BSNL outages and service status in Mahobā, Uttar Pradesh

Problems in the last 24 hours in Mahobā, Uttar Pradesh

The chart below shows the number of BSNL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Mahobā, Uttar Pradesh and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

BSNL Issues Reports Near Mahobā, Uttar Pradesh

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Mahobā and nearby locations:

• 
  Pradeep Kumar (@pradeep73513408) reported 54 minutes ago from Mahobā, Uttar Pradesh

  @BSNLCorporate @AmritMahotsav that is my. location ur bsnl signal lost everyday for 4-5 hours i complain many time but didn't get solution ,pls take this concern thanks mobile no.9795333971

BSNL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported 9 minutes ago

  @dinesht07478732 Dear Customer, Greeting of the day! We apologize for the inconvenience caused. Our team is working diligently on this once we receive any updates, we will notify you accordingly. Regards, BSNL Care (Avantika)

• 
  Samaravel Indira Imayavaramban (@i_samaravel) reported 11 minutes ago

  BSNL sim services are not available for Non 4g sims in Karol Bagh, Jhandewalan, Patel Nagar areas of Delhi from midnight of 6th August. What is the issue ? When will it be rectified ? @BSNLCorporate @JM_Scindia @CMDBSNL

• 
  Ashish Joshi (@bismil_prasad) reported 12 minutes ago

  Telecom Ministers since 1st October, 2000 are responsible for the BSNL mess . BSNL was made to bleed, while TRAI and the dispensation helped Jio & other private operators . Bharti Airtel launched India’s first commercial 4G service on 10 April 2012 in Kolkata. BSNL could only launch 4G in 2025 because it was mandated to launch 4G based on indigenous technology . Many allegations are as under :- In 2010 Spectrum a small firm Infotel (later bought by Reliance) won pan-India 4G spectrum. Licence upgrade was allowed to add voice services by paying old 2001 rates . CAG said ₹3,367 crore “undue benefit” was given. Free offers were allowed when Jio launched it services . Long free data/voice deals got clean chit from TRAI despite rivals calling them predatory. IUC cuts & penalties were imposed . TRAI slashed interconnection charges (helped new entrant Jio) and fined incumbents for not connecting properly with Jio.

• 
  BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported 12 minutes ago

  @PANKAJJHA35093 Dear Customer, We regret the inconvenience caused. BSNL is continuously working to enhance network coverage and connectivity in Mumbai through ongoing improvement activities. We appreciate your patience and support. Regards, BSNL Care (Abhishek)

• 
  BSNLCare (@bsnl_care) reported 13 minutes ago

  @subrata_mahakud Dear Customer, We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused. BSNL is continuously working to enhance its services and provide a better customer experience. We appreciate your patience and cooperation during this improvement process. Regards, BSNL Care (Sangita)

• 
  vinay (@VinayN80667870) reported 14 minutes ago

  @sharath_nayaka7 @glb_kannadiga @airtelindia How to you contact bsnl customer care

• 
  Pankaj Medhi (@medhipankaj123) reported 21 minutes ago

  @JM_Scindia @BSNLCorporate @DoT_India no BSNL network since yesterday, not able to do banking transaction, e office work. No prior information from BSNL. This has never happened with my 2nd SIM Airtel. Out of sentiment, I am keeping the the BSNL, now it's enough....

• 
  Krishna (@KrishnaNews07) reported 22 minutes ago

  @nkk_123 Calling BPCL Bargarh the next “BSNL story” makes for a dramatic exposé. The facts tell a different story. The plant wasn’t “shut down.” It was commissioned in FY25–26 as an integrated 1G+2G biorefinery, with 100 KL/day capacity for each. 1G production began on 6 Oct 2025. 2G production began on 19 Mar 2026. It has already produced 707 KL of 1G + 76 KL of 2G ethanol. A newly commissioned plant undergoing stabilisation—especially with complex 2G technology—is not evidence that a PSU was deliberately crippled to benefit private players. Private ethanol procurement + PSU-owned production can coexist. To prove a “scam,” show evidence of deliberate sabotage or suppression—not simply that a new plant hasn’t reached full commercial stability yet. Rhetoric isn’t evidence. If you’re alleging a scam, present the whole story not just the half that fits the narrative.

• 
  Yash Vijayvargiya (@yashvijay06) reported 24 minutes ago

  @JioCare Still no response for X post, email or complaint that has been raised. Jio is becoming what BSNL used to be a decade ago

• 
  Vertigo_Warrior (@VertigoWarrior) reported 25 minutes ago

  I watched the video. The allegation sounds serious, but this so-called “exposé” seems to present only half the story. A few facts that expose the contradiction: • BPCL’s Bargarh plant wasn’t “shut down” — it was commissioned in FY 2025–26 as an integrated 1G + 2G biorefinery. • Capacity: 100 KL/day each for 1G and 2G ethanol. • 1G production began: 6 Oct 2025 • 2G production began: 19 Mar 2026 • The facility has already produced 707 KL of 1G + 76 KL of 2G ethanol. • The 1G plant is operational and undergoing stabilisation after minor pending work. Commissioning/stabilisation ≠ deliberately making a PSU plant non-operational. • 2G ethanol is new, complex technology. It requires an entire ecosystem around paddy-straw collection, feedstock logistics, chemicals, processing and technology stabilisation. • The creator’s logic appears to be: “Government plant not yet at full commercial stability = deliberately shut down to benefit private players.” That conclusion simply doesn’t follow. • India needs huge ethanol volumes for E20. Developing OMC-owned capacity and procuring ethanol from multiple producers are not mutually exclusive. • Buying ethanol from private producers isn’t proof of a “scam”. The evidence required is that government plants were deliberately sabotaged or kept shut to favour them. • Bargarh actually points in the opposite direction: BPCL invested, commissioned the facility and started producing ethanol itself. Calling it the next “BSNL story” makes for a dramatic video. But rhetoric is not evidence. If you're going to allege a scam, present the full facts, not just the half that suits the narrative.