 2001 rates . CAG said ₹3,367 crore “undue benefit” was given. Free offers were allowed when Jio launched it services . Long free data/voice deals got clean chit from TRAI despite rivals calling them predatory. IUC cuts & penalties were imposed . TRAI slashed interconnection charges (helped new entrant Jio) and fined incumbents for not connecting properly with Jio.

  • bsnl_care
    BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported

    @Manojpa21011976 Dear Customer, Greetings of the day! We acknowledge your concern and are working on a resolution. Your complaint has been escalated, and you can expect a response shortly. Your complaint number is H0515187392721 . Regards,  BSNL-Care (Neha)

  • ManikPr74400542
    Manik Pradhan (@ManikPr74400542) reported

    @BSNLCorporate Bsnl sim network problem now please contact me.

  • bsnl_care
    BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported

    @itz_not_suubhh Dear Customer, We appreciate your feedback. BSNL is continuously working to strengthen its network, expand services, and provide better connectivity and customer experience. Regards, BSNL Care (Abhishek)

  • nidal_shar45826
    Indian (@nidal_shar45826) reported

    @FunnyFox0 @IndianTechGuide Agreed. Jio wooed everyone with the free data and people got wooed. Lets also shed some light on the fact that so many BSNL network towers were given to Jio. A clear cut case of favoritism

  • TG_TriGany
    Triton Ganymede (@TG_TriGany) reported

    @Raul15476 Speed test conducted under the coverage of BSNL Kolkata CTD network MCC MNC/PLMN 404 81 in Band 1 LTE 2100 10 MHz Bandwidth check the images properly.

  • rtripathi6
    Rakesh Tripathi (@rtripathi6) reported

    @holgermu @TMobile Who is the network provider - is it BSNL ?

  • The_Gopal_Patha
    Gopal Patha (@The_Gopal_Patha) reported

    Fascinating post. Let me understand the argument correctly. The more government companies a Prime Minister creates, the more he has "worked for the nation." Nehru created 33, so he's a hero. Modi created zero, so he's a traitor selling the country. That's the logic. Okay. Let's run with it. Air India was born under Nehru. It was loved, protected and funded by every single government that came after him. Congress, Janata, BJP, back to Congress. Nobody touched it. Nobody fixed it. You know what Air India did in return? It accumulated ₹61,500 crore in losses. Every single rupee of that came from Indian taxpayers. Farmers, salaried employees, small business owners. Their taxes kept a bleeding airline alive for decades because letting it die would have been "anti-national." That is what your scoreboard celebrates. Not outcomes. Just creation. BSNL. Another government jewel. Created, protected, never reformed. It topped India's loss-making PSU list for years running. Consecutive years. While the government was pumping money into BSNL to keep it breathing, Jio connected 400 million Indians in under three years. A private company did in three years what a government company couldn't do in three decades. Tell me which one served the nation. Now let's talk about the "sold to friends at throwaway prices" line. Air India was sold to Tata Sons through a competitive bidding process. It was not gifted. It was not backdoor dealt. Multiple parties were invited. Tata won. And Air India, which was hemorrhaging thousands of crores annually from public funds, is now being rebuilt. New planes. New routes. Actual accountability. Compare that to the 70 years of government ownership where the losses just kept stacking and nobody resigned, nobody was fired, nobody answered for anything because it was government money so who cares. Here is the actual question your post refuses to ask. Of the companies that were created by Nehru, Indira, Rajiv, Manmohan and everyone else on your list, how many of them made money? How many of them served the public efficiently? How many of them innovated, competed, grew? Because if creating a government company that bleeds for 40 years is "working for the nation," and selling that same bleeding company after it has cost taxpayers lakhs of crores is "hollowing out the country," then your entire framework is built on sentiment, not sense. The government's job is not to run airlines. It is not to run telephone companies, hotels, steel plants and bread factories. Its job is defence, law, infrastructure, healthcare and education. Every rupee the government spent propping up loss-making PSUs was a rupee not spent on a government school, a government hospital or a road in a village that still does not have one. That is the actual cost of your scoreboard. That is what those 190-odd companies Nehru and Indira created actually meant in practice for ordinary Indians. Modi created zero new government companies. Good. The government has no business being in business. Disinvestment is not betrayal. It is basic governance. The only people who call it betrayal are the ones who benefited from government jobs in those companies regardless of whether the company made a single rupee of profit. Count the companies created all you want. Some of us are counting the losses.

  • papps_gunner
    Papps (@papps_gunner) reported

    @piyush_trades lol trader relax. There is absolutely every business case for the companies to increase tariffs. It’s a capitalist economy. The same set of guys like you compare an AI power guzzling company to Infosys and TCS and wonder why aren’t they growing. These companies have heavily bled in the past and will always look to Vodafone for what happened and how everything went haywire. Profit in a low cost rate card vs the world is non-negotiable If you want a govt solution, port your sim to BSNL.